11.11.2014 Views

Railway Corridor 8 – Republic of Albania

Railway Corridor 8 – Republic of Albania

Railway Corridor 8 – Republic of Albania

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Contracting authority:<br />

Economic operator:<br />

Facility:<br />

Section:<br />

Phase:<br />

Content:<br />

Public Enterprise for <strong>Railway</strong> Infrastructure<br />

MACEDONIAN RAILWAYS - Skopje<br />

EUROTRANSPROJECT OOD<br />

Technical documentation at a level <strong>of</strong> study and<br />

preliminary design for the railway line <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> 8-<br />

Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Preliminary design<br />

Volume 4- Environmental Impact<br />

Assessment Study<br />

Technical no.: 001 / 2010


Public Enterprise for <strong>Railway</strong> Infrastructure “Macedonian<br />

<strong>Railway</strong>s” - Skopje<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY<br />

OF THE PROJECT<br />

CONSTRUCTION OF RAILWAY LINE<br />

KICEVO – LIN (BORDER WITH THE REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA)<br />

June 2010<br />

2


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Content<br />

Person in charge and expert team involved in the preparation <strong>of</strong> Environmental Impact<br />

Assessment Study .............................................................................................................. 11<br />

List <strong>of</strong> acronyms .................................................................................................................... 15<br />

Non-technical summary ...................................................................................................... 17<br />

1.1 Zero alternative ..................................................................................................................... 21<br />

Section 1 25<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment legislation ........................................................................... 54<br />

The phases <strong>of</strong> the EIA procedure implementation are shown on the figure below: .............. 55<br />

Methodology <strong>of</strong> the Study preparation .................................................................................... 62<br />

Considered alternatives.......................................................................................................... 64<br />

1.2 Zero alternative ..................................................................................................................... 70<br />

2 Project description and characteristics ......................................................................... 72<br />

2.1 Brief history <strong>of</strong> Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s .................................................................................. 72<br />

2.2 <strong>Railway</strong> infrastructure <strong>of</strong> Macedonia relative to neighbours ............................................... 72<br />

2.3 Advantages <strong>of</strong> the railway .................................................................................................... 72<br />

2.4 Description <strong>of</strong> the railway infrastructure.............................................................................. 73<br />

2.5 Layout .................................................................................................................................... 75<br />

2.6 Longitudinal pr<strong>of</strong>ile ............................................................................................................... 75<br />

2.7 Stations layout and longitudinal section ............................................................................... 79<br />

2.8 Bridges and viaducts ............................................................................................................. 80<br />

2.9 Inclinations <strong>of</strong> cuts and embankments ................................................................................. 81<br />

2.10 Locomotives .......................................................................................................................... 82<br />

2.11 Towing vehicles ..................................................................................................................... 83<br />

2.12 Systems <strong>of</strong> railway electrification ......................................................................................... 84<br />

2.13 Electric traction ..................................................................................................................... 85<br />

2.14 Diesel locomotive .................................................................................................................. 86<br />

2.15 Specific solutions for the Project .......................................................................................... 87<br />

2.15.1 Design parameters for open line, stations and intersections ....................................... 90<br />

2.15.2 Section 1 ........................................................................................................................ 91<br />

2.15.3 Section 1.2 ..................................................................................................................... 97<br />

2.15.4 Section 2 ........................................................................................................................ 99<br />

3 Description <strong>of</strong> the environment................................................................................... 103<br />

3.1 Geomorphological characteristics ...................................................................................... 103<br />

3.1.1 Structural relief ........................................................................................................... 103<br />

3.1.2 Structural blocks (mountains)..................................................................................... 104<br />

3.1.3 Graben structures (depressions, basins)..................................................................... 105<br />

3.1.4 Recent relief along the railway corridor ..................................................................... 106<br />

3.2 Climate conditions in the area ............................................................................................ 107<br />

3.2.1 Climate characteristics <strong>of</strong> Kicevo Basin ....................................................................... 108<br />

3.2.2 Climate characteristics <strong>of</strong> Ohrid-Struga Basin ............................................................ 110<br />

3.3 Geology <strong>of</strong> the railway line area ......................................................................................... 116<br />

3.4 Engineering - Geological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route ................... 119<br />

3


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

3.4.1 Non Coherent Rock Masses ........................................................................................ 119<br />

3.4.2 Poorly Coherent Rock Masses ..................................................................................... 119<br />

3.4.3 Highly Coherent Rock Masses ..................................................................................... 119<br />

3.4.4 Contemporary registered engineering - geological appearances and processes ....... 120<br />

3.5 Hydrogeological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route ................................ 121<br />

3.5.1 Well porous rock masses/sediments .......................................................................... 121<br />

3.5.2 Medium porous rock masses/sediments .................................................................... 122<br />

3.5.3 Poorly porous rock masses/sediments ....................................................................... 122<br />

3.5.4 Predominantly non-porous rock masses/sediments .................................................. 122<br />

3.6 Tectonics and seismic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route ....................... 125<br />

3.7 Soil characteristics .............................................................................................................. 129<br />

3.7.1 Colluvial soils ............................................................................................................... 130<br />

3.7.2 Alluvial soils ................................................................................................................. 131<br />

3.7.3 Marsh soils .................................................................................................................. 131<br />

3.8 Hydrography and quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters in the area ..................................................... 133<br />

3.9 Quality <strong>of</strong> air in the area ..................................................................................................... 139<br />

3.9.1 Quality <strong>of</strong> ambient air in Kicevo .................................................................................. 140<br />

3.9.2 Quality <strong>of</strong> ambient air in Ohrid ................................................................................... 147<br />

3.10 Environmental noise in the area ......................................................................................... 150<br />

3.11 Biological diversity .............................................................................................................. 153<br />

3.11.1 Biogeographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area ................................................................ 153<br />

3.11.2 Biomes ......................................................................................................................... 153<br />

3.11.3 Climate-vegetation-soil zones ..................................................................................... 155<br />

3.11.4 DESCRIPTION OF ECOSYSTEMS AND HABITATS .......................................................... 158<br />

3.11.5 Azonal forests .............................................................................................................. 162<br />

3.11.6 Open areas - pastures ................................................................................................. 165<br />

3.11.7 Rocky areas ................................................................................................................. 165<br />

3.11.8 Wetlands ..................................................................................................................... 167<br />

3.11.9 Anthropogenic habitats .............................................................................................. 175<br />

3.11.10 Significant habitats and species .................................................................................. 180<br />

3.11.11 Important species ....................................................................................................... 182<br />

3.11.12 Valorization <strong>of</strong> vertebrate fauna ................................................................................. 194<br />

3.12 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> landscapes .............................................................................................. 198<br />

3.12.1 Hilly rural landscape in oak forest belt ....................................................................... 200<br />

3.12.2 Landscape <strong>of</strong> subalpine broadleaved forests.............................................................. 201<br />

3.12.3 Urban landscape Kicevo .............................................................................................. 201<br />

3.12.4 Lake plane landscape .................................................................................................. 201<br />

3.13 Population, populated places and economic and social parameters ................................. 202<br />

3.13.1 Social- geographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> settlements along the Kicevo- Lin railway line<br />

route 203<br />

3.14 Use and categorization <strong>of</strong> the land around the railway line route ..................................... 214<br />

3.14.1 Economic and geographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area along the railway line route<br />

Kicevo-Lin .................................................................................................................................... 216<br />

3.15 Existing or planned infrastructure around the route .......................................................... 225<br />

3.15.1 Economic infrastructure.............................................................................................. 225<br />

3.15.2 Institutional infrastructure .......................................................................................... 226<br />

3.15.3 Linear infrastructure ................................................................................................... 226<br />

3.16 Forests ................................................................................................................................. 227<br />

4


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

3.16.1 Forest and forestry management in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia ............................... 227<br />

3.16.2 Goals <strong>of</strong> forestry development ................................................................................... 229<br />

3.16.3 Status <strong>of</strong> crops in the contact zone ............................................................................. 231<br />

3.16.4 Manner <strong>of</strong> management ............................................................................................. 234<br />

3.17 Erosive processes in the contact zone ................................................................................ 236<br />

3.17.1 Status <strong>of</strong> crops in the construction zone <strong>of</strong> the railway line ...................................... 237<br />

3.18 Natural heritage .................................................................................................................. 240<br />

3.19 Cultural heritage ................................................................................................................. 241<br />

4 Assessment <strong>of</strong> environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> the project implementation ......................... 247<br />

4.1 Safety aspects ..................................................................................................................... 247<br />

4.2 Impacts on biological diversity ............................................................................................ 247<br />

4.2.1 Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats and ecosystems ....................................................................... 247<br />

4.2.2 Assessment <strong>of</strong> the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats.................................................................... 252<br />

4.2.3 Impacts on habitats ..................................................................................................... 260<br />

4.2.4 Impacts on flora and fauna ......................................................................................... 264<br />

4.3 Impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters ........................................................................... 265<br />

4.3.1 Impact <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters .................. 266<br />

4.3.2 Impact <strong>of</strong> the railway line operation on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters ...................... 267<br />

4.3.3 Impacts on rivers and other wetlands ........................................................................ 268<br />

4.4 Impacts on landscape ......................................................................................................... 270<br />

4.4.1 Disorder in functional characteristics <strong>of</strong> the landscape <strong>of</strong> subalpine broadleaved<br />

forests. 270<br />

4.4.2 Impacts on hilly rural landscape ................................................................................. 270<br />

4.4.3 Impacts on plane lake landscape ................................................................................ 271<br />

4.5 Impacts on geological structures ........................................................................................ 271<br />

4.5.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 271<br />

4.5.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 272<br />

4.6 Impacts <strong>of</strong> vibrations and seismics ..................................................................................... 272<br />

4.6.1 Response <strong>of</strong> people ..................................................................................................... 273<br />

4.6.2 Impact <strong>of</strong> vibrations on sensitive equipment ............................................................. 273<br />

4.6.3 Impact <strong>of</strong> vibrations on buildings................................................................................ 273<br />

4.7 Impacts on soils ................................................................................................................... 273<br />

4.7.1 <strong>Railway</strong> line construction phase ................................................................................. 274<br />

4.7.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 277<br />

4.8 Impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> air and climate ........................................................................... 278<br />

4.8.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 278<br />

4.8.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 280<br />

4.9 Impacts <strong>of</strong> noise .................................................................................................................. 280<br />

4.9.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 280<br />

4.9.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 282<br />

4.10 Solid waste management .................................................................................................... 285<br />

4.10.1 Waste during construction.......................................................................................... 285<br />

4.10.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 287<br />

4.11 Socio-economic aspects, ownership aspects and impacts on revenues ............................ 287<br />

4.12 Visual effects/impacts on landscape .................................................................................. 287<br />

4.12.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 287<br />

4.12.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 287<br />

4.13 Impacts on forests ............................................................................................................... 288<br />

5


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

4.13.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 288<br />

4.13.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 288<br />

4.14 Impacts on erosion and deposits during construction and operational phases ................. 288<br />

4.15 Impacts on natural heritage ................................................................................................ 289<br />

4.16 Impacts on cultural heritage ............................................................................................... 289<br />

4.17 Impacts <strong>of</strong> radiation ............................................................................................................ 289<br />

4.18 Impacts <strong>of</strong> odour ................................................................................................................. 289<br />

4.19 Cumulative impacts............................................................................................................. 289<br />

4.20 Matrix <strong>of</strong> environmental impacts ....................................................................................... 290<br />

5 Measures for environmental impacts prevention or reduction..................................... 291<br />

5.1 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on geomorphology ..................................................... 291<br />

5.2 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on biological diversity ................................................ 291<br />

5.2.1 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on habitats and ecosystems ............................... 291<br />

5.2.2 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on species ........................................................... 293<br />

5.3 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on the functionality <strong>of</strong> landscapes ............................. 294<br />

5.4 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on geology .................................................................. 294<br />

5.5 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on seismics and vibrations ......................................... 295<br />

5.5.1 Methods for reduction <strong>of</strong> seismical effects <strong>of</strong> mining ................................................ 295<br />

5.5.2 Methods for mitigation <strong>of</strong> vibrations from railway transport .................................... 298<br />

5.6 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on soils........................................................................ 301<br />

5.7 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> air .................................................... 303<br />

5.7.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 303<br />

5.7.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 303<br />

5.8 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters ................................ 303<br />

5.8.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 303<br />

5.8.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 304<br />

5.8.3 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on wetlands ........................................................ 304<br />

5.9 Measures for noise impacts reduction ............................................................................... 306<br />

5.10 Measures for sustainable waste management ................................................................... 306<br />

5.10.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 306<br />

5.10.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 307<br />

5.11 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on cultural heritage .................................................... 308<br />

5.12 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on forests and forestry ............................................... 308<br />

5.12.1 Construction phase ..................................................................................................... 308<br />

5.12.2 Operational phase ....................................................................................................... 308<br />

5.12.3 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> negative effects <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction on erosion<br />

and deposits ................................................................................................................................ 309<br />

5.12.4 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on socio-economic aspect .................................. 310<br />

5.13 Overview <strong>of</strong> measures for environmental impact reduction and environmental monitoring<br />

310<br />

6 Recommendations and conclusions ........................................................................... 311<br />

6.1 Project justification ............................................................................................................. 311<br />

6.2 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 311<br />

6.3 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 311<br />

7 References ................................................................................................................ 312<br />

APPENDICES ................................................................................................................... 316<br />

6


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 1 Southeastern axis, ГВР .......................................................................................................... 47<br />

Figure 2 <strong>Corridor</strong> VІІІ, according to the Memorandum <strong>of</strong> Understanding ............................................. 48<br />

Figure 3 <strong>Railway</strong> corridor VІІІ, section Duras-Skopje-S<strong>of</strong>ia .................................................................. 49<br />

Figure 4 <strong>Railway</strong> network <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia ...................................................................... 51<br />

Figure 5 Existing railway network through the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia ................................................ 52<br />

Figure 6 Utilization <strong>of</strong> the railway infrastructure <strong>of</strong> Macedonia ............................................................. 52<br />

Figure 7 Considered alternatives .......................................................................................................... 67<br />

Figure 8 Accepted section for the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) ......... 69<br />

Figure 9 Constituent elements <strong>of</strong> the railway ........................................................................................ 75<br />

Figure 10 Cross-section <strong>of</strong> embankment, excavation and incision <strong>of</strong> single-track line ........................ 77<br />

Figure 11 Superstructure <strong>of</strong> the railway line ......................................................................................... 78<br />

Figure 12 Cross-section and constituent parts <strong>of</strong> the line ..................................................................... 78<br />

Figure 13 Required station width .......................................................................................................... 80<br />

Figure 14 Schematic overview <strong>of</strong> the main constituent elements <strong>of</strong> electric locomotive ...................... 83<br />

Figure 15 Passenger wagon ................................................................................................................. 84<br />

Figure 16 <strong>Railway</strong> electrification system ............................................................................................... 84<br />

Figure 17 Accepted section <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) ........ 88<br />

Figure 18 Tunnel ................................................................................................................................... 94<br />

Figure 19 Stations and intersections ..................................................................................................... 96<br />

Figure 20 Municipalities through which the railway route passes ....................................................... 103<br />

Figure 21 Structural relief .................................................................................................................... 104<br />

Figure 22 Climate map <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia ........................................................................ 107<br />

Figure 23 Average precipitation .......................................................................................................... 109<br />

Figure 24 Climate diagram Ohrid and Struga ..................................................................................... 111<br />

Figure 25 Rose <strong>of</strong> winds in Ohrid ........................................................................................................ 114<br />

Figure 26 Tectonic regionalization <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia ..................................................... 127<br />

Figure 27 Map <strong>of</strong> isolines <strong>of</strong> seismic intensity <strong>of</strong> earthquakes in Macedonia (by MCS) ..................... 128<br />

Figure 28 Seismic map ....................................................................................................................... 129<br />

Figure 29 Colluvial soils ...................................................................................................................... 130<br />

Figure 30 Marsh soils .......................................................................................................................... 132<br />

Figure 31 Watershed areas................................................................................................................. 134<br />

Figure 32 Measuring points monitoring the waters in the watershed <strong>of</strong> Treska river ......................... 137<br />

Figure 33 Measuring points monitoring the waters in the watershed <strong>of</strong> the river Crn Drim ................ 139<br />

Figure 34 Monitoring stations .............................................................................................................. 140<br />

Figure 35 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> SO 2 in Kicevo ................................................................. 142<br />

Figure 36 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> nitrogen dioxide for the period 2007-2009 ..................... 143<br />

Figure 37 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> suspended particulate matters sized up to 10 micrometers<br />

for the period 2007-2009 ..................................................................................................................... 144<br />

Figure 38 Maximum daily 8-hours mean value <strong>of</strong> the concentration <strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide for the period<br />

2007-2009 ........................................................................................................................................... 145<br />

Figure 39 Long-term target for human health protection for ozone for the period 2007-2009 ........... 146<br />

Figure 40 Long-term target for vegetation protection for ozone for the period 2007-2009 ................. 147<br />

Figure 41 Average monthly concentrations <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006 ............................. 148<br />

Figure 42 Measurements <strong>of</strong> dust in the air ......................................................................................... 150<br />

Figure 43 Noise measuring points ...................................................................................................... 152<br />

7


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 44 Biomes in southwestern part <strong>of</strong> Macedonia (by Matvejev & Puncer 1989) ........................ 153<br />

Figure 45 Climate-vegetation-soil zones in Southwestern part <strong>of</strong> Macedonia (by Filipovski at al. 1996)<br />

............................................................................................................................................................ 156<br />

Figure 46 Italian and Turkey oak forest near village Arbinovo............................................................ 157<br />

Figure 47 Remains <strong>of</strong> Downy oak and Hop hornbeam forests near Kicevo ....................................... 159<br />

Figure 48 Truffle oak (Quercus robur) in the village Moroista ............................................................ 164<br />

Figure 49 Calcareous rocks near the village Radozda ....................................................................... 166<br />

Figure 50 Sandbars on the river Sateska near the village Volino ....................................................... 168<br />

Figure 51 Reed belt on Ohrid Lake shore, between the settlement Elen Kamen and the village<br />

Radozda .............................................................................................................................................. 169<br />

Figure 52 Sandy bank on the river Sateska near the village Pesocan ............................................... 170<br />

Figure 53 Humid meadows and marshy habitats in the remains <strong>of</strong> Struga marsh near the village<br />

Radolista ............................................................................................................................................. 173<br />

Figure 54 Meadows and fields in the zone <strong>of</strong> Italian and Turkey oak forests before the border-crossing<br />

Kjafasan. ............................................................................................................................................. 176<br />

Figure 55 Meadows and remains <strong>of</strong> chestnut forests in the zone <strong>of</strong> Italian and Turkey oak forests near<br />

the village Radozda ............................................................................................................................. 176<br />

Figure 56 Fields and meadows in the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Treska near the village Drugovo ................ 178<br />

Figure 57 Willow belts by the river Crn Drim ....................................................................................... 181<br />

Figure 58 Spring above the village Radozda with Lemna. ................................................................. 182<br />

Figure 59 Ibises (Plegadis falcinellus) ................................................................................................ 193<br />

Figure 60 Land categorization ............................................................................................................ 216<br />

Figure 61 Overview <strong>of</strong> forest management units in the contact zone along the route ....................... 233<br />

Figure 62 Risk <strong>of</strong> erosion along the route ........................................................................................... 236<br />

Figure 63 Erosiveness at sections ...................................................................................................... 237<br />

Figure 64 Alder belt along river Sateska near the village Arbinovo .................................................... 255<br />

Figure 65 Alder belt along the river Treska ......................................................................................... 255<br />

Figure 66 Siliceous rocks near the village Pesocan ........................................................................... 257<br />

Figure 67 Vineyard near the village Meseista ..................................................................................... 259<br />

Figure 68 Apple orchard in the village Volino ..................................................................................... 260<br />

Figure 69 Proposal for route redirection near the village Arbinovo to avoid destruction <strong>of</strong> alder forest,<br />

marshy habitats and humid meadows ................................................................................................ 262<br />

Figure 70 Alder woodlot near the village Botun .................................................................................. 263<br />

Figure 71 Reduction <strong>of</strong> noise with reference to the source (construction phase) ............................... 281<br />

Figure 72 Noise decline with reference to source (operational phase) .............................................. 285<br />

Figure 73 Marshy habitats near the village Arbinovo (alder woods, humid meadows and marsh<br />

communities) ....................................................................................................................................... 292<br />

Figure 74 Presentation <strong>of</strong> rock mass behaviour in mining with NONEL-system and detonation fuse 297<br />

Figure 75 Presentation <strong>of</strong> rock mass behaviour in initiation at several drillings with NONEL- system<br />

and detonation fuse ............................................................................................................................. 297<br />

Figure 76 Photograph made during mining with NONEL-system ....................................................... 298<br />

Figure 77 Building insulation to reduce ground vibrations from the nearby railway line by use <strong>of</strong><br />

system <strong>of</strong> springs (Gerb Vibrations Control Systems) ........................................................................ 300<br />

Table 1 Description <strong>of</strong> railway corridor VІІІ ........................................................................................... 49<br />

Table 2 Current status <strong>of</strong> railway lines in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia .................................................. 53<br />

8


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Table 3 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the railway network ..................................................................................... 53<br />

Table 4 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> alternatives ......................................................................................................... 71<br />

Table 5 Registered engineering geological appearances and processes along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />

line ....................................................................................................................................................... 120<br />

Table 6 Hydrogeological appearances ............................................................................................... 123<br />

Table 7 Classification <strong>of</strong> waters .......................................................................................................... 135<br />

Table 8 Measuring parameters <strong>of</strong> institutions ..................................................................................... 140<br />

Table 9 Limit values for SO 2 ............................................................................................................... 141<br />

Table 10 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> nitrogen dioxide for the period 2007-2009 ...................... 142<br />

Table 11 Analysis <strong>of</strong> suspended particulate matters sized up to 10 micrometers for the period 2007-<br />

2009 .................................................................................................................................................... 143<br />

Table 12 Analysis <strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide for the period 2007-2009 ...................................................... 144<br />

Table 13 Analysis <strong>of</strong> data on ozone for the period 2007-2009 ........................................................... 145<br />

Table 14 Analysis <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006 .................................................................... 147<br />

Table 15 Average monthly concentrations <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006 .............................. 148<br />

Table 16 Limit values for protection <strong>of</strong> ecosystems and vegetation ................................................... 149<br />

Table 17 Limit values for human health protection ............................................................................. 149<br />

Table 18 Noise levels .......................................................................................................................... 151<br />

Table 19 Important species <strong>of</strong> vascular flora in the subject corridor................................................... 184<br />

Table 20 Overview <strong>of</strong> important species <strong>of</strong> insects and some arthropods ......................................... 184<br />

Table 21 Species diversity (vascular plants) in humid habitats near Belcisko Blato (near the corridor)<br />

............................................................................................................................................................ 185<br />

Table 22 Important amphibian species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line ......................................... 190<br />

Table 23 Important reptile species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line ................................................ 190<br />

Table 24 Important bird species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line.................................................... 191<br />

Table 25 Important mammalian species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line ....................................... 193<br />

Table 26 Valorization <strong>of</strong> amphibians ................................................................................................... 194<br />

Table 27 Valorization <strong>of</strong> reptiles .......................................................................................................... 195<br />

Table 28 Valorization <strong>of</strong> bird fauna. .................................................................................................... 195<br />

Table 29 Valorization <strong>of</strong> mammals ...................................................................................................... 197<br />

Table 30 Overview <strong>of</strong> municipalities and settlements within or affected by the corridor along the route<br />

<strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin............................................................................................................... 202<br />

Table 31 Overview <strong>of</strong> total population, population by gender and ethnic structure, by municipalities<br />

and populated places along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin ............................................................ 205<br />

Table 32 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> total population, population by gender and ethnic structure, by<br />

municipalities and populated places along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin ..................................... 207<br />

Table 33 Overview <strong>of</strong> population by age groups, by municipalities and populated places along the<br />

railway line route Kicevo-Lin ............................................................................................................... 208<br />

Table 34 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> population by age groups, by municipalities and populated places<br />

along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin ............................................................................................... 209<br />

Table 35 Overview <strong>of</strong> the population by economic activity, by municipalities and populated places<br />

along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin ............................................................................................... 210<br />

Table 36 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> the population by economic activity, by municipality along the railway<br />

line route Kicevo-Lin ............................................................................................................................ 211<br />

Table 37 Overview <strong>of</strong> population, households, number <strong>of</strong> members per households and dwellings, by<br />

municipality and populated place along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin .......................................... 212<br />

9


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Table 38 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> the population by age groups, by municipality along the railway line<br />

route Kicevo-Lin .................................................................................................................................. 213<br />

Table 39 Land use in the analyzed corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Kjafasan ................................ 214<br />

Table 40 Overview <strong>of</strong> agricultural land by registered land plots, by municipalities and populated places<br />

along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin ............................................................................................... 218<br />

Table 41 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> agricultural areas by registered land plots, by municipalities and<br />

populated places along the railway line Kicevo-Lin ............................................................................ 224<br />

Table 42 –Woodstock by Forest Management Units .......................................................................... 232<br />

Table 43 Composition <strong>of</strong> crops by growing type ................................................................................. 234<br />

Table 44 Composition <strong>of</strong> crops by species ......................................................................................... 234<br />

Table 45 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the forest in the railway line route (along axis) ....................................... 239<br />

Table 46 Objects <strong>of</strong> nature .................................................................................................................. 240<br />

Table 47 Archeological sites ............................................................................................................... 242<br />

Table 48 Matrix determining the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats ....................................................................... 253<br />

Table 49 Average emissions from construction machines ................................................................. 278<br />

Table 50 Concentration <strong>of</strong> harmful substances in the air around construction sites .......................... 279<br />

Table 51 Noise levels from construction equipment ........................................................................... 280<br />

Table 52 Noise levels from railway line construction sites (15 m from source) .................................. 280<br />

Table 53 Levels <strong>of</strong> exposure at noise from different sources <strong>of</strong> the railway transport ....................... 282<br />

Table 54 Calculation <strong>of</strong> reference equivalent noise (15 m from the source) ...................................... 284<br />

Table 55 Amounts <strong>of</strong> inert waste ........................................................................................................ 286<br />

Table 56 List <strong>of</strong> wastes ....................................................................................................................... 286<br />

Table 57 Criteria for environmental impact assessment ..................................................................... 290<br />

10


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Environmental Consulting Company<br />

DEKONS-EMA doo export-import<br />

No. 03-163<br />

29.06.2010, Skopje<br />

Reference no. 01- 45<br />

Person in charge and expert team involved in the preparation <strong>of</strong> Environmental<br />

Impact Assessment Study<br />

Based on the Contract concluded between DEKONS-EMA<br />

and Public Enterprise for<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> Infrastructure "Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s"-Skopje, as Investor, the development <strong>of</strong><br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study was has been initiated.<br />

Chapter XI (Environmental Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> Projects) <strong>of</strong> the Law on Environment<br />

(Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 53/05, 81/05, 24/07, 159/2008, 83/09 and<br />

48/10) establishes the ground for the EIA procedure performance, according to the Decree<br />

determining projects for which and criteria on the basis <strong>of</strong> which the screening for an<br />

environmental impact assessment shall be carried out (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia no. 74/05), the activities to be carried out in the frames <strong>of</strong> the Project -<br />

Constriction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) - belongs to<br />

the first category, Annex 1, titled: "7(a). construction <strong>of</strong> transport lines for long-distance railway<br />

traffic and airports with a basic runway length <strong>of</strong> 2.100 m or more", which assumes application <strong>of</strong><br />

the procedure for "Notification <strong>of</strong> the authority responsible for the activity" and "screening <strong>of</strong><br />

the necessity for environmental impact assessment performance" by the competent body -<br />

MEPP and "EIA Study scoping", upon which the consulting company DEKONS-EMA<br />

initiated the preparation <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Impact Assessment Study.<br />

In the frames <strong>of</strong> the agreed activity, in the period January-April 2010, field investigation was<br />

carried out, review <strong>of</strong> the existing technical documentation on the facilities and manner <strong>of</strong><br />

transport through railway line, as well as analysis <strong>of</strong> European and international practices <strong>of</strong><br />

this transport mode use.<br />

The Environmental Impact Assessment Study provides an overview <strong>of</strong> the current status <strong>of</strong><br />

the sites where the railway line will run, considers alternatives, identifies potential impacts on<br />

environmental media during the construction phase, operational phase - railway line use, as<br />

well as post-operational phase and proposes measures for their reduction or mitigation.<br />

11


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

The following expert team was involved in the preparation <strong>of</strong> this document:<br />

DEKONS EMA:<br />

- Menka Spirovska, Manager and responsible person for the Environmental Impact<br />

Assessment Study<br />

- Maja Kocova, expert from the List <strong>of</strong> Environmental Impact Assessment experts<br />

- Julijana Nikova, graduated technologist<br />

- Elena Jankova, graduated environmental engineer<br />

EXTERNAL EXPERTS:<br />

- Bosko Nikov, air, noise;<br />

- Trajce Stafilov, water;<br />

- Ljupco Melovski, biodiversity, landscape;<br />

- Slavco Hristov, biodiversity;<br />

- Dusko Mukaetov, soils;<br />

- Mitko Dimov, geology, hydrology;<br />

- Blagoja Markovski, economic aspects, GIS;<br />

- Ivan Blinkov, erosion and forests;<br />

- Aco Trendafilov, erosion and forests;<br />

- Dragan Kolcakovski, climate;<br />

- Metodija Velevski, birds;<br />

- Dejan Mirakovski, vibrations<br />

Director,<br />

Menka Spirovska<br />

12


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

13


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

14


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

List <strong>of</strong> acronyms<br />

GGV<br />

GDP<br />

BOD<br />

V<br />

LV<br />

HLV<br />

URE<br />

BCP<br />

daN<br />

dB<br />

LRT<br />

ETS<br />

ERTMS<br />

Gross Gained Value<br />

Gross Domestic Product<br />

Biological Oxygen Demand<br />

Volts<br />

Limit value<br />

High level value<br />

Upper Rail Edge<br />

Border control point<br />

decaNewton<br />

Decibels<br />

Long rail tracks<br />

Electric traction substations<br />

European <strong>Railway</strong> Transport Management System<br />

ЕС<br />

ЕЕС<br />

ETCS<br />

European Community<br />

European Economic Community<br />

European Train Control System<br />

EU<br />

RS<br />

RTO<br />

RTE<br />

W<br />

E<br />

EG<br />

S<br />

SE<br />

SSE<br />

PE<br />

kN<br />

кm<br />

km/h<br />

kV<br />

MR<br />

MEPP<br />

European Union<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> Station<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> Transport Organization<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> Transport Enterprise<br />

West<br />

East<br />

Engineering geology<br />

South<br />

Southeast<br />

South- Southeast<br />

Public Enterprise<br />

KiloNewton<br />

Kilometer<br />

Kilometer per hour<br />

Kilovlts<br />

Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment and Physical Planning<br />

MAFWE<br />

MPа<br />

mm<br />

NSC<br />

masl<br />

MVA<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Forestry and Water<br />

Economy<br />

Megapascals<br />

Millimeters<br />

Mercalli scale<br />

Meters above sea level<br />

Megavolt ampere<br />

15


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

BAT<br />

EIA<br />

Best Available Techniques<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment<br />

PM<br />

FMB<br />

Particulate matters sized ≤<br />

10 micrometers<br />

Forest Management Branch<br />

RM<br />

N<br />

NW<br />

MMW<br />

STM<br />

t<br />

FC<br />

TGV<br />

TPP<br />

HMA<br />

HG<br />

Hz<br />

COD<br />

FMUs<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />

North<br />

Northwest<br />

North-Northwest<br />

Synchronized Transport Mode<br />

Tone/tones<br />

Freight car<br />

High-speed trains<br />

Thermal Power Plant<br />

Hydrometeorological Administration<br />

Hydrogeological<br />

Hertz<br />

Chemical Oxygen Demand<br />

Forest Management Units<br />

16


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Non-technical summary<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> the Project, in accordance with the Project Programme, prepared by the<br />

Public Enterprise for <strong>Railway</strong> Infrastructure “Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s”- Skopje, is to develop a<br />

railway line Kicevo-border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>- Lin.<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> this railway line and other sections missing in <strong>Corridor</strong> 8, aims towards<br />

less expensive and faster transport <strong>of</strong> the population and economic assets. <strong>Railway</strong><br />

connection <strong>of</strong> Macedonia with the neighboring countries is expected to influence positively in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> enhanced economic activities and trade in the country, neighboring countries<br />

(<strong>Albania</strong> and Bulgaria) and the Region.<br />

The new railway connection will contribute to the improvement <strong>of</strong> the local population socialeconomic<br />

condition, particularly in the railway station areas, and thus on a regional level<br />

(development <strong>of</strong> the western part <strong>of</strong> the country), meaning cheaper transportation <strong>of</strong> people<br />

and goods. Furthermore, the construction <strong>of</strong> this railway line will bring about establishing a<br />

railway connection <strong>of</strong> Macedonia with <strong>Albania</strong>, which would enable creating a transport<br />

connection with the ports <strong>of</strong> Duras and Valona on the Adriatic Sea. This is <strong>of</strong> great<br />

significance for the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia as a continental country.<br />

The strategic goals <strong>of</strong> the Macedonian Government regarding railway transport include:<br />

Attractive railway service for the passengers, with the advantage <strong>of</strong> high quality travel<br />

to the work place, safe travelling possibilities and a guarantee that our transport<br />

choice will consider environmental conditions, including air quality and noise<br />

generation.<br />

Supporting heavy freight trains, used for transport <strong>of</strong> large amounts <strong>of</strong> various<br />

products, through an effective transition from rail to road transport and vice versa.<br />

Supporting the national industry through enabling a low-cost and effective mode <strong>of</strong><br />

mass transport.<br />

Macedonia’s geographical position and characteristics determine the strategic need for sea<br />

access through the territories <strong>of</strong> its neighbors. Connections to ports on the Aegean and<br />

Adriatic Seas are <strong>of</strong> exceptional national importance, especially accessibility to the ports <strong>of</strong><br />

Pirea, Taranto and Gioia Tauro. At present, only the connections with Pirea are adequately<br />

developed, while those with Duras and southern Italian ports require major development.<br />

The incomplete east-to-west railway line has a negative impact on rail transport<br />

competitiveness and the economy <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, on the whole. The lack <strong>of</strong> connection with<br />

the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> and the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria is a major obstacle in the improvement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the exchange market, not only with neighboring countries, but with Eastern Europe<br />

(Russia, Belarus, Ukraine), Turkey and Caucasus countries, as well. The <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia is a land locked country and mass transport should improve by connecting to<br />

<strong>Albania</strong> and Bulgaria ports, so from a strategic point <strong>of</strong> view, the connection with the<br />

<strong>Albania</strong>n and Bulgarian railway infrastructure is a significant challenge for the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia.<br />

The subject <strong>of</strong> the present Study, the railway line Kicevo- border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Albania</strong>, is designed as an extension <strong>of</strong> the railway line Skopje- Tetovo- Gostivar- Kicevo,<br />

and aims to help solve the aforementioned issues.<br />

Defining <strong>of</strong> a new European Transport Strategy for Planning in accordance with the EU<br />

enlargement process was finalized in December 2005, with the publication <strong>of</strong> the “Peace and<br />

development networks” report, produced by the High Level Group for “Wider Europe for<br />

17


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Transport”. The Strategy basic goal is to improve the EU connections with new neighboring<br />

countries, the Far East and North Africa. Stimulating the development <strong>of</strong> rail freight corridors<br />

also falls under the priorities <strong>of</strong> the work group coordinating the Strategy implementation.<br />

Within that common framework, <strong>Corridor</strong> VIII is recognized as an integral part <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

five new Transnational European axes- the South-Eastern axis.<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> VIII along axis East-West is an indispensable economic and<br />

political instrument for the Balkan Region, and helps improve interregional stability. It is also<br />

associated with expectations for positive influence on the exchange and communications<br />

between the countries through the territories <strong>of</strong> which it passes. Connecting the Adriatic with<br />

the Black Sea leads to great opportunities for economic development.<br />

Starting from ports Bari and Brindisi in Italy, <strong>Corridor</strong> VIII passes through <strong>Albania</strong>n ports<br />

Duras and Vlora, connecting them with a railway line with the capital Tirana. From there, the<br />

existing railway connection continues to the <strong>Albania</strong>-Macedonia border.<br />

The subject <strong>of</strong> the present Study, the railway line Kicevo-border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>,<br />

will be intended for mixed traffic (passenger and freight). According to technical criteria, the<br />

line should be a single-track main line with standard track gauge <strong>of</strong> 1 435 mm for lowest<br />

nominal speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h and axle pressure <strong>of</strong> 250 kN. The track is planned to be<br />

electrified with a single-phase system <strong>of</strong> electrification 25 kV and 50 Hz.<br />

In accordance with the Project programme and the adopted division <strong>of</strong> railway corridor 8 in<br />

sections, the route <strong>of</strong> the future railway line Kicevo- border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> was<br />

divided in two sections:<br />

Section 1<br />

Section 2<br />

Kicevo- Struga<br />

Struga- border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong><br />

The requirements for performing an Environmental Impact Assessment on certain projects<br />

are defined in Articles 76-94 <strong>of</strong> Chapter XI <strong>of</strong> the Law on Environment (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong><br />

RM no. 53/05; 81/05, 24/07, 159/08, 83/09 and 47/10). “Project” is a term which means the<br />

development document that provides an analysis and defines the final solutions in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

the use <strong>of</strong> natural and man made values, regulates the construction <strong>of</strong> facilities and<br />

installations, as well as the performance <strong>of</strong> other actions and activities (such as building<br />

collectors, construction <strong>of</strong> roads, expansion/reconstruction <strong>of</strong> factories and mines, etc.)<br />

which have an impact on the environment, landscape and human health.<br />

The types <strong>of</strong> projects and criteria under which the requirement for environmental impact<br />

assessment procedure performance is established, are determined by the Government <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, at the proposal <strong>of</strong> the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration<br />

responsible for environmental matters according to Article 77 <strong>of</strong> the Law on Environment. A<br />

more detailed project definition is specified in the Decree determining the projects and the<br />

criteria under which the requirement for environmental impact assessment procedure<br />

performance is established (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no.74/05).<br />

The Decree determining the projects and the criteria under which the requirement for<br />

environmental impact assesment procedure performance is established recognizes two<br />

categories <strong>of</strong> projects:<br />

− Projects that require environmental impact assessment procedure performance prior to<br />

reaching decision for their implementation.<br />

−Generally determined projects, that could have significant environmental impact, based on<br />

which the requirement for environmental impact assessment procedure performance is<br />

established, prior to the issuance <strong>of</strong> decision for the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Project. The<br />

