the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ... the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

dataspace.princeton.edu
from dataspace.princeton.edu More from this publisher
12.11.2014 Views

were mobilized to support a non-confessional, irenic project. 520 More interested in integrating his sources rather than distinguishing them, the common thread in all his influences is a belief in the “essentially inner spiritual nature of Christian experience” that finds no expression in one church only, but rather draws on a single pool of wisdom. 521 In his quest to trace all wisdom back to a single source, Crollius is prepared not only to link Christian theology and pagan philosophy as Ficino did, but is even willing to view Christianity as a kind of magic, whose spells are conducted with the magic Word (Christ) rather than a magic word. 522 As Crollius writes, “es ligt und besteht alles in der Erkanntnuß, als der gantzen Welt Schatz, sintemal ohne dieselbige niemand zum ewigen Leben kommen kan.” 523 Most of what heathens wrote is false, but some pagans, including Hermes, lived with pure hearts before Christ’s time and were enlightened by the Holy Spirit in the “secret shrine of their hearts” and deserve to be called “lovers of God” more even than people who call themselves Christians. 524 These Christians-before-Christ are possible because there is only one true wisdom that 520 Crollius, 3. 521 “Crolls ‘wahre’ Philosophie greift zurück auf die Zeit, bevor das Wort ‘Fleisch’ geworden ist, und versteht sich dennoch nicht als heidnisch, sondern also christlich.” Crollius, 4. 522 Hannaway writes that “by focusing the Cabalistic magic on the name of Christ himself, Croll could claim that this magic was nothing other than the fulfilment of St. Paul’s injunction: ‘And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by him’...Croll envisages both magics, natural and Cabalistic, as devolving from one source, the Word” (21). Interestingly, Dillon has found similar views on the subject of magic expressed in Origen: “the name of Jesus has power independent of the virtue of the person using it” and it therefore “has...a truly magical power” because “the efficacy of a magical incantation is now dependent on the moral state of the person using it, but solely on the correct performance of the associated ritual” (206). John Dillon, The Magical Power of Names in Origen and Later Platonism (Rome: Edizioni dell'Ateno, 1985), reprinted in John Dillon, The Golden Chain: Studies in the Development of Platonism and Christianity (Aldershot: Variorum, 1990). 523 Oswaldus Crollius, Basilica Chymica oder Alchymistische Königlich Klynod (Frankfurt: Gottfried Tampach, 1623), 27. 524 “Diese Widergeburt haben Hermes und andere, so eines reinen Hertzens und heiligen Wandels gewesen, eher das Wort Fleisch worden, durch den Heiligen Geist erleuchtet in dem geheimen Schrein ihrer Hertzen stillschweigent gehabt, unnd besser erkennt, dann viel auß den unsern, welche Christen wöllen genennet seyn, und viel lieber für Erkenner, als Liebhaber GOttes gehalten werden. Crollius, Basilica, 27-28. 188

enlightens all great thinkers in every era rather than a single point at which wisdom was finally revealed in Christ and the Church he founded. Knowledge in all its forms is what Crollius is after, and for him knowledge of Self, of God and of Nature are all identical, or at least have the same source. Like Weigel, Crollius believes that “alle natürliche un[d] ubernatürliche Güter zuvor in uns: Gleich wie aber derselbige Göttliche Character durch die Sünde in uns verfinstert wirdt, also scheinet und leuchtet er hernach, nach dem die Sünde außgetilget..die Erkanntnuß aller Dinge ist mit uns zugleich erschaffen, und ligt alles gleichsamb in dem Marck unsers Geistes verborgen, und wirdt demnach nichts mehr erfordert, als daß wir uns von dem Schlaff auffmuntern, darinn wir durch die Sünde gerathen, die uns von GOtt verliehene Gaben nicht achten, und also weder sehen, empfinden oder glauben, daß solche Gaben unnd Güter albereit in uns zugegen.” 525 Far from created things obscuring knowledge of God, the diligent study of Nature will reveal God—a thought that Crollius attributes to Dionysius: “Dionysius aber sagt, wir können Gott nicht auß seiner Natur sondern auß aller Creaturen ordentlichen Disposition, in deren er sie erschaffen, und welche die Bildtnussen unnd Gleichheiten seiner Göttlichen Exemplar vorstellen, am allerbesten erkennen.” 526 From Dionysius’ understanding of the double-edged value of God’s names Crollius takes away the idea that Dionysius teaches how to read the book of nature via an analysis of the book of grace. 527 Both teach, as Crollius writes, that “unser Gemüth zu GOtt, unnd unsere Augen zu der Warheit würden erhoben, wie gleichfalls auch zu der 525 Crollius, Basilica, 26. 526 Ibid. 527 “To the Paracelsian enthusiast, with his innate distrust for the written texts of men, the Book of Nature was not a book like an other: it was the book, the companion to the only other book which mattered, the Book of Scriptures. In addition, neither of these two books was an open text of words to be read and cursorily analyzed; they were books of signs whose hidden meanings were to be interpreted....its text was not a discourse of words...but a codex of secret signs whose interpretation must be guided by the light from within and without.” Hannaway, 61. 189

