13.11.2014 Views

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

With a median follow-up of 38 months from the start of VAD<br />

therapy, no statistically significant difference in OS was observed<br />

between the two groups (median, 56 months for Tx-1 vs. 60<br />

months for Tx-2). Patients who died due to treatment-related<br />

causes were 3% in group A and 4.9% in group B. Compared to<br />

group A, patients assigned to the the double transplant arm of the<br />

study had a significantly longer duration of remission (median<br />

TTR, 27 vs. 44 months, respectively; p = .005) and extended EFS<br />

(median, 34 months for patients randomized to group B vs.25<br />

months for those assigned to group A; p= .05).<br />

Results of the present analysis confirmed that double<br />

autotransplants as primary therapy for MM could be timely<br />

performed in slightly less than two thirds of patients aged below<br />

60 with a risk of treatment-related mortality that did not exceed<br />

5%. Nonhematological toxicity of sequential HDT consisting of<br />

MEL and Bu-Mel was minimal and no cumulative toxicity was<br />

observed in the Tx-2 arm of the study compared to Tx-1. Double<br />

autotransplants, albeit not correlated with significantly higher CR<br />

rates in comparison with Tx-1, effected responses of “better<br />

quality”. This finding ultimately resulted in extended duration of<br />

remission and longer EFS for patients assigned to receive double<br />

autotransplants in comparison with those randomized to a single<br />

autotransplant. With a median follow-up of approximately 3<br />

years no difference in OS was disclosed between the two<br />

treatment groups. It is worthy of note that data similar to those<br />

herein described were reported by the French Myeloma<br />

Intergroup at a preliminary analysis of the IFM-94 trial of single<br />

versus double autologous transplants, both prepared with TBI and<br />

MEL, 140 mg/m², preceded by MEL in case of double transplants<br />

(8). More recently, the same group updated the results of the trial<br />

with a longer follow-up and found that double autotransplants<br />

significantly extended the 5-year projected probability of OS and<br />

EFS in comparison with a single transplant (9). Mature data<br />

derived from the final analysis of our study must be awaited<br />

before definite conclusions can be given concerning the impact of<br />

double autotransplants on the ultimate outcome of MM.<br />

Supported in part by Università di Bologna, Progetti di Ricerca<br />

ex-60% (M.C.)<br />

Appendix<br />

The following physicians actively participated in the “Bologna<br />

96” study:R. Giustolisi, F. Di Raimondo, Catania; E. Volpe,<br />

Avellino; G. Broccia, M.G. Cabras, Cagliari; L. Gugliotta, L.<br />

Masini, Reggio Emilia; B. Rotoli, L. Catalano, Napoli; G. Torelli,<br />

F. Narni, Modena; F. Dammacco, V.M. Lauta, Bari; F. Lauria,<br />

P.Galieni, A. Gozzetti, Siena; L. Cavanna, G. Civardi, Piacenza;<br />

P. Leoni, M. Offidani, Ancona; M. Gobbi, F. Ballerini, Genova;<br />

D. Amadori, P. Gentilini, Forlì; D. Mamone, Messina; R.<br />

Battista, Chioggia; F. Ricciuti, D. Vertone, Potenza; L.<br />

Guardigni, S. Pasini, Cesena; L. Contu, A. Ledda, Cagliari; M.<br />

Longinotti, F. Dore, Sassari; M.G. Michieli, Aviano; A. Zaccaria,<br />

A.L. Molinari, Ravenna; R. Fanin, F. Patriarca, Udine.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Attal M, Harousseau J-L, Stopa A-M, et al: A prospective<br />

randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and<br />

chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 91.<br />

Lenhoff S, Hjorth M, Holmberg E, et al: Impact of high-dose<br />

therapy with autologous stem cell support in patients younger<br />

than 60 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a<br />

population-based study. Blood 2000; 95: 7.<br />

Bjorkstrand B, Ljungman P, Bird JM, Samson D, Gahrton G:<br />

Double high-dose chemoradiotherapy with autologous stem cell<br />

transplantation can induce molecular remissions in multiple<br />

myeloma. Bone Marrow transpl 1995; 15: 367.<br />

Barlogie B, Jagannath S, Desikan KR, et al: Total therapy with<br />

tandem transplants for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood<br />

1999; 93: 55.<br />

Barlogie B, Jagannath S, Vesole DH, et al: Superiority of tandem<br />

autologous transplantation over standard therapy for previously<br />

untreated multiple myeloma. Blood 1997; 89: 789.<br />

Vesole DH, Barlogie B, Jagannath S, et al: High-dose therapy for<br />

refractory multiple myeloma: improved prognosis with better<br />

supportive care and double transplants. Blood 1994; 84: 950.<br />

Bladé J, Samson D, Reece D, et al: criteria for evaluating disease<br />

response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma<br />

treated by high-dose therapy and haematopoietic stem cell<br />

transplantation. Br J Haematol 1998; 102: 115.<br />

Attal M, Payen C, Facon T, et al: Single versus double transplant<br />

in myeloma: a randomized trial of the Intergroupe Francaise du<br />

Myelome (IFM). Blood 1997; 90: 418a.<br />

Attal M, Harousseau J-L: Randomized trial experience of the<br />

Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome. Semin Hematol 2001; 38:<br />

226.<br />

P10.2.5<br />

SINGLE VS. TANDEM AUTOLOGOUS<br />

TRANSPLANTATION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA: THE<br />

GMMG EXPERIENCE<br />

Goldschmidt H<br />

On behalf of the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group,<br />

GMMG<br />

High-dose (HD) therapy followed by autologous stem cell<br />

transplantation (ASCT) has improved event-free (EFS) and<br />

overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM), but nonetheless<br />

virtually all patients eventually relapse. Single center experience<br />

of the Arkansas group has indicated that total therapy including<br />

tandem ASCT improves clinical outcome further, and results of<br />

the French IFM-group have shown in a randomized trial that MM<br />

patients benefit from tandem ASCT. No significant benefit of<br />

double ASCT could be demonstrated in the studies performed by<br />

the HOVON-group, the Bologna-group and in the MAG95-study.<br />

Melphalan without total body irradiation is currently considered<br />

as the best high-dose therapy regimen.<br />

Between 1996 and 2000, patients with MM who had received no<br />

more than 6 previous cycles of conventional chemotherapy were<br />

included in the GMMG-HD2 trial. In the study two<br />

randomizations were possible. The first randomization was<br />

optional and compared standard VAD vs. vincristine, oral<br />

idarubicine and dexamethasone (VID) as induction treatment.<br />

Results showed no difference in response and number of stem<br />

cells mobilized. Hematological toxicity was higher after VID<br />

compared to VAD. The second randomization was obligatory and<br />

compared a single cycle of HD-melphalan vs. two sequential<br />

cycles of HD-melphalan, each followed by peripheral blood<br />

ASCT. Interferon-alpha was started as maintenance treatment for<br />

all patients at a dose of 13.5 million units per week. The median<br />

follow up of the patients in the study is 36 month. The GMMG<br />

will present results of the first trial comparing a single vs. two<br />

sequential cycles of HD-melphalan (200 mg/m 2 ) followed by<br />

ASCT.<br />

S61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!