18


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Project which is the subject <strong>of</strong> this Study falls under projects for which performance <strong>of</strong> EIA<br />

procedure is compulsory.<br />

Methodology <strong>of</strong> the Study preparation process includes planning and implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

three main activity groups:<br />

Activity 1: Gathering data for conducting a Baseline Study<br />

Gathering data in order to acquire a stock <strong>of</strong> relevant information and clear picture <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environmental conditions and social surroundings is an essential precondition for a<br />

comprehensive analysis <strong>of</strong> probable environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> Project implementation and<br />

necessary measures for their reduction.<br />

This activity includes desk work/analysis, as well as field investigation and description <strong>of</strong> the<br />

basic environmental condition <strong>of</strong> the region which is the subject <strong>of</strong> the project activity. The<br />

analyses focus on reviewing the available planning and technical documentation, while field<br />

activities are conducted in order to evaluate the quality <strong>of</strong> environmental media and natural<br />

resources in the wider corridor.<br />

Activity 2: Preparing the Environmental Impact Assessment Study<br />

The EIA Study is based on the following technical requirements:<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> considered alternatives.<br />

Identification and evaluation <strong>of</strong> probable direct and indirect impacts during the basic phases<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Project Life Cycle:<br />

Engineering design (planning phase);<br />

Executing construction works (construction phase);<br />

Project functionality (operational phase);<br />

Post-operational phase <strong>of</strong> the project,<br />

Cumulative effects assessment.<br />

Determining applicable measures for probable impacts reduction, advantage given to<br />

avoidance and prevention measures, and using compensation measures as a permanent<br />

alternative.<br />

Establishing an Environmental Management Plan and monitoring the reduction measures<br />

implementation, for each <strong>of</strong> the Project phases.<br />

A) Approach used to determine probable impacts from Project implementation and<br />

measures for their reduction or avoidance.<br />

The methodology for identification and assessment <strong>of</strong> probable environmental<br />

impacts includes:<br />

Reviewing published literature (on national and international level);<br />

Using relevant experiences and knowledge;<br />

Interviews and conversations with representatives <strong>of</strong> the Investor and relevant<br />

organizations/stakeholder groups;<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> relevant statistical and cartographic databases and census data;<br />

Field work and investigations.<br />

Impacts will be significant if they:<br />

19


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

are intensive, in time or space.<br />

are intensive, regarding the assimilative capacity <strong>of</strong> the environment and nature.<br />

exceed the environment standards and thresholds.<br />

are not in accordance with environmental policies and land use plans.<br />

have a negative impact on ecologically sensitive and significant areas or natural<br />

heritage resources.<br />

have a negative impact on the community lifestyle or traditional land use.<br />

B) Impact reduction measures<br />

Environmental impact reduction measures are only necessary if a probability <strong>of</strong> significant<br />

damage and irreversible environmental effects occurs. The measures planned in the EIA<br />

Study are in accordance with the requirements <strong>of</strong> relevant regulations and policies, as well<br />

as with the best international practices.<br />

Impact reduction principles, including their hierarchical organization, are as follows:<br />

Advantage <strong>of</strong> avoidance and prevention measures.<br />

Consideration <strong>of</strong> feasible project alternatives.<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> standard measures for minimization <strong>of</strong> every significant impact.<br />

The measures have to be adequate and financially effective.<br />

Using compensation measures as a last mean/measure available.<br />

Activity 3: Consultation and finalizing<br />

The expert team for the development <strong>of</strong> this Study is obliged to participate in the process <strong>of</strong><br />

its presentation before the concerned public and in the process <strong>of</strong> public consultations, as<br />

well as in the process <strong>of</strong> adequacy assessment <strong>of</strong> the EIA Study, which will result in final<br />

acceptance <strong>of</strong> the Study by the MEPP.<br />

The rules and detailed procedures <strong>of</strong> including the public in the decision making process are<br />

established by the relevant Macedonian legislation, concerning the EIA.<br />

Consideration <strong>of</strong> alternatives is, in practice, <strong>of</strong>ten done through “cost-benefit” analysis,<br />

applied in the selection <strong>of</strong> the most adequate project solution concerning route variation.<br />

This, in most cases, means the best solution in terms <strong>of</strong> investment.<br />

With regard to strategic studies, special methods are used to broadcast the needs and the<br />

justifiability <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> specific measures and activities in the domain <strong>of</strong> transport<br />

policy.<br />

It is evident that a few feasibility studies considered the aspects <strong>of</strong> environmental protection<br />

as a criterion for selection <strong>of</strong> a variation/route, which can in further phases be frequent and<br />

limiting factor. Namely, it <strong>of</strong>ten happens that variations selected on the basis <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

analysis are unfavorable in terms <strong>of</strong> possible environmental impacts. In this Study, the<br />

expert team focused on the analysis <strong>of</strong> environmental aspects in order to confirm or<br />

counteract the variations proposed by the designer.<br />

Description <strong>of</strong> alternative 1<br />

The route is divided in two sections:<br />

- Section 1- from km 115+600 to km 121+000. At km.115 <strong>of</strong> the route, the line enters a<br />

tunnel. Lithological units through which it passes include: phylitoides, marbles,<br />

limestones and diabases. Physical and mechanical characteristics <strong>of</strong> these rock masses<br />

are favorable for construction <strong>of</strong> structures <strong>of</strong> this type. The aspect that should be paid<br />

20


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

greater attention in further phases <strong>of</strong> investigation is the transgressive boundary between<br />

limestones and phylitoides, as well as the boundary between diabases and limestones.<br />

Both can be carriers <strong>of</strong> big quantities <strong>of</strong> water which will pose problems during the tunnel<br />

construction. From km. 121+000 to km. 151+000, the route enters a terrain with much<br />

less clear inclinations. By several tunnels along the course <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, the route<br />

lowers gently towards the village Messeiste. In this area, there are gullies, temporary and<br />

permanent watercourses and all <strong>of</strong> them enter into Sateska river. Tectonics <strong>of</strong> the terrain<br />

exists, but due to the coverage with delluvial cover and presence <strong>of</strong> intense vegetation, it<br />

is difficult to note. From km.123 to km.132, rock masses through which the route passes<br />

are basalts, clays, conglomerates, sandstones and marbles. After km.141, the route<br />

continues along the alluvial area <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, but shales taking an anticlinal<br />

position with reference to Sateska river are found on left and on right <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

This part <strong>of</strong> the terrain is favorable for development <strong>of</strong> structures <strong>of</strong> this type, with the<br />

only remark that it is too narrow for highway and railway line, and therefore the gorge will<br />

require broadening and cuttings on left and on right <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska. Generally, the<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the route from km 123 to km 139 is favorable without any major problematic<br />

segments.<br />

- Section 2- from km 157+000 to km 161 +000, the route proceeds through ravine and<br />

marshy conditions. The terrain is built <strong>of</strong> lake sediments, mainly clays, with high water<br />

level. Struga Fields are cut through with drainage canals, which presently ensure that the<br />

area is not a marsh. In the lower ground segments (18-19 m), there is a high hydrostatic<br />

pressure which enables the occurrence <strong>of</strong> artesian water. The prefix “marshy terrain”<br />

makes it unfavorable for construction. During the line designing and construction,<br />

provision has to be made for uninterrupted drainage <strong>of</strong> the terrain where the line passes<br />

and serious analysis <strong>of</strong> the module <strong>of</strong> the stinginess should be undertaken <strong>of</strong> the terrain<br />

through which the route will be passing. From km.161 to km.136, the route runs over<br />

prolluvial sediments where no particular problems in construction are expected. From<br />

km.163 to km.164+900, the route passes through marbles, which we also regard to be a<br />

stable construction environment. After km 164+900, the route enters a tunnel which will<br />

be opened in a medium <strong>of</strong> stratified conglomerates and sandstones. Their azimuth is<br />

eastwards, with a slope angle <strong>of</strong> around 40 . Besides conglomerates and sandstones,<br />

there are also phylitic shales and marbles. Azimuth and slope angle <strong>of</strong> the strata <strong>of</strong> these<br />

rock masses are similar with those <strong>of</strong> conglomerates. The tunnel as a structure exits at<br />

km 168, and then the route continues into phylitic shales. Foliation <strong>of</strong> these rock masses<br />

is under certain angle with reference to the route and it poses no particular problem in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> the line stability. Generally speaking, from km.167 to km.170, the terrain is<br />

assessed as favorable for development <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> structures.<br />

Exploitation conditions – The regime <strong>of</strong> traffic regulation and monitoring has been<br />

envisaged to be a modern block system for safety and control.<br />

The manner <strong>of</strong> crossing other existing road arteries will be by way <strong>of</strong> delevelled<br />

intersection with categorized state and local road infrastructure.<br />

Electrification system – single phase system with electricity voltage <strong>of</strong> 25 kV and<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> 50 Hz.<br />

1.1 Zero alternative<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> project non-implementation, the effects would be as follows:<br />

Unchanged conditions in the transport in this corridor (use <strong>of</strong> existing road means <strong>of</strong><br />

transportation);<br />

21


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Aggravated transport <strong>of</strong> passengers and goods. The existing mode <strong>of</strong> transport does<br />

not provide high comfort <strong>of</strong> travel in passenger transport;<br />

Delayed regional development;<br />

High transportation costs, with the transport not well organized even at medium long<br />

transportation distances. The price <strong>of</strong> transportation results in relatively high<br />

consumption <strong>of</strong> fuel per unit transported product or passenger.<br />

Low level <strong>of</strong> safety in road traffic compared to railway traffic.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> fossil fuels in transport and low application <strong>of</strong> the so called “clean” energy<br />

resources in transportation <strong>of</strong> passengers or goods/ unchanged trend in the ambient<br />

air quality.<br />

Deteriorated quality <strong>of</strong> all environmental media.<br />

Characteristics <strong>of</strong> ecosystems and flora and fauna abundance will remain<br />

unchanged.<br />

Although the share <strong>of</strong> the railway transport in the overall transport <strong>of</strong> goods and passengers<br />

is lower compared to road transport, we should point out environmental, spatial, energy and<br />

other advantages <strong>of</strong> the railway transport compared to road, namely:<br />

1. Specific energy consumption:<br />

- in passenger transport is by 3.5 times lower compared to road transport,<br />

- in freight transport, it is by 8.7 times lower compared to road transport.<br />

2. Specific emission <strong>of</strong> harmful gases compared to the value <strong>of</strong> all harmful gases in<br />

traffic:<br />

- in passenger transport it is by 8.3 times lower compared to road transport,<br />

- in freight transport, it is by 30 times lower compared to road transport.<br />

3. Safety in railway transport is by around 24 times higher than the safety in road<br />

transport.<br />

4. Space occupation, under equal flow through <strong>of</strong> the railway, is by 2 to 3 times smaller<br />

than in the case <strong>of</strong> highway.<br />

The above data clearly indicate the advantages <strong>of</strong> railway compared to road transport.<br />

The main advantages <strong>of</strong> this transport system may be summarized into the following<br />

characteristics:<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> allows massive transport which is ranked second immediately after waterway<br />

transport. The weight <strong>of</strong> one freight train could range between 300 and 4000 t, and<br />

beyond.<br />

Transportation speed at medium long distances (500 to 1000 km) is competitive with<br />

the speed <strong>of</strong> air transport – high-speed trains (TGV) reach speeds during the use<br />

phase <strong>of</strong> 270 to 300 km/h. With classical passenger trains which run over well<br />

equipped lines, the speed is between 120 and 160 km/h. Classical freight trains run<br />

at speeds <strong>of</strong> 50 to 160 km/h; however, there are many special freight trains today<br />

which run at a speed <strong>of</strong> 200 km/h.<br />

High comfort <strong>of</strong> travel in passenger transport. The latest high-speed trains are<br />

equipped with comfortable seats, Internet and audio-visual connections on the seats,<br />

22


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

special cars for family travels with various kinds <strong>of</strong> automatic service, high-quality<br />

wagon-restaurants, sleeping cars, etc.<br />

Low transport costs in well organized transport on medium long transportation<br />

destinations. The low price <strong>of</strong> the transport results from relatively low resistance in<br />

movement and low energy consumption per unit transported product or passenger.<br />

Therefore, this transportation mode is cost-effective in case <strong>of</strong> massive transport <strong>of</strong><br />

passengers and goods.<br />

High level <strong>of</strong> safety in transport compared to other transport modes.<br />

Apart from the possibility for use <strong>of</strong> diesel fuels for engines drive in locomotives,<br />

electricity can be used, too. This characteristic is very important, especially in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> limited oil reserves in the world when we need to use the so called “clean”<br />

energy resources as much as possible.<br />

The selection <strong>of</strong> a specific solution for Section 1-Kicevo-Struga and for Section 2-Struga-Lin<br />

(border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) has got the following general characteristics:<br />

1. Total track length: 62.594 km<br />

2. Total route length: 42.117 km = 67.29 %<br />

3. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with R < 500 m: 0.000 km = 0.00 %<br />

4 Length <strong>of</strong> twists with 500 m ≤ R < 800 m: 10.008 km = 15.99 %<br />

5. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with 800 m ≤ R < 1200 m: 3.654 km = 5.84 %<br />

6. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with R ≥ 1200 m: 6.815 km = 10.88 %<br />

7. Longitudinal inclinations i ≤ 12.5 ‰ : 36.898 km = 58.95 %<br />

8. Longitudinal inclinations 12.5 ‰ ≤ i ≤ 18 ‰ : 12.392 km = 19.80 %<br />

9. Longitudinal inclinations i > 18 ‰ : 13.304 km = 21.25 %<br />

10. Total length <strong>of</strong> bridges and viaducts: 4.498 km = 7.19 %<br />

11. Total length <strong>of</strong> tunnels: 12.374 km = 19.77 %<br />

17. Nominal speed 100 km /h<br />

Category <strong>of</strong> railway line – Based on the importance and function within the railway<br />

network, defined in the National Transport Strategy, the subject railway line is ranked as<br />

main line for international mixed passenger and goods transport line and thus it has to<br />

comply with the conditions specified in international agreements.<br />

Category <strong>of</strong> the terrain for the selected alternative – From Kicevo to the village<br />

Messeiste, the terrain is characterized with hill and mountainous nature with presence <strong>of</strong><br />

high hills and deep dales. From the village Messeiste to the village Kalista, the route<br />

stretches over ravine and marshy type <strong>of</strong> land. From the village Kalista to the border with the<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, the terrain is hilly and mountainous with clearly huge steep slopes,<br />

dales, hills, taluses and gullies.<br />

23


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Engineering geological characteristics - In general terms, routes pass through highly<br />

coherent rock masses, medium to poorly coherent rock masses and non-coherent rock<br />

masses. Highly coherent rock masses - represented with phylites, phylitoides, marbles,<br />

diabases, metarhyolites and shales. They constitute a favourable medium for construction,<br />

but care has to be taken <strong>of</strong> the shale nature, foliation and stratification aspects. Poorly to<br />

medium coherent rock masses are Triassic and Pliocene sediments (claystones,<br />

conglomerates, sandstones and clays). Such rock masses are generally considered as<br />

unfavourable for construction and therefore they should be treated with special approach.<br />

Besides these poorly coherent rock masses, there are also lake sediments <strong>of</strong> Quarternary<br />

age represented by clays, dusty to sandy clays, sands and sludge ribs. We assess this<br />

medium <strong>of</strong> lake sediments as unfavourable. The unfavourability is especially present at<br />

places <strong>of</strong> high water level. Non-coherent rock masses - this group incorporates Quarternary<br />

(alluvial) sediments. They occur in the riverbeds <strong>of</strong> the river Treska and along the course <strong>of</strong><br />

Sateska river. They constitute a favourable medium for construction.<br />

The line will be intended for combined transport (freight and passenger), with prevailing<br />

freight transport. It will be designed as single-track <strong>of</strong> standard gauge equal to1435 mm;<br />

Nominal speed will be 100 km/h for passenger and freight transport and consequently the<br />

minimum elements <strong>of</strong> horizontal twists are min. R=500 m and Lp=140 m; The maximum<br />

qualified longitudinal inclination will amount 25‰, taking into account that the subject terrain<br />

in which the route will be designed is difficult mountainous one. The minimum radius <strong>of</strong><br />

vertical twists is 10 000 m; Electrification system 25 kV, 50 Hz. Nominal speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h<br />

for contact network and equipment <strong>of</strong> the contact network, supply and control <strong>of</strong> the traction.<br />

Communication system with optical cable GSM-R (GSMR-Raylwas) (wireless<br />

telecommunication platform developed specially for railways) for conversational link and data<br />

transmission; Signalization – Electronic centralization, facilitating remote control; Automatic<br />

blocking system (without blocking signals); European <strong>Railway</strong> Transport Management<br />

System (ERTMS)/European Train Control System (ETCS) level 1, Transmission System<br />

CTM 16 (synchronized transport system);<br />

Track subgrade gauge <strong>of</strong> 6.00 m; Protection layer against freezing <strong>of</strong> 50 cm; Thickness <strong>of</strong><br />

ballast prism – minimum 33 cm, under the lower edge <strong>of</strong> the sleeper in transversal crosssection<br />

under the rail; Module <strong>of</strong> sub-base compressibility Е 0 = 30 МРа; Module <strong>of</strong> subgrade<br />

compressibility Е пл = 60 МРа;<br />

Welded rails in LRT , rail type С 49 on reinforced concrete prestressed sleepers <strong>of</strong> the type<br />

MP94 fixed by elastic fixing accessories and laid onto ballast prism, <strong>of</strong> an average thickness<br />

<strong>of</strong> 35 cm, beneath the pressing surface <strong>of</strong> the sleeper;<br />

Drainage system – concrete drains and drainage elements, as required<br />

Distance between tracks, as well as minimum distances to the structures in <strong>of</strong>ficial places<br />

will comply with the Rulebook on superstructure designing;<br />

Height <strong>of</strong> platform above URE-min. 55 cm; Length <strong>of</strong> platforms-min. 220 m for intersections<br />

and 400 m for stations;<br />

During designing, the signed intergovernmental agreements and protocols for railway<br />

connection establishment will be observed;<br />

During designing, the agreed border stations on Macedonian and <strong>Albania</strong>n side,<br />

respectively: Struga and Lin, will be respected. Standing point on the border between the<br />

two countries will be specified additionally.<br />

24


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Section 1<br />

Section 1 will extend from the railway station Kicevo at km.102+600, which is at the moment<br />

the final station <strong>of</strong> the line Gjorce Petrov-Kicevo, up to the future railway station Struga, to<br />

km.156+238.19. The railway station Struga will be part <strong>of</strong> the second section, Struga-border<br />

with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>. This division serves the purpose/possibility for the final part <strong>of</strong><br />

the route to become operational in case <strong>of</strong> possible phased construction <strong>of</strong> the line. This<br />

means provision <strong>of</strong> the commencement <strong>of</strong> construction in the opposite direction, i.e. from Lin<br />

(border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) towards Kicevo.<br />

Section 2<br />

Section 2 starts from km 151+000.00, at 690 m. Before the railway station Struga route from<br />

km.151+000.00 to km.164+730.09<br />

Through the first 5.5 kilometers the route is located in a flat part i.e. it passes through the<br />

Struga valley. The second part <strong>of</strong> the route is mountainous up to the agreed junction point<br />

with the <strong>Albania</strong>n side.<br />

Description <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> geostructure, the territory through which the railway corridor Kicevo-Lin (<strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

passes, belongs to the West Macedonian Zone, which is in the Neogene (Quarternary<br />

period) and is under the influence <strong>of</strong> the minimum horizontal stress component in East-<br />

Northeastern-West-Northwestern direction and the maximum component in vertical direction.<br />

This regime has brought about a gravitational activity <strong>of</strong> thrust dislocations, either as a<br />

reactivation <strong>of</strong> pre-neotectonic (Drim Zone) forms or newly created forms. Thrust activity is<br />

directly linked to the formation <strong>of</strong> morphostructural units, which coincide with the thrust<br />

contours. The most distinguished positive morphostructural units, along the railway corridor,<br />

are the Ilinski Block, a small part <strong>of</strong> the peripheral southern part <strong>of</strong> the Jablanica Block and<br />

the peripheral North- Northwestern part <strong>of</strong> the Galicica Block. Depressions (grabens) found<br />

along the corridor are: the Kicevo valley, the Belcista (Debrca) valley and the Ohrid-Struga<br />

valley.<br />

In order to describe the climate along the railway corridor Kicevo-Lin (<strong>Albania</strong>), the climate<br />

conditions in the Kicevo valley are presented, as a starting point <strong>of</strong> the corridor and climate<br />

conditions in the Ohrid-Struga valley (final part <strong>of</strong> the corridor). Meanwhile, the basic climate<br />

indicators in the Debrca valley (743 m) do not differ much from the Ohrid-Struga valley (695-<br />

769 m) - in fact they are much more similar than the ones in the Kicevo valley (620 m).<br />

The average annual air temperature in the Kicevo valley is 10.8˚C, but in certain years it<br />

varies from 10.1 to 11.8˚C. July is the warmest month with 20.6˚C, i.e. 1˚C cooler than the<br />

same month in the Prilep Field. The average annual temperature oscillation is 20.7˚C.<br />

The annual precipitation in the Kicevo valley usually consists <strong>of</strong> rain and a small portion <strong>of</strong><br />

snow. The total precipitation in the Kicevo valley is higher than in the Pelagonia and Ohrid-<br />

Struga valley. Distribution <strong>of</strong> the precipitation belongs to the Mediterranean pluviometric<br />

regime, meaning that a large amount <strong>of</strong> it falls during the cold part <strong>of</strong> the year.<br />

Prevailing winds in the Kicevo valley are those coming from the north and south. The most<br />

frequent is the north wind, with an annual average <strong>of</strong> 161 ‰. It occurs throughout the year,<br />

but most frequently during the winter months.<br />

25


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

The average autumn frost date in the Kicevo valley is 31 October, and its earliest<br />

appearance is on 30 September. The average spring frost date is 8 April, and its latest is 10<br />

May.<br />

A larger part <strong>of</strong> the Ohrid-Struga valley is under water (Ohrid Lake / 348.8 km 2 ). It has the<br />

same latitude as Pelagonia, but its altitude is about 695 to 760 m at an average.<br />

Through the Drim valley, the Ohrid-Struga valley is exposed to the north and due to that,<br />

cold air masses penetrate during the winter period, lowering the air temperature, while<br />

during the summer period there are Mediterranean influences.<br />

The average annual temperature in Ohrid is 11.2 0 C, while in Struga it is 10.9 0 C. The average<br />

January temperature in Ohrid is 1.7 0 C, in Struga 1.1 0 C; the average February temperature in<br />

Ohrid is 3.1 0 C, and in Struga 2.5 0 C, and the average December temperature in Ohrid is<br />

3.8 0 C, and in Struga 3.1 0 C. However, during the summer, the difference in air temperature<br />

between Ohrid and Struga is very small. In July, Ohrid is warmer than Struga by only 0.2 0 C,<br />

and in August by only 0.1 0 C.<br />

During winter, despite the Lake’s thermal influence on the air temperature, minimum air<br />

temperatures drop far below 0˚C. Absolute minimum temperature in Ohrid was -17.2 0 C, then<br />

16.6 0 C on 14 January 1968, etc. In Struga, the absolute minimum temperature was -20,0 0 C,<br />

recorded on 20 January 1963, then -19,0 0 C on 22 December 1967, etc.<br />

Precipitation in the Ohrid-Struga valley is conditional upon the Mediterranean pluviometric<br />

regime. A larger amount <strong>of</strong> the annual precipitation falls during the cold part <strong>of</strong> the year, with<br />

maximum in late autumn, and a smaller amount during the warm part <strong>of</strong> the year, with<br />

minimum in the summer months. The average annual precipitation amount in the Ohrid area<br />

is 708.3 mm, while in the Struga Field it is 810.9 mm.<br />

The Ohrid valley is characterized with a particular wind regime, conditioned by the Lake.<br />

Apart from winds appearing due to general atmospheric changes, winds <strong>of</strong> local nature also<br />

appear here, as a consequence <strong>of</strong> uneven air warming over land and lake surfaces. The<br />

winds in the Ohrid valley have their local names, given to them according to their blowing<br />

direction or by the Ohrid fishermen.<br />

According to data from the measurement point in Ohrid, the average autumn frost date is 15<br />

November, and the spring one is 6 April i.e. the average frost period is 143 days. The<br />

earliest autumn frost date is 5 October, and the latest is 18 May.<br />

The evaporation rate from the free water surface in the Ohrid valley is higher than the rate<br />

<strong>of</strong> fallen precipitation. The average annual evaporation rate is 836 l/m 2 , and the annual<br />

precipitation rate is 708 l/m 2 . The evaporation rate is highest in August (137), then in July<br />

(132), and lowest in January with 27 l/m 2 .<br />

Fog rarely occurs in the Ohrid valley. There are five foggy days a year at an average, mainly<br />

during the three winter months.<br />

The wider area <strong>of</strong> the route <strong>of</strong> the line, starting from the railway station Kicevo (station<br />

102km+000, to station 128km+850), with a length <strong>of</strong> approximately 29 kilometers, belongs to<br />

the sheet <strong>of</strong> Kicevo in the Basic Geological Map, scale 1:100.000. Within this sheet (from<br />

oldest to youngest), the following geological (lithological) units have been identified:<br />

Paleozoic metamorphites and magmatc rocks (Devonian).<br />

Complex <strong>of</strong> mesosoic sediments and magmatc rocks. It is represented by Triasic,<br />

Jurasic and Upper Chalk sediments, as well as magmatic rocks<br />

Tertiary and Quarternay sediments<br />

26


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

The area <strong>of</strong> the route <strong>of</strong> the line (from the station 128km+850 to the end <strong>of</strong> the line route –<br />

the border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, station 170km+000), with a length <strong>of</strong> approximately<br />

42 km, belongs to the sheet <strong>of</strong> Ohrid in the Basic Geological Map, scale 1:100.000. Within<br />

this sheet (from oldest to youngest), the following geological (lithological) units have been<br />

identified:<br />

Paleozoic metamorphites and magmatc rocks (Devonian). The overall thickness <strong>of</strong><br />

these formations reaches around 2000 m.<br />

Complex <strong>of</strong> Mesozoic sediments. It is represented by Triassic, Jurassic and Upper<br />

Chalk sediments.<br />

Tertiary and Quarternay sediments.<br />

From engineering - geological point <strong>of</strong> view, the terrain along the route <strong>of</strong> the line consists <strong>of</strong><br />

(1) non coherent, (2i) poorly coherent and (3) highly coherent rock masses.<br />

The area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route belongs to the Western Macedonian zone, characterized<br />

with fine plicative structures and radial tectonics.<br />

Structures in Western Macedonian geotectonic zone extend along NW-SE to NNW-SSE<br />

directions. Tectonic development is connected with two major orogeneses: Herzine and<br />

Alpine orogenesis.<br />

Occurrence <strong>of</strong> disastrous earthquakes reaching epicentral intensity up to X MCS-64 and<br />

magnitude to 7,8 (the highest magnitude observed ever on the Balkan Peninsula), is<br />

frequent in this region.<br />

The rote <strong>of</strong> the line, except several sections which pass through mountainous area, runs<br />

through colluviums and alluviums <strong>of</strong> Kicevo, Izdeglavje, Belciste and Struga valleys.<br />

These deposits host colluvial soils, colluvial soils with signs <strong>of</strong> lessening, cements, alluvial<br />

alluvial with well expressed signs <strong>of</strong> hydromorphism, and marsh-gley soils, while the<br />

siliceous substrates, depending on vegetation and altitude, as well as the stage <strong>of</strong><br />

pedogenesis, have the following types: brown forest soils, litosols and regosols. On<br />

calcareous rocks, the following types have been recognized: brown forest soils on<br />

calcareous and dolomite (calcokacambisols) and calcareous dolomite chernosems<br />

(calcomelanosols).<br />

The wider area <strong>of</strong> the route corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo- <strong>Albania</strong>n border is a part <strong>of</strong><br />

the territory <strong>of</strong> two bigger regional watershed areas:<br />

Watershed area <strong>of</strong> the Treska river, the following watercourses gravitate in the upper<br />

course <strong>of</strong> the river: (1) Studencica river, formed north <strong>of</strong> the village Dobrenoec, i.e. it is<br />

uncaptured remain <strong>of</strong> the spring Studencica (the waters <strong>of</strong> which are captured by the<br />

regional water supply system supplying water to several municipalities); (2) Brzdanska river<br />

and (3) Ehlovecka river;<br />

Watershed area <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim river, from its outflow from Lake Ohrid up to the artificial<br />

accumulation Globocica, the following watercourses gravitate: (1) Sateska River, the largest<br />

tributary <strong>of</strong> Crn Drim river. Rivers flowing into it are: Bigorstica, Golema Reka, Gorna Reka,<br />

Vilipica, Mala Reka, Pesocanska Reka, the Matica Canal (composed <strong>of</strong> the rivers Slatinska<br />

Reka, Ozdolenska Reka and Sosanska Reka), rivers Kocunska Reka, Kochanska Reka,<br />

Zletovska Reka, Golema Reka and Graiska Reka; then (2) Belicka Reka, which is<br />

uncaptured remain <strong>of</strong> several karst aquifers above the village <strong>of</strong> Gorna Belica, the waters <strong>of</strong><br />

which are captured for water supply <strong>of</strong> the city <strong>of</strong> Struga and the surrounding villages); (3)<br />

Sum River, formed from the karst aquifer <strong>of</strong> the same name; (4) Vevcani River, formed from<br />

the karst aquifer above the village <strong>of</strong> Vevcani and (5) Susica River, formed west <strong>of</strong> the<br />

village <strong>of</strong> Visni.<br />

27


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Level fluctuations <strong>of</strong> these watercourses are within the hydrological cycle. However, during<br />

periods <strong>of</strong> high water level, some <strong>of</strong> the watercourses tend to overflow their banks, and form<br />

temporary lakes, on smaller or larger surfaces, all along their course.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> their drainage surface is covered with oak and beech forest and pastures. The<br />

hydrographic network is composed <strong>of</strong> multiple aquifers, small watercourses and gullies. The<br />

waters <strong>of</strong> the river Studencica are used for water supply <strong>of</strong> urban centers Kicevo,<br />

Makedonski Brod, Prilep and Krusevo, and other smaller populated areas. This water is<br />

categorized as second-class.<br />

The cities <strong>of</strong> Kicevo, Makedonski Brod, Prilep, Krusevo, as well as several villages situated<br />

near the water supply pipelines in the Kicevo and Prilep regions, receive their water through<br />

the water supply system “Studencica”.<br />

The system was built for a capacity <strong>of</strong> 1500 l/s, and uses Studencica’s spring water, which,<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> affluence, ranges between 450 and 4300 l/s. The pipelines, from the source to<br />

the populated areas, are made <strong>of</strong> steel and have a total length <strong>of</strong> 100 km.<br />

In time <strong>of</strong> maximum water consumption, but minimum spring affluence, the system does not<br />

satisfy the water demands in connected areas. Still, it is important to note that the water<br />

quality at the very source <strong>of</strong> the Treska River has not changed in years. It complies with all<br />

the criteria for first category quality.<br />

The water quality at the measurement point below Kicevo- Bigor village- Dolenci, <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

deviates from the quality allowed, regarding organic and microbiologic pollution, as a result<br />

<strong>of</strong> wastewaters from the city <strong>of</strong> Kicevo.<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> the precipitation infiltrated under the ground surface constitutes ground waters.<br />

Their movement inside the ground and through rock masses is slow with minor or major<br />

delay. At suitable places, they emerge on the surface and enrich surface waters.<br />

The aquifer Dolno Popolzani is situated in the village <strong>of</strong> Dolno Popolzani- Kicevo, about 200<br />

m south <strong>of</strong> the Treska River. The yield <strong>of</strong> this aquifer varies during the year, ranging from<br />

200 to 1000 l/s. The aquifer is in the midst <strong>of</strong> Devonian limestones and has an altitude <strong>of</strong> 640<br />

m above sea level.<br />

Spring, ground and surface waters or a combination <strong>of</strong> the above are used for water supply<br />

<strong>of</strong> populated areas.<br />

The Hydrometeorological Administration has set two measurement points in the Ohrid-<br />

Struga region (Crn Drim basin). They are located in the construction zone <strong>of</strong> the Kicevo-<br />

Kjafasan railway line: SP60018–Kalista, Ohrid Lake and SP60019– Struga, Crn Drim River.<br />

The water <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake is controlled at four more measurement points: SP60012– St.<br />

Naum, SP60015– Metropol Hotel, SP60016– the City <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and SP60017– City Beach.<br />

According to assessments, it has been established that the water <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim River, near<br />

its outlet from Ohrid Lake, is relatively pure and can potentially be affected by municipal and<br />

industrial wastewaters from the cities <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and Struga, particularly those that have not<br />

passed though the collector system and water treatment system.<br />

Data from the MEIC monitoring system at the Ministry for Environment and Physical<br />

Planning has been used for this Study, and the air quality along the railway track has been<br />

measured for particulate matter.<br />

Environmental noise emission is primarily correlated with technology, industry and transport<br />

development.<br />

28


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Noise nuisance means annoyance, caused by the emission <strong>of</strong> a frequent and/or prolonged<br />

sound, generated at certain time and place, which impedes or influences everyday activity<br />

and work, concentration, rest and sleep.<br />

Noise nuisance is defined by the level <strong>of</strong> noise annoyance <strong>of</strong> the population specified<br />

through terrain measurements and inspections. The limit values <strong>of</strong> basic environmental<br />

noise indicators are established in the Rulebook on limit values <strong>of</strong> noise levels (Official<br />

Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM. 147/08).<br />

In absence <strong>of</strong> a developed state monitoring network, for the subject location wider area,<br />

there is no data from environmental noise levels measurements. Consequently, there are no<br />

noise management planning documents, i.e. a strategic map and action plan.<br />

Biogeographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area are presented through the division <strong>of</strong> biomes by<br />

Matvejev (Matvjev 1995: in Lopatin & Matvejev 1995; Matvejev & Puncer 1989) and in<br />

accordance with climate-vegetation-soil zones (regions) by Filipovski at al. (1996).<br />

According to the division <strong>of</strong> Matvejev & Puncer (1989), the corridor <strong>of</strong> the planned railway<br />

line Kicevo-Radozda belongs to the biome <strong>of</strong> South-European, primarily deciduous forests<br />

and biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean, mostly deciduous forests and shruberries.<br />

Biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean, mostly deciduous forests and shruberries spreads over<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor. The most outstanding characteristic <strong>of</strong> climate is well<br />

expressed arid period in the course <strong>of</strong> summer, while maximum precipitations take place<br />

during spring and autumn. More thermopile segments <strong>of</strong> Kicevo valley, the valley <strong>of</strong> the river<br />

Sateska in Ohrid gorge and shore area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake between Struga and Radozda are<br />

situated here. This biome includes also most <strong>of</strong> the areas adjacent to the route <strong>of</strong> the<br />

planned railway line. From among plant communities specific for this biome, we find<br />

Quercetum frainetto-cerris, as well as elements <strong>of</strong> Querco-Carpinetum orientalis (on lower<br />

parts) along the line. All biocenoses are characterized with the animal life forms<br />

Xeroaestisilvicola and Xeroaestidrymicola (Matvejev 1995). Plants, besides trees, are<br />

dominated by terophytes and criptophytes. Plant species most specific for the biome <strong>of</strong> sub-<br />

Mediterranean, mostly deciduous forests and shruberries, in the observed corridor, include:<br />

Quercus pubescens, Quercus frainetto, Quercus trojana, Quercus cerris, Carpinus orientalis,<br />

Ostrya carpinifolia, Corylus colurna, Crataegus orientalis, Acer tataricum, Acer hyrcanum,<br />

Acer monspessulanum, Syringa vulgaris and Tilia argentea.<br />

The most specific vertebrate species include:<br />

Amphibians and reptiles: Testudo hermanni, Lacerta trilineata and Ablepharus kitaibelii.<br />

Birds: Parus lugubris, Dendrocopus syriacus, Ficedula semitorquata, Streptopelia decaocto<br />

and Accipiter brevipes.<br />

Mammals: Dryomys nitedula, Apodemus flavicollis, Glis glis and Erinaceus roumanicus.<br />

The most important habitats found within the analyzed corridor are the following:<br />

Habitats: Italian and Turkey oak forests, forests <strong>of</strong> Hop hornbeam (Ostryo-Carpinion<br />

orientalis), forests dominated by Macedonian oak (Quercus trojana), as well as alder belts<br />

along rivers and riverby belts <strong>of</strong> willows and poplars (listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat<br />

Directive).<br />

Seminatural and antropogeneous habitats: degraded forests <strong>of</strong> Hop hornbeam, Acacia<br />

plantations, orchards under apricots, peaches, almonds, walnuts and quinces, vineyards,<br />

fields with/without boundaries, alleys, gardens, villages, towns.<br />

29


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Biome <strong>of</strong> South European mostly deciduous forests occupies the highest parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

observed corridor. From among plant communities specific for this biome, Sessile oak forest<br />

(Orno-Quercetum petraeae) can be found within the boundaries <strong>of</strong> the corridor.<br />

Animal life forms specific for the observed area include Theroaestisilvicola and<br />

Herboaestisilvicola (Matvejev, 1995),minor share <strong>of</strong> evergreen phaerophytes is characteristic<br />

here. The most important plant species in this biome include: Quercus petraea, Fagus<br />

sylvatica, Carpinus betulus, Corylus avellana, Berberis vulgaris, Sorbus aucuparia,<br />

Evonymus europaea, Acer campestre, Acer pseudoplatanus, Sorbus torminalis, Tilia<br />

platyphyllos, Ligustrum vulgare, Viburnum opulus, Prunus avium and Convallaria majalis.<br />

Specific vertebrate species are the following:<br />

Amphibians and reptiles: Triturus cristatus, Salamandra salamandra, Rana dalmatina,<br />

Hyla arborea, Anguis fragilis, Lacerta agilis, Natrix natrix.<br />

Birds: Phylloscopus sibilatrix, Turdus philomelos, Parus caeruleus, Phoenicurus<br />

phoenicurus, Erithacus rubecula, Dendrocopus leucotos, Coccothraustes coccothraustes,<br />

Strix aluco.<br />

Mammals: Capreolus capreolus, Clethrionomys glareolus, Glis glis, Muscardinus<br />

avellanarius.<br />

The most important habitats found within the analyzed corridor are the following:<br />

Natural habitats: Sessile oak forests, woodlots, rivers and clearings within oak forests.<br />

Seminatural and antropogeneous habitats: degraded forests, meadows, orchards under<br />

apples, plums, pears, cherries, meadows under alfa-alfa, fields under wheat crops, gardens,<br />

alleys and several villages.<br />

According to the division made by Filipovski et al. (1996), there are eight climate-vegetationsoil<br />

zones in Macedonia. Most <strong>of</strong> the corridor <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line Kicevo-Radozda<br />

belongs to the warm continental area. Much smaller part belongs to the cold continental<br />

area. Elements <strong>of</strong> continental sub-Mediterranean area occur near Kicevo and Struga.<br />

The following specific habitats with specific ecosystems have been considered:<br />

Zonal natural forests (Downy and Hop hornbeam forests, Italian and Turkey oak forests,<br />

Chestnut forests, Sessile oak forests)<br />

Azonal forests (Alder belts and woodlots, Willow belts, remains <strong>of</strong> marshy oak forests).<br />

Open areas - pastures; Rocky areas; Calcareous rocks and rocky grounds; Siliceous<br />

rocks; Wetlands; Ohrid Lake; Rivers and streams; Springs and wells; Swamps and<br />

marshes; Reeds (Scirpeto-Phragmitetum W. Koch); Caricetum elatae W. Koch<br />

lysimachietosum Mic; Cyperetum longi Mic; Sparganio-Glycerietum fluitantis Br.-Bl.<br />

