Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
of 4590 single subset determinations in 601 controls. We did no<br />
found statistically significant differences in the number of<br />
reinfused CD34+cells/Kg between patients receiving selected or<br />
unselected CD34+ PBSC. All patients achieved lymphocyte<br />
engraftment; median time to achieve a count of 500x106/l was 14<br />
days for HD, 22 for MM and 20 for NHL. Total lymphocytes<br />
count was significantly higher in HD group (730x106/l) than in<br />
MM (270x106/l) and NHL (220x106/l) on day 15; then, from day<br />
60, it reached stable values beyond 1000x106/l in all groups. CD3<br />
cells recovery was similar in the 3 groups without reaching<br />
normal values but with a trend toward normalization until the 3rd<br />
year; thereafter the values returned into the normal range. CD4+<br />
counts remained below the normal value throughout the<br />
observation period with a trend toward normalization in the 3<br />
groups. Normal values were reaching for HD and NHL on the 6th<br />
year and on the 7th year for the MM. Suppressor (CD8) T-cells,<br />
decreased after transplant, as from day 60 returned to normal<br />
values or beyond the normal range without statistical differences<br />
among the groups. The persistent reduction in CD4 cells and the<br />
recovery of the CD8 cells subset determed a persistent reduction<br />
of the CD4/CD8 ratio. CD19 B cells recovered from day 30,<br />
achieving normal range on day 120 in the 3 groups; after 1 year<br />
all values settled beyond the normal range; only at baseline time<br />
the MM-group showed significant increase of CD19 lymphocytes<br />
in comparison with the others two groups. Effector cells,<br />
including CD3/HLA-DR and CD16/56, showed a similar trend<br />
during the study period. CD16/56 remained below the normal<br />
range until day 15 in the 3 groups and increased markedly<br />
reaching values beyond the normal range from day 30 with the<br />
maximum value on the 5th year in MM and on the 6th year in HD<br />
and NHL groups. The immunological recovery after PBSCT was<br />
similar in the 3 groups of lymphoprolipherative disorders. These<br />
data suggest that CD4 and CD4/CD8 could reach stable normal<br />
value resulting in a complete lymphocyte recovery in a longer<br />
follow-up.<br />
278<br />
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Mobilization for<br />
Autologous Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma (MM):<br />
Comparison of four different schemes in 115 patients<br />
from a single center.<br />
A. Alegre, A. Granda, , B.Aguado, C. Aláez, C. Blázquez, J.<br />
Cannata, E. Martí, S. Nistal, S.Osorio, A. Figuera, M.J.<br />
Fernández-Villalta and J.M. Fernández-Rañada.<br />
Hematology Department. Hospital Universitario de la Princesa.<br />
Madrid.Spain<br />
Introduction and Objectives: Autologous PBSC transplantation is<br />
the treatment of choice for symptomatic MM patients under 70<br />
years of age as intensification after induction treatment. However,<br />
the best method to mobilizing and collecting progenitor cells is<br />
not well defined the collecteons results could be influenzed by<br />
several variables related with disease status and with the<br />
technical procedures used.<br />
Patients and Methods: We present our single Centre experience<br />
comparing four methods used for PBSC mobilization and<br />
collection cell for autologous PBSCT in MM. From 1989 we<br />
have included 115 patients with MM (58M/57F). median of age<br />
was 50 years (28-70): 6 stage I, 24 stage II and 85 stage III .<br />
Median interval between diagnosis and mobilization was 9.5<br />
months (2-142). Moblization schemes were as follows: Group I:<br />
Cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 iv + GM-CSF 8 mcrg/Kg/d sc<br />
(Molgramostim, Leucomax®- Schering Plough); Group 2:<br />
Cyclophosphamide 2-4 g/m2 iv + G-CSF(filgrastim,<br />
