the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ... the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

dataspace.princeton.edu
from dataspace.princeton.edu More from this publisher
12.11.2014 Views

lood and eat his body established an equally frustrating cross between earthly wine and heavenly blood, one that required Christians to gather together to carry out an earthly ritual. Moreover, if the Apostles beheld God in the flesh when he appeared on Earth as Jesus Christ, then interpreting the second commandment that made all images of the transcendent God taboo (Exodus 20:4) was no longer an easy matter: did the Bilderverbot apply to images of Christ as well? And finally, though the world may be sinful, Christ repeatedly refused any involvement in political and social affairs, opening up the disjunction between the secular and sacred spheres when he tells his followers “So gebet dem Keiser, was des Keisers ist, und Gotte, was Gottes ist.” 76 This is easier said than done, given that what is at stake is salvation (what could be more important?) and the absolute claims of an omnipotent God (why should his claims not be absolute?). 77 Confessionalization puts additional pressure on Christ’s commandment, in that the Landeskirche, under the oversight of the Prince, seems to play the role of both Caesar and God. In this tense scenario, it is no easy task to distinguish between the things that belong to God and those that belong to Caesar. Although Luther does make room for temporal political authority, he still argues for a strict separation of temporal and spiritual government. Temporal authority is charged with restraining the chaos that constantly threatens the post-lapsarian world, 78 76 Matthew, 22:21 77 Kolakowski, 26. Leszek Kolakowski, "Toleranz und Absolutheitsansprüche," in Christlicher Glaube in moderner Gesellschaft, ed. Franz Böckle et al. (Freiburg im Briesgau: Herder, 1981). 78 WA11, 251:12-15. Luther addresses this question, amongst others, in a treatise from 1523 entitled Von welltlicher Uberkeytt, wie weyt man yhr gehorsam schuldig sey: “Zum reych der wellt oder unter das gesetz gehören alle, die nicht Christen sind. Denn syntemal wenig glewben und das weniger teyl sich hellt nach Christlicher art, das es nicht widderstrebe dem ubel, Ja das es nicht selb ubel thue, hat Gott den selben ausser dem Chrstlichen stand unnd Gottis reych eyn ander regiment verschafft unnd sie unter das schwerd geworffen...Denn wo das nicht were, Syntemal alle wellt böse und unter tausent kaum eyn recht Christ ist, würde eyns das ander fressen, das niemant kund weyb und kind zihen, sich neeren und Gotte dienen, damit 28

and in these external dealings, the Prince rules with God’s blessing. 79 However, temporal power must remember its limits, “das sie sich nicht zuo weytt strecke unnd Gott ynn seyn reych und regiment greyffe.” 80 Luther insists that faith is an act of God alone; over this internal kingdom of the soul God rules with his Word alone, without the mediation of the external sword of temporal authority. 81 Luther, crucially, also restricts the authority of spiritual government in favour of divine authority over the soul, calling the government (“regiment”) of priests and bishops “nicht eyn uberkeytt odder gewallt, sondern ein dienst und ampt.” 82 Luther formulated his dialectical “two-kingdoms theory” (as it is often called) when there existed at least a nominal institutional separation between temporal (kings, princes and emperors) and spiritual authority (bishops and popes). A half a century later, Weigel worried that the reordering of the Saxon state in his own time confounded God and Caesar entirely and concluded that such a church could no longer be God’s church: Weigel classed both the Lutheran Church and the Obrigkeit in Saxony on the side of Caesar and dismissed them both as lacking authority in matters of faith. Making Decisions and Making Meaning Dismissing the guidance of the Church’s authority in religious matters, however, contributed little to solving the dilemma discussed at the beginning of this introduction, die welt wüste würde.” Unless otherwise indicated, all Luther citations are from the Weimar edition (WA). D. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe, (Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger, 1929). 79 “Nun kan yhe menschlich ordnung sich nicht strecken ynn den hymel unnd uber die seele, sondern nur auff erden, auff den eusserlichen wandel der menschen unternander, da menschen sehenn, erkennen, richtenn, urteylen, straffen unnd erredten kundenn. Das alles hat auch Christus selbs feyn unterscheyden und kurtz gefasset, da er spricht Matt: .22. ‘Gebt dem Keyser, was des Keyßers ist, und Gott, was Gottis ist.” WA11, 266:9-18. 80 WA11, 261:30-31. 81 WA11, 263:13-15. 82 WA11, 271:11-12. 29