1925;<br />

Antropogeneous habitats (Woodlots and plantations-black pine plantations, meadows,<br />

agricultural habitats, fields, gardens, vineyards, orchards, urban and urbanized areas as<br />

habitats, populated places and settlements).<br />

Within the observed corridor, there is a low number <strong>of</strong> habitats. Some <strong>of</strong> these habitats are<br />

listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat Directive 92/43/ЕЕС, which means that EU Member State<br />

or accessing country (like Macedonia) are obliged to protect them. Some <strong>of</strong> these habitats<br />

are frequently found and widely spread in Macedonia. Apart from this, some habitats enjoy<br />

conservation priority in EU (marked by “*”), i.e. they require designation <strong>of</strong> special<br />

conservation areas (Natura 2000).<br />

30


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Italian and Turkey oak forests. Although listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat Directive<br />

92/43/ЕЕС, these forests are widely spread in Macedonia, especially in its western parts.<br />

They even build up uninterrupted climatezonal belt between 700 and 900 m a.s.l. Forests<br />

within the observed corridor are mainly well developed, however under strong pressure <strong>of</strong><br />

forestry activities. These forests in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the village Slivovo were affected by forest<br />

fire.<br />

Chestnut forests. Chestnut forests in Macedonia are mainly spread in western parts, from<br />

Shar Planina Mt. to Jablanica, but they also occur in southeastern part <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />

(Belasica). They are listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat Directive 92/43/ЕЕС. Within the<br />

investigated corridor, they occur between village Radozda and Macedonian-<strong>Albania</strong>n border.<br />

Alder belts and woodlots. This habitat is considered as priority habitat type (*) for<br />

conservation under EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС. The alder woodlots are <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

importance, as they are almost entirely extinct in other parts <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. Alder belts grow<br />

almost along all rivers and streams in the observed corridor. Woodlots were found near<br />

villages Arbinovo and Botun. Alder stands, as well as other riparian habitats, have very<br />

important ecological function in preventing and mitigating floods, reduction <strong>of</strong> the pollution,<br />

being natural corridors for the movement <strong>of</strong> animals and have some other specific roles in<br />

mineral matters movement.<br />

Willow belts. Willow belts occur much less within the investigated corridor than alder belts,<br />

and therefore their significance is lower. They are listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat<br />

Directive 92/43/ЕЕС. Segments that could compose forest stands have not been identified<br />

within the investigated corridor, while they enjoy priority for conservation under the EU<br />

Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (*).<br />

Remains <strong>of</strong> woodlots <strong>of</strong> marshy oak. As already indicated in the text above, the only<br />

recorded remain <strong>of</strong> woodlot <strong>of</strong> marshy oak is located in the village Moroista, which is out <strong>of</strong><br />

the observed corridor. However, there is a possibility to find other individual trunks or minor<br />

groups along canals and marshy areas between the village Volino and village Moroista.<br />

Communities <strong>of</strong> marshy oak in Macedonia are exceptionally rare and very important for<br />

habitat and species diversity.<br />

Calcareous rocks. Calcareous rocks in lower parts <strong>of</strong> Macedonia are substrate onto which<br />

rare and endemic hasmpophyte species grow. They are listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat<br />

Directive 92/43/ЕЕС. Within the investigated corridor, calcareous rocks occur between the<br />

settlement Elen Kamen and village Radozda. Apart from their biological importance as a<br />

habitat for typical vegetation, plants and birds, calcareous rocks within the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest<br />

are exceptionally important also in the context <strong>of</strong> conservation <strong>of</strong> cultural and historical<br />

monuments.<br />

Siliceous rocks. Siliceous rocks are listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat Directive<br />

92/43/ЕЕС. However, siliceous rocks are <strong>of</strong> minor importance in the observed corridor<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the small areas they occupy.<br />

Reeds. Reeds are habitats providing high biological diversity. As a result <strong>of</strong><br />

hydroamelliorations in the past, large portions <strong>of</strong> areas under reed have been destroyed.<br />

Such is the case <strong>of</strong> Struga Marsh which has been almost completely destroyed. Very small<br />

fragments are found between villages Kalista and Radolista and the city <strong>of</strong> Struga. Reed<br />

remains occur between village Volino and village Moroista, as well as along the shore <strong>of</strong><br />

Ohrid Lake, near the village Radozda.<br />

Along the route, we can distinguish three to four landscape types, ranging from purely<br />

cultural, through dominantly cultural to less or more natural characteristics. The specific<br />

natural vegetation providing the external outlook or natural or slightly modified landscapes is<br />

31


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

described in the chapters on biogeographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area along the route and<br />

on the habitats <strong>of</strong> plant communities. Clearer spread <strong>of</strong> biomes or zones largely overlaps<br />

with the spread <strong>of</strong> landscapes. Geographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the relevant spatial entireties<br />

are presented in more detail in the respective chapters.<br />

The area along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin hosts 26 populated places. Among<br />

them, Kicevo and Struga are urban settlements, and the rest are rural. According to data <strong>of</strong><br />

the Census conducted in 2002, the number <strong>of</strong> population in these populated places is<br />

60.992 inhabitants, out <strong>of</strong> whom 43.626 live in cities and others (17366) are distributed in<br />

rural settlements. One <strong>of</strong> the settlements has population between 0 and 10 inhabitants,<br />

seven settlements have from 10 to 100 inhabitants, four have 100 to 300 inhabitants, one<br />

300 to 500 inhabitants and 13 have more than 500 inhabitants. Density <strong>of</strong> population is in<br />

line with this data, and in the areas <strong>of</strong> the villages in Debrca it is below 10 inh./km 2 which is<br />

relatively low. On the other side, along the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line, in Struga Fields area,<br />

there is a density <strong>of</strong> population <strong>of</strong> around 350 inh./km 2 , and thus we may conclude that the<br />

area is rather densely populated. The relatively high number <strong>of</strong> settlements with less than<br />

100 inhabitants, in the context <strong>of</strong> demographic development, is rather concerning, because it<br />

would be realistic to expect full depopulation <strong>of</strong> these settlements in the near future. Such<br />

places include Vidrani and Judovo in the area <strong>of</strong> Kicevo and the group <strong>of</strong> rural settlements in<br />

the Municipality <strong>of</strong> Debrca, such as Arbinovo, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Pesocani, Slivovo and<br />

Turje, which are rather degraded in demographic and economic terms.<br />

Ethnic structure <strong>of</strong> the population along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Kjafasan is<br />

heterogeneous. Around 53% <strong>of</strong> the population are Macedonians, 35% <strong>Albania</strong>ns and the<br />

remaining 12% are Turks, Macedonian <strong>of</strong> Muslim religion, Vlachs, Roma, etc. Settlements<br />

along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line from Kicevo to Struga are populated by Macedonians,<br />

while the section from Struga to the village Radozda is dominated by <strong>Albania</strong>n, Roman,<br />

Turkish, Vlach and other population.<br />

The age structure <strong>of</strong> the population is the main determinant on which the vitality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population depends. In this specific case, it is notable that most <strong>of</strong> the populated places are<br />

characterized with significantly higher share <strong>of</strong> mature and particularly old population. In<br />

rural settlements, especially those with less than 100 inhabitants, there is almost no young<br />

population belonging to the age group <strong>of</strong> 0-19 years.<br />

Economically inactive population accounts for 55%, i.e. more than economically active<br />

persons whose share is 45%. If we take the unemployed persons out <strong>of</strong> the economically<br />

active population, we may conclude that as low as 28% are persons performing pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

and they support the entire remaining population.<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> members per household is relatively low, basically less than 4 members per<br />

household, including urban environments. This problem is significant in rural settlements<br />

where the number <strong>of</strong> members per household is around 2, and in high number <strong>of</strong> cases it is<br />

less than 2. This is especially articulated in the populated places Popolzani, Vidrani, Brzdani<br />

and Judovo in Kicevo area and the group <strong>of</strong> villages in the area <strong>of</strong> Debrca, such as<br />

Arbinovo, Botun, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Pesocani, Slivovo and Turje. This means that high<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> the households have weak economic ability to work. The problem <strong>of</strong> single<br />

member households exists, too.<br />

The analyzed area within the corridor Struga-Kjafasan is 6027 ha (Table 39). This area<br />

should be supplemented by the part <strong>of</strong> forest habitats, above the tunnel Judovo-Slivovo (353<br />

ha), by which the overall area <strong>of</strong> the corridor reaches 6380 ha. Most <strong>of</strong> this area is made <strong>of</strong><br />

forests (41,7%) and agricultural land (39,8%). There, Italian and Turkey oak forests are<br />

predominant covering an area <strong>of</strong> 2507 ha. To the forest land, we can also add riparian alder<br />

32


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

forests covering 131 ha or 2% <strong>of</strong> the total area <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor, which although<br />

occupying small areas are very important in terms <strong>of</strong> biological diversity conservation.<br />

Agricultural land is dominant mainly in Struga Fields. Major part <strong>of</strong> it is represented by huge<br />

complexes <strong>of</strong> fields covering the former Struga Marsh. Therefore, remains <strong>of</strong> marshy<br />

habitats are frequently found within agricultural areas. Due to the nature <strong>of</strong> the territory<br />

(mainly mountain areas), cultivable land covers around 1/3 <strong>of</strong> the territory <strong>of</strong> the settlements<br />

within the corridor or 9180.5 hectares. Fields <strong>of</strong> 7205.2 hectares are dominant, followed by<br />

orchards <strong>of</strong> 844.7 ha, meadows <strong>of</strong> 740.7 ha, etc. Most <strong>of</strong> the cultivable land is privately<br />

owned. As a result <strong>of</strong> the changed lifestyle and activity <strong>of</strong> the population in the course <strong>of</strong> the<br />

past several decades, part <strong>of</strong> these territories is not cultivated in practice, and we can be<br />

free to conclude that such areas can be added to uncultivated areas, especially areas under<br />

pastures and forests.<br />

Uncultivated area (pastures, forests, reed marshes and swamps, barren land) occupies<br />

around 2/3 <strong>of</strong> the territory along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin. The larges areas are<br />

under forest -12337.8 ha, followed by 2782.4 ha under pastures, 2265.6 ha barren land, etc.<br />

Major part <strong>of</strong> uncultivated land area is socially owned, or precisely around 1/4 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mentioned area is privately, and 3/4 socially owned. This applies in particular on populated<br />

places in Kicevo area and the area <strong>of</strong> Debrca, where areas <strong>of</strong> the populated places are<br />

dominated by hilly and mountainous characteristics <strong>of</strong> the land. Private sector has bigger<br />

share in rural areas <strong>of</strong> Struga Fields, so that 1/2 <strong>of</strong> the settlements' areas are in private, and<br />

the rest in social ownership.<br />

In the context <strong>of</strong> the above described situation, practical extension <strong>of</strong> the railway line through<br />

Struga Fields, with a length <strong>of</strong> around 20 km, will affect around 1000 hectares privately<br />

owned land within the corridor itself, part <strong>of</strong> which will have to be subject to expropriation <strong>of</strong><br />

land, which assumes expenditures to regulate the matter. This process will inevitably be<br />

carried out along the whole route <strong>of</strong> the railway line; however, given the configuration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relief and the size <strong>of</strong> land lots under forest, pastures, barren land etc., in the area <strong>of</strong> Kicevo,<br />

Debrca and around the section leading to the border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, the issue<br />

will not be very difficult. The statement can be supported by the fact that the route <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway line in these areas passes through tunnels and bridges, which makes the need for<br />

land expropriation significantly smaller.<br />

Economic infrastructure within the direct corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line route Kicevo-Lin,<br />

considering the geographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area, is not well developed. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

corridor passes through economically underdeveloped rural areas, such as the section from<br />

the village Drugovo to the village Meseista and section from Radolista to Radozda. In these<br />

areas, primary activities <strong>of</strong> the agricultural sector (farming and fruits growing with<br />

insignificant areas under gardens) and forestry (as natural resource which in circumstances<br />

<strong>of</strong> abandoned and demographically exhausted settlements is exploited in an uncontrolled<br />

manner by forest enterprises and illegal wood cutters), are predominant in these areas.<br />

Livestock breeding, in conditions <strong>of</strong> settlements depopulation, is not developed except to<br />

satisfy certain insignificant own needs. In the sphere <strong>of</strong> the secondary sector, the mentioned<br />

section <strong>of</strong> the route does not have industrial facilities.<br />

The institutional infrastructure in populated places <strong>of</strong> the immediate corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway,<br />

except in some settlements in Kicevo area (Vidrani, Judovo) and Debrca (Turje, Slivovo,<br />

Arbinovo, etc.), is represented by schools, outpatient clinics, commercial facilities, post<br />

<strong>of</strong>fices, petrol stations and some catering and touris facilities in almost all bigger populated<br />

places. Within the areas <strong>of</strong> the cities Kicevo and Struga and some <strong>of</strong> the settlements<br />

situated close to the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid, there are also some other institutional infrastructure<br />

33


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

facilities in the sphere <strong>of</strong> banking, tourism (hotels, motels, holiday resorts, etc.), as well as<br />

social, cultural and other facilities.<br />

Linear infrastructure along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin consists mainly <strong>of</strong> national,<br />

regional and local roads, and water supply and electricity infrastructure at certain locations.<br />

The route <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line intersects at several points with national and regional<br />

roads. To be more specific, near the village Popolzani, it intersects the national road Kicevo-<br />

Ohrid, and then again on the section in Botun Gorge. Then, the railway line intersects the<br />

regional road Struga-Debar, immediately next to the city <strong>of</strong> Struga and again on the national<br />

road Struga-Kjafasan near the village Frangovo. On the way, there is a number <strong>of</strong><br />

intersections with local roads in Debrca area and Struga Fields, such as intersections with<br />

the local road passing through the villages Arbinovo, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Belcista, Volino,<br />

Moroista, Zagracani-Sum, Kalista and other less significant roads. This set up will have<br />

certain impacts on the existing communication <strong>of</strong> the settlements with national roads and<br />

through them with urban settlements situated close to the railway line. In this regard,<br />

appropriate technical measures for establishment <strong>of</strong> uninterrupted natural communication on<br />

both sides <strong>of</strong> the line will be necessary.<br />

Within the corridor - the railway line route Kicevo-Radozda, in the contact zone <strong>of</strong> 500 m on<br />

left/right, there are 6 (six) forest management units (FMU), and three more are located in the<br />

immediate surrounding. Forests within those FMUs are mostly used for commercial<br />

purposes and mainly in state ownership. All state owned forests are managed and operated<br />

by the Public Enterprise "Macedonian Forests", through the following forest management<br />

branches (FMB):<br />

- FMB “Lopusnik” – Kicevo (3),<br />

FMU Mazatar; FMU Drenovo, FMU Belicka Reka-Preseka<br />

- FMB “Galicica“– Ohrid (2)<br />

FMU Slavej 1, FME Volnista<br />

- FMB “Karaorman“–Struga (1)<br />

FMU Jablanica-Radozda.<br />

The forests in private ownership, the share <strong>of</strong> which is low, but very significant in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

expropriation, are manged by their owners. Part <strong>of</strong> these forests also include artificially<br />

erected plantations, primarily <strong>of</strong> black pine. For the purpose <strong>of</strong> fast and effective<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> expropriation procedure, it is necessary to undertake measures and<br />

activities for quick and efficient updating <strong>of</strong> ownership (<strong>of</strong>fice based and field activities).<br />

The corridor/route <strong>of</strong> the railway line should pass through 133 subsections distributed in the<br />

mentioned FMUs. For each <strong>of</strong> these FMUs, there is 10-year management plan, with different<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> their validity.<br />

The highest degree <strong>of</strong> erosive processes (category 1 and 2) occurs in the area around<br />

Belicka Reka in Treska (south <strong>of</strong> Popolzani). A risk <strong>of</strong> second category erosion also exists<br />

near the village Botun. The risk <strong>of</strong> erosion in other parts <strong>of</strong> the contact zone is mainly low.<br />

According to the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, Study on natural heritage<br />

conservation, the number <strong>of</strong> identified facilities within the subject area is 10.<br />

Particular attention should be devoted to Belcisko Blato (swamp), located close to the route.<br />

This is due to the fact that this monument <strong>of</strong> nature is characterized with unique natural<br />

values, especially autochthonous flora and fauna. The site Belcisko Blato has been included<br />

in the national Emerald network <strong>of</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> special conservation interest and has been<br />

34


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

proposed for designation as strict natural reserve under the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia. It is necessary to establish potential negative impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway construction<br />

on this site, primarily on biodiversity. Close care has to be taken <strong>of</strong> the maintenance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

site integrity and conservation <strong>of</strong> natural habitats, before all.<br />

In addition to the above, it should be taken into account that a part <strong>of</strong> the railway line gets<br />

close to the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and therefore the impact <strong>of</strong> the railway construction on the<br />

habitats and biodiversity, as well as hydrological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area, should be<br />

assessed. Under the national legislation, Ohrid Lake has been designated for protected area<br />

<strong>of</strong> III category - Monument <strong>of</strong> nature and is part <strong>of</strong> the world natural and cultural heritage<br />

(UNESCO).<br />

Near the route, there is a site with oak trunks, within the populated place Moroista, which<br />

has been planned for designation as monument <strong>of</strong> nature.<br />

Near the route, in the yard <strong>of</strong> the St. Bogorodica Monastery, in the populated place Kalista<br />

on Ohrid Lake shore, there is a Plane tree (Platanus orientalis) trunk, designated for<br />

protected area in the category <strong>of</strong> monument <strong>of</strong> nature.<br />

A part <strong>of</strong> the railway line route, in Struga region, passes through the area which is part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world cultural and natural heritage <strong>of</strong> Ohrid region (UNESCO). With reference to this region,<br />

care should be taken <strong>of</strong> the following sites possessing natural values:<br />

- Sublakustricki springs near the church <strong>of</strong> St.Bogorodica <strong>of</strong> Kalista<br />

- The site <strong>of</strong> Kalista which is the only natural habitat for yellow water-lily (Nuphar lutea) at<br />

Ohrid Lake.<br />

- The site Podmolje is away from the route, but it is the most wide spread reed belt<br />

(Phragmites australis) at Ohrid Lake and natural habitat for threatened bird species and<br />

sprawning ground for the carp. For these reasons, attention has to be paid to this object <strong>of</strong><br />

nature as well.<br />

Within the wider area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route, several cultural and archeological sites have<br />

been recorded.<br />

Environmental impact assessment <strong>of</strong> the project implementation has been made with regard<br />

to:<br />

Safety aspects<br />

The most important safety aspects in the case <strong>of</strong> linear facilities, i.e. railway line, concern<br />

derailing, crashes, fires and explosions (including sabotages or terrorism), trains falling<br />

down, running into passenger vehicles or people at moments <strong>of</strong> railway line crossing, etc.<br />

Impacts on biological diversity<br />

Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats and ecosystems<br />

Based on the description <strong>of</strong> the current status <strong>of</strong> the environment (Chapter Error! Reference<br />

source not found.) as well as by way <strong>of</strong> applying nationally and internationally recognized<br />

criteria, sensitivity <strong>of</strong> ecosystems and habitats was assessed (including also human<br />

settlements as habitats). The most sensitive places and their natural and human induced<br />

values were underlined. Making distinction <strong>of</strong> these key or valuable ecosystems, habitats or<br />

places is necessary in order to achieve thorough assessment <strong>of</strong> possible impacts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line Kicevo-Radozda and propose<br />

effective measures for their protection or future management.<br />

35


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

The following ecosystems (described in Chapter 3.11.4) were assessed: Downy oak-Hop<br />

hornbeam forests, Italian and Turkey oak forests, chestnut forests, Sessile oak forests, alder<br />

forests, willow belts, marshy oak stands, hilly pastures, calcareous rocks, siliceous rocks,<br />

Ohrid Lake, rivers, streams, springs, swamps, humid meadows, black pine plantations,<br />

meadows, fields, vineyards, orchards, gardens, urban habitats and rural habitats.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the ecosystems (like marshy) included several plant associations which were not<br />

assessed individually.<br />

Overall, six habitats were assessed as highly sensitive (hs): chestnut forests, sessile oak<br />

forests, alder belts and forests, marshy oak stands, rivers and marshes. The group <strong>of</strong><br />

medium sensitive (ms) habitats includes 12 habitats: Downy oak-Hop hornbeam forests,<br />

Italian and Turkey oak forests, willow belts, hilly pastures, calcareous rocks, siliceous rocks,<br />

streams, springs, meadows, fields, vineyards and rural habitats. The rest <strong>of</strong> four habitats<br />

were assessed as low sensitive (ls): black pine plantations, orchards, gardens and urban<br />

habitats.<br />

Impacts on habitats<br />

Destruction <strong>of</strong> forest habitats<br />

Antropogeneous plantations: large portion <strong>of</strong> pine plantations near Kicevo (km 104+800 to<br />

km 105+400) will be destructed. Pine plantations in this area, as anthropogenic products, do<br />

not possess great importance for the biodiversity <strong>of</strong> the region, but they are <strong>of</strong> great<br />

economic significance and importance for erosion prevention.<br />

Humid forests and reparian belts (by the rivers Treska, Brzdanska Reka, Judovska Reka,<br />

Vilipica, alder forests near village Arbinovo, alder belts at the foothill <strong>of</strong> the Kula hill near the<br />

village Pesocani, alder woodlots and alleys near the village Botun, alder forests with poplars<br />

near the village Meseista and the village Klimestani).<br />

Swamps and marshes (village Arbinovo, Struga Swamp, including also the marshes near the<br />

village Radolista).<br />

Reeds near the villages Volino and Moroista.<br />

Humid meadows (village Slivovo - river Vilipica, humid meadows near the village Arbinovo,<br />

humid meadows and fields near the villages Volino and Moroiste, humid meadows near the<br />

village Radolista).<br />

Impacts on flora and fauna: the railway line construction will enable accessibility to certain<br />

sites. In this way, the pressure on biodiversity will increase due to intensified hunting (and<br />

poaching), fishing and collection <strong>of</strong> medicinal and aromatic herbs.<br />

Flora<br />

Immediate impacts <strong>of</strong> the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Radozda on<br />

plants is shown through the assessment <strong>of</strong> impacts on habitats. Any specific impact from the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line on individual plant species is not expected. The impact on<br />

individual chestnut trees has been already elaborated in the section on impacts on chestnut<br />

forests.<br />

Fauna<br />

Direct impacts <strong>of</strong> the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line on invertebrates are not<br />

expected. The relevant impacts on the populations <strong>of</strong> invertebrates are covered in the<br />

description <strong>of</strong> impacts on habitats.<br />

The most important impacts on vertebrates during the railway operation include:<br />

36


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Disturbance and direct death cases due to fatal crashes <strong>of</strong> animals into trains.<br />

Habitat fragmentation (this has significant impact on fauna), but this aspect is<br />

elaborated in the section dealing with impacts on landscapes.<br />

Pollution <strong>of</strong> waters during railway construction, which may be physical, chemical and<br />

biological. Physical pollution is manifested through presence <strong>of</strong> particulate matters<br />

from earth residues, sand, solid particles from tires friction, remains from accidents,<br />

etc. Chemical contamination <strong>of</strong> surface waters may result from discharge <strong>of</strong> liquid<br />

matters such as grease and oils. Solid particles, through road surface washing, are<br />

settled in gutters and drainage canals and this can cause their clogging, while grease<br />

and oils float over the surface and reach the recipient.<br />

During the construction phase, with the compaction <strong>of</strong> the subground and other<br />

measures for stability provision, it is possible to experience change in permeability <strong>of</strong><br />

the ground, by which there are direct impacts on water regime <strong>of</strong> both surface and<br />

ground waters.<br />

When the route is at the level <strong>of</strong> embankment, it may pose a serious physical<br />

obstacle to the running <strong>of</strong> surface and ground waters flowing through that watershed<br />

area to reach the recipient. This can in turn cause unnecessary retention on the<br />

terrain and excessive moisting and even flooding.<br />

When the road is in incision or cutting, the flow <strong>of</strong> groundwaters is prevented. In such<br />

case, when the quantity <strong>of</strong> groundwater is larger in ground, an increase in<br />

groundwater level will result in disruption <strong>of</strong> the ground water regime with effects on<br />

the surrounding land.<br />

Wastewater during railway line operation<br />

During the operational phase <strong>of</strong> the railway line, surface water pollution will most <strong>of</strong>ten occur<br />

in periods <strong>of</strong> precipitation. In such periods, the dust deposited on the line and auxiliary<br />

facilities will be washed out by falls and suspended matters will be dissolved. Rainfalls or<br />

waters from snow melting are loaded with matters deposited on the railway line and the area<br />

influenced thereby.<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> putting into operation and its functioning can lead to discharges <strong>of</strong> sanitary<br />

wastewater generated mainly by passenger terminals and service stations. These<br />

wastewaters should be treated in accordance with the regulations on municipal wastewaters.<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> line construction in mountain and hilly relief will cause destruction <strong>of</strong> soil and rocks<br />

into smaller fractions, which will then accumulate on slopes, i.e. close to riverbeds. Rocks<br />

and soils removed or disintegrated in the course <strong>of</strong> the railway construction and transported<br />

to riverbeds will cause increased turbidity and increased quantity <strong>of</strong> suspended particulate<br />

matters. This will in turn raise the content <strong>of</strong> heavy metals and consequently toxic effects on<br />

living organisms.<br />

The greatest hazard during the railway line construction is related to unintentional leakage <strong>of</strong><br />

fuels, oils and lubricants from vehicles and machinery used in railway construction. It is well<br />

known that hydrocarbons contained in fuels and oils are exceptionally toxic for living<br />

organisms. It is particularly dangerous if incidents <strong>of</strong> this kind happen on the shore <strong>of</strong> Ohrid<br />

Lake or within the watershed area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake (for example, river Sateska) and this would<br />

threaten endemic life forms in the Lake and damage irrevocably the habitats and<br />

biocenoses.<br />

During the railway operation, the main hazard for the quality <strong>of</strong> surface and ground waters is<br />

related to incidents <strong>of</strong> release <strong>of</strong> chemical substances (inorganic fertilizers, solutions, fuels).<br />

In case this kind <strong>of</strong> incident happens, it will result in pollution <strong>of</strong> aquatic ecosystems. Ohrid<br />

Lake is considered especially sensitive ecosystem.<br />

37


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Potential sources <strong>of</strong> water pollution during the railway construction include: а) washing out<br />

and erosion <strong>of</strong> the surface area on the site <strong>of</strong> works execution; b) concrete or other material<br />

used for support walls construction; c) water used to wash the vehicles used in the course <strong>of</strong><br />

construction; d) water used to reduce dust emission during construction; e) fuels, oils and<br />

other preparations for lubrication (lubricants) <strong>of</strong> vehicles and equipment used during the<br />

construction.<br />

Release <strong>of</strong> wastewater during the construction may cause physical, chemical and biological<br />

effects. Physical effects can be caused by increased sediments through erosion, canals and<br />

rivers blocking and this can result in floods in periods <strong>of</strong> intensive rainfalls. Increased content<br />

<strong>of</strong> solid suspended matters in water can lead to reduced concentration <strong>of</strong> dissolved oxygen<br />

due to а) reduction <strong>of</strong> light penetrating into the water column, thus reducing the intensity <strong>of</strong><br />

photosynthesis <strong>of</strong> phytoplankton and phytobenthos (micro and macrophytes), which can in<br />

turn reduce production <strong>of</strong> oxygen in the water column; b) high content <strong>of</strong> suspended particles<br />

and turbidity leads to increased energy retention (retention <strong>of</strong> energy in the water column),<br />

resulting in temperature increase and thus reduction in dissolved oxygen. In extreme<br />

conditions, hipoxy can occur as well.<br />

Also, there are chemical and biological effects which depend primarily on the characteristics<br />

and quantity <strong>of</strong> nutrients in the water released through rinsing. Significant chemical effects<br />

can occur during discharges <strong>of</strong> concrete and cement which also cause significant rise in pH<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the water. At the same time, toxic effects occur from increased pH value and<br />

reduction in the populations <strong>of</strong> organisms and biodiversity in general.<br />

Excavated or removed material during the railway construction can have significant impacts<br />

on wetlands and quality <strong>of</strong> water. Therefore, utmost attention has to be paid during the<br />

disposal <strong>of</strong> excavated material, especially during tunnels construction. Excavated material<br />

consists mainly <strong>of</strong> rocks, earth and stones which are capable, in cases <strong>of</strong> erosion, to cause<br />

physical disruptions such as prevention <strong>of</strong> water flow, change in the watercourse<br />

configuration, as well as increased turbidity and quantity <strong>of</strong> nutrients and solid suspended<br />

particles.<br />

In the course <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> bridges on rivers, contamination with heavy metals can<br />

occur, which are bound mainly in sediments <strong>of</strong> rivers. At the same time, river sediments<br />

have great ability to bind organic compounds (such as hydrocarbons released from fuels,<br />

oils and lubricants). Dissolution <strong>of</strong> heavy metals and organic compounds in sediments is<br />

slow, but continuous process which can cause significant impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> water.<br />

Both heavy metals and hydrocarbons are highly toxic for all organisms and this would cause<br />

(depending on the concentration) reduction <strong>of</strong> the populations and biodiversity loss.<br />

Particular care should be taken during the construction <strong>of</strong> bridges in the ravine part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

route designed close to the river Sateska. Sediments inlet in Sateska would threat directly<br />

the ecosystem <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake as well. Pollution <strong>of</strong> sediment with organic compounds and<br />

heavy metals in particular would cause enormous damages <strong>of</strong> life in the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid.<br />

Impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway operation on wetlands<br />

Possible impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway during its operation include:<br />

Water used for air conditioning,<br />

Leakage <strong>of</strong> water from railway cars,<br />

Discharges <strong>of</strong> water from stations,<br />

Drainage.<br />

38


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

The functioning <strong>of</strong> depots and stations will generate municipal wastewaters from<br />

toilets/communal plants. This type <strong>of</strong> waste is mainly characterized with increased BOD<br />

concentrations, suspended matters, ammonium, phosphates, etc. Yet, it is considered that<br />

significant impact on wetlands would occur if wastewaters are discharged without any prior<br />

pre-treatment.<br />

Wastewater will be generated from the plants for railway cars and locomotives<br />

cleaning/maintenance. Thorough cleaning <strong>of</strong> the train floors would be carried out every two<br />

weeks. Detergents containing water will be additionally released in daily cleaning <strong>of</strong> railway<br />

cars. These wastewaters can cause physical, chemical and biological degradations in<br />

wetlands, if not collected and treated.<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> operation will also generate residues <strong>of</strong> oils, fuels and lubricants. These matters<br />

may be washed out from the surface <strong>of</strong> the railway line and drained to wetlands. This<br />

situation can be especially present on bridges, where these matters, carried by water<br />

sediments, will go directly to the recipient.<br />

Impacts on landscapes<br />

Operation <strong>of</strong> linear infrastructural facilities has negative impacts on connectiveness and<br />

connectivity <strong>of</strong> ecosystems. Certain impacts from the railway operation can be expected on<br />

functional landscape characteristics <strong>of</strong> oak forests. The planned bridges and tunnels along<br />

the entire route are a factor able to reduce negative impacts.<br />

More serious impacts can be expected in the section between villages Slivovo and Meseista.<br />

In this area, the railway line passes through oak forests, marsh wetlands and agricultural<br />

land and separates these habitats from the riverbed <strong>of</strong> Sateska.<br />

Impacts on geological structures<br />

The expected impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway during this project phase on geological structures would<br />

be in a form <strong>of</strong> degradation and erosion <strong>of</strong> rock masses/sediments, due to:<br />

Opening <strong>of</strong> access roads and operational plateau for foundation (anchoring) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway construction, execution <strong>of</strong> the necessary auxiliary elements on the railway<br />

line (halts, railway stations, overpasses, underpasses, culverts);<br />

Excavation <strong>of</strong> tunnels;<br />

Excavation <strong>of</strong> foundations for the designed accompanying electric installation;<br />

Potential leakage <strong>of</strong> fuels and oils from construction machinery and vehicles used in<br />

the transport <strong>of</strong> construction materials and equipment, and<br />

Handling and manipulation <strong>of</strong> chemicals and oils for the purposes <strong>of</strong> accompanying<br />

electric installation.<br />

With regard to operational phase (in the phase <strong>of</strong> use and servicing), impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />

line on geological structures, engineering and geological appearances and processes, are<br />

not expected. Possible impacts on hydrogeological occurrences and facilities, through above<br />

described direct and indirect pollution <strong>of</strong> aquifer masses (hydrogeological collectors) at the<br />

same stations remain potentially dangerous.<br />

Impacts <strong>of</strong> vibrations and seismics<br />

In the course <strong>of</strong> construction and later operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Struga-border with<br />

<strong>Albania</strong>, series <strong>of</strong> impacts will be caused on the environment through which the route <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway passes. Most frequent possible impacts include:<br />

Impacts occurring as a result <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line itself,<br />

Impacts occurring as a result <strong>of</strong> the operation <strong>of</strong> transport means in the phase <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway use.<br />

39


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Besides other, specific impacts occurring as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the railway construction are<br />

as follows:<br />

Seismic effects resulting from mining for the purpose <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the structures<br />

on the railway line itself – incisions, tunnels and bridges.<br />

Specific impacts resulting from the operation <strong>of</strong> the transport means during the use <strong>of</strong><br />

the railway line include, inter alia:<br />

Vibrations on the ground resulting from the movement <strong>of</strong> trains over the railway line.<br />

These types <strong>of</strong> impacts are presented in more detail in the separate Elaborate prepared for<br />

the purposes <strong>of</strong> this Study.<br />

Soil contamination<br />

Soil contamination is a type <strong>of</strong> degradation related to and deriving from more general<br />

activities connected to the very process <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the railway and facilities designed<br />

for its functioning. Therefore, it is difficult to link contamination with intensive activities on<br />

individual sections <strong>of</strong> the route, as is the case <strong>of</strong> other types <strong>of</strong> degradation. That is why we<br />

will make more general overview <strong>of</strong> certain sources <strong>of</strong> contamination that may occur in the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> construction and apply on the entire section.<br />

Soil contamination in this phase can result from:<br />

Inappropriate handling <strong>of</strong> fuels and their derivatives used for construction machines,<br />

Washing <strong>of</strong> machines outside <strong>of</strong> specified and adequate locations,<br />

Inadequate handling <strong>of</strong> construction materials and aggressive chemical matters used<br />

during construction,<br />

Inappropriate construction and location <strong>of</strong> camping sites where machines and<br />

materials are kept, as well as<br />

other activities that are not performed in accordance with the guidelines for technical<br />

measures for prevention (mitigation) in the course <strong>of</strong> the construction.<br />

Compaction <strong>of</strong> soil leads to disruption <strong>of</strong> the soil structure, porosity <strong>of</strong> soil and water-air<br />

regime, which in turn leads to reduced ability for infiltration and filtration. As a result <strong>of</strong> this,<br />

surface waters occur which in combination with high level <strong>of</strong> groundwaters, as is the case in<br />

the region along the course <strong>of</strong> Crn Drim (in the zone <strong>of</strong> gley soils) and above the village<br />

Kalista, can lead to excessive moistening <strong>of</strong> surrounding areas intensification <strong>of</strong> gley<br />

processes. Therefore, it is necessary to use, as much as possible, the existing access road,<br />

during the route construction, and to take care that natural courses <strong>of</strong> groundwaters are not<br />

disrupted, because this can cause formation <strong>of</strong> puddles along the route.<br />

Soil conversion<br />

Soil conversion, together with erosion, is the most severe form <strong>of</strong> soil degradation because<br />

soil as natural resource is lost irreversibly both from economic (for agricultural production)<br />

and environmental point <strong>of</strong> view as natural habitat <strong>of</strong> different plant and animal species.<br />

During the railway line operation, the soil will be threatened mostly by erosion and<br />

contamination. Contamination would result from the following processes:<br />

Contamination <strong>of</strong> soil with fuels and derivatives leaking from the locomotive along the route<br />

and at stations. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out regular control <strong>of</strong> machinery fleet in<br />

order to reduce to maximum the threat <strong>of</strong> dangerous chemicals leaking into the soil.<br />

40


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Contamination <strong>of</strong> soil with gaseous substances. The most significant contamination with<br />

gaseous substances and aerosols occurs at a distance <strong>of</strong> 10 meters from the railway, due to<br />

the rapid sedimentation <strong>of</strong> substances heavier than air.<br />

Wastewaters from toilets and maintenance <strong>of</strong> station utilities, require establishment <strong>of</strong><br />

suitable systems for sanitary wastewater treatment, as well as collection and treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

the wastewater generated during stations maintenance.<br />

Solid waste (organic and inorganic). Its production occurs during passenger transport and<br />

around stations. Appropriate service should collect this waste and transport it to adequate<br />

locations, because it may be incorporated into the soil and cause its long-term<br />

contamination.<br />

Spill over <strong>of</strong> transported materials (liquid fuels, ores, etc.). This is another dangerous source<br />

<strong>of</strong> soil contamination and therefore particular attention should be paid to the safety <strong>of</strong><br />

transported material.<br />

Treatment <strong>of</strong> vegetation around the railway with herbicides. Quantities and period <strong>of</strong><br />

treatment should be well planned in order to prevent soil contamination and groundwaters<br />

pollution.<br />

Erosive processes, which can occur in the course <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction, take place<br />

in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> structures (bridges, tunnels, underpasses, drainage canals, etc.), as well as<br />

embankments and support walls at cuttings. Thus, permanent monitoring is necessary and<br />

undertaking <strong>of</strong> rapid intervention measures to prevent major scope <strong>of</strong> degradation along the<br />

railway line in a timely manner.<br />

Impacts on air quality and climate<br />

Electric railway is a form <strong>of</strong> transport that is the least damaging for the environment. The<br />

basic air emissions and impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> the ambient air are related mostly to the<br />

railway construction, generated by construction machines, and during the exploitation the<br />

impacts occur indirectly, including: increased intensity <strong>of</strong> emissions during freight handling at<br />

certain stations with reloading vehicles, increased presence <strong>of</strong> road vehicles at those<br />

stations, use <strong>of</strong> diesel locomotives, etc.<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> the construction phases assumes some intensity <strong>of</strong> gases and dust emission from<br />

the activities, machines and materials used. The main sources <strong>of</strong> emission are:<br />

