Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

supplements.haematologica.org
from supplements.haematologica.org More from this publisher
13.11.2014 Views

occurrence of second transplantation and the timing of this intervention. A time-dependent multivariant Cox analysis shows that for patients having a second transplant in first remission there is a marked increase in the HR for TRM if the transplant is performed after 12 months while the HR for relapse incidence is not as beneficial as when the transplant is performed earlier. As regards survival after relapse, performing a second transplant after this event does not appear to provide an advantage, although if the second transplantation was given before relapse there is an increased HR. Further prospective studies of single and double transplant strategies are required to identify the best therapeutic stratagems for patients with myeloma. 290 Long-Term Event Free Survival (≥ 5 years) in Patients with Myeloma Planned to Receive a Single Autotransplant : Better or Comparable results Compared to Tandem Autotransplants Bhawna Sirohi, R Powles, S Singhal, S Sankpal, S Kulkarni, R Saso, G Patel, C Horton, J Mehta Royal Marsden NHS Trust Between February 1985 and October 2001, 451 consecutive myeloma patients received a single autotransplant conditioned with high-dose melphalan 200mg/m2(Sirohi et al, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002; 21:269a). For this study, only those patients transplanted ≥ 5 years prior to the date of analysis (26 April 2002) were included (n=266). The median age of patients was 50 years (31-69); 92F,174M; 93% IgG; 68% ≥ 2 bone lesions; 76% stage III disease; median creatinine at autograft 83 µmol/L (46- 352); median B2M 2.3mg/L (0.1-16.4). 169 (60%) remained in or attained complete remission after autograft; 75 partial remission; 13 non-responders and 9 (4%) died. The median OS and EFS of these patients was 5.8 years and 2.3 years respectively. The EFS curve shows a stable plateau after 7-8 years comprising 26 (10%) such patients who remain event-free. This data is comparable to the 515 patients presented by Tricot et al for tandem transplantation as shown in the Table. Variable RMH (n=266) Tricot et al (n=515) Transplants Single All received single , 77% received a tandem autograft Age ≥ 50 years 53% 58% Stage III disease 76% 48% Median OS 5.8 years (10days- 3.5 years 16years) Median EFS 2.3 years (10 days- 1.4 years 16years) 7-year OS/EFS 42%/22% 31%/18% Patients eventfree at ≥5years 28% 24% Based on previously described prognostic variables chosen by recursive partitioning, there was a group of 85/272 (31%; B2M missing in 4 ) patients with age

non-CR after the first transplant and highlights the importance of obtaining CR as strictly defined by immunofixation. 292 Prospects of the currents protocol of the Spanish Myeloma Group (GEM-Grupo Español Mieloma) Juan José Lahuerta, Rafael Martínez, Joan Bladé, Javier de la Rubia, José García-Laraña, Adrián Alegre, Felipe Prosper, Felipe Arribas, Anna Sureda, Dolores Carrera, Joan Bargay, Joaquín Díaz-Mediavilla and Jesús San Miguel For the GEM Group Grupo Español de Mieloma The GEM group is the result of integration of the PETHEMA and the Stem Cell transplant Myeloma / GEL-TAMO study groups. The current national protocol was activated in January 2000 and the design was based on the previous experience of both supporting groups. For this reason we used VBMCP/VBAD (x 6 cycles) as induction therapy, because in previous PETHEMA studies this resulted in an optional debulking chemotherapy (1st aim: to determine the response rate to this induction regimen). Stem cells have been collected after 4th cycle (2nd aim: to see if the use of short courses of alkylating agents hampers stem cell collection). After this, all patients received high dose chemotherapy followed by PB stem cell support. Conditioning consisted of Busulphan-Melphalan (BUMEL), because it was superior to Melphalan 200 in our previous retrospective study (Br. J. H. 2002) (3rd aim: to confirm the efficacy and toxicity of BUMEL). Patients that achieved CR went into maintenance therapy, reserving the second potential transplant for relapse. Among CR patients we will compare the outcome of those with both EF- and immunofixation- (CR1) versus CR2 patients (EFbut IF+) (4th aim). Patients in PR or mR will receive a second transplant, either autologous (conditioned with CBV) or miniallogeneic (conditioned with Fluda-Melphalan), based on the availability of an HLA-identical donor (5th aim: to compare the efficacy and toxicity of these two procedures). In all patients, cytogenetic/FISH studies have been performed at diagnosis. Moreover in patients in CR after TRx, MRD investigation is being carried out. So far, 732 patients have entered into the study. The overall response rate to induction chemotherapy is 93% (14% CR1, 18% CR2, 61% PR, 7% stable or progressive disease). Following the first transplant, 57% of patients have achieved CR (39% CR1 and 18% CR2) while 34% were in PR. After the initial 200 patients were transplanted an alarm emerged about a possible increase in VOD toxicity associated with BUMEL (5 out of 12 deaths), and accordingly, the conditioning regimen was switched to Melphalan 200. Data about this adverse event as well as stem cell collection efficacy (93% success with a median of 3.6 x 106 CD34 cells/ kg and 5.3 x 106 CD34 cells/kg for percentil 75) after chemotherapy, including low doses of melphalan, will be presented. 293 T2 model - a pilot study for the evaluation of the experimental therapy of multiple myeloma relapsing after the first autologous stem cell transplantation. Report of the prospective non-randomized pilot study of the Czech Myeloma Group M. Krejci (1), A. Krivanova (1), R. Hajek (1), V. Scudla (2), K. Indrak (2), J. Bacovsky (3), T. Buchler (1), L. Pour (1), A. Svobodnik (4), Z. Adam (1), J.Mayer (1), J. Vorlicek (1) for the Czech Myeloma Group (1) Dpt of Internal Medicine - Hematooncology, University Hospital Brno - Bohunice, (2) 3rd Dpt of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, (3) Dpt of Hematooncology, University Hospital Olomouc, (4) Masaryk University Oncological Center, Brno, Czech Republic Background: High doses of chemotherapy followed by autologous transplantation became widespreadly indicated as upfront therapy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in the last decade, with very good tolerance and low mortality (2-3%). Therapy of relapsing MM is still considered to be experimental. Design of study: The principle of T2 model is repeated transplantation therapy with testing different experimental approaches in patients with MM relapsing/progressing after the 1st autologous transplantation (AT). The patients (pts) are treated with the same + something more - same or very similar induction and reinduction treatment, same myeloablative regimen in the 1st and the 2nd AT and a different maintenance, experimental therapy after the 2nd transplantation. The evaluation of the results of each therapeutic approach uses intra-individual analysis - the comparison of event free survival I (EFS I) (after the 1st AT) and EFS II (after the 2nd AT) in one patient. In T2 model both EFS I and EFS II are compared in one patient, therefore the interindividual differences are excluded. Subjects: 32 pts with relapsing/progressing MM after the 1st AT were included in the pilot study between January 1997 and January 2003, median follow-up was 75,2 months. Methods and results: Pts were matched to the following groups of experimental therapy: autologous transplantation with IL-2 activated PBSC - 10 pts (31,2 %), pamidronate- 4 pts (12,5 %), thalidomide -15pts (46,9 %), consolidation chemotherapy CED - 3 pt (9,4%). A sensitivity to reinduction chemotherapy C-VAD (4 cycles) was more than 90 %, the response to the 2nd transplantation according to the 1st one was in 23 % better (7 pts), in 50 % same (16 pts) and in 27 % worse (9 pts). The toxicity of the 1st and second transplantation was similar and usually did not exceed grade II (SWOG criteria), there were no significant differences instead of clinically irrelevant hematological toxicity. Transplant-related mortality was 3 % (1/32). EFS II is known in 22 pts. Total of 8 pts have achieved prolongation of EFS II versus EFS I, 2 in IL-2 activated graft group, 1 in pamidronate group, 1 in consolidation chemotherapy CED group and 4 in thalidomide group. In the whole group median of EFS I was 15,7 months, median of EFS II was 12,9 months, median of overall survival (OS) was 79,1 months, 63 % pts (20/32) were alive (till 31st January 2003). Conclusions:Repeated transplantation is one of the most powerful approaches in treatment of relapsing MM; toxicity is acceptable, also engraftment is similar to the 1st AT. Testing of new perspective approaches by T2 model may bring a fundamental benefit. S218

