13.11.2014 Views

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of 4590 single subset determinations in 601 controls. We did no<br />

found statistically significant differences in the number of<br />

reinfused CD34+cells/Kg between patients receiving selected or<br />

unselected CD34+ PBSC. All patients achieved lymphocyte<br />

engraftment; median time to achieve a count of 500x106/l was 14<br />

days for HD, 22 for MM and 20 for NHL. Total lymphocytes<br />

count was significantly higher in HD group (730x106/l) than in<br />

MM (270x106/l) and NHL (220x106/l) on day 15; then, from day<br />

60, it reached stable values beyond 1000x106/l in all groups. CD3<br />

cells recovery was similar in the 3 groups without reaching<br />

normal values but with a trend toward normalization until the 3rd<br />

year; thereafter the values returned into the normal range. CD4+<br />

counts remained below the normal value throughout the<br />

observation period with a trend toward normalization in the 3<br />

groups. Normal values were reaching for HD and NHL on the 6th<br />

year and on the 7th year for the MM. Suppressor (CD8) T-cells,<br />

decreased after transplant, as from day 60 returned to normal<br />

values or beyond the normal range without statistical differences<br />

among the groups. The persistent reduction in CD4 cells and the<br />

recovery of the CD8 cells subset determed a persistent reduction<br />

of the CD4/CD8 ratio. CD19 B cells recovered from day 30,<br />

achieving normal range on day 120 in the 3 groups; after 1 year<br />

all values settled beyond the normal range; only at baseline time<br />

the MM-group showed significant increase of CD19 lymphocytes<br />

in comparison with the others two groups. Effector cells,<br />

including CD3/HLA-DR and CD16/56, showed a similar trend<br />

during the study period. CD16/56 remained below the normal<br />

range until day 15 in the 3 groups and increased markedly<br />

reaching values beyond the normal range from day 30 with the<br />

maximum value on the 5th year in MM and on the 6th year in HD<br />

and NHL groups. The immunological recovery after PBSCT was<br />

similar in the 3 groups of lymphoprolipherative disorders. These<br />

data suggest that CD4 and CD4/CD8 could reach stable normal<br />

value resulting in a complete lymphocyte recovery in a longer<br />

follow-up.<br />

278<br />

Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Mobilization for<br />

Autologous Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma (MM):<br />

Comparison of four different schemes in 115 patients<br />

from a single center.<br />

A. Alegre, A. Granda, , B.Aguado, C. Aláez, C. Blázquez, J.<br />

Cannata, E. Martí, S. Nistal, S.Osorio, A. Figuera, M.J.<br />

Fernández-Villalta and J.M. Fernández-Rañada.<br />

Hematology Department. Hospital Universitario de la Princesa.<br />

Madrid.Spain<br />

Introduction and Objectives: Autologous PBSC transplantation is<br />

the treatment of choice for symptomatic MM patients under 70<br />

years of age as intensification after induction treatment. However,<br />

the best method to mobilizing and collecting progenitor cells is<br />

not well defined the collecteons results could be influenzed by<br />

several variables related with disease status and with the<br />

technical procedures used.<br />

Patients and Methods: We present our single Centre experience<br />

comparing four methods used for PBSC mobilization and<br />

collection cell for autologous PBSCT in MM. From 1989 we<br />

have included 115 patients with MM (58M/57F). median of age<br />

was 50 years (28-70): 6 stage I, 24 stage II and 85 stage III .<br />

Median interval between diagnosis and mobilization was 9.5<br />

months (2-142). Moblization schemes were as follows: Group I:<br />

Cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 iv + GM-CSF 8 mcrg/Kg/d sc<br />

