[Dec 2007, Volume 4 Quarterly Issue] Pdf File size - The IIPM Think ...
[Dec 2007, Volume 4 Quarterly Issue] Pdf File size - The IIPM Think ...
[Dec 2007, Volume 4 Quarterly Issue] Pdf File size - The IIPM Think ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Amal Sanyal,<br />
Associate Professor,<br />
Lincoln University,<br />
Canterbury, New Zealand<br />
Governance, Market, Deprivation<br />
And <strong>The</strong> Political System<br />
"<strong>The</strong> care of human life and<br />
happiness, and not their destruction,<br />
is the first and only<br />
object of good government."<br />
-Thomas Jefferson<br />
A<br />
lot has changed in our economic<br />
institutions in the last<br />
two decades. <strong>The</strong>se changes<br />
have not made much impression on water,<br />
housing, healthcare and power for<br />
low income people, or on poverty. I<br />
strongly believe that these issues are<br />
similarly handled in pre- and post-reform<br />
and that this is a matter of the political<br />
system, which has not changed across the<br />
periods. To these issues it is extraneous<br />
if we have a globally integrated fullfledged<br />
market economy or an importsubstituting<br />
economy run by administered<br />
production and pricing. To address<br />
them properly we need governments to<br />
act pro-actively against deprivation. A<br />
necessary condition is to have governments<br />
formed with competent and<br />
public-minded persons. <strong>The</strong> present political<br />
system is not capable of producing<br />
such governments. We need a thorough<br />
political reform, not economic, to get<br />
such governments.<br />
I am not competent to discuss the political<br />
system or its reform possibilities.<br />
Given that this issue of the journal focuses<br />
on market reform, I explore if certain<br />
market reforms can play a catalytic<br />
role in reducing deprivation by either<br />
inducing change in the political system<br />
or in spite it. We can get such effects to<br />
a degree by ridding the government of a<br />
variety of governance tasks, i.e. by letting<br />
markets produce these services. My suggestions<br />
do not arise from an economist’s<br />
habit of preaching ‘market’ for the sake<br />
of the economy. Rather, it is a sort of<br />
preaching ‘market’ for the sake of the<br />
political system. I will focus entirely on<br />
market reforms in the provision of governance.<br />
Though I will mainly examine<br />
possible effects on the political system<br />
and deprivation, I will also elaborate on<br />
more general economic effects.<br />
<strong>The</strong> abstract notion of governance in<br />
practical terms involves production of<br />
services for individuals or communities.<br />
Depending on jurisdiction, central, state<br />
and local governments provide them.<br />
Principles are laid down by the legislature<br />
and production and delivery are<br />
36 THE <strong>IIPM</strong> THINK TANK