12.11.2014 Views

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

saving sacraments by means <strong>of</strong> which <strong>the</strong> participants are divinized,” which<br />

establishment is not an arbitrary act, but ra<strong>the</strong>r is part <strong>of</strong> God’s order-bestowing n<strong>at</strong>ure:<br />

“God himself...gives substance and arrangement to everything th<strong>at</strong> exists, including <strong>the</strong><br />

legal hierarchy and society.” 630 On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> union obtained via <strong>the</strong> sacramental<br />

and liturgical life <strong>of</strong> a real earthly church (described in <strong>the</strong> Ecclesiastical Hierarchy,<br />

hereafter EH) is radically rel<strong>at</strong>ivized by <strong>the</strong> apoph<strong>at</strong>ic union described in <strong>the</strong> Mystical<br />

Theology (hereafter MT). Whereas <strong>the</strong> EH says th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> “perceptible symbols” are <strong>the</strong><br />

means <strong>of</strong> diviniz<strong>at</strong>ion, <strong>the</strong> MT says <strong>the</strong> One “is nei<strong>the</strong>r perceived nor is it perceptible.”<br />

And again, <strong>the</strong> EH has <strong>the</strong> hierarch alone receiving illumin<strong>at</strong>ion and passing it on. 631 But<br />

<strong>the</strong> MT explicitly describes Moses “standing apart from <strong>the</strong> crowds and accompanied by<br />

chosen priests.” He <strong>the</strong>n “breaks free from <strong>the</strong>m” and plunges into <strong>the</strong> “mysterious<br />

darkness <strong>of</strong> unknowing” without priests or liturgy. 632 Dionysius does not resolve <strong>the</strong><br />

tension between <strong>the</strong>se two kinds <strong>of</strong> union (ecclesiastical and extra-ecclesiastical, or<br />

perhaps c<strong>at</strong>aph<strong>at</strong>ic and apoph<strong>at</strong>ic). 633 Weigel is most receptive to <strong>the</strong> non-ecclesiastical<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> union, concluding th<strong>at</strong>, precisely because God has disposed <strong>the</strong> universe<br />

in a hierarchical fashion, <strong>the</strong>re is no need for a separ<strong>at</strong>e ecclesiastical hierarchy to exist.<br />

Since all <strong>the</strong> lower eman<strong>at</strong>ions “remain” in human beings, <strong>the</strong>re is, in a sense, little need<br />

for <strong>the</strong> sacraments to be expressed in m<strong>at</strong>erial form. As discussed above, Weigel calls for<br />

Christians to recognize th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>y have both <strong>the</strong> sacraments and a priest to administer <strong>the</strong>m,<br />

even though both priest and sacrament reside in a different church altoge<strong>the</strong>r—within <strong>the</strong><br />

believer’s own self.<br />

630 EH, 429C.<br />

631 EH, 505A-B.<br />

632 MT, 1001A.<br />

633 Nor does <strong>the</strong> secondary liter<strong>at</strong>ure on Dionysius, which focuses almost exclusively on <strong>the</strong> conception <strong>of</strong><br />

union presented in <strong>the</strong> Mystical Theology.<br />

231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!