Railway Corridor 8 â Republic of Albania
Railway Corridor 8 â Republic of Albania
Railway Corridor 8 â Republic of Albania
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Contracting authority:<br />
Economic operator:<br />
Facility:<br />
Section:<br />
Phase:<br />
Content:<br />
Public Enterprise for <strong>Railway</strong> Infrastructure<br />
MACEDONIAN RAILWAYS - Skopje<br />
EUROTRANSPROJECT OOD<br />
Technical documentation at a level <strong>of</strong> study and<br />
preliminary design for the railway line <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> 8-<br />
Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Preliminary design<br />
Volume 4- Environmental Impact<br />
Assessment Study<br />
Technical no.: 001 / 2010
Public Enterprise for <strong>Railway</strong> Infrastructure “Macedonian<br />
<strong>Railway</strong>s” - Skopje<br />
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY<br />
OF THE PROJECT<br />
CONSTRUCTION OF RAILWAY LINE<br />
KICEVO – LIN (BORDER WITH THE REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA)<br />
June 2010<br />
2
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Content<br />
Person in charge and expert team involved in the preparation <strong>of</strong> Environmental Impact<br />
Assessment Study .............................................................................................................. 11<br />
List <strong>of</strong> acronyms .................................................................................................................... 15<br />
Non-technical summary ...................................................................................................... 17<br />
1.1 Zero alternative ..................................................................................................................... 21<br />
Section 1 25<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment legislation ........................................................................... 54<br />
The phases <strong>of</strong> the EIA procedure implementation are shown on the figure below: .............. 55<br />
Methodology <strong>of</strong> the Study preparation .................................................................................... 62<br />
Considered alternatives.......................................................................................................... 64<br />
1.2 Zero alternative ..................................................................................................................... 70<br />
2 Project description and characteristics ......................................................................... 72<br />
2.1 Brief history <strong>of</strong> Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s .................................................................................. 72<br />
2.2 <strong>Railway</strong> infrastructure <strong>of</strong> Macedonia relative to neighbours ............................................... 72<br />
2.3 Advantages <strong>of</strong> the railway .................................................................................................... 72<br />
2.4 Description <strong>of</strong> the railway infrastructure.............................................................................. 73<br />
2.5 Layout .................................................................................................................................... 75<br />
2.6 Longitudinal pr<strong>of</strong>ile ............................................................................................................... 75<br />
2.7 Stations layout and longitudinal section ............................................................................... 79<br />
2.8 Bridges and viaducts ............................................................................................................. 80<br />
2.9 Inclinations <strong>of</strong> cuts and embankments ................................................................................. 81<br />
2.10 Locomotives .......................................................................................................................... 82<br />
2.11 Towing vehicles ..................................................................................................................... 83<br />
2.12 Systems <strong>of</strong> railway electrification ......................................................................................... 84<br />
2.13 Electric traction ..................................................................................................................... 85<br />
2.14 Diesel locomotive .................................................................................................................. 86<br />
2.15 Specific solutions for the Project .......................................................................................... 87<br />
2.15.1 Design parameters for open line, stations and intersections ....................................... 90<br />
2.15.2 Section 1 ........................................................................................................................ 91<br />
2.15.3 Section 1.2 ..................................................................................................................... 97<br />
2.15.4 Section 2 ........................................................................................................................ 99<br />
3 Description <strong>of</strong> the environment................................................................................... 103<br />
3.1 Geomorphological characteristics ...................................................................................... 103<br />
3.1.1 Structural relief ........................................................................................................... 103<br />
3.1.2 Structural blocks (mountains)..................................................................................... 104<br />
3.1.3 Graben structures (depressions, basins)..................................................................... 105<br />
3.1.4 Recent relief along the railway corridor ..................................................................... 106<br />
3.2 Climate conditions in the area ............................................................................................ 107<br />
3.2.1 Climate characteristics <strong>of</strong> Kicevo Basin ....................................................................... 108<br />
3.2.2 Climate characteristics <strong>of</strong> Ohrid-Struga Basin ............................................................ 110<br />
3.3 Geology <strong>of</strong> the railway line area ......................................................................................... 116<br />
3.4 Engineering - Geological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route ................... 119<br />
3
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
3.4.1 Non Coherent Rock Masses ........................................................................................ 119<br />
3.4.2 Poorly Coherent Rock Masses ..................................................................................... 119<br />
3.4.3 Highly Coherent Rock Masses ..................................................................................... 119<br />
3.4.4 Contemporary registered engineering - geological appearances and processes ....... 120<br />
3.5 Hydrogeological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route ................................ 121<br />
3.5.1 Well porous rock masses/sediments .......................................................................... 121<br />
3.5.2 Medium porous rock masses/sediments .................................................................... 122<br />
3.5.3 Poorly porous rock masses/sediments ....................................................................... 122<br />
3.5.4 Predominantly non-porous rock masses/sediments .................................................. 122<br />
3.6 Tectonics and seismic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route ....................... 125<br />
3.7 Soil characteristics .............................................................................................................. 129<br />
3.7.1 Colluvial soils ............................................................................................................... 130<br />
3.7.2 Alluvial soils ................................................................................................................. 131<br />
3.7.3 Marsh soils .................................................................................................................. 131<br />
3.8 Hydrography and quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters in the area ..................................................... 133<br />
3.9 Quality <strong>of</strong> air in the area ..................................................................................................... 139<br />
3.9.1 Quality <strong>of</strong> ambient air in Kicevo .................................................................................. 140<br />
3.9.2 Quality <strong>of</strong> ambient air in Ohrid ................................................................................... 147<br />
3.10 Environmental noise in the area ......................................................................................... 150<br />
3.11 Biological diversity .............................................................................................................. 153<br />
3.11.1 Biogeographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area ................................................................ 153<br />
3.11.2 Biomes ......................................................................................................................... 153<br />
3.11.3 Climate-vegetation-soil zones ..................................................................................... 155<br />
3.11.4 DESCRIPTION OF ECOSYSTEMS AND HABITATS .......................................................... 158<br />
3.11.5 Azonal forests .............................................................................................................. 162<br />
3.11.6 Open areas - pastures ................................................................................................. 165<br />
3.11.7 Rocky areas ................................................................................................................. 165<br />
3.11.8 Wetlands ..................................................................................................................... 167<br />
3.11.9 Anthropogenic habitats .............................................................................................. 175<br />
3.11.10 Significant habitats and species .................................................................................. 180<br />
3.11.11 Important species ....................................................................................................... 182<br />
3.11.12 Valorization <strong>of</strong> vertebrate fauna ................................................................................. 194<br />
3.12 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> landscapes .............................................................................................. 198<br />
3.12.1 Hilly rural landscape in oak forest belt ....................................................................... 200<br />
3.12.2 Landscape <strong>of</strong> subalpine broadleaved forests.............................................................. 201<br />
3.12.3 Urban landscape Kicevo .............................................................................................. 201<br />
3.12.4 Lake plane landscape .................................................................................................. 201<br />
3.13 Population, populated places and economic and social parameters ................................. 202<br />
3.13.1 Social- geographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> settlements along the Kicevo- Lin railway line<br />
route 203<br />
3.14 Use and categorization <strong>of</strong> the land around the railway line route ..................................... 214<br />
3.14.1 Economic and geographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area along the railway line route<br />
Kicevo-Lin .................................................................................................................................... 216<br />
3.15 Existing or planned infrastructure around the route .......................................................... 225<br />
3.15.1 Economic infrastructure.............................................................................................. 225<br />
3.15.2 Institutional infrastructure .......................................................................................... 226<br />
3.15.3 Linear infrastructure ................................................................................................... 226<br />
3.16 Forests ................................................................................................................................. 227<br />
4
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
3.16.1 Forest and forestry management in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia ............................... 227<br />
3.16.2 Goals <strong>of</strong> forestry development ................................................................................... 229<br />
3.16.3 Status <strong>of</strong> crops in the contact zone ............................................................................. 231<br />
3.16.4 Manner <strong>of</strong> management ............................................................................................. 234<br />
3.17 Erosive processes in the contact zone ................................................................................ 236<br />
3.17.1 Status <strong>of</strong> crops in the construction zone <strong>of</strong> the railway line ...................................... 237<br />
3.18 Natural heritage .................................................................................................................. 240<br />
3.19 Cultural heritage ................................................................................................................. 241<br />
4 Assessment <strong>of</strong> environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> the project implementation ......................... 247<br />
4.1 Safety aspects ..................................................................................................................... 247<br />
4.2 Impacts on biological diversity ............................................................................................ 247<br />
4.2.1 Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats and ecosystems ....................................................................... 247<br />
4.2.2 Assessment <strong>of</strong> the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats.................................................................... 252<br />
4.2.3 Impacts on habitats ..................................................................................................... 260<br />
4.2.4 Impacts on flora and fauna ......................................................................................... 264<br />
4.3 Impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters ........................................................................... 265<br />
4.3.1 Impact <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters .................. 266<br />
4.3.2 Impact <strong>of</strong> the railway line operation on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters ...................... 267<br />
4.3.3 Impacts on rivers and other wetlands ........................................................................ 268<br />
4.4 Impacts on landscape ......................................................................................................... 270<br />
4.4.1 Disorder in functional characteristics <strong>of</strong> the landscape <strong>of</strong> subalpine broadleaved<br />
forests. 270<br />
4.4.2 Impacts on hilly rural landscape ................................................................................. 270<br />
4.4.3 Impacts on plane lake landscape ................................................................................ 271<br />
4.5 Impacts on geological structures ........................................................................................ 271<br />
4.5.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 271<br />
4.5.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 272<br />
4.6 Impacts <strong>of</strong> vibrations and seismics ..................................................................................... 272<br />
4.6.1 Response <strong>of</strong> people ..................................................................................................... 273<br />
4.6.2 Impact <strong>of</strong> vibrations on sensitive equipment ............................................................. 273<br />
4.6.3 Impact <strong>of</strong> vibrations on buildings................................................................................ 273<br />
4.7 Impacts on soils ................................................................................................................... 273<br />
4.7.1 <strong>Railway</strong> line construction phase ................................................................................. 274<br />
4.7.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 277<br />
4.8 Impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> air and climate ........................................................................... 278<br />
4.8.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 278<br />
4.8.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 280<br />
4.9 Impacts <strong>of</strong> noise .................................................................................................................. 280<br />
4.9.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 280<br />
4.9.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 282<br />
4.10 Solid waste management .................................................................................................... 285<br />
4.10.1 Waste during construction.......................................................................................... 285<br />
4.10.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 287<br />
4.11 Socio-economic aspects, ownership aspects and impacts on revenues ............................ 287<br />
4.12 Visual effects/impacts on landscape .................................................................................. 287<br />
4.12.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 287<br />
4.12.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 287<br />
4.13 Impacts on forests ............................................................................................................... 288<br />
5
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
4.13.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 288<br />
4.13.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 288<br />
4.14 Impacts on erosion and deposits during construction and operational phases ................. 288<br />
4.15 Impacts on natural heritage ................................................................................................ 289<br />
4.16 Impacts on cultural heritage ............................................................................................... 289<br />
4.17 Impacts <strong>of</strong> radiation ............................................................................................................ 289<br />
4.18 Impacts <strong>of</strong> odour ................................................................................................................. 289<br />
4.19 Cumulative impacts............................................................................................................. 289<br />
4.20 Matrix <strong>of</strong> environmental impacts ....................................................................................... 290<br />
5 Measures for environmental impacts prevention or reduction..................................... 291<br />
5.1 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on geomorphology ..................................................... 291<br />
5.2 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on biological diversity ................................................ 291<br />
5.2.1 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on habitats and ecosystems ............................... 291<br />
5.2.2 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on species ........................................................... 293<br />
5.3 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on the functionality <strong>of</strong> landscapes ............................. 294<br />
5.4 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on geology .................................................................. 294<br />
5.5 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on seismics and vibrations ......................................... 295<br />
5.5.1 Methods for reduction <strong>of</strong> seismical effects <strong>of</strong> mining ................................................ 295<br />
5.5.2 Methods for mitigation <strong>of</strong> vibrations from railway transport .................................... 298<br />
5.6 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on soils........................................................................ 301<br />
5.7 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> air .................................................... 303<br />
5.7.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 303<br />
5.7.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 303<br />
5.8 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters ................................ 303<br />
5.8.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 303<br />
5.8.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 304<br />
5.8.3 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on wetlands ........................................................ 304<br />
5.9 Measures for noise impacts reduction ............................................................................... 306<br />
5.10 Measures for sustainable waste management ................................................................... 306<br />
5.10.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 306<br />
5.10.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 307<br />
5.11 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on cultural heritage .................................................... 308<br />
5.12 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on forests and forestry ............................................... 308<br />
5.12.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 308<br />
5.12.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 308<br />
5.12.3 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> negative effects <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction on erosion<br />
and deposits ................................................................................................................................ 309<br />
5.12.4 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on socio-economic aspect .................................. 310<br />
5.13 Overview <strong>of</strong> measures for environmental impact reduction and environmental monitoring<br />
310<br />
6 Recommendations and conclusions ........................................................................... 311<br />
6.1 Project justification ............................................................................................................. 311<br />
6.2 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 311<br />
6.3 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 311<br />
7 References ................................................................................................................ 312<br />
APPENDICES ................................................................................................................... 316<br />
6
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 1 Southeastern axis, ГВР .......................................................................................................... 47<br />
Figure 2 <strong>Corridor</strong> VІІІ, according to the Memorandum <strong>of</strong> Understanding ............................................. 48<br />
Figure 3 <strong>Railway</strong> corridor VІІІ, section Duras-Skopje-S<strong>of</strong>ia .................................................................. 49<br />
Figure 4 <strong>Railway</strong> network <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia ...................................................................... 51<br />
Figure 5 Existing railway network through the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia ................................................ 52<br />
Figure 6 Utilization <strong>of</strong> the railway infrastructure <strong>of</strong> Macedonia ............................................................. 52<br />
Figure 7 Considered alternatives .......................................................................................................... 67<br />
Figure 8 Accepted section for the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) ......... 69<br />
Figure 9 Constituent elements <strong>of</strong> the railway ........................................................................................ 75<br />
Figure 10 Cross-section <strong>of</strong> embankment, excavation and incision <strong>of</strong> single-track line ........................ 77<br />
Figure 11 Superstructure <strong>of</strong> the railway line ......................................................................................... 78<br />
Figure 12 Cross-section and constituent parts <strong>of</strong> the line ..................................................................... 78<br />
Figure 13 Required station width .......................................................................................................... 80<br />
Figure 14 Schematic overview <strong>of</strong> the main constituent elements <strong>of</strong> electric locomotive ...................... 83<br />
Figure 15 Passenger wagon ................................................................................................................. 84<br />
Figure 16 <strong>Railway</strong> electrification system ............................................................................................... 84<br />
Figure 17 Accepted section <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) ........ 88<br />
Figure 18 Tunnel ................................................................................................................................... 94<br />
Figure 19 Stations and intersections ..................................................................................................... 96<br />
Figure 20 Municipalities through which the railway route passes ....................................................... 103<br />
Figure 21 Structural relief .................................................................................................................... 104<br />
Figure 22 Climate map <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia ........................................................................ 107<br />
Figure 23 Average precipitation .......................................................................................................... 109<br />
Figure 24 Climate diagram Ohrid and Struga ..................................................................................... 111<br />
Figure 25 Rose <strong>of</strong> winds in Ohrid ........................................................................................................ 114<br />
Figure 26 Tectonic regionalization <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia ..................................................... 127<br />
Figure 27 Map <strong>of</strong> isolines <strong>of</strong> seismic intensity <strong>of</strong> earthquakes in Macedonia (by MCS) ..................... 128<br />
Figure 28 Seismic map ....................................................................................................................... 129<br />
Figure 29 Colluvial soils ...................................................................................................................... 130<br />
Figure 30 Marsh soils .......................................................................................................................... 132<br />
Figure 31 Watershed areas................................................................................................................. 134<br />
Figure 32 Measuring points monitoring the waters in the watershed <strong>of</strong> Treska river ......................... 137<br />
Figure 33 Measuring points monitoring the waters in the watershed <strong>of</strong> the river Crn Drim ................ 139<br />
Figure 34 Monitoring stations .............................................................................................................. 140<br />
Figure 35 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> SO 2 in Kicevo ................................................................. 142<br />
Figure 36 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> nitrogen dioxide for the period 2007-2009 ..................... 143<br />
Figure 37 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> suspended particulate matters sized up to 10 micrometers<br />
for the period 2007-2009 ..................................................................................................................... 144<br />
Figure 38 Maximum daily 8-hours mean value <strong>of</strong> the concentration <strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide for the period<br />
2007-2009 ........................................................................................................................................... 145<br />
Figure 39 Long-term target for human health protection for ozone for the period 2007-2009 ........... 146<br />
Figure 40 Long-term target for vegetation protection for ozone for the period 2007-2009 ................. 147<br />
Figure 41 Average monthly concentrations <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006 ............................. 148<br />
Figure 42 Measurements <strong>of</strong> dust in the air ......................................................................................... 150<br />
Figure 43 Noise measuring points ...................................................................................................... 152<br />
7
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 44 Biomes in southwestern part <strong>of</strong> Macedonia (by Matvejev & Puncer 1989) ........................ 153<br />
Figure 45 Climate-vegetation-soil zones in Southwestern part <strong>of</strong> Macedonia (by Filipovski at al. 1996)<br />
............................................................................................................................................................ 156<br />
Figure 46 Italian and Turkey oak forest near village Arbinovo............................................................ 157<br />
Figure 47 Remains <strong>of</strong> Downy oak and Hop hornbeam forests near Kicevo ....................................... 159<br />
Figure 48 Truffle oak (Quercus robur) in the village Moroista ............................................................ 164<br />
Figure 49 Calcareous rocks near the village Radozda ....................................................................... 166<br />
Figure 50 Sandbars on the river Sateska near the village Volino ....................................................... 168<br />
Figure 51 Reed belt on Ohrid Lake shore, between the settlement Elen Kamen and the village<br />
Radozda .............................................................................................................................................. 169<br />
Figure 52 Sandy bank on the river Sateska near the village Pesocan ............................................... 170<br />
Figure 53 Humid meadows and marshy habitats in the remains <strong>of</strong> Struga marsh near the village<br />
Radolista ............................................................................................................................................. 173<br />
Figure 54 Meadows and fields in the zone <strong>of</strong> Italian and Turkey oak forests before the border-crossing<br />
Kjafasan. ............................................................................................................................................. 176<br />
Figure 55 Meadows and remains <strong>of</strong> chestnut forests in the zone <strong>of</strong> Italian and Turkey oak forests near<br />
the village Radozda ............................................................................................................................. 176<br />
Figure 56 Fields and meadows in the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Treska near the village Drugovo ................ 178<br />
Figure 57 Willow belts by the river Crn Drim ....................................................................................... 181<br />
Figure 58 Spring above the village Radozda with Lemna. ................................................................. 182<br />
Figure 59 Ibises (Plegadis falcinellus) ................................................................................................ 193<br />
Figure 60 Land categorization ............................................................................................................ 216<br />
Figure 61 Overview <strong>of</strong> forest management units in the contact zone along the route ....................... 233<br />
Figure 62 Risk <strong>of</strong> erosion along the route ........................................................................................... 236<br />
Figure 63 Erosiveness at sections ...................................................................................................... 237<br />
Figure 64 Alder belt along river Sateska near the village Arbinovo .................................................... 255<br />
Figure 65 Alder belt along the river Treska ......................................................................................... 255<br />
Figure 66 Siliceous rocks near the village Pesocan ........................................................................... 257<br />
Figure 67 Vineyard near the village Meseista ..................................................................................... 259<br />
Figure 68 Apple orchard in the village Volino ..................................................................................... 260<br />
Figure 69 Proposal for route redirection near the village Arbinovo to avoid destruction <strong>of</strong> alder forest,<br />
marshy habitats and humid meadows ................................................................................................ 262<br />
Figure 70 Alder woodlot near the village Botun .................................................................................. 263<br />
Figure 71 Reduction <strong>of</strong> noise with reference to the source (construction phase) ............................... 281<br />
Figure 72 Noise decline with reference to source (operational phase) .............................................. 285<br />
Figure 73 Marshy habitats near the village Arbinovo (alder woods, humid meadows and marsh<br />
communities) ....................................................................................................................................... 292<br />
Figure 74 Presentation <strong>of</strong> rock mass behaviour in mining with NONEL-system and detonation fuse 297<br />
Figure 75 Presentation <strong>of</strong> rock mass behaviour in initiation at several drillings with NONEL- system<br />
and detonation fuse ............................................................................................................................. 297<br />
Figure 76 Photograph made during mining with NONEL-system ....................................................... 298<br />
Figure 77 Building insulation to reduce ground vibrations from the nearby railway line by use <strong>of</strong><br />
system <strong>of</strong> springs (Gerb Vibrations Control Systems) ........................................................................ 300<br />
Table 1 Description <strong>of</strong> railway corridor VІІІ ........................................................................................... 49<br />
Table 2 Current status <strong>of</strong> railway lines in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia .................................................. 53<br />
8
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Table 3 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the railway network ..................................................................................... 53<br />
Table 4 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> alternatives ......................................................................................................... 71<br />
Table 5 Registered engineering geological appearances and processes along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />
line ....................................................................................................................................................... 120<br />
Table 6 Hydrogeological appearances ............................................................................................... 123<br />
Table 7 Classification <strong>of</strong> waters .......................................................................................................... 135<br />
Table 8 Measuring parameters <strong>of</strong> institutions ..................................................................................... 140<br />
Table 9 Limit values for SO 2 ............................................................................................................... 141<br />
Table 10 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> nitrogen dioxide for the period 2007-2009 ...................... 142<br />
Table 11 Analysis <strong>of</strong> suspended particulate matters sized up to 10 micrometers for the period 2007-<br />
2009 .................................................................................................................................................... 143<br />
Table 12 Analysis <strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide for the period 2007-2009 ...................................................... 144<br />
Table 13 Analysis <strong>of</strong> data on ozone for the period 2007-2009 ........................................................... 145<br />
Table 14 Analysis <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006 .................................................................... 147<br />
Table 15 Average monthly concentrations <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006 .............................. 148<br />
Table 16 Limit values for protection <strong>of</strong> ecosystems and vegetation ................................................... 149<br />
Table 17 Limit values for human health protection ............................................................................. 149<br />
Table 18 Noise levels .......................................................................................................................... 151<br />
Table 19 Important species <strong>of</strong> vascular flora in the subject corridor................................................... 184<br />
Table 20 Overview <strong>of</strong> important species <strong>of</strong> insects and some arthropods ......................................... 184<br />
Table 21 Species diversity (vascular plants) in humid habitats near Belcisko Blato (near the corridor)<br />
............................................................................................................................................................ 185<br />
Table 22 Important amphibian species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line ......................................... 190<br />
Table 23 Important reptile species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line ................................................ 190<br />
Table 24 Important bird species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line.................................................... 191<br />
Table 25 Important mammalian species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line ....................................... 193<br />
Table 26 Valorization <strong>of</strong> amphibians ................................................................................................... 194<br />
Table 27 Valorization <strong>of</strong> reptiles .......................................................................................................... 195<br />
Table 28 Valorization <strong>of</strong> bird fauna. .................................................................................................... 195<br />
Table 29 Valorization <strong>of</strong> mammals ...................................................................................................... 197<br />
Table 30 Overview <strong>of</strong> municipalities and settlements within or affected by the corridor along the route<br />
<strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin............................................................................................................... 202<br />
Table 31 Overview <strong>of</strong> total population, population by gender and ethnic structure, by municipalities<br />
and populated places along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin ............................................................ 205<br />
Table 32 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> total population, population by gender and ethnic structure, by<br />
municipalities and populated places along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin ..................................... 207<br />
Table 33 Overview <strong>of</strong> population by age groups, by municipalities and populated places along the<br />
railway line route Kicevo-Lin ............................................................................................................... 208<br />
Table 34 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> population by age groups, by municipalities and populated places<br />
along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin ............................................................................................... 209<br />
Table 35 Overview <strong>of</strong> the population by economic activity, by municipalities and populated places<br />
along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin ............................................................................................... 210<br />
Table 36 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> the population by economic activity, by municipality along the railway<br />
line route Kicevo-Lin ............................................................................................................................ 211<br />
Table 37 Overview <strong>of</strong> population, households, number <strong>of</strong> members per households and dwellings, by<br />
municipality and populated place along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin .......................................... 212<br />
9
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Table 38 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> the population by age groups, by municipality along the railway line<br />
route Kicevo-Lin .................................................................................................................................. 213<br />
Table 39 Land use in the analyzed corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Kjafasan ................................ 214<br />
Table 40 Overview <strong>of</strong> agricultural land by registered land plots, by municipalities and populated places<br />
along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin ............................................................................................... 218<br />
Table 41 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> agricultural areas by registered land plots, by municipalities and<br />
populated places along the railway line Kicevo-Lin ............................................................................ 224<br />
Table 42 –Woodstock by Forest Management Units .......................................................................... 232<br />
Table 43 Composition <strong>of</strong> crops by growing type ................................................................................. 234<br />
Table 44 Composition <strong>of</strong> crops by species ......................................................................................... 234<br />
Table 45 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the forest in the railway line route (along axis) ....................................... 239<br />
Table 46 Objects <strong>of</strong> nature .................................................................................................................. 240<br />
Table 47 Archeological sites ............................................................................................................... 242<br />
Table 48 Matrix determining the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats ....................................................................... 253<br />
Table 49 Average emissions from construction machines ................................................................. 278<br />
Table 50 Concentration <strong>of</strong> harmful substances in the air around construction sites .......................... 279<br />
Table 51 Noise levels from construction equipment ........................................................................... 280<br />
Table 52 Noise levels from railway line construction sites (15 m from source) .................................. 280<br />
Table 53 Levels <strong>of</strong> exposure at noise from different sources <strong>of</strong> the railway transport ....................... 282<br />
Table 54 Calculation <strong>of</strong> reference equivalent noise (15 m from the source) ...................................... 284<br />
Table 55 Amounts <strong>of</strong> inert waste ........................................................................................................ 286<br />
Table 56 List <strong>of</strong> wastes ....................................................................................................................... 286<br />
Table 57 Criteria for environmental impact assessment ..................................................................... 290<br />
10
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Environmental Consulting Company<br />
DEKONS-EMA doo export-import<br />
No. 03-163<br />
29.06.2010, Skopje<br />
Reference no. 01- 45<br />
Person in charge and expert team involved in the preparation <strong>of</strong> Environmental<br />
Impact Assessment Study<br />
Based on the Contract concluded between DEKONS-EMA<br />
and Public Enterprise for<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> Infrastructure "Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s"-Skopje, as Investor, the development <strong>of</strong><br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study was has been initiated.<br />
Chapter XI (Environmental Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> Projects) <strong>of</strong> the Law on Environment<br />
(Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 53/05, 81/05, 24/07, 159/2008, 83/09 and<br />
48/10) establishes the ground for the EIA procedure performance, according to the Decree<br />
determining projects for which and criteria on the basis <strong>of</strong> which the screening for an<br />
environmental impact assessment shall be carried out (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia no. 74/05), the activities to be carried out in the frames <strong>of</strong> the Project -<br />
Constriction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) - belongs to<br />
the first category, Annex 1, titled: "7(a). construction <strong>of</strong> transport lines for long-distance railway<br />
traffic and airports with a basic runway length <strong>of</strong> 2.100 m or more", which assumes application <strong>of</strong><br />
the procedure for "Notification <strong>of</strong> the authority responsible for the activity" and "screening <strong>of</strong><br />
the necessity for environmental impact assessment performance" by the competent body -<br />
MEPP and "EIA Study scoping", upon which the consulting company DEKONS-EMA<br />
initiated the preparation <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Impact Assessment Study.<br />
In the frames <strong>of</strong> the agreed activity, in the period January-April 2010, field investigation was<br />
carried out, review <strong>of</strong> the existing technical documentation on the facilities and manner <strong>of</strong><br />
transport through railway line, as well as analysis <strong>of</strong> European and international practices <strong>of</strong><br />
this transport mode use.<br />
The Environmental Impact Assessment Study provides an overview <strong>of</strong> the current status <strong>of</strong><br />
the sites where the railway line will run, considers alternatives, identifies potential impacts on<br />
environmental media during the construction phase, operational phase - railway line use, as<br />
well as post-operational phase and proposes measures for their reduction or mitigation.<br />
11
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
The following expert team was involved in the preparation <strong>of</strong> this document:<br />
DEKONS EMA:<br />
- Menka Spirovska, Manager and responsible person for the Environmental Impact<br />
Assessment Study<br />
- Maja Kocova, expert from the List <strong>of</strong> Environmental Impact Assessment experts<br />
- Julijana Nikova, graduated technologist<br />
- Elena Jankova, graduated environmental engineer<br />
EXTERNAL EXPERTS:<br />
- Bosko Nikov, air, noise;<br />
- Trajce Stafilov, water;<br />
- Ljupco Melovski, biodiversity, landscape;<br />
- Slavco Hristov, biodiversity;<br />
- Dusko Mukaetov, soils;<br />
- Mitko Dimov, geology, hydrology;<br />
- Blagoja Markovski, economic aspects, GIS;<br />
- Ivan Blinkov, erosion and forests;<br />
- Aco Trendafilov, erosion and forests;<br />
- Dragan Kolcakovski, climate;<br />
- Metodija Velevski, birds;<br />
- Dejan Mirakovski, vibrations<br />
Director,<br />
Menka Spirovska<br />
12
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
13
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
14
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
List <strong>of</strong> acronyms<br />
GGV<br />
GDP<br />
BOD<br />
V<br />
LV<br />
HLV<br />
URE<br />
BCP<br />
daN<br />
dB<br />
LRT<br />
ETS<br />
ERTMS<br />
Gross Gained Value<br />
Gross Domestic Product<br />
Biological Oxygen Demand<br />
Volts<br />
Limit value<br />
High level value<br />
Upper Rail Edge<br />
Border control point<br />
decaNewton<br />
Decibels<br />
Long rail tracks<br />
Electric traction substations<br />
European <strong>Railway</strong> Transport Management System<br />
ЕС<br />
ЕЕС<br />
ETCS<br />
European Community<br />
European Economic Community<br />
European Train Control System<br />
EU<br />
RS<br />
RTO<br />
RTE<br />
W<br />
E<br />
EG<br />
S<br />
SE<br />
SSE<br />
PE<br />
kN<br />
кm<br />
km/h<br />
kV<br />
MR<br />
MEPP<br />
European Union<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> Station<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> Transport Organization<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> Transport Enterprise<br />
West<br />
East<br />
Engineering geology<br />
South<br />
Southeast<br />
South- Southeast<br />
Public Enterprise<br />
KiloNewton<br />
Kilometer<br />
Kilometer per hour<br />
Kilovlts<br />
Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment and Physical Planning<br />
MAFWE<br />
MPа<br />
mm<br />
NSC<br />
masl<br />
MVA<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Forestry and Water<br />
Economy<br />
Megapascals<br />
Millimeters<br />
Mercalli scale<br />
Meters above sea level<br />
Megavolt ampere<br />
15
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
BAT<br />
EIA<br />
Best Available Techniques<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment<br />
PM<br />
FMB<br />
Particulate matters sized ≤<br />
10 micrometers<br />
Forest Management Branch<br />
RM<br />
N<br />
NW<br />
MMW<br />
STM<br />
t<br />
FC<br />
TGV<br />
TPP<br />
HMA<br />
HG<br />
Hz<br />
COD<br />
FMUs<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />
North<br />
Northwest<br />
North-Northwest<br />
Synchronized Transport Mode<br />
Tone/tones<br />
Freight car<br />
High-speed trains<br />
Thermal Power Plant<br />
Hydrometeorological Administration<br />
Hydrogeological<br />
Hertz<br />
Chemical Oxygen Demand<br />
Forest Management Units<br />
16
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Non-technical summary<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> the Project, in accordance with the Project Programme, prepared by the<br />
Public Enterprise for <strong>Railway</strong> Infrastructure “Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s”- Skopje, is to develop a<br />
railway line Kicevo-border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>- Lin.<br />
The construction <strong>of</strong> this railway line and other sections missing in <strong>Corridor</strong> 8, aims towards<br />
less expensive and faster transport <strong>of</strong> the population and economic assets. <strong>Railway</strong><br />
connection <strong>of</strong> Macedonia with the neighboring countries is expected to influence positively in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> enhanced economic activities and trade in the country, neighboring countries<br />
(<strong>Albania</strong> and Bulgaria) and the Region.<br />
The new railway connection will contribute to the improvement <strong>of</strong> the local population socialeconomic<br />
condition, particularly in the railway station areas, and thus on a regional level<br />
(development <strong>of</strong> the western part <strong>of</strong> the country), meaning cheaper transportation <strong>of</strong> people<br />
and goods. Furthermore, the construction <strong>of</strong> this railway line will bring about establishing a<br />
railway connection <strong>of</strong> Macedonia with <strong>Albania</strong>, which would enable creating a transport<br />
connection with the ports <strong>of</strong> Duras and Valona on the Adriatic Sea. This is <strong>of</strong> great<br />
significance for the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia as a continental country.<br />
The strategic goals <strong>of</strong> the Macedonian Government regarding railway transport include:<br />
Attractive railway service for the passengers, with the advantage <strong>of</strong> high quality travel<br />
to the work place, safe travelling possibilities and a guarantee that our transport<br />
choice will consider environmental conditions, including air quality and noise<br />
generation.<br />
Supporting heavy freight trains, used for transport <strong>of</strong> large amounts <strong>of</strong> various<br />
products, through an effective transition from rail to road transport and vice versa.<br />
Supporting the national industry through enabling a low-cost and effective mode <strong>of</strong><br />
mass transport.<br />
Macedonia’s geographical position and characteristics determine the strategic need for sea<br />
access through the territories <strong>of</strong> its neighbors. Connections to ports on the Aegean and<br />
Adriatic Seas are <strong>of</strong> exceptional national importance, especially accessibility to the ports <strong>of</strong><br />
Pirea, Taranto and Gioia Tauro. At present, only the connections with Pirea are adequately<br />
developed, while those with Duras and southern Italian ports require major development.<br />
The incomplete east-to-west railway line has a negative impact on rail transport<br />
competitiveness and the economy <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, on the whole. The lack <strong>of</strong> connection with<br />
the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> and the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria is a major obstacle in the improvement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the exchange market, not only with neighboring countries, but with Eastern Europe<br />
(Russia, Belarus, Ukraine), Turkey and Caucasus countries, as well. The <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia is a land locked country and mass transport should improve by connecting to<br />
<strong>Albania</strong> and Bulgaria ports, so from a strategic point <strong>of</strong> view, the connection with the<br />
<strong>Albania</strong>n and Bulgarian railway infrastructure is a significant challenge for the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia.<br />
The subject <strong>of</strong> the present Study, the railway line Kicevo- border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Albania</strong>, is designed as an extension <strong>of</strong> the railway line Skopje- Tetovo- Gostivar- Kicevo,<br />
and aims to help solve the aforementioned issues.<br />
Defining <strong>of</strong> a new European Transport Strategy for Planning in accordance with the EU<br />
enlargement process was finalized in December 2005, with the publication <strong>of</strong> the “Peace and<br />
development networks” report, produced by the High Level Group for “Wider Europe for<br />
17
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Transport”. The Strategy basic goal is to improve the EU connections with new neighboring<br />
countries, the Far East and North Africa. Stimulating the development <strong>of</strong> rail freight corridors<br />
also falls under the priorities <strong>of</strong> the work group coordinating the Strategy implementation.<br />
Within that common framework, <strong>Corridor</strong> VIII is recognized as an integral part <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
five new Transnational European axes- the South-Eastern axis.<br />
The development <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> VIII along axis East-West is an indispensable economic and<br />
political instrument for the Balkan Region, and helps improve interregional stability. It is also<br />
associated with expectations for positive influence on the exchange and communications<br />
between the countries through the territories <strong>of</strong> which it passes. Connecting the Adriatic with<br />
the Black Sea leads to great opportunities for economic development.<br />
Starting from ports Bari and Brindisi in Italy, <strong>Corridor</strong> VIII passes through <strong>Albania</strong>n ports<br />
Duras and Vlora, connecting them with a railway line with the capital Tirana. From there, the<br />
existing railway connection continues to the <strong>Albania</strong>-Macedonia border.<br />
The subject <strong>of</strong> the present Study, the railway line Kicevo-border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>,<br />
will be intended for mixed traffic (passenger and freight). According to technical criteria, the<br />
line should be a single-track main line with standard track gauge <strong>of</strong> 1 435 mm for lowest<br />
nominal speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h and axle pressure <strong>of</strong> 250 kN. The track is planned to be<br />
electrified with a single-phase system <strong>of</strong> electrification 25 kV and 50 Hz.<br />
In accordance with the Project programme and the adopted division <strong>of</strong> railway corridor 8 in<br />
sections, the route <strong>of</strong> the future railway line Kicevo- border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> was<br />
divided in two sections:<br />
Section 1<br />
Section 2<br />
Kicevo- Struga<br />
Struga- border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong><br />
The requirements for performing an Environmental Impact Assessment on certain projects<br />
are defined in Articles 76-94 <strong>of</strong> Chapter XI <strong>of</strong> the Law on Environment (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong><br />
RM no. 53/05; 81/05, 24/07, 159/08, 83/09 and 47/10). “Project” is a term which means the<br />
development document that provides an analysis and defines the final solutions in respect <strong>of</strong><br />
the use <strong>of</strong> natural and man made values, regulates the construction <strong>of</strong> facilities and<br />
installations, as well as the performance <strong>of</strong> other actions and activities (such as building<br />
collectors, construction <strong>of</strong> roads, expansion/reconstruction <strong>of</strong> factories and mines, etc.)<br />
which have an impact on the environment, landscape and human health.<br />
The types <strong>of</strong> projects and criteria under which the requirement for environmental impact<br />
assessment procedure performance is established, are determined by the Government <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, at the proposal <strong>of</strong> the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration<br />
responsible for environmental matters according to Article 77 <strong>of</strong> the Law on Environment. A<br />
more detailed project definition is specified in the Decree determining the projects and the<br />
criteria under which the requirement for environmental impact assessment procedure<br />
performance is established (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no.74/05).<br />
The Decree determining the projects and the criteria under which the requirement for<br />
environmental impact assesment procedure performance is established recognizes two<br />
categories <strong>of</strong> projects:<br />
− Projects that require environmental impact assessment procedure performance prior to<br />
reaching decision for their implementation.<br />
−Generally determined projects, that could have significant environmental impact, based on<br />
which the requirement for environmental impact assessment procedure performance is<br />
established, prior to the issuance <strong>of</strong> decision for the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Project. The<br />
18
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Project which is the subject <strong>of</strong> this Study falls under projects for which performance <strong>of</strong> EIA<br />
procedure is compulsory.<br />
Methodology <strong>of</strong> the Study preparation process includes planning and implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
three main activity groups:<br />
Activity 1: Gathering data for conducting a Baseline Study<br />
Gathering data in order to acquire a stock <strong>of</strong> relevant information and clear picture <strong>of</strong> the<br />
environmental conditions and social surroundings is an essential precondition for a<br />
comprehensive analysis <strong>of</strong> probable environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> Project implementation and<br />
necessary measures for their reduction.<br />
This activity includes desk work/analysis, as well as field investigation and description <strong>of</strong> the<br />
basic environmental condition <strong>of</strong> the region which is the subject <strong>of</strong> the project activity. The<br />
analyses focus on reviewing the available planning and technical documentation, while field<br />
activities are conducted in order to evaluate the quality <strong>of</strong> environmental media and natural<br />
resources in the wider corridor.<br />
Activity 2: Preparing the Environmental Impact Assessment Study<br />
The EIA Study is based on the following technical requirements:<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> considered alternatives.<br />
Identification and evaluation <strong>of</strong> probable direct and indirect impacts during the basic phases<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Project Life Cycle:<br />
Engineering design (planning phase);<br />
Executing construction works (construction phase);<br />
Project functionality (operational phase);<br />
Post-operational phase <strong>of</strong> the project,<br />
Cumulative effects assessment.<br />
Determining applicable measures for probable impacts reduction, advantage given to<br />
avoidance and prevention measures, and using compensation measures as a permanent<br />
alternative.<br />
Establishing an Environmental Management Plan and monitoring the reduction measures<br />
implementation, for each <strong>of</strong> the Project phases.<br />
A) Approach used to determine probable impacts from Project implementation and<br />
measures for their reduction or avoidance.<br />
The methodology for identification and assessment <strong>of</strong> probable environmental<br />
impacts includes:<br />
Reviewing published literature (on national and international level);<br />
Using relevant experiences and knowledge;<br />
Interviews and conversations with representatives <strong>of</strong> the Investor and relevant<br />
organizations/stakeholder groups;<br />
Review <strong>of</strong> relevant statistical and cartographic databases and census data;<br />
Field work and investigations.<br />
Impacts will be significant if they:<br />
19
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
are intensive, in time or space.<br />
are intensive, regarding the assimilative capacity <strong>of</strong> the environment and nature.<br />
exceed the environment standards and thresholds.<br />
are not in accordance with environmental policies and land use plans.<br />
have a negative impact on ecologically sensitive and significant areas or natural<br />
heritage resources.<br />
have a negative impact on the community lifestyle or traditional land use.<br />
B) Impact reduction measures<br />
Environmental impact reduction measures are only necessary if a probability <strong>of</strong> significant<br />
damage and irreversible environmental effects occurs. The measures planned in the EIA<br />
Study are in accordance with the requirements <strong>of</strong> relevant regulations and policies, as well<br />
as with the best international practices.<br />
Impact reduction principles, including their hierarchical organization, are as follows:<br />
Advantage <strong>of</strong> avoidance and prevention measures.<br />
Consideration <strong>of</strong> feasible project alternatives.<br />
Identification <strong>of</strong> standard measures for minimization <strong>of</strong> every significant impact.<br />
The measures have to be adequate and financially effective.<br />
Using compensation measures as a last mean/measure available.<br />
Activity 3: Consultation and finalizing<br />
The expert team for the development <strong>of</strong> this Study is obliged to participate in the process <strong>of</strong><br />
its presentation before the concerned public and in the process <strong>of</strong> public consultations, as<br />
well as in the process <strong>of</strong> adequacy assessment <strong>of</strong> the EIA Study, which will result in final<br />
acceptance <strong>of</strong> the Study by the MEPP.<br />
The rules and detailed procedures <strong>of</strong> including the public in the decision making process are<br />
established by the relevant Macedonian legislation, concerning the EIA.<br />
Consideration <strong>of</strong> alternatives is, in practice, <strong>of</strong>ten done through “cost-benefit” analysis,<br />
applied in the selection <strong>of</strong> the most adequate project solution concerning route variation.<br />
This, in most cases, means the best solution in terms <strong>of</strong> investment.<br />
With regard to strategic studies, special methods are used to broadcast the needs and the<br />
justifiability <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> specific measures and activities in the domain <strong>of</strong> transport<br />
policy.<br />
It is evident that a few feasibility studies considered the aspects <strong>of</strong> environmental protection<br />
as a criterion for selection <strong>of</strong> a variation/route, which can in further phases be frequent and<br />
limiting factor. Namely, it <strong>of</strong>ten happens that variations selected on the basis <strong>of</strong> economic<br />
analysis are unfavorable in terms <strong>of</strong> possible environmental impacts. In this Study, the<br />
expert team focused on the analysis <strong>of</strong> environmental aspects in order to confirm or<br />
counteract the variations proposed by the designer.<br />
Description <strong>of</strong> alternative 1<br />
The route is divided in two sections:<br />
- Section 1- from km 115+600 to km 121+000. At km.115 <strong>of</strong> the route, the line enters a<br />
tunnel. Lithological units through which it passes include: phylitoides, marbles,<br />
limestones and diabases. Physical and mechanical characteristics <strong>of</strong> these rock masses<br />
are favorable for construction <strong>of</strong> structures <strong>of</strong> this type. The aspect that should be paid<br />
20
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
greater attention in further phases <strong>of</strong> investigation is the transgressive boundary between<br />
limestones and phylitoides, as well as the boundary between diabases and limestones.<br />
Both can be carriers <strong>of</strong> big quantities <strong>of</strong> water which will pose problems during the tunnel<br />
construction. From km. 121+000 to km. 151+000, the route enters a terrain with much<br />
less clear inclinations. By several tunnels along the course <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, the route<br />
lowers gently towards the village Messeiste. In this area, there are gullies, temporary and<br />
permanent watercourses and all <strong>of</strong> them enter into Sateska river. Tectonics <strong>of</strong> the terrain<br />
exists, but due to the coverage with delluvial cover and presence <strong>of</strong> intense vegetation, it<br />
is difficult to note. From km.123 to km.132, rock masses through which the route passes<br />
are basalts, clays, conglomerates, sandstones and marbles. After km.141, the route<br />
continues along the alluvial area <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, but shales taking an anticlinal<br />
position with reference to Sateska river are found on left and on right <strong>of</strong> it.<br />
This part <strong>of</strong> the terrain is favorable for development <strong>of</strong> structures <strong>of</strong> this type, with the<br />
only remark that it is too narrow for highway and railway line, and therefore the gorge will<br />
require broadening and cuttings on left and on right <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska. Generally, the<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the route from km 123 to km 139 is favorable without any major problematic<br />
segments.<br />
- Section 2- from km 157+000 to km 161 +000, the route proceeds through ravine and<br />
marshy conditions. The terrain is built <strong>of</strong> lake sediments, mainly clays, with high water<br />
level. Struga Fields are cut through with drainage canals, which presently ensure that the<br />
area is not a marsh. In the lower ground segments (18-19 m), there is a high hydrostatic<br />
pressure which enables the occurrence <strong>of</strong> artesian water. The prefix “marshy terrain”<br />
makes it unfavorable for construction. During the line designing and construction,<br />
provision has to be made for uninterrupted drainage <strong>of</strong> the terrain where the line passes<br />
and serious analysis <strong>of</strong> the module <strong>of</strong> the stinginess should be undertaken <strong>of</strong> the terrain<br />
through which the route will be passing. From km.161 to km.136, the route runs over<br />
prolluvial sediments where no particular problems in construction are expected. From<br />
km.163 to km.164+900, the route passes through marbles, which we also regard to be a<br />
stable construction environment. After km 164+900, the route enters a tunnel which will<br />
be opened in a medium <strong>of</strong> stratified conglomerates and sandstones. Their azimuth is<br />
eastwards, with a slope angle <strong>of</strong> around 40 . Besides conglomerates and sandstones,<br />
there are also phylitic shales and marbles. Azimuth and slope angle <strong>of</strong> the strata <strong>of</strong> these<br />
rock masses are similar with those <strong>of</strong> conglomerates. The tunnel as a structure exits at<br />
km 168, and then the route continues into phylitic shales. Foliation <strong>of</strong> these rock masses<br />
is under certain angle with reference to the route and it poses no particular problem in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> the line stability. Generally speaking, from km.167 to km.170, the terrain is<br />
assessed as favorable for development <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> structures.<br />
Exploitation conditions – The regime <strong>of</strong> traffic regulation and monitoring has been<br />
envisaged to be a modern block system for safety and control.<br />
The manner <strong>of</strong> crossing other existing road arteries will be by way <strong>of</strong> delevelled<br />
intersection with categorized state and local road infrastructure.<br />
Electrification system – single phase system with electricity voltage <strong>of</strong> 25 kV and<br />
frequency <strong>of</strong> 50 Hz.<br />
1.1 Zero alternative<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> project non-implementation, the effects would be as follows:<br />
Unchanged conditions in the transport in this corridor (use <strong>of</strong> existing road means <strong>of</strong><br />
transportation);<br />
21
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Aggravated transport <strong>of</strong> passengers and goods. The existing mode <strong>of</strong> transport does<br />
not provide high comfort <strong>of</strong> travel in passenger transport;<br />
Delayed regional development;<br />
High transportation costs, with the transport not well organized even at medium long<br />
transportation distances. The price <strong>of</strong> transportation results in relatively high<br />
consumption <strong>of</strong> fuel per unit transported product or passenger.<br />
Low level <strong>of</strong> safety in road traffic compared to railway traffic.<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> fossil fuels in transport and low application <strong>of</strong> the so called “clean” energy<br />
resources in transportation <strong>of</strong> passengers or goods/ unchanged trend in the ambient<br />
air quality.<br />
Deteriorated quality <strong>of</strong> all environmental media.<br />
Characteristics <strong>of</strong> ecosystems and flora and fauna abundance will remain<br />
unchanged.<br />
Although the share <strong>of</strong> the railway transport in the overall transport <strong>of</strong> goods and passengers<br />
is lower compared to road transport, we should point out environmental, spatial, energy and<br />
other advantages <strong>of</strong> the railway transport compared to road, namely:<br />
1. Specific energy consumption:<br />
- in passenger transport is by 3.5 times lower compared to road transport,<br />
- in freight transport, it is by 8.7 times lower compared to road transport.<br />
2. Specific emission <strong>of</strong> harmful gases compared to the value <strong>of</strong> all harmful gases in<br />
traffic:<br />
- in passenger transport it is by 8.3 times lower compared to road transport,<br />
- in freight transport, it is by 30 times lower compared to road transport.<br />
3. Safety in railway transport is by around 24 times higher than the safety in road<br />
transport.<br />
4. Space occupation, under equal flow through <strong>of</strong> the railway, is by 2 to 3 times smaller<br />
than in the case <strong>of</strong> highway.<br />
The above data clearly indicate the advantages <strong>of</strong> railway compared to road transport.<br />
The main advantages <strong>of</strong> this transport system may be summarized into the following<br />
characteristics:<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> allows massive transport which is ranked second immediately after waterway<br />
transport. The weight <strong>of</strong> one freight train could range between 300 and 4000 t, and<br />
beyond.<br />
Transportation speed at medium long distances (500 to 1000 km) is competitive with<br />
the speed <strong>of</strong> air transport – high-speed trains (TGV) reach speeds during the use<br />
phase <strong>of</strong> 270 to 300 km/h. With classical passenger trains which run over well<br />
equipped lines, the speed is between 120 and 160 km/h. Classical freight trains run<br />
at speeds <strong>of</strong> 50 to 160 km/h; however, there are many special freight trains today<br />
which run at a speed <strong>of</strong> 200 km/h.<br />
High comfort <strong>of</strong> travel in passenger transport. The latest high-speed trains are<br />
equipped with comfortable seats, Internet and audio-visual connections on the seats,<br />
22
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
special cars for family travels with various kinds <strong>of</strong> automatic service, high-quality<br />
wagon-restaurants, sleeping cars, etc.<br />
Low transport costs in well organized transport on medium long transportation<br />
destinations. The low price <strong>of</strong> the transport results from relatively low resistance in<br />
movement and low energy consumption per unit transported product or passenger.<br />
Therefore, this transportation mode is cost-effective in case <strong>of</strong> massive transport <strong>of</strong><br />
passengers and goods.<br />
High level <strong>of</strong> safety in transport compared to other transport modes.<br />
Apart from the possibility for use <strong>of</strong> diesel fuels for engines drive in locomotives,<br />
electricity can be used, too. This characteristic is very important, especially in the<br />
context <strong>of</strong> limited oil reserves in the world when we need to use the so called “clean”<br />
energy resources as much as possible.<br />
The selection <strong>of</strong> a specific solution for Section 1-Kicevo-Struga and for Section 2-Struga-Lin<br />
(border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) has got the following general characteristics:<br />
1. Total track length: 62.594 km<br />
2. Total route length: 42.117 km = 67.29 %<br />
3. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with R < 500 m: 0.000 km = 0.00 %<br />
4 Length <strong>of</strong> twists with 500 m ≤ R < 800 m: 10.008 km = 15.99 %<br />
5. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with 800 m ≤ R < 1200 m: 3.654 km = 5.84 %<br />
6. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with R ≥ 1200 m: 6.815 km = 10.88 %<br />
7. Longitudinal inclinations i ≤ 12.5 ‰ : 36.898 km = 58.95 %<br />
8. Longitudinal inclinations 12.5 ‰ ≤ i ≤ 18 ‰ : 12.392 km = 19.80 %<br />
9. Longitudinal inclinations i > 18 ‰ : 13.304 km = 21.25 %<br />
10. Total length <strong>of</strong> bridges and viaducts: 4.498 km = 7.19 %<br />
11. Total length <strong>of</strong> tunnels: 12.374 km = 19.77 %<br />
17. Nominal speed 100 km /h<br />
Category <strong>of</strong> railway line – Based on the importance and function within the railway<br />
network, defined in the National Transport Strategy, the subject railway line is ranked as<br />
main line for international mixed passenger and goods transport line and thus it has to<br />
comply with the conditions specified in international agreements.<br />
Category <strong>of</strong> the terrain for the selected alternative – From Kicevo to the village<br />
Messeiste, the terrain is characterized with hill and mountainous nature with presence <strong>of</strong><br />
high hills and deep dales. From the village Messeiste to the village Kalista, the route<br />
stretches over ravine and marshy type <strong>of</strong> land. From the village Kalista to the border with the<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, the terrain is hilly and mountainous with clearly huge steep slopes,<br />
dales, hills, taluses and gullies.<br />
23
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Engineering geological characteristics - In general terms, routes pass through highly<br />
coherent rock masses, medium to poorly coherent rock masses and non-coherent rock<br />
masses. Highly coherent rock masses - represented with phylites, phylitoides, marbles,<br />
diabases, metarhyolites and shales. They constitute a favourable medium for construction,<br />
but care has to be taken <strong>of</strong> the shale nature, foliation and stratification aspects. Poorly to<br />
medium coherent rock masses are Triassic and Pliocene sediments (claystones,<br />
conglomerates, sandstones and clays). Such rock masses are generally considered as<br />
unfavourable for construction and therefore they should be treated with special approach.<br />
Besides these poorly coherent rock masses, there are also lake sediments <strong>of</strong> Quarternary<br />
age represented by clays, dusty to sandy clays, sands and sludge ribs. We assess this<br />
medium <strong>of</strong> lake sediments as unfavourable. The unfavourability is especially present at<br />
places <strong>of</strong> high water level. Non-coherent rock masses - this group incorporates Quarternary<br />
(alluvial) sediments. They occur in the riverbeds <strong>of</strong> the river Treska and along the course <strong>of</strong><br />
Sateska river. They constitute a favourable medium for construction.<br />
The line will be intended for combined transport (freight and passenger), with prevailing<br />
freight transport. It will be designed as single-track <strong>of</strong> standard gauge equal to1435 mm;<br />
Nominal speed will be 100 km/h for passenger and freight transport and consequently the<br />
minimum elements <strong>of</strong> horizontal twists are min. R=500 m and Lp=140 m; The maximum<br />
qualified longitudinal inclination will amount 25‰, taking into account that the subject terrain<br />
in which the route will be designed is difficult mountainous one. The minimum radius <strong>of</strong><br />
vertical twists is 10 000 m; Electrification system 25 kV, 50 Hz. Nominal speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h<br />
for contact network and equipment <strong>of</strong> the contact network, supply and control <strong>of</strong> the traction.<br />
Communication system with optical cable GSM-R (GSMR-Raylwas) (wireless<br />
telecommunication platform developed specially for railways) for conversational link and data<br />
transmission; Signalization – Electronic centralization, facilitating remote control; Automatic<br />
blocking system (without blocking signals); European <strong>Railway</strong> Transport Management<br />
System (ERTMS)/European Train Control System (ETCS) level 1, Transmission System<br />
CTM 16 (synchronized transport system);<br />
Track subgrade gauge <strong>of</strong> 6.00 m; Protection layer against freezing <strong>of</strong> 50 cm; Thickness <strong>of</strong><br />
ballast prism – minimum 33 cm, under the lower edge <strong>of</strong> the sleeper in transversal crosssection<br />
under the rail; Module <strong>of</strong> sub-base compressibility Е 0 = 30 МРа; Module <strong>of</strong> subgrade<br />
compressibility Е пл = 60 МРа;<br />
Welded rails in LRT , rail type С 49 on reinforced concrete prestressed sleepers <strong>of</strong> the type<br />
MP94 fixed by elastic fixing accessories and laid onto ballast prism, <strong>of</strong> an average thickness<br />
<strong>of</strong> 35 cm, beneath the pressing surface <strong>of</strong> the sleeper;<br />
Drainage system – concrete drains and drainage elements, as required<br />
Distance between tracks, as well as minimum distances to the structures in <strong>of</strong>ficial places<br />
will comply with the Rulebook on superstructure designing;<br />
Height <strong>of</strong> platform above URE-min. 55 cm; Length <strong>of</strong> platforms-min. 220 m for intersections<br />
and 400 m for stations;<br />
During designing, the signed intergovernmental agreements and protocols for railway<br />
connection establishment will be observed;<br />
During designing, the agreed border stations on Macedonian and <strong>Albania</strong>n side,<br />
respectively: Struga and Lin, will be respected. Standing point on the border between the<br />
two countries will be specified additionally.<br />
24
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Section 1<br />
Section 1 will extend from the railway station Kicevo at km.102+600, which is at the moment<br />
the final station <strong>of</strong> the line Gjorce Petrov-Kicevo, up to the future railway station Struga, to<br />
km.156+238.19. The railway station Struga will be part <strong>of</strong> the second section, Struga-border<br />
with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>. This division serves the purpose/possibility for the final part <strong>of</strong><br />
the route to become operational in case <strong>of</strong> possible phased construction <strong>of</strong> the line. This<br />
means provision <strong>of</strong> the commencement <strong>of</strong> construction in the opposite direction, i.e. from Lin<br />
(border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) towards Kicevo.<br />
Section 2<br />
Section 2 starts from km 151+000.00, at 690 m. Before the railway station Struga route from<br />
km.151+000.00 to km.164+730.09<br />
Through the first 5.5 kilometers the route is located in a flat part i.e. it passes through the<br />
Struga valley. The second part <strong>of</strong> the route is mountainous up to the agreed junction point<br />
with the <strong>Albania</strong>n side.<br />
Description <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> geostructure, the territory through which the railway corridor Kicevo-Lin (<strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
passes, belongs to the West Macedonian Zone, which is in the Neogene (Quarternary<br />
period) and is under the influence <strong>of</strong> the minimum horizontal stress component in East-<br />
Northeastern-West-Northwestern direction and the maximum component in vertical direction.<br />
This regime has brought about a gravitational activity <strong>of</strong> thrust dislocations, either as a<br />
reactivation <strong>of</strong> pre-neotectonic (Drim Zone) forms or newly created forms. Thrust activity is<br />
directly linked to the formation <strong>of</strong> morphostructural units, which coincide with the thrust<br />
contours. The most distinguished positive morphostructural units, along the railway corridor,<br />
are the Ilinski Block, a small part <strong>of</strong> the peripheral southern part <strong>of</strong> the Jablanica Block and<br />
the peripheral North- Northwestern part <strong>of</strong> the Galicica Block. Depressions (grabens) found<br />
along the corridor are: the Kicevo valley, the Belcista (Debrca) valley and the Ohrid-Struga<br />
valley.<br />
In order to describe the climate along the railway corridor Kicevo-Lin (<strong>Albania</strong>), the climate<br />
conditions in the Kicevo valley are presented, as a starting point <strong>of</strong> the corridor and climate<br />
conditions in the Ohrid-Struga valley (final part <strong>of</strong> the corridor). Meanwhile, the basic climate<br />
indicators in the Debrca valley (743 m) do not differ much from the Ohrid-Struga valley (695-<br />
769 m) - in fact they are much more similar than the ones in the Kicevo valley (620 m).<br />
The average annual air temperature in the Kicevo valley is 10.8˚C, but in certain years it<br />
varies from 10.1 to 11.8˚C. July is the warmest month with 20.6˚C, i.e. 1˚C cooler than the<br />
same month in the Prilep Field. The average annual temperature oscillation is 20.7˚C.<br />
The annual precipitation in the Kicevo valley usually consists <strong>of</strong> rain and a small portion <strong>of</strong><br />
snow. The total precipitation in the Kicevo valley is higher than in the Pelagonia and Ohrid-<br />
Struga valley. Distribution <strong>of</strong> the precipitation belongs to the Mediterranean pluviometric<br />
regime, meaning that a large amount <strong>of</strong> it falls during the cold part <strong>of</strong> the year.<br />
Prevailing winds in the Kicevo valley are those coming from the north and south. The most<br />
frequent is the north wind, with an annual average <strong>of</strong> 161 ‰. It occurs throughout the year,<br />
but most frequently during the winter months.<br />
25
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
The average autumn frost date in the Kicevo valley is 31 October, and its earliest<br />
appearance is on 30 September. The average spring frost date is 8 April, and its latest is 10<br />
May.<br />
A larger part <strong>of</strong> the Ohrid-Struga valley is under water (Ohrid Lake / 348.8 km 2 ). It has the<br />
same latitude as Pelagonia, but its altitude is about 695 to 760 m at an average.<br />
Through the Drim valley, the Ohrid-Struga valley is exposed to the north and due to that,<br />
cold air masses penetrate during the winter period, lowering the air temperature, while<br />
during the summer period there are Mediterranean influences.<br />
The average annual temperature in Ohrid is 11.2 0 C, while in Struga it is 10.9 0 C. The average<br />
January temperature in Ohrid is 1.7 0 C, in Struga 1.1 0 C; the average February temperature in<br />
Ohrid is 3.1 0 C, and in Struga 2.5 0 C, and the average December temperature in Ohrid is<br />
3.8 0 C, and in Struga 3.1 0 C. However, during the summer, the difference in air temperature<br />
between Ohrid and Struga is very small. In July, Ohrid is warmer than Struga by only 0.2 0 C,<br />
and in August by only 0.1 0 C.<br />
During winter, despite the Lake’s thermal influence on the air temperature, minimum air<br />
temperatures drop far below 0˚C. Absolute minimum temperature in Ohrid was -17.2 0 C, then<br />
16.6 0 C on 14 January 1968, etc. In Struga, the absolute minimum temperature was -20,0 0 C,<br />
recorded on 20 January 1963, then -19,0 0 C on 22 December 1967, etc.<br />
Precipitation in the Ohrid-Struga valley is conditional upon the Mediterranean pluviometric<br />
regime. A larger amount <strong>of</strong> the annual precipitation falls during the cold part <strong>of</strong> the year, with<br />
maximum in late autumn, and a smaller amount during the warm part <strong>of</strong> the year, with<br />
minimum in the summer months. The average annual precipitation amount in the Ohrid area<br />
is 708.3 mm, while in the Struga Field it is 810.9 mm.<br />
The Ohrid valley is characterized with a particular wind regime, conditioned by the Lake.<br />
Apart from winds appearing due to general atmospheric changes, winds <strong>of</strong> local nature also<br />
appear here, as a consequence <strong>of</strong> uneven air warming over land and lake surfaces. The<br />
winds in the Ohrid valley have their local names, given to them according to their blowing<br />
direction or by the Ohrid fishermen.<br />
According to data from the measurement point in Ohrid, the average autumn frost date is 15<br />
November, and the spring one is 6 April i.e. the average frost period is 143 days. The<br />
earliest autumn frost date is 5 October, and the latest is 18 May.<br />
The evaporation rate from the free water surface in the Ohrid valley is higher than the rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> fallen precipitation. The average annual evaporation rate is 836 l/m 2 , and the annual<br />
precipitation rate is 708 l/m 2 . The evaporation rate is highest in August (137), then in July<br />
(132), and lowest in January with 27 l/m 2 .<br />
Fog rarely occurs in the Ohrid valley. There are five foggy days a year at an average, mainly<br />
during the three winter months.<br />
The wider area <strong>of</strong> the route <strong>of</strong> the line, starting from the railway station Kicevo (station<br />
102km+000, to station 128km+850), with a length <strong>of</strong> approximately 29 kilometers, belongs to<br />
the sheet <strong>of</strong> Kicevo in the Basic Geological Map, scale 1:100.000. Within this sheet (from<br />
oldest to youngest), the following geological (lithological) units have been identified:<br />
Paleozoic metamorphites and magmatc rocks (Devonian).<br />
Complex <strong>of</strong> mesosoic sediments and magmatc rocks. It is represented by Triasic,<br />
Jurasic and Upper Chalk sediments, as well as magmatic rocks<br />
Tertiary and Quarternay sediments<br />
26
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
The area <strong>of</strong> the route <strong>of</strong> the line (from the station 128km+850 to the end <strong>of</strong> the line route –<br />
the border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, station 170km+000), with a length <strong>of</strong> approximately<br />
42 km, belongs to the sheet <strong>of</strong> Ohrid in the Basic Geological Map, scale 1:100.000. Within<br />
this sheet (from oldest to youngest), the following geological (lithological) units have been<br />
identified:<br />
Paleozoic metamorphites and magmatc rocks (Devonian). The overall thickness <strong>of</strong><br />
these formations reaches around 2000 m.<br />
Complex <strong>of</strong> Mesozoic sediments. It is represented by Triassic, Jurassic and Upper<br />
Chalk sediments.<br />
Tertiary and Quarternay sediments.<br />
From engineering - geological point <strong>of</strong> view, the terrain along the route <strong>of</strong> the line consists <strong>of</strong><br />
(1) non coherent, (2i) poorly coherent and (3) highly coherent rock masses.<br />
The area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route belongs to the Western Macedonian zone, characterized<br />
with fine plicative structures and radial tectonics.<br />
Structures in Western Macedonian geotectonic zone extend along NW-SE to NNW-SSE<br />
directions. Tectonic development is connected with two major orogeneses: Herzine and<br />
Alpine orogenesis.<br />
Occurrence <strong>of</strong> disastrous earthquakes reaching epicentral intensity up to X MCS-64 and<br />
magnitude to 7,8 (the highest magnitude observed ever on the Balkan Peninsula), is<br />
frequent in this region.<br />
The rote <strong>of</strong> the line, except several sections which pass through mountainous area, runs<br />
through colluviums and alluviums <strong>of</strong> Kicevo, Izdeglavje, Belciste and Struga valleys.<br />
These deposits host colluvial soils, colluvial soils with signs <strong>of</strong> lessening, cements, alluvial<br />
alluvial with well expressed signs <strong>of</strong> hydromorphism, and marsh-gley soils, while the<br />
siliceous substrates, depending on vegetation and altitude, as well as the stage <strong>of</strong><br />
pedogenesis, have the following types: brown forest soils, litosols and regosols. On<br />
calcareous rocks, the following types have been recognized: brown forest soils on<br />
calcareous and dolomite (calcokacambisols) and calcareous dolomite chernosems<br />
(calcomelanosols).<br />
The wider area <strong>of</strong> the route corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo- <strong>Albania</strong>n border is a part <strong>of</strong><br />
the territory <strong>of</strong> two bigger regional watershed areas:<br />
Watershed area <strong>of</strong> the Treska river, the following watercourses gravitate in the upper<br />
course <strong>of</strong> the river: (1) Studencica river, formed north <strong>of</strong> the village Dobrenoec, i.e. it is<br />
uncaptured remain <strong>of</strong> the spring Studencica (the waters <strong>of</strong> which are captured by the<br />
regional water supply system supplying water to several municipalities); (2) Brzdanska river<br />
and (3) Ehlovecka river;<br />
Watershed area <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim river, from its outflow from Lake Ohrid up to the artificial<br />
accumulation Globocica, the following watercourses gravitate: (1) Sateska River, the largest<br />
tributary <strong>of</strong> Crn Drim river. Rivers flowing into it are: Bigorstica, Golema Reka, Gorna Reka,<br />
Vilipica, Mala Reka, Pesocanska Reka, the Matica Canal (composed <strong>of</strong> the rivers Slatinska<br />
Reka, Ozdolenska Reka and Sosanska Reka), rivers Kocunska Reka, Kochanska Reka,<br />
Zletovska Reka, Golema Reka and Graiska Reka; then (2) Belicka Reka, which is<br />
uncaptured remain <strong>of</strong> several karst aquifers above the village <strong>of</strong> Gorna Belica, the waters <strong>of</strong><br />
which are captured for water supply <strong>of</strong> the city <strong>of</strong> Struga and the surrounding villages); (3)<br />
Sum River, formed from the karst aquifer <strong>of</strong> the same name; (4) Vevcani River, formed from<br />
the karst aquifer above the village <strong>of</strong> Vevcani and (5) Susica River, formed west <strong>of</strong> the<br />
village <strong>of</strong> Visni.<br />
27
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Level fluctuations <strong>of</strong> these watercourses are within the hydrological cycle. However, during<br />
periods <strong>of</strong> high water level, some <strong>of</strong> the watercourses tend to overflow their banks, and form<br />
temporary lakes, on smaller or larger surfaces, all along their course.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> their drainage surface is covered with oak and beech forest and pastures. The<br />
hydrographic network is composed <strong>of</strong> multiple aquifers, small watercourses and gullies. The<br />
waters <strong>of</strong> the river Studencica are used for water supply <strong>of</strong> urban centers Kicevo,<br />
Makedonski Brod, Prilep and Krusevo, and other smaller populated areas. This water is<br />
categorized as second-class.<br />
The cities <strong>of</strong> Kicevo, Makedonski Brod, Prilep, Krusevo, as well as several villages situated<br />
near the water supply pipelines in the Kicevo and Prilep regions, receive their water through<br />
the water supply system “Studencica”.<br />
The system was built for a capacity <strong>of</strong> 1500 l/s, and uses Studencica’s spring water, which,<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> affluence, ranges between 450 and 4300 l/s. The pipelines, from the source to<br />
the populated areas, are made <strong>of</strong> steel and have a total length <strong>of</strong> 100 km.<br />
In time <strong>of</strong> maximum water consumption, but minimum spring affluence, the system does not<br />
satisfy the water demands in connected areas. Still, it is important to note that the water<br />
quality at the very source <strong>of</strong> the Treska River has not changed in years. It complies with all<br />
the criteria for first category quality.<br />
The water quality at the measurement point below Kicevo- Bigor village- Dolenci, <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
deviates from the quality allowed, regarding organic and microbiologic pollution, as a result<br />
<strong>of</strong> wastewaters from the city <strong>of</strong> Kicevo.<br />
Part <strong>of</strong> the precipitation infiltrated under the ground surface constitutes ground waters.<br />
Their movement inside the ground and through rock masses is slow with minor or major<br />
delay. At suitable places, they emerge on the surface and enrich surface waters.<br />
The aquifer Dolno Popolzani is situated in the village <strong>of</strong> Dolno Popolzani- Kicevo, about 200<br />
m south <strong>of</strong> the Treska River. The yield <strong>of</strong> this aquifer varies during the year, ranging from<br />
200 to 1000 l/s. The aquifer is in the midst <strong>of</strong> Devonian limestones and has an altitude <strong>of</strong> 640<br />
m above sea level.<br />
Spring, ground and surface waters or a combination <strong>of</strong> the above are used for water supply<br />
<strong>of</strong> populated areas.<br />
The Hydrometeorological Administration has set two measurement points in the Ohrid-<br />
Struga region (Crn Drim basin). They are located in the construction zone <strong>of</strong> the Kicevo-<br />
Kjafasan railway line: SP60018–Kalista, Ohrid Lake and SP60019– Struga, Crn Drim River.<br />
The water <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake is controlled at four more measurement points: SP60012– St.<br />
Naum, SP60015– Metropol Hotel, SP60016– the City <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and SP60017– City Beach.<br />
According to assessments, it has been established that the water <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim River, near<br />
its outlet from Ohrid Lake, is relatively pure and can potentially be affected by municipal and<br />
industrial wastewaters from the cities <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and Struga, particularly those that have not<br />
passed though the collector system and water treatment system.<br />
Data from the MEIC monitoring system at the Ministry for Environment and Physical<br />
Planning has been used for this Study, and the air quality along the railway track has been<br />
measured for particulate matter.<br />
Environmental noise emission is primarily correlated with technology, industry and transport<br />
development.<br />
28
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Noise nuisance means annoyance, caused by the emission <strong>of</strong> a frequent and/or prolonged<br />
sound, generated at certain time and place, which impedes or influences everyday activity<br />
and work, concentration, rest and sleep.<br />
Noise nuisance is defined by the level <strong>of</strong> noise annoyance <strong>of</strong> the population specified<br />
through terrain measurements and inspections. The limit values <strong>of</strong> basic environmental<br />
noise indicators are established in the Rulebook on limit values <strong>of</strong> noise levels (Official<br />
Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM. 147/08).<br />
In absence <strong>of</strong> a developed state monitoring network, for the subject location wider area,<br />
there is no data from environmental noise levels measurements. Consequently, there are no<br />
noise management planning documents, i.e. a strategic map and action plan.<br />
Biogeographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area are presented through the division <strong>of</strong> biomes by<br />
Matvejev (Matvjev 1995: in Lopatin & Matvejev 1995; Matvejev & Puncer 1989) and in<br />
accordance with climate-vegetation-soil zones (regions) by Filipovski at al. (1996).<br />
According to the division <strong>of</strong> Matvejev & Puncer (1989), the corridor <strong>of</strong> the planned railway<br />
line Kicevo-Radozda belongs to the biome <strong>of</strong> South-European, primarily deciduous forests<br />
and biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean, mostly deciduous forests and shruberries.<br />
Biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean, mostly deciduous forests and shruberries spreads over<br />
most <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor. The most outstanding characteristic <strong>of</strong> climate is well<br />
expressed arid period in the course <strong>of</strong> summer, while maximum precipitations take place<br />
during spring and autumn. More thermopile segments <strong>of</strong> Kicevo valley, the valley <strong>of</strong> the river<br />
Sateska in Ohrid gorge and shore area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake between Struga and Radozda are<br />
situated here. This biome includes also most <strong>of</strong> the areas adjacent to the route <strong>of</strong> the<br />
planned railway line. From among plant communities specific for this biome, we find<br />
Quercetum frainetto-cerris, as well as elements <strong>of</strong> Querco-Carpinetum orientalis (on lower<br />
parts) along the line. All biocenoses are characterized with the animal life forms<br />
Xeroaestisilvicola and Xeroaestidrymicola (Matvejev 1995). Plants, besides trees, are<br />
dominated by terophytes and criptophytes. Plant species most specific for the biome <strong>of</strong> sub-<br />
Mediterranean, mostly deciduous forests and shruberries, in the observed corridor, include:<br />
Quercus pubescens, Quercus frainetto, Quercus trojana, Quercus cerris, Carpinus orientalis,<br />
Ostrya carpinifolia, Corylus colurna, Crataegus orientalis, Acer tataricum, Acer hyrcanum,<br />
Acer monspessulanum, Syringa vulgaris and Tilia argentea.<br />
The most specific vertebrate species include:<br />
Amphibians and reptiles: Testudo hermanni, Lacerta trilineata and Ablepharus kitaibelii.<br />
Birds: Parus lugubris, Dendrocopus syriacus, Ficedula semitorquata, Streptopelia decaocto<br />
and Accipiter brevipes.<br />
Mammals: Dryomys nitedula, Apodemus flavicollis, Glis glis and Erinaceus roumanicus.<br />
The most important habitats found within the analyzed corridor are the following:<br />
Habitats: Italian and Turkey oak forests, forests <strong>of</strong> Hop hornbeam (Ostryo-Carpinion<br />
orientalis), forests dominated by Macedonian oak (Quercus trojana), as well as alder belts<br />
along rivers and riverby belts <strong>of</strong> willows and poplars (listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat<br />
Directive).<br />
Seminatural and antropogeneous habitats: degraded forests <strong>of</strong> Hop hornbeam, Acacia<br />
plantations, orchards under apricots, peaches, almonds, walnuts and quinces, vineyards,<br />
fields with/without boundaries, alleys, gardens, villages, towns.<br />
29
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Biome <strong>of</strong> South European mostly deciduous forests occupies the highest parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
observed corridor. From among plant communities specific for this biome, Sessile oak forest<br />
(Orno-Quercetum petraeae) can be found within the boundaries <strong>of</strong> the corridor.<br />
Animal life forms specific for the observed area include Theroaestisilvicola and<br />
Herboaestisilvicola (Matvejev, 1995),minor share <strong>of</strong> evergreen phaerophytes is characteristic<br />
here. The most important plant species in this biome include: Quercus petraea, Fagus<br />
sylvatica, Carpinus betulus, Corylus avellana, Berberis vulgaris, Sorbus aucuparia,<br />
Evonymus europaea, Acer campestre, Acer pseudoplatanus, Sorbus torminalis, Tilia<br />
platyphyllos, Ligustrum vulgare, Viburnum opulus, Prunus avium and Convallaria majalis.<br />
Specific vertebrate species are the following:<br />
Amphibians and reptiles: Triturus cristatus, Salamandra salamandra, Rana dalmatina,<br />
Hyla arborea, Anguis fragilis, Lacerta agilis, Natrix natrix.<br />
Birds: Phylloscopus sibilatrix, Turdus philomelos, Parus caeruleus, Phoenicurus<br />
phoenicurus, Erithacus rubecula, Dendrocopus leucotos, Coccothraustes coccothraustes,<br />
Strix aluco.<br />
Mammals: Capreolus capreolus, Clethrionomys glareolus, Glis glis, Muscardinus<br />
avellanarius.<br />
The most important habitats found within the analyzed corridor are the following:<br />
Natural habitats: Sessile oak forests, woodlots, rivers and clearings within oak forests.<br />
Seminatural and antropogeneous habitats: degraded forests, meadows, orchards under<br />
apples, plums, pears, cherries, meadows under alfa-alfa, fields under wheat crops, gardens,<br />
alleys and several villages.<br />
According to the division made by Filipovski et al. (1996), there are eight climate-vegetationsoil<br />
zones in Macedonia. Most <strong>of</strong> the corridor <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line Kicevo-Radozda<br />
belongs to the warm continental area. Much smaller part belongs to the cold continental<br />
area. Elements <strong>of</strong> continental sub-Mediterranean area occur near Kicevo and Struga.<br />
The following specific habitats with specific ecosystems have been considered:<br />
Zonal natural forests (Downy and Hop hornbeam forests, Italian and Turkey oak forests,<br />
Chestnut forests, Sessile oak forests)<br />
Azonal forests (Alder belts and woodlots, Willow belts, remains <strong>of</strong> marshy oak forests).<br />
Open areas - pastures; Rocky areas; Calcareous rocks and rocky grounds; Siliceous<br />
rocks; Wetlands; Ohrid Lake; Rivers and streams; Springs and wells; Swamps and<br />
marshes; Reeds (Scirpeto-Phragmitetum W. Koch); Caricetum elatae W. Koch<br />
lysimachietosum Mic; Cyperetum longi Mic; Sparganio-Glycerietum fluitantis Br.-Bl.<br />
1925;<br />
Antropogeneous habitats (Woodlots and plantations-black pine plantations, meadows,<br />
agricultural habitats, fields, gardens, vineyards, orchards, urban and urbanized areas as<br />
habitats, populated places and settlements).<br />
Within the observed corridor, there is a low number <strong>of</strong> habitats. Some <strong>of</strong> these habitats are<br />
listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat Directive 92/43/ЕЕС, which means that EU Member State<br />
or accessing country (like Macedonia) are obliged to protect them. Some <strong>of</strong> these habitats<br />
are frequently found and widely spread in Macedonia. Apart from this, some habitats enjoy<br />
conservation priority in EU (marked by “*”), i.e. they require designation <strong>of</strong> special<br />
conservation areas (Natura 2000).<br />
30
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Italian and Turkey oak forests. Although listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat Directive<br />
92/43/ЕЕС, these forests are widely spread in Macedonia, especially in its western parts.<br />
They even build up uninterrupted climatezonal belt between 700 and 900 m a.s.l. Forests<br />
within the observed corridor are mainly well developed, however under strong pressure <strong>of</strong><br />
forestry activities. These forests in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the village Slivovo were affected by forest<br />
fire.<br />
Chestnut forests. Chestnut forests in Macedonia are mainly spread in western parts, from<br />
Shar Planina Mt. to Jablanica, but they also occur in southeastern part <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />
(Belasica). They are listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat Directive 92/43/ЕЕС. Within the<br />
investigated corridor, they occur between village Radozda and Macedonian-<strong>Albania</strong>n border.<br />
Alder belts and woodlots. This habitat is considered as priority habitat type (*) for<br />
conservation under EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС. The alder woodlots are <strong>of</strong> particular<br />
importance, as they are almost entirely extinct in other parts <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. Alder belts grow<br />
almost along all rivers and streams in the observed corridor. Woodlots were found near<br />
villages Arbinovo and Botun. Alder stands, as well as other riparian habitats, have very<br />
important ecological function in preventing and mitigating floods, reduction <strong>of</strong> the pollution,<br />
being natural corridors for the movement <strong>of</strong> animals and have some other specific roles in<br />
mineral matters movement.<br />
Willow belts. Willow belts occur much less within the investigated corridor than alder belts,<br />
and therefore their significance is lower. They are listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat<br />
Directive 92/43/ЕЕС. Segments that could compose forest stands have not been identified<br />
within the investigated corridor, while they enjoy priority for conservation under the EU<br />
Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (*).<br />
Remains <strong>of</strong> woodlots <strong>of</strong> marshy oak. As already indicated in the text above, the only<br />
recorded remain <strong>of</strong> woodlot <strong>of</strong> marshy oak is located in the village Moroista, which is out <strong>of</strong><br />
the observed corridor. However, there is a possibility to find other individual trunks or minor<br />
groups along canals and marshy areas between the village Volino and village Moroista.<br />
Communities <strong>of</strong> marshy oak in Macedonia are exceptionally rare and very important for<br />
habitat and species diversity.<br />
Calcareous rocks. Calcareous rocks in lower parts <strong>of</strong> Macedonia are substrate onto which<br />
rare and endemic hasmpophyte species grow. They are listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat<br />
Directive 92/43/ЕЕС. Within the investigated corridor, calcareous rocks occur between the<br />
settlement Elen Kamen and village Radozda. Apart from their biological importance as a<br />
habitat for typical vegetation, plants and birds, calcareous rocks within the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest<br />
are exceptionally important also in the context <strong>of</strong> conservation <strong>of</strong> cultural and historical<br />
monuments.<br />
Siliceous rocks. Siliceous rocks are listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat Directive<br />
92/43/ЕЕС. However, siliceous rocks are <strong>of</strong> minor importance in the observed corridor<br />
because <strong>of</strong> the small areas they occupy.<br />
Reeds. Reeds are habitats providing high biological diversity. As a result <strong>of</strong><br />
hydroamelliorations in the past, large portions <strong>of</strong> areas under reed have been destroyed.<br />
Such is the case <strong>of</strong> Struga Marsh which has been almost completely destroyed. Very small<br />
fragments are found between villages Kalista and Radolista and the city <strong>of</strong> Struga. Reed<br />
remains occur between village Volino and village Moroista, as well as along the shore <strong>of</strong><br />
Ohrid Lake, near the village Radozda.<br />
Along the route, we can distinguish three to four landscape types, ranging from purely<br />
cultural, through dominantly cultural to less or more natural characteristics. The specific<br />
natural vegetation providing the external outlook or natural or slightly modified landscapes is<br />
31
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
described in the chapters on biogeographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area along the route and<br />
on the habitats <strong>of</strong> plant communities. Clearer spread <strong>of</strong> biomes or zones largely overlaps<br />
with the spread <strong>of</strong> landscapes. Geographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the relevant spatial entireties<br />
are presented in more detail in the respective chapters.<br />
The area along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin hosts 26 populated places. Among<br />
them, Kicevo and Struga are urban settlements, and the rest are rural. According to data <strong>of</strong><br />
the Census conducted in 2002, the number <strong>of</strong> population in these populated places is<br />
60.992 inhabitants, out <strong>of</strong> whom 43.626 live in cities and others (17366) are distributed in<br />
rural settlements. One <strong>of</strong> the settlements has population between 0 and 10 inhabitants,<br />
seven settlements have from 10 to 100 inhabitants, four have 100 to 300 inhabitants, one<br />
300 to 500 inhabitants and 13 have more than 500 inhabitants. Density <strong>of</strong> population is in<br />
line with this data, and in the areas <strong>of</strong> the villages in Debrca it is below 10 inh./km 2 which is<br />
relatively low. On the other side, along the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line, in Struga Fields area,<br />
there is a density <strong>of</strong> population <strong>of</strong> around 350 inh./km 2 , and thus we may conclude that the<br />
