Integrating CFD and Experiment in Aerodynamics - CFD4Aircraft

More documents

Recommendations

Info

15 [20] Gursul, I., Unsteady Flow Phenomena over Delta Wings at High Angle of Attack, AIAA Journal, vol. 32, no. 2, February 1994, pp. 225-231. [21] Gursul, I. and Xie, W., Buffeting Flows over Delta Wings, AIAA Journal, vol. 37, no. 1, 1999, pp. 58-65. [22] Menke, M. and Gursul, I., Unsteady nature of leading edge vortices, Physics of Fluids, vol. 9, no. 10, 1997, pp. 1-7. [23] Gursul, I., Review of Unsteady Vortex Flows over Delta Wings, AIAA-2003-3942, AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 23-26 June, 2003, Orlando, FL. [24] Gray, J.M., Gursul, I., and Butler, R., Aeroelastic Response of a Flexible Delta Wing due to Unsteady Vortex Flows, AIAA-2003-1106, 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 6-9 January, 2003, Reno, Nevada. [25] Taylor, G., Schnorbus, T. and Gursul, I., An Investigation of Vortex Flows over Low Sweep Delta Wings, AIAA-2003-4021, AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, 23-26 June, 2003, Orlando, FL. [26] Gordnier, R.E. and Visbal, M.R., Higher-Order Compact Difference Scheme Applied to the Simulation of a Low Sweep Delta Wing Flow, AIAA-2003-0620, 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 6-9 January, 2003, Reno, Nevada. [27] Matsuno, T. and Nakamura, Y., Self-Induced Roll Oscillation of 45-Degree Delta Wing, AIAA- 2000-0655, 38th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 10-13 January, 2000, Reno, NV. [28] Gad-el-Hak, M. and Ho, C.M., The Pitching Delta Wing, AIAA Journal, vol. 23, no. 11, 1985, pp. 1660-1665. [29] Rockwell, D., Three-Dimensional Flow Structure on Delta Wings at High Angle-of-Attack: Experimental Concepts and Issues, AIAA Paper 93-0550, January, 1993. [30] Visbal, M.R., Computational and Physical Aspects of Vortex Breakdown on Delta Wings, AIAA Paper 95-0585, January, 1995.
16 [31] Gursul, I., Proposed Mechanism for Time Lag of Vortex Breakdown Location in Unsteady Flows, Journal of Aircraft, vol. 37, no. 4, 2000, pp. 733-736. [32] Arthur, M., “The impact of vortical flow on the free rolling motion of a delta wing aircraft”, Proceedings of conference on Integrating CFD and Experiments, Glasgow, UK, September 8-9, 2003. [33] Gordnier, R., High-Fidelity Computational Simulation of Nonlinear Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems, Workshop on Aerodynamic Issues of Unmanned Air Vehicles, 4-5 November 2002, University of Bath, UK.
Page 1 and 2: Integrating CFD and Experiment in A
Page 3 and 4: Experimentalist’s requirements fo
Page 5 and 6: persistent discrepancy may be due t
Page 7 and 8: numbers significantly lower than th
Page 9 and 10: Heat flux measurements. Over the pa
Page 11 and 12: The measurements are made on select
Page 13 and 14: advantage that the signal is emitte
Page 15 and 16: 12. Mébarki, Y. and Mérienne, M.
Page 17 and 18: castellated nozzles entrained more
Page 19 and 20: Axisymmetric Regular Convergent Div
Page 21 and 22: Figure 5: Typical instantaneous PIV
Page 23 and 24: Figure 8: Streamwise Velocity Profi
Page 25 and 26: 1.25 CFD (SKW PRESTO) Experimental
Page 27 and 28: 5 Conclusions In this paper we have
Page 29 and 30: 2 which include boundary layer and
Page 31 and 32: 4 not received much attention in th
Page 33 and 34: 6 Although a great deal of effort h
Page 35 and 36: 8 Computational simulations can con
Page 37 and 38: 10 separation location over rounded
Page 39 and 40: 12 3.7 Vortex / flexible wing inter
Page 41: 14 [8] Mitchell, A.M. and Molton, P
Page 45 and 46: 18 Figure 3: Spectrum of unsteady f
Page 47 and 48: 20 Figure 7: Flow visualisation of
Page 49 and 50: Figure 11: Upper surface pressure d
Page 51 and 52: While the information presented in
Page 53 and 54: Figure 3 : DFR against Flap angle f
Page 55 and 56: Figure 7 shows a series of plots of
Page 57 and 58: Figure 9 : Contours of Mach number,
Page 59 and 60: ¥:97§Y©R¥e©H !V( H ¨9#f§e!"
Page 61 and 62: é¡êŒëWì¤í?î(ïeð±ñWòL
Page 63 and 64: Ó3×ÓnØ*Ù(Ú*Û+Ü ÝÞ#ß)ÝG
Page 65 and 66: 6‹wB6h67 C,7D4 ')(r,+.st/9:!/L£8
Page 67 and 68: ACBDsEutCIvwlxV^ c Q!Lkd_Q_SFM PQ_^
Page 69 and 70: Ç¹ºF»¼@½:¾¿_À!Á »_ÂÃk
Page 71 and 72: yaw angle. Also, extreme value coef
Page 73 and 74: 0.9 Cs vs yaw angle Side force coef
Page 75 and 76: Fig. 5. Grid block structure around
Page 77 and 78: Cs comparison at V=0.6 m/s Fig. 10.
Page 79 and 80: Investigation of Flow Turning in a
Page 81 and 82: duct as it approaches the blocker c
Page 83 and 84: Figure 1. Natural Blockage Thrust R
Page 85 and 86: Figure 7. Post-Exit rake Total Span
Page 87 and 88: Figure 11. Comparison of Static Pre
Page 89 and 90: 2.2 Data Aquired The Embedded Laser
Page 91 and 92: First, plots of the turbulent Reyno
Page 93 and 94:
Particles seeding tube 3 m 1 m mode
Page 95 and 96:
000000000 MEASUREM ENT S MEASUREM E
Page 97 and 98:
Figure 5: Influence of the pseudo t
Page 99 and 100:
Figure 7: Turbulent Reynolds' numbe
Page 101 and 102:
Figure 9: Turbulent Reynolds' numbe
Page 103 and 104:
Figure 11: Vortex Shedding cycle fo
Page 105 and 106:
Figure 13: Comparison with experime
show all

Integrating CFD and Experiment in Aerodynamics - CFD4Aircraft

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?