DePuy CTA Hemiarthroplasty versus Traditional Hemiarthroplasty
DePuy CTA Hemiarthroplasty versus Traditional Hemiarthroplasty DePuy CTA Hemiarthroplasty versus Traditional Hemiarthroplasty
from shoulderdoc.co.uk
More from this publisher
13.11.2014
Views
To Date: • Complications: • Five postop arthrofibrosis • Tx’d with arthroscopic debredment • One acromial fracture after fall • Two subscap ruptures after falls • No progressive glenoid/acromial wear • Two revisions to Delta (subscap ruptures) • 1.5% revision rate
Failed CTA after Fall – increased superior migration due to subscap rupture Before After
- Page 1 and 2: DePuy CTA Hemiarthroplasty versus T
- Page 3 and 4: Humeral head replacement for massiv
- Page 5: Bipolar Results Study Number of pat
- Page 10 and 11: Surgical Technique
- Page 14 and 15: Case Example 62 y.o. Rhd male, pain
- Page 16 and 17: Attaching the CTA cutting jig
- Page 18 and 19: Before and After
- Page 20 and 21: Drill holes
- Page 22 and 23: Subscapularis Repair
- Page 24 and 25: Subscapularis Deficiency • Consid
- Page 26 and 27: 1 Year Postop
- Page 28 and 29: Postop Care • Majority of surgeri
- Page 30 and 31: Results • 132 primaries, w/ ≥ 2
- Page 34 and 35: Increased anterior translation on a
- Page 36 and 37: Two years postop • 82 year old fe
- Page 38 and 39: Observations • Keys to a good CTA
- Page 41 and 42: Non-anatomic sizing
- Page 43 and 44: Who Gets What??? • If the patient
- Page 45 and 46: Defect type and recommended type of
- Page 47 and 48: CTA versus Reverse Arthroplasty •
- Page 49: CTA or Delta?
- Page 52: Thank you!
Failed <strong>CTA</strong> after Fall – increased<br />
superior migration due to subscap rupture<br />
Before<br />
After
Change language