the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
context is th<strong>at</strong> he picks up on Eckhart’s characteristic language, calling it <strong>the</strong> “ground <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> soul” or “inner ground.” 299 Moreover, Weigel makes it clear th<strong>at</strong> Adam is not simply<br />
<strong>the</strong> first person to be cre<strong>at</strong>ed, but ra<strong>the</strong>r stands in for all people, and th<strong>at</strong> God repe<strong>at</strong>s <strong>the</strong><br />
cre<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Adam for each human being who is conceived. Each person has a double<br />
conception (“es h<strong>at</strong> ein Jeder Christe eine zwifache empfengnis oder geburt”), a visiblem<strong>at</strong>erial<br />
cre<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mortal body, and a second spiritual-heavenly one. 300 Weigel uses<br />
Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s language when he says th<strong>at</strong> Christ is in every person durch den glauben, but<br />
never adds <strong>the</strong> qualific<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> Christ is lost to man because <strong>of</strong> sin and must be reimplanted<br />
in man by faith. Quite <strong>the</strong> opposite: Weigel writes th<strong>at</strong> Christ is not <strong>of</strong>fenbar,<br />
but th<strong>at</strong> does not mean Christ has been driven away by sin, but ra<strong>the</strong>r must be awakened,<br />
remembered or uncovered, which is an entirely different proposition. Weigel does not<br />
deny th<strong>at</strong> humans are sinful, but reminds <strong>the</strong> reader <strong>the</strong>y are only sinful accidentaliter<br />
and not substantialiter: as he writes, “die seele bleibet seele.” 301<br />
Weigel’s idiosyncr<strong>at</strong>ic reading <strong>of</strong> Genesis leads to a ra<strong>the</strong>r counterintuitive<br />
account (<strong>at</strong> least to a modern reader) about how knowledge is acquired, concluding th<strong>at</strong><br />
true knowledge <strong>of</strong> all things (“all erkentnis aller dingen”) is to be found within each<br />
person already. 302 Mirroring <strong>the</strong> oper<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> universe eman<strong>at</strong>ing from interior to<br />
exterior, <strong>the</strong> fundamental principle <strong>of</strong> Weigel’s epistemology is th<strong>at</strong> knowledge comes<br />
from <strong>the</strong> knower and not <strong>the</strong> object known, and he repe<strong>at</strong>s this formula <strong>of</strong>ten throughout<br />
Christus, mit allen Himlischen ewigen guttern, Do ist das reich gottes gantz und volkommen, aber nit<br />
<strong>of</strong>fenbar.” Ibid, 61.<br />
299 For example: “Aber die ubern<strong>at</strong>urliche erkentnis, die mag wol heissen die Innere gottliche erkentnis, dan<br />
sie kommet nicht von aussen hinein, sondern eben das obiectum ist schon darinne, im Inwendigen grunde<br />
der seelen, Nemlich gottes Wort, Wille, gesetz, geist etc.” Weigel, Griff, 53.<br />
300 Ibid, 61.<br />
301 “Es [das reich gottes] muß erwartet, erkennet, gefunden, gefület, geschmeckt werden im Innern grunde<br />
der seelen.” Weigel, Griff, 62 and 72.<br />
302 Ibid, 12.<br />
113