(Molgramostim, Leucomax®- Schering Plough); Group 2:<br />

Cyclophosphamide 2-4 g/m2 iv + G-CSF(filgrastim,<br />

Neupogen®,Amgen) sc; Group 3: G-CSF alone 10 mcrg/Kg/d sc<br />

x 5 (Group 3A) y 20 mcrg/Kg/d sc x 5 (Group 3b). Group 4:<br />

Cyclophosphamide 2 g/m2 iv + G-CSF 10 mcgr/Kg/d sc + SCF<br />

20 mcgr/Kg/d sc.<br />

Lymphocitopheresis were started on day 5 in the cytokine alone<br />

schemes and after leucocyte recovery > 4x10e9/L in the<br />

chemotherapya+cytokine schemes.<br />

Resultas: Different results are showe in the table. ( Patients<br />

characteristics included in each group did not show significant<br />

differences )<br />

Group N Pheresis<br />

number<br />

CD34<br />

x106/kg<br />

Global 115 2 (1-13) 3.1 (1-<br />

16.4)<br />

1 21 6 (4-13) 6.8(1.8-<br />

34.8)*<br />

2 20 3 (2-5) 3.9 (0.5-<br />

14.7)<br />

3 67 2 (1-4) 3.2 (0.04-<br />

14)<br />

3A 56 2 (1-4) 3.4 (0.04-<br />

14)<br />

3B 11 2 (1-3) 3.2 (1.64-<br />

5.9)<br />

4 7 2 (2-4) 4.4 (1.4-<br />

16.4)*<br />

MNC<br />

x108/kg<br />

CFU<br />

x104/kg<br />

7.7 (2-15) 4.8 (0.5-<br />

66.5)<br />

7.6 (5-<br />

11.6)<br />

6.6 (2-<br />

14.8)<br />

8.3 (2-<br />

15.2)<br />

8.2 (2.4-<br />

13.9)<br />

8.3 (2.7-<br />

15.2)<br />

3.7 (2.4-<br />

9.12)<br />

Graft ><br />

0.5<br />

neutr<br />

x 109/L<br />

12 (7-<br />

25)<br />

4 (0-66.5) 13 (9-<br />

20)<br />

13.8 (0.5- 11 (8-<br />

37) 14)<br />

4 (0-25.5) 12 (7-<br />

25)<br />

4 (0-25.5) 12 (7-<br />

25)<br />

- 13.5<br />

(11-20)<br />

16.7 (8.5- 11 (9-<br />

38.5) 13)<br />

Graft<br />

>20<br />

plq.<br />

x109/L<br />

12 (7-<br />

71)<br />

11 (7-<br />

42)<br />

12 (7-<br />

42)<br />

12 (8-<br />

71)<br />

12 (8-<br />

71)<br />

11 (10-<br />

36)<br />

12 (8-<br />

18)<br />

*p< 0.005<br />

The main variables that influence the results, apart from<br />

mobilization scheme, were previous treatment with melphalant<br />

and the number of lines of previous chemotherapy.These two<br />

variables showed the major negative impact.<br />

Comments and Conclusions: The methods with best results<br />

regarding rates of CD34+/kg harvesting include chemotherapy<br />

followed by the cytokine G-CSF. However, the use of G-CSF<br />

alone is enough to reach the minimal CD34/kg targetted rate of<br />

2x10e6/Kg. This method simplifes the collections, reducing the<br />

morbidity and the cost of the global procedure. Patients with<br />

previous treatment including alkilants as melphalan may have<br />

compromised the hemopoietic reserve for PBSC mobilization.<br />

The increase of G-CSF dose , until 20 g/kg, did not showed in<br />

our experience a significant increase in the CD34+ cells<br />

collected, although new studies with much cases are needed to<br />

define this point. SCF after chemotherapy and G-CSF was a<br />

scheme that showed optimal results although more experience<br />

and much cases, including testing ambulatory administration, are<br />

also needed, considering its secondary effects and the scarce<br />

experience with this drug.<br />

279<br />

Intermediate-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Granulocyte<br />

Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) is a Valid<br />

Alternative to High Dose Cyclophosphamide for<br />

Mobilizing Peripheral Blood CD34+ Cells in Patients<br />

with Multiple Myeloma.<br />

Maria Teresa Petrucci, *Giuseppe Avvisati, Giacinto La<br />

Verde, Vincenza Martini, Anna Levi, *Cristina Tirindelli,<br />

Pasqualino Amaranto Giovanna Meloni, Franco Mandelli<br />

Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia University<br />

"La Sapienza”, *Ematologia University “Campus Bio-Medico”,<br />

Rome- Italy<br />

High doses (7g/m2) cyclophosphamide (CTX) followed by<br />

recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-<br />

CSF) is an effective mobilizing regimen for collecting peripheral<br />

blood stem cells (PBSC). However, this regimen can cause severe<br />

toxicity requiring hospitalization and increasing costs. In this<br />

study, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of a<br />

S211

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!