the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
God is nei<strong>the</strong>r here nor <strong>the</strong>re (“nec est hic et ibi”), nor is he everywhere (“non enim esset<br />
ubique”); he is nei<strong>the</strong>r today nor tomorrow (“nec est hodie aut cras”), nor is he eternity<br />
(“non enim esset aeternus”). Weigel, in fact, explicitly acknowledges <strong>at</strong> this point th<strong>at</strong> he<br />
had read Dionysius and, in particular, had taken his teaching on neg<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> neg<strong>at</strong>ions to<br />
heart: “Coincidunt et vere affirm<strong>at</strong>nur de DEO, DEUS lux est. DEUS est tenebrae. Et<br />
Affirm<strong>at</strong>iones et Neg<strong>at</strong>iones, in divinis non contrariuntur sibi invicem. Sed de his consule<br />
Dionysius Areopagitam, De Mystica Theologia.” Referring his reader to Dionysius’<br />
Mystical Theology Weigel comments th<strong>at</strong> affirm<strong>at</strong>ions and neg<strong>at</strong>ions do not contradict<br />
each o<strong>the</strong>r when referring to God. 613<br />
Moreover, whereas Boethius strives to refer <strong>the</strong> imperfect shadow <strong>of</strong> particular<br />
goods upwards to <strong>the</strong>ir perfect exemplar, Weigel (via Dionysius) is keen to emphasize <strong>the</strong><br />
reverse, namely th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> perfect exemplar is never<strong>the</strong>less in all particular things, even if<br />
imperfectly. We have encountered this passage before, in which Dionysius argues th<strong>at</strong><br />
God is both perfectly transcendent (“in his total unity he rises above all limit<strong>at</strong>ion”) and<br />
perfectly immanent (“nothing in <strong>the</strong> world lacks its share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> One”). 614 God, as Weigel<br />
paraphrases Dionysius, “est unum, non collectione ex pluribus, sed unitissima et fontali<br />
unit<strong>at</strong>e unum est, et ipsum est ante omne unum, et ante omnem multitudinem.” 615 Taking<br />
up Dionysius’ analogy, Weigel writes th<strong>at</strong> all numbers, no m<strong>at</strong>ter how big or how small,<br />
are all based on <strong>the</strong> number one: “nihil existentium est expers unius, ut numerus omnis<br />
unit<strong>at</strong>is est particeps, et binarius dicitur...unus et denarius, et dimidia, cujusvis rei pars<br />
613 Dionysius closes <strong>the</strong> MT with <strong>the</strong> idea in question: “[The Cause <strong>of</strong> all] is beyond assertion and denial.<br />
We make assertions and denials <strong>of</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> is next to it, but never <strong>of</strong> it, for it is both beyond every assertion,<br />
being <strong>the</strong> perfect and unique cause <strong>of</strong> all things, and, by virtue <strong>of</strong> its preeminently simple and absolute<br />
n<strong>at</strong>ure, free <strong>of</strong> every limit<strong>at</strong>ion, beyond every limit<strong>at</strong>ion; it is also beyond every denial.” MT, 1048B.<br />
614 DN, 977B and 977C.<br />
615 Weigel, De vita be<strong>at</strong>a, 58.<br />
226