1 1.10 Application of estuarine and coastal classifications in marine ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Stelzenmüller, V., Rogers, S.I., Mills, C.M. 2008. Spatio-temporal patterns of fishing pressure on UK marine landscapes, and their implications for spatial planning and management. ICES Journal of Marine Sciences 65(6), 1081-1091. Stelzenmüller, V., Ellis, J.R., Rogers, S.I. 2010. Towards a spatially explicit risk assessment for marine management: Assessing the vulnerability of fish to aggregate extraction. Biological Conservation 143, 230-238. St. Martin, K., Hall-Arber, M. 2008. The missing layer: Geo-technologies, communities, and implications for marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 32, 779-786. Stevens, T., Connolly, R.M. 2004. Testing the utility of abiotic surrogates for marine habitat mapping at scales relevant to management. Biological Conservation 119, 351-362. Thompson, S.D., Gergel, S.E. 2008. Conservation implications of mapping rare habitats using high spatial resolution imagery: Recommendations for heterogeneous and fragmented landscapes. Landscape Ecology 23(9), 1023-1037. Troy, A., Wilson, M.A. (2006) Mapping ecosystem services: practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecological Economics 60(2), 435–449. Valavanis, V. D., Pierce, G. J., Zuur, A. F., Palialexis, A., Saveliev, A., Katara, I., Wang, J. J. 2008. Modelling of essential fish habitat based on remote sensing, spatial analysis and GIS. Hydrobiologia 612, 5-20. Valiela, I., Bowen, J.L., York, J.K. 2001. Mangrove forests: one of the world’s threatened major tropical environments. BioScience 51(10), 807-815. Vincent, M.A., Atkins, S., Lumb, C., Golding, N., Lieberknecht, L. M., Webster, M.. 2004. Marine nature conservation and sustainable development: the Irish Sea Pilot. Report to Defra by the Joint Nature Conservation Commission, Peterborough, UK. 90
Wells, S., Ravilous, C., Corcoran, E. 2006. In the front line: Shoreline protection and other ecosystem services from mangroves and coral reefs. United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK, 33 pp. Weiss, A. D. 2001. Topographic Positions and Landforms Analysis (Conference Poster). ESRI International User Conference. San Diego, CA, July 9-13. Wiens J.A. 2000. Ecological heterogeneity: an ontogeny of concepts and approaches. In: Hutchings, M.J., John, E.A., Stewart, A.J.A. (Eds), The Ecological Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 9-31. Williams, K.B., 2002. The Potential Wetland Restoration and Enhancement Site Identification Procedure. NC Division of Coastal Management, Raleigh, NC. Wright, D.J., 2005. Report of HURL Cruise KOK0510: Submersible Dives and Multibeam Mapping to Investigate Benthic Habitats of Tutuila, American Samoa. Technical Report NOAA's Office of Undersea Research Submersible Science Program, Hawai'i Undersea Research Lab. http://dusk.geo.orst.edu/djl/samoa/hurl (Last accessed 7 September 2009). Wright, D.J., Lundblad, E.R., Larkin, E.M., Rinehart, R.W., Murphy, J., Cary-Kothera, L., Draganov, K. 2005. Benthic Terrain Modeler (BTM) extension for ArcGIS 8.x and 9.x, ver. 1.0. [http://www.csc. noaa.gov/products/btm/]. Wright, D.J., Heyman, W.D. 2008. Marine and coastal GIS for geomorphology, habitat mapping, and marine reserves, Marine Geodesy 31(4), 1-8. Wright, D.J., Lundblad, E.R., Fenner, D., Whaylen, L., Smith, J.R. 2006. Initial results of submersible dives and multibeam mapping to investigate benthic habitats of Tutuila, American Samoa, Eos, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 87(36), Ocean Sciences Meeting Supplement, Abstract OS12B-04. 91
Page 1 and 2:
1.10 Application of estuarine and c
Page 3 and 4:
SYNOPSIS Coastal and marine classif
Page 5 and 6:
government and non-governmental man
Page 7 and 8:
paucity of species and habitat data
Page 9 and 10:
and many sub-catastrophic disturban
Page 11 and 12:
conservation practitioners, industr
Page 13 and 14:
levels of the hierarchy are defined
Page 15 and 16:
distributions, both within and surr
Page 17 and 18:
In a hierarchical framework for the
Page 19 and 20:
1.10.2.3 Australian Coastal Classif
Page 21 and 22:
Ecological theory predicts that the
Page 23 and 24:
outbreaks in the late 1970s (Green
Page 25 and 26:
intertidal zones, and shallow coast
Page 27 and 28:
1.10.3.1 Identifying Priority Conse
Page 29 and 30:
y the Massachusetts Oceans Act (200
Page 31 and 32:
eight color coded zones to provide
Page 33 and 34:
appropriate place to investigate fe
Page 35 and 36:
1.10.4.3 Massachusetts Ocean Plan T
Page 37 and 38:
One of the foundational concepts un
Page 39 and 40: ecosystems has shown that considera
Page 41 and 42: In May 2004, Germany was the first
Page 43 and 44: improve the design and interpretati
Page 45 and 46: NOAA’s CoastWatch Change Analysis
Page 47 and 48: ground resolution of 30 m. Each cla
Page 49 and 50: also be used to assess the role of
Page 51 and 52: States (Gundlach and Hayes 1978). T
Page 53 and 54: information at the species level. I
Page 55 and 56: 1.10.8.4 Classifying and Mapping Hu
Page 57 and 58: map of the entire Australian shorel
Page 59 and 60: within 11 regions, leading to an ov
Page 61 and 62: enhancement of certain functions in
Page 63 and 64: achieved by identifying barriers to
Page 65 and 66: ecosystem service values extracted
Page 67 and 68: 1.10.12 FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND PRIOR
Page 69 and 70: 1.10.12.1 Linking Patterns and Proc
Page 71 and 72: approach. New classifications will
Page 73 and 74: Arundel, H. and Mount, R. 2007. Nat
Page 75 and 76: Connell, J. H. 1978. Diversity in t
Page 77 and 78: Duke. N.C., Meynecke, J.O., Dittman
Page 79 and 80: Green, A.L., C.E. Birkeland, R.H. R
Page 81 and 82: Hiddink, J. G., Jennings, S., Kaise
Page 83 and 84: Kostylev, V., Todd, B.J., Fader, G.
Page 85 and 86: Maxwell, D.L., Stelzenmüller, V.,
Page 87 and 88: Spatial and temporal patterns in fi
Page 89: Sharples, C. 2006. Indicative Mappi
Page 93 and 94: FIGURE LEGENDS Figure 1. A) Classes
Page 95 and 96: Figure 10. Ecological evaluation in
Page 97 and 98: Figure 21. Combining 'intolerance'
Page 99 and 100: selected planning units in gray ins
Page 101 and 102: Box 2. Classifications as thematic
Page 103 and 104: Figure 1. 1
Page 117 and 118: Figure 15. Fishing effort (hrs/day)
Page 121 and 122: Figure 19. 100% Conversion. 80% 60%
Page 135: Figure 33. 33
show all

1 1.10 Application of estuarine and coastal classifications in marine ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?