Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
myeloma and in 40% of previously untreated patients, its<br />
combination with thalidomide (TD) was assessed. Approximately<br />
50% of previously treated patients responded. [3] Despite the<br />
higher response rate of TD it is not clear whether this<br />
combination is associated with longer survival than that achieved<br />
with single agent thalidomide; however many patients responded<br />
after resistance to sequential administration of thalidomide and<br />
pulses dexamethasone separately, which suggests synergy of the<br />
two agents. The thalidomide-dexamethasone combination<br />
induced objective responses in 72% and 64% of previously<br />
untreated patients in 2 series respectively. [2, 4] With this nonmyelosuppressive<br />
regimen 86% of responsive patients were in<br />
remission within 2 months. Blood stem collection was rapid and<br />
efficient with the use of G-CSF alone in most instances. [2]<br />
While this active oral regimen obviates the need for a long-term<br />
central venous catheter, it is associated with increased risk for<br />
thrombosis. This risk is even higher when chemotherapy and<br />
particularly doxorubicin is administered with TD. Despite several<br />
preliminary studies the mechanism of deep vein thrombosis is not<br />
clearly understood and firm recommendations regarding<br />
antithrombotic prophylaxis are lacking.<br />
There have been several studies concerning the efficacy of<br />
thalidomide combined with dexamethasone and<br />
chemotherapeutic agents such as cyclophosphamide, melphalan,<br />
doxorubicin, etoposide and cisplatin. While responses are being<br />
reported in approximately 60% of previously treated patients, the<br />
impact of these combinations on patients’ outcome remains<br />
unclear. Ongoing studies will establish the role of these<br />
combinations as primary treatment for multiple myeloma.<br />
Certain of the thalidomide analogues demonstrate enhanced<br />
activity in vitro and may have a better toxicity profile than<br />
thalidomide. Immunomodulatory drugs (IMIDs) induce apoptosis<br />
or growth arrest even in resistant myeloma cell lines and patient<br />
cells, inhibit the production of cytokines, vascular endothelial<br />
growth factor in the bone marrow milieu, decrease angiogenesis<br />
and inhibit the binding of myeloma cells to bone marrow stromal<br />
cells. IMID 3 (CC-5013) has been administered to 24 patients<br />
with relapsing or refractory myeloma. Objective responses of at<br />
least 25% and 50% reduction in paraprotein were documented in<br />
71 % and 29% of patients respectively, including some patients<br />
who had failed thalidomide. Somnolence, constipation and<br />
neuropathy were not observed but myelosuppression was noted.<br />
[5]<br />
In summary thalidomide has shown remarkable activity against<br />
myeloma at all stages of the disease. Its unique mechanism of<br />
action and lack of myelosuppression allow the combination with<br />
other agents, and especially with dexamethasone. Thrombotic<br />
events associated with the combination treatment are still a field<br />
of research. Immunomodulatory derivatives of thalidomide are<br />
already used in clinical trials, showing remarkable antimyeloma<br />
activity with an improved toxicity profile.<br />
References<br />
1. Singhal S, J Mehta, R Desikan, et al. Antitumor activity of<br />
thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med<br />
1999; 341: 1565-71.<br />
2. Weber D, K Rankin, M Gavino, et al. Thalidomide alone or<br />
with dexamethasone for previously untreated multiple<br />
