1 1.10 Application of estuarine and coastal classifications in marine ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Lundblad, E., Wright, D.J., Miller, J., Larkin, E.M., Rinehart, R., Battista, T., Anderson, S.M., Naar, D.F., Donahue, B.T. 2006. Classifying benthic terrains with multibeam bathymetry, bathymetric position and rugosity: Tutuila, American Samoa. Marine Geodesy 29(2), 89-111. Lynch, T. P. 2006. Incorporation of recreational fishing effort into design of marine protected areas. Conservation Biology 20, 1466–1476. Madden, C. J., Grossman, D.H. 2008. A framework for a coastal/marine ecological classification standard (CMECS). In Mapping the seafloor for habitat characterization, B. J. Todd and H. G. Greene (eds.), pp. 185–210. St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada: Geological Association of Canada, Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 47. Madden, C. J., Grossman, D.H., Goodin, K.L. 2005. Coastal and Marine Systems of North America: Framework for an Ecological Classification Standard: Version II. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Birkeland, C.E., Randall, R.H., Wass, R.C., Smith, B., and S. Wilkins, 1987. Biological Assessment of the Fagatele Bay National Marine Sanctuary, NOAA Technical Memorandum, 232 pp. Maidment, D.R., ed., 2002. Arc Hydro: GIS for Water Resources. ESRI Press. Redlands, CA. Nagelkerken, I., Blaber, S.J.M., Bouillon, S., Green, P., Haywood, M., Kirton, L.G., Meynecke, J.O., Pawlik, J., Penrose, H.M., Sasekumar, A., Somerfield, P.J. 2008. The habitat function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: a review. Aquatic Botany 89, 155-185. Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan (Volume 2), Baseline Assessment and Science Framework, December 2009. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 227 pp. http://www.env.state.ma.us/eea/mop/final-v1/v1-front.pdf 84
Maxwell, D.L., Stelzenmüller, V., Eastwood, P.D., Rogers S.I. 2009. Modelling the spatial distribution of plaice (Pleuronectes platessa), sole (Solea solea) and thornback ray (Raja clavata) in UK waters for marine management and planning. Journal of Sea Research 61 (4), 258-267. Menza, C., Finnen, E. 2007. Manual for the sampling design tool for ArcGIS. NOAA Center for Coastal and Marine Monitoring. http://ccma.nos.noaa.gov/products/biogeography/sampling/welcome.html Monmonier, M. 1996. How to lie with maps. University of Chicago Press. Chicago, 207 pp. Mount, R.E., Bricher, P.J. 2008. Estuarine, Coastal and Marine (ECM) National Habitat Mapping Project, ECM National Habitat Map Series User Guide Version 1 February 2008. Spatial Science Group, School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania. Report to the Department of Climate Change and the National Land and Water Resources Audit, Canberra, ACT. ECM National Habitat Map Series User Guide. (http://www.ozcoasts.org.au/nrm_rpt/acknowledgements.jsp) Mumby, P.J., Broad, K., Brumbaugh, D.R., Dahlgren, C.P., Harborne, A.R., Hastings, A., Holmes, K.E., Kappel, C.V., Micheli, F., Sanchirico, J.N. 2008. Coral reef habitats as surrogates of species, ecological functions and ecosystem services. Conservation Biology 22, 941-951. Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Green, R.E., Lehner, B., Malcolm, T.R., Ricketts, T.H. 2008. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 9495–9500. NOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS). 2006. An ecological characterization of the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary Region: Oceanographic, Biogeographic and Contaminants Assessment. Prepared by NCCOS’s Biogeography Team in cooperation with the National Marine Sanctuary Program. Silver Spring, MD. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 45. 85
Page 1 and 2:
1.10 Application of estuarine and c
Page 3 and 4:
SYNOPSIS Coastal and marine classif
Page 5 and 6:
government and non-governmental man
Page 7 and 8:
paucity of species and habitat data
Page 9 and 10:
and many sub-catastrophic disturban
Page 11 and 12:
conservation practitioners, industr
Page 13 and 14:
levels of the hierarchy are defined
Page 15 and 16:
distributions, both within and surr
Page 17 and 18:
In a hierarchical framework for the
Page 19 and 20:
1.10.2.3 Australian Coastal Classif
Page 21 and 22:
Ecological theory predicts that the
Page 23 and 24:
outbreaks in the late 1970s (Green
Page 25 and 26:
intertidal zones, and shallow coast
Page 27 and 28:
1.10.3.1 Identifying Priority Conse
Page 29 and 30:
y the Massachusetts Oceans Act (200
Page 31 and 32:
eight color coded zones to provide
Page 33 and 34: appropriate place to investigate fe
Page 35 and 36: 1.10.4.3 Massachusetts Ocean Plan T
Page 37 and 38: One of the foundational concepts un
Page 39 and 40: ecosystems has shown that considera
Page 41 and 42: In May 2004, Germany was the first
Page 43 and 44: improve the design and interpretati
Page 45 and 46: NOAA’s CoastWatch Change Analysis
Page 47 and 48: ground resolution of 30 m. Each cla
Page 49 and 50: also be used to assess the role of
Page 51 and 52: States (Gundlach and Hayes 1978). T
Page 53 and 54: information at the species level. I
Page 55 and 56: 1.10.8.4 Classifying and Mapping Hu
Page 57 and 58: map of the entire Australian shorel
Page 59 and 60: within 11 regions, leading to an ov
Page 61 and 62: enhancement of certain functions in
Page 63 and 64: achieved by identifying barriers to
Page 65 and 66: ecosystem service values extracted
Page 67 and 68: 1.10.12 FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND PRIOR
Page 69 and 70: 1.10.12.1 Linking Patterns and Proc
Page 71 and 72: approach. New classifications will
Page 73 and 74: Arundel, H. and Mount, R. 2007. Nat
Page 75 and 76: Connell, J. H. 1978. Diversity in t
Page 77 and 78: Duke. N.C., Meynecke, J.O., Dittman
Page 79 and 80: Green, A.L., C.E. Birkeland, R.H. R
Page 81 and 82: Hiddink, J. G., Jennings, S., Kaise
Page 83: Kostylev, V., Todd, B.J., Fader, G.
Page 87 and 88: Spatial and temporal patterns in fi
Page 89 and 90: Sharples, C. 2006. Indicative Mappi
Page 91 and 92: Wells, S., Ravilous, C., Corcoran,
Page 93 and 94: FIGURE LEGENDS Figure 1. A) Classes
Page 95 and 96: Figure 10. Ecological evaluation in
Page 97 and 98: Figure 21. Combining 'intolerance'
Page 99 and 100: selected planning units in gray ins
Page 101 and 102: Box 2. Classifications as thematic
Page 103 and 104: Figure 1. 1
Page 117 and 118: Figure 15. Fishing effort (hrs/day)
Page 121 and 122: Figure 19. 100% Conversion. 80% 60%
Page 135:
Figure 33. 33
show all

1 1.10 Application of estuarine and coastal classifications in marine ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?