Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
9. Chemotherapy, maintenance,<br />
treatment and supportive care<br />
9.1 Chemotherapy<br />
225<br />
The value of anthracycline sparing by the use of weekly<br />
cyclophosphamide after induction with the ABCM<br />
regimen: the results of the VIIIth MRC Myeloma trial<br />
Mark T.Drayson*, Janet A.Dunn , Ian C.M.MacLennan*,<br />
Nicola Barth, Gulnaz Begum<br />
On behalf of the Medical Research Council Working Party for<br />
Leukaemia in adults; *Department of Immunity and Infection,<br />
Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit<br />
This trial compared the efficacy of two cytotoxic chemotherapy<br />
regimens in patients presenting with multiple myeloma, at the age<br />
of 65yrs and over, or patients presenting under the age of 65yrs in<br />
whom intensive chemotherapy was contraindicated. The<br />
treatment options were ABCM to plateau vs 3 courses ABCM<br />
then C-weekly to plateau.<br />
ABCM cycle-time 6weeks – adriamycin 30mg/m2 plus BiCNU<br />
30mg/m2 iv on day one; cyclophosphamide 100mg/m2 plus<br />
melphalan 6mg/m2 orally days 22, 23, 24 & 25.<br />
C-weekly – cyclophosphamide 400mg/m2 orally on first day of<br />
each week; prednisolone 40mg/m2 orally on alternate days for<br />
first 6 weeks.<br />
Observations in the Vth MRC myelomatosis trial and subsequent<br />
pilot studies indicate that changing to weekly cyclophosphamide after<br />
starting treatment with ABCM may be as effective as continuing to<br />
give ABCM until plateau is reached (Lancet, 1992 339: 200-205).<br />
The modified treatment: 1) Causes less marrow toxicity than either<br />
conventional melphalan regimens or ABCM. 2) Uses less adriamycin<br />
than continued ABCM and so is less cardiotoxic. 3) Improves<br />
treatment options after relapse from plateau. 4) The management of<br />
treatment is easier and less expensive than when ABCM is used until<br />
plateau. Given these advantages a result showing either equal or<br />
improved efficacy of ABCM followed by C weekly would be taken<br />
as an indication for using this modified regimen.<br />
The trial opened for entry on 1 November 1993 and 600 patients<br />
were registered into the study, the last in July 2002. Patients were<br />
randomised after successfully completing three courses of ABCM at<br />
a time that is between 18 and 36 weeks post diagnosis. Of the 600<br />
patients registered, 55% of patients were randomised (163 - C-<br />
weekly and 165 – ABCM). The main reasons for non-randomisation<br />
were early deaths and disease progression or early conversion to C-<br />
weekly because of myelotoxicity in the first 3 courses of ABCM.<br />
Patient characteristics were well balanced between the two treatment<br />
arms of the trial. Of the 328 randomised patients, the median age was<br />
68 years (IQR 65–71 years), 27% were under 65 years, 34%<br />
presented with a Serum β2 microglobulin