Leveling <strong>of</strong> the terrain, excavation and rails placement<br />

Placement <strong>of</strong> signals and telephone lines<br />

Placement <strong>of</strong> electric installation<br />

In the phase <strong>of</strong> the railway operation, certain impact on the quality <strong>of</strong> air may occur around<br />

stations and intersections as a result <strong>of</strong> the activities <strong>of</strong> diesel locomotives shunting,<br />

unloading, storage and road vehicles operation. These impacts are minor, but there is no<br />

data available to carry out quantitative assessment. Considering the nature <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />

operation – linear project for railway traffic which will be used for transport <strong>of</strong> passengers<br />

and material goods – no impacts on climate change are expected both during the railway<br />

construction and during the period <strong>of</strong> its use.<br />

Noise impacts<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line assumes a series <strong>of</strong> activities which generate noise. The<br />

noise is generated by the equipment to be used.<br />

41


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> compositions and speed <strong>of</strong> trains are significant factors for noise. In fact, the<br />

speed <strong>of</strong> the train determines the predominant source <strong>of</strong> noise. In case <strong>of</strong> diesel<br />

locomotives, the noise from engines is predominant at lower speeds, while the source <strong>of</strong><br />

noise at higher speeds is the contact between wheels and rails.<br />

Under the optimistic scenario, the maximum number <strong>of</strong> compositions to run over the line<br />

daily in 2040 will amount 39, out <strong>of</strong> which 14 passenger and 25 freight. This number has<br />

been accepted for further calculations along the whole line.<br />

According to the results, at a distance <strong>of</strong> 120 m from the railway line, the level <strong>of</strong> noise drops<br />

at 45 dBA which corresponds with the natural phone. This means that at a distance <strong>of</strong> 120 m<br />

from the source <strong>of</strong> the noise, the natural phone will decline by around 3 dBA. At a distance <strong>of</strong><br />

250 m already, the noise from this railway line will not have any notable impact.<br />

Solid waste impacts<br />

During the railway line construction, the work will involve new material, i.e. a new line will be<br />

located and set up and thus there will be no waste generated from reconstruction (mostly<br />

construction waste and demolition waste). During the operation and functioning <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway line, different types <strong>of</strong> waste will be generated. These include municipal waste,<br />

packaging waste, waste from construction activities, etc. Minor quantity <strong>of</strong> hazardous waste<br />

will occur among other wastes.<br />

The waste to be generated in the course <strong>of</strong> the line utilization phase is related to its<br />

maintenance or to users <strong>of</strong> railway transport and it is municipal in nature on stations or<br />

intersections.<br />

The types <strong>of</strong> wastes produced include consumables, spare parts and equipment. The<br />

dynamics <strong>of</strong> these wastes generation is correlated with the maintenance and the frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> passengers.<br />

Socio-economic aspects, proprietary aspects and impacts on revenues<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> its length, the planned route <strong>of</strong> the railway line will pass through state and<br />

privately owned land (mostly agricultural land and arable areas). As a structure, it will not<br />

occupy a lot <strong>of</strong> space in width which implies negligible impact on places related to<br />

agricultural activities or economic revenues.<br />

Permanent loss <strong>of</strong> land, forest and other assets, as well as possible damage during the<br />

construction phase or during the line use will be subject to compensation in accordance with<br />

the Macedonian legislation.<br />

Public Enterprise “Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s” – Skopje will carry out appropriate process <strong>of</strong> land<br />

expropriation with every natural and legal person owning land required for the project<br />

implementation.<br />

Impacts on forests<br />

The so called soil sealing, i.e. conversion from productive into unproductive land will<br />

take place, and in this case permanent conversion <strong>of</strong> forest into building land by<br />

which economic and generally useful functions and values <strong>of</strong> forest will be<br />

permanently lost;<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> access roads, other infrastructure and facilities will have additional<br />

impacts through disruption <strong>of</strong> natural ecosystems and increased amount <strong>of</strong> expected<br />

negative effects and damages;<br />

Links between different ecosystems will be broken and therefore permanent negative<br />

impacts are expected in the food chain, movement and reproduction <strong>of</strong> animals, etc.<br />

42


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

There is also direct impact on the established balance, cycles, processes and<br />

dynamics <strong>of</strong> sustainable development <strong>of</strong> biological development;<br />

Forest fragmentation will occur in certain sections which will have negative reflections<br />

on economic activity;<br />

Change in the manner <strong>of</strong> operation in certain parts along the railway line, i.e. at<br />

places <strong>of</strong> planned resurrection wood cuts and various other activities aimed at<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> productivity will result in change <strong>of</strong> forestry measures due to the line<br />

construction, which will burden the forest managing enterprise financially. The overall<br />

changes envisaged will take place in around 1820 ha.<br />

In the course <strong>of</strong> the operational phase <strong>of</strong> the line, the most significant impact in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

increased risk <strong>of</strong> fire will be the occurrence <strong>of</strong> sparkles during breaking and other operations<br />

<strong>of</strong> rail vehicles.<br />

Impacts on erosion and deposits during construction and operational phases<br />

The following impacts can be expected during construction and operational phases <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway line:<br />

Disruption <strong>of</strong> the established regime <strong>of</strong> water running, with possible severe negative<br />

effects within the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line;<br />

Increased hazards <strong>of</strong> erosion processes, including even stability <strong>of</strong> slopes due to<br />

earth works. Considering the great volume <strong>of</strong> construction works, especially<br />

voluminous earth works, excavations and embankments along the line route will<br />

cause intensification <strong>of</strong> erosive processes, which will have negative effects on the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> waters;<br />

Turbidity <strong>of</strong> watercourses will occur frequently which will have negative effects on the<br />

life in the watercourses and Ohrid Lake; Processes <strong>of</strong> transportation and<br />

retransportation <strong>of</strong> deposits along hydrographic network <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska are<br />

expected to intensify. Such processes will have negative effects on the ecosystem <strong>of</strong><br />

Ohrid Lake;<br />

Due to huge earth works, upon compensation activities, a surplus <strong>of</strong> around 300 000<br />

m 3 is expected for disposal. This will result in soil degradation (type: change in<br />

outlook), but there is a danger <strong>of</strong> erosive processes in disposed material;<br />

Impacts on natural heritage<br />

The planned route <strong>of</strong> the railway line will not pass close to any recorded protected natural<br />

heritage.<br />

Impacts on cultural heritage<br />

During elaboration <strong>of</strong> the planning documentation and detailed designing <strong>of</strong> the railway line,<br />

the Investor will observe the requirements for conservation <strong>of</strong> recorded cultural heritage<br />

incorporated in Macedonian legislation and multilateral agreements in the area <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />

Impacts <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />

Impacts <strong>of</strong> radiation are not expected during construction works and railway line operation.<br />

Impacts <strong>of</strong> odour<br />

Impacts <strong>of</strong> odour are not expected during construction works and railway line operation.<br />

Cumulative impacts<br />

Cumulative effects may occur as a result <strong>of</strong> other existing or future projects <strong>of</strong> the same type<br />

along its corridor (highway, regional road).<br />

43


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Impacts after the operational phase have not been considered, because projects <strong>of</strong> this type<br />

are used for hundreds <strong>of</strong> years and during that period minor reconstruction undertakings are<br />

possible for their upgrading.<br />

Based on identified environmental impacts, measures to prevent or reduce environmental<br />

impacts have been envisaged.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> environment, the linear Project – Construction <strong>of</strong> railway line Kicevo-Lin (border<br />

with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) does not pose any particular threat to environment and nature,<br />

and the route is acceptable as a whole. Provided that the recommended measures for<br />

reduction and mitigation <strong>of</strong> possible impacts on the environment are adopted, the Project will<br />

have sustainability for a long period from financial point <strong>of</strong> view, but also in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental protection and quality <strong>of</strong> living.<br />

The process <strong>of</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Impact Assessment Study for the Project –<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) was carried out<br />

in accordance with the methodology prescribed by law.<br />

Expert team in all areas required for such a complex linear project participated in the<br />

elaboration <strong>of</strong> the Study.<br />

All aspects <strong>of</strong> environment and nature, cultural heritage, as well as aspects <strong>of</strong> socioeconomic<br />

development and human welfare have been considered.<br />

This was done to provide sustainability <strong>of</strong> the Project in long run.<br />

During the development <strong>of</strong> the Study, we have had good communication in the frames <strong>of</strong> the<br />

expert team, as well as with the Investor and developer <strong>of</strong> the Preliminary Design. This<br />

resulted in acquisition <strong>of</strong> timely information and access to terrain and required plans.<br />

44


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Goal <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> the Project, in accordance with the Project Programme, prepared by the<br />

Public Enterprise for <strong>Railway</strong> Infrastructure “Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s”- Skopje, is to develop a<br />

railway line Kicevo- Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>).<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> this railway line and other sections missing in <strong>Corridor</strong> 8, aims towards<br />

less expensive and faster transport <strong>of</strong> the population and economic assets. <strong>Railway</strong><br />

connection <strong>of</strong> Macedonia with the neighboring countries is expected to influence positively in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> enhanced economic activities and trade in the country, neighboring countries<br />

(<strong>Albania</strong> and Bulgaria) and the Region.<br />

The new railway connection will contribute to the improvement <strong>of</strong> the local population socialeconomic<br />

condition, particularly in the railway station areas, and thus on a regional level<br />

(development <strong>of</strong> the western part <strong>of</strong> the country), meaning less costly transportation <strong>of</strong><br />

people and goods. Furthermore, the construction <strong>of</strong> this railway line will bring about<br />

establishing a railway connection <strong>of</strong> Macedonia with <strong>Albania</strong>, which would enable creating a<br />

transport connection with the ports Duras and Valona on the Adriatic Sea. This is <strong>of</strong> great<br />

significance for the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia as a continental country.<br />

Integrated transport system has a crucial role in the enhancement <strong>of</strong> the economic growth<br />

and maintenance <strong>of</strong> competition by enabling access to fast, efficient and reliable transport<br />

services, as well as facilitating individual mobility.<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> the transport network, its operation, management and maintenance,<br />

contribute directly to the growth <strong>of</strong> the economy, connection <strong>of</strong> people with their work places<br />

and their other activities, improve employment rate as a key social element providing<br />

economic growth in the country.<br />

Improved accessibility will enable revenues from land use and changes in population<br />

migrations.<br />

Transport density is concentrated strictly on road transport, which has significant impacts on<br />

the environment, especially in conditions <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> fuels with high content <strong>of</strong> sulfur and high<br />

share <strong>of</strong> old vehicles involved in the traffic. On the other side, this situation may cause<br />

increased economic costs <strong>of</strong> the transport system in the country.<br />

In consideration <strong>of</strong> the above indicated factors, the strategic goals <strong>of</strong> the Macedonian<br />

Government regarding railway transport include:<br />

Attractive railway service for the passengers, with the advantage <strong>of</strong> high quality travel<br />

to the work place, safe travelling possibilities and a guarantee that our transport<br />

choice will consider environmental conditions, including air quality and noise<br />

generation.<br />

Supporting heavy freight trains, used for transport <strong>of</strong> large amounts <strong>of</strong> various<br />

products, through an effective transition from rail to road transport and vice versa.<br />

Supporting the national industry in enabling a low-cost and effective mode <strong>of</strong> mass<br />

transport.<br />

Geographical position and geostrategic interests <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia is situated on the cross-road <strong>of</strong> the main roads in Southeastern<br />

Europe, which makes it an important strategic route in the domain <strong>of</strong> land transport<br />

connecting Central Europe, Aegean Sea, Black Sea and Adriatic Sea. This position<br />

45


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

contributes to the development <strong>of</strong> international transport through the two corridors passing<br />

through the country along the two main axes: North-South (<strong>Corridor</strong> X) and East-West<br />

(<strong>Corridor</strong> VIII), known as Pan-European corridors, connected within Trans-European<br />

transport networks.<br />

Macedonia’s geographical position and characteristics determine the strategic need for sea<br />

access through the territories <strong>of</strong> its neighbors. Connections to ports on the Aegean and<br />

Adriatic Seas are <strong>of</strong> exceptional national importance, especially accessibility to the ports <strong>of</strong><br />

Pirea, Taranto and Gioia Tauro. At present, only the connections with Pirea are adequately<br />

developed, while those with Duras and southern Italian ports require serious construction.<br />

The incomplete east-to-west railway line has a negative impact on rail transport<br />

competitiveness and the economy <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, on the whole. The lack <strong>of</strong> connection with<br />

the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> and the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria is a major obstacle in the improvement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the exchange market, not only with neighboring countries, but with Eastern Europe<br />

(Russia, Belarus, Ukraine), Turkey and Caucasus countries, as well. The <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia is a land locked country and mass transport should improve by connecting to<br />

<strong>Albania</strong> and Bulgaria ports, so from a strategic point <strong>of</strong> view, the connection with the<br />

<strong>Albania</strong>n and Bulgarian railway infrastructure is a significant challenge for the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia.<br />

The subject <strong>of</strong> the present Study, the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Albania</strong>), is designed as an extension <strong>of</strong> the railway line Skopje- Tetovo- Gostivar- Kicevo,<br />

and aims to help solve the aforementioned issues.<br />

International importance <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

Defining <strong>of</strong> a new European Transport Strategy for Planning in accordance with the EU<br />

enlargement process was finalized in December 2005, with the publication <strong>of</strong> the “Peace and<br />

development networks” report, produced by the High Level Group for “Wider Europe for<br />

Transport”. The Strategy basic goal is to improve the EU connections with new neighboring<br />

countries, the Far East and North Africa. Stimulating the development <strong>of</strong> rail freight corridors<br />

also falls under the priorities <strong>of</strong> the work group coordinating the Strategy implementation.<br />

Within that common framework, <strong>Corridor</strong> VIII is recognized as an integral part <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

five new Transnational European axes- the South-Eastern axis.<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) is<br />

recognized in the analysis <strong>of</strong> the High Level Group, which defines it as priority railway<br />

project 10.<br />

46


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 1 Southeastern axis, ГВР 1<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> corridor VІІІ<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> VIII along axis East-West is an indispensable economic and<br />

political instrument for the Balkan Region, and helps improve interregional stability. It is also<br />

associated with expectations for positive influence on the exchange and communications<br />

between the countries the territories <strong>of</strong> which it passes through. Connecting the Adriatic with<br />

the Black Sea leads to great opportunities for economic development<br />

1 Source: М ЕC, Report <strong>of</strong> the High Level Group, led by Ms. Layola de Palasio, November 2005.<br />

47


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 2 <strong>Corridor</strong> VІІІ, according to the Memorandum <strong>of</strong> Understanding 2<br />

As it can be seen in the above scheme, <strong>Corridor</strong> VIII starts at the ports Bari and Brindisi in<br />

Italy, and passes through <strong>Albania</strong>n ports Duras and Vlora, connecting them with a railway<br />

line with the capital Tirana. From there, the existing railway connection continues to the<br />

<strong>Albania</strong>n-Macedonian border.<br />

On the territory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, it has two stretches at Rogozine and Lin. The former line<br />

connects Rogozine with the port <strong>of</strong> Vlora and the latter runs from Lin through Pogradec and<br />

Kastice, establishing connection with Kristolopigi in Greece.<br />

Upon crossing the <strong>Albania</strong>n-Macedonian border, the corridor is directed towards north<br />

through Tetovo, reaching the capital <strong>of</strong> Skopje. From there, it is directed towards east, up to<br />

Macedonian-Bulgarian border, then passing through Plovdiv and Stara Zagora, to reach its<br />

end in Black Sea ports Burgas and Varna.<br />

2 Source: Secretariat <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> VІІІ<br />

48


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 3 <strong>Railway</strong> corridor VІІІ, section Duras-Skopje-S<strong>of</strong>ia 3<br />

Pre-Feasibility Study on the development <strong>of</strong> the railway axis along Pan-European <strong>Corridor</strong><br />

VІІІ, prepared by the Secretariat <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Corridor</strong> in September 2007, divided the line into 17<br />

sections and full overview <strong>of</strong> these is presented in the next Table:<br />

Table 1 4 Description <strong>of</strong> railway corridor VІІІ<br />

Section<br />

Features<br />

The territory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong><br />

Tirana – Duras (1) Existing distance between stations was renovated in 1998.<br />

Necessary renovation<strong>of</strong> the upper superstructure <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />

Duras – Rogozhine – Elbasan<br />

(2)<br />

Elbasan – Librazhdi (3) and<br />

Librazhdi – Lin (4)<br />

Lin – border with Macedonia<br />

(5)<br />

Existing station which passing through the hilly<br />

Unsatisfactory condition<br />

Mach speed limit 34 km/h<br />

Need rehabilitation<br />

Existing section passes through mountainous<br />

Longitudinal Mach stream <strong>of</strong> 18‰ and horizontal curves with radius<br />

300 m<br />

Unsatisfactory condition<br />

Mach speed limit 27/24 km/h<br />

Missing section with a length 2 - 3<br />

3 Source: Secretariat <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> VІІІ<br />

4 Source: Prefeasibility Study on the development <strong>of</strong> the railway axis along Pan-European <strong>Corridor</strong> VІІІ,<br />

Secretariat <strong>of</strong> Pan-European <strong>Corridor</strong> VІІІ, 2007.<br />

49


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Section<br />

The territory <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />

Border with <strong>Albania</strong> –<br />

Struga (6) and Struga –<br />

Kicevo (7)<br />

Features<br />

Missin section, the subject <strong>of</strong> this study<br />

Kicevo – Gostivar (8) Gostivar<br />

– Gorce Petrov – Skopje (9)<br />

and Skopje – Kumanovo (10)<br />

Kumanovo – Beljakovci (11)<br />

Beljakovci – Kriva Palanka<br />

(12)<br />

Kriva Palanka – border with<br />

Bulgaria (13))<br />

The teritorry <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria<br />

Border with Macedonia –<br />

Gyueshevo (14)<br />

Gyueshevo - Kyustendil (15)<br />

and Kyustendil - Radomir (16)<br />

Radomir – S<strong>of</strong>ia (17)<br />

Existing and sections that are used<br />

The need for minimal intervention in sections Kicevo – Gorce Petrov<br />

Section 10 electrified, the other - no<br />

Section under construction 29 km in length<br />

Stage <strong>of</strong> development approximately 35%<br />

Design speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h<br />

Section under construction 37 km in length<br />

Stage <strong>of</strong> development approximately 58%<br />

Design speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h<br />

Mach longitudinal gradient <strong>of</strong> 15‰<br />

Missing sections with length 23 km<br />

Mountain terrain<br />

Design speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h<br />

Mach longitudinal gradient <strong>of</strong> 25‰<br />

Missing section with lendth 2.5 km, which 1.2 km is tunnel<br />

Design speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h<br />

Longitudinal gradient <strong>of</strong> 2‰<br />

Existing section with 88 km length in exsploatation<br />

Unelectrified<br />

Rated speed 65 km/h, but the trade is between 25 и 35 km/h<br />

Existing section in exsploatation<br />

Electrified, partly doubled (11 km)<br />

The railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>), subject <strong>of</strong> the present<br />

Study, will be intended for mixed traffic (passenger and freight). According to technical<br />

criteria, the line should be a single-track main line with standard track gauge <strong>of</strong> 1 435 mm for<br />

lowest nominal speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h and axle pressure <strong>of</strong> 250 kN. The track is planned to be<br />

electrified with a single-phase system <strong>of</strong> electrification 25 kV and 50 Hz.<br />

In accordance with the Project programme and the adopted division <strong>of</strong> railway corridor 8 in<br />

sections, the route <strong>of</strong> the future railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

was divided in two sections, namely:<br />

‣ Section 1<br />

‣ Section 2<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> transport<br />

Kicevo- Struga , and<br />

Struga- Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>).<br />

Alike the road network, the railway network <strong>of</strong> Macedonia follows the main corridors. The<br />

total length <strong>of</strong> the main railway network is 925 km, <strong>of</strong> which:<br />

50


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

- Open line 699 km;<br />

- Station tracks 226 km, and<br />

- Industrial tracks 102 km 5 .<br />

312.66 km <strong>of</strong> the railway line are electrified by mono-phase system <strong>of</strong> 25 kV, 50 Hz. Track<br />

gauge <strong>of</strong> the entire network is 1 435 mm. The main line on <strong>Corridor</strong> X from Tabanovci to<br />

Gevgelia, through Kako and Veles, has single electrified track.<br />

Figure 4 <strong>Railway</strong> network <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia 6<br />

Categorization <strong>of</strong> the existing railway network is presented on the next Figure.<br />

According to the recent assessment <strong>of</strong> the World Bank, "The railway network in Macedonia<br />

consists mainly <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> Х with several partitions (some <strong>of</strong> which are closed for passenger<br />

transport or used only for some types <strong>of</strong> freight transport). Under the current circumstances,<br />

the system <strong>of</strong> Macedonian railways provides limited and not full services. As <strong>of</strong> recently,<br />

several lines have been closed, which used to be loaded with passenger transport. As a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the reduced passenger transport and emergence <strong>of</strong> huge losses related to freight<br />

transport, the lines have been declared as non-pr<strong>of</strong>itable and closed”.<br />

5 Source: Announcement <strong>of</strong> the network for 2009<br />

6 Source: Announcement <strong>of</strong> the network for 2009<br />

51


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 5 Existing railway network through the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia 7<br />

Description <strong>of</strong> the current status is presented in the following figures and tables.<br />

Figure 6 Utilization <strong>of</strong> the railway infrastructure <strong>of</strong> Macedonia 8<br />

7 Source: Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, Spatial development Strategy<br />

8 Source: World Bank, Macedonian Rails- a potential that must be seized<br />

52


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Table 2 9 Current status <strong>of</strong> railway lines in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />

Track<br />

кm<br />

Year <strong>of</strong><br />

construction<br />

Embedded<br />

Rails<br />

driving speed<br />

km/h<br />

Tabanovce – Skopje 49,80 1888 49 100/75<br />

Skopje – Veles 48,74 1873 49 90/80<br />

Veles - Gevgelija 113,92 1873 49 100/80<br />

Skopje – Volkovo - border 31,68 1874 49 100/85<br />

G.Petrov - Kicevo 103,00 1952/69 49 100/50<br />

Veles – Bitola 128,87 1931/36 49 100/50<br />

Bitola - Kremenica<br />

16.70 1894<br />

разни<br />

типови<br />

B. Gumno - Sapotnica 29,43 1957 35б 35<br />

Gradsko - Sivec 16,33 1983 49 50<br />

Veles - Kocani 85,58 1925- 45,8а,35б 70/50<br />

Zajas – Tajmiste 6,60 1969 49 40<br />

Skopje node 37,30 1971 49 100/40<br />

Table 3 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the railway network<br />

<strong>Railway</strong><br />

lines<br />

<strong>Corridor</strong><br />

10<br />

Location<br />

Tabanovce - Gevgelija - through<br />

Skopje and Veles<br />

Condition<br />

Single, electrified, most recent renovation <strong>of</strong><br />

sections 30 years ago<br />

<strong>Corridor</strong> 8 Gorce Petrov – Jegunovce Built in the period 1952/1969 g. as freight line to<br />

use mines in Jegunovce (Fe, Ni, Cr)<br />

Skopje -<br />

General<br />

Jankovic<br />

Stream D,<br />

<strong>Corridor</strong> 10<br />

Kumanovo<br />

-<br />

Beljakovce<br />

<strong>Corridor</strong> 8<br />

Stream D,<br />

<strong>Corridor</strong> 10<br />

Connects with Pristina and<br />

Kosovo zhp network<br />

Veles – Bitola<br />

At border with R.Bulgaria to the<br />

east<br />

Jegunovce – Kicevo<br />

Kicevo – Tajmiste<br />

Veles – Kocani<br />

Used for passenger and freight transport<br />

It woeks for passenger and freight transport<br />

30<br />

Speed<br />

(km/h)<br />

110<br />

60-80<br />

60-80<br />

60-80<br />

First section <strong>of</strong> the future link on the railway<br />

network in Bulgaria; close for movement 60-80<br />

The latest railway line(1968), in good condition,<br />

used 2 month per year for the transport <strong>of</strong> livestock<br />

80-100<br />

Closed to passenger transport, occasionally is used<br />

for freight transport 40-60<br />

Stream D,<br />

<strong>Corridor</strong> 10<br />

Bitola – border - Greece<br />

Secondary lines with low performance, built in<br />

1939, not used<br />

<strong>Corridor</strong> 10 Gradsko - Sivec Only for freight transport 40-50<br />

5-10<br />

9 Source: National programme for railway infrastructure 2008-2012<br />

53


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment legislation<br />

The requirements for the development <strong>of</strong> Environmental Impact Assessment for certain<br />

projects is in accordance with the Law on Environment (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no. 53/05,<br />

81/05, 24/07, 159/08, 83/09 and 48/10). “Project” is a term which refers to development<br />

document in which final solutions for use <strong>of</strong> natural and man-made values are analyzed and<br />

defined and construction <strong>of</strong> facilities and installations and implementation <strong>of</strong> other activities<br />

(such as construction and development collectors, construction <strong>of</strong> roads,<br />

expansion/upgrading <strong>of</strong> factories or mines, etc.) is regulated where such projects have<br />

impacts on environment, landscape and human health.<br />

The types <strong>of</strong> projects and the criteria on the basis <strong>of</strong> which the need for carrying out<br />

environmental impact assessment procedure is established are determined by the<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia at the proposal <strong>of</strong> the body <strong>of</strong> the state<br />

administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment, based on Article 77<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Law on Environment. Detailed determination <strong>of</strong> the projects is specified in the Decree<br />

determining the projects and the criteria under which the requirement for environmental<br />

impact assesment procedure performance is established (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no.74/05).<br />

The Decree determining the projects and the criteria under which the requirement for<br />

environmental impact assesment procedure performance is established specifies two<br />

categories <strong>of</strong> projects, namely:<br />

- Projects requiring compulsory environmental impact assesment procedure<br />

performance prior to the issuance <strong>of</strong> the decision for the project implementation;<br />

- Generally specified projects, that may have significant environmental impact, for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> which the requirement for environmental impact assesment procedure<br />

performance is established prior to the issuance <strong>of</strong> the decision for the project<br />

implementation, depending on the project characteristics, size and location, the latest<br />

scientific and technical knowledge and solutions contained in the regulations specifying the<br />

minimum values <strong>of</strong> environmental emissions.<br />

The performance <strong>of</strong> the EIA procedure is specified in the Law on Environment, Decree<br />

determining the projects and the criteria under which the requirement for environmental<br />

impact assesment procedure performance is established, and it is defined in more detail in<br />

the following bylaws:<br />

- Rulebook on the information to be included in the notification on the intention to carry<br />

out a project and the procedure determining the requirement for environmental impact<br />

assesment <strong>of</strong> the project (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />

- Rulebook on additional criteria, the manner, procedure and compensation for the<br />

costs for inclusion in and exclusion from the List <strong>of</strong> project environmental impact assesment<br />

experts (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />

- Rulebook on the information to be included in the notification on the intention to carry<br />

out a project and the procedure determining the requirement for environmental impact<br />

assesment <strong>of</strong> the project (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />

- Rulebook on the content <strong>of</strong> the announcement <strong>of</strong> the notification on the intention to<br />

carry out a project, on the decision for environmental impact assesment, <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environmental impact assesment study on the project, <strong>of</strong> the report on the adequacy <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental impact assesment study and the decision by which consent to the project<br />

implementation is issued or rejected, as well as the manner <strong>of</strong> public consultation (Official<br />

Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />

54


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

- Rulebook on the form, content, procedure and manner <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> the report<br />

on the adequacy <strong>of</strong> the project environmental impact assesment study, as well as the<br />

procedure on the authorization <strong>of</strong> persons on the List <strong>of</strong> environmental impact assesment<br />

experts to prepare the report (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06).<br />

The implementation <strong>of</strong> the EIA procedure consists <strong>of</strong> several steps or phases, namely:<br />

notification on the intention to carry out a project, screening, request for EIA scoping,<br />

assessment and evaluation <strong>of</strong> direct and indirect impacts on the environment from project<br />

undertaking or non-undertaking. The impact <strong>of</strong> the project on the environment is assessed in<br />

accordance with the state <strong>of</strong> the environment on the area concerned at the time in which the<br />

notification on the intention to carry out a project is submitted. The following elements have<br />

to be considered in environmental impact assesment:<br />

Project preparation, execution, implementation and termination <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

implementation, including also the result and the effects <strong>of</strong> the project completion,<br />

Removal <strong>of</strong> polluting substances and restoration <strong>of</strong> the affected area to its former<br />

status, if such obligation is specified by special regulations,<br />

Normal functioning <strong>of</strong> the project, as well as possibilities for accidents.<br />

The phases <strong>of</strong> the EIA procedure implementation are shown on the figure below:<br />

EIA procedure<br />

The environmental impact assesment covers the following aspects:<br />

- Establishment <strong>of</strong> the requirement for EIA performance,<br />

- Environmental impact assesment scoping,<br />

- Preparation <strong>of</strong> EIA Study,<br />

- Establishment <strong>of</strong> adequacy and approval <strong>of</strong> the project environmental impact<br />

assesment study, including public presentation, public opinion and public<br />

participation in decision making,<br />

- Notification on adopted decision.<br />

55


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

EIA Study includes data/information on the current status, identification <strong>of</strong> impacts, as well<br />

as comparative assessment <strong>of</strong> impacts resulting from several project alternatives. EIA is<br />

carried out by authorized experts in accordance with the established methodology,<br />

notification structure and required documents. Public participation is compulsory throughout<br />

the process, in accordance with the Law on Environment.<br />

The Investor intending to carry out a project covered by Articles 77 and 78 <strong>of</strong> the Law on<br />

Environment is obliged to submit notification on the intention to carry out a project to the<br />

body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment,<br />

accompanied by opinion on the need for carrying out environmental impact assessment,<br />

both in writing and electronic form. The body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the<br />

affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment, within ten days from the day <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> the<br />

notification, shall inform the Investor on the need to supplement the notification, and within<br />

five days from the day <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> the full notification, it shall display it on the web site <strong>of</strong> the<br />

MEPP and in at least one daily newspaper distributed on the whole territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Macedonia. The Minister specifies the information to be included in the notification in<br />

order to establish the requirement for environmental impact assessment performance for the<br />

project.<br />

Screening is the phase <strong>of</strong> the EIA process through which the body <strong>of</strong> the state<br />

administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment analyzes the need<br />

for EIA development on the specific project within 30 days from the day <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> the<br />

notification in full. When the need for EIA development on the specific project is established,<br />

the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />

shall by decision notify the Investor, who shall then submit an application for scoping <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project environmental impact assessment, i.e. definition <strong>of</strong> all areas to be covered in the EIA<br />

(content <strong>of</strong> the EIA). Within five days from the day <strong>of</strong> its adoption, the decision shall be<br />

published on the web site <strong>of</strong> the MEP and in at least one daily newspaper distributed on the<br />

whole territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. Public participation is included as early as in<br />

the first phase. The Investor, affected legal and natural persons, as well as civil associations<br />

established for environment protection and improvement, may submit an appeal against<br />

such decision to the Commission <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia settling<br />

administrative matters at second instance in the area <strong>of</strong> environment, within eight days from<br />

the day <strong>of</strong> publication <strong>of</strong> the decision.<br />

The EIA scoping phase is process within which the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration<br />

responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment specifies the scope <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environmental impact assessment study <strong>of</strong> the project. The body <strong>of</strong> the state administration<br />

responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment, while determining the scope <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environmental impact assessment study <strong>of</strong> the project, shall consult the Investor and the<br />

Municipality, the City <strong>of</strong> Skopje and Municipalities in the City <strong>of</strong> Skopje on the area <strong>of</strong> which<br />

the project will be implemented, as well as other relevant bodies <strong>of</strong> the state administration<br />

and institutions, which are obliged to provide information and opinions within 15 days from<br />

the day <strong>of</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> the request for consultation.<br />

The body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />

shall issue opinion on the scoping and notify the Investor thereon.<br />

The main goal <strong>of</strong> this phase is to inform the Investor <strong>of</strong> issues (tasks) to be addressed in the<br />

final version <strong>of</strong> the EIA Study. This also assumes inclusion <strong>of</strong> specific requirements on the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> each individual project proposal.<br />

Scoping <strong>of</strong> the environmental impact assessment <strong>of</strong> the project is compulsory under Articles<br />

81(4) and 82(1) <strong>of</strong> the Law on Environment. The Investor is obliged to request the opinion on<br />

56


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

the scoping by the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong><br />

the environment.<br />

The opinion on the scope <strong>of</strong> the environmental impact assessment <strong>of</strong> the project shall in<br />

particular contain the following information to be taken into account by the Investor while<br />

developing the project proposal:<br />

- alternatives that need to be considered,<br />

- basic overview and investigations that need to be carried out,<br />

- methods and criteria used to presume and assess the effects,<br />

- mitigation measures to be undertaken,<br />

- legal persons that should be consulted during the preparation <strong>of</strong> the environmental<br />

impact assessment study <strong>of</strong> the project, and<br />

- structure, content and length <strong>of</strong> environmental information.<br />

The above means that the Investor may undertake different types <strong>of</strong> activities select<br />

alternative location or modify the solution proposed by the project, all aimed at reducing or<br />

mitigating the potential environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

The body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />

may, besides the scoping <strong>of</strong> the environmental impact assessment <strong>of</strong> the project, in the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> the further environmental impact assessment procedure, request additional<br />

information if they find necessary, or to request information to be compiled in a manner<br />

corresponding with modern knowledge and methods <strong>of</strong> assessment.<br />

Once the scope is determined, the development <strong>of</strong> the EIA Study is initiated. The<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the environmental impact assessment study concerning the implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the project is in accordance with Article 2 <strong>of</strong> the Rulebook on the content <strong>of</strong> the<br />

requirements to be fulfilled by the environmental impact assesment study (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />

The Investor shall prepare the environmental impact assessment study for the project,<br />

required to carry out the environmental impact assessment procedure for the project and<br />

submit it to the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environment both in writing and electronic form, and to engage at least one person from the<br />

List <strong>of</strong> experts (Article 85 <strong>of</strong> the Law on Environment), to sign the study as person<br />

responsible for its quality. Within five working days from the day <strong>of</strong> receipt or completion, the<br />

body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />

shall publish the environmental impact assessment study for the project on the web site <strong>of</strong><br />

the MEPP and announcement that the study is completed and available to the public in at<br />

least one daily newspaper distributed on the whole territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />

Any person, the bodies <strong>of</strong> the state administration, mayors <strong>of</strong> municipalities, the City <strong>of</strong><br />

Skopje and municipalities in the City <strong>of</strong> Skopje, may submit their opinions, in writing, the<br />

body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment,<br />

within 30 days from the day <strong>of</strong> publication the environmental impact assessment study. If the<br />

study does not contain certain legal requirements, the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration<br />

responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment shall return it to the Investor and<br />

specify the deadline within which it shall be supplemented or modified, which may not be<br />

longer than 40 days, starting from the day <strong>of</strong> the study receipt.<br />

57


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Once the impacts on the environment have been identified and assessed in the prepared<br />

EIA Study, the process goes further with the review <strong>of</strong> the study adequacy. The review<br />

shall focus on identification <strong>of</strong> deficiencies <strong>of</strong> major and minor importance, which may have<br />

direct influence on the process <strong>of</strong> making decision with regard to the quality <strong>of</strong> the Study. In<br />

case no serious deficiencies have been detected, it will be so noted. Review <strong>of</strong> adequacy <strong>of</strong><br />

the Study is a process <strong>of</strong> checking the adequacy <strong>of</strong> the EIA Study through “Report on the<br />

adequacy <strong>of</strong> Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project”, which is prepared by<br />

the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />

persons authorized thereby from among the List <strong>of</strong> experts within deadline which may not<br />

exceed 60 days from the day on which the Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Project has been submitted together with the opinions on the Study obtained upon prior<br />

conducted public debate. The Report shall establish whether the Environmental Impact<br />

Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project meets the requirements specified by the law and proposes<br />

the conditions that should be specified in the permit for the project implementation, as well<br />

as the measures for negative impacts prevention and reduction. In case <strong>of</strong> at least one<br />

response “inadequate” in the checklist, the Study is returned to the Investor who should<br />

supplement or finalize it within deadline that shall not exceed 30 days.<br />

Within five working days from the day <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> the Report on the adequacy <strong>of</strong><br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project, the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration<br />

responsible for the affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment shall forward the Report to the<br />

bodies <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the performance <strong>of</strong> activities relevant for<br />

the project and to the bodies <strong>of</strong> the municipalities, the City <strong>of</strong> Skopje and municipalities in<br />

the City <strong>of</strong> Skopje, on the territory <strong>of</strong> which the project is intended to be implemented and<br />

shall publish the Report on the web site <strong>of</strong> the MEPP and in at least one daily newspaper<br />

distributed on the whole territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />

The procedure through which the quality <strong>of</strong> the developed Study is checked is actually the<br />

main “protective procedure” incorporated in the whole EIA procedure. Most <strong>of</strong>ten, the quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Study is improved upon the completed review and thus better results are achieved<br />

with regard to environment and obtaining <strong>of</strong> approval for the project which has been<br />

generally accepted both by experts and public.<br />

Finally, the review gives recommendations on how and when should the serious deficiencies<br />

in the study be removed and which appropriate measures should be implemented during the<br />

project implementation.<br />

The EIA Study will be approved by the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the<br />

affairs in the area <strong>of</strong> the environment only if all responses on the checklist have been<br />

assessed as adequate. Based on the EIA Study, the Report on the EIA Study adequacy,<br />

public debate carried out in accordance with Article 91 <strong>of</strong> the Law on Environment and<br />

opinions obtained, the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the affairs in the area<br />

<strong>of</strong> the environment shall within 40 days from the day <strong>of</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> the Report, issue a<br />

decision granting consent or rejecting the request for the project implementation.<br />

The decision contains an assessment <strong>of</strong> whether the Environmental Impact Assessment<br />

Study <strong>of</strong> the project meets the requirement prescribed by the Law on Environment and<br />

conditions for issuance <strong>of</strong> the permit for the project implementation, as well as the measures<br />

for negative impacts prevention and reduction, particularly for:<br />

- prevention <strong>of</strong> harmful environmental impacts resulting from the project implementation,<br />

- prevention, restriction, mitigation or reduction <strong>of</strong> harmful impacts,<br />

- increase <strong>of</strong> positive environmental impacts resulting from the project implementation,<br />

and<br />

58


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

- assessment <strong>of</strong> expected effects <strong>of</strong> the proposed measures.<br />

Within five working days from the day <strong>of</strong> its issuance, the decision is submitted to the<br />

Investor, the body <strong>of</strong> the state administration responsible for the permit issuance, or decision<br />

for the project implementation and to the municipality or the City <strong>of</strong> Skopje on the territory <strong>of</strong><br />

which the project is intended to be implemented and shall publish it on the web site <strong>of</strong> the<br />

MEPP and in at least one daily newspaper distributed on the whole territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Macedonia. If the Investor fails to present the decision, the body responsible for issuance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the permit or decision for the implementation <strong>of</strong> the project for which the environmental<br />

impact assessment is carried out, it shall not issue the permit or decision for the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

The decision will cease to have legal effect if within two years from its issuance the<br />

implementation has not been initiated.<br />

National legal framework regulating the area:<br />

‣ Law on Environment (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 53/05, 81/05,<br />

24/07 and 159/08, 83/09, and 48/10);<br />

Decree determining the projects and the criteria under which the requirement for<br />

environmental impact assesment procedure performance is established (Official<br />

Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 74/05);<br />

Rulebook on the information to be included in the notification on the intention to<br />

carry out a project and the procedure determining the requirement for<br />

environmental impact assesment <strong>of</strong> the project (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />

Rulebook on the content <strong>of</strong> the requirements to be fulfilled by the environmental<br />

impact assesment study (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no.<br />