occurrence of second transplantation and the timing of this<br />

intervention. A time-dependent multivariant Cox analysis shows<br />

that for patients having a second transplant in first remission there<br />

is a marked increase in the HR for TRM if the transplant is<br />

performed after 12 months while the HR for relapse incidence is<br />

not as beneficial as when the transplant is performed earlier. As<br />

regards survival after relapse, performing a second transplant<br />

after this event does not appear to provide an advantage, although<br />

if the second transplantation was given before relapse there is an<br />

increased HR. Further prospective studies of single and double<br />

transplant strategies are required to identify the best therapeutic<br />

stratagems for patients with myeloma.<br />

290<br />

Long-Term Event Free Survival (≥ 5 years) in Patients<br />

with Myeloma Planned to Receive a Single<br />

Autotransplant : Better or Comparable results<br />

Compared to Tandem Autotransplants<br />

Bhawna Sirohi, R Powles, S Singhal, S Sankpal, S<br />

Kulkarni, R Saso, G Patel, C Horton, J Mehta<br />

Royal Marsden NHS Trust<br />

Between February 1985 and October 2001, 451 consecutive<br />

myeloma patients received a single autotransplant conditioned<br />

with high-dose melphalan 200mg/m2(Sirohi et al, Proc Am Soc<br />

Clin Oncol 2002; 21:269a). For this study, only those patients<br />

transplanted ≥ 5 years prior to the date of analysis (26 April<br />

2002) were included (n=266). The median age of patients was 50<br />

years (31-69); 92F,174M; 93% IgG; 68% ≥ 2 bone lesions; 76%<br />

stage III disease; median creatinine at autograft 83 µmol/L (46-<br />

352); median B2M 2.3mg/L (0.1-16.4). 169 (60%) remained in or<br />

attained complete remission after autograft; 75 partial remission;<br />

13 non-responders and 9 (4%) died. The median OS and EFS of<br />

these patients was 5.8 years and 2.3 years respectively. The EFS<br />

curve shows a stable plateau after 7-8 years comprising 26 (10%)<br />

such patients who remain event-free. This data is comparable to<br />

the 515 patients presented by Tricot et al for tandem<br />

transplantation as shown in the Table.<br />

Variable RMH (n=266) Tricot et al (n=515)<br />

Transplants Single All received single ,<br />

77% received a<br />

tandem autograft<br />

Age ≥ 50 years 53% 58%<br />

Stage III disease 76% 48%<br />

Median OS 5.8 years (10days- 3.5 years<br />

16years)<br />

Median EFS 2.3 years (10 days- 1.4 years<br />

16years)<br />

7-year OS/EFS 42%/22% 31%/18%<br />

Patients eventfree<br />

at ≥5years<br />

28% 24%<br />

Based on previously described prognostic variables chosen by<br />

recursive partitioning, there was a group of 85/272 (31%; B2M<br />

missing in 4 ) patients with age

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!