area is rather densely populated. The relatively high number <strong>of</strong> settlements with less than<br />
100 inhabitants, in the context <strong>of</strong> demographic development, is rather concerning, because it<br />
would be realistic to expect full depopulation <strong>of</strong> these settlements in the near future. Such<br />
places include Vidrani and Judovo in the area <strong>of</strong> Kicevo and the group <strong>of</strong> rural settlements in<br />
the Municipality <strong>of</strong> Debrca, such as Arbinovo, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Pesocani, Slivovo and<br />
Turje, which are rather degraded in demographic and economic terms.<br />
Ethnic structure <strong>of</strong> the population along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Kjafasan is<br />
heterogeneous. Around 53% <strong>of</strong> the population are Macedonians, 35% <strong>Albania</strong>ns and the<br />
remaining 12% are Turks, Macedonian <strong>of</strong> Muslim religion, Vlachs, Roma, etc. Settlements<br />
along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line from Kicevo to Struga are populated by Macedonians,<br />
while the section from Struga to the village Radozda is dominated by <strong>Albania</strong>n, Roman,<br />
Turkish, Vlach and other population.<br />
The age structure <strong>of</strong> the population is the main determinant on which the vitality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
population depends. In this specific case, it is notable that most <strong>of</strong> the populated places are<br />
characterized with significantly higher share <strong>of</strong> mature and particularly old population. In<br />
rural settlements, especially those with less than 100 inhabitants, there is almost no young<br />
population belonging to the age group <strong>of</strong> 0-19 years.<br />
Economically inactive population accounts for 55%, i.e. more than economically active<br />
persons whose share is 45%. If we take the unemployed persons out <strong>of</strong> the economically<br />
active population, we may conclude that as low as 28% are persons performing pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
and they support the entire remaining population.<br />
The number <strong>of</strong> members per household is relatively low, basically less than 4 members per<br />
household, including urban environments. This problem is significant in rural settlements<br />
where the number <strong>of</strong> members per household is around 2, and in high number <strong>of</strong> cases it is<br />
less than 2. This is especially articulated in the populated places Popolzani, Vidrani, Brzdani<br />
and Judovo in Kicevo area and the group <strong>of</strong> villages in the area <strong>of</strong> Debrca, such as<br />
Arbinovo, Botun, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Pesocani, Slivovo and Turje. This means that high<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> the households have weak economic ability to work. The problem <strong>of</strong> single<br />
member households exists, too.<br />
The analyzed area within the corridor Struga-Kjafasan is 6027 ha (Table 39). This area<br />
should be supplemented by the part <strong>of</strong> forest habitats, above the tunnel Judovo-Slivovo (353<br />
ha), by which the overall area <strong>of</strong> the corridor reaches 6380 ha. Most <strong>of</strong> this area is made <strong>of</strong><br />
forests (41,7%) and agricultural land (39,8%). There, Italian and Turkey oak forests are<br />
predominant covering an area <strong>of</strong> 2507 ha. To the forest land, we can also add riparian alder<br />
32
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
forests covering 131 ha or 2% <strong>of</strong> the total area <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor, which although<br />
occupying small areas are very important in terms <strong>of</strong> biological diversity conservation.<br />
Agricultural land is dominant mainly in Struga Fields. Major part <strong>of</strong> it is represented by huge<br />
complexes <strong>of</strong> fields covering the former Struga Marsh. Therefore, remains <strong>of</strong> marshy<br />
habitats are frequently found within agricultural areas. Due to the nature <strong>of</strong> the territory<br />
(mainly mountain areas), cultivable land covers around 1/3 <strong>of</strong> the territory <strong>of</strong> the settlements<br />
within the corridor or 9180.5 hectares. Fields <strong>of</strong> 7205.2 hectares are dominant, followed by<br />
orchards <strong>of</strong> 844.7 ha, meadows <strong>of</strong> 740.7 ha, etc. Most <strong>of</strong> the cultivable land is privately<br />
owned. As a result <strong>of</strong> the changed lifestyle and activity <strong>of</strong> the population in the course <strong>of</strong> the<br />
past several decades, part <strong>of</strong> these territories is not cultivated in practice, and we can be<br />
free to conclude that such areas can be added to uncultivated areas, especially areas under<br />
pastures and forests.<br />
Uncultivated area (pastures, forests, reed marshes and swamps, barren land) occupies<br />
around 2/3 <strong>of</strong> the territory along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin. The larges areas are<br />
under forest -12337.8 ha, followed by 2782.4 ha under pastures, 2265.6 ha barren land, etc.<br />
Major part <strong>of</strong> uncultivated land area is socially owned, or precisely around 1/4 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
mentioned area is privately, and 3/4 socially owned. This applies in particular on populated<br />
places in Kicevo area and the area <strong>of</strong> Debrca, where areas <strong>of</strong> the populated places are<br />
dominated by hilly and mountainous characteristics <strong>of</strong> the land. Private sector has bigger<br />
share in rural areas <strong>of</strong> Struga Fields, so that 1/2 <strong>of</strong> the settlements' areas are in private, and<br />
the rest in social ownership.<br />
In the context <strong>of</strong> the above described situation, practical extension <strong>of</strong> the railway line through<br />
Struga Fields, with a length <strong>of</strong> around 20 km, will affect around 1000 hectares privately<br />
owned land within the corridor itself, part <strong>of</strong> which will have to be subject to expropriation <strong>of</strong><br />
land, which assumes expenditures to regulate the matter. This process will inevitably be<br />
carried out along the whole route <strong>of</strong> the railway line; however, given the configuration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
relief and the size <strong>of</strong> land lots under forest, pastures, barren land etc., in the area <strong>of</strong> Kicevo,<br />
Debrca and around the section leading to the border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, the issue<br />
will not be very difficult. The statement can be supported by the fact that the route <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway line in these areas passes through tunnels and bridges, which makes the need for<br />
land expropriation significantly smaller.<br />
Economic infrastructure within the direct corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line route Kicevo-Lin,<br />
considering the geographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area, is not well developed. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
corridor passes through economically underdeveloped rural areas, such as the section from<br />
the village Drugovo to the village Meseista and section from Radolista to Radozda. In these<br />
areas, primary activities <strong>of</strong> the agricultural sector (farming and fruits growing with<br />
insignificant areas under gardens) and forestry (as natural resource which in circumstances<br />
<strong>of</strong> abandoned and demographically exhausted settlements is exploited in an uncontrolled<br />
manner by forest enterprises and illegal wood cutters), are predominant in these areas.<br />
Livestock breeding, in conditions <strong>of</strong> settlements depopulation, is not developed except to<br />
satisfy certain insignificant own needs. In the sphere <strong>of</strong> the secondary sector, the mentioned<br />
section <strong>of</strong> the route does not have industrial facilities.<br />
The institutional infrastructure in populated places <strong>of</strong> the immediate corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway,<br />
except in some settlements in Kicevo area (Vidrani, Judovo) and Debrca (Turje, Slivovo,<br />
Arbinovo, etc.), is represented by schools, outpatient clinics, commercial facilities, post<br />
<strong>of</strong>fices, petrol stations and some catering and touris facilities in almost all bigger populated<br />
places. Within the areas <strong>of</strong> the cities Kicevo and Struga and some <strong>of</strong> the settlements<br />
situated close to the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid, there are also some other institutional infrastructure<br />
33
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
facilities in the sphere <strong>of</strong> banking, tourism (hotels, motels, holiday resorts, etc.), as well as<br />
social, cultural and other facilities.<br />
Linear infrastructure along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin consists mainly <strong>of</strong> national,<br />
regional and local roads, and water supply and electricity infrastructure at certain locations.<br />
The route <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line intersects at several points with national and regional<br />
roads. To be more specific, near the village Popolzani, it intersects the national road Kicevo-<br />
Ohrid, and then again on the section in Botun Gorge. Then, the railway line intersects the<br />
regional road Struga-Debar, immediately next to the city <strong>of</strong> Struga and again on the national<br />
road Struga-Kjafasan near the village Frangovo. On the way, there is a number <strong>of</strong><br />
intersections with local roads in Debrca area and Struga Fields, such as intersections with<br />
the local road passing through the villages Arbinovo, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Belcista, Volino,<br />
Moroista, Zagracani-Sum, Kalista and other less significant roads. This set up will have<br />
certain impacts on the existing communication <strong>of</strong> the settlements with national roads and<br />
through them with urban settlements situated close to the railway line. In this regard,<br />
appropriate technical measures for establishment <strong>of</strong> uninterrupted natural communication on<br />
both sides <strong>of</strong> the line will be necessary.<br />
Within the corridor - the railway line route Kicevo-Radozda, in the contact zone <strong>of</strong> 500 m on<br />
left/right, there are 6 (six) forest management units (FMU), and three more are located in the<br />
immediate surrounding. Forests within those FMUs are mostly used for commercial<br />
purposes and mainly in state ownership. All state owned forests are managed and operated<br />
by the Public Enterprise "Macedonian Forests", through the following forest management<br />
branches (FMB):<br />
- FMB “Lopusnik” – Kicevo (3),<br />
FMU Mazatar; FMU Drenovo, FMU Belicka Reka-Preseka<br />
- FMB “Galicica“– Ohrid (2)<br />
FMU Slavej 1, FME Volnista<br />
- FMB “Karaorman“–Struga (1)<br />
FMU Jablanica-Radozda.<br />
The forests in private ownership, the share <strong>of</strong> which is low, but very significant in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
expropriation, are manged by their owners. Part <strong>of</strong> these forests also include artificially<br />
erected plantations, primarily <strong>of</strong> black pine. For the purpose <strong>of</strong> fast and effective<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> expropriation procedure, it is necessary to undertake measures and<br />
activities for quick and efficient updating <strong>of</strong> ownership (<strong>of</strong>fice based and field activities).<br />
The corridor/route <strong>of</strong> the railway line should pass through 133 subsections distributed in the<br />
mentioned FMUs. For each <strong>of</strong> these FMUs, there is 10-year management plan, with different<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> their validity.<br />
The highest degree <strong>of</strong> erosive processes (category 1 and 2) occurs in the area around<br />
Belicka Reka in Treska (south <strong>of</strong> Popolzani). A risk <strong>of</strong> second category erosion also exists<br />
near the village Botun. The risk <strong>of</strong> erosion in other parts <strong>of</strong> the contact zone is mainly low.<br />
According to the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, Study on natural heritage<br />
conservation, the number <strong>of</strong> identified facilities within the subject area is 10.<br />
Particular attention should be devoted to Belcisko Blato (swamp), located close to the route.<br />
This is due to the fact that this monument <strong>of</strong> nature is characterized with unique natural<br />
values, especially autochthonous flora and fauna. The site Belcisko Blato has been included<br />
in the national Emerald network <strong>of</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> special conservation interest and has been<br />
34
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
proposed for designation as strict natural reserve under the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia. It is necessary to establish potential negative impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway construction<br />
on this site, primarily on biodiversity. Close care has to be taken <strong>of</strong> the maintenance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
site integrity and conservation <strong>of</strong> natural habitats, before all.<br />
In addition to the above, it should be taken into account that a part <strong>of</strong> the railway line gets<br />
close to the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and therefore the impact <strong>of</strong> the railway construction on the<br />
habitats and biodiversity, as well as hydrological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area, should be<br />
assessed. Under the national legislation, Ohrid Lake has been designated for protected area<br />
<strong>of</strong> III category - Monument <strong>of</strong> nature and is part <strong>of</strong> the world natural and cultural heritage<br />
(UNESCO).<br />
Near the route, there is a site with oak trunks, within the populated place Moroista, which<br />
has been planned for designation as monument <strong>of</strong> nature.<br />
Near the route, in the yard <strong>of</strong> the St. Bogorodica Monastery, in the populated place Kalista<br />
on Ohrid Lake shore, there is a Plane tree (Platanus orientalis) trunk, designated for<br />
protected area in the category <strong>of</strong> monument <strong>of</strong> nature.<br />
A part <strong>of</strong> the railway line route, in Struga region, passes through the area which is part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world cultural and natural heritage <strong>of</strong> Ohrid region (UNESCO). With reference to this region,<br />
care should be taken <strong>of</strong> the following sites possessing natural values:<br />
- Sublakustricki springs near the church <strong>of</strong> St.Bogorodica <strong>of</strong> Kalista<br />
- The site <strong>of</strong> Kalista which is the only natural habitat for yellow water-lily (Nuphar lutea) at<br />
Ohrid Lake.<br />
- The site Podmolje is away from the route, but it is the most wide spread reed belt<br />
(Phragmites australis) at Ohrid Lake and natural habitat for threatened bird species and<br />
sprawning ground for the carp. For these reasons, attention has to be paid to this object <strong>of</strong><br />
nature as well.<br />
Within the wider area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route, several cultural and archeological sites have<br />
been recorded.<br />
Environmental impact assessment <strong>of</strong> the project implementation has been made with regard<br />
to:<br />
Safety aspects<br />
The most important safety aspects in the case <strong>of</strong> linear facilities, i.e. railway line, concern<br />
derailing, crashes, fires and explosions (including sabotages or terrorism), trains falling<br />
down, running into passenger vehicles or people at moments <strong>of</strong> railway line crossing, etc.<br />
Impacts on biological diversity<br />
Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats and ecosystems<br />
Based on the description <strong>of</strong> the current status <strong>of</strong> the environment (Chapter Error! Reference<br />
source not found.) as well as by way <strong>of</strong> applying nationally and internationally recognized<br />
criteria, sensitivity <strong>of</strong> ecosystems and habitats was assessed (including also human<br />
settlements as habitats). The most sensitive places and their natural and human induced<br />
values were underlined. Making distinction <strong>of</strong> these key or valuable ecosystems, habitats or<br />
places is necessary in order to achieve thorough assessment <strong>of</strong> possible impacts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line Kicevo-Radozda and propose<br />
effective measures for their protection or future management.<br />
35
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
The following ecosystems (described in Chapter 3.11.4) were assessed: Downy oak-Hop<br />
hornbeam forests, Italian and Turkey oak forests, chestnut forests, Sessile oak forests, alder<br />
forests, willow belts, marshy oak stands, hilly pastures, calcareous rocks, siliceous rocks,<br />
Ohrid Lake, rivers, streams, springs, swamps, humid meadows, black pine plantations,<br />
meadows, fields, vineyards, orchards, gardens, urban habitats and rural habitats.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the ecosystems (like marshy) included several plant associations which were not<br />
assessed individually.<br />
Overall, six habitats were assessed as highly sensitive (hs): chestnut forests, sessile oak<br />
forests, alder belts and forests, marshy oak stands, rivers and marshes. The group <strong>of</strong><br />
medium sensitive (ms) habitats includes 12 habitats: Downy oak-Hop hornbeam forests,<br />
Italian and Turkey oak forests, willow belts, hilly pastures, calcareous rocks, siliceous rocks,<br />
streams, springs, meadows, fields, vineyards and rural habitats. The rest <strong>of</strong> four habitats<br />
were assessed as low sensitive (ls): black pine plantations, orchards, gardens and urban<br />
habitats.<br />
Impacts on habitats<br />
Destruction <strong>of</strong> forest habitats<br />
Antropogeneous plantations: large portion <strong>of</strong> pine plantations near Kicevo (km 104+800 to<br />
km 105+400) will be destructed. Pine plantations in this area, as anthropogenic products, do<br />
not possess great importance for the biodiversity <strong>of</strong> the region, but they are <strong>of</strong> great<br />
economic significance and importance for erosion prevention.<br />
Humid forests and reparian belts (by the rivers Treska, Brzdanska Reka, Judovska Reka,<br />
Vilipica, alder forests near village Arbinovo, alder belts at the foothill <strong>of</strong> the Kula hill near the<br />
village Pesocani, alder woodlots and alleys near the village Botun, alder forests with poplars<br />
near the village Meseista and the village Klimestani).<br />
Swamps and marshes (village Arbinovo, Struga Swamp, including also the marshes near the<br />
village Radolista).<br />
Reeds near the villages Volino and Moroista.<br />
Humid meadows (village Slivovo - river Vilipica, humid meadows near the village Arbinovo,<br />
humid meadows and fields near the villages Volino and Moroiste, humid meadows near the<br />
village Radolista).<br />
Impacts on flora and fauna: the railway line construction will enable accessibility to certain<br />
sites. In this way, the pressure on biodiversity will increase due to intensified hunting (and<br />
poaching), fishing and collection <strong>of</strong> medicinal and aromatic herbs.<br />
Flora<br />
Immediate impacts <strong>of</strong> the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Radozda on<br />
plants is shown through the assessment <strong>of</strong> impacts on habitats. Any specific impact from the<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line on individual plant species is not expected. The impact on<br />
individual chestnut trees has been already elaborated in the section on impacts on chestnut<br />
forests.<br />
Fauna<br />
Direct impacts <strong>of</strong> the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line on invertebrates are not<br />
expected. The relevant impacts on the populations <strong>of</strong> invertebrates are covered in the<br />
description <strong>of</strong> impacts on habitats.<br />
The most important impacts on vertebrates during the railway operation include:<br />
36
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Disturbance and direct death cases due to fatal crashes <strong>of</strong> animals into trains.<br />
Habitat fragmentation (this has significant impact on fauna), but this aspect is<br />
elaborated in the section dealing with impacts on landscapes.<br />
Pollution <strong>of</strong> waters during railway construction, which may be physical, chemical and<br />
biological. Physical pollution is manifested through presence <strong>of</strong> particulate matters<br />
from earth residues, sand, solid particles from tires friction, remains from accidents,<br />
etc. Chemical contamination <strong>of</strong> surface waters may result from discharge <strong>of</strong> liquid<br />
matters such as grease and oils. Solid particles, through road surface washing, are<br />
settled in gutters and drainage canals and this can cause their clogging, while grease<br />
and oils float over the surface and reach the recipient.<br />
During the construction phase, with the compaction <strong>of</strong> the subground and other<br />
measures for stability provision, it is possible to experience change in permeability <strong>of</strong><br />
the ground, by which there are direct impacts on water regime <strong>of</strong> both surface and<br />
ground waters.<br />
When the route is at the level <strong>of</strong> embankment, it may pose a serious physical<br />
obstacle to the running <strong>of</strong> surface and ground waters flowing through that watershed<br />
area to reach the recipient. This can in turn cause unnecessary retention on the<br />
terrain and excessive moisting and even flooding.<br />
When the road is in incision or cutting, the flow <strong>of</strong> groundwaters is prevented. In such<br />
case, when the quantity <strong>of</strong> groundwater is larger in ground, an increase in<br />
groundwater level will result in disruption <strong>of</strong> the ground water regime with effects on<br />
the surrounding land.<br />
Wastewater during railway line operation<br />
During the operational phase <strong>of</strong> the railway line, surface water pollution will most <strong>of</strong>ten occur<br />
in periods <strong>of</strong> precipitation. In such periods, the dust deposited on the line and auxiliary<br />
facilities will be washed out by falls and suspended matters will be dissolved. Rainfalls or<br />
waters from snow melting are loaded with matters deposited on the railway line and the area<br />
influenced thereby.<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> putting into operation and its functioning can lead to discharges <strong>of</strong> sanitary<br />
wastewater generated mainly by passenger terminals and service stations. These<br />
wastewaters should be treated in accordance with the regulations on municipal wastewaters.<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> line construction in mountain and hilly relief will cause destruction <strong>of</strong> soil and rocks<br />
into smaller fractions, which will then accumulate on slopes, i.e. close to riverbeds. Rocks<br />
and soils removed or disintegrated in the course <strong>of</strong> the railway construction and transported<br />
to riverbeds will cause increased turbidity and increased quantity <strong>of</strong> suspended particulate<br />
matters. This will in turn raise the content <strong>of</strong> heavy metals and consequently toxic effects on<br />
living organisms.<br />
The greatest hazard during the railway line construction is related to unintentional leakage <strong>of</strong><br />
fuels, oils and lubricants from vehicles and machinery used in railway construction. It is well<br />
known that hydrocarbons contained in fuels and oils are exceptionally toxic for living<br />
organisms. It is particularly dangerous if incidents <strong>of</strong> this kind happen on the shore <strong>of</strong> Ohrid<br />
Lake or within the watershed area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake (for example, river Sateska) and this would<br />
threaten endemic life forms in the Lake and damage irrevocably the habitats and<br />
biocenoses.<br />
During the railway operation, the main hazard for the quality <strong>of</strong> surface and ground waters is<br />
related to incidents <strong>of</strong> release <strong>of</strong> chemical substances (inorganic fertilizers, solutions, fuels).<br />
In case this kind <strong>of</strong> incident happens, it will result in pollution <strong>of</strong> aquatic ecosystems. Ohrid<br />
Lake is considered especially sensitive ecosystem.<br />
37
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Potential sources <strong>of</strong> water pollution during the railway construction include: а) washing out<br />
and erosion <strong>of</strong> the surface area on the site <strong>of</strong> works execution; b) concrete or other material<br />
used for support walls construction; c) water used to wash the vehicles used in the course <strong>of</strong><br />
construction; d) water used to reduce dust emission during construction; e) fuels, oils and<br />
other preparations for lubrication (lubricants) <strong>of</strong> vehicles and equipment used during the<br />
construction.<br />
Release <strong>of</strong> wastewater during the construction may cause physical, chemical and biological<br />
effects. Physical effects can be caused by increased sediments through erosion, canals and<br />
rivers blocking and this can result in floods in periods <strong>of</strong> intensive rainfalls. Increased content<br />
<strong>of</strong> solid suspended matters in water can lead to reduced concentration <strong>of</strong> dissolved oxygen<br />
due to а) reduction <strong>of</strong> light penetrating into the water column, thus reducing the intensity <strong>of</strong><br />
photosynthesis <strong>of</strong> phytoplankton and phytobenthos (micro and macrophytes), which can in<br />
turn reduce production <strong>of</strong> oxygen in the water column; b) high content <strong>of</strong> suspended particles<br />
and turbidity leads to increased energy retention (retention <strong>of</strong> energy in the water column),<br />
resulting in temperature increase and thus reduction in dissolved oxygen. In extreme<br />
conditions, hipoxy can occur as well.<br />
Also, there are chemical and biological effects which depend primarily on the characteristics<br />
and quantity <strong>of</strong> nutrients in the water released through rinsing. Significant chemical effects<br />
can occur during discharges <strong>of</strong> concrete and cement which also cause significant rise in pH<br />
value <strong>of</strong> the water. At the same time, toxic effects occur from increased pH value and<br />
reduction in the populations <strong>of</strong> organisms and biodiversity in general.<br />
Excavated or removed material during the railway construction can have significant impacts<br />
on wetlands and quality <strong>of</strong> water. Therefore, utmost attention has to be paid during the<br />
disposal <strong>of</strong> excavated material, especially during tunnels construction. Excavated material<br />
consists mainly <strong>of</strong> rocks, earth and stones which are capable, in cases <strong>of</strong> erosion, to cause<br />
physical disruptions such as prevention <strong>of</strong> water flow, change in the watercourse<br />
configuration, as well as increased turbidity and quantity <strong>of</strong> nutrients and solid suspended<br />
particles.<br />
In the course <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> bridges on rivers, contamination with heavy metals can<br />
occur, which are bound mainly in sediments <strong>of</strong> rivers. At the same time, river sediments<br />
have great ability to bind organic compounds (such as hydrocarbons released from fuels,<br />
oils and lubricants). Dissolution <strong>of</strong> heavy metals and organic compounds in sediments is<br />
slow, but continuous process which can cause significant impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> water.<br />
Both heavy metals and hydrocarbons are highly toxic for all organisms and this would cause<br />
(depending on the concentration) reduction <strong>of</strong> the populations and biodiversity loss.<br />
Particular care should be taken during the construction <strong>of</strong> bridges in the ravine part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
route designed close to the river Sateska. Sediments inlet in Sateska would threat directly<br />
the ecosystem <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake as well. Pollution <strong>of</strong> sediment with organic compounds and<br />
heavy metals in particular would cause enormous damages <strong>of</strong> life in the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid.<br />
Impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway operation on wetlands<br />
Possible impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway during its operation include:<br />
Water used for air conditioning,<br />
Leakage <strong>of</strong> water from railway cars,<br />
Discharges <strong>of</strong> water from stations,<br />
Drainage.<br />
38
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
The functioning <strong>of</strong> depots and stations will generate municipal wastewaters from<br />
toilets/communal plants. This type <strong>of</strong> waste is mainly characterized with increased BOD<br />
concentrations, suspended matters, ammonium, phosphates, etc. Yet, it is considered that<br />
significant impact on wetlands would occur if wastewaters are discharged without any prior<br />
pre-treatment.<br />
Wastewater will be generated from the plants for railway cars and locomotives<br />
cleaning/maintenance. Thorough cleaning <strong>of</strong> the train floors would be carried out every two<br />
weeks. Detergents containing water will be additionally released in daily cleaning <strong>of</strong> railway<br />
cars. These wastewaters can cause physical, chemical and biological degradations in<br />
wetlands, if not collected and treated.<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> operation will also generate residues <strong>of</strong> oils, fuels and lubricants. These matters<br />
may be washed out from the surface <strong>of</strong> the railway line and drained to wetlands. This<br />
situation can be especially present on bridges, where these matters, carried by water<br />
sediments, will go directly to the recipient.<br />
Impacts on landscapes<br />
Operation <strong>of</strong> linear infrastructural facilities has negative impacts on connectiveness and<br />
connectivity <strong>of</strong> ecosystems. Certain impacts from the railway operation can be expected on<br />
functional landscape characteristics <strong>of</strong> oak forests. The planned bridges and tunnels along<br />
the entire route are a factor able to reduce negative impacts.<br />
More serious impacts can be expected in the section between villages Slivovo and Meseista.<br />
In this area, the railway line passes through oak forests, marsh wetlands and agricultural<br />
land and separates these habitats from the riverbed <strong>of</strong> Sateska.<br />
Impacts on geological structures<br />
The expected impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway during this project phase on geological structures would<br />
be in a form <strong>of</strong> degradation and erosion <strong>of</strong> rock masses/sediments, due to:<br />
Opening <strong>of</strong> access roads and operational plateau for foundation (anchoring) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway construction, execution <strong>of</strong> the necessary auxiliary elements on the railway<br />
line (halts, railway stations, overpasses, underpasses, culverts);<br />
Excavation <strong>of</strong> tunnels;<br />
Excavation <strong>of</strong> foundations for the designed accompanying electric installation;<br />
Potential leakage <strong>of</strong> fuels and oils from construction machinery and vehicles used in<br />
the transport <strong>of</strong> construction materials and equipment, and<br />
Handling and manipulation <strong>of</strong> chemicals and oils for the purposes <strong>of</strong> accompanying<br />
electric installation.<br />
With regard to operational phase (in the phase <strong>of</strong> use and servicing), impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />
line on geological structures, engineering and geological appearances and processes, are<br />
not expected. Possible impacts on hydrogeological occurrences and facilities, through above<br />
described direct and indirect pollution <strong>of</strong> aquifer masses (hydrogeological collectors) at the<br />
same stations remain potentially dangerous.<br />
Impacts <strong>of</strong> vibrations and seismics<br />
In the course <strong>of</strong> construction and later operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Struga-border with<br />
<strong>Albania</strong>, series <strong>of</strong> impacts will be caused on the environment through which the route <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway passes. Most frequent possible impacts include:<br />
Impacts occurring as a result <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line itself,<br />
Impacts occurring as a result <strong>of</strong> the operation <strong>of</strong> transport means in the phase <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway use.<br />
39
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Besides other, specific impacts occurring as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the railway construction are<br />
as follows:<br />
Seismic effects resulting from mining for the purpose <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the structures<br />
on the railway line itself – incisions, tunnels and bridges.<br />
Specific impacts resulting from the operation <strong>of</strong> the transport means during the use <strong>of</strong><br />
the railway line include, inter alia:<br />
Vibrations on the ground resulting from the movement <strong>of</strong> trains over the railway line.<br />
These types <strong>of</strong> impacts are presented in more detail in the separate Elaborate prepared for<br />
the purposes <strong>of</strong> this Study.<br />
Soil contamination<br />
Soil contamination is a type <strong>of</strong> degradation related to and deriving from more general<br />
activities connected to the very process <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the railway and facilities designed<br />
for its functioning. Therefore, it is difficult to link contamination with intensive activities on<br />
individual sections <strong>of</strong> the route, as is the case <strong>of</strong> other types <strong>of</strong> degradation. That is why we<br />
will make more general overview <strong>of</strong> certain sources <strong>of</strong> contamination that may occur in the<br />
process <strong>of</strong> construction and apply on the entire section.<br />
Soil contamination in this phase can result from:<br />
Inappropriate handling <strong>of</strong> fuels and their derivatives used for construction machines,<br />
Washing <strong>of</strong> machines outside <strong>of</strong> specified and adequate locations,<br />
Inadequate handling <strong>of</strong> construction materials and aggressive chemical matters used<br />
during construction,<br />
Inappropriate construction and location <strong>of</strong> camping sites where machines and<br />
materials are kept, as well as<br />
other activities that are not performed in accordance with the guidelines for technical<br />
measures for prevention (mitigation) in the course <strong>of</strong> the construction.<br />
Compaction <strong>of</strong> soil leads to disruption <strong>of</strong> the soil structure, porosity <strong>of</strong> soil and water-air<br />
regime, which in turn leads to reduced ability for infiltration and filtration. As a result <strong>of</strong> this,<br />
surface waters occur which in combination with high level <strong>of</strong> groundwaters, as is the case in<br />
the region along the course <strong>of</strong> Crn Drim (in the zone <strong>of</strong> gley soils) and above the village<br />
Kalista, can lead to excessive moistening <strong>of</strong> surrounding areas intensification <strong>of</strong> gley<br />
processes. Therefore, it is necessary to use, as much as possible, the existing access road,<br />
during the route construction, and to take care that natural courses <strong>of</strong> groundwaters are not<br />
disrupted, because this can cause formation <strong>of</strong> puddles along the route.<br />
Soil conversion<br />
Soil conversion, together with erosion, is the most severe form <strong>of</strong> soil degradation because<br />
soil as natural resource is lost irreversibly both from economic (for agricultural production)<br />
and environmental point <strong>of</strong> view as natural habitat <strong>of</strong> different plant and animal species.<br />
During the railway line operation, the soil will be threatened mostly by erosion and<br />
contamination. Contamination would result from the following processes:<br />
Contamination <strong>of</strong> soil with fuels and derivatives leaking from the locomotive along the route<br />
and at stations. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out regular control <strong>of</strong> machinery fleet in<br />
order to reduce to maximum the threat <strong>of</strong> dangerous chemicals leaking into the soil.<br />
40
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Contamination <strong>of</strong> soil with gaseous substances. The most significant contamination with<br />
gaseous substances and aerosols occurs at a distance <strong>of</strong> 10 meters from the railway, due to<br />
the rapid sedimentation <strong>of</strong> substances heavier than air.<br />
Wastewaters from toilets and maintenance <strong>of</strong> station utilities, require establishment <strong>of</strong><br />
suitable systems for sanitary wastewater treatment, as well as collection and treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
the wastewater generated during stations maintenance.<br />
Solid waste (organic and inorganic). Its production occurs during passenger transport and<br />
around stations. Appropriate service should collect this waste and transport it to adequate<br />
locations, because it may be incorporated into the soil and cause its long-term<br />
contamination.<br />
Spill over <strong>of</strong> transported materials (liquid fuels, ores, etc.). This is another dangerous source<br />
<strong>of</strong> soil contamination and therefore particular attention should be paid to the safety <strong>of</strong><br />
transported material.<br />
Treatment <strong>of</strong> vegetation around the railway with herbicides. Quantities and period <strong>of</strong><br />
treatment should be well planned in order to prevent soil contamination and groundwaters<br />
pollution.<br />
Erosive processes, which can occur in the course <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction, take place<br />
in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> structures (bridges, tunnels, underpasses, drainage canals, etc.), as well as<br />
embankments and support walls at cuttings. Thus, permanent monitoring is necessary and<br />
undertaking <strong>of</strong> rapid intervention measures to prevent major scope <strong>of</strong> degradation along the<br />
railway line in a timely manner.<br />
Impacts on air quality and climate<br />
Electric railway is a form <strong>of</strong> transport that is the least damaging for the environment. The<br />
basic air emissions and impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> the ambient air are related mostly to the<br />
railway construction, generated by construction machines, and during the exploitation the<br />
impacts occur indirectly, including: increased intensity <strong>of</strong> emissions during freight handling at<br />
certain stations with reloading vehicles, increased presence <strong>of</strong> road vehicles at those<br />
stations, use <strong>of</strong> diesel locomotives, etc.<br />
Each <strong>of</strong> the construction phases assumes some intensity <strong>of</strong> gases and dust emission from<br />
the activities, machines and materials used. The main sources <strong>of</strong> emission are:<br />
Leveling <strong>of</strong> the terrain, excavation and rails placement<br />
Placement <strong>of</strong> signals and telephone lines<br />
Placement <strong>of</strong> electric installation<br />
In the phase <strong>of</strong> the railway operation, certain impact on the quality <strong>of</strong> air may occur around<br />
stations and intersections as a result <strong>of</strong> the activities <strong>of</strong> diesel locomotives shunting,<br />
unloading, storage and road vehicles operation. These impacts are minor, but there is no<br />
data available to carry out quantitative assessment. Considering the nature <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />
operation – linear project for railway traffic which will be used for transport <strong>of</strong> passengers<br />
and material goods – no impacts on climate change are expected both during the railway<br />
construction and during the period <strong>of</strong> its use.<br />
Noise impacts<br />
The construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line assumes a series <strong>of</strong> activities which generate noise. The<br />
noise is generated by the equipment to be used.<br />
41
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> compositions and speed <strong>of</strong> trains are significant factors for noise. In fact, the<br />
speed <strong>of</strong> the train determines the predominant source <strong>of</strong> noise. In case <strong>of</strong> diesel<br />
locomotives, the noise from engines is predominant at lower speeds, while the source <strong>of</strong><br />
noise at higher speeds is the contact between wheels and rails.<br />
Under the optimistic scenario, the maximum number <strong>of</strong> compositions to run over the line<br />
daily in 2040 will amount 39, out <strong>of</strong> which 14 passenger and 25 freight. This number has<br />
been accepted for further calculations along the whole line.<br />
According to the results, at a distance <strong>of</strong> 120 m from the railway line, the level <strong>of</strong> noise drops<br />
at 45 dBA which corresponds with the natural phone. This means that at a distance <strong>of</strong> 120 m<br />
from the source <strong>of</strong> the noise, the natural phone will decline by around 3 dBA. At a distance <strong>of</strong><br />
250 m already, the noise from this railway line will not have any notable impact.<br />
Solid waste impacts<br />
During the railway line construction, the work will involve new material, i.e. a new line will be<br />
located and set up and thus there will be no waste generated from reconstruction (mostly<br />
construction waste and demolition waste). During the operation and functioning <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway line, different types <strong>of</strong> waste will be generated. These include municipal waste,<br />
packaging waste, waste from construction activities, etc. Minor quantity <strong>of</strong> hazardous waste<br />
will occur among other wastes.<br />
The waste to be generated in the course <strong>of</strong> the line utilization phase is related to its<br />
maintenance or to users <strong>of</strong> railway transport and it is municipal in nature on stations or<br />
intersections.<br />
The types <strong>of</strong> wastes produced include consumables, spare parts and equipment. The<br />
dynamics <strong>of</strong> these wastes generation is correlated with the maintenance and the frequency<br />
<strong>of</strong> passengers.<br />
Socio-economic aspects, proprietary aspects and impacts on revenues<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> its length, the planned route <strong>of</strong> the railway line will pass through state and<br />
privately owned land (mostly agricultural land and arable areas). As a structure, it will not<br />
occupy a lot <strong>of</strong> space in width which implies negligible impact on places related to<br />
agricultural activities or economic revenues.<br />
Permanent loss <strong>of</strong> land, forest and other assets, as well as possible damage during the<br />
construction phase or during the line use will be subject to compensation in accordance with<br />
the Macedonian legislation.<br />
Public Enterprise “Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s” – Skopje will carry out appropriate process <strong>of</strong> land<br />
expropriation with every natural and legal person owning land required for the project<br />
implementation.<br />
Impacts on forests<br />
The so called soil sealing, i.e. conversion from productive into unproductive land will<br />
take place, and in this case permanent conversion <strong>of</strong> forest into building land by<br />
which economic and generally useful functions and values <strong>of</strong> forest will be<br />
permanently lost;<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> access roads, other infrastructure and facilities will have additional<br />
impacts through disruption <strong>of</strong> natural ecosystems and increased amount <strong>of</strong> expected<br />
negative effects and damages;<br />
Links between different ecosystems will be broken and therefore permanent negative<br />
impacts are expected in the food chain, movement and reproduction <strong>of</strong> animals, etc.<br />
42
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
There is also direct impact on the established balance, cycles, processes and<br />
dynamics <strong>of</strong> sustainable development <strong>of</strong> biological development;<br />
Forest fragmentation will occur in certain sections which will have negative reflections<br />
on economic activity;<br />
Change in the manner <strong>of</strong> operation in certain parts along the railway line, i.e. at<br />
places <strong>of</strong> planned resurrection wood cuts and various other activities aimed at<br />
improvement <strong>of</strong> productivity will result in change <strong>of</strong> forestry measures due to the line<br />
construction, which will burden the forest managing enterprise financially. The overall<br />
changes envisaged will take place in around 1820 ha.<br />
In the course <strong>of</strong> the operational phase <strong>of</strong> the line, the most significant impact in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
increased risk <strong>of</strong> fire will be the occurrence <strong>of</strong> sparkles during breaking and other operations<br />
<strong>of</strong> rail vehicles.<br />
Impacts on erosion and deposits during construction and operational phases<br />
The following impacts can be expected during construction and operational phases <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway line:<br />
Disruption <strong>of</strong> the established regime <strong>of</strong> water running, with possible severe negative<br />
effects within the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line;<br />
Increased hazards <strong>of</strong> erosion processes, including even stability <strong>of</strong> slopes due to<br />
earth works. Considering the great volume <strong>of</strong> construction works, especially<br />
voluminous earth works, excavations and embankments along the line route will<br />
cause intensification <strong>of</strong> erosive processes, which will have negative effects on the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> waters;<br />
Turbidity <strong>of</strong> watercourses will occur frequently which will have negative effects on the<br />
life in the watercourses and Ohrid Lake; Processes <strong>of</strong> transportation and<br />
retransportation <strong>of</strong> deposits along hydrographic network <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska are<br />
expected to intensify. Such processes will have negative effects on the ecosystem <strong>of</strong><br />
Ohrid Lake;<br />
Due to huge earth works, upon compensation activities, a surplus <strong>of</strong> around 300 000<br />
m 3 is expected for disposal. This will result in soil degradation (type: change in<br />
outlook), but there is a danger <strong>of</strong> erosive processes in disposed material;<br />
Impacts on natural heritage<br />
The planned route <strong>of</strong> the railway line will not pass close to any recorded protected natural<br />
heritage.<br />
Impacts on cultural heritage<br />
During elaboration <strong>of</strong> the planning documentation and detailed designing <strong>of</strong> the railway line,<br />
the Investor will observe the requirements for conservation <strong>of</strong> recorded cultural heritage<br />
incorporated in Macedonian legislation and multilateral agreements in the area <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />
Impacts <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />
Impacts <strong>of</strong> radiation are not expected during construction works and railway line operation.<br />
Impacts <strong>of</strong> odour<br />
Impacts <strong>of</strong> odour are not expected during construction works and railway line operation.<br />
Cumulative impacts<br />
Cumulative effects may occur as a result <strong>of</strong> other existing or future projects <strong>of</strong> the same type<br />
along its corridor (highway, regional road).<br />
43
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Impacts after the operational phase have not been considered, because projects <strong>of</strong> this type<br />
are used for hundreds <strong>of</strong> years and during that period minor reconstruction undertakings are<br />
possible for their upgrading.<br />
Based on identified environmental impacts, measures to prevent or reduce environmental<br />
impacts have been envisaged.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> environment, the linear Project – Construction <strong>of</strong> railway line Kicevo-Lin (border<br />
with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) does not pose any particular threat to environment and nature,<br />
and the route is acceptable as a whole. Provided that the recommended measures for<br />
reduction and mitigation <strong>of</strong> possible impacts on the environment are adopted, the Project will<br />
have sustainability for a long period from financial point <strong>of</strong> view, but also in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
environmental protection and quality <strong>of</strong> living.<br />
The process <strong>of</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Impact Assessment Study for the Project –<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) was carried out<br />
in accordance with the methodology prescribed by law.<br />
Expert team in all areas required for such a complex linear project participated in the<br />
elaboration <strong>of</strong> the Study.<br />
All aspects <strong>of</strong> environment and nature, cultural heritage, as well as aspects <strong>of</strong> socioeconomic<br />
development and human welfare have been considered.<br />
This was done to provide sustainability <strong>of</strong> the Project in long run.<br />
During the development <strong>of</strong> the Study, we have had good communication in the frames <strong>of</strong> the<br />
expert team, as well as with the Investor and developer <strong>of</strong> the Preliminary Design. This<br />
resulted in acquisition <strong>of</strong> timely information and access to terrain and required plans.<br />
44
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Goal <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> the Project, in accordance with the Project Programme, prepared by the<br />
Public Enterprise for <strong>Railway</strong> Infrastructure “Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s”- Skopje, is to develop a<br />
railway line Kicevo- Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>).<br />
The construction <strong>of</strong> this railway line and other sections missing in <strong>Corridor</strong> 8, aims towards<br />
less expensive and faster transport <strong>of</strong> the population and economic assets. <strong>Railway</strong><br />
connection <strong>of</strong> Macedonia with the neighboring countries is expected to influence positively in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> enhanced economic activities and trade in the country, neighboring countries<br />
(<strong>Albania</strong> and Bulgaria) and the Region.<br />
The new railway connection will contribute to the improvement <strong>of</strong> the local population socialeconomic<br />
condition, particularly in the railway station areas, and thus on a regional level<br />
(development <strong>of</strong> the western part <strong>of</strong> the country), meaning less costly transportation <strong>of</strong><br />
people and goods. Furthermore, the construction <strong>of</strong> this railway line will bring about<br />
establishing a railway connection <strong>of</strong> Macedonia with <strong>Albania</strong>, which would enable creating a<br />
transport connection with the ports Duras and Valona on the Adriatic Sea. This is <strong>of</strong> great<br />
significance for the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia as a continental country.<br />
Integrated transport system has a crucial role in the enhancement <strong>of</strong> the economic growth<br />
and maintenance <strong>of</strong> competition by enabling access to fast, efficient and reliable transport<br />
services, as well as facilitating individual mobility.<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> the transport network, its operation, management and maintenance,<br />
contribute directly to the growth <strong>of</strong> the economy, connection <strong>of</strong> people with their work places<br />
and their other activities, improve employment rate as a key social element providing<br />
economic growth in the country.<br />
Improved accessibility will enable revenues from land use and changes in population<br />
migrations.<br />
Transport density is concentrated strictly on road transport, which has significant impacts on<br />
the environment, especially in conditions <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> fuels with high content <strong>of</strong> sulfur and high<br />
share <strong>of</strong> old vehicles involved in the traffic. On the other side, this situation may cause<br />
increased economic costs <strong>of</strong> the transport system in the country.<br />
In consideration <strong>of</strong> the above indicated factors, the strategic goals <strong>of</strong> the Macedonian<br />
Government regarding railway transport include:<br />
Attractive railway service for the passengers, with the advantage <strong>of</strong> high quality travel<br />
to the work place, safe travelling possibilities and a guarantee that our transport<br />
choice will consider environmental conditions, including air quality and noise<br />
generation.<br />
Supporting heavy freight trains, used for transport <strong>of</strong> large amounts <strong>of</strong> various<br />
products, through an effective transition from rail to road transport and vice versa.<br />
Supporting the national industry in enabling a low-cost and effective mode <strong>of</strong> mass<br />
transport.<br />
Geographical position and geostrategic interests <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia is situated on the cross-road <strong>of</strong> the main roads in Southeastern<br />
Europe, which makes it an important strategic route in the domain <strong>of</strong> land transport<br />
connecting Central Europe, Aegean Sea, Black Sea and Adriatic Sea. This position<br />
45
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
contributes to the development <strong>of</strong> international transport through the two corridors passing<br />
through the country along the two main axes: North-South (<strong>Corridor</strong> X) and East-West<br />
(<strong>Corridor</strong> VIII), known as Pan-European corridors, connected within Trans-European<br />
transport networks.<br />
Macedonia’s geographical position and characteristics determine the strategic need for sea<br />
access through the territories <strong>of</strong> its neighbors. Connections to ports on the Aegean and<br />
Adriatic Seas are <strong>of</strong> exceptional national importance, especially accessibility to the ports <strong>of</strong><br />
Pirea, Taranto and Gioia Tauro. At present, only the connections with Pirea are adequately<br />
developed, while those with Duras and southern Italian ports require serious construction.<br />
The incomplete east-to-west railway line has a negative impact on rail transport<br />
competitiveness and the economy <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, on the whole. The lack <strong>of</strong> connection with<br />
the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> and the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria is a major obstacle in the improvement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the exchange market, not only with neighboring countries, but with Eastern Europe<br />
(Russia, Belarus, Ukraine), Turkey and Caucasus countries, as well. The <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia is a land locked country and mass transport should improve by connecting to<br />
<strong>Albania</strong> and Bulgaria ports, so from a strategic point <strong>of</strong> view, the connection with the<br />
<strong>Albania</strong>n and Bulgarian railway infrastructure is a significant challenge for the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia.<br />
The subject <strong>of</strong> the present Study, the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Albania</strong>), is designed as an extension <strong>of</strong> the railway line Skopje- Tetovo- Gostivar- Kicevo,<br />
and aims to help solve the aforementioned issues.<br />
International importance <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
Defining <strong>of</strong> a new European Transport Strategy for Planning in accordance with the EU<br />
enlargement process was finalized in December 2005, with the publication <strong>of</strong> the “Peace and<br />
development networks” report, produced by the High Level Group for “Wider Europe for<br />
Transport”. The Strategy basic goal is to improve the EU connections with new neighboring<br />
countries, the Far East and North Africa. Stimulating the development <strong>of</strong> rail freight corridors<br />
also falls under the priorities <strong>of</strong> the work group coordinating the Strategy implementation.<br />
Within that common framework, <strong>Corridor</strong> VIII is recognized as an integral part <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
five new Transnational European axes- the South-Eastern axis.<br />
The development <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) is<br />
recognized in the analysis <strong>of</strong> the High Level Group, which defines it as priority railway<br />
project 10.<br />
46
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 1 Southeastern axis, ГВР 1<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> corridor VІІІ<br />
The development <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> VIII along axis East-West is an indispensable economic and<br />
political instrument for the Balkan Region, and helps improve interregional stability. It is also<br />
associated with expectations for positive influence on the exchange and communications<br />
between the countries the territories <strong>of</strong> which it passes through. Connecting the Adriatic with<br />
the Black Sea leads to great opportunities for economic development<br />
1 Source: М ЕC, Report <strong>of</strong> the High Level Group, led by Ms. Layola de Palasio, November 2005.<br />
47
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 2 <strong>Corridor</strong> VІІІ, according to the Memorandum <strong>of</strong> Understanding 2<br />
As it can be seen in the above scheme, <strong>Corridor</strong> VIII starts at the ports Bari and Brindisi in<br />
Italy, and passes through <strong>Albania</strong>n ports Duras and Vlora, connecting them with a railway<br />
line with the capital Tirana. From there, the existing railway connection continues to the<br />
<strong>Albania</strong>n-Macedonian border.<br />
On the territory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, it has two stretches at Rogozine and Lin. The former line<br />
connects Rogozine with the port <strong>of</strong> Vlora and the latter runs from Lin through Pogradec and<br />
Kastice, establishing connection with Kristolopigi in Greece.<br />
Upon crossing the <strong>Albania</strong>n-Macedonian border, the corridor is directed towards north<br />
through Tetovo, reaching the capital <strong>of</strong> Skopje. From there, it is directed towards east, up to<br />
Macedonian-Bulgarian border, then passing through Plovdiv and Stara Zagora, to reach its<br />
end in Black Sea ports Burgas and Varna.<br />
2 Source: Secretariat <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> VІІІ<br />
48
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 3 <strong>Railway</strong> corridor VІІІ, section Duras-Skopje-S<strong>of</strong>ia 3<br />
Pre-Feasibility Study on the development <strong>of</strong> the railway axis along Pan-European <strong>Corridor</strong><br />
VІІІ, prepared by the Secretariat <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Corridor</strong> in September 2007, divided the line into 17<br />
sections and full overview <strong>of</strong> these is presented in the next Table:<br />
Table 1 4 Description <strong>of</strong> railway corridor VІІІ<br />
Section<br />
Features<br />
The territory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong><br />
Tirana – Duras (1) Existing distance between stations was renovated in 1998.<br />
Necessary renovation<strong>of</strong> the upper superstructure <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />
Duras – Rogozhine – Elbasan<br />
(2)<br />
Elbasan – Librazhdi (3) and<br />
Librazhdi – Lin (4)<br />
Lin – border with Macedonia<br />
(5)<br />
Existing station which passing through the hilly<br />
Unsatisfactory condition<br />
Mach speed limit 34 km/h<br />
Need rehabilitation<br />
Existing section passes through mountainous<br />
Longitudinal Mach stream <strong>of</strong> 18‰ and horizontal curves with radius<br />
300 m<br />
Unsatisfactory condition<br />
Mach speed limit 27/24 km/h<br />
Missing section with a length 2 - 3<br />
3 Source: Secretariat <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> VІІІ<br />
4 Source: Prefeasibility Study on the development <strong>of</strong> the railway axis along Pan-European <strong>Corridor</strong> VІІІ,<br />
Secretariat <strong>of</strong> Pan-European <strong>Corridor</strong> VІІІ, 2007.<br />
49
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Section<br />
The territory <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />
Border with <strong>Albania</strong> –<br />
Struga (6) and Struga –<br />
Kicevo (7)<br />
Features<br />
Missin section, the subject <strong>of</strong> this study<br />
Kicevo – Gostivar (8) Gostivar<br />
– Gorce Petrov – Skopje (9)<br />
and Skopje – Kumanovo (10)<br />
Kumanovo – Beljakovci (11)<br />
Beljakovci – Kriva Palanka<br />
(12)<br />
Kriva Palanka – border with<br />
Bulgaria (13))<br />
The teritorry <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria<br />
Border with Macedonia –<br />
Gyueshevo (14)<br />
Gyueshevo - Kyustendil (15)<br />
and Kyustendil - Radomir (16)<br />
Radomir – S<strong>of</strong>ia (17)<br />
Existing and sections that are used<br />
The need for minimal intervention in sections Kicevo – Gorce Petrov<br />
Section 10 electrified, the other - no<br />
Section under construction 29 km in length<br />
Stage <strong>of</strong> development approximately 35%<br />
Design speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h<br />
Section under construction 37 km in length<br />
Stage <strong>of</strong> development approximately 58%<br />
Design speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h<br />
Mach longitudinal gradient <strong>of</strong> 15‰<br />
Missing sections with length 23 km<br />
Mountain terrain<br />
Design speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h<br />
Mach longitudinal gradient <strong>of</strong> 25‰<br />
Missing section with lendth 2.5 km, which 1.2 km is tunnel<br />
Design speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h<br />
Longitudinal gradient <strong>of</strong> 2‰<br />
Existing section with 88 km length in exsploatation<br />
Unelectrified<br />
Rated speed 65 km/h, but the trade is between 25 и 35 km/h<br />
Existing section in exsploatation<br />
Electrified, partly doubled (11 km)<br />
The railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>), subject <strong>of</strong> the present<br />
Study, will be intended for mixed traffic (passenger and freight). According to technical<br />
criteria, the line should be a single-track main line with standard track gauge <strong>of</strong> 1 435 mm for<br />
lowest nominal speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h and axle pressure <strong>of</strong> 250 kN. The track is planned to be<br />
electrified with a single-phase system <strong>of</strong> electrification 25 kV and 50 Hz.<br />
In accordance with the Project programme and the adopted division <strong>of</strong> railway corridor 8 in<br />
sections, the route <strong>of</strong> the future railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
was divided in two sections, namely:<br />
‣ Section 1<br />
‣ Section 2<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> transport<br />
Kicevo- Struga , and<br />
Struga- Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>).<br />
Alike the road network, the railway network <strong>of</strong> Macedonia follows the main corridors. The<br />
total length <strong>of</strong> the main railway network is 925 km, <strong>of</strong> which:<br />
50
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
- Open line 699 km;<br />
- Station tracks 226 km, and<br />
- Industrial tracks 102 km 5 .<br />
312.66 km <strong>of</strong> the railway line are electrified by mono-phase system <strong>of</strong> 25 kV, 50 Hz. Track<br />
gauge <strong>of</strong> the entire network is 1 435 mm. The main line on <strong>Corridor</strong> X from Tabanovci to<br />
Gevgelia, through Kako and Veles, has single electrified track.<br />
Figure 4 <strong>Railway</strong> network <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia 6<br />
Categorization <strong>of</strong> the existing railway network is presented on the next Figure.<br />
According to the recent assessment <strong>of</strong> the World Bank, "The railway network in Macedonia<br />
consists mainly <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> Х with several partitions (some <strong>of</strong> which are closed for passenger<br />
transport or used only for some types <strong>of</strong> freight transport). Under the current circumstances,<br />
the system <strong>of</strong> Macedonian railways provides limited and not full services. As <strong>of</strong> recently,<br />
several lines have been closed, which used to be loaded with passenger transport. As a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> the reduced passenger transport and emergence <strong>of</strong> huge losses related to freight<br />
transport, the lines have been declared as non-pr<strong>of</strong>itable and closed”.<br />
5 Source: Announcement <strong>of</strong> the network for 2009<br />
6 Source: Announcement <strong>of</strong> the network for 2009<br />
51
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 5 Existing railway network through the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia 7<br />
Description <strong>of</strong> the current status is presented in the following figures and tables.<br />
Figure 6 Utilization <strong>of</strong> the railway infrastructure <strong>of</strong> Macedonia 8<br />
7 Source: Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, Spatial development Strategy<br />
8 Source: World Bank, Macedonian Rails- a potential that must be seized<br />
52
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Table 2 9 Current status <strong>of</strong> railway lines in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />
Track<br />
кm<br />
Year <strong>of</strong><br />
construction<br />
Embedded<br />
Rails<br />
driving speed<br />
km/h<br />
Tabanovce – Skopje 49,80 1888 49 100/75<br />
Skopje – Veles 48,74 1873 49 90/80<br />
Veles - Gevgelija 113,92 1873 49 100/80<br />
Skopje – Volkovo - border 31,68 1874 49 100/85<br />
G.Petrov - Kicevo 103,00 1952/69 49 100/50<br />
Veles – Bitola 128,87 1931/36 49 100/50<br />
Bitola - Kremenica<br />
16.70 1894<br />
разни<br />
типови<br />
B. Gumno - Sapotnica 29,43 1957 35б 35<br />
Gradsko - Sivec 16,33 1983 49 50<br />
Veles - Kocani 85,58 1925- 45,8а,35б 70/50<br />
Zajas – Tajmiste 6,60 1969 49 40<br />
Skopje node 37,30 1971 49 100/40<br />
Table 3 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the railway network<br />
<strong>Railway</strong><br />
lines<br />
<strong>Corridor</strong><br />
10<br />
Location<br />
Tabanovce - Gevgelija - through<br />
Skopje and Veles<br />
Condition<br />
Single, electrified, most recent renovation <strong>of</strong><br />
sections 30 years ago<br />
<strong>Corridor</strong> 8 Gorce Petrov – Jegunovce Built in the period 1952/1969 g. as freight line to<br />
use mines in Jegunovce (Fe, Ni, Cr)<br />
Skopje -<br />
General<br />
Jankovic<br />
Stream D,<br />
<strong>Corridor</strong> 10<br />
Kumanovo<br />
-<br />
Beljakovce<br />
<strong>Corridor</strong> 8<br />
Stream D,<br />
<strong>Corridor</strong> 10<br />
Connects with Pristina and<br />
Kosovo zhp network<br />
Veles – Bitola<br />
At border with R.Bulgaria to the<br />
east<br />
Jegunovce – Kicevo<br />
Kicevo – Tajmiste<br />
Veles – Kocani<br />
Used for passenger and freight transport<br />
It woeks for passenger and freight transport<br />
30<br />
Speed<br />
(km/h)<br />
110<br />
60-80<br />
60-80<br />
60-80<br />
First section <strong>of</strong> the future link on the railway<br />
network in Bulgaria; close for movement 60-80<br />
The latest railway line(1968), in good condition,<br />
used 2 month per year for the transport <strong>of</strong> livestock<br />
80-100<br />
Closed to passenger transport, occasionally is used<br />
for freight transport 40-60<br />
Stream D,<br />
<strong>Corridor</strong> 10<br />
Bitola – border - Greece<br />
Secondary lines with low performance, built in<br />
1939, not used<br />
<strong>Corridor</strong> 10 Gradsko - Sivec Only for freight transport 40-50<br />
5-10<br />
9 Source: National programme for railway infrastructure 2008-2012<br />
53
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment legislation<br />
The requirements for the development <strong>of</strong> Environmental Impact Assessment for certain<br />
projects is in accordance with the Law on Environment (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no. 53/05,<br />
81/05, 24/07, 159/08, 83/09 and 48/10). “Project” is a term which refers to development<br />
document in which final solutions for use <strong>of</strong> natural and man-made values are analyzed and<br />
defined and construction <strong>of</strong> facilities and installations and implementation <strong>of</strong> other activities<br />
(such as construction and development collectors, construction <strong>of</strong> roads,<br />
expansion/upgrading <strong>of</strong> factories or mines, etc.) is regulated where such projects have<br />
impacts on environment, landscape and human health.<br />
The types <strong>of</strong> projects and the criteria on the basis <strong>of</strong> which the need for carrying out<br />
environmental impact assessment procedure is established are determined by the<br />
Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia at the proposal <strong>of</strong> the body <strong>of</strong> the state<br />
administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment, based on Article 77<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Law on Environment. Detailed determination <strong>of</strong> the projects is specified in the Decree<br />
determining the projects and the criteria under which the requirement for environmental<br />
impact assesment procedure performance is established (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no.74/05).<br />
The Decree determining the projects and the criteria under which the requirement for<br />
environmental impact assesment procedure performance is established specifies two<br />
categories <strong>of</strong> projects, namely:<br />
- Projects requiring compulsory environmental impact assesment procedure<br />
performance prior to the issuance <strong>of</strong> the decision for the project implementation;<br />
- Generally specified projects, that may have significant environmental impact, for the<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> which the requirement for environmental impact assesment procedure<br />
performance is established prior to the issuance <strong>of</strong> the decision for the project<br />
implementation, depending on the project characteristics, size and location, the latest<br />
scientific and technical knowledge and solutions contained in the regulations specifying the<br />
minimum values <strong>of</strong> environmental emissions.<br />
The performance <strong>of</strong> the EIA procedure is specified in the Law on Environment, Decree<br />
determining the projects and the criteria under which the requirement for environmental<br />
impact assesment procedure performance is established, and it is defined in more detail in<br />
the following bylaws:<br />
- Rulebook on the information to be included in the notification on the intention to carry<br />
out a project and the procedure determining the requirement for environmental impact<br />
assesment <strong>of</strong> the project (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />
- Rulebook on additional criteria, the manner, procedure and compensation for the<br />
costs for inclusion in and exclusion from the List <strong>of</strong> project environmental impact assesment<br />
experts (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />
- Rulebook on the information to be included in the notification on the intention to carry<br />
out a project and the procedure determining the requirement for environmental impact<br />
assesment <strong>of</strong> the project (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />
- Rulebook on the content <strong>of</strong> the announcement <strong>of</strong> the notification on the intention to<br />
carry out a project, on the decision for environmental impact assesment, <strong>of</strong> the<br />
environmental impact assesment study on the project, <strong>of</strong> the report on the adequacy <strong>of</strong><br />
environmental impact assesment study and the decision by which consent to the project<br />
implementation is issued or rejected, as well as the manner <strong>of</strong> public consultation (Official<br />
Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />
54
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
- Rulebook on the form, content, procedure and manner <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> the report<br />
on the adequacy <strong>of</strong> the project environmental impact assesment study, as well as the<br />
procedure on the authorization <strong>of</strong> persons on the List <strong>of</strong> environmental impact assesment<br />
experts to prepare the report (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06).<br />
The implementation <strong>of</strong> the EIA procedure consists <strong>of</strong> several steps or phases, namely:<br />
notification on the intention to carry out a project, screening, request for EIA scoping,<br />
assessment and evaluation <strong>of</strong> direct and indirect impacts on the environment from project<br />
undertaking or non-undertaking. The impact <strong>of</strong> the project on the environment is assessed in<br />
accordance with the state <strong>of</strong> the environment on the area concerned at the time in which the<br />
notification on the intention to carry out a project is submitted. The following elements have<br />
to be considered in environmental impact assesment:<br />
Project preparation, execution, implementation and termination <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
implementation, including also the result and the effects <strong>of</strong> the project completion,<br />
Removal <strong>of</strong> polluting substances and restoration <strong>of</strong> the affected area to its former<br />
status, if such obligation is specified by special regulations,<br />
Normal functioning <strong>of</strong> the project, as well as possibilities for accidents.<br />
The phases <strong>of</strong> the EIA procedure implementation are shown on the figure below:<br />
EIA procedure<br />
The environmental impact assesment covers the following aspects:<br />
- Establishment <strong>of</strong> the requirement for EIA performance,<br />
- Environmental impact assesment scoping,<br />
- Preparation <strong>of</strong> EIA Study,<br />
- Establishment <strong>of</strong> adequacy and approval <strong>of</strong> the project environmental impact<br />
assesment study, including public presentation, public opinion and public<br />
participation in decision making,<br />
- Notification on adopted decision.<br />
55
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
EIA Study includes data/information on the current status, identification <strong>of</strong> impacts, as well<br />
as comparative assessment <strong>of</strong> impacts resulting from several project alternatives. EIA is<br />
carried out by authorized experts in accordance with the established methodology,<br />
notification structure and required documents. Public participation is compulsory throughout<br />
the process, in accordance with the Law on Environment.<br />
The Investor intending to carry out a project covered by Articles 77 and 78 <strong>of</strong> the Law on<br />
Environment is obliged to submit notification on the intention to carry out a project to the<br />
body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment,<br />
accompanied by opinion on the need for carrying out environmental impact assessment,<br />
both in writing and electronic form. The body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the<br />
affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment, within ten days from the day <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> the<br />
notification, shall inform the Investor on the need to supplement the notification, and within<br />
five days from the day <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> the full notification, it shall display it on the web site <strong>of</strong> the<br />
MEPP and in at least one daily newspaper distributed on the whole territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> Macedonia. The Minister specifies the information to be included in the notification in<br />
order to establish the requirement for environmental impact assessment performance for the<br />
project.<br />
Screening is the phase <strong>of</strong> the EIA process through which the body <strong>of</strong> the state<br />
administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment analyzes the need<br />
for EIA development on the specific project within 30 days from the day <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> the<br />
notification in full. When the need for EIA development on the specific project is established,<br />
the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />
shall by decision notify the Investor, who shall then submit an application for scoping <strong>of</strong> the<br />
project environmental impact assessment, i.e. definition <strong>of</strong> all areas to be covered in the EIA<br />
(content <strong>of</strong> the EIA). Within five days from the day <strong>of</strong> its adoption, the decision shall be<br />
published on the web site <strong>of</strong> the MEP and in at least one daily newspaper distributed on the<br />
whole territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. Public participation is included as early as in<br />
the first phase. The Investor, affected legal and natural persons, as well as civil associations<br />
established for environment protection and improvement, may submit an appeal against<br />
such decision to the Commission <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia settling<br />
administrative matters at second instance in the area <strong>of</strong> environment, within eight days from<br />
the day <strong>of</strong> publication <strong>of</strong> the decision.<br />
The EIA scoping phase is process within which the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration<br />
responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment specifies the scope <strong>of</strong> the<br />
environmental impact assessment study <strong>of</strong> the project. The body <strong>of</strong> the state administration<br />
responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment, while determining the scope <strong>of</strong> the<br />
environmental impact assessment study <strong>of</strong> the project, shall consult the Investor and the<br />
Municipality, the City <strong>of</strong> Skopje and Municipalities in the City <strong>of</strong> Skopje on the area <strong>of</strong> which<br />
the project will be implemented, as well as other relevant bodies <strong>of</strong> the state administration<br />
and institutions, which are obliged to provide information and opinions within 15 days from<br />
the day <strong>of</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> the request for consultation.<br />
The body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />
shall issue opinion on the scoping and notify the Investor thereon.<br />
The main goal <strong>of</strong> this phase is to inform the Investor <strong>of</strong> issues (tasks) to be addressed in the<br />
final version <strong>of</strong> the EIA Study. This also assumes inclusion <strong>of</strong> specific requirements on the<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> each individual project proposal.<br />
Scoping <strong>of</strong> the environmental impact assessment <strong>of</strong> the project is compulsory under Articles<br />
81(4) and 82(1) <strong>of</strong> the Law on Environment. The Investor is obliged to request the opinion on<br />
56
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
the scoping by the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong><br />
the environment.<br />
The opinion on the scope <strong>of</strong> the environmental impact assessment <strong>of</strong> the project shall in<br />
particular contain the following information to be taken into account by the Investor while<br />
developing the project proposal:<br />
- alternatives that need to be considered,<br />
- basic overview and investigations that need to be carried out,<br />
- methods and criteria used to presume and assess the effects,<br />
- mitigation measures to be undertaken,<br />
- legal persons that should be consulted during the preparation <strong>of</strong> the environmental<br />
impact assessment study <strong>of</strong> the project, and<br />
- structure, content and length <strong>of</strong> environmental information.<br />
The above means that the Investor may undertake different types <strong>of</strong> activities select<br />
alternative location or modify the solution proposed by the project, all aimed at reducing or<br />
mitigating the potential environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
The body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />
may, besides the scoping <strong>of</strong> the environmental impact assessment <strong>of</strong> the project, in the<br />
course <strong>of</strong> the further environmental impact assessment procedure, request additional<br />
information if they find necessary, or to request information to be compiled in a manner<br />
corresponding with modern knowledge and methods <strong>of</strong> assessment.<br />
Once the scope is determined, the development <strong>of</strong> the EIA Study is initiated. The<br />
development <strong>of</strong> the environmental impact assessment study concerning the implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the project is in accordance with Article 2 <strong>of</strong> the Rulebook on the content <strong>of</strong> the<br />
requirements to be fulfilled by the environmental impact assesment study (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />
The Investor shall prepare the environmental impact assessment study for the project,<br />
required to carry out the environmental impact assessment procedure for the project and<br />
submit it to the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the<br />
environment both in writing and electronic form, and to engage at least one person from the<br />
List <strong>of</strong> experts (Article 85 <strong>of</strong> the Law on Environment), to sign the study as person<br />
responsible for its quality. Within five working days from the day <strong>of</strong> receipt or completion, the<br />
body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />
shall publish the environmental impact assessment study for the project on the web site <strong>of</strong><br />
the MEPP and announcement that the study is completed and available to the public in at<br />
least one daily newspaper distributed on the whole territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />
Any person, the bodies <strong>of</strong> the state administration, mayors <strong>of</strong> municipalities, the City <strong>of</strong><br />
Skopje and municipalities in the City <strong>of</strong> Skopje, may submit their opinions, in writing, the<br />
body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment,<br />
within 30 days from the day <strong>of</strong> publication the environmental impact assessment study. If the<br />
study does not contain certain legal requirements, the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration<br />
responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment shall return it to the Investor and<br />
specify the deadline within which it shall be supplemented or modified, which may not be<br />
longer than 40 days, starting from the day <strong>of</strong> the study receipt.<br />
57
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Once the impacts on the environment have been identified and assessed in the prepared<br />
EIA Study, the process goes further with the review <strong>of</strong> the study adequacy. The review<br />
shall focus on identification <strong>of</strong> deficiencies <strong>of</strong> major and minor importance, which may have<br />
direct influence on the process <strong>of</strong> making decision with regard to the quality <strong>of</strong> the Study. In<br />
case no serious deficiencies have been detected, it will be so noted. Review <strong>of</strong> adequacy <strong>of</strong><br />
the Study is a process <strong>of</strong> checking the adequacy <strong>of</strong> the EIA Study through “Report on the<br />
adequacy <strong>of</strong> Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project”, which is prepared by<br />
the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />
persons authorized thereby from among the List <strong>of</strong> experts within deadline which may not<br />
exceed 60 days from the day on which the Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Project has been submitted together with the opinions on the Study obtained upon prior<br />
conducted public debate. The Report shall establish whether the Environmental Impact<br />
Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project meets the requirements specified by the law and proposes<br />
the conditions that should be specified in the permit for the project implementation, as well<br />
as the measures for negative impacts prevention and reduction. In case <strong>of</strong> at least one<br />
response “inadequate” in the checklist, the Study is returned to the Investor who should<br />
supplement or finalize it within deadline that shall not exceed 30 days.<br />
Within five working days from the day <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> the Report on the adequacy <strong>of</strong><br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project, the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration<br />
responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment shall forward the Report to the<br />
bodies <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the performance <strong>of</strong> activities relevant for<br />
the project and to the bodies <strong>of</strong> the municipalities, the City <strong>of</strong> Skopje and municipalities in<br />
the City <strong>of</strong> Skopje, on the territory <strong>of</strong> which the project is intended to be implemented and<br />
shall publish the Report on the web site <strong>of</strong> the MEPP and in at least one daily newspaper<br />
distributed on the whole territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />
The procedure through which the quality <strong>of</strong> the developed Study is checked is actually the<br />
main “protective procedure” incorporated in the whole EIA procedure. Most <strong>of</strong>ten, the quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Study is improved upon the completed review and thus better results are achieved<br />
with regard to environment and obtaining <strong>of</strong> approval for the project which has been<br />
generally accepted both by experts and public.<br />
Finally, the review gives recommendations on how and when should the serious deficiencies<br />
in the study be removed and which appropriate measures should be implemented during the<br />
project implementation.<br />
The EIA Study will be approved by the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the<br />
affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment only if all responses on the checklist have been<br />
assessed as adequate. Based on the EIA Study, the Report on the EIA Study adequacy,<br />
public debate carried out in accordance with Article 91 <strong>of</strong> the Law on Environment and<br />
opinions obtained, the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area<br />
<strong>of</strong> the environment shall within 40 days from the day <strong>of</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> the Report, issue a<br />
decision granting consent or rejecting the request for the project implementation.<br />
The decision contains an assessment <strong>of</strong> whether the Environmental Impact Assessment<br />
Study <strong>of</strong> the project meets the requirement prescribed by the Law on Environment and<br />
conditions for issuance <strong>of</strong> the permit for the project implementation, as well as the measures<br />
for negative impacts prevention and reduction, particularly for:<br />
- prevention <strong>of</strong> harmful environmental impacts resulting from the project implementation,<br />
- prevention, restriction, mitigation or reduction <strong>of</strong> harmful impacts,<br />
- increase <strong>of</strong> positive environmental impacts resulting from the project implementation,<br />
and<br />
58
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
- assessment <strong>of</strong> expected effects <strong>of</strong> the proposed measures.<br />
Within five working days from the day <strong>of</strong> its issuance, the decision is submitted to the<br />
Investor, the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the permit issuance, or decision<br />
for the project implementation and to the municipality or the City <strong>of</strong> Skopje on the territory <strong>of</strong><br />
which the project is intended to be implemented and shall publish it on the web site <strong>of</strong> the<br />
MEPP and in at least one daily newspaper distributed on the whole territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> Macedonia. If the Investor fails to present the decision, the body responsible for issuance<br />
<strong>of</strong> the permit or decision for the implementation <strong>of</strong> the project for which the environmental<br />
impact assessment is carried out, it shall not issue the permit or decision for the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
The decision will cease to have legal effect if within two years from its issuance the<br />
implementation has not been initiated.<br />
National legal framework regulating the area:<br />
‣ Law on Environment (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 53/05, 81/05,<br />
24/07 and 159/08, 83/09, and 48/10);<br />
Decree determining the projects and the criteria under which the requirement for<br />
environmental impact assesment procedure performance is established (Official<br />
Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 74/05);<br />
Rulebook on the information to be included in the notification on the intention to<br />
carry out a project and the procedure determining the requirement for<br />
environmental impact assesment <strong>of</strong> the project (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />
Rulebook on the content <strong>of</strong> the requirements to be fulfilled by the environmental<br />
impact assesment study (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no.<br />
33/06);<br />
Rulebook on the content <strong>of</strong> the announcement <strong>of</strong> the notification on the intention<br />
to carry out a project, on the decision for environmental impact assesment, <strong>of</strong> the<br />
environmental impact assesment study on the project, <strong>of</strong> the report on the<br />
adequacy <strong>of</strong> environmental impact assesment study and the decision by which<br />
consent to the project implementation is issued or rejected, as well as the manner<br />
<strong>of</strong> public consultation (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />
Rulebook on the form, content, procedure and manner <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> the<br />
report on the adequacy <strong>of</strong> the project environmental impact assesment study, as<br />
well as the procedure on the authorization <strong>of</strong> persons on the List <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />
impact assesment experts to prepare the report (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />
‣ Law on Nature Protection (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 67/04,<br />
14/06 and 84/07 and 35/10);<br />
‣ Law on Waters (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 4/98, 19/00, 42/05,<br />
46/06) and new Law on Waters (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 87/08,<br />
6/09 and 161/09);<br />
Decree on waters classification (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia <strong>of</strong><br />
31 March 1999);<br />
59
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Decree on categorization <strong>of</strong> watercourses, lakes, accumulations and<br />
groundwaters (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 18/99, 71/99);<br />
‣ Law on Waste Management (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 68/04,<br />
107/07, 102/08 and 143/08);<br />
List <strong>of</strong> wastes (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 100/05);<br />
‣ Law on Ambient Air Quality (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 67/04 and<br />
92/07 and 35/10);<br />
Decree on the limit values <strong>of</strong> the levels and types <strong>of</strong> polluting substances in the<br />
ambient air and alert thresholds, deadlines for limit values achievement,<br />
margins <strong>of</strong> tolerance for the limit values, target values and long-term targets<br />
(Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 50/2005);<br />
Rulebook on the criteria, methods and procedures for ambient air quality<br />
assessment (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 82/06);<br />
‣ Law on Cultural Heritage Conservation (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />
no. 20/04 and 115/07);<br />
‣ Law on the Protection <strong>of</strong> Animals Welfare (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />
no. 113/07);<br />
‣ Law on Plants Protection (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 25/98, 6/00);<br />
‣ Law on Forests (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 64/09);<br />
‣ Law on Protection against Environmental Noise (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia no. 79/07);<br />
Rulebook on the limit values <strong>of</strong> environmental noise levels (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 147/08);<br />
Rulebook on the locations <strong>of</strong> measuring stations and measuring points (Official<br />
Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 120/08);<br />
Decision on determination <strong>of</strong> the cases in which and conditions under which the<br />
peace <strong>of</strong> citizens is considered disturbed by harmful noise (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 01/09);<br />
Additional relevant legislation:<br />
‣ Law on railway System (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 47/10);<br />
‣ Law on railway System Safety (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no.47/10);<br />
‣ Law on the Agreements on Shipments in the <strong>Railway</strong> Transport (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 55/07);<br />
‣ Law on Road Transport (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 68/04,<br />
127/06 and 114/09);<br />
60
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
‣ Law on Transport <strong>of</strong> Dangerous matters in Road and railway Transport (Official Gazette<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 92/07 and 161/09);<br />
‣ Law on Spatial and Urban Planning (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no.<br />
51/05, 137/07 and 91/09);<br />
Rulebook on the standards and the norms <strong>of</strong> space planning (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 69/99);<br />
Rulebook on detailed content, scale and manner <strong>of</strong> graphical processing <strong>of</strong> urban<br />
plans (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 78/06 and 140/07);<br />
‣ Law on Building (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 130/09);<br />
‣ Law on Expropriation (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/95, 20/98,<br />
40/99, 31/03, 10/08 and 106/08);<br />
‣ Law on Agricultural Land (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 135/07)<br />
‣ Law on Public Hygiene (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 111/08 and<br />
64/09).<br />
Relevant multilateral agreements:<br />
Convention on Wetlands <strong>of</strong> International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitats<br />
(Ramsar, 1971), ratified in 1977;<br />
Convention on the Protection <strong>of</strong> World Cultural and natural Heritage (Paris, 1972),<br />
ratified in 1974;<br />
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species <strong>of</strong> Wild Fauna and Flora<br />
(Washington, 1973), ratified in 1999;<br />
Convention on Migratory Species Conservation (Bonn, 1979), ratified in 1999;<br />
The Convention on the Conservation <strong>of</strong> European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (the<br />
Bern, 1979), ratified in 1997;<br />
Agreement on the Conservation <strong>of</strong> the Bats in Europe (London, 1991), ratified in<br />
1999 (Amendment <strong>of</strong> the Agreement ratified in 2002);<br />
Agreement on the Conservation <strong>of</strong> the African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds<br />
(Hague, 1995), ratified in 1999;<br />
The Basel Convention on the Control <strong>of</strong> Transboundary Movements <strong>of</strong> Hazardous<br />
Wastes and their Disposal (Basel, 1995), ratified in 1997;<br />
Convention on Biodiversity (Rio de Ganeiro,1992), ratified in 1998;<br />
Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and<br />
Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus, 1998), ratified in 1999;<br />
Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in Transboundary Context (Espoo,<br />
1991), ratified in 1999;<br />
Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (Geneva, 1979), ratified in<br />
1997, together with 8 protocols that have not been ratified yet<br />
61
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (New York, 1992), ratified<br />
in 1997;<br />
European Convention for the Protection <strong>of</strong> Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental<br />
and other Scientific Purposes (Strasbourg, 1986), ratified in 2002;<br />
European Landscape Convention (Florence, 2000), ratified in 2003.<br />
Methodology <strong>of</strong> the Study preparation<br />
The methodology <strong>of</strong> the Study preparation involves planning and implementation <strong>of</strong> three<br />
main groups <strong>of</strong> activities:<br />
Activity 1: Collection <strong>of</strong> data for the preparation <strong>of</strong> “Baseline“ study<br />
Collection <strong>of</strong> data for provision <strong>of</strong> a stock <strong>of</strong> relevant information and clear picture <strong>of</strong> the<br />
state <strong>of</strong> the environment and social conditions, as basic precondition for comprehensive<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> probable impacts on the environment to result from the implementation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Project and measures required for their reduction.<br />
This activity involves desk work/analysis, as well as activities for field observation and<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> basic state <strong>of</strong> the environment <strong>of</strong> the area which is subject <strong>of</strong> this project activity.<br />
Analyses are focused on the review <strong>of</strong> available planning and technical documentation, while<br />
field activities are carried out to make evaluation <strong>of</strong> media and natural resources within wider<br />
corridor.<br />
Activity 2: Preparation <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Impact Assessment Study<br />
The EIA Study is based on the following technical requirements:<br />
1. Overview <strong>of</strong> considered alternatives.<br />
2. Identification and evaluation <strong>of</strong> probable direct and indirect impacts during the<br />
main phases <strong>of</strong> the Project life cycle:<br />
- Engineering design (planning phase);<br />
- Execution <strong>of</strong> construction works (construction phase);<br />
- Project functionality (operational phase);<br />
- Upon completion <strong>of</strong> the project use.<br />
3. Consideration <strong>of</strong> cumulative effects.<br />
4. Definition <strong>of</strong> applicable measures for probable impacts reduction, with preference<br />
for measures for avoidance and prevention, and use <strong>of</strong> compensation measures<br />
as sustainable alternative.<br />
5. Definition <strong>of</strong> Environmental management plan and monitoring over the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the measures for reduction, for each <strong>of</strong> the project phases.<br />
А) Approach applied in identification <strong>of</strong> possible impacts from the Project<br />
implementation and measures for their reduction or avoidance<br />
Methodology for identification and assessment <strong>of</strong> potential environmental impacts includes:<br />
- Review <strong>of</strong> published literature (at national and international levels);<br />
- Use <strong>of</strong> relevant experiences and knowledge;<br />
- Interviews and discussions between Investor and relevant<br />
organizations/interested groups;<br />
- Review <strong>of</strong> relevant statistical and cartographic databases and census<br />
data;<br />
- Field work and investigations.<br />
62
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Impacts will be significant if:<br />
- they are intensive, in space or time.<br />
- they are intensive with regard to assimilation capacity <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />
and nature.<br />
- they exceed environmental standards and thresholds.<br />
- they do not comply with environmental policy and land use plans.<br />
- they have negative impacts on ecologically sensitive and important areas<br />
or resources <strong>of</strong> the natural heritage.<br />
- they have negative impacts on the lifestyle <strong>of</strong> the community or traditional<br />
land use.<br />
B) Measures for impacts reduction<br />
Measures for environmental impacts reduction are required if there is probability for<br />
significant harmful and irreversible effects on the environment. The measures defined in the<br />
EIA Study are in accordance with the requirements <strong>of</strong> the relevant regulations and policies,<br />
as well as the best international practices.<br />
The principles <strong>of</strong> impacts reduction, including their hierarchical setup, are as follows:<br />
- Preference for measures for avoidance and prevention,<br />
- Consideration <strong>of</strong> feasible project alternatives,<br />
- Identification <strong>of</strong> standard measures for minimization <strong>of</strong> each significant<br />
impact,<br />
- Measures should be adequate and financially effective,<br />
- Use <strong>of</strong> compensation measures as the last available resort/measure.<br />
Activity 3: Consultation and finalization<br />
The expert team composed to develop this Study is obliged to participate in the process <strong>of</strong><br />
its presentation before the concerned public and in the process <strong>of</strong> public consultation, as<br />
well as in the process <strong>of</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> the EIA Study adequacy to result in ultimate<br />
approval <strong>of</strong> the Study by the MEEP.<br />
Macedonian legislation concerning EIA establishes the rules and the detailed procedures for<br />
public involvement in the process <strong>of</strong> decision making.<br />
63
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Considered alternatives<br />
Introduction<br />
According to its position, the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia is central Balkan state. It is situated on<br />
the crossroad <strong>of</strong> two corridors which are very important both for the Region and Europe.<br />
These are <strong>Corridor</strong> 10 on North-South direction and <strong>Corridor</strong> 8 on East-West direction.<br />
In principle, corridors are routes through which movement <strong>of</strong> people, goods, information,<br />
energy and other types <strong>of</strong> communication are carried out. Within this system <strong>of</strong> exchange,<br />
railway transport is <strong>of</strong> exceptional importance due to its ability for massive transport <strong>of</strong><br />
people and goods.<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> transport on the Macedonian territory has had a long tradition. <strong>Railway</strong> connection<br />
at north-south direction over Skopje-Thessaloniki section was established as early as in 70s<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 19 th century. This is actually the present section <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> 10 on the territory <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia. The intensity <strong>of</strong> the traffic has been much lower on east-west direction. The<br />
reason for this is the fact that the main port for the region, through which all external supplies<br />
<strong>of</strong> goods have been carried out, has been Thessaloniki. On the other side, all changes in<br />
technological development have been coming from north and so the north-south<br />
communication has been prevalent.<br />
Under the newly established political changes occurring by the end <strong>of</strong> the last century, and<br />
especially upon the break down <strong>of</strong> Warsaw Pact, contacts <strong>of</strong> the countries on east with the<br />
western world have been intensified. In this context, such processes have intensified in the<br />
area <strong>of</strong> the Balkans as well. In parallel with Thessaloniki port, the ports in Duras and Valona<br />
in <strong>Albania</strong> and Burgas and Varna in Bulgaria have become more and more operational.<br />
The construction <strong>of</strong> this railway line and other sections missing in <strong>Corridor</strong> 8 will contribute to<br />
the achievement <strong>of</strong> the goals <strong>of</strong> economic development and provision <strong>of</strong> less costly and<br />
faster transport <strong>of</strong> the population and goods. <strong>Railway</strong> connection <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia with the neighbouring countries is expected to influence positively in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
enhanced economic activities and trade in the country and the region. At present, the<br />
transport through this corridor is carried out without interruption solely by road. <strong>Railway</strong><br />
transport participates partially on the territories <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia and <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria, but in local frames due to lack <strong>of</strong> connection <strong>of</strong> their<br />
railway networks. The necessity for mutual connection <strong>of</strong> these networks was recognized<br />
back in 1990s, and started in practice in 1994 with the commencement <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong><br />
the railway line Kumanovo-border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria.<br />
The western, undeveloped part which is also located on the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia is on the extension Kicevo-Lin. This part requires development <strong>of</strong> full technical<br />
documentation in order to enable undertaking <strong>of</strong> specific investment activities towards its<br />
construction.<br />
The western, undeveloped part which is also located on the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia, lies on the extension Kicevo-Lin. Full technical documentation should be<br />
prepared for this part in order to undertake specific investment activities towards its<br />
construction. So far, several pre-feasibility studies and action plans have been prepared,<br />
which have also considered the western part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> 8. These documents were<br />
elaborated without detailed and more specific technical parameters, due to the fact that there<br />
is no technical documentation available at all. This project activity takes for the first time a<br />
comprehensive approach, which should result in provided financial resources for the idea<br />
implementation. During the project preparation phase, PE <strong>Railway</strong>s prepared Prefeasibility<br />
Study. Its goal was to consider the possibilities for establishment <strong>of</strong> railway transport along<br />
64
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
<strong>Corridor</strong> 8, Kicevo-Lin direction and propose several possible variants. They include the<br />
necessary technical and economic analyses, providing relevant indicators <strong>of</strong> the justifiability<br />
<strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> this corridor, as well as <strong>of</strong> the selection <strong>of</strong> the best variation for the<br />
future route. The overview <strong>of</strong> alternative variations for selection <strong>of</strong> optimal corridor<br />
considered in the Prefeasibility Study is given below.<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> variations is most <strong>of</strong>ten done through analysis <strong>of</strong> several criteria, defined in<br />
advance for the Project assessment. These analyses, aimed at decision reaching, take into<br />
account all factors <strong>of</strong> relevance for the selection <strong>of</strong> the optimum variation. As far as any<br />
project <strong>of</strong> transport infrastructure is concerned, before we approach the selection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
optimum alternative solution, we have to take the reality as a starting point, i.e. that these<br />
projects have broader social interest and there are many stakeholders that feel directly or<br />
indirectly both positive and negative impacts there<strong>of</strong>. The investment transport (linear)<br />
projects usually dispose <strong>of</strong> several variant solutions for the route, which differ mutually by<br />
several parameters from technical point <strong>of</strong> view, but also from financial investment point <strong>of</strong><br />
view. Therefore, there is a constant search for the most optimal solution from among many<br />
possible combinations. Yet, how can we assess the most optimal solution and detect the<br />
best project or variation?<br />
With regard to evaluation and selection <strong>of</strong> the best solution for the transport infrastructure,<br />
two types <strong>of</strong> assessments should be considered, namely:<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> the individual usefulness <strong>of</strong> the project,<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> the societal usefulness <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
Individual usefulness <strong>of</strong> the project concerns the benefit that could be acquired by the one(s)<br />
performing the transport or the one managing the transport infrastructure. Usually, these are<br />
public enterprises, in this case PE <strong>Railway</strong>s, which performs activities in the transport sector.<br />
Criteria for societal assessment do not always correspond and are not identical with the<br />
interests taken in the analysis under the individual usefulness assessment. In the case <strong>of</strong> the<br />
transport infrastructure, important criteria that should be taken in the analyses are the travel<br />
time and external costs <strong>of</strong> the transport, environmental protection criteria, criteria related to<br />
safety <strong>of</strong> the transport and impacts on regional economic activities.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong>ten (but not solely or effectively), evaluation <strong>of</strong> the variant solutions <strong>of</strong> the project is<br />
made on the basis <strong>of</strong> technical and economic indicators and to this end we should<br />
determine:<br />
Costs required for the infrastructure construction and its operation, i.e. its exploitation<br />
and maintenance,<br />
Costs related to external effects <strong>of</strong> the transport (safety, reliability, environment), and<br />
Costs caused by the time spent in transport.<br />
The most frequently used methods for evaluation <strong>of</strong> the economic justifiability <strong>of</strong> the<br />
investment are based on Cost-Benefit Analysis. From among them, the methods <strong>of</strong> net<br />
