pdf 1242 KByte - JIKO

12.11.2014 Views
Policy Paper: Assessing prerequisites for market-based REDD+ activities 36 Pistorius, Till, Christine B. Schmitt, Dinah Benick and Steffen Entenmann (2011): Greening REDD+: Challenges and opportunities for forest biodiversity conservation (Policy Paper, second revised version). University of Freiburg. Available at: http://www.landespflegefreiburg.de/ressourcen/Schmitt_Publikationen/Greening%20REDD%20_Freiburg%20University_2011_final.pdf [Accessed 27 February 2012]. ROW (n.d.). REDD Offset Working Group | Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation. Available at: http://stateredd.org/ [Accessed 14 December 2011]. Savaresi, Annalisa and Elisa Morgera (2009): Ownership of Land, Forest and Carbon. In J. Costenbader (Ed.), Legal Frameworks for REDD Design and Implementation at the National Level, IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper (pp. 15–34). Gland: IUCN. Available at: http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/buch_eplp77_gb_20091208_advanced_copy_low.pdf [Accessed 3 January 2012]. Skutsch, Margaret, Patrick E. van Laake, Eliakimu M. Zahabu, Bhaskar S. Karky and Pushkin Phartiyal (2009): Community monitoring in REDD+. In A. Angelsen (Ed.), Realising REDD+ National Strategies and Policy Options (pp. 101–112). Bogor: CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research). Spergel, Barry and Michael Wells (2009): Conservation trust funds as a model for REDD+ national financing. Realising REDD+ National Strategies and Policy Options (pp. 75–83). Bogor. Stern, Nicholas (2008): Key elements of a global deal on climate change. The London School of Economics and Political Science. Available at: [Accessed 3 October 2011]. Stern, Nicholas, Siobhan Peters, Vicki Bakhshi, Alex Bowen, Catherine Cameron, Sebastian Catovsky, Di Crane, Sophie Cruickshank and Simon Dietz (2006): Stern Review: The economics of climate change. London: HM Treasury. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/stern_review_report.htm [Accessed 12 November 2011]. Streck, Charlotte (2009): Rights and REDD+: Legal and regulatory considerations. In A. Angelsen (Ed.), Realising REDD+ National Strategies and Policy Options (pp. 151–162). CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research). Streck, Charlotte, Luis Gomez-Echeverri, Pablo Gutman, Cyril Loisel and Jacob Werksman (2009): REDD+ Institutional Options Assessment: Developing an Efficient, Effective, and Equitable Institutional Framework for REDD+ under the UNFCCC. Meridian Institute. Available at: http://www.redd-oar.org/links/REDD+IOA_en.pdf [Accessed 27 November 2011]. Sunderlin, William D., Anne M. Larson and Peter Crankleton (2009): Forest tenure rights and REDD+. Realising REDD+ National Strategies and Policy Options (pp. 139–162). Bogor: CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research). The REDD Desk (2011a, May 9): Brazil. Available at: http://www.theredddesk.org/countries/brazil/readiness_overview [Accessed 2 January 2012]. The REDD Desk (2011b, February 11): Guyana: Monitoring, Reporting and Verification System Roadmap. Available at: http://www.theredddesk.org/countries/guyana/info/plan/monitoring_reporting_and_verification_system_roadmap [Accessed 4 January 2012]. UN-REDD Programme (2011a): The UN-REDD Programme Strategy 2011-2015. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Available at: http://www.unep.org/forests/Portals/142/docs/UN-REDD%20Programme%20Strategy.pdf [Accessed 21 February 2012]. UN-REDD Programme (2011b): UN-REDD Programme Guidelines on Free, Prior and Informed Consent - Draft for Comment. Available at: http://www.unredd.net/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=6369&Itemid=53 [Accessed 12 July 2011]. UNFCCC (2009): Decision 3/CP.13: Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries: approaches to stimulate action. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its thirteenth session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007 - UNFCCC/CP/2007/6/Add1. UNFCCC (2010): Report of the Conference of the Parties on its fifteenth session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009. Addendum. Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its fifteenth session - FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. UNFCCC (2011): Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its sixteenth session - FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1. Geneva: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf [Accessed 20 March 2012]. UNFCCC (2012): Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventeenth session, held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011. Addendum. Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its seventeenth session - FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.2. Geneva: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a02.pdf [Accessed 15 March 2012]. Vatn, Arild and Arild Angelsen (2009): Options for a national REDD+ architecture. In A. Angelsen (Ed.), Realising REDD+ National Strategies and Policy Options (pp. 57–74). Bogor: CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research). Nicolas Kreibich, Christof Arens and Wolfgang Sterk Wuppertal Institute

Policy Paper: Assessing prerequisites for market-based REDD+ activities 37 Vatn, Arild and Paul Vedele (2011): Getting Ready! A Study of the National Governance Structures for REDD+. Department of International Environment and Development Studies Noragric. Available at: http://www.umb.no/statisk/noragric/noragric_report_no._59.pdf [Accessed 5 September 2011]. Wertz-Kanounnikoff, Sheila and Arild Angelsen (2009): Global and national REDD+ architecture - linking institutions and actions. In A. Angelsen (Ed.), Realising REDD+ National Strategies and Policy Options. Bogor: CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research). Available at: http://www.forestsclimatechange.org/fileadmin/downloads/realisingredd2.pdf [Accessed 14 April 2010]. Wunder, Sven (2009): Can payments for envrionmental services reduce deforestation and forest degradation? In A. Angelsen (Ed.), Realising REDD+ National Strategies and Policy Options (pp. 213–224). Bogor: CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research). The positions expressed in this policy paper are strictly those of the authors and represent neither the opinion of the Wuppertal Institute nor of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. Contact: Nicolas Kreibich Tel. +49(0)202 2492194 EMail: nico.kreibich@wupperinst.org Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy ppersberg 19 42103 Wuppertal Germany The Wuppertal Institute is carrying out the “JIKO”project on behalf of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. Internet: www.jikobmu.de Nicolas Kreibich, Christof Arens and Wolfgang Sterk Wuppertal Institute

Page 1 and 2: JIKO Policy Paper 3/2012 June 2012

Page 3 and 4: Policy Paper: Assessing prerequisit
















Page 35: Policy Paper: Assessing prerequisit

countries

activities

carbon

readiness

reference

institute

deforestation

assessing

wuppertal

prerequisites

kbyte

jiko

forestindustries.eu

pdf 1242 KByte - JIKO

pdf 1242 KByte - JIKO ... View more pdf 1242 KByte - JIKO

Delete template?

Save as template ?

pdf 1242 KByte - JIKO pdf 1242 KByte - JIKO