12.11.2014 Views

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Altern<strong>at</strong>ively, some Lu<strong>the</strong>rans took it upon <strong>the</strong>mselves to ferret through <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ological<br />

writings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Middle Ages in search <strong>of</strong> documents th<strong>at</strong> agreed with Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s new<br />

<strong>the</strong>ology, thus proving th<strong>at</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>r was only <strong>the</strong> l<strong>at</strong>est in a line <strong>of</strong> witnesses to <strong>the</strong> Truth,<br />

and th<strong>at</strong> true <strong>the</strong>ology could not be extinguished even under <strong>the</strong> tyranny <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> papacy. 55<br />

But whereas <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> how to value <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ological writings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Middle Ages<br />

was an important issue for many Lu<strong>the</strong>rans (regardless <strong>of</strong> how <strong>the</strong>y answered <strong>the</strong><br />

question), it seems th<strong>at</strong> history was not a pressing question for Weigel.<br />

In short, Weigel was interested in Eckhart and Dionysius nei<strong>the</strong>r because <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were considered heretics nor because <strong>the</strong>y anted<strong>at</strong>ed Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s writings. He did not turn to<br />

<strong>the</strong>se texts because <strong>the</strong>y formed part <strong>of</strong> an anti-canon <strong>of</strong> books th<strong>at</strong> pious Lu<strong>the</strong>rans ought<br />

to stay away from; if anything, Eckhart and Dionysius would have been part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

eclectic reading list <strong>of</strong> a learned sixteenth century reader. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, I argue throughout this<br />

dissert<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> Weigel was keenly interested in wh<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>se texts had to say about<br />

indifference. The concept <strong>of</strong> indifference is <strong>the</strong> key element <strong>of</strong> Weigel’s response to <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ological and ecclesiological challenges <strong>of</strong> his time, namely a lack <strong>of</strong> consensus about<br />

fundamental issues: how should decisions about religious life be made, on wh<strong>at</strong> basis,<br />

and more importantly, by whom? Indifference became key for Weigel because <strong>the</strong><br />

sixteenth century saw not only doctrine transformed in <strong>the</strong> wake <strong>of</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s reform<br />

55 The most famous <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se projects was headed by M<strong>at</strong>thias Flacius Illyricus, producing <strong>the</strong> C<strong>at</strong>alogus<br />

Testium Verit<strong>at</strong>e, qui ante nostram aet<strong>at</strong>em reclamarunt Papae (1556), reprinted in 1562 and transl<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

into German in 1573; and <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> monumental Ecclesiastica Historia, better known as <strong>the</strong> Magdeburger<br />

Centurien, published between 1557 and 1574. A good (albeit partisan) overview <strong>of</strong> Flacius’ enormously<br />

interesting work is Oliver K. Olson, M<strong>at</strong>thias Flacius and <strong>the</strong> Survival <strong>of</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>r's Reform (Wiesbaden:<br />

Harrasowitz Verlag, 2002); see also Bruce Gordon, “The Changing Face <strong>of</strong> Protestant History and Identity<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Sixteenth Century” and Markus Wriedt, “Lu<strong>the</strong>r's Concept <strong>of</strong> History and <strong>the</strong> Form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> an<br />

Evangelical Identity”, in Protestant History and Identity in Sixteenth-Century Europe, ed. Bruce Gordon<br />

(Brookfield, VT: Scolar Press, 1996); Martina Hartmann, "M<strong>at</strong>thias Flacius Illyricus, die Magdeburger<br />

Centuri<strong>at</strong>oren und die Anfänge der quellenbezogenen Geschichtsforschung," in C<strong>at</strong>alogus und Centurien:<br />

Interdisziplinäre Studien zu M<strong>at</strong>thias Flacius und den Magdeburger Centurien, ed. Martina Hartmann and<br />

Arno Mentzel-Reuters, 1-17 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008).<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!