12.11.2014 Views

[Dec 2007, Volume 4 Quarterly Issue] Pdf File size - The IIPM Think ...

[Dec 2007, Volume 4 Quarterly Issue] Pdf File size - The IIPM Think ...

[Dec 2007, Volume 4 Quarterly Issue] Pdf File size - The IIPM Think ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MORE MARKETS, LESS GOVERNMENT<br />

all the states in backward categories are<br />

having PCCE which is less than Rs.1000.<br />

<strong>The</strong> lowest among them is Bihar with<br />

only Rs.696.27 and highest PCCE is<br />

earned in Uttar Pradesh (Rs.964.02). In<br />

comparison to backward states, the lowest<br />

PCCE stands at Rs.1018.55 and highest<br />

at Rs.1148.27 (Maharashtra).<br />

Total Cases Of Foreign Direct<br />

Investment<br />

FDI influences growth by increasing total<br />

factor productivity and, more generally,<br />

the efficiency of resource use in the<br />

recipient economy. Technology transfers<br />

through FDI generate positive externalities<br />

in the host country. FDI contributes<br />

to export growth, productivity<br />

growth and finance for balance of payments;<br />

it supports increase in national<br />

income. FDI increases employment and<br />

contributes to economic growth. FDI<br />

has increased manifold over the past two<br />

decades. FDI brings private overseas<br />

funds into the country for investments.<br />

Under the new Industrial Policy Resolution<br />

the industrial policy reforms have<br />

substantially reduced the industrial licensing<br />

requirements, removed restrictions<br />

on expansion and facilitated easy<br />

access to foreign technology and foreign<br />

direct investment. Foreign Direct Investment<br />

in India is allowed on automatic<br />

route in almost all sectors. Table-<br />

3 will help us in explaining the much<br />

widening of regional imbalance<br />

throughout India. As it is evident from<br />

the table, the cumulative numbers of<br />

FDI cases are lowest in the state of Bihar(27),<br />

followed by Orissa (91) and<br />

highest in the state of Maharashtra with<br />

3743 and seconded only by Karnataka,<br />

with 2147 cases. That means the total<br />

Table-3 Total Cases Of FDI In Select States Of India<br />

Total Cases of FDI<br />

States Aug 1991-<strong>Dec</strong> 2004<br />

Forward Group Number Investment in Rs Cr<br />

Andhra Pradesh 1026 11634.44<br />

Karnataka 2147 19096.39<br />

Maharashtra 3743 37107.79<br />

Tamil Nadu 2066 22651.29<br />

Total FG 90489.91<br />

Backward Group<br />

Bihar 27 739.71<br />

Madhya Pradesh 170 9271<br />

Orissa 91 8229.31<br />

Rajasthan 241 2911.21<br />

Uttar Pradesh 536 4836.56<br />

Total BG 25987.79<br />

Source: http://eaindustry.nic.in/handbk0305/chap143.pdf<br />

gap between the highest and the lowest regions of the country. This has enabled<br />

is almost 3716 cases and this depicts the the developed regions to achieve accelerated<br />

economic growth during the<br />

clear case of wide regional inequalities.<br />

Again, the total investment in aforementioned<br />

backward states is only 28.7% of which were unable to attract any signifi-<br />

1990s. Backward regions of the country,<br />

the forward states. Ever since reforms cant private, experienced decelerated<br />

started, a great majority of FDI is directed<br />

only into select states which al-<br />

<strong>The</strong> issue of regional balance has been<br />

economic growth during this period.<br />

ready had good standard of living. <strong>The</strong> an integral component of almost every<br />

flow of private investment, both domestic<br />

and foreign, has been extremely bining<br />

and a strategy of State-led industri-<br />

Five Year Plan. <strong>The</strong> adoption of planased<br />

in favour of the more developed alization, with Plans and policies designed<br />

to facilitate more investments in<br />

the relatively backward areas were intended<br />

to lead to a more balanced<br />

growth in the country. It was expected<br />

that, over time, inter-state disparities<br />

would be minimized. An analysis of<br />

these trends, especially the more recent<br />

trends (after 1991), leads to the inevitable<br />

inference that, regional disparities<br />

still persist and in some indicators it has<br />

widened more especially after reform<br />

THE INDIA ECONOMY REVIEW<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!