Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Haematologica 2003 - Supplements Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
occurrence of second transplantation and the timing of this intervention. A time-dependent multivariant Cox analysis shows that for patients having a second transplant in first remission there is a marked increase in the HR for TRM if the transplant is performed after 12 months while the HR for relapse incidence is not as beneficial as when the transplant is performed earlier. As regards survival after relapse, performing a second transplant after this event does not appear to provide an advantage, although if the second transplantation was given before relapse there is an increased HR. Further prospective studies of single and double transplant strategies are required to identify the best therapeutic stratagems for patients with myeloma. 290 Long-Term Event Free Survival (≥ 5 years) in Patients with Myeloma Planned to Receive a Single Autotransplant : Better or Comparable results Compared to Tandem Autotransplants Bhawna Sirohi, R Powles, S Singhal, S Sankpal, S Kulkarni, R Saso, G Patel, C Horton, J Mehta Royal Marsden NHS Trust Between February 1985 and October 2001, 451 consecutive myeloma patients received a single autotransplant conditioned with high-dose melphalan 200mg/m2(Sirohi et al, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002; 21:269a). For this study, only those patients transplanted ≥ 5 years prior to the date of analysis (26 April 2002) were included (n=266). The median age of patients was 50 years (31-69); 92F,174M; 93% IgG; 68% ≥ 2 bone lesions; 76% stage III disease; median creatinine at autograft 83 µmol/L (46- 352); median B2M 2.3mg/L (0.1-16.4). 169 (60%) remained in or attained complete remission after autograft; 75 partial remission; 13 non-responders and 9 (4%) died. The median OS and EFS of these patients was 5.8 years and 2.3 years respectively. The EFS curve shows a stable plateau after 7-8 years comprising 26 (10%) such patients who remain event-free. This data is comparable to the 515 patients presented by Tricot et al for tandem transplantation as shown in the Table. Variable RMH (n=266) Tricot et al (n=515) Transplants Single All received single , 77% received a tandem autograft Age ≥ 50 years 53% 58% Stage III disease 76% 48% Median OS 5.8 years (10days- 3.5 years 16years) Median EFS 2.3 years (10 days- 1.4 years 16years) 7-year OS/EFS 42%/22% 31%/18% Patients eventfree at ≥5years 28% 24% Based on previously described prognostic variables chosen by recursive partitioning, there was a group of 85/272 (31%; B2M missing in 4 ) patients with age
non-CR after the first transplant and highlights the importance of obtaining CR as strictly defined by immunofixation. 292 Prospects of the currents protocol of the Spanish Myeloma Group (GEM-Grupo Español Mieloma) Juan José Lahuerta, Rafael Martínez, Joan Bladé, Javier de la Rubia, José García-Laraña, Adrián Alegre, Felipe Prosper, Felipe Arribas, Anna Sureda, Dolores Carrera, Joan Bargay, Joaquín Díaz-Mediavilla and Jesús San Miguel For the GEM Group Grupo Español de Mieloma The GEM group is the result of integration of the PETHEMA and the Stem Cell transplant Myeloma / GEL-TAMO study groups. The current national protocol was activated in January 2000 and the design was based on the previous experience of both supporting groups. For this reason we used VBMCP/VBAD (x 6 cycles) as induction therapy, because in previous PETHEMA studies this resulted in an optional debulking chemotherapy (1st aim: to determine the response rate to this induction regimen). Stem cells have been collected after 4th cycle (2nd aim: to see if the use of short courses of alkylating agents hampers stem cell collection). After this, all patients received high dose chemotherapy followed by PB stem cell support. Conditioning consisted of Busulphan-Melphalan (BUMEL), because it was superior to Melphalan 200 in our previous retrospective study (Br. J. H. 2002) (3rd aim: to confirm the efficacy and toxicity of BUMEL). Patients that achieved CR went into maintenance therapy, reserving the second potential transplant for relapse. Among CR patients we will compare the outcome of those with both EF- and immunofixation- (CR1) versus CR2 patients (EFbut IF+) (4th aim). Patients in PR or mR will receive a second transplant, either autologous (conditioned with CBV) or miniallogeneic (conditioned with Fluda-Melphalan), based on the availability of an HLA-identical donor (5th aim: to compare the efficacy and toxicity of these two procedures). In all patients, cytogenetic/FISH studies have been