[Dec 2007, Volume 4 Quarterly Issue] Pdf File size - The IIPM Think ...
[Dec 2007, Volume 4 Quarterly Issue] Pdf File size - The IIPM Think ...
[Dec 2007, Volume 4 Quarterly Issue] Pdf File size - The IIPM Think ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MORE MARKETS, LESS GOVERNMENT<br />
all the states in backward categories are<br />
having PCCE which is less than Rs.1000.<br />
<strong>The</strong> lowest among them is Bihar with<br />
only Rs.696.27 and highest PCCE is<br />
earned in Uttar Pradesh (Rs.964.02). In<br />
comparison to backward states, the lowest<br />
PCCE stands at Rs.1018.55 and highest<br />
at Rs.1148.27 (Maharashtra).<br />
Total Cases Of Foreign Direct<br />
Investment<br />
FDI influences growth by increasing total<br />
factor productivity and, more generally,<br />
the efficiency of resource use in the<br />
recipient economy. Technology transfers<br />
through FDI generate positive externalities<br />
in the host country. FDI contributes<br />
to export growth, productivity<br />
growth and finance for balance of payments;<br />
it supports increase in national<br />
income. FDI increases employment and<br />
contributes to economic growth. FDI<br />
has increased manifold over the past two<br />
decades. FDI brings private overseas<br />
funds into the country for investments.<br />
Under the new Industrial Policy Resolution<br />
the industrial policy reforms have<br />
substantially reduced the industrial licensing<br />
requirements, removed restrictions<br />
on expansion and facilitated easy<br />
access to foreign technology and foreign<br />
direct investment. Foreign Direct Investment<br />
in India is allowed on automatic<br />
route in almost all sectors. Table-<br />
3 will help us in explaining the much<br />
widening of regional imbalance<br />
throughout India. As it is evident from<br />
the table, the cumulative numbers of<br />
FDI cases are lowest in the state of Bihar(27),<br />
followed by Orissa (91) and<br />
highest in the state of Maharashtra with<br />
3743 and seconded only by Karnataka,<br />
with 2147 cases. That means the total<br />
Table-3 Total Cases Of FDI In Select States Of India<br />
Total Cases of FDI<br />
States Aug 1991-<strong>Dec</strong> 2004<br />
Forward Group Number Investment in Rs Cr<br />
Andhra Pradesh 1026 11634.44<br />
Karnataka 2147 19096.39<br />
Maharashtra 3743 37107.79<br />
Tamil Nadu 2066 22651.29<br />
Total FG 90489.91<br />
Backward Group<br />
Bihar 27 739.71<br />
Madhya Pradesh 170 9271<br />
Orissa 91 8229.31<br />
Rajasthan 241 2911.21<br />
Uttar Pradesh 536 4836.56<br />
Total BG 25987.79<br />
Source: http://eaindustry.nic.in/handbk0305/chap143.pdf<br />
gap between the highest and the lowest regions of the country. This has enabled<br />
is almost 3716 cases and this depicts the the developed regions to achieve accelerated<br />
economic growth during the<br />
clear case of wide regional inequalities.<br />
Again, the total investment in aforementioned<br />
backward states is only 28.7% of which were unable to attract any signifi-<br />
1990s. Backward regions of the country,<br />
the forward states. Ever since reforms cant private, experienced decelerated<br />
started, a great majority of FDI is directed<br />
only into select states which al-<br />
<strong>The</strong> issue of regional balance has been<br />
economic growth during this period.<br />
ready had good standard of living. <strong>The</strong> an integral component of almost every<br />
flow of private investment, both domestic<br />
and foreign, has been extremely bining<br />
and a strategy of State-led industri-<br />
Five Year Plan. <strong>The</strong> adoption of planased<br />
in favour of the more developed alization, with Plans and policies designed<br />
to facilitate more investments in<br />
the relatively backward areas were intended<br />
to lead to a more balanced<br />
growth in the country. It was expected<br />
that, over time, inter-state disparities<br />
would be minimized. An analysis of<br />
these trends, especially the more recent<br />
trends (after 1991), leads to the inevitable<br />
inference that, regional disparities<br />
still persist and in some indicators it has<br />
widened more especially after reform<br />
THE INDIA ECONOMY REVIEW<br />
65