13.11.2014 Views

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

Haematologica 2003 - Supplements

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

evidence from two t(11;14) cases where DNA from 11q13 was<br />

joined to recombined hybrid (S/S) switch region sequences.<br />

In the first case S sequence and S1 sequence, on der(11), had<br />

apparently recombined before a 3’ join to 11q13. However in the<br />

second case 11q13 sequence was joined to sequence 5’ of a<br />

S/S1 hybrid switch region on der(14). There was also<br />

evidence of another non-CSR-mediated rearrangement having<br />

occurred at the t(11;14) recombination site on der(14), with 5’S<br />

sequence inverted from germline orientation for a run of 40 bases<br />

before being aligned in the conventional orientation running for<br />

approximately 1kb, until the recombination point with S1<br />

sequence. For this case the reciprocal der(11) breakpoint was also<br />

isolated and sequenced, comparison between the two breakpoints<br />

showed that 21 bases of 11q13 sequence was common to both, i.e<br />

had been apparently duplicated in the recombination process<br />

associated with the translocation event. Both this data and the fact<br />

the breakpoint on 14q32 involved the same region 5’ of S and<br />

not another switch region suggests that the translocation did not<br />

occur by an aberrant CSR process. The four cases described<br />

above suggest that primary IgH translocations in MM can occur<br />

via different mechanisms. We speculate that legitimate CSR<br />

rearrangements can occur before a later translocation event<br />

between 4p16 or 11q13 and 14q32, which implies that primary<br />

IgH translocations can occur at different time points. Therefore<br />

the crucial neoplastic event which juxtaposes the IgH enhancers<br />

to the critical oncogene(s) associated with immortalisation of<br />

plasma cells is independent of translocation partner and may not<br />

occur via a CSR mechanism, but rather a later undefined event.<br />

026<br />

t(4;14)(p16;q32) as a Model for Unbalanced<br />

Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Translocations in<br />

Multiple Myeloma<br />

Jonathan J. Keats, Tony Reiman, Christopher A. Maxwell,<br />

Michael J. Mant, Andrew R. Belch, Linda M. Pilarski<br />

Department of Oncology and Medicine, University of Alberta and<br />

Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB Canada<br />

Translocations involving the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH)<br />