performed at diagnosis. Moreover in patients in CR after TRx, MRD investigation is being carried out. So far, 732 patients have entered into the study. The overall response rate to induction chemotherapy is 93% (14% CR1, 18% CR2, 61% PR, 7% stable or progressive disease). Following the first transplant, 57% of patients have achieved CR (39% CR1 and 18% CR2) while 34% were in PR. After the initial 200 patients were transplanted an alarm emerged about a possible increase in VOD toxicity associated with BUMEL (5 out of 12 deaths), and accordingly, the conditioning regimen was switched to Melphalan 200. Data about this adverse event as well as stem cell collection efficacy (93% success with a median of 3.6 x 106 CD34 cells/ kg and 5.3 x 106 CD34 cells/kg for percentil 75) after chemotherapy, including low doses of melphalan, will be presented. 293 T2 model - a pilot study for the evaluation of the experimental therapy of multiple myeloma relapsing after the first autologous stem cell transplantation. Report of the prospective non-randomized pilot study of the Czech Myeloma Group M. Krejci (1), A. Krivanova (1), R. Hajek (1), V. Scudla (2), K. Indrak (2), J. Bacovsky (3), T. Buchler (1), L. Pour (1), A. Svobodnik (4), Z. Adam (1), J.Mayer (1), J. Vorlicek (1) for the Czech Myeloma Group (1) Dpt of Internal Medicine - Hematooncology, University Hospital Brno - Bohunice, (2) 3rd Dpt of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, (3) Dpt of Hematooncology, University Hospital Olomouc, (4) Masaryk University Oncological Center, Brno, Czech Republic Background: High doses of chemotherapy followed by autologous transplantation became widespreadly indicated as upfront therapy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in the last decade, with very good tolerance and low mortality (2-3%). Therapy of relapsing MM is still considered to be experimental. Design of study: The principle of T2 model is repeated transplantation therapy with testing different experimental approaches in patients with MM relapsing/progressing after the 1st autologous transplantation (AT). The patients (pts) are treated with the same + something more - same or very similar induction and reinduction treatment, same myeloablative regimen in the 1st and the 2nd AT and a different maintenance, experimental therapy after the 2nd transplantation. The evaluation of the results of each therapeutic approach uses intra-individual analysis - the comparison of event free survival I (EFS I) (after the 1st AT) and EFS II (after the 2nd AT) in one patient. In T2 model both EFS I and EFS II are compared in one patient, therefore the interindividual differences are excluded. Subjects: 32 pts with relapsing/progressing MM after the 1st AT were included in the pilot study between January 1997 and January 2003, median follow-up was 75,2 months. Methods and results: Pts were matched to the following groups of experimental therapy: autologous transplantation with IL-2 activated PBSC - 10 pts (31,2 %), pamidronate- 4 pts (12,5 %), thalidomide -15pts (46,9 %), consolidation chemotherapy CED - 3 pt (9,4%). A sensitivity to reinduction chemotherapy C-VAD (4 cycles) was more than 90 %, the response to the 2nd transplantation according to the 1st one was in 23 % better (7 pts), in 50 % same (16 pts) and in 27 % worse (9 pts). The toxicity of the 1st and second transplantation was similar and usually did not exceed grade II (SWOG criteria), there were no significant differences instead of clinically irrelevant hematological toxicity. Transplant-related mortality was 3 % (1/32). EFS II is known in 22 pts. Total of 8 pts have achieved prolongation of EFS II versus EFS I, 2 in IL-2 activated graft group, 1 in pamidronate group, 1 in consolidation chemotherapy CED group and 4 in thalidomide group. In the whole group median of EFS I was 15,7 months, median of EFS II was 12,9 months, median of overall survival (OS) was 79,1 months, 63 % pts (20/32) were alive (till 31st January 2003). Conclusions:Repeated transplantation is one of the most powerful approaches in treatment of relapsing MM; toxicity is acceptable, also engraftment is similar to the 1st AT. Testing of new perspective approaches by T2 model may bring a fundamental benefit. S218
- Page 175 and 176: 176 Pro-inflammatory and angiogenic
- Page 177 and 178: 180 Clinical study on the bone lesi
- Page 179 and 180: 7.2 Imaging studies 185 99mTc-MIBI
- Page 181 and 182: 189 Factors Predicting Occult Spina
- Page 183 and 184: vivo detected resonances was invest
- Page 185 and 186: Support Unit (CTSU) with flexibilit
- Page 187 and 188: (β2m) & C reactive protein (CRP).
