12.11.2014 Views

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

the mystical theology of valentin weigel - DataSpace at Princeton ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

e “as it was when it was not.” For Weigel, this ultim<strong>at</strong>e spiritual poverty has important<br />

epistemological ramific<strong>at</strong>ions. Abandoning <strong>the</strong> self entails abandoning <strong>the</strong> self’s<br />

cognitive faculties, allowing God’s own cognition to take over instead, leaving God to<br />

peacefully contempl<strong>at</strong>e God’s own self without interference. In such a scenario, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

cannot be, by definition, any disagreement or disunity, as <strong>the</strong> various selves abandon<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves and resolve into a single viewer (God) contempl<strong>at</strong>ing a single object (which is<br />

also God) through a medium th<strong>at</strong> is identical with both viewer and object (in God’s own<br />

self).<br />

In <strong>the</strong> third and final phase, Eckhartian spiritual poverty appears in Weigel’s<br />

oeuvre as guidance for Christians living in discordant times. As is fitting for giving<br />

practical advice, Weigel takes up a pastoral form—<strong>the</strong> sermon. The sermon in question<br />

belongs to his most controversial work, <strong>the</strong> Kirchen- und Hauspostille, and tre<strong>at</strong>s <strong>the</strong><br />

flight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Family from Herod’s violent revenge upon all <strong>the</strong> male children in<br />

Bethlehem. Weigel asks why Christ did not intervene to prevent this terrible injustice:<br />

surely <strong>the</strong> King <strong>of</strong> Kings incarn<strong>at</strong>e need not fear a mere earthly king, and be reduced to<br />

sneaking away <strong>at</strong> night? Weigel reads <strong>the</strong> flight into Egypt as a defence <strong>of</strong> nonintervention<br />

in political affairs: it is better to refuse to be tempted into violence altoge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

by fleeing and hiding, which is <strong>the</strong>refore not cowardice, but ra<strong>the</strong>r imit<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> Christ<br />

Himself. Just as Christ chose not to return Herod’s violence with violence, a Christian<br />

should avoid intervening in earthly affairs because any intervention (even on God’s side)<br />

can only fuel conflict—never extinguish it. Moreover, Weigel draws parallels between<br />

Herod’s Judaea and <strong>the</strong> Saxony <strong>of</strong> his own time, where corrupt priests, blinded by selfinterest,<br />

cooper<strong>at</strong>e with an earthly ruler to persecute <strong>the</strong> innocent and <strong>the</strong> faithful.<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!