were mobilized to support a non-confessional, irenic project. 520 More interested in<br />

integr<strong>at</strong>ing his sources ra<strong>the</strong>r than distinguishing <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong> common thread in all his<br />

influences is a belief in <strong>the</strong> “essentially inner spiritual n<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> Christian experience”<br />

th<strong>at</strong> finds no expression in one church only, but ra<strong>the</strong>r draws on a single pool <strong>of</strong><br />

wisdom. 521 In his quest to trace all wisdom back to a single source, Crollius is prepared<br />

not only to link Christian <strong>the</strong>ology and pagan philosophy as Ficino did, but is even<br />

willing to view Christianity as a kind <strong>of</strong> magic, whose spells are conducted with <strong>the</strong><br />

magic Word (Christ) ra<strong>the</strong>r than a magic word. 522 As Crollius writes, “es ligt und besteht<br />

alles in der Erkanntnuß, als der gantzen Welt Sch<strong>at</strong>z, sintemal ohne dieselbige niemand<br />

zum ewigen Leben kommen kan.” 523 Most <strong>of</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> hea<strong>the</strong>ns wrote is false, but some<br />

pagans, including Hermes, lived with pure hearts before Christ’s time and were<br />

enlightened by <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit in <strong>the</strong> “secret shrine <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir hearts” and deserve to be<br />

called “lovers <strong>of</strong> God” more even than people who call <strong>the</strong>mselves Christians. 524 These<br />

Christians-before-Christ are possible because <strong>the</strong>re is only one true wisdom th<strong>at</strong><br />

520 Crollius, 3.<br />

521 “Crolls ‘wahre’ Philosophie greift zurück auf die Zeit, bevor das Wort ‘Fleisch’ geworden ist, und<br />

versteht sich dennoch nicht als heidnisch, sondern also christlich.” Crollius, 4.<br />

522 Hannaway writes th<strong>at</strong> “by focusing <strong>the</strong> Cabalistic magic on <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Christ himself, Croll could<br />

claim th<strong>at</strong> this magic was nothing o<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> fulfilment <strong>of</strong> St. Paul’s injunction: ‘And wh<strong>at</strong>soever ye do<br />

in word or deed, do all in <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r by him’...Croll<br />

envisages both magics, n<strong>at</strong>ural and Cabalistic, as devolving from one source, <strong>the</strong> Word” (21). Interestingly,<br />

Dillon has found similar views on <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> magic expressed in Origen: “<strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Jesus has power<br />

independent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> virtue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> person using it” and it <strong>the</strong>refore “has...a truly magical power” because “<strong>the</strong><br />

efficacy <strong>of</strong> a magical incant<strong>at</strong>ion is now dependent on <strong>the</strong> moral st<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> person using it, but solely on<br />

<strong>the</strong> correct performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> associ<strong>at</strong>ed ritual” (206). John Dillon, The Magical Power <strong>of</strong> Names in<br />

Origen and L<strong>at</strong>er Pl<strong>at</strong>onism (Rome: Edizioni dell'Ateno, 1985), reprinted in John Dillon, The Golden<br />

Chain: Studies in <strong>the</strong> Development <strong>of</strong> Pl<strong>at</strong>onism and Christianity (Aldershot: Variorum, 1990).<br />

523 Oswaldus Crollius, Basilica Chymica oder Alchymistische Königlich Klynod (Frankfurt: Gottfried<br />

Tampach, 1623), 27.<br />

524 “Diese Widergeburt haben Hermes und andere, so eines reinen Hertzens und heiligen Wandels gewesen,<br />

eher das Wort Fleisch worden, durch den Heiligen Geist erleuchtet in dem geheimen Schrein ihrer Hertzen<br />

stillschweigent gehabt, unnd besser erkennt, dann viel auß den unsern, welche Christen wöllen genennet<br />

seyn, und viel lieber für Erkenner, als Liebhaber GOttes gehalten werden. Crollius, Basilica, 27-28.<br />

188

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!