12.11.2014 Views

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Spirit, which inspired <strong>the</strong> Apostles (“bases et columnae ecclesiae”) to institute and<br />

organize <strong>the</strong> Church “in its hierarchy and in its ecclesiastical <strong>of</strong>fices” (“instituta fuit &<br />

ordin<strong>at</strong>a in suis gradibus & <strong>of</strong>ficijs ecclesia”). 471 The Christianity th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apostles<br />

preached was, in fact, identical to <strong>the</strong> Christianity th<strong>at</strong> was practiced in <strong>the</strong> Roman<br />

Church <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sixteenth century because, before dispersing to undertake <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

proselytizing mission, <strong>the</strong> Apostles set <strong>the</strong> ceremonies and sacred rites according to<br />

which <strong>the</strong> sacraments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church would be administered and <strong>the</strong> ministers<br />

consecr<strong>at</strong>ed. 472 As Clichtove argues, Dionysius’ writings prove th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> Roman Church is<br />

timeless, unchanging and divinely instituted. On this account, <strong>the</strong>re is no need for reform,<br />

since <strong>the</strong> Church has not changed in fifteen centuries—in fact, to change anything would<br />

be to act against God’s will, according to which <strong>the</strong> hierarchical church was established.<br />

Less well known than Clichtove’s polemic but equally interesting is <strong>the</strong> inclusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> an excerpt <strong>of</strong> Dionysius’ writing in a small compil<strong>at</strong>ion entitled <strong>the</strong> Epitome<br />

Apostolicorum Constitutionum from 1546, addressed to Pope Paul III, edited by <strong>the</strong><br />

C<strong>at</strong>holic and humanist <strong>the</strong>ologian Johannes Cochlaeus toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> Venetian<br />

humanist (and ambassador) Carlo Capello. 473 Though it comprises a mere 23 folios, <strong>the</strong><br />

compil<strong>at</strong>ion, through its prefaces and <strong>the</strong> arrangement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> works it contains, positions<br />

Dionysius alongside o<strong>the</strong>r “Apostolic” writers as evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church<br />

and <strong>of</strong> its divine origins, and explicitly polemicizes against <strong>the</strong> “new sects.”<br />

471 Clichtove, 18v-19r.<br />

472 “...caeremoniaeque & ritus sacri ab ijsdem definiti quibus ecclesiastica administrarentur sacramenta &<br />

ministrorum sacrorum fieret consecr<strong>at</strong>io antequam dispergerentur in uniuersum orbem, aut per martyrium<br />

de mundo tollerentur.” Ibid.<br />

473 Johannes Cochlaeus, Epitome Apostolicarum Constitutionum, In Creta Insula, per Carolum Capellium<br />

Venetum repertarum, & e Greco in L<strong>at</strong>inum transl<strong>at</strong>um (Ingolstadt: Alexander Weissenhorn, 1546).<br />

174

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!