Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Haematologica 2003 - Supplements
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
evidence from two t(11;14) cases where DNA from 11q13 was<br />
joined to recombined hybrid (S/S) switch region sequences.<br />
In the first case S sequence and S1 sequence, on der(11), had<br />
apparently recombined before a 3’ join to 11q13. However in the<br />
second case 11q13 sequence was joined to sequence 5’ of a<br />
S/S1 hybrid switch region on der(14). There was also<br />
evidence of another non-CSR-mediated rearrangement having<br />
occurred at the t(11;14) recombination site on der(14), with 5’S<br />
sequence inverted from germline orientation for a run of 40 bases<br />
before being aligned in the conventional orientation running for<br />
approximately 1kb, until the recombination point with S1<br />
sequence. For this case the reciprocal der(11) breakpoint was also<br />
isolated and sequenced, comparison between the two breakpoints<br />
showed that 21 bases of 11q13 sequence was common to both, i.e<br />
had been apparently duplicated in the recombination process<br />
associated with the translocation event. Both this data and the fact<br />
the breakpoint on 14q32 involved the same region 5’ of S and<br />
not another switch region suggests that the translocation did not<br />
occur by an aberrant CSR process. The four cases described<br />
above suggest that primary IgH translocations in MM can occur<br />
via different mechanisms. We speculate that legitimate CSR<br />
rearrangements can occur before a later translocation event<br />
between 4p16 or 11q13 and 14q32, which implies that primary<br />
IgH translocations can occur at different time points. Therefore<br />
the crucial neoplastic event which juxtaposes the IgH enhancers<br />
to the critical oncogene(s) associated with immortalisation of<br />
plasma cells is independent of translocation partner and may not<br />
occur via a CSR mechanism, but rather a later undefined event.<br />
026<br />
t(4;14)(p16;q32) as a Model for Unbalanced<br />
Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Translocations in<br />
Multiple Myeloma<br />
Jonathan J. Keats, Tony Reiman, Christopher A. Maxwell,<br />
Michael J. Mant, Andrew R. Belch, Linda M. Pilarski<br />
Department of Oncology and Medicine, University of Alberta and<br />
Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB Canada<br />
Translocations involving the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH)<br />
locus are common and recurrent events in multiple myeloma<br />
(MM). The most common IgH translocations identified to date<br />
are t(11;14)(q13;q32), t(4;14)(p16;q32), and t(14;16)(q32;q23).<br />
The frequency of each event in patient populations has become<br />
apparent in the last few years with t(11;14) occurring in 15-20%,<br />
t(4;14) 10-15%, and t(14;16) in approximately 5% of patients.<br />
Moreover, multiple independent research groups have now<br />
reported similar results regarding the clinical impact of IgH<br />
translocations in MM. We and others have found that t(4;14)<br />
predicts for a poor outcome while other groups have shown a<br />
similar prognosis for t(14;16) patients, however, t(11;14) seems<br />
to predict for an improved outcome. Interestingly, as shown by<br />
our group, the clinical outcome associated with t(4;14) appears to<br />
be independent of FGFR3 expression, the proposed target gene of<br />
t(4;14), as a subset of patients lack FGFR3 expression. These<br />
observations lead us to hypothesize that in some patients t(4;14)<br />
may be unbalanced resulting in the selective loss of der(14),<br />
which has recently been validated by Santra et al. Moreover, this<br />
phenomenon does not seem to be localized to t(4;14) as Fonseca<br />
and colleges have recently shown that unbalanced translocations<br />
also occur in both t(11;14) and t(14;16) MM. Therefore, we are<br />
beginning to investigate the importance of genes that flank either<br />
