13.11.2014 Views

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

myeloma and in 40% of previously untreated patients, its<br />

combination with thalidomide (TD) was assessed. Approximately<br />

50% of previously treated patients responded. [3] Despite the<br />

higher response rate of TD it is not clear whether this<br />

combination is associated with longer survival than that achieved<br />

with single agent thalidomide; however many patients responded<br />

after resistance to sequential administration of thalidomide and<br />

pulses dexamethasone separately, which suggests synergy of the<br />

two agents. The thalidomide-dexamethasone combination<br />

induced objective responses in 72% and 64% of previously<br />

untreated patients in 2 series respectively. [2, 4] With this nonmyelosuppressive<br />

regimen 86% of responsive patients were in<br />

remission within 2 months. Blood stem collection was rapid and<br />

efficient with the use of G-CSF alone in most instances. [2]<br />

While this active oral regimen obviates the need for a long-term<br />

central venous catheter, it is associated with increased risk for<br />

thrombosis. This risk is even higher when chemotherapy and<br />

particularly doxorubicin is administered with TD. Despite several<br />

preliminary studies the mechanism of deep vein thrombosis is not<br />

clearly understood and firm recommendations regarding<br />

antithrombotic prophylaxis are lacking.<br />

There have been several studies concerning the efficacy of<br />

thalidomide combined with dexamethasone and<br />

chemotherapeutic agents such as cyclophosphamide, melphalan,<br />

doxorubicin, etoposide and cisplatin. While responses are being<br />

reported in approximately 60% of previously treated patients, the<br />

impact of these combinations on patients’ outcome remains<br />

unclear. Ongoing studies will establish the role of these<br />

combinations as primary treatment for multiple myeloma.<br />

Certain of the thalidomide analogues demonstrate enhanced<br />

activity in vitro and may have a better toxicity profile than<br />

thalidomide. Immunomodulatory drugs (IMIDs) induce apoptosis<br />

or growth arrest even in resistant myeloma cell lines and patient<br />

cells, inhibit the production of cytokines, vascular endothelial<br />

growth factor in the bone marrow milieu, decrease angiogenesis<br />

and inhibit the binding of myeloma cells to bone marrow stromal<br />

cells. IMID 3 (CC-5013) has been administered to 24 patients<br />

with relapsing or refractory myeloma. Objective responses of at<br />

least 25% and 50% reduction in paraprotein were documented in<br />

71 % and 29% of patients respectively, including some patients<br />

who had failed thalidomide. Somnolence, constipation and<br />

neuropathy were not observed but myelosuppression was noted.<br />

[5]<br />

In summary thalidomide has shown remarkable activity against<br />

myeloma at all stages of the disease. Its unique mechanism of<br />

action and lack of myelosuppression allow the combination with<br />

other agents, and especially with dexamethasone. Thrombotic<br />

events associated with the combination treatment are still a field<br />

of research. Immunomodulatory derivatives of thalidomide are<br />

already used in clinical trials, showing remarkable antimyeloma<br />

activity with an improved toxicity profile.<br />

References<br />

1. Singhal S, J Mehta, R Desikan, et al. Antitumor activity of<br />

thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med<br />

1999; 341: 1565-71.<br />

2. Weber D, K Rankin, M Gavino, et al. Thalidomide alone or<br />

with dexamethasone for previously untreated multiple<br />

myeloma. J Clin Oncol <strong>2003</strong>; 21: 16-9.<br />