33/06);<br />

Rulebook on the content <strong>of</strong> the announcement <strong>of</strong> the notification on the intention<br />

to carry out a project, on the decision for environmental impact assesment, <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environmental impact assesment study on the project, <strong>of</strong> the report on the<br />

adequacy <strong>of</strong> environmental impact assesment study and the decision by which<br />

consent to the project implementation is issued or rejected, as well as the manner<br />

<strong>of</strong> public consultation (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />

Rulebook on the form, content, procedure and manner <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

report on the adequacy <strong>of</strong> the project environmental impact assesment study, as<br />

well as the procedure on the authorization <strong>of</strong> persons on the List <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />

impact assesment experts to prepare the report (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/06);<br />

‣ Law on Nature Protection (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 67/04,<br />

14/06 and 84/07 and 35/10);<br />

‣ Law on Waters (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 4/98, 19/00, 42/05,<br />

46/06) and new Law on Waters (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 87/08,<br />

6/09 and 161/09);<br />

Decree on waters classification (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia <strong>of</strong><br />

31 March 1999);<br />

59


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Decree on categorization <strong>of</strong> watercourses, lakes, accumulations and<br />

groundwaters (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 18/99, 71/99);<br />

‣ Law on Waste Management (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 68/04,<br />

107/07, 102/08 and 143/08);<br />

List <strong>of</strong> wastes (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 100/05);<br />

‣ Law on Ambient Air Quality (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 67/04 and<br />

92/07 and 35/10);<br />

Decree on the limit values <strong>of</strong> the levels and types <strong>of</strong> polluting substances in the<br />

ambient air and alert thresholds, deadlines for limit values achievement,<br />

margins <strong>of</strong> tolerance for the limit values, target values and long-term targets<br />

(Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 50/2005);<br />

Rulebook on the criteria, methods and procedures for ambient air quality<br />

assessment (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 82/06);<br />

‣ Law on Cultural Heritage Conservation (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />

no. 20/04 and 115/07);<br />

‣ Law on the Protection <strong>of</strong> Animals Welfare (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />

no. 113/07);<br />

‣ Law on Plants Protection (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 25/98, 6/00);<br />

‣ Law on Forests (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 64/09);<br />

‣ Law on Protection against Environmental Noise (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia no. 79/07);<br />

Rulebook on the limit values <strong>of</strong> environmental noise levels (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 147/08);<br />

Rulebook on the locations <strong>of</strong> measuring stations and measuring points (Official<br />

Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 120/08);<br />

Decision on determination <strong>of</strong> the cases in which and conditions under which the<br />

peace <strong>of</strong> citizens is considered disturbed by harmful noise (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 01/09);<br />

Additional relevant legislation:<br />

‣ Law on railway System (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 47/10);<br />

‣ Law on railway System Safety (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no.47/10);<br />

‣ Law on the Agreements on Shipments in the <strong>Railway</strong> Transport (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 55/07);<br />

‣ Law on Road Transport (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 68/04,<br />

127/06 and 114/09);<br />

60


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

‣ Law on Transport <strong>of</strong> Dangerous matters in Road and railway Transport (Official Gazette<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 92/07 and 161/09);<br />

‣ Law on Spatial and Urban Planning (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no.<br />

51/05, 137/07 and 91/09);<br />

Rulebook on the standards and the norms <strong>of</strong> space planning (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 69/99);<br />

Rulebook on detailed content, scale and manner <strong>of</strong> graphical processing <strong>of</strong> urban<br />

plans (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 78/06 and 140/07);<br />

‣ Law on Building (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 130/09);<br />

‣ Law on Expropriation (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 33/95, 20/98,<br />

40/99, 31/03, 10/08 and 106/08);<br />

‣ Law on Agricultural Land (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 135/07)<br />

‣ Law on Public Hygiene (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 111/08 and<br />

64/09).<br />

Relevant multilateral agreements:<br />

Convention on Wetlands <strong>of</strong> International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitats<br />

(Ramsar, 1971), ratified in 1977;<br />

Convention on the Protection <strong>of</strong> World Cultural and natural Heritage (Paris, 1972),<br />

ratified in 1974;<br />

Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species <strong>of</strong> Wild Fauna and Flora<br />

(Washington, 1973), ratified in 1999;<br />

Convention on Migratory Species Conservation (Bonn, 1979), ratified in 1999;<br />

The Convention on the Conservation <strong>of</strong> European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (the<br />

Bern, 1979), ratified in 1997;<br />

Agreement on the Conservation <strong>of</strong> the Bats in Europe (London, 1991), ratified in<br />

1999 (Amendment <strong>of</strong> the Agreement ratified in 2002);<br />

Agreement on the Conservation <strong>of</strong> the African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds<br />

(Hague, 1995), ratified in 1999;<br />

The Basel Convention on the Control <strong>of</strong> Transboundary Movements <strong>of</strong> Hazardous<br />

Wastes and their Disposal (Basel, 1995), ratified in 1997;<br />

Convention on Biodiversity (Rio de Ganeiro,1992), ratified in 1998;<br />

Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and<br />

Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus, 1998), ratified in 1999;<br />

Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in Transboundary Context (Espoo,<br />

1991), ratified in 1999;<br />

Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (Geneva, 1979), ratified in<br />

1997, together with 8 protocols that have not been ratified yet<br />

61


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (New York, 1992), ratified<br />

in 1997;<br />

European Convention for the Protection <strong>of</strong> Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental<br />

and other Scientific Purposes (Strasbourg, 1986), ratified in 2002;<br />

European Landscape Convention (Florence, 2000), ratified in 2003.<br />

Methodology <strong>of</strong> the Study preparation<br />

The methodology <strong>of</strong> the Study preparation involves planning and implementation <strong>of</strong> three<br />

main groups <strong>of</strong> activities:<br />

Activity 1: Collection <strong>of</strong> data for the preparation <strong>of</strong> “Baseline“ study<br />

Collection <strong>of</strong> data for provision <strong>of</strong> a stock <strong>of</strong> relevant information and clear picture <strong>of</strong> the<br />

state <strong>of</strong> the environment and social conditions, as basic precondition for comprehensive<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> probable impacts on the environment to result from the implementation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Project and measures required for their reduction.<br />

This activity involves desk work/analysis, as well as activities for field observation and<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> basic state <strong>of</strong> the environment <strong>of</strong> the area which is subject <strong>of</strong> this project activity.<br />

Analyses are focused on the review <strong>of</strong> available planning and technical documentation, while<br />

field activities are carried out to make evaluation <strong>of</strong> media and natural resources within wider<br />

corridor.<br />

Activity 2: Preparation <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Impact Assessment Study<br />

The EIA Study is based on the following technical requirements:<br />

1. Overview <strong>of</strong> considered alternatives.<br />

2. Identification and evaluation <strong>of</strong> probable direct and indirect impacts during the<br />

main phases <strong>of</strong> the Project life cycle:<br />

- Engineering design (planning phase);<br />

- Execution <strong>of</strong> construction works (construction phase);<br />

- Project functionality (operational phase);<br />

- Upon completion <strong>of</strong> the project use.<br />

3. Consideration <strong>of</strong> cumulative effects.<br />

4. Definition <strong>of</strong> applicable measures for probable impacts reduction, with preference<br />

for measures for avoidance and prevention, and use <strong>of</strong> compensation measures<br />

as sustainable alternative.<br />

5. Definition <strong>of</strong> Environmental management plan and monitoring over the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the measures for reduction, for each <strong>of</strong> the project phases.<br />

А) Approach applied in identification <strong>of</strong> possible impacts from the Project<br />

implementation and measures for their reduction or avoidance<br />

Methodology for identification and assessment <strong>of</strong> potential environmental impacts includes:<br />

- Review <strong>of</strong> published literature (at national and international levels);<br />

- Use <strong>of</strong> relevant experiences and knowledge;<br />

- Interviews and discussions between Investor and relevant<br />

organizations/interested groups;<br />

- Review <strong>of</strong> relevant statistical and cartographic databases and census<br />

data;<br />

- Field work and investigations.<br />

62


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Impacts will be significant if:<br />

- they are intensive, in space or time.<br />

- they are intensive with regard to assimilation capacity <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />

and nature.<br />

- they exceed environmental standards and thresholds.<br />

- they do not comply with environmental policy and land use plans.<br />

- they have negative impacts on ecologically sensitive and important areas<br />

or resources <strong>of</strong> the natural heritage.<br />

- they have negative impacts on the lifestyle <strong>of</strong> the community or traditional<br />

land use.<br />

B) Measures for impacts reduction<br />

Measures for environmental impacts reduction are required if there is probability for<br />

significant harmful and irreversible effects on the environment. The measures defined in the<br />

EIA Study are in accordance with the requirements <strong>of</strong> the relevant regulations and policies,<br />

as well as the best international practices.<br />

The principles <strong>of</strong> impacts reduction, including their hierarchical setup, are as follows:<br />

- Preference for measures for avoidance and prevention,<br />

- Consideration <strong>of</strong> feasible project alternatives,<br />

- Identification <strong>of</strong> standard measures for minimization <strong>of</strong> each significant<br />

impact,<br />

- Measures should be adequate and financially effective,<br />

- Use <strong>of</strong> compensation measures as the last available resort/measure.<br />

Activity 3: Consultation and finalization<br />

The expert team composed to develop this Study is obliged to participate in the process <strong>of</strong><br />

its presentation before the concerned public and in the process <strong>of</strong> public consultation, as<br />

well as in the process <strong>of</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> the EIA Study adequacy to result in ultimate<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> the Study by the MEEP.<br />

Macedonian legislation concerning EIA establishes the rules and the detailed procedures for<br />

public involvement in the process <strong>of</strong> decision making.<br />

63


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Considered alternatives<br />

Introduction<br />

According to its position, the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia is central Balkan state. It is situated on<br />

the crossroad <strong>of</strong> two corridors which are very important both for the Region and Europe.<br />

These are <strong>Corridor</strong> 10 on North-South direction and <strong>Corridor</strong> 8 on East-West direction.<br />

In principle, corridors are routes through which movement <strong>of</strong> people, goods, information,<br />

energy and other types <strong>of</strong> communication are carried out. Within this system <strong>of</strong> exchange,<br />

railway transport is <strong>of</strong> exceptional importance due to its ability for massive transport <strong>of</strong><br />

people and goods.<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> transport on the Macedonian territory has had a long tradition. <strong>Railway</strong> connection<br />

at north-south direction over Skopje-Thessaloniki section was established as early as in 70s<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 19 th century. This is actually the present section <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> 10 on the territory <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia. The intensity <strong>of</strong> the traffic has been much lower on east-west direction. The<br />

reason for this is the fact that the main port for the region, through which all external supplies<br />

<strong>of</strong> goods have been carried out, has been Thessaloniki. On the other side, all changes in<br />

technological development have been coming from north and so the north-south<br />

communication has been prevalent.<br />

Under the newly established political changes occurring by the end <strong>of</strong> the last century, and<br />

especially upon the break down <strong>of</strong> Warsaw Pact, contacts <strong>of</strong> the countries on east with the<br />

western world have been intensified. In this context, such processes have intensified in the<br />

area <strong>of</strong> the Balkans as well. In parallel with Thessaloniki port, the ports in Duras and Valona<br />

in <strong>Albania</strong> and Burgas and Varna in Bulgaria have become more and more operational.<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> this railway line and other sections missing in <strong>Corridor</strong> 8 will contribute to<br />

the achievement <strong>of</strong> the goals <strong>of</strong> economic development and provision <strong>of</strong> less costly and<br />

faster transport <strong>of</strong> the population and goods. <strong>Railway</strong> connection <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia with the neighbouring countries is expected to influence positively in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

enhanced economic activities and trade in the country and the region. At present, the<br />

transport through this corridor is carried out without interruption solely by road. <strong>Railway</strong><br />

transport participates partially on the territories <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia and <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria, but in local frames due to lack <strong>of</strong> connection <strong>of</strong> their<br />

railway networks. The necessity for mutual connection <strong>of</strong> these networks was recognized<br />

back in 1990s, and started in practice in 1994 with the commencement <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong><br />

the railway line Kumanovo-border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria.<br />

The western, undeveloped part which is also located on the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia is on the extension Kicevo-Lin. This part requires development <strong>of</strong> full technical<br />

documentation in order to enable undertaking <strong>of</strong> specific investment activities towards its<br />

construction.<br />

The western, undeveloped part which is also located on the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia, lies on the extension Kicevo-Lin. Full technical documentation should be<br />

prepared for this part in order to undertake specific investment activities towards its<br />

construction. So far, several pre-feasibility studies and action plans have been prepared,<br />

which have also considered the western part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> 8. These documents were<br />

elaborated without detailed and more specific technical parameters, due to the fact that there<br />

is no technical documentation available at all. This project activity takes for the first time a<br />

comprehensive approach, which should result in provided financial resources for the idea<br />

implementation. During the project preparation phase, PE <strong>Railway</strong>s prepared Prefeasibility<br />

Study. Its goal was to consider the possibilities for establishment <strong>of</strong> railway transport along<br />

64


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

<strong>Corridor</strong> 8, Kicevo-Lin direction and propose several possible variants. They include the<br />

necessary technical and economic analyses, providing relevant indicators <strong>of</strong> the justifiability<br />

<strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> this corridor, as well as <strong>of</strong> the selection <strong>of</strong> the best variation for the<br />

future route. The overview <strong>of</strong> alternative variations for selection <strong>of</strong> optimal corridor<br />

considered in the Prefeasibility Study is given below.<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> variations is most <strong>of</strong>ten done through analysis <strong>of</strong> several criteria, defined in<br />

advance for the Project assessment. These analyses, aimed at decision reaching, take into<br />

account all factors <strong>of</strong> relevance for the selection <strong>of</strong> the optimum variation. As far as any<br />

project <strong>of</strong> transport infrastructure is concerned, before we approach the selection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

optimum alternative solution, we have to take the reality as a starting point, i.e. that these<br />

projects have broader social interest and there are many stakeholders that feel directly or<br />

indirectly both positive and negative impacts there<strong>of</strong>. The investment transport (linear)<br />

projects usually dispose <strong>of</strong> several variant solutions for the route, which differ mutually by<br />

several parameters from technical point <strong>of</strong> view, but also from financial investment point <strong>of</strong><br />

view. Therefore, there is a constant search for the most optimal solution from among many<br />

possible combinations. Yet, how can we assess the most optimal solution and detect the<br />

best project or variation?<br />

With regard to evaluation and selection <strong>of</strong> the best solution for the transport infrastructure,<br />

two types <strong>of</strong> assessments should be considered, namely:<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> the individual usefulness <strong>of</strong> the project,<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> the societal usefulness <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

Individual usefulness <strong>of</strong> the project concerns the benefit that could be acquired by the one(s)<br />

performing the transport or the one managing the transport infrastructure. Usually, these are<br />

public enterprises, in this case PE <strong>Railway</strong>s, which performs activities in the transport sector.<br />

Criteria for societal assessment do not always correspond and are not identical with the<br />

interests taken in the analysis under the individual usefulness assessment. In the case <strong>of</strong> the<br />

transport infrastructure, important criteria that should be taken in the analyses are the travel<br />

time and external costs <strong>of</strong> the transport, environmental protection criteria, criteria related to<br />

safety <strong>of</strong> the transport and impacts on regional economic activities.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong>ten (but not solely or effectively), evaluation <strong>of</strong> the variant solutions <strong>of</strong> the project is<br />

made on the basis <strong>of</strong> technical and economic indicators and to this end we should<br />

determine:<br />

Costs required for the infrastructure construction and its operation, i.e. its exploitation<br />

and maintenance,<br />

Costs related to external effects <strong>of</strong> the transport (safety, reliability, environment), and<br />

Costs caused by the time spent in transport.<br />

The most frequently used methods for evaluation <strong>of</strong> the economic justifiability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

investment are based on Cost-Benefit Analysis. From among them, the methods <strong>of</strong> net<br />

current value and the method <strong>of</strong> internal cost-effectiveness rate, are the best known and<br />

universally applied.<br />

It is important to point out that the cost-benefit analyses are applied in the selection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

most adequate project solution concerning the route variation, i.e. the best solution in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> investment. On the other side, the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the strategies for undertaking measures<br />

that are part <strong>of</strong> the transport policy <strong>of</strong> a country, is based on other methods and studies.<br />

65


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

With regard to strategic studies, special methods are used to broadcast the needs and the<br />

justifiability <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> specific measures and activities in the domain <strong>of</strong> transport<br />

policy.<br />

It is evident that few feasibility studies considered the aspects <strong>of</strong> environmental protection as<br />

a criterion for selection <strong>of</strong> a variation/route, which can in further phases be frequent and<br />

limiting factor. Namely, it <strong>of</strong>ten happens that variations selected on the basis <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

analysis are unfavourable in terms <strong>of</strong> possible environmental impacts. In this Study, the<br />

expert team focused on the analysis <strong>of</strong> environmental aspects in order to confirm or<br />

counteract the variations proposed by the designer.<br />

Considered alternatives<br />

66


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 7 Considered alternatives<br />

Description <strong>of</strong> Alternative 1<br />

The solution for Section 1-Kicevo-Struga and for Section 2-Struga-Lin (border with the<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) was predetermined by the adopted solution with the following general<br />

characteristics:<br />

67


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

1. Total track length: 62.594 km<br />

2. Total route length: 42.117 km = 67.29 %<br />

3. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with R < 500 m: 0.000 km = 0.00 %<br />

4 Length <strong>of</strong> twists with 500 м ≤ R < 800 m: 10.008 km = 15.99 %<br />

5. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with 800 м ≤ R < 1200 m: 3.654 km = 5.84 %<br />

6. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with R ≥ 1200 m: 6.815 km = 10.88 %<br />

7. Longitudinal inclinations i ≤ 12.5 ‰ : 36.898 km = 58.95 %<br />

8. Longitudinal inclinations 12.5 ‰ ≤ i ≤ 18 ‰ : 12.392km = 19.80 %<br />

9. Longitudinal inclinations i > 18 ‰ : 13.304 km = 21.25 %<br />

10. Total length <strong>of</strong> bridges and viaducts: 4.498 km = 7.19 %<br />

11. Total length <strong>of</strong> tunnels: 12.374 km = 19.77 %<br />

12. Nominal speed 100 km/h<br />

The figure shows the section accepted for construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line to connect Kicevo<br />

and Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>).<br />

Elements <strong>of</strong> the alternative:<br />

- Category <strong>of</strong> railway line – Based on the importance and function within the railway<br />

network, defined in the National Transport Strategy, the subject railway line is ranked as<br />

main line for international mixed passenger and goods transport line and thus it has to<br />

comply with the conditions specified in international agreements.<br />

- Category <strong>of</strong> the terrain for the selected variant – From Kicevo to the village Meseiste,<br />

the terrain is characterized with hill and mountainous nature with presence <strong>of</strong> high hills<br />

and deep dales. From the village Meseiste to the village Kalista, the route stretches over<br />

ravine and marshy type <strong>of</strong> land. From the village Kalista to the border with the <strong>Republic</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, the terrain is hilly and mountainous with clearly huge steep slopes, dales,<br />

hills, taluses and gullies.<br />

The route is divided in two sections:<br />

Section 1- from km 115+600 to km 121+000. At km.115 <strong>of</strong> the route, the line enters a<br />

tunnel. Lithological units through which it passes include: phylitoides, marbles, limestones<br />

and diabases. Physical and mechanical characteristics <strong>of</strong> these rock masses are favourable<br />

for construction <strong>of</strong> structures <strong>of</strong> this type. The aspect that should be paid greater attention in<br />

further phases <strong>of</strong> investigation is the transgressive boundary between limestones and<br />

phylitoides, as well as the boundary between diabases and limestones. Both can be carriers<br />

<strong>of</strong> big quantities <strong>of</strong> water which will pose problems during the tunnel construction. From km.<br />

121+000 to km. 151+000, the route enters a terrain with much less clear inclinations. By<br />

several tunnels along the course <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, the route lowers gently towards the<br />

village Meseiste. In this area, there are gullies, temporary and permanent watercourses and<br />

all <strong>of</strong> them enter into Sateska river. Tectonics <strong>of</strong> the terrain exists, but due to the coverage<br />

with delluvial cover and presence <strong>of</strong> intense vegetation, it is difficult to note. From km.123 to<br />

km.132, rock masses through which the route passes are basalts, clays, conglomerates,<br />

sandstones and marbles. After km.141, the route continues along the alluvial area <strong>of</strong> the<br />

river Sateska, but shales taking an anticlinal position with reference to Sateska river are<br />

found on left and on right <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

68


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 8 Accepted section for the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

This part <strong>of</strong> the terrain is favourable for development <strong>of</strong> structures <strong>of</strong> this type, with the only<br />

remark that it is too narrow for highway and railway line, and therefore the gorge will require<br />

broadening and cuttings on left and on right <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska. Generally, the part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

route from km 123 to km 139 is favourable without any major problematic segments.<br />

Section 2- from km 157+000 to km 161 +000, the route proceeds through ravine and<br />

marshy conditions. The terrain is built <strong>of</strong> lake sediments, mainly clays, with high water level.<br />

Struga Fields are cut through with drainage canals, which presently ensure that the area is<br />

not a marsh. In the lower ground segments (18-19 m), there is a high hydrostatic pressure<br />

69


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

which enables the occurrence <strong>of</strong> artesian water. The prefix “marshy terrain” makes it<br />

unfavourable for construction. During the line designing and construction, provision has to be<br />

made for uninterrupted drainage <strong>of</strong> the terrain where the line passes and serious analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the module <strong>of</strong> the stinginess should be undertaken <strong>of</strong> the terrain through which the route will<br />

be passing. From km.161 to km.136, the route runs over prolluvial sediments where no<br />

particular problems in construction are expected. From km.163 to km.164+900, the route<br />

passes through marbles, which we also regard to be a stable construction environment. After<br />

km 164+900, the route enters a tunnel which will be opened in a medium <strong>of</strong> stratified<br />

conglomerates and sandstones. Their azimuth is eastwards, with drop angle <strong>of</strong> around 40 .<br />

Besides conglomerates and sandstones, there are also phylitic shales and marbles. Azimuth<br />

and drop angle <strong>of</strong> the strata <strong>of</strong> these rock masses are similar with those <strong>of</strong> conglomerates.<br />

The tunnel as a structure exits at km 168, and then the route continues into phylitic shales.<br />

Foliation <strong>of</strong> these rock masses is under certain angle with reference to the route and it poses<br />

no particular problem in terms <strong>of</strong> the line stability. Generally speaking, from km.167 to<br />

km.170, the terrain is assessed as favourable for development <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> facilities.<br />

Exploitation conditions – The regime <strong>of</strong> traffic regulation and monitoring has been<br />

envisaged to be a modern block system for safety and control.<br />

The manner <strong>of</strong> crossing with other existing road arteries will be by way <strong>of</strong> delevelled<br />

intersection with categorized state and local road infrastructure.<br />

Electrification system – single phase system with electricity voltage <strong>of</strong> 25 kV and frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> 50 Hz.<br />

1.2 Zero alternative<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> project non-implementation, the effects would be as follows:<br />

Unchanged conditions in transport in this corridor (use <strong>of</strong> existing road means <strong>of</strong><br />

transportation);<br />

Aggravated transport <strong>of</strong> passengers and goods. The existing mode <strong>of</strong> transport does<br />

not provide high comfort <strong>of</strong> travel in passenger transport;<br />

Delayed regional development;<br />

High transportation costs, with the transport not well organized even at medium long<br />

transportation distances. The price <strong>of</strong> transportation results in relatively high<br />

consumption <strong>of</strong> fuel per unit transported product or passenger.<br />

Low level <strong>of</strong> safety in road traffic compared to railway traffic.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> fossil fuels in transport and low application <strong>of</strong> the so called “clean” energy<br />

resources in transportation <strong>of</strong> passengers or goods/ unchanged trend in the ambient<br />

air quality.<br />

Deteriorated quality <strong>of</strong> all environmental media.<br />

Characteristics <strong>of</strong> ecosystems and flora and fauna abundance will remain<br />

unchanged.<br />

70


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Table 4 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> alternatives<br />

Criteria<br />

Score<br />

Alternative1<br />

Zero alternative<br />

Technical evaluation + -<br />

Exploitation and transport + 0<br />

Cost-efficiency + -<br />

Environment ± 0<br />

+ positive<br />

- negative<br />

0 neutral<br />

71


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

2 Project description and characteristics<br />

2.1 Brief history <strong>of</strong> Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />

The beginnings <strong>of</strong> the railway transport in the area <strong>of</strong> Macedonia date back in 1873, when<br />

the railway line Thessaloniki-Skopje was put in operation.<br />

In 1945, the Federal <strong>Railway</strong> Administration established the State <strong>Railway</strong>s Directorate in<br />

Skopje. In 1963, the State <strong>Railway</strong> Directorate was transformed into <strong>Railway</strong> Transport<br />

Enterprise (RTE) - Skopje. In 1977, RTE Skopje was transformed into <strong>Railway</strong> Transport<br />

Organization (RTO)-Skopje. In 1990, organizational transformation returned the name RTE-<br />

Skopje. In 1993, RTE-Skopje was transformed into Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s (MR) and became<br />

member <strong>of</strong> the International Union <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong>s (IUR).<br />

By way <strong>of</strong> the Law on PE Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s Transformation (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no.<br />

29/2005), the Enterprise was divided into two new entities in 2007, namely:<br />

1. Public Enterprise for <strong>Railway</strong> Infrastructure “Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s” - Skopje<br />

2. Joint Stock Company for Transport “Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s for Transport AD”-Skopje<br />

2.2 <strong>Railway</strong> infrastructure <strong>of</strong> Macedonia relative to neighbours<br />

Land transportation lines (railway infrastructure and roads) are the only resources for transport<br />

connection <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia as typically continental country with the countries in the<br />

Region and beyond, with regard to transportation <strong>of</strong> goods.<br />

With reference to railway infrastructure, only the railway <strong>Corridor</strong> 10, as one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

important and longest pan-European corridors, connects the countries <strong>of</strong> Central and<br />

Southeastern Europe and with its southern section passes through the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia,<br />

between railway stations Tabanovci and <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Greece.<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, through the railway line Gj.Petrov Volkovo – G.Jankovic is connected<br />

with Kosovo, while through the railway line Bitola-Kremenica it is connected with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Greece. In 1984, transport on Bitola-Kremenica section was terminated.<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> connection with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria and <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> has been planned<br />

through development <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> no.8 as one <strong>of</strong> the 10 Pan-European corridors to connect Black<br />

and Adriatic Seas through the railway line Burgas-S<strong>of</strong>ia-Skopje-Duras.<br />

The following sections <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> 8 should be constructed in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia:<br />

Kumanovo-Kriva Palanka-Border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria, which is under<br />

construction, and<br />

Kicevo-Struga-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>).<br />

2.3 Advantages <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />

Although the share <strong>of</strong> the railway transport in the overall transport <strong>of</strong> goods and passengers<br />

is lower compared to road transport, we should point out environmental, spatial, energy and<br />

other advantages <strong>of</strong> the railway transport compared to road, namely:<br />

1. Specific energy consumption:<br />

- in passenger transport is by 3.5 times lower compared to road transport,<br />

72


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

- in freight transport, it is by 8.7 times lower compared to road transport.<br />

2. Specific emission <strong>of</strong> harmful gases compared to the value <strong>of</strong> all harmful gases in<br />

traffic:<br />

- in passenger transport it is by 8.3 times lower compared to road transport,<br />

- in freight transport, it is by 30 times lower compared to road transport.<br />

3. Safety in railway transport is by around 24 times higher than the safety in road<br />

transport.<br />

4. Space occupation, under equal flow through <strong>of</strong> the railway, is by 2 to 3 times smaller<br />

than I the case <strong>of</strong> highway.<br />

The above data clearly indicate the advantages <strong>of</strong> railway compared to road transport.<br />

The main advantages <strong>of</strong> this transport system may be summarized into the following<br />

characteristics:<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> allows massive transport which is ranked second immediately after waterway<br />

transport. The weight <strong>of</strong> one freight train could range between 300 and 4000 t, and<br />

beyond.<br />

Transportation speed at medium long distances (500 to 1000 km) is competitive with<br />

the speed <strong>of</strong> air transport – high-speed trains (TGV) reach speeds during the use<br />

phase <strong>of</strong> 270 to 300 km/h. With classical passenger trains which run over well<br />

equipped lines, the speed is between 120 and 160 km/h. Classical freight trains run<br />

at speeds <strong>of</strong> 50 to 160 km/h; however, there are many special freight trains today<br />

which run at a speed <strong>of</strong> 200 km/h.<br />

High comfort <strong>of</strong> travel in passenger transport. The latest high-speed trains are<br />

equipped with comfortable seats, Internet and audio-visual connections on the seats,<br />

special cars for family travels with various kinds <strong>of</strong> automatic service, high-quality<br />

wagon-restaurants, sleeping cars, etc.<br />

Low transport costs in well organized transport on medium long transportation<br />

destinations. The low price <strong>of</strong> the transport results from relatively low resistance in<br />

movement and low energy consumption per unit transported product or passenger.<br />

Therefore, this transportation mode is cost-effective in case <strong>of</strong> massive transport <strong>of</strong><br />

passengers and goods.<br />

High level <strong>of</strong> safety in transport compared to other transport modes.<br />

Apart from the possibility for use <strong>of</strong> diesel fuels for engines drive in locomotives,<br />

electricity can be used, too. This characteristic is very important, especially in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> limited oil reserves in the world when we need to use the so called “clean”<br />

energy resources as much as possible.<br />

2.4 Description <strong>of</strong> the railway infrastructure<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> infrastructure is defined in paragraph 16, Article 2 and Article 24 <strong>of</strong> the Law on<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> System (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no. 47/10) and it comprises:<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> lines with superstructure and substructure;<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> stations;<br />

Tracks;<br />

Switching yards;<br />

Facilities on lines, plants and devices;<br />

73


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Electrification system;<br />

Trains electric traction facilities;<br />

Signaling and control systems;<br />

Communication and information systems in railway traffic;<br />

Buildings, depots and other building structures on railway stations serving<br />

organization and regulation <strong>of</strong> the railway transport and infrastructure<br />

maintenance;<br />

Land functionally belonging to the line and service points and structures;<br />

Air space above the line up to the height <strong>of</strong> 12 m, or 14 m. above the upper edge<br />

<strong>of</strong> the track with long distance transmission lines <strong>of</strong> voltage exceeding 220 KV.<br />

The route <strong>of</strong> a railway line is subject to strict designing criteria, both from safety and<br />

operational points <strong>of</strong> view.<br />

The most important difference between railway and road transport is that the vehicles<br />

composing the train are driven forcibly along fixed way (rails). Their motion is strictly<br />

controlled and subject <strong>of</strong> strict organizational and safety regulations.<br />

In functional terms, railway transport consists <strong>of</strong> three subsystems:<br />

- <strong>Railway</strong> or line,<br />

- Trains, i.e. several interconnected railway vehicles tracted by a vehicle with<br />

mechanical motor,<br />

- Phase <strong>of</strong> exploitation, i.e. organization <strong>of</strong> that transport.<br />

Classical track (the railway) consists <strong>of</strong> several materials connected mutually in a track grid<br />

<strong>of</strong> different elasticity. They transmit dynamic loads from vehicles on materials in the earth<br />

body. Classical railway consists <strong>of</strong> earth body, known as substructure and track also called<br />

superstructure. From geometrical point <strong>of</strong> view, the route <strong>of</strong> the line passes through uneven<br />

terrain. In order to enable the trains to run over it, uneven points on the terrain should be<br />

leveled, i.e. grade line <strong>of</strong> the railway should be formed, known as substructure and track also<br />

called superstructure. At points where the grade line <strong>of</strong> the route lies higher than the level <strong>of</strong><br />

the terrain, dikes are made, while at points where the grade line <strong>of</strong> the route is lower than the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> the terrain, excavations are made. Incisions are made at points where the levels <strong>of</strong><br />

the grade line and the terrain coincide. The substructure comprises dike, excavation and<br />

incision with their slopes and structures along the route which may be supporting wall,<br />

culverts, tunnels, bridges and viaducts. The superstructure consists <strong>of</strong> two rails laid down on<br />

sleepers and fixed on them by track accessories, laid down in ballast bed prism (ballast<br />

stone).<br />

The above concept <strong>of</strong> the superstructure is known under the term “classical track”. Each <strong>of</strong><br />

the constituent elements <strong>of</strong> the railway should be studied separately and in more detail,<br />

while analyzing it as a single interactive whole.<br />

Trains are composed <strong>of</strong> several railway vehicles interlinked and tracted by (one or more)<br />

railway vehicle equipped with mechanical traction motor and locomotive. Characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

the vehicles (and trains accordingly) depend on the scope and the nature <strong>of</strong> transported<br />

products or passengers.<br />

74


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 9 Constituent elements <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />

The phase <strong>of</strong> the railway transport exploitation is very important not only in terms <strong>of</strong> its costeffectiveness<br />

in functioning, but it also has influence on technical elements during line<br />

designing and selection <strong>of</strong> rail vehicles. For the purpose <strong>of</strong> safe performance <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />

transport, railway lines are equipped with signal control devices without which this transport<br />

can not be organized and practiced. Stations are <strong>of</strong>ficial places on the line serving traffic,<br />

commercial and technical operations in the phase <strong>of</strong> the line exploitation, such as: receiving<br />

and dispatching goods and passengers, manipulation with cars and wagons, repair and<br />

maintenance <strong>of</strong> rail vehicles. Stations have several tracks, interconnected with turntables,<br />

revolvers and gears, as well as a number <strong>of</strong> auxiliary devices, installations and buildings.<br />

The three above subsystems <strong>of</strong> the railway transport system are in an interactive mutual<br />

interdependence and any change in one <strong>of</strong> those subsystems has impact on the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> the other ones. Therefore, railway companies used to be for a long time a<br />

single whole in the frames <strong>of</strong> each country, i.e. they had monopoly position in the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> the railway transport.<br />

2.5 Layout<br />

When two places are connected by railway line, it is practically impossible to draw the axes<br />

<strong>of</strong> the route as a straight line because <strong>of</strong> the configuration <strong>of</strong> the terrain and the need to<br />

avoid and pass through different physical obstacles on the ground. Therefore, several<br />

sections are drawn and circular horizontal twists are inserted in the cross-section <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sections, with certain radius <strong>of</strong> twists. Twists are divided into left and right depending on the<br />

direction <strong>of</strong> turning away from the direction following the route towards station. The end<br />

points <strong>of</strong> the twists are called start and end <strong>of</strong> the twist, and the breaking angle between<br />

sections is called intersecting angle. Station is the distance <strong>of</strong> each point from the axis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

line measured horizontally from the start <strong>of</strong> stationing. Horizontal projection <strong>of</strong> axis<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> sections and twists is called layout (outline plan) <strong>of</strong> the rail line.<br />

2.6 Longitudinal pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

The section <strong>of</strong> the terrain with a vertical plane which by the axle <strong>of</strong> the railway line gives the<br />

axial terrain spot heights, which applied in a certain scale present the natural cross-section<br />

75


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the terrain marked by the terrain height spots. A line leveling the earth masses<br />

(excavations and embankments) is projected on the terrain longitudinal pr<strong>of</strong>ile, taking into<br />

account relief and geological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the terrain. The line projected in this way,<br />

which levels the earth masses, is the grade line <strong>of</strong> the railway line route. Its most important<br />

characteristic is the longitudinal slopes expressed in promiles (‰) or (m/km). If the grade line<br />

goes up towards station, we say that it is in rising, if it falls with the increase <strong>of</strong> the station,<br />

the grade line is falling. The spot where the slopes are changed are called intersections <strong>of</strong><br />

the grade line. According to the Law on <strong>Railway</strong> System (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no. 47/10),<br />

the maximum longitudinal slope is restricted at 25 ‰. If the grade line does not level the<br />

earth masses and the material obtained from the excavation is not sufficient to make the<br />

embankments, then material is excavated from the terrain close to the axis, i.e. borrowing<br />

pits are established; while, in the opposite case (when we have more material than required<br />

for the embankments), the excavated material is transported to landfill.<br />

Cross-section<br />

If we make a section <strong>of</strong> the terrain with a vertical plane normal to the axis <strong>of</strong> the railway line,<br />

we will obtain the terrain spot heights which give the terrain line <strong>of</strong> the cross-section pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />

The scale <strong>of</strong> application is 1:100 or 1:200. By applying <strong>of</strong> such drawn cross-section pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong><br />

the terrain on the spot height <strong>of</strong> the grade line (spot height <strong>of</strong> the subgrade) and inclinations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the embankments or excavations and/or artificial structures, we obtain the cross-section<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the railway line. The upper surface <strong>of</strong> the cross-section pr<strong>of</strong>ile, onto which the<br />

superstructure <strong>of</strong> the track is applied, is called subgrade <strong>of</strong> the railway line. The key data on<br />

the subgrade in the designs <strong>of</strong> our railway lines are specified with reference to the railway<br />

line rank.<br />

76


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 10 Cross-section <strong>of</strong> embankment, excavation and incision <strong>of</strong> single-track line<br />

First, ballast prism is applied onto the subgrade <strong>of</strong> the railway line, and then sleepers and<br />

two rails are fixed on them at the end. The upper surface <strong>of</strong> the rails is marked as spot<br />

height <strong>of</strong> URE (Upper Rail Edge) and it defines the free pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the railway line.<br />

77


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 11 Superstructure <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

The structure gauge (maximum moving dimensions) is the space above URE, which should<br />

be secured against all kinds <strong>of</strong> lateral obstacles in order to guarantee safe passage <strong>of</strong><br />

railway vehicles (it also includes certain expansions, i.e. reserves).<br />

Apart from the structure gauge (maximum moving dimensions), the loading gauge is also<br />

important for the designing. It is the space in which every loaded railway vehicle, i.e. every<br />

full wagon should be accommodated and nothing should be outside <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

Figure 12 Cross-section and constituent parts <strong>of</strong> the line<br />

Overpasses are bridge constructions leading other transport lines above the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway line.<br />

Underpasses are bridge constructions leading other transport lines below the level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway line.<br />

78


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Culverts are structures beneath the subgrade <strong>of</strong> the railway line (substructure), used for<br />

drainage <strong>of</strong> small quantities <strong>of</strong> water – storm waters from a given watershed area or minor<br />

permanent waters (streams), as well as receipt and drainage <strong>of</strong> the water from the canals. In<br />

some cases, they are used for animals and agricultural mechanization passage under the<br />

railway line. The openings <strong>of</strong> culverts range from 1.5 to 5.0m.<br />

The connection between the main platform and other inter-track platforms in a station can be<br />

established by a corridor (sub-corridor) beneath the tracks and it is intended for safe<br />

passage <strong>of</strong> the passengers from one platform to another. They are constructed only in major<br />

stations with high frequency <strong>of</strong> traffic and people.<br />

Canal is prefabricated concrete element used to coat the drainage canals <strong>of</strong> the subgrade <strong>of</strong><br />

the line in order to provide more efficient removal <strong>of</strong> waters (storm, less <strong>of</strong>ten permanent)<br />

and for easier maintenance. Canals are used for overflow drainage <strong>of</strong> surface water falling<br />

onto the subgrade <strong>of</strong> the line and surrounding terrain, as well as the water originating from<br />

the watershed area. By this, the possibility for the line subgrade flooding is avoided.<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> easier and faster passengers getting on and <strong>of</strong> the board, supply,<br />

uploading and unloading <strong>of</strong> luggage and mail, platforms are constructed along the tracks and<br />

their subgrade line is elevated above the tracks. They are divided into passenger and <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

