1 1.10 Application of estuarine and coastal classifications in marine ...
1 1.10 Application of estuarine and coastal classifications in marine ...
1 1.10 Application of estuarine and coastal classifications in marine ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>in</strong>tertidal zones, <strong>and</strong> shallow <strong>coastal</strong> areas <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g reefs), where <strong>of</strong>fshore classification<br />
categories must be <strong>in</strong>tegrated with those for wetl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tertidal regions (e.g., Heyman <strong>and</strong><br />
Kjerfve, 1999; Wright <strong>and</strong> Heyman, 2008; Hogrefe 2008).<br />
<strong>1.10</strong>.3 SPATIAL CONSERVATION PRIORITIZATION AND EVALUATION<br />
With <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g human pressure on the mar<strong>in</strong>e environment <strong>and</strong> a chang<strong>in</strong>g global<br />
climate, the efficient <strong>and</strong> effective allocation <strong>of</strong> conservation resources is both urgent <strong>and</strong><br />
paramount. Quantitative techniques for the identification <strong>and</strong> prioritization <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />
targets are now be<strong>in</strong>g used widely <strong>in</strong> mar<strong>in</strong>e site prioritization around the world. Mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />
<strong>classifications</strong> are a core component <strong>of</strong> the site prioritization process <strong>and</strong> the success <strong>of</strong> these<br />
techniques is heavily dependent on the type, amount <strong>and</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> biophysical data available.<br />
The analytical approaches can <strong>in</strong>volve a simple scor<strong>in</strong>g, whereby each spatial unit (site, grid cell,<br />
polygon etc.) is scored relative to a set <strong>of</strong> factors (vulnerability, species richness, uniqueness,<br />
etc.) or a more analytically complex complementarity-based approach. Complementarity<br />
approaches utilize algorithms to maximize <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> as many components <strong>of</strong> biodiversity as<br />
possible for a given representativeness target, thus focus<strong>in</strong>g more broadly on collective<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> sets <strong>of</strong> locations to provide optimal scenarios (Ferrier <strong>and</strong> W<strong>in</strong>tle 2009).<br />
Complementarity is important <strong>in</strong> situations where efficient sets <strong>of</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g units are required<br />
that can both m<strong>in</strong>imize the cost <strong>of</strong> conservation action <strong>and</strong> ensure that all biodiversity features<br />
receive some level <strong>of</strong> protection. The purpose <strong>of</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g priority areas for biodiversity<br />
conservation is usually to mitigate threat, therefore, <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation on threaten<strong>in</strong>g<br />
25