the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ... the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
were mobilized to support a non-confessional, irenic project. 520 More interested in integrating his sources rather than distinguishing them, the common thread in all his influences is a belief in the “essentially inner spiritual nature of Christian experience” that finds no expression in one church only, but rather draws on a single pool of wisdom. 521 In his quest to trace all wisdom back to a single source, Crollius is prepared not only to link Christian theology and pagan philosophy as Ficino did, but is even willing to view Christianity as a kind of magic, whose spells are conducted with the magic Word (Christ) rather than a magic word. 522 As Crollius writes, “es ligt und besteht alles in der Erkanntnuß, als der gantzen Welt Schatz, sintemal ohne dieselbige niemand zum ewigen Leben kommen kan.” 523 Most of what heathens wrote is false, but some pagans, including Hermes, lived with pure hearts before Christ’s time and were enlightened by the Holy Spirit in the “secret shrine of their hearts” and deserve to be called “lovers of God” more even than people who call themselves Christians. 524 These Christians-before-Christ are possible because there is only one true wisdom that 520 Crollius, 3. 521 “Crolls ‘wahre’ Philosophie greift zurück auf die Zeit, bevor das Wort ‘Fleisch’ geworden ist, und versteht sich dennoch nicht als heidnisch, sondern also christlich.” Crollius, 4. 522 Hannaway writes that “by focusing the Cabalistic magic on the name of Christ himself, Croll could claim that this magic was nothing other than the fulfilment of St. Paul’s injunction: ‘And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by him’...Croll envisages both magics, natural and Cabalistic, as devolving from one source, the Word” (21). Interestingly, Dillon has found similar views on the subject of magic expressed in Origen: “the name of Jesus has power independent of the virtue of the person using it” and it therefore “has...a truly magical power” because “the efficacy of a magical incantation is now dependent on the moral state of the person using it, but solely on the correct performance of the associated ritual” (206). John Dillon, The Magical Power of Names in Origen and Later Platonism (Rome: Edizioni dell'Ateno, 1985), reprinted in John Dillon, The Golden Chain: Studies in the Development of Platonism and Christianity (Aldershot: Variorum, 1990). 523 Oswaldus Crollius, Basilica Chymica oder Alchymistische Königlich Klynod (Frankfurt: Gottfried Tampach, 1623), 27. 524 “Diese Widergeburt haben Hermes und andere, so eines reinen Hertzens und heiligen Wandels gewesen, eher das Wort Fleisch worden, durch den Heiligen Geist erleuchtet in dem geheimen Schrein ihrer Hertzen stillschweigent gehabt, unnd besser erkennt, dann viel auß den unsern, welche Christen wöllen genennet seyn, und viel lieber für Erkenner, als Liebhaber GOttes gehalten werden. Crollius, Basilica, 27-28. 188
enlightens all great thinkers in every era rather than a single point at which wisdom was finally revealed in Christ and the Church he founded. Knowledge in all its forms is what Crollius is after, and for him knowledge of Self, of God and of Nature are all identical, or at least have the same source. Like Weigel, Crollius believes that “alle natürliche un[d] ubernatürliche Güter zuvor in uns: Gleich wie aber derselbige Göttliche Character durch die Sünde in uns verfinstert wirdt, also scheinet und leuchtet er hernach, nach dem die Sünde außgetilget..die Erkanntnuß aller Dinge ist mit uns zugleich erschaffen, und ligt alles gleichsamb in dem Marck unsers Geistes verborgen, und wirdt demnach nichts mehr erfordert, als daß wir uns von dem Schlaff auffmuntern, darinn wir durch die Sünde gerathen, die uns von GOtt verliehene Gaben nicht achten, und also weder sehen, empfinden oder glauben, daß solche Gaben unnd Güter albereit in uns zugegen.” 