current value and the method <strong>of</strong> internal cost-effectiveness rate, are the best known and<br />
universally applied.<br />
It is important to point out that the cost-benefit analyses are applied in the selection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
most adequate project solution concerning the route variation, i.e. the best solution in terms<br />
<strong>of</strong> investment. On the other side, the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the strategies for undertaking measures<br />
that are part <strong>of</strong> the transport policy <strong>of</strong> a country, is based on other methods and studies.<br />
65
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
With regard to strategic studies, special methods are used to broadcast the needs and the<br />
justifiability <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> specific measures and activities in the domain <strong>of</strong> transport<br />
policy.<br />
It is evident that few feasibility studies considered the aspects <strong>of</strong> environmental protection as<br />
a criterion for selection <strong>of</strong> a variation/route, which can in further phases be frequent and<br />
limiting factor. Namely, it <strong>of</strong>ten happens that variations selected on the basis <strong>of</strong> economic<br />
analysis are unfavourable in terms <strong>of</strong> possible environmental impacts. In this Study, the<br />
expert team focused on the analysis <strong>of</strong> environmental aspects in order to confirm or<br />
counteract the variations proposed by the designer.<br />
Considered alternatives<br />
66
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 7 Considered alternatives<br />
Description <strong>of</strong> Alternative 1<br />
The solution for Section 1-Kicevo-Struga and for Section 2-Struga-Lin (border with the<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) was predetermined by the adopted solution with the following general<br />
characteristics:<br />
67
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
1. Total track length: 62.594 km<br />
2. Total route length: 42.117 km = 67.29 %<br />
3. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with R < 500 m: 0.000 km = 0.00 %<br />
4 Length <strong>of</strong> twists with 500 м ≤ R < 800 m: 10.008 km = 15.99 %<br />
5. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with 800 м ≤ R < 1200 m: 3.654 km = 5.84 %<br />
6. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with R ≥ 1200 m: 6.815 km = 10.88 %<br />
7. Longitudinal inclinations i ≤ 12.5 ‰ : 36.898 km = 58.95 %<br />
8. Longitudinal inclinations 12.5 ‰ ≤ i ≤ 18 ‰ : 12.392km = 19.80 %<br />
9. Longitudinal inclinations i > 18 ‰ : 13.304 km = 21.25 %<br />
10. Total length <strong>of</strong> bridges and viaducts: 4.498 km = 7.19 %<br />
11. Total length <strong>of</strong> tunnels: 12.374 km = 19.77 %<br />
12. Nominal speed 100 km/h<br />
The figure shows the section accepted for construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line to connect Kicevo<br />
and Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>).<br />
Elements <strong>of</strong> the alternative:<br />
- Category <strong>of</strong> railway line – Based on the importance and function within the railway<br />
network, defined in the National Transport Strategy, the subject railway line is ranked as<br />
main line for international mixed passenger and goods transport line and thus it has to<br />
comply with the conditions specified in international agreements.<br />
- Category <strong>of</strong> the terrain for the selected variant – From Kicevo to the village Meseiste,<br />
the terrain is characterized with hill and mountainous nature with presence <strong>of</strong> high hills<br />
and deep dales. From the village Meseiste to the village Kalista, the route stretches over<br />
ravine and marshy type <strong>of</strong> land. From the village Kalista to the border with the <strong>Republic</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, the terrain is hilly and mountainous with clearly huge steep slopes, dales,<br />
hills, taluses and gullies.<br />
The route is divided in two sections:<br />
Section 1- from km 115+600 to km 121+000. At km.115 <strong>of</strong> the route, the line enters a<br />
tunnel. Lithological units through which it passes include: phylitoides, marbles, limestones<br />
and diabases. Physical and mechanical characteristics <strong>of</strong> these rock masses are favourable<br />
for construction <strong>of</strong> structures <strong>of</strong> this type. The aspect that should be paid greater attention in<br />
further phases <strong>of</strong> investigation is the transgressive boundary between limestones and<br />
phylitoides, as well as the boundary between diabases and limestones. Both can be carriers<br />
<strong>of</strong> big quantities <strong>of</strong> water which will pose problems during the tunnel construction. From km.<br />
121+000 to km. 151+000, the route enters a terrain with much less clear inclinations. By<br />
several tunnels along the course <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, the route lowers gently towards the<br />
village Meseiste. In this area, there are gullies, temporary and permanent watercourses and<br />
all <strong>of</strong> them enter into Sateska river. Tectonics <strong>of</strong> the terrain exists, but due to the coverage<br />
with delluvial cover and presence <strong>of</strong> intense vegetation, it is difficult to note. From km.123 to<br />
km.132, rock masses through which the route passes are basalts, clays, conglomerates,<br />
sandstones and marbles. After km.141, the route continues along the alluvial area <strong>of</strong> the<br />
river Sateska, but shales taking an anticlinal position with reference to Sateska river are<br />
found on left and on right <strong>of</strong> it.<br />
68
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 8 Accepted section for the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
This part <strong>of</strong> the terrain is favourable for development <strong>of</strong> structures <strong>of</strong> this type, with the only<br />
remark that it is too narrow for highway and railway line, and therefore the gorge will require<br />
broadening and cuttings on left and on right <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska. Generally, the part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
route from km 123 to km 139 is favourable without any major problematic segments.<br />
Section 2- from km 157+000 to km 161 +000, the route proceeds through ravine and<br />
marshy conditions. The terrain is built <strong>of</strong> lake sediments, mainly clays, with high water level.<br />
Struga Fields are cut through with drainage canals, which presently ensure that the area is<br />
not a marsh. In the lower ground segments (18-19 m), there is a high hydrostatic pressure<br />
69
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
which enables the occurrence <strong>of</strong> artesian water. The prefix “marshy terrain” makes it<br />
unfavourable for construction. During the line designing and construction, provision has to be<br />
made for uninterrupted drainage <strong>of</strong> the terrain where the line passes and serious analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
the module <strong>of</strong> the stinginess should be undertaken <strong>of</strong> the terrain through which the route will<br />
be passing. From km.161 to km.136, the route runs over prolluvial sediments where no<br />
particular problems in construction are expected. From km.163 to km.164+900, the route<br />
passes through marbles, which we also regard to be a stable construction environment. After<br />
km 164+900, the route enters a tunnel which will be opened in a medium <strong>of</strong> stratified<br />
conglomerates and sandstones. Their azimuth is eastwards, with drop angle <strong>of</strong> around 40 .<br />
Besides conglomerates and sandstones, there are also phylitic shales and marbles. Azimuth<br />
and drop angle <strong>of</strong> the strata <strong>of</strong> these rock masses are similar with those <strong>of</strong> conglomerates.<br />
The tunnel as a structure exits at km 168, and then the route continues into phylitic shales.<br />
Foliation <strong>of</strong> these rock masses is under certain angle with reference to the route and it poses<br />
no particular problem in terms <strong>of</strong> the line stability. Generally speaking, from km.167 to<br />
km.170, the terrain is assessed as favourable for development <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> facilities.<br />
Exploitation conditions – The regime <strong>of</strong> traffic regulation and monitoring has been<br />
envisaged to be a modern block system for safety and control.<br />
The manner <strong>of</strong> crossing with other existing road arteries will be by way <strong>of</strong> delevelled<br />
intersection with categorized state and local road infrastructure.<br />
Electrification system – single phase system with electricity voltage <strong>of</strong> 25 kV and frequency<br />
<strong>of</strong> 50 Hz.<br />
1.2 Zero alternative<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> project non-implementation, the effects would be as follows:<br />
Unchanged conditions in transport in this corridor (use <strong>of</strong> existing road means <strong>of</strong><br />
transportation);<br />
Aggravated transport <strong>of</strong> passengers and goods. The existing mode <strong>of</strong> transport does<br />
not provide high comfort <strong>of</strong> travel in passenger transport;<br />
Delayed regional development;<br />
High transportation costs, with the transport not well organized even at medium long<br />
transportation distances. The price <strong>of</strong> transportation results in relatively high<br />
consumption <strong>of</strong> fuel per unit transported product or passenger.<br />
Low level <strong>of</strong> safety in road traffic compared to railway traffic.<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> fossil fuels in transport and low application <strong>of</strong> the so called “clean” energy<br />
resources in transportation <strong>of</strong> passengers or goods/ unchanged trend in the ambient<br />
air quality.<br />
Deteriorated quality <strong>of</strong> all environmental media.<br />
Characteristics <strong>of</strong> ecosystems and flora and fauna abundance will remain<br />
unchanged.<br />
70
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Table 4 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> alternatives<br />
Criteria<br />
Score<br />
Alternative1<br />
Zero alternative<br />
Technical evaluation + -<br />
Exploitation and transport + 0<br />
Cost-efficiency + -<br />
Environment ± 0<br />
+ positive<br />
- negative<br />
0 neutral<br />
71
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
2 Project description and characteristics<br />
2.1 Brief history <strong>of</strong> Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />
The beginnings <strong>of</strong> the railway transport in the area <strong>of</strong> Macedonia date back in 1873, when<br />
the railway line Thessaloniki-Skopje was put in operation.<br />
In 1945, the Federal <strong>Railway</strong> Administration established the State <strong>Railway</strong>s Directorate in<br />
Skopje. In 1963, the State <strong>Railway</strong> Directorate was transformed into <strong>Railway</strong> Transport<br />
Enterprise (RTE) - Skopje. In 1977, RTE Skopje was transformed into <strong>Railway</strong> Transport<br />
Organization (RTO)-Skopje. In 1990, organizational transformation returned the name RTE-<br />
Skopje. In 1993, RTE-Skopje was transformed into Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s (MR) and became<br />
member <strong>of</strong> the International Union <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong>s (IUR).<br />
By way <strong>of</strong> the Law on PE Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s Transformation (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no.<br />
29/2005), the Enterprise was divided into two new entities in 2007, namely:<br />
1. Public Enterprise for <strong>Railway</strong> Infrastructure “Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s” - Skopje<br />
2. Joint Stock Company for Transport “Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s for Transport AD”-Skopje<br />
2.2 <strong>Railway</strong> infrastructure <strong>of</strong> Macedonia relative to neighbours<br />
Land transportation lines (railway infrastructure and roads) are the only resources for transport<br />
connection <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia as typically continental country with the countries in the<br />
Region and beyond, with regard to transportation <strong>of</strong> goods.<br />
With reference to railway infrastructure, only the railway <strong>Corridor</strong> 10, as one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
important and longest pan-European corridors, connects the countries <strong>of</strong> Central and<br />
Southeastern Europe and with its southern section passes through the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia,<br />
between railway stations Tabanovci and <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Greece.<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, through the railway line Gj.Petrov Volkovo – G.Jankovic is connected<br />
with Kosovo, while through the railway line Bitola-Kremenica it is connected with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Greece. In 1984, transport on Bitola-Kremenica section was terminated.<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> connection with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria and <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> has been planned<br />
through development <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> no.8 as one <strong>of</strong> the 10 Pan-European corridors to connect Black<br />
and Adriatic Seas through the railway line Burgas-S<strong>of</strong>ia-Skopje-Duras.<br />
The following sections <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> 8 should be constructed in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia:<br />
Kumanovo-Kriva Palanka-Border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria, which is under<br />
construction, and<br />
Kicevo-Struga-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>).<br />
2.3 Advantages <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />
Although the share <strong>of</strong> the railway transport in the overall transport <strong>of</strong> goods and passengers<br />
is lower compared to road transport, we should point out environmental, spatial, energy and<br />
other advantages <strong>of</strong> the railway transport compared to road, namely:<br />
1. Specific energy consumption:<br />
- in passenger transport is by 3.5 times lower compared to road transport,<br />
72
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
- in freight transport, it is by 8.7 times lower compared to road transport.<br />
2. Specific emission <strong>of</strong> harmful gases compared to the value <strong>of</strong> all harmful gases in<br />
traffic:<br />
- in passenger transport it is by 8.3 times lower compared to road transport,<br />
- in freight transport, it is by 30 times lower compared to road transport.<br />
3. Safety in railway transport is by around 24 times higher than the safety in road<br />
transport.<br />
4. Space occupation, under equal flow through <strong>of</strong> the railway, is by 2 to 3 times smaller<br />
than I the case <strong>of</strong> highway.<br />
The above data clearly indicate the advantages <strong>of</strong> railway compared to road transport.<br />
The main advantages <strong>of</strong> this transport system may be summarized into the following<br />
characteristics:<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> allows massive transport which is ranked second immediately after waterway<br />
transport. The weight <strong>of</strong> one freight train could range between 300 and 4000 t, and<br />
beyond.<br />
Transportation speed at medium long distances (500 to 1000 km) is competitive with<br />
the speed <strong>of</strong> air transport – high-speed trains (TGV) reach speeds during the use<br />
phase <strong>of</strong> 270 to 300 km/h. With classical passenger trains which run over well<br />
equipped lines, the speed is between 120 and 160 km/h. Classical freight trains run<br />
at speeds <strong>of</strong> 50 to 160 km/h; however, there are many special freight trains today<br />
which run at a speed <strong>of</strong> 200 km/h.<br />
High comfort <strong>of</strong> travel in passenger transport. The latest high-speed trains are<br />
equipped with comfortable seats, Internet and audio-visual connections on the seats,<br />
special cars for family travels with various kinds <strong>of</strong> automatic service, high-quality<br />
wagon-restaurants, sleeping cars, etc.<br />
Low transport costs in well organized transport on medium long transportation<br />
destinations. The low price <strong>of</strong> the transport results from relatively low resistance in<br />
movement and low energy consumption per unit transported product or passenger.<br />
Therefore, this transportation mode is cost-effective in case <strong>of</strong> massive transport <strong>of</strong><br />
passengers and goods.<br />
High level <strong>of</strong> safety in transport compared to other transport modes.<br />
Apart from the possibility for use <strong>of</strong> diesel fuels for engines drive in locomotives,<br />
electricity can be used, too. This characteristic is very important, especially in the<br />
context <strong>of</strong> limited oil reserves in the world when we need to use the so called “clean”<br />
energy resources as much as possible.<br />
2.4 Description <strong>of</strong> the railway infrastructure<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> infrastructure is defined in paragraph 16, Article 2 and Article 24 <strong>of</strong> the Law on<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> System (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no. 47/10) and it comprises:<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> lines with superstructure and substructure;<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> stations;<br />
Tracks;<br />
Switching yards;<br />
Facilities on lines, plants and devices;<br />
73
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Electrification system;<br />
Trains electric traction facilities;<br />
Signaling and control systems;<br />
Communication and information systems in railway traffic;<br />
Buildings, depots and other building structures on railway stations serving<br />
organization and regulation <strong>of</strong> the railway transport and infrastructure<br />
maintenance;<br />
Land functionally belonging to the line and service points and structures;<br />
Air space above the line up to the height <strong>of</strong> 12 m, or 14 m. above the upper edge<br />
<strong>of</strong> the track with long distance transmission lines <strong>of</strong> voltage exceeding 220 KV.<br />
The route <strong>of</strong> a railway line is subject to strict designing criteria, both from safety and<br />
operational points <strong>of</strong> view.<br />
The most important difference between railway and road transport is that the vehicles<br />
composing the train are driven forcibly along fixed way (rails). Their motion is strictly<br />
controlled and subject <strong>of</strong> strict organizational and safety regulations.<br />
In functional terms, railway transport consists <strong>of</strong> three subsystems:<br />
- <strong>Railway</strong> or line,<br />
- Trains, i.e. several interconnected railway vehicles tracted by a vehicle with<br />
mechanical motor,<br />
- Phase <strong>of</strong> exploitation, i.e. organization <strong>of</strong> that transport.<br />
Classical track (the railway) consists <strong>of</strong> several materials connected mutually in a track grid<br />
<strong>of</strong> different elasticity. They transmit dynamic loads from vehicles on materials in the earth<br />
body. Classical railway consists <strong>of</strong> earth body, known as substructure and track also called<br />
superstructure. From geometrical point <strong>of</strong> view, the route <strong>of</strong> the line passes through uneven<br />
terrain. In order to enable the trains to run over it, uneven points on the terrain should be<br />
leveled, i.e. grade line <strong>of</strong> the railway should be formed, known as substructure and track also<br />
called superstructure. At points where the grade line <strong>of</strong> the route lies higher than the level <strong>of</strong><br />
the terrain, dikes are made, while at points where the grade line <strong>of</strong> the route is lower than the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> the terrain, excavations are made. Incisions are made at points where the levels <strong>of</strong><br />
the grade line and the terrain coincide. The substructure comprises dike, excavation and<br />
incision with their slopes and structures along the route which may be supporting wall,<br />
culverts, tunnels, bridges and viaducts. The superstructure consists <strong>of</strong> two rails laid down on<br />
sleepers and fixed on them by track accessories, laid down in ballast bed prism (ballast<br />
stone).<br />
The above concept <strong>of</strong> the superstructure is known under the term “classical track”. Each <strong>of</strong><br />
the constituent elements <strong>of</strong> the railway should be studied separately and in more detail,<br />
while analyzing it as a single interactive whole.<br />
Trains are composed <strong>of</strong> several railway vehicles interlinked and tracted by (one or more)<br />
railway vehicle equipped with mechanical traction motor and locomotive. Characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />
the vehicles (and trains accordingly) depend on the scope and the nature <strong>of</strong> transported<br />
products or passengers.<br />
74
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 9 Constituent elements <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />
The phase <strong>of</strong> the railway transport exploitation is very important not only in terms <strong>of</strong> its costeffectiveness<br />
in functioning, but it also has influence on technical elements during line<br />
designing and selection <strong>of</strong> rail vehicles. For the purpose <strong>of</strong> safe performance <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />
transport, railway lines are equipped with signal control devices without which this transport<br />
can not be organized and practiced. Stations are <strong>of</strong>ficial places on the line serving traffic,<br />
commercial and technical operations in the phase <strong>of</strong> the line exploitation, such as: receiving<br />
and dispatching goods and passengers, manipulation with cars and wagons, repair and<br />
maintenance <strong>of</strong> rail vehicles. Stations have several tracks, interconnected with turntables,<br />
revolvers and gears, as well as a number <strong>of</strong> auxiliary devices, installations and buildings.<br />
The three above subsystems <strong>of</strong> the railway transport system are in an interactive mutual<br />
interdependence and any change in one <strong>of</strong> those subsystems has impact on the<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> the other ones. Therefore, railway companies used to be for a long time a<br />
single whole in the frames <strong>of</strong> each country, i.e. they had monopoly position in the<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> the railway transport.<br />
2.5 Layout<br />
When two places are connected by railway line, it is practically impossible to draw the axes<br />
<strong>of</strong> the route as a straight line because <strong>of</strong> the configuration <strong>of</strong> the terrain and the need to<br />
avoid and pass through different physical obstacles on the ground. Therefore, several<br />
sections are drawn and circular horizontal twists are inserted in the cross-section <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sections, with certain radius <strong>of</strong> twists. Twists are divided into left and right depending on the<br />
direction <strong>of</strong> turning away from the direction following the route towards station. The end<br />
points <strong>of</strong> the twists are called start and end <strong>of</strong> the twist, and the breaking angle between<br />
sections is called intersecting angle. Station is the distance <strong>of</strong> each point from the axis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
line measured horizontally from the start <strong>of</strong> stationing. Horizontal projection <strong>of</strong> axis<br />
composed <strong>of</strong> sections and twists is called layout (outline plan) <strong>of</strong> the rail line.<br />
2.6 Longitudinal pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
The section <strong>of</strong> the terrain with a vertical plane which by the axle <strong>of</strong> the railway line gives the<br />
axial terrain spot heights, which applied in a certain scale present the natural cross-section<br />
75
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the terrain marked by the terrain height spots. A line leveling the earth masses<br />
(excavations and embankments) is projected on the terrain longitudinal pr<strong>of</strong>ile, taking into<br />
account relief and geological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the terrain. The line projected in this way,<br />
which levels the earth masses, is the grade line <strong>of</strong> the railway line route. Its most important<br />
characteristic is the longitudinal slopes expressed in promiles (‰) or (m/km). If the grade line<br />
goes up towards station, we say that it is in rising, if it falls with the increase <strong>of</strong> the station,<br />
the grade line is falling. The spot where the slopes are changed are called intersections <strong>of</strong><br />
the grade line. According to the Law on <strong>Railway</strong> System (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no. 47/10),<br />
the maximum longitudinal slope is restricted at 25 ‰. If the grade line does not level the<br />
earth masses and the material obtained from the excavation is not sufficient to make the<br />
embankments, then material is excavated from the terrain close to the axis, i.e. borrowing<br />
pits are established; while, in the opposite case (when we have more material than required<br />
for the embankments), the excavated material is transported to landfill.<br />
Cross-section<br />
If we make a section <strong>of</strong> the terrain with a vertical plane normal to the axis <strong>of</strong> the railway line,<br />
we will obtain the terrain spot heights which give the terrain line <strong>of</strong> the cross-section pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />
The scale <strong>of</strong> application is 1:100 or 1:200. By applying <strong>of</strong> such drawn cross-section pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong><br />
the terrain on the spot height <strong>of</strong> the grade line (spot height <strong>of</strong> the subgrade) and inclinations<br />
<strong>of</strong> the embankments or excavations and/or artificial structures, we obtain the cross-section<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the railway line. The upper surface <strong>of</strong> the cross-section pr<strong>of</strong>ile, onto which the<br />
superstructure <strong>of</strong> the track is applied, is called subgrade <strong>of</strong> the railway line. The key data on<br />
the subgrade in the designs <strong>of</strong> our railway lines are specified with reference to the railway<br />
line rank.<br />
76
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 10 Cross-section <strong>of</strong> embankment, excavation and incision <strong>of</strong> single-track line<br />
First, ballast prism is applied onto the subgrade <strong>of</strong> the railway line, and then sleepers and<br />
two rails are fixed on them at the end. The upper surface <strong>of</strong> the rails is marked as spot<br />
height <strong>of</strong> URE (Upper Rail Edge) and it defines the free pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the railway line.<br />
77
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 11 Superstructure <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
The structure gauge (maximum moving dimensions) is the space above URE, which should<br />
be secured against all kinds <strong>of</strong> lateral obstacles in order to guarantee safe passage <strong>of</strong><br />
railway vehicles (it also includes certain expansions, i.e. reserves).<br />
Apart from the structure gauge (maximum moving dimensions), the loading gauge is also<br />
important for the designing. It is the space in which every loaded railway vehicle, i.e. every<br />
full wagon should be accommodated and nothing should be outside <strong>of</strong> it.<br />
Figure 12 Cross-section and constituent parts <strong>of</strong> the line<br />
Overpasses are bridge constructions leading other transport lines above the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway line.<br />
Underpasses are bridge constructions leading other transport lines below the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway line.<br />
78
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Culverts are structures beneath the subgrade <strong>of</strong> the railway line (substructure), used for<br />
drainage <strong>of</strong> small quantities <strong>of</strong> water – storm waters from a given watershed area or minor<br />
permanent waters (streams), as well as receipt and drainage <strong>of</strong> the water from the canals. In<br />
some cases, they are used for animals and agricultural mechanization passage under the<br />
railway line. The openings <strong>of</strong> culverts range from 1.5 to 5.0m.<br />
The connection between the main platform and other inter-track platforms in a station can be<br />
established by a corridor (sub-corridor) beneath the tracks and it is intended for safe<br />
passage <strong>of</strong> the passengers from one platform to another. They are constructed only in major<br />
stations with high frequency <strong>of</strong> traffic and people.<br />
Canal is prefabricated concrete element used to coat the drainage canals <strong>of</strong> the subgrade <strong>of</strong><br />
the line in order to provide more efficient removal <strong>of</strong> waters (storm, less <strong>of</strong>ten permanent)<br />
and for easier maintenance. Canals are used for overflow drainage <strong>of</strong> surface water falling<br />
onto the subgrade <strong>of</strong> the line and surrounding terrain, as well as the water originating from<br />
the watershed area. By this, the possibility for the line subgrade flooding is avoided.<br />
For the purpose <strong>of</strong> easier and faster passengers getting on and <strong>of</strong> the board, supply,<br />
uploading and unloading <strong>of</strong> luggage and mail, platforms are constructed along the tracks and<br />
their subgrade line is elevated above the tracks. They are divided into passenger and <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />
(luggage-mail). Depending on the position, they are divided into main – by the passenger<br />
building and inter-track (between the tracks).<br />
The station fence delineates the station area which is an area <strong>of</strong> land restricted by closed<br />
lines on irregular polygonal shape and the boundary is most <strong>of</strong>ten from the entry to the exit<br />
signal.<br />
These are structures aimed at securing the earth body against rocks sliding, securing <strong>of</strong><br />
excavations and embankments, reduction <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the embankment cross stays. This<br />
is undertaken in conditions which are unstable for the subgrade protection, terrains prone to<br />
earth sliding, avoidance <strong>of</strong> unaesthetic forms <strong>of</strong> the embankments in populated places or<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> the expropriation scope.<br />
Proper drainage <strong>of</strong> the line subgrade in cases in which the groundwater level is raised to the<br />
level posing danger for the subgrade condition (either from infiltration or capillary lifting <strong>of</strong><br />
those waters) is developed by way <strong>of</strong> drainage installation. Drainage <strong>of</strong> the subgrade is<br />
collection and transportation <strong>of</strong> the water from the terrain resulting from groundwaters or<br />
surface waters that could permeate into the subgrade.<br />
2.7 Stations layout and longitudinal section<br />
Stations are <strong>of</strong>ficial points along the line route, where transport, technical and commercial<br />
activities are performed. Depending on the purposes, stations are designed with different<br />
characteristics in relation to facilities and installations within the station. At the stage <strong>of</strong><br />
Conceptual design and main design, the positioning, the role and functional equipment <strong>of</strong><br />
stations should be elaborated in more detail.<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> the stations depends on the required perspective permeability performance <strong>of</strong><br />
the line and level <strong>of</strong> development and functional equipment <strong>of</strong> the area through which the<br />
line passes. From exploitation point <strong>of</strong> view, the best arrangement <strong>of</strong> the station is when the<br />
driving times <strong>of</strong> a pair <strong>of</strong> trains in all inter-station distances are approximately the same.<br />
In relation to populated places, the position and the size <strong>of</strong> the stations should be<br />
determined and integrated into general and detailed urban plans <strong>of</strong> urban agglomerations.<br />
While selecting the location for the passenger station, it should be planned near central<br />
urban zones, which are well connected with public urban transport systems for passengers<br />
79
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
transport. In major urban agglomerations, there are usually more than one stations<br />
designed, which inter alia are also used for suburban passenger transport and formation <strong>of</strong><br />
so called “multi-modal junctions” in which several types <strong>of</strong> transport systems have their<br />
station terminals. Of course, these planning should take into account the prospective<br />
volumes <strong>of</strong> transport and the so called “modal distribution” by types <strong>of</strong> transport systems.<br />
The railway station, with the installations and facilities that compose it, occupies large area<br />
and therefore care should be taken <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the cross-section gauge <strong>of</strong> the station<br />
plateau. It is recommendable to design the station plateau on a shallow embankment for<br />
easier drainage.<br />
Great savings in stations construction could be achieved if the location has favourable<br />
geological composition. Modern techniques for terrain improvement by injection or<br />
replacement <strong>of</strong> materials <strong>of</strong>fer technical solutions even under unfavourable conditions, but<br />
this increases the cost <strong>of</strong> construction.<br />
Stations should be designed “in direction”, but if solution <strong>of</strong> a station with horizontal twist is<br />
justified, then the minimum radius is 500 meters, with the turntables being “in direction”.<br />
Figure 13 Required station width<br />
Conceptual design has been prepared for all stations planned along the route <strong>of</strong> the newly<br />
designed railway line, determining the number and the type <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial buildings, access<br />
roads and connection with the remaining urban structure.<br />
The length <strong>of</strong> a station is determined in relation to the length <strong>of</strong> the tracks in the station on<br />
which all required tasks with the trains may be performed without interruption and safely. To<br />
this end, the length <strong>of</strong> the trains should be determined and it is calculated by way <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
number <strong>of</strong> axles <strong>of</strong> the vehicles comprised in the longest train to be stopping at the station.<br />
In determining the length <strong>of</strong> the train, the axial mean distance <strong>of</strong> 5 meters (mean distance<br />
along axle) is taken. To determine the length <strong>of</strong> the tracks, two lengths <strong>of</strong> a 25 meters long<br />
locomotive and 10 more meters reserve are added to this length, to provide safety on both<br />
sides <strong>of</strong> the track. The number <strong>of</strong> axles on the longest train is taken to be 100 or 150 axles.<br />
The distance between the tracks in the station is 4.75 meters, if it is not electrified, or 6.0<br />
meters if the station is electrified and requires erection <strong>of</strong> columns for contact line. The width<br />
<strong>of</strong> a station depends on the number <strong>of</strong> tracks, their mutual distances and structures and<br />
premises for <strong>of</strong>ficial purposes. The grade line <strong>of</strong> the station should be in horizontal or with<br />
the maximum bottoming slope <strong>of</strong> 1.5‰.<br />
2.8 Bridges and viaducts<br />
Bridge is construction which crosses over larger watercourse with an opening exceeding 5.0<br />
m. Viaduct is a construction crossing over a gully that can not be crossed over by an<br />
embankment because <strong>of</strong> great heights <strong>of</strong> excavation.<br />
80
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Selection <strong>of</strong> the position for a bridge location depends on hydrological conditions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
riverbed, geological conditions on the bottom <strong>of</strong> the riverbed and banks <strong>of</strong> the river, direction<br />
<strong>of</strong> the watercourse flowing compared to the line axis, topographic conditions, longitudinal<br />
and cross-section pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> the riverbed.<br />
Determination <strong>of</strong> the location for the bridge is made as early as upon initial technical<br />
explorations. In this initial stage <strong>of</strong> designing, such places are designed as fixed points, i.e.<br />
points through which the route should run.<br />
While selecting the place for river crossing, the following should be taken into account:<br />
o Selection <strong>of</strong> the direction by which river is to be crossed is adjusted with the route<br />
layout and it should not deteriorate technical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the route layout,<br />
o The best place to select is where the watercourse does not spread even at the<br />
biggest water, i.e. where banks exist to enable crossing the river at the lowest<br />
distance,<br />
o When widely spread riverbed needs to be crossed over, then the place where the<br />
axis <strong>of</strong> the line is normal to the axis <strong>of</strong> the real flow should be selected. Also, in<br />
situations like this, the most suitable places for foundation <strong>of</strong> the columns should be<br />
selected,<br />
o A crossing place above which major tributary enters the river should be avoided, in<br />
order to avoid danger from great waters striking the bridge columns directly,<br />
o The location selected for a crossing should be where the riverbed is permanent, i.e.<br />
the water should not erode nor fill in the riverbed with deposits, thus damaging the<br />
riverbanks,<br />
o Access roads to the bridge should be favourable with regard to the works and<br />
stability <strong>of</strong> the earth body. This is especially important for high embankments, which<br />
should be well secured against the impacts <strong>of</strong> the watercourses,<br />
o Considering the fact that the value <strong>of</strong> foundations is in some cases even above 50%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the total costs for a bridge construction, the place <strong>of</strong> each column should be<br />
examined and specified in detail.<br />
In many cases, it would be impossible to observe the best conditions for a bridge location<br />
and therefore modification <strong>of</strong> the existing state <strong>of</strong> the riverbed and the terrain should be<br />
undertaken.<br />
By their constructive characteristics, properties and shapes, viaducts are not different from<br />
bridges. However, their position on the route differs from the one <strong>of</strong> the bridges.<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Viaducts are used to cross over deep gullies where such solution is better justified<br />
than high embankment,<br />
Viaducts are especially applied where the route runs through a populated place,<br />
because urban area is densely developed on the surface. The only solutions in<br />
leading the line route in cases like this are viaducts or tunnels,<br />
These structures are most frequently used to cross over unstable terrains, such as<br />
earth-slides. The decision is made on the basis <strong>of</strong> economic and technical solutions<br />
for unstable terrains reclamation.<br />
2.9 Inclinations <strong>of</strong> cuts and embankments<br />
Inclinations facilitate transition from the subgrade <strong>of</strong> the transport line to surrounding natural<br />
terrain and provision <strong>of</strong> stability <strong>of</strong> the substructure.<br />
The slope <strong>of</strong> the inclinations and the measures for their protection have influence on the<br />
stability <strong>of</strong> the structure, occurrence <strong>of</strong> inclinations sliding and on the scope <strong>of</strong> the<br />
maintenance and rehabilitation works during the operational phase.<br />
81
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
The optimum slope <strong>of</strong> inclinations depends on the type <strong>of</strong> material and its actual condition,<br />
its physical and mechanical characteristics, height <strong>of</strong> inclinations and measures envisaged to<br />
protect inclinations from external impacts.<br />
From economic point <strong>of</strong> view, it turns that inclinations should be designed with maximum<br />
slope, which ensures stability <strong>of</strong> inclinations, because in such case the cubic volumes <strong>of</strong><br />
excavated material or deposited material and areas <strong>of</strong> expropriated land are the smallest. If<br />
we analyze this choice in terms <strong>of</strong> costs related to the protection <strong>of</strong> such inclinations, we<br />
may conclude that their maintenance and rehabilitation during operational phase are highest.<br />
With regard to most <strong>of</strong> the materials, no steeper slope <strong>of</strong> inclinations than 1:1.5 which is<br />
adopted as standard inclination can be applied. Only embankments made <strong>of</strong> crushed stone<br />
or cutting into a rock may be executed with a slope <strong>of</strong> inclinations steeper than 1:1.5. For the<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> easier maintenance <strong>of</strong> the slopes <strong>of</strong> embankment inclinations, they are not<br />
executed with slopes steeper than the standard slope <strong>of</strong> 1:1.5. Slopes gentler than 1:1.5 are<br />
designed to correspond with the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the materials, primarily when the strength<br />
<strong>of</strong> shearing is low. Gentler slopes are also made in cases in which:<br />
There is a need for integration <strong>of</strong> the transport line into the environment,<br />
In sharp twists in order to enhance visibility in driving,<br />
There is danger for snow drifting <strong>of</strong> the transport line.<br />
2.10 Locomotives<br />
Locomotives are motor towing (tractional) vehicles without space for a load, but only<br />
mechanical motors for trains towing (traction). According to the type <strong>of</strong> the motors,<br />
locomotives can be divided as follows:<br />
Steam locomotive (steam fueled);<br />
Electric locomotive (electricity driven);<br />
Diesel locomotive with internal combustion motors (they use oil).<br />
The choice <strong>of</strong> the type <strong>of</strong> locomotive to be used for trains traction depends on:<br />
geometrical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the track and structures along the route,<br />
envisaged exploitation characteristics, such as traffic load, maximum loads and trains<br />
weight, required performances during the operational phase (speed, durability),<br />
type <strong>of</strong> available and required line equipment (possibilities to use steam, electric or<br />
diesel drive).<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> steam locomotives is not as widely spread as in the past and therefore the most<br />
important characteristics <strong>of</strong> the electric locomotive that will be used and electrification<br />
systems in railway are presented here.<br />
82
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 14 Schematic overview <strong>of</strong> the main constituent elements <strong>of</strong> electric locomotive<br />
2.11 Towing vehicles<br />
Towing vehicles to be used on this route are divided into:<br />
- <strong>Railway</strong> cars (or just cars) used for passengers transport;<br />
- Luggage vans used to transport mail shipments and express mail;<br />
- Wagons used to carry goods or objects;<br />
- Cars with platforms (usually uncovered wagons used to transport passenger<br />
vehicles).<br />
The length <strong>of</strong> the trains (which is important for the desing <strong>of</strong> a line and stations and planning<br />
<strong>of</strong> the operational phase) is determined by taking the real length <strong>of</strong> towing means and the<br />
average axial distance <strong>of</strong> towing vehicles.<br />
83
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 15 Passenger wagon<br />
The carrying weight <strong>of</strong> trains ususally ranges between 15 and 45 tones. This is very<br />
important characteristic <strong>of</strong> cars, because bigger carrying weight enables carrying bigger<br />
loads by shorter compositions.<br />
2.12 Systems <strong>of</strong> railway electrification<br />
The main characteristics <strong>of</strong> the system <strong>of</strong> electrification include the type <strong>of</strong> current and<br />
voltage in the contact grid, characteristics that have been taken also in the classification <strong>of</strong><br />
electrified railways.<br />
Electricity supply to this system is conducted by long distance transmission lines in the<br />
railway electricity supply system.<br />
Figure 16 <strong>Railway</strong> electrification system<br />
The available current goes to electric towing substations where through current rectifiers it is<br />
transformed from alternating into direct current (first, the voltage <strong>of</strong> the alternating current,<br />
through transformers, is reduced to 3000 V). Such current is then released into contact<br />
network. The positive characteristics <strong>of</strong> this system are that it enables to apply simpler<br />
constructive solutions for electric motors <strong>of</strong> the locomotives.<br />
The above system has the following disadvantages:<br />
the need for current rectifiers which rectify the current from three-phase into direct,<br />
84
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
relatively low voltage in the contact line <strong>of</strong> 3000 V which requires that it has large<br />
section (320 to 520 mm 2 , carrying cord <strong>of</strong> 120 mm 2 and contact line <strong>of</strong> two weirs <strong>of</strong><br />
100 or 200 mm).<br />
The need to place the electric towing substations at small distances <strong>of</strong> 15 to 35 km.<br />
Single-phase (mono-phase) system<br />
This system <strong>of</strong> electrification uses alternating (single-phase) current with a frequency <strong>of</strong> 50<br />
Hz and normally voltage <strong>of</strong> 25000 V in the contact line. Electricity is taken from the network<br />
<strong>of</strong> long distance transmission lines with a voltage <strong>of</strong> 110 KV (or, directly from the power<br />
plant) and it is led to electric towing substation. Here, by way <strong>of</strong> transformers, the voltage is<br />
reduced to 25000 V and such alternating current is released into the contact line for<br />
locomotive supply.<br />
The locomotive itself contains transformers for reduction <strong>of</strong> voltage to around 1000 V and<br />
rectifier which transforms the alternating into direct current. This voltage powers the electric<br />
motors <strong>of</strong> locomotive.<br />
The advantages <strong>of</strong> this system include:<br />
Small section <strong>of</strong> the contact line (owing to the high voltage <strong>of</strong> 25 KV, it consists <strong>of</strong><br />
carrying cord with a section <strong>of</strong> 65 mm 2 and contact conductor <strong>of</strong> one weir with a<br />
section <strong>of</strong> 100 mm 2 ),<br />
Electric towing substations may be positioned at larger distances <strong>of</strong> 75 to 80 km.<br />
As a shortcoming <strong>of</strong> this system <strong>of</strong> electrification, we should mention the significant increase<br />
in the weight <strong>of</strong> the locomotive due to the requirement for current transformers and rectifiers.<br />
This contributes to the need for more complicated construction <strong>of</strong> locomotives and their<br />
bigger sensitivity to changes in voltage.<br />
2.13 Electric traction<br />
The application <strong>of</strong> electric traction dates back in the end <strong>of</strong> the 19 th and beginning <strong>of</strong> the 20 th<br />
century. The first constructed electric traction vehicles used direct current which was the only<br />
type <strong>of</strong> current known at that time, and so electric motors could not use current with a<br />
voltage higher than 500 V.<br />
By discovering the polyphase currents, possibility for construction <strong>of</strong> a different type <strong>of</strong><br />
motors was created.<br />
New discoveries in the field <strong>of</strong> electric power enabled development <strong>of</strong> different technical<br />
solutions for electric motors. Different countries adopted and improved different systems <strong>of</strong><br />
electric traction:<br />
Switzerland, Sweden, Austria and Germany apply single-phase system with 16 2/3<br />
Hz and voltage <strong>of</strong> 15000, 18000 and 22000 V.<br />
The Netherlands, France and England use direct system (direct current) with a<br />
voltage <strong>of</strong> 1500 V and 1650 V.<br />
Italy uses direct current as well, but with a voltage <strong>of</strong> 3000 V, and Russia with 3000<br />
V, etc.<br />
The main railway line Tabanovce-Gevgelia is eletrified through a system <strong>of</strong> single-phase<br />
current with a frequency <strong>of</strong> 50 Hz and voltage <strong>of</strong> 25000 V. In the frames <strong>of</strong> the railways<br />
system <strong>of</strong> the former Yugoslav state, railway line electrification from north to Zagreb is by a<br />
system <strong>of</strong> direct current with a voltage <strong>of</strong> 3300 V итн.<br />
85
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Depending on the type <strong>of</strong> the current, used to power the electric motors, locomotives are<br />
divided into locomotives with direct current, locomotives with single-phase current and<br />
locomotives with three-phase current.<br />
Electric locomotive <strong>of</strong> mono-phase system<br />
Our electrified railway lines use the mono-phase system <strong>of</strong> electrification (current with<br />
voltage <strong>of</strong> 25000 V and frequency <strong>of</strong> 50 Hz). The most frequently used locomotives <strong>of</strong> this<br />
type here are locomotives Е-441 and Е-461.<br />
Locomotive Е-441 has a drive wheels diamater <strong>of</strong> 1.25 m in new rims and 1.17 m in torn out<br />
rims. The mass <strong>of</strong> the locomotive amounts 80 t. It has 4 electric motors and axial pressure is<br />
20 t, maximum motion speed is 28000 daN. The hourly traction power <strong>of</strong> the wheels rim<br />
(efective) in case <strong>of</strong> half torn out rims is 19000 daN.<br />
Besides electric locomotives, there are also other electric motor vehicles, most <strong>of</strong>ten used in<br />
urban public transport <strong>of</strong> passengers in large cities. Electromotor cars have electric motor<br />
drive, and the required electricity is taken from contact line via prantograph, as well as<br />
electric locomotives. They differ from locomotives in the aspect that these vehicles have<br />
space for passengers reception, too.<br />
2.14 Diesel locomotive<br />
Motors in diesel locomotives use oil as driving fuel and they are equipped with cisterns, oil<br />
storage tanks.<br />
The advantage compared to electric locomotive is that the diesel locomotive is entirely<br />
independent from external additional driving installations, like electricity supply. Diesel<br />
locomotive consists <strong>of</strong> diesel motor, power gear, auxiliary machines, locomotive pedestal<br />
and commanding area.<br />
Diesel motor is used to drive the locomotive. It is internal combustion motor which uses oil<br />
as fuel. As a result <strong>of</strong> the high temperature achieved during air compression in motor<br />
cylinders, the oil is agitated and combusted releasing energy. The overall motor output may<br />
exceed 3000 horse-powers.<br />
The power gear with diesel locomotives is very important for the traction performance. Diesel<br />
motor provides normal output only under normal, optimum number <strong>of</strong> revolutions and it is not<br />
able to turn the wheels directly as it is done by electric traction motors. In order to utilize the<br />
output rationally, the gear is placed between it and locomotive driving wheels. Thanks to it,<br />
the motor may work unburdened with optimum number <strong>of</strong> revolutions, and then by way <strong>of</strong><br />
various transmissions the locomotive wheels are connected to move at a speed suitable for<br />
the current motion conditions (increasing or decreasing the speed, independently from the<br />
motor performance or stopping them from turning with the motor continuing to work).<br />
Auxiliary machines and equipment with diesel and diesel-electric locomotive include:<br />
Accumulator batteries, which have the role to supply electricity to the electric<br />
starter (servo-motor) to put the diesel motor in drive.<br />
Motor-generator <strong>of</strong> continuous current, which is connected through a belt to a<br />
gear <strong>of</strong> the diesel motor and generates electricity.<br />
Air compressor, used to produce compressed air supplied to breaks, sand<br />
blasting devices, to regulate the performance <strong>of</strong> diesel motor, etc.<br />
Electrical instruments installed on the table in locomotive command cabinet used<br />
for vehicle movement steering and control.<br />
86
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Locomotive pedestal consists <strong>of</strong> steel rim produced <strong>of</strong> primary and secondary longitudinal<br />
and cross-section bearings with other conjunctions and rigid segments. The whole<br />
construction is placed on its upper side, including all parts (bodywork), while the lower part<br />
holds the pivots for the revolving socles which enable radial movement <strong>of</strong> axles and wheels.<br />
Control area serves to accomodate the command (driving) board on which all devices and<br />
instruments for the locomotive command and control are placed.<br />
2.15 Specific solutions for the Project<br />
The selection <strong>of</strong> a specific solution for Section 1-Kicevo-Struga and for Section 2-Struga-Lin<br />
(border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) has got the following general characteristics:<br />
1. Total track length: 62.594 km<br />
2. Total route length: 42.117 km = 67.29 %<br />
3. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with R < 500 m: 0.000 km = 0.00 %<br />
4 Length <strong>of</strong> twists with 500 m ≤ R < 800 m: 10.008 km = 15.99 %<br />
5. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with 800 m ≤ R < 1200 m: 3.654 km = 5.84 %<br />
6. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with R ≥ 1200 m: 6.815 km = 10.88 %<br />
7. Longitudinal inclinations i ≤ 12.5 ‰ : 36.898 km = 58.95 %<br />
8. Longitudinal inclinations 12.5 ‰ ≤ i ≤ 18 ‰ : 12.392 km = 19.80 %<br />
9. Longitudinal inclinations i > 18 ‰ : 13.304 km = 21.25 %<br />
10. Total length <strong>of</strong> bridges and viaducts: 4.498 km = 7.19 %<br />
11. Total length <strong>of</strong> tunnels: 12.374 km = 19.77 %<br />
17. Nominal speed 100 km /h<br />
The figure below shows the accepted section for construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line to connect<br />
Kicevo and Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>).<br />
87
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 17 Accepted section <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
- Category <strong>of</strong> railway line – Based on the importance and function within the railway<br />
network, defined in the National Transport Strategy, the subject railway line is ranked as<br />
88
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
main line for international mixed passenger and goods transport line and thus it has to<br />
comply with the conditions specified in international agreements.<br />
- Category <strong>of</strong> the terrain for the selected variant – From Kicevo to the village Meseiste,<br />
the terrain is characterized with hill and mountainous nature with presence <strong>of</strong> high hills<br />
and deep dales. From the village Meseiste to the village Kalista, the route stretches over<br />
ravine and marshy type <strong>of</strong> land. From the village Kalista to the border with the <strong>Republic</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, the terrain is hilly and mountainous with clearly huge steep slopes, dales,<br />
hills, taluses and gullies.<br />
- Engineering geological characteristics – Generally, the routes pass through solid<br />
coherent rock masses, medium to poorly coherent rock masses and non-coherent rock<br />
masses. The solid coherent rock masses are represented with phylites, phylitoides,<br />
marbles, diabases, metarhyolites and shales. They provide favourable building<br />
environment, but care should be taken <strong>of</strong> shale nature, foliation and stratification<br />
aspects. Poorly to medium coherent rock masses are Triassic and Pliocene sediments<br />
(claystones, conglomerates, sandstones and clays). Such rock masses are generally<br />
considered as unfavourable building environment and therefore they require special<br />
treatment. Apart from the above mentioned poorly coherent rock masses, there are also<br />
lake sediments <strong>of</strong> Quarternary age represented through clays, dusty to sandy clays,<br />
sands and slag rims. The environment <strong>of</strong> lake sediments is assessed as unfavourable.<br />
Unfavourability is especially present at places with high water level. Non-coherent rock<br />
masses – this group includes Quarternary (alluvial) sediments. They are represented in<br />
the riverbed <strong>of</strong> Treska and along the course <strong>of</strong> Sateska river. They make a favourable<br />
building environment.<br />
- Section 1- from km 115+600 to km 121+000. At km.115 <strong>of</strong> the route, the line enters a<br />
tunnel. Lithological units through which it passes include: phylitoides, marbles,<br />
limestones and diabases. Physical and mechanical characteristics <strong>of</strong> these rock masses<br />
are favourable for construction <strong>of</strong> structures <strong>of</strong> this type. The aspect that should be paid<br />
greater attention in further phases <strong>of</strong> investigation is the transgressive boundary between<br />
limestones and phylitoides, as well as the boundary between diabases and limestones.<br />
Both can be carriers <strong>of</strong> big quantities <strong>of</strong> water which will pose problems during the tunnel<br />
construction. From km. 121+000 to km. 151+000, the route enters a terrain with much<br />
less clear inclinations. By several tunnels along the course <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, the route<br />
lowers gently towards the village Meseiste. In this area, there are gullies, temporary and<br />
permanent watercourses and all <strong>of</strong> them enter into Sateska river. Tectonics <strong>of</strong> the terrain<br />
exists, but due to the coverage with delluvial cover and presence <strong>of</strong> intense vegetation, it<br />
is difficult to note. From km.123 to km.132, rock masses through which the route passes<br />
are basalts, clays, conglomerates, sandstones and marbles. After km.141, the route<br />
continues along the alluvial area <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, but shales taking an anticlinal<br />
position with reference to Sateska river are found on left and on right <strong>of</strong> it.<br />
- This part <strong>of</strong> the terrain is favourable for development <strong>of</strong> structures <strong>of</strong> this type, with the<br />
only remark that it is too narrow for highway and railway line, and therefore the gorge will<br />
require broadening and cuttings on left and on right <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska. Generally, the<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the route from km 123 to km 139 is favourable without any major problematic<br />
segments.<br />
- Section 2- from km 157+000 to km 161 +000, the route proceeds through ravine and<br />
marshy conditions. The terrain is built <strong>of</strong> lake sediments, mainly clays, with high water<br />
level. Struga Fields are cut through with drainage canals, which presently ensure that the<br />
89
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
area is not a marsh. In the lower ground segments (18-19 m), there is a high hydrostatic<br />
pressure which enables the occurrence <strong>of</strong> artesian water. The prefix “marshy terrain”<br />
makes it unfavourable for construction. During the line designing and construction,<br />
provision has to be made for uninterrupted drainage <strong>of</strong> the terrain where the line passes<br />
and serious analysis <strong>of</strong> the module <strong>of</strong> the stinginess should be undertaken <strong>of</strong> the terrain<br />
through which the route will be passing. From km.161 to km.136, the route runs over<br />
prolluvial sediments where no particular problems in construction are expected. From<br />
km.163 to km.164+900, the route passes through marbles, which we also regard to be a<br />
stable construction environment. After km 164+900, the route enters a tunnel which will<br />
be opened in a medium <strong>of</strong> stratified conglomerates and sandstones. Their azimuth is<br />
eastwards, with drop angle <strong>of</strong> around 40 . Besides conglomerates and sandstones, there<br />
are also phylitic shales and marbles. Azimuth and drop angle <strong>of</strong> the strata <strong>of</strong> these rock<br />
masses are similar with those <strong>of</strong> conglomerates. The tunnel as a structure exits at km<br />
168, and then the route continues into phylitic shales. Foliation <strong>of</strong> these rock masses is<br />
under certain angle with reference to the route and it poses no particular problem in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> the line stability. Generally speaking, from km.167 to km.170, the terrain is<br />
assessed as favourable for development <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> structures.<br />
- Exploitation conditions – The regime <strong>of</strong> traffic regulation and monitoring has been<br />
envisaged to be a modern block system for safety and control.<br />
- The manner <strong>of</strong> crossing with other existing road arteries will be by way <strong>of</strong> delevelled<br />
intersection with categorized state and local road infrastructure.<br />
- Electrification system – single phase system with electricity voltage <strong>of</strong> 25 kV and<br />
frequency <strong>of</strong> 50 Hz.<br />
2.15.1 Design parameters for open line, stations and intersections<br />
The line will be intended for combined transport (freight and passenger), with prevailing<br />
freight transport;<br />
It will be designed as single-track <strong>of</strong> standard gauge equal to1435 mm;<br />
Nominal speed will be 100 km/h for passenger and freight transport and consequently<br />
the minimum elements <strong>of</strong> horizontal twists are min. R=500 m and Lp=140 m;<br />
The maximum qualified longitudinal inclination will amount 25‰, taking into account that<br />
the subject terrain in which the route will be designed is difficult mountainous one. The<br />
minimum radius <strong>of</strong> vertical twists is 10 000 m;<br />
Electrification system 25 kV, 50 Hz. Nominal speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h for contact network and<br />
equipment <strong>of</strong> the contact network, supply and control <strong>of</strong> the traction.<br />
Telecommunication – Communication system with optical cable GSM-R (GSMR-<br />
Raylwas) (wireless telecommunication platform developed specially for railways) for<br />
conversational link and data transmission;<br />
Signalization – Electronic centralization, facilitating remote control; Automatic blocking<br />
system (without blocking signals); European <strong>Railway</strong> Transport Management System<br />
(ERTMS) /European Train Control System (ETCS) level 1, Transmission System CTM<br />
16 (synchronized transport system);<br />
Width <strong>of</strong> the track subgrade <strong>of</strong> 6.00 m;<br />
Protection layer against freezing <strong>of</strong> 50 cm;<br />
90
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Thickness <strong>of</strong> ballast prism – minimum 33 cm, under the lower edge <strong>of</strong> the sleeper in<br />
transversal cross-section under the rail;<br />
Module <strong>of</strong> sub-base compressibility Е 0 = 30 МРа;<br />
Module <strong>of</strong> subgrade compressibility Е пл = 60 МРа;<br />
Welded rails in LRT , rail type С 49 on reinforced concrete prestressed sleepers <strong>of</strong> type<br />
MP94 fixed by elastic fixing accessories and laid onto ballast prism, <strong>of</strong> an average<br />
thickness <strong>of</strong> 35 cm, beneath the pressing surface <strong>of</strong> the sleeper;<br />
Drainage system – concrete canals and drainage elements, as required;<br />
Distance between tracks, as well as minimum distances to the structures in <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />
places will comply with the Rulebook on superstructure designing;<br />
Height <strong>of</strong> platform above URE-min. 55 cm;<br />
Length <strong>of</strong> platforms-min. 220 m for intersections and 400 m for stations;<br />
During designing, the signed intergovernmental agreements and protocols for railway<br />
connection establishment will be observed;<br />
During designing, the agreed border stations on Macedonian and <strong>Albania</strong>n side,<br />
respectively: Struga and Lin, will be respected.<br />
Standing point on the border between the two countries will be specified additionally.<br />
2.15.2 Section 1<br />
Section 1 will extend from the railway station Kicevo at km.102+600, which is at the moment<br />
the final station <strong>of</strong> the line Gjorce Petrov-Kicevo, up to the future railway station Struga, to<br />
km.156+238.19. The railway station Struga will be part <strong>of</strong> the second section, Struga-border<br />
with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>. This division serves the purpose/possibility for the final part <strong>of</strong><br />
the route to become operational in case <strong>of</strong> possible phase construction <strong>of</strong> the line. This<br />
means provision <strong>of</strong> the commencement <strong>of</strong> construction in the opposite direction, i.e. from Lin<br />
(border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) towards Kicevo.<br />
2.15.2.1 Section 1.1- horizontal solution<br />
Considered variant starts from the railway station Kicevo at km.102+688.33, where the line<br />
Gjorce Petrov-Kicevo ends, from km.0+000 to km.102+688.33.<br />
The route is characterized with exceptionally complex terrain conditions, which directs the<br />
designer to apply to the maximum the prescribed minimum parameters for the line. This<br />
means very frequent use <strong>of</strong> the minimum radius <strong>of</strong> 500 m, for the purpose <strong>of</strong> utmost<br />
integration <strong>of</strong> the route into the terrain. The most difficult terrain conditions are on the first 18<br />
km.<br />
- Route from km.102+136 to km.113+000<br />
This is a section from the first inter-station distance, from the railway station Kicevo to the<br />
intersection Brzdani, with a length <strong>of</strong> 9.7 km. This part <strong>of</strong> the route is characterized by the<br />
fact that the designer has to address several problems:<br />
Bypass <strong>of</strong> the village Drugovo on its upper side, with parallel running <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />
line route with the route <strong>of</strong> the future highway from km.105+900 to km.107+600;<br />
91
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Crossing the river Treska, at km.107+929, where the route proceeds along the river<br />
valley <strong>of</strong> Brzdanska Reka towards south;<br />
At km.111+500, the route runs westwards and at km.112+363.61, the station plateau<br />
<strong>of</strong> the intersection Brzdani starts.<br />
The route is rather diversified, which is imposed by terrain conditions which are exceptionally<br />
difficult. There are 12 horizontal twists in total, two <strong>of</strong> which are <strong>of</strong> minimum radius <strong>of</strong> 500 m.<br />
This shows that the designer has managed to integrate to the maximum extent into the<br />
surrounding, applying the minimum radius. Two twists <strong>of</strong> 500 m radius have been envisaged,<br />
one right and one left. There are total <strong>of</strong> five twists <strong>of</strong> 600 m radius, two left and three right.<br />
There is also one left twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 850 m, one right twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 1200 m and<br />
one left twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 1500 m. The core part <strong>of</strong> the intersection Brzdani itself is in the<br />
right horizontal twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 700 m.<br />
It should be pointed out that the selection <strong>of</strong> the variant for the route has taken care <strong>of</strong> the<br />
length <strong>of</strong> intersections. It should enable accommodation <strong>of</strong> the specified transitional twists,<br />
as well as straight segment <strong>of</strong> minimum В/2 or 50 m.<br />
- Route from km.113+000 to km.121+600<br />
This is the second inter-station distance <strong>of</strong> this variant, starting from the intersection Brzdani<br />
and extending to the intersection Slivovo. Immediately upon the exit from the intersection<br />
Brzdani, the route rises up to the entry portal <strong>of</strong> the base tunnel on the Mountain Bigla, in<br />
order to transfer it on the opposite side in the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska. The tunnel has a<br />
length <strong>of</strong> 5610 m and it is aligned, except the last 180 m from the exit portal which is in a<br />
right twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 700 m. There is also one left twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 500 m, one left<br />
twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 700 m and one right twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 2000 m. Through this tunnel,<br />
the route is directed somewhat more southwards. Immediately after the exit from the tunnel,<br />
the route enters into the intersection Slivovo at km.121+264.41. The intersection Slivovo is<br />
located on the left horizontal twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 700 m. This is completely new station<br />
plateau at level 900.<br />
- Route from km.121+600 to km.130+000<br />
This section is entirely laid over the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska. The route runs in parallel with<br />
the route <strong>of</strong> the current main road to Ohrid as well as the route <strong>of</strong> the future highway. There<br />
is no mutual cross-cutting, because the routes <strong>of</strong> the roads are constantly on the right side <strong>of</strong><br />
the valley, while the railway line on the left.<br />
The route is well integrated in the surrounding, with optimum use <strong>of</strong> the elements <strong>of</strong><br />
horizontal solution. Thanks to that, the number <strong>of</strong> structures (tunnels and bridges) is<br />
relatively low.<br />
Rather big problem in route leading occurs in the part from km.125+100 to km.132+100.<br />
Namely, in this part, the route enters into a narrow gorge <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, with very<br />
steep slopes.<br />
Earlier, at km.125+300, the route crosses from left to the right side <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska and<br />
proceeds along that direction up to the intersection Izdeglavje.<br />
In the context <strong>of</strong> the above, on plans in Р=1:2500, the designer is able to locate the route<br />
more precisely. At the level <strong>of</strong> basic design, it will be necessary, by way <strong>of</strong> microreplacement<br />
through cross-section pr<strong>of</strong>iles, to specify the ultimate location <strong>of</strong> the route in the<br />
gorge.<br />
92
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
As mentioned above, the layout is well developed. There are four horizontal twists with a<br />
radius <strong>of</strong> 500 m, three <strong>of</strong> which right and one left, three twists with radius <strong>of</strong> 800 m and three<br />
left and one right twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 1000 m.<br />
2.15.2.2 Longitudinal pr<strong>of</strong>ile-Vertical solution-Section 1.1<br />
Vertical solution for the alternative was elaborated based on terrain conditions through which<br />
the route is guided.<br />
During the railway line designing, the criteria for the minimum longitudinal 0‰ and maximum<br />
slope 23.6‰, as well as radius <strong>of</strong> vertical twists <strong>of</strong> 10 000 m have been observed.<br />
The station Kicevo lies in a horizontal at grade level 630, the length <strong>of</strong> the grade level<br />
shoulder is 1362.7 m. Then, slope <strong>of</strong> 12‰ with a length <strong>of</strong> 500 m follows, which is preceding<br />
piece between the horizontal and the slope <strong>of</strong> 20‰ with a length <strong>of</strong> 2570 m.<br />
Then comes rising with a slope <strong>of</strong> 8.2‰ and 20.7‰ and crossing by a bridge at km<br />
107+811.00 above the main road Kicevo-Kjafasan and river Treska reaching the level<br />
729.29 at km 108+833.00. Rising proceeds with a slope <strong>of</strong> 19‰ and 22.5‰, with lengths <strong>of</strong><br />
1046.26 m and 1844.74 m, respectively.<br />
In this way, we reach the intersection Brzdani at km 112+363.61 and level 794.99. Both<br />
turnout shafts <strong>of</strong> the intersection are with a slope <strong>of</strong> 10‰ and length <strong>of</strong> 395 m and 320 m,<br />
respectively. The grade level shoulder, created between them, is with a slope <strong>of</strong> 1.5‰ and<br />
length <strong>of</strong> 695 m. After the intersection Brzdani, the route mounts towards the base tunnel<br />
Bigla which is 5610 m in length.<br />
Before entering into it, the steepest slope on the section occurs. It is 23.6‰ with a length <strong>of</strong><br />
1002 m and reaches a level <strong>of</strong> 822.40 at km 114+136.00. Up to km 119+945.00, the tunnel<br />
is with a slope <strong>of</strong> 14.40‰ and before the exit from it and entry into the intersection Slivovo, it<br />
has dropping slope <strong>of</strong> 5‰, with a length <strong>of</strong> 532 m.<br />
The new intersection Slivovo is at km 121+261.41 and level 907.64; it is laid entirely in a<br />
slope <strong>of</strong> 1.5‰ with a length <strong>of</strong> 1146 m. From km 120+477.00 and level 908.77, to the end <strong>of</strong><br />
the section, there is a series <strong>of</strong> falling slopes. At km 125+267.00, by bridge we cross over<br />
the river Sateska and local road Arbinovo-Izdeglavje.<br />
That road is cut at km 127+975.02, where construction <strong>of</strong> road overpass is envisaged. Then<br />
comes a slope <strong>of</strong> 14‰ with a length <strong>of</strong> 774 m and entry with a slope <strong>of</strong> 1.5‰ into new<br />
intersection – Izdeglavje at km 129+516.62. The intersection is laid entirely in a slope <strong>of</strong><br />
1.5‰ at level 793.86.<br />
2.15.2.3 Tunnels-Section 1.1<br />
The selected alternative has eight tunnels, the longest <strong>of</strong> which is the base tunnel Bigla, with<br />
a length <strong>of</strong> 5610 m. Other tunnels have lengths ranging from 125 to 560 m.<br />
The total length <strong>of</strong> the tunnels under this alternative is 7526 m, or 27.01% <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the<br />
route 1.1.<br />
Along this length, we have total <strong>of</strong> 1916 m tunnels with a length <strong>of</strong> less than 1000 m and one<br />
tunnel with a length exceeding 1000 m (tunnel Bigla with a length <strong>of</strong> 5610 m).<br />
93
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 18 Tunnel<br />
2.15.2.4 Viaducts and bridges- Section 1.1<br />
The alternative has several bridges, with expected problematic solutions for the bridge<br />
above river Treska, at km 107+811.00, with a length <strong>of</strong> 400 m and height <strong>of</strong> 70 m.<br />
The total length <strong>of</strong> bridges under this alternative is 3555 m, or 12.76% <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the<br />
section 1.1.<br />
2.15.2.5 Stations and intersection<br />
On the section, reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the existing station Kicevo is envisaged, as well as<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> three new intersections: Brzdani, Slivovo and Izdeglavje.<br />
94
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
95
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 19 Stations and intersections<br />
- km. 102+688.33 railway station Kicevo L plateau=977.12 m.<br />
There is 1 main track and three reception-dispatching tracks.<br />
- km. 112+363.61 intersection Brzdani L plateau=977.79m.<br />
There is 1 main track and two reception-dispatching tracks.<br />
- km. 121+264.41 intersection Slivovo L plateau =888.28 m.<br />
96
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
There is 1 main track and two reception-dispatching tracks.<br />
- km. 129+516.62 intersection Izdeglavje L plateau =885.91 m.<br />
- There is 1 main track and two reception-dispatching tracks.<br />
2.15.2.6 Crossings and deviations<br />
The following roads are crossed:<br />
- km 103+498.90 – asphalted road – is corrected and construction <strong>of</strong> underpass<br />
or overpass road is envisaged at km 103+612.47.<br />
- km 107+021.36 – rural road, passing under a bridge at km 107+075.00.<br />
- km 107+755.61 – main road Kicevo Kjafasan, passing under bridge at km<br />
107+811.00.<br />
- km 110+573.14 – rural road to the village Vidrani is replaced at km 110+547.63,<br />
and it will pass below bridge at km 110+520.00.<br />
- km 111+727.25 - rural road to the village Brzdani is replaced at km 111+750.18,<br />
and it will pass below bridge at km 111+830.00.<br />
- km 114+723.09 – rural road to Dzudovo, passing below bridge at km<br />
114+710.00.<br />
- km 120+289.41 – rural road, passing below tunnel.<br />
- km 120+597.33 – rural road to the village Slivovo, road underpass is envisaged.<br />
- km 122+518.30 - rural road, passing above tunnel.<br />
- km 124+214.10 – rural road to Arbinovo, road overpass is envisaged.<br />
- km 124+334.42 – rural road, road underpass is envisaged.<br />
- km 125+320.81 – rural road Arbinovo-Izdeglavje, passing below bridge at km<br />
125+267.00.<br />
- km 127+975.02 - rural road Arbinovo-Izdeglavje, road overpass is envisaged.<br />
2.15.3 Section 1.2<br />
During the railway line designing, the criteria for minimum radius used are observed and it is<br />
500 m, with transitional curve <strong>of</strong> 140 m.<br />
- Route from km 129+966.00 to km 141+981.00<br />
It is a section at inter-station distance Izdeglavje – Meseiste, with a length <strong>of</strong> 13 km.<br />
After the crossing station Izdeglavje, by a left curve, the route <strong>of</strong> the line passes between the<br />
existing main road and river Sateska. Supporting structure is envisaged to protect the<br />
embankment <strong>of</strong> the line against the waters <strong>of</strong> the river.<br />
At km 130+636.00, the crossing over Pesocanska Reka (river) will be accomplished by a<br />
railway bridge with L= 30 m. At km 130+750.00, the route passes at 30 m from the plot <strong>of</strong> the<br />
existing church St. Cyril and Methodius, proceeding southwards, running in parallel with the<br />
existing main road Kicevo-Ohrid. By a right twist, the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line passes by the<br />
factory “Sloboda”, after which it takes direction towards southwest, again in parallel with the<br />
main road. The route is in embankment <strong>of</strong> around 1.5 m in height, and at km 134+110.00<br />
railway bridge is envisaged to cross the river Sateska.<br />
97
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
At km 135+025.00, the route enters a tunnel by which the village Botun is passed by. After<br />
the exit from the tunnel, the route crosses over the existing main road and the river Sateska,<br />
where by a left twist it contacts the route <strong>of</strong> the newly designed highway. The shortest<br />
distance between the railway line and the newly designed highway is 8.00 m in continuation<br />
at around 100 m. On this part, protection measures are envisaged against blinding <strong>of</strong><br />
vehicles moving on the side <strong>of</strong> the rail vehicles, as well as securing <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
against road vehicles flying out from the highway.<br />
At km.137+100.00, the railway line moves away from the highway and then proceeds<br />
southwards. It crosses Sateska river again by a bridge L= 60 m, and soon after that it enters<br />
a tunnel. After the exit from the tunnel, the route runs in parallel with the existing main road<br />
to a higher level, after which at km 139+472.00, with the railway overpass bridge, it crosses<br />
over the newly designed highway. By a left twist, the route passes by the village Meseista on<br />
west, after which it is directed to southwest and at km 141+981.41 enters into the station<br />
Meseista.<br />
- Route from km 143+045.03 to km 151+000.00<br />
After the station Meseista, by a right twist, the route is directed southwestwards passing<br />
south by the village Volino, after which at km 144+311.00 it crosses the existing canal by a<br />
bridge. At km 148+000.00, the route, by a right twist, passes by the villages Moroiste and<br />
Mislesevo and continues toward west. At km 150+925.00, the railway line crosses the<br />
riverbed <strong>of</strong> Crn Drim river, by a bridge, and at km 150+983.00 it cuts the road Struga-Debar<br />
by a road overpass.<br />
2.15.3.1 Longitudinal pr<strong>of</strong>ile-Vertical solution-Section 1.2<br />
Vertical solution for the alternative was elaborated based on terrain conditions through which<br />
the route is guided.<br />
The maximum slope used is 15.00‰ at a length <strong>of</strong> 1021 m.<br />
The station Meseista is at a level 719 m with a slope <strong>of</strong> 1.00‰ over a length <strong>of</strong> 1307 m. The<br />
whole station is on an embankment <strong>of</strong> 3 m in height. The grade level <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
through the entire Struga field is addressed by an embankment <strong>of</strong> around 1.5 m, due to the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> high groundwaters.<br />
2.15.3.2 Tunnels-Section 1.2<br />
There are two tunnels on this section.<br />
By one tunnel, having a length <strong>of</strong> 990 m and single-side longitudinal slope <strong>of</strong> 3‰, the village<br />
Botun is passed by.<br />
The next tunnel has a length <strong>of</strong> 480 m and single-side longitudinal slope <strong>of</strong> 3‰. By this<br />
tunnel, a total <strong>of</strong> four crossings <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska and the existing main road will be<br />
avoided.<br />
The total length <strong>of</strong> tunnels along Section 1,2 is 1470 m or 6.90% <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the section<br />
1.2.<br />
2.15.3.3 Bridges- Section 1.2<br />
The alternative has envisaged 11 bridges in total on this section <strong>of</strong> the railway line, six (6) <strong>of</strong><br />
which have a length <strong>of</strong> up to 20 m, and five (5) are with a length <strong>of</strong> 20-50 m. The overall<br />
length <strong>of</strong> bridges under this alternative is 428 m, and in percentages it amounts 2.00% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
length <strong>of</strong> section 1.2.<br />
98
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
At km 137+310.00, by a railway bridge with a length <strong>of</strong> 61 m, the river Sateska is crossed,<br />
and at km 139+472.00 the crossing over the newly designed highway is located, where the<br />
length <strong>of</strong> the bridge construction is 80 m.<br />
2.15.3.4 Stations and intersections - Section 1.2<br />
Station Meseista is designed as a nodal station. It connects the railway line Kicevo-Lin<br />
(border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>), with the railway connection from the Airport “St.Pavle”<br />
in Ohrid.<br />
The station is designed with four tracks with the following operational lengths:<br />
- 1 track–726 m (650 m),<br />
- 2 track–726 m,<br />
- 3 track–737 m,<br />
- 4 track–650 m.<br />
The railway link with the Ohrid Airport will not be constructed in this phase and thus an<br />
operational length <strong>of</strong> 1 track <strong>of</strong> 726 m is obtained. The construction <strong>of</strong> the railway link with<br />
the Airport will shorten the operational length <strong>of</strong> 1 track to 650 m.<br />
The station is designed with two platforms <strong>of</strong> 220 m in lengths, which have exits towards<br />
pedestrian subcorridor. Axial between first and second and third and fourth track is 5.10 m,<br />
and between second and third, it is 9.00 m.<br />
The station will include: administrative building, parking space and loading ramp.<br />
2.15.3.5 Crossings and deviations-Section 1.2<br />
Total <strong>of</strong> 13 overpasses and two underpasses have been envisaged on this section.<br />
The passage through the highway at km 139+472.00 will be accomplished by underpass<br />
with a length <strong>of</strong> 80 m.<br />
2.15.4 Section 2<br />
Section 2 starts from km 151+000.00, at 690 m. before the station Struga.<br />
Route from km.151+000.00 to km.164+730.09<br />
With its first 5.5 kilometers, the route is located in a flat area, i.e. passing through Struga<br />
Fields. The second part <strong>of</strong> the route runs through mountainous terrain up to the agreed point<br />
<strong>of</strong> connection on the <strong>Albania</strong>n side.<br />
Immediately after the crossing over the river Crn Drim, at km.150+925, there is a favourable<br />
location for the future railway station “Struga”, northwest <strong>of</strong> the city in its industrial zone. The<br />
station plateau would be positioned in the area between the main amelioration canal Sum<br />
and the route <strong>of</strong> the future highway to <strong>Albania</strong>. At the same time, the railway station “Struga”,<br />
at km.152+125, will be a border station on the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. The<br />
plane part, which covers the Struga fields, is cut through with amelioration canals which will<br />
be overcome as obstacles by construction <strong>of</strong> culverts, with openings, depending on the size<br />
<strong>of</strong> canals.<br />
Besides amelioration canals, obstacles also include road lines <strong>of</strong> different ranks. Fortunately,<br />
there are no crossings <strong>of</strong> the newly designed highway for this alternative.<br />
At km.155+690, the railway line cuts the existing main road to <strong>Albania</strong>, and at km.156+662<br />
the local road to the Monastery Kalista and the village Radozda. Both will be solved by<br />
structures, where the crossing will be at two levels.<br />
99
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
The main characteristic <strong>of</strong> the accepted alternative for the subject section is in the fact that<br />
the corridor connecting the two railway networks is away from the Ohrid Lake shore. This<br />
imposes a more radical solution, i.e. longer tunnel to surmount the mountain massif between<br />
the two countries, but it provides protection <strong>of</strong> the lake ecosystem, which is part <strong>of</strong> the world<br />
list <strong>of</strong> natural heritage (UNESCO). By way <strong>of</strong> tunnels with a length <strong>of</strong> 3135 m, 88 m and 155<br />
m, respectively, the passage is made from Struga to Lin valley, and to the connecting point<br />
itself.<br />
According to the agreement, the connection is on the route at the grade line 725.00. These<br />
are preliminary agreements and they may undergo minor corrections till adoption <strong>of</strong> all<br />
details <strong>of</strong> the design.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the route layout, there are 11 curves, out <strong>of</strong> which minimum<br />
radius <strong>of</strong> 500 m is applied only on two right curves. One left curve is designed at the exit<br />
from the tunnel number 11, with a radius <strong>of</strong> 550 m. Radius <strong>of</strong> 700 m is applied on one left<br />
curve. Two horizontal curves, one left and one right with a radius <strong>of</strong> 1000 m, one left with a<br />
radius <strong>of</strong> 1200 m and 4 curves, two right and two left are with a radius <strong>of</strong> 1500 m.<br />
The route <strong>of</strong> the newly designed highway cuts the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line above a tunnel at<br />
km 160+775.<br />
The total length <strong>of</strong> the section is 13.73 km.<br />
2.15.4.1 Longitudinal pr<strong>of</strong>ile-Vertical solution<br />
At the first 4820 m, the maximum slope <strong>of</strong> the grade line is 2.4‰. The grade line on the<br />
station plateau <strong>of</strong> the railway station Struga is in horizontal with a slope 0.00‰ and slope<br />
0.50‰, where the horizontal is at the level 694.45. It is proposed that the station plateau has<br />
a length <strong>of</strong> around 1117 m, from km.151+692 to km.152+809.<br />
After the exit from the station Struga, the grade line is with a slope 1.10‰ up to km.153+600<br />
and level 695.74. Next slopes are 0.50‰ and 2.40‰, and level 699.35 is reached at<br />
km.155+820. Then, the next 3345 m use slopes <strong>of</strong> 7.60‰ up to km.156+500, from 18.50‰<br />
to km.158+300 and slope <strong>of</strong> 21.00‰ (maximum slope for the second section) with a length<br />
<strong>of</strong> 795 m, reaching the level 755.99 at km.159+165. Next slope is 9.50‰ with a length <strong>of</strong> 500<br />
m, before the entry portal <strong>of</strong> the base tunnel. The entire tunnel length <strong>of</strong> 3135 m is falling.<br />
The maximum slope is 13.00‰ with a length <strong>of</strong> 1985 m. The level at the entry portal is<br />
759.65, and the level at the exit portal 731.18. The slope at the exit from the tunnel is 4.50‰<br />
up to km.162+955, and tunnel with a length <strong>of</strong> 88 m is located onto it. Next slopes are from<br />
1.50‰ to km.163+600, 3.00‰ up to km.164+250 with a level <strong>of</strong> 727.04 and 5.00‰ in the<br />
section <strong>of</strong> connection between the railway networks <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia and<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, respectively. At a slope <strong>of</strong> 3.00‰, the last tunnel with a length <strong>of</strong> 155 m<br />
is located.<br />
2.15.4.2 Tunnels<br />
The proposed alternative has three tunnels, with a length <strong>of</strong> 3135 m, 88 m and 155 m. The<br />
tunnel <strong>of</strong> 3135 m is a base tunnel and it is used to transfer the route from the Struga Fields<br />
to the Lin valley.<br />
The overall percentage <strong>of</strong> tunnels along this section is 24.60%<br />
2.15.4.3 Viaducts and bridges<br />
Under this alternative, bridges are above major rivers cutting the route. Their length reaches<br />
30 m. Numerous minor gullies are drained through culverts.<br />
100
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Two bridges will be constructed in the border area with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, with a length<br />
<strong>of</strong> 170 m and 240 m. The total length <strong>of</strong> bridges for this alternative is 515 m, and in<br />
percentage it is 3.75% <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> section 2.<br />
2.15.4.4 Stations and intersections<br />
On the Section 2, at the extension Struga-Lin, the railway station “Struga” is the border<br />
station on the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />
Under the bilateral agreements signed so far at the level <strong>of</strong> Ministries, this station has been<br />
envisaged to be the border station <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. For the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Albania</strong>, that role belongs to the railway station Lin.<br />
The required number <strong>of</strong> railway tracks for the railway station Struga is 7, with a minimum<br />
utilization length <strong>of</strong> 650 m. Construction <strong>of</strong> intermodal terminal with the necessary buildings<br />
(structures) has been envisaged to enable its functioning. Two platforms will be built on the<br />
station, with a length <strong>of</strong> 300 m, with passenger sub-corridor between them and exit towards<br />
intermodal terminal. Also, loading station with garage tracks has been envisaged, with<br />
utilization length <strong>of</strong> 228 m, track with a ramp with utilization length <strong>of</strong> 190 m and track under<br />
the crane with utilization length <strong>of</strong> 225 m. Storehouse will be built in the station as well.<br />
To support all these assets, construction <strong>of</strong> a longer station plateau <strong>of</strong> 1117 m is envisaged<br />
as well.<br />
The grade line <strong>of</strong> this section <strong>of</strong>fers a possibility for construction <strong>of</strong> intersection near the<br />
village Radozda. The intersection will have three tracks, with a minimum utilization length <strong>of</strong><br />
650 m.<br />
2.15.4.5 Crossings and deviations<br />
The Terms <strong>of</strong> Reference require that all intersections with other transport line are executed<br />
beyond level. This will enhance the overall transport safety. Along the first half <strong>of</strong> the route <strong>of</strong><br />
the selected alternative, there is a common corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line and the existing main<br />
road Kicevo-Kjafasan. The same arrangement will be the case with the future highway<br />
Kicevo-Kjafasan, too.<br />
With this Section, intersections with the future highway are avoided. In fact, they intersect at<br />
km. 160+775, where the line is in tunnel.<br />
The crossings <strong>of</strong> the existing road infrastructure remain to be solved further. These are as<br />
follows:<br />
- At km 153+196 with local road to the village Sum, by construction <strong>of</strong> overpass.<br />
- At km 154+800 with local road to the village Radolista, by construction <strong>of</strong><br />
overpass.<br />
- At km.155+743 with the main road Kicevo-Kjafasan, by construction <strong>of</strong><br />
overpass.<br />
- At km.156+662 with local road to the Monastery Kaliste and village Radozda, by<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> underpass.<br />
- At km.157+205 with rural road, by construction <strong>of</strong> overpass.<br />
- At km.163+067 with rural road, by construction <strong>of</strong> overpass.<br />
- At km 164+305 with rural road, by construction <strong>of</strong> overpass.<br />
101
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Based on the above, six overpasses and one underpass should be constructed. The main<br />
parameters for the specific cross-section pr<strong>of</strong>iles in this case will be as follows:<br />
- Subgrade width is 6.00 m.<br />
- The subgrade is single-line with cross-section slope <strong>of</strong> 4%.<br />
- Thickness <strong>of</strong> protection layer against freezing is 50-80 cm.<br />
- Thickness <strong>of</strong> ballast prism under the lower rail beneath the sleeper is 33 cm.<br />
- Drainage <strong>of</strong> the body into cuttings and incisions is by drainage canals.<br />
102
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
3 Description <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />
The planned railway line <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> VIII passes through the western and southwestern parts<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. It extends through Municipalities Kicevo, Drugovo, Debrca<br />
and Struga.<br />
Figure 20 Municipalities through which the railway route passes<br />
3.1 Geomorphological characteristics<br />
3.1.1 Structural relief<br />
The territory through which the railway corridor Kicevo-Lin (<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) passes, in<br />
geostructural terms, belongs to Western Macedonian zone, which in Neogene (Quarternary<br />
period) was under the influence <strong>of</strong> the minimum horisontal component <strong>of</strong> tension towards<br />
east-northeast-west-southwest, and maximum component in vertical direction. This regime<br />
induced gravitational activity <strong>of</strong> fault dislocations, both as re-activation <strong>of</strong> Pre-Neotectonic<br />
(Drim zone) or as newly created forms. The activity <strong>of</strong> faults is directly related to the creation<br />
<strong>of</strong> morphostructural entireties because they correspond with their outlines. From among<br />
positive morphostructural entireties along the railway corridor, we should point out the Ilinski<br />
Block, a small portion <strong>of</strong> the furthest southern part <strong>of</strong> the block Jablanica and the furthest<br />
north-northwestern part <strong>of</strong> the block Galicica. Depressions (grabens) which are distinctive<br />
along the corridor, include: Kicevo, Belcista (Debrca) and Ohrid-Struga.<br />
103
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 21 Structural relief<br />
3.1.2 Structural blocks (mountains)<br />
Ilinski block, which extends in northwest-southeast direction in a length <strong>of</strong> around 40 km, is<br />
composed <strong>of</strong> the mountains Inlinska (Liska, 1909 m), Plakenska (Stalev Kamen, 1998 m)<br />
and Bigla (Golem Kamen, 1.656 m). The Block, as independent structural entirety, is on all<br />
sides marked by depth faults, i.e. Galicnik and Pelister blocks on southwest, Stogovo and<br />
Bistra on northwest and Shemnica and Ljuben block on east. Apart from the mentioned<br />
block structures, at certain stretches, it is also marked with imposed depressions, such as<br />
Kicevo on north, Prespa on south, Debrca on west-northwest and Capari depressions on<br />
southeast.<br />
Geological composition <strong>of</strong> Ilinski Block is dominated primarily by old formations. On Ilinska<br />
Planina Mt., these are Devonian phylitic shales, metasandstones and marbles. On<br />
Plakenska Planina Mt., Triassic conglomerates broken through with Jurassic granates are<br />
widely spread, while Paleozoic phylitic shales prevail. They also constitute the base <strong>of</strong><br />
Plakenska Planina Mt. As a result <strong>of</strong> this geological composition <strong>of</strong> Ilinska, Plakenska and<br />
Bigla Mts., fluviodenudation relief prevails, and at certain areas we also find karst relief,<br />
represented with crevices, depressions, as well as the caves Sino Rebro and Jaorec. In the<br />
cave Jaorec, fossil Pleistocene fauna has been investigated (Garevski, 1970).<br />
The Mountain Jablanica (Crn Kamen, 2.257 m) is situated on northwest <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Basin (on<br />
west from the Crn Drim river valley), between Ohrid and Debar basins. Its eastern parts<br />
belong to Macedonia, while western ones are situated in the neighbouring <strong>Albania</strong>, between<br />
the valleys <strong>of</strong> the river Skumbini and spring segments <strong>of</strong> the river Okstunit. The rectilinear<br />
length <strong>of</strong> the mountain in meridian direction is 45 km. Its width reaches 25 km (7.5 km in the<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia).<br />
The contact between the horst Jablanica and Ohrid Graben has been for long known in<br />
literature as Drim Zone. This fault northward dislocation, along the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Crn<br />
Drim, changes its direction insignificantly towards Debar Basin. Then, it continues the same<br />
direction in <strong>Albania</strong>. In southern, almost meridian direction, the fault dislocation goes by the<br />
eastern hill foot <strong>of</strong> Mokra Gora (Mukal, 1.622 m) towards Korca Valley. On the western side<br />
(territory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>), Jablanica Block is separated by the eastern rim <strong>of</strong> Shkumbija. In<br />
general terms, Jablanica is typically inverse geomorphological structure (horst - synclinal),<br />
which in the relief <strong>of</strong> this area is the most raised part. The area <strong>of</strong> the mountain Jablanica is<br />
104
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
cut into several blocks by vertical, mainly deep faults. Fault concentration is especially<br />
specific for the valley <strong>of</strong> Belicka Reka.<br />
The Mountain Galicica (Vir, 2.288 m) is by its height the dominant relief occurrence (horst)<br />
situated between Ohrid Lake basin on west and Prespa Lake on east. It has a gangly form <strong>of</strong><br />
meridian direction in a length <strong>of</strong> around 50 km, while its smallest width (village Trpejca -<br />
village Leskoec) reaches 10 km. On the mountain Galicica, only the furthest southern parts<br />
(Stara Galicica) raise 2.000 m above the sea level.<br />
According to its structural characteristics, Galicica is a typical (outstanding) horst which is<br />
raised by predominantly neotectonic inter-block faults. The maximum vertical movement in<br />
the western part <strong>of</strong> Galicica, i.e. between it and Ohrid Graben, is accomplished along a<br />
system <strong>of</strong> rugged faults. The eastern side <strong>of</strong> the horst Galicica is in tectonic contact with the<br />
Prespa Graben. Slightly wrinkled synclinal extends through the central part <strong>of</strong> Galicica. Due<br />
to the massive presence <strong>of</strong> limestones and intensive radial tectonics, by which the mountain<br />
is cut into several blocks, the wrinkles can not be noted. The synclinal structure, in its lowest<br />
parts, is built <strong>of</strong> Triassic conglomerates resting onto Paleozoic metamorphites, i.e. Devonian<br />
phylitic shales.<br />
3.1.3 Graben structures (depressions, basins)<br />
Creation <strong>of</strong> morphostructures <strong>of</strong> sinking is related to the process <strong>of</strong> overall rising, where<br />
under the influence <strong>of</strong> certain tension conditions, gravitation accommodation at certain areas<br />
takes place, resulting in creation <strong>of</strong> basin forms. Basins, i.e. depressions, as tectonic forms<br />
are imposed structures. In western parts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, they are<br />
characterized with a graben nature, which were (and some still are) lake basins in<br />
Plioquarternary period.<br />
Kicevo depression is relatively small neotectonic form, situated in an area dominated by<br />
rising processes. Along less expressed faults, the basin is affected by sinking and<br />
accumulation <strong>of</strong> plioquarternary sediments. The interactions <strong>of</strong> the depression with the<br />
surrounding terrains are reflected in old re-activated and young neotectonic fault<br />
dislocations. Kicevo Basin is filled in with medium and upper Pliocene sediments, covered<br />
over with quarternary deposits, and uncovered along rimmed parts <strong>of</strong> the basin. Pliocene<br />
sediments are unique lithological complex, with insignificant alternation <strong>of</strong> claystones, sands,<br />
gravels, marls, coal clays and coal.<br />
The Basin <strong>of</strong> Debrca belongs to the group <strong>of</strong> the smallest basins in the western parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia (368 km 2 ), situated between the mountains Stogovo on southeast,<br />
Karaorman on east and Ilinska Planina on west, and Plakenska Planina on northwest. The<br />
lowest bottom <strong>of</strong> the basin is near the village Botun, at 743 m above the sea level. Debrca is<br />
divided into three geographic parts, namely: Gorna, Sredna and Dolna (upper, middle and<br />
lower) Debrca. The river <strong>of</strong> Sateska occurs as water artery for the whole area <strong>of</strong> the basin,<br />
and its upper and middle watershed areas correspond fully with the boundary <strong>of</strong> the basin.<br />
Ohrid-Debar Graben is the most outstanding sinking morphostructure in the frames <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Western Macedonian zone. Formation <strong>of</strong> this graben structure is related to the end <strong>of</strong> lower<br />
and beginning <strong>of</strong> middle Pliocene, i.e. the period <strong>of</strong> commencement <strong>of</strong> the expansion<br />
orogene phase with manifestation <strong>of</strong> intensive differentiated vertical movements. As a result<br />
<strong>of</strong> these processes, the old fault structures are initially re-activated. Later, the process <strong>of</strong><br />
area sinking takes place along them, i.e. its transformation into the Pliocene lake basins<br />
Ohrid and Debar. The interactions with the surrounding, highly raised terrains, such as<br />
Deshat, Stogovo, Galicica and Jablanica, are everywhere tectonically and rather<br />
contradictory expressed, with maximum amplitudes <strong>of</strong> relocation bigger than 1.500 m.<br />
105
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Pliocene sediments in Ohrid Basin have been identified in the southern part (Ljubaniste), as<br />
well as in northwestern part, and they have been also detected by deep drilling in Struga<br />
Fields. Based on this, we may conclude that Pliocene sediments spread throughout<br />
peripheral parts <strong>of</strong> the basin, and they have not been observed in its central part.<br />
3.1.4 Recent relief along the railway corridor<br />
From the city Kicevo towards Drugovo, the corridor runs along abrasive terrace built <strong>of</strong><br />
Pliocene sediments (marls, clays, sands and gravel). Above the village Drugovo, it cuts<br />
several recent dales, while on west <strong>of</strong> it, along the left valley side <strong>of</strong> the river Treska, it<br />
passes through solid phylitoides <strong>of</strong> Devonian age. Then, it crosses the river valley and above<br />
the village Dolno Popolzani, the corridor continues southwards - furthest northeastern parts<br />
<strong>of</strong> Ilinska Planina Mt. (Liska, 1908 m), south <strong>of</strong> Veli Vrv (1.535 m). This part <strong>of</strong> the mountain<br />
Ilinska Planina is built <strong>of</strong> solid rocks, represented with Devonian phylitoides, carbonate<br />
shales and slab-like marbles. Along the left valley side <strong>of</strong> the river Brzdanska, to the village<br />
Brzdani, valleys <strong>of</strong> several short watercourses - right tributaries to Brzdanska Reka - are cut<br />
with several tunnels and surface sections. From the village Brzdani, the section proceeds<br />
westwards, along the left valley side <strong>of</strong> the river Judovska (right tributary to Brzdanska<br />
Reka), to the village Judovo. It is important that in this area, the section cuts through<br />
Devonian phylitoides and slab-like limestones. From Judovo to the village Slivovo, the<br />
section is in tunnel make. It passes along Debel Rid (1.252 m), on west <strong>of</strong> Golema Krasta<br />
(1.376 m), above the village Turje, i.e. between it and Mijalecka Krasta (1.298 m).<br />
Toponymes "krasta" themselves indicate that the relief in question is karstic built <strong>of</strong> slab-like<br />
Devonian marbles. As a result <strong>of</strong> the small oasis <strong>of</strong> karst, surface karstic forms (depressions,<br />
etc.) are not visible, but the possibility for revealing underground caverns (cavities) during<br />
the opening <strong>of</strong> the tunnel should not be excluded and this issue should be addressed with<br />
particular care. Apart from the opening <strong>of</strong> the tunnel segment through Devonian phylitoides<br />
and marbles, in the initial section immediately after Judovo, the tunnel section also breaks<br />
through Devonian magmatites-metamorphised rhyolites.<br />
Southeast <strong>of</strong> the village Slivovo, the route passes through the alluvium <strong>of</strong> the river Vilipica,<br />
by a tunnel breaks through the hill Opalnik (966 m, built <strong>of</strong> Triassic limestones) and reaches<br />
the river Sateska. Along the left bank <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, west <strong>of</strong> Arbinovo, it passes<br />
through the alluvial ravine and the river Sateska itself, and then on the left valley side<br />
towards south, it breaks through the small Arbinovo Gorge, which connects Gorna and<br />
Dolna Belica. In fact, it is an epigenetic valley, with the river Sateska cut into the harder<br />
Triassic conglomerates, sandstones and claystones, which compose the hills <strong>of</strong> Cartoica<br />
(1.007 m) and Arbinovski Rid (1.012 m), or it has not cut into the less resistent lake<br />
sediments on west <strong>of</strong> Cartoica. On west <strong>of</strong> Izdeglavje, on the right bank <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska,<br />
the section passes along the western edge <strong>of</strong> Sredna Debrca, along Pliocene clays and<br />
alluvium <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, while in its final segment before the entry into Pesocanska<br />
Klisura (gorge), it runs through Quarternary lake and marsh sediments.<br />
At the entry <strong>of</strong> the river Pesocanska into the river Sateska, the section runs through the<br />
small gorge Pesocanska Klisura. It is <strong>of</strong> asymmetrical nature, which means that the left<br />
valley side near the peak Kula (962 m) is much steeper than the right one. The gorge itself is<br />
built <strong>of</strong> solid Triassic slab-like limestones. It follows the right valley side <strong>of</strong> Sateska river<br />
towards south, to the village Botun, cutting its right tributary Kacunska Reka (929 m). Along<br />
the stretch between Gorica (811 m), on the left and Kuckov Rid (920 m) on the right side, the<br />
corridor is transferred on the left side <strong>of</strong> Sateska river. It passes through the alluvial ravine<br />
(754 m) and near the village Botun it enters into the Botun gorge by a tunnel. This gorge (6<br />
106
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
km) is the largest along the river course <strong>of</strong> Sateska river. Sateska cut through Devonian<br />
phylitoide shales and built up a deep gorge-like valley.<br />
On east <strong>of</strong> the village Klimestica, the section leaves the Botun gorge and goes along the<br />
alluvial ravine <strong>of</strong> Sateska river to the village Volino (708 m). From Volino westwards, it<br />
crosses Crn Drim (693 m) above Struga and continuing towards south-southwest, exits from<br />
the flat part <strong>of</strong> Struga fields. From this part, initially it runs through the alluvium <strong>of</strong> Sateska<br />
river, and then to Kalista through lake and marsh sediments. Furtheron, from Kalista to<br />
Radozda (furthest southeastern slopes <strong>of</strong> Jablanica) and then to the border, geological<br />
composition is represented with solid Triassic complex built <strong>of</strong> conglomerates, sandstones<br />
and claystones, as well as marbleized Devonian limestones near Radozda and phylitic<br />
shales <strong>of</strong> the same origin. Leaving the valley on west <strong>of</strong> Frangovo, the section exits above<br />
the village Radozda, southwards by way <strong>of</strong> tunnel through Krasta. After that, the route<br />
proceeds southwards up to the border, cutting through several dales above the Lake <strong>of</strong><br />
Ohrid.<br />
3.2 Climate conditions in the area<br />
To present the climate along the railway corridorKicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Albania</strong>), climate conditions in Kicevo Basin as starting point <strong>of</strong> the corridor are described, as<br />
well as climate conditions in Ohrid-Sruga Basin (the closing part <strong>of</strong> the corridor). It should be<br />
pointed out that climate indicators <strong>of</strong> the basin Debrca (743 m) do not differ from Ohrid-<br />
Sruga Basin (695 - 769 m), i.e. they are closer to them than the ones <strong>of</strong> the Kicevo Basin<br />
(620 m).<br />
Figure 22 Climate map <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />
107
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
3.2.1 Climate characteristics <strong>of</strong> Kicevo Basin<br />
Kicevo Basin (620 m) is by 50 meters lower in altitude compared to Prilepsko Pole (673 m),<br />
but in warm parts <strong>of</strong> the year, it manifests significantly lower values <strong>of</strong> average monthly<br />
temperatures. For example, the difference in August is 1.3°C. The average monthly<br />
temperatures in this warmer part <strong>of</strong> the year are approximately the same as in Ohrid-Struga<br />
Basin. During the rest <strong>of</strong> the year, temperatures are normal and adequate for the altitude.<br />
In fact, the basin <strong>of</strong> Kicevo is relatively high but deeply cut into afforested mountain massifs<br />
and local air currents occur due to unequal conditions for air colling and heating in this basin<br />
and surrounding high mountain massifs. Such local circulation and mixing <strong>of</strong> hot and cold air<br />
is mostly manifested during the warm part <strong>of</strong> the year, especially during summer months.<br />
This explains the lower temperature values in this part <strong>of</strong> the year. In other words, the forests<br />
nearby the basin appear as climate modifier with certain influence on temperature regime.<br />
