12.11.2014 Views

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

final work), Weigel strongly criticizes wh<strong>at</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>r had defined as <strong>the</strong> task <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ologian: correctly distinguishing God’s Law from God’s Gospel, a practice termed<br />

orthotomia (Greek for “correctly cutting” language about God). Instead, Weigel <strong>of</strong>fers a<br />

passion<strong>at</strong>e defence <strong>of</strong> a <strong>the</strong>ology th<strong>at</strong> is respectful <strong>of</strong> God’s unity by practicing<br />

apophasis—an indifferent signific<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> does not divide God’s unity into <strong>at</strong>tributes<br />

and properties. This indifferent signific<strong>at</strong>ion sets laypeople free from <strong>the</strong> confessional<br />

church, leaving <strong>the</strong> <strong>at</strong>tainment <strong>of</strong> salv<strong>at</strong>ion as a m<strong>at</strong>ter for God and devout soul alone.<br />

Th<strong>at</strong> is, guided by Dionysius’ <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> apophasis, Weigel imagines a church in which<br />

<strong>the</strong> ultim<strong>at</strong>e spiritual power rests with laypeople ra<strong>the</strong>r than with a pr<strong>of</strong>essional clergy.<br />

In this respect, <strong>the</strong> positive valu<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> indifference th<strong>at</strong> Weigel absorbs from<br />

his pre-modern influences—Dionysius’ apophasis and Meister Eckhart’s Gelassenheit—<br />

both serve to bring about harmony amongst Christians by suppressing human capabilities.<br />

As discussed above, good Christians should strive to <strong>at</strong>tain a st<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Gelassenheit in<br />

order to suppress <strong>the</strong>ir unruly epistemological activity, which only separ<strong>at</strong>es <strong>the</strong>m from<br />

God ra<strong>the</strong>r than uniting <strong>the</strong>m. Likewise, Christians should cultiv<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> spiritual practice<br />

<strong>of</strong> apophasis in order to bring about a failure <strong>of</strong> ordinary signific<strong>at</strong>ion, particularly <strong>the</strong><br />

way th<strong>at</strong> language is used to write doctrine (and confessional documents in particular),<br />

which only introduces unnecessary distinctions into God’s supreme unity.<br />

Dionysius on God’s Unity<br />

Examining Dionysius’ writings more closely, we find th<strong>at</strong> he does not embrace<br />

hierarchy for its own sake. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, Dionysius’ hierarchically structured universe follows,<br />

paradoxically, from <strong>the</strong> most important assertion in his <strong>the</strong>ology: God is One. The Divine<br />

208

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!