1 1.10 Application of estuarine and coastal classifications in marine ...
1 1.10 Application of estuarine and coastal classifications in marine ... 1 1.10 Application of estuarine and coastal classifications in marine ...
Schroeder, R., Smith, E., Tuitele, C., Tagarino, A., Vaitautolu, S., Vaoli, E., Vargas-Angel, B., Vroom, P. 2008. The state of coral reef ecosystems of American Samoa. In (eds.), The State of Coral Reef Ecosystems of the United States and Pacific Freely Associated States: 2008, ed. J.M. Wadell and A.M. Clark. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 73. NOAA/NCCOS Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment’s Biogeography Team. Silver Spring, MD, pp 307-351. Ferrier, S., B. A. Wintle. 2009. Quantitative approaches to spatial conservation prioritization: matching the solution to the need. In Spatial Conservation Prioritization, Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools, ed. A. Moilanen, K. A. Wilson and H. P. Possingham, 1-15. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Fisheries and Ocean Canada (DFO). 2004. Identification of ecologically and biologically sensitive areas. DFO Canada Science Advisory Section Ecosystem Status Report 2004/006. Fraschetti, S., Terlizzi, S. Boero, F. 2008. How many habitats are there in the sea (and where)? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 366(1-2), 109-115. Geselbracht, L., Torres, R., Cumming, G.S., Dorfman, D., Beck, M., Shaw, D. 2009. Identification of a spatially efficient portfolio of priority conservation sites in estuarine areas of Florida. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19, 408-420. Gilman, E., Ellison, J.C., Duke N.C., Field, C. 2008. Threats to mangroves from climate change and adaptation options: A Review. Aquatic Botany 89 (2), 237-250. Gilliland, P.M. and Laffoley D. 2008. Key elements and steps in the process of developing ecosystem-based marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 32, 787-796. Giri, C.P., Zhu, Z., Tieszen, L.L., Singh, A., Gillette, S., Kelmelis, J.A., 2008. Mangrove forest distributions and dynamics (1975-2005) of the tsunami-affected region of Asia. Journal of Biogeography 35(3), 519-528. 78
Green, A.L., C.E. Birkeland, R.H. Randall, 1999. Twenty years of disturbance and change in Fagatele Bay National Marine Sanctuary, American Samoa. Pacific Science 53(4), 376-400. Grober-Dunsmore, R., Frazer, T.K., Lindberg, W.J., Beets, J.P. 2007. Reef fish and habitat relationships in a Caribbean seascape: the importance of reef context. Coral Reefs 26(1), 201– 216. Grober-Dunsmore, R., Frazer, T.K., Beets, J.P., Lindberg, W.J., Zwick, P., Funicelli, N. 2008. Influence of landscape structure on reef fish assemblages. Landscape Ecology 23, 37-53. Guisan, A., Weiss, S.B., Weiss, A.D. 1999. GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution. Plant Ecology 143, 107-122. Gundlach, E.R. and Hayes, M.O. 1978. Vulnerability of coastal environments to oil spill impacts. Marine Technology Society Journal 12(4), 18-27. Hall, K., Paramor, O.A.L., Robinson, L.A., Winrow-Giffin, A., Frid, C.L.J., Eno, N.C., Dernie, K.M., Sharp, R.A.M., Wyn, G.C., Ramsey, K. 2008. Mapping the sensitivity of benthic habitats to fishing in Welsh waters – development of a protocol. University of Liverpool and Countryside Council for Wales (CCW Policy Research Report No. 08/12). Halpern, B.S., Selkoe, K.A., Micheli, F., Kappel, C.V. 2007. Evaluating and ranking the vulnerability of marine ecosystems to anthropogenic threats. Conservation Biology 21, 1301– 1315. Halpern, B.S., Walbridge, S., Selkoe, K.A., Kappel, C.V., Micheli, F., D’Agrosa, C., Bruno, J.F., Casey, K.S., Ebert, C., Fox, H.E., Fujita, R., Heinemann, D., Lenihan, H.S., Madin, E.M.P., Perry, M.T., Selig, E.R., Spalding, M., Steneck, R., Watson, R. 2008. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319, 948–952. 79
- Page 27 and 28: 1.10.3.1 Identifying Priority Conse
- Page 29 and 30: y the Massachusetts Oceans Act (200
- Page 31 and 32: eight color coded zones to provide
- Page 33 and 34: appropriate place to investigate fe
- Page 35 and 36: 1.10.4.3 Massachusetts Ocean Plan T
- Page 37 and 38: One of the foundational concepts un
- Page 39 and 40: ecosystems has shown that considera
- Page 41 and 42: In May 2004, Germany was the first
- Page 43 and 44: improve the design and interpretati
- Page 45 and 46: NOAA’s CoastWatch Change Analysis
- Page 47 and 48: ground resolution of 30 m. Each cla
- Page 49 and 50: also be used to assess the role of
- Page 51 and 52: States (Gundlach and Hayes 1978). T
- Page 53 and 54: information at the species level. I
- Page 55 and 56: 1.10.8.4 Classifying and Mapping Hu
- Page 57 and 58: map of the entire Australian shorel
- Page 59 and 60: within 11 regions, leading to an ov
- Page 61 and 62: enhancement of certain functions in
- Page 63 and 64: achieved by identifying barriers to
- Page 65 and 66: ecosystem service values extracted
- Page 67 and 68: 1.10.12 FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND PRIOR
- Page 69 and 70: 1.10.12.1 Linking Patterns and Proc
- Page 71 and 72: approach. New classifications will
- Page 73 and 74: Arundel, H. and Mount, R. 2007. Nat
- Page 75 and 76: Connell, J. H. 1978. Diversity in t
- Page 77: Duke. N.C., Meynecke, J.O., Dittman
- Page 81 and 82: Hiddink, J. G., Jennings, S., Kaise
- Page 83 and 84: Kostylev, V., Todd, B.J., Fader, G.