3.2.1.1 Temperature<br />
The average annual temperature <strong>of</strong> the air in Kicevo Basin is 10.8°C, though it varies in<br />
some years from 10.1 to 11.8°C. July is the warmest month with 20.6°C, i.e. it is colder by<br />
1°C in the same month compered to Prilepsko Pole (northern part Pelagonia Basin). January<br />
is the coldest with -0.1°C, which is almost equal in value with Prilepsko Pole. The average<br />
annual temperature oscillation is 20.7°C.<br />
Autumn in Kicevo Basin is warmer than spring, i.e. September is warmer than May, October<br />
than April and November than March. Also, the inter-month difference in the air<br />
temperatures during autumn months is bigger, and slightly smaller in spring months. This<br />
makes transition from winter to summer calmer. The average winter temperature is 1.5°C, or<br />
only the average January temperature is below zero, while February for example (2.4°C) is<br />
warmer than December (2.1°C). The average summer temperature is 19.8°C. In this period<br />
<strong>of</strong> the year, July (20.6°C) is warmer than August (20.3°C).<br />
The well expressed continental nature <strong>of</strong> Kicevo Basin has a strong influence on extreme<br />
minimum temperatures during the cold part <strong>of</strong> the year. The absolute minimum temperature<br />
is -25.7°C,recorded on 9 February 1956. The absolute minimum temperature could be even<br />
lower, because there were no measurements in January and February 1954, while winter in<br />
that specific year was among the coldest. By months, the minimum temperatures are below<br />
zero between September and May. Temperature values below -10°C occur between<br />
November and March, and below -20°C only during the three winter months. High afforested<br />
mountains and their proximity to the basin have certain influence on the values <strong>of</strong> extreme<br />
maximum temperatures. The absolute maximum temperature in this basin is 40.5°C. By<br />
months, values above 35°C occur between June and September, while value above 30°C<br />
occurs from may to October. Values above 25°C occur from April to October. At an average,<br />
there is total <strong>of</strong> 98 summer and 33 tropical days in Kicevo Basin.<br />
3.2.1.2 Precipitation<br />
Precipitations in Kicevo Basin are mostly <strong>of</strong> rain and smaller portion <strong>of</strong> snow. The total<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> precipitation in Kicevo Basin is higher compared to Pelagonia and Ohrid-Struga<br />
Basins. Precipitation distribution belongs to Mediterranean pluviometric regime, i.e. greater<br />
amounts fall during the cold part <strong>of</strong> the year. This is especially well expressed during<br />
November and the three winter months. The least precipitation falls during summer months.<br />
The average annual precipitation sum in Kicevo Basin is 786.7 mm, with the maximum in<br />
November (107.1 mm), and minimum in July (36.2 mm).<br />
The snow occurs between October and April. At an average, there are 37 days with snow<br />
cover per year. However, this varies in certain years, ranging from 10 to 93 days. The<br />
108
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
absolute maximum height <strong>of</strong> snow cover <strong>of</strong> 95 cm in February and 77 cm in March was<br />
recorded in 1954. In December 1973, the height was measured at 70 cm, and 65 cm in<br />
January 1965. The longest uninterrupted duration <strong>of</strong> the snow cover was 90 days, from 20<br />
December 1953 to 19 March 1954. Duration <strong>of</strong> the snow cover <strong>of</strong> 58 days was recorded<br />
from 31 January to 28 March 1956, and 56 days from 15 January to 11 March 1963.<br />
Figure 23 Average precipitation<br />
3.2.1.3 Winds<br />
Kicevo Basin is dominated by winds with winds in north and south direction. Northern wind<br />
occurs with greatest frequency, with an annual average <strong>of</strong> 161 ‰. It blows throughout the<br />
year, but most frequently during winter months. Its average annual velocity is 2 m/s, and<br />
maximum up to 19.0 m/s. Southern wind is <strong>of</strong> average annual frequency <strong>of</strong> 140 ‰ (average<br />
annual velocity <strong>of</strong> 2.2 m/s / maximum 15.5 m/s). Southwestern wind also has significant<br />
frequency (63 ‰) with an average velocity <strong>of</strong> 2.4 m/s and maximum <strong>of</strong> 18.9 m/s.<br />
Northwestern wind has a frequency <strong>of</strong> 51 ‰, average velocity <strong>of</strong> 2.9 m/s and maximum <strong>of</strong><br />
15.5 m/s. Winds <strong>of</strong> eastern, southeastern and western direction have frequency <strong>of</strong> 20 to 39<br />
m/s, average annual velocity <strong>of</strong> 1.8 m/s and maximum <strong>of</strong> 15.0 m/s. Kicevo Basin is medium<br />
aerated. At an average, there are 405 ‰ annually with stillness, with maximum in October<br />
(477 ‰), and minimum in April and May with 344 ‰.<br />
3.2.1.4 Other climate elements<br />
The average date <strong>of</strong> autumn frost in Kicevo Basin is 31 October, and the earliest autumn<br />
frost occurs on 30 September. The average date <strong>of</strong> spring frost is 8 April, and the latest<br />
spring frost occurs on 10 May. The autumn frost occurs most <strong>of</strong>ten in November (44 %),<br />
then in October (36 %) and September (20 %). November frost is in 28 % <strong>of</strong> the cases with<br />
weak, 12 % with moderate and 4 % with strong intensity. Autumn frost in October is 24 %<br />
weaker and 12 % moderate in intensity, while September is 16 % with weak and 4 % with<br />
moderate intensity. Spring frost has greatest frequency in April (68 %), then in March (24 %)<br />
and in May with 8 %. In April, in 64 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, it is weak and in 4 % moderate in<br />
109
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
intensity. Spring frost occurring in March in 12 % is weak and in 12 % moderate in intensity.<br />
The May frost is <strong>of</strong> weak intensity.<br />
Duration <strong>of</strong> solar radiation in Kicevo Basin is presented on the basis <strong>of</strong> calculation <strong>of</strong> data<br />
on cloudness. Kicevo Basin has a lower sum <strong>of</strong> solar radiation hours compared to Pelagonia<br />
and Ohrid Basins. Here, the average annual is 2064 hours. The maximum is in July, with an<br />
average <strong>of</strong> 300 hours, while the minimum is in December with 85 hours solar radiation at an<br />
average. The average annual cloudiness in Kicevo Basin is 5.5 tenths. Maximum is in<br />
December and January with 7.8 tenths, while the minimum is in August with 3.2 tenths. At an<br />
average, there are 79 clear and 119 cloudy days per year. The 160 cloudy days are with an<br />
average daily cloudiness above 2, and below 8 tenths.<br />
The relative air humidity in Kicevo Basin has opposite trend from the temperature <strong>of</strong> the air.<br />
From January to July it drops, and then by December it increases. The average annual value<br />
is 74 %, with the maximum in January (87 %), and minimum in July (63 %). The fog is not a<br />
rare occurrence in this basin. At an average, there are 33 days with fog per year, but in<br />
some years this value reaches as high as 80 days. The fog occurs throughout the year, with<br />
the greatest frequency during the three winter months, and lower frequency in September,<br />
October and March.<br />
3.2.2 Climate characteristics <strong>of</strong> Ohrid-Struga Basin<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> Ohrid-Struga Basin is under water (Ohrid Lake / 348,8 km 2 ). It is positioned at the<br />
same latitude as Pelagonia, but at higher altitude, the average ranging from 695 to 760 m.<br />
Its distance from Adriatic Sea is around 110 km. This enables permeation <strong>of</strong> sea currents in<br />
the Basin from west, but it is under influence <strong>of</strong> the lake, which is also reflected in higher<br />
temperatures during winter period <strong>of</strong> the year and somewhat reduced during summer<br />
months. Thus, for example, in Pelagonia, which is positioned at around 200 meters lower<br />
above the sea level, January and December temperatures are by 2°C, and February by<br />
0.7°C lower than in Ohrid Basin. The average July temperature is by 1°C, and August by<br />
0.9°C higher in Pelagonia (Bitola) than in Ohrid.<br />
Due to the openness <strong>of</strong> Ohrid-Struga Basin through the valley <strong>of</strong> Drim towards north, cold air<br />
masses permeate in winter months, reducing the air temperature, while during the dummer<br />
period, there is permeation <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean influences.<br />
110
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 24 Climate diagram Ohrid and Struga<br />
3.2.2.1 Temperatures<br />
The average annual temperature in Ohrid is 11.2°C, and 10.9°C in Struga. The average<br />
January temperature in Ohrid has a value <strong>of</strong> 1.7°C, and in Struga 1.1°C; the average<br />
February temperature in Ohrid is 3.1°C, and in Struga 2.5°C; and the average December<br />
temperature in Ohrid is 3.8°C, and in Struga 3.1°C. However, during summer months, the<br />
difference in air temperature between Ohrid and Struga is quite low. In July, Ohrid is only by<br />
0.2°C, and in August only by 0.1°C warmer than Struga.<br />
The absolute minimum temperature in Struga is -20°C, and in Ohrid -17.2°C, while absolute<br />
maximum temperatures are <strong>of</strong> almost the same value <strong>of</strong> 36.5°C. The influence <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake<br />
in the basin is manifested through reduction <strong>of</strong> annual temperature oscillations. Thus, the<br />
annual temperature oscillations in Ohrid are 19.1°C, and in Struga 19.5°C. In Pelagonia,<br />
they are 22.1°C. The absolute oscillation in Ohrid has a value <strong>of</strong> 53.8°C, and in Struga<br />
56.5°C, while in Pelagonia it is 68.4°C.<br />
Autumn and spring are slightly warmer in Ohrid than in Struga. In Ohrid, the average autumn<br />
temperature is 12.1°C, in Struga it is 11.5°C. Summer in Ohrid has a temperature <strong>of</strong> 9.9°C,<br />
and in 9.0°C. In the entire Ohrid-Struga Basin, the autumn is significantly warmer than<br />
spring, in Ohrid by 2.2°C, and in Struga by 2.5°C. Inter-month temperature difference in<br />
spring and autumn months is <strong>of</strong> low value. Therefore, transition from winter to summer and<br />
vice verse in this basin is not abrupt, and this makes spring and autumn as transitional<br />
seasons in thermal regards well expressed.<br />
Apart from the thermal influence <strong>of</strong> the Lake on the temperature <strong>of</strong> the air, minimum air<br />
temperatures in winter drom far beyond 0°C. The absolute minimum temperature in Ohrid is<br />
-17.2°C, then 16.6°C recorded on 14 January 1968, etc. In Struga, absolute minimum<br />
temperature is -20.0°C, recorded on 20 January 1963, then -19.0°C on 22 December 1967,<br />
etc. In Ohrid, annual absolute minimum temperature with a value below -15°C may be<br />
111
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
expected once in 8 years, with a value below -10°C may be expected once in two years,<br />
while values lower than -8°C occur every year. By months, the absolute minimum<br />
temperature with a value lower than -15°C occurs in January, February and March, with a<br />
value lower than -10°C from December to March, and values below zero from October to<br />
May. In Struga, absolute minimum temperature with value lower than -15°C may be<br />
expected once in 4-5 years, and value below -10°C may be expected once in a year or two.<br />
By months, value below -15°C occurs from December to March, and values below zero<br />
occur from October to May.<br />
Ohrid Lake, as thermal regulator <strong>of</strong> the surrounding air manifests the influence through<br />
reduction in the air temperature, too. This is reflected in the warm part <strong>of</strong> the year, especially<br />
during summer months when great quantity <strong>of</strong> warmth is spent to warm the lake waters and<br />
in evaporation. Yet, the warming influence <strong>of</strong> the Lake during winter months is more<br />
expressed and it is significant climate modifier during this season. During summer months,<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> air temperature is under the influence <strong>of</strong> the basin altitude as well.<br />
The absolute maximum temperature in in Ohrid Basin is 36.7°C, while in Pelagonia it is<br />
41.5°C, in Polog basin 40.0°C, etc. Value higher than 35°C has been recorded only twice,<br />
and value higher than 30°C occurs every year. By months, values higher than 30°C occur<br />
between May and September, and value above 25°C occurs from March to October. At an<br />
average, there are 73 summer, and only 11 tropical days (in Pelagonia, 98 summer and 36<br />
tropical days). As a result <strong>of</strong> the high altitude <strong>of</strong> the Basin, proximity <strong>of</strong> the high mountains<br />
Galicica and Jablanica and local air currents, in summer months nights are fresh, while daily<br />
relatively high temperatures are easy to bear.<br />
3.2.2.2 Precipitation<br />
Precipitations in Ohrid-Struga basin are predetermined by the Mediterranean pluviometric<br />
regime. Most <strong>of</strong> the annual precipitations fall in the cold part <strong>of</strong> the year, with the maximum<br />
in late autumn, and lower in warm part <strong>of</strong> the year with the minimum in summer months. The<br />
average annual sum <strong>of</strong> precipitation in the Ohrid area amounts 708.3 mm, while in Struga<br />
fields it is 810.9 mm. In certain years, the annual sum deviates from the average in wide<br />
ranges, from 339.6 to 1075.6 mm Ohrid area and from 517.9 to 1064.7 mm in Struga fields.<br />
Precipitations are rather unevenly distributed in the course <strong>of</strong> the year. In Ohrid, greatest<br />
precipitation is recorded in November (98.4 mm), then December and January with 78.9<br />
mm, and 76.4 mm, respectively, and least rainy are July (23.2 mm) and August with 29.1<br />
mm. In Struga, the most rainly is also November, but with bigger amount compared to Ohrid,<br />
i.e. 108.7 mm at an average. December and January are with 98.0 and 96.6 mm,<br />
respectively. The least rainy is July, with 24.0 and August with 29.6 mm, at an average.<br />
By seasons, distribution <strong>of</strong> precipitations in Struga fields and Ohrid is the same, only the<br />
seasonal sums in Struga area are somewhat higher and difference between winter and<br />
autumn precipitations is slightly bigger. In the total average annual number <strong>of</strong> rainy days in<br />
Ohrid Basin, 61 % are days with daily quantity equal to or bigger than 1.0 mm, 36 % are<br />
days with daily quantity equal to or bigger than 5.0 mm, 18 % are days with daily quantity<br />
equal to or bigger than 10.0 mm and 5 % are days with daily quantity equal to or bigger than<br />
20.0 mm. Accordingly, precipitations in this basin are distributed to rainy days with daily<br />
quantity <strong>of</strong> 1.0 to 5.0 mm (3.5 %), then from 0.1 to 1.0 mm (29 %), from 5.0 to 10.0 (18 %),<br />
from 10.0 to 20.0 (13 %) and daily quantity above 20.0 mm in only 5 %.<br />
Precipitations in Ohrid Basin consist mainly <strong>of</strong> rain, and very small amount <strong>of</strong> snow. Snow<br />
occurs every year (winter months), but the snow cover has short duration. Snow falls from<br />
November to April and there are 19 days under snow cover per year, at an average, though<br />
in some years this sum is in the range from 5 to 43 days. The maximum height <strong>of</strong> snow<br />
112
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
cover is 64 cm, measured on 14 January 1963, followed by 54 cm on 25 February 1965, etc.<br />
The longest period under uninterrupted snow cover was 29 days, from 15 January to 12<br />
February 1963. Then, 22 days from 28 January to 18 February in 1956 and from 9 February<br />
to 2 March 1965.<br />
3.2.2.3 Winds<br />
Ohrid Basin is characterized with specific regime <strong>of</strong> winds. Apart from winds occurring as a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> the general atmospheric changes, winds <strong>of</strong> local nature occur there as well, due to<br />
the uneven warming <strong>of</strong> the air above land and above lake surface. Winds in Ohrid Basin<br />
have their local names, too, given either by the direction <strong>of</strong> blowing or by Ohrid fishermen.<br />
These local winds have influence on the general distribution and frequency <strong>of</strong> wind direction<br />
in the basin. Thus, according to the measurements <strong>of</strong> the Ohrid measuring point, northern<br />
wind prevails in this area, followed by southwestern and southern winds. According to the<br />
measurements in Struga, the wind from south is prevalent, followed by those from north and<br />
northeast.<br />
In Ohrid, dominant wind is the northern, with an average annual frequency <strong>of</strong> 297 ‰,<br />
average annual velocity <strong>of</strong> 2.4, and maximum<strong>of</strong> 12.3 m/s. Northern wind blows throughout<br />
the year, mostly during night hours, while its frequence is lower in afternoon hours.<br />
Southwestern and southern winds are almost with the same frequency with 179 and 176 ‰,<br />
respectively, with an annual average velocity <strong>of</strong> 2.9 and maximum <strong>of</strong> 18.9 m/s. They blow<br />
throughout the year, with the greatest frequency from April to June. They blow over day time<br />
till late evening hours. Northwestern wind has frequency <strong>of</strong> 73 ‰, average annual velocity <strong>of</strong><br />
1.8 m/s and maximum velocity <strong>of</strong> 15.5 m/s. Northeastern wind has frequency <strong>of</strong> 43 ‰,<br />
average annual velocity <strong>of</strong> 2.5 m/s and maximum velocity <strong>of</strong> 12.3 m/s. Eastern and<br />
southeastern winds are <strong>of</strong> the same frequency <strong>of</strong> 23 ‰, average velocity <strong>of</strong> 3.1 m/s and<br />
maximum <strong>of</strong> 18.9 m/s.<br />
Among local winds, Strmec which blows in summer months from west and southwest to the<br />
lake, is specific. It starts in afternoon hours, and stops somewhere before midnight. The wind<br />
Veternik blows from the lake surface on west to Jablanica and on east to Galicica. It starts in<br />
morning and ends in afternoon hours. The wind Smeten starts somewhere around the village<br />
Trpejca towards Pestani and turns westwards towards the lake expanse. In winter, the wind<br />
Sever blows from north, from Struga towards S.Naum. The wind Belicnik blows from Galicica<br />
towards Pestani and <strong>Albania</strong>n mountains. The wind Stocen blows down from Galicica,<br />
village Trpejca towards St. Naum and from the village <strong>of</strong> Pestani towards the village Lion on<br />
the <strong>Albania</strong>n western shore. In spring months, the winter Nokjnik blows from western and<br />
eastern mountain massifs towards lake expanse. It starts after the sunset and starts<br />
somewhere in dawns. The wind Jug starts around 13 hours and stops after midnight.<br />
Ohrid Basin is rather windy. Out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> measured cases, 862 ‰ are with<br />
wind from different directions, and only 138 ‰ are without wind, i.e. with stillness.<br />
September and October are notably windy, with an average frequency <strong>of</strong> stilness <strong>of</strong> 99 and<br />
81 ‰, respectively and May is with greatest frequency <strong>of</strong> stillness, with 215 ‰ at an<br />
average.<br />
113
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
300<br />
N<br />
NW<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
NE<br />
W<br />
0<br />
E<br />
SW<br />
SE<br />
Figure 25 Rose <strong>of</strong> winds in Ohrid<br />
3.2.2.4 Other climate elements<br />
S<br />
According to the data <strong>of</strong> the measuring point in Ohrid, the average date <strong>of</strong> autumn frost is<br />
31 November, and the average date <strong>of</strong> spring frost is 6 April, i.e. the average period <strong>of</strong> frost<br />
is 143 days. The early date <strong>of</strong> autumn frost is 5 October, and the latest spring frost occurs on<br />
18 May. However, the real average annual number <strong>of</strong> frost days in Ohrid is 61 days, while in<br />
Prilepsko Pole it is 77, and in Polog Basin, for example, the number <strong>of</strong> frost days is 89.<br />
The first autumn frost occurs most <strong>of</strong>ten in November (64 %), then in October (24 %) and<br />
December (12 %). November frost is in 40 % <strong>of</strong> the cases with weak, 20 % with moderate<br />
and 4 % with strong intensity. The frost occurring in October is 20 % with weak and 4 %<br />
moderate in intensity. The earliest frost occurring in December is with moderate intensity.<br />
The latest date <strong>of</strong> spring frost most <strong>of</strong>ten occurs in April (64 %), then in March with 32 %.<br />
The frost in April is in 40 % <strong>of</strong> the cases with weak, in 20 % with moderate and 4 % with<br />
strong intensity. The spring frost in March is with weak intensity, and the one recorded in<br />
May is also with weak intensity. In Struga fields, the extreme frost period is <strong>of</strong> the same<br />
duration as the one in Ohrid area, but the average frost period is by few days longer.<br />
The frequency <strong>of</strong> draught in Ohrid Basin is approximately as in Gevgelia, but lower than in<br />
the area <strong>of</strong> Southern Povardarie - areas positioned at similar latitude as Ohrid Basin. Among<br />
the total recorded dry periods, 84 % are <strong>of</strong> duration between 10 and 20 days, 6 % with a<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> 20-30 days, 4 % last between 30-40 days and 7 % are longer than 40 days. By<br />
seasons, they occur most frequently during summer months (37 %), then in autumn (28 %)<br />
and the least in spring (19 %) and winter months with 17 %. Extremely long dry periods, with<br />
a duration exceeding 80 days, as recorded in 1956, 1961, 1965 and 1969 in the areas <strong>of</strong> the<br />
114
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
eastern parts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, have not been reflected in Ohrid area. Here, the<br />
longest dry period was 61 days, from 26 June to 20 August in 1956, then for 57 days, from<br />
16 July to 10 September in 1954, etc.<br />
Ohrid Basin is characterized with long lasting solar radiation. The average annual solar<br />
radiation is 2233 hours or 6 hours per day at an average, with the maximum in July (308<br />
hours), or 10 hours per day at an average in this month. The minimum is in January (80<br />
hours), or 3 hours per day at an average. The average annual cloudness is 5.2 tenths and<br />
has regular annual trend. It declines regularly from January to July, and then increases<br />
regularly by December. With a value above 6 tenth, the average monthly cloudiness occurs<br />
between November and April. The most cloudy are the three winter months, and the least<br />
cloudness occurs in July, with an average <strong>of</strong> 2,8 tenths. Out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> days in a<br />
year, 24 % are clear, 27 % are stormy, and 49 % are cloudy. Clear days are most frequent in<br />
July, August and September, and stormy days are the most frequent between November<br />
and March. The relative air humidity has opposite trend from the temperature <strong>of</strong> the air.<br />
From January to July it drops, and then it increases. The average annual value is 71 %, with<br />
the maximum in December and January (79 %), and minimum in July and August (60 %).<br />
Evaporation from the free water surface in Ohrid Basin is greater than precipitations. At an<br />
average, the annual evaporation is 836 l/m 2 , and the annual sum <strong>of</strong> precipitation is 708 l/m 2 .<br />
The greatest evaporation takes place in August (137), then in July (132), and the smallest in<br />
January with 27 l/m 2 . The fog is a rare occurrence in Ohrid Basin. At an average, there are 5<br />
days with fog per year, mostly during the three winter monthsAccording to the data <strong>of</strong> the<br />
measuring point in Ohrid, the average date <strong>of</strong> autumn frost is 31 November, and the<br />
average date <strong>of</strong> spring frost is 6 April, i.e. the average period <strong>of</strong> frost is 143 days. The early<br />
date <strong>of</strong> autumn frost is 5 October, and the latest spring frost occurs on 18 May. However, the<br />
real average annual number <strong>of</strong> frost days in Ohrid is 61 days, while in Prilepsko Pole it is 77,<br />
and in Polog Basin, for example, the number <strong>of</strong> frost days is 89.<br />
The first autumn frost occurs most <strong>of</strong>ten in November (64 %), then in October (24 %) and<br />
December (12 %). November frost is in 40 % <strong>of</strong> the cases with weak, 20 % with moderate<br />
and 4 % with strong intensity. The frost occurring in October is 20 % with weak and 4 %<br />
moderate in intensity. The earliest frost occurring in December is with moderate intensity.<br />
The latest date <strong>of</strong> spring frost most <strong>of</strong>ten occurs in April (64 %), then in March with 32 %.<br />
The frost in April is in 40 % <strong>of</strong> the cases with weak, in 20 % with moderate and 4 % with<br />
strong intensity. The spring frost in March is with weak intensity, and the one recorded in<br />
May is also with weak intensity. In Struga fields, the extreme frost period is <strong>of</strong> the same<br />
duration as the one in Ohrid area, but the average frost period is by few days longer.<br />
The frequency <strong>of</strong> draught in Ohrid Basin is approximately as in Gevgelia, but lower than in<br />
the area <strong>of</strong> Southern Povardarie - areas positioned at similar latitude as Ohrid Basin. Among<br />
the total recorded dry periods, 84 % are <strong>of</strong> duration between 10 and 20 days, 6 % with a<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> 20-30 days, 4 % last between 30-40 days and 7 % are longer than 40 days. By<br />
seasons, they occur most frequently during summer months (37 %), then in autumn (28 %)<br />
and the least in spring (19 %) and winter months with 17 %. Extremely long dry periods, with<br />
a duration exceeding 80 days, as recorded in 1956, 1961, 1965 and 1969 in the areas <strong>of</strong> the<br />
eastern parts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, have not been reflected in Ohrid area. Here, the<br />
longest dry period was 61 days, from 26 June to 20 August in 1956, then for 57 days, from<br />
16 July to 10 September in 1954, etc.<br />
Ohrid Basin is characterized with long lasting solar radiation. The average annual solar<br />
radiation is 2233 hours or 6 hours per day at an average, with the maximum in July (308<br />
hours), or 10 hours per day at an average in this month. The minimum is in January (80<br />
hours), or 3 hours per day at an average. The average annual cloudness is 5.2 tenths and<br />
115
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
has regular annual trend. It declines regularly from January to July, and then increases<br />
regularly by December. With a value above 6 tenth, the average monthly cloudiness occurs<br />
between November and April. The most cloudy are the three winter months, and the least<br />
cloudness occurs in July, with an average <strong>of</strong> 2.8 tenths. Out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> days in a<br />
year, 24 % are clear, 27 % are stormy, 49 % are cloudy. Clear days are most frequent in<br />
July, August and September, and stormy days are the most frequent between November<br />
and March. The relative air humidity has opposite trend from the temperature <strong>of</strong> the air.<br />
From January to July it drops, and then it increases. The average annual value is 71 %, with<br />
the maximum in December and January (79 %), and minimum in July and August (60 %).<br />
Evaporation from the free water surface in Ohrid Basin is greater than precipitations. At an<br />
average, the annual evaporation is 836 l/m 2 , and the annual sum <strong>of</strong> precipitation is 708 l/m 2 .<br />
The greatest evaporation takes place in August (137), then in July (132), and the smallest in<br />
January with 27 l/m 2 . The fog is a rare occurrence in Ohrid Basin. At an average, there are 5<br />
days with fog per year, mostly during the three winter months.<br />
3.3 Geology <strong>of</strong> the railway line area<br />
The wider area <strong>of</strong> the route <strong>of</strong> the line, starting from the railway station Kicevo<br />
(station 102km+000, to station 128km+850), with a length <strong>of</strong> approximately 29<br />
kilometers, belongs to the sheet <strong>of</strong> Kicevo in the Basic Geological Map, scale<br />
1:100.000. Within this sheet (from oldest to youngest), the following geological<br />
(lithological) units have been identified:<br />
1. Paleozoic metamorphites and magmatc rocks (Devonian). The overall thickness <strong>of</strong><br />
these formations ranges between 2000 and 3000 m:<br />
FD–Phylitoides - the most frequently represented lithological unit, built mostly <strong>of</strong><br />
phylites, but also argilophylites, argiloschists, sandstones, sericite-quartz shales, etc.<br />
These rocks <strong>of</strong>ten alternate and transfer from one into others both horisontally and<br />
vertically. They are found in the areas <strong>of</strong> the villages Drugovo, Popolzani, Brzdani,<br />
Judovo and Slivovo;<br />
QD–Quartzites-recorded as minor, isolated masses NE <strong>of</strong> the village Drugovo. These<br />
are massive and riverbank rocks, mainly built <strong>of</strong> quartz grains, with ingredients <strong>of</strong><br />
sericite, muscovite, chlorite, circone, turmaline and magnetite;<br />
MmD–Carbonate shales - recorded as minor or major masses into phylitoides, at<br />
sites in the areas <strong>of</strong> the villages Drugovo, Brzdani and Judovo. Their structure<br />
includes calcite-chlorite grains, and they also occur as quartz, feldspath and biotite;<br />
MD–Marble plates - recorded on Ilinska Planina Mt., built exclusively <strong>of</strong> calcite;<br />
Metamorphosed rhyolites - recorded near the village Judovo. This is isolated rock<br />
mass, which has broken through phylitoide formation. The original massiveness has<br />
been almost entirely lost and it has gained shale like texture, its structure being<br />
prophiric to blastoprophiric;<br />
2. Complex <strong>of</strong> mesosoic sediments. It is represented by Triasic, Jurasic and Upper<br />
Chalk sediments, as well as magmatic rocks, represented in turn by diabases:<br />
Т 2,3 –Cpnglomerates and sandstones - occur in the basal part <strong>of</strong> Triassic sediments,<br />
which transgressively press on Paleosoic shales. They are recorded on SW <strong>of</strong> the<br />
village Arbinovo (hill Cartoica);<br />
116
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Т 2,3 –Claystones and horn shales - they occur in rather big amounts on the floor <strong>of</strong><br />
limestone masses, and lie transgressively onto Paleosoic shales. They have been<br />
recorded between villages Turje-Slivovo and near Arbinovo;<br />
Т 2,3 –Massive and riverbank limestones - represented on west <strong>of</strong> the village Arbinovo.<br />
They are rather cracked on the surface and affected by intense tectonics and<br />
carstification;<br />
- Diabases - together with gabbros, they relate to Jurassic magmatism. They occur<br />
near the village Slivovo and SW <strong>of</strong> the village Arbinovo, in a form <strong>of</strong> breakouts into<br />
Triassic sediments. It is characterized with dark greenish colour, they are solid and<br />
compact. Their structure is ophitic, subophitic and dolerite. They are composed<br />
mainly <strong>of</strong> plagioclasses, and we also find albite and chlorite as secondary minerals.<br />
3. Tertiary and Quarternay sediments<br />
Pl 2,3 –Pliocene - it is developed in the rim part <strong>of</strong> Kicevo gorge and in the basin <strong>of</strong><br />
Debrca. In Kicevo gorge, these sediments are made <strong>of</strong> gravel and sand sediments,<br />
which in deeper strata pass into poorly coherent clayey sands and clays. They lie<br />
transgressively over Paleosoic shales and their estimated power is up to 250 m. In<br />
the basin <strong>of</strong> Debrca, these sediments are represented with sands and clays, while<br />
gravels occur in the uppermost layers, as closing terrace <strong>of</strong> the former lake which ran<br />
<strong>of</strong>f into Ohrid basin through the river Sateska. The thickness <strong>of</strong> these sediments in<br />
the basin <strong>of</strong> Debrca reaches around 140 m;<br />
pr–Proluvial Quarternary sediments - recorded at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the route, near the<br />
railway station Kicevo. They are represented with coarse clastic material, unclassified<br />
and poorly processed. They are made <strong>of</strong> sandy clays, gravels, quartz particles and<br />
blocks, shales, clcareous and other rocks building up the surrounding slopes;<br />
b–Organogenic-marsh sediments - recorded on a minor area before the entry <strong>of</strong> the<br />
river Sateska into the gorge, SW <strong>of</strong> the village Arbinovo. These are occasionally<br />
flooded areas, where clays with high proportion <strong>of</strong> organic matter (peat) have been<br />
identified. The capacity <strong>of</strong> these sediments has been estimated to be 2-5 m;<br />
al–Alluvial sediments - developed along river valleys <strong>of</strong> Treska and Sateska. They<br />
are represented with coarse clastic material, composed <strong>of</strong> sandy clays, sands,<br />
gravels and rounded forms <strong>of</strong> the surrounding rocks. By way <strong>of</strong> drilling, the thickness<br />
<strong>of</strong> these sediments was estimated at 30-50 m.<br />
The area <strong>of</strong> the route <strong>of</strong> the line (from the station 128km+850 to the end <strong>of</strong> the line route –<br />
the border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, station 170km+000), with a length <strong>of</strong> approximately<br />
42 km, belongs to the sheet <strong>of</strong> Ohrid in the Basic Geological Map, scale 1:100.000. Within<br />
this sheet (from oldest to youngest), the following geological (lithological) units have been<br />
identified:<br />
1. Paleozoic metamorphites and magmatc rocks (Devonian). The overall thickness <strong>of</strong><br />
these formations reaches around 2000m:<br />
Sqse Phylitic shales - represented along the gorge <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska (extension<br />
from the village Botun to the village Klimatsani), and also found near the village<br />
Radolista. By their mineralogical composition, these rocks incorporate: quartzsericite-clayey<br />
shales, quartz-sericite and quartz-sericite-graphitic shales;<br />
Sq–Metasandstones - occur as thin ribs or in bigger masses alternate horisontally or<br />
vertically with the above described phytic shales. They are found near the villages<br />
Klimestani and Trebeniste, as well as south <strong>of</strong> the village Radolista. They are<br />
117
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
composed mostly <strong>of</strong> quartz, and less <strong>of</strong>ten sericite, feldsphath, calcite, titanite,<br />
circone, granate and turmaline. Graphitic-bituminous matter occurs locally, attributing<br />
dark colour to the rock;<br />
M–Marblized limestones - recorded on the south <strong>of</strong> the village Kaliste and near the<br />
village Radozda in a form <strong>of</strong> isolated minor masses. In their lower parts, these<br />
limestones are slab-like, and massive in the upper ones. The intensity <strong>of</strong> marblization<br />
declines as we go to higher horizons.<br />
2. Complex <strong>of</strong> Mesozoic sediments. It is represented by Triassic, Jurassic and Upper<br />
Chalk sediments:<br />
Т 2 1 –Conglomerates - occur in basal part <strong>of</strong> Triassic sediments, and rarely as intraserial<br />
into claystones. They have been recorded S <strong>of</strong> the village Kalista and W <strong>of</strong> the<br />
village Radozda. They are poorly stratified, with specific good roundness <strong>of</strong> stones,<br />
and rather solid; they are built <strong>of</strong> quartz, quartzites, phylitic shales, orthoclass grains,<br />
microclyn and plagioclas. Limonite and sericite-alevrolite matter is the most frequent<br />
bounding segment. At points where conglomerates continue into limestones, they are<br />
cemented with carbonate matter, precrystalized into calcite-dolomite grains;<br />
Т 2 1 –Sandstones, alevrolites and claystones - developed on the Mountain Jablanica,<br />
beneath thick limestone masses. They are <strong>of</strong> heterogeneous composition and poorly<br />
sorted. They are made mostly <strong>of</strong> grains <strong>of</strong> quartz, less fedspaths, pieces <strong>of</strong><br />
metasandstones and phylitic shales. Binding element in sandstones is represented<br />
with sericite-silicite, and less <strong>of</strong>ten carbonate matter with some share <strong>of</strong> limonite.<br />
These sediments are characterized with rhytmical sedimentation;<br />
Т 2 1,2 –Slab-like limestones with horn slates - developed on the Mountain Jablanica,<br />
above the villages Kalista and Radozda, and they cross on <strong>Albania</strong>n side as well.<br />
They are built <strong>of</strong> carbonate matter, while horn slates are made <strong>of</strong> amorphous silicite<br />
matter and radiolaritic shells.<br />
3. Tertiary and Quarternay sediments:<br />
Pl 3 –Upper Pliocene sediments, developed transgressively both over Paleozoic rocks<br />
and Triassic sediments, throughout Ohrid-Struga gorge. Major part <strong>of</strong> those are<br />
covered over with Quarternary deposits, but there are also uncovered masses below<br />
the villages Zagracani and Dolna Belica. They are represented with gravels, sands<br />
and clays. Towards deeper layers, the material becomes more and more clayey and<br />
better stratified, and towards upper layers it turns into Quarternary lake sediments;<br />
ј–Lake and marsh sediments, developed throughout Struga gorge, with confirmed<br />
power <strong>of</strong> 20-30m. They are also developed in the lowest parts <strong>of</strong> Debrca, between<br />
villages Izdeglavje and Belcista. They are represented with gravel, sand, various<br />
clays and peat;<br />
pr–Proluvial sediments - along edge parts <strong>of</strong> Ohrid-Struga basin. They have been<br />
identified near the villages Botun, Klimestani and Meseista, as well as on the lowest<br />
slopes <strong>of</strong> the mountain Jablanica, near the villages Radolista and Kalista. They are<br />
represented with coarse clastic material, unclassified and poorly processed. They are<br />
composed <strong>of</strong> sandy clays, gravels, pieces and blocks <strong>of</strong> quartz, shales, limestones<br />
and other rocks which make up the surrounding slopes;<br />
al–Aluvial sediments - developed along river valleys <strong>of</strong> Sateska. They are<br />
represented with coarse clastic material, composed <strong>of</strong> sandy clays, gravels and<br />
rounded forms <strong>of</strong> the surrounding rocks.<br />
118
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Graphical presentation <strong>of</strong> geological characteristics is given in Appendix 1 - Geological map.<br />
3.4 Engineering - Geological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route<br />
From engineering - geological point <strong>of</strong> view, tThe terrain along the route <strong>of</strong> the line consists<br />
<strong>of</strong> (1) non coherent, (2i) poorly coherent and (3) highly coherent rock masses.<br />
3.4.1 Non Coherent Rock Masses<br />
In this group <strong>of</strong> non coherent rock masses along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line, we can<br />
emphasize the following:<br />
Lake sediments (j). These sediments are generally distributed in Ohrid-Struga basin, as<br />
well as in areas <strong>of</strong> Gorna and Dolna Debrca (N and E <strong>of</strong> the Mountain Gaber). These are<br />
non coherent, poorly compacted materials with intergranular porosity.<br />
Marsh sediments (b). They are made <strong>of</strong> organogenic fine grain silts. They are present<br />
before the entry <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska in the gorge, SW <strong>of</strong> the village Arbinovo. They can<br />
be unfavourable ground for foundation <strong>of</strong> heavy constructions.<br />
Alluvial sediments (al). They can be found along the valleys <strong>of</strong> the rivers Treska and<br />
Sateska. They consist <strong>of</strong> large-grain gravels and sands. The material is medium to well<br />
rounded and well compacted and sorted. These sediments possess high filtration<br />
characteristics and are quite water porous.<br />
Proluvial sediments (pr). They can be found along the edge parts <strong>of</strong> Kicevo and Ohrid-<br />
Struga basins. The prolluvium is characterized with large grain cobbles and stones, not<br />
rounded or partially rounded, weakly sorted and mixed with clay and sand materials<br />
weakly to medium compacted. The porosity is intergranular due to the larger coarse<br />
grains.<br />
Pliocene sediments (Pl 3, Pl 2,3 ). They spread as transgressive cover over Paleozoic rock<br />
masses in all valleys. They consist <strong>of</strong> sands, clays and big masses <strong>of</strong> gravel sediments<br />
that alternate vertically.<br />
3.4.2 Poorly Coherent Rock Masses<br />
Poorly coherent rock masses are the ones that consist <strong>of</strong> particles smaller than 0.002 mm.<br />
The most typical representatives are clays and marls. They are very frequent along the<br />
route, but they are most visible in the Pliocene sediments, in sand and clay series (Pl 3, Pl 2,3 ).<br />
From engineering geological aspect, they represent an environment where various<br />
appearances may occur, such as: swelling, consolidated depressions, supplanting, dragging<br />
down (due to the terrain morphology where they occur, this is excluded), exceeding the<br />
carriage capacity, etc. Very <strong>of</strong>ten, there is a need for improvement <strong>of</strong> their properties.<br />
3.4.3 Highly Coherent Rock Masses<br />
In highly coherent rock masses, there are mostly solid crystallized connections between the<br />
grains. Along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line, within this group there are several types <strong>of</strong> rocks<br />
that are important from engineering geological aspect, namely:<br />
Quartz-sericite (Sqse), carbonate shales (MmD) and quartz shales (Sq)- These rocks are<br />
full <strong>of</strong> cracks, broken and weathered in the surface zones. The largest part <strong>of</strong> their line<br />
along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line is covered by small layer <strong>of</strong> dust and sand mixed with<br />
pieces <strong>of</strong> the indigenous rock.<br />
119
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Phylitoides (FD) and quartzites (QD). From a tectonic point <strong>of</strong> view, the rocks are quite<br />
damaged and broken, so, they <strong>of</strong>ten form delluvial layer during the weathering <strong>of</strong> the<br />
indigenous rock (in situ) which can be thick from several cm to 2 meters.<br />
Rhyolites ( and diabases magmatic rock masses with visible cracks on the<br />
surface.<br />
Slab-like marbles (MD), mass limestones, dolomite limestones and slab-like limestones<br />
with horn slates (Т 2 1,2 ). From engineering and geological point <strong>of</strong> view, they are quite<br />
damaged, with numerous cracks and holes. They are covered with silt and clay materials<br />
mixed with pieces <strong>of</strong> marble. Local delluvial cover exceeds the thickness <strong>of</strong> 2 metres.<br />
Conglomerates and sandstones, alevrolites and claystones (Т 2 1 )- From engineering and<br />
geological point <strong>of</strong> view, they are quite stable and solid rock masses, but they are prone<br />
to surface erosion and material wash-out.<br />
3.4.4 Contemporary registered engineering - geological appearances and processes<br />
As a result <strong>of</strong> the wide spectrum <strong>of</strong> egsogenic influences (physical, mechanical, chemical<br />
and antropogenic), a large number <strong>of</strong> contemporary engineering geological processes and<br />
appearances occur, which are noticed along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line. Upon the<br />
engineering geological investigation, the following engineering geological processes and<br />
appearances have been registered:<br />
Surface disintegration. For the formation <strong>of</strong> these processes and appearances, several<br />
factors have been the cause (climate factors, tectonic conditions, resistence <strong>of</strong> rocks to<br />
decomposition, etc.) It is most clearly expressed along the extension from the village<br />
Botun to the village Klimestani (on the right bank <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska), then the extension<br />
from the village Brzdani to the village Judovo, as well as in the gorge <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska<br />
(S <strong>of</strong> Arbinovo towards Izdeglavje). Products that are obtained from the surface<br />
disintegration processes are larger blocks, crushed stones, and smaller stones separated<br />
from the indigenous rocks.<br />
Erosion. By washing out, under the influence <strong>of</strong> various external factors, decomposion<br />
and movement <strong>of</strong> the decomposed rock material occur. While under the influence <strong>of</strong><br />
strong water flows and rains, the eroded material is transported to the foothills <strong>of</strong> the<br />
mountain as a consequence <strong>of</strong> multiple and long-term washing out <strong>of</strong> eroded materials,<br />
and create tranches and greves, that are very frequent phenomenon along the route <strong>of</strong><br />
the railway line. In relation to those engineering geological processes, the exploitation <strong>of</strong><br />
the forest stock is very intensive, especially along the extension Botun-Meseista.<br />
Processes <strong>of</strong> landfall and landslide This is a process where earth masses are detached<br />
from the ground and they move under the gravitation influence and their own weight. In<br />
this terrain (along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line), there are numerous old or settled dragdowns,<br />
but also active and potentially dangerous after the construction <strong>of</strong> the route. In<br />
relation to those engineering geological processes, the exploitation <strong>of</strong> the forest stock is<br />
very intensive, especially along the extension Botun-Meseista.<br />
Along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line, the following engineering geological appearances and<br />
processes have been registered, and they are graphically presented in Appendix 2:<br />
Table 5 Registered engineering geological appearances and processes along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />
line<br />
120
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
No. Description Y X km No. Description Y X km<br />
1 Jaruga 495445.92 594947.90 104+585.45<br />
Surface 485647.00 581739.00 123+312.78<br />
2 Jaruga 495327.15 594832.14 104+750.90<br />
16 washing<br />
(from - to) 485578.00 581623.00 123+448.52<br />
3 Jaruga 495235.37 594751.83 104+854.51 17 Jaruga 485576.00 581617.00 123+454.83<br />
4<br />
Surface<br />
washing<br />
493485.78 593328.87 107+165.44 18 Landslide 485628.62 579019.33 126+269.58<br />
5 Јaruga 493197.28 593107.30 107+530.73 19<br />
Surface<br />
washing<br />
483039.00 571110.00 135+412.31<br />
6 Jaruga 493231.42 593269.76 107+417.49 20 Jaruga 483039.00 571110.00 135+412.31<br />
7 Jaruga 493070.00 591988.00 108+845.54 21 Surface<br />
8 Jaruga 492983.30 590805.35 110+081.59 22 Jaruga 482645.00 570883.00 135+867.61<br />
9 Landslide 493080.00 590762.00 110+167.95 23 Landslide 482184.51 568774.51 138+232.83<br />
10 Jaruga 492283.34 590805.35 109+886.73 24 Jaruga 482010.88 568760.98 138+266.18<br />
11 Landslide 493271.00 589762.00 111+191.75 25 Jaruga 481967.00 569318.00 137+717.81<br />
12 Landslide 492682.70 589039.20 112+202.39 26 Jaruga 481791.00 568221.00 138+830.91<br />
13 Landslide 491896.03 589066.40 112+674.38 27<br />
14 Landslide 491574.31 589008.92 113+298.83 28<br />
Surface<br />
washing<br />
Surface<br />
washing<br />
469349.00 553823.00 160+112.23<br />
469449.00 553645.00 160+289.91<br />
15<br />
Surface<br />
washing<br />
(from - to)<br />
485912.00 581950.00 122+971.34 29 Landslide 469299.00 552537.00 161+400.60<br />
30 Jaruga 469523.00 551090.00 162+872.53<br />
485726.00 581822.00 123+197.38<br />
31 Jaruga 469561.00 549771.00 164+228.44<br />
3.5 Hydrogeological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route<br />
According to the lithologic structure, structural type <strong>of</strong> porosity, degree and nature <strong>of</strong> cracks,<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> water and other hydrogeological parametres that induce their porosity, rocks<br />
masses/sediments recognized along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line may be divided in the<br />
following groups:<br />
3.5.1 Well porous rock masses/sediments<br />
Within this group, there are:<br />
al- alluvial sediments <strong>of</strong> the River Treska (Q = 10-50 l/s, T = 300-5000 m 2 /day),<br />
where there is a confined type <strong>of</strong> aquifer <strong>of</strong> free level, the maintenance, drainage,<br />
directions and oscillations on the groundwater level (GWL) <strong>of</strong> which correspond to<br />
the river. In the upper part <strong>of</strong> the River Treska, the replenishment also results from<br />
several identified karstic aquifers. Smaller portion <strong>of</strong> replenished water comes from<br />
atmospheric precipitation.<br />
MD–(slab-like marbles), Т 2 1,2 , (slab-like limestones with horn slates), Т 2,3 (massivle<br />
riverbank limestones). The following hydrogeological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the medium<br />
are applicable for them: >10 karst appearances/km 2 , Q aquifer > 100 l/s. Within the,<br />
karst-fractured type <strong>of</strong> aquifer <strong>of</strong> free groundwater level is developed. The<br />
maintenance <strong>of</strong> these aquifers originates mainly from atmospheric falls, to a certain<br />
extent from the regional fault structures, which in blocks divided the present rock<br />
masses, and smaller portion from side replenishment from some adjacent aquifer.<br />
Drainage <strong>of</strong> these aquifers has mostly been registered through a number <strong>of</strong> karst<br />
121
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
springs, and a portion through overflow into certain adjacent aquifer. The oscillation<br />
<strong>of</strong> level <strong>of</strong> groundwater in this aquifer is specific, and consequently reflected in the<br />
karst springs capacity. Many <strong>of</strong> these springs, like "Sum", "Gorna Belica", "Kalista"<br />
are captured for water supply for the City <strong>of</strong> Struga and surrounding villages.<br />
3.5.2 Medium porous rock masses/sediments<br />
Within this group, there are:<br />
Аl-(alluvial) sediments <strong>of</strong> the River Sateska, where there is a confined type <strong>of</strong> aquifer<br />
<strong>of</strong> free level, the maintenance, drainage, directions and oscillations on the<br />
groundwater level (GWL) <strong>of</strong> which correspond to the river. The following<br />
hydrogeological characteristics are applicable for the aquifer: Т = 50-300 m 2 /day, Q =<br />
2-10 l/s. Most <strong>of</strong> the replenishment <strong>of</strong> this aquifer results from the existing karstic<br />
aquifers (such as Petricanski izvori, the springs near the village Godivje, karst aquifer<br />
in Izdeglavje, springs on north <strong>of</strong> the village Belcista and others), a portion from<br />
atmospheric precipitation, a portion from temporary side tributaries entering into the<br />
river Sateska and portion by way <strong>of</strong> overflow from side karst aquifers, like the karst<br />
limestone massif above the village Klimestani.<br />
М- (Paleosoic marbles), Т 2 1,2 , (slab-like limestones with horn slates) and Т 2<br />
1,2<br />
(dolomite marbles), where a karst-fractured type <strong>of</strong> aquifer has been<br />
developed. The following hydrogeological characteristics are applicable for<br />
them: 1-10 karst appearances/km 2 , Q aquifer = 10-100 l/s. The maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />
these aquifers originates mainly from atmospheric falls, to a great extent from<br />
the regional fault structures. Well developed regional tectonics, in the frames<br />
<strong>of</strong> Western-Macedonian tectonic zone, certainly plays certain role in the<br />
drainage <strong>of</strong> these aquifers. In addition to this, drainage <strong>of</strong> these aquifers has<br />
mostly been registered through a number <strong>of</strong> karst springs, and a portion<br />
through overflow into certain adjacent aquifer.<br />
3.5.3 Poorly porous rock masses/sediments<br />
Within this group, there are:<br />
Pr-(proluvial) sediments, which by their local distribution do not posses any major<br />
significance, and Pl 2,3 (Pl 3 ) – Pliocene sediments <strong>of</strong> Kicevo basin, valley <strong>of</strong> Debrca<br />
and Struga basin, with developed confined type <strong>of</strong> aquifer under pressure (with<br />
artesan or subartesan groundwater level). Hydrogeological characteristics are as<br />
follows: Т = 15-50 m 2 /day, Q = 0,5-2 l/s, Q aquifer = 0,05-0,5 l/s.<br />
Т 2,3 -conglomerates and sandstones, where fractured type <strong>of</strong> aquifer with free water<br />
level exists. Hydrogeological characteristics are as follows: Q well = 0,5-2,0 l/s; Q aquifer =<br />
0,05-0,5 l/s. Replenishment <strong>of</strong> this aquifer is accomplished through atmospheric falls.<br />
No surface outflow has been recorded for this aquifer, which means that its drainage<br />
takes place into al-aquifer <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska or overflows into Pliocene sediments<br />
(described above).<br />
3.5.4 Predominantly non-porous rock masses/sediments<br />
This group <strong>of</strong> rock masses/sediments has the following characteristics:<br />
Low level <strong>of</strong> porosity and water production (T < 15m 2 /day).<br />
The presence <strong>of</strong> springs with low level <strong>of</strong> production (Qi < 0.5 l/s) in non coherent rock<br />
masses. Most <strong>of</strong> them are <strong>of</strong> temporary nature <strong>of</strong> flow (dry out).<br />
122
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
The presence <strong>of</strong> shallow dug wells for the cattle and irrigation, which are generally<br />
exploited by occasional manual drawing water from the well.<br />
Developed cracks and intergranular porosity, shallow under the surface and local<br />
limited spreading.<br />
Within this group, there are:<br />
ј, b-lake and organogenic marsh sediments;<br />
-metamorphised rhyolites;<br />
MmD-carbonate shales;<br />
QD-quartzirtes;<br />
FD-phyliotoides;<br />
Sq; Sqse- metasadnstones and alevrolites and quartz-sericite shales within the<br />
Paleozoic complex.<br />
Registered hydrogeological appearances and objects along the route<br />
Along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line, the following hydrogeological appearances and objects<br />
have been registered:<br />
Table 6 Hydrogeological appearances<br />
No.<br />
HG phenomenon or<br />
objekt<br />
Y X Capacity, comment<br />
1 Excavated well - group 496147.00 5968690.00<br />
2<br />
3<br />
Chlorine. station and<br />
pipeline Studencica<br />
Source.primitive<br />
captured<br />
495291.75 595455.56<br />
495645.63 595137.11 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
4 Source, uncaptured 494979.00 594659.00 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
5 Source, uncaptured 492739.45 593031.27 1,0-10 l/s (up the road Kicevo - Ohrid)<br />
6 Excavited well, group 493750.00 593205.00<br />
7 Source, captured 493888.00 593383.50 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
8<br />
9<br />
Carsten source,<br />
uncaptured<br />
Carsten source,<br />
uncaptured<br />
493220.50 592520.75 10 – 100 l/s<br />
493338.75 592327.90 1,0-10 l/s<br />
10 Excavited well, group 493135.00 592710.00<br />
11 Source, captured 493394.00 592233.00 1,0-10 l/s<br />
12 Source, captured 492523.50 589217.00 1,0-10 l/s<br />
13 Well, excavited 492625.00 588845.00<br />
14 Source, captured 492796.50 590507.50 1-10 l/s (water supply <strong>of</strong> the village Vidrani)<br />
123
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
No.<br />
15<br />
16<br />
HG phenomenon or<br />
objekt<br />
Source primitive<br />
captured<br />
Source primitive<br />
captured<br />
Y X Capacity, comment<br />
492501.50 590928.00 1,0-10 l/s<br />
493600.00 589453.50 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
17 Well, excavited 492625.00 588845.00<br />
18 Karsten source, captured 491690.00 588630.00 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
19 Source, uncaptured 490023.70 588909.32 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
20 Source, uncaptured 489595.47 587225.34 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
21 Source, uncaptured 489279.50 586348.50 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
22 Source, captured 489360.50 585464.00<br />
23 Source, captured 487620.50 585877.00<br />
24 Source, captured (group) 487414.00 585014.00<br />
0,1 – 1,0 l/s (water supply <strong>of</strong> the village<br />
Turje)<br />
0,1 – 1,0 l/s (water supply <strong>of</strong> the village<br />
Slivovo)<br />
0,1 – 1,0 l/s (water supply <strong>of</strong> the village<br />
Slivovo)<br />
25 Source, captured 487480.50 583989.00 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
26 Source, captured 485924.50 582934.50 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
27<br />
Source, primitive<br />
captured<br />
486160.58 582204.50 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
28 Source, captured 485799.00 582086.50 1,0 - 10 l/s<br />
29 Source, captured 485275.50 581666.50 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
30 Artesian bore hole 485095.00 581330.00 Q с.и . = 0,2-0,4 l/s<br />
31 Well, pierce 485350.00 581200.00<br />
32 Excavited well(group) 486105.00 580705.00<br />
33 Source, captured 486394.70 580551.46 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
34 Source, uncaptured 484892.50 578009.00 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
35<br />
Wrecked uncaptured<br />
source (group)<br />
485578.00 578097.50 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
36 Well, drilled 484913.60 577431.65<br />
37 Well, excivited(dug) 484850.00 577484.00<br />
38<br />
Carsten source,<br />
captured<br />
486140.00 576980.00 10 – 100 l/s (in the village Izdeglavje)<br />
39 Well, excavated (group) 485920.00 576935.00<br />
40 Source, uncaptured 483480.34 576049.08 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
41<br />
Carsten source,<br />
uncaptured (group) and<br />
485085.00 574904.00 Wrecked source “Blue Virovo”<br />
124
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
No.<br />
HG phenomenon or<br />
objekt<br />
wet field<br />
Y X Capacity, comment<br />
Q = 10 – 100 l/s<br />
42 Source, captured 483126.65 571158.57 Fountain - 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
43 Source, uncaptured 482302.56 570727.09 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
44 Source, uncaptured 481824.13 570509.29 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
45 Source, uncaptured 481684.65 569707.48 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
46 Source, uncaptured 482379.48 568732.40 Over active landslide - 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
47 Source, uncaptured 482072.53 567535.07 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
48 Well, excavated 478727.01 564020.69 In the village Volino<br />
49 Artesian bore hole 475643.94 562696.20<br />
In the monastery circle near the village<br />
Moroishta<br />
Qси. = 0,3 – 0,6 l/s<br />
50 Artesian hole (group) 475469.51 562249.29 In the village Moroishta<br />
51<br />
Carsten source<br />
(group)<br />
469595.98 559978.86 “Noice”, Q = 100 – 1000l/s<br />
52 Regional plumbing 470908.50 559972.60 From G.Belica to Struga<br />
53<br />
Carsten source,<br />
captured<br />
470060.28 556220.52<br />
Part for water supply <strong>of</strong> the village Kalista<br />
Q = 1,0-10 l/s<br />
54<br />
55<br />
Carsten source,<br />
uncaptured<br />
Carsten source,<br />
uncaptured<br />
469172.43 555304.96 Source “Good water” Q = 10 – 100 l/s<br />
469193.09 554974.16 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
56 Source, captured 469771.35 551820.87 1,0-10 l/s<br />
57 Source, uncaptured 469360.89 550921.52 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
58 Source, uncaptured 469676.25 550817.12 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />
59<br />
Reservoir and supply<br />
pipeline<br />
469534.82 549957.86<br />
For water supply <strong>of</strong> the village Radozda<br />
and watchtowers<br />
It should be mentioned that there are three speleological objects in the wider area <strong>of</strong> the<br />
village Drugovo - caves, identified as proposals for protection under the category monument<br />
<strong>of</strong> nature, namely: Utova Dupka, Kalina Dupka and Ginceica. However, these caves are at<br />
great distance from the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line.<br />
3.6 Tectonics and seismic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route<br />
The area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route belongs to the Western Macedonian zone, which is<br />
characterized with fine plicative structures and radial tectonics.<br />
125
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Structures in Western Macedonian geotectonic zone extend along NW-SE to NNW-SSE<br />
directions. Tectonic development is connected with two major orogeneses: Herzine and<br />
Alpine orogenesis.<br />
By Herzine orogenesis, Paleosoic sediments were regionally metamorphosed and wrinkled<br />
in mild synclinal and anticlinal structures.<br />
Alpine orogenesis enabled strong dynamo-metamorphism, intensive wrinkling <strong>of</strong> the terrain<br />
and in most cases reprocessing <strong>of</strong> herzine structures. In later phases <strong>of</strong> Alpine orogenesis<br />
(by the end <strong>of</strong> Lower or beginning <strong>of</strong> Middle Pliocene), the terrain was affected by very<br />
intensive radial tectonics, forming several tectonic grabens.<br />
Paleosoic metamorphic rocks are intensively wrinkled into mild synclinal and anticlinal<br />
structures. Synclinal ones are bigger, well expressed, with brachiform character at spots,<br />
while anticlinal are less expressed, narrow and open structures.<br />
The most significant structures within the boundaries <strong>of</strong> Western Macedonian zone include:<br />
Brzdanska anticlinal, Presecka synclinal, Vrbjanska anticlinal , Pesocanska synclinal,<br />
Stogovo synclinal, Karaorman synclinal, Sateska anticlinal, Botun brachisynclinal,<br />
Frangovska anticlinal, Crndrim anticlinal, Kicevo graben and the graben Debrca.<br />
In the period <strong>of</strong> Middle Plocene, certain segments <strong>of</strong> the terrain were subject <strong>of</strong> intensive<br />
radial tectonics (neotectonics), the result being the establishment <strong>of</strong> several tectonic<br />
grabens. The most remarkable is the Ohrid graben, oriented in N-S direction, between<br />
mountain ranges Galicica-Karaorman and Jablanica-Mokra, and delineated with the<br />
southern slopes <strong>of</strong> Karaorman Mt. on north.<br />
During the formation <strong>of</strong> Pliocene grabens, the terrain became rather labile with intensive<br />
manifestation <strong>of</strong> radial tectonics. It was active through entire Middle and Upper Pliocene, and<br />
it was also active in Quarter with a tendency <strong>of</strong> slowing down. Most <strong>of</strong> the faults have deepsea<br />
nature and such faults occur mainly in SW area <strong>of</strong> Galicica and landscapes <strong>of</strong> Jablanica,<br />
where diapirically extended bodies <strong>of</strong> ultrabasites occur on the same ruptures.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the vertical ruptures are active today as well, which confirms the data that the wider<br />
area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and Prespa Lakes belongs to the most active seismic areas in Macedonia.<br />
The region covering the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia and areas at 100 kilometers<br />
beyond its borders, in tectonic terms, belongs to the Mediterranean orogene area <strong>of</strong> Alpine-<br />
Himalaya belt. Predetermined by such tectonic affiliation, seismic activity <strong>of</strong> this region is one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the strongest on the inland part <strong>of</strong> the Balkan Peninsula.<br />
Occurrence <strong>of</strong> disastrous earthquakes reaching epicentral intensity up to X MCS-64 and<br />
magnitude to 7,8 (the highest magnitude observed ever on the Balkan Peninsula), is<br />
frequent in this region.<br />
Earthquakes in the region are mainly shallow (h<br />
hypocentres <strong>of</strong> up to 40 km, and most <strong>of</strong>ten to 20 km.<br />
60 km), with most <strong>of</strong> them having<br />
Through the time, earthquake epicenters have concentrated into specific epicentral areas<br />
connected in seismogene zones. These zones, with their epicentral areas and all historical<br />
and contemporary earthquakes that have taken place therein, determine the seismicity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
analyzed region <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />
126
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 26 Tectonic regionalization <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />
Three seismogene zones define the seismicity <strong>of</strong> the wider region:<br />
The first among them stretches along Vardar River valley, covering epicentral areas<br />
from the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Serbia, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia and <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Greece,<br />
respectively, and it is connected with the tectonic unit <strong>of</strong> the Vardar zone (part <strong>of</strong><br />
Dinarides-Helinides) – therefore, it has been named Vardar seismogene zone in<br />
seismological and seismotectonic literature.<br />
The second seismogene zone is linked with Ograzden-Halkidiki zone (major part <strong>of</strong><br />
Serbian-Macedonian massif and some part <strong>of</strong> Kraistidna zone on Carpato-<br />
Balkanides). This seismogene zone includes epicentral areas from the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Serbia, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria and <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Greece,<br />
respectively. The valley <strong>of</strong> Struma River stretches along major part <strong>of</strong> its eastern<br />
edge and therefore it has been named Struma seismogene zone.<br />
The third seismogene zone includes epicentral areas from the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Serbia,<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> and <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Greece, respectively.<br />
The valley <strong>of</strong> Bel Drim River stretches into its furthest northeastern part, and the<br />
valley <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim River and the valley <strong>of</strong> the mouth <strong>of</strong> these two rivers – river<br />
Drim stretch along its upper western part. Therefore, this seismogene zone has<br />
been named Drim seismogene zone.<br />
Based on the above, it may be concluded that the seismicity <strong>of</strong> the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> Macedonia and border areas is predetermined by the three main longitudinal seismogene<br />
zones (Struma, Vardar and Drim).<br />
127
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 27 Map <strong>of</strong> isolines <strong>of</strong> seismic intensity <strong>of</strong> earthquakes in Macedonia (by MCS)<br />
With reference to the degree <strong>of</strong> seismic intensity by MCS scale, the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
passes through three areas:<br />
Area with maximum seismic intensity <strong>of</strong> 7 0 – which includes the stretch from the<br />
railway station Kicevo to the stretch below village Slivovo;<br />
Area with maximum seismic intensity <strong>of</strong> 8 0 – from the stretch below Slivovo, to the<br />
stretch vilage Meseiste - village Volino;<br />
Area with maximum seismic intensity <strong>of</strong> 9 0 – which comprises Ohrid Lake together<br />
with the shore belt, and thus the stretch village Meseista - village Volino, to the end <strong>of</strong><br />
the route.<br />
128
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 28 Seismic map<br />
3.7 Soil characteristics<br />
The route <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin with its length <strong>of</strong> 62.3 km passes through several<br />
basins and mountainous areas, which are rather different in terms <strong>of</strong> pedogenetic factors<br />
(geology, relief, climate, vegetation and man impact). This diversity <strong>of</strong> pedogenetic<br />
conditions has predetermined the presence <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> soil types, which alternate at<br />
small distances, making the soil cover rather diverse.<br />
The rote <strong>of</strong> the line, except several sections which pass through mountainous area, runs<br />
through colluviums and alluviums <strong>of</strong> Kicevo, Izdeglavje, Belciste and Struga basins.<br />
129
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
These deposits host colluvial soils, colluvial soils with signs <strong>of</strong> lessening, cements, alluvial<br />
with well expressed signs <strong>of</strong> hydromorphism, and marsh-gley soils, while the siliceous<br />
substrates, depending on vegetation and altitude, as well as the stage <strong>of</strong> pedogenesis, have<br />
the following types: brown forest soils, litosols and regosols. On limestone rocks, the<br />
following types have been recognized: brown forest soils on limestone and dolomite<br />
(calcokacambisols) and limestone dolomite chernosems (calcomelanosols).<br />
3.7.1 Colluvial soils<br />
In the investigated area, the route runs through several sections over this soil type, namely:<br />
Kicevo basin, the area <strong>of</strong> village Drugovo (103-107 km) - the route passes over<br />
colluiviums created <strong>of</strong> silicate material (phylitoides and shales), characterized by low<br />
level <strong>of</strong> sorting due to steep terrain and short transport, as well as high content <strong>of</strong><br />
skeleton. On the surface, processes <strong>of</strong> surface and weak burrow erosion are notable.<br />
Appearances <strong>of</strong> lessening due to more intensive clay washing out are present on flat<br />
micro-sites.<br />
Figure 29 Colluvial soils<br />
At the entrance into Struga basin, near the villages Klimestani and Mesesita, the route<br />
runs over alluvial soils formed <strong>of</strong> sediments <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, as well as on the<br />
contact with colluvial sediments formed <strong>of</strong> shale like siliceous material. These colluviums<br />
are rather irregular, from morphological point <strong>of</strong> view. In some, stratification is not clearly<br />
expressed, but there such with clear distinction <strong>of</strong> strata and diverse granular<br />
composition. They have skeleton on surface, though fine granulated earth prevails. As<br />
the terrain approaches the village Trebenista and the route goes down towards the<br />
central part <strong>of</strong> the fields, colluvium gradually turn into soils <strong>of</strong> more and more fine<br />
mechanical composition and into alluvial soils.<br />
130
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Colluvial soils in the area <strong>of</strong> the village Radoliste go down steeply towards the village<br />
Struga fields. These colluvial soils were formed by material obtained by soil erosion<br />
formed onto limestone and dolomite, and therefore they occur in red colour, heavier<br />
mechanical composition and better sorted.<br />
3.7.2 Alluvial soils<br />
Alluvial soils through which the route passes are formed <strong>of</strong> the alluvial sediments <strong>of</strong> the river<br />
Sateska and its tributaries in the area <strong>of</strong> Izdeglavje and Belciste fields, as well as lake and<br />
marsh sediments in Struga basin.<br />
In Izdeglavje field, the route passes along the western side <strong>of</strong> the field along the flow<br />
<strong>of</strong> Sateska river, over alluvial soils which have dry pr<strong>of</strong>ile due to specific unsorted<br />
and coarse skeleton material, despite the high level <strong>of</strong> subsoil waters. These are low<br />
acid carbonate free soils, with low content <strong>of</strong> organic matter and nutrients.<br />
The route section in Belciste field passes through skeletal alluvial soils. These soils<br />
have poor water carrying physical properties, they are carbonate free and<br />
structureless. In a small segment, south <strong>of</strong> Novo Selo, the route passes through pure<br />
skeleton.<br />
Alluvial soils <strong>of</strong> Struga field cover the areas <strong>of</strong> the villages Volino, Moroviste, Livada<br />
and Mislesevo (144-149 km). They were formed mainly on material transported by<br />
the river Sateska. These are young, under-developed soils with well expressed<br />
stratification <strong>of</strong> the soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile. Close to the river, they have coarser mechanical<br />
composition, while in the zone <strong>of</strong> the route they are characterized by finer mechanical<br />
composition. These are carbonate free soils with low acid activity, while mechanical<br />
composition varies depending on the distance from the former riverbed <strong>of</strong> Sateska.<br />
Their content <strong>of</strong> organic matter and nutrients is low, but still they are assessed as<br />
soils with good potential fertility, good water porosity and good water and air regime.<br />
In the route segment from 146-147 km, in the area known under the name Propast,<br />
alluviums with morphological indications <strong>of</strong> gradual transformation into marsh ones are<br />
found, owing to the high level <strong>of</strong> groundwaters in the depression, in a form <strong>of</strong> plod spots<br />
and planes. With regard to these soils, particular attention should be paid to the high<br />
groundwater level, detected at small depth due to extremely humid conditions, which<br />
makes this terrain an unstable ground for construction interventions.<br />
3.7.3 Marsh soils<br />
Marsh soils (149-156 km) are found in the zone <strong>of</strong> the former Struga marsh (on left and right<br />
along the course <strong>of</strong> the river Crn Drim), which was characterized by presence <strong>of</strong> areas<br />
beneath low peat bogs. Areas under marsh soils are actually depression <strong>of</strong> the Struga fields,<br />
which is positioned below the level <strong>of</strong> the Lake, and therefore groundwater is in permanent<br />
contact with the lake ones and they are thus subject <strong>of</strong> strong oscillations. Parts <strong>of</strong> these<br />
areas are now covered by coarse deposit transported there by the left tributaries <strong>of</strong> Drim,<br />
primarily Belicka Reka. Besides, major portion <strong>of</strong> the excessive water is evacuated through<br />
canal system to the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and in the canal Sum. Still, during the field investigations<br />
we found gley horizon at the depth <strong>of</strong> 40-50 cm, which indicates high water level <strong>of</strong> ground<br />
waters, while on the right <strong>of</strong> the river Drim, in the area Sarkanica, presence <strong>of</strong> large areas<br />
under surface water have been detected.<br />
131
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 30 Marsh soils<br />
Marsh soils have been also identified in the area <strong>of</strong> the village Kalista, immediately below the<br />
highway to <strong>Albania</strong>, below the village Radolista (162 km). These are soils with high content<br />
<strong>of</strong> organic matter, heavier mechanical composition relative to alluvial soils and well sorted.<br />
Due to the high groundwater level both with humid alluviums and marsh gleyey soils, they<br />
are used for production <strong>of</strong> annual crops. Plantation <strong>of</strong> perianual plants has not been noted in<br />
these areas.<br />
The segment <strong>of</strong> the route in the mountainous region, spreading in the areas <strong>of</strong> the villages,<br />
Popolzani, Vidrani, Brzdani and Judovo, soils formed on limestone and dolomite alternate at<br />
small distances, as well as soils on silicate ground (regosols and shallow brown forest soils<br />
under oak vegetation), mostly as a result <strong>of</strong> frequent changes in geological substrate <strong>of</strong><br />
limestone in siliceous rocks.<br />
132
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
After the exit from the tunnel near Slivovo, up to the entry in Izdeglavje field, the line runs<br />
over shallow soils formed on limestone. These are soils <strong>of</strong> shallow pr<strong>of</strong>ile formed onto solid<br />
rock. Any degradation <strong>of</strong> the soil cover with these soils results in intensive erosion and loss<br />
<strong>of</strong> entire soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />
On the way from the village Botun to the village Klimestani, the route goes through regosols<br />
formed on shales. These are shallow soils with low content <strong>of</strong> humus and rather unstable<br />
with regard to erosion due to low content <strong>of</strong> organic matter, poor stability <strong>of</strong> structural<br />
aggregates and great slope <strong>of</strong> the terrain. In a part <strong>of</strong> the gorge, intensive wood cutting on<br />
inclined terrain has been observed, as well as construction interventions, resulting in<br />
intensive erosion processes.<br />
With its last section, from the stretch 163-170 km, in the areas <strong>of</strong> the villages M.Vlaj and<br />
Radozda, the route <strong>of</strong> the line passes through soils formed onto siliceous ground (phylitic<br />
shales), prevailed by regosols and cements on minor locations. Calcareous dolomite<br />
chernosems and brown soils limestone and dolomite have been identified on marbleized<br />
limestones. With a short section, the route passes through limestone crumbles (talus).<br />
3.8 Hydrography and quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters in the area<br />
The wider area <strong>of</strong> the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Albania</strong>) is part <strong>of</strong> the territory <strong>of</strong> two major regional watershed areas:<br />
Watershed area <strong>of</strong> the river Treska, the following watercourses gravitate in its<br />
upper course: (1) river Studencica, formed on north <strong>of</strong> the village Dobrenoec, i.e. it is<br />
uncaptured remain <strong>of</strong> the springs <strong>of</strong> Studencica (the waters <strong>of</strong> which have been<br />
captured by regional water supply system supplying water to several municipalities);<br />
(2) Brzdanska Reka and (3) Ehlovecka Reka;<br />
Watershed area <strong>of</strong> the river Crn Drim, into which, from its outflow from Ohrid Lake<br />
to the artificial water accumulation Globocica, the following watercourses gravitate:<br />
(1) Sateska Reka, which is the biggest tributary to the river Crn Drim. The following<br />
rivers enter into it: Bigorstica, Golema Reka, Gorna Reka, Vilipica, Mala Reka,<br />
Pesocanska Reka, channel Matica (composed <strong>of</strong> the rivers Slatinska Reka,<br />
Ozdolenska Reka and Shosanska Reka), Kocunska Reka, Zletovska Reka, Golema<br />
Reka and Graista; then (2) river Belicka Reka, which is uncaptured remain <strong>of</strong> several<br />
karstic aquifers above the village Gorna Belica, (the waters <strong>of</strong> which have been<br />
captured for water supply to the City <strong>of</strong> Struga and surrounding villages); (3) river<br />
Sum, formed by the karstic aquifer <strong>of</strong> the same name, (4) river Vevcanska Reka,<br />
formed by the karstic aquifer above the village Vevcani, and (5) river Susica, formed<br />
west <strong>of</strong> the village Visni.<br />
133
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 31 Watershed areas<br />
Fluctuations in the levels <strong>of</strong> these watercourses are within the hydrological cycle; however,<br />
in periods <strong>of</strong> high water level, some <strong>of</strong> these watercourses are characterized by appearance<br />
<strong>of</strong> overflows from their riverbeds and temporary lake formation, over smaller or larger areas<br />
along watercourses.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> the river Treska, overflows have been recorded in the area near the entry into<br />
the river Brzdanska Reka.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, overflows have been recorded in the part below the village<br />
Arbinovo (before entry in the gorge), then along the extension from the village Izdeglavje to<br />
the point before the village Pesocani, at the entry point with the river Matica and before the<br />
village Botun (Dolna Debrca). Part <strong>of</strong> the course <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska (before the village<br />
Volino) was artificially redirected into channelized course towards Ohrid Lake, which<br />
contributes in the protection against flooding in the lower course, towards the Lake, as well<br />
as the entry into the river Crn Drim.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> the river Crn Drim, overflows from its riverbed and temporary lake formation<br />
have been recorded along the stretch from the city <strong>of</strong> Struga to the point before the village<br />
Velesta.<br />
Data on the quantitative characteristics <strong>of</strong> the watercourses Treska, Sateska and Crn Drim<br />
was taken by the Hydrometeorological Administration, for a period <strong>of</strong> 3 hydrological years<br />
(2000-2002 година), and average values are as follows:<br />
River Treska (measuring point village Izvor, watershed area <strong>of</strong> 60 km 2 )<br />
Qmax. = 2,37 m 3 /s, Qsr. = 1,85 m 3 /s, Qmin. = 1,36 m 3 /s<br />
River Sateska (measuring point village Botun, watershed area <strong>of</strong> 357 km 2 )<br />
Qmax. = 7,02 m 3 /s, Qsr. = 3,78 m 3 /s, Qmin. = 2,41 m 3 /s<br />
134
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
River Crn Drim (measuring point village Lozani)<br />
Qmax. = 22,38 m 3 /s, Qsr. = 16,31 m 3 /s, Qmin. = 12,09 m 3 /s<br />
Under the Decree on waters clasification, according to the purpose and degree <strong>of</strong> purity,<br />
surface waters (watercourses, lakes and accumulations) and groundwaters are distributed<br />
into classes, namely:<br />
Table 7 Classification <strong>of</strong> waters<br />
Class<br />
I<br />
II<br />
III<br />
IV<br />
V<br />
Use / Purpose <strong>of</strong> the water<br />
Class <strong>of</strong> very clean, oligotrophic water which in natural condition and eventual disinfection<br />
may be used for drinking and for production and processing the food products, as well as for<br />
spawning <strong>of</strong> noble types <strong>of</strong> fish – salmonides. The buffering capacity <strong>of</strong> the water is very<br />
good. It is constantly saturated with oxygen, contains low level <strong>of</strong> nutrients and bacteria, and<br />
very low level <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic pollution with organic substances (but not inorganic matters).<br />
Class <strong>of</strong> water with low level <strong>of</strong> pollution, mesotrophic water, which in natural condition may<br />
be used for bathing and recreation, for water sports, for spawning other types <strong>of</strong> fish<br />
(cyprindae) , or which by regular methods <strong>of</strong> processing and conditioning (coagulation,<br />
filtration, disinfection and alike) may be used for drinking and production <strong>of</strong> food products.<br />
The buffering capacity and saturation <strong>of</strong> water with oxygen during the whole year are good.<br />
The present burdening may lead to insignificant increase <strong>of</strong> primary productivity.<br />
Class <strong>of</strong> moderately eutrophic water, which in natural condition may be used for irrigation,<br />
and after regular methods <strong>of</strong> processing (conditioning) it can also be used in the industry<br />
where there is no need <strong>of</strong> water with drinking quality, The buffering capacity in weak, but it<br />
preserves the acidity <strong>of</strong> the water to levels that are still adequate for most <strong>of</strong> the fish.<br />
Occasionally, there is deficiency <strong>of</strong> oxygen. The level <strong>of</strong> primary production is significant,<br />
and some changes in the structure <strong>of</strong> the community can be noticed, including the types <strong>of</strong><br />
fish. The burdening with harmful substances is evident, as well as the microbiological<br />
pollution. Concentration <strong>of</strong> harmful substances varies from natural level to level <strong>of</strong> chronic<br />
poisoning in relation to aquatic life.<br />
Class <strong>of</strong> strongly eutrophic, polluted water, which in natural conditions may be used for other<br />
purposes, but only after certain type <strong>of</strong> processing. The buffering capacity exceeds the<br />
limits, which leads to larger acidity levels that have impact on the development <strong>of</strong> younger<br />
generation. In the epilimnion, there is oversaturation with oxygen, while in the hypolimnion<br />
the level <strong>of</strong> oxygen is too low. Flourishing <strong>of</strong> algae is notable.<br />
Increased decomposition <strong>of</strong> organic matters, simultaneously with water stratification, may<br />
lead to anaerobic conditions and death <strong>of</strong> fish. Massive sites <strong>of</strong> tolerant species, fish<br />
populations and benthos organisms may be affected. Microbiological contamination does not<br />
allow this water to be used for recreation, while harmful substances discharged or released<br />
from the sediment (sediment - deposits) may affect the quality <strong>of</strong> aquatic life. Concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> harmful substances may vary from chronic to acute levels <strong>of</strong> toxicity for the aquatic life.<br />
Class <strong>of</strong> very polluted, hypertrophic water, which in natural conditions may not be used for<br />
any purpose. The water has no buffering capacity and its acidity is harmful for many fish<br />
species. Big problems occur in oxygen regime, with over saturation and scarcity <strong>of</strong> oxygen in<br />
epilimnion, leading to anaerobic conditions in the hypolimnion. Disintegrators prevail over<br />
producers. Fish or benthos species do not exist constantly. Concentration <strong>of</strong> harmful<br />
substances exceeds acute levels <strong>of</strong> toxicity for aquatic life.<br />
Under the Decree on waters categorization (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no. 18/99 and 71/99),<br />
natural and artificial watercourses, sections <strong>of</strong> watercourses, lakes, accumulations and<br />
135
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
groundwaters, the waters <strong>of</strong> which are distributed in classes by their purpose and degree <strong>of</strong><br />
purity, are divided into five categories.<br />
The I category includes watercourses the waters <strong>of</strong> which meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> the I<br />
class, the II category – requirements <strong>of</strong> the II class, the III category – requirements <strong>of</strong> the III<br />
class, the IV category – requirements <strong>of</strong> the IV class, and the V category includes<br />
watercourses the waters <strong>of</strong> which have to meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> the V class.<br />
The main types <strong>of</strong> watercourses pollution <strong>of</strong> the area along the railway line route originate<br />
from municipal waste water discharged from the populated places and agricultural and<br />
livestock breeding activities.<br />
The quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters in the immediate surrounding <strong>of</strong> the railway line route is not<br />
significantly deteriorated by emissions <strong>of</strong> industrial activities.<br />
The text below presents categorization <strong>of</strong> watercourses and lakes in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia (based on the Law on Waters, Article 85, paragraph 4 and Article 4, paragraph 3,<br />
published in the Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 38/90, 63/94 and 63/98).<br />
Treska river watershed<br />
Brzdanska Reka (from the village Brzdani to the entry in the river Treska)–2.<br />
category;<br />
River Studencica (from the village D.Dobrenoec to the entry in the river Treska)–2.<br />
category;<br />
River Treska (from the village Izvor to the entry in the river Vardar)–2. category;<br />
Crn Drim river watershed<br />
River Sateska (from the village Botun, to the entry in Ohrid Lake)–2. category;<br />
River Sum (from the village Sum to the entry in the river Crn Drim)–2. category;<br />
Река Crn Drim (from Struga to the border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)–2. category;<br />
Under the relevant legislation in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, the monitoring <strong>of</strong> surface waters<br />
is performed continuously by the Hydrometeorological Administration from Skopje. The type<br />
<strong>of</strong> measurements, methodology and parameters monitored, as well as changes and<br />
condition <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> waters are carried out in accordance with a special Programme.<br />
The Programme implementation is aimed at surface waters quantity and quality monitoring<br />
on the whole territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. As a result <strong>of</strong> all these activities, annual<br />
reports on the quality <strong>of</strong> waters are produced.<br />
In the area <strong>of</strong> intended construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Kjafasan, the watershed areas<br />
in the region <strong>of</strong> Kicevo and the second area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid-Struga region, are covered. Kicevo<br />
region covers the upper course <strong>of</strong> the watershed area <strong>of</strong> the river Treska.<br />
In the period up to 1996, Hydrometeorological Administration carried out examinations <strong>of</strong> the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> waters at 3 measuring points in the region <strong>of</strong> Kicevo, namely:<br />
SP 63501–village Izvor, river Treska,<br />
SP 63502–Bigor Dolenci, river Treska,<br />
SP 63525– Kicevo, Kicevska Reka (river)<br />
136
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 32 Measuring points monitoring the waters in the watershed <strong>of</strong> Treska river<br />
Based on the results from the said monitoring, it has been found out that the regime and the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> waters in the rivers Kicevska Reka and Treska are affected by discharged<br />
municipal wastewaters from the City <strong>of</strong> Kicevo and thermal power plant "Oslomej".<br />
Other permanent surface watercourses include the rivers Golema Reka and Studencica.<br />
River Treska originates from a karst aquifer near the village Izvor, on the southern slope <strong>of</strong><br />
the mountain Bistra. Up to Kicevo Basin, it is known under the name Golema Reka. Its<br />
watershed has numerous springs and rivers, which replenish it permanently and therefore it<br />
is a river with the greatest annual fluctuations in the flow in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. The<br />
spring is located at 750 m a.s.l., and its yield ranges between 1500 and 2000 l/s. р.<br />
Studencica is left tributary to the river Treska. River Studencica is mountaimuous river with<br />
great gradient <strong>of</strong> water mirror. The watershed area <strong>of</strong> the river Studencica is long-shaped,<br />
lying on southeastern slopes <strong>of</strong> Bistra Mt., and occupying 53 km 2 . The flow direction is<br />
northwest-southeast. It spreads over from the highest spot level <strong>of</strong> 2099 m a.s.l., to spot<br />
level 565 m a.s.l. The main spring is at spot level 1780 m a.s.l. Its length is 14.1 km. Most <strong>of</strong><br />
the watershed area is covered with oak and beech forest and pastures. Hydrographic<br />
network is composed <strong>of</strong> several aquifers, minor streams and gullies. The waters <strong>of</strong> the river<br />
137
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Studencica are used for water supply <strong>of</strong> the populated places Kicevo, Makedonski Brod,<br />
Prilep and Krusevo and other smaller settlements. This water has been categorized as II<br />
class.<br />
The water supply system “Studencica” supplies water to the cities Kicevo, Makedonski Brod,<br />
Prilep and Krusevo and a number <strong>of</strong> rural settlements situated along supply pipelines in<br />
Kicevo and Prilep regions, respectively.<br />
The system was constructed for a capacity <strong>of</strong> 1500 l/s, and it uses the water from the springs<br />
<strong>of</strong> Studencica the yield <strong>of</strong> which is within the range from 450 to 4300 l/s. Supply pipelines,<br />
from the springs to the populated places, are made <strong>of</strong> steel, with a total length <strong>of</strong> 100 km.<br />
In days <strong>of</strong> maximum water consumption, and minimum yield <strong>of</strong> the spring, the system is not<br />
able to satisfy the demand for water in connected places. The quality <strong>of</strong> the water in the river<br />
Treska, at the very spring, has not changed substantially for years now. It corresponds by all<br />
criteria to water quality <strong>of</strong> first category.<br />
At the measuring point below Kicevo-village Bigor-Dolenci, the quality <strong>of</strong> water <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
deviates from the prescribed one with regard to organic and microbiological pollution, which<br />
is a consequence <strong>of</strong> the wastewaters from the City <strong>of</strong> Kicevo.<br />
Part <strong>of</strong> the precipitation infiltrated beneath the soil surface, establishes the groundwater<br />
resources.<br />
Their movement in soil and through rock masses is small, with minor or major delays. At<br />
suitable points, they come out on the surface and enrich surface waters.<br />
The springs at Dolno Popolzani is situated in the village Dolno Popolzani-Kicevo area, at<br />
around 200 m south <strong>of</strong> the river Treska. The yield <strong>of</strong> this spring varies in the course <strong>of</strong> the<br />
year, ranging between 200 and 1000 l/s. The aquifer is situated in Devonian limestones,<br />
positioned at 640 m above sea level.<br />
Aquifer, surface and groundwaters, or combination <strong>of</strong> those, are used for water supply <strong>of</strong><br />
populated places.<br />
In Ohrid-Struga region (Crn Drim river watershed area), Hydrometeorological Administration<br />
has two measuring points in the zone <strong>of</strong> intended construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-<br />
Kjafasan: SP60018–Kalista, Ohrid Lake and SP60019–Struga, river Crn Drim.<br />
Also, the water <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake is controlled at four additional measuring points: SP60012– St.<br />
Naum, SP60015–Hotel Metropol, SP60016–City <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and SP60017–City Beach.<br />
According to the above measurements, it has been established that the quality <strong>of</strong> the water<br />
in the river Crn Drim, at its exit from Ohrid Lake, is relatively clean and can potentially be<br />
affected by municipal and industrial wastewaters from the cities Ohrid and Struga, especially<br />
those not collected into the wastewater collection system and treatment plant.<br />
138
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 33 Measuring points monitoring the waters in the watershed <strong>of</strong> the river Crn Drim<br />
3.9 Quality <strong>of</strong> air in the area<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, as signatory <strong>of</strong> the Stabilization and Association Agreement, makes<br />
efforts, inter alia, towards approximation and transposition <strong>of</strong> the European legislation in the<br />
area <strong>of</strong> air. The Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment and Physical Planning (MEPP) prepared the<br />
framework Law on Ambient Air Quality in line with the Framework Water Directive 96/62/EC,<br />
as well as Decree on the limit values <strong>of</strong> the levels and types <strong>of</strong> polluting substances in the<br />
139
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
ambient air and alert thresholds, deadlines for limit values achievement, margins <strong>of</strong><br />
tolerance for the limit values, target values and long-term targets.<br />
Regular air quality monitoring is one <strong>of</strong> the most important tools in providing relevant data on<br />
the state <strong>of</strong> the air in a given area. Responsible authority for the air quality monitoring is the<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment and Physical Planning, through the system <strong>of</strong> monitoring stations<br />
established throughout the country.<br />
Figure 34 Monitoring stations<br />
Hydrometeorological Administration has set its stations on the whole territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> Macedonia to monitor meteorological parameters and air quality. So far, the two<br />
mentioned institutions have not carried out measurements <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> the air along the<br />
railway line route.<br />
Table 8 Measuring parameters <strong>of</strong> institutions<br />
3.9.1 Quality <strong>of</strong> ambient air in Kicevo<br />
The quality <strong>of</strong> ambient air in Kicevo is monitored by automatic monitoring station, functioning<br />
in the frames <strong>of</strong> the State automatic ambient air quality monitoring system, managed by the<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment and Physical Planning. The station was set in December 2002 and<br />
140
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
since then, hourly data on all measuring parameters are received continuously in the central<br />
stations based in the Macedonian Environmental Information Centre.<br />
The monitoring stations measure the concentrations <strong>of</strong> the following polluting substances:<br />
sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, suspended particulate matters bigger than 10 micro meters,<br />
ozone and carbon monoxide. The station is also equipped with instruments which measure<br />
the following meteorological parameters: temperature, wind direction and velocity, humidity,<br />
pressure and global radiation.<br />
The ambient air quality monitoring station located in Kicevo shows the pollution in the city<br />
caused by human activities, heating <strong>of</strong> households during winter period, traffic and work <strong>of</strong><br />
industrial facilities. Namely, the Thermal Power Plant “Oslomej” is situated in the vicinity <strong>of</strong><br />
Kicevo.<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> data presented below is based on the Decree on the limit values <strong>of</strong> the levels<br />
and types <strong>of</strong> polluting substances in the ambient air and alert thresholds, deadlines for limit<br />
values achievement, margins <strong>of</strong> tolerance for the limit values, target values and long-term<br />
targets (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no. 50/05).<br />
3.9.1.1 Sulfur dioxide<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> data on sulfur dioxide obtained by the monitoring station Kicevo for the period<br />
2007-2009 is presented in the table below:<br />
Table 9 Limit values for SO 2<br />
SO 2 [µg/m 3 ] 2007 2008 2009<br />
Protection <strong>of</strong> human health<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming on one hour GV for protection <strong>of</strong> human helath +<br />
MT set for the relevant year<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming on one year GV for protection <strong>of</strong> human health to<br />
be reached in 2012 year<br />
0 0 0<br />
0 0 3<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> exceeding the daily GV protection <strong>of</strong> human health 0 1 1<br />
Protection <strong>of</strong> ecosystems<br />
Averrage annual concentration [ µg/m3 ] 17,53 22,97 22,71<br />
Averrage concentration in winter [ µg/m3 ] 21,02 26,10 31,22<br />
The hourly limit value for human health protection plus the margin <strong>of</strong> tolerance for 2007 was<br />
500 μg/m 3 , for 2008 - 470 μg/m 3 and for 2009 it was 440 μg/m 3 , and the allowed number <strong>of</strong><br />
exceedences during a year is 24 times. The table shoes that during the analyzed period<br />
there is no exceedence <strong>of</strong> the hourly limit value for human health protection plus the margin<br />
<strong>of</strong> tolerance specified for the respective year. The hourly limit value for human health<br />
protection that should be achieved in 2012 is 350 μg/m 3 and it was exceeded only three<br />
times during 2009, and the allowed number <strong>of</strong> exceedences during a year is 24 times, which<br />
means that and the allowed number <strong>of</strong> exceedences during a year was not exceeded.<br />
Daily limit value for human health protection is 125 μg/m 3 , and the allowed number <strong>of</strong> its<br />
exceedednces is three times during a year. Considering that daily limit value for human<br />
141
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
health protection was exceeded only once in each 2008 and 2009, exceedence <strong>of</strong> the daily<br />
limit value for human health protection for the period 2007-2009 was not recorded.<br />
The next Figure shows the average annual concentration and the average concentration in<br />
winter period <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide for the period 2007-2009, in Kicevo. It is notable that there<br />
was minor exceedence <strong>of</strong> the average annual concentration relative to limit value for<br />
ecosystems protection in 2008 and 2009. It is also notable that the average concentrations<br />
<strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide measured in winter period are higher than the average annual<br />
concentrations every year and they slightly exceed the limit value for ecosystems protection.<br />
Figure 35 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> SO 2 in Kicevo<br />
3.9.1.2 Nitrogen dioxide<br />
According to the analysis made for hourly values <strong>of</strong> nitrogen dioxide concentrations obtained<br />
by the monitoring station Kicevo for the period 2007–2009, we may note that there is no<br />
exceeding <strong>of</strong> hourly value in terms <strong>of</strong> human health protection.<br />
Namely, the hourly value for human health protection plus margin <strong>of</strong> tolerance for 2007 was<br />
300 g/m 3 , for 2008 - 280 g/m 3 and for 2009 it was 260 g/m 3 , and the allowed number <strong>of</strong><br />
exceedences during a year is 18 times.<br />
The hourly value for human health protection to be achieved in 2012 is 200 g/m 3 .<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> data is presented in the table below.<br />
Table 10 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> nitrogen dioxide for the period 2007-2009<br />
Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2) 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming one hour GV to protect human health + MT for<br />
a relevant year<br />
0 0 0<br />
142
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming one year GV for protection <strong>of</strong> human health<br />
which should be reached in 2012 year<br />
0 0 0<br />
Просечна годишна концентрација [ g/m 3 ] 12 28 30<br />
The average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> nitrogen dioxide is presented on the next Figure.<br />
Figure 36 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> nitrogen dioxide for the period 2007-2009<br />
The diagram shows that the average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> nitrogen dioxide relative to the<br />
limit value for human health protection plus margin <strong>of</strong> tolerance specified for the respective<br />
year (60 g/m 3 for 2007, 56 g/m 3 for 2008 and 52 g/m 3 for 2009), the limit value for human<br />
health protection to be achieved in 2012 (40 g/m 3 ) and limit value for vegetation protection<br />
(30 g/m 3 ) was not exceeded in none <strong>of</strong> the years <strong>of</strong> the analyzed period.<br />
3.9.1.3 Suspended particulate matters sized up to 10 micrometers<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> data on the suspended particulate matters sized up to 10 micrometers is<br />
presented in Table 11.<br />
Table 11 Analysis <strong>of</strong> suspended particulate matters sized up to 10 micrometers for the period 2007-<br />
2009<br />
Suspended particulate matters sized up to 10 micrometars (PM 10) 2007 2008 2009<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming the daily GV to protect human health + MT set<br />
for the relevant year<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming the daily GV for protection <strong>of</strong> human health<br />
which should be reached in 2012<br />
129 167 175<br />
215 254 218<br />
Averrage annual concentration 85 80.72 76.89<br />
Daily limit value for human health protection plus margin <strong>of</strong> tolerance for 2007 was 75 g/m 3 ,<br />
for 2008 - 67 g/m 3 and for 2009 it was 59 g/m 3 , while the allowed number <strong>of</strong> exceedences<br />
during a year is 35 times. Daily limit value for human health protection to be achieved in<br />
2010 is 50 g/m 3 .<br />
Table 11 shows that the number <strong>of</strong> exceedednces <strong>of</strong> daily limit value for human health<br />
protection plus margin <strong>of</strong> tolerance specified for the respective year, as well as the number<br />
143
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
exceedences <strong>of</strong> the daily limit value for human health protection to be achieved in 2010,<br />
exceeds the number <strong>of</strong> allowed exceedences.<br />
The next Figure shows the average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> suspended particulate matters<br />
sized up to 10 micrometers.<br />
The Figure shows that the average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> suspended particulate matters<br />
sized up to 10 micrometers relative to the limit value for human health protection plus margin<br />
<strong>of</strong> tolerance specified for the respective year (60 g/m 3 for 2007, 54 g/m 3 for 2008 and 47<br />
g/m 3 for 2009) and the limit value for human health protection to be achieved in 2012 (40<br />
g/m 3 ), was exceeded every year <strong>of</strong> the analyzed period.<br />
It should be pointed out that there is a slight trend <strong>of</strong> decline in the average annual<br />
concentration, but it is above the allowed limit values.<br />
Nevertheless, based on the analyses made, we can make a general conclusion that high<br />
concentrations <strong>of</strong> this polluting substances are recorded on the whole territory <strong>of</strong> the country,<br />
especially during winter period <strong>of</strong> the year.<br />
Figure 37 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> suspended particulate matters sized up to 10 micrometers<br />
for the period 2007-2009<br />
3.9.1.4 Carbon monoxide<br />
Based on the analysis <strong>of</strong> hourly data on carbon monoxide, the following Table <strong>of</strong> carbon<br />
monoxide has been composed.<br />
Table 12 Analysis <strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide for the period 2007-2009<br />
144
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Carbon monoxide (CO) 2007 2008 2009<br />
Maximum daily eight – hour average concentration <strong>of</strong> CO<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming the GV to protect human health + MT<br />
for the corresponding year<br />
6.08 8.13 8.64<br />
0 0 0<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming the daily GV for protection <strong>of</strong> human<br />
health which should be reached in 2012<br />
0 0 0<br />
Based on the analysis made we can conclude that there was no exceeding <strong>of</strong> the limit value<br />
for human health protection plus margin <strong>of</strong> tolerance during the analyzed period <strong>of</strong> three<br />
years, specified for each year starting with 2007 (16 mg/m 3 for 2007, 15 mg/m 3 for 2008 and<br />
14 mg/m 3 for 2009), nor exceeding <strong>of</strong> the limit value for human health protection to be<br />
reached in 2012.<br />
The maximum daily 8-hours mean value <strong>of</strong> the concentration <strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide is<br />
presented on Figure 38.<br />
Figure 38 Maximum daily 8-hours mean value <strong>of</strong> the concentration <strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide for the period<br />
2007-2009<br />
The diagram shows that the exceeding <strong>of</strong> the concentration <strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide above the<br />
respective limit values were not recorded during the analyzed period.<br />
3.9.1.5 Ozone<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> data on the concentrations <strong>of</strong> ozone is presented in the following Table.<br />
Table 13 Analysis <strong>of</strong> data on ozone for the period 2007-2009<br />
145
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Озон (О 3) 2007 2008 2009<br />
Long term goals<br />
Maximum daily eight – hour average concentration 184 155 138<br />
АОТ40 calculated from one – hour values from May to July 21480 23637.4 17865<br />
Target values<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> exceeting on target value for protection <strong>of</strong><br />
human health<br />
37 57 20<br />
The target value for human health protection for ozone is 120 g/m 3 and it must not be<br />
exceeded by more than 35 times during a year. Yet, Table 13 clearly shows that in 2007 and<br />
2008, the allowed number <strong>of</strong> exceedences <strong>of</strong> the target value for human health protection<br />
was exceeded was exceeded, while in 2009, the number <strong>of</strong> exceedences <strong>of</strong> the target value<br />
for human health protection was lower than the allowed number <strong>of</strong> exceedences.<br />
The long-term value for human health protection for ozone for the period 2007 to 2009 is<br />
presented on the next Figure.<br />
Figure 39 Long-term target for human health protection for ozone for the period 2007-2009<br />
During the analyzed period, the maximum daily 8-hours average value <strong>of</strong> the concentration<br />
<strong>of</strong> zone exceeded the long-term value for human health protection for all three, though the<br />
overview on Figure 40 shows clearly that the maximum daily 8-hours average value <strong>of</strong> the<br />
concentration <strong>of</strong> zone has a falling trend.<br />
146
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
The long-term target for vegetation protection for ozone for the period 2007-2009 is<br />
presented on Figure 40.<br />
Figure 40 Long-term target for vegetation protection for ozone for the period 2007-2009<br />
The long-term target for vegetation protection was exceeded at the measuring point Kicevo<br />
during 2007, 2008 and 2009.<br />
АОТ40 expressed in ( g/m 3 x hours) means the sum <strong>of</strong> the difference between hourly<br />
concentrations above 80 g/m 3 (= 40 th pieces <strong>of</strong> billion) and 80 g/m 3 during the analyzed<br />
period May-July.<br />
For the purpose <strong>of</strong> the analysis, one-hour values are taken into account, measured every<br />
day between 8.00 in the morning and 20.00 in the evening by Central European Time, when<br />
solar radiation is the greatest. In general, exceedences <strong>of</strong> long-term targets for ozone have<br />
been recorded at all measuring points in our country and they are related to the geographical<br />
position <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia in the southern part <strong>of</strong> Europe, characterized by a<br />
high number <strong>of</strong> sunny days during summer period.<br />
3.9.2 Quality <strong>of</strong> ambient air in Ohrid<br />
The ambient air quality monitoring in Ohrid is performed only at one measuring point in the<br />
city and it measures sulfur dioxide and smoke. This measuring point is part <strong>of</strong> the network<br />
for air quality monitoring in Ohrid <strong>of</strong> the Hydrometeorological Administration. Data obtained<br />
by this measuring pont for the mentioned polluting substances are average daily, because<br />
manual methods <strong>of</strong> their analysis are applied.<br />
Data on the analysis made for sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006 are shown in Table 14:<br />
Table 14 Analysis <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006<br />
Ohrid<br />
Averrage annual<br />
concentration<br />
Мах Min MPC<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> days with average<br />
concentration above the MPC<br />
147
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Sulfur dioxide [ g/m 3 ] 22,53 52,02 0 150 0<br />
Smoke [ g/m 3 ] 7,92 44,41 0 50 0<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> these polluting substances is within the maximum permissible concentrations<br />
(MPC) specified in Article 4 <strong>of</strong> the Law on Air Pollution applicable in that period.<br />
The average monthly concentrations <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006 are shown in<br />
Table 15 and Figure 41.<br />
Table 15 Average monthly concentrations <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006<br />
Polluting<br />
substance<br />
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July August Sep Oct Nov Dec<br />
Sulfur dioxide 19,36 26,71 29,60 27,59 22,41 16,92 21,80 18,62 19,90<br />
Smoke 11,84 9,06 9,06 9,01 4,59 6,58 6,98 5,60 9,30<br />
Figure 41 Average monthly concentrations <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006<br />
Data presented shows clearly that the concentrations <strong>of</strong> these polluting substances are<br />
higher during winter period <strong>of</strong> the year, than during the summer period when concentrations<br />
