12.11.2014 Views

Download Guidebook as .pdf (2.2 Mb) - Carolina Geological Society

Download Guidebook as .pdf (2.2 Mb) - Carolina Geological Society

Download Guidebook as .pdf (2.2 Mb) - Carolina Geological Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

______________________________________________________________________________________<br />

2008 annual meeting – Spruce Pine Mining District: Little Switzerland, North <strong>Carolina</strong><br />

______________________________________________________________________________________<br />

FIGURE CAPTIONS<br />

Figure 1. Geochronology of the Spruce Pine area. The histogram is b<strong>as</strong>ed on work by Goldberg and<br />

Dallmeyer (1997) on amphibolite, mica schist and gneiss; the country rocks for the Spruce Pine plutonic<br />

suite. Garnet ages are by Nd-Sm, hornblende ages are by Rb-Sr and Ar-Ar, muscovite dates are by Ar-Ar.<br />

Ages of the Spruce Pine granitic rocks are shown by arrows over the top of the histogram and include U-Pb<br />

ages on uraninite (Aldrich et al., 1958) and zircon (Johnson et al., 2001), Rb-Sr whole rock isochrons on<br />

pegmatites (Kish, 1983, 1989), and K-Ar dates on muscovite <strong>as</strong> compiled by Lesure (1968). Below the<br />

histogram is the model for deformation (F1, F2, F3) and metamorphism (M1, M2, M3) in the Spruce Pine<br />

area <strong>as</strong> proposed by Butler (1973).<br />

Figure 2. General geology (modified from Brobst, 1962) of the Minpro pluton and the location of the<br />

LUF1 pegmatite (Luf).<br />

Figure 3. Geologic map of a portion of the LUF1 pegmatite.<br />

Figure 4. Composition of muscovite from the LUF1 pegmatite compared to muscovite from other Spruce<br />

Pine pegmatites.<br />

Figure 5. Compositions of muscovite from the LUF1 pegmatite and other Spruce Pine granitic rocks<br />

compared to the field for igneous white mica from granitic rocks (Miller et al., 1981).<br />

Figure 6. Composition of garnet from the LUF1 pegmatite compared to garnet from other Spruce Pine<br />

granitic rocks. The other Spruce Pine granitic rocks include samples from Deer Park pegmatite (DP),<br />

Crabtree Creek Falls pegmatite (CTCF), McKinney Mine pegmatite (MP), Sink Hole pegmatite (SH), and<br />

Day Book pegmatite (DB).<br />

Figure 7. Melting relations of the Spruce Pine granite taken from Vaughn (1963) and Fenn (unpublished<br />

data). Cooling paths for LUF feldspars (LUF Fs) are b<strong>as</strong>ed on estimates of pre-exsolution feldspars<br />

following the methods of Whitney and Stormer (1977). See text for details.<br />

______________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Page 18<br />

______________________________________________________________________________________

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!