12.11.2014 Views

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

with fragments <strong>of</strong> Eckhart and Tauler sermons. (This last st<strong>at</strong>ement does not apply to <strong>the</strong><br />

rel<strong>at</strong>ionship between Dionysius and Weigel.)<br />

Sara Poor’s study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> complex reception <strong>of</strong> Mechthild <strong>of</strong> Magdeburg’s book<br />

Der fliessende Licht der Got<strong>the</strong>it has served as an important methodological model for<br />

this dissert<strong>at</strong>ion, even though <strong>the</strong> body <strong>of</strong> texts addressed differs gre<strong>at</strong>ly. 49 Addressing <strong>the</strong><br />

issue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exclusion <strong>of</strong> women’s writing from <strong>the</strong> literary and <strong>the</strong>ological canon, and<br />

moreover <strong>the</strong> double exclusion resulting from <strong>the</strong> marginaliz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> pre-modern works<br />

in <strong>the</strong> modern academy, Poor <strong>at</strong>tends to <strong>the</strong> afterlife <strong>of</strong> Mechthild’s book in all its forms:<br />

from a complete text th<strong>at</strong> names Mechthild as <strong>the</strong> author, to <strong>the</strong> inclusion <strong>of</strong> anonymous<br />

excerpts in compil<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> devotional texts, to a few remaining traces <strong>of</strong> Mechthild’s<br />

name and work in printed sources from <strong>the</strong> early modern era, to Mechthild’s appearance<br />

and positioning in contemporary teaching anthologies and reference works. Taking a<br />

diachronic perspective allows Mechthild to resurface as an author worthy <strong>of</strong> study, ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than limiting th<strong>at</strong> st<strong>at</strong>us to those who have become gre<strong>at</strong>s, if gre<strong>at</strong>ness is <strong>at</strong>tributed solely<br />

to those whose name/fame lives on and whose texts survive intact. Moreover, Poor’s<br />

book allows <strong>the</strong> reader to observe influence across time, and suggests th<strong>at</strong> an author’s<br />

afterlife is rarely simple; <strong>the</strong> reception <strong>of</strong> an author is not divided into a true reception<br />

and a false one, and a work may persist without <strong>the</strong> author’s name or in fragmentary<br />

form. 50 In my opinion, Poor’s approach steers a steady course between <strong>the</strong> New and Old<br />

Philologies by <strong>the</strong>m<strong>at</strong>izing <strong>the</strong> way th<strong>at</strong> Mechthild’s authorship is constructed (by<br />

49 Sara S. Poor, Mechthild <strong>of</strong> Magdeburg and Her Book: Gender and <strong>the</strong> Making <strong>of</strong> Textual Authority<br />

(Philadelphia: University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania Press, 2004).<br />

50 Admittedly from <strong>the</strong> perspective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> author, as Poor points out, this can be a bad thing as it leads to a<br />

weakening <strong>of</strong> authorship to <strong>the</strong> point <strong>of</strong> her disappearance. Poor, 13.<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!