side of the t(4;14) breakpoints to determine their expression<br />
levels and potential contribution to MM.<br />
To access the importance of flanking genes we have updated our<br />
cohort, which now includes 272 MM and 77 MGUS patients.<br />
Using an RT-PCR screening assay we have found 38 (14.0%)<br />
t(4;14) positive MM patients and 1 (1.3%) positive MGUS<br />
patient. This strategy can identify three major breakpoint<br />
clusters, termed MB4-1, 2, and 3. The 38 MM patients segregate<br />
into 26 MB4-1, and 6 each of MB4-2 and MB4-3, while the<br />
MGUS patient is an MB4-1. FGFR3 is expressed in 27/37<br />
(73.0%) positive MM patients and in the one MGUS patient. All<br />
FGFR3 non-expressers lacked a detectable der(14) RT-PCR<br />
product. Furthermore, for 54 negative and 11 t(4;14) positive<br />
patients we have tested multiple BM samples, primarily diagnosis<br />
and relapse, and have yet to find any differences in t(4;14) status<br />
or FGFR3 expression. To define the level of gene expression we<br />
have chosen to use quantitative RT-PCR. We are particularly<br />
interested in genes that are not interrupted by any of the<br />
breakpoints or genes that may promote the oncogenic process by<br />
either overexpression or haplo-insufficiency. One gene that falls<br />
into the latter category is the Response Element-II Binding<br />
Protein (RE-IIBP). Transcription of RE-IIBP initiates<br />
downstream of all known t(4;14) breakpoints and thus, unlike<br />
MMSET type I & II, RE-IIBP could be overexpressed in its<br />
native form by the mu enhancer within all t(4;14) patients. To<br />
date we have observed an 8-15 fold increase in the expression of<br />
RE-IIBP in t(4;14) positive cell lines compared to other human<br />
myeloma cell lines. Work is ongoing to identify other genes<br />
located on chromosome 4 that are deregulated by t(4;14).<br />
027<br />
The recurrent translocation t(14;20)(q32;q12) in<br />
multiple myeloma results in aberrant expression of<br />
MafB and PPP1R16B (TIMAP); a molecular and<br />
genetical analysis of the chromosomal breakpoint<br />
Gienke R Boersma-Vreugdenhil, Jeroen Kuipers, Ton<br />
Peeters, Esther van Straalen, Anne Hagemeijer, Peter L<br />
Pearson, Hans C. Clevers, Bert J.E.G. Bast<br />
Depts Immunology & Medical Genetics, UMC UtrechtCenter for<br />
Human Genetics, KU Leuven<br />
Chromosomal translocations of the Immunoglobulin Heavy gene<br />
region at 14q32 are regularly involved in B lymphoid<br />
malignancies. They are thought to be important in initiating<br />
transformation either by deregulation of existing (proto)<br />
oncogenes or creation of new hybrid genes with transforming<br />
properties. Previously, we reported a novel translocation,<br />
t(14;20)(q32;q12), found in the myeloma cell line UM3 by means<br />
of double color FISH analysis. In this cell line, the t(14;20) is the<br />
only translocation involving the IgH locus. Using a recently<br />
developed sensitive double color Immuno FISH, we found the<br />
t(14;20) in the diagnostic bone marrow sample as well, excluding<br />
a possible in vitro artifact.<br />
We cloned the regions containing the breakpoints in the der(14)<br />
and der(20) chromosomes from the UM3 cell line, and analyzed<br />
ectopic mRNA expression of genes and expressed sequence tags<br />
(EST’s) in the breakpoint regions of both derivative<br />
chromosomes. Ectopic gene expression was observed for the<br />
transcription factor MafB in der(14), and aberrant expression<br />
levels of PPPIR16B, also known as TIMAP (putatively involved<br />
in the regulation of apoptosis), was detected in der(20). In<br />
addition, we characterized the breakpoints in a similar if not<br />
identical t(14;20) in 3 other cell lines; the breakpoint scatter is<br />
comprised within a region of 0,8 Mb, explaining the aberrant<br />
expression in all situations. We also have found such a t(14;20) in<br />
additional patient material.<br />
S99