DePuy CTA Hemiarthroplasty versus Traditional Hemiarthroplasty

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Results • 132 primaries, w/ ≥ 24 months f/u • Seebauer IA/B - IIA • 89 had previous surgery, 12 had > 2 prior surgeries • Average FF: Preop - 65 Postop – 128 • Range 70 – 160 • Average ER: Preop – 8 Postop - 30 • Pain VAS: Preop – 9.4 Postop – 1.4 • SST score: Preop – 1.1 Postop – 8.6 • ASES score: Preop – 28 Postop - 76 • Satisfaction: 88% rated result as good or excellent • 84% of surgeries were performed under regional anesthesia as an outpatient procedure
Results of <strong>CTA</strong> in Seebauer IIB • 23 patients • 16 failed TSA arthroplasty • Average FF: Preop - 37 Postop - 70 • Pain VAS: Preop - 10 Postop – 4 • Satisfaction: 12 poor, 8 fair, 3 good • Overall, poor subscapularis function correlated with poor function
Page 1 and 2: DePuy CTA Hemiarthroplasty versus T
Page 3 and 4: Humeral head replacement for massiv
Page 5: Bipolar Results Study Number of pat
Page 10 and 11: Surgical Technique
Page 14 and 15: Case Example 62 y.o. Rhd male, pain
Page 16 and 17: Attaching the CTA cutting jig
Page 18 and 19: Before and After
Page 20 and 21: Drill holes
Page 22 and 23: Subscapularis Repair
Page 24 and 25: Subscapularis Deficiency • Consid
Page 26 and 27: 1 Year Postop
Page 28 and 29: Postop Care • Majority of surgeri
Page 32 and 33: To Date: • Complications: • Fiv
Page 34 and 35: Increased anterior translation on a
Page 36 and 37: Two years postop • 82 year old fe
Page 38 and 39: Observations • Keys to a good CTA
Page 41 and 42: Non-anatomic sizing
Page 43 and 44: Who Gets What??? • If the patient
Page 45 and 46: Defect type and recommended type of
Page 47 and 48: CTA versus Reverse Arthroplasty •
Page 49: CTA or Delta?
Page 52: Thank you!

DePuy CTA Hemiarthroplasty versus Traditional Hemiarthroplasty

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?