12.11.2014 Views

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Protestant Mysticism: Not a Contradiction in Terms<br />

Although scholars have recently challenged <strong>the</strong> idea th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> phrase “Protestant<br />

mysticism” is a contradiction in terms, it had long been assumed th<strong>at</strong> Martin Lu<strong>the</strong>r<br />

swept aside all things medieval, and <strong>the</strong>refore mysticism as well. For instance, Brunner<br />

defined <strong>the</strong> options thus: “Entweder die Mystik oder das Wort.” 23 The epigram to<br />

Brunner’s work (by Lu<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>of</strong> course) firmly aligns Protestantism with <strong>the</strong> Word:<br />

“Verbum est principium primum, Lu<strong>the</strong>r.” 24 With <strong>the</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s authority behind<br />

him, Brunner suggests th<strong>at</strong> mysticism is somehow not quite Christian—or <strong>at</strong> least not<br />

quite biblical—and thus has no place in Protestantism, which purports to be firmly rooted<br />

in Scripture, as Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s principle <strong>of</strong> sola scriptura has it. Brunner writes: “Gott kommt<br />

zu uns, indem er spricht. Die T<strong>at</strong>en Gottes sind Kund-machungen, Euangelia. Das ist die<br />

Gegenwart des ‘Numinosen’: daß seine Gedanken kund werden. Das ist das Mysterium<br />

tremendum, daß er uns anruft.” 25 God does not make himself available to Christians via<br />

special experiences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> numinous and <strong>the</strong> mysterium tremendum (<strong>the</strong>se words describe<br />

his understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>mystical</strong> experience), but ra<strong>the</strong>r is only present through God’s call,<br />

his word and his Euangelia. To belong to Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s “evangelical” camp 26 is to repudi<strong>at</strong>e<br />

mysticism and respond solely to <strong>the</strong> Word. 27<br />

23 Emil Brunner, Die Mystik und das Wort: Der Gegens<strong>at</strong>z zwischen moderner Religionsauffassung und<br />

christlichem Glauben dargestellt an der Theologie Schleiermachers (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1924), 5.<br />

24 Ibid.<br />

25 Ibid.<br />

26 “Evangelical” was <strong>the</strong> preferred self-design<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>r and his followers, whereas “Protestant” and<br />

“Lu<strong>the</strong>ran” were o<strong>the</strong>r design<strong>at</strong>ions. Emphasizing <strong>the</strong> primacy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Euangelia is ano<strong>the</strong>r way th<strong>at</strong><br />

Brunner indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>ran <strong>the</strong>ologie is true, and moreover, true because it is based on <strong>the</strong> evangelical<br />

speech act. Diarmaid MacCulloch, Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years (New York: Viking,<br />

2010), 608.<br />

27 Brunner also insists th<strong>at</strong> union (a central <strong>the</strong>me in <strong>mystical</strong> texts) is nothing more than hearing and<br />

responding to God’s word: ins<strong>of</strong>ar as a Christian accepts God’s words, <strong>the</strong>y become part <strong>of</strong> his person,<br />

which constitutes a kind <strong>of</strong> union. “Dieses Rufen hören, diesem unfaßbaren Sprechen Glauben schenken,<br />

diese Wahrheit, die all unsere Wahrheiten außer Kraft setzt…diese uns Fernste…als unsere geltende<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!