- Page 189 and 190: plasmids carrying the clonotypic in
- Page 191 and 192: newly diagnosed multiple myeloma as
- Page 193 and 194: 216 Transgenic expression of Myc an
- Page 195 and 196: 221 Prolonged survival in the 5T2MM
- Page 197 and 198: 9. Chemotherapy, maintenance, treat
- Page 199 and 200: 229 EFFECTIVENESS OF STANDARD CHEMO
- Page 201 and 202: 234 Melphalan and Dexamethasone- Is
- Page 203 and 204: Methods. We investigated the VECD p
- Page 205 and 206: 9.2 Renal complications. 243 MERIT
- Page 207 and 208: cost of SRE-related care was $10,24
- Page 209 and 210: those with Hb >13 g/dL. Analysis of
- Page 211 and 212: sustained response, lasting from 52
- Page 213 and 214: proportion of bone abnormality. IgD
- Page 215 and 216: disease. The lack of response to in
- Page 217 and 218: yielding a median of 3x106/kg CD34
- Page 219 and 220: patients(pts) aged ≥60 yrs. We co
- Page 221 and 222: PBSC mobilizing regimen utilizing C
- Page 223 and 224: their leukocytes and platelets. No
- Page 225: 25 Gy to marrow. The tracer dose wa
- Page 229 and 230: 296 PERIPHERAL BLOOD STEM CELL TRAN
- Page 231 and 232: References Effect of dose-intensive
- Page 233 and 234: with cyclosporine A and methotrexat
- Page 235 and 236: 11.Role of novel therapies targetin
- Page 237 and 238: 312 Thalidomide as Rescue of Relaps
- Page 239 and 240: patients, light chain in 1 patients
- Page 241 and 242: platelets of 207 (76-402), B2M of 3
- Page 243 and 244: 325 Low Dose Thalidomide plus Dexam
- Page 245 and 246: in 5 pts (11%), M protein decreased
- Page 247 and 248: time from diagnosis was 3.7 years a
- Page 249 and 250: 339 Thalidomide, Clarithromycin and
- Page 251 and 252: 344 COMBINATION OF THALIDOMIDE, DEX
- Page 253 and 254: experienced early death during the
- Page 255 and 256: untreated patients with high tumor
- Page 257 and 258: 357 Thalidomide protects endothelia
- Page 259 and 260: 362 EOSINOPHILIA IS A VERY COMMON F
- Page 261 and 262: 11.5 CC 4047, PS 341 and arsenic tr
- Page 263 and 264: without chromosome 13. Mean IC50 fo
- Page 265 and 266: myeloma patients. Phase I data indi
- Page 267 and 268: 11.6 Other drugs 380 EFFECT OF STI5
- Page 269 and 270: significant inhibition of cell prol
- Page 271 and 272: which acts to prevent the synthesis
- Page 273 and 274: of B and its metabolites, however,
- Page 275 and 276: and 10 months after start of therap
occurrence of second transplantation and the timing of this<br />
intervention. A time-dependent multivariant Cox analysis shows<br />
that for patients having a second transplant in first remission there<br />
is a marked increase in the HR for TRM if the transplant is<br />
performed after 12 months while the HR for relapse incidence is<br />
not as beneficial as when the transplant is performed earlier. As<br />
regards survival after relapse, performing a second transplant<br />
after this event does not appear to provide an advantage, although<br />
if the second transplantation was given before relapse there is an<br />
increased HR. Further prospective studies of single and double<br />
transplant strategies are required to identify the best therapeutic<br />
stratagems for patients with myeloma.<br />
290<br />
Long-Term Event Free Survival (≥ 5 years) in Patients<br />
with Myeloma Planned to Receive a Single<br />
Autotransplant : Better or Comparable results<br />
Compared to Tandem Autotransplants<br />
Bhawna Sirohi, R Powles, S Singhal, S Sankpal, S<br />
Kulkarni, R Saso, G Patel, C Horton, J Mehta<br />
Royal Marsden NHS Trust<br />
Between February 1985 and October 2001, 451 consecutive<br />
myeloma patients received a single autotransplant conditioned<br />
with high-dose melphalan 200mg/m2(Sirohi et al, Proc Am Soc<br />
Clin Oncol 2002; 21:269a). For this study, only those patients<br />
transplanted ≥ 5 years prior to the date of analysis (26 April<br />
2002) were included (n=266). The median age of patients was 50<br />
years (31-69); 92F,174M; 93% IgG; 68% ≥ 2 bone lesions; 76%<br />
stage III disease; median creatinine at autograft 83 µmol/L (46-<br />
352); median B2M 2.3mg/L (0.1-16.4). 169 (60%) remained in or<br />
attained complete remission after autograft; 75 partial remission;<br />
13 non-responders and 9 (4%) died. The median OS and EFS of<br />
these patients was 5.8 years and 2.3 years respectively. The EFS<br />
curve shows a stable plateau after 7-8 years comprising 26 (10%)<br />
such patients who remain event-free. This data is comparable to<br />
the 515 patients presented by Tricot et al for tandem<br />
transplantation as shown in the Table.<br />
Variable RMH (n=266) Tricot et al (n=515)<br />
Transplants Single All received single ,<br />
77% received a<br />
tandem autograft<br />
Age ≥ 50 years 53% 58%<br />
Stage III disease 76% 48%<br />
Median OS 5.8 years (10days- 3.5 years<br />
16years)<br />
Median EFS 2.3 years (10 days- 1.4 years<br />
16years)<br />
7-year OS/EFS 42%/22% 31%/18%<br />
Patients eventfree<br />
at ≥5years<br />
28% 24%<br />
Based on previously described prognostic variables chosen by<br />
recursive partitioning, there was a group of 85/272 (31%; B2M<br />
missing in 4 ) patients with age