12.11.2014 Views

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

more importantly, a <strong>the</strong>ology th<strong>at</strong> accords with Scripture (high praise indeed from<br />

Lu<strong>the</strong>r). 223<br />

As for <strong>the</strong> text itself, Neander <strong>of</strong>fers <strong>the</strong> reader <strong>the</strong> fruits <strong>of</strong> his reading <strong>of</strong> Tauler,<br />

juxtaposed with passages from Lu<strong>the</strong>r to interpret Tauler’s meaning. Neander used <strong>the</strong><br />

1522 Basel edition <strong>of</strong> Tauler (<strong>the</strong> same one th<strong>at</strong> Weigel used), and has commented on <strong>the</strong><br />

entire work, including <strong>the</strong> Eckhart sermons published in th<strong>at</strong> edition. This means th<strong>at</strong><br />

Neander’s work can tell us something about <strong>the</strong> reception <strong>of</strong> Eckhart in more orthodox<br />

Lu<strong>the</strong>ran <strong>the</strong>ology as well, despite Eckhart’s name not appearing in <strong>the</strong> title <strong>of</strong> Neander’s<br />

work, or Neander being entirely aware th<strong>at</strong> he was not always reading Tauler. Wh<strong>at</strong> is<br />

most striking about Neander’s glosses on Tauler/Eckhart is wh<strong>at</strong> he does not say—<strong>the</strong><br />

passages Neander cites from Eckhart do not express <strong>the</strong> more daring <strong>the</strong>ological ideas<br />

th<strong>at</strong> raised eyebrows amongst his medieval readers (about <strong>the</strong> uncre<strong>at</strong>ed spark <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> soul<br />

in particular). Take, for instance, <strong>the</strong> lines he takes from <strong>the</strong> Basel Tauler edition, which<br />

read: “Alles das Gott gefelt, das gefellet im in seinem eingebornen Son, Und alles das<br />

Gott lieb h<strong>at</strong>, das h<strong>at</strong> er lieb in seinem eingebornen Sone. Nun sol der Mensch also leben,<br />

das er eins sey mit dem eingebornen Son, und das er der eingeborne Son sey.” 224 Neander<br />

explains this passage by appending two short quot<strong>at</strong>ions from Lu<strong>the</strong>r to emphasize <strong>the</strong><br />

Lu<strong>the</strong>ran position th<strong>at</strong> this union is not essential but ra<strong>the</strong>r occurs by faith (“Lu<strong>the</strong>rus: Per<br />

fidem Christi efficitur Christianus unus spiritus & unum cum Christo”), and th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

union is not an unmedi<strong>at</strong>ed identity, as Eckhart would claim, but ra<strong>the</strong>r more akin to <strong>the</strong><br />

joining <strong>of</strong> bride and bridegroom (“Durch Christum ist die CHristenheit und GOTT also<br />

vereiniget, wie eine Braut mit ihrem Breutigam, das die Braut recht und macht habe, zu<br />

223 “Ac de Tauleri concionibus: Necque ego nec in L<strong>at</strong>ina, graeca aut hebraea, uel nostra lingua,<br />

Theologiam uidi salubriore[m] & cum Euangelio consonantiorem.”<br />

224 BT, CCLXXXIVvb.<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!