the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
and all <strong>the</strong> more so since he saw little point in <strong>at</strong>tempting to build a new church th<strong>at</strong><br />
would be more congenial to his beliefs, having concluded th<strong>at</strong> not only is his particular<br />
church spiritually corrupt, but th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> very idea <strong>of</strong> an earthly church is unchristian. Wh<strong>at</strong>,<br />
<strong>the</strong>n, would be <strong>the</strong> point in trying to found a new church? Reform<strong>at</strong>ion, in o<strong>the</strong>r words, is<br />
just as hopeless as maintaining <strong>the</strong> imperfect st<strong>at</strong>us quo.<br />
Not testifying in public did not, <strong>of</strong> course, exclude testifying in priv<strong>at</strong>e (i.e. before<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r laypeople, or, as Weigel calls <strong>the</strong>m, idiota 382 ), in <strong>the</strong> company <strong>of</strong> kindred spirits—<br />
though again, whe<strong>the</strong>r testifying in priv<strong>at</strong>e still counts as testifying is by no means clear.<br />
Tertullian and <strong>the</strong> martyrs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Golden Legend would likely not have allowed it. 383 In<br />
his final work, <strong>the</strong> Dialogus de Christianismo, Weigel depicts <strong>the</strong> Layman in his de<strong>at</strong>h<br />
throes (“Ach Gott, wie bange ist mir, ich kan nicht weytter...”), his bro<strong>the</strong>rs Johannes and<br />
Paulus appear, urging him to give up his heretical beliefs. Fearing for <strong>the</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
bro<strong>the</strong>r’s soul, <strong>the</strong>y suggest he let a priest give him absolution and administer last rites,<br />
but <strong>the</strong> Layman insists th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> sacraments are useless, th<strong>at</strong> Christ is within him, and th<strong>at</strong><br />
he <strong>the</strong>refore has a priest and <strong>the</strong> sacraments to hand already. In desper<strong>at</strong>ion, Johannes<br />
uses <strong>the</strong> following argument: “Ist dein Glaube gerecht, wie du immer in deiner Meynung<br />
verharret bist, so tröste dich deines gutten Gewissens. Ist er aber falsch gewesen und hast<br />
falsche Leere geliebet, so thu nur Busse und bekenne es fur den Priester.” 384 Weigel does<br />
not have Johannes gambling on <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> God here, but ra<strong>the</strong>r on <strong>the</strong> means <strong>of</strong><br />
salv<strong>at</strong>ion. If it is possible for <strong>the</strong> inner man to remain gelassen, unmoved and unaffected<br />
382 Chapter 4 returns to Weigel’s concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> layperson.<br />
383 In De fuga persecutione, Tertullian writes: “Can you boast th<strong>at</strong> you have shown yourself a brave and<br />
constant witness to Christ?...Oh yes, perhaps you have admitted you are a Christian to some individual, but,<br />
in refusing to do so before many, you have denied Him.” Tertullian, Disciplinary, Moral and Ascetical<br />
Works, trans. Rudolph Arbesmann, Emily Joseph Daly and Edwin A. Quain (New York: Fa<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Church, Inc., 1959), 300-301.<br />
384 Weigel, Dialogus, 134.<br />
143