Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Plenary Sessions<br />
1. Development of normal and malignant<br />
plasma cell<br />
P1.1<br />
PRIMARY IGH TRANSLOCATIONS AND D-TYPE<br />
CYCLIN EXPRESSION PROVIDE A NOVEL<br />
MOLECULAR CLASSIFICATION OF MULTIPLE<br />
MYELOMA<br />
Bergsagel PL 1 , Chesi M 1 , Trudel S 1 , Affer M 1 , Robbiani<br />
DF 1 , Ely S 1 , Hurt EM 2 , Staudt LM 2 , Fonseca R 3 , Barlogie<br />
B 4 , Shaughnessy J 4 , Kuehl WM 5<br />
1. Weill Medical College, 2. Metabolism Branch, NCI, 3. Mayo<br />
Clinic, 4. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 5. Genetics<br />
Department, NCI. Contact: plbergsa@med.cornell.edu<br />
During the secondary immune response activated B cells undergo<br />
IgH somatic mutation and isotype switch recombination then<br />
home to the bone marrow and differentiate into long-lived plasma<br />
cells. Multiple myeloma is the malignant counterpart of these<br />
cells. We hypothesized that errors in these B cell specific DNA<br />
modification processes may be responsible for IgH translocations<br />
in MM, and developed a Southern blot assay to identify them.<br />
Identification and cloning of translocation breakpoints in MM has<br />
identified two types of IgH translocations. Primary translocations<br />
have breakpoints that cluster within the switch and JH regions<br />
(11q13, 6p21, 4p16, and 16q23), while secondary translocations<br />
have breakpoints outside of these regions (8q24, 6p25, 20q11,<br />
other non-recurrent partners). We postulate that these primary<br />
translocations, which occur in 40% of MM patients at diagnosis,<br />
are early, disease-defining events. Other unidentified IgH<br />
translocations (not 11q13, 6p21, 4p16, or 16q23) are identified in<br />
20% of patients at diagnosis, although the frequency of primary<br />
and secondary translocations within this group is unknown.<br />
Finally, 40% of patients do not have IgH translocations at<br />
diagnosis, and the molecular pathogenesis of this subset remains<br />
enigmatic 1 .<br />
The primary translocations identify homogeneous groups of<br />
patients with similar phenotypic features and response to<br />
treatments. Seventy-five percent of patients with t(4;14)<br />
ectopically express FGFR3 and proliferate abnormally in<br />
response to FGF. Inhibition of FGFR3 signaling in these MM<br />
inhibits FGF induced growth, and in cell lines with activating<br />
mutations can induce growth arrest followed by differentiation,<br />
then apoptosis. Ectopic expression of c-maf, most pronounced in<br />
t(14;16) MM, results in expression of integrin beta 7, increased<br />
adhesion to E-cadherin and stroma and increased expression of<br />
cyclin D2, a direct transcriptional target of cyclin D2. Inhibition<br />
of c-maf inhibits growth and tumorigenicity in nude mice of c-<br />
maf-expressing MM cell lines. These results demonstrate the<br />
importance of these translocations to MM biology and validate<br />
the genes dysregulated by these translocations as attractive targets<br />
for drug development.<br />
In addition these results highlight the importance of cyclin D<br />
dysregulation, either directly (Cyclin D1 - 11q13, Cyclin D3 -<br />
6p21) or indirectly (Cyclin D2 – 16q23, 4p16), as a common<br />
pathway dysregulated by IgH translocation in MM. If we<br />
examine the expression of cyclin D in a large group of MM<br />
patients (200) it is evident that almost all patients (not only those<br />
with translocations) ectopically express a single cyclin D, a result<br />
incongruous with such a low proliferative tumor. Therefore<br />
dysregulation of the cyclin D pathway provides a unifying<br />
hypothesis for myelomagenesis. In this analysis, 60% (119/200)<br />
of patients do not have a primary translocations, with 35%<br />
(70/200) that express cyclin D1 (at a level below that seen with<br />
t(11;14)), 20% (40/200) that express cyclin D2, and 5% (9/200)<br />
without a predominant cyclin D. This large group of patients with<br />
a low level of cyclin D1 expression and lacking a t(11;14) (that<br />
we call D1 lo) have a distinct gene expression profile suggesting<br />
that they represent a homogeneous population of patients. We do<br />
not observe MM cell lines with this phenotype, and postulate that<br />
they may be particularly dependent on the bone marrow<br />
microenvironment for their growth and survival. We postulate<br />
that this group of patients represents an important new molecular<br />
subtype of MM that may include most of the patients lacking IgH<br />
translocations. In a recent cytogenetic analysis the prognostic<br />
importance of ploidy has been noted, with hypodiploid MM<br />
associated with a worse prognosis (median OS 12.6 mo) and<br />
more frequent IgH translocation (56%), while hyperdiploid MM<br />
had a better prognosis (median OS 33.8 mo), and less frequent<br />
IgH translocations (11%) 2 . This suggests that the D1 lo group,<br />
lacking primary IgH translocations, overlaps significantly with<br />
this hyperdiploid group.<br />
Based on this analysis of the data generated by Avet-Loiseau and<br />
the IFM 3 , Fonseca and the Mayo group 4 , and Shaughnessy and<br />
the Arkansas group 5 , and Smadja, Bastard and the Groupe<br />
Francais de Cytogenetique Hematologique 2 , we propose the<br />
following simple molecular classification of MM:<br />
Translocation and Cyclin D (TC) Molecular Classification of<br />
MM v1.0<br />
Class 1 ry IgH Cyclin Diploid Incidence Survival*<br />
tx<br />
TC1 6p21 D3 Non-hyper 3% 88%<br />
11q13 D1 Non-hyper 15%<br />
TC2 None D1 lo ?Hyper 35% ?51%<br />
TC3 None None ?Hyper 3% ?49%<br />
None D2 ?Hyper 20%<br />
TC4 4p16 D2 Non-hyper 18% 23%<br />
16q23 D2 Non-hyper 6%<br />
*Overall Survival at 80 months from Moreau et al, 2002 3 .<br />
This model has important implications for identifying genetically<br />
homogeneous groups of patients for treatment protocols, and<br />
defines two distinct groups (TC2 and TC3) in need of greater<br />
molecular dissection.<br />
1. Kuehl WM, Bergsagel PL. Multiple myeloma: evolving<br />
genetic events and host interactions. Nat Rev Cancer.<br />
2002;2:175-187<br />
2. Smadja NV, Bastard C, Brigaudeau C, Leroux D, Fruchart C.<br />
Hypodiploidy is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma.<br />
Blood. 2001;98:2229-2238.<br />
3. Moreau P, Facon T, Leleu X, Morineau N, Huyghe P,<br />
Harousseau JL, Bataille R, Avet-Loiseau H. Recurrent 14q32<br />
translocations determine the prognosis of multiple myeloma,<br />
especially in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy. Blood.<br />
2002;100:1579-1583<br />
4. Fonseca R, Blood E, Rue M, Harrington D, Oken MM, Kyle<br />
RA, Dewald GW, Van Ness B, Van Wier SA, Henderson KJ,<br />
Bailey RJ, Greipp PR. Clinical and Biologic Implications of<br />
Recurrent Genomic Aberrations in Myeloma. Blood. <strong>2003</strong><br />
5. Zhan F, Hardin J, Kordsmeier B, Bumm K, Zheng M, Tian E,<br />
Sanderson R, Yang Y, Wilson C, Zangari M, Anaissie E, Morris<br />
C, Muwalla F, van Rhee F, Fassas A, Crowley J, Tricot G,<br />
S15