- Page 85 and 86: Maxwell, D.L., Stelzenmüller, V.,
- Page 87 and 88: Spatial and temporal patterns in fi
- Page 89 and 90: Sharples, C. 2006. Indicative Mappi
- Page 91 and 92: Wells, S., Ravilous, C., Corcoran,
- Page 93 and 94: FIGURE LEGENDS Figure 1. A) Classes
- Page 95 and 96: Figure 10. Ecological evaluation in
- Page 97 and 98: Figure 21. Combining 'intolerance'
- Page 99 and 100: selected planning units in gray ins
- Page 101 and 102: Box 2. Classifications as thematic
- Page 103 and 104: Figure 1. 1
- Page 105 and 106: Figure 3. 3
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 5. 5
- Page 109 and 110: Figure 7. 7
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 9. 9
- Page 113 and 114: Figure 11. 11
- Page 115 and 116: Figure 13. 13
- Page 117 and 118: Figure 15. Fishing effort (hrs/day)
- Page 119 and 120: Figure 17. 17
- Page 121 and 122: Figure 19. 100% Conversion. 80% 60%
- Page 123 and 124: Figure 21. 21
- Page 125 and 126: Figure 23. 23
- Page 127 and 128: Figure 25. 25
Green, A.L., C.E. Birkel<strong>and</strong>, R.H. R<strong>and</strong>all, 1999. Twenty years <strong>of</strong> disturbance <strong>and</strong> change <strong>in</strong><br />
Fagatele Bay National Mar<strong>in</strong>e Sanctuary, American Samoa. Pacific Science 53(4), 376-400.<br />
Grober-Dunsmore, R., Frazer, T.K., L<strong>in</strong>dberg, W.J., Beets, J.P. 2007. Reef fish <strong>and</strong> habitat<br />
relationships <strong>in</strong> a Caribbean seascape: the importance <strong>of</strong> reef context. Coral Reefs 26(1), 201–<br />
216.<br />
Grober-Dunsmore, R., Frazer, T.K., Beets, J.P., L<strong>in</strong>dberg, W.J., Zwick, P., Funicelli, N. 2008.<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape structure on reef fish assemblages. L<strong>and</strong>scape Ecology 23, 37-53.<br />
Guisan, A., Weiss, S.B., Weiss, A.D. 1999. GLM versus CCA spatial model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> plant species<br />
distribution. Plant Ecology 143, 107-122.<br />
Gundlach, E.R. <strong>and</strong> Hayes, M.O. 1978. Vulnerability <strong>of</strong> <strong>coastal</strong> environments to oil spill<br />
impacts. Mar<strong>in</strong>e Technology Society Journal 12(4), 18-27.<br />
Hall, K., Paramor, O.A.L., Rob<strong>in</strong>son, L.A., W<strong>in</strong>row-Giff<strong>in</strong>, A., Frid, C.L.J., Eno, N.C., Dernie,<br />
K.M., Sharp, R.A.M., Wyn, G.C., Ramsey, K. 2008. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> benthic habitats<br />
to fish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Welsh waters – development <strong>of</strong> a protocol. University <strong>of</strong> Liverpool <strong>and</strong> Countryside<br />
Council for Wales (CCW Policy Research Report No. 08/12).<br />
Halpern, B.S., Selkoe, K.A., Micheli, F., Kappel, C.V. 2007. Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> rank<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
vulnerability <strong>of</strong> mar<strong>in</strong>e ecosystems to anthropogenic threats. Conservation Biology 21, 1301–<br />
1315.<br />
Halpern, B.S., Walbridge, S., Selkoe, K.A., Kappel, C.V., Micheli, F., D’Agrosa, C., Bruno, J.F.,<br />
Casey, K.S., Ebert, C., Fox, H.E., Fujita, R., He<strong>in</strong>emann, D., Lenihan, H.S., Mad<strong>in</strong>, E.M.P.,<br />
Perry, M.T., Selig, E.R., Spald<strong>in</strong>g, M., Steneck, R., Watson, R. 2008. A global map <strong>of</strong> human<br />
impact on mar<strong>in</strong>e ecosystems. Science 319, 948–952.<br />
79
Change language