the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
authorities, <strong>the</strong> blindness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> supposedly pious priests, Herod’s insistence on having<br />
his own way ra<strong>the</strong>r than God’s—<strong>the</strong> un-Gelassenheit <strong>of</strong> Herod’s court and <strong>the</strong> priests<br />
represents (as Weigel st<strong>at</strong>es in no uncertain terms) <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> all conflict, <strong>the</strong> “Brunn<br />
aller Kriegen.” 381<br />
Whereas Herod’s Ungelassenheit leads him to take violent action, Weigel<br />
commends <strong>the</strong> Gelassenheit <strong>of</strong> those who take no action and do not intervene in worldly<br />
affairs. Weigel’s Eckhartian concept <strong>of</strong> Gelassenheit helps him to reach <strong>the</strong> conclusion<br />
th<strong>at</strong> reform does not mean modifying earthly institutions, because this kind <strong>of</strong> change can<br />
only perpetu<strong>at</strong>e suffering by causing wars: <strong>the</strong> only true reform is <strong>the</strong> reform<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
soul, its becoming gelassen. Despite <strong>the</strong> fact th<strong>at</strong> Weigel hoped to imit<strong>at</strong>e Christ by a<br />
peaceful and quiet evasion (in not publically leaving <strong>the</strong> Church in protest), his definition<br />
<strong>of</strong> reform<strong>at</strong>ion had practical implic<strong>at</strong>ions for both Church and St<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> made him non<br />
gr<strong>at</strong>a: Gelassenheit means th<strong>at</strong> nei<strong>the</strong>r church nor st<strong>at</strong>e are ultim<strong>at</strong>ely necessary. Unlike<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs who fought for <strong>the</strong> reform <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> church, Weigel thought th<strong>at</strong> a “Christian church”<br />
was a contradiction in terms. Th<strong>at</strong> is, it is <strong>the</strong> very idea <strong>of</strong> an institutional church th<strong>at</strong> is<br />
<strong>the</strong> problem, ra<strong>the</strong>r than any particular incarn<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church. Through his reading <strong>of</strong><br />
Eckhart’s <strong>mystical</strong> texts, Weigel realized th<strong>at</strong> a Christian’s particip<strong>at</strong>ion or nonparticip<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
in <strong>the</strong>m is an indifferent m<strong>at</strong>ter, and can nei<strong>the</strong>r harm nor save a truly<br />
faithful Christian. In a marked departure from <strong>the</strong> celebr<strong>at</strong>ed confessors and martyrs <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> early Church—and from Martin Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s defiantly public st<strong>at</strong>ements <strong>of</strong> belief—<br />
Weigel allowed th<strong>at</strong> nei<strong>the</strong>r priests nor parishioners need speak out in public against<br />
practices th<strong>at</strong> were contrary to <strong>the</strong>ir beliefs, if doing so would endanger <strong>the</strong>ir safety.<br />
Dismissing <strong>the</strong> call to martyrdom in this way, however, left Weigel spiritually homeless,<br />
381 Weigel, Postille, 78.<br />
142