13.11.2014 Views

Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa

Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa

Download - Media Institute of Southern Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

State <strong>of</strong> the media in <strong>Southern</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> 2002<br />

In 2002 one <strong>of</strong> the significant victories for media freedom and freedom <strong>of</strong><br />

expression was recorded in Zambia. Years <strong>of</strong> sustained campaigning for media<br />

law reforms, led by the Zambia chapter <strong>of</strong> MISA, appear to be bearing<br />

fruit with the lodging in parliament <strong>of</strong> three private members bills, i.e. the<br />

Independent Broadcasting Authority Bill, Freedom <strong>of</strong> Expression Bill and the<br />

Broadcasting Bill.<br />

The Independent Broadcasting Authority Act, if passed, would provide for<br />

the establishment <strong>of</strong> an independent broadcast authority that would regulate<br />

the industry and grant licences to prospective broadcasters. Currently, the<br />

Minister <strong>of</strong> Information and Broadcasting has the power to unilaterally withdraw<br />

broadcast licences, or reject any application for a licence. If adopted, the<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the authority would be drawn from a cross-section <strong>of</strong> society.<br />

The Freedom <strong>of</strong> Expression Act aims to enshrine in the Constitution the freedom<br />

<strong>of</strong> the press, while the Broadcast Bill aims to give legal status to broadcasters<br />

other than the state-owned Zambia National Broadcasting Corporation<br />

(ZNBC).<br />

But before we give the Zambian government a standing ovation for the media<br />

law reform process, it must be noted that Section 69 <strong>of</strong> the Zambian Penal<br />

Code, which creates the <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> criminal libel against the president, continues<br />

to be flagrantly applied. The mistreatment <strong>of</strong> journalists by police and<br />

political party cadres continued unabated in 2002 and the government is still<br />

very eager to keep its hold on and control <strong>of</strong> the state<br />

broadcaster.<br />

Section 69 is one <strong>of</strong> the biggest hindrances to free media practice in Zambia.<br />

It was applied against Post Newspaper Editor Fred M’membe, who was charged<br />

with defaming President Mwanawasa in a story that quoted Dipak Patel calling<br />

the President “a cabbage”. The People Newspaper Editor Emmanuel<br />

Chilekwa, too, came face to face with Section 69 when he was charged with<br />

defaming the President in an article, which alleged that President Mwanawasa<br />

was suffering from Parkinson’s Disease.<br />

Throughout the year journalists were threatened, (twice through bomb scares),<br />

physically attacked or verbally abused by overzealous political party cadres,<br />

detained by police even for ‘bailable’ <strong>of</strong>fences as was the case with Chilekwa<br />

and his reporters, and generally despised by government <strong>of</strong>ficials for not supporting<br />

“national development”.<br />

2002<br />

In the rest <strong>of</strong> the region only the names <strong>of</strong> the journalists and the media institutions<br />

targeted may differ, for the attacks suffered were similar, ongoing and<br />

have in some cases intensified specifically because <strong>of</strong> targeted campaigns by<br />

those enemies <strong>of</strong> press freedom and freedom <strong>of</strong> expression.<br />

12 So This Is Democracy?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!