(luggage-mail). Depending on the position, they are divided into main – by the passenger<br />

building and inter-track (between the tracks).<br />

The station fence delineates the station area which is an area <strong>of</strong> land restricted by closed<br />

lines on irregular polygonal shape and the boundary is most <strong>of</strong>ten from the entry to the exit<br />

signal.<br />

These are structures aimed at securing the earth body against rocks sliding, securing <strong>of</strong><br />

excavations and embankments, reduction <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the embankment cross stays. This<br />

is undertaken in conditions which are unstable for the subgrade protection, terrains prone to<br />

earth sliding, avoidance <strong>of</strong> unaesthetic forms <strong>of</strong> the embankments in populated places or<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> the expropriation scope.<br />

Proper drainage <strong>of</strong> the line subgrade in cases in which the groundwater level is raised to the<br />

level posing danger for the subgrade condition (either from infiltration or capillary lifting <strong>of</strong><br />

those waters) is developed by way <strong>of</strong> drainage installation. Drainage <strong>of</strong> the subgrade is<br />

collection and transportation <strong>of</strong> the water from the terrain resulting from groundwaters or<br />

surface waters that could permeate into the subgrade.<br />

2.7 Stations layout and longitudinal section<br />

Stations are <strong>of</strong>ficial points along the line route, where transport, technical and commercial<br />

activities are performed. Depending on the purposes, stations are designed with different<br />

characteristics in relation to facilities and installations within the station. At the stage <strong>of</strong><br />

Conceptual design and main design, the positioning, the role and functional equipment <strong>of</strong><br />

stations should be elaborated in more detail.<br />

Distribution <strong>of</strong> the stations depends on the required perspective permeability performance <strong>of</strong><br />

the line and level <strong>of</strong> development and functional equipment <strong>of</strong> the area through which the<br />

line passes. From exploitation point <strong>of</strong> view, the best arrangement <strong>of</strong> the station is when the<br />

driving times <strong>of</strong> a pair <strong>of</strong> trains in all inter-station distances are approximately the same.<br />

In relation to populated places, the position and the size <strong>of</strong> the stations should be<br />

determined and integrated into general and detailed urban plans <strong>of</strong> urban agglomerations.<br />

While selecting the location for the passenger station, it should be planned near central<br />

urban zones, which are well connected with public urban transport systems for passengers<br />

79


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

transport. In major urban agglomerations, there are usually more than one stations<br />

designed, which inter alia are also used for suburban passenger transport and formation <strong>of</strong><br />

so called “multi-modal junctions” in which several types <strong>of</strong> transport systems have their<br />

station terminals. Of course, these planning should take into account the prospective<br />

volumes <strong>of</strong> transport and the so called “modal distribution” by types <strong>of</strong> transport systems.<br />

The railway station, with the installations and facilities that compose it, occupies large area<br />

and therefore care should be taken <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the cross-section gauge <strong>of</strong> the station<br />

plateau. It is recommendable to design the station plateau on a shallow embankment for<br />

easier drainage.<br />

Great savings in stations construction could be achieved if the location has favourable<br />

geological composition. Modern techniques for terrain improvement by injection or<br />

replacement <strong>of</strong> materials <strong>of</strong>fer technical solutions even under unfavourable conditions, but<br />

this increases the cost <strong>of</strong> construction.<br />

Stations should be designed “in direction”, but if solution <strong>of</strong> a station with horizontal twist is<br />

justified, then the minimum radius is 500 meters, with the turntables being “in direction”.<br />

Figure 13 Required station width<br />

Conceptual design has been prepared for all stations planned along the route <strong>of</strong> the newly<br />

designed railway line, determining the number and the type <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial buildings, access<br />

roads and connection with the remaining urban structure.<br />

The length <strong>of</strong> a station is determined in relation to the length <strong>of</strong> the tracks in the station on<br />

which all required tasks with the trains may be performed without interruption and safely. To<br />

this end, the length <strong>of</strong> the trains should be determined and it is calculated by way <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> axles <strong>of</strong> the vehicles comprised in the longest train to be stopping at the station.<br />

In determining the length <strong>of</strong> the train, the axial mean distance <strong>of</strong> 5 meters (mean distance<br />

along axle) is taken. To determine the length <strong>of</strong> the tracks, two lengths <strong>of</strong> a 25 meters long<br />

locomotive and 10 more meters reserve are added to this length, to provide safety on both<br />

sides <strong>of</strong> the track. The number <strong>of</strong> axles on the longest train is taken to be 100 or 150 axles.<br />

The distance between the tracks in the station is 4.75 meters, if it is not electrified, or 6.0<br />

meters if the station is electrified and requires erection <strong>of</strong> columns for contact line. The width<br />

<strong>of</strong> a station depends on the number <strong>of</strong> tracks, their mutual distances and structures and<br />

premises for <strong>of</strong>ficial purposes. The grade line <strong>of</strong> the station should be in horizontal or with<br />

the maximum bottoming slope <strong>of</strong> 1.5‰.<br />

2.8 Bridges and viaducts<br />

Bridge is construction which crosses over larger watercourse with an opening exceeding 5.0<br />

m. Viaduct is a construction crossing over a gully that can not be crossed over by an<br />

embankment because <strong>of</strong> great heights <strong>of</strong> excavation.<br />

80


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> the position for a bridge location depends on hydrological conditions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

riverbed, geological conditions on the bottom <strong>of</strong> the riverbed and banks <strong>of</strong> the river, direction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the watercourse flowing compared to the line axis, topographic conditions, longitudinal<br />

and cross-section pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> the riverbed.<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> the location for the bridge is made as early as upon initial technical<br />

explorations. In this initial stage <strong>of</strong> designing, such places are designed as fixed points, i.e.<br />

points through which the route should run.<br />

While selecting the place for river crossing, the following should be taken into account:<br />

o Selection <strong>of</strong> the direction by which river is to be crossed is adjusted with the route<br />

layout and it should not deteriorate technical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the route layout,<br />

o The best place to select is where the watercourse does not spread even at the<br />

biggest water, i.e. where banks exist to enable crossing the river at the lowest<br />

distance,<br />

o When widely spread riverbed needs to be crossed over, then the place where the<br />

axis <strong>of</strong> the line is normal to the axis <strong>of</strong> the real flow should be selected. Also, in<br />

situations like this, the most suitable places for foundation <strong>of</strong> the columns should be<br />

selected,<br />

o A crossing place above which major tributary enters the river should be avoided, in<br />

order to avoid danger from great waters striking the bridge columns directly,<br />

o The location selected for a crossing should be where the riverbed is permanent, i.e.<br />

the water should not erode nor fill in the riverbed with deposits, thus damaging the<br />

riverbanks,<br />

o Access roads to the bridge should be favourable with regard to the works and<br />

stability <strong>of</strong> the earth body. This is especially important for high embankments, which<br />

should be well secured against the impacts <strong>of</strong> the watercourses,<br />

o Considering the fact that the value <strong>of</strong> foundations is in some cases even above 50%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the total costs for a bridge construction, the place <strong>of</strong> each column should be<br />

examined and specified in detail.<br />

In many cases, it would be impossible to observe the best conditions for a bridge location<br />

and therefore modification <strong>of</strong> the existing state <strong>of</strong> the riverbed and the terrain should be<br />

undertaken.<br />

By their constructive characteristics, properties and shapes, viaducts are not different from<br />

bridges. However, their position on the route differs from the one <strong>of</strong> the bridges.<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Viaducts are used to cross over deep gullies where such solution is better justified<br />

than high embankment,<br />

Viaducts are especially applied where the route runs through a populated place,<br />

because urban area is densely developed on the surface. The only solutions in<br />

leading the line route in cases like this are viaducts or tunnels,<br />

These structures are most frequently used to cross over unstable terrains, such as<br />

earth-slides. The decision is made on the basis <strong>of</strong> economic and technical solutions<br />

for unstable terrains reclamation.<br />

2.9 Inclinations <strong>of</strong> cuts and embankments<br />

Inclinations facilitate transition from the subgrade <strong>of</strong> the transport line to surrounding natural<br />

terrain and provision <strong>of</strong> stability <strong>of</strong> the substructure.<br />

The slope <strong>of</strong> the inclinations and the measures for their protection have influence on the<br />

stability <strong>of</strong> the structure, occurrence <strong>of</strong> inclinations sliding and on the scope <strong>of</strong> the<br />

maintenance and rehabilitation works during the operational phase.<br />

81


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

The optimum slope <strong>of</strong> inclinations depends on the type <strong>of</strong> material and its actual condition,<br />

its physical and mechanical characteristics, height <strong>of</strong> inclinations and measures envisaged to<br />

protect inclinations from external impacts.<br />

From economic point <strong>of</strong> view, it turns that inclinations should be designed with maximum<br />

slope, which ensures stability <strong>of</strong> inclinations, because in such case the cubic volumes <strong>of</strong><br />

excavated material or deposited material and areas <strong>of</strong> expropriated land are the smallest. If<br />

we analyze this choice in terms <strong>of</strong> costs related to the protection <strong>of</strong> such inclinations, we<br />

may conclude that their maintenance and rehabilitation during operational phase are highest.<br />

With regard to most <strong>of</strong> the materials, no steeper slope <strong>of</strong> inclinations than 1:1.5 which is<br />

adopted as standard inclination can be applied. Only embankments made <strong>of</strong> crushed stone<br />

or cutting into a rock may be executed with a slope <strong>of</strong> inclinations steeper than 1:1.5. For the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> easier maintenance <strong>of</strong> the slopes <strong>of</strong> embankment inclinations, they are not<br />

executed with slopes steeper than the standard slope <strong>of</strong> 1:1.5. Slopes gentler than 1:1.5 are<br />

designed to correspond with the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the materials, primarily when the strength<br />

<strong>of</strong> shearing is low. Gentler slopes are also made in cases in which:<br />

There is a need for integration <strong>of</strong> the transport line into the environment,<br />

In sharp twists in order to enhance visibility in driving,<br />

There is danger for snow drifting <strong>of</strong> the transport line.<br />

2.10 Locomotives<br />

Locomotives are motor towing (tractional) vehicles without space for a load, but only<br />

mechanical motors for trains towing (traction). According to the type <strong>of</strong> the motors,<br />

locomotives can be divided as follows:<br />

Steam locomotive (steam fueled);<br />

Electric locomotive (electricity driven);<br />

Diesel locomotive with internal combustion motors (they use oil).<br />

The choice <strong>of</strong> the type <strong>of</strong> locomotive to be used for trains traction depends on:<br />

geometrical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the track and structures along the route,<br />

envisaged exploitation characteristics, such as traffic load, maximum loads and trains<br />

weight, required performances during the operational phase (speed, durability),<br />

type <strong>of</strong> available and required line equipment (possibilities to use steam, electric or<br />

diesel drive).<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> steam locomotives is not as widely spread as in the past and therefore the most<br />

important characteristics <strong>of</strong> the electric locomotive that will be used and electrification<br />

systems in railway are presented here.<br />

82


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 14 Schematic overview <strong>of</strong> the main constituent elements <strong>of</strong> electric locomotive<br />

2.11 Towing vehicles<br />

Towing vehicles to be used on this route are divided into:<br />

- <strong>Railway</strong> cars (or just cars) used for passengers transport;<br />

- Luggage vans used to transport mail shipments and express mail;<br />

- Wagons used to carry goods or objects;<br />

- Cars with platforms (usually uncovered wagons used to transport passenger<br />

vehicles).<br />

The length <strong>of</strong> the trains (which is important for the desing <strong>of</strong> a line and stations and planning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the operational phase) is determined by taking the real length <strong>of</strong> towing means and the<br />

average axial distance <strong>of</strong> towing vehicles.<br />

83


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 15 Passenger wagon<br />

The carrying weight <strong>of</strong> trains ususally ranges between 15 and 45 tones. This is very<br />

important characteristic <strong>of</strong> cars, because bigger carrying weight enables carrying bigger<br />

loads by shorter compositions.<br />

2.12 Systems <strong>of</strong> railway electrification<br />

The main characteristics <strong>of</strong> the system <strong>of</strong> electrification include the type <strong>of</strong> current and<br />

voltage in the contact grid, characteristics that have been taken also in the classification <strong>of</strong><br />

electrified railways.<br />

Electricity supply to this system is conducted by long distance transmission lines in the<br />

railway electricity supply system.<br />

Figure 16 <strong>Railway</strong> electrification system<br />

The available current goes to electric towing substations where through current rectifiers it is<br />

transformed from alternating into direct current (first, the voltage <strong>of</strong> the alternating current,<br />

through transformers, is reduced to 3000 V). Such current is then released into contact<br />

network. The positive characteristics <strong>of</strong> this system are that it enables to apply simpler<br />

constructive solutions for electric motors <strong>of</strong> the locomotives.<br />

The above system has the following disadvantages:<br />

the need for current rectifiers which rectify the current from three-phase into direct,<br />

84


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

relatively low voltage in the contact line <strong>of</strong> 3000 V which requires that it has large<br />

section (320 to 520 mm 2 , carrying cord <strong>of</strong> 120 mm 2 and contact line <strong>of</strong> two weirs <strong>of</strong><br />

100 or 200 mm).<br />

The need to place the electric towing substations at small distances <strong>of</strong> 15 to 35 km.<br />

Single-phase (mono-phase) system<br />

This system <strong>of</strong> electrification uses alternating (single-phase) current with a frequency <strong>of</strong> 50<br />

Hz and normally voltage <strong>of</strong> 25000 V in the contact line. Electricity is taken from the network<br />

<strong>of</strong> long distance transmission lines with a voltage <strong>of</strong> 110 KV (or, directly from the power<br />

plant) and it is led to electric towing substation. Here, by way <strong>of</strong> transformers, the voltage is<br />

reduced to 25000 V and such alternating current is released into the contact line for<br />

locomotive supply.<br />

The locomotive itself contains transformers for reduction <strong>of</strong> voltage to around 1000 V and<br />

rectifier which transforms the alternating into direct current. This voltage powers the electric<br />

motors <strong>of</strong> locomotive.<br />

The advantages <strong>of</strong> this system include:<br />

Small section <strong>of</strong> the contact line (owing to the high voltage <strong>of</strong> 25 KV, it consists <strong>of</strong><br />

carrying cord with a section <strong>of</strong> 65 mm 2 and contact conductor <strong>of</strong> one weir with a<br />

section <strong>of</strong> 100 mm 2 ),<br />

Electric towing substations may be positioned at larger distances <strong>of</strong> 75 to 80 km.<br />

As a shortcoming <strong>of</strong> this system <strong>of</strong> electrification, we should mention the significant increase<br />

in the weight <strong>of</strong> the locomotive due to the requirement for current transformers and rectifiers.<br />

This contributes to the need for more complicated construction <strong>of</strong> locomotives and their<br />

bigger sensitivity to changes in voltage.<br />

2.13 Electric traction<br />

The application <strong>of</strong> electric traction dates back in the end <strong>of</strong> the 19 th and beginning <strong>of</strong> the 20 th<br />

century. The first constructed electric traction vehicles used direct current which was the only<br />

type <strong>of</strong> current known at that time, and so electric motors could not use current with a<br />

voltage higher than 500 V.<br />

By discovering the polyphase currents, possibility for construction <strong>of</strong> a different type <strong>of</strong><br />

motors was created.<br />

New discoveries in the field <strong>of</strong> electric power enabled development <strong>of</strong> different technical<br />

solutions for electric motors. Different countries adopted and improved different systems <strong>of</strong><br />

electric traction:<br />

Switzerland, Sweden, Austria and Germany apply single-phase system with 16 2/3<br />

Hz and voltage <strong>of</strong> 15000, 18000 and 22000 V.<br />

The Netherlands, France and England use direct system (direct current) with a<br />

voltage <strong>of</strong> 1500 V and 1650 V.<br />

Italy uses direct current as well, but with a voltage <strong>of</strong> 3000 V, and Russia with 3000<br />

V, etc.<br />

The main railway line Tabanovce-Gevgelia is eletrified through a system <strong>of</strong> single-phase<br />

current with a frequency <strong>of</strong> 50 Hz and voltage <strong>of</strong> 25000 V. In the frames <strong>of</strong> the railways<br />

system <strong>of</strong> the former Yugoslav state, railway line electrification from north to Zagreb is by a<br />

system <strong>of</strong> direct current with a voltage <strong>of</strong> 3300 V итн.<br />

85


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Depending on the type <strong>of</strong> the current, used to power the electric motors, locomotives are<br />

divided into locomotives with direct current, locomotives with single-phase current and<br />

locomotives with three-phase current.<br />

Electric locomotive <strong>of</strong> mono-phase system<br />

Our electrified railway lines use the mono-phase system <strong>of</strong> electrification (current with<br />

voltage <strong>of</strong> 25000 V and frequency <strong>of</strong> 50 Hz). The most frequently used locomotives <strong>of</strong> this<br />

type here are locomotives Е-441 and Е-461.<br />

Locomotive Е-441 has a drive wheels diamater <strong>of</strong> 1.25 m in new rims and 1.17 m in torn out<br />

rims. The mass <strong>of</strong> the locomotive amounts 80 t. It has 4 electric motors and axial pressure is<br />

20 t, maximum motion speed is 28000 daN. The hourly traction power <strong>of</strong> the wheels rim<br />

(efective) in case <strong>of</strong> half torn out rims is 19000 daN.<br />

Besides electric locomotives, there are also other electric motor vehicles, most <strong>of</strong>ten used in<br />

urban public transport <strong>of</strong> passengers in large cities. Electromotor cars have electric motor<br />

drive, and the required electricity is taken from contact line via prantograph, as well as<br />

electric locomotives. They differ from locomotives in the aspect that these vehicles have<br />

space for passengers reception, too.<br />

2.14 Diesel locomotive<br />

Motors in diesel locomotives use oil as driving fuel and they are equipped with cisterns, oil<br />

storage tanks.<br />

The advantage compared to electric locomotive is that the diesel locomotive is entirely<br />

independent from external additional driving installations, like electricity supply. Diesel<br />

locomotive consists <strong>of</strong> diesel motor, power gear, auxiliary machines, locomotive pedestal<br />

and commanding area.<br />

Diesel motor is used to drive the locomotive. It is internal combustion motor which uses oil<br />

as fuel. As a result <strong>of</strong> the high temperature achieved during air compression in motor<br />

cylinders, the oil is agitated and combusted releasing energy. The overall motor output may<br />

exceed 3000 horse-powers.<br />

The power gear with diesel locomotives is very important for the traction performance. Diesel<br />

motor provides normal output only under normal, optimum number <strong>of</strong> revolutions and it is not<br />

able to turn the wheels directly as it is done by electric traction motors. In order to utilize the<br />

output rationally, the gear is placed between it and locomotive driving wheels. Thanks to it,<br />

the motor may work unburdened with optimum number <strong>of</strong> revolutions, and then by way <strong>of</strong><br />

various transmissions the locomotive wheels are connected to move at a speed suitable for<br />

the current motion conditions (increasing or decreasing the speed, independently from the<br />

motor performance or stopping them from turning with the motor continuing to work).<br />

Auxiliary machines and equipment with diesel and diesel-electric locomotive include:<br />

Accumulator batteries, which have the role to supply electricity to the electric<br />

starter (servo-motor) to put the diesel motor in drive.<br />

Motor-generator <strong>of</strong> continuous current, which is connected through a belt to a<br />

gear <strong>of</strong> the diesel motor and generates electricity.<br />

Air compressor, used to produce compressed air supplied to breaks, sand<br />

blasting devices, to regulate the performance <strong>of</strong> diesel motor, etc.<br />

Electrical instruments installed on the table in locomotive command cabinet used<br />

for vehicle movement steering and control.<br />

86


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Locomotive pedestal consists <strong>of</strong> steel rim produced <strong>of</strong> primary and secondary longitudinal<br />

and cross-section bearings with other conjunctions and rigid segments. The whole<br />

construction is placed on its upper side, including all parts (bodywork), while the lower part<br />

holds the pivots for the revolving socles which enable radial movement <strong>of</strong> axles and wheels.<br />

Control area serves to accomodate the command (driving) board on which all devices and<br />

instruments for the locomotive command and control are placed.<br />

2.15 Specific solutions for the Project<br />

The selection <strong>of</strong> a specific solution for Section 1-Kicevo-Struga and for Section 2-Struga-Lin<br />

(border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) has got the following general characteristics:<br />

1. Total track length: 62.594 km<br />

2. Total route length: 42.117 km = 67.29 %<br />

3. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with R < 500 m: 0.000 km = 0.00 %<br />

4 Length <strong>of</strong> twists with 500 m ≤ R < 800 m: 10.008 km = 15.99 %<br />

5. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with 800 m ≤ R < 1200 m: 3.654 km = 5.84 %<br />

6. Length <strong>of</strong> twists with R ≥ 1200 m: 6.815 km = 10.88 %<br />

7. Longitudinal inclinations i ≤ 12.5 ‰ : 36.898 km = 58.95 %<br />

8. Longitudinal inclinations 12.5 ‰ ≤ i ≤ 18 ‰ : 12.392 km = 19.80 %<br />

9. Longitudinal inclinations i > 18 ‰ : 13.304 km = 21.25 %<br />

10. Total length <strong>of</strong> bridges and viaducts: 4.498 km = 7.19 %<br />

11. Total length <strong>of</strong> tunnels: 12.374 km = 19.77 %<br />

17. Nominal speed 100 km /h<br />

The figure below shows the accepted section for construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line to connect<br />

Kicevo and Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>).<br />

87


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 17 Accepted section <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

- Category <strong>of</strong> railway line – Based on the importance and function within the railway<br />

network, defined in the National Transport Strategy, the subject railway line is ranked as<br />

88


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

main line for international mixed passenger and goods transport line and thus it has to<br />

comply with the conditions specified in international agreements.<br />

- Category <strong>of</strong> the terrain for the selected variant – From Kicevo to the village Meseiste,<br />

the terrain is characterized with hill and mountainous nature with presence <strong>of</strong> high hills<br />

and deep dales. From the village Meseiste to the village Kalista, the route stretches over<br />

ravine and marshy type <strong>of</strong> land. From the village Kalista to the border with the <strong>Republic</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, the terrain is hilly and mountainous with clearly huge steep slopes, dales,<br />

hills, taluses and gullies.<br />

- Engineering geological characteristics – Generally, the routes pass through solid<br />

coherent rock masses, medium to poorly coherent rock masses and non-coherent rock<br />

masses. The solid coherent rock masses are represented with phylites, phylitoides,<br />

marbles, diabases, metarhyolites and shales. They provide favourable building<br />

environment, but care should be taken <strong>of</strong> shale nature, foliation and stratification<br />

aspects. Poorly to medium coherent rock masses are Triassic and Pliocene sediments<br />

(claystones, conglomerates, sandstones and clays). Such rock masses are generally<br />

considered as unfavourable building environment and therefore they require special<br />

treatment. Apart from the above mentioned poorly coherent rock masses, there are also<br />

lake sediments <strong>of</strong> Quarternary age represented through clays, dusty to sandy clays,<br />

sands and slag rims. The environment <strong>of</strong> lake sediments is assessed as unfavourable.<br />

Unfavourability is especially present at places with high water level. Non-coherent rock<br />

masses – this group includes Quarternary (alluvial) sediments. They are represented in<br />

the riverbed <strong>of</strong> Treska and along the course <strong>of</strong> Sateska river. They make a favourable<br />

building environment.<br />

- Section 1- from km 115+600 to km 121+000. At km.115 <strong>of</strong> the route, the line enters a<br />

tunnel. Lithological units through which it passes include: phylitoides, marbles,<br />

limestones and diabases. Physical and mechanical characteristics <strong>of</strong> these rock masses<br />

are favourable for construction <strong>of</strong> structures <strong>of</strong> this type. The aspect that should be paid<br />

greater attention in further phases <strong>of</strong> investigation is the transgressive boundary between<br />

limestones and phylitoides, as well as the boundary between diabases and limestones.<br />

Both can be carriers <strong>of</strong> big quantities <strong>of</strong> water which will pose problems during the tunnel<br />

construction. From km. 121+000 to km. 151+000, the route enters a terrain with much<br />

less clear inclinations. By several tunnels along the course <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, the route<br />

lowers gently towards the village Meseiste. In this area, there are gullies, temporary and<br />

permanent watercourses and all <strong>of</strong> them enter into Sateska river. Tectonics <strong>of</strong> the terrain<br />

exists, but due to the coverage with delluvial cover and presence <strong>of</strong> intense vegetation, it<br />

is difficult to note. From km.123 to km.132, rock masses through which the route passes<br />

are basalts, clays, conglomerates, sandstones and marbles. After km.141, the route<br />

continues along the alluvial area <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, but shales taking an anticlinal<br />

position with reference to Sateska river are found on left and on right <strong>of</strong> it.<br />

- This part <strong>of</strong> the terrain is favourable for development <strong>of</strong> structures <strong>of</strong> this type, with the<br />

only remark that it is too narrow for highway and railway line, and therefore the gorge will<br />

require broadening and cuttings on left and on right <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska. Generally, the<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the route from km 123 to km 139 is favourable without any major problematic<br />

segments.<br />

- Section 2- from km 157+000 to km 161 +000, the route proceeds through ravine and<br />

marshy conditions. The terrain is built <strong>of</strong> lake sediments, mainly clays, with high water<br />

level. Struga Fields are cut through with drainage canals, which presently ensure that the<br />

89


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

area is not a marsh. In the lower ground segments (18-19 m), there is a high hydrostatic<br />

pressure which enables the occurrence <strong>of</strong> artesian water. The prefix “marshy terrain”<br />

makes it unfavourable for construction. During the line designing and construction,<br />

provision has to be made for uninterrupted drainage <strong>of</strong> the terrain where the line passes<br />

and serious analysis <strong>of</strong> the module <strong>of</strong> the stinginess should be undertaken <strong>of</strong> the terrain<br />

through which the route will be passing. From km.161 to km.136, the route runs over<br />

prolluvial sediments where no particular problems in construction are expected. From<br />

km.163 to km.164+900, the route passes through marbles, which we also regard to be a<br />

stable construction environment. After km 164+900, the route enters a tunnel which will<br />

be opened in a medium <strong>of</strong> stratified conglomerates and sandstones. Their azimuth is<br />

eastwards, with drop angle <strong>of</strong> around 40 . Besides conglomerates and sandstones, there<br />

are also phylitic shales and marbles. Azimuth and drop angle <strong>of</strong> the strata <strong>of</strong> these rock<br />

masses are similar with those <strong>of</strong> conglomerates. The tunnel as a structure exits at km<br />

168, and then the route continues into phylitic shales. Foliation <strong>of</strong> these rock masses is<br />

under certain angle with reference to the route and it poses no particular problem in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> the line stability. Generally speaking, from km.167 to km.170, the terrain is<br />

assessed as favourable for development <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> structures.<br />

- Exploitation conditions – The regime <strong>of</strong> traffic regulation and monitoring has been<br />

envisaged to be a modern block system for safety and control.<br />

- The manner <strong>of</strong> crossing with other existing road arteries will be by way <strong>of</strong> delevelled<br />

intersection with categorized state and local road infrastructure.<br />

- Electrification system – single phase system with electricity voltage <strong>of</strong> 25 kV and<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> 50 Hz.<br />

2.15.1 Design parameters for open line, stations and intersections<br />

The line will be intended for combined transport (freight and passenger), with prevailing<br />

freight transport;<br />

It will be designed as single-track <strong>of</strong> standard gauge equal to1435 mm;<br />

Nominal speed will be 100 km/h for passenger and freight transport and consequently<br />

the minimum elements <strong>of</strong> horizontal twists are min. R=500 m and Lp=140 m;<br />

The maximum qualified longitudinal inclination will amount 25‰, taking into account that<br />

the subject terrain in which the route will be designed is difficult mountainous one. The<br />

minimum radius <strong>of</strong> vertical twists is 10 000 m;<br />

Electrification system 25 kV, 50 Hz. Nominal speed <strong>of</strong> 100 km/h for contact network and<br />

equipment <strong>of</strong> the contact network, supply and control <strong>of</strong> the traction.<br />

Telecommunication – Communication system with optical cable GSM-R (GSMR-<br />

Raylwas) (wireless telecommunication platform developed specially for railways) for<br />

conversational link and data transmission;<br />

Signalization – Electronic centralization, facilitating remote control; Automatic blocking<br />

system (without blocking signals); European <strong>Railway</strong> Transport Management System<br />

(ERTMS) /European Train Control System (ETCS) level 1, Transmission System CTM<br />

16 (synchronized transport system);<br />

Width <strong>of</strong> the track subgrade <strong>of</strong> 6.00 m;<br />

Protection layer against freezing <strong>of</strong> 50 cm;<br />

90


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Thickness <strong>of</strong> ballast prism – minimum 33 cm, under the lower edge <strong>of</strong> the sleeper in<br />

transversal cross-section under the rail;<br />

Module <strong>of</strong> sub-base compressibility Е 0 = 30 МРа;<br />

Module <strong>of</strong> subgrade compressibility Е пл = 60 МРа;<br />

Welded rails in LRT , rail type С 49 on reinforced concrete prestressed sleepers <strong>of</strong> type<br />

MP94 fixed by elastic fixing accessories and laid onto ballast prism, <strong>of</strong> an average<br />

thickness <strong>of</strong> 35 cm, beneath the pressing surface <strong>of</strong> the sleeper;<br />

Drainage system – concrete canals and drainage elements, as required;<br />

Distance between tracks, as well as minimum distances to the structures in <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

places will comply with the Rulebook on superstructure designing;<br />

Height <strong>of</strong> platform above URE-min. 55 cm;<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> platforms-min. 220 m for intersections and 400 m for stations;<br />

During designing, the signed intergovernmental agreements and protocols for railway<br />

connection establishment will be observed;<br />

During designing, the agreed border stations on Macedonian and <strong>Albania</strong>n side,<br />

respectively: Struga and Lin, will be respected.<br />

Standing point on the border between the two countries will be specified additionally.<br />

2.15.2 Section 1<br />

Section 1 will extend from the railway station Kicevo at km.102+600, which is at the moment<br />

the final station <strong>of</strong> the line Gjorce Petrov-Kicevo, up to the future railway station Struga, to<br />

km.156+238.19. The railway station Struga will be part <strong>of</strong> the second section, Struga-border<br />

with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>. This division serves the purpose/possibility for the final part <strong>of</strong><br />

the route to become operational in case <strong>of</strong> possible phase construction <strong>of</strong> the line. This<br />

means provision <strong>of</strong> the commencement <strong>of</strong> construction in the opposite direction, i.e. from Lin<br />

(border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) towards Kicevo.<br />

2.15.2.1 Section 1.1- horizontal solution<br />

Considered variant starts from the railway station Kicevo at km.102+688.33, where the line<br />

Gjorce Petrov-Kicevo ends, from km.0+000 to km.102+688.33.<br />

The route is characterized with exceptionally complex terrain conditions, which directs the<br />

designer to apply to the maximum the prescribed minimum parameters for the line. This<br />

means very frequent use <strong>of</strong> the minimum radius <strong>of</strong> 500 m, for the purpose <strong>of</strong> utmost<br />

integration <strong>of</strong> the route into the terrain. The most difficult terrain conditions are on the first 18<br />

km.<br />

- Route from km.102+136 to km.113+000<br />

This is a section from the first inter-station distance, from the railway station Kicevo to the<br />

intersection Brzdani, with a length <strong>of</strong> 9.7 km. This part <strong>of</strong> the route is characterized by the<br />

fact that the designer has to address several problems:<br />

Bypass <strong>of</strong> the village Drugovo on its upper side, with parallel running <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />

line route with the route <strong>of</strong> the future highway from km.105+900 to km.107+600;<br />

91


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Crossing the river Treska, at km.107+929, where the route proceeds along the river<br />

valley <strong>of</strong> Brzdanska Reka towards south;<br />

At km.111+500, the route runs westwards and at km.112+363.61, the station plateau<br />

<strong>of</strong> the intersection Brzdani starts.<br />

The route is rather diversified, which is imposed by terrain conditions which are exceptionally<br />

difficult. There are 12 horizontal twists in total, two <strong>of</strong> which are <strong>of</strong> minimum radius <strong>of</strong> 500 m.<br />

This shows that the designer has managed to integrate to the maximum extent into the<br />

surrounding, applying the minimum radius. Two twists <strong>of</strong> 500 m radius have been envisaged,<br />

one right and one left. There are total <strong>of</strong> five twists <strong>of</strong> 600 m radius, two left and three right.<br />

There is also one left twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 850 m, one right twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 1200 m and<br />

one left twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 1500 m. The core part <strong>of</strong> the intersection Brzdani itself is in the<br />

right horizontal twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 700 m.<br />

It should be pointed out that the selection <strong>of</strong> the variant for the route has taken care <strong>of</strong> the<br />

length <strong>of</strong> intersections. It should enable accommodation <strong>of</strong> the specified transitional twists,<br />

as well as straight segment <strong>of</strong> minimum В/2 or 50 m.<br />

- Route from km.113+000 to km.121+600<br />

This is the second inter-station distance <strong>of</strong> this variant, starting from the intersection Brzdani<br />

and extending to the intersection Slivovo. Immediately upon the exit from the intersection<br />

Brzdani, the route rises up to the entry portal <strong>of</strong> the base tunnel on the Mountain Bigla, in<br />

order to transfer it on the opposite side in the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska. The tunnel has a<br />

length <strong>of</strong> 5610 m and it is aligned, except the last 180 m from the exit portal which is in a<br />

right twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 700 m. There is also one left twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 500 m, one left<br />

twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 700 m and one right twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 2000 m. Through this tunnel,<br />

the route is directed somewhat more southwards. Immediately after the exit from the tunnel,<br />

the route enters into the intersection Slivovo at km.121+264.41. The intersection Slivovo is<br />

located on the left horizontal twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 700 m. This is completely new station<br />

plateau at level 900.<br />

- Route from km.121+600 to km.130+000<br />

This section is entirely laid over the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska. The route runs in parallel with<br />

the route <strong>of</strong> the current main road to Ohrid as well as the route <strong>of</strong> the future highway. There<br />

is no mutual cross-cutting, because the routes <strong>of</strong> the roads are constantly on the right side <strong>of</strong><br />

the valley, while the railway line on the left.<br />

The route is well integrated in the surrounding, with optimum use <strong>of</strong> the elements <strong>of</strong><br />

horizontal solution. Thanks to that, the number <strong>of</strong> structures (tunnels and bridges) is<br />

relatively low.<br />

Rather big problem in route leading occurs in the part from km.125+100 to km.132+100.<br />

Namely, in this part, the route enters into a narrow gorge <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, with very<br />

steep slopes.<br />

Earlier, at km.125+300, the route crosses from left to the right side <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska and<br />

proceeds along that direction up to the intersection Izdeglavje.<br />

In the context <strong>of</strong> the above, on plans in Р=1:2500, the designer is able to locate the route<br />

more precisely. At the level <strong>of</strong> basic design, it will be necessary, by way <strong>of</strong> microreplacement<br />

through cross-section pr<strong>of</strong>iles, to specify the ultimate location <strong>of</strong> the route in the<br />

gorge.<br />

92


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

As mentioned above, the layout is well developed. There are four horizontal twists with a<br />

radius <strong>of</strong> 500 m, three <strong>of</strong> which right and one left, three twists with radius <strong>of</strong> 800 m and three<br />

left and one right twist with a radius <strong>of</strong> 1000 m.<br />

2.15.2.2 Longitudinal pr<strong>of</strong>ile-Vertical solution-Section 1.1<br />

Vertical solution for the alternative was elaborated based on terrain conditions through which<br />

the route is guided.<br />

During the railway line designing, the criteria for the minimum longitudinal 0‰ and maximum<br />

slope 23.6‰, as well as radius <strong>of</strong> vertical twists <strong>of</strong> 10 000 m have been observed.<br />

The station Kicevo lies in a horizontal at grade level 630, the length <strong>of</strong> the grade level<br />

shoulder is 1362.7 m. Then, slope <strong>of</strong> 12‰ with a length <strong>of</strong> 500 m follows, which is preceding<br />

piece between the horizontal and the slope <strong>of</strong> 20‰ with a length <strong>of</strong> 2570 m.<br />

Then comes rising with a slope <strong>of</strong> 8.2‰ and 20.7‰ and crossing by a bridge at km<br />

107+811.00 above the main road Kicevo-Kjafasan and river Treska reaching the level<br />

729.29 at km 108+833.00. Rising proceeds with a slope <strong>of</strong> 19‰ and 22.5‰, with lengths <strong>of</strong><br />

1046.26 m and 1844.74 m, respectively.<br />

In this way, we reach the intersection Brzdani at km 112+363.61 and level 794.99. Both<br />

turnout shafts <strong>of</strong> the intersection are with a slope <strong>of</strong> 10‰ and length <strong>of</strong> 395 m and 320 m,<br />

respectively. The grade level shoulder, created between them, is with a slope <strong>of</strong> 1.5‰ and<br />

length <strong>of</strong> 695 m. After the intersection Brzdani, the route mounts towards the base tunnel<br />

Bigla which is 5610 m in length.<br />

Before entering into it, the steepest slope on the section occurs. It is 23.6‰ with a length <strong>of</strong><br />

1002 m and reaches a level <strong>of</strong> 822.40 at km 114+136.00. Up to km 119+945.00, the tunnel<br />

is with a slope <strong>of</strong> 14.40‰ and before the exit from it and entry into the intersection Slivovo, it<br />

has dropping slope <strong>of</strong> 5‰, with a length <strong>of</strong> 532 m.<br />

The new intersection Slivovo is at km 121+261.41 and level 907.64; it is laid entirely in a<br />

slope <strong>of</strong> 1.5‰ with a length <strong>of</strong> 1146 m. From km 120+477.00 and level 908.77, to the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the section, there is a series <strong>of</strong> falling slopes. At km 125+267.00, by bridge we cross over<br />

the river Sateska and local road Arbinovo-Izdeglavje.<br />

That road is cut at km 127+975.02, where construction <strong>of</strong> road overpass is envisaged. Then<br />

comes a slope <strong>of</strong> 14‰ with a length <strong>of</strong> 774 m and entry with a slope <strong>of</strong> 1.5‰ into new<br />

intersection – Izdeglavje at km 129+516.62. The intersection is laid entirely in a slope <strong>of</strong><br />

1.5‰ at level 793.86.<br />

2.15.2.3 Tunnels-Section 1.1<br />

The selected alternative has eight tunnels, the longest <strong>of</strong> which is the base tunnel Bigla, with<br />

a length <strong>of</strong> 5610 m. Other tunnels have lengths ranging from 125 to 560 m.<br />

The total length <strong>of</strong> the tunnels under this alternative is 7526 m, or 27.01% <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the<br />

route 1.1.<br />

Along this length, we have total <strong>of</strong> 1916 m tunnels with a length <strong>of</strong> less than 1000 m and one<br />

tunnel with a length exceeding 1000 m (tunnel Bigla with a length <strong>of</strong> 5610 m).<br />