3. Dimopoulos M A, K Zervas, G Kouvatseas, et al. Thalidomide<br />

and dexamethasone combination for refractory multiple<br />

myeloma. Ann Oncol 2001; 12: 991-5.<br />

4. Rajkumar S V, S Hayman, M A Gertz, et al. Combination<br />

therapy with thalidomide plus dexamethasone for newly<br />

diagnosed myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 4319-23.<br />

5. Richardson P G, R L Schlossman, E Weller, et al.<br />

Immunomodulatory drug CC-5013 overcomes drug resistance<br />

and is well tolerated in patients with relapsed multiple<br />

myeloma. Blood 2002; 100: 3063-7.<br />

Table I. Outcomes after thalidomide alone, with dexamethasone<br />

+/- other agents in previously treated multiple myeloma<br />

Series Regimen Pt No PR EFS OS<br />

Barlogie<br />

2002 ASH<br />

Thal 200 to<br />

800mg<br />

169 33% 20% @2y<br />

9% @4y<br />

48% @2y<br />

25% @4y<br />

Yakoub- Median 400 83 48% 50% @1y 57% @1y<br />

Agha 2002 mg<br />

Neben Thal 400mg 83 20% 45% @1y 86% @1y<br />

2002<br />

Richardson Thal 200- 30 42% NA NA<br />

2002 ASH 600<br />

Juliusson Thal 200 to 23 43% NA NA<br />

2000 800mg<br />

Blade 2001 Thal 200 to 23 13% NA NA<br />

800mg<br />

Prince 2002 Thal med 75 28% 50% @5.5m 50% @14.6<br />

600mg<br />

Dimopoulos<br />

2001<br />

Thal400<br />

Dex pulses<br />

44 55% 50% @10m<br />

for responders<br />

50%<br />

@12.6m<br />

Palumbo<br />

2002<br />

Thal 100<br />

Dex pulse<br />

monthly<br />

120 52% 50% @12m 50% @27m<br />

Anagnostopoulos<br />

<strong>2003</strong><br />

Coleman<br />

2002<br />

Moehler TM<br />

2001<br />

Garcia-<br />

Sanz 2002<br />

Choon-Kee<br />

Lee <strong>2003</strong><br />

ASH<br />

Srkalovic<br />

2002<br />

Kropff 2002<br />

ASH<br />

Hussein<br />

2002 ASH<br />

Thal 200 to<br />

800<br />

Dexa<br />

pulses<br />

47 57% 50% @16m 50%@38m<br />

Thal<br />

50 74% NA NA<br />

max200<br />

clar 500x2<br />

dex 40/w<br />

Thal CTX 56 68% 50% @16m 55% @16m<br />

VP16 dex<br />

Thal CTX 22 53%* 51% @1y 52% @1y<br />

dex<br />

DTPACE 156 43% NA<br />

NA<br />

(>75%)<br />

Thal melph 21 70%^ 50% @9m 50% @13m<br />

dex<br />

Hyper CTD 60 72% 50% @11m 50% @19m<br />

Thal doxil<br />

VCR dex<br />

Roundtable II<br />

35 74% NA NA<br />

P12.2.1<br />

FARNESYLTRANSFERASE INHIBITORS IN MULTIPLE<br />

MYELOMA.<br />

Melissa Alsina, M.D.<br />

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa,<br />

Florida, USA<br />

Multiple myeloma (MM) patients with mutated RAS are less<br />

likely to respond to chemotherapy and have a shortened median<br />

survival. 1-2 Therefore, targeting RAS farnesylation, which is<br />

required for its function, may be a novel approach to treatment of<br />

MM. In a recently published article by Bolick et al 3 , the<br />

prenylation inhibitors, FTI-277 and GGTI-2166, a farnesyl<br />

transferase inhibitor and geranylgeranyl transferase inhibitor,<br />

respectively, were shown to induce apoptosis in myeloma cell<br />

lines selected for resistance to classic cytotoxics including<br />

doxorubicin and melphalan. Similarly, we and others have shown<br />

that FTI-R115777 (Zarnestra) induces a dose and time dependent<br />

growth inhibition and apoptosis in myeloma cell lines. 4, 5<br />

We have evaluated in a phase II trial the activity and tolerability of<br />

the farnesyltransferase (FTase) inhibitor Zarnestra and correlated<br />

these to inhibition of protein farnesylation and oncogenic/tumor<br />

survival pathways in patients with advanced multiple myeloma.<br />

Eligibility criteria included patients with relapsed or refractory<br />

myeloma, ECOG performance status < 3, normal renal function and<br />

S78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!