13.11.2014 Views

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

234<br />

Melphalan and Dexamethasone- Is it choice of therapy<br />

in Patients not willing for ABMT in Multiple Myeloma ?<br />

Sharma A, Raina V, Bedi N, Kumar R, Mohanti B K,<br />

Kochupillai V<br />

Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical<br />

Sciences, New Delhi, India<br />

Multiple myeloma (MM) is conventionally treated with<br />

combination chemotherapy using oral melphalan, prednisolone (<br />

MP) or infusional vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone<br />

(VAD) followed by autologous bone marrow/ stem cell<br />

transplant ( ABMT). Even though VAD doesn’t offer any<br />

survival advantage it is preferred because of less stem cell<br />

toxicity and faster responses. The faster response with VAD<br />

regimen is because of dexamethasone. For patients who are not<br />

candidates for autologous transpalnt combination of melphalan<br />

and dexamethasone (MD) may be a good oral alternative to MP<br />

or VAD if it results in comparable responses and time to<br />

responses. It is all the more important for country like us where<br />

many patients are unable to bear cost of VAD. From November<br />

2000 to September 2002, 22 newly diagnosed patients who were<br />

not willing to undergo ABMT, were enrolled onto this study.<br />

Patients characteristics: Median age- 55 years ( 27-75 years),<br />

Sex- males 12, Stage distribution- IIIA- 16, and IIIB- 6 patients.<br />

Sixteen patients had bone marrow plasma cells > 25%.<br />

Monoclonal band – IgG –13, IgA- 2, pure light chain myeloma-<br />

7 patients. Beta 2 microglobulin was done in 13 patients and it<br />

was high in 9. Treatment – melphalan 6 mg/m 2 PO day 1-4,<br />

dexamethasone 40 mg PO day 1-4 and 9-12 every 4 weeks with<br />

PCP prophylaxis using Septran. Therapy was discontinued if;<br />

patient became intolerant, disease progressed, or 12 cycles were<br />

completed in responding patients. Results- results are shown in<br />

table 1. Two patients achieved CR after 2 cycles.<br />

Response<br />

n=22<br />

CR PR SD PD Non evaluable<br />

(LFU before<br />

assessment)<br />

5 9 4 0 4<br />

After 4<br />

cycles<br />

Best 6 8 4 0 4<br />

response<br />

Toxicity- Treatment was generally well tolerated, still,<br />

dexamethasone was stopped in 3 patients because of proximal<br />

myopathy. Survival- Currently 5 patients are alive without<br />

evidence of disease, 10 are surviving with disease, 6 have died of<br />

disease progression, and in 1 patient follow up information is not<br />

available. Median survival has not reached. Two years OS and<br />

PFS is 63% and 70% respectively. Conclusion- Combination of<br />

melphalan and dexamethasone is safe, may be effective oral<br />

alternative to infusional VAD in patients not willing to undergo<br />

ABMT, and probably superior to MP in time to responses. We,<br />

plan to start a randomised trial between MP and MD in patients<br />

not willing for ABMT.<br />

235<br />

A 15 years experience in the treatment of multiple<br />

myeloma patients with conventional chemotherapy –<br />

the end of one era?<br />

J.Bila, I.Elezovic, D.Tomin, M.Gotic, N.Suvajdzic,<br />

M.Sretenovic, V.Cemerikic, D.Boskovic.<br />

Institute of Haematology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade,<br />

Serbia.<br />

Despite all the advances in systemic and supportive therapies,<br />

multiple myeloma (MM) is still currently an incurable plasma<br />

cell malignancy.The aim of study was to present results of a longterm<br />

follow up (15yrs) of MM patients treated with conventional<br />

chemotherapy followed with Interferon-Alpha (IFN-a)<br />

maintenance therapy.<br />

Patients and methods: The study included 120pts with de novo<br />

diagnosed MM between 1988 and <strong>2003</strong>. The group consisted of<br />

63 male and 57 female pts, mean age 65yrs (range 27-79).<br />

According to the clinical stage (CS) of disease, distribution of<br />

MM pts was as follows: I 8pts (6,7%), II 44pts (36,7%), III 68pts<br />

(56,7%). Renal impairment existed in 29pts (24,2%). There were<br />

48pts (40%) with IgG kappa monoclonal (M) protein, 36pts<br />

(30%) with IgG lambda, 22pts (18,3%) with IgA, 2pts (1,7%)<br />

with IgD, and 12pts (16%) with secretion of kappa/lambda light<br />

chains. None secretory MM was diagnosed in 4pts (3,3%).<br />

Elevated Beta2-microglobulin was registered in45/60 analyzed<br />

pts (75%). Imunohistochemical staining of bone marrow revealed<br />

high expression of VEGF, BFGF and Ki-67 in 20/45 analyzed pts<br />

(44,4%).<br />

Results: Chemotherapy according to the MP/VMCP regimen was<br />

applied through 2-15 cycles (Me 9) at 100pts (83,3%) as the<br />

initial MM treatment. Plateau phase was achieved in 55pts (55%)<br />

with duration 1-90m (Me 21). During plateau phase, 65/100pts<br />

(65%) relapsed and therefore were treated with second line<br />

regimen (VAD,M2, Z-Dex). The overall survival for this group of<br />

MM pts was 1-142m (Me 42) with five-year survival obtained in<br />

20% of MM pts.Two pts (2%) died due to secondary malignancy.<br />

Twenty MM pts (16,7%) in the II and IIICS with renal<br />

impairment were treated with 2-9 cycles (Me 6) of VAD<br />

protocol. Five pts (25%) died during the treatment. Responses<br />

according to the EBMT/IBMTR criteria were as follows: 3/15<br />

complete responses (20%), 9/15 partial responses (65%), 2/15<br />

minimal responses (13,3%) and 1/15 stable disease (6,7%).<br />

Average duration of remission was 18m (7-29). Relapses were<br />

observed in 10/15pts (66,7%). Median overall survival (24m) was<br />

similar to the survival of MM pts treated with MP/VMCP<br />

protocol. During plateau phase 29pts (24,2%) received IFN-a<br />

maintenance therapy which resulted with evidently longer<br />

duration of plateau phase compared to MM pts without IFN-a<br />

therapy (Me 21m vs. Me15m).<br />

Conclusion: Treatment results of different chemotherapy<br />

protocols for MM, followed by IFN-a maintenance therapy, are<br />

very similar and not satisfactory.<br />

Is it the end of one era? A great improvement is achieved<br />

applying high-dose therapy with stem-cell support, but without<br />

definitive curable effect. New treatment options which target is<br />

the MM cell, the MM cell-host interaction offers a great promise<br />

to improve patient outcome in MM.<br />

236<br />

A NEW PROTOCOL OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA:<br />

RESULTS OF A PRELIMINARY EVALUATION.<br />

Puertas A, Montero I, Martino ML, Campo T, Vaquero A,<br />

Parody R, Rodriguez ,JM<br />

Division of Haematology. University Hospital "Virgen del Rocío".<br />

Seville (Spain).<br />

INTRODUCTION: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a clonal plasma<br />

cell proliferative disorder that accounts for 10% of malignant<br />

hematologic neoplasms. Combinations of different chemotherapy<br />

regimens have not improved survival significantly in relation<br />

with the combination of melphalan-prednisone. Others alternative<br />

treatments as autologous stem cell transplantation, thalidomide<br />

and inmunotherapy have been proposed. We followed up a group<br />

of 35 patients with active MM treated with a novel total therapy<br />

protocol during a two years period.<br />

S192

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!