are relatively low.<br />
Generally, the overall analysis conducted so far lead to the conclusion that Ohrid is relatively<br />
clean urban environment where no increasing <strong>of</strong> the concentrations <strong>of</strong> the two polluting<br />
substances have been recorded above MPC.<br />
The limit values <strong>of</strong> the levels and types <strong>of</strong> polluting substances in the ambient air are<br />
presented in the following tables.<br />
148
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Table 16 Limit values for protection <strong>of</strong> ecosystems and vegetation<br />
Polluting substance Protection Average period Limit value<br />
Sulfur dioxide - SO 2 Ecosystems Year winter period 20 µg/m³<br />
Nitric oxide (NO + NO 2) Vegetation Year 30 µg/m³<br />
Source: Annual report <strong>of</strong> processed data on the quality <strong>of</strong> the environment -2008; MEPP<br />
Table 17 Limit values for human health protection<br />
Pollutants<br />
Sulfur dioxide - SO 2<br />
Nitric oxide<br />
PM 10<br />
Carbone monoxide<br />
Average period<br />
Maximum daily 8-hour<br />
average<br />
Limit value to be<br />
reached in 2012<br />
year<br />
Allowed number<br />
<strong>of</strong> bridging over<br />
the year<br />
Limit value for<br />
20008 year<br />
1 hour 350 µg/m³ 24 470 µg/m³<br />
24 hour 125 µg/m³ 3 125 µg/m³<br />
1 hour 200 µg/m³ 18 280 µg/m³<br />
1 year 40 µg/m³ 0 56 µg/m³<br />
24 hour 50 µg/m³ 35 67 µg/m³<br />
1 year 40 µg/m³ 0 54 µg/m³<br />
10 mg/m³<br />
0<br />
15 µg/m³<br />
Lead 1 year 0,5 µg/m³ 0 0,9 µg/m³<br />
C 6H 6 1 year 5 µg/m³ 0 9 µg/m³<br />
Source: Annual report <strong>of</strong> processed data on the quality <strong>of</strong> the environment -2008; MEPP<br />
For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this Study, air quality measurements were conducted along the railway<br />
line route for particulate matter. The exact points <strong>of</strong> conducted measurements with<br />
coordinates are presented on the next Figure. The results obtained are presented in<br />
Appendix 3.<br />
149
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 42 Measurements <strong>of</strong> dust in the air<br />
3.10 Environmental noise in the area<br />
Emission <strong>of</strong> noise in the environment has been primarily identified in relation to the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> technology, industry and transport.<br />
According to the Law on the Protection against Environmental Law (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no.79/07), environmental noise is the noise caused by undesired or<br />
harmful external sound generated by human activities imposed from the nearby surrounding<br />
and causes nuisance and annoyance, including the noise released from means <strong>of</strong><br />
transportation, i.e. road, railway and air transport and sites <strong>of</strong> industrial activity.<br />
Nuisance related to noise means annoyance caused by emission <strong>of</strong> sound which is frequent<br />
and/or lasting, generated in a given time and place, which impedes or has impact on the<br />
people’s common activity or work, concentration, rest and sleeping.<br />
150
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Nuisance related to noise is defined through the extent <strong>of</strong> annoyance <strong>of</strong> the population by<br />
the noise determined by way <strong>of</strong> field surveys or inspections.The limit values <strong>of</strong> the basic<br />
indicators <strong>of</strong> environmental noise are specified in the Rulebook on the limit values <strong>of</strong> noise<br />
level (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 147/08).<br />
According to the extent <strong>of</strong> protection against noise, the limit values <strong>of</strong> the basic indicators <strong>of</strong><br />
environmental noise caused by different sources should not exceede:<br />
Table 18 Noise levels<br />
Field differentiated by the degree <strong>of</strong><br />
protection against noise<br />
Noise level expressed in dB<br />
Lд Lв Lн<br />
Range <strong>of</strong> first degree 50 50 40<br />
Range <strong>of</strong> second degree 55 55 45<br />
Range <strong>of</strong> third degree 60 60 55<br />
Range <strong>of</strong> fourth degree 70 70 60<br />
o Ld – day (period from 07,00 to 19,00 hours)<br />
o Le – evening (period from 19,00 to 23,00 hours)<br />
o Ln – night (period from 23,00 to 07,00 hours)<br />
According to the extent <strong>of</strong> protection against noise, the areas are determined by the<br />
Rulebook on the location <strong>of</strong> measuring stations and measuring points (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 120/08).<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Area <strong>of</strong> I extent <strong>of</strong> protection against noise is area intended for tourism and recreation,<br />
area in the close vicinity <strong>of</strong> health care institution for hospital treatment and area <strong>of</strong><br />
national parks and nature reserves.<br />
Area <strong>of</strong> II extent <strong>of</strong> protection against noise is area intended primarily for stay, i.e.<br />
residential area, area in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> buildings intended for training and education<br />
activity, facilities for social welfare intended for accomodation <strong>of</strong> children and elderly<br />
persons and facilities for primary health care, area <strong>of</strong> play grounds and public parks,<br />
public green areas and recreation areas and sites within local parks.<br />
Area <strong>of</strong> III extent <strong>of</strong> protection against noise is area where undertaking in the<br />
environment is allowed, where causing <strong>of</strong> noise will be less disturbing, i.e. commercial<br />
- business - residential area, which is at the same time intended for stay, or where<br />
there are facilities with protected premises, artisan and similar activities <strong>of</strong> production<br />
(mixed area), area intended for agricultural activity and public centres, where<br />
administrative, commercial, service and catering activities are performed.<br />
Area <strong>of</strong> IV extent <strong>of</strong> protection against noise is area where undertaking in the<br />
environment is allowed, which may cause disturbance with noise, area without<br />
dwellings, intended for industrial or artisan or similar activities <strong>of</strong> production, transport<br />
151
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
activities, storage activities and service activities and public activities generating<br />
significant noise.<br />
Under the Decision on determination <strong>of</strong> the cases in which and conditions under which the<br />
peace <strong>of</strong> citizens is considered disturbed by harmful noise (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 01/09), the activities by which, in case they produce noise in excess <strong>of</strong> the<br />
limit values <strong>of</strong> noise levels, the peace <strong>of</strong> the citizens is disrupted, are identified.<br />
In absence <strong>of</strong> well developed state monitoring network, there is no measurement data<br />
available for environmental noise levels in the wider area <strong>of</strong> the subject location.<br />
Consequently, there are no planning documents for noise management, i.e. strategic map<br />
and action plan.<br />
Measurements <strong>of</strong> noise levels have been conducted along the railway line route. The values<br />
<strong>of</strong> the conducted measurements are presented in Appendix 4.<br />
Figure 43 Noise measuring points<br />
152
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
3.11 Biological diversity<br />
3.11.1 Biogeographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area<br />
Biogeographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area are presented through the division <strong>of</strong> biomes by<br />
Matvejev (Matvejev 1995: in Lopatin & Matvejev 1995; Matvejev & Puncer 1989) and in<br />
accordance with climate-vegetation-soil zones (regions) by Filipovski at al. (1996).<br />
1. Biomes <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean evergreen<br />
forests and maquis (the clip <strong>of</strong> the map<br />
does not contain such biomes)<br />
2. Biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean,<br />
predominantly deciduous forests and<br />
shruberries<br />
3. Biome <strong>of</strong> South-European, primarily<br />
deciduous forests (ecotonic-vykarian<br />
landscapes are marked 23, 32 and 321-<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> numbers is related to the<br />
prevailing ecological characteristics;<br />
landscapes with steppe elements are<br />
marked with 263 and 236)<br />
4. Biomes <strong>of</strong> European, primarily needleshape<br />
leaved forests <strong>of</strong> boreal type (these<br />
landscapes with elements <strong>of</strong> deciduous<br />
forests are marked with 43; deciduous<br />
forests with elements <strong>of</strong> needle-shape<br />
leaved forests are marked with 34)<br />
5. Biomes <strong>of</strong> Alpine rock grounds, pastures<br />
and snow fields <strong>of</strong> Alpine-Nordic type<br />
6. Biomes <strong>of</strong> steppe and forest-steppes (the<br />
map clip does not contain such biomes)<br />
7. Biomes <strong>of</strong> rocky grounds, pastures and<br />
rocky ground forests on<br />
(oro)Mediterranean<br />
mountains<br />
(oromediterranean elements in sub<br />
Mediterranean forests are 27, in<br />
deciduous 37, in boreal 47 or combined<br />
347, 437, 743 or 473).<br />
Figure 44 Biomes in southwestern part <strong>of</strong> Macedonia (by Matvejev & Puncer 1989)<br />
3.11.2 Biomes<br />
According to the division <strong>of</strong> biomes <strong>of</strong> Matvejev & Puncer (1989), the corridor <strong>of</strong> the<br />
planned railway line Kicevo-Radozda belongs to the biome <strong>of</strong> South-European,<br />
primarily deciduous forests and biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean, predominantly<br />
deciduous forests and shrubberies (Figure 44).<br />
153
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean, predominantly deciduous forests and<br />
shruberries spreads over most <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor. The most outstanding<br />
characteristic <strong>of</strong> climate is well expressed arid period in the course <strong>of</strong> the summer,<br />
while maximum precipitations take place during spring and autumn. More thermopile<br />
segments <strong>of</strong> the lowest parts <strong>of</strong> Kicevo valley, the valley <strong>of</strong> Sateska river in Ohrid<br />
gorge and shore area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake between Struga and Radozda are situated here.<br />
This biome includes also most <strong>of</strong> the areas adjacent to the route <strong>of</strong> the planned<br />
railway line. From among plant communities specific for this biome, we find<br />
Quercetum frainetto-cerris, as well as elements <strong>of</strong> Querco-Carpinetum orientalis (on<br />
lower parts) along the line. All biocenoses are characterized with the animal life<br />
forms Xeroaestisilvicola and Xeroaestidrymicola (Matvejev 1995). Plants, besides<br />
trees, are dominated by terophytes and criptophytes. Plant species most specific for<br />
the biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean, predominantly deciduous forests and shruberries,<br />
in the observed corridor, include: Quercus pubescens, Quercus frainetto, Quercus<br />
trojana, Quercus cerris, Carpinus orientalis, Ostrya carpinifolia, Corylus colurna,<br />
Crataegus orientalis, Acer tataricum, Acer hyrcanum, Acer monspessulanum,<br />
Syringa vulgaris and Tilia argentea.<br />
The most specific vertebrate species include:<br />
Amphibians and reptiles: Testudo hermanni, Lacerta trilineata and Ablepharus<br />
kitaibelii.<br />
Birds: Parus lugubris, Dendrocopus syriacus, Ficedula semitorquata, Streptopelia<br />
decaocto and Accipiter brevipes.<br />
Mammals: Dryomys nitedula, Apodemus flavicollis, Glis glis and Erinaceus<br />
roumanicus.<br />
The most important habitats found within the analyzed corridor are the following:<br />
Natural habitats: Italian and Turkey oak forests, forests <strong>of</strong> Hop hornbeam (Ostryo-<br />
Carpinion orientalis), forests dominated by Macedonian oak (Quercus trojana), as<br />
well as alder belts along rivers and riverby belts <strong>of</strong> willows and poplars (listed in<br />
Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat Directive).<br />
Seminatural and antropogeneous habitats: degraded forests <strong>of</strong> Hop<br />
hornbeam, Acacia plantations, orchards under apricots, peaches, almonds,<br />
walnuts and quinces, vineyards, fields with/without boundaries, alleys,<br />
gardens, villages, towns.<br />
Biome <strong>of</strong> South European predominantly deciduous forests occupies the highest parts<br />
<strong>of</strong> the observed corridor. From among plant communities specific for this biome, Sessile oak<br />
forest (Orno-Quercetum petraeae) can be found within the boundaries <strong>of</strong> the corridor.<br />
Animal life forms specific for the observed area include Theroaestisilvicola and<br />
Herboaestisilvicola (Matvejev, 1995), minor share <strong>of</strong> evergreen phaerophytes is<br />
characteristic here. The most important plant species in this biome include: Quercus<br />
petraea, Fagus sylvatica, Carpinus betulus, Corylus avellana, Berberis vulgaris,<br />
Sorbus aucuparia, Evonymus europaea, Acer campestre, Acer pseudoplatanus,<br />
Sorbus torminalis, Tilia platyphyllos, Ligustrum vulgare, Viburnum opulus, Prunus<br />
avium and Convallaria majalis. Specific vertebrate species are the following:<br />
154
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Amphibians and reptiles: Triturus cristatus, Salamandra salamandra, Rana<br />
dalmatina, Hyla arborea, Anguis fragilis, Lacerta agilis, Natrix natrix.<br />
Birds: Phylloscopus sibilatrix, Turdus philomelos, Parus caeruleus, Phoenicurus<br />
phoenicurus, Erithacus rubecula, Dendrocopus leucotos, Coccothraustes<br />
coccothraustes, Strix aluco.<br />
Mammals: Capreolus capreolus, Clethrionomys glareolus, Glis glis, Muscardinus<br />
avellanarius.<br />
The most important habitats found within the analyzed corridor are the following:<br />
Natural habitats: Sessile oak forests, woodlots, rivers and clearings within oak<br />
forests.<br />
Seminatural and antropogeneous habitats: degraded forests, meadows,<br />
orchards under apples, plums, pears, cherries, meadows under alfa-alfa, fields<br />
under wheat crops, gardens, alleys and several villages.<br />
3.11.3 Climate-vegetation-soil zones<br />
According to the division made by Filipovski et al. (1996), there are eight climate-vegetationsoil<br />
zones in Macedonia. Most <strong>of</strong> the corridor <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line Kicevo-Radozda<br />
belongs to the warm continental area. Much smaller part belongs to the cold continental<br />
area. Elements <strong>of</strong> continental sub-Mediterranean area occur near Kicevo and Struga.<br />
155
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 45 Climate-vegetation-soil zones in Southwestern part <strong>of</strong> Macedonia (by Filipovski at al. 1996)<br />
The warm continental area occupies the lower parts <strong>of</strong> all valleys in western Macedonia,<br />
between 600 and 900 m a.s.l. The total area it covers in Macedonia is 7400 km 2 or 27.4%.<br />
Prevailing and climate zonal plant community in this area is the Italian and Turkey oak forest<br />
community (Quercetum frainetto-cerris macedonicum Oberd. emend. H-t). Italian and Turkey<br />
oak forests in most <strong>of</strong> the western Macedonia are the first and lowest forest community. In<br />
practice, the whole route <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line passes through this area.<br />
156
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 46 Italian and Turkey oak forest near village Arbinovo<br />
At the very beginning <strong>of</strong> the analyzed corridor, we find elements <strong>of</strong> continental – sub-<br />
Mediterranean area, which is more specific for central and eastern parts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia. In the western part <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, continental – sub-Mediterranean area spreads<br />
over the gorges <strong>of</strong> the rivers Crn Drim, Radika, as well as Skopje and Veles valleys. This<br />
area covers total area <strong>of</strong> 8970 km 2 or 34.9% <strong>of</strong> the national territory <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. It usually<br />
occupies parts up to 600 m a.s.l. Climate zonal community is the forest <strong>of</strong> the eastern<br />
hornbeam and Downy oak (Querco-Carpinetum orientalis macedonicum Rud. apud H-t).<br />
Such elements can be found along the shore area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake, between villages Kalista<br />
and Radozda as well.<br />
These two zones overlap with the biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean, predominantly deciduous<br />
forests and shrubberies, according to Matvejev.<br />
Cold continental area occupies higher parts <strong>of</strong> the mountains, above the warm continental<br />
area, between 900 and 1100 m a.s.l. The total area covered by this area in Macedonia is<br />
3420 km 2 or 13.3%. Climate zonal community is the forest <strong>of</strong> Sessile oak (Orno-Quercetum<br />
petraeae Em). This zone overlaps with the biome <strong>of</strong> South European, predominantly<br />
deciduous forests, according to Matvejev.<br />
157
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
3.11.4 DESCRIPTION OF ECOSYSTEMS AND HABITATS<br />
3.11.4.1 Zonal natural forests<br />
3.11.4.1.1 Downy oak-Hop hornbeam forests (Querco-Carpinetum orientalis) 10<br />
Downy oak-Hop hornbeam forests are not typical forest ecosystem in the frames <strong>of</strong> the<br />
analyzed corridor <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line Kicevo-Radozda.<br />
This ecosystem belongs to the zonal biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean, predominantly deciduous<br />
forests and shrubberies.<br />
Specific plant community is Querco-Carpinetum orientalis macedonicum Rud. 39 apud<br />
Ht. 1946. This thermophilic community grows mostly on skeletal soils (silicate or carbonate).<br />
The main edificators in these forests are the eastern hornbeam (Carpinus orientalis) and<br />
Downy oak (Quercus pubescens). Apart from these species, the community usually includes<br />
other woody species, such as: Juniperus oxycedrus, Rubus sanguineus, Pyrus<br />
amygdaliformis, Cornus mas, Colutea arborescens, Coronilla emeroides, Prunus spinosa,<br />
Acer monspessulanum, A. tataricum, Crataegus monogyna, Ulmus campestris, Rhamnus<br />
rhodopaea, Asparagus acutifolius, Ruscus aculeatus, Hedera helix. In the storey <strong>of</strong> grass<br />
plants, the following species grow: Cyclamen neapolitanum, Lathyrus venetus, Anemone<br />
apenina, Lithospermum purpureoviolaceum, Lamium purpureum, Cardamine graeca, Carex<br />
halleriana and other species. During field investigations, in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> Kicevo, individual<br />
trunks <strong>of</strong> black pine (Pinus nigra) were found as well.<br />
Mammals are represented by high number <strong>of</strong> species, namely: Vulpes vulpes, Felis<br />
sylvestris, Canis lupus, Canis aureus, Meles meles, Martes foina, Mustela nivalis, Lepus<br />
europaeus, Apodemus flavicollis, Apodemus sylvicollis, Glis glis. From among birds, many<br />
species were found during field investigations, the most numerous <strong>of</strong> which include:<br />
Streptopelia turtur, Oriolus oriolus, Erithacus rubecula, Fringilla coelebs, Troglodytes<br />
troglodytes, Carduelis chloris, Aegithalos caudatus, Turdus merula, Turdus viscivorus, etc.<br />
Birds species specific for Downy oak-Hop hornbeam forests in this area include: Parus<br />
lugubris Sylvia cantillans and Dendrocopus syriacus. Herpet<strong>of</strong>auna is also rich: Rana<br />
dalmatina, Bufo bufo, Bufo viridis, Coluber jugularis, Anguis fragilis, Podarcis muralis,<br />
Podarcis erhardii rivetti, Lacerta viridis, Lacerta trilineata, Ablepharus kitaibeli, Testudo<br />
graeca, Testudo hermanni. From among insects, the most specific species are the following:<br />
Carabus convexus, Calosoma sycophanta, Calosoma inquisitor, Myas chalybaeus, Cymindis<br />
lineata, Cymindis axillaris, Brachinus explodens, Brachinus crepitans, Calathus fuscipes,<br />
Calathus melanocephalus. Butterflies are most frequently represented by Nymphalis<br />
polychloros, Lybithea celtis, Vanessa atalanta, Colias crocea, Polyommatus icarus,<br />
Gonepteryx rhamni, etc.<br />
10<br />
EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I) does not cover these forests as priority habitats for<br />
conservation<br />
158
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 47 Remains <strong>of</strong> Downy oak and Hop hornbeam forests near Kicevo<br />
This community is widely spread in Adriatic and Aegean sub-Mediterranean region. In<br />
Macedonia, is spreads mainly in central and eastern parts. In the valley <strong>of</strong> Vardar River, it is<br />
climate zonal community which climbs up to 600 m a.s.l., and on southern slopes reaches up<br />
to 1000 m a.s.l.<br />
Within the observed corridor, we find strongly degraded Downy oak and Hop hornbeam<br />
forests on minor areas, which <strong>of</strong>ten look like hilly pastures with remains/elements <strong>of</strong> Downy<br />
oak and Hop hornbeam forests. These include more thermophilic parts <strong>of</strong> the lowest parts <strong>of</strong><br />
Kicevo valley (fragments), the valley <strong>of</strong> Sateska Reka in Debrca (along the stretch from the<br />
village Botun to the village Pesocani) and shore area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake, between Struga and<br />
Radozda (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />
3.11.4.2 Italian and Turkey oak forests (Quercetum frainetto-cerris macedonicum) 11<br />
Italian and Turkey oak forests, together with Downy oak and Hop hornbeam forests belong<br />
to zonal biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean predominantly deciduous forests and shrubberies.<br />
These forests grow most <strong>of</strong>ten on deep soils <strong>of</strong> silicate, and sometimes carbonate substrate.<br />
Quercetum frainetto-cerris macedonicum Oberd. emend. H-t. is specific phytocenosis.<br />
The most important plant species include: Quercus frainetto, Q. cerris, Q. pubescens, Acer<br />
campestre, Acer tataricum, Carpinus orientalis, Crataegus monogyna, Fraxinus ornus,<br />
Prunus spinosa, Pyrus piraster, Sorbus torminalis, Cornus mas, Corylus avellana,<br />
Sambucus nigra, Rubus discolor, Clematis vitalba, Prunus vulgaris, Ostrya carpinifolia,<br />
Juniperus oxycedrus, Evonymus verrucosa, Geranium sanguineum, Euphorbia cyparissias,<br />
11 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 9280 Quercus frainetto woods (Italian oak forests)<br />
159
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Asparugus acutifolius, Hieracium pilosella, Digitalis lanata, Lathyrus venetus, Festuca<br />
heterophylla, Melica uniflora, Symphytum tuberosum, Anemone apenina, Primula acaulis,<br />
Aremonia agrimonoides, Viola alba, Cyclamen neapolitanum, Veronica chamaedrys, etc.<br />
Forests are in most <strong>of</strong> their area dominated by Italian oak, while Turkey oak is less<br />
abundant. The latter prevails on the hill Cartojca, in the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, between<br />
the villages Arbinovo and Izdeglavje.<br />
The fauna in Italian and Turkey oak forests is very similar with the one in Downy oak and<br />
Hop hornbeam forests. The most important difference is connected with the extent <strong>of</strong><br />
degradation <strong>of</strong> forest habitats - Downy oak and Hop hornbeam forests are much more<br />
degraded and occupy much smaller areas. Ornith<strong>of</strong>auna is represented by high number <strong>of</strong><br />
species, the following being more specific: Dendrocopos major, Dendrocopos medius, Picus<br />
viridis, Columba palumbus, etc. Forests within and by the corridor <strong>of</strong>fer nesting opportunities<br />
for some <strong>of</strong> the most important species, which were not recorded during field observations,<br />
but still included in the analysis in order to apply the precaution principle. Among them, the<br />
following are the most important: Aquila pomarina and Ficedula semitorquata. The most<br />
important representatives <strong>of</strong> mammals are the following species: Vulpes vulpes, Canis<br />
lupus, Ursus arctos, Meles meles, Martes foina, Mustela nivalis, Mustela putorius, Lepus<br />
europaeus, Apodemus flavicollis, Apodemus sylvicollis, Glis glis. Herpet<strong>of</strong>auna is<br />
represented by relatively high number <strong>of</strong> species: Rana dalmatina, Bufo bufo, Bufo viridis,<br />
Coluber jugularis, Anguis fragilis, Podarcis muralis, Podarcis erhardii rivetti, Lacerta viridis,<br />
Ablepharus kitaibeli, Testudo graeca, Testudo hermanni. From among insects, the following<br />
species are the most important: Myas chalybaeus, Carabus intricatus, Carabus violaceus,<br />
Carabus convexus, Molops rufipes, Harpalus serripes, Harpalus dimidiatus, Amara eurynota,<br />
Amara aenea, Calathus fuscipes, Calathus melanocephalus.<br />
This forest community spreads only on the Balkan Peninsula, and in Macedonia it is climate<br />
zonal community in the warm continental area. It is found in all valleys in our country, usually<br />
above 600 m a.s.l. Considering that it is mentioned in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat and wild<br />
species Directive, this forest habitat enjoys the status <strong>of</strong> conservation in Europe, although it<br />
is widely distributed in Macedonia.<br />
In the frames <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor, it is a dominant forest community covering the<br />
largest areas <strong>of</strong> all forest habitats (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />
3.11.4.3 Chestnut forests (Castaneo-Quercetum macedonicum) 12<br />
Chestnut forests belong to the biome <strong>of</strong> South European predominantly deciduous forests. In<br />
Macedonia, they are found in Italian and Turkey oak, and even in Downy oak and Hop<br />
hornbeam belts. All chestnut forests in Macedonia belong to association Castaneo-<br />
Quercetum macedonicum (Nik. 1951) Wen. 1965 (syn: Castanetum sativae-macedonicum<br />
Nik. 1951) <strong>of</strong> the alliance Castaneo-Quercion Soõ (1962) 1964. Most <strong>of</strong>ten they grow on<br />
heavy clayey soils, and they are very diverse by their floristic composition. Chestnut forests<br />
in Macedonia are not extremely acidophilic, and they are relatively thermophilic.<br />
Besides chestnut (Castanea sativa), fragmented chestnut forests also include significant<br />
number <strong>of</strong> woody plants from the adjacent Italian and Turkey oak woods (Quercus frainetto,<br />
Q. pubescens, Q. cerris). Most <strong>of</strong> the chestnut forests within the observed corridor are<br />
modified under the influence <strong>of</strong> man. Chestnut forests have been limited to minor woods or<br />
12 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 9260 Castanea sativa woods (chestnut forests)<br />
160
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
boundaries <strong>of</strong> numerous small meadows. Therefore, we can also find other fruit trees there,<br />
such as Prunus cerasus, P. cerasifera, P. spinosa, Juglans regia, Pyrus pyraster.<br />
In the storey <strong>of</strong> shrubs, the following species were found: Coronilla emerus ssp. emeroides,<br />
Lonicera caprifolium, Cytisus nigricans, Hedera helix. The storey <strong>of</strong> grass plants<br />
accommodates the following species: Tammus communis, Helleborus odorus, Ranunculus<br />
ficaria, Viola odorata, Cyclamen hederifolium.<br />
Chestnut forests in Macedonia are under threat <strong>of</strong> degradation and extinction due to the<br />
widely spread viral diseases and cutting <strong>of</strong> high quality wood. They are important at<br />
European level, too.<br />
The fauna <strong>of</strong> vertebrates is very similar to the one <strong>of</strong> Downy oak and Hop hornbeam and<br />
Italian and Turkey oak woods, but the number <strong>of</strong> dead trunks along the stretch from the<br />
village Radozda to the border makes us expect that there is high number <strong>of</strong> specific bird<br />
species (Picus canus, Strix aluco,Certhia bachydactyla, etc.)<br />
The only chestnut forests within the investigated corridor, in a form <strong>of</strong> fragments, are found<br />
between the village Radozda and Macedonian-<strong>Albania</strong>n border at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 750 to 850<br />
m (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />
3.11.4.4 Sessile oak forests (Orno-Quercetum petraeae) 13<br />
Sessile oak forests belong to the cold continental area where climate zonal community<br />
exists. They are included in the zoo-biome <strong>of</strong> South European predominantly deciduous<br />
forests.<br />
The main plant community is Orno-Quercetum petraeae Em 1968. It grows on shady and<br />
rather humid slopes. In deep river valleys, it may go down to 600 m a.s.l., and in sunny<br />
slopes it climbs up to 1300 m a.s.l. There are optimum conditions for the growth <strong>of</strong> this<br />
community in the altitudinal belt between 900 and 1100 m a.s.l. Soils are skeletal, acid, they<br />
grow on siliceous substrate, and the most frequent soil type are the brown forest soils<br />
(cambisols).<br />
Floristic composition <strong>of</strong> these forests is poorer compared to Italian and Turkey oak and<br />
Downy oak and Hop hornbeam woods. Sessile oak (Quercus petraea) is edificator. Although<br />
not mentioned in the pr<strong>of</strong>essional literature, frequently found species <strong>of</strong> this community in<br />
the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest is the oak Quercus dalechampii which is also known among people<br />
under the name “gorun”. Other tree species also grow in the storey <strong>of</strong> trees, such as:<br />
Fraxinus ornus, Sorbus torminalis, Acer hyrcanum, Acer tataricum and Tilia tomentosa.<br />
Grass storey is represented by Luzula forsteri, Trifolium balcanicum, Lathyrus venetus,<br />
Festuca heterophylla, Cynanchum speciosum, etc.<br />
This forest community spreads in western parts <strong>of</strong> the Balkan Peninsula. In Macedonia, it is<br />
spread throughout the national territory.<br />
Within the investigated corridor, Sessile oak forests occupy the highest slopes, while in river<br />
valleys they go lower as well. Sessile oak forests have been recorded in dales south <strong>of</strong> the<br />
village Pesocani and on a part <strong>of</strong> the hill Cartoica between villages Arbinovo and Izdeglavje.<br />
They are most widely spread between the villages Judovo and Slivovo, but the line passes<br />
13 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I) does not cover these forests as habitats with conservation<br />
priority<br />
161
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
through this part through a long tunnel, and therefore Sessile oak forests are not mapped<br />
(please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />
3.11.5 Azonal forests<br />
Azonal forests in the investigated corridor grow along the courses <strong>of</strong> rivers, streams and<br />
canals.<br />
3.11.5.1 Alder belts and woodlots (Carici elongatae-Alnetum glutinosae) 14<br />
Alder belts grow along rivers and streams. The alder (Alnus glutinosa) is edificatory in these<br />
belts. Besides alder, other woody and shrub species are also found here, such as: Carpinus<br />
betulus, Salix amplexicaulis, Rubus discolor, Juglans regia, Clematis vitalba, Humulus<br />
lupulus, Sambucus nigra, etc. In the storey <strong>of</strong> grass plants, we find Caltha palustris,<br />
Ranunculus ficaria, Lamium purpureum, L. Maculatum and other species.<br />
Alder belts and woodlots <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor belong to the alliance <strong>of</strong> Alnion<br />
glutinosae (Malcuit 1929) Meijer Drees 1936. There are several representative communities<br />
<strong>of</strong> this alliance in Macedonia, in its western parts, including: Geo coccinei-Alnetum Em 1964,<br />
Fraxino-Alnetum glutinosae Lj. Micevski & J. Matveeva 1978 and Carici elongatae-Alnetum<br />
glutinosae. The former community is found on higher altitudes. The latter community has<br />
been described from the gorge <strong>of</strong> the river Treska between Makedonski Brod and Matka.<br />
Alder communities in the region <strong>of</strong> Debrca belong to the third community, i.e. Carici<br />
elongatae-Alnetum glutinosae.<br />
Ornith<strong>of</strong>auna is represented by several species, the most specific among them being:<br />
Motacilla cinerea, Cinclus cinclus, Dendrocopos major, Parus palustris, Picus viridis, etc.<br />
High number <strong>of</strong> species are absent because <strong>of</strong> the degraded status <strong>of</strong> these belts.<br />
Herpet<strong>of</strong>auna is very rich (almost all amphibian species are found along small rivers or<br />
flooded areas covering these forests, as well as high number <strong>of</strong> reptiles, including grass<br />
snake Natrix natrix and Aesculapian Snake (Elaphe longissima). Fauna <strong>of</strong> mammals is not<br />
well studied, but the following species have been confirmed along rivers: otter Lutra lutra,<br />
water shrew Neomys sp, wildcats Felis silvestris, etc.<br />
Alder woodlots in Macedonia are very rare. They have been destroyed on most <strong>of</strong> their<br />
former habitats, together with marshes drainage after the Second World War. The only well<br />
preserved stand is found in Belciste marsh, near by the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest, but it is also <strong>of</strong><br />
significance that some <strong>of</strong> the rather well preserved stands are found within the subject<br />
corridor itself.<br />
These forests have had similar destiny in the whole <strong>of</strong> Europe and therefore they have not<br />
only been listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the Habitats and wild species Directive, but they have high<br />
conservation priority (*). This means that every EU Member State has to designate protected<br />
area within the spread <strong>of</strong> these habitats (Natura 2000 area) for the purpose <strong>of</strong> their efficient<br />
conservation.<br />
In the frames <strong>of</strong> investigated corridor, alder belts have been observed over most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
course <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, along the rivers Brzdanska, Judovska and Vilipica (village<br />
Slivovo), as well s along other watercourses and canals in ravine areas (villages Botun,<br />
14 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 91E0 * Alluvial forests with Alnus glutinosa and Fraxinus excelsior<br />
(Alno-Padion, Alnion incanae, Salicion albae) (alluvial alder and willow forests and minor forests)<br />
162
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Volino). Alder woodlots or their remains have been observed in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the villages<br />
Arbinovo and Botun (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />
3.11.5.2 Willow belts (Salicetum albае-fragilis) 15<br />
Willow belts are far less abundant in the frames <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor than alder belts.<br />
They spread along rivers, i.e. on places flooded during spring, while during summer water<br />
drains deeper in soil layers, but it is still in root zone. The soil is sandy and sludgy, porous<br />
and rich in mineral matters.<br />
Community <strong>of</strong> willow belts belongs to the alliance Salicion albae Soô (1930) 1940 and<br />
association Salicetum albo-fragilis Issler 26 em. Soô 57.<br />
The storey <strong>of</strong> trees is dominated by white willow (Salix alba), and the following species have<br />
been observed along it: Salix fragilis, Populus alba, Salix amplexicaulis, Alnus glutinosa. In<br />
the storey <strong>of</strong> grass plants the following species occur: Arum italicum, Lamium purpureum, L.<br />
maculatum, Lycopus europaeus, Solanum dulcamara, Eupatorium cannabinum.<br />
Fauna is very similar with the one in alder belts; from among birds, the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
penduline tit Remiz pendulinus is specific.<br />
Specific representatives <strong>of</strong> invertebrates include the following species: Arion subfuscus,<br />
Helix lucorum, Balea serbica (snails) and Pterostichus niger, Anchomenus dorsalis, Platynus<br />
assimilis, Nebria brevicollis, Bembidion decorum (ground beetles - Carabidae).<br />
Willow belts are threatened in Europe due to canalization <strong>of</strong> rivers (Annex I <strong>of</strong> Habitat<br />
Directive). The situation in our country is similar.<br />
Short willow belts have been recorded within the investigated corridor along the river<br />
Sateska, and the best developed ones grow northwest <strong>of</strong> the village Izdeglavje, at the site<br />
Staro Selo. Riparian belts near the motel Pocinka (village Arbinovo) are characterized by<br />
abundant presence <strong>of</strong> white poplar (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />
3.11.5.3 Remains <strong>of</strong> marsh oak forests (Quercus robur) 16<br />
Forests <strong>of</strong> the alliance Quercion robori-petraeae Br.-Bl. 1932 (or Alno-Quercion roboris Ht<br />
1937) grow on deep clayey soils flooded during spring due to the rise in the level <strong>of</strong><br />
groundwater, and less <strong>of</strong>ten due to overflow <strong>of</strong> river waters.<br />
These woodlots are very rare and cover very small areas in Macedonia.<br />
Along the course <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, by the village Moroista, we noted remains <strong>of</strong> the<br />
community Quercetum pedunculiflorae macedonicum Em. Several preserved trunks (15)<br />
<strong>of</strong> Quercus robur have gigantic dimensions (the fattest tree has a rim <strong>of</strong> 6.7 m) and grow in<br />
the yard <strong>of</strong> the church St.Bogorodica and cover an area <strong>of</strong> 0.8 ha.<br />
This is the only stand <strong>of</strong> its kind in Macedonia, and therefore it has been proposed for<br />
protection as “monument <strong>of</strong> nature” under the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />
15 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 91E0 * Alluvial forests with Alnus glutinosa and Fraxinus<br />
excelsior (Alno-Padion, Alnion incanae, Salicion albae) (alluvial alder and willow forests and minor<br />
forests)<br />
16 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 9190 Old acidophilous oak woods with Quercus robur on sandy<br />
plains<br />
163
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
(2000-2020). This site is beyond the investigated corridor. In Macedonia, this community is<br />
potentially distributed in Pelagonia, Polog, Kicevo Valley and Vardar Valley, too.<br />
Remains <strong>of</strong> these woodlots within the investigated corridor can probably be found along the<br />
canals in Strusko Pole (fields), but due to their extremely fragmented status and full<br />
degradation, they do not compose individual habitat and thus they are not presented on the<br />
Map <strong>of</strong> habitats in Appendix 6 and 7).<br />
Figure 48 Truffle oak (Quercus robur) in the village Moroista<br />
164
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
3.11.6 Open areas - pastures<br />
Hilly pastures are poorly represented in the investigated corridor. These are secondary<br />
habitats existing on areas on which forest ecosystems grow primarily, at altitude <strong>of</strong> up to<br />
1200 m. Therefore, within the habitat <strong>of</strong> hilly pastures, we may find various succession<br />
stages, from open pastures to strongly degraded woods (Downy oak and Hop hornbeam and<br />
Italian and Turkey oak woods). These habitats are characterized with great daily and<br />
seasonal amplitudes <strong>of</strong> air and soil temperatures and lower humidity (especially stressed<br />
during summer period). These ecological conditions are the reason for the specific spectrum<br />
<strong>of</strong> life forms, i.e. bigger abundance <strong>of</strong> thermophitic plants.<br />
In the frames <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> interest, most <strong>of</strong> the grass areas are in fact abandoned fields<br />
and meadows, which still lack typical characteristics <strong>of</strong> hilly pastures. Therefore, as well as<br />
for the fact that the period <strong>of</strong> elaboration <strong>of</strong> this Study did not allow field investigations (early<br />
spring), it was not possible to determine more precisely the affiliation <strong>of</strong> these grass areas.<br />
(please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />
Fauna <strong>of</strong> these habitats abounds <strong>of</strong> specific species, so that the most specific reptiles<br />
include Coluber caspius, Ablefarus kitaibelli, Vipera ammodytes, Podarcis taurica, P. erhardii<br />
rivetti, birds are represented by Anthus campestris, Lanius collurio, Lanuus minor, Lanius<br />
senator,Carduelis cannabina, etc.<br />
Hilly pastures, especially on calcareous ground, are habitats <strong>of</strong> priority for conservation<br />
under the European legislation.<br />
3.11.7 Rocky areas<br />
The investigated corridor comprises small areas <strong>of</strong> rocks and rocky grounds, which by their<br />
geological composition and vegetation may be calcareous or siliceous.<br />
Rocky habitats are characterized with very low biological production and extreme climate<br />
and soil conditions. Temperature oscillations are great during day and year. These habitats<br />
are characterized with low humidity because <strong>of</strong> the low water retention capacity <strong>of</strong><br />
indigenous substrate and poorly developed soils. Such ecological conditions induce the<br />
occurrence <strong>of</strong> specialized plant species (chasmophytes) and animals. Vegetation cover is<br />
poorly developed, and so the physiognomy <strong>of</strong> the habitat is determined by the composition<br />
and the structure <strong>of</strong> rocks. Yet, the presence <strong>of</strong> rare and endemic plant species is an<br />
important feature <strong>of</strong> these habitats.<br />
3.11.7.1 Calcareous rocks and rocky grounds 17<br />
Specific flora and vegetation grow on calcareous rocks and rocky grounds. Literature<br />
contains limited data on the composition <strong>of</strong> the flora and plant communities growing within<br />
the investigated corridor.<br />
Chasmophytes grow in the cracks <strong>of</strong> the rocks. During the field investigations, the following<br />
plant species were recorded: Sedum acre, С. album, Centaurea spp., Ceterach <strong>of</strong>ficinarum,<br />
Asplenium trichomanes, etc. This data is not sufficient to determine the synthaxonomic<br />
affiliation <strong>of</strong> these habitats.<br />
The best habitats on calcareous rocks have been recorded along the shore <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake,<br />
between the settlements Elen Kamen and Radozda (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats,<br />
Appendix 6 and 7). Given the small areas covered by these habitats in the investigated<br />
17 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 8210 Calcareous rocky slopes with chasmophytic vegetation<br />
165
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
corridor, they are not sites <strong>of</strong> conservation interest, although listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> EU Directive<br />
on habitats and wild species under the code 8210.<br />
As a result <strong>of</strong> small areas they occupy, these habitats do not host any significant fauna<br />
species, i.e. only opportune and widely distributed representatives are present (Buteo rufinus<br />
was recorded away from the corridor).<br />
However, presence <strong>of</strong> some bat species is possible along small cracks and canals <strong>of</strong> the<br />
massif, and these are priority group for conservation.<br />
Figure 49 Calcareous rocks near the village Radozda<br />
3.11.7.2 Siliceous rocks 18<br />
Siliceous rocks are not specific habitat in the investigated corridor, because they occupy<br />
small areas and are scattered mostly over forest habitats. Therefore, flora composition <strong>of</strong><br />
siliceous rocks is similar with the composition <strong>of</strong> the surrounding habitats, but with<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> certain species, namely: Polypodium vulgare, Asplenium trichomanes,<br />
Asplenium septentrionale,<br />
Despite their low number <strong>of</strong> representation, they <strong>of</strong>fer potentially conditions for nesting <strong>of</strong><br />
certain bird species (there are records <strong>of</strong> nesting <strong>of</strong> ravens Corvus corax on most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sites, which is a precondition for the settlement <strong>of</strong> several species <strong>of</strong> kestrel (Falco<br />
tinnunculus, F. beregrinus, F. biarmcus), and Bubo bubo.<br />
18 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 8220 Siliceous rocky slopes with chasmophytic vegetation<br />
166
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Small areas with habitats on siliceous rocks were recorded on the left side <strong>of</strong> the river<br />
Sateska, near the village Pesocani and in the gorge <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska between the<br />
villages Arbinovo and Izdeglavje (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7). Given<br />
the small areas covered by these habitats in the investigated corridor, they are not sites <strong>of</strong><br />
conservation interest, although listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> EU Directive on habitats and wild species<br />
under the code 8220.<br />
3.11.8 Wetlands<br />
The territory <strong>of</strong> intended railway line route passes through moderate continental climate<br />
zone, situated between the mountains Ilinska, Karaorman and Jablanica. The designed<br />
railway line route is characterized with hilly relief in the region <strong>of</strong> Kicevo to the village<br />
Meseiste and plane marshy in the region <strong>of</strong> the village Meseiste to the village Kalista, at an<br />
altitude <strong>of</strong> 700-900 m. Mountains are characterized with exceptionally steep slopes<br />
separated in between with small and medium rivers.<br />
There are seven rivers within the corridor <strong>of</strong> the route, the following <strong>of</strong> which are bigger:<br />
Treska, Sateska and Crn Drim, while rivers Vilipica, Judovska, Brzdanska and Bukov Dol are<br />
more prominent in the group <strong>of</strong> smaller ones. Besides, the corridor hosts significant number<br />
<strong>of</strong> springs, nameless streams, drainage canals (artificial water bodies), the canal <strong>of</strong> the river<br />
Sateska (modified water body), as well as non-permanent water bodies, such as flooded<br />
areas (during spring upon rivers overflow), swamps, marshes (remains <strong>of</strong> Struga marsh) and<br />
pit bogs. Non-permanent water bodies occur mainly during spring upon snow smelting and<br />
remain by the end <strong>of</strong> the spring or early summer (depending on the volumes <strong>of</strong> rain). Small<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> Struga marsh sustain throughout the year, but due to constant drainage, these<br />
areas are very small and fragmented.<br />
It is interesting to point out that the aquatic ecosystems in the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
belong to two watersheds, namely Adriatic (Crn Drim river watershed) and Aegean (Treska<br />
river watershed).<br />
3.11.8.1 Ohrid Lake<br />
Proximity <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake, which apart from the watershed <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska (which enters<br />
into Ohrid lake through a canal) enters within the corridor in the final part <strong>of</strong> the route (near<br />
the village Radozda) is <strong>of</strong> particular importance for the designed route. Ohrid Lake is the<br />
oldest, continuously existing lake in Europe and one <strong>of</strong> the most important aquatic<br />
ecosystems in terms <strong>of</strong> diversity (endemism, relictness, species diversity) on global level<br />
(Cvijic, 1905, 1911). Most scientists agree with the time frame <strong>of</strong> 2-5 million years age <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Lake (Stankovic 1960). Some authors maintain that the southern basin <strong>of</strong> the Lake occurred<br />
during Miocene (Ivanovski and Strackov, 1974; Spirkovski et al. 2001). According to the data<br />
<strong>of</strong> Albrecht & Willke (2008), Ohrid Lake has the highest index <strong>of</strong> endemic diversity on global<br />
level (even higher than the Baikal Lake, Tanganyika, Malawi, Titicaca, Biwa, Aoki), by which<br />
it is recognized as the most important lake not only in Europe, but also in the world. Ohrid<br />
lake is part <strong>of</strong> the group <strong>of</strong> lakes marked as Desaret lakes, composed <strong>of</strong> Ohrid, Prespa<br />
(Large and Minor) and Maliq (<strong>Albania</strong>).<br />
Ohrid Lake is located in the tectonic depression between the mountains Jablanica and<br />
Galicica. It is the deepest lake on the Balkans with the maximum depth <strong>of</strong> 288 m and<br />
average depth <strong>of</strong> 155 m. The water surface <strong>of</strong> the Lake amounts 358 km 2 and the estimates<br />
are that it contains 55.4 km³ <strong>of</strong> water. The Lake’s maximum length is 30.4 km and maximum<br />
width is 14.8 km. The length <strong>of</strong> the shoreline is 87.53 km.<br />
The bottom <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake in the shore region is mainly rocky with presence <strong>of</strong> relatively<br />
coarse stones, while in the bays, usually up to 1 m depth, there are sand deposits. Mixture <strong>of</strong><br />
organic sediment and sand is found much less frequently, which is more frequent in the<br />
167
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
region <strong>of</strong> the villages Kalista and Radozda. At a depth <strong>of</strong> 5 m, there is mainly sandy bottom<br />
where dense populations <strong>of</strong> diverse species <strong>of</strong> Chara grow. The belt <strong>of</strong> Chara spreads<br />
mainly to a depth <strong>of</strong> 10-15 m. Fine sediment (clayey) occurs at bigger depths with poor<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> organic matters. Diversity <strong>of</strong> substrates enables the growth <strong>of</strong> high number <strong>of</strong><br />
microbial algae species (Diatomea) which at certain sites reaches as many as more than<br />
200 confirmed Diatomeas.<br />
Figure 50 Sandbars on the river Sateska near the village Volino<br />
With regard to macrophytes, Ohrid Lake is rich in species. The most abundant and frequent<br />
species in the Lake include different species <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton (P. perfoliatus, P. crispus, P.<br />
pectinatus, P. acutifolius) and Ceratophyllum demersum, while at a depth <strong>of</strong> 5-15 m, a belt <strong>of</strong><br />
Chara occurs composed <strong>of</strong> several species (C. ceratophylla, C. ohridana, C. globularis). The<br />
biggest belt <strong>of</strong> claspingleaf pondweed Potamogeton perfoliatus with a total area <strong>of</strong> 684.029<br />
ha (Talevska 2009) is found in the region <strong>of</strong> the village Radozda. Reed stands (Phragmites<br />
australis) occur in the shore region spreading to a depth <strong>of</strong> 2 m on rocky ground, but there is<br />
also Cladophora on wooden poles grown over with epiphytes.<br />
168
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 51 Reed belt on Ohrid Lake shore, between the settlement Elen Kamen and the village<br />
Radozda<br />
3.11.8.2 Rivers and streams<br />
River Treska in Kicevo valley, also known under the name Golema Reka (Big River), is third<br />
in length tributary <strong>of</strong> the river Vardar. It originates from karstic aquifer, occurring on the<br />
southern branch <strong>of</strong> the mountain Bistra, below the peak Kiska in the village Izvor in Kopacka<br />
at 740 m above sea level, and it enters the river Vardar in Skopje Valley near the village<br />
Saraj, at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 260 m. The total length <strong>of</strong> the course is 138 km, with a gradient <strong>of</strong> 480<br />
m and watershed area <strong>of</strong> 2.068 km 2 or 8.04% <strong>of</strong> the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />
(Gasevski 1978).<br />
In its evolution, Treska built Kicevo (14.0 km), Brod (17.5 km) and Golema (66.2 km) valleys,<br />
and it cuts Kicevo valley, alluvial river expansion <strong>of</strong> Brod, Porece area and small portion <strong>of</strong><br />
Skopje Valley. Research carried out so far confirmed that Treska had pirate valley,<br />
composed <strong>of</strong> two rivers: one entering Skopje Lake – Lower Treska and the other one<br />
entering Porece Lake – Upper Treska. The one entering Porece Lake flew out through<br />
Barbaras and Usi in Pelagonia. Upon the Skopje Lake run<strong>of</strong>f, the lower erosive base<br />
lowered down in Skopje Valley, the vertical erosion increased, causing backward<br />
replacement <strong>of</strong> the aquifer <strong>of</strong> Lower Treska and its infiltration in the basin <strong>of</strong> Porece. Thus, it<br />
drained the water from Porece basin and carried out piracy in the upper course or Upper<br />
Treska building a unique valley.<br />
In the corridor <strong>of</strong> the route, Treska River is characterized with rapid water flow and rocky<br />
bottom. At certain points, there are riparian weak sand deposits, while organic sediments are<br />
almost completely absent. Riparian region is inhabited by woody species (alder, willow,<br />
poplar) resulting in significant shade. Open areas occur less frequently resulting mainly from<br />
tree cutting on the river banks. Rocky ground and tree bark immersed into the water are<br />
grown over with aquatic mosses (Fontinalis antipyretica). No other macrophitic species have<br />
been recorded during the investigation period.<br />
River Sateska is the largest river in the watershed area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake. Its watershed area<br />
covers around 411. 5 km 2 . Around 39.36 % <strong>of</strong> the total surface watershed area belongs to<br />
Ohrid Lake. Aquifer region <strong>of</strong> the river is located in the mountainous region, while its middle<br />
169
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
and lower course are in the plane region. Sateska river is characterized with great erosive<br />
potential and carries significant amounts <strong>of</strong> undissolved mineral matters. In its middle and<br />
lower course, the river runs through agricultural areas, being additionally loaded with organic<br />
(dissolved and undissolved) matters. Several villages are located along the river with<br />
unsettled communal problems. Wastewaters contribute further to the river pollution. It is<br />
maintained that in the past (up to 18 th century), the river entered Ohrid lake directly, and<br />
later, due to human activities, it changed its natural bed near the village Volino and entered<br />
the river Crn Drim. In 1961, the riverbed <strong>of</strong> Sateska was diverted towards Ohrid Lake<br />
(Sibinovic 1987). The flow <strong>of</strong> the water in the river is largely variable and dependent on<br />
climate conditions (quantity <strong>of</strong> water sediments). It is characterized with two peaks: in spring<br />
(March-April) as a result <strong>of</strong> snow melting and in November and December (more intensive<br />
rain and snow falls). The annual flow <strong>of</strong> the river is around 129 million m 3 .<br />
The corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line incorporates the middle and the lower course <strong>of</strong> the river<br />
Sateska. In the region <strong>of</strong> the village Pesocan down to the village Meseiste, the river is<br />
characterized with rapid flow. The bottom <strong>of</strong> the river is mainly rocky, but with notable sand<br />
deposits at places with weaker flow. Organic sediment is found rarely. In spring, the water is<br />
highly turbid due to significant presence <strong>of</strong> inorganic matter.<br />
Figure 52 Sandy bank on the river Sateska near the village Pesocan<br />
Macrophyte vegetation in this region is represented mainly by small populations <strong>of</strong> aquatic<br />
mosses (Fontinalis antipyretica and Rhynchostegium riparioides) fixed onto the rocky<br />
ground. From among macrophyte algae, we find mostly Hydrurus foetidus, while in summer<br />
months, Cladophora sp. is dominant. During spring period, coarser stones, as well as<br />
branches immersed in water are grown over with epilytic communities in outstanding brown<br />
colour, dominated mainly by siliceous algae (Diatomea).<br />
In its lower course (after the village Meseiste down to the entry into Crn Drim, i.e. Ohrid<br />
Lake), the river Sateska is characterized with a slower flow and small meanders. It is<br />
170
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
important to note that during field investigations, due to the high water level <strong>of</strong> the river<br />
Sateska and high water level <strong>of</strong> the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid in particular, part <strong>of</strong> the water from the<br />
Sateska river was redirected to its natural riverbed (i.e. to the entry into Crn Drim river), while<br />
the rest was flowing through the canal towards Ohrid Lake. Because <strong>of</strong> its high water level,<br />
the river flooded the surrounding areas under alder, poplar and willow, thus forming marshy<br />
biotopes (with prevailing woody vegetation). The bottom <strong>of</strong> these marshy biotopes is sludgy<br />
with rich organic detritus. The bottom <strong>of</strong> the river itself (in its natural riverbed) is rocky, with<br />
notable sand deposits at certain places. Apart from that, exceptionally great impact <strong>of</strong> solid<br />
municipal waste disposed <strong>of</strong> in the vicinity and in the very riverbed is notable. In such<br />
conditions, the water is highly turbid with visible matters <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic origin.<br />
Typical aquatic vegetation has not been detected. The canal <strong>of</strong> Sateska river (modified water<br />
body) is built <strong>of</strong> big size stone blocks and the flow is regulated. Under such conditions, the<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> aquatic vegetation is impossible. Due to the strong variation in the water flow in the<br />
canal, growth <strong>of</strong> stable epilytic vegetation is not possible. The most frequent substrate in<br />
such conditions includes fallen branches or grass plants (terrestrial) immersed in the water<br />
for longer than two weeks.<br />
River Crn Drim flows out <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 695 m and its length is around 56<br />
km. The middle course <strong>of</strong> the river at the outflow from the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid is 22.24 m 3 /sec. The<br />
river retains its natural characteristics only at less than half <strong>of</strong> its course, i.e. from the exit<br />
from Struga to the village Tasmarunista. There are two large accumulations (Globocica and<br />
Spilje) for electricity production. In the region <strong>of</strong> the city <strong>of</strong> Struga, the river is canalized and<br />
with rapid flow, and after the exit from the city, the riverbed is natural. The bottom <strong>of</strong> the river<br />
is rocky in its central part, while the bank segments are covered with sand deposits. Apart<br />
from this, the region close to the banks is characterized by the presence <strong>of</strong> great quantities<br />
<strong>of</strong> solid municipal waste, as well as numerous immersed branches.<br />
Macrophyte vegetation during spring is less common, while bigger presence <strong>of</strong> macrophytes<br />
occurs during summer and early autumn, when vegetation is represented by Potamogeton<br />
perfoliatus, P. crispus, P. pectinatus, P. acutifolius, Myriophyllum spicatum and Zannichellia<br />
palustris (Talevska 2010). There are much smaller populations <strong>of</strong> reed - Phragmites australis<br />
and broadleaf and narrowleaf cattail - Typha latifolia and Typha angustifolia (Talevski et al.<br />
2010). During the year, significant populations <strong>of</strong> Cladophora occur as well, with more<br />
intense domination in the course <strong>of</strong> summer.<br />
Smaller rivers in the corridor are Vilipica, Judovska, Brzdanska and Bukov Dol. During<br />
spring, due to snow melting, these rivers are characterized with rapid flow and full-watered.<br />
During summer, the quantity <strong>of</strong> water is drastically reduced also due to the possibility for<br />
their use for irrigation. The bank <strong>of</strong> the rivers is usually planted with woody species, which<br />
causes intense shading. Under such circumstances, one could expect lower species<br />
diversity <strong>of</strong> algae. Dominant macrophyte in this rivers is the aquatic moss (Fontinalis<br />
antipyretica). The bank <strong>of</strong> the river Bukov Dol, as a result <strong>of</strong> human impact (wood cutting) is<br />
open and unshaded. Signs <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic impacts are also related to the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
solid municipal waste and demolishing waste on the very bank, as well as in the river itself.<br />
Owing to the rapid flow, the bottom <strong>of</strong> the river is rocky, without visible deposits <strong>of</strong> sand and<br />
sediment. Stones are grown over with rich epilytic sediments. Significant populations <strong>of</strong> bluegreen<br />
algae (primarily Phormidium spp) have been found in the epilithon.<br />
3.11.8.3 Springs and wells<br />
In the artificially formed small puddle from the spring above the village Radozda, the<br />
following species <strong>of</strong> vascular plants grow: Callitriche stagnalis, Veronica beccabunga,<br />
Ranunculus repens, Mentha sp. and Equisetum telmateja.<br />
171
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Beyond the investigated corridor, there are many karstic springs: springs in the foothill <strong>of</strong> the<br />
hill Gaber (Sini Viroj near the village Belcista and springs near the village Novo Selo), as well<br />
as the springs in the village Izdeglavje.<br />
3.11.8.4 Swamps and marshes 19<br />
Along running waters, the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line includes swamps, marshes and artificial<br />
water bodies (irrigation and drainage canals). Swamps are found mainly along the course <strong>of</strong><br />
the river Sateska (before the village Moroiste) and they are mostly non-permanent. They are<br />
distrophic-eutrophic with rich deposits <strong>of</strong> organic sediment, low content <strong>of</strong> dissolved oxygen<br />
and high content <strong>of</strong> nutrients. The main substrates for algae growth are the numerous<br />
branches fallen into the water. In spring, these substrates are grown over with big<br />
populations <strong>of</strong> siliceous algae. In addition to these, though with low abundance and <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
free, green algae (Spyrogira spp) occur as well. Also, small areas under mountainous pit<br />
bogs have been found near the river Vilipica, which are probably humid only during summer.<br />
They are rich in organic sediment which is excellent substrate for the growth <strong>of</strong> rich<br />
Diatomea flora. The prevailing component, mosses, is represented by several species.<br />
Remains <strong>of</strong> Struga marsh are also found near the railway line. This marsh, as a result from<br />
the constant drainage, has been strongly degraded and transformed into cultivable land.<br />
Small stands <strong>of</strong> reed are present close to Ohrid Lake, while the rest is represented with the<br />
communities <strong>of</strong> Caricetum elatae and Cyperetum longi. In segments with weaker flow, there<br />
is a growth <strong>of</strong> green algae (mostly Spyrogira spp.). Prevailing substrates for the growth <strong>of</strong><br />
Diatomea are organic sediments and macrophytes. The following marshy communities are<br />
found in the fields <strong>of</strong> Struga: Scirpo-Phragmitetum, Cyperetum longi, Caricetum elatae W.<br />
Koch 1926 lysimachietosum Mic., Sparganio-Glycerietum fluitantis Br.-Bl. All marshy<br />
habitats <strong>of</strong> the railway line corridor belong to a type listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> EU Directive on<br />
Habitats and wild species under the code 7230. This habitat type includes communities <strong>of</strong><br />
the alliances Phragmition and Magnocaricion elatae.<br />
19 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 7230 Alcalin fens<br />
172
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 53 Humid meadows and marshy habitats in the remains <strong>of</strong> Struga marsh near the village<br />
Radolista<br />
The fauna in this area is not very specialized in relation to individual plant communities.<br />
Historically, the area used to be very important nesting, resting and overwinter stay <strong>of</strong> high<br />
number <strong>of</strong> bird species, out <strong>of</strong> which only few individuals can be found today, mostly<br />
occasionally (disoriented or at migration) or in low number for overwinter stay. This includes<br />
several species <strong>of</strong> heron and ibis (Ardea cinerea, A. purpurea, Egretta gazetta, Casmerodius<br />
albus, Nycticorax nycticorax, Platalea leucorodia, Plegadis falcinelus), but Ardeolla ralloides<br />
and Ixobrichus mnutus, as well as Circus aeruginosus from among birds <strong>of</strong> pray make nests<br />
in the area. Flooding and humid conditions enable the presence <strong>of</strong> several species <strong>of</strong> snipes<br />
(Gallinago gallinago, Tringa ochropus, Tringa glareola, Tringa totanus, Philomachus pugnax<br />
etc.), storks Ciconia ciconia and Black-headed wagtail Motacilla flava feldegg. The most<br />
specific species from among mammals is the otter Lutra lutra. Almost all amphibian species<br />
found in Macedonia can be found here.<br />
3.11.8.5 Reeds (Scirpeto-Phragmitetum W. Koch)<br />
Physiognomy <strong>of</strong> the habitat is determined by the reed (Phragmites australis). Reed stands in<br />
the corridor are not thick, which is common for this habitat. Besides reed, the following<br />
species are also found in the community: Typha spp., Scirpus lacustris, Mentha "aquatica",<br />
Iris pseudacorus, Alisma plantago-aquatica etc. The habitat develops on permanently or<br />
occasionally humid soils, and at Elen Kamen-Radozda in the very water <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake.<br />
Small areas under reed were identified in the investigated corridor. The most important ones<br />
are found between villages Volino and Moroista and along the shore <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake between<br />
the settlement Elen Kamen and the village Radozda.<br />
Reeds along Ohrid Lake shore build very narrow belt where vegetation has poor coverage.<br />
In this regard, this habitat has limited significance for biological diversity and probably is not<br />
an area where many birds nest.<br />
173
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Reeds in Struga Fields between villages Volino and Moroista occupy large areas and have<br />
certain importance for many animal species (see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />
3.11.8.6 Caricetum elatae W. Koch lysimachietosum Mic.<br />
Community belongs to the alliance Magnocaricion elatae (W. Koch) Br.-Bl, which used to<br />
spread along valleys in the past, but due to specific climate conditions, it sustained only in<br />
Ohrid Valley.<br />
The community grows in depressions which are constantly flooded or have high ground<br />
waters. At certain places, water is retained throughout the year. In parts which are somewhat<br />
higher, water can withdraw during summer, but the soil retains its humidity. Soils are rich in<br />
organic matter with weakly acid pH (~6).<br />
Specific species <strong>of</strong> this community is Carex elata. It grows in a form <strong>of</strong> columns with a height<br />
<strong>of</strong> 30-60 cm. From among other species, we can find Scutellaria galericulata, Senecio<br />
paludosus, Galium palustre, Lysimachia vulgaris f. glanduloso-villosa, Lythrum salicaria,<br />
Rumex hydrolapatthum, Iris pseudacorus, Polygonum amphibium, Roripa amphibia, Scirpus<br />
lacuster, Sium latifolium, Alisma plantago-aquatica, Typha latifolia, Stachys palustris etc.<br />
Association Caricetum elatae has Euro-Siberian distribution. In Macedonia, it is known only<br />
in Ohrid Valley, where it is represented as specific sub-association lysimachietosum.<br />
In the frames <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor, it is found in the remains <strong>of</strong> the former Struga<br />
marsh, between Struga and villages Kalista and Radolista, and used to grow north <strong>of</strong> Struga<br />
as well, along the river Crn Drim (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7, under<br />
wetlands-marshes).<br />
3.11.8.7 Cyperetum longi Mic.<br />
This community also belongs to the alliance Magnocaricion elatae (W. Koch) Br.-Bl. It<br />
probably developed upon the withdrawal <strong>of</strong> the community Caricetum elatae in the<br />
Postglacial period. Typical sub association grows in Struga Marsh, compared to Skopje<br />
Valley where subass. caricetosum acutiformis Mic. is found.<br />
Physiognomy <strong>of</strong> the community is given by Cyperus longus., and the height <strong>of</strong> stands ranges<br />
between 150 and 200 cm.<br />
The association Cyperetum longi grows on areas which during spring and winter months are<br />
under water, while in summer months, after mowing, the soil dries out and cracks. pH <strong>of</strong> the<br />
soil is poorly alkaline to very poorly alkaline.<br />
This community has low economic significance, as does the community Caricetum elatae. It<br />
is mowed twice in a year, but the hay is <strong>of</strong> low quality and used for stables laying. Better hay<br />
is produced by crops with Trifolium fragiferum and Agrostis alba.<br />
Specific species <strong>of</strong> this association are: Cyperus longus, Pulicaria dysentherica and<br />
Veronica scutellata. Specific species <strong>of</strong> the alliance are: Galium palustre, Lysimachia<br />
nummularia, Carex acutiformis, Leucojum aestivum, Carex riparia and Lycopus europaeus.<br />
In Macedonia, it is also found in remains <strong>of</strong> Skopje area marshes (Aracinovo-Hipodrom-<br />
Petrovec-Katlanovo), as well as in Ohrid and Struga marshes.<br />
In the frames <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor, it is found in the remains <strong>of</strong> the former Struga<br />
Marsh, between Struga and villages Kalista and Radolista and north <strong>of</strong> Struga, along the left<br />
bank <strong>of</strong> the river Crn Drim (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7, under<br />
wetlands-marshes).<br />
174
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
3.11.8.8 Sparganio-Glycerietum fluitantis Br.-Bl. 1925<br />
This community belongs to the alliance Glycerieto-Sparganion Br.-Bl. et Siss. It grows along<br />
canals with slowly running water, and forms marsh meadow stands spreading over large<br />
areas. The soil is constantly humid due to the high groundwater level.<br />
From flora point <strong>of</strong> view, this community is scarce in species. The most abundant is Glyceria<br />
fluitantis which is also characterized by high coverage. Sparganium neglectum and S.<br />
Polyedrum grow massively. From among species characteristic for the alliance, we also find<br />
Myosotis caespitosa and Veronica anagalis-aquatica.<br />
In Struga Marsh, this association is represented by sub-association Sparganio-Glycerietum<br />
fluitantis heleocharetosum Mic. This sub-association is distributed in the areas <strong>of</strong> Bitola and<br />
Struga. Differential species <strong>of</strong> this sub-association are Heleocharis palustris, Galium<br />
palustre, Oenanthe fistulosa, Ranunculus ophioglossifolius and Veronica scutellata. In the<br />
vicinity <strong>of</strong> the village Kalista, a patch <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton pusillus grows, usually found in small<br />
depressions covered by surface water with a depth <strong>of</strong> 40 cm. These spots are dominated by<br />
Potamogeton pusillus, and some other species <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants are found as well, such as:<br />
Nymphaea alba and Utricularia neglecta. The association Sparganio-Glycerietum fluitantis is<br />
probably widely distributed in Macedonia. It has been known in the areas <strong>of</strong> Skopje, Bitola<br />
and Struga. In the frames <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor, it is found in the remains <strong>of</strong> the former<br />
Struga Marsh, between Struga and villages Kalista and Radolista (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong><br />
habitats, Appendix 6 and 7, under wetlands-marshes). The areal <strong>of</strong> this community has been<br />
significantly shortened because <strong>of</strong> the amelioration <strong>of</strong> the Struga Marsh, but there are still<br />
some vital segments.<br />
3.11.9 Anthropogenic habitats<br />
3.11.9.1 Woodlots and plantations- Black pine plantations<br />
Forest plantations within the investigated corridor are represented by plantations <strong>of</strong> black<br />
pine (Pinus nigra). The black pine plantations were erected in the past as bare land<br />
afforestation measure and erosion prevention measure.<br />
Apart from black pine, this plantations may also include white pine trunks (Pinus sylvestris).<br />
In the storey <strong>of</strong> shrubs and grass plants, species from the surrounding habitats can be found<br />
as well, such as: Quercus pubescens, Quercus cerris, Quercus frainetto, Rubus sanguineus,<br />
Carpinus orientalis, Ranunculus ficaria, Trifolium pratense, Crocus weldenii, Helleborus<br />
odorus. From among birds, the most significant species is the snake eagle Circaetus<br />
gallicus, which nests over these plantations. There are especially large plantations in the<br />
vicinity <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Kicevo at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor, as well as between<br />
villages Arbinovo and Izdeglavje. In the rest <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor, especially between<br />
villages Slivovo and Klimestani, black pine plantations are represented by dispersed smaller<br />
stands (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />
3.11.9.2 Meadows 20<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the meadows in the investigated corridor are constantly less or more intensively<br />
managed (humid and moderately humid), while minor portion is under extensive<br />
20 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): does not include meadows from Macedonia as habitats with<br />
priority for conservation<br />
175
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
management or abandoned years ago. Meadows in the plane part are characterized with<br />
rather anthropogenized features, while those spreading over edge parts <strong>of</strong> forests or in the<br />
valleys are extensive. Depending on the intensity <strong>of</strong> mowing, meadows may have specific<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> plant and animal species (humid meadows in particular) or flora and fauna<br />
compositions may be dominated by species from the surrounding grass and wood habitats if<br />
less mowed or abandoned.<br />
Figure 54 Meadows and fields in the zone <strong>of</strong> Italian and Turkey oak forests before the border-crossing<br />
Kjafasan.<br />
Figure 55 Meadows and remains <strong>of</strong> chestnut forests in the zone <strong>of</strong> Italian and Turkey oak forests near<br />
the village Radozda<br />
176
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
In the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest, the meadowws belong to the so called ravine meadows (Micevski,<br />
1964), while in syntax terms they belong to the alliance Trifolion resupinati Mic. <strong>of</strong> the order<br />
Trifolio-Hordeetalia H-ić., or class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea Br.-Bl. et Tx. These are habitats<br />
<strong>of</strong> Heleno-Mesian type <strong>of</strong> riparian and humid meadows. They are characterized by<br />
domination <strong>of</strong> different species <strong>of</strong> clovers (Trifolium spp.) in their floral composition,<br />
compared to continental European meadows where different species <strong>of</strong> grass (Poaceae)<br />
prevail.<br />
Humid and moderately humid meadows in our environment are under threat related to their<br />
substitution with meadows with alfa-alfa which are more productive, but uni-type and with<br />
very low value in terms <strong>of</strong> biodiversity. Yet, they have not been listed as habitats with priority<br />
for conservation in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС for the sole fact that they have not<br />
been proposed for conservation so far by no party (the Annex is composed by EU Member<br />
States) However, similar habitats which phytocenologically belong to the alliance Molinion<br />
W. Koch and Molinio-Holoschoenion Br.-Bl. (semi-natural humid meadows with tall herbal<br />
plants – code 6410 and 6420 <strong>of</strong> Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС, as well as the<br />
alliance Arrhenatherion Koch (circum-Mediterranean mesophilic meadows – code 6510) are<br />
considered threatened in Europe. Accordingly, meadows <strong>of</strong> the alliance Trifolion resupinati in<br />
Macedonia are certainly priority habitat type for conservation.<br />
The period in which field investigation <strong>of</strong> the habitats was carried out along the corridor <strong>of</strong><br />
the proposed railway line did not allow precise determination <strong>of</strong> phytocenological affiliation <strong>of</strong><br />
meadows. However, based on certain earlier analysis and analogy with Prespa area, we<br />
may conclude that the meadows in the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest belong to the following<br />
communities: Cynosureto-Caricetum hirtae Mic., mostly to sub-association ranunculetosum<br />
aceris Mic., Trifolietum nigrescentis-subterranei Mic. and most probably association<br />
Trifolietum resupinati-balansae Mic.<br />
Species characteristic for these communities, as well as the alliance uniting them, include<br />
several species <strong>of</strong> clovers (Trifolium resupinatum, T. balansae, T. nigrescens, T. filiforme, T.<br />
patens, T. repens, T. pretense, and frequently found T. fragiferum), then grasses (Cynosurus<br />
cristatus, Anthoxanthum odoratum, Agrostis alba, Alopecurus utriculatus, A. pratgensis,<br />
Bromus racemosus), sedges (Carex hirta, C. vulpina, C. distans, C. divisa), as well as<br />
Lychnis flos-cuculi, Oenanthe stenoloba, Oe. silaifolina, Oe. fistulosa, Ranunculus acris, R.<br />
velutinus, Cirsium canum, Inula britanica and many other meadow species.<br />
They are <strong>of</strong> particular significance for some bird species, primarily storks, and it seems that<br />
the valley <strong>of</strong> Sateska river with humid and flooded meadows is at least occasionally for<br />
migration is used by cranes (Grus grus). The presence <strong>of</strong> crake (Crex crex) has not been<br />
confirmed, but it is very probable. Apart from their conservation significance, these meadows<br />
also have high economic value, because they produce high quality hay. Meadow habitats <strong>of</strong><br />
ravine meadow type are widely distributed in the valleys <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, but major part <strong>of</strong> their<br />
areas is threatened to extinct due to abandoned mowing.<br />
In the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest, they are especially abundant in Struga Valley and Debrca (more<br />
humid variants), and throughout the corridor on minor areas (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong><br />
habitats, Appendix 6 and 7). At some places where meadows are mixed with small field plots<br />
and gardens, they are not presented on the map.<br />
3.11.9.3 Agricultural habitats<br />
Areas under intensive agricultural activities within the investigated corridor may be fields,<br />
gardens, vineyards and orchards.<br />
177
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
3.11.9.4 Fields<br />
The most frequently grown crops on the fields <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor are wheat and<br />
corn. Fields occupy larger areas in Struga Fields, while mixed with meadows, gardens and<br />
orchards they can be found along expansions <strong>of</strong> the river valleys (Sateska, Treska,<br />
Brzdanska, Judovska, Vilipica rivers) or through Downy oak-Hop hornbeam forests (villages<br />
Slivovo, Radozda).<br />
Figure 56 Fields and meadows in the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Treska near the village Drugovo<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the fields are separated by boundaries <strong>of</strong> trees or shrubs. Tree boundaries may be<br />
composed <strong>of</strong> fruit trees (Prunus spinosa, P. cerasifera, P. cerasus, Juglans regia, Populus<br />
nigra cv. pyramidalis), and much more <strong>of</strong>ten remains <strong>of</strong> natural vegetation. In Struga Fields,<br />
boundaries are dominated by willows, alders and poplars. Different oak species (Quercus<br />
pubescens, Q. frainetto, Cornus mas) are also found in hilly areas.<br />
Field plots occupy mainly very small areas which together with boundaries contribute to<br />
mosaic-like outlook <strong>of</strong> the agricultural land. Major areas are occupied only by plots near the<br />
city <strong>of</strong> Struga, on the area <strong>of</strong> the former Struga marsh (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats,<br />
Appendix 6 and 7).<br />
Compared to the economic importance <strong>of</strong> the fields, their importance for biodiversity is very<br />
low. However, climate conditions during the last winter and spring characterized with<br />
increased precipitation, showed that the fields in the surrounding <strong>of</strong> Struga up to the village<br />
Moroista convert easily into swamps and marshes, i.e. habitats typical for that area 50 years<br />
ago. Many rare birds (ibis, spoonbill heron) have been recorded in these sites, as they use<br />
flooded areas for feeding.<br />
The following butterfly species were also recorded in the fields: Gonepteryx rhamni,<br />
Nymphalis polycholoros, Nymphalis antiopa, Vanessa atalanta, Colias crocea. The<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> the communities <strong>of</strong> ground-beetles is dominated by: Harpalus distinguendus,<br />
178
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
H. affinis, H. rufipes, Amara aenea, Chlaenius vestitus, Brachinus explodens, Pterostichus<br />
niger, P. nigrita, Carabus coriaceus, Bembidion lampros, Cicindela campestris.<br />
Birds: Ciconia ciconia, Corvus cornix, Upupa epops, Garrulus glandarius, Fringilla coelebs,<br />
Carduelis carduelis, Turdus merula, Turdus viscivorus, Pica pica.<br />
3.11.9.5 Gardens<br />
Favourable conditions for formation <strong>of</strong> gardens exist along the valleys <strong>of</strong> the rivers in the<br />
investigated corridor. These are individual parcels with small or very small areas. The most<br />
frequent crops grown there include beans, tomatoes, peppers, cabbage and pumpkin.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> the small area <strong>of</strong> the gardens, we can not talk <strong>of</strong> any specific floral and faunistic<br />
elements.<br />
3.11.9.6 Vineyards<br />
Vineyards in the observed corridor occupy small areas, although Ohrid-Struga region is one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the major grapes and wine producing regions in Macedonia. Private vineyards cover small<br />
areas and are most <strong>of</strong>ten surrounded with fields. Due to small and scattered areas under<br />
vineyards, specific plant and animal species do not exist there.<br />
Vineyards in the corridor are located in plane parts <strong>of</strong> Struga Fields, especially between the<br />
villages Meseista, Klimestani and Trebenista. On the map <strong>of</strong> habitats, they are presented<br />
collectively with other agricultural habitats.<br />
3.11.9.7 Orchards<br />
Orchards in the investigated area are most <strong>of</strong>ten composed <strong>of</strong> apples, and less <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>of</strong><br />
cherry, sour cherry, walnut, pear and peach. Flora and fauna are highly dependent on the<br />
surrounding agricultural land, because <strong>of</strong> the small areas <strong>of</strong> orchards.<br />
Orchards are found along the entire investigated corridor, but they are more frequent in<br />
Struga Fields. On the map <strong>of</strong> habitats, they are presented collectively with other agricultural<br />
habitats.<br />
3.11.9.8 Urban and urbanized areas as habitats<br />
The only urban habitats within the investigated corridor belong to the City <strong>of</strong> Kicevo.<br />
Besides, there are several industrial facilities (factory <strong>of</strong> Oteks in the village Meseiste and<br />
some other) located within the corridor.<br />
Urban areas have low importance for biological diversity. Species living in urban habitats are<br />
usually cosmopolitan.<br />
From among birds, the presence <strong>of</strong> stork (Ciconia ciconia) little owl (Athene noctua) and<br />
scops owl (Otus scops) is the most significant.<br />
3.11.9.9 Populated places and settlements<br />
The investigated corridor also includes several populated places (villages and settlements).<br />
Populated places are habitats where specific communities <strong>of</strong> plants and animals develop<br />
and are usually adapted to “joint” life with people. From among plants, these are most <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
nitrophilic and ruderal plants <strong>of</strong> low conservation significance as they are cosmopolitan<br />
species.<br />
Bird fauna in rural areas is somewhat specific, although some <strong>of</strong> the species live in natural<br />
habitats as well, such as: Hirundo rustica, Delichon urbica, Passer domesticus, Phoenicurus<br />
ochruros, Pica pica, Crovus monedula, Corvus cornix, Passer domesticus.<br />
179
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
3.11.10 Significant habitats and species<br />
3.11.10.1 Significant habitats<br />
There is low number <strong>of</strong> habitats in the investigated corridor. Some <strong>of</strong> these habitats are<br />
listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС, which means that an EU Member State or<br />
accession country (like Macedonia) are obliged to conserve them. Some <strong>of</strong> these habitats<br />
are frequent and widely distributed in Macedonia. Besides, some <strong>of</strong> these habitats have<br />
priority for conservation in the EU (marked with “*”), i.e. they require designation <strong>of</strong> special<br />
areas for conservation (Natura 2000).<br />
1. Italian and Turkey oak forests. Although listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Directive<br />
92/43/ЕЕС, these forests are widely distributed in Macedonia, especially in its western part.<br />
They even build continuous climate zonal belt between 700 and 900 m a.s.l. Forests in the<br />
investigated corridor are well developed, but under strong pressure <strong>of</strong> forestry activities.<br />
These forests were affected by forest fire near the village Slivovo.<br />
2. Chestnut forests. Chestnut forests in Macedonia are mainly distributed in its western<br />
parts, from Shar Planina to Jablanica Mts., but they also grow in southeastern Macedonia<br />
(Belasica). They are included in Annex I <strong>of</strong> EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС. Within the investigated<br />
corridor, they occur between the villages Radozda and Macedonian-<strong>Albania</strong>n border.<br />
3. Alder belts and woodlots. These forests are considered as priority habitats for<br />
conservation (*) under the EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС. Alder woodlots are <strong>of</strong> particular<br />
importance, as they are almost completely extinct in other parts <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. Alder belts<br />
grow along almost all rivers and streams in the investigated corridor. Woodlots have been<br />
also recorded near the villages Arbinovo and Botun. Alder stands, alike other riparian<br />
habitats, have very important ecological function in the prevention and mitigation <strong>of</strong> floods,<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> pollution, they are natural corridors for the movement <strong>of</strong> animals and have<br />
certain specific roles in the exchange <strong>of</strong> mineral matters.<br />
4. Willow belts. Willow belts within the investigated corridor are much less abundant than<br />
alder belts, and therefore their importance is lower. They are listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU<br />
Directive 92/43/ЕЕС. Part <strong>of</strong> them that could constitute forest stands are not found within the<br />
investigated corridor; otherwise, they have priority for conservation under the EU Directive<br />
92/43/ЕЕС (*).<br />
180
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 57 Willow belts by the river Crn Drim<br />
5. Remains <strong>of</strong> minor forests <strong>of</strong> marshy oak. As already indicated in the text, the only<br />
recorded remain <strong>of</strong> minor marshy oak forest is located in the village Moroista, outside <strong>of</strong> the<br />
investigated corridor. Yet, there is a possibility for other individual trunks or smaller groups to<br />
be found along canals and marsh-like sections between the village Vilino and the village<br />
Moroista. Communities <strong>of</strong> marshy oak in Macedonia are exceptionally rare and very<br />
important for the diversity <strong>of</strong> habitats and species.<br />
6. Calcareous rocks. Calcareous rocks in lower parts <strong>of</strong> Macedonia are substrate onto<br />
which rare and endemic chasmophytic species develop, covered by EU Directive<br />
92/43/ЕЕС. Calcareous rocks in the investigated corridor are found between the settlement<br />
Elen Kamen and the village Radozda. Apart from their biological importance as habitats for a<br />
typical vegetation, plants and birds, calcareous rocks in the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest are<br />
exceptionally important in terms <strong>of</strong> protection <strong>of</strong> cultural and historical monuments as well.<br />
7. Siliceous rocks. Siliceous rocks are listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС.<br />
However, siliceous rocks have low importance within the investigated corridor because <strong>of</strong><br />
the small areas they cover.<br />
8. Reeds. Reeds are habitat which enables high biological diversity. Due to hydro<br />
ameliorations in the past, large portion <strong>of</strong> the area under belts was destroyed. Such is the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> Struga Marsh which has been almost completely destroyed. Very small fragments<br />
are found between the villages Kalista, Radolista and the City <strong>of</strong> Struga. Reed remains are<br />
found between the villages Volino and Moroista, as well as along the shore <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake,<br />
near the village Radozda.<br />
181
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
3.11.11 Important species<br />
3.11.11.1 Diversity <strong>of</strong> algae and macrophytes<br />
3.11.11.1.1 Current knowledge<br />
Biological diversity <strong>of</strong> algae in the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line has been rather poorly<br />
investigated with an exception <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake. So far, there is data only on the composition<br />
and partially on algae distribution for Crn Drim. Trajanovska (2009), during several years <strong>of</strong><br />
chara study, established the presence <strong>of</strong> three species <strong>of</strong> chara, namely: Chara tomentosa<br />
(=Chara ceratophylla), Chara globularis (=Chara fragilis), Chara ohridana and a species <strong>of</strong><br />
starry stonewort [Nitellopsis obtusa (Desv.) J. Groves].<br />
Apart from macroscopic algae, significant number <strong>of</strong> macrophytes has been found in the<br />
river Crn Drim, including Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud., Typha latifolia L., Typha<br />
angustifolia L., Shoenoplectus lacustris (L.) Palla), Mentha aquatica L., Lemna minor L.,<br />
Lemna trisulca L., Potamogeton perfoliatus L., Potamogeton pectinatus L., Potamogeton<br />
crispus L., Potamogeton acutifolius Link., Potamogeton natans L., Zannichellia palustris L.,<br />
Myriophillum spicatum L., Myriophyllum verticillatum L., Ceratophyllum demersum L.,<br />
Vallisneria spiralis L., Elodea canadensis Rich.& Michx. и Utricularia neglecta Lehm.<br />
(Talevski 2010).<br />
Figure 58 Spring above the village Radozda with Lemna.<br />
As far as Drim Basin is concerned, literature contains data on the qualitative composition <strong>of</strong><br />
mayflies (Ephemeroptera) and stoneflies (Plecoptera), as one <strong>of</strong> the main members <strong>of</strong><br />
benthos communities (Ikonomov, 1960). There is no data on other groups. In his study <strong>of</strong><br />
mayflies in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, Ikonomov (1960) carried out detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> this<br />
group in Vardar, Drim and Strumica Basins. In Drim Basin, he established the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
relatively high number (37) <strong>of</strong> Ephemeroptera, or around 50% <strong>of</strong> the overall number <strong>of</strong><br />
mayflies known for the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />
182
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
With regard to the entry area <strong>of</strong> Sateska river into Ohrid Lake, there is data only on the<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> phytoplankton which incorporates centric diatomea Cyclotella ocellata and<br />
Stephanodiscus hantzschii, while Asterionella formosa and Ulnaria ulna are found from<br />
penate forms, while phytobenthos has remained completely unexplored. Due to the<br />
channeling <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, diversity and abundance <strong>of</strong> macrophytes have reduced<br />
drastically. Small populations <strong>of</strong> Typha latifolia, . Lemna minor, Potamogeton perfoliatus L.,<br />
Potamogeton pectinatus, Myriophyllum verticillatum L., Ceratophyllum demersum L have<br />
been found near the river entry into the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid.<br />
So far, there has been no data at all on the composition and presence <strong>of</strong> algae in the upper<br />
course <strong>of</strong> the river Treska. The status <strong>of</strong> other aquatic ecosystems covered by the railway<br />
line corridor, such as Struga Marsh, rivers Bukov Dol, Vilipica, Brzdanska, Judovska, as well<br />
as numerous aquifers, marshy biotopes, peat bogs, canals, etc., is the same. During these<br />
investigations, the results on species composition and distribution <strong>of</strong> algae in the mentioned<br />
water bodies have been presented for the first time. Data on macrophytes in the river Treska<br />
within the railway line corridor is not available as well. During investigations, two species <strong>of</strong><br />
mosses have been established (Fontinalis antipyretica and Rhynchostegium riparioides)<br />
found supported on rocky ground.<br />
Diatomea in Ohrid Lake are relatively well explored, although majority <strong>of</strong> data refers to<br />
Ohrid City and area around St.Naum springs. Initial knowledge <strong>of</strong> this region has been<br />
presented by Pavlov (2010), who established more than 200 species <strong>of</strong> algae in the vicinity<br />
<strong>of</strong> the village Radozda. High number <strong>of</strong> established species is endemic for Ohrid Lake, such<br />
as Amphora ohridana, Cyclotella fottii, Cymbopleura juriljii, Diploneis ostracodarum,<br />
Epithemia ohridana, G. sancti-naumii, G. mihoi, Navicula subhastatula etc.<br />
3.11.11.1.2 Results obtained in the frames <strong>of</strong> the Study<br />
Ohrid Lake is characterized with rich diatomic flora found in benthos communities. Four<br />
communities are found in the shore region <strong>of</strong> the village Radozda, namely: epilithonic,<br />
episamonic, epiphytic (<strong>of</strong> Cladophora) and periphytonic (Phragmites australis). Each <strong>of</strong><br />
these communities is represented by different species composition. The epilithon is<br />
dominated mainly by species <strong>of</strong> the orders Gomphonema (G. tergestinum, G. fonticolum, G.<br />
micropus) and Navicula (N. antonii, N. subalpina, N. ognjanovae). Episamonic communities<br />
are dominated by the species Cyclotella ocellata, Amphora indistincta, A. pediculus,<br />
Encyonopsis microcephala, Pseudostaurosira brevistriata and Staurosirella pinnata. As<br />
epiphytes <strong>of</strong> Cladophora species <strong>of</strong> the order Diatoma (D. densicostata, D. ehrenbergii),<br />
Encyonema (E. pseudocaspitosum, E. ochridanum) occur, as well as several<br />
representatives <strong>of</strong> the species complex <strong>of</strong> Gomphonema olivaceum. The greatest diversity <strong>of</strong><br />
diatomea is found in periphytonic communities, where we find a series <strong>of</strong> endemic species<br />
such as Cymbella ohridana, Gomphonema macedonicum, G. irroratum, Aneumastus<br />
ohridanum, Aneumastus albanicus, Placoneis macedonicum etc.<br />
River Crn Drim has very similar composition as Ohrid Lake, although several cosmopolitan<br />
species that are rarely found in the Lake have significantly higher representation here<br />
(including Hannaea arcus, Planothidium lanceolatu, P. rostratum etc.). Yet, several<br />
interesting species have been identified in the river, like Cylotella fottii, Diatoma ochridana,<br />
D. densicostata, Placoneis balcanicus, P. subgastriformis, Navicula mollicula, Geissleria<br />
ohridana etc., which used to be regarded endemic for the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid. According to<br />
species composition, primarily for the presence <strong>of</strong> endemic species, it is regarded highly<br />
sensitive to impacts from the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line.<br />
183
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
3.11.11.2 Plants<br />
The area through which the corridor <strong>of</strong> the proposed railway line extends has been poorly<br />
explored in terms <strong>of</strong> flora, except the section in the area <strong>of</strong> Struga marsh. There are<br />
exceptionally few data and these relate to incidental findings. Yet, there is sufficient amount<br />
<strong>of</strong> literature and our own data to assess floral diversity <strong>of</strong> wetlands (all above listed, together<br />
with alder forests). The text below describes rare and significant plants found along the<br />
corridor <strong>of</strong> interest, while overall heritage is presented on the table on wetlands in the area <strong>of</strong><br />
Belcisko Blato (marsh).<br />
Table 19 Important species <strong>of</strong> vascular flora in the subject corridor<br />
Type Locality in the corridor <strong>of</strong> inerest Meaning<br />
Lathyrus palustris L. Struga Swamp The only site in the RM<br />
Sium latifolium L. Struga Swamp The only site in the RM<br />
Salvinia natans L.<br />
Acorus calamus L.<br />
Nuphar luteum (L.) Sith. et Sm.<br />
Kalista – Struga – Struga Swamp<br />
Struga Swamp<br />
Lake Kalista (from Struga Swamp is<br />
missing)<br />
Berne convention, Appendix I;<br />
CFP*A(ii)<br />
The species is not found many<br />
decades and is considered to<br />
disappear from the flora <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />
Plant that is disappeared from the<br />
flora <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />
Ranunculus fluitans Lam. Crn Drin near Struga The only site in the RM<br />
Ranunculus circinatus Sibth. Struga Swamp In RM found only in Prespa<br />
Dryopteris carthusiana (Vill.) H. P.<br />
Fuchs<br />
Belcisko In evlova forest swamp<br />
A third site in the RM, but not in the<br />
corridor<br />
Utricularia<br />
* IPA-Important Plant (internationally designated areas according to series <strong>of</strong> criteria (Aspecies<br />
and C-habitats)<br />
3.11.11.3 Insects<br />
There are several species within the investigated areas listed in international conventions for<br />
biological diversity conservation (Table ).<br />
Table 20 Overview <strong>of</strong> important species <strong>of</strong> insects and some arthropods<br />
IUCN Corine HD Habitats Location<br />
Potamon fluviatile NT Lake Village Rodozda<br />
Austropotamobius torrentium<br />
VU<br />
Streams<br />
rivers<br />
and<br />
Kalista-Radozda, all rivers<br />
and streams<br />
Aeschna isosceles LC Swamp Struga swamp<br />
Calopteryx splendens LC Swamp Struga swamp<br />
Orthetrum brunneum LC Swamp Struga swamp<br />
Orthetrumcoerulescens LC Swamp Struga swamp<br />
184
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Sympecma fusca LC Swamp Struga Swamp<br />
Sympetrum sanguineum LC Swamp Struga Swamp<br />
Carabus intricatus LR/nt + Oak forest all forests<br />
Carabus convexus dilatatus + Oak forest all forests<br />
Calosoma sycophanta + Oak forest all forests<br />
Cerambyx cerdo IV Oak forest all forests<br />
Osmoderma eremita IV Old forest -<br />
Pieris balcana LC Oak forest Valley <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim<br />
Coenonympha rhodopensis<br />
Euphydryas aurinia<br />
Parnassius apollo VU IV<br />
Maculinea arion<br />
Lycaena dispar LR/nt IV<br />
Zerynthia polyxena<br />
LC<br />
IV<br />
IV<br />
Meadows, fallow<br />
land<br />
Meadows, fallow<br />
land<br />
Meadow,<br />
land<br />
Meadow,<br />
land<br />
Meadow,<br />
land<br />
Meadov,<br />
land<br />
fallow<br />
fallow<br />
fallow<br />
fallow<br />
target corridor<br />
valley <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim<br />
valley <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim<br />
valley <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim<br />
valley <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim<br />
target corridor<br />
Considering the distribution <strong>of</strong> certain butterfly species <strong>of</strong> priority for protection at European<br />
level, eight Important Butterfly Areas have been designated on the territory <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />
The area "Struga" covers the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Crn Drim from its outflow from Ohrid Lake,<br />
up to the dam Globocica.<br />
On the other side, Ohrid Lake, part <strong>of</strong> the shore area <strong>of</strong> which is integrated in the corridor <strong>of</strong><br />
the future line, as well as flooded areas in its vicinity, have been recognized as important<br />
ornithological site in Europe.<br />
Apart from the species concerned, several endemic species are also found within the<br />
investigated corridor, such as: Tapinopterus rambousekianus (distributed only on Jablanica),<br />
Molops rufipes steindachneri (western macedonian species), Aptinus merditanus (southern<br />
Balkan species). The investigated corridor covers small and atypical part <strong>of</strong> the areal (they<br />
prefer higher areas) <strong>of</strong> these species distribution.<br />
Table 21 Species diversity (vascular plants) in humid habitats near Belcisko Blato (near the corridor)<br />
Type/taxon<br />
Habitats<br />
Achillea millefolium L. Millefolium<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Achillea pannonica Scheele<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Agrimonia eupatoria L. ssp. Eupatoria<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Agrostis stolonifera L.<br />
Swampy meadow<br />
Ajuga reptans L.<br />
Swampy meadow<br />
Alisma plantago-aquatica L.<br />
Wet meadow<br />
185
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Type/taxon<br />
Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertner<br />
Alopecurus arundinaceus Poiret in Lam.<br />
Alopecurus geniculatus L.<br />
Anthoxanthum odoratum L.<br />
Aremonia agrimonoides (L.) DC<br />
Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) Beauv. ex J. & C. Presl<br />
Arum maculatum L.<br />
Atyrium filix-femina (L.) Roth var. multidentatum Doell<br />
Berula erecta (Huds. ) Cuville<br />
Bidens tripartita L.<br />
Bromus hordeaceus L. ssp. Hordeaceus<br />
Bromus racemosus L.<br />
Bromus sterilis L.<br />
Callitriche stagnalis Scop.<br />
Caltha palustris L. ssp. cornuta (Schott, Nyman & Kotschy) Beck<br />
Calystegia sepium (L.) R. Br. ssp. Sepium<br />
Carex acutiformis Ehren.<br />
Carex appropinquata Schumacher<br />
Carex distachya Desf.<br />
Carex distans L.<br />
Carex hirta L.<br />
Carex otrubae Podp.<br />
Carex pseudocyperus L.<br />
Carex remota L.<br />
Carex riparia Curt.<br />
Carpinus betulus L.<br />
Catabrosa aquatica (L.) Beauv.<br />
Cerastium caespitosum Gilib.<br />
Circea lutetiana L.<br />
Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. var. incanum Beck<br />
Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. var. horridum W. Gr.<br />
Cirsium palustre (L.) Scop.<br />
Cirsum vulgare (Savi) Ten.<br />
Convolvulus arvensis L.<br />
Cornus sanguinea L.<br />
Corylus avellana L.<br />
Habitats<br />
Forest Evlova<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Forest Evlova<br />
Bog<br />
Forest Evlova<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Forest Evlova<br />
Forest Evlova<br />
Bog, swamp, boggy meadow<br />
Swampy meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
water<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow; Блато<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Swampy meadow, Evlova forest<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Evlova forest; блатна ливада<br />
Evlova forest<br />
water<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Evlova forest<br />
186
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Type/taxon<br />
Crataegus monogyna Jacq. ssp. Monogyna<br />
Cynosurus cristatus L.<br />
Dactylorhiza incarnata (L.) Soó ssp. Incarnata<br />
Dactylorhiza saccifera (Brongn.) Soó<br />
Daucus carota L.<br />
Dipsacus laciniatus L.<br />
Dryopteris carthusiana (Vill.) H. P. Fuchs<br />
Eleocharis palustris (L.) Roemer et Schultes ssp. palustris<br />
Epilobium hirsutum L. var. Hirsutum<br />
Epilobium parviflorum Schreb.<br />
Epipactis palustris (L.) Crantz<br />
Equisetum fluviatile L.<br />
Equisetum palustre L.<br />
Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers. ssp. Annuus<br />
Eupatorium cannabinum L. ssp. Cannabinum<br />
Evonymus europaeus L. var. bulgarica (Vel.) Stoj. et Stef.<br />
Evonymus verrucosus Scop. var. laevifolius Beck<br />
Festuca rubra L. ssp. Rubra<br />
Fragaria vesca L.<br />
Frangula alnus Millers ssp. Alnus<br />
Galega <strong>of</strong>ficinalis L.<br />
Galeopsis speciosa Miller<br />
Galium aparine L.<br />
Galium elongatum C. Presl<br />
Galium palustre L.<br />
Galium rivale (Sibth. et Sm.) Griseb.<br />
Galium verum L. ssp. Verum<br />
Geranium robertianum L.<br />
Geum molle Vis. et Pančić<br />
Geum urbanum L.<br />
Glyceria plicata (Fries) Fries<br />
Hedera helix L.<br />
Holcus lanatus L.<br />
Habitats<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Swampy meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Swampy meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Swampy meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Swampy meadow, Wet meadow<br />
Swampy meadow, Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow, блато<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
187
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Type/taxon<br />
Humulus lupulus L.<br />
Hypericum tetrapterum Fries<br />
Iris pseudoacorus L.<br />
Juncus articulatus L.<br />
Juncus effusus L. var. compactus Lej. et Court.<br />
Juncus glaucus Ehrh.<br />
Juncus inflexus L.<br />
Juncus tenuis Willd.<br />
Juncus tenuis Willd.<br />
Juniperus communis L. ssp. Communis<br />
Lathyrus pratensis L.<br />
Lemna minor L.<br />
Lemna trisulca L.<br />
Ligustrum vulgare L.<br />
Linaria vulgaris Mill.<br />
Lolium perenne L.<br />
Lonicera sp. ?<br />
Lotus corniculatus L. var. Corniculatus<br />
Lychnis flos-cuculi L.<br />
Lycopus europaeus L.<br />
Lycopus exaltatus L.<br />
Lysimachia numularia L.<br />
Lysimachia vulgaris L.<br />
Lythrum salicaria L.<br />
Mentha aquatica L.<br />
Mentha longifolia (L.) Hudson<br />
Mycelis muralis (L.) Dumort.<br />
Myosotis arvensis (L.) Hill.<br />
Myosotis laxa Lehm. ssp. caespitosa (C. F. Schultz) Hyl.<br />
Myosotis scorpioides L.<br />
Myriophyllum verticillatum L.<br />
Oenanthe fistulosa L.<br />
Ononis arvensis L. var. spinescens (Ledeb) Garcke<br />
Orchis laxiflora Lam. ssp. Laxiflora<br />
Peucedanum aegopodioides (Boiss.) Vand.<br />
Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel<br />
Plantago lanceolata L. var. Lanceolata<br />
Poa trivialis L. ssp. Trivialis<br />
Habitats<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow,<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Swampy – in water<br />
Swampy – in water<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Bog<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Swampy meadow<br />
Evlova forest, wet meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Bog<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Swampy<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Bog, wet meadow<br />
Bog, evlova forest<br />
Open water –in/on vater<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Bog, wet meadow<br />
Bog<br />
Wet meadow, bog, evlova forest<br />
Open water – in/on water<br />
Wet meadow, bog<br />
Bog<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
188
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Type/taxon<br />
Potamogeton pusillus L. var. panormitanus A. Bennett.<br />
Potentilla reptans L.<br />
Prunella vulgaris L.<br />
Pulicaria dysenterica (L.) Bernh.<br />
Quercus sp.<br />
Ranunculus acris L.<br />
Ranunculus ophioglossifolius Vill.<br />
Ranunculus repens L.<br />
Ranunculus sceleratus L.<br />
Ranunculus serbicus Vis.<br />
Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix ssp. Trichophyllus<br />
Rhinanthus minor L. var. Minor<br />
Roripa kerneri Menyh. et Borb. in Matemat.<br />
Roripa prolifera (Heufel) Neilr. var. Prolifera<br />
Roripa sylvestris (L.) Besser ssp. Sylvestris<br />
Rosa corymbifera Borkh.<br />
Rubus caesius L.<br />
Rubus discolor Weihe & Nees<br />
Rubus sanguineus Friv. var. Sanguineus<br />
Rumex conglomeratus Murray<br />
Rumex crispus L.<br />
Rumex hydrolapathum Hudson<br />
Rumex pulcher L.<br />
Rumex pulcher L.<br />
Rumex sanguineus ? L.<br />
Salix alba L. ssp. Alba<br />
Salix cinerea L.<br />
Salix triandra L. var.triandra<br />
Sambucus nigra L.<br />
Scutellaria galericulata L.<br />
Solanum dulcamara L.<br />
Sparganium erectum L. ssp. neglectum (Beeby) Schintz et Thell.<br />
Stellaria aquatica L.<br />
Torilis arvense (Huds.) Links sp. Arvense<br />
Tragopogon balcanicum Velen.<br />
Trifolium campestre Schreb. var. campestre<br />
Trifolium fragiferum L. bonannii (Presl.) Soják<br />
Habitats<br />
Swampy meadow, wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Evlova forest, Bog, wet meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Open in evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Bog<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Swampy meadow, Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Bog,wet meadow,<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Bog Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Swampy<br />
Evlova forest ,Bog<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Bog, Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Swampy meadow, Bog, swampy<br />
Wet meadow, Bog<br />
Wet meadow, Bog<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow, Bog, swampy<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Bog<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Wet meadow Bog<br />
Wet meadow, Bog<br />
Wet meadow<br />
189
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Type/taxon<br />
Trifolium hybridum ? L. Hybridum<br />
Trifolium pratense L. var. Sativum<br />
Trifolium repens L. Repens<br />
Trifolium resupinatum L.<br />
Typha latifolia L.<br />
Urtica dioica L.<br />
Valeriana <strong>of</strong>ficinalis L. ssp. Officinalis<br />
Verbena <strong>of</strong>ficinalis L.<br />
Veronica anagalis-aquatica L. var. anagalis-aquatica<br />
Veronica arvensis L.<br />
Veronica becabunga L.<br />
Veronica scardica Griseb.<br />
Veronica scutellata L.<br />
Viburnum opulus L.<br />
Vicia cracca L.<br />
Vicia villosa Roth. ssp. varia (Host) Corb.<br />
Habitats<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Bog, Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Near stream<br />
Bog<br />
Bog<br />
By the stream<br />
Wet meadow, bog<br />
Evlova forest<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Bog<br />
Wet meadow<br />
Near stream<br />
Bog<br />
Bog<br />
By the stream<br />
3.11.11.4 Vertebrates<br />
Taking into account the number <strong>of</strong> habitats through which the line route passes, significant<br />
number <strong>of</strong> vertebrate species has been recorded or expected. Also, owing to the bigger<br />
conservation interest on European level for these groups (especially birds), major portion <strong>of</strong><br />
the overall number is considered important (listed in the annexes <strong>of</strong> Habitat Directive or, in<br />
the case <strong>of</strong> birds, Annex 1 <strong>of</strong> the Bird Directive). It should be pointed out that high number<br />
species, mentioned here as important in relation to their coverage by the annexes, are<br />
frequent and widely distributed in Macedonia.<br />
Table 22 Important amphibian species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
No. (Superior) type IUCN Habitats directive Bern<br />
convention<br />
1 Triturus carnifex - II; IV II<br />
2 Bombina variegata - II; IV II<br />
3 Bufo viridis - IV II<br />
4 Hyla arborea - IV II<br />
5 (Pelobates syriacus balcanicus) - IV II<br />
6 Rana dalmatina - IV II<br />
7 Rana graeca - IV III<br />
Table 23 Important reptile species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
No. (Superior) type IUCN Habitats directive Bern<br />
convention<br />
190
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
No. (Superior) type IUCN Habitats directive Bern<br />
convention<br />