myeloma. J Clin Oncol <strong>2003</strong>; 21: 16-9.<br />
3. Dimopoulos M A, K Zervas, G Kouvatseas, et al. Thalidomide<br />
and dexamethasone combination for refractory multiple<br />
myeloma. Ann Oncol 2001; 12: 991-5.<br />
4. Rajkumar S V, S Hayman, M A Gertz, et al. Combination<br />
therapy with thalidomide plus dexamethasone for newly<br />
diagnosed myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 4319-23.<br />
5. Richardson P G, R L Schlossman, E Weller, et al.<br />
Immunomodulatory drug CC-5013 overcomes drug resistance<br />
and is well tolerated in patients with relapsed multiple<br />
myeloma. Blood 2002; 100: 3063-7.<br />
Table I. Outcomes after thalidomide alone, with dexamethasone<br />
+/- other agents in previously treated multiple myeloma<br />
Series Regimen Pt No PR EFS OS<br />
Barlogie<br />
2002 ASH<br />
Thal 200 to<br />
800mg<br />
169 33% 20% @2y<br />
9% @4y<br />
48% @2y<br />
25% @4y<br />
Yakoub- Median 400 83 48% 50% @1y 57% @1y<br />
Agha 2002 mg<br />
Neben Thal 400mg 83 20% 45% @1y 86% @1y<br />
2002<br />
Richardson Thal 200- 30 42% NA NA<br />
2002 ASH 600<br />
Juliusson Thal 200 to 23 43% NA NA<br />
2000 800mg<br />
Blade 2001 Thal 200 to 23 13% NA NA<br />
800mg<br />
Prince 2002 Thal med 75 28% 50% @5.5m 50% @14.6<br />
600mg<br />
Dimopoulos<br />
2001<br />
Thal400<br />
Dex pulses<br />
44 55% 50% @10m<br />
for responders<br />
50%<br />
@12.6m<br />
Palumbo<br />
2002<br />
Thal 100<br />
Dex pulse<br />
monthly<br />
120 52% 50% @12m 50% @27m<br />
Anagnostopoulos<br />
<strong>2003</strong><br />
Coleman<br />
2002<br />
Moehler TM<br />
2001<br />
Garcia-<br />
Sanz 2002<br />
Choon-Kee<br />
Lee <strong>2003</strong><br />
ASH<br />
Srkalovic<br />
2002<br />
Kropff 2002<br />
ASH<br />
Hussein<br />
2002 ASH<br />
Thal 200 to<br />
800<br />
Dexa<br />
pulses<br />
47 57% 50% @16m 50%@38m<br />
Thal<br />
50 74% NA NA<br />
max200<br />
clar 500x2<br />
dex 40/w<br />
Thal CTX 56 68% 50% @16m 55% @16m<br />
VP16 dex<br />
Thal CTX 22 53%* 51% @1y 52% @1y<br />
dex<br />
DTPACE 156 43% NA<br />
NA<br />
(>75%)<br />
Thal melph 21 70%^ 50% @9m 50% @13m<br />
dex<br />
Hyper CTD 60 72% 50% @11m 50% @19m<br />
Thal doxil<br />
VCR dex<br />
Roundtable II<br />
35 74% NA NA<br />
P12.2.1<br />
FARNESYLTRANSFERASE INHIBITORS IN MULTIPLE<br />
MYELOMA.<br />
Melissa Alsina, M.D.<br />
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa,<br />
Florida, USA<br />
Multiple myeloma (MM) patients with mutated RAS are less<br />
likely to respond to chemotherapy and have a shortened median<br />
survival. 1-2 Therefore, targeting RAS farnesylation, which is<br />
required for its function, may be a novel approach to treatment of<br />
MM. In a recently published article by Bolick et al 3 , the<br />
prenylation inhibitors, FTI-277 and GGTI-2166, a farnesyl<br />
transferase inhibitor and geranylgeranyl transferase inhibitor,<br />
respectively, were shown to induce apoptosis in myeloma cell<br />
lines selected for resistance to classic cytotoxics including<br />
doxorubicin and melphalan. Similarly, we and others have shown<br />
that FTI-R115777 (Zarnestra) induces a dose and time dependent<br />
growth inhibition and apoptosis in myeloma cell lines. 4, 5<br />
We have evaluated in a phase II trial the activity and tolerability of<br />
the farnesyltransferase (FTase) inhibitor Zarnestra and correlated<br />
these to inhibition of protein farnesylation and oncogenic/tumor<br />
survival pathways in patients with advanced multiple myeloma.<br />
Eligibility criteria included patients with relapsed or refractory<br />
myeloma, ECOG performance status < 3, normal renal function and<br />
S78