lood and e<strong>at</strong> his body established an equally frustr<strong>at</strong>ing cross between earthly wine and<br />

heavenly blood, one th<strong>at</strong> required Christians to ga<strong>the</strong>r toge<strong>the</strong>r to carry out an earthly<br />

ritual. Moreover, if <strong>the</strong> Apostles beheld God in <strong>the</strong> flesh when he appeared on Earth as<br />

Jesus Christ, <strong>the</strong>n interpreting <strong>the</strong> second commandment th<strong>at</strong> made all images <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

transcendent God taboo (Exodus 20:4) was no longer an easy m<strong>at</strong>ter: did <strong>the</strong> Bilderverbot<br />

apply to images <strong>of</strong> Christ as well?<br />

And finally, though <strong>the</strong> world may be sinful, Christ repe<strong>at</strong>edly refused any<br />

involvement in political and social affairs, opening up <strong>the</strong> disjunction between <strong>the</strong> secular<br />

and sacred spheres when he tells his followers “So gebet dem Keiser, was des Keisers ist,<br />

und Gotte, was Gottes ist.” 76 This is easier said than done, given th<strong>at</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> is <strong>at</strong> stake is<br />

salv<strong>at</strong>ion (wh<strong>at</strong> could be more important?) and <strong>the</strong> absolute claims <strong>of</strong> an omnipotent God<br />

(why should his claims not be absolute?). 77 Confessionaliz<strong>at</strong>ion puts additional pressure<br />

on Christ’s commandment, in th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> Landeskirche, under <strong>the</strong> oversight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Prince,<br />

seems to play <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> both Caesar and God. In this tense scenario, it is no easy task to<br />

distinguish between <strong>the</strong> things th<strong>at</strong> belong to God and those th<strong>at</strong> belong to Caesar.<br />

Although Lu<strong>the</strong>r does make room for temporal political authority, he still argues<br />

for a strict separ<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> temporal and spiritual government. Temporal authority is<br />

charged with restraining <strong>the</strong> chaos th<strong>at</strong> constantly thre<strong>at</strong>ens <strong>the</strong> post-lapsarian world, 78<br />

76 M<strong>at</strong><strong>the</strong>w, 22:21<br />

77 Kolakowski, 26. Leszek Kolakowski, "Toleranz und Absolu<strong>the</strong>itsansprüche," in Christlicher Glaube in<br />

moderner Gesellschaft, ed. Franz Böckle et al. (Freiburg im Briesgau: Herder, 1981).<br />

78 WA11, 251:12-15. Lu<strong>the</strong>r addresses this question, amongst o<strong>the</strong>rs, in a tre<strong>at</strong>ise from 1523 entitled Von<br />

welltlicher Uberkeytt, wie weyt man yhr gehorsam schuldig sey: “Zum reych der wellt oder unter das gesetz<br />

gehören alle, die nicht Christen sind. Denn syntemal wenig glewben und das weniger teyl sich hellt nach<br />

Christlicher art, das es nicht widderstrebe dem ubel, Ja das es nicht selb ubel thue, h<strong>at</strong> Gott den selben<br />

ausser dem Chrstlichen stand unnd Gottis reych eyn ander regiment verschafft unnd sie unter das schwerd<br />

geworffen...Denn wo das nicht were, Syntemal alle wellt böse und unter tausent kaum eyn recht Christ ist,<br />

würde eyns das ander fressen, das niemant kund weyb und kind zihen, sich neeren und Gotte dienen, damit<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!