1 Emys orbicularis LR/nt II; IV II<br />
2 Testudo graeca VU II; IV II<br />
3 Testudo hermanni LR/nt II; IV II<br />
4 Cyrtodactylus kotschyi - IV II<br />
5 Lacerta trilineata - IV II<br />
6 Lacerta viridis - IV II<br />
7 Podarcis erhardii - IV II<br />
8 Podarcis muralis - IV II<br />
9 Podarcis taurica - IV II<br />
10 Ablepharus kitaibelii - IV II<br />
11 Coluber caspius - IV III<br />
12 Coluber najadum - IV II<br />
13 Coronella austriaca - IV II<br />
14 Elaphe situla - II; IV II<br />
15 Elaphe longissima - IV II<br />
16 (Elaphe quatuorlineata) - II; IV II<br />
17 Natrix tessellata - IV II<br />
18 (Telescopus fallax) - IV II<br />
19 Vipera ammodytes - IV II<br />
Table 24 Important bird species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
No. (superior) type Macedonian name IUCN Birds<br />
Directive<br />
Bern<br />
Convention<br />
1 Gavia stellata Small sea diver I II II<br />
2 Gavia arctica white I II II<br />
3 Podiceps auritus Ear diver I II II<br />
4 Phalacrocorax pygmeus Small cormorant I II II<br />
5 Botaurus stellaris Big aqueous bull I II II<br />
6 Ixobrichus minutus Small aqueous bull I II II<br />
7 Nycticorax nycticorax Night heron I II<br />
8 Ardeolla ralloides Yellow heron I II<br />
9 Egretta garzetta Small white heron I II II<br />
10 Casmerodius albus Big white heron I II<br />
11 Ardea purpurea Red heron I II II<br />
12 Ciconia ciconia stork I II II<br />
13 Plegadis falcinellus IBIS I II II<br />
14 Platalea leucorodia heron I II II<br />
15 Aythya nyroca Black NT I III I: II<br />
Bonn<br />
Convention<br />
191
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
No. (superior) type Macedonian name IUCN Birds<br />
Directive<br />
Bern<br />
Convention<br />
16 Pernis apivorus I II II<br />
17 Circaetus gallicus I II II<br />
18 Circus aeruginosus Boggy harrier I II II<br />
19 Circus cyaneus Poland harrier I II II<br />
20 Circus macrourus Hunting harrier NT I II II<br />
21 (Circus pygargus) Meadow harrier I II II<br />
22 Accipiter brevipes I II II<br />
23 Buteo rufinus I II II<br />
24 (Aquila pomarina) Little eagle I II II<br />
25 (Aquila chrysaetos) Golden eagle I II II<br />
26 Falco vespertinus blue NT I II II<br />
27 Falco columbarius Small falcon I II II<br />
28 Falco eleonorae Mediterranean falcon I II II<br />
29 (Falco peregrinus) Gray falcon I II II<br />
30 Bonasa bonasia I; II/2 III<br />
31 Alectoris graeca partidge I; II/1 III<br />
32 Porzana porzana Swamp tainted chicken I II II<br />
33 (Crex crex) NT I II II<br />
34 Grus grus Gray I II II<br />
35 Himantopus himantopus I II II<br />
36 (Recurvirostra avosetta) I II II<br />
37 Philomachus pugnax I; II/2 III II<br />
38 Tringa glareola Forest tringov I II II<br />
39 Larus melanocephalus Mediterranean gull I II II<br />
40 Larus minutus Small gull I II<br />
41 Sterna nilotica tern I II II<br />
42 (Sterna caspia) Caspian tern I II II<br />
43 Sterna hirundo river I II II<br />
44 Sterna albifrons Small I II II<br />
45 Chlidonias hybrida Tern, white beard I II<br />
46 Chlidonias niger Black tern I II II<br />
47 Bubo bubo owl I II<br />
48 Caprimulgus europaeus I II<br />
49 Alcedo atthis I II<br />
50 (Coracias garrulus) NT I II II<br />
51 Picus canus Gray woodpecker I II<br />
52 Dryocopus martius Black woodpecker I II<br />
Bonn<br />
Convention<br />
192
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
No. (superior) type Macedonian name IUCN Birds<br />
Directive<br />
53 Dendrocopos syriacus Syrrian woodpecker I II<br />
54 Dendrocopos medius medium woodpecker I II<br />
55 Melanocorypha calandra Great lark I II<br />
56 Calandrella<br />
brachydactyla<br />
Small lark I II<br />
57 Lullula arborea Forest lark I III<br />
58 Anthus campestris Poland I II<br />
59 (Acrocephalus<br />
melanopogon)<br />
Bern<br />
Convention<br />
I II II<br />
60 Sylvia nisoria tainted I II II<br />
61 (Ficedula semitorquata) Colorful NT I II II<br />
62 Ficedula albicollis I II II<br />
63 Lanius collurio I II<br />
64 Lanius minor small I II<br />
65 Emberiza hortulana garden I III<br />
Bonn<br />
Convention<br />
Figure 59 Ibises (Plegadis falcinellus)<br />
Table 25 Important mammalian species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
No. (superrior) type IUCN habitats directive Bern<br />
convention<br />
1 (Rhinolophus blasii) - II; IV II II<br />
Bonn<br />
convention<br />
193
Ohrid lake<br />
Rivers and streams<br />
Marshes, swamps<br />
and wet meadows<br />
farmland<br />
Evlovi and vrbovi<br />
belts<br />
Blackboron forests<br />
Oak forests<br />
Chestnuts forests<br />
Settlements<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
2 Rhinolophus ferrumequinum - II; IV II II<br />
3 Rhinolophus hipposiderus - III; IV II II<br />
4 (Rhinolophus mehelyi) VU III; IV II II<br />
5 (Eptesicus serotinus) - IV II II<br />
6 (Pipistrellus kuhlii) - IV II II<br />
7 (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) - IV III II<br />
8 (Hypsugo savii) - IV II II<br />
9 (Myotis oxygnathus) - III; IV II II<br />
10 (Myotis capaccinii) VU II; IV II II<br />
11 (Myotis mustacinus) - IV II II<br />
12 (Myotis myotis) - II; IV II II<br />
13 (Myotis daubentonii) - IV II II<br />
14 Miniopterus schreibersi NT II; IV II II<br />
15 Felis silvestris - IV II -<br />
16 Lutra lutra NT II; IV II -<br />
17 Ursus arctos - II; IV II -<br />
18 Dryomys nitedula - IV III -<br />
19 Muscardinus avellanarius - IV III -<br />
3.11.12 Valorization <strong>of</strong> vertebrate fauna<br />
Valorization <strong>of</strong> vertebrate fauna has been made in accordance with several international<br />
criteria presented in the Chapter "Determination <strong>of</strong> sensitivity".<br />
It is evident that the most important habitats are the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and riparian marshes,<br />
swamps and meadows, followed by oak forests, belts <strong>of</strong> willow and alder and cultivable<br />
areas.<br />
Table 26 Valorization <strong>of</strong> amphibians<br />
(Amphibia)<br />
Habitats directive<br />
Not included 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3<br />
II; IV 2 2 2 1 1 1 1<br />
IV 4 4 5 3 4 1 2 2 3<br />
V 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
Emerald network<br />
невклучени 8 8 9 5 7 1 6 6 7<br />
194
Ohrid lake<br />
Rivers and streams<br />
Marshes, swamps<br />
and wet meadows<br />
farmland<br />
Evlovi and vrbovi<br />
belts<br />
Blackboron forests<br />
Oak forests<br />
Chestnuts forests<br />
Settlements<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
included 2 2 2 1 1 1 1<br />
Bern convention<br />
II 5 5 6 3 4 1 2 2 3<br />
III 5 5 5 2 4 5 5 5<br />
Total 10 10 11 5 8 1 7 7 8<br />
Table 27 Valorization <strong>of</strong> reptiles<br />
(Reptilia)<br />
IUCN<br />
LC 2 2 4 15 11 3 15 15 11<br />
NT 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2<br />
VU 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />
Habitats directive<br />
Not included 1 1 2 4 3 2 2 3<br />
II; IV 1 1 3 3 3 2 4 4 4<br />
IV 1 1 1 10 7 3 11 11 7<br />
Emerald network<br />
Not included 2 2 3 14 10 3 13 13 10<br />
included 1 1 3 3 3 2 4 4 4<br />
Bern convention<br />
II 2 2 4 12 9 5 14 14 10<br />
III 1 1 2 5 4 3 3 4<br />
Total 3 3 6 17 13 5 17 17 14<br />
Table 28 Valorization <strong>of</strong> bird fauna.<br />
195
Ohrid lake<br />
Rivers and streams<br />
Marshes, swamps and wet meadows<br />
farmland<br />
Evlovi and vrbovi belts<br />
Blackboron forests<br />
Oak forests<br />
Chestnuts forests<br />
Rocks<br />
Settlements<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
CRITERIA<br />
IUCN<br />
SPEC<br />
ETS<br />
Bird Directive<br />
CATEGORY<br />
VU 1<br />
NT 1 4 2 1 2<br />
LC 46 55 42 60 80<br />
1 3 2<br />
2 2 9 8 8 1 13 5 2 3<br />
3 17 2 16 16 11 4 14 9 9 12<br />
-E 5 2 8 5 21 16 28 24 1 10<br />
-EW 2 0 2 2 2<br />
non-SPEC 19 7 23 13 21 14 25 20 6 13<br />
NE 1<br />
(EN) 1<br />
R 3 2<br />
(R) 1<br />
H 2 7 2 2 1 3 2 2<br />
(H) 5 1 4 8 5 2 11 6 5 3<br />
VU 2 2 2 1<br />
(VU) 3 1 1 1<br />
D 2 2 4 7 1 7 4 1 3<br />
(D) 6 1 8 7 3 5 2 4 7<br />
S 15 6 19 10 31 24 39 30 4 16<br />
(S) 12 3 12 10 11 6 16 16 3 7<br />
NE 1<br />
I 18 27 13 9 3 17 8 3 2<br />
I; II/1 1<br />
I; II/2 1 1 1<br />
II/1 2 1 1<br />
II/1; III/1 1 1 1 1<br />
II/1; III/2 7 2 1 0<br />
196
Ohrid lake<br />
Rivers and streams<br />
Ohrid lake<br />
Marshes, swamps<br />
and wet meadows<br />
Rivers and streams<br />
Marshes, swamps and wet meadows<br />
farmland<br />
farmland<br />
Evlovi and vrbovi<br />
belts<br />
Evlovi and vrbovi belts<br />
Blackboron forests<br />
Blackboron forests<br />
Oak forests<br />
Oak forests<br />
Chestnuts forests<br />
Chestnuts forests<br />
Rocks<br />
Settlements<br />
Settlements<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
CRITERIA CATEGORY<br />
II/2 11 8 9 9 4 8 8 6<br />
II/2; III/2 1 1<br />
Not included 9 20 18 43 28 55 43 13 29<br />
included 19 29 13 9 3 18 8 3 2<br />
Emerald netwoek Not included 29 30 31 52 32 64 52 15 36<br />
II 22 11 45 27 44 28 65 45 15 25<br />
III 25 14 14 11 6 14 12 3 8<br />
Bern convention Not included 1 3 6 1 3 3 5<br />
I; II 3<br />
II 31 6 48 17 21 16 36 23 7 10<br />
Bonn convention Not included 14 5 11 27 40 19 46 37 11 28<br />
Total 48 11 59 44 61 35 82 60 18 38<br />
Valorization has not taken the bats into consideration, due to the short period <strong>of</strong><br />
investigation. We expect 14 species, all listed in the annexes <strong>of</strong> the Habitat Directive, three<br />
<strong>of</strong> which are globally threatened.<br />
Table 29 Valorization <strong>of</strong> mammals<br />
(Mammalia)<br />
IUCN<br />
LC 4 4 12 16<br />
DD 2<br />
197
Ohrid lake<br />
Rivers and streams<br />
Marshes, swamps<br />
and wet meadows<br />
farmland<br />
Evlovi and vrbovi<br />
belts<br />
Blackboron forests<br />
Oak forests<br />
Chestnuts forests<br />
Settlements<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
(Mammalia)<br />
NT 1 1 1<br />
Habitats directive<br />
Not included 4 4 12 17 19 10 18 18 9<br />
II; IV 1 1 1 1<br />
III; IV<br />
IV 1 2 1 3 3<br />
Emerald network<br />
Not included 4 4 12 18 21 10 20 20 9<br />
included 1 1 1 1 2 1<br />
Bern convention<br />
Not included 3 3 6 12 7 2 7 7 6<br />
II 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2<br />
III 1 1 6 5 13 7 12 12 3<br />
Total 5 5 13 18 21 11 22 21 9<br />
3.12 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> landscapes<br />
In the context <strong>of</strong> the ecology, landscape is the basic functional unit incorporating man and<br />
their activities within the space, including the ecosystems. In fact, interaction <strong>of</strong> man with<br />
biological diversity and inanimate natural properties <strong>of</strong> a given area constitute landscape.<br />
Everyday activities <strong>of</strong> people are carried out in several ecosystems (natural and<br />
anthropogenic), i.e. at a level <strong>of</strong> a landscape. Therefore, the landscape reflects the socioeconomic<br />
situation <strong>of</strong> an area from ecological point <strong>of</strong> view (although it is originally<br />
geographical term).<br />
Landscape is topographically defined territory composed <strong>of</strong> specific mosaic <strong>of</strong> inter-related<br />
ecosystem types that could be or have been subject <strong>of</strong> specific human. Landscape is<br />
defined primarily as a piece <strong>of</strong> land that can be covered by a single view. But, ecology<br />
excludes the view, i.e. landscape exists independently from the perception (as different from<br />
paysage). It is heterogeneous and dynamic level <strong>of</strong> ecological systems organization.<br />
Landscape development is under the influence <strong>of</strong> natural or anthropogenic factors or<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> both. A landscape type (which is actually the basic systematic category with<br />
landscapes) may possess entirely natural characteristics or to be entirely modified by man<br />
and not to cover a single natural ecosystem (as is the case with major urban areas). Thus,<br />
the landscape exactly is the level <strong>of</strong> ecological organization which involves people and their<br />
activities in ecological systems. Through landscape, we explore the functioning <strong>of</strong> mannature<br />
relations and define the causes for the current outlook and distribution <strong>of</strong> ecosystems<br />
in the space.<br />
198
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
For the purpose <strong>of</strong> easier comprehension <strong>of</strong> the text, the main characteristics <strong>of</strong> landscapes<br />
and the basic terminology are clarified below.<br />
The landscape has a structure, i.e. it is composed <strong>of</strong> several categories <strong>of</strong> landscape<br />
elements:<br />
- Matrix is dominant, comprehensive element<br />
- Patches are minor elements dispersed in the matrix (they may be small forests<br />
inside agricultural land or open terrains within a forest)<br />
• Mosaic is a group <strong>of</strong> patches<br />
- <strong>Corridor</strong>s are linear elements<br />
o<br />
o<br />
• Network is a group <strong>of</strong> corridors<br />
Edge - may be distinguished in the frames <strong>of</strong> patches and corridors, and has<br />
explicit mutual relations with the matrix,<br />
Interior– may be distinguished in the frames <strong>of</strong> patches and corridors, and<br />
has poor or no interaction at all with the matrix.<br />
Spatial organization <strong>of</strong> the mosaic and networks constitutes the imprint <strong>of</strong> the<br />
landscape. It is important in the exploration <strong>of</strong> similarities or differences <strong>of</strong> two<br />
landscapes from structural point <strong>of</strong> view. The structure is the basis for the functional<br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> individual landscapes.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the more important aspects <strong>of</strong> landscapes include: size <strong>of</strong> patches, which means<br />
the amount <strong>of</strong> available habitat; fragmentation; heterogenity; spatial ration between patches -<br />
connection and connectivity.<br />
Connectiveness–two patches <strong>of</strong> the same type are close to each other and<br />
connected with the space,<br />
Connectivity– individuals or their reproductive parts <strong>of</strong> species are able to move from<br />
one to another patch even when those are not linked.<br />
Quantitative presentation <strong>of</strong> heterogenity and fragmentation depend on the scale.<br />
Preservation <strong>of</strong> natural values <strong>of</strong> an area is possible only by integration <strong>of</strong> human needs<br />
within conservation activities. Basically, landscape approach should secure maximum<br />
preservation <strong>of</strong> nature under conditions <strong>of</strong> full implementation <strong>of</strong> man's intentions and<br />
projects. In the specific case, the landscape should sustain the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />
line with all accompanying elements and structures, with minimum impacts on the<br />
environment (including natural ecosystems and man's goods and creations). In all cases,<br />
incorporation <strong>of</strong> such a big size infrastructure project, like the railway line with a length <strong>of</strong><br />
62.6 km in the landscape will cause significant changes in landscape characteristics and<br />
serious impacts on all elements <strong>of</strong> the landscape (both cultural and natural). Therefore, there<br />
is a necessity for determination and description <strong>of</strong> cultural and natural characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />
landscape types along the route.<br />
In the frames <strong>of</strong> the area intended for construction <strong>of</strong> the future railway line Kicevo-Radozda,<br />
human activities have been and are performed with different intensity in different<br />
ecosystems, mainly depending on the altitude. Thus, several distinctive landscapes have<br />
been formed along the corridor.<br />
The main activity and land use along the corridor is the forestry (Kicevo-Botun) and<br />
agriculture, mainly farming (in Struga Fields). These intensive activities have been<br />
performed for centuries leaving behind a strong imprint on the entire territory, on landscapes<br />
199
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
and nature in general. Besides, the presence <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake and historically and geologically<br />
determined lake terraces in the southern part <strong>of</strong> the corridor, together with the prevailing<br />
vegetation types are the main factors determining the appearance and diversity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
present landscapes along railway corridor. Moderate continental climate and strong climate<br />
influence <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake summarize the external influence.<br />
Considering the above mentioned anthropogenic, biogeographical, physical and<br />
geographical characteristics as criteria, three to four landscape types can be distinguished<br />
along the railway line route with gradation from purely cultural through predominantly cultural<br />
up to more or less natural characteristics. Specific natural vegetation which attributes the<br />
external appearance <strong>of</strong> natural or slightly modified landscapes is described in the chapters<br />
on biogeographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area along the route, and on habitats <strong>of</strong> plant<br />
communities. Clearer distribution <strong>of</strong> biomes or zones overlaps with the distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
landscapes to a great extent. Geographical characteristics or spatial entireties are presented<br />
in more detail in the respective chapters.<br />
Two clearly differentiated spatial entireties can be distinguished along the railway line,<br />
namely: hilly-subalpine and gorge-like northern part (km 0+000 km 36+000) with two typical<br />
landscape types and plane lake southern part (km 36+000 to km 54+800) with one<br />
landscape type. In the furthest southern part (km 54+800 to km 61+500), the corridor passes<br />
through an area <strong>of</strong> similar characteristics as the one in the northern part.<br />
3.12.1 Hilly rural landscape in oak forest belt<br />
This landscape type covers most <strong>of</strong> the area extending along the assessed corridor for the<br />
railway line Kicevo-Radozda construction. More precisely, it spreads from km 1+800 to km<br />
36+000 and from km 54+800 to the end <strong>of</strong> the corridor. The hilly rural landscape can be<br />
treated predominantly as cultural landscape.<br />
Relief is hilly-mountainous with steeper or gentler slopes. The slopes are cut through with<br />
river valleys. The gentler one is predominantly siliceous, but there is also calcareous ground<br />
in the furthest southern part. Certain parts are characterized with alluvial deposits. Erosion is<br />
severe problem at certain spots. This landscape is widely spread landscape in hilly part <strong>of</strong><br />
the whole Macedonia.<br />
In the core area, under the influence <strong>of</strong> the railway line, the matrix is represented with<br />
agricultural areas (mainly meadows and small gardens and fields) with lots <strong>of</strong> trees. Trees<br />
are fruits or oak trunks or woodlots (chestnut trunks are specific for the furthest southern part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the railway line corridor). <strong>Corridor</strong>s are wide and real small forests at places, which means<br />
they can serve as habitats and migration paths <strong>of</strong> migration for carnivore animals. It may be<br />
confirmed that this landscape has sufficient importance in terms <strong>of</strong> supporting biodiversity in<br />
general. Patches <strong>of</strong> forest vegetation are connective, and in some cases connected. It is <strong>of</strong><br />
particular importance that connectivity reaches far in the area and rather distant forest<br />
ecosystems <strong>of</strong> adjacent landscapes are connected through these landscape corridors. An<br />
important feature <strong>of</strong> this landscape (not the same in all areas <strong>of</strong> this landscape type) are the<br />
linear corridors in river valleys represented by alder or willow belts or small patches <strong>of</strong> alder<br />
woodlots. They ensure survival and easy movement for many important animal species<br />
(otter, for example), and thus represent particularly important structural element for the<br />
functionality <strong>of</strong> this landscape in terms <strong>of</strong> biodiversity conservation.<br />
In peripheral parts <strong>of</strong> the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest, the landscape gets more and more an<br />
appearance <strong>of</strong> semi-natural landscape <strong>of</strong> broadleaved forests.<br />
200
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Populated places are villages <strong>of</strong> compacted type which are not continuously distributed and<br />
most <strong>of</strong>ten not connected with asphalted roads in between (they are connected with the<br />
main road Kicevo-Ohrid). Some are almost completely depopulated, and so traditional<br />
agricultural practices have been abandoned (Vidrani, Judovo, Slivovo), and some others to a<br />
certain extent.<br />
In recent times, processes <strong>of</strong> overgrowing prevail on abandoned fields and meadows with<br />
adjacent shrub or forest vegetation.<br />
It is specific that some other human structures are scattered throughout the landscape<br />
(petrol stations, small factories or plants, queries, etc.) that have been out <strong>of</strong> operation for a<br />
long. This only disrupts the appearance <strong>of</strong> the landscape (paysage), but not its<br />
functionality 21 .<br />
Cultural and historical monuments are scarcely represented and limited to certain rural<br />
settlements. They are mostly represented with churches and cemeteries (usually within the<br />
church land) 22 .<br />
3.12.2 Landscape <strong>of</strong> subalpine broadleaved forests<br />
Oak forests composed mainly <strong>of</strong> Sessile oak spread at an altitude higher than 900 m along<br />
the stretch from the village Judovo to the village Slivovo. They constitute subalpine<br />
landscape <strong>of</strong> broadleaved forests in which patches are wood clearings <strong>of</strong> different<br />
dimensions. This landscape is <strong>of</strong> exceptional importance for the carnivores because they<br />
provide favourable habitat for the individuals migrating between core areas in the frames <strong>of</strong><br />
the National Parks “Galicica”, “Pelister” and “Mavrovo”. Belt <strong>of</strong> mesophilic oaks and beech<br />
forests spreads along whole Shar Planina Mt.<br />
At the stretch near the village Popolzani, this landscape continues through hilly rural<br />
landscape to the same landscape type on the mountain <strong>of</strong> Bistra.<br />
Construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Radozda will not have any direct<br />
impact on the structure and functioning <strong>of</strong> this landscape and therefore it will not be<br />
described in detail.<br />
3.12.3 Urban landscape Kicevo<br />
There are two urban entireties in the frames <strong>of</strong> the wider area affected by the construction<br />
and especially operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Radozda: Kicevo and Struga. Only Kicevo<br />
is situated in the narrow corridor determined for assessment <strong>of</strong> the line impacts. The<br />
landscape spreads over the very beginning <strong>of</strong> the railway line corridor (km 0+000 to km<br />
1+800). This is a genuine urban landscape, the peripheral part <strong>of</strong> which is represented with<br />
degraded land and structures <strong>of</strong> secondary and tertiary infrastructure.<br />
Urban landscape has very low importance in terms <strong>of</strong> biodiversity, but interventions in it<br />
(such as railway line construction) have impact on people themselves (reduced quality <strong>of</strong><br />
living, pollution, noise).<br />
3.12.4 Lake plane landscape<br />
This landscape in Macedonia is found only in Ohrid-Struga Valley and Prespa. In the corridor<br />
<strong>of</strong> the line, it spreads from km 36+000 (village Klimestani) to km 54+800 (village Radolista)<br />
and covers Struga Fields, which is in the most part modified former Struga Marsh. The<br />
landscape is purely cultural, agricultural.<br />
21 See the chapter on socio-economic context<br />
22 See the chapter on cultural heritage<br />
201
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
The relief is plane without outstanding elevations throughout the area. The relief is formed<br />
onto lake terrace, and thus the geological ground is composed <strong>of</strong> lake sediments. Ohrid<br />
Lake it self is specific feature <strong>of</strong> the landscape. The whole area is characterized with high<br />
level <strong>of</strong> ground waters apart from the dense canal network installed in the past to drain<br />
Struga Marsh.<br />
The landscape is dominated by agricultural land, which means that the matrix is represented<br />
with fields and other anthropogenically modified habitats (rural settlements and gardens,<br />
meadows, etc.). The biggest portion <strong>of</strong> the area is occupied by the matrix. Patchy structure<br />
<strong>of</strong> the landscape is made <strong>of</strong> rare and dispersed habitats with reeds, as well as residues <strong>of</strong><br />
marshy habitats. There are no plane humid forests and woods at all, but there are individual<br />
remains <strong>of</strong> forest vegetation (marshy oak, alder or willows) 23 .<br />
<strong>Corridor</strong>s are represented with canals and marshy vegetation associated with them. The<br />
most important corridor in the frames <strong>of</strong> this specific landscape is the old riverbed <strong>of</strong> Sateska<br />
and alder belts and remains <strong>of</strong> woodlots along the riverbed. Most <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> Sateska is<br />
not within the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest for the Environmental Impact Assessment Study related to<br />
the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Radozda. It may be assessed that<br />
the functionality <strong>of</strong> the landscape, in relation to medium and small size mammals and other<br />
vertebrate and invertebrate fauna, is at satisfactory level (corridors are functional). All<br />
corridors are presented on the map <strong>of</strong> habitats (Annex 6 and 7). Visual layout <strong>of</strong> the<br />
landscape is given in Appendix 5.<br />
Anthropogenic establishments, except fields, are represented in this landscape with rural<br />
settlements and industrial facilities. The most important villages that would be affected<br />
directly with the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line are the villages Klimestani,<br />
Meseista, Volino, Moroista, Zagracani and Radolista. From among industrial facilities, the<br />
most important are the plant <strong>of</strong> the “Oteks” factory near the village Meseiste and the factory<br />
“Poliplast” for products <strong>of</strong> plastic mass, the Joint Stock Company “Grafikom” for printing<br />
activity, Public Enterprise “Jablanica” for parquet and lumber production, Public Enterprise<br />
for water management “Crn Drim” dealing with water management in Struga area (see the<br />
chapter on socio-economic context). There are no outstanding cultural or historical<br />
structures and monuments within the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />
3.13 Population, populated places and economic and social parameters<br />
The documentation that defines the future railway route, as a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> 8, Kicevo- Lin<br />
section, shows that 26 settlements, belonging administratively to four municipalities, are<br />
directly affected. Analyses have been made in the aforementioned settlements, concerning<br />
social-geographical and economic-geographical features along the route <strong>of</strong> the Kicevo-<br />
Radozda railway line.<br />
Table 30 Overview <strong>of</strong> municipalities and settlements within or affected by the corridor along the route<br />
<strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin<br />
Municipality<br />
KICEVO<br />
DRUGOVO<br />
Kicevo<br />
Settlements<br />
Brzdani, Vidrani, G.Popolzani, D.Popolzani, Drugovo, Judovo,<br />
23 With regard to the importance <strong>of</strong> natural marshy vegetation remains, see chapter 3.11.8.4<br />
202
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
DEBARCA<br />
STRUGA<br />
Arabinovo, botun, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Pesocani, Slivovo, Turje,<br />
klimestani, Meseista, Volino, Trebenista,<br />
Mislesovo, Moroista, Struga, Zagracani – Sum, Radolista, Kalista,<br />
Frangovo, Radozda<br />
The socio-geographical characteristics are shown through analyses <strong>of</strong> total population, its<br />
gender, national, age and some economic structures.<br />
The economic-geographical aspects have been considered through detailed review <strong>of</strong><br />
agricultural land by land registration lots classified in populated places, municipalities and<br />
along with a display <strong>of</strong> land affiliation by property (private, public sector and in total).<br />
Numerous aspects <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> the primary sector, as well as the other activity<br />
sectors, are presented and can be noted through this data.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> railway line environmental impact and functionality <strong>of</strong> the space on both sides <strong>of</strong><br />
the railway line, various infrastructural aspects <strong>of</strong> the linear and institutional infrastructure<br />
have been analyzed.<br />
3.13.1 Social- geographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> settlements along the Kicevo- Lin railway<br />
line route<br />
3.13.1.1 Total population, population by gender and ethnic structure<br />
Description <strong>of</strong> the basic functions <strong>of</strong> a given space assumes necessary study <strong>of</strong> the<br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> population and settlements. The basic elements <strong>of</strong> the population<br />
demographic structure, in function <strong>of</strong> comprehending the socio-geographical aspects <strong>of</strong> the<br />
area along the Kicevo- Lin railway line route, include:<br />
-number <strong>of</strong> population,<br />
-population gender structure,<br />
-ethnic structure,<br />
-population age structure,<br />
-population characteristics according to economic activity, and<br />
-households and apartments.<br />
The study was performed in settlements, classified by municipalities and collectively,<br />
all along the railway route. Thus, a more complete and more accurate insight in<br />
characteristics in every particular territory was enabled, and accordingly undertaking <strong>of</strong><br />
adequate measures for status improvement.<br />
3.13.1.2 Population in numbers<br />
Natural characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area, on one hand, and socio-economic aspects, on the other,<br />
are the basic determinants that have had and still have impact on population coverage in a<br />
given area. In the case <strong>of</strong> the corridor along the railway line Kicevo-Lin, most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
settlements are scattered in the valleys <strong>of</strong> rivers Treska, Sateska, Crn Drim and by the Ohrid<br />
Lake. The population numbers, gender and ethnic structure are shown in Table 31.<br />
According to overview <strong>of</strong> the table, it is established that 26 settlements are located along the<br />
Kicevo-Lin railway line route. The only urban places among them are Kicevo and Struga,<br />
while the rest are rural. According to data from the 2002 census, these populated places<br />
have 60992 inhabitants, 43626 <strong>of</strong> which live in the cities, and the rest (17366) in villages. In<br />
addition, one settlement has 0-10 inhabitants, seven settlements have 10-100 inhabitants,<br />
203
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
four have 100-300 inhabitants, one has 300-500 inhabitants and 13 are with more than 500<br />
inhabitants.<br />
In relation to this data is also the population density which in the areas <strong>of</strong> Debrca villages is<br />
under 10 inh./km 2 which is relatively low. On the contrary, in the Struga Field, along the<br />
railway corridor, the population density reaches approximately 350 inh./km 2 , so it is noted<br />
that the space is rather densely populated. In terms <strong>of</strong> demographic development, the<br />
relatively large number <strong>of</strong> settlements, with less than 100 inhabitants is alarming, due to<br />
expectations that these settlements may soon be completely depopulated. Such populated<br />
places are Vidrani and Judovo near Kicevo, and the group <strong>of</strong> villages in the municipality <strong>of</strong><br />
Debrca, including Arbinovo, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Pesocani, Slivovo and Turje, which are<br />
demographically and economically rather degraded.<br />
Regarding railway line functional aspects, it is realistic to expect a certain positive impact on<br />
settlement revitalization, meaning their constant maintenance, provided that part <strong>of</strong> their<br />
population is directly involved in the railway. The railway route section from the Botun village<br />
to the Radozda village passes through the Struga Field, where populated places are<br />
demographically and economically vital, therefore the railway line positive impacts should be<br />
many-sided. The case here concerns demographic, economic socio-cultural development<br />
aspects.<br />
3.13.1.3 Gender structure <strong>of</strong> the population<br />
The population gender structure is one <strong>of</strong> the demographical indicators that determine the<br />
population vitality in a certain area, as well as the way <strong>of</strong> organizing life and work.<br />
According to data presented in the enclosed tables, it can be concluded that male population<br />
prevails in the populated areas. The reason for this state mainly relates to the frequent<br />
emigration <strong>of</strong> female population, which, in terms <strong>of</strong> migration, is more dynamic, due to<br />
emigrational features <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>of</strong> these areas, education, marriage (for the younger<br />
population) etc.<br />
204
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Table 31 Overview <strong>of</strong> total population, population by gender and ethnic structure, by municipalities and populated places along the railway line route Kicevo-<br />
Lin<br />
KICEVO MUNICIPALITY<br />
Settlements<br />
Total<br />
population<br />
Man Woman NATIONALITY<br />
Macedonians <strong>Albania</strong>n Turks Roma Vlachs Serbs Bosniaks Other<br />
KICEVO 27067 13568 13499 15031 7641 2406 1329 75 82 7 496<br />
TOTAL 27067 13568 13499 15031 7641 2406 1329 75 82 7 496<br />
DRUGOVO MUNICIPALITY<br />
Settlements<br />
Total<br />
population<br />
Man Woman NATIONALITY<br />
Macedonians <strong>Albania</strong>n Turks Roma Vlachs Serbs Bosniaks Other<br />
BRZDANI 162 83 79 162 - - - - - - -<br />
VIDRANI 8 4 4 8 - - - - - - -<br />
G. POPOLZANI 109 55 54 109 - - - - - - -<br />
DRUGOVO 1492 786 706 1250 108 128 1 - 2 - 3<br />
JUDOVO 27 16 11 27 - - - - - - -<br />
TOTAL 1798 944 854 1556 108 128 1 - 2 - 3<br />
205
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
DEBRCA MUNICIPALITY<br />
Settlements<br />
Total<br />
population<br />
Man Woman NATIONALITY<br />
Macedonians <strong>Albania</strong>n Turks Roma Vlachs Serbs Bosniaks Other<br />
ARBINOVO 26 8 18 26 - - - - - - -<br />
BOTUN 227 128 99 220 - - - - - - 7<br />
IZDEGLAVJE 136 64 72 136 - - - - - - -<br />
NOVO SELO 68 31 37 64 - - - - - - 4<br />
PESOCANI 95 45 50 95 - - - - - - -<br />
SLIVOVO 16 7 9 16 - - - - - - -<br />
TURJE 17 10 7 17 - - - - - - -<br />
KLIMESTANI 57 33 24 - - - - - - - -<br />
MESEISTA 779 374 405 776 - - - - - - 3<br />
VOLINO 462 236 226 226 - - - - - - -<br />
TREBENISTA 513 251 262 500 - - - - - - 13<br />
TOTAL 2396 1187 1209 2076 - - - - - - 27<br />
SREUGA MUNICIPALITY<br />
Settlements<br />
Total<br />
population<br />
Man Woman NATIONALITY<br />
Macedonians <strong>Albania</strong>n Turks Roma Vlachs Serbs Bosniaks Other<br />
206
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
MOROISTA 909 450 459 903 6<br />
MISLESOVO 3507 1754 1753 2791 527 28 13 66 15 - 67<br />
STRUGA 16559 8221 8338 8901 5293 907 97 550 72 16 723<br />
ZAGRACANI 1075 540 535 1 1071 - - - - - 3<br />
SUM 837 431 406 2 823 - - - - - 12<br />
RADOLISTA 3119 1561 1558 1 3085 - - - - - 33<br />
KALISTA 1178 589 589 95 1079 - - - - - 4<br />
FRANGOVO 1739 893 846 - 1734 - - - - - 5<br />
RADOZDA 808 402 406 806 2<br />
TOTAL 29731 14841 14890 13500 13622 935 110 616 87 16 855<br />
Table 32 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> total population, population by gender and ethnic structure, by municipalities and populated places along the railway line route<br />
Kicevo-Lin<br />
Municipality<br />
Total<br />
population<br />
Man Woman NATIONALITY<br />
Macedonians <strong>Albania</strong>n Turks Roma Vlachs Serbs Bosniaks Other<br />
KICEVO 27067 13568 13499 15031 7641 2406 1329 75 82 7 496<br />
DRUGOVO 1798 944 854 1556 108 128 1 - 2 - 3<br />
DEBARCA 2396 1187 1209 2076 - - - - - - 27<br />
STRUGA 29731 14841 14890 13500 13622 935 110 616 87 16 855<br />
TOTAL 60992 30540 30452 32163 21371 3469 1440 691 171 23 1381<br />
207
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
3.13.1.4 Ethnic structure<br />
Ethnic structure <strong>of</strong> the population along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Kjafasan is<br />
heterogeneous. Around 53% <strong>of</strong> the population are Macedonians, 35% <strong>Albania</strong>ns and the<br />
remaining 12% are Turks, Macedonian <strong>of</strong> Muslim religion, Vlachs, Roma, etc. Settlements<br />
along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line from Kicevo to Struga are populated by Macedonians,<br />
while the section from Struga to the village Radozda is dominated by <strong>Albania</strong>n, Roman,<br />
Turkish, Vlach and other population.<br />
3.13.1.5 Age structure <strong>of</strong> the population<br />
The age structure <strong>of</strong> the population is the main determinant on which the vitality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
population depends. In this specific case, it is notable that most <strong>of</strong> the populated places are<br />
characterized with significantly higher share <strong>of</strong> mature and particularly old population. In<br />
rural settlements, especially those with less than 100 inhabitants, there is almost no young<br />
population belonging to the age group <strong>of</strong> 0-19 years. Details <strong>of</strong> age structure by populated<br />
places, municipalities and collectively for the corridor, along the railway line route Kicevo-<br />
Kjafasan, are presented in the tables below.<br />
Table 33 Overview <strong>of</strong> population by age groups, by municipalities and populated places along the<br />
railway line route Kicevo-Lin<br />
KICEVO MUNICIPALITY<br />
Settlements<br />
AGE GROUPS<br />
0-19 г. 20-64 65-> вкупно<br />
KICEVO 8167 16560 2340 27067<br />
TOTAL 8167 16560 2340 27067<br />
DRUGOVO MUNICIPALITY<br />
Settlements<br />
AGE GROUPS<br />
0-19 г. 20-64 65-> вкупно<br />
BRZDANI 27 92 43 162<br />
VIDRANI 0 2 6 8<br />
POPOLZANI 29 59 21 109<br />
DRUGOVO 453 875 164 1492<br />
JUDOVO 0 12 15 27<br />
TOTAL 509 1040 249 1798<br />
DEBRCA MUNICIPALITY<br />
Settlements<br />
AGE GROUPS<br />
0-19 г. 20-64 65-> Вкупно<br />
ARBINOVO 2 5 19 26<br />
BOTUN 53 128 46 227<br />
IZDEGLAVJE 22 58 56 136<br />
NOVO SELO 13 25 30 68<br />
208
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
PESOCANI 18 56 21 95<br />
SLIVOVO 0 3 13 16<br />
TURJE 0 8 9 17<br />
KLIMESTANI 6 31 20 57<br />
MESEISTA 165 400 214 779<br />
VOLINO 117 262 83 462<br />
TREBENISTA 106 298 109 513<br />
TOTAL 502 1274 610 2396<br />
STRUGA MUNICIPALITY<br />
Settlements<br />
AGE GROUPS<br />
0-19 г. 20-64 65-> Вкупно<br />
MOROISTA 273 529 107 909<br />
MISLESEVO 1003 2162 342 3507<br />
STRUGA 5042 9941 1576 16559<br />
ZAGRACANI 444 570 61 1075<br />
SUM 378 411 48 837<br />
RADOLISTA 1361 1566 192 3119<br />
KALISTA 494 608 76 1178<br />
FRANGOVO 749 883 107 1739<br />
RADOZDA 208 493 107 808<br />
TOTAL 9952 17163 2616 29731<br />
Table 34 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> population by age groups, by municipalities and populated places<br />
along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin<br />
Settlements AGE GROUPS СТРУКТУРА ВО %<br />
0-19 г. 20-64 65-> вкупно 0-19 г. 20-64 65-> вкупно<br />
kicevo 8167 16560 2340 27067 30,1 61,2 8,7 100<br />
drugovo 509 1040 249 1798 28,4 57,8 13,8 100<br />
debrca 502 1274 610 2396 18,8 49,2 32,0 100<br />
struga 9952 17163 2616 29731 33,5 57,7 8,8 100<br />
total 19130 36037 5815 60992 31,4 59,1 9,5 100<br />
Data in the tables shows that the mature age group <strong>of</strong> 20-64 years prevails with around<br />
60%. Young age group <strong>of</strong> 0-19 years, at an average, is represented by around 30 %, and<br />
population older than 65 years is represented at an average by around 10%. If observed by<br />
populated places in a municipality, it is notable that the share <strong>of</strong> old population in Drugovo,<br />
Debrca and Ohrid is high. This means that the population in the settlements along the<br />
railway corridor is approaching deep maturity with a tendency towards full depopulation <strong>of</strong><br />
the area. On the other side, the percentage <strong>of</strong> representation <strong>of</strong> young population in Struga<br />
209
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Fields is rather high, while the proportion <strong>of</strong> old population corresponds with the one <strong>of</strong><br />
stable demographic structures <strong>of</strong> population.<br />
In the context <strong>of</strong> the above, there is a serious issue <strong>of</strong> revitalization <strong>of</strong> the settlements in the<br />
Municipality <strong>of</strong> Debrca, while stable demographic structure <strong>of</strong> the population can be<br />
expected in the settlements <strong>of</strong> Struga Fields and other populated places.<br />
3.13.1.6 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the population by economic activity<br />
Population by economic activity (persons at an age above 15 years) is a very important<br />
component <strong>of</strong> demographic study, as these components enable an insight in socio-economic<br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> a given population. The text below presents data on economically active<br />
(including data on persons performing activity and persons not performing an activity) and<br />
economically inactive population. Economically active population consists <strong>of</strong> persons at an<br />
age <strong>of</strong> 15 and older. They have been grouped as persons performing an activity (i.e.<br />
employed or self-employed) and persons not performing an activity (including persons that<br />
have terminated their employment for various reasons) and so they look for a job.<br />
Economically inactive population includes persons who are work able, but for various<br />
reasons do not look for a job, such as: housewives, persons at military service, in prison,<br />
students, persons not able to work, retired persons, etc.<br />
Table 35 Overview <strong>of</strong> the population by economic activity, by municipalities and populated places<br />
along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin<br />
KICEVO MUNICIPALITY<br />
ECONOMICALLY ACTIVE<br />
ECONOMICALLY<br />
SETTLEMENTS<br />
TOTAL<br />
ALL<br />
IMPLOY UNIMPLOY<br />
INACTIVE<br />
KICEVO 20887 9904 5929 3975 10983<br />
TOTAL 20887 9904 5929 3975 10983<br />
DRUGOVO MUNICIPALITY<br />
ECONOMICALLY ACTIVE<br />
ECONOMICALLY<br />
SETTLEMENTS<br />
TOTAL<br />
ALL<br />
IMPLOY UNIMPLOY<br />
INACTIVE<br />
BRZDANI 146 23 23 - 123<br />
VIDRANI 8 1 1 - 7<br />
POPOLZANI 88 56 27 29 32<br />
DRUGOVO 1159 688 355 333 471<br />
JUDOVO 27 5 2 3 22<br />
TOTAL 1428 773 408 365 655<br />
DEBRCA MUNICIPALITY<br />
ECONOMICALLY ACTIVE<br />
ECONOMICALLY<br />
SETTLEMENTS<br />
TOTAL<br />
ALL IMPLOY UNIMPLOY<br />
INACTIVE<br />
210
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
ARBINOVO 24 1 - ARBINOVO 24<br />
BOTUN 188 66 40 BOTUN 188<br />
IZDEGLAVJE 120 38 12 IZDEGLAVJE 120<br />
NOVO SELO 60 19 7 NOVO SELO 60<br />
PESOCANI 82 32 15 PESOCANI 82<br />
SLIVOVO 16 1 1 SLIVOVO 16<br />
TURJE 14 - - TURJE 14<br />
KLIMESTANI 53 17 14 KLIMESTANI 53<br />
MESEISTA 666 280 172 MESEISTA 666<br />
VOLINO 362 162 89 VOLINO 362<br />
TREBENISTA 431 167 137 TREBENISTA 431<br />
TOTAL 2016 783 487 TOTAL 2016<br />
STRUGA MUNICIPALITY<br />
ECONOMICALLY ACTIVE<br />
SETTLEMENTS<br />
TOTAL<br />
ALL<br />
IMPLOY UNIMPLOY<br />
ECONOMICALLY<br />
INACTIVE<br />
MOROISTA 706 391 224 MOROISTA 706<br />
MISLESEVO 2770 1343 819 MISLESEVO 2770<br />
STRUGA 12919 6150 4114 STRUGA 12919<br />
ZAGRACANI 753 131 90 ZAGRACANI 753<br />
SUM 550 161 139 SUM 550<br />
RADOLISTA 1961 389 269 RADOLISTA 1961<br />
KALISTA 803 185 93 KALISTA 803<br />
FRANGOVO 1154 375 102 FRANGOVO 1154<br />
RADOZDA 658 389 244 RADOZDA 658<br />
TOTAL 22274 9514 6094 TOTAL 22274<br />
Table 36 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> the population by economic activity, by municipality along the railway<br />
line route Kicevo-Lin<br />
ECONOMICALLY ACTIVE<br />
SETTLEMENTS<br />
TOTAL<br />
ALL<br />
IMPLOY UNIMPLOY<br />
ECONOMICALLY<br />
INACTIVE<br />
KICEVO 20887 9904 5929 KICEVO 20887<br />
DRUGOVO 1428 773 408 DRUGOVO 1428<br />
DEBARCA 2016 783 487 DEBARCA 2016<br />
211
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
STRUGA 22274 9514 6094 STRUGA 22274<br />
TOTAL 46605 20974 12918 TOTAL 46605<br />
Data presented in tables indicates that economically inactive population accounts for 55%,<br />
i.e. more than economically active persons whose share is 45%. If we take the unemployed<br />
persons out <strong>of</strong> the economically active population, we may conclude that as low as 28% are<br />
persons performing pr<strong>of</strong>ession and they support the entire remaining population. It turns out<br />
that economically inactive population has greater influence on the overall state, where on<br />
one side there are persons with personal incomes that are most represented in the cities<br />
Kicevo and Struga and rural settlements in the Municipality Debrca and some villages in<br />
Ohrid area, and on the other side, as inactive population, there is younger population in the<br />
populated places <strong>of</strong> Struga Fields.<br />
The impact <strong>of</strong> the railway line, in terms <strong>of</strong> economic activity <strong>of</strong> the population, should be<br />
significant, especially in populated places in Struga Fields where relatively high portion <strong>of</strong><br />
young people that do not perform an activity (in the context <strong>of</strong> various needs in the railway<br />
transport, customs and economic systems), they will engage in and around activities<br />
connected with the railway transport.<br />
3.13.1.7 Households, members per households and dwellings<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the most important indicators <strong>of</strong> the population vitality, work ability and<br />
(comparatively) utilization <strong>of</strong> natural resources within given space, is the number <strong>of</strong><br />
households and especially the number <strong>of</strong> members per household as the main element in<br />
assessing the possibility for economic management <strong>of</strong> agricultural assets. Therefore, the text<br />
below presents the status concerning the number <strong>of</strong> households per populated place in<br />
Osogovo Mountains area compared to the number <strong>of</strong> population members per household<br />
and housing units.<br />
Table 37 Overview <strong>of</strong> population, households, number <strong>of</strong> members per households and dwellings, by<br />
municipality and populated place along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin<br />
KICEVO MUNICIPALITY<br />
Settlement Total population Households No.<strong>of</strong> mem. Per households housing<br />
KICEVO 27067 7510 3,6 9246<br />
TOTAL 27067 7510 3,6 9246<br />
DRUGOVO MUNICIPALITY<br />
Settlement Total population Households No.<strong>of</strong> mem. Per households housing<br />
BRZDANI 162 53 3,0 99<br />
VIDRANI 8 5 1,6 26<br />
G.POPOLZANI 109 36 3,0 55<br />
DRUGOVO 1492 441 3,4 586<br />
JUDOVO 5 3 1,7 10<br />
TOTAL 1776 538 3,3 776<br />
DEBRCA MUNICIPALITY<br />
212
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Settlement Total population Households No.<strong>of</strong> mem. Per households housing<br />
ARBINOVO 26 17 1,5 80<br />
BOTUN 227 76 3,0 142<br />
IZDEGLAVJE 136 58 2,3 122<br />
NOVO SELO 68 37 1,8 39<br />
PESOCANI 95 43 2,2 88<br />
SLIVOVO 16 10 1,6 75<br />
TURJE 17 9 1,9 64<br />
KLIMESTANI 57 23 2,5 40<br />
MESEISTA 779 246 3,2 564<br />
VOLINO 462 137 3,4 244<br />
TREBENISTA 513 169 3,0 345<br />
TOTAL 2396 825 5,4 1803<br />
STRUGA MUNICIPALITY<br />
Settlement Total population Households No.<strong>of</strong> mem. Per households housing<br />
MOROISTA 909 212 4,3 262<br />
MISLESEVO 3507 840 4,2 1127<br />
STRUGA 16559 4261 3,9 5604<br />
ZAGRACANI 1075 230 4,7 251<br />
SUM 837 192 4,4 211<br />
RADOLISTA 3119 667 4,7 703<br />
KALISTA 1178 283 4,2 341<br />
FRANGOVO 1739 385 4,5 413<br />
RADOZDA 808 217 3,7 347<br />
TOTAL 29731 7287 4,1 9259<br />
Table 38 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> the population by age groups, by municipality along the railway line<br />
route Kicevo-Lin<br />
Settlement Total population Households No.<strong>of</strong> mem. Per households housing<br />
KICEVO 27067 7510 3,6 9246<br />
DRUGOVO 1776 538 3,3 776<br />
DEBARCA 2396 825 5,4 1803<br />
OHRID 1811 575 3,1 1193<br />
STRUGA 29731 7287 4,1 9259<br />
213
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
TOTAL 60970 16160 3,8 21084<br />
Based on the data presented, we may conclude that the number <strong>of</strong> members per is relatively<br />
low, basically less than 4 members per household, including urban environments. This<br />
problem is significant in rural settlements where the number <strong>of</strong> members per household is<br />
around 2, and in high number <strong>of</strong> cases it is less than 2. This especially articulated in the<br />
populated places Popolzani, Vidrani, Brzdani and Judovo in Kicevo area and the group <strong>of</strong><br />
villages in the area <strong>of</strong> Debrca, such as Arbinovo, Botun, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Pesocani,<br />
Slivovo and Turje. This means that high proportion <strong>of</strong> the households have weak economic<br />
ability to work. The problem <strong>of</strong> single member households exists, too.<br />
It can be noted that, at the level <strong>of</strong> all data, the number <strong>of</strong> dwellings is higher than the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> households by around 25%. This situation is much more explicit in rural<br />
settlements, which have drastically disrupted demographic structure. There, due to<br />
depopulation and migration processes, part <strong>of</strong> the dwellings have been abandoned. In<br />
demographically more vital populated places, like the cities Kicevo and Struga and major<br />
populated places Drugovo, Mislesevo, Radolista, etc., the number <strong>of</strong> dwellings relative to<br />
households is higher, but not so drastically as in the case <strong>of</strong> demographically weaker<br />
settlements. This is due to the fact that some households own more than one dwelling.<br />
The construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line is expected to have positive impact on revitalization and<br />
economic sustainability <strong>of</strong> the area.<br />
3.14 Use and categorization <strong>of</strong> the land around the railway line route<br />
The analyzed area within the corridor Struga-Kjafasan amounts 6027 ha (Table 39). This<br />
area should be supplemented by the part <strong>of</strong> forest habitats, above the tunnel Judovo-Slivovo<br />
(353 ha), by which the overall area <strong>of</strong> the corridor reaches 6380 ha.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> this area is made <strong>of</strong> forests (41.7%) and agricultural land (39.8%). There, Italian and<br />
Turkey oak forests are predominant covering an area <strong>of</strong> 2507 ha. To the forest land, we can<br />
also add riparian alder forests covering 131 ha or 2% <strong>of</strong> the total area <strong>of</strong> the investigated<br />
corridor, which although occupying small areas are very important in terms <strong>of</strong> biological<br />
diversity conservation.<br />
Agricultural land is dominant mainly in Struga Fields. Major part <strong>of</strong> it is represented by huge<br />
complexes <strong>of</strong> fields covering the former Struga Marsh. Therefore, remains <strong>of</strong> marsh habitats<br />
are frequently found within agricultural areas.<br />
Land use in the analyzed space along the railway line Kicevo -Lin is presented in Table 39.<br />
Table 39 Land use in the analyzed corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Kjafasan<br />
Purpose <strong>of</strong> land<br />
Area<br />
[ha] %<br />
FOREST LAND 2658.15 41.66<br />
Natural forests 2507.54 39.30<br />
Blagun – gaberovi forests 50.56 0.79<br />
Ploskachevo – cerovi forests 2391.13 37.48<br />
Purpose <strong>of</strong> land<br />
Area<br />
[ha] %<br />
Well – developed forest 2239.09 35.09<br />
214
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Purpose <strong>of</strong> land<br />
Area<br />
Degraded stage 34.11 0.53<br />
Final degraded stage 117.93 1.85<br />
Chestnut forests 34.64 0.54<br />
Gorunovi forests 31.21 0.49<br />
Forest plantation 150.61 2.36<br />
Blackboron plantations 150.61 2.36<br />
Near river FORESTS 130.76 2.05<br />
Evlovi belts and forests 130.76 2.05<br />
LAND PASTURES(OPEN HABITATS) 33.8 0.53<br />
Брдски пасишта 33.8 0.53<br />
Wetlands 74.19 1.16<br />
Wetland habitats 15.68 0.25<br />
Wet meadows 56.81 0.89<br />
Alluwial sands 1.7 0.03<br />
WET SURFACES 110.49 1.73<br />
Lake 110.49 1.73<br />
AGRICULTURAL LAND 2539.22 39.80<br />
meadows 607.82 9.53<br />
Fields, vineyards and orchards 1799.23 28.20<br />
Abandoned fields 132.17 2.07<br />
RURAL AREAS AND INDUSTRY 480.63 7.53<br />
Settlements 470.61 7.38<br />
Urban habitats 184.18 2.89<br />
Rural habitats 286.43 4.49<br />
Industry 10.02 0.16<br />
quarry 1.78 0.03<br />
separation 1.07 0.02<br />
Industrial facilities 7.17 0.11<br />
TOTAL LAND ANALYZED 6027.24 94.47<br />
HABITATS OVER TUNNEL JUDOVO -SLIVOVO* 353.08 5.53<br />
TOTAL 6380.32 100.00<br />
Well – developed forest 2239.09 35.09<br />
Degraded stage 34.11 0.53<br />
Final degraded stage 117.93 1.85<br />
Chestnut forests 34.64 0.54<br />
*Habitats and land use above the tunnel Judovo-Slivovo have not been analyzed. Most <strong>of</strong><br />
this area is forest land.<br />
215
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 60 Land categorization<br />
3.14.1 Economic and geographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area along the railway line<br />
route Kicevo-Lin<br />
Economic development <strong>of</strong> a given area is in close correlation with its natural and geographic<br />
characteristics, such as relief structure <strong>of</strong> the area, location <strong>of</strong> populated places, natural<br />
resources, distribution <strong>of</strong> the population, level <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> institutional and linear<br />
infrastructure and other factors.<br />
Taking into account the above factors, direct perception <strong>of</strong> the area along the railway line<br />
route Kicevo-Lin and other economic and geographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> this mountain massif<br />
have been considered primarily through review <strong>of</strong> agricultural areas by cadastre (registered<br />
land) plots. More precisely, alfa-numerical presentation <strong>of</strong> cultivable land areas (fields,<br />
gardens, orchards, vineyards, meadows), pastures, forests, infertile lands, etc., has been<br />
made. In this context, it was possible to acquire better picture <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the basic natural<br />
resources and their impact on economic development <strong>of</strong> the region. In close correlation with<br />
these capacities, we have also considered other economic and non-economic activities and<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> relevance for the sustainable development and use <strong>of</strong> the space along the railway<br />
line Kicevo-Lin. Overview <strong>of</strong> infrastructure availability in populated places and the region was<br />
made, as well as overview <strong>of</strong> possibilities for more intensive communication between the<br />
settlements in the region.<br />
3.14.1.1 Overview <strong>of</strong> agricultural areas by registered land plots along the railway line<br />
route Kicevo-Lin<br />
The overview <strong>of</strong> agricultural areas by registered land plots along along the railway line<br />
Kicevo-Lin is presented by municipality and populated place. Factographic data is also<br />
216
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
classified by sectors <strong>of</strong> ownership, in order to enable clearer perception <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong><br />
agricultural areas by registered land plots clustered as cultivable and uncultivable land. More<br />
precisely, cultivable land is classified as fields, rice fields, gardens, orchards, vineyards and<br />
meadows. Uncultivable land is classified as areas under pasture, forest, reeds and marshes<br />
and infertile land. This provides more comprehensive and specific view over natural<br />
capacities <strong>of</strong> the space along the railway line Kicevo-Lin. Detailed data is presented in the<br />
tables below.<br />
.<br />
217
ORDINAL NO.<br />
PROPERITY (HA)<br />
FIELDS<br />
RICE FIELDS<br />
GARDENS<br />
ORCHARDS<br />
INTE.<br />
ORCHARDS.<br />
VINEYARDS<br />
INTENSIVE<br />
VINEYARDS<br />
MEADOWS<br />
TOTAL<br />
TRE.SURF.<br />
PASTURES<br />
FORESTS<br />
SWAMPY<br />
BARREN LAND<br />
TOTAL AREA<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Table 40 Overview <strong>of</strong> agricultural land by registered land plots, by municipalities and populated places along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin<br />
DRUGOVO MUNICIPALITY<br />
NAME OF CADASTRAL<br />
CULTURE<br />
CULTURE<br />
MUNICIPALITY<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />
private 54.8 - 1.8 17.2 - 1.3 - 1.8 76.9 135.2 106.9 - 8.8 327.8<br />
1 BRZDANI<br />
social 0.2 - - 0.1 - 0.4 - - 0.7 70.8 284.0 - 25.3 380.8<br />
total 55.0 - 1.8 17.3 - 1.7 - 1.8 77.6 206.0 390.9 - 34.1 708.6<br />
private 40.0 - 0.9 4.3 - 0.1 - 2.9 48.2 19.9 23.4 - 1.0 92.5<br />
2 VIDRANI<br />
social - - - - - - - - - 11.7 130.5 - 14.1 156.3<br />
total 40.0 - 0.9 4.3 - 0.1 - 2.9 48.2 31.6 153.9 - 15.1 248.8<br />
G AND D POPOLZANI private 16.9 - 0.9 5.0 - - - 22.5 45.3 26.2 25.8 - 2.0 102.0<br />
3<br />
social - - - 0.1 - - - - 0.1 6.1 107.2 - 11.4 124.8<br />
total 16.9 - 0.9 5.1 - - - 22.5 45.4 32.3 133.0 - 13.4 226.8<br />
DRUGOVO private 104.9 - - 9.3 - 2.0 - 0.3 116.5 40.0 8.2 - 14.4 179.1<br />
4<br />
social 0.5 - - 0.1 - - - - 0.6 137.0 328.4 - 31.7 497.7<br />
total 105.4 - - 9.4 - 2.0 - 0.3 117.1 177.0 336.6 - 46.1 676.8<br />
private 47.9 - - 8.1 - 0.1 - 6.4 62.5 162.7 64.3 - 2.5 292.0<br />
5 ЈUDOVO<br />
social 1.2 - - 0.2 - - - 0.3 1.7 62.9 464.2 - 22.3 551.1<br />
total 49.1 - - 8.3 - 0.1 - 6.7 64.2 225.6 528.5 - 24.8 843.1<br />
private 490.8 - - 99.0 - 16.4 - 37.4 643.6 54.0 29.4 - 136.4 863.4<br />
6 KICEVO<br />
social 37.6 - - 37.6 - 44.6 - 5.0 124.8 368.7 449.2 - 281.0 1223.7<br />
218
ORDINAL<br />
NO.<br />
PROPERITY<br />
(HA)<br />
FIELDS<br />
RICE<br />
FIELDS<br />
GARDENS<br />
ORCHARD<br />
S<br />
INTE.<br />
ORCHARD<br />
ORCHARD<br />
S<br />
INTE.<br />
ORCHARD<br />
S.<br />
TOTAL<br />
TRE.SURF.<br />
RICE<br />
FIELDS<br />
GARDENS<br />
ORCHARD<br />
S<br />
BARREN<br />
LAND<br />
INTE.<br />
TOTAL ORCHARD AREA<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
7<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
total 528.4 - - 136.6 - 61.0 - 42.4 768.4 422.7 478.6 - 417.4 2087.1<br />
TOTAL private 755.3 - 3.6 142.9 - 19.9 - 71.3 993.0 438.0 258.0 - 165.1 1856.8<br />
social 39.5 - - 38.1 - 45.0 - 5.3 127.9 657.2 1763.5 - 385.8 2934.4<br />
total 794.8 - 3.6 181.0 - 64.9 - 76.6 1120.9 1095.2 2021.5 - 550.9 4791.2<br />
DEBRCA MUNICIPALITY<br />
NAME OF CADASTRAL<br />
MUNICIPALITY<br />
CULTURE<br />
FIELDS<br />
FIELDS CULTURE<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1<br />
1 TURJE<br />
2 SLIVOVO<br />
3 АRBINOVO<br />
private 281.3 - 0.7 2.6 -<br />
private 281.3 - 0.7 2.6 -<br />
1 TURJE<br />
social 247.5 - - 0.4 - social 247.5 - - 0.4 -<br />
total 528.8 - 0.7 3.0 - total 528.8 - 0.7 3.0 -<br />
private 247.7 - 0.9 2.8 -<br />
private 247.7 - 0.9 2.8 -<br />
2 SLIVOVO<br />
social 63.7 - - 0.1 - social 63.7 - - 0.1 -<br />
total 311.4 - 0.9 2.9 - total 311.4 - 0.9 2.9 -<br />
private 209.9 - - 2.8 -<br />
private 209.9 - - 2.8 -<br />
3 АRBINOVO<br />
social 47.2 - - - - social 47.2 - - - -<br />
total 257.1 - - 2.8 - total 257.1 - - 2.8 -<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
219
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
private 258.8 - 1.0 1.5 -<br />
private 258.8 - 1.0 1.5 -<br />
4 IZDEGLAVJE<br />
4 IZDEGLAVJE<br />
4<br />
social 20.3 - 0.3 0.3 - social 20.3 - 0.3 0.3 -<br />
total 279.1 - 1.3 1.8 - total 279.1 - 1.3 1.8 -<br />
private 165.5 - 0.2 - -<br />
private 165.5 - 0.2 - -<br />
5 PESOCANI<br />
5 PESOCANI<br />
5<br />
social 34.6 - - - - social 34.6 - - - -<br />
total 200.1 - 0.2 - - total 200.1 - 0.2 - -<br />
private 136.5 - 0.1 1.3 -<br />
private 136.5 - 0.1 1.3 -<br />
6 NOVO SELO<br />
6 NOVO SELO<br />
6<br />
social 14.8 - - 0.1 - social 14.8 - - 0.1 -<br />
total 151.3 - 0.1 1.4 - total 151.3 - 0.1 1.4 -<br />
private 293.0 - 0.4 3.2 -<br />
private 293.0 - 0.4 3.2 -<br />
7 BOTUN<br />
7 BOTUN<br />
7<br />
social 76.6 - - - - social 76.6 - - - -<br />
total 369.6 - 0.4 3.2 - total 369.6 - 0.4 3.2 -<br />
private 113.3 - 0.2 16.0 -<br />
private 113.3 - 0.2 16.0 -<br />
8<br />
KLIMESTANI<br />
KLIMESTANI<br />
8<br />
8<br />
social 14.2 - - - - social 14.2 - - - -<br />
total 127.5 - 0.2 16.0 - total 127.5 - 0.2 16.0 -<br />
private 440.2 - 8.0 61.5 -<br />
private 440.2 - 8.0 61.5 -<br />
9<br />
MESEISTA<br />
9<br />
9<br />
MESEISTA<br />
social 157.2 - 0.9 15.7 - social 157.2 - 0.9 15.7 -<br />
total 597.4 - 8.9 77.2 - total 597.4 - 8.9 77.2 -<br />
10 VOLINO<br />
private 357.9 - 5.3 49.9 - 10 VOLINO private 357.9 - 5.3 49.9 - 10<br />
social 6.4 - - 5.5 - social 6.4 - - 5.5 -<br />
220
ORDINAL NO.<br />
PROPERITY (HA)<br />
FIELDS<br />
RICE FIELDS<br />
GARDENS<br />
ORCHARDS<br />
INTE.<br />
ORCHARD<br />
ORCHARDS<br />
INTE.<br />
ORCHARDS.<br />
TOTAL<br />
TRE.SURF.<br />
FIELDS<br />
RICE FIELDS<br />
GARDENS<br />
ORCHARDS<br />
BARREN LAND<br />
INTE. ORCHARD<br />
TOTAL AREA<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
11<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
total 364.3 - 5.3 55.4 - total 364.3 - 5.3 55.4 -<br />
private 371.0 - 7.9 52.8 -<br />
private 371.0 - 7.9 52.8 -<br />
11<br />
TREBENISTA<br />
TREBENISTA<br />
social 20.1 - 0.2 3.1 - social 20.1 - 0.2 3.1 -<br />
total 391.1 - 8.1 55.9 - total 391.1 - 8.1 55.9 -<br />
private 2875.1 - 42.8 194.4 - TOTAL private 2875.1 - 42.8 194.4 -<br />
TOTAL<br />
social 702.6 - 2.2 25.2 - social 702.6 - 2.2 25.2 -<br />
total 3577.7 - 45 219.6 - total 3577.7 - 45 219.6 -<br />
11<br />
STRUGA MUNICIPALITY<br />
NAME OF CADASTRAL<br />
MUNICIPALITY<br />
CULTURE<br />
FIELDS<br />
CULTURE<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1<br />
1 MOROISTA<br />
2 KOROSISTA<br />
private 436.1 - 8.0 20.5 -<br />
private 436.1 - 8.0 20.5 -<br />
1 MOROISTA<br />
social 22.2 - 0.2 21.3 - social 22.2 - 0.2 21.3 -<br />
total 458.3 - 8.2 41.8 - total 458.3 - 8.2 41.8 -<br />
private 230.9 - 13.3 13.2 -<br />
private 230.9 - 13.3 13.2 -<br />
2 KOROSISTA<br />
social 0.4 - - - - social 0.4 - - - -<br />
1<br />
2<br />
221
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
total 231.3 - 13.3 13.2 - total 231.3 - 13.3 13.2 -<br />
private 788.0 - 1.6 118.0 -<br />
private 788.0 - 1.6 118.0 -<br />
3 МISLESEVO<br />
3 МISLESEVO<br />
social 160.6 - - 95.6 - social 160.6 - - 95.6 -<br />
total 948.6 - 1.6 213.6 - total 948.6 - 1.6 213.6 -<br />
private 205.8 - 3.6 49.6 -<br />
private 205.8 - 3.6 49.6 -<br />
4 STRUGA<br />
4 STRUGA<br />
social 289.6 - 1.7 68.5 - social 289.6 - 1.7 68.5 -<br />
total 495.4 - 5.3 118,1 - total 495.4 - 5.3 118,1 -<br />
private 237.3 - - 14.9 -<br />
private 237.3 - - 14.9 -<br />
5 ZAGRAC.SUM<br />
5 ZAGRAC.SUM<br />
social 14.7 - - - - social 14.7 - - - -<br />
total 252.0 - - 14.9 - total 252.0 - - 14.9 -<br />
private 213.2 - - 19.3 -<br />
private 213.2 - - 19.3 -<br />
6 RADOLISTA<br />
6 RADOLISTA<br />
social 0.1 - - - - social 0.1 - - - -<br />
private 213.2 - - 19.3 - private 213.2 - - 19.3 -<br />
social 110.4 - 0.6 4.8 -<br />
social 110.4 - 0.6 4.8 -<br />
7 KALISTA<br />
7 KALISTA<br />
total 1.1 - - - - total 1.1 - - - -<br />
private 111.5 - 0.6 4.8 - private 111.5 - 0.6 4.8 -<br />
social 86.3 - - 13.6 -<br />
social 86.3 - - 13.6 -<br />
8 FRANGOVO<br />
8 FRANGOVO<br />
total 0.2 - - - - total 0.2 - - - -<br />
private 86.5 - - 13.6 - private 86.5 - - 13.6 -<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
222
ORDINAL NO.<br />
PROPERITY (HA)<br />
FIELDS<br />
RICE FIELDS<br />
GARDENS<br />
ORCHARDS<br />
INTE.<br />
ORCHARD<br />
ORCHARDS<br />
INTE.<br />
ORCHARD<br />
MEADOW<br />
TOTAL<br />
TRE.SURF.<br />
FORESTS<br />
SWAMPY<br />
SWAMPY<br />
BARREN LAND<br />
TOTAL AREA<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
STRUGA MUNICIPALITY (cont.)<br />
NAME OF CADASTRAL<br />
CULTURE<br />
MUNICIPALITY<br />
CULTURE<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />
private 4.6 - - 1.0 - 2.4 - 23.5 31.5 75.1 179.1 - 2.5 288.2<br />
9 MALI VLAJ<br />
social - - - - - - - - - 74.0 607.4 - 13.4 694.8<br />
total 4.6 - - 1.0 - 2.4 - 23.5 31.5 149.1 786.5 - 15.9 983.0<br />
private 29.9 - - 3.8 - 8.3 - 15.4 57.4 118.4 187.7 - 11.3 374.8<br />
10 RADOZDA<br />
social 1.3 - - - - 0.6 - 0.4 2.3 67.5 317.7 - 32.0 419.5<br />
total 31.2 - - 3.8 - 8.9 - 15.8 59.7 185.9 505.4 - 43.3 794.3<br />
TOTAL private 2342.5 - 27.1 258.7 - 71.2 - 313.6 3013.1 447.0 1011.0 0.5 192.4 4664.0<br />
11<br />
social 490.2 - 1.9 185.4 - 2.5 - 6.7 686.7 639.7 2218.6 0.1 448.4 3993.5<br />
total 2832.7 - 29.0 444.1 - 73.7 - 320.3 3699.8 1086.7 3229.6 0.6 640.8 8657.5<br />
223
ORDINAL<br />
NO.<br />
PROPERITY<br />
(HA)<br />
FIELDS<br />
RICE<br />
FIELDS<br />
GARDENS<br />
ORCHARD<br />
S<br />
INTE.<br />
ORCHARD<br />
ORCHARD<br />
S<br />
INTE.<br />
ORCHARD<br />
MEADOW<br />
TOTAL<br />
TRE.SURF.<br />
FORESTS<br />
SWAMPY<br />
SWAMPY<br />
BARREN<br />
LAND<br />
TOTAL AREA<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Table 41 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> agricultural areas by registered land plots, by municipalities and populated places along the railway line Kicevo-Lin<br />
KICEVO-LIN RAILWAY LINE<br />
NAME OF CADASTRAL<br />
CULTURE<br />
CULTURE<br />
MUNICIPALITY<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />
DRUGOVO private 755.3 - 3.6 142.9 - 19.9 - 71.3 993.0 438.0 258.0 - 165.1 1856.8<br />
1<br />
social 39.5 - - 38.1 - 45.0 - 5.3 127.9 657.2 1763.5 - 385.8 2934.4<br />
total 794.8 - 3.6 181.0 - 64.9 - 76.6 1120.9 1095.2 2021.5 - 550.9 4791.2<br />
DEBARCA private 2875.1 - 42.8 194.4 - 146.9 0.3 313.1 3554.5 112.3 417.5 - 100.8 4185.1<br />
2<br />
social 702.6 - 2.2 25.2 - 45.4 - 30.7 805.3 488.2 6669.2 - 974.1 8936.8<br />
total 3577.7 - 45 219.6 - 192.3 0.3 343.8 4359.8 600.5 7086.7 - 1073.9 13121.9<br />
private 197.9 - 1.1 24.3 - 45.4 - 3.5 272.2 87.0 1937.9 - 464.0 2761.1<br />
social 1480.3 - 22.5 204.5 - 189.5 - 68.8 1965.6 126.8 1957.7 - 495.9 4546.0<br />
STRUGA total 2342.5 - 27.1 258.7 - 71.2 - 313.6 3013.1 447.0 1011.0 0.5 192.4 4664.0<br />
3<br />
private 490.2 - 1.9 185.4 - 2.5 - 6.7 686.7 639.7 2218.6 0.1 448.4 3993.5<br />
social 2832.7 - 29.0 444.1 - 73.7 - 320.3 3699.8 1086.7 3229.6 0.6 640.8 8657.5<br />
total 5972.9 55.4 596.0 - 238.0 0.3 698.0 7560.6 997.3 1686.5 0.5 458.3 10705.9<br />
TOTAL<br />
private 1232.3 3.3 248.7 - 92.9 - 42.7 1619.9 1785.1 10651.3 0.1 1808.3 15864.7<br />
total 7205.2 58.7 844.7 - 330.9 0.3 740.7 9180.5 2782.4 12337.8 0.6 2265.6 26570.6<br />
224
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Tables above present data on the size <strong>of</strong> areas by registered land plots, by municipalities<br />
and populated places along along the railway line Kicevo-Lin. Total <strong>of</strong> 26 areas <strong>of</strong> populated<br />
places covering 26570,6 hectares (265 km 2 ) have been included. This means that the<br />
average size <strong>of</strong> rural area amounts around 10 km 2 . Nevertheless, although the immediate<br />
corridor occupies only around 60 km 2 (corridor on right and left <strong>of</strong> the railway line route with<br />
a total width <strong>of</strong> 1 km), analyses have been made to cover whole areas <strong>of</strong> the populated<br />
places.<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> the total area <strong>of</strong> the territory <strong>of</strong> 26570,6 hectares, 15864,7 hectares or 59.7% are<br />
socially owned, and the rest <strong>of</strong> 10705,9 hectares or 40.3% are in the private sector.<br />
Owing to the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the territory (predominantly mountainous area), cultivable<br />
land area covers around 1/3 <strong>of</strong> the territory <strong>of</strong> the settlements in the corridor or 9180,5<br />
hectares. Fields <strong>of</strong> 7205.2 hectares prevail, then orchards with 844.7 ha, meadows with<br />
740.7 ha etc. Most <strong>of</strong> the cultivable areas are in private ownership. Changes in lifestyle and<br />
economy management <strong>of</strong> the population in the course <strong>of</strong> the last decades has resulted in<br />
part <strong>of</strong> these territories not being cultivated, and so we can conclude that they supplement<br />
uncultivable areas, especially those under pastures and forests.<br />
Uncultivated area (pastures, forests, reed marshes and swamps, barren land) occupies<br />
around 2/3 <strong>of</strong> the territory along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin. The largest areas<br />
are under forest -12337.8 ha, followed by 2782.4 ha under pastures, 2265.6 ha barren land,<br />
etc. Major part <strong>of</strong> uncultivated land area is socially owned, or precisely around 1/4 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
mentioned area is privately, and 3/4 socially owned. This applies in particular on populated<br />
places in Kicevo area and the area <strong>of</strong> Debrca, where areas <strong>of</strong> the populated places are<br />
dominated by hilly and mountainous characteristics <strong>of</strong> the land. Private sector has bigger<br />
share in rural areas <strong>of</strong> Struga Fields, so that 1/2 <strong>of</strong> the settlements' areas are in private, and<br />
the rest in social ownership.<br />
In the context <strong>of</strong> the above described situation, practical extension <strong>of</strong> the railway line through<br />
Struga Fields, with a length <strong>of</strong> around 20 km, will affect around 1000 hectares privately<br />
owned land within the corridor itself, part <strong>of</strong> which will have to be subject to expropriation <strong>of</strong><br />
land, which assumes expenditures to regulate the matter. This process will inevitably be<br />
carried out along the whole route <strong>of</strong> the railway line; however, given the configuration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
relief and the size <strong>of</strong> registered land plots under forest, pastures, barren land etc., in the area<br />
<strong>of</strong> Kicevo, Debrca and around the section leading to the border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>,<br />
the issue will not be very difficult. The statement can be supported by the fact that the route<br />
<strong>of</strong> the railway line in these areas passes through tunnels and bridges, which makes the need<br />
for land expropriation significantly smaller.<br />
3.15 Existing or planned infrastructure around the route<br />
Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the infrastructure in a certain area are very important components <strong>of</strong> daily<br />
functioning and work needs <strong>of</strong> the population. In the sphere <strong>of</strong> infrastructure equipment,<br />
economic, institutional and linear infrastructures are almost equally important.<br />
3.15.1 Economic infrastructure<br />
Considering geographical characteristics, the economic infrastructure <strong>of</strong> the immediate<br />
corridor <strong>of</strong> the route <strong>of</strong> the Kicevo- Lin railway line is not very developed. The bigger part <strong>of</strong><br />
the corridor passes through economically underdeveloped rural areas, including the section<br />
from Drugovo to the village <strong>of</strong> Meseista and the section from Radolista to Radozda. Primary<br />
activities from the agriculture domain (farming and fruit-growing on insignificant surfaces as<br />
gardens) and forestry (as a natural recourse which, in conditions <strong>of</strong> abandoned and<br />
demographically weakened populated areas, is uncontrollably exploited by forest enterprises<br />
225
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
and illegal woodcutters) predominate in this area. Livestock breeding, in conditions <strong>of</strong><br />
depopulated settlements, only developed to the level <strong>of</strong> satisfying insignificant personal<br />
needs. In the secondary sector domain, regarding the aforementioned sector <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />
route, industrial facilities are non-existent.<br />
The economic infrastructure from the secondary activities domain is present in the urban<br />
areas <strong>of</strong> Kicevo and Struga, and in some <strong>of</strong> the larger rural areas in the Struga Field. In<br />
Kicevo for example, some <strong>of</strong> the most distinguished industrial facilities include: Construction<br />
Company “Bistra Drvo”, Public Enterprise “Elektrostopanstvo”, Joint Stock Company “Zito<br />
Karaorman” for production <strong>of</strong> flour, bread and bakery, Joint Stock Company EMO,<br />
operational unit for steel latticed pillars, that is to say production <strong>of</strong> metal constructions, Joint<br />
Stock Company “Tane Celeski” for production <strong>of</strong> tools, Joint Stock Company “Tajmiste” for<br />
production <strong>of</strong> string products, Textile Works “Kikoteks”, forest management Public Enterprise<br />
“Lopusnik” etc. More distinctive facilities in Struga include: Joint Stock Company "Struzanka"<br />
for production <strong>of</strong> textile products and curtains, Joint Stock Company “Grafikom” for printing<br />
activities, Public Enterprise “Jablanica” for production <strong>of</strong> parquet and timber, Public Water<br />
Management Enterprise “Crn Drim” for water management, Joint Stock Company “Ilinden”<br />
for skyscraper construction, Joint Stock Company “Jugotrans” for passenger transport and<br />
other facilities. A textile branch factory <strong>of</strong> “Oteks” is found in the village <strong>of</strong> Meseista.<br />
The railway line impact on the development <strong>of</strong> every domain economic infrastructure should<br />
undoubtedly be positive and a development factor. At the same time, expanding economic<br />
capacities, as well as establishing new facilities <strong>of</strong> other domains with enhanced production,<br />
transport and trade capacities, should be expected.<br />
3.15.2 Institutional infrastructure<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> institutional infrastructure in populated areas near the railway corridor, excluding<br />
several <strong>of</strong> the settlements around Kicevo (Vidrani, Judovo) and around Debrca (Turje,<br />
Slivovo, Arbinovo etc.), almost all bigger settlements have schools, out-patient clinics,<br />
commercial facilities, posts, gas stations and some restaurants and tourist facilities. Other<br />
institutional infrastructure facilities from the sphere <strong>of</strong> banking, tourism (hotels, motels,<br />
resting areas etc.), social-cultural and other facilities are found in the areas <strong>of</strong> the cities <strong>of</strong><br />
Kicevo and Struga, as well as some villages near the Ohrid Lake.<br />
The railway line, with its accompanying elements (railway stops and stations), should impact<br />
revitalizing and expanding <strong>of</strong> institutional infrastructure capacities in settlements near the<br />
railway.<br />
3.15.3 Linear infrastructure<br />
The linear infrastructure along the route <strong>of</strong> the Kicevo- Lin railway line, is mainly composed<br />
<strong>of</strong> highways, regional and local roads, and at certain locations a water-supply and electricity<br />
infrastructure.<br />
The planned railway line route intersects several highways and regional roads. More<br />
specifically, the route intersects the Kicevo- Ohrid highway, near the village <strong>of</strong> Popolzani,<br />
and once again at the section near the Botun gorge. Furthermore, the railway line intersects<br />
the Struga- Debar regional road, near the city <strong>of</strong> Struga, and once again the Struga-<br />
Kjafasan highway, near the village <strong>of</strong> Frangovo. Multiple intersections with local roads occur<br />
along the way, in the Debrca area and the Struga Field, such as intersections with the local<br />
roads leading to villages Arbinovo, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Belcista, Volino, Moroista,<br />
Zagracani-Sum, Kalista and other less significant roads. This situation will have certain<br />
impacts regarding the existing communication <strong>of</strong> settlements with highways and through<br />
226
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
them with urban centers near the railway line. In this context, adequate technical measures<br />
for establishing an open natural communication <strong>of</strong> space on both sides <strong>of</strong> the railway line are<br />
inevitable.<br />
The railway line compulsorily intersects many water management objects, such as the river<br />
Sateska canal gravitating towards the Ohrid Lake, the Crn Drim river, the underground<br />
aqueduct from the village <strong>of</strong> Radolista towards Struga, as well as several canals <strong>of</strong> the<br />
amelioration network in the Struga Field. These objects correlations will most certainly<br />
disrupt the existing ecological balance. Thus, the need for adequate technical solutions is<br />
inevitable, minimizing the railway line negative environmental impacts.<br />
At certain points, the railway line comes across elements <strong>of</strong> the electro-distribution network,<br />
present in the railway corridor. This occurs at several places in the Debrca area and the<br />
Struga Field.<br />
3.16 Forests<br />
3.16.1 Forest and forestry management in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />
3.16.1.1 Forest management<br />
Under the Law on Forests (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no. 64/09, all forests in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia, depending on geographical, natural and economic characteristics, are divided<br />
and organized into parts/units called forest management units (FMUs). There are 197 FMUs<br />
on the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia (current status). Each FMU, depending on the<br />
relief, topography, hydrography, composition, structure, age, and other natural<br />
characteristics and criteria, is divided/organized in smaller parts, called sections or<br />
subsections. Subsection is the smallest geographical, natural and economic spatial<br />
organizational unit in the frames <strong>of</strong> a FMU. All measures and activities within a FMU (forest<br />
growing, protection and use) are planned and carried out at the level <strong>of</strong> subsection.<br />
Management plans are prepared for each FMU. The validity <strong>of</strong> plans is 10 years. The plans<br />
are approved and adopted by the MAFWE, upon prior conducted review and issued consent<br />
by relevant institutions and entities. No activities in the forest, except physical protection, can<br />
be carried out beyond the plan. With regard to forests <strong>of</strong> economic purpose, commercial<br />
management plans are adopted, while for the forests within protected areas, management<br />
plans include elements <strong>of</strong> the content <strong>of</strong> the forest commercial management plans, as an<br />
integral part (Article 29 <strong>of</strong> the Law on Forests).<br />
A FMU, based on its geographical and natural characteristics, covers part <strong>of</strong> a mountain<br />
massif or one smaller hilly lower mountain massif, one or more landscapes, one or more<br />
biomes, several climate-vegetation-soil zones/belts, several habitats and several growth<br />
sites and habitats.<br />
According to the purpose, forests are divided into forests for economic/commercial purpose<br />
and forests for special purpose. Forests for commercial purpose should primarily have<br />
commercial, while forests for special purpose have conservation, natural, scientific, cultural,<br />
historical, defense, etc. importance. Significant part <strong>of</strong> the forests for commercial purpose,<br />
owing to their natural and economic characteristics, should be designated for forests for<br />
special purpose, as they do not have economic value and perform exclusively generally<br />
useful functions. Forests with special purpose, regardless <strong>of</strong> the use, and for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
their sustainable development, require provision <strong>of</strong> sustainable sources <strong>of</strong> funding.<br />
According to the ownership, forests in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia are in state and private<br />
ownership. Forests <strong>of</strong> religious communities are treated as private ownership.<br />
State forests for commercial purpose are managed by the PE “Macedonian Forests”, and<br />
private ones by their owners, most <strong>of</strong> whom are organized into Association <strong>of</strong> private forests<br />
owners.<br />
227
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Forests with special purpose (national parks, forest reserves, multi-purpose areas, training<br />
and scientific forests, forest parks, etc.) are managed by public institutions national parks,<br />
public institutions for multi-purpose area management, PE “Macedonian Forests”, public<br />
enterprises at local level (Skopje, Vinica, Strumica, etc.), Agriculture and Forestry School<br />
“Gjorce Petrov” from Kavadarci, etc. The management entity, depending on the category <strong>of</strong><br />
protection and purpose, is determined by the Assembly and the Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />
Under the Law on Forests, forests for commercial purpose owned by the state are<br />
managed by the Public Enterprise “Macedonian Forests” with its headquarters in Skopje.<br />
The public enterprise comprises 30 branches. Public enterprise, both at headquarters and<br />
branch levels, is organized into sectors (preparation <strong>of</strong> plans and programmes; growing,<br />
protection and ecology <strong>of</strong> forests; use <strong>of</strong> forests and other wood products; plan and analysis;<br />
investment and development; hunting and hunting tourism; commerce; finance and legal<br />
administrative affairs.<br />
Under the applicable legislation and <strong>of</strong>ficial national forest classification (forests for special<br />
purpose), the forests for economic/commercial purpose prevail in the structure by purpose,<br />
with 92%. Many forests with exclusively conservational or other ecological functions,<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficially have a treatment <strong>of</strong> economic forests, while in fact exist as forests with special<br />
purpose (many artificially erected and natural forests in the zones <strong>of</strong> watershed areas <strong>of</strong><br />
water accumulation, protection <strong>of</strong> settlements, transport routes and many other). Many <strong>of</strong><br />
those forests have been and still are great burden to the forestry <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia. Such forests require permanent investments. Unfortunately, up to date, although<br />
many <strong>of</strong> them have been erected under decisions <strong>of</strong> national bodies and authorities and<br />
prepared and reviewed project documentation, they have not gained the treatment and the<br />
attribute <strong>of</strong> protection forests or forests with other ecological function.<br />
Under the current legislation, decisions <strong>of</strong> the Assembly <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia,<br />
decisions <strong>of</strong> the Government, and even decisions <strong>of</strong> municipal assemblies (adopted before<br />
1991), forests for special purpose are managed by public institutions, public enterprises<br />
on state and local levels and public educational institutions. Individual decisions <strong>of</strong> municipal<br />
assemblies adopted before 1991, concerning forests for species purpose, have neither been<br />
disputed, nor reviewed and still exist as such.<br />
Forests in the three national parks are managed by three public institutions (national park<br />
administrations), and the five protection forests and forests for special purpose are managed<br />
public enterprises, i.e. institutions at central and local level.<br />
Forests in multi-purpose area – forest reserve “Jasen” are managed by the Public Enterprise<br />
for management and protection <strong>of</strong> the multi-purpose area “Jasen”, with its headquarters in<br />
Skopje.<br />
The Park Forest Vodno is managed by the PE “Parks and Greenery”-Skopje. Forest for<br />
training and scientific purposes “Mihajlovo” – Kavadarci is managed by the state secondary<br />
school “Gjorce Petrov” from Kavadarci, etc.<br />
Other forests managed by state or local public enterprises cover small areas and have no<br />
significant role in the creation <strong>of</strong> forestry policy and general importance <strong>of</strong> forests for the<br />
sustainable development and promotion <strong>of</strong> forests and environment in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia (Forest Park Gazi Baba, Forest Park Vinica, etc.).<br />
3.16.1.2 Game management<br />
Under the Law on Hunting (Article 36-43), the game in the hunting sites in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia, with the approval <strong>of</strong> the Government, is awarded for use (concession) to legal<br />
228
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
persons and hunters’ societies registered for performance <strong>of</strong> hunting activities, by way <strong>of</strong><br />
concession for a period <strong>of</strong> 10 to 20 years.<br />
In the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, based on natural conditions and concepts and strategies for<br />
development <strong>of</strong> agriculture and forestry as dominant space users, regionalization <strong>of</strong> habitats<br />
and spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> hunting and breeding centres have been made. There are 11<br />
hunting management areas in the country, in which all hunting sites for small and big size<br />
game are grouped.<br />
3.16.2 Goals <strong>of</strong> forestry development<br />
The goals <strong>of</strong> sustainable development and improvement <strong>of</strong> forests and forestry in the<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia should be in line with the strategic projects for forest sustainable<br />
management and use, including primarily: Strategy for Sustainable Development <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Forestry in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, and Action Plan for its implementation, adopted by<br />
the Government in 2006, as well as the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia and Plans<br />
for sustainable use and management <strong>of</strong> forests.<br />
Under the said strategic and other projects, by 2020, priority is given to the following goals:<br />
Integrated planning and management <strong>of</strong> space in mountain regions;<br />
Sustainable use, extension and improvement <strong>of</strong> forest resources;<br />
Higher proportion <strong>of</strong> leaved and native tree species;<br />
More dense and better quality network <strong>of</strong> forest infrastructure;<br />
Improvement <strong>of</strong> assortment structure;<br />
Rational and cost-efficient use <strong>of</strong> timber and timber waste;<br />
Expansion and standardization <strong>of</strong> production assortment;<br />
Improvement <strong>of</strong> conditions and possibilities for use <strong>of</strong> the potential <strong>of</strong> other wood<br />
products;<br />
Enrichment and expansion <strong>of</strong> biodiversity, especially fauna;<br />
Achievement <strong>of</strong> sustainable and development balance in natural resources use<br />
(forests, water, soil, biodiversity, etc.;<br />
Valorization <strong>of</strong> generally useful ecological functions <strong>of</strong> forests;<br />
Improvement and promotion <strong>of</strong> forest protection system, etc.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the measures and activities for sustainable development, improvement and use <strong>of</strong><br />
forests are contained in the action plans <strong>of</strong> the mentioned strategic documents, mainly<br />
Strategy for Sustainable Development <strong>of</strong> the Forestry in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia by 2006,<br />
Action Plan for the Strategy implementation, as well as projects for forestry transformation in<br />
the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />
The most important provisions, decisions, measures and activities aimed at establishing<br />
conditions and possibilities for implementation <strong>of</strong> the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Macedonia, meaning also achievement <strong>of</strong> the goals <strong>of</strong> the Strategy for Sustainable<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> the Forestry in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, include the following:<br />
‣ political will to implement spatial plans and strategies;<br />
‣ pr<strong>of</strong>essional, scientific, political and public campaign towards amendment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
legislation in the area <strong>of</strong> forestry for the purpose <strong>of</strong> acquiring and implementing the<br />
concept <strong>of</strong> integrated management and use <strong>of</strong> the space in mountainous regions;<br />
229
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
‣ implementation <strong>of</strong> the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia and the Strategy for<br />
Sustainable Development <strong>of</strong> the Forestry in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, in the<br />
domains <strong>of</strong> forestation and amelioration <strong>of</strong> forests.<br />
‣ establishment <strong>of</strong> information system for marketing, monitoring <strong>of</strong> the status in forests,<br />
planning, production, market, conservation, etc;<br />
‣ amelioration <strong>of</strong> degraded forests and shrublands through direct and indirect<br />
conversion;<br />
‣ fostering native, leaved, commercial species and disease and pests resistant<br />
species;<br />
‣ timely implementation <strong>of</strong> planning activities in forests growing and conservation<br />
(clearing, lightning, selective cutting, phased and final cuttings, fire prevention lines,<br />
etc.);<br />
‣ increased investment in projection and implementation <strong>of</strong> sustainable modern forest<br />
road infrastructure;<br />
‣ investment in modern techniques and technology (modernization <strong>of</strong> the processes <strong>of</strong><br />
opening, growing, use and conservation <strong>of</strong> forests – modern and multi-functional<br />
machinery);<br />
‣ establishment and development <strong>of</strong> information system and modern infrastructure for<br />
marketing, planning, designing, collection, processing, packaging and search for and<br />
provision <strong>of</strong> markets for other wood products;<br />
‣ establishment <strong>of</strong> institutional and economic climate for rapid development <strong>of</strong> hunting<br />
and investment in protected areas – reserves and other habitats <strong>of</strong> importance for<br />
fauna;<br />
‣ establishment <strong>of</strong> legal and institutional framework for integrated management <strong>of</strong><br />
mountainous ecosystems and frameworks for sustainable regime <strong>of</strong> use, balance<br />
and development <strong>of</strong> natural resources (forest-water-mineral resources-game, etc.);<br />
‣ campaign for valorization <strong>of</strong> generally useful and social functions <strong>of</strong> forests;<br />
‣ inventory and Cadastre <strong>of</strong> forests;<br />
‣ certification <strong>of</strong> tall trunk forests;<br />
‣ establishment and development <strong>of</strong> monitoring centre and network and protection <strong>of</strong><br />
forests against diseases, pests, forest fires and disasters;<br />
‣ continuous education <strong>of</strong> the staff in forestry, state administration, education and other<br />
institutions at all levels (from workers to the manager in chief), etc.<br />
In the past period, until the end <strong>of</strong> 1990s, there was a trend <strong>of</strong> permanent improvement <strong>of</strong><br />
forest resources in scope and quality and environment as a whole. Basically, this was due to<br />
political and public will and state support for forestation <strong>of</strong> bare lands, erosive and ungrown<br />
forest lands and outside forests. In parallel with the forestation, investments were made in<br />
amelioration <strong>of</strong> degraded forests and shrublands. All these projects were implemented with<br />
the support from the state budget and state institutions, primarily the Assembly <strong>of</strong> SRM,<br />
MAFWE, Fund for forestation (which existed until 1990) and <strong>of</strong> course strong efforts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Forest Management Enterprises and local institutions.<br />
In the coming period, apart from enhancement <strong>of</strong> the productive capacity <strong>of</strong> forests, priority<br />
task will be to improve the efficiency <strong>of</strong> forestation as first precondition for enlargement <strong>of</strong><br />
overall areas under forest. This assumes pr<strong>of</strong>essional attitude and approach to this primary<br />
measure and activity in forestry.<br />
230
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Other significant measure and activity concerns amelioration <strong>of</strong> degraded forests and<br />
shrublands.<br />
Existing openness <strong>of</strong> forests is not sufficient and not in function <strong>of</strong> forestry development,<br />
primarily in terms <strong>of</strong> growing, protection and use <strong>of</strong> forests, development <strong>of</strong> hunting and<br />
hunting tourism, protection and use <strong>of</strong> other forest products, as well as development <strong>of</strong> rural,<br />
mountain and monastery tourism. Important measures, activities and investments should be<br />
made in forest road infrastructure as one <strong>of</strong> the dominant capital investments in the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> hilly and mountainous regions in the country and development <strong>of</strong> rural<br />
municipalities (National Strategy for Development <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Rural Areas 2007-<br />
2013).<br />
Considering the current status and increasingly occurring climate change, great attention<br />
should be paid to the protection <strong>of</strong> forests against plant diseases and pests, with particular<br />
accent on forest fires. In this context, it is necessary to observe and apply the laws in the<br />
country and functioning <strong>of</strong> legal state consistently.<br />
Based on the above and current circumstances in the country, primarily in forestry, the real<br />
projection <strong>of</strong> the forestry development in the next 10 to 12 years should focus on sustainable<br />
development, and promotion should be subject <strong>of</strong> the next spatial plan.<br />
This conclusion is founded on the set goals and measures in applicable (current) plans for<br />
forests management, implemented goals and activities in the past 10 year period <strong>of</strong><br />
regulation (analysis <strong>of</strong> forest management and use in the past) and certainly current financial<br />
situation in forestry, as well as the need for transformation <strong>of</strong> the forestry system.<br />
The goals and the measures for implementation <strong>of</strong> the forthcoming activities in forestry are<br />
envisaged in the Action Plan for the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Strategy for Sustainable<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> the Forestry in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. Their execution is directly<br />
conditioned by political will and commitment and activities for their accomplishment. The<br />
main roles in this process belong to: the Government, governmental institutions, primarily<br />
MAFWE and entities with the basic activity in the management <strong>of</strong> forests for special and<br />
commercial purposes, as well as non-governmental organizations and associations,<br />
primarily the Association <strong>of</strong> private forests owners.<br />
3.16.3 Status <strong>of</strong> crops in the contact zone<br />
Within the corridor - the railway line route Kicevo-Radozda, in the contact zone <strong>of</strong> 500 m on<br />
left/right, there are 6 (six) forest management units (FMUs), and three more are located in<br />
the immediate surrounding. Forests within those FMU are mostly used for commercial<br />
purposes and mainly in state ownership. All state owned forests are managed and operated<br />
by the Public Enterprise "Macedonian Forests", through the following forest management<br />
branches (FMB):<br />
- FMB “Lopusnik” – Kicevo (3),<br />
FMU Mazatar; FMU Drenovo, FMU Belicka Reka-Preseka<br />
- FMB “Galicica“– Ohrid (2)<br />
FMU Slavej 1, FMU Volnista<br />
- FMB “Karaorman“–Struga (1)<br />
FMU Jablanica-Radozda.<br />
The forests in private ownership, the share <strong>of</strong> which is low, but very significant in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
expropriation, are manged by their owners. Part <strong>of</strong> these forests also include artificially<br />
erected plantations, primarily <strong>of</strong> black pine. For the purpose <strong>of</strong> fast and effective<br />
231
area<br />
Total increment<br />
wood<br />
Pllaned afforestation<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> expropriation procedure, it is necessary to undertake measures and<br />
activities for quick and efficient updating <strong>of</strong> ownership (<strong>of</strong>fice based and field activities).<br />
The corridor/route <strong>of</strong> the railway line should pass through 133 subsections distributed in the<br />
mentioned FMUs. For each <strong>of</strong> these FMUs, there is 10-year management plan, with different<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> their validity<br />
Measurement, calculation and planning <strong>of</strong> different forest activities, like forestation, seedling,<br />
various growing measures, main cuttings, are carried out at the level <strong>of</strong> subsection.<br />
Data in the tables below is taken from the plans, proportionally estimated for the contact<br />
area in relation to proportional coverage <strong>of</strong> these subsections in the contact zone. The<br />
following species are presented on the maps in Appendix 8:<br />
beech - green (dark and light, depending whether it is low-trunk or tall-trunk)<br />
oak - brown (different colour intensity for different species)<br />
pine - red (different colour intensity for black pine, white pine and other pine species)<br />
other leaved trees – yellow with a mark in the box (cg – black hop hornbeam, bg –<br />
white hop hornbeam, br – acacia, bz - birch, js - aspen)<br />
fir – blue<br />
douglasia – violet.<br />
Table 42 –Woodstock by Forest Management Units<br />
Forestry commercial unit<br />
ha m 3 m 3 ha m 3<br />
Drenovo 321 1070 21536 0 0<br />
Belicka reka - Preseka 193 295 22479 0 0<br />
Mazatar 478 596 25017 0 9285<br />
Slavej 1 180 312 12434 0 0<br />
Volnista 373 595 14503 0 2370<br />
Jablanica - Kafasan 298 269 10484 0 0<br />
TOTAL 1821 3284 113017 5 13036<br />
WITHOUT TUNNEL 1403 2762 92753 5 12551<br />
OVER TUNNEL 418 522 20264 0 485<br />
The contact zone <strong>of</strong> the railway line incorporates 1821 ha <strong>of</strong> forest in total (covered by<br />
regulation plans), out <strong>of</strong> which 1403 ha are in the free zone, and around 418 ha above<br />
tunnels. The zone above tunnels is not included in further calculations.<br />
232
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Within the said area, the total annual increment is 27 620 m 3 wood mass. Overall wood<br />
mass in these forests is 92 753 m 3 . It has been planned 24 to cut out 12 551 m 3 out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total annual increment for a period <strong>of</strong> 10 years (amounting 27 620 m 3 ), which means that the<br />
reserve available for cutting is 45.4% <strong>of</strong> the increment. In addition to this, it has been<br />
planned to forest only 5 ha (forestations carried out through the action The day <strong>of</strong> the tree<br />
are not included in these calculations).<br />
The age <strong>of</strong> plantations ranges between 5 and 100 years, and the average age is 44 years.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> existing risk <strong>of</strong> forest fires (categorization 1-4 class), in categorized subsections,<br />
the average risk is <strong>of</strong> 3 rd category.<br />
Figure 61 Overview <strong>of</strong> forest management units in the contact zone along the route<br />
24 In plans with 10 years validity<br />
233
Type <strong>of</strong> crops by type<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> crop<br />
area<br />
area<br />
Total increment<br />
Total increment<br />
wood<br />
wood<br />
Pllaned afforestation<br />
Pllaned afforestation<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Table 43 Composition <strong>of</strong> crops by growing type<br />
ha m 3 m 3 ha m 3<br />
CLEAN TOTAL 898 1555 61147 5 9954<br />
TOTAL 505 1207 31606 0 2597<br />
stemmed 1237 2354 77700 0 11243<br />
high 166 408 15053 5 1308<br />
3.16.4 Manner <strong>of</strong> management<br />
According to composition <strong>of</strong> crops, pure crops prevail represented mostly by Italian and<br />
Sessile, with segments <strong>of</strong> black pine and chestnut.<br />
Low-trunk crops are absolutely dominant in the area. This category incorporates all crops <strong>of</strong><br />
leaved species: different oaks, beech, black and white ho hornbeam, etc.<br />
Tall-trunk crops are actually the crops planted artificially, mostly with black pine. This group<br />
also includes crops <strong>of</strong> chestnut.<br />
Table 44 Composition <strong>of</strong> crops by species<br />
ha m 3 m 3 ha m 3<br />
CLEAN SUBCONTRACT<br />
BLACK PINE 58 159 5593 0 83<br />
GORUN 573 970 35848 0 4246<br />
Ploskach 254 411 18418 5 5625<br />
CHESTNUT 13 16 1287 0 0<br />
SUBCONTRANC<br />
White gaber 85 67 2873 0 0<br />
Cer 8 9 581 0 0<br />
Black gaber 30 30 1803 0 0<br />
Blagun 6 4 105 0<br />
Black pine –other type 74 662 5173 0 329<br />
234
Type <strong>of</strong> crops by type<br />
area<br />
Total increment<br />
wood<br />
Pllaned afforestation<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Cer<br />
33 62 3268 0 0<br />
Cer<br />
108 198 10424 0 0<br />
White gaber 117 113 4975 0 2268<br />
chestnut 45 62 2405 0 0<br />
The average amounts <strong>of</strong> wood mass in these subsections fall within the averages for the<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. The plans for forest management I the mentioned FMUs envisage<br />
different measures for use. Under the plans, the 10 year increment available for cutting is<br />
12551 m 3 . The greatest increment available for cutting has been planned in the FMU<br />
Mazatar 1. In low-trunk degraded crops <strong>of</strong> oak and beech, resurrection cutting is primary.<br />
The cutting interval with these crops is 40 years. There are sufficient crops mature for cutting<br />
in the subject area. As opposed to them, in tall-trunk crops <strong>of</strong> black pine established by<br />
artificial way, i.e. planted at great density <strong>of</strong> 2000 seedlings/ha, only selective cutting has<br />
been envisaged to optimize the number <strong>of</strong> trunks and the quality <strong>of</strong> wood pulp, and better<br />
survival <strong>of</strong> trunks is provided in case <strong>of</strong> strong winds, snow, etc. (In black pine crops not<br />
treated in this way, the trunks are thin and tall and thus their mechanical properties are lower<br />
and damages from wind and slow are visible). If the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line is not<br />
harmonized with the dynamics <strong>of</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> planned forest activities, disturbance <strong>of</strong> the so<br />
called production process could occur.<br />
235
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
3.17 Erosive processes in the contact zone<br />
Figure 62 Risk <strong>of</strong> erosion along the route<br />
The Figure shows that, in general terms, there is lower risk <strong>of</strong> erosive processes in the<br />
contact zone (category 4 and 5). In plane parts, the terrain is <strong>of</strong> category 5, and parts under<br />
forest belong to categories 3, 4 and 5. It should be pointed out that it is the dense forest<br />
cover exactly which provides protection to the terrain from erosion; however, due to the<br />
influence <strong>of</strong> erosive factors, potential change in land cover and removal <strong>of</strong> forest vegetation<br />
would take the land into higher risk categories 1 or 2.<br />
236
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 63 Erosiveness at sections<br />
The highest degree <strong>of</strong> erosive processes (categories 1 and 2) exists in the area around<br />
Belicka Reka in Treska (south <strong>of</strong> Popolzani). A risk <strong>of</strong> second category erosion also exists<br />
near the village Botun. The risk <strong>of</strong> erosion in other parts <strong>of</strong> the contact zone is mainly low.<br />
3.17.1 Status <strong>of</strong> crops in the construction zone <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
Description <strong>of</strong> the route through the railway line axis:<br />
Note: The term bare land used in the text refers to land not grown over with forest and also<br />
unregulated.<br />
Route through FMU DRENOVO<br />
237
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
From the station Kicevo, it passes through bare land, and then enters section 5 g (pine<br />
artificially planted crops) in a length <strong>of</strong> 800 m.<br />
Then, it passes through bare land with rare woody vegetation not included in the plan. Then,<br />
it passes through section 1 b (oak) in a length <strong>of</strong> 100 m. From there, it proceeds through<br />
agricultural land.<br />
Route through FMU Belicka Reka - Preseka<br />
It enters in this FMU near the village Dolno Popolzani, at station km 108 in subsection 72 b.<br />
Then, it runs for 350 m through a forest <strong>of</strong> Italian and Turkey oak. In this section, there are<br />
viaducts above the section. Then, it runs for 200 m through 71 d (Italian and Turkey oak) and<br />
220 m through 71 g (Italian and Turkey oak). In this section, there is also viaduct above the<br />
section, as well as short tunnel above 70 v. Then, it runs for 100 m through 69 d (Italian and<br />
Turkey oak), and then through bare land and enters section 68 where tunnel 5 is located.<br />
After the exit from the tunnel, it runs for 100 m through 68 b (Turkey oak and Sessile oak),<br />
and then again through bare land and enters into tunnel 6 from where it exits in section 67<br />
where it runs for 70 m through 67 d (Turkey and Downy oak). After that, the route runs for<br />
550 m through 67 g (Downy oak and white hop hornbeam) and part through bare land (with<br />
rare oak-hop hornbeam vegetation, but not covered by the plan). It enters 66 v (Downy oak<br />
and white hop hornbeam) and runs for 70 m through a forest and then 70 m through bare<br />
land and then again through forest for 70 m and from there it enters tunnel 7. After the exit<br />
from the tunnel, it runs for 70 m through section 66 g (Downy oak and Turkey oak). Through<br />
section 65 g, it alternately passes through forest and bare land, <strong>of</strong> which the forest <strong>of</strong> Turkey<br />
and Sessile oak amounts 300 m. Just before the village Judovo, the route changes the<br />
direction towards southeast and enters in 58 on a bare land and there, at km115 it enters in<br />
the long tunnel no. 8.<br />
FMU Volnista<br />
From the tunnel, the route exits below the village Slivovo. Here, the route enters section 13.<br />
By slight replacement for 100 m lower, it is possible to avoid a route through a Sessile oak<br />
forest. In this section, the route runs for 400 m. Then, the route enters section 15, first in<br />
tunnel 9, and then passes through a Sessile oak forest in 15 а and 16, in a total length <strong>of</strong><br />
300 m, passing on its way through bare lands as well and reaching the village Arbinovo. In<br />
this part, the route runs through agricultural land.<br />
FMU Slavej<br />
In this unit, the route enters south-southwest <strong>of</strong> the village Arbinovo in section 141 b and<br />
runs through 141 b and g through Italian oak forest in a length <strong>of</strong> 700 m. The route also<br />
passes by a black pine crop in a length <strong>of</strong> 300 m. It enters tunnel 10 and from there exits and<br />
runs through agricultural land areas up to the village Pesocan.<br />
From there, the route runs outside the boundary <strong>of</strong> the forest. Then, it passes between FMU<br />
Slavej and FMU Mazatar which are physically separated by the shore area <strong>of</strong> the river<br />
Sateska.<br />
FMU Mazatar<br />
Near the village Botun, the route enters section 78 and 81, passing through tunnel 11. After<br />
the exit from the tunnel, it passes again through plane agricultural land. Up to Klimestani, the<br />
route runs along the boundary <strong>of</strong> the forest, i.e. sections 83 а (Italian oak), 84 v (black pine)<br />
and 85 v (black pine with acacia) in a total length <strong>of</strong> 1km.<br />
Then, the route runs through agricultural land from the village Meseiste, up to after Struga<br />
near the village Kalista.<br />
238
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
FMU Jablanica - Kjafasan<br />
In this unit, the route runs between sections 6 and 23, but it does not enter any <strong>of</strong> them.<br />
Near section 7а, it enters a tunnel and then exits for short above the village Radozda and<br />
reaches section 1а, an area grown over with Italian oak and hop hornbeam in a length <strong>of</strong><br />
350 m.<br />
To calculate the potential loss during construction activities, we have calculated the surface<br />
area and the wood mass within the construction zone <strong>of</strong> the route.<br />
The route passes through 19 sections in 5 FMUs. The construction zone along the axis <strong>of</strong><br />
the railway line was calculated for a width <strong>of</strong> 50 m.<br />
Under such conditions, the route passes through 4.85 km in forest in total (without the part <strong>of</strong><br />
tunnels). The construction zone covers an area <strong>of</strong> 24,25 ha under forest. The overall wood<br />
mass in this zone amounts 1854.25 m 3 . Apart from wood mass, there is also potential loss <strong>of</strong><br />
annual increment <strong>of</strong> wood mass <strong>of</strong> 42.44 m 3 in total.<br />
Table 45 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the forest in the railway line route (along axis)<br />
The construction zone <strong>of</strong> the railway line also includes temporary storehouses for materials<br />
and access roads. Project documentation does not contain data on the position and length <strong>of</strong><br />
the access roads. This is <strong>of</strong> particular importance because construction <strong>of</strong> access roads<br />
assumes destruction <strong>of</strong> additional forest. During the route construction, the opening <strong>of</strong><br />
239
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
access road through oak forest results in a loss <strong>of</strong> at least 50-60 m 3 /km additional forest, at<br />
an average.<br />
The available documentation also lacks data on the number, size and distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
temporary storehouses. This impact can not be assessed accurately. Yet, a loss <strong>of</strong> around<br />
70-100 m 3 /ha wood mass should be included in the calculations as well.<br />
3.18 Natural heritage<br />
With reference to the railway line route from Kicevo to the populated place Radozda, in the<br />
context <strong>of</strong> natural heritage, the following should be underlined:<br />
‣ According to the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, sectoral Study on natural<br />
heritage conservation, the number <strong>of</strong> identified objects <strong>of</strong> nature within the subject area<br />
is 10 as presented in the next Table.<br />
Table 46 Objects <strong>of</strong> nature<br />
1. Cave ”Utova Dupka” Drugovo<br />
Drugovo<br />
2. Cave Kalina dupka<br />
3. Cave Ginceica<br />
4. Suvi Dol<br />
Drugovo<br />
Drugovo<br />
5. Belcisko blato Belcista<br />
6. Pesocanska river Belcista<br />
7. Cave Jaorec Belcista<br />
8. Ohrid lake Ohrid, Struga<br />
9. Dabovi Stebla Struga<br />
10. Platan s. Kali[ta Struga<br />
Particular attention should be devoted to Belcisko Blato (swamp), located close to the<br />
route. This is due to the fact that this monument <strong>of</strong> nature is characterized with unique<br />
natural values, especially indigenous flora and fauna. The site Belcisko Blato has been<br />
included in the national Emerald network <strong>of</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> special conservation interest and<br />