93


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 18 Tunnel<br />

2.15.2.4 Viaducts and bridges- Section 1.1<br />

The alternative has several bridges, with expected problematic solutions for the bridge<br />

above river Treska, at km 107+811.00, with a length <strong>of</strong> 400 m and height <strong>of</strong> 70 m.<br />

The total length <strong>of</strong> bridges under this alternative is 3555 m, or 12.76% <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the<br />

section 1.1.<br />

2.15.2.5 Stations and intersection<br />

On the section, reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the existing station Kicevo is envisaged, as well as<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> three new intersections: Brzdani, Slivovo and Izdeglavje.<br />

94


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

95


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 19 Stations and intersections<br />

- km. 102+688.33 railway station Kicevo L plateau=977.12 m.<br />

There is 1 main track and three reception-dispatching tracks.<br />

- km. 112+363.61 intersection Brzdani L plateau=977.79m.<br />

There is 1 main track and two reception-dispatching tracks.<br />

- km. 121+264.41 intersection Slivovo L plateau =888.28 m.<br />

96


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

There is 1 main track and two reception-dispatching tracks.<br />

- km. 129+516.62 intersection Izdeglavje L plateau =885.91 m.<br />

- There is 1 main track and two reception-dispatching tracks.<br />

2.15.2.6 Crossings and deviations<br />

The following roads are crossed:<br />

- km 103+498.90 – asphalted road – is corrected and construction <strong>of</strong> underpass<br />

or overpass road is envisaged at km 103+612.47.<br />

- km 107+021.36 – rural road, passing under a bridge at km 107+075.00.<br />

- km 107+755.61 – main road Kicevo Kjafasan, passing under bridge at km<br />

107+811.00.<br />

- km 110+573.14 – rural road to the village Vidrani is replaced at km 110+547.63,<br />

and it will pass below bridge at km 110+520.00.<br />

- km 111+727.25 - rural road to the village Brzdani is replaced at km 111+750.18,<br />

and it will pass below bridge at km 111+830.00.<br />

- km 114+723.09 – rural road to Dzudovo, passing below bridge at km<br />

114+710.00.<br />

- km 120+289.41 – rural road, passing below tunnel.<br />

- km 120+597.33 – rural road to the village Slivovo, road underpass is envisaged.<br />

- km 122+518.30 - rural road, passing above tunnel.<br />

- km 124+214.10 – rural road to Arbinovo, road overpass is envisaged.<br />

- km 124+334.42 – rural road, road underpass is envisaged.<br />

- km 125+320.81 – rural road Arbinovo-Izdeglavje, passing below bridge at km<br />

125+267.00.<br />

- km 127+975.02 - rural road Arbinovo-Izdeglavje, road overpass is envisaged.<br />

2.15.3 Section 1.2<br />

During the railway line designing, the criteria for minimum radius used are observed and it is<br />

500 m, with transitional curve <strong>of</strong> 140 m.<br />

- Route from km 129+966.00 to km 141+981.00<br />

It is a section at inter-station distance Izdeglavje – Meseiste, with a length <strong>of</strong> 13 km.<br />

After the crossing station Izdeglavje, by a left curve, the route <strong>of</strong> the line passes between the<br />

existing main road and river Sateska. Supporting structure is envisaged to protect the<br />

embankment <strong>of</strong> the line against the waters <strong>of</strong> the river.<br />

At km 130+636.00, the crossing over Pesocanska Reka (river) will be accomplished by a<br />

railway bridge with L= 30 m. At km 130+750.00, the route passes at 30 m from the plot <strong>of</strong> the<br />

existing church St. Cyril and Methodius, proceeding southwards, running in parallel with the<br />

existing main road Kicevo-Ohrid. By a right twist, the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line passes by the<br />

factory “Sloboda”, after which it takes direction towards southwest, again in parallel with the<br />

main road. The route is in embankment <strong>of</strong> around 1.5 m in height, and at km 134+110.00<br />

railway bridge is envisaged to cross the river Sateska.<br />

97


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

At km 135+025.00, the route enters a tunnel by which the village Botun is passed by. After<br />

the exit from the tunnel, the route crosses over the existing main road and the river Sateska,<br />

where by a left twist it contacts the route <strong>of</strong> the newly designed highway. The shortest<br />

distance between the railway line and the newly designed highway is 8.00 m in continuation<br />

at around 100 m. On this part, protection measures are envisaged against blinding <strong>of</strong><br />

vehicles moving on the side <strong>of</strong> the rail vehicles, as well as securing <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

against road vehicles flying out from the highway.<br />

At km.137+100.00, the railway line moves away from the highway and then proceeds<br />

southwards. It crosses Sateska river again by a bridge L= 60 m, and soon after that it enters<br />

a tunnel. After the exit from the tunnel, the route runs in parallel with the existing main road<br />

to a higher level, after which at km 139+472.00, with the railway overpass bridge, it crosses<br />

over the newly designed highway. By a left twist, the route passes by the village Meseista on<br />

west, after which it is directed to southwest and at km 141+981.41 enters into the station<br />

Meseista.<br />

- Route from km 143+045.03 to km 151+000.00<br />

After the station Meseista, by a right twist, the route is directed southwestwards passing<br />

south by the village Volino, after which at km 144+311.00 it crosses the existing canal by a<br />

bridge. At km 148+000.00, the route, by a right twist, passes by the villages Moroiste and<br />

Mislesevo and continues toward west. At km 150+925.00, the railway line crosses the<br />

riverbed <strong>of</strong> Crn Drim river, by a bridge, and at km 150+983.00 it cuts the road Struga-Debar<br />

by a road overpass.<br />

2.15.3.1 Longitudinal pr<strong>of</strong>ile-Vertical solution-Section 1.2<br />

Vertical solution for the alternative was elaborated based on terrain conditions through which<br />

the route is guided.<br />

The maximum slope used is 15.00‰ at a length <strong>of</strong> 1021 m.<br />

The station Meseista is at a level 719 m with a slope <strong>of</strong> 1.00‰ over a length <strong>of</strong> 1307 m. The<br />

whole station is on an embankment <strong>of</strong> 3 m in height. The grade level <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

through the entire Struga field is addressed by an embankment <strong>of</strong> around 1.5 m, due to the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> high groundwaters.<br />

2.15.3.2 Tunnels-Section 1.2<br />

There are two tunnels on this section.<br />

By one tunnel, having a length <strong>of</strong> 990 m and single-side longitudinal slope <strong>of</strong> 3‰, the village<br />

Botun is passed by.<br />

The next tunnel has a length <strong>of</strong> 480 m and single-side longitudinal slope <strong>of</strong> 3‰. By this<br />

tunnel, a total <strong>of</strong> four crossings <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska and the existing main road will be<br />

avoided.<br />

The total length <strong>of</strong> tunnels along Section 1,2 is 1470 m or 6.90% <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the section<br />

1.2.<br />

2.15.3.3 Bridges- Section 1.2<br />

The alternative has envisaged 11 bridges in total on this section <strong>of</strong> the railway line, six (6) <strong>of</strong><br />

which have a length <strong>of</strong> up to 20 m, and five (5) are with a length <strong>of</strong> 20-50 m. The overall<br />

length <strong>of</strong> bridges under this alternative is 428 m, and in percentages it amounts 2.00% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

length <strong>of</strong> section 1.2.<br />

98


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

At km 137+310.00, by a railway bridge with a length <strong>of</strong> 61 m, the river Sateska is crossed,<br />

and at km 139+472.00 the crossing over the newly designed highway is located, where the<br />

length <strong>of</strong> the bridge construction is 80 m.<br />

2.15.3.4 Stations and intersections - Section 1.2<br />

Station Meseista is designed as a nodal station. It connects the railway line Kicevo-Lin<br />

(border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>), with the railway connection from the Airport “St.Pavle”<br />

in Ohrid.<br />

The station is designed with four tracks with the following operational lengths:<br />

- 1 track–726 m (650 m),<br />

- 2 track–726 m,<br />

- 3 track–737 m,<br />

- 4 track–650 m.<br />

The railway link with the Ohrid Airport will not be constructed in this phase and thus an<br />

operational length <strong>of</strong> 1 track <strong>of</strong> 726 m is obtained. The construction <strong>of</strong> the railway link with<br />

the Airport will shorten the operational length <strong>of</strong> 1 track to 650 m.<br />

The station is designed with two platforms <strong>of</strong> 220 m in lengths, which have exits towards<br />

pedestrian subcorridor. Axial between first and second and third and fourth track is 5.10 m,<br />

and between second and third, it is 9.00 m.<br />

The station will include: administrative building, parking space and loading ramp.<br />

2.15.3.5 Crossings and deviations-Section 1.2<br />

Total <strong>of</strong> 13 overpasses and two underpasses have been envisaged on this section.<br />

The passage through the highway at km 139+472.00 will be accomplished by underpass<br />

with a length <strong>of</strong> 80 m.<br />

2.15.4 Section 2<br />

Section 2 starts from km 151+000.00, at 690 m. before the station Struga.<br />

Route from km.151+000.00 to km.164+730.09<br />

With its first 5.5 kilometers, the route is located in a flat area, i.e. passing through Struga<br />

Fields. The second part <strong>of</strong> the route runs through mountainous terrain up to the agreed point<br />

<strong>of</strong> connection on the <strong>Albania</strong>n side.<br />

Immediately after the crossing over the river Crn Drim, at km.150+925, there is a favourable<br />

location for the future railway station “Struga”, northwest <strong>of</strong> the city in its industrial zone. The<br />

station plateau would be positioned in the area between the main amelioration canal Sum<br />

and the route <strong>of</strong> the future highway to <strong>Albania</strong>. At the same time, the railway station “Struga”,<br />

at km.152+125, will be a border station on the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. The<br />

plane part, which covers the Struga fields, is cut through with amelioration canals which will<br />

be overcome as obstacles by construction <strong>of</strong> culverts, with openings, depending on the size<br />

<strong>of</strong> canals.<br />

Besides amelioration canals, obstacles also include road lines <strong>of</strong> different ranks. Fortunately,<br />

there are no crossings <strong>of</strong> the newly designed highway for this alternative.<br />

At km.155+690, the railway line cuts the existing main road to <strong>Albania</strong>, and at km.156+662<br />

the local road to the Monastery Kalista and the village Radozda. Both will be solved by<br />

structures, where the crossing will be at two levels.<br />

99


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

The main characteristic <strong>of</strong> the accepted alternative for the subject section is in the fact that<br />

the corridor connecting the two railway networks is away from the Ohrid Lake shore. This<br />

imposes a more radical solution, i.e. longer tunnel to surmount the mountain massif between<br />

the two countries, but it provides protection <strong>of</strong> the lake ecosystem, which is part <strong>of</strong> the world<br />

list <strong>of</strong> natural heritage (UNESCO). By way <strong>of</strong> tunnels with a length <strong>of</strong> 3135 m, 88 m and 155<br />

m, respectively, the passage is made from Struga to Lin valley, and to the connecting point<br />

itself.<br />

According to the agreement, the connection is on the route at the grade line 725.00. These<br />

are preliminary agreements and they may undergo minor corrections till adoption <strong>of</strong> all<br />

details <strong>of</strong> the design.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the route layout, there are 11 curves, out <strong>of</strong> which minimum<br />

radius <strong>of</strong> 500 m is applied only on two right curves. One left curve is designed at the exit<br />

from the tunnel number 11, with a radius <strong>of</strong> 550 m. Radius <strong>of</strong> 700 m is applied on one left<br />

curve. Two horizontal curves, one left and one right with a radius <strong>of</strong> 1000 m, one left with a<br />

radius <strong>of</strong> 1200 m and 4 curves, two right and two left are with a radius <strong>of</strong> 1500 m.<br />

The route <strong>of</strong> the newly designed highway cuts the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line above a tunnel at<br />

km 160+775.<br />

The total length <strong>of</strong> the section is 13.73 km.<br />

2.15.4.1 Longitudinal pr<strong>of</strong>ile-Vertical solution<br />

At the first 4820 m, the maximum slope <strong>of</strong> the grade line is 2.4‰. The grade line on the<br />

station plateau <strong>of</strong> the railway station Struga is in horizontal with a slope 0.00‰ and slope<br />

0.50‰, where the horizontal is at the level 694.45. It is proposed that the station plateau has<br />

a length <strong>of</strong> around 1117 m, from km.151+692 to km.152+809.<br />

After the exit from the station Struga, the grade line is with a slope 1.10‰ up to km.153+600<br />

and level 695.74. Next slopes are 0.50‰ and 2.40‰, and level 699.35 is reached at<br />

km.155+820. Then, the next 3345 m use slopes <strong>of</strong> 7.60‰ up to km.156+500, from 18.50‰<br />

to km.158+300 and slope <strong>of</strong> 21.00‰ (maximum slope for the second section) with a length<br />

<strong>of</strong> 795 m, reaching the level 755.99 at km.159+165. Next slope is 9.50‰ with a length <strong>of</strong> 500<br />

m, before the entry portal <strong>of</strong> the base tunnel. The entire tunnel length <strong>of</strong> 3135 m is falling.<br />

The maximum slope is 13.00‰ with a length <strong>of</strong> 1985 m. The level at the entry portal is<br />

759.65, and the level at the exit portal 731.18. The slope at the exit from the tunnel is 4.50‰<br />

up to km.162+955, and tunnel with a length <strong>of</strong> 88 m is located onto it. Next slopes are from<br />

1.50‰ to km.163+600, 3.00‰ up to km.164+250 with a level <strong>of</strong> 727.04 and 5.00‰ in the<br />

section <strong>of</strong> connection between the railway networks <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia and<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, respectively. At a slope <strong>of</strong> 3.00‰, the last tunnel with a length <strong>of</strong> 155 m<br />

is located.<br />

2.15.4.2 Tunnels<br />

The proposed alternative has three tunnels, with a length <strong>of</strong> 3135 m, 88 m and 155 m. The<br />

tunnel <strong>of</strong> 3135 m is a base tunnel and it is used to transfer the route from the Struga Fields<br />

to the Lin valley.<br />

The overall percentage <strong>of</strong> tunnels along this section is 24.60%<br />

2.15.4.3 Viaducts and bridges<br />

Under this alternative, bridges are above major rivers cutting the route. Their length reaches<br />

30 m. Numerous minor gullies are drained through culverts.<br />

100


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Two bridges will be constructed in the border area with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, with a length<br />

<strong>of</strong> 170 m and 240 m. The total length <strong>of</strong> bridges for this alternative is 515 m, and in<br />

percentage it is 3.75% <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> section 2.<br />

2.15.4.4 Stations and intersections<br />

On the Section 2, at the extension Struga-Lin, the railway station “Struga” is the border<br />

station on the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />

Under the bilateral agreements signed so far at the level <strong>of</strong> Ministries, this station has been<br />

envisaged to be the border station <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. For the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Albania</strong>, that role belongs to the railway station Lin.<br />

The required number <strong>of</strong> railway tracks for the railway station Struga is 7, with a minimum<br />

utilization length <strong>of</strong> 650 m. Construction <strong>of</strong> intermodal terminal with the necessary buildings<br />

(structures) has been envisaged to enable its functioning. Two platforms will be built on the<br />

station, with a length <strong>of</strong> 300 m, with passenger sub-corridor between them and exit towards<br />

intermodal terminal. Also, loading station with garage tracks has been envisaged, with<br />

utilization length <strong>of</strong> 228 m, track with a ramp with utilization length <strong>of</strong> 190 m and track under<br />

the crane with utilization length <strong>of</strong> 225 m. Storehouse will be built in the station as well.<br />

To support all these assets, construction <strong>of</strong> a longer station plateau <strong>of</strong> 1117 m is envisaged<br />

as well.<br />

The grade line <strong>of</strong> this section <strong>of</strong>fers a possibility for construction <strong>of</strong> intersection near the<br />

village Radozda. The intersection will have three tracks, with a minimum utilization length <strong>of</strong><br />

650 m.<br />

2.15.4.5 Crossings and deviations<br />

The Terms <strong>of</strong> Reference require that all intersections with other transport line are executed<br />

beyond level. This will enhance the overall transport safety. Along the first half <strong>of</strong> the route <strong>of</strong><br />

the selected alternative, there is a common corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line and the existing main<br />

road Kicevo-Kjafasan. The same arrangement will be the case with the future highway<br />

Kicevo-Kjafasan, too.<br />

With this Section, intersections with the future highway are avoided. In fact, they intersect at<br />

km. 160+775, where the line is in tunnel.<br />

The crossings <strong>of</strong> the existing road infrastructure remain to be solved further. These are as<br />

follows:<br />

- At km 153+196 with local road to the village Sum, by construction <strong>of</strong> overpass.<br />

- At km 154+800 with local road to the village Radolista, by construction <strong>of</strong><br />

overpass.<br />

- At km.155+743 with the main road Kicevo-Kjafasan, by construction <strong>of</strong><br />

overpass.<br />

- At km.156+662 with local road to the Monastery Kaliste and village Radozda, by<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> underpass.<br />

- At km.157+205 with rural road, by construction <strong>of</strong> overpass.<br />

- At km.163+067 with rural road, by construction <strong>of</strong> overpass.<br />

- At km 164+305 with rural road, by construction <strong>of</strong> overpass.<br />

101


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Based on the above, six overpasses and one underpass should be constructed. The main<br />

parameters for the specific cross-section pr<strong>of</strong>iles in this case will be as follows:<br />

- Subgrade width is 6.00 m.<br />

- The subgrade is single-line with cross-section slope <strong>of</strong> 4%.<br />

- Thickness <strong>of</strong> protection layer against freezing is 50-80 cm.<br />

- Thickness <strong>of</strong> ballast prism under the lower rail beneath the sleeper is 33 cm.<br />

- Drainage <strong>of</strong> the body into cuttings and incisions is by drainage canals.<br />

102


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

3 Description <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />

The planned railway line <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> VIII passes through the western and southwestern parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. It extends through Municipalities Kicevo, Drugovo, Debrca<br />

and Struga.<br />

Figure 20 Municipalities through which the railway route passes<br />

3.1 Geomorphological characteristics<br />

3.1.1 Structural relief<br />

The territory through which the railway corridor Kicevo-Lin (<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) passes, in<br />

geostructural terms, belongs to Western Macedonian zone, which in Neogene (Quarternary<br />

period) was under the influence <strong>of</strong> the minimum horisontal component <strong>of</strong> tension towards<br />

east-northeast-west-southwest, and maximum component in vertical direction. This regime<br />

induced gravitational activity <strong>of</strong> fault dislocations, both as re-activation <strong>of</strong> Pre-Neotectonic<br />

(Drim zone) or as newly created forms. The activity <strong>of</strong> faults is directly related to the creation<br />

<strong>of</strong> morphostructural entireties because they correspond with their outlines. From among<br />

positive morphostructural entireties along the railway corridor, we should point out the Ilinski<br />

Block, a small portion <strong>of</strong> the furthest southern part <strong>of</strong> the block Jablanica and the furthest<br />

north-northwestern part <strong>of</strong> the block Galicica. Depressions (grabens) which are distinctive<br />

along the corridor, include: Kicevo, Belcista (Debrca) and Ohrid-Struga.<br />

103


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 21 Structural relief<br />

3.1.2 Structural blocks (mountains)<br />

Ilinski block, which extends in northwest-southeast direction in a length <strong>of</strong> around 40 km, is<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> the mountains Inlinska (Liska, 1909 m), Plakenska (Stalev Kamen, 1998 m)<br />

and Bigla (Golem Kamen, 1.656 m). The Block, as independent structural entirety, is on all<br />

sides marked by depth faults, i.e. Galicnik and Pelister blocks on southwest, Stogovo and<br />

Bistra on northwest and Shemnica and Ljuben block on east. Apart from the mentioned<br />

block structures, at certain stretches, it is also marked with imposed depressions, such as<br />

Kicevo on north, Prespa on south, Debrca on west-northwest and Capari depressions on<br />

southeast.<br />

Geological composition <strong>of</strong> Ilinski Block is dominated primarily by old formations. On Ilinska<br />

Planina Mt., these are Devonian phylitic shales, metasandstones and marbles. On<br />

Plakenska Planina Mt., Triassic conglomerates broken through with Jurassic granates are<br />

widely spread, while Paleozoic phylitic shales prevail. They also constitute the base <strong>of</strong><br />

Plakenska Planina Mt. As a result <strong>of</strong> this geological composition <strong>of</strong> Ilinska, Plakenska and<br />

Bigla Mts., fluviodenudation relief prevails, and at certain areas we also find karst relief,<br />

represented with crevices, depressions, as well as the caves Sino Rebro and Jaorec. In the<br />

cave Jaorec, fossil Pleistocene fauna has been investigated (Garevski, 1970).<br />

The Mountain Jablanica (Crn Kamen, 2.257 m) is situated on northwest <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Basin (on<br />

west from the Crn Drim river valley), between Ohrid and Debar basins. Its eastern parts<br />

belong to Macedonia, while western ones are situated in the neighbouring <strong>Albania</strong>, between<br />

the valleys <strong>of</strong> the river Skumbini and spring segments <strong>of</strong> the river Okstunit. The rectilinear<br />

length <strong>of</strong> the mountain in meridian direction is 45 km. Its width reaches 25 km (7.5 km in the<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia).<br />

The contact between the horst Jablanica and Ohrid Graben has been for long known in<br />

literature as Drim Zone. This fault northward dislocation, along the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Crn<br />

Drim, changes its direction insignificantly towards Debar Basin. Then, it continues the same<br />

direction in <strong>Albania</strong>. In southern, almost meridian direction, the fault dislocation goes by the<br />

eastern hill foot <strong>of</strong> Mokra Gora (Mukal, 1.622 m) towards Korca Valley. On the western side<br />

(territory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>), Jablanica Block is separated by the eastern rim <strong>of</strong> Shkumbija. In<br />

general terms, Jablanica is typically inverse geomorphological structure (horst - synclinal),<br />

which in the relief <strong>of</strong> this area is the most raised part. The area <strong>of</strong> the mountain Jablanica is<br />

104


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

cut into several blocks by vertical, mainly deep faults. Fault concentration is especially<br />

specific for the valley <strong>of</strong> Belicka Reka.<br />

The Mountain Galicica (Vir, 2.288 m) is by its height the dominant relief occurrence (horst)<br />

situated between Ohrid Lake basin on west and Prespa Lake on east. It has a gangly form <strong>of</strong><br />

meridian direction in a length <strong>of</strong> around 50 km, while its smallest width (village Trpejca -<br />

village Leskoec) reaches 10 km. On the mountain Galicica, only the furthest southern parts<br />

(Stara Galicica) raise 2.000 m above the sea level.<br />

According to its structural characteristics, Galicica is a typical (outstanding) horst which is<br />

raised by predominantly neotectonic inter-block faults. The maximum vertical movement in<br />

the western part <strong>of</strong> Galicica, i.e. between it and Ohrid Graben, is accomplished along a<br />

system <strong>of</strong> rugged faults. The eastern side <strong>of</strong> the horst Galicica is in tectonic contact with the<br />

Prespa Graben. Slightly wrinkled synclinal extends through the central part <strong>of</strong> Galicica. Due<br />

to the massive presence <strong>of</strong> limestones and intensive radial tectonics, by which the mountain<br />

is cut into several blocks, the wrinkles can not be noted. The synclinal structure, in its lowest<br />

parts, is built <strong>of</strong> Triassic conglomerates resting onto Paleozoic metamorphites, i.e. Devonian<br />

phylitic shales.<br />

3.1.3 Graben structures (depressions, basins)<br />

Creation <strong>of</strong> morphostructures <strong>of</strong> sinking is related to the process <strong>of</strong> overall rising, where<br />

under the influence <strong>of</strong> certain tension conditions, gravitation accommodation at certain areas<br />

takes place, resulting in creation <strong>of</strong> basin forms. Basins, i.e. depressions, as tectonic forms<br />

are imposed structures. In western parts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, they are<br />

characterized with a graben nature, which were (and some still are) lake basins in<br />

Plioquarternary period.<br />

Kicevo depression is relatively small neotectonic form, situated in an area dominated by<br />

rising processes. Along less expressed faults, the basin is affected by sinking and<br />

accumulation <strong>of</strong> plioquarternary sediments. The interactions <strong>of</strong> the depression with the<br />

surrounding terrains are reflected in old re-activated and young neotectonic fault<br />

dislocations. Kicevo Basin is filled in with medium and upper Pliocene sediments, covered<br />

over with quarternary deposits, and uncovered along rimmed parts <strong>of</strong> the basin. Pliocene<br />

sediments are unique lithological complex, with insignificant alternation <strong>of</strong> claystones, sands,<br />

gravels, marls, coal clays and coal.<br />

The Basin <strong>of</strong> Debrca belongs to the group <strong>of</strong> the smallest basins in the western parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia (368 km 2 ), situated between the mountains Stogovo on southeast,<br />

Karaorman on east and Ilinska Planina on west, and Plakenska Planina on northwest. The<br />

lowest bottom <strong>of</strong> the basin is near the village Botun, at 743 m above the sea level. Debrca is<br />

divided into three geographic parts, namely: Gorna, Sredna and Dolna (upper, middle and<br />

lower) Debrca. The river <strong>of</strong> Sateska occurs as water artery for the whole area <strong>of</strong> the basin,<br />

and its upper and middle watershed areas correspond fully with the boundary <strong>of</strong> the basin.<br />

Ohrid-Debar Graben is the most outstanding sinking morphostructure in the frames <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Western Macedonian zone. Formation <strong>of</strong> this graben structure is related to the end <strong>of</strong> lower<br />

and beginning <strong>of</strong> middle Pliocene, i.e. the period <strong>of</strong> commencement <strong>of</strong> the expansion<br />

orogene phase with manifestation <strong>of</strong> intensive differentiated vertical movements. As a result<br />

<strong>of</strong> these processes, the old fault structures are initially re-activated. Later, the process <strong>of</strong><br />

area sinking takes place along them, i.e. its transformation into the Pliocene lake basins<br />

Ohrid and Debar. The interactions with the surrounding, highly raised terrains, such as<br />

Deshat, Stogovo, Galicica and Jablanica, are everywhere tectonically and rather<br />

contradictory expressed, with maximum amplitudes <strong>of</strong> relocation bigger than 1.500 m.<br />

105


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Pliocene sediments in Ohrid Basin have been identified in the southern part (Ljubaniste), as<br />

well as in northwestern part, and they have been also detected by deep drilling in Struga<br />

Fields. Based on this, we may conclude that Pliocene sediments spread throughout<br />

peripheral parts <strong>of</strong> the basin, and they have not been observed in its central part.<br />

3.1.4 Recent relief along the railway corridor<br />

From the city Kicevo towards Drugovo, the corridor runs along abrasive terrace built <strong>of</strong><br />

Pliocene sediments (marls, clays, sands and gravel). Above the village Drugovo, it cuts<br />

several recent dales, while on west <strong>of</strong> it, along the left valley side <strong>of</strong> the river Treska, it<br />

passes through solid phylitoides <strong>of</strong> Devonian age. Then, it crosses the river valley and above<br />

the village Dolno Popolzani, the corridor continues southwards - furthest northeastern parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ilinska Planina Mt. (Liska, 1908 m), south <strong>of</strong> Veli Vrv (1.535 m). This part <strong>of</strong> the mountain<br />

Ilinska Planina is built <strong>of</strong> solid rocks, represented with Devonian phylitoides, carbonate<br />

shales and slab-like marbles. Along the left valley side <strong>of</strong> the river Brzdanska, to the village<br />

Brzdani, valleys <strong>of</strong> several short watercourses - right tributaries to Brzdanska Reka - are cut<br />

with several tunnels and surface sections. From the village Brzdani, the section proceeds<br />

westwards, along the left valley side <strong>of</strong> the river Judovska (right tributary to Brzdanska<br />

Reka), to the village Judovo. It is important that in this area, the section cuts through<br />

Devonian phylitoides and slab-like limestones. From Judovo to the village Slivovo, the<br />

section is in tunnel make. It passes along Debel Rid (1.252 m), on west <strong>of</strong> Golema Krasta<br />

(1.376 m), above the village Turje, i.e. between it and Mijalecka Krasta (1.298 m).<br />

Toponymes "krasta" themselves indicate that the relief in question is karstic built <strong>of</strong> slab-like<br />

Devonian marbles. As a result <strong>of</strong> the small oasis <strong>of</strong> karst, surface karstic forms (depressions,<br />

etc.) are not visible, but the possibility for revealing underground caverns (cavities) during<br />

the opening <strong>of</strong> the tunnel should not be excluded and this issue should be addressed with<br />

particular care. Apart from the opening <strong>of</strong> the tunnel segment through Devonian phylitoides<br />

and marbles, in the initial section immediately after Judovo, the tunnel section also breaks<br />

through Devonian magmatites-metamorphised rhyolites.<br />

Southeast <strong>of</strong> the village Slivovo, the route passes through the alluvium <strong>of</strong> the river Vilipica,<br />

by a tunnel breaks through the hill Opalnik (966 m, built <strong>of</strong> Triassic limestones) and reaches<br />

the river Sateska. Along the left bank <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, west <strong>of</strong> Arbinovo, it passes<br />

through the alluvial ravine and the river Sateska itself, and then on the left valley side<br />

towards south, it breaks through the small Arbinovo Gorge, which connects Gorna and<br />

Dolna Belica. In fact, it is an epigenetic valley, with the river Sateska cut into the harder<br />

Triassic conglomerates, sandstones and claystones, which compose the hills <strong>of</strong> Cartoica<br />

(1.007 m) and Arbinovski Rid (1.012 m), or it has not cut into the less resistent lake<br />

sediments on west <strong>of</strong> Cartoica. On west <strong>of</strong> Izdeglavje, on the right bank <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska,<br />

the section passes along the western edge <strong>of</strong> Sredna Debrca, along Pliocene clays and<br />

alluvium <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, while in its final segment before the entry into Pesocanska<br />

Klisura (gorge), it runs through Quarternary lake and marsh sediments.<br />

At the entry <strong>of</strong> the river Pesocanska into the river Sateska, the section runs through the<br />

small gorge Pesocanska Klisura. It is <strong>of</strong> asymmetrical nature, which means that the left<br />

valley side near the peak Kula (962 m) is much steeper than the right one. The gorge itself is<br />

built <strong>of</strong> solid Triassic slab-like limestones. It follows the right valley side <strong>of</strong> Sateska river<br />

towards south, to the village Botun, cutting its right tributary Kacunska Reka (929 m). Along<br />

the stretch between Gorica (811 m), on the left and Kuckov Rid (920 m) on the right side, the<br />

corridor is transferred on the left side <strong>of</strong> Sateska river. It passes through the alluvial ravine<br />

(754 m) and near the village Botun it enters into the Botun gorge by a tunnel. This gorge (6<br />

106


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

km) is the largest along the river course <strong>of</strong> Sateska river. Sateska cut through Devonian<br />

phylitoide shales and built up a deep gorge-like valley.<br />

On east <strong>of</strong> the village Klimestica, the section leaves the Botun gorge and goes along the<br />

alluvial ravine <strong>of</strong> Sateska river to the village Volino (708 m). From Volino westwards, it<br />

crosses Crn Drim (693 m) above Struga and continuing towards south-southwest, exits from<br />

the flat part <strong>of</strong> Struga fields. From this part, initially it runs through the alluvium <strong>of</strong> Sateska<br />

river, and then to Kalista through lake and marsh sediments. Furtheron, from Kalista to<br />

Radozda (furthest southeastern slopes <strong>of</strong> Jablanica) and then to the border, geological<br />

composition is represented with solid Triassic complex built <strong>of</strong> conglomerates, sandstones<br />

and claystones, as well as marbleized Devonian limestones near Radozda and phylitic<br />

shales <strong>of</strong> the same origin. Leaving the valley on west <strong>of</strong> Frangovo, the section exits above<br />

the village Radozda, southwards by way <strong>of</strong> tunnel through Krasta. After that, the route<br />

proceeds southwards up to the border, cutting through several dales above the Lake <strong>of</strong><br />

Ohrid.<br />

3.2 Climate conditions in the area<br />

To present the climate along the railway corridorKicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Albania</strong>), climate conditions in Kicevo Basin as starting point <strong>of</strong> the corridor are described, as<br />

well as climate conditions in Ohrid-Sruga Basin (the closing part <strong>of</strong> the corridor). It should be<br />

pointed out that climate indicators <strong>of</strong> the basin Debrca (743 m) do not differ from Ohrid-<br />

Sruga Basin (695 - 769 m), i.e. they are closer to them than the ones <strong>of</strong> the Kicevo Basin<br />

(620 m).<br />

Figure 22 Climate map <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />

107


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

3.2.1 Climate characteristics <strong>of</strong> Kicevo Basin<br />

Kicevo Basin (620 m) is by 50 meters lower in altitude compared to Prilepsko Pole (673 m),<br />

but in warm parts <strong>of</strong> the year, it manifests significantly lower values <strong>of</strong> average monthly<br />

temperatures. For example, the difference in August is 1.3°C. The average monthly<br />

temperatures in this warmer part <strong>of</strong> the year are approximately the same as in Ohrid-Struga<br />

Basin. During the rest <strong>of</strong> the year, temperatures are normal and adequate for the altitude.<br />

In fact, the basin <strong>of</strong> Kicevo is relatively high but deeply cut into afforested mountain massifs<br />

and local air currents occur due to unequal conditions for air colling and heating in this basin<br />

and surrounding high mountain massifs. Such local circulation and mixing <strong>of</strong> hot and cold air<br />

is mostly manifested during the warm part <strong>of</strong> the year, especially during summer months.<br />

This explains the lower temperature values in this part <strong>of</strong> the year. In other words, the forests<br />

nearby the basin appear as climate modifier with certain influence on temperature regime.<br />

3.2.1.1 Temperature<br />

The average annual temperature <strong>of</strong> the air in Kicevo Basin is 10.8°C, though it varies in<br />

some years from 10.1 to 11.8°C. July is the warmest month with 20.6°C, i.e. it is colder by<br />

1°C in the same month compered to Prilepsko Pole (northern part Pelagonia Basin). January<br />

is the coldest with -0.1°C, which is almost equal in value with Prilepsko Pole. The average<br />

annual temperature oscillation is 20.7°C.<br />

Autumn in Kicevo Basin is warmer than spring, i.e. September is warmer than May, October<br />

than April and November than March. Also, the inter-month difference in the air<br />

temperatures during autumn months is bigger, and slightly smaller in spring months. This<br />

makes transition from winter to summer calmer. The average winter temperature is 1.5°C, or<br />

only the average January temperature is below zero, while February for example (2.4°C) is<br />

warmer than December (2.1°C). The average summer temperature is 19.8°C. In this period<br />

<strong>of</strong> the year, July (20.6°C) is warmer than August (20.3°C).<br />

The well expressed continental nature <strong>of</strong> Kicevo Basin has a strong influence on extreme<br />

minimum temperatures during the cold part <strong>of</strong> the year. The absolute minimum temperature<br />

is -25.7°C,recorded on 9 February 1956. The absolute minimum temperature could be even<br />

lower, because there were no measurements in January and February 1954, while winter in<br />

that specific year was among the coldest. By months, the minimum temperatures are below<br />

zero between September and May. Temperature values below -10°C occur between<br />

November and March, and below -20°C only during the three winter months. High afforested<br />

mountains and their proximity to the basin have certain influence on the values <strong>of</strong> extreme<br />

maximum temperatures. The absolute maximum temperature in this basin is 40.5°C. By<br />

months, values above 35°C occur between June and September, while value above 30°C<br />

occurs from may to October. Values above 25°C occur from April to October. At an average,<br />

there is total <strong>of</strong> 98 summer and 33 tropical days in Kicevo Basin.<br />

3.2.1.2 Precipitation<br />

Precipitations in Kicevo Basin are mostly <strong>of</strong> rain and smaller portion <strong>of</strong> snow. The total<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> precipitation in Kicevo Basin is higher compared to Pelagonia and Ohrid-Struga<br />

Basins. Precipitation distribution belongs to Mediterranean pluviometric regime, i.e. greater<br />

amounts fall during the cold part <strong>of</strong> the year. This is especially well expressed during<br />

November and the three winter months. The least precipitation falls during summer months.<br />

The average annual precipitation sum in Kicevo Basin is 786.7 mm, with the maximum in<br />

November (107.1 mm), and minimum in July (36.2 mm).<br />

The snow occurs between October and April. At an average, there are 37 days with snow<br />

cover per year. However, this varies in certain years, ranging from 10 to 93 days. The<br />

108


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

absolute maximum height <strong>of</strong> snow cover <strong>of</strong> 95 cm in February and 77 cm in March was<br />

recorded in 1954. In December 1973, the height was measured at 70 cm, and 65 cm in<br />

January 1965. The longest uninterrupted duration <strong>of</strong> the snow cover was 90 days, from 20<br />

December 1953 to 19 March 1954. Duration <strong>of</strong> the snow cover <strong>of</strong> 58 days was recorded<br />

from 31 January to 28 March 1956, and 56 days from 15 January to 11 March 1963.<br />

Figure 23 Average precipitation<br />

3.2.1.3 Winds<br />

Kicevo Basin is dominated by winds with winds in north and south direction. Northern wind<br />

occurs with greatest frequency, with an annual average <strong>of</strong> 161 ‰. It blows throughout the<br />

year, but most frequently during winter months. Its average annual velocity is 2 m/s, and<br />

maximum up to 19.0 m/s. Southern wind is <strong>of</strong> average annual frequency <strong>of</strong> 140 ‰ (average<br />

annual velocity <strong>of</strong> 2.2 m/s / maximum 15.5 m/s). Southwestern wind also has significant<br />

frequency (63 ‰) with an average velocity <strong>of</strong> 2.4 m/s and maximum <strong>of</strong> 18.9 m/s.<br />

Northwestern wind has a frequency <strong>of</strong> 51 ‰, average velocity <strong>of</strong> 2.9 m/s and maximum <strong>of</strong><br />

15.5 m/s. Winds <strong>of</strong> eastern, southeastern and western direction have frequency <strong>of</strong> 20 to 39<br />

m/s, average annual velocity <strong>of</strong> 1.8 m/s and maximum <strong>of</strong> 15.0 m/s. Kicevo Basin is medium<br />

aerated. At an average, there are 405 ‰ annually with stillness, with maximum in October<br />

(477 ‰), and minimum in April and May with 344 ‰.<br />

3.2.1.4 Other climate elements<br />

The average date <strong>of</strong> autumn frost in Kicevo Basin is 31 October, and the earliest autumn<br />

frost occurs on 30 September. The average date <strong>of</strong> spring frost is 8 April, and the latest<br />

spring frost occurs on 10 May. The autumn frost occurs most <strong>of</strong>ten in November (44 %),<br />

then in October (36 %) and September (20 %). November frost is in 28 % <strong>of</strong> the cases with<br />

weak, 12 % with moderate and 4 % with strong intensity. Autumn frost in October is 24 %<br />

weaker and 12 % moderate in intensity, while September is 16 % with weak and 4 % with<br />

moderate intensity. Spring frost has greatest frequency in April (68 %), then in March (24 %)<br />

and in May with 8 %. In April, in 64 % <strong>of</strong> the cases, it is weak and in 4 % moderate in<br />