525 Far from created things obscuring knowledge of God, the diligent study of Nature will reveal God—a thought that Crollius attributes to Dionysius: “Dionysius aber sagt, wir können Gott nicht auß seiner Natur sondern auß aller Creaturen ordentlichen Disposition, in deren er sie erschaffen, und welche die Bildtnussen unnd Gleichheiten seiner Göttlichen Exemplar vorstellen, am allerbesten erkennen.” 526 From Dionysius’ understanding of the double-edged value of God’s names Crollius takes away the idea that Dionysius teaches how to read the book of nature via an analysis of the book of grace. 527 Both teach, as Crollius writes, that “unser Gemüth zu GOtt, unnd unsere Augen zu der Warheit würden erhoben, wie gleichfalls auch zu der 525 Crollius, Basilica, 26. 526 Ibid. 527 “To the Paracelsian enthusiast, with his innate distrust for the written texts of men, the Book of Nature was not a book like an other: it was the book, the companion to the only other book which mattered, the Book of Scriptures. In addition, neither of these two books was an open text of words to be read and cursorily analyzed; they were books of signs whose hidden meanings were to be interpreted....its text was not a discourse of words...but a codex of secret signs whose interpretation must be guided by the light from within and without.” Hannaway, 61. 189
- Page 141 and 142: teacher. 366 However, the turning p
- Page 143 and 144: Weigel gives the passage an unexpec
- Page 145 and 146: Murren”)—and they do this “in
- Page 147 and 148: and all the more so since he saw li
- Page 149 and 150: the strength of the intellectual re
- Page 151 and 152: CHAPTER 3 • DIONYSIUS, WHOEVER HE
- Page 153 and 154: demonstrated for Eckhart, I will de
- Page 155 and 156: destroyer that Dionysius is most of
- Page 157 and 158: ears good news to the church.” 39
- Page 159 and 160: points out, with a purification, a
- Page 161 and 162: served as cornerstones in defences
- Page 163 and 164: (Acts 17: 15-34), one of the skepti
- Page 165 and 166: to make the interpretation of these
- Page 167 and 168: Outside the universities, Dionysius
- Page 169 and 170: defiled the “sacred things” by
- Page 171 and 172: other leaders of the Protestant Ref
- Page 173 and 174: valorization of hierarchy per se in
- Page 175 and 176: as well as the with the arguments u
- Page 177 and 178: freedom, but rather obedience. 468
- Page 179 and 180: The primary piece in the compilatio
- Page 181 and 182: It is hardly surprising that Cochla
- Page 183 and 184: it does during the Council of Trent
- Page 185 and 186: for a hierarchical church, seizing
- Page 187 and 188: the ancient teaching”) that “be
- Page 189 and 190: Dionysiacum. For Lefèvre d’Étap
- Page 191: Aristotle would have been glad to h
- Page 195 and 196: offered Dionysius to the Gelehrtenr
- Page 197 and 198: nine distinct editions of Dionysius
- Page 199 and 200: editions of Greek and Latin classic
- Page 201 and 202: (Turin), and is a reprint of Lefèv
- Page 203 and 204: presses in Spain (his first publica
- Page 205 and 206: growing body of evidence suggesting
- Page 207 and 208: Weigel concludes that, precisely be
- Page 209 and 210: apart, he suggested that true Chris
- Page 211 and 212: and so did not dwell on the fact th
- Page 213 and 214: Names, as the title suggests, is ba
- Page 215 and 216: animals, through plants and non-liv
- Page 217 and 218: of being.” 580 As we will see lat
- Page 219 and 220: (“God is a rock”) or even a neg
- Page 221 and 222: This is admittedly a nonsensical as
- Page 223 and 224: compositions, most likely dating to
- Page 225 and 226: Dionysius to show that, just as God
- Page 227 and 228: efer to Greek and Hebrew, the bibli
- Page 229 and 230: argues that there cannot be more th
- Page 231 and 232: dicitur una.” 616 The stress that
- Page 233 and 234: Weigel suggests will allow the soul
- Page 235 and 236: saving sacraments by means of which
- Page 237 and 238: Melanchthon’s Defence of the Augs
- Page 239 and 240: alternative—namely prayer. 643 We
- Page 241 and 242: Dionysius writes that the summit of
were mobilized to support a non-confessional, irenic project. 520 More interested in<br />
integr<strong>at</strong>ing his sources ra<strong>the</strong>r than distinguishing <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong> common thread in all his<br />