Neupogen®,Amgen) sc; Group 3: G-CSF alone 10 mcrg/Kg/d sc<br />
x 5 (Group 3A) y 20 mcrg/Kg/d sc x 5 (Group 3b). Group 4:<br />
Cyclophosphamide 2 g/m2 iv + G-CSF 10 mcgr/Kg/d sc + SCF<br />
20 mcgr/Kg/d sc.<br />
Lymphocitopheresis were started on day 5 in the cytokine alone<br />
schemes and after leucocyte recovery > 4x10e9/L in the<br />
chemotherapya+cytokine schemes.<br />
Resultas: Different results are showe in the table. ( Patients<br />
characteristics included in each group did not show significant<br />
differences )<br />
Group N Pheresis<br />
number<br />
CD34<br />
x106/kg<br />
Global 115 2 (1-13) 3.1 (1-<br />
16.4)<br />
1 21 6 (4-13) 6.8(1.8-<br />
34.8)*<br />
2 20 3 (2-5) 3.9 (0.5-<br />
14.7)<br />
3 67 2 (1-4) 3.2 (0.04-<br />
14)<br />
3A 56 2 (1-4) 3.4 (0.04-<br />
14)<br />
3B 11 2 (1-3) 3.2 (1.64-<br />
5.9)<br />
4 7 2 (2-4) 4.4 (1.4-<br />
16.4)*<br />
MNC<br />
x108/kg<br />
CFU<br />
x104/kg<br />
7.7 (2-15) 4.8 (0.5-<br />
66.5)<br />
7.6 (5-<br />
11.6)<br />
6.6 (2-<br />
14.8)<br />
8.3 (2-<br />
15.2)<br />
8.2 (2.4-<br />
13.9)<br />
8.3 (2.7-<br />
15.2)<br />
3.7 (2.4-<br />
9.12)<br />
Graft ><br />
0.5<br />
neutr<br />
x 109/L<br />
12 (7-<br />
25)<br />
4 (0-66.5) 13 (9-<br />
20)<br />
13.8 (0.5- 11 (8-<br />
37) 14)<br />
4 (0-25.5) 12 (7-<br />
25)<br />
4 (0-25.5) 12 (7-<br />
25)<br />
- 13.5<br />
(11-20)<br />
16.7 (8.5- 11 (9-<br />
38.5) 13)<br />
Graft<br />
>20<br />
plq.<br />
x109/L<br />
12 (7-<br />
71)<br />
11 (7-<br />
42)<br />
12 (7-<br />
42)<br />
12 (8-<br />
71)<br />
12 (8-<br />
71)<br />
11 (10-<br />
36)<br />
12 (8-<br />
18)<br />
*p< 0.005<br />
The main variables that influence the results, apart from<br />
mobilization scheme, were previous treatment with melphalant<br />
and the number of lines of previous chemotherapy.These two<br />
variables showed the major negative impact.<br />
Comments and Conclusions: The methods with best results<br />
regarding rates of CD34+/kg harvesting include chemotherapy<br />
followed by the cytokine G-CSF. However, the use of G-CSF<br />
alone is enough to reach the minimal CD34/kg targetted rate of<br />
2x10e6/Kg. This method simplifes the collections, reducing the<br />
morbidity and the cost of the global procedure. Patients with<br />
previous treatment including alkilants as melphalan may have<br />
compromised the hemopoietic reserve for PBSC mobilization.<br />
The increase of G-CSF dose , until 20 g/kg, did not showed in<br />
our experience a significant increase in the CD34+ cells<br />
collected, although new studies with much cases are needed to<br />
define this point. SCF after chemotherapy and G-CSF was a<br />
scheme that showed optimal results although more experience<br />
and much cases, including testing ambulatory administration, are<br />
also needed, considering its secondary effects and the scarce<br />
experience with this drug.<br />
279<br />
Intermediate-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Granulocyte<br />
Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) is a Valid<br />
Alternative to High Dose Cyclophosphamide for<br />
Mobilizing Peripheral Blood CD34+ Cells in Patients<br />
with Multiple Myeloma.<br />
Maria Teresa Petrucci, *Giuseppe Avvisati, Giacinto La<br />
Verde, Vincenza Martini, Anna Levi, *Cristina Tirindelli,<br />
Pasqualino Amaranto Giovanna Meloni, Franco Mandelli<br />
Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia University<br />
"La Sapienza”, *Ematologia University “Campus Bio-Medico”,<br />
Rome- Italy<br />
High doses (7g/m2) cyclophosphamide (CTX) followed by<br />
recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-<br />
CSF) is an effective mobilizing regimen for collecting peripheral<br />
blood stem cells (PBSC). However, this regimen can cause severe<br />
toxicity requiring hospitalization and increasing costs. In this<br />
study, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of a<br />
S211