has been proposed for designation as strict natural reserve under the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. It is necessary to identify potential negative impacts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway construction on this site, primarily on biodiversity. Close care has to be taken <strong>of</strong><br />
the maintenance <strong>of</strong> the site integrity and conservation <strong>of</strong> natural habitats, before all.<br />
‣ In addition to the above, it should be taken into account that a part <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
gets close to the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and therefore the impact <strong>of</strong> the railway construction on<br />
the habitats and biodiversity, as well as hydrological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area, should<br />
be assessed. Under the national legislation, Ohrid Lake has been designated for<br />
protected area <strong>of</strong> III category - Monument <strong>of</strong> nature and is part <strong>of</strong> the world natural and<br />
cultural heritage (UNESCO).<br />
‣ Near the route, there is a site with oak trunks, within the populated place Moroista, which<br />
has been planned for designation as monument <strong>of</strong> nature.<br />
240
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
‣ Near the route, in the yard <strong>of</strong> the St. Bogorodica Monastery, in the populated place<br />
Kalista on Ohrid Lake shore, there is a Plane tree (Platanus orientalis) trunk, designated<br />
for protected area in the category <strong>of</strong> monument <strong>of</strong> nature.<br />
‣ Part <strong>of</strong> the railway line route, in Struga region, passes through the area which is part <strong>of</strong><br />
the world cultural and natural heritage <strong>of</strong> Ohrid region (UNESCO). With reference to this<br />
region, care should be taken <strong>of</strong> the following sites possessing natural values:<br />
- Sublakustricki springs near the church <strong>of</strong> St.Bogorodica <strong>of</strong> Kalista<br />
- The site <strong>of</strong> Kalista which is the only natural habitat for yellow water-lily (Nuphar lutea) at<br />
Ohrid Lake.<br />
- The site Podmolje is away from the route, but it is the most wide spread reed belt<br />
(Phragmites australis) at Ohrid Lake and natural habitat for threatened bird species and<br />
sprawning ground for the carp. For these reasons, attention has to be paid to this object<br />
<strong>of</strong> nature as well.<br />
3.19 Cultural heritage<br />
Several cultural and archeological sites have been recorded on the wider area <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway line route. They are presented in a table below (Archeological map <strong>of</strong> RM,<br />
1994), and graphically in Appendix 6.<br />
241
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Table 47 Archeological sites<br />
Archaeological<br />
Settlement Specifically position Meaning and time Description Concern<br />
site<br />
1 Kamen Most - Opale Radolista 1,5 km NE from the town Settlement for neolith Several graves Probably<br />
2 Kitino Kale and Kitka Kicevo In the town Bronze age Settlements None<br />
3 St. Ilija Meseista 1 km NE form the town Settlement form bronze age Pieces from ceramics None<br />
4 Dere – kaj Cesma Trebenista NW from the town Settlement form bronze age Pieces from ceramics Probably<br />
5 Dupen Kamen Struga West side Necropolis from Hellenistic time Several Hellenistic graves i None<br />
6 Popolzani Popolcani In the town Settlement from Rome age basis Probably<br />
7 Dzepino Frangovo In the town Settlement from Rome time 100-100 m basis Probably<br />
8 Kaldrma Radozda 300 m west from the town Road from Rome time Via Egnatia Probably<br />
9 Feriste – Petrin Dol Frangovo Around 1 km NW Settlement from Rome time Graves Probably<br />
10 Kadri church Frangovo SW side Middle age church basis Probably<br />
11 Laista Novo Selo 2 km SW Graveyard from Rome time Arhitektonic object Probably<br />
242
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Archaeological<br />
Settlement Specifically position Meaning and time Description Concern<br />
site<br />
12 Monastery <strong>of</strong> St.Bogorodica Kalista In the chick Middle age church Pieces in the curch None<br />
13 Selce Brzdani 2 km North Settlement form late antic age basis<br />
Probably<br />
14 Seliste Brzdani 1,5 km west Settlement form late antic age Pieces from ceramics<br />
Probably<br />
15 Bogorodicna Krasta Brzdani On the hill Middle age church basis<br />
Probably<br />
16 Kula Pesocani 500 m east Middle age church basis<br />
Probably<br />
17 Zadel Botun 500 m NW Settlement form late antic age Pieces from ceramics<br />
Probably<br />
18 Gorno Pole Meseista west Settlement form late antic age basis Probably<br />
243
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Archaeological<br />
Settlement Specifically position Meaning and time Description Concern<br />
site<br />
19 Cemetery Ciflik Koroista 500-800 m, near the quarry Settlement form late antic age graveyards<br />
Probably<br />
20<br />
Kale<br />
Koroista 1,5 km NE Middle age church Pieces from ceramics<br />
Probably<br />
21 Rasnica Koroista South direction Settlement form late antic age Pieces from ceramics Probably<br />
22 Radolista Radolista East side Settlement form late antic age Pieces from ceramics Probably<br />
23 Arapian Cementary Sum South-east Settlement form late antic age graves None<br />
24 Gradi[te Vidrani East side Settlement form late antic age graves Probably<br />
244
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Archaeological<br />
Settlement Specifically position Meaning and time Description Concern<br />
site<br />
25 Livadiste Judovo Settlement form late antic age<br />
Probably<br />
26 Dobra Voda Arbinovo 1 km SW Middle age church basis<br />
Probably<br />
27 Krivi Zagoni - Lozista Meseista 400 m west Settlement form late antic age graves<br />
Probably<br />
28 Lozja - Buzelica Kalista west Middle age church graves None<br />
29 Latinska Crkva Koroista 1 km south<br />
Middle age church<br />
graves Probably<br />
30 Gypsy cementery Radolista east<br />
Middle age church<br />
31 Behind Lozja Meseista 1,2 km SW Settlement form late middle age Pieces from ceramics None<br />
32 Dzuma - Dzumija Sultan Bajazit dzamija Kicevo In the town None<br />
245
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Archaeological<br />
Settlement Specifically position Meaning and time Description Concern<br />
site<br />
33 Environment <strong>of</strong> Kicevo Kicevo In the surrounding <strong>of</strong> the town Middle age moneys money None<br />
34 Rim church Drugovo Near the curch Middle age church graves Probably<br />
35 Vodici Brzdani 300 m west Middle age church graves<br />
Probably<br />
36 Seliste Svinjiste 3 km west Middle age church graves Probably<br />
246
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
4 Assessment <strong>of</strong> environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> the project implementation<br />
4.1 Safety aspects<br />
The most important safety aspects related to linear projects, i.e. railway line, concern<br />
derailing, collisions, fires and explosions (including sabotages or terrorism), trains falls,<br />
clashes with passenger traffic or people in moments <strong>of</strong> line crossing, etc.<br />
Considering the fact that the subject railway line is electrified, safety aspects from incidental<br />
explosions <strong>of</strong> fuels in locomotives or stations for fuel filling are excluded. During the railway<br />
line designing and construction, provisions <strong>of</strong> the Law on Safety in the railway System<br />
(Official gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no.47/10) will be observed.<br />
From among potential accidents related to a linear project, the first ranked are <strong>of</strong> course the<br />
collisions. Proper placement <strong>of</strong> road and traffic signalization and adherence to it will result in<br />
avoidance <strong>of</strong> high number <strong>of</strong> these accidents.<br />
Fires may break out from rails sparkling or lack <strong>of</strong> care by passengers, as well as in cases <strong>of</strong><br />
transport <strong>of</strong> inflammable material by way <strong>of</strong> its sparkling. In order to avoid unwanted fires,<br />
the railway operator will regularly maintain the surface around the rains and train regularly its<br />
staff in proper operation <strong>of</strong> the railway transport.<br />
4.2 Impacts on biological diversity<br />
4.2.1 Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats and ecosystems<br />
Based on the description <strong>of</strong> the current status <strong>of</strong> environmental media in Chapter 3 and<br />
especially chapter on the status <strong>of</strong> biological diversity (Chapter Error! Reference source<br />
not found.), as well as by application <strong>of</strong> nationally and internationally recognized criteria,<br />
sensitivity <strong>of</strong> ecosystems and habitats was assessed (including also human settlements as<br />
habitats). The most sensitive places and their natural and human induced values were<br />
underlined. Making distinction <strong>of</strong> these key or valuable ecosystems, habitats or places is<br />
necessary in order to achieve thorough assessment <strong>of</strong> possible impacts <strong>of</strong> the construction<br />
and operation <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line Kicevo-Radozda and propose effective measures<br />
for their protection or future management.<br />
4.2.1.1 Methodology<br />
Sensitivity was assessed using a matrix designed specifically for this purpose. The matrix<br />
was used to asses the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> natural ecosystems and habitats exclusively.<br />
4.2.1.2 Matrix creation<br />
Ecosystems/sites (presented in orders) were assessed by criteria (shown in columns <strong>of</strong> the<br />
table <strong>of</strong> the matrix).<br />
4.2.1.3 List <strong>of</strong> assessed ecosystems/sites<br />
The following ecosystems (described in Chapter 3.11.4) were assessed: Downy oak-Hop<br />
hornbeam forests, Italian and Turkey oak forests, chestnut forests, Sessile oak forests, alder<br />
forests, willow belts, marshy oak stands, hilly pastures, calcareous rocks, siliceous rocks,<br />
Ohrid Lake, rivers, streams, springs, swamps, humid meadows, black pine plantations,<br />
meadows, fields, vineyards, orchards, gardens, urban habitats and rural habitats.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the ecosystems (like marshy) included several plant associations which were not<br />
assessed individually.<br />
247
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
4.2.1.4 Description <strong>of</strong> criteria<br />
Total <strong>of</strong> 14 criteria were used to asses the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the above listed ecosystems and<br />
habitats:<br />
1. EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС;<br />
2. Rare communities in Macedonia;<br />
3. Well preserved natural communities;<br />
4. Presence <strong>of</strong> species from IUCN Global Red List;<br />
5. Presence <strong>of</strong> species important for Europe (European Habitat Directive);<br />
6. Presence <strong>of</strong> endangered birds;<br />
7. Presence <strong>of</strong> endemic species;<br />
8. Presence <strong>of</strong> rare species;<br />
9. Landscape values;<br />
10. Economic values;<br />
11. Abundance in species;<br />
12. Geomorphological and geological value;<br />
13. Protection from erosion;<br />
14. Value <strong>of</strong> the protection from pollution.<br />
Criteria were selected to reflect national and international (European and global) importance<br />
<strong>of</strong> ecosystems/habitats and their species composition that can be found in the project and<br />
wider analyzed area. The more valuable the habitat (more applicable criteria), the more<br />
sensitive it is.<br />
Criterion 1 – Habitat Directive (Council Directive 92/43/ЕЕС concerning the protection <strong>of</strong><br />
natural habitats and wild flora and fauna). The List <strong>of</strong> important habitats is given in Annex I-<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> natural habitats <strong>of</strong> interest for the Community the conservation <strong>of</strong> which requires<br />
designation <strong>of</strong> special areas for conservation.<br />
Criterion 2 - Rare communities in Macedonia. Rareness <strong>of</strong> the communities was assessed<br />
on the basis <strong>of</strong> the expert experience and current knowledge on communities distribution.<br />
Criterion 3 - Well preserved natural communities. Extent <strong>of</strong> naturalness i.e. scope <strong>of</strong> human<br />
intervention and manner <strong>of</strong> land use was assessed on the basis <strong>of</strong> the expert judgment.<br />
Criterion 4 - Presence <strong>of</strong> species from IUCN Global Red List. Number <strong>of</strong> species<br />
enrolled in the IUCN Global Red List in the habitat determines its value. Categories <strong>of</strong> the<br />
IUCN Red List are described below:<br />
EXTINCT (EX). The taxon is extinct when there is no reasonable doubt that the<br />
last individual has been extinct. A taxon is presumed Extinct when exhaustive<br />
surveys in known and/or expected habitat, at appropriate times (diurnal,<br />
seasonal, annual), throughout its historic range have failed to record an<br />
individual. Surveys should be over a time frame appropriate to the taxon’s life<br />
cycle and life form.<br />
EXTINCT IN THE WILD (EW). A taxon is Extinct in the Wild when it is known only to<br />
survive in cultivation, in captivity or as a naturalized population (or populations) well<br />
outside the past range. A taxon is presumed Extinct in the Wild when exhaustive<br />
248
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
surveys in known and/or expected habitat, at appropriate times (diurnal, seasonal,<br />
annual), throughout its historic range have failed to record an individual. Surveys should<br />
be over a time frame appropriate to the taxon’s life cycle and life form.<br />
CRITICALLY ENDANGERED (CR). A taxon is Critically Endangered when the best<br />
available evidence indicates that it meets any <strong>of</strong> the criteria A to E for Critically<br />
Endangered, and it is therefore considered to be facing an extremely high risk <strong>of</strong><br />
extinction in the wild.<br />
ENDANGERED (EN). A taxon is Endangered when the best available evidence<br />
indicates that it meets any <strong>of</strong> the criteria A to E for Endangered (see Section V), and it is<br />
therefore considered to be facing a very high risk <strong>of</strong> extinction in the wild.<br />
VULNERABLE (VU). A taxon is Vulnerable when the best available evidence indicates<br />
that it meets any <strong>of</strong> the criteria A to E for Vulnerable (criteria from A to E are not<br />
described in this Study), and it is therefore considered to be facing a high risk <strong>of</strong><br />
extinction in the wild.<br />
NEARLY THREATENED (NT). A taxon is Near Threatened when it has been evaluated<br />
against the criteria but does not qualify for Critically Endangered, Endangered or<br />
Vulnerable now, but is close to qualifying for or is likely to qualify for a threatened<br />
category in the near future.<br />
LEAST CONCERN (LC). A taxon is Least Concern when it has been evaluated against<br />
the criteria and does not qualify for Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable or<br />
Near Threatened. Widespread and abundant taxa are included in this category.<br />
DATA DEFICIENT (DD). A taxon is Data Deficient when there is inadequate information<br />
to make a direct, or indirect, assessment <strong>of</strong> its risk <strong>of</strong> extinction based on its distribution<br />
and/or population status. A taxon in this category may be well studied, and its biology<br />
well known, but appropriate data on abundance and/or distribution are lacking. Data<br />
Deficient is therefore not a category <strong>of</strong> threat. Listing <strong>of</strong> taxa in this category indicates<br />
that more information is required and acknowledges the possibility that future research<br />
will show that threatened classification is appropriate. It is important to make positive<br />
use <strong>of</strong> whatever data are available. In many cases great care should be exercised in<br />
choosing between DD and a threatened status. If the range <strong>of</strong> a taxon is suspected to<br />
be relatively circumscribed, and a considerable period <strong>of</strong> time has elapsed since the last<br />
record <strong>of</strong> the taxon, threatened status may well be justified.<br />
NOT EVALUATED (NE). A taxon is Not Evaluated when it is has not yet been<br />
evaluated against the criteria.<br />
Criterion 5 - Presence <strong>of</strong> species important for Europe. This criterion takes into account<br />
European Habitat Directive and IUCN Red List. Important species in the Habitat Directive<br />
are listed in:<br />
Annex II – Animal and plant species <strong>of</strong> interest for the community the conservation <strong>of</strong><br />
which requires designation <strong>of</strong> special areas for conservation<br />
Annex IV - Animal and plant species <strong>of</strong> interest for the community in need for strict<br />
protection<br />
Criterion 6 - Presence <strong>of</strong> endangered birds. This criterion is based on several<br />
conventions. Birds are assessed separately because <strong>of</strong> their good elaboration in<br />
international conventions. The following conventions have been taken into account:<br />
249
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
А. Bird Directive – Council Directive 79/409/ЕЕC on the conservation <strong>of</strong> wild birds<br />
Annex I – Species with special measures for conservation with regard to their habitat in<br />
order to secure their survival and reproduction in their area <strong>of</strong> spread. In this context, the<br />
following should be taken into account:<br />
• Species endangered with extinction<br />
• Species vulnerable by specific changes in their habitats<br />
• Species considered rare because <strong>of</strong> their small population or limited local<br />
distribution<br />
• Other species requiring particular attention because <strong>of</strong> the specific nature <strong>of</strong><br />
their habitat<br />
Annex II – Due to their population level, geographical distribution and reproduction degree in<br />
the community, species listed in Annex II may be subject <strong>of</strong> hunting under the international<br />
legislation. Member States should ensure that the hunting <strong>of</strong> these species does not<br />
jeopardize the conservation efforts in their area <strong>of</strong> distribution.<br />
Annex II/1 – Species related to Annex II/1 may be hunted in seas and on land where<br />
this Directive is applicable.<br />
Annex II/2 - Species related to Annex II/2 may be hunted only in Member States as<br />
specified in their legislations.<br />
Annex III – Member States should prohibit, with regard to all birds occurring in wild on the<br />
European territory <strong>of</strong> the Member States, sale, transport and breeding for sale, <strong>of</strong>fers for sale<br />
<strong>of</strong> alive or dead birds and any recognizable part or derivative <strong>of</strong> such bird.<br />
B. Bonn Convention<br />
Appendix I – Species threatened with extinction<br />
Appendix II – Migratory species protected by agreements.<br />
Migratory species that have unfavourable status <strong>of</strong> conservation or would have significant<br />
benefit from the international cooperation organized by concluded agreements, are listed in<br />
Appendix II <strong>of</strong> the Convention. Therefore, the Convention encourages the parties to carry out<br />
global or regional agreements and management <strong>of</strong> individual species or, very <strong>of</strong>ten, group <strong>of</strong><br />
listed individuals.<br />
C. SPEC – Species <strong>of</strong> interest for European conservation (only for birds)<br />
SPEC 1<br />
SPEC 2<br />
SPEC 3<br />
Non-SPEC E<br />
European species <strong>of</strong> interest for global conservation<br />
Unfavourable status <strong>of</strong> conservation in Europe, concentrated in Europe<br />
Unfavourable status <strong>of</strong> conservation in Europe, not concentrated in Europe<br />
Favourable status <strong>of</strong> conservation in Europe, concentrated in Europe<br />
Non-SPEC Favourable status <strong>of</strong> conservation in Europe, not concentrated in Europe<br />
D. European threatened status (ETS)<br />
• CR – Critically endangered – if the European population falls under any <strong>of</strong> the criteria<br />
<strong>of</strong> IUCN Red List <strong>of</strong> critically endangered<br />
250
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
• EN - Endangered - if the European population falls under any <strong>of</strong> the criteria <strong>of</strong> IUCN<br />
Red List <strong>of</strong> endangered<br />
• VU - Vulnerable - if the European population falls under any <strong>of</strong> the criteria <strong>of</strong> IUCN<br />
Red List <strong>of</strong> vulnerable<br />
• D - Declining - if the European population does not fall under any <strong>of</strong> the criteria <strong>of</strong><br />
IUCN Red List, but has declined by more than 10% for 10 years or three generations,<br />
• R - Rare - if the European population does not fall under any <strong>of</strong> the criteria <strong>of</strong> IUCN<br />
Red List, and is not declining, but counts less than 10000 reproductive pairs (or<br />
20000 individuals or 40000 overwintering individuals) and is not bordering major non-<br />
European population<br />
• H – Harassed – if the European population does not fall under any <strong>of</strong> the criteria <strong>of</strong><br />
IUCN Red List and is not rare or declining, but it has not recovered yet from<br />
moderate or major declining suffered thereby in the period from 1970 to 1990<br />
• L – Localized - if the European population does not fall under any <strong>of</strong> the criteria <strong>of</strong><br />
IUCN Red List and is not rare, exhausted and declining, but is significantly<br />
concentrated with more than 90 % <strong>of</strong> the European population in 10 or less sites.<br />
• S - Safe - if the European population does not fall under any <strong>of</strong> the above listed<br />
criteria<br />
• DD – Data Deficient – if there is no adequate information to make direct or indirect<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> its risk for extinction based on its distribution and/or population status<br />
• NE – Not Evaluated – if its European population has not been evaluated by the<br />
criteria<br />
Criterion 7 - Presence <strong>of</strong> endemic species. This criterion assesses the number <strong>of</strong> present<br />
endemic species in the habitat. The result shown in Table 48 is the average <strong>of</strong> the results on<br />
endemic species <strong>of</strong> flora and fauna.<br />
Criterion 8 - Presence <strong>of</strong> rare species. This criterion assesses the number <strong>of</strong> present rare<br />
species in the habitat. The result shown in Table 48 is the average <strong>of</strong> the results on rare<br />
species <strong>of</strong> flora, fauna and fungi.<br />
Criterion 9 - Landscape values. Landscape value has been assessed on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />
several characteristics: structural and functional importance <strong>of</strong> certain landscape, aesthetic<br />
value, rarity in Macedonia, etc.<br />
Criterion 10 - Economic values. The importance <strong>of</strong> the economy determines this criterion.<br />
The most important economic values in the project area are connected with forestry, water<br />
potential and livestock breeding.<br />
Criterion 11 – Diversity <strong>of</strong> species. The overall value <strong>of</strong> biodiversity, i.e. diversity <strong>of</strong> species<br />
has been assessed on the basis <strong>of</strong> expert judgment.<br />
Criterion 12 - Geomorphological and geological value. The basis <strong>of</strong> this criterion was the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> significant geomorphological and geological structure. It should be pointed out<br />
that the result <strong>of</strong> the matrix relates only to some sites within the range <strong>of</strong> the assessed<br />
habitat.<br />
Criterion 13 - Protection from erosion. One <strong>of</strong> the important features for preservation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
natural conditions is the potential for protection <strong>of</strong> the habitat against erosion.<br />
Criterion 14 - Value <strong>of</strong> the protection from pollution. Absorption capacity for pollutants is<br />
very important feature <strong>of</strong> ecosystems. It is based on expert judgment.<br />
251
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
4.2.1.5 Scoring and ranking<br />
Scoring <strong>of</strong> all habitats for each <strong>of</strong> the 14 listed criteria ranged from 0 to 3. The meaning <strong>of</strong><br />
these scores is as follows:<br />
0 – no occurrence/insignificant<br />
1 – low occurrence/significance<br />
2 – medium occurrence/significance<br />
3 – strong occurrence/significance<br />
The sum <strong>of</strong> scores for the habitat determines its sensitivity. The highest possible sum is 42.<br />
Ranking <strong>of</strong> sensitivity was made on the basis <strong>of</strong> the following table:<br />
0 - 10 – low sensitivity (ls)<br />
11-20 – medium sensitivity (ms)<br />
21-30 – high sensitivity (hs)<br />
31-42 – very high sensitivity (vhs)<br />
The meaning <strong>of</strong> each extent <strong>of</strong> sensitivity is described below:<br />
ls – no specific obstacle for construction activities; yet, aesthetic value <strong>of</strong> the<br />
landscape should be protected and unnecessary destructions and excessive disturbances<br />
should be avoided; impact on this habitat will be <strong>of</strong> minor significance.<br />
ms – construction activities are allowed, but the work should be carried out with<br />
precaution, destruction <strong>of</strong> these habitats or their parts should be avoided; if destruction is<br />
unavoidable, recultivation measures should be undertaken; impact on this habitat will be <strong>of</strong><br />
medium significance.<br />
hs – such places, biotopes and sites have enormous significance with regard to<br />
natural or economic values; any type <strong>of</strong> construction activity should be avoided; if there is no<br />
other solution, then maximum measures should be undertaken to protect the site; when<br />
natural sites are affected, special construction regime is applied (e.g. seasonal restrictions,<br />
strict territorial recommendations, etc.); any damage caused on these ecosystem types<br />
should be recovered and compensated in accordance with the Law on Nature Protection.<br />
Permanent monitoring should be organized by the Investor during construction activities.<br />
vhs – all construction activities are prohibited; any construction activity near such<br />
places or sites should be restricted and preventive measures should be undertaken as in the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> highly sensitive habitats/sites. Very strong negative impacts will cause irreversible<br />
changes in these habitats/sites, i.e. they will be lost permanently. Investor should organize<br />
permanent monitoring during construction works as in highly sensitive habitats/sites.<br />
4.2.2 Assessment <strong>of</strong> the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats<br />
Based on the described methodology, assessment <strong>of</strong> the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats found in the<br />
investigated corridor was made. The analysis <strong>of</strong> the results showed that urban habitats had<br />
lowest value (5 points in total), and Ohrid Lake (38 points and alder belts (31 points) had the<br />
highest value.<br />
None <strong>of</strong> the habitats was assessed as very highly sensitive. Total <strong>of</strong> six habitats was<br />
assessed as highly sensitive (hs): chestnut forests, Sessile oak forests, alder belts and<br />
forests, stands <strong>of</strong> marshy oak, rivers and marshes. The group <strong>of</strong> medium sensitive (ms)<br />
includes 12 habitats: Downy oak and hop hornbeam forests, Italian and Turkey oak forests,<br />
252
EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС;<br />
Rare communities in<br />
Macedonia;<br />
Well preserved natural<br />
communities;<br />
Presence <strong>of</strong> species from<br />
IUCN Global Red List;<br />
Presence <strong>of</strong> species<br />
important for Europe<br />
(European Habitat Directive);<br />
Presence <strong>of</strong> endangered<br />
birds;<br />
Presence <strong>of</strong> endemic<br />
species;<br />
Presence <strong>of</strong> rare species;<br />
Landscape values;<br />
Economic values;<br />
Abundance in species;<br />
Geomorphological and<br />
geological value;<br />
Protection from erosion;<br />
Value <strong>of</strong> the protection from<br />
pollution.<br />
total<br />
sensitivity<br />
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
willow belt, hilly pastures, calcareous rocks, siliceous rocks, streams, springs, meadows,<br />
fields, vineyards and rural habitats. Other four habitats were assessed as lowly sensitive (ls):<br />
black pine crops, orchards, gardens and urban habitats.<br />
Table 48 Matrix determining the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats<br />
Habitats<br />
Downy oak-Hop<br />
hornbeam forests<br />
Italian and<br />
Turkey oak<br />
forests<br />
2 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 12 ms<br />
1 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 3 2 20 ms<br />
chestnut forests 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 2 2 24 hs<br />
Sessile oak<br />
forests<br />
1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 1 3 2 23 hs<br />
alder forests 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 3 22 hs<br />
willow belts 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 2 1 2 3 31 vhs<br />
marshy oak<br />
stands<br />
3 1 3 0 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 3 1 19 ms<br />
hilly pastures 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 13 ms<br />
calcareous rocks 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 0 1 17 ms<br />
siliceous rocks 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 10 ms<br />
Ohrid Lake 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 38 vhs<br />
rivers 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 0 0 23 hs<br />
streams 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 19 ms<br />
springs 2 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 12 ms<br />
swamps 3 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 27 hs<br />
humid meadows 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 9 ls<br />
black pine<br />
plantations<br />
1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 20 ms<br />
meadows 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 23 hs<br />
fields 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 11 ms<br />
vineyards 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 3 1 0 1 0 10 ms<br />
orchards 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 8 ls<br />
gardens 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 1 0 9 ls<br />
urban habitats 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 5 ls<br />
rural habitats 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 11 ms<br />
253
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
4.2.2.1 Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> individual habitats<br />
The text below elaborates the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> individual habitats. Also, all possible conflicts and<br />
problems that could occur during the railway construction and operation have been<br />
indicated.<br />
1. Downy oak and hop hornbeam forests (ms-12)<br />
These forests have low economic significance because <strong>of</strong> their scarce presence in the<br />
investigated corridor. Most <strong>of</strong> them are degraded and no major conflicts are expected during<br />
the railway construction and operation.<br />
2. Italian and Turkey oak forests (ms-20)<br />
These forests have great economic significance because they are the main forest resource<br />
exploited by forest enterprises. However, these forests in Macedonia are climate zonally<br />
distributed, and cover the largest area within the investigated corridor among all forest<br />
habitats.<br />
Part <strong>of</strong> the designed route passes through Italian and Turkey oak forests which leads to an<br />
expected direct destruction <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> these forests for the purposes <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
construction and access roads opening. In addition to this, the construction <strong>of</strong> the line will<br />
result in fragmentation and disruption <strong>of</strong> other landscape characteristics.<br />
3. Chestnut forests (hs-24)<br />
Chestnut forests in Macedonia have disjunctive spread with most <strong>of</strong> the aerial in western<br />
Macedonia Chestnut forests which have been significantly modified under the influence <strong>of</strong><br />
people are found near the village Radozda.<br />
The route <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line passes through this habitat, and we can expect direct<br />
destruction <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> this habitat and probable destruction <strong>of</strong> some individual chestnut<br />
trunks.<br />
4. Sessile oak forests (hs-23)<br />
Sessile forests compose climate zonal belt in Macedonia and have wide distribution. Within<br />
the investigated corridor, they develop on Preseka, above the long tunnel between the<br />
villages Judovo and Slivovo. Therefore, no conflicts are expected during the railway<br />
construction and operation.<br />
5. Alder belts (hs-22)<br />
Alder belts are priority species for conservation under the EU Habitat Directive. These<br />
communities are important for their specific ecological functions (control <strong>of</strong> pollution,<br />
protection from floods and erosion, symbiotic nitrification, enrichment <strong>of</strong> soil with nitrates).<br />
They are azonal type <strong>of</strong> vegetation connected with the flow <strong>of</strong> rivers and streams, and they<br />
are found in a form <strong>of</strong> woodlots within certain marshes. In the investigated corridor, most <strong>of</strong><br />
alder communities occur in a form <strong>of</strong> riparian belts.<br />
During the railway construction, direct destruction <strong>of</strong> alder communities or modification <strong>of</strong><br />
hydrological regime in their biotopes is possible.<br />
6. Alder forests (vhs-31)<br />
Alder forests are more important than alder belts. They occur near the villages Botun and<br />
Arbinovo. Alder forests in Macedonia are widely spread, and the best preserved stands at<br />
the level <strong>of</strong> Macedonia are found within the wider area <strong>of</strong> the railway line corridor. Alder<br />
forests have important role in supporting high biological diversity and play important role in<br />
preventing floods and pollution.<br />
254
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Alder forests are the only habitat assessed as very highly sensitive. Any destruction <strong>of</strong> alder<br />
forests is not permissible. A more serious conflict situation could occur near the village<br />
Arbinovo, where the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line runs close to alder forest and marshy habitats.<br />
Figure 64 Alder belt along river Sateska near the village Arbinovo<br />
Figure 65 Alder belt along the river Treska<br />
255
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
7. Willow belts (ms-19)<br />
Willow belts have similar ecological functions like alder communities. Within the investigated<br />
corridor, they occupy very small areas, and accordingly have much lower importance and<br />
lower sensitivity.<br />
During the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line, no major problems are expected in<br />
relation to willow belts.<br />
8. Marshy oak stands (hs-21)<br />
Marshy oak in Macedonia is a rare species, and its stands are even rarer. Several trunks in<br />
the church yard in the village Moroista are considered to be the best preserved stand in<br />
Macedonia. Apart from the national importance, communities <strong>of</strong> marshy oak are enrolled in<br />
the list <strong>of</strong> habitats for conservation under the EU Habitat Directive. This stand is outside the<br />
investigated corridor and no impacts are expected from the railway construction and<br />
operation. However, we can not exclude the possibility for direct damages on some<br />
individual marshy oak trunks in Struga Fields.<br />
9. Hilly pastures (ms-13)<br />
Hilly pastures in Macedonia are widely spread, especially in central and eastern parts where<br />
they occupy large areas. Within the investigated corridor, actually no typical communities <strong>of</strong><br />
hilly pastures grow, but they occur in some transitional succession phases <strong>of</strong> abandoned<br />
agricultural lands or strongly degraded forest ecosystems. In addition to this, these areas are<br />
rather small and have no significant importance for biological diversity.<br />
During the construction <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line, direct destruction <strong>of</strong> parts <strong>of</strong> hilly<br />
pastures is possible, but this conflict does not have high priority.<br />
10. Calcareous rocks (ms-17)<br />
Calcareous rocks near the village Radozda have significance for biological diversity<br />
(chasmophytic flora and vegetation, presence <strong>of</strong> rare and endemic species). This area has<br />
great importance because <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> cave churches.<br />
Given the fact that the route <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line is away from the mentioned<br />
calcareous rocks, major impacts on natural ecosystems are not expected. However, during<br />
mining and opening <strong>of</strong> the route, measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> vibrations have to be undertaken,<br />
in order to protect cave churches.<br />
11. Siliceous rocks (ms-10)<br />
Siliceous rocks in the investigated corridor occupy insignificant areas, and thus no specific<br />
vegetation and flora grows on them, but they are formed under the influence <strong>of</strong> adjacent<br />
habitats.<br />
During the railway construction and operation, no impacts are expected on siliceous rocks.<br />
256
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 66 Siliceous rocks near the village Pesocan<br />
12. Ohrid Lake (vhs-38)<br />
Ohrid Lake is characterized with the highest sensitivity in relation to all habitats in the<br />
corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line, due to numerous characteristics it has, such as presence <strong>of</strong> rare<br />
and well preserved communities, presence <strong>of</strong> endangered bird species, and enormous<br />
number <strong>of</strong> endemic species. Many authors have pointed out the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid not only as<br />
the most important ecosystem in Europe, but also on global level due to its high index <strong>of</strong><br />
endemic biodiversity.<br />
During the railway construction, series <strong>of</strong> negative impacts on the Lake is possible in the<br />
region <strong>of</strong> the village Radozda, such as erosion and inlet <strong>of</strong> excavated material, drainage <strong>of</strong><br />
matters from construction locations along the line, wastewater from the camps <strong>of</strong> workers,<br />
etc. During the railway construction, inlet <strong>of</strong> matters in the Lake is possible, as well as<br />
destruction <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> the communities, increased turbidity, pollution with fuels and oils and<br />
eutrophication.<br />
13. Rivers (hs-23)<br />
Rivers are highly sensitive for a series <strong>of</strong> characteristics, such as presence <strong>of</strong> rare and<br />
protected communities and species, endemic species, as well as landscape values. Several<br />
rivers are located in the railway corridor, among which Crn Drim and Sateska are<br />
distinguished as more important and sensitive to impacts.<br />
During the railway construction, series <strong>of</strong> negative impacts on rivers are possible, such as<br />
inlet <strong>of</strong> matters from construction sites, wastewater from camping sites for the workers, inlet<br />
<strong>of</strong> solid municipal waste, etc. Great negative impact can originate from leakage <strong>of</strong> fuels, oils<br />
and lubricants, which due to their high toxicity may cause damages on communities. In<br />
addition to this, construction <strong>of</strong> bridges may cause change in the flow <strong>of</strong> rivers and inlet <strong>of</strong><br />
solid waste material (rocks and stones) and finer material (sand, soil) which could cause<br />
pollution <strong>of</strong> the water and increased turbidity.<br />
257
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
14. Streams (ms-19)<br />
Similar as rivers, streams are sensitive because <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> rare communities, which<br />
are to a great extent well preserved, as well as species enrolled on the IUCN Red List.<br />
Possible impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway construction are identical as those <strong>of</strong> rivers, but with stronger<br />
intensity due to the size <strong>of</strong> the water body. More severe conflict situation could arise in the<br />
region <strong>of</strong> Bukov Dol, where inlet <strong>of</strong> solid waste material is possible during the construction <strong>of</strong><br />
the bridge and the tunnel.<br />
15. Springs (ms-12)<br />
In the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line, there are several springs in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the village<br />
Radozda. Potential impacts include changes in the spring replenishment as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
buffering in the region <strong>of</strong> the watershed area, as well as full or partial covering <strong>of</strong> the spring.<br />
Yet, no serious disruptions <strong>of</strong> these habitats are expected.<br />
16. Marshes<br />
Marshes are habitats that are strongly affected on global and European level which is the<br />
ground for their inclusion in different international conventions. Areas under marshes in<br />
Macedonia have been significantly reduced during the last 60-70 years. The former Struga<br />
Marsh is almost entirely dried out and destructed. Remains <strong>of</strong> Struga Marsh may be seen<br />
between the City <strong>of</strong> Struga and villages Kalista and Radolista. The route <strong>of</strong> the railway does<br />
not affect this area and marshy communities in it directly, but certain impact can be expected<br />
during the operation (annoyance, use <strong>of</strong> local roads through the marsh remains, etc.).<br />
Reed community was recorded in Struga marsh, too, between the villages Volino and<br />
Moroista. The construction <strong>of</strong> the railway may cause direct destruction <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> this habitat.<br />
Also, during the operation, we may expect severe impacts due to annoyance.<br />
17. Black pine plantations (ls-9)<br />
Black pine plantations within the investigated corridor have very low importance for biological<br />
diversity, but they have certain importance in erosion prevention and control. These are<br />
artificially planted plantations which cover small areas, and they are dispersed through<br />
Italian and Turkey oak forests.<br />
During the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line, direct destruction <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the black pine<br />
plantations is possible, but this conflict has much lower significance than the destruction <strong>of</strong><br />
natural forests.<br />
18. Meadows (ms-20)<br />
Meadows are semi-natural ecosystems on which specific vegetation grows. Generally,<br />
meadows in Macedonia are habitats with reducing areas due to abandoned traditional<br />
agriculture and livestock breeding and different amelioration undertakings. They support high<br />
biological diversity and are significant for their ecological functions (economic value,<br />
protection from erosion).<br />
Meadows in the investigated corridor are situated in river valleys and gorges, immediately<br />
next to watercourses. Certain impact on meadows can be expected during the railway<br />
construction mostly due to the use <strong>of</strong> access roads.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> the meadows near the village Radozda, we may expect direct destruction<br />
because the planned route <strong>of</strong> the railway line passes through meadows located between the<br />
remains <strong>of</strong> chestnut forest.<br />
19. Humid meadows (hs-23)<br />
Humid meadows are represented by the communities Caricetum elatae and Cyperetum<br />
longi. These are rare communities in Macedonia which have never had high economic<br />
258
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
importance for the local population. They support specific biodiversity characterized by the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> rare species <strong>of</strong> plants and important bird species. They are best developed in<br />
the remains <strong>of</strong> Struga Marsh (near village Radozda), along the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska<br />
(especially near the village Arbinovo) and in Struga Fields (between the villages Moroista<br />
and Volino). The construction <strong>of</strong> the railway may be a serious problem due to direct<br />
destruction <strong>of</strong> these habitats or interruption <strong>of</strong> their connection with the surrounding habitats.<br />
20. Fields (ms-11)<br />
Fields are anthropogenic habitats with primary economic significance. They have very low<br />
importance for biological diversity. During the construction, destruction <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> these<br />
habitats is inevitable (directly through the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line and construction <strong>of</strong><br />
new access roads). Also, we may expect impacts during the railway operation (annoyance,<br />
pollution, vibrations). Yet, those have been assessed as low/insignificant because <strong>of</strong> the low<br />
sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the habitat.<br />
21. Vineyards (ms-10)<br />
Vineyards are anthropogenic habitats with usually higher economic significance than fields.<br />
However, within the investigated corridor, the importance <strong>of</strong> vineyards in terms <strong>of</strong> support for<br />
biological diversity is low.<br />
During the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line, we may expect direct impacts on vineyards.<br />
During the line operation, the most serious problem will be soil, water and air pollution.<br />
Figure 67 Vineyard near the village Meseista<br />
22. Orchards (ls-8)<br />
Orchards have high economic value, but relatively low significance for biological diversity.<br />
During the railway construction, the most serious problem will be soil, water and air pollution.<br />
259
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 68 Apple orchard in the village Volino<br />
23. Gardens (ls-9)<br />
Gardens in the investigated corridor occupy small areas, and therefore have low economic<br />
significance and very low importance in terms <strong>of</strong> biological diversity. We may expect<br />
destruction <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the gardens as a result <strong>of</strong> the railway construction. During the line<br />
operation, the most serious problem will be soil, water and air pollution.<br />
24. Urban habitats (ls-5)<br />
From among analyzed habitats, urban habitats have the lowest importance in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
biological diversity. The planned route in the City <strong>of</strong> Kicevo takes care for infrastructural and<br />
residential structures. Construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line in urban habitats will not<br />
have any serious impact on living organisms and their communities. In other parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
investigated corridor, no conflicts with infrastructural projects are expected.<br />
25. Rural habitats (ms-11)<br />
Rural habitats have much higher importance than urban habitats. Yet, their importance in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> supporting the biological diversity is relatively low. Rural habitats are characterized<br />
with the presence <strong>of</strong> cosmopolitan species and ruderal communities. Potential conflicts<br />
related to the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line may be assessed as low.<br />
4.2.3 Impacts on habitats<br />
4.2.3.1 Destruction <strong>of</strong> forest habitats<br />
Anthropogenic plantations: major part <strong>of</strong> pine plantations in the area <strong>of</strong> Kicevo (km 104+800<br />
to km 105+400) will be destructed. Pine forests in that part, as anthropogenic creations,<br />
have no big importance for biological diversity <strong>of</strong> the region, but they have high economic<br />
significance and role in the prevention <strong>of</strong> erosion.<br />
260
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Destruction <strong>of</strong> Italian and Turkey oak forests. During the railway construction, the<br />
following forest stands will be affected by direct destruction:<br />
- Italian and Turkey oak forest – from the village Popolzani to the village<br />
Judovo;<br />
- from the village Slivovo (km 121+200) to the village Arbinovo (opposite<br />
motel Pocinka – km 124+000);<br />
- from the village Arbinovo (km 125+200) to the church St.Bogorodica – near<br />
the village Izdeglavje (km 126+600);<br />
- from the village Botun (km 135+200) to the village Klimestani (km 138+800);<br />
- village <strong>of</strong> Frangovo – small part <strong>of</strong> around 100 meters will be affected<br />
(around km 159+800 to km 159+900);<br />
- from the village Radozda to the border (quantification <strong>of</strong> this impact is<br />
encumbered for two reasons: oak forest is cut through with active or<br />
abandoned meadows and presence <strong>of</strong> chestnut trunks in this part, which is<br />
special and significance impact.<br />
Hop hornbeam oak forest. Destruction or degradation <strong>of</strong> this forest type is not<br />
envisaged given the fact that the railway line passes through tunnel in the area <strong>of</strong><br />
growth <strong>of</strong> this habitat,<br />
Chestnut forests. The most important impact on chestnut forests is expected at<br />
around one kilometer south <strong>of</strong> the village Radozda (km 163+000 to km164+000). High<br />
number <strong>of</strong> old and younger chestnut trunks are expected to be destructed during the<br />
railway construction. Considering that these stands are strongly modified chestnut<br />
forests, the quantity <strong>of</strong> the impact is not significant. Nevertheless, destruction <strong>of</strong><br />
chestnut trunks has negative economic effect as well.<br />
4.2.3.2 Humid forests and riparian belts<br />
Humid forests, especially with alder, are <strong>of</strong> highest conservation interest in the corridor. Their<br />
importance is described in the relevant chapter determining the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats<br />
3.11.10.<br />
Riparian belts by the river Treska – Destruction <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> the alder belt (highly<br />
sensitive habitat) on the river Treska near the village Popolzani is almost unavoidable.<br />
Riparian belts by the river Brzdanska- Major degradation <strong>of</strong> alder belt along the<br />
course <strong>of</strong> Brzdanska Reka along the stretch from the village Popolzani to the village<br />
Brzdani is not expected. However, certain degradations are possible, mainly by<br />
accidence, at certain pieces <strong>of</strong> these belts where they approach close to the existing<br />
asphalted road to Demir Hisar.<br />
Riparian belts by the river Judovska- Degradation <strong>of</strong> the belt <strong>of</strong> alder vegetation<br />
along Judovska Reka from the village Brzdani to the village Judovo is almost<br />
unavoidable. The valley has steep slopes, and the route runs above the river along its<br />
right side. Construction works will cause destruction <strong>of</strong> great part <strong>of</strong> the oak forest, but<br />
also part <strong>of</strong> alder stands. Another problem has to do with the very narrow road to the<br />
village Judovo and it is not suitable for heavy vehicles. Additional works will certainly<br />
cause destruction <strong>of</strong> alder trunks together with small gardens or meadows.<br />
Riparian belts by the river Vilipica- Destruction <strong>of</strong> woodlots and forest belts near<br />
the village Slivovo (km 121+000). There is indirect threat to alder woodlots and belts<br />
at km 121+000 to km 122+000. The threat can result in destruction or degradation <strong>of</strong><br />
261
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
these woodlots and alder belts if construction works require movement <strong>of</strong><br />
mechanization and/or freight vehicles in them to access the route which otherwise<br />
does not affect them directly (it is located somewhat higher than the oak forest). By<br />
quantity, this impact is not the same as the corresponding negative impact near the<br />
village Arbinovo, because these stands are much more degraded.<br />
Alder forests near the village Arbinovo – In the region below the village Arbinovo,<br />
before the entry <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska into the gorge near the hill Cartojca, there are<br />
alder woodlots or thin trees and alleys in a rather good condition. After the alder forest<br />
close to Belciste Marsh, these are probably the best alder stands in Macedonia. This<br />
is also the ground for their high sensitivity to degradation (see matrix in Table 48<br />
Matrix determining the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats). Based on their sensitivity, negative<br />
impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway construction may be high.<br />
Figure 69 Proposal for route redirection near the village Arbinovo to avoid destruction <strong>of</strong> alder forest,<br />
marshy habitats and humid meadows<br />
Alder belts in the foothill <strong>of</strong> Kula near the village Pesocani – At the twist at the<br />
river Sateska around the hill Kula (around hundred meters north <strong>of</strong> the village<br />
Pesocani), there are alder belts which are directly affected by the railway line<br />
construction (~km 130+000).<br />
Alder woodlots and alleys near the village Botun – In the area <strong>of</strong> the village Botun,<br />
direct impacts (destructions) are expected on alder belts and woodlots in the following<br />
sites:<br />
- north <strong>of</strong> the village Botun (~km 134+500),<br />
- east <strong>of</strong> the village Botun (~km 135+000) and<br />
- belts along the gorge (~km 136+000 to km 139+000).<br />
262
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 70 Alder woodlot near the village Botun<br />
Alder forests with poplars near the village Meseista (village Klimestani)-The<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> the railway will cause destruction <strong>of</strong> alder belts between the villages<br />
Klimestani and Meseista. These alder belts, as opposed to previous ones, are<br />
characterized with higher presence <strong>of</strong> other woody species (willow, poplar).<br />
4.2.3.3 Marshes and swamps<br />
Description <strong>of</strong> habitats and species in the relevant chapters leads to the conclusion that<br />
marshy habitats are very important for biodiversity in Macedonia. That importance has<br />
crucial influence on the positioning <strong>of</strong> these habitats as highly sensitive, which is visible<br />
in Table 48. Based on this, negative impacts <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line construction on<br />
marshes and swamps have high intensity. The strong negative impact is further stressed<br />
with the fact that under the current conditions these habitats are <strong>of</strong> drastically reduced<br />
areas due to hydro-ameliorations back in 1950s. Construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line will be<br />
additional (cumulative) effect on further degradation and functional characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />
these habitats. The most severe impacts are expected in the following areas:<br />
village Arbinovo-Marshes near the village Arbinovo have been preserved on larger<br />
areas within alder woodlots or their remains, as well as between mowed humid<br />
meadows. According to the Feasibility Study, the route <strong>of</strong> the future railway line<br />
passes in the middle <strong>of</strong> these habitats and cuts twice the river Sateska. The<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line is expected to have huge negative impacts<br />
(destruction, fragmentation) on this habitats in that area.<br />
Struga Marsh (including also marshes near the village Radolista)-The route <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway line passes through the former Struga Marsh. Hydro amelioration interventions<br />
in the past have destroyed the natural vegetation in this area almost entirely. The<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line will reduce the possibility for revitalization <strong>of</strong> Struga<br />
263
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Marsh. Opening <strong>of</strong> access roads is additional threat for the remains <strong>of</strong> the Marsh<br />
(marshes, humid meadows, boundaries with willows).<br />
Reeds near villages Volino and Moroista - this habitat is not threatened with direct<br />
destruction during the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line itself, because it does not run<br />
through it. Negative impacts could be expected during the opening <strong>of</strong> possible access<br />
roads.<br />
4.2.3.4 Humid meadows<br />
Humid meadows in the corridor are special conservation interest. Their importance is<br />
described in the relevant chapter 3.11.9.2. The construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line poses<br />
danger <strong>of</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> high number <strong>of</strong> fields and meadows on the boundaries <strong>of</strong><br />
which there are canals <strong>of</strong> marshy vegetation.<br />
Below is the list <strong>of</strong> sites where destruction <strong>of</strong> humid meadows is expected:<br />
village Slivovo - river Vilipica - destruction <strong>of</strong> humid meadows is expected near the<br />
village Slivovo (km 121+000), together with degraded alder woodlots. There is indirect<br />
threat for humid meadows at km 121+000 to km 122+000. The threat may result in<br />
destruction or degradation <strong>of</strong> these humid meadows, if construction works require<br />
movement <strong>of</strong> construction mechanization and/or freight vehicles in them in order to<br />
access the route which otherwise does not affect them (it is located somewhat above<br />
in oak forest).<br />
Humid meadows near the village Arbinovo - as already indicated, the construction <strong>of</strong><br />
the planned railway line will cause destruction <strong>of</strong> alder forests, marshy habitats and<br />
humid meadows. All these habitats are highly or very highly sensitive.<br />
Humid meadows and fields near the villages Volino and Moroiste - destruction <strong>of</strong><br />
some <strong>of</strong> the humid meadows is expected in Struga Fields, especially between villages<br />
Volino and Moroiste.<br />
Humid meadows near the village Radolista - impacts on humid meadows near the<br />
village Radolista are identical with identified impacts on marshy habitats in Struga<br />
Marsh.<br />
4.2.4 Impacts on flora and fauna<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line will bring better accessibility <strong>of</strong> certain sites. This will<br />
increase the pressure on biological diversity, due to intensified hunting (and poaching),<br />
fishing and collection <strong>of</strong> medicinal and aromatic plants.<br />
4.2.4.1 Flora<br />
Direct impact <strong>of</strong> the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Radozda on plants<br />
is presented through the assessment <strong>of</strong> their habitats. Specific impact <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
construction is not expected on individual plant species. Impacts on individual chestnut<br />
trunks have already been elaborated in the section on impacts on chestnut forests.<br />
4.2.4.2 Fauna<br />
Direct impacts <strong>of</strong> the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line on invertebrates are not<br />
expected. Relevant impacts on invertebrate populations are covered in the description <strong>of</strong><br />
impacts on habitats.<br />
The most important impacts on vertebrates during the railway operation include:<br />
disturbance and direct mortality due to deadly collisions <strong>of</strong> animals with trains;<br />
264
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
habitats fragmentation (has significant impact on fauna), but this aspect has been<br />
elaborated in the segments on impacts on landscapes.<br />
Electric installations also have negative impact on birds through causing <strong>of</strong> direct mortality<br />
(electrocution). Birds, which stand on poles or transmission cables may die if they cause<br />
"short circuit". It is well known in the world that high number <strong>of</strong> big size bird species die on<br />
poorly designed electric railway installations as they use poles for observation, rest and<br />
nesting. Electrocution does not endanger only birds, but it is also a threat to the safety <strong>of</strong><br />
railway transport.<br />
Some animals (bear, wolf) avoid parts in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> railway lines because <strong>of</strong> human<br />
activities and increased noise.<br />
It is expected that columns that will bear the electricity conductors for trains supply will be<br />
used by birds as standing grounds, and even potential nesting points. Mortality <strong>of</strong> birds in<br />
such cases is well documented and surprisingly high, especially during migration period.<br />
Birds are affected by electrocution due to closure <strong>of</strong> the circuit with their wings or body<br />
(contact through earthing and phase or two phases). Thus, larger birds are more suspicious<br />
to electrocution. Bird species particularly affected by electrocution (but also collision) during<br />
the railway line operation include storks, herons and birds <strong>of</strong> pray.<br />
4.3 Impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters<br />
Pollution <strong>of</strong> waters during the railway line construction may be physical, chemical and<br />
biological. Physical pollution is manifested through presence <strong>of</strong> solid matters <strong>of</strong> earth<br />
residues, sand, solid matters from tires friction, remains <strong>of</strong> accidents, etc. Chemical pollution<br />
<strong>of</strong> surface waters can be caused by discharge <strong>of</strong> liquid matters like oils and greases. Solid<br />
particles, through road surface wash-out, settle in gutters and drainage canals and they can<br />
cause their clogging, while fats and oils may float on surface and reach the recipient. There,<br />
they create a "film" that prevents oxygen supply to the watercourse, thus preventing the<br />
normal development <strong>of</strong> the biological component into the recipient.<br />
Chemical pollution also results from dissolution <strong>of</strong> pollutants present in the air. These<br />
pollutants originate from exhaust gases <strong>of</strong> vehicles, imissions from polluting components <strong>of</strong><br />
the nearby industrial and manufacturing facilities, dissolution <strong>of</strong> individual components <strong>of</strong> the<br />
surrounding land, application <strong>of</strong> agrochemical products and pesticide, animal and plant<br />
waste, etc.<br />
Chemical pollution may be manifested as strongly acid, weakly acid neutral environment and<br />
all variations ranging from strongly base to strongly acid environment. It should be taken into<br />
account that not all <strong>of</strong> these pollutions originate from the transport corridor/railway line.<br />
Majority <strong>of</strong> them may be present also in the absence <strong>of</strong> constructed <strong>Corridor</strong> 8 or acid rains<br />
can cause the chemical pollution <strong>of</strong> surface waters.<br />
Biological pollutions result from disintegration <strong>of</strong> organic matters used as food <strong>of</strong> various<br />
micro organisms. They may be due to food thrown by unconscious participants in traffic,<br />
leaves scattered around by wind, feathers and other matters present in the immediate<br />
surrounding.<br />
The above defined pollutions may be constant, seasonal or incidental. Intensity and form <strong>of</strong><br />
pollution <strong>of</strong> surface and ground waters may be considered in phases here as well:<br />
construction phase and use/operation phase <strong>of</strong> the railway line.<br />
During the construction phase, compaction <strong>of</strong> the subground and other measures aimed at<br />
securing stability, may lead to change in the ground permeability, by which direct impact is<br />
caused with regard to the regime <strong>of</strong> surface and ground waters.<br />
265
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
When the route passes through an embankment, this may create a severe physical barrier to<br />
the flow <strong>of</strong> surface and ground waters running through that area to reach the recipient. In this<br />
context, unnecessary retention <strong>of</strong> the terrain and excessive humidification and even flooding<br />
can occur.<br />
When the road is in incision, the flow <strong>of</strong> ground waters is cut. In such cases, when the<br />
quantity <strong>of</strong> ground water is higher in the ground, at groundwater level increase, disrupted<br />
regime <strong>of</strong> ground waters affects the surrounding lands.<br />
Wastewaters during railway operation<br />
During the railway line operational phase, pollution <strong>of</strong> surface waters occurs most frequently<br />
during precipitation. In such periods, the dust settled on the track and accompanying<br />
facilities is washed-out by the falls and dissolves suspended particulate matters. Ran falls or<br />
waters originating from snow melting are burdened with matters which settle on the line and<br />
the area controlled by it.<br />
Putting the railway into operation and its operation can lead to discharges <strong>of</strong> sanitary waste<br />
waters generated mostly by passenger terminals and service stations. These waste waters<br />
should be treated in accordance with the regulations regarding municipal waste waters.<br />
Also, waste water emission could result from the maintenance and repair <strong>of</strong> locomotives and<br />
wagons. Discharge under high pressure may cause discharges <strong>of</strong> waste water containing<br />
particulate matters <strong>of</strong> transport material, dyes, greases and oils, etc. During these<br />
interventions, base solutions for removal <strong>of</strong> dyes, greases and other impurities from axles<br />
and other metallic parts Also, acids and bases may be used to remove corroded materials<br />
(present along entire line). Passenger trains generate sanitary water as well, which is usually<br />
discharged directly on the surface <strong>of</strong> the track/railway.<br />
4.3.1 Impact <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> construction in mountaneous and hilly relief will cause destruction <strong>of</strong> soil and rocks<br />
into smaller fractions, which will accumulate on the slopes, i.e. near riverbeds. During snow<br />
melting and more intensive rainfalls, these fractions will be transported to the riverbeds.<br />
Rocks and soil removed or disintegrated during the railway construction and transported to<br />
riverbeds will cause increased turbidity, i.e. increased quantity <strong>of</strong> solid suspended matters.<br />
On the other side, this will also increase the content <strong>of</strong> heavy metals, and consequently the<br />
toxical effects on living organisms.<br />
Nevertheless, the greatest danger in relation to the railway line construction comes from<br />
incidental leakage <strong>of</strong> fuels, oils and lubricants from vehicles and machinery used in the<br />
railway construction. It is well known that hydrocarbons contained in fuels and oils are<br />
extremely toxic for living organisms. It is especially dangerous if incidents occur on the shore<br />
<strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake or within the watershed area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake (e.g. river Sateska), which would<br />
endanger endemic living organisms in the Lake, but also irreversible damages would occur<br />
on habitats and biocenoses.<br />
Establishment <strong>of</strong> linear construction belt (which should be in the width range <strong>of</strong> 10-50 m) and<br />
construction zones during the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line, accompanying tunnels and<br />
bridges and access roads to individual parts <strong>of</strong> the route can affect the quality <strong>of</strong> surface<br />
waters in the following way:<br />
Disruption and removal <strong>of</strong> soil cover (humus) and part <strong>of</strong> rock masses/sediments<br />
may cause erosion <strong>of</strong> the sediments and potential pollution <strong>of</strong> the surrounding<br />
surface waters through increase in the level <strong>of</strong> solid suspended particulate matters in<br />
them;<br />
266
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Delayed removal and dislocation <strong>of</strong> excavated masses during tunnels opening can<br />
cause formation <strong>of</strong> artificial partition and accumulation <strong>of</strong> water downstream in<br />
surface watercourses existing along dales, below the locations envisaged for tunnels<br />
opening;<br />
Polluted waters run-<strong>of</strong>f from sites <strong>of</strong> construction activity;<br />
Leakage <strong>of</strong> fuels and oils from vehicles and construction machinery;<br />
By way <strong>of</strong> removal/throwing <strong>of</strong> waste in surface waters;<br />
Heavy metals contained in emissions from vehicles.<br />
Irreversible direct impacts on the regime and the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters are not expected<br />
from the execution <strong>of</strong> construction works.<br />
Potential different sites along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line that should be paid attention<br />
include:<br />
At station 108km;<br />
At station 114km + 850m (before the entry into tunnel no. 6);<br />
At station 120km + 430m (before the exit from tunnel no. 6);<br />
At station 122km + 070m (before the entry into tunnel no. 7);<br />
At station 126km + 020m (before the entry into tunnel no. 8);<br />
At station 126km + 147m (before the exit from tunnel no. 8);<br />
At station 135km + 025m (before the entry into tunnel no. 9);<br />
At station 136km + 015m (before the exit from tunnel no. 9);<br />
At station 137km + 855m (before the entry into tunnel no. 10);<br />
At station 138km + 335m (before the exit from tunnel no.10);<br />
At station 159km + 550m (before the entry into tunnel no. 11);<br />
At station 162km + 752m (before the exit from tunnel no. 11).<br />
Another potential impact related to the railway construction originates from workers' camping<br />
sites, as well as the point for cleaning and maintenance <strong>of</strong> the vehicles and mechanization.<br />
Camping sites <strong>of</strong> workers engaged in the railway construction may be sources <strong>of</strong> pollution<br />
with faecal (municipal) waste waters, but also solid municipal waste (especially from<br />
packaging <strong>of</strong> food and materials used in construction). Good organization and selection <strong>of</strong><br />
suitable place in the camps are necessary (if such are planned). Discharge <strong>of</strong> faecal<br />
wastewaters in rivers or Ohrid Lake could be potential disaster (especially for the Lake <strong>of</strong><br />
Ohrid) and significant deterioration <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> water.<br />
4.3.2 Impact <strong>of</strong> the railway line operation on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters<br />
During the railway line operation, the main danger for surface and ground waters comes<br />
from incidents <strong>of</strong> chemical substances run-<strong>of</strong>fs (inorganic fertilizers, solvents, fuels). In case<br />
<strong>of</strong> incident <strong>of</strong> this kind, aquatic ecosystems will be polluted. Ohrid Lake is especially<br />
sensitive ecosystem. Therefore, the relevant services <strong>of</strong> PE <strong>Railway</strong>s will be obliged to<br />
prepare an action plan for coping with incidents <strong>of</strong> this kind. At the same time, this services<br />
have to be trained and staffed adequately.<br />
It has been assumed that railway stations will be connected to utility systems and therefore<br />
no serious impact is expected from municipal waste waters on natural ecosystems.<br />
267
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
During the operation, the railway line as a construction project may not have any impact on<br />
quantitative and qualitative characteristics <strong>of</strong> surface waters.<br />
Expected potential impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> waters during this phase are related to railway<br />
compositions running over the line. The most critical points on the line where impacts on<br />
surface waters can be expected are the locations where the railway line crosses the existing<br />
watercourses, i.e. the bridges. Potential sources <strong>of</strong> water pollution during this phase include:<br />
Leakage <strong>of</strong> fuel or oils from driving machines (locomotives) for railway compositions<br />
(trains) energizing;<br />
Removal/throwing <strong>of</strong> waste (especially from passenger trains) into surface waters.<br />
4.3.3 Impacts on rivers and other wetlands<br />
4.3.3.1 Impacts during construction<br />
Potential impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway construction phase on wetlands and algae diversity include:<br />
- run-<strong>of</strong>fs from railway line construction sites,<br />
- run-<strong>of</strong>f/drainage at the sites for stations construction,<br />
- excavated or removed material,<br />
- drainage <strong>of</strong> river sediments,<br />
- sanitary waste waters (from workshops), and<br />
- other activities connected with the construction.<br />
Water drained from the construction sites may contain increased quantity <strong>of</strong> sediment, solid<br />
particulate matters and various contaminating substances. Potential sources <strong>of</strong> water<br />
pollution during the railway line construction are the following: а) wash out and erosion from<br />
the surface on the location <strong>of</strong> works execution; b) concrete or other material used for support<br />
walls construction; c) water used to wash vehicles used during construction; d) water used to<br />
reduce dust during construction; e) fuel, oils and lubrication preparations for vehicles and<br />
equipment used during the railway construction.<br />
Wastewater discharges during construction may cause physical, chemical and biological<br />
impacts. Physical impacts may result from increased sediments through erosion, blockage <strong>of</strong><br />
canals and rivers and causing <strong>of</strong> floods under conditions <strong>of</strong> intensive precipitations.<br />
Increased content <strong>of</strong> solid suspended particulate matters in water may cause reduction in<br />
the concentration <strong>of</strong> dissolved oxygen in the water due to а) reduction in light penetrating<br />
into water column, reducing the intensity <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis and phytoplankton and<br />
phytobenthos (micro and macrophytes), which in turn reduces the production <strong>of</strong> oxygen in<br />
the water column; b) high content <strong>of</strong> suspended matters and turbidity results in increased<br />
energy retention (retention <strong>of</strong> energy in the water column), which results in increased<br />
temperature and consequently reduction in dissolved oxygen. Horoscopy could also occur in<br />
extreme conditions.<br />
In addition to the above, there are also chemical and biological impacts which depend<br />
primarily on the chemical characteristics and quantity <strong>of</strong> nutrients in the water released by<br />
run-<strong>of</strong>f. Significant chemical effects may occur at discharges <strong>of</strong> concrete and cement which<br />
also induce increase in pH value <strong>of</strong> the water. At the same time, increased pH value causes<br />
toxic effects and reduction in the populations <strong>of</strong> organisms and biodiversity in general.<br />
Material excavated or removed during the railway construction may have significant impact<br />
on wetlands and quality <strong>of</strong> water. Therefore, great care should be taken during disposal <strong>of</strong><br />
268
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
the excavated material, especially while constructing the tunnels. Excavated material<br />
consists mostly <strong>of</strong> rocks, earth and stones which are able in case <strong>of</strong> erosion to cause<br />
physical disruptions, such as interruption <strong>of</strong> water flow, change in the flow configuration, as<br />
well as increase in turbidity and quantity <strong>of</strong> nutrients and solid suspended particulate matter.<br />
During the construction <strong>of</strong> bridges over rivers, pollution may occur with heavy metals, which<br />
are bounded mostly to the sediment in the river. Also, river sediments have high ability for<br />
bounding <strong>of</strong> organic compounds (such as hydrocarbons released from fuels, oils and<br />
lubricants). Dissolution <strong>of</strong> heavy metals and organic compounds from sediments is slow, but<br />
persistent process and can cause significant impact on the quality <strong>of</strong> water. Both heavy<br />
metals and hydrocarbons are strongly toxic for all organisms and this could cause<br />
(depending on the concentration) reduction <strong>of</strong> populations and biodiversity loss. Particular<br />
attention should be paid during the construction <strong>of</strong> bridges in plane part <strong>of</strong> the railway line,<br />
designed near by Sateska River. Inlet <strong>of</strong> sediment into the river Sateska will endanger<br />
directly the ecosystem <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake. Pollution <strong>of</strong> the sediment with organic compounds and<br />
heavy metals in particular would cause enormous damages on the life in Ohrid Lake.<br />
Municipal wastewater occurs from sanitary facilities for the work force on the site <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway construction. Wastewater is characterized with high level <strong>of</strong> biological oxygen<br />
demand (BOD), ammonium, phosphorus and coliform bacteria. This effluent would cause<br />
pollution <strong>of</strong> the aquatic ecosystem. In case 500 workers take part in the work on the railway,<br />
around 250 m 3 wastewater would be released on daily basis. Extremely high impact on<br />
wetlands and quality <strong>of</strong> water would occur if these wastewater is discharged directly into the<br />
water without pretreatment. However, it is assumed that appropriate sanitary infrastructure<br />
will be placed for the workers and no discharge <strong>of</strong> municipal waste waters into aquatic<br />
ecosystems will be allowed. It is supposed that mobile chemical toilets, septic tanks and<br />
appropriate location for (municipal) wastes will be provided.<br />
In addition to the above, problems may occur during the railway construction with regard to<br />
solid waste disposal which may result in pollution or damages to wetlands. Food remains or<br />
waste <strong>of</strong> food packaging are <strong>of</strong> particular importance, as well as the waste from the<br />
packaging <strong>of</strong> materials used in the railway construction. If these matters reach wetlands,<br />
they may cause pollution through inlet <strong>of</strong> organic matters and nutrients (and reduction in<br />
oxygen quantity), increase in turbidity, salinity and conductivity. On the other side, release <strong>of</strong><br />
liquids stored in the area <strong>of</strong> the railway line development, such as oils, diesel fuel, solvents,<br />
lubricants, may have extremely high impact on wetlands. Therefore, in order to reduce the<br />
risk <strong>of</strong> such releases (incidents), it is necessary to provide suitable barriers (boundaries)<br />
which would prevent the propagation <strong>of</strong> liquids and their penetration into soil or water, as<br />
well as appropriate disposal, keeping and handling <strong>of</strong> fuels, oils and lubricants.<br />
4.3.3.2 Impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway line operation on wetlands<br />
Possible impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway during its operation include:<br />
- water for air conditioning,<br />
- leakage <strong>of</strong> water from wagons,<br />
- discharge <strong>of</strong> water from stations,<br />
- drainage.<br />
It is assumed that stations and platforms, during summer period, will have natural ventilation<br />
or mechanical ventilation if they are covered or closed. Air conditioning <strong>of</strong> the premises is<br />
envisaged by air cooling. In this way, there will be no discharge <strong>of</strong> wastewater from air<br />
conditioning. Electricity based heating is recommended during winter, as it does not include<br />
269
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
heating <strong>of</strong> water, which in the period outside heating season would be discharged into<br />
aquatic ecosystems. In this way, no impact would be expected on wetlands.<br />
Leakage <strong>of</strong> certain quantity <strong>of</strong> fuel and oils from locomotives is also expected. At some<br />
points, bigger quantity <strong>of</strong> fuel or oils release can be expected (e.g. in stations), and they<br />
would be washed out by water sediments and transported to the soil or surface waters. Such<br />
situation would cause disruptions <strong>of</strong> wetlands.<br />
Functioning <strong>of</strong> depots and stations will generate municipal wastewater from toilets/utilities.<br />
This waste is mainly characterized with increased concentrations <strong>of</strong> BOD, suspended<br />
particulate matter, ammonium, phosphates. Yet, it is considered that significant impacts on<br />
wetlands would occur if waste waters are discharged without pretreatment. It is assumed<br />
that the stations will be connected to municipal system or will be adequately installed and<br />
maintained regularly.<br />
Wastewater will be generated from the stations for wagons and locomotives<br />
cleaning/maintenance. Thorough cleaning <strong>of</strong> the floor <strong>of</strong> the trains would be carried out<br />
every second week. Water with detergents would be additionally released through daily<br />
cleaning <strong>of</strong> wagons. These waste waters may cause physical, chemical and biological<br />
degradations in wetlands, if they are not collected and treated.<br />
Functioning <strong>of</strong> the railway will also generate residues <strong>of</strong> oils, fuels and lubricants. These<br />
matters may be washed out from the surface <strong>of</strong> the line and thus drained to aquatic<br />
ecosystems. This situation can be especially explicit on bridges, where these matters would<br />
be inlet with the water sediments directly into the recipient.<br />
4.4 Impacts on landscape<br />
4.4.1 Disorder in functional characteristics <strong>of</strong> the landscape <strong>of</strong> subalpine<br />
broadleaved forests.<br />
Operation <strong>of</strong> linear infrastructural projects has negative impact on the connectiveness and<br />
connectivity <strong>of</strong> ecosystems. Certain impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway line operation can be expected on<br />
the functional landscape characteristics <strong>of</strong> oak forests. Planned bridges and tunnels along<br />
the entire railway line route are factor reducing the negative impacts.<br />
Major impacts may be expected in the area between the villages Slivovo and Meseista. In<br />
this part, the line passes through oak forests, marshy habitats and agricultural land and<br />
separates these habitats from the riverbed <strong>of</strong> Sateska.<br />
In order to avoid negative impacts on the functional characteristics (connectiveness) <strong>of</strong> oak<br />
forests, no mitigation measures are proposed. Construction <strong>of</strong> the planned tunnels and<br />
bridges provides sufficient guarantee for the maintenance <strong>of</strong> the functionality <strong>of</strong> this<br />
landscape.<br />
4.4.2 Impacts on hilly rural landscape<br />
The railway line will cut high number <strong>of</strong> fields and meadows on the boundaries <strong>of</strong> which edge<br />
vegetation (boundaries) <strong>of</strong> fruit trees and oaks grows. This vegetation attributes the imprint<br />
<strong>of</strong> this landscape type, but it is also a significant corridor for the movement <strong>of</strong> high number <strong>of</strong><br />
animal species. Destruction <strong>of</strong> these structures is expected to result from the route itself<br />
(direct occupation <strong>of</strong> area), construction works (direct or indirect destruction <strong>of</strong> trees), as well<br />
as from access roads. This habitat destruction is expected to reduce the functionality <strong>of</strong> this<br />
landscape relative to natural processes.<br />
270
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
4.4.3 Impacts on plane lake landscape<br />
The railway line will cut large area on which remains <strong>of</strong> marshy habitats are found (they<br />
support reproduction <strong>of</strong> amphibians or nutrition <strong>of</strong> certain animals) on both sides.<br />
Amphibians move from marshy habitats towards grass ones 9including fields) for food and<br />
the opposite direction to lay eggs. Although the railway line differs from a highway and<br />
frequency <strong>of</strong> trains will not be too high, more problematic passage <strong>of</strong> amphibians and other<br />
animals over the railway (around 50 cm) is expected, as well as increased mortality during<br />
such passages.<br />
4.5 Impacts on geological structures<br />
4.5.1 Construction phase<br />
Expected impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway in this project phase on geological structures would be in a<br />
form <strong>of</strong> degradation and erosion <strong>of</strong> rock masses/sediments, due to:<br />
Opening <strong>of</strong> access roads and operational plateau for foundation (anchoring) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
track railway construction, execution <strong>of</strong> the accompanying elements <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />
(halt points, railway stations, overpasses, underpasses, culverts);<br />
Excavation <strong>of</strong> tunnels;<br />
Excavation <strong>of</strong> foundations for the planned accompanying electric installation;<br />
Possible leakage <strong>of</strong> fuels and oils from construction machinery and vehicles for<br />
transport <strong>of</strong> construction materials and equipment, and<br />
Handling and management <strong>of</strong> chemicals and oils for the purposes <strong>of</strong> the<br />
accompanying electric installation.<br />
Degradation and erosion <strong>of</strong> rock masses/sediments include all contemporary engineering<br />
and geological processes and appearances described above. Critical points for these<br />
potential impacts are the stretches where the line passes over dales with already identified<br />
trenches and landslides, and <strong>of</strong> course the most critical points are the stretches where the<br />
line is going to be positioned under ground (tunnels). There, depending on the existing<br />
geological composition and existing tectonics <strong>of</strong> rock masses, we may expect degradations<br />
through rock slides and wreck <strong>of</strong> underground spaces. Such occurrences may be expected<br />
in relation to tunnels nos. 9 and 10 (on the stretch from the village Botun to the village<br />
Klimestani) and near the tunnel no.11 (near the village Radozda) due to the relatively<br />
weaker engineering geological properties <strong>of</strong> the present rock mass (Sqse–phylitic shales).<br />
For the purposes <strong>of</strong> the railway construction, no opening <strong>of</strong> new installations is envisaged for<br />
the phase <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> mineral and geological resources in the area <strong>of</strong> the route corridor.<br />
Accordingly, no negative impacts are expected on mineral resources in the subject area.<br />
With reference to hydrogeological occurrences and facilities, impacts expected during this<br />
phase which require attention include:<br />
Potential degradation and destruction <strong>of</strong> existing underground linear facilities<br />
(pipelines) intersect by the railway line. One <strong>of</strong> the most critical is the railway line<br />
intersection with the regional water supply pipeline supplying water to the City <strong>of</strong><br />
Struga and surrounding villages, close to the village Sum (station 135 km-136 km).<br />
Also, potential impacts may be expected on the local water supply system supplying<br />
water to the village Radozda and guardhouse on Macedonian-<strong>Albania</strong>n border<br />
(station 163 km+970-164 km+100).<br />
271
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Potential direct and direct impacts (through water occurrences and facilities) on<br />
aquifer rock masses (hydrogeological collectors), through vertical infiltration<br />
(leakage) <strong>of</strong> fuel, oil or cement solution from vehicles and construction machines.<br />
Potential location at risk is in the tunnel no. 6 (station 115km + 500-119 km + 00),<br />
where the line is expected through a part <strong>of</strong> represented hydrogeological collectors:<br />
MD–slab-like marbles and Т2,3 massive and bank-like limestone from the springs <strong>of</strong><br />
which the village is supplied with water. Also, location at potential risk is found on the<br />
stretch above the village Popolzani to the area below the village Vidrani (station<br />
107km + 950-110 km + 350), where the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line passes through part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the represented hydrogeological collectors: MD–slab-like marbles drained through<br />
the identified karst springs in the village.<br />
4.5.2 Operational phase<br />
With reference <strong>of</strong> operational phase (use and servicing phase), impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway on<br />
geological structures, engineering geological appearances and processes are not expected.<br />
The possible impacts on hydrogeological occurrences and facilities remain potentially<br />
dangerous, through above described direct and indirect pollution <strong>of</strong> aquifer rock masses<br />
(hydrogeological collectors) on the same stations.<br />
4.6 Impacts <strong>of</strong> vibrations and seismics<br />
In the course <strong>of</strong> construction and later operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Struga-Lin (border<br />
with <strong>Albania</strong>), series <strong>of</strong> impacts will be caused on the environment through which the route <strong>of</strong><br />
the railway passes. Most frequent possible impacts include:<br />
- Impacts occurring as a result <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line itself,<br />
- Impacts occurring as a result <strong>of</strong> the operation <strong>of</strong> transport means in the phase<br />
<strong>of</strong> the railway use.<br />
Besides other, specific impacts occurring as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the railway construction are<br />
as follows:<br />
- Seismic effects resulting from mining for the purpose <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the structures<br />
on the railway line itself – incisions, tunnels and bridges.<br />
Specific impacts occurring as a result <strong>of</strong> the operation <strong>of</strong> transport means in the phase <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway use include, inter alia:<br />
- Vibrations on the ground resulting from the movement <strong>of</strong> trains over the railway line.<br />
The text below will describe techniques for establishment <strong>of</strong> the safety zones for seismic<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> mining, techniques for assessment <strong>of</strong> the intensity <strong>of</strong> vibrations occurring as a<br />
consequence <strong>of</strong> trains movement over the line.<br />
These types <strong>of</strong> impacts are presented in more detail in the separate Elaborate prepared for<br />
the purposes <strong>of</strong> this Study, presented in detail in Appendix 9.<br />
Impacts <strong>of</strong> vibrations generated during the railway construction and during its operation are<br />
especially significant near the populated places (Kicevo, Brzdani, Vidrani, G. Popolzani, D.<br />
Popolzani, Drugovo, Judovo, Arbinovo, Botun, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Pesocani, Slivovo,<br />
Turje, Klimestani, Meseista, Volino, Trebenista, Mislesevo, Moroista, Struga, Zagracani-<br />
Sum, Radolista, Kalista, Frangovo, Radozda), because <strong>of</strong> the risky group <strong>of</strong> receptors -<br />
people. Some animal life forms are equally sensitive to impacts <strong>of</strong> vibrations, and it may<br />
happen that they leave their habitats.<br />
272
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
4.6.1 Response <strong>of</strong> people<br />
The response <strong>of</strong> people to vibrations on the ground is influenced by many factors. Some <strong>of</strong><br />
those factors are physical, like amplitude, duration and frequency content <strong>of</strong> vibrations, while<br />
other factors like the type <strong>of</strong> population, age, gender and expectations are physiological (ISO<br />
2631-2, 2003). This means that people's reaction to vibrations is subjective and differs for<br />
different people.<br />
4.6.2 Impact <strong>of</strong> vibrations on sensitive equipment<br />
Vibrations <strong>of</strong> the ground caused by the traffic may obstruct the operation <strong>of</strong> sensitive<br />
equipment such as electronic microscopes inside buildings. Therefore, sometimes it is<br />
necessary to mitigate vibrations if the railway line passes near building. The type <strong>of</strong> suitable<br />
measure against this should be determined depending on the specific conditions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway and buildings.<br />
4.6.3 Impact <strong>of</strong> vibrations on buildings<br />
The overview <strong>of</strong> reports on damages <strong>of</strong> buildings related with vibrations (Nelson &<br />
Saurenman, 1983) shows that there is only 5% probability that buildings will suffer structural<br />
damages due to the spped <strong>of</strong> particles smaller than 50 mm/s and there has been no case <strong>of</strong><br />
damages on buildings reported for speeds <strong>of</strong> particles smaller than 25 mm/s. According to<br />
the report, there is no risk <strong>of</strong> architectural damages on normal buildings due to vibrations<br />
weaker than 15 mm/s.<br />
Generally speaking, we may say that the problem <strong>of</strong> excessive vibrations on the ground<br />
caused by railway traffic has three links, i.e. source, path and receptor. In other words,<br />
vibrations on the ground caused by railway traffic are influenced by factors like roughness <strong>of</strong><br />
wheels and rails, specific support <strong>of</strong> track, dynamic characteristics <strong>of</strong> vehicles running over<br />
rails, strength <strong>of</strong> rail bearers, design <strong>of</strong> the railway structure, characteristics <strong>of</strong> the soil and<br />
design <strong>of</strong> the structure <strong>of</strong> facilities and speed <strong>of</strong> the train.<br />
It is commonly assumed that there will be no damages on buildings due to vibrations caused<br />
by ground vibrations. The most important impact that may result from the vibrations <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway line Kicevo-Struga-Lin (border with <strong>Albania</strong>) is related to people living in buildings<br />
along the planned route <strong>of</strong> the railway line. Furtheron, if there is equipment sensitive to<br />
vibrations inside buildings, its proper functioning may be disordered by vibrations if no<br />
measures are undertaken. If there are buildings <strong>of</strong> special nature very close to the railway<br />
line route, like theatres or old historical buildings, they should be observed with great<br />
attention with regard to ground vibrations.<br />
4.7 Impacts on soils<br />
Soil is a natural resource which is very complex and exceptionally sensitive to different<br />
external impacts. Soil reacts quickly to existing negative impacts which may result in its<br />
accelerated degradation, but on the other side it recovers very difficult and slowly from<br />
changes suffered as a result <strong>of</strong> these impacts. These changes may induce loss <strong>of</strong> the basic<br />
functions <strong>of</strong> the soil which define its fertility.<br />
Based on the above, it is necessary to identify all possible negative impacts in each<br />
individual case that may be classified in several types <strong>of</strong> soil degradation, namely:<br />
Soil erosion,<br />
Reduced content <strong>of</strong> organic matter,<br />
Soil compaction,<br />
273
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Soil salination,<br />
Soil contamination,<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> soil biodiversity,<br />
Soil conversion (soil sealing),<br />
Landslides, and<br />
Floods.<br />
The term soil degradation in the context <strong>of</strong> environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> certain construction<br />
undertakings concerns several different processes, the most important being: loss <strong>of</strong> fertile<br />
soil layer, change in water permeability, soil degradation at locations used for material<br />
borrowing for construction, degradation resulting from surplus material disposal, soil<br />
conversion on places where construction activities take place (soil sealing) and other<br />
impacts which depending on conditions may have major or minor impacts.<br />
Construction works related to vegetation clearing and soil layer are actually the biggest<br />
changes in the topography <strong>of</strong> the terrain. As far as the impact on soils is concerned, in case<br />
<strong>of</strong> construction works <strong>of</strong> this type, we distinguish two critical phases: construction phase and<br />
operational phase.<br />
Chapter 3.7 describes in brief the most important soil types identified and their location in<br />
different sections <strong>of</strong> the railway line. This chapter deals with sensitivity <strong>of</strong> individual soil types<br />
in relation to construction activities and possible forms <strong>of</strong> soil degradation.<br />
4.7.1 <strong>Railway</strong> line construction phase<br />
Soil contamination<br />
Soil contamination is a type <strong>of</strong> degradation related to and deriving from more general<br />
activities connected to the very process <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the railway and facilities designed<br />
for its functioning. Therefore, it is difficult to link contamination with intensive activities on<br />
individual sections <strong>of</strong> the route, as is the case <strong>of</strong> other types <strong>of</strong> degradation. That is why we<br />
will make more general overview <strong>of</strong> certain sources <strong>of</strong> contamination that may occur in the<br />
process <strong>of</strong> construction and apply on the entire section.<br />
Soil contamination in this phase can result from:<br />
inappropriate handling <strong>of</strong> fuels and their derivatives used for construction machines,<br />
washing <strong>of</strong> machines outside <strong>of</strong> specified and adequate locations,<br />
inadequate handling <strong>of</strong> construction materials and aggressive chemical matters used<br />
during construction,<br />
inappropriate construction and location <strong>of</strong> camping sites where machines and materials<br />
are kept, as well as<br />
other activities that are not performed in accordance with the guidelines for technical<br />
measures for prevention (mitigation) in the course <strong>of</strong> the construction.<br />
Soils contamination during construction is one aspect <strong>of</strong> impact on soil which can be<br />
minimized if the relevant technical measures prescribed for construction are observed.<br />
We should point out that soils nearby watercourses and wells are especially vulnerable to<br />
soil contamination if ground waters are positioned close to the soil surface.<br />
In the area <strong>of</strong> investigation, such specific cases have been identified with: alluvial soils in<br />
Izdeglavje and Belcista valleys, due to the fact that the route passes by the flow <strong>of</strong> Sateska<br />
274
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
River which then enters the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid, and thus any pollution <strong>of</strong> these soils<br />
characterized with exceptionally high porosity and permeability will have direct impact on<br />
these waters. Also, alluvial and marsh gleyey soils in the area <strong>of</strong> Struga Fields are<br />
vulnerable for three reasons, namely: (а) these are soils with shallow ground waters, (b) they<br />
are intensively used in agricultural production and therefore contamination <strong>of</strong> these soils will<br />
have an impact on further fertility <strong>of</strong> the soils in support <strong>of</strong> agricultural production, and (c)<br />
potential contamination <strong>of</strong> ground waters used for irrigation, and for drinking water supply in<br />
some cases.<br />
As far as other types <strong>of</strong> degradation are concerned, they are mainly connected with the need<br />
to organize transport <strong>of</strong> big quantity <strong>of</strong> construction material and related activities <strong>of</strong> opening<br />
<strong>of</strong> access roads to certain parts <strong>of</strong> the route, clearing <strong>of</strong> soil cover in the part where the<br />
railway will pass, the need to establish borrowing pits for disposal <strong>of</strong> the surplus earth.<br />
Soil erosion and destruction <strong>of</strong> soil cover<br />
Section 1 covers the stretch from Kicevo to Struga (villages Drugovo, Brzdani, Judovo,<br />
Slivovo, along the course <strong>of</strong> Sateska river and Struga Fields).<br />
The general characteristic <strong>of</strong> the terrain is high stratification with high hills and deep dales,<br />
with permanent or temporary water flows. There are small earth slides (calcareous detritus),<br />
as well as colluvial cones produced by delluvial-prolluvial deposits. All this contributes to the<br />
existence <strong>of</strong> numerous incisions and cross-cuts on the route, as well as viaducts and tunnels<br />
the construction <strong>of</strong> which will have great impact on soils in this part <strong>of</strong> the route.<br />
In the initial part <strong>of</strong> the route (station Kicevo-Brzdani-exit from the tunnel near the village<br />
Slivovo), the route runs first through plane terrain over alluvial cultivated soils. Then, in the<br />
area <strong>of</strong> the village Drugovo, the route rises above the village and passes over colluvial<br />
sediments covered with poor vegetation and rare artificially planted forests. Soils are inclined<br />
and even under natural conditions there are visible presence <strong>of</strong> surface and trench erosion.<br />
In order to achieve the required grading, the project envisages high number <strong>of</strong> cuttings in<br />
the terrain, which assumes disorder in natural vegetation and surface soil layer and<br />
occurrence <strong>of</strong> intensified erosion, as these are unstable colluvial sediments on inclined<br />
terrain. Then, the route makes cuttings into solid compact limestone, and after the crossover<br />
<strong>of</strong> the river Treska, on the stretch near villages Popolzani, Vidrani and Brzdani, it<br />
continues over inclined terrain cut through by dales over a complex <strong>of</strong> regosols and brown<br />
forest soils which are on inclined terrain under oak vegetation. On this stretch, and in order<br />
to cross over the high number <strong>of</strong> dales and gullies, the project has envisaged around 20<br />
bridges (105+700 l-80 m, 106+024 l-80 m, 106+637 l-200 m, 107+075 l-200 m, 107+418 l-<br />
118 m, 107+817 l-400 m, 108+300 l-40 m, 108+487 l-165 m, 109+540 l-162 m, 108+839 l-25<br />
m, 110+185 l-160 m, 110+520 l-70 m, 110+915 l-110 m, 11+340 l-90 m, 111+830 l-180 m,<br />
112+230 l-120 m, 112+433 l-60 m, 112+890 l-120 m, 114+700 l-60 m) and 8 tunnels the<br />
longest <strong>of</strong> which is the one on the stretch between the village Judovo and the village Slivovo,<br />
with around 6 km in length.<br />
High number <strong>of</strong> construction interventions on a relatively small stretch assumes employment<br />
<strong>of</strong> huge earth works and transport <strong>of</strong> big quantities <strong>of</strong> construction material and earth<br />
excavation. Chemical contamination <strong>of</strong> soil can occur in the surrounding area <strong>of</strong> such<br />
construction interventions related to the use <strong>of</strong> construction materials containing certain<br />
aggressive chemical components which in turn can induce disruption <strong>of</strong> the quality (type) <strong>of</strong><br />
the soil, contamination with heavy metals or physical mixture <strong>of</strong> internal construction material<br />
with the fertile pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the soil. Besides, in the case <strong>of</strong> construction projects <strong>of</strong> this kind,<br />
part <strong>of</strong> fertile surface areas around the project is covered over with inert (barren) soil layer<br />
obtained through excavations, process <strong>of</strong> uploading and unloading, etc. Also, access roads<br />
should be opened to each <strong>of</strong> the planned facilities, which increases further the impact on<br />
soils in this part <strong>of</strong> the railway line.<br />
275
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Due to the high number <strong>of</strong> tunnels in this part <strong>of</strong> the route, great quantity <strong>of</strong> excavated<br />
material is expected from most <strong>of</strong> the envisaged tunnels. Part <strong>of</strong> this material will be used as<br />
subground for the railway line , while the rest will be stored in several disposal sites or used<br />
as material for recultivation <strong>of</strong> some open pit along the route.<br />
On the stretch from the intersection Preseka to the station Izdeglavje, the route passes<br />
through rather complicated terrain with high number <strong>of</strong> natural cuttings and dales, mostly on<br />
calcareous material. Soils on limestone in this part are exceptionally vulnerable to erosion<br />
due to shallow solum, usually inclined terrain and weak vegetation. In circumstances like<br />
this, fertile layer may be quickly taken away and the resulting damage is irreversible, and<br />
therefore extraordinary prevention measures should be undertaken.<br />
High number <strong>of</strong> lateral cross-cuts with limestone is also envisaged (total <strong>of</strong> 8 bridges have<br />
been planned with a total length <strong>of</strong> 1025.00 m and two tunnels with a total length <strong>of</strong> 530 m).<br />
The material to be obtained by excavations <strong>of</strong> tunnels and lateral excavations could be used<br />
for construction <strong>of</strong> the embankment <strong>of</strong> the railway line in the area <strong>of</strong> Izdeglavje and Belcista<br />
fields. Terrain is rather difficult to access, and considering the high number <strong>of</strong> structures, this<br />
will require opening <strong>of</strong> new access roads in addition to existing ones. This part <strong>of</strong> the section<br />
will be subject to the same possible impacts <strong>of</strong> soil contamination and degradation.<br />
On the part <strong>of</strong> the route from the station Izdeglavje-intersection Meseiste, for the first several<br />
kilometers (130-135 km) the route runs over alluvial sediments and follows the logics <strong>of</strong> the<br />
terrain, without major construction interventions that would have impacts on soils, except the<br />
cutting at the hill Veternik, which is <strong>of</strong> calcareous origin. We should point out that, in the part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the section close to the village Botun, the route passes through the lowest part <strong>of</strong> Belcista<br />
Field over alluviums with possible high subsoil waters which gravitate to the river Sateska.<br />
There is a need to undertake special measures to prevent contamination <strong>of</strong> these soils<br />
because they are light and infiltration <strong>of</strong> toxic matters in ground and overground<br />
watercourses would be easy.<br />
Above the village Botun, the route enters a tunnel (no. 11 ), and then crosses the river by<br />
bridge in order to avoid torrents on the hills Korito and Koprnica. Then, the route makes<br />
several more crossings over the river and the highway, and by way <strong>of</strong> several cuttings and<br />
two tunnels (12 and 13) exits from Struga Field where it runs over alluvial and colluvial soils<br />
on the right side <strong>of</strong> the highway up to the intersection Meseista. This is rather difficult part<br />
passing through an area <strong>of</strong> regosols and shallow brown forest soils on inclined terrain, which<br />
in case <strong>of</strong> degraded vegetation will be subjected to accelerated erosion. Such case has been<br />
identified on the stretch 137-139 km where due to intensive wood cutting and opening <strong>of</strong> a<br />
forest road, there is occurrence <strong>of</strong> intensive erosion processes and potential earthslide.<br />
From the intersection Meseista to the Station Struga, the section runs first through slightly<br />
inclined colluvial soils, on which weak traces <strong>of</strong> erosion are visible. The bigger inclination<br />
and weak filtration <strong>of</strong> heavy (by mechanical composition) colluviums induce the occurrence<br />
<strong>of</strong> major quantities <strong>of</strong> water which runs <strong>of</strong>f on the surface. In the central part <strong>of</strong> Struga Field,<br />
the railway runs over alluvial and gley soils which have not been subjected to erosion<br />
processes, owing to the flat terrain and good water permeability. Shallow ground water has<br />
been identified, which given the long rainy period preceding the investigations, as well as the<br />
high water level <strong>of</strong> the Lake, is not strange at all. Particular attention should be devoted to<br />
these soils during the construction phase <strong>of</strong> the railway, in order to avoid excessive<br />
trampling and compaction <strong>of</strong> the top soil, as well as degradation <strong>of</strong> the drainage canal<br />
network which is anyway in poor condition. If the above considerations are not taken into<br />
account, there may be occurrence <strong>of</strong> excessive humidity <strong>of</strong> these soils and surface waters<br />
and thus disorder in water-air regime <strong>of</strong> soils and consequently their reduced value as<br />
agricultural areas.<br />
Section 2 covers the part from the Station Struga-Zagracani, Radolista-Radozda.<br />
276
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
With regard to this section <strong>of</strong> the route, concerning the impact <strong>of</strong> construction on destruction<br />
<strong>of</strong> the top soil and intensification <strong>of</strong> erosion processes, the part <strong>of</strong> the route from 163-165 km<br />
is especially interesting; there, it runs along the highway in the areas <strong>of</strong> the villages<br />
Frangovo and M.Vlaj, on inclined terrain <strong>of</strong> cultivated areas and soils, formed on colluvial<br />
sediments, produced by material sliding from higher terrains beneath soils formed on<br />
limestone. This is a zone <strong>of</strong> activity <strong>of</strong> several torrents the erosive processes on which may<br />
intensify and induce earthslides if the top soil is destroyed. Then, the route proceeds through<br />
a longer and a shorter tunnel and several bridges in the zone <strong>of</strong> soils on limestone and<br />
dolomite, as well as complex <strong>of</strong> cement forest soils and regosols.<br />
Disintegration <strong>of</strong> soil structure (soil compaction)<br />
This is another way <strong>of</strong> soil degradation which occurs during linear projects development, as<br />
a result <strong>of</strong> the activity <strong>of</strong> construction mechanization. The area <strong>of</strong> Struga Field will be<br />
subjected to this type <strong>of</strong> soil degradation in particular, because the soils are formed on a<br />
sediment with a deep soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile, low content <strong>of</strong> organic matter and weak stability <strong>of</strong><br />
structural aggregates. Also, colluvial soils in the area <strong>of</strong> the villages Drugovo, Meseista and<br />
Zagracani will be subject to compaction. Soil compaction induces disruption <strong>of</strong> the soil<br />
structure and porosity <strong>of</strong> the soil and water-air regime, which in turn leads to reduction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
infiltration and filtration ability. As a result <strong>of</strong> this, surface waters occur, which in combination<br />
with the high groundwater level, as is the case in the river <strong>of</strong> Crn Drim river flow (in the zone<br />
