(NASIS) Requirements Definition Document - Bureau of Indian ...

(NASIS) Requirements Definition Document - Bureau of Indian ... (NASIS) Requirements Definition Document - Bureau of Indian ...

12.11.2014 Views

NASIS Requirements Definition Document (RDD) Version 1.0 17 February 2006 • FACE and Baby FACE manual process and web interface (until it is replaced by NASIS) • Transportation calculation module website (until it is replaced by NASIS) • ENAN-II Network (used by students, school staff, ELOs, and Central Office staff to communicate with NASIS) • ENAN Network via Internet access (for students and parents to communicate with NASIS) • Any access a vendor may require for system support and/or maintenance 1.7 Methods of Implementation NASIS is to be a web based student information system that will be phased into use throughout the BIA education system. For schools that are currently using an electronic student system for school management of data there will be a transition from the current system to the NASIS system which will include importing data from the legacy system. For schools keeping paper and pencil records there will be manual input needed for basis carry-over information. The phase-in will require training at each level on those functions to be used by the various users at each organizational level. Adequate training is crucial to deployment of the system. For each school using an existing program there will be a plan for the transition that must be designed to least impact the instructional support for the school. While the system acquired will be an “Off the Shelf” product there will be a need for a test environment to ensure that all required factors are functional. The contractor must make needed modifications to fulfill established BIA needs and use of these modifications must be validated in a test environment. Prior to deployment there will be an in-depth review by subject matter experts to define and customize the product for BIA use. 1.8 Points of Contact System Owner Business Owner IA employee with signature authority Project Manager COTR OCIO Manager, Education Programs OCIO PMSO Representative Points of Contact Ed Parisian, Acting Director, OIEP Ed Parisian, Acting Director, OIEP Ed Parisian, Acting Director, OIEP Allen McCready (OIEP Contractor) Glenn Allison (OIEP) Al Foster (OCIO) Dan Bonner (OCIO Contractor) 6

NASIS Requirements Definition Document (RDD) Version 1.0 17 February 2006 OCIO CP/IC Representative SME, Consolidated AYP Report and Student Assessments SME, Boarding Schools, Transportation SME, Special Needs Programs SME, Student Demographic Information SME, Student Discipline SME, Face and Baby Face Program SME, WebISEP ELOs, ELO Level Reports Contractors Phil Simons (OIEP Contractor) Pat Abeyta, Peter Camp (OIEP) Kathy Murray (OIEP) Pat Abeyta (OIEP) Kathy Renville (OIEP) Larry Byers (OIEP) Debbie Lente-Jojola (OIEP) Glenn Allison, Joe Herrin (OIEP) David Talayumptewa (OIEP) Scott Garrett (Wyandotte) 1.9 Document References Reference Title Consolidated State Performance Report: Parts I and II Report of Children with Special Disabilities Receiving Special Education Under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, As Amended Personnel (In Full-Time Equivalency of Assignment) Employed to Provide Special Education and Related Services for Children with Disabilities Part B, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Implementation of FAPE Requirements Report of Children with Disabilities Exiting Special Education Report of Children with Disabilities Subject to Disciplinary Removal Report of the Participation and Performance of Students with Disabilities on State Assessments Review Sheets for AYP for various states Office of Indian Education Programs, Bureau-Wide Annual Report Card Bureau-Wide Annual Report, Part I: School-Wide Participation (complete) School-Wide Annual Report Card AYP Calculation Summary Bureau of Indian Affairs Office of Indian Education Programs State Performance Plan Submitted December 1, 2005 Report of Students Who Receive Early Intervention Services funded by P.L. 108- 446 Part B (IDEIA 04) NASIS to WebISEP Interface Files Federal Register Part II, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 25 CFR Part 30, et al. Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001; Final Rule (http://www.gpoaccess.gov/topics/education.html) Location Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Appendix H Appendix I Appendix J Appendix K Appendix L Appendix M Appendix N Appendix O URL as indicated 7

<strong>NASIS</strong> <strong>Requirements</strong> <strong>Definition</strong> <strong>Document</strong> (RDD)<br />

Version 1.0<br />

17 February 2006<br />

• FACE and Baby FACE manual process and web interface (until it is replaced by <strong>NASIS</strong>)<br />

• Transportation calculation module website (until it is replaced by <strong>NASIS</strong>)<br />

• ENAN-II Network (used by students, school staff, ELOs, and Central Office staff to communicate with<br />

<strong>NASIS</strong>)<br />

• ENAN Network via Internet access (for students and parents to communicate with <strong>NASIS</strong>)<br />

• Any access a vendor may require for system support and/or maintenance<br />

1.7 Methods <strong>of</strong> Implementation<br />

<strong>NASIS</strong> is to be a web based student information system that will be phased into use throughout the BIA<br />

education system. For schools that are currently using an electronic student system for school<br />

management <strong>of</strong> data there will be a transition from the current system to the <strong>NASIS</strong> system which will<br />

include importing data from the legacy system. For schools keeping paper and pencil records there will be<br />

manual input needed for basis carry-over information.<br />

The phase-in will require training at each level on those functions to be used by the various users at each<br />

organizational level. Adequate training is crucial to deployment <strong>of</strong> the system. For each school using an<br />

existing program there will be a plan for the transition that must be designed to least impact the<br />

instructional support for the school.<br />

While the system acquired will be an “Off the Shelf” product there will be a need for a test environment<br />

to ensure that all required factors are functional. The contractor must make needed modifications to fulfill<br />

established BIA needs and use <strong>of</strong> these modifications must be validated in a test environment. Prior to<br />

deployment there will be an in-depth review by subject matter experts to define and customize the product<br />

for BIA use.<br />

1.8 Points <strong>of</strong> Contact<br />

System Owner<br />

Business Owner<br />

IA employee with signature authority<br />

Project Manager<br />

COTR<br />

OCIO Manager, Education Programs<br />

OCIO PMSO Representative<br />

Points <strong>of</strong> Contact<br />

Ed Parisian, Acting Director, OIEP<br />

Ed Parisian, Acting Director, OIEP<br />

Ed Parisian, Acting Director, OIEP<br />

Allen McCready (OIEP Contractor)<br />

Glenn Allison (OIEP)<br />

Al Foster (OCIO)<br />

Dan Bonner (OCIO Contractor)<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!