12.11.2014 Views

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

context is th<strong>at</strong> he picks up on Eckhart’s characteristic language, calling it <strong>the</strong> “ground <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> soul” or “inner ground.” 299 Moreover, Weigel makes it clear th<strong>at</strong> Adam is not simply<br />

<strong>the</strong> first person to be cre<strong>at</strong>ed, but ra<strong>the</strong>r stands in for all people, and th<strong>at</strong> God repe<strong>at</strong>s <strong>the</strong><br />

cre<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Adam for each human being who is conceived. Each person has a double<br />

conception (“es h<strong>at</strong> ein Jeder Christe eine zwifache empfengnis oder geburt”), a visiblem<strong>at</strong>erial<br />

cre<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mortal body, and a second spiritual-heavenly one. 300 Weigel uses<br />

Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s language when he says th<strong>at</strong> Christ is in every person durch den glauben, but<br />

never adds <strong>the</strong> qualific<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> Christ is lost to man because <strong>of</strong> sin and must be reimplanted<br />

in man by faith. Quite <strong>the</strong> opposite: Weigel writes th<strong>at</strong> Christ is not <strong>of</strong>fenbar,<br />

but th<strong>at</strong> does not mean Christ has been driven away by sin, but ra<strong>the</strong>r must be awakened,<br />

remembered or uncovered, which is an entirely different proposition. Weigel does not<br />

deny th<strong>at</strong> humans are sinful, but reminds <strong>the</strong> reader <strong>the</strong>y are only sinful accidentaliter<br />

and not substantialiter: as he writes, “die seele bleibet seele.” 301<br />

Weigel’s idiosyncr<strong>at</strong>ic reading <strong>of</strong> Genesis leads to a ra<strong>the</strong>r counterintuitive<br />

account (<strong>at</strong> least to a modern reader) about how knowledge is acquired, concluding th<strong>at</strong><br />

true knowledge <strong>of</strong> all things (“all erkentnis aller dingen”) is to be found within each<br />

person already. 302 Mirroring <strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> universe eman<strong>at</strong>ing from interior to<br />

exterior, <strong>the</strong> fundamental principle <strong>of</strong> Weigel’s epistemology is th<strong>at</strong> knowledge comes<br />

from <strong>the</strong> knower and not <strong>the</strong> object known, and he repe<strong>at</strong>s this formula <strong>of</strong>ten throughout<br />

Christus, mit allen Himlischen ewigen guttern, Do ist das reich gottes gantz und volkommen, aber nit<br />

<strong>of</strong>fenbar.” Ibid, 61.<br />

299 For example: “Aber die ubern<strong>at</strong>urliche erkentnis, die mag wol heissen die Innere gottliche erkentnis, dan<br />

sie kommet nicht von aussen hinein, sondern eben das obiectum ist schon darinne, im Inwendigen grunde<br />

der seelen, Nemlich gottes Wort, Wille, gesetz, geist etc.” Weigel, Griff, 53.<br />

300 Ibid, 61.<br />

301 “Es [das reich gottes] muß erwartet, erkennet, gefunden, gefület, geschmeckt werden im Innern grunde<br />

der seelen.” Weigel, Griff, 62 and 72.<br />

302 Ibid, 12.<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!