influences is a belief in <strong>the</strong> “essentially inner spiritual n<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> Christian experience”<br />
th<strong>at</strong> finds no expression in one church only, but ra<strong>the</strong>r draws on a single pool <strong>of</strong><br />
wisdom. 521 In his quest to trace all wisdom back to a single source, Crollius is prepared<br />
not only to link Christian <strong>the</strong>ology and pagan philosophy as Ficino did, but is even<br />
willing to view Christianity as a kind <strong>of</strong> magic, whose spells are conducted with <strong>the</strong><br />
magic Word (Christ) ra<strong>the</strong>r than a magic word. 522 As Crollius writes, “es ligt und besteht<br />
alles in der Erkanntnuß, als der gantzen Welt Sch<strong>at</strong>z, sintemal ohne dieselbige niemand<br />
zum ewigen Leben kommen kan.” 523 Most <strong>of</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> hea<strong>the</strong>ns wrote is false, but some<br />
pagans, including Hermes, lived with pure hearts before Christ’s time and were<br />
enlightened by <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit in <strong>the</strong> “secret shrine <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir hearts” and deserve to be<br />
called “lovers <strong>of</strong> God” more even than people who call <strong>the</strong>mselves Christians. 524 These<br />
Christians-before-Christ are possible because <strong>the</strong>re is only one true wisdom th<strong>at</strong><br />
520 Crollius, 3.<br />
521 “Crolls ‘wahre’ Philosophie greift zurück auf die Zeit, bevor das Wort ‘Fleisch’ geworden ist, und<br />
versteht sich dennoch nicht als heidnisch, sondern also christlich.” Crollius, 4.<br />
522 Hannaway writes th<strong>at</strong> “by focusing <strong>the</strong> Cabalistic magic on <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Christ himself, Croll could<br />
claim th<strong>at</strong> this magic was nothing o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> fulfilment <strong>of</strong> St. Paul’s injunction: ‘And wh<strong>at</strong>soever ye do<br />
in word or deed, do all in <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r by him’...Croll<br />
envisages both magics, n<strong>at</strong>ural and Cabalistic, as devolving from one source, <strong>the</strong> Word” (21). Interestingly,<br />
Dillon has found similar views on <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> magic expressed in Origen: “<strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Jesus has power<br />
independent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> virtue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> person using it” and it <strong>the</strong>refore “has...a truly magical power” because “<strong>the</strong><br />
efficacy <strong>of</strong> a magical incant<strong>at</strong>ion is now dependent on <strong>the</strong> moral st<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> person using it, but solely on<br />
<strong>the</strong> correct performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> associ<strong>at</strong>ed ritual” (206). John Dillon, The Magical Power <strong>of</strong> Names in<br />
Origen and L<strong>at</strong>er Pl<strong>at</strong>onism (Rome: Edizioni dell'Ateno, 1985), reprinted in John Dillon, The Golden<br />
Chain: Studies in <strong>the</strong> Development <strong>of</strong> Pl<strong>at</strong>onism and Christianity (Aldershot: Variorum, 1990).<br />
523 Oswaldus Crollius, Basilica Chymica oder Alchymistische Königlich Klynod (Frankfurt: Gottfried<br />
Tampach, 1623), 27.<br />
524 “Diese Widergeburt haben Hermes und andere, so eines reinen Hertzens und heiligen Wandels gewesen,<br />
eher das Wort Fleisch worden, durch den Heiligen Geist erleuchtet in dem geheimen Schrein ihrer Hertzen<br />
stillschweigent gehabt, unnd besser erkennt, dann viel auß den unsern, welche Christen wöllen genennet<br />
seyn, und viel lieber für Erkenner, als Liebhaber GOttes gehalten werden. Crollius, Basilica, 27-28.<br />
188