12.11.2014 Views

[Dec 2007, Volume 4 Quarterly Issue] Pdf File size - The IIPM Think ...

[Dec 2007, Volume 4 Quarterly Issue] Pdf File size - The IIPM Think ...

[Dec 2007, Volume 4 Quarterly Issue] Pdf File size - The IIPM Think ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MORE MARKETS, LESS GOVERNMENT<br />

ly to skew further the economics of agriculture<br />

that is already leading to large<br />

scale suicides of farmers. Moreover, it is<br />

likely to have a casacading effect on prices<br />

of essentials like foodgrains.<br />

In Indore, an Asian Development<br />

Bank (ADB) loan for Urban Water Supply<br />

has put a condition that all public<br />

standposts must be phased out and the<br />

city Municipal Corporation has taken an<br />

in-principle decision that this should be<br />

done unless the person (who happens to<br />

have a standpost in front of the house)<br />

agrees to pay the bills. <strong>The</strong> logic is that<br />

public stand posts are a source of leakage<br />

and do not yield revenue. Removing<br />

standposts certainly fits into the process<br />

of making the system more market oriented<br />

– no supply without payment – but<br />

impacts the poor very hard.<br />

Less Market, More Accountable<br />

Government<br />

It is difficult to escape the conclusion<br />

that the marketisation of the system can<br />

only be at the cost of social responsibility.<br />

‘More Market’ in the water sector is<br />

likely to hit hard the most vulnerable sections<br />

of the society, and those living on<br />

the margins are likely to be pushed out<br />

even from there. It is also likely to have a<br />

deleterious impact on livelihoods of<br />

farmers and a cascading effect on millions<br />

of other poor as food prices too<br />

could be affected. Further, the market<br />

cannot handle the many critically important<br />

externalities – social, ecological,<br />

cultural and religious- associated with<br />

water. Commodification and marketisation<br />

of water will also create the dangers<br />

of monopolistic control on this vital resource.<br />

Thus, the advocacy of ‘More<br />

Market’ in the water sector is a sure recipe<br />

for disaster. However, this does in any<br />

way mean, automatically, that business as<br />

usual is fine or that more ‘governmentas-usual’<br />

is the answer. For there is no<br />

denying that the myriad problems of the<br />

water sector – lack of access, inequity,<br />

deteriorating quality, destruction of environment,<br />

displacement due to dams<br />

etc. – are in many ways due to the gross<br />

inefficiency, corruption and mismanagement<br />

by the public agencies handling<br />

water resources. However, water, with its<br />

vital necessity for our very daily survival<br />

as well as its central role in livelihood,<br />

economy, society and culture has to be<br />

under public control. But this public control<br />

has to be really ‘public’ –that is, by<br />

the community at large and not just by<br />

the Government or bureaucratic agencies.<br />

What we need is an accountable,<br />

responsible, transparent and participatory<br />

system of managing water –<br />

Less Markets, More Accountable<br />

Public Systems.<br />

Endnotes<br />

1<br />

D’souza 2006 Page 128-129<br />

2<br />

World Bank 1999a Page ix<br />

3<br />

ibid<br />

4<br />

World Bank 1999b to 1999f<br />

5<br />

World Bank 1999a<br />

6<br />

Since water is primarily a state subject,<br />

the reforms have to take place at the<br />

state level.<br />

7<br />

World Bank 2004<br />

8<br />

World Bank 1999b Page 133-134<br />

9<br />

Maharashtra Water Resources Regulatory<br />

Authority Act (MWRRA)<br />

2005, Clause 11 (i)<br />

10<br />

World Bank 1999c Page 29<br />

11<br />

World Bank 1999d Page 108<br />

l2<br />

For more information, see for example<br />

Water: Private, Limited <strong>Issue</strong>s in Privatisation,<br />

Corporatisation and Commercialisation<br />

of Water Sector in India,<br />

Manthan Adhyayan Kendra 2006,<br />

available at www.manthan-india.org<br />

References<br />

• D’souza Rohan (2006): ‘Drowned and<br />

Dammed – Colonial Capitalism and<br />

flood control in Eastern India’, Oxford<br />

University Press, New Delhi.<br />

• Dwivedi Gaurav, Rehmat and Shripad<br />

Dharmadhikary (<strong>2007</strong>): ‘Water: Private,<br />

Limited’, Manthan Adhyayan<br />

Kendra, Badwani, Madhya Pradesh.<br />

• World Bank (1999a): ‘Initiating and<br />

Sustaining Water Sector Reforms: A<br />

Synthesis’, World Bank, Washington<br />

D.C. and Allied Publishers Limited,<br />

Mumbai.<br />

• World Bank (1999b): ‘Inter-Sectoral<br />

Water Allocation, Planning and Management’,<br />

World Bank, Washington<br />

D.C. and Allied Publishers Limited,<br />

Mumbai.<br />

• World Bank (1999c): ‘Groundwater<br />

Regulation and Management’, World<br />

Bank, Washington D.C. and Allied<br />

Publishers Limited, Mumbai.<br />

• World Bank (1999d): ‘<strong>The</strong> Irrigation<br />

Sector’, World Bank, Washington D.<br />

C. and Allied Publishers Limited,<br />

Mumbai.<br />

• World Bank (1999e): ‘Rural Water<br />

Supply and Sanitation’, World Bank,<br />

Washington D.C. and Allied Publishers<br />

Limited, Mumbai.<br />

• World Bank (1999f): ‘Urban Water<br />

Supply and Sanitation’, World Bank,<br />

Washington D.C. and Allied Publishers<br />

Limited, Mumbai.<br />

• World Bank (2004): ‘Water Resources<br />

Sector Strategy’, World Bank, Washington<br />

D.C.<br />

THE INDIA ECONOMY REVIEW<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!