Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
234<br />
Melphalan and Dexamethasone- Is it choice of therapy<br />
in Patients not willing for ABMT in Multiple Myeloma ?<br />
Sharma A, Raina V, Bedi N, Kumar R, Mohanti B K,<br />
Kochupillai V<br />
Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical<br />
Sciences, New Delhi, India<br />
Multiple myeloma (MM) is conventionally treated with<br />
combination chemotherapy using oral melphalan, prednisolone (<br />
MP) or infusional vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone<br />
(VAD) followed by autologous bone marrow/ stem cell<br />
transplant ( ABMT). Even though VAD doesn’t offer any<br />
survival advantage it is preferred because of less stem cell<br />
toxicity and faster responses. The faster response with VAD<br />
regimen is because of dexamethasone. For patients who are not<br />
candidates for autologous transpalnt combination of melphalan<br />
and dexamethasone (MD) may be a good oral alternative to MP<br />
or VAD if it results in comparable responses and time to<br />
responses. It is all the more important for country like us where<br />
many patients are unable to bear cost of VAD. From November<br />
2000 to September 2002, 22 newly diagnosed patients who were<br />
not willing to undergo ABMT, were enrolled onto this study.<br />
Patients characteristics: Median age- 55 years ( 27-75 years),<br />
Sex- males 12, Stage distribution- IIIA- 16, and IIIB- 6 patients.<br />
Sixteen patients had bone marrow plasma cells > 25%.<br />
Monoclonal band – IgG –13, IgA- 2, pure light chain myeloma-<br />
7 patients. Beta 2 microglobulin was done in 13 patients and it<br />
was high in 9. Treatment – melphalan 6 mg/m 2 PO day 1-4,<br />
dexamethasone 40 mg PO day 1-4 and 9-12 every 4 weeks with<br />
PCP prophylaxis using Septran. Therapy was discontinued if;<br />
patient became intolerant, disease progressed, or 12 cycles were<br />
completed in responding patients. Results- results are shown in<br />
table 1. Two patients achieved CR after 2 cycles.<br />
Response<br />
n=22<br />
CR PR SD PD Non evaluable<br />
(LFU before<br />
assessment)<br />
5 9 4 0 4<br />
After 4<br />
cycles<br />
Best 6 8 4 0 4<br />
response<br />
Toxicity- Treatment was generally well tolerated, still,<br />
dexamethasone was stopped in 3 patients because of proximal<br />
myopathy. Survival- Currently 5 patients are alive without<br />
evidence of disease, 10 are surviving with disease, 6 have died of<br />
disease progression, and in 1 patient follow up information is not<br />
available. Median survival has not reached. Two years OS and<br />
PFS is 63% and 70% respectively. Conclusion- Combination of<br />
melphalan and dexamethasone is safe, may be effective oral<br />
alternative to infusional VAD in patients not willing to undergo<br />
ABMT, and probably superior to MP in time to responses. We,<br />
plan to start a randomised trial between MP and MD in patients<br />
not willing for ABMT.<br />
235<br />
A 15 years experience in the treatment of multiple<br />
myeloma patients with conventional chemotherapy –<br />
the end of one era?<br />
J.Bila, I.Elezovic, D.Tomin, M.Gotic, N.Suvajdzic,<br />
M.Sretenovic, V.Cemerikic, D.Boskovic.<br />
Institute of Haematology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade,<br />
Serbia.<br />
Despite all the advances in systemic and supportive therapies,<br />
multiple myeloma (MM) is still currently an incurable plasma<br />
cell malignancy.The aim of study was to present results of a longterm<br />
follow up (15yrs) of MM patients treated with conventional<br />
chemotherapy followed with Interferon-Alpha (IFN-a)<br />
maintenance therapy.<br />
Patients and methods: The study included 120pts with de novo<br />
diagnosed MM between 1988 and <strong>2003</strong>. The group consisted of<br />
63 male and 57 female pts, mean age 65yrs (range 27-79).<br />
According to the clinical stage (CS) of disease, distribution of<br />
MM pts was as follows: I 8pts (6,7%), II 44pts (36,7%), III 68pts<br />
(56,7%). Renal impairment existed in 29pts (24,2%). There were<br />
48pts (40%) with IgG kappa monoclonal (M) protein, 36pts<br />
(30%) with IgG lambda, 22pts (18,3%) with IgA, 2pts (1,7%)<br />
with IgD, and 12pts (16%) with secretion of kappa/lambda light<br />
chains. None secretory MM was diagnosed in 4pts (3,3%).<br />
Elevated Beta2-microglobulin was registered in45/60 analyzed<br />
pts (75%). Imunohistochemical staining of bone marrow revealed<br />
high expression of VEGF, BFGF and Ki-67 in 20/45 analyzed pts<br />
(44,4%).<br />
Results: Chemotherapy according to the MP/VMCP regimen was<br />
applied through 2-15 cycles (Me 9) at 100pts (83,3%) as the<br />
initial MM treatment. Plateau phase was achieved in 55pts (55%)<br />
with duration 1-90m (Me 21). During plateau phase, 65/100pts<br />
(65%) relapsed and therefore were treated with second line<br />
regimen (VAD,M2, Z-Dex). The overall survival for this group of<br />
MM pts was 1-142m (Me 42) with five-year survival obtained in<br />
20% of MM pts.Two pts (2%) died due to secondary malignancy.<br />
Twenty MM pts (16,7%) in the II and IIICS with renal<br />
impairment were treated with 2-9 cycles (Me 6) of VAD<br />
protocol. Five pts (25%) died during the treatment. Responses<br />
according to the EBMT/IBMTR criteria were as follows: 3/15<br />
complete responses (20%), 9/15 partial responses (65%), 2/15<br />
minimal responses (13,3%) and 1/15 stable disease (6,7%).<br />
Average duration of remission was 18m (7-29). Relapses were<br />
observed in 10/15pts (66,7%). Median overall survival (24m) was<br />
similar to the survival of MM pts treated with MP/VMCP<br />
protocol. During plateau phase 29pts (24,2%) received IFN-a<br />
maintenance therapy which resulted with evidently longer<br />
duration of plateau phase compared to MM pts without IFN-a<br />
therapy (Me 21m vs. Me15m).<br />
Conclusion: Treatment results of different chemotherapy<br />
protocols for MM, followed by IFN-a maintenance therapy, are<br />
very similar and not satisfactory.<br />
Is it the end of one era? A great improvement is achieved<br />
applying high-dose therapy with stem-cell support, but without<br />
definitive curable effect. New treatment options which target is<br />
the MM cell, the MM cell-host interaction offers a great promise<br />
to improve patient outcome in MM.<br />
236<br />
A NEW PROTOCOL OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA:<br />
RESULTS OF A PRELIMINARY EVALUATION.<br />
Puertas A, Montero I, Martino ML, Campo T, Vaquero A,<br />
Parody R, Rodriguez ,JM<br />
Division of Haematology. University Hospital "Virgen del Rocío".<br />
Seville (Spain).<br />
INTRODUCTION: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a clonal plasma<br />
cell proliferative disorder that accounts for 10% of malignant<br />
hematologic neoplasms. Combinations of different chemotherapy<br />
regimens have not improved survival significantly in relation<br />
with the combination of melphalan-prednisone. Others alternative<br />
treatments as autologous stem cell transplantation, thalidomide<br />
and inmunotherapy have been proposed. We followed up a group<br />
of 35 patients with active MM treated with a novel total therapy<br />
protocol during a two years period.<br />
S192