<strong>of</strong> gley soils) and above the village Kalista, may cause excessive humidity <strong>of</strong> surrounding<br />
areas and intensification <strong>of</strong> gley processes. Therefore, existing access roads should be used<br />
to the maximum during the route construction, and care should be taken during the<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> the embankment on the route in order to avoid disruption <strong>of</strong> natural flows <strong>of</strong><br />
ground waters as this may cause formation <strong>of</strong> water ponds along the route.<br />
Soil conversion (soil sealing)<br />
Conversion <strong>of</strong> soil, together with erosion, is the heaviest form <strong>of</strong> soil degradation, because<br />
the soil as natural resource is lost irreversibly, both in economic (for agricultural production)<br />
and ecological terms (as natural habitat fore different plant and animal species).<br />
Several zones which are particularly vulnerable to this type <strong>of</strong> degradation in the investigated<br />
area include: alluvial and gley soils in the areas <strong>of</strong> Izdeglavje, Belcista and Struga Field, due<br />
to their economic importance as agricultural land for the local economy and soils formed on<br />
limestone and dolomite which are relict soil types the formation <strong>of</strong> which takes tens <strong>of</strong><br />
thousands <strong>of</strong> years.<br />
4.7.2 Operational phase<br />
During the railway operation, the soil will be mostly under threat <strong>of</strong> erosion and<br />
contamination. Contamination would be product <strong>of</strong> the following processes:<br />
- Contamination from fuels and derivatives released from the locomotive along the<br />
route and at stations.<br />
- Contamination <strong>of</strong> soils with substances from gas emissions. The most significant<br />
pollution with gas substances and aerosols occurs at a distance <strong>of</strong> 10 meters from<br />
the railway, because <strong>of</strong> the rapid sedimentation <strong>of</strong> substances that are heavier than<br />
air.<br />
- Waste waters from toilets and maintenance <strong>of</strong> station halts.<br />
- Solid waste (organic and inorganic). Its production originates from passenger<br />
transport and around station facilities.<br />
277
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
- Pouring <strong>of</strong> materials that are transported (liquid fuels, ores, etc.). This is one more<br />
dangerous source <strong>of</strong> soil pollution in the nearest part to the railway line during its<br />
operation.<br />
- Treatment <strong>of</strong> the vegetation around the railway line with herbicides.<br />
Erosive processes that may occur during the railway construction are located in the<br />
surrounding <strong>of</strong> facilities (bridges, tunnels, underpasses, drainage canals, etc.), as well as at<br />
embankments and support walls <strong>of</strong> cuttings.<br />
4.8 Impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> air and climate<br />
Electric railway line is a transport mode that is the least harmful for the environment. The<br />
main air emissions and impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> ambient air are related mostly to the<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> the railway, generated by construction machines, while in the course <strong>of</strong> its<br />
operation those generated indirectly prevail, namely: increased emission intensity during<br />
manipulation <strong>of</strong> the freight at certain stations with transfer vehicles, increased presence <strong>of</strong><br />
road vehicles at such stations, use <strong>of</strong> diesel locomotive, etc.<br />
4.8.1 Construction phase<br />
Each <strong>of</strong> the construction phases assumes some intensity <strong>of</strong> gases and dust emission from<br />
the activities, machines and materials used. The main sources <strong>of</strong> emission are:<br />
Leveling <strong>of</strong> the terrain, excavation and rails placement<br />
Placement <strong>of</strong> signals and telephone lines<br />
Placement <strong>of</strong> electric installation.<br />
As no specification <strong>of</strong> the equipment to be used and dynamics <strong>of</strong> use are available,<br />
calculation will be based on the common CORINAIR values and certain values recognized in<br />
practice. The length <strong>of</strong> the line, according to the proposed design, is 62.5 km. It includes<br />
tunnels in a length <strong>of</strong> 12 400 m, viaducts in a total length <strong>of</strong> 3 130 m, as well as auxiliary<br />
facilities. The table below presents average emissions from construction machines for 1 km<br />
constructed line.<br />
Table 49 Average emissions from construction machines<br />
Construction phase CO NOx VOC PМ10* N 2O CH 4 NH 3 CO 2 SO 2<br />
Leveling, digging and placement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the rail<br />
Емисија (kg/km)<br />
4 2 16 1 0 0 0 177 0<br />
Signalisation 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 13 0<br />
Electrical equipment 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 50 0<br />
Total 5 2 19 1 0 0 0 240 0<br />
*emission <strong>of</strong> the treated material is not calculated<br />
According to Australian guideline on the assessment <strong>of</strong> emissions during excavations, dust<br />
emission is calculated by the following equation:<br />
EF<br />
U<br />
2.2<br />
PM<br />
0.75<br />
0.001184<br />
1 ER<br />
10 1. 4<br />
PM 10<br />
M<br />
2<br />
1.3<br />
278
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
where:<br />
EF PM10 – factor <strong>of</strong> emission <strong>of</strong> particles with diameter smaller than 10 m (kg/t processed<br />
material)<br />
U – wind speed (m/s)<br />
M – humidity <strong>of</strong> material (%)<br />
ER PM10 – efficiency <strong>of</strong> emission reduction<br />
At wind speed <strong>of</strong> 2.2 m/s and humidity <strong>of</strong> the earth mass <strong>of</strong> 5%, without reduction system,<br />
the PM10 emission will be 0.25 g/t. Taking into account that 51 480 m 3 or around 128.700 t<br />
<strong>of</strong> earth are treated for each kilometer railway, then the emission <strong>of</strong> flying dust from<br />
construction sites will be 31.4 kg.<br />
Emission factor for uploading and unloading <strong>of</strong> dampers is 0.0043 kg/t, or 553.4 kg/km. It<br />
turns that the total emission <strong>of</strong> PM 10 , at a construction site <strong>of</strong> 1 km, is 584.8 kg.<br />
The most unfavourable alternative for the environment is to carry out the construction works<br />
in a manner that each next kilometer is constructed upon the completion <strong>of</strong> the previous one.<br />
In such case, construction <strong>of</strong> one kilometer railway would be completed in around 22 days,<br />
and the intensity <strong>of</strong> dust emission would amount 0.307 g/s. According to the guideline for<br />
determination <strong>of</strong> BAT <strong>of</strong> the English Environmental Agency, the contribution <strong>of</strong> activities is<br />
determined by the following expression:<br />
PC<br />
RR<br />
DF<br />
where:<br />
PC-contribution <strong>of</strong> the process in the pollutant concentration increase, μg/m 3<br />
RR-quantity <strong>of</strong> emission, g/s<br />
DF-dispersion factor<br />
g<br />
3<br />
m<br />
g<br />
s<br />
Dispersion factor depends on the level <strong>of</strong> release, and its numerical value <strong>of</strong> long-term<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> the emission on the ground is 148.<br />
Taking all values into account, the following concentrations <strong>of</strong> harmful substances into the air<br />
around construction sites are obtained as a result <strong>of</strong> the activities <strong>of</strong> railway construction.<br />
Table 50 Concentration <strong>of</strong> harmful substances in the air around construction sites<br />
Construction phase CO NOx VOC PМ10* N 2O CH 4 NH 3 CO 2 SO 2<br />
Leveling, digging and<br />
placement <strong>of</strong> the rail<br />
Концентрација како придонес на активностите (μg/m 3 )<br />
0,31 0.16 1.24 45.53 0 0 0 13.75 0<br />
Signalisation 0 0 0.08 0 0 0 0 1.01 0<br />
Electrical equipment 0.08 0 0.16 0 0 0 0 3.88 0<br />
Total 0.39 0.16 1.48 1.01 0 0 0 18.64 0<br />
279
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
*Emissions from earth excavation and manipulation are included<br />
According to the results obtained, the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line has minimum and<br />
short-term impact on the quality <strong>of</strong> air.<br />
4.8.2 Operational phase<br />
Electric traction trains have been envisaged to run over the railway line, which will eliminate<br />
all emissions into the air. Certain impact on the quality <strong>of</strong> air can occur at stations and<br />
intersections due to maneuvering activities <strong>of</strong> diesel locomotives, unloading, storage and<br />
operations <strong>of</strong> road vehicles. These impacts are minimum, but there is no sufficient data<br />
available to carry out a quantitative assessment. Due to the nature <strong>of</strong> the railway operation –<br />
linear facility for railway transport to be used for transport <strong>of</strong> passengers and material goods,<br />
impacts on climate change are not expected either during the railway construction nor during<br />
its operational phase.<br />
4.9 Impacts <strong>of</strong> noise<br />
4.9.1 Construction phase<br />
The construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line is related to a series <strong>of</strong> activities which cause noise.<br />
Table 51 presents machines that are most frequently used in railways construction and<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> noise at reference distance <strong>of</strong> 15 m from the source. The values in the table are<br />
based on data from the available literature.<br />
Table 51 Noise levels from construction equipment<br />
Noise during construction Level <strong>of</strong> noise (dBА) 15<br />
m from the source<br />
Source <strong>of</strong> noise during<br />
construction<br />
Level <strong>of</strong> noise (dBА)<br />
15 m from the source<br />
Comresor 81 drill 101<br />
Digger 80 drill 96<br />
Ballast Equalizer 82 Pneumatic toll 85<br />
Ballast Tamper 83 pump 76<br />
Compactor 82 chainsaw 90<br />
Concreate mixing 85 Rock drill 98<br />
Pump for concreate 82 roller 74<br />
Vibrator for concreate 76 saw 76<br />
Crane 88 Shaking mashine 83<br />
Mobile crane 83 Scrap mashine 89<br />
bulldozer 85 shovel 82<br />
generator 81 pushing 77<br />
Mashine for flattening 85 woodcutter 84<br />
Pneumatic gun 85 Track loader 85<br />
Dneumatic drill 88 track 88<br />
Considering that different equipment is used in different construction phases, USEPA<br />
recommends the following values by phases:<br />
Table 52 Noise levels from railway line construction sites (15 m from source)<br />
280
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Construction phase Noise with all equipment Noise with minimum equipment<br />
Cleaning <strong>of</strong> the fiels 84 84<br />
excavation 89 79<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> the base 78 78<br />
Construction 87 75<br />
Finishing 89 75<br />
Noise spread is a logarithm function expressed as<br />
D<br />
D<br />
( G<br />
1<br />
D<br />
Leq<br />
Leq<br />
ref ) 20 log<br />
10<br />
10 log<br />
10<br />
Dref<br />
Where:<br />
L eq (ref) – equivalent level <strong>of</strong> noise at reference distance from the source<br />
D ref – reference distance <strong>of</strong> noise from the source<br />
D – distance from the source<br />
G - Factor <strong>of</strong> the terrain<br />
Taking into account the heighest values and neglecting the terrain factor, the most<br />
unfavourable scenario <strong>of</strong> noise spread around construction sites is established, based on<br />
which the diagrame on Figure 71 was made.<br />
ref<br />
Figure 71 Reduction <strong>of</strong> noise with reference to the source (construction phase)<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the works will be carried out outside <strong>of</strong> the populated places, without sensitive<br />
receptors. Additionally, the noise during the construction is an annoyance <strong>of</strong> temporary<br />
(short-term) nature, so the impacts are not significant, except in the immediate vicinity <strong>of</strong><br />
construction sites. Impacts at a distance <strong>of</strong> 400 m are within the limits below 60 dBA during<br />
active period. The intensity <strong>of</strong> work during night will be at minimum and this will reduce the<br />
impacts on animals.<br />
281
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
4.9.2 Operational phase<br />
The US Federal Transit Administration (USA-FTA) has prepared guidelines on the<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> the impacts on noise and vibrations from the transport. The assessment<br />
phases consist <strong>of</strong>:<br />
1. Specification <strong>of</strong> reference level at source – the procedure starts with estimate <strong>of</strong><br />
noise level at sources;<br />
2. Conversion <strong>of</strong> the reference noise level at the source <strong>of</strong> exposure into Leq(h) or<br />
Leq(dvn);<br />
3. Assessment <strong>of</strong> noise spread.<br />
Noise in the railway transport originates from:<br />
Locomotive<br />
o Drive motors<br />
o Auxiliary installations<br />
o Contact between wheels and rails<br />
o Breaks<br />
o Sirens<br />
Wagons<br />
o Contact between wheels and rails<br />
o Breaks<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> compositions and speed <strong>of</strong> trains are significant factor for noise. In fact, the<br />
speed <strong>of</strong> the train determines the predominant source <strong>of</strong> noise. In case <strong>of</strong> diesel<br />
locomotives, the noise from engines is predominant at lower speeds, while the source <strong>of</strong><br />
noise at higher speeds is the contact between wheels and rails.<br />
Under the optimistic scenario, the maximum number <strong>of</strong> compositions to run over the line<br />
daily in 2040 will amount 39, out <strong>of</strong> which 14 passenger and 25 freight. This number has<br />
been accepted for further calculations along the whole line.<br />
The levels <strong>of</strong> exposure to noise from different sources in the railway transport according to<br />
FTA [1] are given in Table 53.<br />
Table 53 Levels <strong>of</strong> exposure at noise from different sources <strong>of</strong> the railway transport<br />
Source/type<br />
Intensity(dB)<br />
Local trains Locomotive Diesel - electric 92<br />
Electric 90<br />
Diesel multy units Diesel 85<br />
Buzzers 400 m with crossing 110<br />
Choaches Scrap, welded reils 82<br />
Reilway transit welded reils 82<br />
Tranzit buzzer 200 m with crossing 93<br />
Transformation <strong>of</strong> exposure at noise from the locomotive (SEL ref ), in a form <strong>of</strong> Leq(h), is<br />
carried out according to the following expression:<br />
where:<br />
L<br />
S<br />
( h)<br />
SELref<br />
10 log( Nlok<br />
) 10 log 10 log( V )<br />
S<br />
ref<br />
35.6<br />
eq<br />
2<br />
282
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
L eq (ref) –equivalent level <strong>of</strong> noise at reference distance from the source<br />
S ref<br />
S<br />
N -<br />
–reference speed<br />
–current speed<br />
number <strong>of</strong> locomotives in compositions<br />
V - frequency (number <strong>of</strong> compositions per hour 10·log(3600)-35.6) translation <strong>of</strong><br />
seconds into hours<br />
Determination <strong>of</strong> hourly equivalent level <strong>of</strong> noise for a day, night and evening is performed<br />
so that the appropriate frequency is inserted in the expression. To calculate the referent<br />
hourly level <strong>of</strong> noise from wagons, we apply the following expression:<br />
L<br />
S<br />
( h)<br />
SELref<br />
10 log( Nvagoni)<br />
20 log 10 log( V )<br />
S<br />
eqV<br />
3<br />
ref<br />
in which variables have the same meaning as above. The average daily equivalent noise at<br />
reference distance is calculated as:<br />
10<br />
10<br />
L 10 log 12 10 4 10 8 10 13.8<br />
4<br />
dvn<br />
L ( d )<br />
L ( v)<br />
L ( n)<br />
eq<br />
eq<br />
eq<br />
10<br />
35.6<br />
In the above expression, 13.8 is 10·log(24/10). Taking into account the number <strong>of</strong><br />
compositions and taking the maximum speed as constant, we get the values <strong>of</strong> the reference<br />
equivalent noise at daily level, as presented in Table 54.<br />
283
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Table 54 Calculation <strong>of</strong> reference equivalent noise (15 m from the source)<br />
Passanger<br />
Locomotive SEL ref LeqL(h)d 53,6<br />
SEL(loko)ref 90 LeqL(h)v 52,4<br />
No <strong>of</strong> coaches locomotiveN(lok) 1 LeqL(h)n 52,4<br />
K 10<br />
Speed 100<br />
Frequention 14<br />
ден 0,6667<br />
вечер 0,5<br />
ноќ 0,5<br />
Coaches<br />
No <strong>of</strong> coaches 7 LeqL(h)d 55,0<br />
SEL(vagon)ref 82 LeqL(h)v 53,8<br />
LeqL(h)n 53,8<br />
Freight<br />
Locomotive<br />
SEL(loko)ref 90 LeqL(d) 56,3<br />
N(loko) 1 Leq(v) 55,4<br />
K 10 Leq(n) 54,1<br />
Speed 100<br />
Frequention 25<br />
1,25<br />
1<br />
0,75<br />
Coaches<br />
N(vagon) 15 LeqV(d) 61,1<br />
SEL(vagon)ref 82 Leq(v) 60,1<br />
Leq(n) 58,8<br />
Total for periods Leq(d) 63,5<br />
Leq(v) 62,5<br />
Leq(n) 61,6<br />
Leq(dvn) 63,0<br />
284
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
If the obtained level <strong>of</strong> 63 dBA is substituted in the equation (1) we will get the curve <strong>of</strong> noise<br />
spread from the railway transport on the line in its least favourable variant. That curve is<br />
shown on Figure 72.<br />
According to these results, at a distance <strong>of</strong> 120 m from the railway line, the level <strong>of</strong> noise<br />
declines to 45 dBA which corresponds with the natural phone. This means that at a distance<br />
<strong>of</strong> 120 m from the source, the noise will be lower than natural phone by around 3 dBA.<br />
Already at 250 m, the noise from this railway line will not have any notable impact.<br />
Therefore, the field spreading to 120 m left and right from the line is marked on the layout<br />
map.<br />
Figure 72 Noise decline with reference to source (operational phase)<br />
Graphical presentation <strong>of</strong> noise impact on the affected area can be found in Appendix 10.<br />
4.10 Solid waste management<br />
During the railway line construction, the work will involve new material, i.e. a new line will be<br />
located and set up and thus there will be no waste generated from reconstruction (mostly<br />
construction waste and demolition waste). During the operation and functioning <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway line, different types <strong>of</strong> waste will be generated. These include municipal waste,<br />
packaging waste, waste from construction activities, etc. Minor quantity <strong>of</strong> hazardous waste<br />
will occur among other wastes.<br />
4.10.1 Waste during construction<br />
The waste to be generated during the railway construction will originate from construction<br />
activities and construction industry. Construction operations generate non-hazardous waste.<br />
Construction equipment that will be used for construction may be used for several times, and<br />
thus reduce waste from construction activities. Fractions <strong>of</strong> waste that will be generated as a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> construction activities are related to the types <strong>of</strong> materials and equipment that will<br />
be used during construction (earth and concrete works, assemblage, electric and<br />
mechanical, finishing works, etc.).<br />
Maintenance <strong>of</strong> the mechanization to be used during the railway construction will not be<br />
performed along the route <strong>of</strong> the line, i.e. on the location itself, but it will be taken to<br />
285
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
adequate service centres in the nearby populated places, where authorized service<br />
operators exist. For these reasons, no waste specific for this type <strong>of</strong> activity will be<br />
generated (accumulators, lubrication, greases and oils, used tires, etc.).<br />
Solid waste generated by the work contractors/workers during the railway construction, will<br />
be approximately identical in composition with the waste generated in households.<br />
Inert waste originated from excavation or from tunnels opening is natural material (earth or<br />
stone) which may be reused in the railway construction, for embankments or as buffer in the<br />
line setting. Based on the calculations made on cross-section pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the railway, the<br />
expected material to be dealt with by the contractor <strong>of</strong> works is shown in the following table.<br />
Table 55 Amounts <strong>of</strong> inert waste<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> activity Quantity m 3<br />
Excavation <strong>of</strong> humus 533.840<br />
Excavation 2.797.240<br />
Embankment 2.498.356<br />
Buffer 167.304<br />
Crush stone 170.830<br />
gravel 21.577<br />
The next table shows expected waste types during the phase <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />
line, presented in accordance with the List <strong>of</strong> wastes (Official gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no. 100/05).<br />
Table 56 List <strong>of</strong> wastes<br />
12 WASTES FROM SHAPING AND PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL SURFACE<br />
TREATMENT OF METALS AND PLASTICS<br />
12 01 13 welding wastes<br />
15 – WASTE PACKAGING; ABSORBENTS, WIPING CLOTHS, FILTER<br />
MATERIALS AND PROTECTIVE CLOTHING NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED<br />
15 01 packaging (including separately collected municipal packaging waste)<br />
17 – CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTES (INCLUDING EXCAVATED<br />
SOIL FROM CONTAMINATED SITES)<br />
17 01 01 concrete<br />
17 03 bituminous mixtures, coal tar and tarred products *)<br />
17 04 metals (including their alloys)<br />
17 05 04 soil and stones<br />
17 06 04 insulation materials<br />
17 09 04 mixed construction and demolition wastes<br />
20 – MUNICIPAL WASTES (HOUSEHOLD WASTE AND SIMILAR COMMERCIAL,<br />
INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL WASTES) INCLUDING SEPARATELY<br />
COLLECTED FRACTIONS<br />
20 01 separately collected fractions *)<br />
20 02 01 biodegradable waste<br />
20 03 01 mixed municipal waste<br />
20 03 04 septic tank sludge<br />
20 03 07 bulky waste<br />
286
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
*) Depending on composition, it may be categorized as hazardous waste<br />
4.10.2 Operational phase<br />
The waste to be generated during the operational phase <strong>of</strong> the railway line will originate from<br />
its maintenance or by the users <strong>of</strong> the railway transport and it has municipal nature at<br />
stations or intersections.<br />
The types <strong>of</strong> waste generated include consumables, spare parts and equipment. Dynamics<br />
<strong>of</strong> generation <strong>of</strong> these wastes is related to the maintenance and to the frequency <strong>of</strong><br />
passengers.<br />
4.11 Socio-economic aspects, ownership aspects and impacts on revenues<br />
The planned route <strong>of</strong> the railway line, due to its length, will pass through state and privately<br />
owned land (mostly agricultural land and cultivable areas). As a structure, it will not occupy a<br />
lot <strong>of</strong> space in width, which implies negligible impact on places related to agricultural<br />
activities or related to economic revenues.<br />
Permanent loss <strong>of</strong> land, forest and other properties, as well as potential damage during the<br />
railway construction or operation, will be subject <strong>of</strong> compensation in accordance with the<br />
Macedonian legislation.<br />
Public Enterprise “Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s”-Skopje will carry out appropriate process <strong>of</strong> land<br />
expropriation with each natural or legal person, owner <strong>of</strong> land which is required for the<br />
project implementation.<br />
4.12 Visual effects/impacts on landscape<br />
4.12.1 Construction phase<br />
Landscape in the frames <strong>of</strong> construction zones established along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
will be notably modified during the construction. The number <strong>of</strong> construction zones, their size<br />
and locations must be specified in the technical documentation for building. These zones,<br />
together with the sites for storage <strong>of</strong> construction materials and assemblage segments for<br />
the railway line, will be visible and cause changes in the aesthetics <strong>of</strong> the landscape. Yet,<br />
these changes will be <strong>of</strong> short-term nature, their duration being equal to the duration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway construction itself. Therefore, as well as for the fact that the route will pass through<br />
forest landscape in most <strong>of</strong> the corridor, the said changes will be negligible.<br />
Upon the completion <strong>of</strong> the construction works, and in accordance with the obligations <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Law on Building, micro relief and vegetation in these zones will be subject to restoration.<br />
4.12.2 Operational phase<br />
At certain sites, the new railway line will induce limited visual changes in the existing<br />
landscape and paysage. As a result <strong>of</strong> the narrow corridor occupied by the line, the length<br />
and the number <strong>of</strong> tunnels, proximity <strong>of</strong> the regional road Kicevo-Ohrid-border with <strong>Albania</strong>,<br />
as well as distance <strong>of</strong> populated places, it is expected that the visual effect <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
will be insignificant.<br />
No landscapes with significant landscape values, tourist and recreational zones, historical<br />
and architectural monuments have been identified in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the route, the aesthetic<br />
values <strong>of</strong> which would be in conflict with it. There are no recorded, designated or proposed<br />
areas for protection <strong>of</strong> the landscape diversity in the close surrounding <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
Kicevo-Lin in the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia 2002-2020.<br />
Apart from the careful planning <strong>of</strong> the railway route, it will need to be cleared from<br />
vegetation, trees and part <strong>of</strong> the forest management units, but due to the small width <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway, interventions will be minor. In addition to this, execution <strong>of</strong> excavations and erection<br />
287
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
<strong>of</strong> embankments, setting <strong>of</strong> bridges that cross the rivers Treska and Sateska, as well as<br />
development <strong>of</strong> viaducts (crossing dales and trenches) will contribute ti the modification <strong>of</strong><br />
visual characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area concerned. Notable visual changes will occur at points <strong>of</strong><br />
intersection with local roads.<br />
4.13 Impacts on forests<br />
Construction activities along the route will induce major changes in many domains.<br />
4.13.1 Construction phase<br />
1. The so called soil sealing, i.e. conversion from productive into unproductive land will<br />
take place, and in this case permanent conversion <strong>of</strong> forest into building land by<br />
which economic and generally useful functions and values <strong>of</strong> forest will be<br />
permanently lost;<br />
2. Construction <strong>of</strong> access roads, other infrastructure and facilities will have additional<br />
impacts through disruption <strong>of</strong> natural ecosystems and increased amount <strong>of</strong> expected<br />
negative effects and damages;<br />
3. Links between different ecosystems will be broken and therefore permanent<br />
negative impacts are expected in the food chain, movement and reproduction <strong>of</strong><br />
animals, etc. There is also direct impact on the established balance, cycles,<br />
processes and dynamics <strong>of</strong> sustainable development <strong>of</strong> biological development;<br />
4. Forest fragmentation will occur in certain sections which will have negative<br />
reflections on economic activity;<br />
5. Change in the manner <strong>of</strong> operation in certain parts along the railway line, i.e. at<br />
places <strong>of</strong> planned resurrection wood cuts and various other activities aimed at<br />
improvement <strong>of</strong> productivity will result in change <strong>of</strong> forestry measures due to the line<br />
construction, which will burden the forest managing enterprise financially. The<br />
overall changes envisaged will take place in around 1820 ha.<br />
4.13.2 Operational phase<br />
In the course <strong>of</strong> the operational phase <strong>of</strong> the line, the most significant impact will be<br />
increased risk <strong>of</strong> fire.<br />
- risk <strong>of</strong> forest fire occurrence from the sparkles during breaking and other operations <strong>of</strong><br />
rail vehicles.<br />
4.14 Impacts on erosion and deposits during construction and operational phases<br />
The following impacts can be expected during construction and operational phases <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway line:<br />
1. Disruption <strong>of</strong> the established regime <strong>of</strong> water running, with possible severe negative<br />
within the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line;<br />
2. Increased hazards <strong>of</strong> erosion processes, including even stability <strong>of</strong> slopes due to<br />
earth works. Considering the great volume <strong>of</strong> construction works, especially<br />
voluminous earth works, excavations and embankments along the line route will<br />
288
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
cause intensification <strong>of</strong> erosive processes, which will have negative effects on the<br />
quality <strong>of</strong> waters;<br />
3. Turbidity <strong>of</strong> watercourses will occur frequently which will have negative effects on the<br />
life in the watercourses and Ohrid Lake; Processes <strong>of</strong> transportation and<br />
retransportation <strong>of</strong> deposits along hydrographic network <strong>of</strong> Sateska river are<br />
expected to intensify. Such processes will have negative effects on the ecosystem <strong>of</strong><br />
Ohrid Lake;<br />
4. Due to huge earth works, upon compensation activities, a surplus <strong>of</strong> around 300 000<br />
m 3 is expected for disposal. This will result in soil degradation (type: change in<br />
outlook), but there is a danger <strong>of</strong> erosive processes in disposed material.<br />
4.15 Impacts on natural heritage<br />
The planned route <strong>of</strong> the railway line will not pass close to any recorded protected natural<br />
heritage.<br />
During the elaboration <strong>of</strong> the planning documentation and detailed designing <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />
line, the Investor will observe the requirements for conservation <strong>of</strong> the recorded natural<br />
heritage stipulated in Macedonian legislation and multilateral agreements in the area <strong>of</strong><br />
nature conservation.<br />
This approach implies avoidance <strong>of</strong> potential construction activities, opening/use <strong>of</strong> access<br />
roads, as well as location <strong>of</strong> the railway route in areas around the recorded protected areas.<br />
This will ensure elimination <strong>of</strong> potential direct impacts thereon.<br />
4.16 Impacts on cultural heritage<br />
During elaboration <strong>of</strong> the planning documentation and detailed designing <strong>of</strong> the railway line,<br />
the Investor will observe the requirements for conservation <strong>of</strong> recorded cultural heritage<br />
incorporated in Macedonian legislation and multilateral agreements in the area <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />
There are no archeological sites and areas with cultural heritage along the planned route <strong>of</strong><br />
the railway line that would pose limiting factor in the process <strong>of</strong> railway line planning and<br />
designing. During the railway construction, the Institute for Monuments Conservation from<br />
Ohrid will perform monitoring. In case existence <strong>of</strong> artifacts is established or indications <strong>of</strong><br />
potential archeological good on the location during earth and construction works, the<br />
activities will be terminated and the Administration for Cultural Heritage under the Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
|Culture will be notified duly.<br />
Impacts on cultural archeological heritage are not expected during the operational phase <strong>of</strong><br />
the railway line.<br />
4.17 Impacts <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />
Impacts <strong>of</strong> radiation are not expected during construction works and railway line operation.<br />
4.18 Impacts <strong>of</strong> odour<br />
Impacts <strong>of</strong> odour are not expected during construction works and railway line operation.<br />
4.19 Cumulative impacts<br />
Changes in environment induced by the activities in combination with other activities from<br />
the past, present or future activities which are similar with the activities planned within the<br />
observed area, are called cumulative impacts. Based on this, in relation to the planned<br />
289
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
railway line, cumulative effects may occur as a result <strong>of</strong> other existing or future projects <strong>of</strong><br />
the same kind along its corridor (highway, regional road).<br />
In the area near the rote, construction, i.e. extension <strong>of</strong> the existing main road Kicevo Ohrid<br />
to achieve the level <strong>of</strong> highway has been planned. Expected cumulative effects include noise<br />
and air emissions. They are expected to take place in a short time interval, and therefore we<br />
may assess them as negligible.<br />
4.20 Matrix <strong>of</strong> environmental impacts<br />
Identification the impacts <strong>of</strong> project activities on different elements <strong>of</strong> the environment has<br />
been made in order to establish link between the activities in all phases <strong>of</strong> the project life<br />
cycle and the state <strong>of</strong> the environment in the afected area, socio-economic and health<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> the population living and working in the project area.<br />
While assessing the impacts, criteria for environmental impact assessment have been set<br />
and matrix prepared to assess all impacts on different elements <strong>of</strong> the environment.<br />
Criteria for environmental impacts assessment are presented in the following table.<br />
Table 57 Criteria for environmental impact assessment<br />
Criteria<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> the impact due to the selected criteria<br />
Caracter <strong>of</strong> the impact Positive (+) Negative (-) None-neutral 0<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> the impact Direct Indirect Cumulative<br />
Density <strong>of</strong> the impact Big Midle Small<br />
Area <strong>of</strong> the impact Area Volumen Dispersion<br />
Time <strong>of</strong> existence Immediately After some period (h/d/y)<br />
Time duration Short Midle Long<br />
Reversibility repeat Non-repeat<br />
Probability <strong>of</strong> the impact Certainly Probably Impossible<br />
Importancy Local Nacional Cross-border/global<br />
Appendix 11 contains the matrix <strong>of</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-lin construction.<br />
290
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
5 Measures for environmental impacts prevention or reduction<br />
5.1 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on geomorphology<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> geomorphology (relief), significant sites or endemic forms the integrity <strong>of</strong> which<br />
would be disrupted (modified) during the corridor development have not been recorded<br />
along the railway corridor (Kicevo-Lin), starting from Kicevo Valley, through the furthest<br />
northern parts <strong>of</strong> Ilinska Planina Mt., Debrca and Ohrid-Struga Valley. Therefore, no specific<br />
mitigation measures have been envisaged with regard to them.<br />
In addition to the above, along the entire corridor, no sites have been identified which could<br />
induce occurrence <strong>of</strong> snoslides or major earthslides due to the morphoplastics, that would<br />
pose obstacles to the normal performance <strong>of</strong> the transportation upon putting the railway line<br />
into operation. Therefore, specific measures for their mitigation have not been envisaged.<br />
With regard to potential occurrence <strong>of</strong> caverns (cave expansions) along the designed tunnel<br />
between the villages Judovo and Slivovo, the contractor will notify the competent authority<br />
(Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment and Physical Planning) in time. Furthermore, during the opening <strong>of</strong><br />
the tunnel above the village Radozda, care should be taken to prevent any damage <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cave church.<br />
5.2 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on biological diversity<br />
5.2.1 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on habitats and ecosystems<br />
5.2.1.1 Forest habitats<br />
Italian and Turkey oak forests<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line will result in direct destruction <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> the forest habitats,<br />
especially Italian and Turkey oak woods.<br />
Mitigation measure: Avoidance <strong>of</strong> excessive and unnecessary destruction <strong>of</strong> these woods<br />
and use <strong>of</strong> existing forest roads as access roads during railway line construction.<br />
Construction works in forest habitats should be limited to a minimum narrow belt around the<br />
route.<br />
Chestnut forests<br />
Mitigation measure: To avoid unnecessary destructing <strong>of</strong> chestnut trunks. Destruction <strong>of</strong><br />
chestnut trunks should be minimized, i.e. only on spots <strong>of</strong> direct passage <strong>of</strong> the line.<br />
5.2.1.2 Humid forests and riparian belts<br />
Riparian belts along Treska river<br />
Mitigation measure: the feet <strong>of</strong> the bridge columns near the village Popolzani (km<br />
107+811) should be positioned above the right bank <strong>of</strong> the river Treska, and on the left bank<br />
they should be away from the river to avoid destruction <strong>of</strong> alder riparian belts.<br />
Riparian belts along the rivers Brzdanska, Judovska and Vilipica<br />
According to the current route plan, there is no direct threat <strong>of</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> alder belts<br />
along the rivers Brzdanska, Judovska and Vilipica. Potential danger derives from the<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> access roads or rockslides during construction activities above the riverbeds.<br />
Mitigation measure: To avoid any destruction <strong>of</strong> alder belts along the rivers Brzdanska,<br />
Judovska and Vilipica. In case such degradations occur, recultivation <strong>of</strong> the natural<br />
vegetation will be accomplished as a matter <strong>of</strong> necessity.<br />
291
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Alder forests near the village Arbinovo<br />
Alder forest in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the village Arbinovo have been assessed as very highly<br />
sensitive. Under the current plan, the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line passes through alder woods.<br />
Figure 73 Marshy habitats near the village Arbinovo (alder woods, humid meadows and marsh<br />
communities)<br />
Mitigation measure: The proposed route is confirmed by one modification concerning the<br />
bridge solution between spot heights 124+334,42 and 124+489,37. This solution will improve<br />
the access <strong>of</strong> people to meadows and secure uninterrupted crossing <strong>of</strong> animal species, as<br />
well as uninterrupted air circulation.<br />
Alder belts in the foothill <strong>of</strong> the hill Kula near the village Pesocani<br />
The route <strong>of</strong> the line passes through alder belts along the river Sateska, in the foothill <strong>of</strong> Kula<br />
near the village Pesocani, posing direct threat <strong>of</strong> riparian vegetation destruction.<br />
Mitigation measure: The route should be diverted above these habitats, along the right side<br />
<strong>of</strong> the river Sateska and avoid its double cutting with the future railway line.<br />
5.2.1.3 Marshes<br />
Marshy habitats near the village Arbinovo (see the mitigation measure <strong>of</strong> alder forests<br />
near the village Arbinovo)<br />
Struga marsh (including the marsh in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the village Radolista)<br />
Mitigation measures:<br />
To avoid destruction <strong>of</strong> tree boundaries which are remains <strong>of</strong> the marshy vegetation<br />
(willows and poplars).<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> underground culverts for amphibians, reptiles and mammals.<br />
Reeds near the villages Volino and Moroista<br />
292
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Mitigation measure: Access roads, camping sites, temporary waste duming depots should<br />
not be developed in the reeds between villages Volino and Moroista.<br />
5.2.1.4 Humid meadows<br />
General mitigation measure: Unnecessary destruction <strong>of</strong> marsh vegetation has to be<br />
avoided. Where this is unavoidable, it should be limited to the minimum! This measure<br />
applies to all humid meadows (humid meadows along river Sateska, humid meadows<br />
between Volino and Moroiste)<br />
Humid meadows near the village Arbinovo. (see the mitigation measure for alder forests<br />
near the village Arbinovo).<br />
Humid meadows near the village Radolista (see mitigation measure in Struga marsh).<br />
Monitoring over the implementation <strong>of</strong> mitigation measures for the impacts on forest<br />
ecosystems, marsh habitats, meadows and some <strong>of</strong> the landscapes should be carried out<br />
during the railway line construction. Given the fact that the subject habitats and sites are<br />
spread along the entire route length, it would be preferable to hire an expert (biologist)<br />
during construction works along the entire route. The engagement <strong>of</strong> this expert in days is<br />
shown in the table with the measures for impacts reduction, including the monitoring<br />
measures.<br />
5.2.2 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on species<br />
In order to reduce direct death rate <strong>of</strong> animals from collision with the trains during the<br />
operational phase, the following will be necessary:<br />
removal <strong>of</strong> dead animals from the line vicinity,<br />
removal <strong>of</strong> food and other wastes near the line.<br />
Removal <strong>of</strong> potential sources <strong>of</strong> food will reduce the presence <strong>of</strong> animals near the railway<br />
line and thus the direct death rate will be reduced as well.<br />
Also, it is recommended snow cleaning and establishing clearings at every 50-100 meters. In<br />
this way, animals that would move on the line could escape on the clearings in time and thus<br />
the collisions-deaths <strong>of</strong> animals will be reduced, and the safety <strong>of</strong> the transport will be<br />
increased.<br />
The columns bearing the electricity conductors required for electricity supply to trains are<br />
expected to be used by birds as standing points, and even as potential nesting spots. In<br />
such cases, bird death cases are well documented and surprisingly high, especially during<br />
migration. Therefore, many European countries undertake activities for readaptation <strong>of</strong><br />
electric columns and attention is paid to the design <strong>of</strong> newly erected columns. The electric<br />
columns have so far not been subject <strong>of</strong> the required attention, but lately, especially in<br />
Germany, care is taken <strong>of</strong> the new design as well.<br />
Beards are subject to electrocution due to the circuit closed with their wings or body<br />
(earthing contact and phase or two phases). For this reason, larger birds are more exposed<br />
to electrocution. Bird species that will be particularly threatened by electrocution (but also<br />
collision) during the railway line operation include storks, herons and birds <strong>of</strong> pray.<br />
There are solutions for drastic reduction in death cases with birds, and all <strong>of</strong> them are based<br />
on preventing the birds to close the circuit (moving the wires away from each other and from<br />
the main column at a distance bigger than the range <strong>of</strong> the bird's wings):<br />
293
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
1. Supporters (insulators) should be hanged downwards (not upwards) on the<br />
horisontal partition <strong>of</strong> the columns.<br />
2. The lowest distance between two adjacent wires should be bigger than 140 cm.<br />
3. Distance between the peak <strong>of</strong> the column and the first wire beneath it, alike the<br />
distance between insulator and uninsulated part <strong>of</strong> the wire should exceede 60 cm. If wires<br />
are placed laterally <strong>of</strong> the column, they should be moved away <strong>of</strong> it on an insulated<br />
supporter which is at least 140 cm long.<br />
4. At each column, at least 60 cm <strong>of</strong> the wire should be insulated with plastic coating,<br />
on both sides <strong>of</strong> the supporter.<br />
During the railway line construction, sensitive aquatic ecosystems should be subjected to<br />
periodical inspections by relevant specialists, in order to secure proper application <strong>of</strong> the<br />
prevention measures. Sensitive sites include Ohrid Lake near the village Radozda, Crn Drim<br />
upon its exit from Struga, the river Sateska near the villages Pesocani and Volino, and river<br />
Treska in the region <strong>of</strong> the village Popolzani. It is also recommended to perform periodical<br />
sampling <strong>of</strong> water for chemical analysis, paying particular attention on the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
hydrocarbon compounds, nutrients (phosphates, nitrates, ammonium) and bacteria (total<br />
and coliform). In parallel, laboratory analysis should be made <strong>of</strong> the composition and<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> benthos diatomea as one <strong>of</strong> the relevant indicators <strong>of</strong> water pollution. It is<br />
recommended such analysis to be carried out every two months.<br />
5.3 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on the functionality <strong>of</strong> landscapes<br />
Hilly rural landscape<br />
General measure: To prevent unnecessary destruction <strong>of</strong> boundary vegetation. To avoid<br />
(and fully prevent where possible) destruction <strong>of</strong> boundary vegetation immediately around<br />
the route.<br />
Impacts on plane lake landscape<br />
Mitigation measures: to build culverts with much bigger frequency (at every 150 m) in the<br />
plane lake landscape, from the village Klimestani to the village Radolista.<br />
5.4 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on geology<br />
Design and construction phase<br />
The following measures should be applied in order to establish conditions for avoidance <strong>of</strong><br />
possible impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway line on geological structures, engineering geological<br />
appearances and processes and hydrogeological appearances and facilities during detailed<br />
planning and designing:<br />
Selection <strong>of</strong> appropriate alternative solution while dimensioning the railway line route<br />
and required access roads along the stretches (stations) where underground linear<br />
facilities (canals and pipelines) exist;<br />
294
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Selection <strong>of</strong> appropriate alternative solution and adequate construction materials<br />
while dimensioning the route <strong>of</strong> the long-distance transmission line and necessary<br />
access roads along the stretches (stations) where possibility for potential direct<br />
pollution <strong>of</strong> aquifers has been identified (hydrogeological collectors), and in this way<br />
also indirect pollution <strong>of</strong> recorded water occurrences and facilities. One <strong>of</strong> the<br />
solutions is to apply, i.e. install insulation construction materials (clay buffer,<br />
geotextile, etc.) on critical stretches (stations);<br />
Also, attention should be paid <strong>of</strong> segments <strong>of</strong> the existing regional pipeline<br />
"Stidencica", along the extension from chlorination station towards the city <strong>of</strong> Kicevo<br />
(station 102 km-103 km) and extension where the line crosses river Treska by a<br />
bridge (station 107 km + 600-108 km + 000);<br />
Geodetic survey and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> potentially sensitive engineering geological<br />
appearances and processes with regard to rockslides, surface wash-out, draw <strong>of</strong>f,<br />
and earth slides. These are recorded appearances and processes having potential to<br />
cause geological hazards in relation to line safety and stability.<br />
To eliminate and reduce potential impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway line on geology, hydrogeological<br />
occurrences and facilities and engineering geological appearances and processes,<br />
management measures should be undertaken during construction phase, including:<br />
Selection <strong>of</strong> adequate and technically proper functioning construction machinery and<br />
vehicles;<br />
Selection <strong>of</strong> suitable locations for temporary and permanent disposal <strong>of</strong> excavated<br />
rock masses/sediments;<br />
Adoption <strong>of</strong> good construction and construction zones management practices:<br />
As required, installation and maintenance <strong>of</strong> control measures for erosion and<br />
sedimentation along drainage lines, to prevent transport <strong>of</strong> sediments from the<br />
construction zones along the railway line route;<br />
Progressive rehabilitation and stabilization <strong>of</strong> disrupted rock masses/sediments in<br />
order to reduce erosion;<br />
Rehabilitation (grass or vegetation planting) <strong>of</strong> permanent sites for excavated rock<br />
masses disposal. Formerly removed humus material could serve this purpose;<br />
Removal <strong>of</strong> deposited earth material, as soon as it becomes possible;<br />
Provision <strong>of</strong> equipment/vessels for leakage removal.<br />
Operational phase<br />
The main precondition for elimination <strong>of</strong> potential impacts in this project phase is selection <strong>of</strong><br />
adequate and technically proper functioning power mechanization, as well as adequate and<br />
technically proper functioning power and construction mechanization and vehicles (in the<br />
phase <strong>of</strong> the line maintenance and service).<br />
During maintenance and service activities, the personnel will be obliged to observe the<br />
requirements for prevention regarding potential events <strong>of</strong> fuel or oil leakage from the<br />
vehicles.<br />
5.5 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on seismics and vibrations<br />
5.5.1 Methods for reduction <strong>of</strong> seismical effects <strong>of</strong> mining<br />
The operations <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the structures along the route (incisions, tunnels, bridges)<br />
will be conducted by applying techniques <strong>of</strong> drilling and mining, which will cause seismical<br />
295
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
effects in the environemnt. Adopted danger distances should comply with the technical rules<br />
<strong>of</strong> the legislation and they have to be observed.<br />
Mining should be performed by applying millisecond arresters, upon prior calculation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
maximum permissible quantity <strong>of</strong> explosive to be detonated simultaneously (equal arrest<br />
interval).<br />
It is recommended to use the NONEL system for initiation <strong>of</strong> explosive charge in order<br />
to annul negative effects <strong>of</strong> mining.<br />
Sources <strong>of</strong> vibrations - it is specific that strong vibrations are generated during mining<br />
activities, and their effects should be minimized, which can be achieved by calculation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
radius <strong>of</strong> danger zones, for the following risks occurrence:<br />
• Dispersion <strong>of</strong> the material,<br />
• Seismic activity,<br />
• Air waves dangerous for people,<br />
• Air waves dangerous for structures.<br />
If, upon the adoption <strong>of</strong> danger zones, and for the purpose <strong>of</strong> maximum reduction <strong>of</strong> these<br />
risks, safe manner <strong>of</strong> mining is in principle expected by application <strong>of</strong> the modern NONELsystem<br />
<strong>of</strong> connectors between mining holes, the maximum permissible quantity <strong>of</strong> explosive<br />
in one mining drilling should be determined.<br />
The application <strong>of</strong> this mining parameters and proper disposal <strong>of</strong> excavated blocks will<br />
drastically reduce negative impacts on the environment.<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> the modern way <strong>of</strong> initiation <strong>of</strong> NONEL has numerous advantages compared to<br />
classical way <strong>of</strong> mining charges initiation. The most outstanding properties <strong>of</strong> the NONELsystem<br />
giving advantage to it before the classical way <strong>of</strong> initiation include the following:<br />
- Reduction <strong>of</strong> stresses from detonation,<br />
- Safe in operations in the mine field,<br />
- High possibility for explosive charge targeting,<br />
- NONEL-system is resistant to moisture, electricity, flame and friction,<br />
- Possibility for conducting the mining works under water as well,<br />
- Simple handing and preparation for complex mass mining,<br />
- Possibility for combination with all classical means <strong>of</strong> initiation,<br />
- Activation <strong>of</strong> high number <strong>of</strong> mining holes with different intervals <strong>of</strong> initiation,<br />
- Relatively effective means <strong>of</strong> initiation both for surface and underground mining,<br />
- Better granulation <strong>of</strong> mined material,<br />
- Reduced dispersion <strong>of</strong> rock pieces.<br />
296
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 74 Presentation <strong>of</strong> rock mass behaviour in mining with NONEL-system and detonation fuse<br />
Figure 75 Presentation <strong>of</strong> rock mass behaviour in initiation at several drillings with NONEL- system<br />
and detonation fuse<br />
297
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 76 Photograph made during mining with NONEL-system<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Albania</strong>), the estimates based on the intensity <strong>of</strong> the activities lead to the conclusion that<br />
seismic impacts resulting from mining will not present major problem and will be restricted to<br />
the working environment in the zone <strong>of</strong> construction activities. It is recommended to use<br />
NONEL system <strong>of</strong> explosive charging in order to eliminate negative impacts <strong>of</strong> mining.<br />
5.5.2 Methods for mitigation <strong>of</strong> vibrations from railway transport<br />
In order to reduce vibrations <strong>of</strong> the ground caused by trains at certain distance from the<br />
track, several aspects should be taken into consideration, such as generation <strong>of</strong> vibrations at<br />
the source, their propagation in the surrounding and interaction with the structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />
recipient. In other words, methods available for mitigation <strong>of</strong> excessive vibrations <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ground may be divided into three general groups, namely:<br />
The first group includes those resulting in generation <strong>of</strong> less intense vibrations at<br />
source.<br />
The second group <strong>of</strong> measures is focused on the propagation <strong>of</strong> vibrations from<br />
source towards recipient, and<br />
The third group <strong>of</strong> measures includes the methods that reduce the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
vibrations on recipient. Based on this, the best method or methods should be<br />
adopted, taking into account technical and economic aspects <strong>of</strong> the problem.<br />
5.5.2.1 Mitigation methods at source<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the methods that may be used for avoidance <strong>of</strong> excessive vibrations in the railway<br />
structure are listed below (Wilson et al. 1983, Nelson and Sauernman, 1983, and<br />
Bahrekazemi et al., 2003):<br />
- Welded rails,<br />
- Modification <strong>of</strong> design <strong>of</strong> the wagons, especially primary system for suspension,<br />
- Elastic wheels,<br />
- Wheels alignment,<br />
- Rails sharpening,<br />
- Elastic adhesives for direct fixing <strong>of</strong> rails,<br />
- Stabilization <strong>of</strong> the soil under the embankment,<br />
298
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
- Floating slabs,<br />
- Reducing the train speed.<br />
Usually, a combination <strong>of</strong> two or more <strong>of</strong> these methods is used. For example, wheels<br />
alignment, rails sharpening, welded rails and elastic fixing are used all together. Each<br />
method is the most efficient within certain frequency range. Methods <strong>of</strong> wheels alignment<br />
and rails sharpening are efficient at a frequency <strong>of</strong> more than 100 Hz, while floating slabs<br />
are efficient at frequencies exceeding 15-20 Hz. This method is most frequently used in<br />
subground railways characterized with their high frequency property compared to traffic on<br />
surface railways on s<strong>of</strong>t soil.<br />
On the other side, in the range <strong>of</strong> very low frequency (below 20 Hz), the method <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
stabilization can mitigate vibrations.<br />
5.5.2.2 Methods <strong>of</strong> path mitigation<br />
Sometimes, we use barrier on the path <strong>of</strong> is the waves propagating from source to recipient,<br />
in order to mitigate ground vibrations. The method also known as protection has been<br />
studied experimentally (Woods, 1968, and Masarch 2004) and numerically (Haupt, 1978,<br />
Besoks, 1986, and Ahmad and Al-Hussaini, 1991), both for open and in-filled trenches used<br />
as barrier. Compared to open trenches, it has been established that both width and depth<br />
are relevant for in-filled trenches. Furthermore, the optimum depth <strong>of</strong> in-filled trenches is<br />
around 1,2 times bigger than the wave length <strong>of</strong> Raili's waves in soil material (Ahmad and<br />
Al-Hussaini).<br />
The method is used with certain efficiency in the reduction <strong>of</strong> ground vibrations caused by<br />
railway transport, by use <strong>of</strong> stabilized soil with calcareous cement as with the in-filled<br />
trenches (Wit and Bahrekazemi, 2003). An important deficiency <strong>of</strong> methods in soils with s<strong>of</strong>t<br />
clay results from relatively low frequency <strong>of</strong> vibrations in this soil type which is suitable for<br />
very long wave lengths. Thus, to be efficient, the trench has to be very deep.<br />
5.5.2.3 Methods for mitigation with buildings<br />
If only one or several buildings are affected by excessive ground vibrations from the railway<br />
line, alternative methods, such as insulation, can prove suitable.<br />
Insulation <strong>of</strong> the foundations <strong>of</strong> the buildings from the ground, by applying the system <strong>of</strong><br />
elastic support as shown in Figure 77, is a method used sometimes to mitigate ground<br />
vibrations. With this method, the building is observed as a rigid body placed on a certain<br />
number <strong>of</strong> springs (and shock absorbers). Natural frequency <strong>of</strong> the system has to be<br />
designed to be far below the lowest frequency <strong>of</strong> vibrations that should be subject <strong>of</strong><br />
mitigation, as can be seen by one degree <strong>of</strong> the free system on the right part <strong>of</strong> Figure 77.<br />
The bottom left part <strong>of</strong> Figure 77 shows reduction <strong>of</strong> vibrations at different frequencies.<br />
Natural frequency <strong>of</strong> the system in vertical direction is 4 Hz. As we can see from the natural<br />
frequency spectrum defined by manufacturer, vibrations at frequencies higher than around<br />
10 Hz are reduced efficiently.<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> industrial building where excessive ground vibrations may impede the operation <strong>of</strong><br />
certain equipment, it could be appropriate to insulate only parts <strong>of</strong> the building or even only<br />
the foundations <strong>of</strong> the sensitive equipment <strong>of</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the building in a similar way as the<br />
one described above for the entire building.<br />
299
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Figure 77 Building insulation to reduce ground vibrations from the nearby railway line by use <strong>of</strong><br />
system <strong>of</strong> springs (Gerb Vibrations Control Systems)<br />
There are methods for mitigation <strong>of</strong> ground vibrations potentially caused by the railway<br />
transport along the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>). The<br />
method or the combination <strong>of</strong> methods that will be used depends on factors like frequency<br />
content <strong>of</strong> vibrations generated on the ground, the distance <strong>of</strong> structures from the line, type<br />
and stratification <strong>of</strong> soil in the area where the line is built, the number <strong>of</strong> structures that need<br />
to be protected from excessive ground vibrations and types <strong>of</strong> structures. Further on, ground<br />
vibrations combined with environmental noise from the railway can be perceived as more<br />
annoying by people. Therefore, combination <strong>of</strong> methods for noise with those for vibrations<br />
mitigation is recommended in order to achieve the best results.<br />
The speed <strong>of</strong> trains and the force <strong>of</strong> wheels are two very important factors influencing the<br />
level <strong>of</strong> ground vibrations. Geotechnical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the terrain also have important<br />
effect on vibrations. With regard to the type <strong>of</strong> the trains running over the line, we may<br />
conclude that there is no significant difference between vibrations generated in rails <strong>of</strong> freight<br />
and non-freight trains when vibrations are normalized for the force <strong>of</strong> the wheels and the<br />
speed <strong>of</strong> the train. Vibrations generated by freight trains are reduced with the increase <strong>of</strong> the<br />
300
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
distance from the axis <strong>of</strong> track symmetry at lower rate compared to non-freight trains. Also,<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> vibrations may be influenced by the speed <strong>of</strong> the train.<br />
5.6 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on soils<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the main tasks in the planning <strong>of</strong> civil works is to plan well the balance <strong>of</strong> materials by<br />
individual sections, i.e. the surplus <strong>of</strong> earth obtained by cuttings and tunnels opening and the<br />
demand for material for embankments erection. In this way, the demand for additional<br />
material would be balanced with the surplus material requiring disposal. Also, the need for<br />
borrowing pits and disposal sites would be lowered, which is a benefit for the environment<br />
while reduced manipulation <strong>of</strong> materials would reduce the cost <strong>of</strong> the facility construction.<br />
General measures that need to be undertaken in order to reduce the impact <strong>of</strong> railway line<br />
construction on soils include:<br />
Strict protection <strong>of</strong> all zones, beyond the core construction zone, so to avoid excavation<br />
<strong>of</strong> additional areas for temporary and permanent use (storage <strong>of</strong> construction materials,<br />
parking <strong>of</strong> mechanization or workshops for vehicles repair). Regular control <strong>of</strong><br />
machinery fleet in order to minimize the threat <strong>of</strong> leakage <strong>of</strong> hazardous chemical<br />
substances into soil;<br />
Proper management <strong>of</strong> the top soil because that material can be used further for<br />
inclinations recultivation and stabilization;<br />
Keeping and manipulation <strong>of</strong> fuels has to be a strictly controlled process which assumes<br />
undertaking <strong>of</strong> measures <strong>of</strong> prevention <strong>of</strong> soil contamination. Filling in the machines and<br />
aggregates with fuel must not be closer than 50 m to watercourses, canals or drinking<br />
water wells;<br />
Opening <strong>of</strong> access roads to certain construction sites beyond those specified in<br />
technical documentation should be prohibited;<br />
Machines should be parked at duely planned and arranged areas (camps) which should<br />
comply with the required preconditions for soils protection against contamination with<br />
fuels and derivatives;<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> contamination <strong>of</strong> the soil with incidential spillage <strong>of</strong> fuel or a derivative, the<br />
contaminated layer <strong>of</strong> soil should be removed and disposed <strong>of</strong> at suitable location;<br />
During dying or other type <strong>of</strong> chemical protection on a part <strong>of</strong> constructions, appropriate<br />
protection measures have to be undertaken, such as covering <strong>of</strong> surrounding soil;<br />
Adequate management <strong>of</strong> generated municipal waste;<br />
Cleaning <strong>of</strong> the equipment and vehicles should take place only at specifically<br />
determined places designed in a manner to avoid contamination <strong>of</strong> soil and ground<br />
waters. In this way, washing <strong>of</strong> trunks/concrete mixers will be with prevented<br />
uncontrolled throwing away <strong>of</strong> concrete remains. Concrete amounts that will be<br />
accumulated in this way can be further disposed <strong>of</strong> as inert solid waste or reused as<br />
filling material in some construction processes;<br />
Upon the completion <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction, all borrowing pits and disposal sites<br />
will be recultivated so to improve visual effect and renew natural vegetation;<br />
Wastewater from toilets and maintenance <strong>of</strong> station facilities - appropriate systems <strong>of</strong><br />
sanitary wastewater treatment, as well as system <strong>of</strong> collection and treatment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
waste water generated during stations maintenance should be established;<br />
301
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Solid waste (organic and inorganic). Its generation occurs in the course <strong>of</strong> passenger<br />
transport and around station facilities. Solid waste will be managed by an appropriate<br />
service that will collect and transport it to adequate locations, because it can be<br />
incorporated in the soil and result in soil prolonged pollution;<br />
Treatment <strong>of</strong> vegetation around the line with herbicides. Amounts and timing <strong>of</strong><br />
treatment should be well planned and soil and ground waters pollution should be<br />
prevented;<br />
Erosion processes that may occur in the course <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction are in<br />
the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the structures (bridges, tunnels, underpasses, drainage canals, etc.), as<br />
well as with embankments and supporting walls <strong>of</strong> cuttings. Regular monitoring and<br />
undertaking <strong>of</strong> prompt intervention measures are required for timely prevention <strong>of</strong> major<br />
degradation <strong>of</strong> soil along the line.<br />
Mitigation measures for certain soil types that are the most vulnerable in relation to<br />
degradation:<br />
1. Colluvial soils (villages Drugovo, Meseista, Frangovo, Radolista)<br />
Areas are onto rather inclined terrains and mostly cultivated. Soil is clayey and heavy which<br />
determines possible occurrence <strong>of</strong> intensive erosion. The route usually makes cuttings<br />
diagonally to the inclination <strong>of</strong> the terrains under colluvial soils. High number <strong>of</strong> civil works<br />
contributing to contamination have been planned.<br />
Mitigation measures:<br />
- Construction <strong>of</strong> support walls, drains and drainage system,<br />
- To stabilize embankments upon cuttings, free area for the inclination stabilization<br />
should be developed,<br />
- Destruction <strong>of</strong> natural vegetation should be avoided,<br />
- Stabilization <strong>of</strong> the embankments <strong>of</strong> the route with fertile soil layer and grass<br />
planting. In addition to this, inclinations may be strengthened with jute-grid and<br />
embankments on cuttings with mat-grid made <strong>of</strong> polyester fabric,<br />
- Treatment <strong>of</strong> torrents, especially in the part <strong>of</strong> the route where bridge columns lie;<br />
- Arrangment <strong>of</strong> entrance and exit portals <strong>of</strong> tunnels with grass planting,<br />
- Civil works should be limited to minimum near the route in order to reduce the<br />
destruction <strong>of</strong> the vegetation to the maximum.<br />
2. Alluvial soils and marshy gley soils (Struga Valley)<br />
Ravine soils with high groundwater, under intensive agricultural production. There is real<br />
danger <strong>of</strong> soils compaction, disintegration <strong>of</strong> natural structure and disordering water<br />
physical properties.<br />
Mitigation measures:<br />
- Minimum treading over minimum possible area during the line construction;<br />
- Particular attention should be paid to canal network and construction <strong>of</strong> overpasses<br />
for free evacuation <strong>of</strong> excessive water;<br />
- Wastewater treatment system to prevent soils contamination around stations.<br />
3. Soils on calcareous and dolomite ground<br />
302
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
These are relict soils <strong>of</strong> special ecological importance. They usually occur on great<br />
inclinations and therefore shallow solum and poor structure make them subject <strong>of</strong> rapid<br />
degradation.<br />
Mitigation measures: to undertake all measures envisaged for colluvial soils.<br />
5.7 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> air<br />
5.7.1 Construction phase<br />
Civil works are limited in time to a single place, but emissions, especially dust, are<br />
significant:<br />
Fencing <strong>of</strong> parts <strong>of</strong> the construction sites where increased dust emission is expected<br />
due to the effects <strong>of</strong> the wind;<br />
Splashing <strong>of</strong> access roads with water;<br />
During earth material excavation and transport, paths should not have a slope above<br />
8% in order to reduce consumption <strong>of</strong> fuel and accordingly exhaustive gases<br />
emission;<br />
5.7.2 Operational phase<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> diesel locomotives for transport or maneuvering should be limited to minimum,<br />
especially on bigger stations;<br />
Transport <strong>of</strong> road fraight vehicles should be regulated at the stations (Struga, Kicevo)<br />
in order to minimize operation <strong>of</strong> engines while standing.<br />
5.8 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters<br />
Measures for waters protection during design phase involve applying <strong>of</strong> technical solutions<br />
through designing <strong>of</strong> facilities that will prevent or reduce the impact <strong>of</strong> soil pollution. While<br />
designing, particular attention should be paid to drainage. At several points, <strong>Corridor</strong> 8<br />
intersects several watercourses. For the purpose <strong>of</strong> proper operation <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
(uninterrupted and safe performance <strong>of</strong> the transport) on one side, and protection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
project itself against erosive action <strong>of</strong> storm waters and environment protection on the other,<br />
high quality and comprehensive drainage <strong>of</strong> the superstructure <strong>of</strong> the construction should be<br />
provided.<br />
Drainage is the main protection measure for storm waters collection and removal. While<br />
providing it, care should be taken to carry out the drainage in a manner that will prevent<br />
pollution <strong>of</strong> surface and ground waters.<br />
5.8.1 Construction phase<br />
Introduction <strong>of</strong> water protection measures during construction should commence as early as<br />
with the terrain clearance. Cut or unrooted trees should not be thrown into watercourses in<br />
order to avoid prevention <strong>of</strong> water running through them on one side, and degradation <strong>of</strong><br />
organic mass on the other.<br />
General measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> potential impacts <strong>of</strong> emissions into surface waters during<br />
construction phase include procedures <strong>of</strong> good construction practice which should be taken<br />
care <strong>of</strong> by the competent civil engineering supervisor:<br />
Near surface waters, construction zones will be established on adequate distance, or<br />
in absence <strong>of</strong> space for construction zones establishment, surface waters will be<br />
chanallized adequately;<br />
303
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Introduction <strong>of</strong> control measures for erosion and sedimentation, through<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> temporary drainages for removal <strong>of</strong> potentially dangerous surface<br />
waters that will be formed from the construction project;<br />
Collection and treatment <strong>of</strong> the wastewaters from the construction site prior to their<br />
discharge into surface watercourses;<br />
Disposal <strong>of</strong> excavated material outside drainage lines and surface waters;<br />
Removal <strong>of</strong> excavated and deposited earth material, as soon as possible;<br />
Provision and use <strong>of</strong> equipment/vessels for evacuation <strong>of</strong> potential leakages;<br />
Solid waste disposal into containers;<br />
Placement <strong>of</strong> mobile toilets at distances <strong>of</strong> more than 100 meters from drainage<br />
lines;<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> services <strong>of</strong> authorized company for handling and removal <strong>of</strong> wastewater from<br />
mobile toilets.<br />
5.8.2 Operational phase<br />
Taking into account the sources <strong>of</strong> potential pollution, the measures for reducing <strong>of</strong> the<br />
potential impacts <strong>of</strong> the emissions on surfacewaters during the operational phase include<br />
primarily activities for control and maintenance <strong>of</strong> the railway line.<br />
During the maintenance and control activities, the personnel will be obliged to observe the<br />
requirements related to public order concerning waste throwing near surface waters and<br />
possible events <strong>of</strong> fuel or oil leakage from vehicles.<br />
In the course <strong>of</strong> the operational phase, it will be necessary to prepare schedule <strong>of</strong><br />
maintenance <strong>of</strong> the systems for collection and removal <strong>of</strong> waters and other liquids from the<br />
surface <strong>of</strong> the tracks. Occurrence <strong>of</strong> mud in culverts may induce septic conditions,<br />
development <strong>of</strong> undesirable micro organisms, contamination <strong>of</strong> water and spread <strong>of</strong> odour.<br />
5.8.3 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on wetlands<br />
5.8.3.1 During the railway line construction<br />
In the course <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction, the following additional measures should be<br />
undertaken in order to reduce impacts on wetlands and algae, that have not been described<br />
among measures for waters and soils protection:<br />
- Vehicles washing zones have to be fenced and restricted. The treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
wastewaters generated in this way will require construction <strong>of</strong> simple plants (twolevel<br />
ponds-sedimentation tanks) in order to prevent discharging <strong>of</strong> untreated<br />
wastewater into streams, rivers or Ohrid Lake. Particular care should be taken at oils<br />
replacement, where spill out <strong>of</strong> oils on soil or into water has to be strictly prohibited<br />
and sanctioned. The sites for vehicles maintenance must not be located close to<br />
Ohrid Lake;<br />
- Vehicles washing in rivers, streams or Ohrid Lake has to be prohibited;<br />
- While dying metal construction, especially metal bridges, the part subjected to dying<br />
has to be covered in order to prevent spilling out <strong>of</strong> dye into surface waters;<br />
- Camping sites for the workers must not be located on the shore <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake and<br />
the banks <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska;<br />
304
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
- Construction <strong>of</strong> ocassional barriers near the streams will be required in order to<br />
prevent inlet <strong>of</strong> material (rocks, stones, earth) during the railway construction, which<br />
would cause disruption <strong>of</strong> the water course <strong>of</strong> the streams/rivers;<br />
- The planned railway line route has to be outside protected zones;<br />
- The planned route has to be executed in a manner to prevent intrusion <strong>of</strong> polluting<br />
substances and solid waste into water bodies;<br />
- Protection measures against water pollution have to be undertaken in particular close<br />
to the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid, as well as within the watershed area <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, so to<br />
prevent any pollution <strong>of</strong> the Lake.<br />
- Also, attention has to be paid to drainage and irrigation canals, as their covering with<br />
materials from the railway line construction may induce significant dsamages;<br />
- In order to eliminate the possibility for waters pollution with food remains (organized<br />
provisions for workers), daily delivery <strong>of</strong> food for the workers is proposed to the place<br />
<strong>of</strong> construction and transport <strong>of</strong> the vessels to the place with settled municipal<br />
infrastructure.<br />
Ohrid Lake is the most important aquatic ecosystem in Europe and therefore it should be<br />
subject <strong>of</strong> particular attention during the railway line construction. The Lake has to be<br />
designated as highly sensitive ecosystem both during construction and operational phase <strong>of</strong><br />
the railway line. Particular attention has to be paid to the protection against incidental<br />
leakage <strong>of</strong> fuels and oils. During the construction, all measures for Ohrid Lake protection<br />
have to be undertaken against such incidents. In case <strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> incidental leakage <strong>of</strong><br />
fuels and oils on the surface <strong>of</strong> the soil, the affected layer <strong>of</strong> earth has to be removed and<br />
transported and disposed <strong>of</strong> at appropriate landfills, outside the watershed area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid<br />
Lake. For this purpose, the relevant services <strong>of</strong> the project constructors have to prepare<br />
detailed plan <strong>of</strong> action in case <strong>of</strong> incidental leakage <strong>of</strong> fuels and oils. To that end, training <strong>of</strong><br />
workers for different emergency situations is required. This service has to maintain<br />
permanent cooperation with the Centre for Crisis Management and <strong>of</strong>fices <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />
Environment and Physical Planning. Also, this service should be properly equipped in order<br />
to be able to react promptly to these kind <strong>of</strong> incidents.<br />
5.8.3.2 During the railway line operation<br />
The following measures should be undertaken to reduce negative impact <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />
operation on wetlands:<br />
- Adequate maintenance <strong>of</strong> surface drainage systems, especially at places where<br />
bigger quantity <strong>of</strong> leaked fuels, oils and lubricants (stations, depots) can be expected,<br />
because theur efficiency is highly dependent on proper cleaning and maintenance;<br />
- Construction <strong>of</strong> drainage system in depots where trains would be maintained<br />
(washing, cleaning, parts replacement, etc.). Wastewater generated by training<br />
cleaning (wagons and locomotives) must not be discharged directly into municipal<br />
sewerage system. For this purpose, treatment system should be constructed to<br />
remove suspended particulate matters and oils. Separated waste oils should be<br />
managed in accordance with the applicable legislation and best available techniques;<br />
- Construction <strong>of</strong> municipal wwastewater treatment plant at all major stations (4). At<br />
other, smaller stations, mobile toilets will be installed to be managed by authorized<br />
natural person or legal person. This will prevent impact on wetlands;<br />
- Use <strong>of</strong> biodegradable and phoshat-free detergents for trains cleaning and<br />
maintenance;<br />
305
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
- In case customs terminal is built in Struga, i.e. close to the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid, it will need<br />
to be equipped with collection system to collect sediment (dust) and residues <strong>of</strong> oils<br />
and fuels. This collection system has to be maintained and cleaned adequately.<br />
Collected water (especially after rainfalls) must in no case be discharged directly into<br />
natural recipient. It has to be prior treated, but the treated water must not be<br />
discharged in the watershed area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake.<br />
5.9 Measures for noise impacts reduction<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line, as any other construction activity, assumes generation <strong>of</strong><br />
noise due to the use <strong>of</strong> heavy machines, excavation and transportation <strong>of</strong> huge quantities <strong>of</strong><br />
earth material, mining events, compaction, etc.<br />
Measured applicable for noise impact include:<br />
Erection <strong>of</strong> sound barriers;<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> the intensity <strong>of</strong> work during evening and night hours;<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> equipment which generates less noise.<br />
Despite the fact that the impacts <strong>of</strong> noise to be generated by the trains on this railway line<br />
will be restricted to around 200 meters, and noise level will be equalized with the natural<br />
phone already at 120 m, it may be significant at certain locations (in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> some<br />
stations) because <strong>of</strong> the proximity <strong>of</strong> residential buildings.<br />
The measures for environmental noise reduction include:<br />
Erection <strong>of</strong> sound barriers wherever needed;<br />
Restriction <strong>of</strong> speed through sensitive locations;<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> system <strong>of</strong> breaking and warning that generate lower noise level.<br />
Passengers in trains are also exposed at the impact <strong>of</strong> the noise. To reduce these impacts,<br />
wagons should be well insulated and sound insulated windows should be used.<br />
5.10 Measures for sustainable waste management<br />
For the purpose <strong>of</strong> appropriate waste management, reduction <strong>of</strong> generated waste amounts<br />
and safe disposal <strong>of</strong> different waste fractions, waste separation will be necessary. The<br />
vessels for waste fractions collection should be adequately marked depending on the type <strong>of</strong><br />
the waste.<br />
Waste should be collected at designated places, removed by relevant operators, i.e.<br />
companies licenced for performance <strong>of</strong> public services in accordance with the Law on Waste<br />
Management. The manner <strong>of</strong> collection, disposal and frequency <strong>of</strong> waste removal should be<br />
defined in the basic plan for waste management.<br />
5.10.1 Construction phase<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> expected waste types, the manner <strong>of</strong> its management is presented in the<br />
following table.<br />
Waste<br />
fraction/type<br />
Packaging waste<br />
Handling<br />
Selection/recycling/reuse Other fractions Transport/recovery/<br />
removal<br />
Selection <strong>of</strong> waste types<br />
for which there is market<br />
interest<br />
Comment<br />
Mixed waste Licensed entity Fractions <strong>of</strong><br />
hazardous waste<br />
will be separated<br />
306
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Municipal waste<br />
Demolition<br />
waste/other waste<br />
from construction<br />
activities<br />
Selection <strong>of</strong> waste types<br />
for which there is market<br />
interest<br />
Reuse <strong>of</strong> demolition<br />
waste/ Selection <strong>of</strong><br />
waste types for which<br />
there is market interest<br />
Excavation waste Part <strong>of</strong> the waste<br />
(humus) to be used for<br />
recultivation, and<br />
deposits to be used for<br />
filling-in surface pits, and<br />
if this is not possible,<br />
landfilling<br />
Mixed waste Licensed entity Fractions <strong>of</strong><br />
hazardous waste<br />
will be separated<br />
Mixed waste Licensed entity<br />
/demolition waste<br />
landfill<br />
Fractions <strong>of</strong><br />
hazardous waste<br />
will be separated<br />
Inert waste As agreed Due to huge<br />
quantities <strong>of</strong> inert<br />
waste, Programme<br />
for waste<br />
management<br />
should be<br />
prepared in<br />
accordance with<br />
the Law on<br />
Environment<br />
- While setting temporary construction points, mobile toilets should be set and they will<br />
be maintained and emptied at certain intervals;<br />
- For the purpose <strong>of</strong> adequate waste management, waste bins will be placed in<br />
different coloures for collection <strong>of</strong> different waste fractions;<br />
- During construction works, wastewater from concrete production will be generated (if<br />
mobile concrete base is available). Such waste water contains high quantity <strong>of</strong><br />
suspended particulate matter (mainly silicate and sand) and has the common pH<br />
above 12. This water has to be colected, treated, i.e. neutralized, prior to discharge;<br />
- Waste generated during route clearing or biodegradable waste during the route<br />
development should be adequately collected and transferred to an operator for<br />
recovery;<br />
- Metal waste (remains or wires) expected during the railway line construction should<br />
be separated from other wastes, as materials that can be reused or recycled.<br />
- Hazardous waste may be generated during vehicles operation. During the railway<br />
line construction, all heavy vehicles that will be used (they use mostly oil or petrol as<br />
fuel) will need to be equipped with special vessels for leaking fuel collection.<br />
Particular attention should be paid to prevent leakage <strong>of</strong> oils from vehicles, but in<br />
case <strong>of</strong> such event absorbers should be used to reduce impacts on environmental<br />
media, contaminated soil should be removed from the watershed area <strong>of</strong> surface<br />
waters along the railway line.<br />
5.10.2 Operational phase<br />
Non-hazardous waste<br />
For the purpose <strong>of</strong> temporary disposal <strong>of</strong> municipal waste, adequate site should be selected<br />
that will not be close to any water body or populated place. Particular attention should be<br />
paid to the disposal <strong>of</strong> materials that are not inert. The whole generated waste should be<br />
collected, disposed <strong>of</strong> or removed in a controlled manner, by authorized waste operator.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the waste types may be managed by private operators in possession <strong>of</strong> licence for<br />
collection, transport and disposal <strong>of</strong> waste, in accordance with the Law on Waste<br />
Management and relevant secondary legislation.<br />
Hazardous waste<br />
307
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
The waste called hazardous is the waste which can be explosive, oxidizing, inflammable,<br />
irritating or toxic, cancerogene, corrosive, infectious if incinerated or in contact with air, water<br />
and acid and generate toxic matters. This type <strong>of</strong> waste should be temporarily stored at<br />
appropriate places and to be labeled.<br />
Hasardous waste generated by the route maintenance during its operation should be<br />
adequately collected and labelled, and then removed and managed by a licenced entity.<br />
5.11 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on cultural heritage<br />
In the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the sites that have already been described within the description <strong>of</strong> cultural<br />
heritage, care should be taken while performing construction activities to avoid damages on<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the values. Presence <strong>of</strong> expert in the area <strong>of</strong> cultural heritage is recommendable, for<br />
example Institute for Cultural Heritage in Ohrid, to carry out the monitoring during the railway<br />
line construction.<br />
In case during the performance <strong>of</strong> earths and construction works artifacts are found or<br />
indications occur that certain archeological good is found at some sites along the railway line<br />
route, construction works will be terminated and Administration for Cultural Heritage <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> Culture will be notified in a timely manner. Also, the specified sites will be secured<br />
and temporarily fensed to avoid potential negative impacts in terms <strong>of</strong> their safety and<br />
status.<br />
5.12 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on forests and forestry<br />
5.12.1 Construction phase<br />
Prior to the commencement <strong>of</strong> any activity on the railway line route, according to the<br />
provisions <strong>of</strong> the Law on Forests, Elaborate on the establishment <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> damage<br />
resulting from the permanent conversion <strong>of</strong> forest into construction land should be prepared.<br />
The Elaborate will define the area for clearing and permanent conversion, the quantity <strong>of</strong><br />
wood mass <strong>of</strong> tree-stump, the price <strong>of</strong> the wood mass, increment lost, lost revenues from<br />
other wood products, lost generally useful functions <strong>of</strong> the forest, etc. 25 .<br />
In order to reduce negative effects <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> access roads and other<br />
infrastructure that will cause cutting <strong>of</strong> significant wood stock (also with impacts on<br />
ecosystyems), the existing forest road infrastructure should be used (upon compensation),<br />
while the scope <strong>of</strong> the new infrastructure will be dimensioned carefully and to the necessary<br />
minimum.<br />
Planning, construction, maintenance and use <strong>of</strong> forest infrastructure is regulated by the<br />
provisions <strong>of</strong> Articles 73 and 74 <strong>of</strong> the Law on Forests, namely:<br />
Due to the termination <strong>of</strong> the links between different ecosystems, and in order to<br />
provide corridors, paths for game movement from one side <strong>of</strong> the railway line to the<br />
other, culvert should be planned and constructed in an amount and at distances most<br />
suitable for that purpose;<br />
The occurred fragmentation causes change in forest division which should be<br />
reviewed in the elaboratrion <strong>of</strong> the new plan for the respecitve FMU.<br />
5.12.2 Operational phase<br />
In this phase, the danger <strong>of</strong> forest fire outbreaks should be eliminated if the rules on the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> measures are applied consistently with the Law on Fire Prevention and the<br />
25 Regulated by Articles 13, 14, 15, 18 and 60 <strong>of</strong> the Law on Forests.<br />
308
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Law on Forests. All measures and procedures should be applied for fire prevention<br />
(prevention pre-suppressive and suppressive).<br />
Obligations <strong>of</strong> the line managing entity:<br />
- Permanent removal <strong>of</strong> the vegetation on the line subgrade;<br />
- Cleaning <strong>of</strong> drains and gutters to facilitate water flow capacity, but also to<br />
eliminate the possibility for growing <strong>of</strong> vegetation within them and risk <strong>of</strong> fire;<br />
- Greening with fire resistent species (not to plant needle-shape leaved<br />
species).<br />
Obligations <strong>of</strong> the entity managing the forest along the line:<br />
- All obligations deriving from the Law on Forests and the Law on Fire<br />
Prevention.<br />
5.12.3 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> negative effects <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction on<br />
erosion and deposits<br />
The Main Design for the railway line construction should contain "Phased project"<br />
that will include the following elements:<br />
Documentation for expropriation;<br />
Elaborate on permanent conversion <strong>of</strong> forest into construction land;<br />
Performance <strong>of</strong> wood cutting along the route and forest order establishment;<br />
Tree-stumps digging out,<br />
Removal <strong>of</strong> active/fertile soil layer and its storage on suitable locations;<br />
Earth works, etc.<br />
During the line construction, mechanization and technology causing minimum<br />
stresses and harmful impacts on the regime <strong>of</strong> spring waters within the range <strong>of</strong> the<br />
railway line route/corridor and downstream <strong>of</strong> it, below the line, should be used.<br />
Inclinations should be executed in accordance with the standards, and inclinations<br />
at risk <strong>of</strong> erosive processes only, should also be greened out by fire resistant<br />
species. For slopes where risk <strong>of</strong> chasmal processes exists, appropriate main<br />
designs should be elaborated;<br />
In order to reduce the negative effect <strong>of</strong> erosive processes along the line, good<br />
planning and compensation <strong>of</strong> earh masses (excavations and embankments)<br />
should be accomplished, and excessive earth mass should not be thrown<br />
whereever in a form <strong>of</strong> huge heaps <strong>of</strong> disposed material (as is <strong>of</strong>ten done), but it<br />
should be stored inside suitable depressions for that purpose which will be later on<br />
recultivated;<br />
Part <strong>of</strong> earth masses from excavation may be used for development <strong>of</strong> embankments<br />
by watercourses with low banks, where overflows occur, based on prior elaborated<br />
project documentation;<br />
Fertile-humus accumulation horison <strong>of</strong> soils, as well as parts <strong>of</strong> horisons В and В/С<br />
along the route should be separated from the geological horison (indigenous<br />
horison) as a matter <strong>of</strong> necessity and stored along access roads to be used later on<br />
in the process <strong>of</strong> biological recultivation <strong>of</strong> landfills formed <strong>of</strong> excavations;<br />
During the line construction, efforts should be made to minimize the negative<br />
impacts <strong>of</strong> coarse stone blocks rolling and other harmful impacts, massive<br />
rockslides and alike, over watercourses slopes and riverbeds and remedy the<br />
consequences.<br />
309
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
5.12.4 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on socio-economic aspect<br />
In Botun, peripheral parts <strong>of</strong> Struga and the village Radolista, there is a potential for imapcts<br />
on residential buildings and therefore measures are required to comensate the owners.<br />
In the context <strong>of</strong> property, part <strong>of</strong> the railway line passes over state owned land (mainly the<br />
routs from the village Drugovo to the village Novo Selo, then from Botun to Meseiste and<br />
from Frangovo to Radozda); however, in the areas <strong>of</strong> the settlements Drugovo, Novo Selo,<br />
Botun, Moroista, Korosista, Mislesevo, Struga, Zagracani-Sum, Radolista, Frangovo and<br />
Radozda, the railway line will occupy land in private ownership, so that the land<br />
expropriation is inevitable. Measures for land owners compensation are inevitable, too.<br />
At several points, the railway line intersects main, regional and local roads (with the main<br />
road Kicevo-Kjafasan it intersects near the village Popolzani, close to Botun Gorge and near<br />
the village Frangovo with the regional road Struga Debar, very close to the City <strong>of</strong> Struga,<br />
and local roads in the area <strong>of</strong> Debrca and Struga Fields (such as intersections with the local<br />
road to the villages Arbinovo, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Belcista, Volino, Moroista, Zagracani-<br />
Sum, Kalista and many other minor roads). This situation will affect the current<br />
communication <strong>of</strong> the settlements with the main roads and urban settlements. Unavoidable<br />
technical measures will be required to establish uninterrupted natural communication <strong>of</strong> the<br />
area on both sides <strong>of</strong> the line.<br />
The railway line intersects with a number <strong>of</strong> water management facilities (the river Treska,<br />
river Sateska, canal on the river Sateska which gravitates to Ohrid Lake, Crn Drim river,<br />
underground water supply system from the village Radolista to Struga, water supply system<br />
near the village Radozda and several canals <strong>of</strong> the amelioration network <strong>of</strong> Struga Fields).<br />
These intersections will affect water management and established ecological balance.<br />
Therefore, it is recommended that the Main Design devotes particular attention to the<br />
protection <strong>of</strong> the already set infrastructure network and avoid conflicts with it. Over certain<br />
extensions, the railway line also intersects with elements <strong>of</strong> the electricity distribution<br />
network established within the railway corridor. This occurs at several sites in the area <strong>of</strong><br />
Debrca and Struga Fields. Technical solutions for impacts elimination are necessary.<br />
5.13 Overview <strong>of</strong> measures for environmental impact reduction and environmental<br />
monitoring<br />
The matrix <strong>of</strong> measures for environmental impacts reduction and environmental monitoring<br />
is presented in Appendix 12.<br />
310
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
6 Recommendations and conclusions<br />
6.1 Project justification<br />
Project justification is presented in paragraph 1.3 <strong>of</strong> this Study. On this ocassion, we should<br />
re-stress the importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> 8 (railway transport) aimed at connecting the country<br />
with two ports (Duras and Burgas), exchange <strong>of</strong> goods and easier transfer <strong>of</strong> people. Also,<br />
this mode <strong>of</strong> transport is preffered compared to other transport modes, because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
insignificant impacts on the environment during its operational phase.<br />
6.2 Recommendations<br />
Recommendations driving from assessed impacts include;<br />
Findings <strong>of</strong> the experts with regard to expected impacts during the railway line<br />
construction and use and accordingly proposed measures will be observed;<br />
Measures proposed should be translated into phased solutions <strong>of</strong> the Main Design;<br />
Monitoring group should be established by the Investor, to monitor the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the proposed measures into the Main Design, as well as their<br />
implementation in practice, during the construction and exploitation <strong>of</strong> this linear<br />
project.<br />
PE "Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s" should employ at least one person responsible for<br />
environmental management in relation to the activities <strong>of</strong> railway transport<br />
completion in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />
6.3 Conclusion<br />
From environmental point <strong>of</strong> view, the linear project - construction <strong>of</strong> railway line Kicevo-Lin<br />
(border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) does not pose any particular threat to environment and<br />
nature and the route is acceptable in its entirety. If the proposed measures for possible<br />
environmental impacts reduction and mitigation are adopted, it will be sustainable in longrun,<br />
both from financial and environmental and quality <strong>of</strong> living points <strong>of</strong> view.<br />
The process <strong>of</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Impact Assessment Study for the project -<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) was carried out<br />
in accordance with the legally prescribed methodology.<br />
The preparation <strong>of</strong> the Study involved team <strong>of</strong> experts in all areas required for a complex<br />
linear project <strong>of</strong> this type.<br />
All aspects <strong>of</strong> environment and nature, cultural heritage, as well as aspects <strong>of</strong> socioeconomic<br />
development and people's welfare, have been considered.<br />
The above has been done to secure sustainability <strong>of</strong> the project on long-term basis.<br />
During the Study development, good communication has been accomplished among expert<br />
team members, as well as with the Investor and developer <strong>of</strong> the Conceptual Design. This<br />
resulted in timely information obtaining and access to the terrain and required plans.<br />
311
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
7 References<br />
- Просторен план на РМ 2004-2020 (МЖСПП)<br />
Biodiversity, landscape<br />
Albrecht, C. & Wilke, T. (2008): Lake Ohrid: biodiversity and evolution. Hydrobiologia, 615:<br />
103-114.<br />
Cvijic, J. (1906-1911). Osnove za geografiju i geologiju Makedonije i stare Srbije. Srpska<br />
kraljevska akademija.<br />
Ernst Basler and Partners (1995). The World Bank Feasibility Study on the Lake Ohrid<br />
Conservation Project. Zollikon. 158 pp.<br />
Гашевски, М. (1978). Основни хидрографски особености на речната мрежа во СР<br />
Македонија. Географско Друштво на СР Македонија, 15-16: 29-42. Скопје.<br />
Икономов, П. (1960): Распространување на Ephemeroptera во Македонија. Acta. Mus.<br />
Mac. Sci. Nat., Т. 7, 3:41-74, Скопје.<br />
Икономов, П. (1980): Сезонска и лонгитудинална дистрибуција на Plecoptera (Insecta)<br />
во однос на температурниот фактор во изворниот регион на реката Треска<br />
(Велика Река). Год. Збор. на Биол. факултет на Унив. "Кирил и Методиј" во Скопје,<br />
33:5-13.<br />
Ivanovski T. & Strackov, M. (1974). Tectonics and history <strong>of</strong> the tectonic evolution <strong>of</strong> Ohrid<br />
Valley nad its outskrits. In: Symposium on hte Problems <strong>of</strong> the Regulation <strong>of</strong> Lake<br />
Ohrid. Maced. Acad. Sci. Skopje, 17-29.<br />
Митиќ В. (1998): Фитопланктонот и хлорофилот а во литоралниот регион на<br />
Охридското Езеро каде што се влева реката Сатеска. Петто советување:<br />
Водостопанство во Република Македонија. Реферати и соопштенија: 161-165.<br />
Митиќ В., Јорданоски М., Патчева С. и Велјаноска Е. (2000): Одредување на<br />
квалитетот на истечната вода од Охридското Езеро кај Струга. Седмо<br />
советување: Водостопанството во Република Македонија, Струга. Реферати и<br />
соопштенија: 247-252.<br />
Pavlov (2010). The ecology <strong>of</strong> the benthic diatom community in Lake Ohrid and the<br />
possibility for assessing the ecological status <strong>of</strong> the lake. Msci Thesis UNESCO-IHE<br />
Institute For Water Education. Delft. 172 pp.<br />
Pfister, P. & Pipp, E., (2009). Leitfaden zur erhebung der biologischen qualitatselemente:<br />
Bundesministerium Für Land- Und Forstwirtschaft, Wasserwirtschaft, U.U., Vii, S. &<br />
Wien, A.<br />
Rott, E. ed. 1999. Indikationslisten fur aufwuchsalgen in osterreichischen fliessgewassern.<br />
Teil 2: Trophieindikation sowiegeochemische praferenz; taxonomische und<br />
toxikologische anmerkungen., Wien: WWK, Bundesministerium fur Land-und<br />
Forstwirtschaft.<br />
Schaumburg, J., Schranz, C., Stelzer, D. & H<strong>of</strong>mann, G., (2007). Action instructions for the<br />
ecological evaluation <strong>of</strong> lakes for implementation <strong>of</strong> the EU water framework directive:<br />
Makrophytes and phytobenthos.<br />
Сибиновиќ, М. (1987). Езера. Охридско и Преспанско. Завод за водостопанство на<br />
СРМ- Скопје. 156 стр.<br />
312
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Spirkovski, S., Avramovski, O., Kodzoman, A. (2001). Watersheed management in the Lake<br />
Ohrid region <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> and Macedonia, lakes & reservoirs. Research and management<br />
6: 237-242.<br />
Stankovic, S. (1960). The Balkan Lake Ohrid and its Living World. Monographiae Biologicae<br />
Vo. IX, Uitgeverij Dr. W. Junk, Den Haag.<br />
Taleska, M. (2010). Influence <strong>of</strong> Human Activities on Submerged Vascular Macrophytes<br />
Alongside Crn Drim River. BALWOIS 2010 - Ohrid, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. 25-29 May<br />
2010.<br />
Talevska (2009): Surface area <strong>of</strong> the belt <strong>of</strong> red head grass (Potamogeton perfoliatus L.) in<br />
Lake Ohrid. BALWOIS 2009. - Ohrid, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />
Talevski, T., Talevska, M., Milosevic, D. & Talevska A. (2010). Anthropogenic Influence on<br />
Ichthy<strong>of</strong>auna and Macrophyte Diversity in the Crn Drim Ecosystem. BALWOIS 2010 -<br />
Ohrid, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. 25-29 May 2010.<br />
WFD-UKTAG, (2008). Phytobenthos - diatom assessment <strong>of</strong> lake ecological quality<br />
(DARLEQ) (WFD-UKTAG), W.F.D.-U.K.A.G., Sniffer, Place, G., Edinburgh, 3aa, E.,<br />
Scotland & www.Wfduk.Org.<br />
K. H. Tan (2000) Environmental Soil Science: Second edition, Revised and Expanded.<br />
Books in soils, plants and the environment, vol 74. Marcel Dekker, Inc.<br />
H.D. Scott (2000) Soil Physics. Agricultural and Environmental Applications. Iowa State<br />
University press/Ames<br />
http://book.coe.int/EN/ficheouvrage.php?PAGEID=36&lang=EN&produit_aliasid=1827<br />
http://www.aplic.org/<br />
Soils<br />
Ѓ. Филиповски, Р. Ризовски, П. Ристевски (1996)Ч Карактеристики на климатсковегетациските<br />
почвени зони (региони)во Република Македонија. МАНУ<br />
Ѓ. Филиповски (1995) Почвите на Република Македонија. Том 1. МАНУ<br />
Ѓ. Филиповски (2003) Деградација на почвите како компонента на животната средина<br />
во Република Македонија. МАНУ<br />
D. Popovski (1953) Zemjljista Belcickog Polja. Zemljiste i biljka, God II, No.2. Beograd<br />
Д. Поповски (1955): Почвите во Издеглавско поле и нивните својства. Социјалистичко<br />
земјоделство, Год VII, Бр. 6. Скопје.<br />
Д. Петковски (1994)Ч Генеза, својства и распространетост на почвите во кичевско<br />
поле. Годишен зборник на Земјоделскиот институт, Книга XIII-XIV. 1994. Скопје<br />
Д. Поповски (1953)Ч Почвите во струшко поле. Зборник на земјоделскиот испитателен<br />
институт. Книга II, Скопје<br />
S. Parr (1999): Study on the Assessment <strong>of</strong> Indirect and Cumulative Impacts as well as<br />
Impact Interactions. European Commission Directorate-General XI, Environment,<br />
Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection.<br />
Посебни планови за стопанисување со шумите, подготвени од ЈП “Maкедонски<br />
шуми” – сектор за планирање 1978<br />
Посебен план за стопанисување со шумите “Беличка Река- Пресека” 2008-2017<br />
Посебен план за стопанисување со шумите “Дреново” 2007-2016<br />
313
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
Посебен план за стопанисување со шумите “Волништа” 2004-2013<br />
Посебен план за стопанисување со шумите “Мaзатар” 2003-2012<br />
Посебен план за стопанисување со шумите “Славеј” 2003-2012<br />
Посебен план за стопанисување со шумите “Јабланица - Ќафасан” 2009-2018<br />
Закон за шуми (Сл.весник на РМ , 64/09)<br />
Подзаконски акти во врска со шумарството<br />
Карта на ерозија на РМ - ЗВРМ , 1993<br />
Air:<br />
Noise<br />
[1] Air Pollution Associated with the Construction <strong>of</strong> Swedish <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />
Norrbotniabanan Case Study, Ross Phillips, Banverket Norra Banregionen, Luleå,<br />
December 2006<br />
[2] Horizontal Guidance Note-H1 (Annex F), Environment Agency , Bristol, April<br />
2010 http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/pdf/GEHO0410BSIL-e-e.pdf<br />
[3] Emission Estimation Technique Manual for Mining and Processing <strong>of</strong><br />
Nonmetallic Minerals , Environment Australia, 2000<br />
http://www.npi.gov.au/publications/emission-estimation-technique/pubs/<br />
nonmetallic.pdf<br />
Годишен извештај за квалитет на воздухот 2006, 2007, 2008 година (МЖСПП)<br />
Месечни извештаи за квалитет на воздухот за мерно место Кичево (МЖСПП)<br />
[1] Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, FTA-VA-90-1003-06, May, 2006<br />
[2] Railroad Noise Emission Standards, US EPA<br />
[3] http://www.nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=20016M33.txt<br />
Water<br />
1. Z. Karamanolevski, J. Milevski, S. Alchinova Monevska, REVIEW OF AVAILABLE OF<br />
PHYSICO-CHEMICAL, GEOMORPHOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL QUALITY ELEMENTS<br />
ON SURFACE WATER AND THE MONITORING ACTIONS UNDERTAKE IN<br />
HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL ADMINISTRATION, BIECO, 2005.<br />
2. Annual Reports on Surface Water Quality in <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, 1977-1997,<br />
Hydrometeorological Institute <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, Skopje, 1998.<br />
3. Study on Integrated Water Resources Development and Management Master Plan in the<br />
<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, Financed by JICA -Japan International Cooperation Agency, 1997-<br />
1998.<br />
4. Water Pollution Monitoring System for Streams and Rivers in Macedonia – I and II Fase,<br />
EAWAG, Swiss, 1997-2004 and 2006.<br />
6. http://www.meteo.gov.mк<br />
Socio-economic aspects<br />
ВГИ. (1970-1972): Топографски карти со размер 1:25000 (Гаус-Кригерова проекција) за<br />
територијата на Република Македонија (216 секции), Белград.<br />
314
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
ВГИ. (1976): Топографски карти со размер 1:200000 (Гаус-Кригерова проекција) за<br />
територијата на Република Македонија, листови 4221-Скопје, 4222-Куманово, 4223-<br />
Ќустендил, 4121-Битола, 4122-Прилеп, 4123-Солун. Белград.<br />
ДЗС (2004) Попис на населението, домаќинствата и становите во Република<br />
Македонија, 2002, Вкупно население, домаќинства и станови, вкупно население<br />
според изјаснувањето за националнат припадност, мајчиниот јазик и вероисповедта<br />
(податоци по населени места) книга 10, Скопје.<br />
ДЗС (2004) Попис на населението, домаќинствата и становите во Република<br />
Македонија, 2002, Вкупно население по пол И возраст (податоци по населени места)<br />
книга11, Скопје.<br />
ДЗС (2004) Попис на населението, домаќинствата и становите во Република<br />
Македонија, 2002, Вкупно население во земјата, вкупно население според активноста<br />
и полот (податоци по населени места) книга12, Скопје.<br />
Маркоски Б. (1992): Картографско картометриски проучувања на хипсометриската<br />
структура на просторот и разместеноста на населението во Република Македонија.<br />
Докторска дисертација,, Институтот за географија, Природно математичкиот<br />
факултет,, стр. 1-625, Скопје. (ракопис).<br />
Маркоски Б. (1995): Хипсометрија на просторот и населеноста во Република<br />
Македонија - картографски метод. Македонска ризница. стр. 1-316, Скопје.<br />
Маркоски Б. (2004): Картографско дефинирање и диференцирање на планинските<br />
просторни целини во Република Македонија, Билтен за физичка географија, ПМФ-<br />
Институт за географија, стр. 25-34, Скопје.<br />
Републичка геодетска управа. (1982): СР Македонија низ катастарска евиденција.<br />
Скопје.<br />
Waste<br />
- IFC Environment, Health and Safety Guedilines for <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />
- Листа на видови на отпад („Сл. весник на РМ“ бр. 100/05)<br />
- http://www.campuserc.org/virtualtour/waste/best/Pages/default.aspx<br />
315
Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />
APPENDICES<br />
316