12.11.2014 Views

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was a devilish heretic to o<strong>the</strong>rs (“een duvelijc mensche,” as one writer put it), 149 whose<br />

heretical ideas ought to be pulled out root and branch. The leaders <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dominican<br />

order reaffirmed <strong>the</strong> papal decision against Eckhart <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir general meeting in 1328,<br />

warning in particular against preaching dangerous ideas th<strong>at</strong> common people might<br />

misunderstand. 150 O<strong>the</strong>r polemical texts, mostly from Holland and mostly from <strong>the</strong><br />

fourteenth century, also emphasized <strong>the</strong> need to avoid misleading laypeople. 151<br />

Vilific<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> Eckhart such as <strong>the</strong>se (fearing th<strong>at</strong> Eckhart’s ideas were spreading and<br />

ga<strong>the</strong>ring followers) might also indic<strong>at</strong>e Eckhart’s popularity and renown across Europe,<br />

or might simply reflect a degree <strong>of</strong> paranoia amongst <strong>the</strong> clergy. 152<br />

Eckhart’s name also appears in a few histories and chronicles from <strong>the</strong> l<strong>at</strong>e<br />

medieval and early modern era. Dominican chroniclers <strong>at</strong>tempted a form <strong>of</strong> public<br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ions, <strong>at</strong>tempting to conceal <strong>the</strong> “Schandfleck ihrer Ordensgeschichte” 153 by<br />

imagining th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> papal bull from 1327 was directed not against Eckhart himself, but<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r against Beghards and Beguines. The devoted Dominican reformer Johannes Meyer<br />

also included Eckhart in his fifteenth century “who’s who” <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dominican order, <strong>the</strong><br />

Liber de viris illustribus ordinis praedic<strong>at</strong>orum (1466), where Eckhart is memorialized as<br />

a “magister in <strong>the</strong>ologia, homo doctus et sanctus.” 154 The humanist Johannes Tri<strong>the</strong>mius<br />

included Eckhart in a c<strong>at</strong>alogue <strong>of</strong> his own, <strong>the</strong> C<strong>at</strong>alogus scriptorum ecclesiasticorum<br />

(1531), as a learned man and a good speaker (“in divinis scripturis eruditus et in<br />

149 Jan van Leeuwen, quoted in Degenhardt, 37.<br />

150 Ibid, 31.<br />

151 Degenhardt lists Gerard Zerbolt van Zutphen, Jan van Ruusbroec, Jan van Leeuwen and Geert Groote.<br />

Groote, in particular, was a leading light in <strong>the</strong> devotio moderna movement, and Degenhardt sees his anti-<br />

Eckhart writings as a tactical move to distance his movement from a <strong>the</strong>ologian declared suspect by <strong>the</strong><br />

Pope. William <strong>of</strong> Ockham and Michael von Cesena also wrote against Eckhart in <strong>the</strong> 14 th century.<br />

152 Degenhardt, 49.<br />

153 Ibid, 71.<br />

154 Johannes Meyer, quoted in Degenhardt, 74.<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!