Resilience - University of Miami School of Architecture

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6. Rendering from Rickenbacker entry, Cambridge Seven 2005 2005 master plan update In 2005, Cambridge Seven Associates submied a revised master plan. Aer a programming study, Cambridge Seven proposed a new structure along the north edge of campus which essenally followed the 1979 plan. The major variaon from the 1979 proposal was that a second east-west bar should be constructed, creang two major courtyards, the northerly one fully enclosed, and a smaller southern space open to the bay. This would allow for added and updated indoor space, but lost something of the simplicity and impact of the 1979 diagram (figure 5). 22 2010 5. Master plan revisions (new in green), Cambridge Seven 2010 seawater lab proposal The Univesity expects to break ground this spring on an updated version of the sea-water lab building proposed in 2005. The 2010 version has a simplified footprint, but much finer grained elevaons than previous campus buildings. Parking is proposed for the ground level, with two levels of office and laboratory space above. The building is organized along a central east-west corridor, with a double height common space at the east end facing the Rickenbacker Causeway. lost opportunity for tropicalism? The building is designed to allow for expansion on the north side. Unfortunately, this means that workspace facing the potenal expansion will have no natural light. The central corridor, glazed facade, and minimal covered exterior space suggest a a design approach which relies heavily on mechanized thermal control and lighng. It seems that there is a missed opportunity to design a modern research facility which is sll connected to the meless quali- es of its subtropical locaon. poor connecon to core of campus With the main entry and common area at the east end of the building, there is lile opportunity to connect with the central pedestrian core of campus.
10. Agassiz, Yehle 11. Glassell, author Original open labs vs. corridor building proposed plan - critique Interior spaces, no venlaon or natural light Internal corridors limit flexibility of plan No entries or access to campus center 7. 2010 elevaons and secon,, Cambridge Seven Common space faces arterial road 8. 2010 proposed plan, Cambridge Seven 9. 2010 proposed future expansion, Cambridge Seven
Page 1: Resilience An investigation of Trop
Page 5: Table of Contents Overall Objecve .
Page 8 and 9: 2 1. Doherty building and campus wa
Page 10 and 11: esilient community As urban designe
Page 12 and 13: Biscayne Bay Land-Fill Rickenbacker
Page 14 and 15: environmental history As is typical
Page 16 and 17: 10 7. Virginia Key 1960’s, Yehle
Page 18 and 19: one campus. A two level south wing
Page 20 and 21: at that me for academic architectur
Page 22 and 23: uildings: interior • Poorly defin
Page 24 and 25: id building name date sq. . 1101 Do
Page 26 and 27: city of miami virginia key plan Whi
Page 30 and 31: master planning critique make bigge
Page 32 and 33: site diagrams relaon to causeway pr
Page 34 and 35: 28 virginia key ecosystem urban •
Page 36 and 37: proposed redevelopment sequence The
Page 38 and 39: campus square footage studies build
Page 40 and 41: “Landscape Urbanism describes a d
Page 42 and 43: 2. High Line route. adapted from go
Page 44 and 45: 8. Venice Hospital model, from Alla
Page 47: Works Cited Abramovitz-Harris-Kings
Page 50 and 51: campus challenges/ proposed solutio
Page 52 and 53: site master plan Hobie Beach To Mar
Page 54 and 55: typical fl oor plans and section la
Page 56 and 57: grosvenor north transformation shel
Page 58 and 59: circulation interior circulaon serv
Page 60 and 61: climate comfort exisng condions •
Page 62 and 63: social interaction exisng condions
Page 64: campus entry existing proposed labo
Page 68: waterfront quadrangles vising schol

Resilience - University of Miami School of Architecture

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?