12.11.2014 Views

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dionysius writes th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> summit <strong>of</strong> this ascent is not illumin<strong>at</strong>ion but ra<strong>the</strong>r union with<br />

<strong>the</strong> “completely unknown by an inactivity <strong>of</strong> all knowledge” in which Moses “knows<br />

beyond <strong>the</strong> mind by knowing nothing.” 650<br />

However, to simply summarize Dionysius’ argument like this as a series <strong>of</strong> steps<br />

(assert, neg<strong>at</strong>e, neg<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> neg<strong>at</strong>ion) is already to miss Dionysius’ point. Dionysius’ is a<br />

perform<strong>at</strong>ive insight: one can only understand wh<strong>at</strong> he means by doing wh<strong>at</strong> he says, or<br />

more specifically, by saying wh<strong>at</strong> he says. Beginning with an invit<strong>at</strong>ion to follow along<br />

(“So this is wh<strong>at</strong> we say” 651 ) <strong>the</strong> last two short chapters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mystical Theology contain<br />

long lists <strong>of</strong> repetitive sentences as Dionysius moves up <strong>the</strong> chain <strong>of</strong> denials. He begins:<br />

“The Cause <strong>of</strong> all is above all and is not inexistence, lifeless, speechless, mindless. It is<br />

not a m<strong>at</strong>erial body, and hence has nei<strong>the</strong>r shape nor form, quality, quantity or weight.” 652<br />

Sentences with a similar cadence continue for several more paragraphs, concluding with<br />

<strong>the</strong> final neg<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> all neg<strong>at</strong>ions: “It is beyond assertion and denial. We make assertions<br />

and denials <strong>of</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> is next to it, but never <strong>of</strong> it, for it is both beyond every assertion,<br />

being <strong>the</strong> perfect and unique cause <strong>of</strong> all things, and, by virtue <strong>of</strong> its pre-eminently simple<br />

and absolute n<strong>at</strong>ure, free <strong>of</strong> every limit<strong>at</strong>ion, beyond every limit<strong>at</strong>ion; it is also beyond<br />

every denial.” 653 The repetition, however, is precisely <strong>the</strong> point, as <strong>the</strong> names in <strong>the</strong> list<br />

are not simply an excess <strong>of</strong> examples th<strong>at</strong> all prove <strong>the</strong> same argument. One example will<br />

not suffice, th<strong>at</strong> is, and as I discussed <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> this chapter, apoph<strong>at</strong>ic <strong>the</strong>ology<br />

means reading <strong>the</strong> whole list until one has run out <strong>of</strong> things to say, as Dionysius instructs:<br />

more language falters, and when it has passed up and beyond <strong>the</strong> ascend, it will turn silent completely,<br />

since it will finally be <strong>at</strong> one with him who is indescribable.” MT, 1033C.<br />

650 MT, 1001A.<br />

651 MT, 1040D.<br />

652 Ibid.<br />

653 Ibid, 1048B<br />

237

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!