12.11.2014 Views

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

course Weigel does not rule out <strong>the</strong> possibility th<strong>at</strong> one might be moved to faith by a<br />

sermon or by <strong>the</strong> sacraments, he departs significantly from Lu<strong>the</strong>r in asserting th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>y<br />

are only one amongst many ways th<strong>at</strong> God calls sinners back to himself. Instead, Weigel<br />

concludes th<strong>at</strong> it is far better to fall silent and listen to God’s Word speaking within,<br />

meaning th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is no need for church ministers whose job it is to preach, such th<strong>at</strong><br />

each and every person is a layman and a listener.<br />

Of course, <strong>the</strong> Zuhörer does speak, but he has taken on a way <strong>of</strong> using language<br />

th<strong>at</strong> blunts <strong>the</strong> knife <strong>the</strong> Preacher uses to recte secare. Putting back toge<strong>the</strong>r wh<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

preacher had cut apart, <strong>the</strong> Zuhörer pieces God’s <strong>at</strong>tributes back into union. The<br />

Preacher’s way with words could be described ei<strong>the</strong>r as a disput<strong>at</strong>ion (from <strong>the</strong> L<strong>at</strong>in “to<br />

think asunder”) or as a polemic (“to make war by speaking”), both <strong>of</strong> which Weigel<br />

explicitly rejects. The Zuhörer’s unitive way <strong>of</strong> speaking reverses <strong>the</strong> distinctions th<strong>at</strong> are<br />

introduced into God’s unity, making his speech an Irenik (to make peace by speaking),<br />

concluding <strong>the</strong> Dionysian dynamic <strong>of</strong> procession, remaining and returning. The Zuhörer’s<br />

undifferenti<strong>at</strong>ed speech—his apoph<strong>at</strong>ic <strong>the</strong>ology—simply has no place in, and no need<br />

for <strong>the</strong> confessional church. This laypeople’s church th<strong>at</strong> Weigel describes so positively<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Dialogus sadly did not come about in reality: <strong>the</strong> Dialogus concludes in <strong>the</strong> realm<br />

<strong>of</strong> fantasy with <strong>the</strong> figure <strong>of</strong> De<strong>at</strong>h conversing with <strong>the</strong> ghost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Preacher to testify<br />

th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> Layman was right to forge his own independent spiritual course, ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

obediently following <strong>the</strong> Preacher’s <strong>of</strong>ficial doctrine. Perhaps it might serve as a mark <strong>of</strong><br />

Weigel’s pessimism about ecclesiastical institutions th<strong>at</strong> he does not have <strong>the</strong> Layman<br />

are only one amongst many ways th<strong>at</strong> God calls sinners back to himself. Also, in keeping with Weigel’s<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> knowledge (see Chapter 2), words only carry meaning because <strong>the</strong>y refer back to <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> all<br />

meaning th<strong>at</strong> is indwelling inside each person.<br />

254

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!