12.11.2014 Views

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

his neglect <strong>of</strong> Eckhart. 158 For instance, <strong>the</strong> Protestant historian Gottfried Arnold, in his<br />

monumental and popular Unpar<strong>the</strong>yische Kirchen- und Ketzerhistorie (1699-1700),<br />

lumps him toge<strong>the</strong>r with ano<strong>the</strong>r writer and mentions Eckhart only because he makes an<br />

appearance in Tauler: “M. Eckhardus, M. Dietrich, deren in den Schriften Tauleri viel<br />

gedacht wird.” 159 Arnold does mention Eckhart in <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> Jan Wycliffe and Jan<br />

Hus, who were “ein kleines licht des wahren wesens in Christo” who came a little way<br />

“auf den rechten weg.” However, it is not Eckhart who is <strong>the</strong> focus <strong>of</strong> controversy in <strong>the</strong><br />

Middle Ages, in Arnold’s account, but ra<strong>the</strong>r Tauler. Tauler receives his own entry in <strong>the</strong><br />

section entitled “Von denen [i.e. fourteenth century] vornehmsten Scribenten der kirchen,”<br />

and appears <strong>the</strong>re as <strong>the</strong> “aus diesem seculo bekannt genug Johannes Taulerus, von dem<br />

<strong>of</strong>ft viel streitens gewesen ist;” he is a “wunderbarer Prediger,” and his writings are “sehr<br />

nachdencklich zu lesen, und in unserer sprache gar wol zu bekommen.” 160 Tauler, not<br />

Eckhart, is <strong>the</strong> object <strong>of</strong> controversy and thought provoking, and it is Tauler’s writings<br />

whose vernacularity (“in unserer sprache”) Arnold emphasizes.<br />

There are <strong>of</strong> course exceptions, such th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> Protestant world was not entirely<br />

ignorant <strong>of</strong> Eckhart. For instance, Daniel Sudermann (1550-1631), like Weigel and<br />

Arnold, called himself an “unparteiischen Liebhaber der göttlichen Wahrheit,” and was<br />

interested in spiritual and pious liter<strong>at</strong>ure, regardless <strong>of</strong> its source and provenance. He<br />

was a passion<strong>at</strong>e collector <strong>of</strong> manuscripts who, acting independently <strong>of</strong> congreg<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

parish and university, travelled throughout Germany, compiling religious writings from<br />

158 See in particular Heiko A. Oberman, The Dawn <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reform<strong>at</strong>ion: Essays in L<strong>at</strong>e Medieval and Early<br />

Reform<strong>at</strong>ion Thought, (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1986). See also Monica Pieper, Daniel Sudermann (1550-<br />

ca. 1631) als Vertreter des mystischen Spiritualismus (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 1985).<br />

159 Gottfried Arnold, Unpar<strong>the</strong>yische Kirchen- und Ketzer-Historie: Vom Anfang des Neuen Testamentsbiß<br />

auf das Jahr Christi 1688, Vol. 1 (Frankfurt a.M.: Thomas Fritschens sol. Erben, 1729), Book XIV,<br />

Chapter 2, 420.<br />

160 Arnold, Chapter 3, 423.<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!