12.11.2014 Views

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

God is nei<strong>the</strong>r here nor <strong>the</strong>re (“nec est hic et ibi”), nor is he everywhere (“non enim esset<br />

ubique”); he is nei<strong>the</strong>r today nor tomorrow (“nec est hodie aut cras”), nor is he eternity<br />

(“non enim esset aeternus”). Weigel, in fact, explicitly acknowledges <strong>at</strong> this point th<strong>at</strong> he<br />

had read Dionysius and, in particular, had taken his teaching on neg<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> neg<strong>at</strong>ions to<br />

heart: “Coincidunt et vere affirm<strong>at</strong>nur de DEO, DEUS lux est. DEUS est tenebrae. Et<br />

Affirm<strong>at</strong>iones et Neg<strong>at</strong>iones, in divinis non contrariuntur sibi invicem. Sed de his consule<br />

Dionysius Areopagitam, De Mystica Theologia.” Referring his reader to Dionysius’<br />

Mystical Theology Weigel comments th<strong>at</strong> affirm<strong>at</strong>ions and neg<strong>at</strong>ions do not contradict<br />

each o<strong>the</strong>r when referring to God. 613<br />

Moreover, whereas Boethius strives to refer <strong>the</strong> imperfect shadow <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

goods upwards to <strong>the</strong>ir perfect exemplar, Weigel (via Dionysius) is keen to emphasize <strong>the</strong><br />

reverse, namely th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> perfect exemplar is never<strong>the</strong>less in all particular things, even if<br />

imperfectly. We have encountered this passage before, in which Dionysius argues th<strong>at</strong><br />

God is both perfectly transcendent (“in his total unity he rises above all limit<strong>at</strong>ion”) and<br />

perfectly immanent (“nothing in <strong>the</strong> world lacks its share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> One”). 614 God, as Weigel<br />

paraphrases Dionysius, “est unum, non collectione ex pluribus, sed unitissima et fontali<br />

unit<strong>at</strong>e unum est, et ipsum est ante omne unum, et ante omnem multitudinem.” 615 Taking<br />

up Dionysius’ analogy, Weigel writes th<strong>at</strong> all numbers, no m<strong>at</strong>ter how big or how small,<br />

are all based on <strong>the</strong> number one: “nihil existentium est expers unius, ut numerus omnis<br />

unit<strong>at</strong>is est particeps, et binarius dicitur...unus et denarius, et dimidia, cujusvis rei pars<br />

613 Dionysius closes <strong>the</strong> MT with <strong>the</strong> idea in question: “[The Cause <strong>of</strong> all] is beyond assertion and denial.<br />

We make assertions and denials <strong>of</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> is next to it, but never <strong>of</strong> it, for it is both beyond every assertion,<br />

being <strong>the</strong> perfect and unique cause <strong>of</strong> all things, and, by virtue <strong>of</strong> its preeminently simple and absolute<br />

n<strong>at</strong>ure, free <strong>of</strong> every limit<strong>at</strong>ion, beyond every limit<strong>at</strong>ion; it is also beyond every denial.” MT, 1048B.<br />

614 DN, 977B and 977C.<br />

615 Weigel, De vita be<strong>at</strong>a, 58.<br />

226

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!