DePuy CTA Hemiarthroplasty versus Traditional Hemiarthroplasty
DePuy CTA Hemiarthroplasty versus Traditional Hemiarthroplasty
DePuy CTA Hemiarthroplasty versus Traditional Hemiarthroplasty
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Study<br />
Arntz et<br />
al.(1993)<br />
Williams and<br />
Rockwood<br />
(1996)<br />
Field et al.<br />
(1997)<br />
Zuckerman et<br />
al. (2000)<br />
Cofield et al<br />
(2001)<br />
Number of<br />
patients<br />
Duration of<br />
Follow-up<br />
(years)<br />
No or Mild<br />
Postoperative<br />
Pain<br />
(no. of<br />
shoulders)<br />
Preop<br />
Postop.<br />
Active<br />
Elevation (deg)<br />
18 3 61% (11) 66 (44-90)<br />
112 (70-160)<br />
21 4 86% (18) 70 (0-155)<br />
120 (15-160)<br />
16 3 81% (13) 60 (40-80)<br />
100 (80-130)<br />
15 2 47% (7) 69 (20-140)<br />
86 (45-140)<br />
33 5 73% (24) 72 (30-150)<br />
91 (40-165)<br />
Successful<br />
Results based<br />
on limited<br />
goals<br />
(no. of<br />
shoulders)<br />
Not reported<br />
86% (18)<br />
63% (10)<br />
Not reported<br />
67% (22)<br />
Total/Average 103 3.4 69.2% 67.4 to 101.8<br />
(+34.4 degrees)<br />
72%
Change language