the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Protestant Mysticism: Not a Contradiction in Terms<br />
Although scholars have recently challenged <strong>the</strong> idea th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> phrase “Protestant<br />
mysticism” is a contradiction in terms, it had long been assumed th<strong>at</strong> Martin Lu<strong>the</strong>r<br />
swept aside all things medieval, and <strong>the</strong>refore mysticism as well. For instance, Brunner<br />
defined <strong>the</strong> options thus: “Entweder die Mystik oder das Wort.” 23 The epigram to<br />
Brunner’s work (by Lu<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>of</strong> course) firmly aligns Protestantism with <strong>the</strong> Word:<br />
“Verbum est principium primum, Lu<strong>the</strong>r.” 24 With <strong>the</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s authority behind<br />
him, Brunner suggests th<strong>at</strong> mysticism is somehow not quite Christian—or <strong>at</strong> least not<br />
quite biblical—and thus has no place in Protestantism, which purports to be firmly rooted<br />
in Scripture, as Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s principle <strong>of</strong> sola scriptura has it. Brunner writes: “Gott kommt<br />
zu uns, indem er spricht. Die T<strong>at</strong>en Gottes sind Kund-machungen, Euangelia. Das ist die<br />
Gegenwart des ‘Numinosen’: daß seine Gedanken kund werden. Das ist das Mysterium<br />
tremendum, daß er uns anruft.” 25 God does not make himself available to Christians via<br />
special experiences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> numinous and <strong>the</strong> mysterium tremendum (<strong>the</strong>se words describe<br />
his understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>mystical</strong> experience), but ra<strong>the</strong>r is only present through God’s call,<br />
his word and his Euangelia. To belong to Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s “evangelical” camp 26 is to repudi<strong>at</strong>e<br />
mysticism and respond solely to <strong>the</strong> Word. 27<br />
23 Emil Brunner, Die Mystik und das Wort: Der Gegens<strong>at</strong>z zwischen moderner Religionsauffassung und<br />
christlichem Glauben dargestellt an der Theologie Schleiermachers (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1924), 5.<br />
24 Ibid.<br />
25 Ibid.<br />
26 “Evangelical” was <strong>the</strong> preferred self-design<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>r and his followers, whereas “Protestant” and<br />
“Lu<strong>the</strong>ran” were o<strong>the</strong>r design<strong>at</strong>ions. Emphasizing <strong>the</strong> primacy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Euangelia is ano<strong>the</strong>r way th<strong>at</strong><br />
Brunner indic<strong>at</strong>es th<strong>at</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>ran <strong>the</strong>ologie is true, and moreover, true because it is based on <strong>the</strong> evangelical<br />
speech act. Diarmaid MacCulloch, Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years (New York: Viking,<br />
2010), 608.<br />
27 Brunner also insists th<strong>at</strong> union (a central <strong>the</strong>me in <strong>mystical</strong> texts) is nothing more than hearing and<br />
responding to God’s word: ins<strong>of</strong>ar as a Christian accepts God’s words, <strong>the</strong>y become part <strong>of</strong> his person,<br />
which constitutes a kind <strong>of</strong> union. “Dieses Rufen hören, diesem unfaßbaren Sprechen Glauben schenken,<br />
diese Wahrheit, die all unsere Wahrheiten außer Kraft setzt…diese uns Fernste…als unsere geltende<br />
9