locus are common and recurrent events in multiple myeloma<br />

(MM). The most common IgH translocations identified to date<br />

are t(11;14)(q13;q32), t(4;14)(p16;q32), and t(14;16)(q32;q23).<br />

The frequency of each event in patient populations has become<br />

apparent in the last few years with t(11;14) occurring in 15-20%,<br />

t(4;14) 10-15%, and t(14;16) in approximately 5% of patients.<br />

Moreover, multiple independent research groups have now<br />

reported similar results regarding the clinical impact of IgH<br />

translocations in MM. We and others have found that t(4;14)<br />

predicts for a poor outcome while other groups have shown a<br />

similar prognosis for t(14;16) patients, however, t(11;14) seems<br />

to predict for an improved outcome. Interestingly, as shown by<br />

our group, the clinical outcome associated with t(4;14) appears to<br />

be independent of FGFR3 expression, the proposed target gene of<br />

t(4;14), as a subset of patients lack FGFR3 expression. These<br />

observations lead us to hypothesize that in some patients t(4;14)<br />

may be unbalanced resulting in the selective loss of der(14),<br />

which has recently been validated by Santra et al. Moreover, this<br />

phenomenon does not seem to be localized to t(4;14) as Fonseca<br />

and colleges have recently shown that unbalanced translocations<br />

also occur in both t(11;14) and t(14;16) MM. Therefore, we are<br />

beginning to investigate the importance of genes that flank either<br />

side of the t(4;14) breakpoints to determine their expression<br />

levels and potential contribution to MM.<br />

To access the importance of flanking genes we have updated our<br />

cohort, which now includes 272 MM and 77 MGUS patients.<br />

Using an RT-PCR screening assay we have found 38 (14.0%)<br />

t(4;14) positive MM patients and 1 (1.3%) positive MGUS<br />

patient. This strategy can identify three major breakpoint<br />

clusters, termed MB4-1, 2, and 3. The 38 MM patients segregate<br />

into 26 MB4-1, and 6 each of MB4-2 and MB4-3, while the<br />

MGUS patient is an MB4-1. FGFR3 is expressed in 27/37<br />

(73.0%) positive MM patients and in the one MGUS patient. All<br />

FGFR3 non-expressers lacked a detectable der(14) RT-PCR<br />

product. Furthermore, for 54 negative and 11 t(4;14) positive<br />

patients we have tested multiple BM samples, primarily diagnosis<br />

and relapse, and have yet to find any differences in t(4;14) status<br />

or FGFR3 expression. To define the level of gene expression we<br />

have chosen to use quantitative RT-PCR. We are particularly<br />

interested in genes that are not interrupted by any of the<br />

breakpoints or genes that may promote the oncogenic process by<br />

either overexpression or haplo-insufficiency. One gene that falls<br />

into the latter category is the Response Element-II Binding<br />

Protein (RE-IIBP). Transcription of RE-IIBP initiates<br />

downstream of all known t(4;14) breakpoints and thus, unlike<br />

MMSET type I & II, RE-IIBP could be overexpressed in its<br />

native form by the mu enhancer within all t(4;14) patients. To<br />

date we have observed an 8-15 fold increase in the expression of<br />

RE-IIBP in t(4;14) positive cell lines compared to other human<br />

myeloma cell lines. Work is ongoing to identify other genes<br />

located on chromosome 4 that are deregulated by t(4;14).<br />

027<br />

The recurrent translocation t(14;20)(q32;q12) in<br />

multiple myeloma results in aberrant expression of<br />

MafB and PPP1R16B (TIMAP); a molecular and<br />

genetical analysis of the chromosomal breakpoint<br />

Gienke R Boersma-Vreugdenhil, Jeroen Kuipers, Ton<br />

Peeters, Esther van Straalen, Anne Hagemeijer, Peter L<br />

Pearson, Hans C. Clevers, Bert J.E.G. Bast<br />

Depts Immunology & Medical Genetics, UMC UtrechtCenter for<br />

Human Genetics, KU Leuven<br />

Chromosomal translocations of the Immunoglobulin Heavy gene<br />

region at 14q32 are regularly involved in B lymphoid<br />

malignancies. They are thought to be important in initiating<br />

transformation either by deregulation of existing (proto)<br />

oncogenes or creation of new hybrid genes with transforming<br />

properties. Previously, we reported a novel translocation,<br />

t(14;20)(q32;q12), found in the myeloma cell line UM3 by means<br />

of double color FISH analysis. In this cell line, the t(14;20) is the<br />

only translocation involving the IgH locus. Using a recently<br />

developed sensitive double color Immuno FISH, we found the<br />

t(14;20) in the diagnostic bone marrow sample as well, excluding<br />

a possible in vitro artifact.<br />

We cloned the regions containing the breakpoints in the der(14)<br />

and der(20) chromosomes from the UM3 cell line, and analyzed<br />

ectopic mRNA expression of genes and expressed sequence tags<br />

(EST’s) in the breakpoint regions of both derivative<br />

chromosomes. Ectopic gene expression was observed for the<br />

transcription factor MafB in der(14), and aberrant expression<br />

levels of PPPIR16B, also known as TIMAP (putatively involved<br />

in the regulation of apoptosis), was detected in der(20). In<br />

addition, we characterized the breakpoints in a similar if not<br />

identical t(14;20) in 3 other cell lines; the breakpoint scatter is<br />

comprised within a region of 0,8 Mb, explaining the aberrant<br />

expression in all situations. We also have found such a t(14;20) in<br />

additional patient material.<br />

S99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!