12.11.2014 Views

[Dec 2007, Volume 4 Quarterly Issue] Pdf File size - The IIPM Think ...

[Dec 2007, Volume 4 Quarterly Issue] Pdf File size - The IIPM Think ...

[Dec 2007, Volume 4 Quarterly Issue] Pdf File size - The IIPM Think ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MORE MARKETS, LESS GOVERNMENT<br />

Table 1. Performance Of State-Level PSEs<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

PSEs<br />

Proportion<br />

of loss making<br />

PSEs<br />

Losses of<br />

loss making<br />

PSEs<br />

Proportion of capital<br />

in 'non-working'<br />

PSEs<br />

Proportion of<br />

PSEs with negative<br />

net worth<br />

Rate of Return on<br />

Capital<br />

% % SGDP % % medium average<br />

Andhra Pradesh 54 15 -0.06 2.3 14.8 5.6 10.0<br />

Assam 43 77 -3.47 1.6 20.9 -3.3 -16.4<br />

Bihar 54 70 -1.38 13.0 11.1 -2.5 -7.7<br />

Chhattisgarh 11 36 -0.02 0.0 9.1 5.1 4.6<br />

Delhi 11 45 -4.21 0.0 9.1 3.6 -27.8<br />

Goa 16 63 -0.57 0.0 0.0 -0.1 -11.0<br />

Gujarat 51 39 -0.38 50.5 17.6 2.2 -8.9<br />

Haryana 29 59 -0.05 1.4 13.8 5.5 5.0<br />

Himachal<br />

21 62 -0.50 27.8 23.8 3.3 5.7<br />

Pradesh<br />

Jharkhand 6 17 -0.15 0.0 0.0 33.6 43.1<br />

Karnataka 82 41 -0.28 1.5 7.3 3.6 31.2<br />

Kerala 114 61 -0.39 1.1 14.0 1.7 -15.3<br />

Madhya Pradesh 42 33 -0.13 3.8 14.3 1.3 2.2<br />

Maharashtra 82 68 -0.38 3.2 20.7 -0.3 -4.6<br />

Orissa 69 70 -0.28 1.1 21.7 -1.3 -35.0<br />

Punjab 57 44 -0.23 0.3 15.8 -1.2 -12.0<br />

Rajasthan 24 38 -0.06 0.1 20.8 7.4 20.6<br />

Tamil Nadu 68 53 -0.14 0.6 29.4 2.4 -1.6<br />

Uttar Pradesh 94 62 -0.94 51.1 17.0 -1.0 -29.9<br />

Uttaranchal 25 60 -0.32 47.7 12.0 -2.3 -16.4<br />

West Bengal 86 72 -0.50 0.8 44.2 1.4 -45.2<br />

Source: OECD Analysis Of Data From <strong>The</strong> Comptroller and Auditor General<br />

obligations and responsibilities that<br />

PSEs are required to undertake in terms<br />

of public services should be clearly mandated<br />

by laws or regulations. <strong>The</strong>se obligations<br />

and responsibilities should<br />

also be disclosed to the general public<br />

and the related costs should be covered<br />

by government in a transparent manner.<br />

PSEs should be exposed to competitive<br />

conditions in access to finance. Finally,<br />

preferential procurement policies<br />

should be ended at the state level, following<br />

plans by central government to<br />

do so in 2008.<br />

11. Once these steps have been taken,<br />

the privatisation programme needs to<br />

be revitalised, especially in the competitive<br />

sectors of the economy. To date,<br />

privatisation has been slow and involved<br />

only partial sales which, according to<br />

international evidence, are less effective<br />

in raising productivity and profitability<br />

than full sales to the private sector,<br />

as control stays with the<br />

government. 1 Going forward, mixed<br />

sales that transfer control to the private<br />

sector and combine strategic investors<br />

with public share offerings, have the<br />

potential advantages of developing<br />

strong corporate governance structures<br />

and introducing new management and<br />

technology into the company. For PSEs<br />

operating in network sectors in which<br />

there are monopoly elements, the regulatory<br />

environment needs to be made<br />

consistent with private ownership and<br />

competition with independent regulators<br />

in place as part of the privatisation<br />

process. <strong>The</strong> worst performing and<br />

THE INDIA ECONOMY REVIEW<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!