109


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

intensity. Spring frost occurring in March in 12 % is weak and in 12 % moderate in intensity.<br />

The May frost is <strong>of</strong> weak intensity.<br />

Duration <strong>of</strong> solar radiation in Kicevo Basin is presented on the basis <strong>of</strong> calculation <strong>of</strong> data<br />

on cloudness. Kicevo Basin has a lower sum <strong>of</strong> solar radiation hours compared to Pelagonia<br />

and Ohrid Basins. Here, the average annual is 2064 hours. The maximum is in July, with an<br />

average <strong>of</strong> 300 hours, while the minimum is in December with 85 hours solar radiation at an<br />

average. The average annual cloudiness in Kicevo Basin is 5.5 tenths. Maximum is in<br />

December and January with 7.8 tenths, while the minimum is in August with 3.2 tenths. At an<br />

average, there are 79 clear and 119 cloudy days per year. The 160 cloudy days are with an<br />

average daily cloudiness above 2, and below 8 tenths.<br />

The relative air humidity in Kicevo Basin has opposite trend from the temperature <strong>of</strong> the air.<br />

From January to July it drops, and then by December it increases. The average annual value<br />

is 74 %, with the maximum in January (87 %), and minimum in July (63 %). The fog is not a<br />

rare occurrence in this basin. At an average, there are 33 days with fog per year, but in<br />

some years this value reaches as high as 80 days. The fog occurs throughout the year, with<br />

the greatest frequency during the three winter months, and lower frequency in September,<br />

October and March.<br />

3.2.2 Climate characteristics <strong>of</strong> Ohrid-Struga Basin<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> Ohrid-Struga Basin is under water (Ohrid Lake / 348,8 km 2 ). It is positioned at the<br />

same latitude as Pelagonia, but at higher altitude, the average ranging from 695 to 760 m.<br />

Its distance from Adriatic Sea is around 110 km. This enables permeation <strong>of</strong> sea currents in<br />

the Basin from west, but it is under influence <strong>of</strong> the lake, which is also reflected in higher<br />

temperatures during winter period <strong>of</strong> the year and somewhat reduced during summer<br />

months. Thus, for example, in Pelagonia, which is positioned at around 200 meters lower<br />

above the sea level, January and December temperatures are by 2°C, and February by<br />

0.7°C lower than in Ohrid Basin. The average July temperature is by 1°C, and August by<br />

0.9°C higher in Pelagonia (Bitola) than in Ohrid.<br />

Due to the openness <strong>of</strong> Ohrid-Struga Basin through the valley <strong>of</strong> Drim towards north, cold air<br />

masses permeate in winter months, reducing the air temperature, while during the dummer<br />

period, there is permeation <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean influences.<br />

110


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 24 Climate diagram Ohrid and Struga<br />

3.2.2.1 Temperatures<br />

The average annual temperature in Ohrid is 11.2°C, and 10.9°C in Struga. The average<br />

January temperature in Ohrid has a value <strong>of</strong> 1.7°C, and in Struga 1.1°C; the average<br />

February temperature in Ohrid is 3.1°C, and in Struga 2.5°C; and the average December<br />

temperature in Ohrid is 3.8°C, and in Struga 3.1°C. However, during summer months, the<br />

difference in air temperature between Ohrid and Struga is quite low. In July, Ohrid is only by<br />

0.2°C, and in August only by 0.1°C warmer than Struga.<br />

The absolute minimum temperature in Struga is -20°C, and in Ohrid -17.2°C, while absolute<br />

maximum temperatures are <strong>of</strong> almost the same value <strong>of</strong> 36.5°C. The influence <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake<br />

in the basin is manifested through reduction <strong>of</strong> annual temperature oscillations. Thus, the<br />

annual temperature oscillations in Ohrid are 19.1°C, and in Struga 19.5°C. In Pelagonia,<br />

they are 22.1°C. The absolute oscillation in Ohrid has a value <strong>of</strong> 53.8°C, and in Struga<br />

56.5°C, while in Pelagonia it is 68.4°C.<br />

Autumn and spring are slightly warmer in Ohrid than in Struga. In Ohrid, the average autumn<br />

temperature is 12.1°C, in Struga it is 11.5°C. Summer in Ohrid has a temperature <strong>of</strong> 9.9°C,<br />

and in 9.0°C. In the entire Ohrid-Struga Basin, the autumn is significantly warmer than<br />

spring, in Ohrid by 2.2°C, and in Struga by 2.5°C. Inter-month temperature difference in<br />

spring and autumn months is <strong>of</strong> low value. Therefore, transition from winter to summer and<br />

vice verse in this basin is not abrupt, and this makes spring and autumn as transitional<br />

seasons in thermal regards well expressed.<br />

Apart from the thermal influence <strong>of</strong> the Lake on the temperature <strong>of</strong> the air, minimum air<br />

temperatures in winter drom far beyond 0°C. The absolute minimum temperature in Ohrid is<br />

-17.2°C, then 16.6°C recorded on 14 January 1968, etc. In Struga, absolute minimum<br />

temperature is -20.0°C, recorded on 20 January 1963, then -19.0°C on 22 December 1967,<br />

etc. In Ohrid, annual absolute minimum temperature with a value below -15°C may be<br />

111


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

expected once in 8 years, with a value below -10°C may be expected once in two years,<br />

while values lower than -8°C occur every year. By months, the absolute minimum<br />

temperature with a value lower than -15°C occurs in January, February and March, with a<br />

value lower than -10°C from December to March, and values below zero from October to<br />

May. In Struga, absolute minimum temperature with value lower than -15°C may be<br />

expected once in 4-5 years, and value below -10°C may be expected once in a year or two.<br />

By months, value below -15°C occurs from December to March, and values below zero<br />

occur from October to May.<br />

Ohrid Lake, as thermal regulator <strong>of</strong> the surrounding air manifests the influence through<br />

reduction in the air temperature, too. This is reflected in the warm part <strong>of</strong> the year, especially<br />

during summer months when great quantity <strong>of</strong> warmth is spent to warm the lake waters and<br />

in evaporation. Yet, the warming influence <strong>of</strong> the Lake during winter months is more<br />

expressed and it is significant climate modifier during this season. During summer months,<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> air temperature is under the influence <strong>of</strong> the basin altitude as well.<br />

The absolute maximum temperature in in Ohrid Basin is 36.7°C, while in Pelagonia it is<br />

41.5°C, in Polog basin 40.0°C, etc. Value higher than 35°C has been recorded only twice,<br />

and value higher than 30°C occurs every year. By months, values higher than 30°C occur<br />

between May and September, and value above 25°C occurs from March to October. At an<br />

average, there are 73 summer, and only 11 tropical days (in Pelagonia, 98 summer and 36<br />

tropical days). As a result <strong>of</strong> the high altitude <strong>of</strong> the Basin, proximity <strong>of</strong> the high mountains<br />

Galicica and Jablanica and local air currents, in summer months nights are fresh, while daily<br />

relatively high temperatures are easy to bear.<br />

3.2.2.2 Precipitation<br />

Precipitations in Ohrid-Struga basin are predetermined by the Mediterranean pluviometric<br />

regime. Most <strong>of</strong> the annual precipitations fall in the cold part <strong>of</strong> the year, with the maximum<br />

in late autumn, and lower in warm part <strong>of</strong> the year with the minimum in summer months. The<br />

average annual sum <strong>of</strong> precipitation in the Ohrid area amounts 708.3 mm, while in Struga<br />

fields it is 810.9 mm. In certain years, the annual sum deviates from the average in wide<br />

ranges, from 339.6 to 1075.6 mm Ohrid area and from 517.9 to 1064.7 mm in Struga fields.<br />

Precipitations are rather unevenly distributed in the course <strong>of</strong> the year. In Ohrid, greatest<br />

precipitation is recorded in November (98.4 mm), then December and January with 78.9<br />

mm, and 76.4 mm, respectively, and least rainy are July (23.2 mm) and August with 29.1<br />

mm. In Struga, the most rainly is also November, but with bigger amount compared to Ohrid,<br />

i.e. 108.7 mm at an average. December and January are with 98.0 and 96.6 mm,<br />

respectively. The least rainy is July, with 24.0 and August with 29.6 mm, at an average.<br />

By seasons, distribution <strong>of</strong> precipitations in Struga fields and Ohrid is the same, only the<br />

seasonal sums in Struga area are somewhat higher and difference between winter and<br />

autumn precipitations is slightly bigger. In the total average annual number <strong>of</strong> rainy days in<br />

Ohrid Basin, 61 % are days with daily quantity equal to or bigger than 1.0 mm, 36 % are<br />

days with daily quantity equal to or bigger than 5.0 mm, 18 % are days with daily quantity<br />

equal to or bigger than 10.0 mm and 5 % are days with daily quantity equal to or bigger than<br />

20.0 mm. Accordingly, precipitations in this basin are distributed to rainy days with daily<br />

quantity <strong>of</strong> 1.0 to 5.0 mm (3.5 %), then from 0.1 to 1.0 mm (29 %), from 5.0 to 10.0 (18 %),<br />

from 10.0 to 20.0 (13 %) and daily quantity above 20.0 mm in only 5 %.<br />

Precipitations in Ohrid Basin consist mainly <strong>of</strong> rain, and very small amount <strong>of</strong> snow. Snow<br />

occurs every year (winter months), but the snow cover has short duration. Snow falls from<br />

November to April and there are 19 days under snow cover per year, at an average, though<br />

in some years this sum is in the range from 5 to 43 days. The maximum height <strong>of</strong> snow<br />

112


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

cover is 64 cm, measured on 14 January 1963, followed by 54 cm on 25 February 1965, etc.<br />

The longest period under uninterrupted snow cover was 29 days, from 15 January to 12<br />

February 1963. Then, 22 days from 28 January to 18 February in 1956 and from 9 February<br />

to 2 March 1965.<br />

3.2.2.3 Winds<br />

Ohrid Basin is characterized with specific regime <strong>of</strong> winds. Apart from winds occurring as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the general atmospheric changes, winds <strong>of</strong> local nature occur there as well, due to<br />

the uneven warming <strong>of</strong> the air above land and above lake surface. Winds in Ohrid Basin<br />

have their local names, too, given either by the direction <strong>of</strong> blowing or by Ohrid fishermen.<br />

These local winds have influence on the general distribution and frequency <strong>of</strong> wind direction<br />

in the basin. Thus, according to the measurements <strong>of</strong> the Ohrid measuring point, northern<br />

wind prevails in this area, followed by southwestern and southern winds. According to the<br />

measurements in Struga, the wind from south is prevalent, followed by those from north and<br />

northeast.<br />

In Ohrid, dominant wind is the northern, with an average annual frequency <strong>of</strong> 297 ‰,<br />

average annual velocity <strong>of</strong> 2.4, and maximum<strong>of</strong> 12.3 m/s. Northern wind blows throughout<br />

the year, mostly during night hours, while its frequence is lower in afternoon hours.<br />

Southwestern and southern winds are almost with the same frequency with 179 and 176 ‰,<br />

respectively, with an annual average velocity <strong>of</strong> 2.9 and maximum <strong>of</strong> 18.9 m/s. They blow<br />

throughout the year, with the greatest frequency from April to June. They blow over day time<br />

till late evening hours. Northwestern wind has frequency <strong>of</strong> 73 ‰, average annual velocity <strong>of</strong><br />

1.8 m/s and maximum velocity <strong>of</strong> 15.5 m/s. Northeastern wind has frequency <strong>of</strong> 43 ‰,<br />

average annual velocity <strong>of</strong> 2.5 m/s and maximum velocity <strong>of</strong> 12.3 m/s. Eastern and<br />

southeastern winds are <strong>of</strong> the same frequency <strong>of</strong> 23 ‰, average velocity <strong>of</strong> 3.1 m/s and<br />

maximum <strong>of</strong> 18.9 m/s.<br />

Among local winds, Strmec which blows in summer months from west and southwest to the<br />

lake, is specific. It starts in afternoon hours, and stops somewhere before midnight. The wind<br />

Veternik blows from the lake surface on west to Jablanica and on east to Galicica. It starts in<br />

morning and ends in afternoon hours. The wind Smeten starts somewhere around the village<br />

Trpejca towards Pestani and turns westwards towards the lake expanse. In winter, the wind<br />

Sever blows from north, from Struga towards S.Naum. The wind Belicnik blows from Galicica<br />

towards Pestani and <strong>Albania</strong>n mountains. The wind Stocen blows down from Galicica,<br />

village Trpejca towards St. Naum and from the village <strong>of</strong> Pestani towards the village Lion on<br />

the <strong>Albania</strong>n western shore. In spring months, the winter Nokjnik blows from western and<br />

eastern mountain massifs towards lake expanse. It starts after the sunset and starts<br />

somewhere in dawns. The wind Jug starts around 13 hours and stops after midnight.<br />

Ohrid Basin is rather windy. Out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> measured cases, 862 ‰ are with<br />

wind from different directions, and only 138 ‰ are without wind, i.e. with stillness.<br />

September and October are notably windy, with an average frequency <strong>of</strong> stilness <strong>of</strong> 99 and<br />

81 ‰, respectively and May is with greatest frequency <strong>of</strong> stillness, with 215 ‰ at an<br />

average.<br />

113


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

300<br />

N<br />

NW<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

NE<br />

W<br />

0<br />

E<br />

SW<br />

SE<br />

Figure 25 Rose <strong>of</strong> winds in Ohrid<br />

3.2.2.4 Other climate elements<br />

S<br />

According to the data <strong>of</strong> the measuring point in Ohrid, the average date <strong>of</strong> autumn frost is<br />

31 November, and the average date <strong>of</strong> spring frost is 6 April, i.e. the average period <strong>of</strong> frost<br />

is 143 days. The early date <strong>of</strong> autumn frost is 5 October, and the latest spring frost occurs on<br />

18 May. However, the real average annual number <strong>of</strong> frost days in Ohrid is 61 days, while in<br />

Prilepsko Pole it is 77, and in Polog Basin, for example, the number <strong>of</strong> frost days is 89.<br />

The first autumn frost occurs most <strong>of</strong>ten in November (64 %), then in October (24 %) and<br />

December (12 %). November frost is in 40 % <strong>of</strong> the cases with weak, 20 % with moderate<br />

and 4 % with strong intensity. The frost occurring in October is 20 % with weak and 4 %<br />

moderate in intensity. The earliest frost occurring in December is with moderate intensity.<br />

The latest date <strong>of</strong> spring frost most <strong>of</strong>ten occurs in April (64 %), then in March with 32 %.<br />

The frost in April is in 40 % <strong>of</strong> the cases with weak, in 20 % with moderate and 4 % with<br />

strong intensity. The spring frost in March is with weak intensity, and the one recorded in<br />

May is also with weak intensity. In Struga fields, the extreme frost period is <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

duration as the one in Ohrid area, but the average frost period is by few days longer.<br />

The frequency <strong>of</strong> draught in Ohrid Basin is approximately as in Gevgelia, but lower than in<br />

the area <strong>of</strong> Southern Povardarie - areas positioned at similar latitude as Ohrid Basin. Among<br />

the total recorded dry periods, 84 % are <strong>of</strong> duration between 10 and 20 days, 6 % with a<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> 20-30 days, 4 % last between 30-40 days and 7 % are longer than 40 days. By<br />

seasons, they occur most frequently during summer months (37 %), then in autumn (28 %)<br />

and the least in spring (19 %) and winter months with 17 %. Extremely long dry periods, with<br />

a duration exceeding 80 days, as recorded in 1956, 1961, 1965 and 1969 in the areas <strong>of</strong> the<br />

114


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

eastern parts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, have not been reflected in Ohrid area. Here, the<br />

longest dry period was 61 days, from 26 June to 20 August in 1956, then for 57 days, from<br />

16 July to 10 September in 1954, etc.<br />

Ohrid Basin is characterized with long lasting solar radiation. The average annual solar<br />

radiation is 2233 hours or 6 hours per day at an average, with the maximum in July (308<br />

hours), or 10 hours per day at an average in this month. The minimum is in January (80<br />

hours), or 3 hours per day at an average. The average annual cloudness is 5.2 tenths and<br />

has regular annual trend. It declines regularly from January to July, and then increases<br />

regularly by December. With a value above 6 tenth, the average monthly cloudiness occurs<br />

between November and April. The most cloudy are the three winter months, and the least<br />

cloudness occurs in July, with an average <strong>of</strong> 2,8 tenths. Out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> days in a<br />

year, 24 % are clear, 27 % are stormy, and 49 % are cloudy. Clear days are most frequent in<br />

July, August and September, and stormy days are the most frequent between November<br />

and March. The relative air humidity has opposite trend from the temperature <strong>of</strong> the air.<br />

From January to July it drops, and then it increases. The average annual value is 71 %, with<br />

the maximum in December and January (79 %), and minimum in July and August (60 %).<br />

Evaporation from the free water surface in Ohrid Basin is greater than precipitations. At an<br />

average, the annual evaporation is 836 l/m 2 , and the annual sum <strong>of</strong> precipitation is 708 l/m 2 .<br />

The greatest evaporation takes place in August (137), then in July (132), and the smallest in<br />

January with 27 l/m 2 . The fog is a rare occurrence in Ohrid Basin. At an average, there are 5<br />

days with fog per year, mostly during the three winter monthsAccording to the data <strong>of</strong> the<br />

measuring point in Ohrid, the average date <strong>of</strong> autumn frost is 31 November, and the<br />

average date <strong>of</strong> spring frost is 6 April, i.e. the average period <strong>of</strong> frost is 143 days. The early<br />

date <strong>of</strong> autumn frost is 5 October, and the latest spring frost occurs on 18 May. However, the<br />

real average annual number <strong>of</strong> frost days in Ohrid is 61 days, while in Prilepsko Pole it is 77,<br />

and in Polog Basin, for example, the number <strong>of</strong> frost days is 89.<br />

The first autumn frost occurs most <strong>of</strong>ten in November (64 %), then in October (24 %) and<br />

December (12 %). November frost is in 40 % <strong>of</strong> the cases with weak, 20 % with moderate<br />

and 4 % with strong intensity. The frost occurring in October is 20 % with weak and 4 %<br />

moderate in intensity. The earliest frost occurring in December is with moderate intensity.<br />

The latest date <strong>of</strong> spring frost most <strong>of</strong>ten occurs in April (64 %), then in March with 32 %.<br />

The frost in April is in 40 % <strong>of</strong> the cases with weak, in 20 % with moderate and 4 % with<br />

strong intensity. The spring frost in March is with weak intensity, and the one recorded in<br />

May is also with weak intensity. In Struga fields, the extreme frost period is <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

duration as the one in Ohrid area, but the average frost period is by few days longer.<br />

The frequency <strong>of</strong> draught in Ohrid Basin is approximately as in Gevgelia, but lower than in<br />

the area <strong>of</strong> Southern Povardarie - areas positioned at similar latitude as Ohrid Basin. Among<br />

the total recorded dry periods, 84 % are <strong>of</strong> duration between 10 and 20 days, 6 % with a<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> 20-30 days, 4 % last between 30-40 days and 7 % are longer than 40 days. By<br />

seasons, they occur most frequently during summer months (37 %), then in autumn (28 %)<br />

and the least in spring (19 %) and winter months with 17 %. Extremely long dry periods, with<br />

a duration exceeding 80 days, as recorded in 1956, 1961, 1965 and 1969 in the areas <strong>of</strong> the<br />

eastern parts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, have not been reflected in Ohrid area. Here, the<br />

longest dry period was 61 days, from 26 June to 20 August in 1956, then for 57 days, from<br />

16 July to 10 September in 1954, etc.<br />

Ohrid Basin is characterized with long lasting solar radiation. The average annual solar<br />

radiation is 2233 hours or 6 hours per day at an average, with the maximum in July (308<br />

hours), or 10 hours per day at an average in this month. The minimum is in January (80<br />

hours), or 3 hours per day at an average. The average annual cloudness is 5.2 tenths and<br />

115


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

has regular annual trend. It declines regularly from January to July, and then increases<br />

regularly by December. With a value above 6 tenth, the average monthly cloudiness occurs<br />

between November and April. The most cloudy are the three winter months, and the least<br />

cloudness occurs in July, with an average <strong>of</strong> 2.8 tenths. Out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> days in a<br />

year, 24 % are clear, 27 % are stormy, 49 % are cloudy. Clear days are most frequent in<br />

July, August and September, and stormy days are the most frequent between November<br />

and March. The relative air humidity has opposite trend from the temperature <strong>of</strong> the air.<br />

From January to July it drops, and then it increases. The average annual value is 71 %, with<br />

the maximum in December and January (79 %), and minimum in July and August (60 %).<br />

Evaporation from the free water surface in Ohrid Basin is greater than precipitations. At an<br />

average, the annual evaporation is 836 l/m 2 , and the annual sum <strong>of</strong> precipitation is 708 l/m 2 .<br />

The greatest evaporation takes place in August (137), then in July (132), and the smallest in<br />

January with 27 l/m 2 . The fog is a rare occurrence in Ohrid Basin. At an average, there are 5<br />

days with fog per year, mostly during the three winter months.<br />

3.3 Geology <strong>of</strong> the railway line area<br />

The wider area <strong>of</strong> the route <strong>of</strong> the line, starting from the railway station Kicevo<br />

(station 102km+000, to station 128km+850), with a length <strong>of</strong> approximately 29<br />

kilometers, belongs to the sheet <strong>of</strong> Kicevo in the Basic Geological Map, scale<br />

1:100.000. Within this sheet (from oldest to youngest), the following geological<br />

(lithological) units have been identified:<br />

1. Paleozoic metamorphites and magmatc rocks (Devonian). The overall thickness <strong>of</strong><br />

these formations ranges between 2000 and 3000 m:<br />

FD–Phylitoides - the most frequently represented lithological unit, built mostly <strong>of</strong><br />

phylites, but also argilophylites, argiloschists, sandstones, sericite-quartz shales, etc.<br />

These rocks <strong>of</strong>ten alternate and transfer from one into others both horisontally and<br />

vertically. They are found in the areas <strong>of</strong> the villages Drugovo, Popolzani, Brzdani,<br />

Judovo and Slivovo;<br />

QD–Quartzites-recorded as minor, isolated masses NE <strong>of</strong> the village Drugovo. These<br />

are massive and riverbank rocks, mainly built <strong>of</strong> quartz grains, with ingredients <strong>of</strong><br />

sericite, muscovite, chlorite, circone, turmaline and magnetite;<br />

MmD–Carbonate shales - recorded as minor or major masses into phylitoides, at<br />

sites in the areas <strong>of</strong> the villages Drugovo, Brzdani and Judovo. Their structure<br />

includes calcite-chlorite grains, and they also occur as quartz, feldspath and biotite;<br />

MD–Marble plates - recorded on Ilinska Planina Mt., built exclusively <strong>of</strong> calcite;<br />

Metamorphosed rhyolites - recorded near the village Judovo. This is isolated rock<br />

mass, which has broken through phylitoide formation. The original massiveness has<br />

been almost entirely lost and it has gained shale like texture, its structure being<br />

prophiric to blastoprophiric;<br />

2. Complex <strong>of</strong> mesosoic sediments. It is represented by Triasic, Jurasic and Upper<br />

Chalk sediments, as well as magmatic rocks, represented in turn by diabases:<br />

Т 2,3 –Cpnglomerates and sandstones - occur in the basal part <strong>of</strong> Triassic sediments,<br />

which transgressively press on Paleosoic shales. They are recorded on SW <strong>of</strong> the<br />

village Arbinovo (hill Cartoica);<br />

116


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Т 2,3 –Claystones and horn shales - they occur in rather big amounts on the floor <strong>of</strong><br />

limestone masses, and lie transgressively onto Paleosoic shales. They have been<br />

recorded between villages Turje-Slivovo and near Arbinovo;<br />

Т 2,3 –Massive and riverbank limestones - represented on west <strong>of</strong> the village Arbinovo.<br />

They are rather cracked on the surface and affected by intense tectonics and<br />

carstification;<br />

- Diabases - together with gabbros, they relate to Jurassic magmatism. They occur<br />

near the village Slivovo and SW <strong>of</strong> the village Arbinovo, in a form <strong>of</strong> breakouts into<br />

Triassic sediments. It is characterized with dark greenish colour, they are solid and<br />

compact. Their structure is ophitic, subophitic and dolerite. They are composed<br />

mainly <strong>of</strong> plagioclasses, and we also find albite and chlorite as secondary minerals.<br />

3. Tertiary and Quarternay sediments<br />

Pl 2,3 –Pliocene - it is developed in the rim part <strong>of</strong> Kicevo gorge and in the basin <strong>of</strong><br />

Debrca. In Kicevo gorge, these sediments are made <strong>of</strong> gravel and sand sediments,<br />

which in deeper strata pass into poorly coherent clayey sands and clays. They lie<br />

transgressively over Paleosoic shales and their estimated power is up to 250 m. In<br />

the basin <strong>of</strong> Debrca, these sediments are represented with sands and clays, while<br />

gravels occur in the uppermost layers, as closing terrace <strong>of</strong> the former lake which ran<br />

<strong>of</strong>f into Ohrid basin through the river Sateska. The thickness <strong>of</strong> these sediments in<br />

the basin <strong>of</strong> Debrca reaches around 140 m;<br />

pr–Proluvial Quarternary sediments - recorded at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the route, near the<br />

railway station Kicevo. They are represented with coarse clastic material, unclassified<br />

and poorly processed. They are made <strong>of</strong> sandy clays, gravels, quartz particles and<br />

blocks, shales, clcareous and other rocks building up the surrounding slopes;<br />

b–Organogenic-marsh sediments - recorded on a minor area before the entry <strong>of</strong> the<br />

river Sateska into the gorge, SW <strong>of</strong> the village Arbinovo. These are occasionally<br />

flooded areas, where clays with high proportion <strong>of</strong> organic matter (peat) have been<br />

identified. The capacity <strong>of</strong> these sediments has been estimated to be 2-5 m;<br />

al–Alluvial sediments - developed along river valleys <strong>of</strong> Treska and Sateska. They<br />

are represented with coarse clastic material, composed <strong>of</strong> sandy clays, sands,<br />

gravels and rounded forms <strong>of</strong> the surrounding rocks. By way <strong>of</strong> drilling, the thickness<br />

<strong>of</strong> these sediments was estimated at 30-50 m.<br />

The area <strong>of</strong> the route <strong>of</strong> the line (from the station 128km+850 to the end <strong>of</strong> the line route –<br />

the border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, station 170km+000), with a length <strong>of</strong> approximately<br />

42 km, belongs to the sheet <strong>of</strong> Ohrid in the Basic Geological Map, scale 1:100.000. Within<br />

this sheet (from oldest to youngest), the following geological (lithological) units have been<br />

identified:<br />

1. Paleozoic metamorphites and magmatc rocks (Devonian). The overall thickness <strong>of</strong><br />

these formations reaches around 2000m:<br />

Sqse Phylitic shales - represented along the gorge <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska (extension<br />

from the village Botun to the village Klimatsani), and also found near the village<br />

Radolista. By their mineralogical composition, these rocks incorporate: quartzsericite-clayey<br />

shales, quartz-sericite and quartz-sericite-graphitic shales;<br />

Sq–Metasandstones - occur as thin ribs or in bigger masses alternate horisontally or<br />

vertically with the above described phytic shales. They are found near the villages<br />

Klimestani and Trebeniste, as well as south <strong>of</strong> the village Radolista. They are<br />

117


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

composed mostly <strong>of</strong> quartz, and less <strong>of</strong>ten sericite, feldsphath, calcite, titanite,<br />

circone, granate and turmaline. Graphitic-bituminous matter occurs locally, attributing<br />

dark colour to the rock;<br />

M–Marblized limestones - recorded on the south <strong>of</strong> the village Kaliste and near the<br />

village Radozda in a form <strong>of</strong> isolated minor masses. In their lower parts, these<br />

limestones are slab-like, and massive in the upper ones. The intensity <strong>of</strong> marblization<br />

declines as we go to higher horizons.<br />

2. Complex <strong>of</strong> Mesozoic sediments. It is represented by Triassic, Jurassic and Upper<br />

Chalk sediments:<br />

Т 2 1 –Conglomerates - occur in basal part <strong>of</strong> Triassic sediments, and rarely as intraserial<br />

into claystones. They have been recorded S <strong>of</strong> the village Kalista and W <strong>of</strong> the<br />

village Radozda. They are poorly stratified, with specific good roundness <strong>of</strong> stones,<br />

and rather solid; they are built <strong>of</strong> quartz, quartzites, phylitic shales, orthoclass grains,<br />

microclyn and plagioclas. Limonite and sericite-alevrolite matter is the most frequent<br />

bounding segment. At points where conglomerates continue into limestones, they are<br />

cemented with carbonate matter, precrystalized into calcite-dolomite grains;<br />

Т 2 1 –Sandstones, alevrolites and claystones - developed on the Mountain Jablanica,<br />

beneath thick limestone masses. They are <strong>of</strong> heterogeneous composition and poorly<br />

sorted. They are made mostly <strong>of</strong> grains <strong>of</strong> quartz, less fedspaths, pieces <strong>of</strong><br />

metasandstones and phylitic shales. Binding element in sandstones is represented<br />

with sericite-silicite, and less <strong>of</strong>ten carbonate matter with some share <strong>of</strong> limonite.<br />

These sediments are characterized with rhytmical sedimentation;<br />

Т 2 1,2 –Slab-like limestones with horn slates - developed on the Mountain Jablanica,<br />

above the villages Kalista and Radozda, and they cross on <strong>Albania</strong>n side as well.<br />

They are built <strong>of</strong> carbonate matter, while horn slates are made <strong>of</strong> amorphous silicite<br />

matter and radiolaritic shells.<br />

3. Tertiary and Quarternay sediments:<br />

Pl 3 –Upper Pliocene sediments, developed transgressively both over Paleozoic rocks<br />

and Triassic sediments, throughout Ohrid-Struga gorge. Major part <strong>of</strong> those are<br />

covered over with Quarternary deposits, but there are also uncovered masses below<br />

the villages Zagracani and Dolna Belica. They are represented with gravels, sands<br />

and clays. Towards deeper layers, the material becomes more and more clayey and<br />

better stratified, and towards upper layers it turns into Quarternary lake sediments;<br />

ј–Lake and marsh sediments, developed throughout Struga gorge, with confirmed<br />

power <strong>of</strong> 20-30m. They are also developed in the lowest parts <strong>of</strong> Debrca, between<br />

villages Izdeglavje and Belcista. They are represented with gravel, sand, various<br />

clays and peat;<br />

pr–Proluvial sediments - along edge parts <strong>of</strong> Ohrid-Struga basin. They have been<br />

identified near the villages Botun, Klimestani and Meseista, as well as on the lowest<br />

slopes <strong>of</strong> the mountain Jablanica, near the villages Radolista and Kalista. They are<br />

represented with coarse clastic material, unclassified and poorly processed. They are<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> sandy clays, gravels, pieces and blocks <strong>of</strong> quartz, shales, limestones<br />

and other rocks which make up the surrounding slopes;<br />

al–Aluvial sediments - developed along river valleys <strong>of</strong> Sateska. They are<br />

represented with coarse clastic material, composed <strong>of</strong> sandy clays, gravels and<br />

rounded forms <strong>of</strong> the surrounding rocks.<br />

118


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Graphical presentation <strong>of</strong> geological characteristics is given in Appendix 1 - Geological map.<br />

3.4 Engineering - Geological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route<br />

From engineering - geological point <strong>of</strong> view, tThe terrain along the route <strong>of</strong> the line consists<br />

<strong>of</strong> (1) non coherent, (2i) poorly coherent and (3) highly coherent rock masses.<br />

3.4.1 Non Coherent Rock Masses<br />

In this group <strong>of</strong> non coherent rock masses along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line, we can<br />

emphasize the following:<br />

Lake sediments (j). These sediments are generally distributed in Ohrid-Struga basin, as<br />

well as in areas <strong>of</strong> Gorna and Dolna Debrca (N and E <strong>of</strong> the Mountain Gaber). These are<br />

non coherent, poorly compacted materials with intergranular porosity.<br />

Marsh sediments (b). They are made <strong>of</strong> organogenic fine grain silts. They are present<br />

before the entry <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska in the gorge, SW <strong>of</strong> the village Arbinovo. They can<br />

be unfavourable ground for foundation <strong>of</strong> heavy constructions.<br />

Alluvial sediments (al). They can be found along the valleys <strong>of</strong> the rivers Treska and<br />

Sateska. They consist <strong>of</strong> large-grain gravels and sands. The material is medium to well<br />

rounded and well compacted and sorted. These sediments possess high filtration<br />

characteristics and are quite water porous.<br />

Proluvial sediments (pr). They can be found along the edge parts <strong>of</strong> Kicevo and Ohrid-<br />

Struga basins. The prolluvium is characterized with large grain cobbles and stones, not<br />

rounded or partially rounded, weakly sorted and mixed with clay and sand materials<br />

weakly to medium compacted. The porosity is intergranular due to the larger coarse<br />

grains.<br />

Pliocene sediments (Pl 3, Pl 2,3 ). They spread as transgressive cover over Paleozoic rock<br />

masses in all valleys. They consist <strong>of</strong> sands, clays and big masses <strong>of</strong> gravel sediments<br />

that alternate vertically.<br />

3.4.2 Poorly Coherent Rock Masses<br />

Poorly coherent rock masses are the ones that consist <strong>of</strong> particles smaller than 0.002 mm.<br />

The most typical representatives are clays and marls. They are very frequent along the<br />

route, but they are most visible in the Pliocene sediments, in sand and clay series (Pl 3, Pl 2,3 ).<br />

From engineering geological aspect, they represent an environment where various<br />

appearances may occur, such as: swelling, consolidated depressions, supplanting, dragging<br />

down (due to the terrain morphology where they occur, this is excluded), exceeding the<br />

carriage capacity, etc. Very <strong>of</strong>ten, there is a need for improvement <strong>of</strong> their properties.<br />

3.4.3 Highly Coherent Rock Masses<br />

In highly coherent rock masses, there are mostly solid crystallized connections between the<br />

grains. Along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line, within this group there are several types <strong>of</strong> rocks<br />

that are important from engineering geological aspect, namely:<br />

Quartz-sericite (Sqse), carbonate shales (MmD) and quartz shales (Sq)- These rocks are<br />

full <strong>of</strong> cracks, broken and weathered in the surface zones. The largest part <strong>of</strong> their line<br />

along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line is covered by small layer <strong>of</strong> dust and sand mixed with<br />

pieces <strong>of</strong> the indigenous rock.<br />

119


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Phylitoides (FD) and quartzites (QD). From a tectonic point <strong>of</strong> view, the rocks are quite<br />

damaged and broken, so, they <strong>of</strong>ten form delluvial layer during the weathering <strong>of</strong> the<br />

indigenous rock (in situ) which can be thick from several cm to 2 meters.<br />

Rhyolites ( and diabases magmatic rock masses with visible cracks on the<br />

surface.<br />

Slab-like marbles (MD), mass limestones, dolomite limestones and slab-like limestones<br />

with horn slates (Т 2 1,2 ). From engineering and geological point <strong>of</strong> view, they are quite<br />

damaged, with numerous cracks and holes. They are covered with silt and clay materials<br />

mixed with pieces <strong>of</strong> marble. Local delluvial cover exceeds the thickness <strong>of</strong> 2 metres.<br />

Conglomerates and sandstones, alevrolites and claystones (Т 2 1 )- From engineering and<br />

geological point <strong>of</strong> view, they are quite stable and solid rock masses, but they are prone<br />

to surface erosion and material wash-out.<br />

3.4.4 Contemporary registered engineering - geological appearances and processes<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> the wide spectrum <strong>of</strong> egsogenic influences (physical, mechanical, chemical<br />

and antropogenic), a large number <strong>of</strong> contemporary engineering geological processes and<br />

appearances occur, which are noticed along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line. Upon the<br />

engineering geological investigation, the following engineering geological processes and<br />

appearances have been registered:<br />

Surface disintegration. For the formation <strong>of</strong> these processes and appearances, several<br />

factors have been the cause (climate factors, tectonic conditions, resistence <strong>of</strong> rocks to<br />

decomposition, etc.) It is most clearly expressed along the extension from the village<br />

Botun to the village Klimestani (on the right bank <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska), then the extension<br />

from the village Brzdani to the village Judovo, as well as in the gorge <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska<br />

(S <strong>of</strong> Arbinovo towards Izdeglavje). Products that are obtained from the surface<br />

disintegration processes are larger blocks, crushed stones, and smaller stones separated<br />

from the indigenous rocks.<br />

Erosion. By washing out, under the influence <strong>of</strong> various external factors, decomposion<br />

and movement <strong>of</strong> the decomposed rock material occur. While under the influence <strong>of</strong><br />

strong water flows and rains, the eroded material is transported to the foothills <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mountain as a consequence <strong>of</strong> multiple and long-term washing out <strong>of</strong> eroded materials,<br />

and create tranches and greves, that are very frequent phenomenon along the route <strong>of</strong><br />

the railway line. In relation to those engineering geological processes, the exploitation <strong>of</strong><br />

the forest stock is very intensive, especially along the extension Botun-Meseista.<br />

Processes <strong>of</strong> landfall and landslide This is a process where earth masses are detached<br />

from the ground and they move under the gravitation influence and their own weight. In<br />

this terrain (along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line), there are numerous old or settled dragdowns,<br />

but also active and potentially dangerous after the construction <strong>of</strong> the route. In<br />

relation to those engineering geological processes, the exploitation <strong>of</strong> the forest stock is<br />

very intensive, especially along the extension Botun-Meseista.<br />

Along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line, the following engineering geological appearances and<br />

processes have been registered, and they are graphically presented in Appendix 2:<br />

Table 5 Registered engineering geological appearances and processes along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />

line<br />

120


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

No. Description Y X km No. Description Y X km<br />

1 Jaruga 495445.92 594947.90 104+585.45<br />

Surface 485647.00 581739.00 123+312.78<br />

2 Jaruga 495327.15 594832.14 104+750.90<br />

16 washing<br />

(from - to) 485578.00 581623.00 123+448.52<br />

3 Jaruga 495235.37 594751.83 104+854.51 17 Jaruga 485576.00 581617.00 123+454.83<br />

4<br />

Surface<br />

washing<br />

493485.78 593328.87 107+165.44 18 Landslide 485628.62 579019.33 126+269.58<br />

5 Јaruga 493197.28 593107.30 107+530.73 19<br />

Surface<br />

washing<br />

483039.00 571110.00 135+412.31<br />

6 Jaruga 493231.42 593269.76 107+417.49 20 Jaruga 483039.00 571110.00 135+412.31<br />

7 Jaruga 493070.00 591988.00 108+845.54 21 Surface<br />

8 Jaruga 492983.30 590805.35 110+081.59 22 Jaruga 482645.00 570883.00 135+867.61<br />

9 Landslide 493080.00 590762.00 110+167.95 23 Landslide 482184.51 568774.51 138+232.83<br />

10 Jaruga 492283.34 590805.35 109+886.73 24 Jaruga 482010.88 568760.98 138+266.18<br />

11 Landslide 493271.00 589762.00 111+191.75 25 Jaruga 481967.00 569318.00 137+717.81<br />

12 Landslide 492682.70 589039.20 112+202.39 26 Jaruga 481791.00 568221.00 138+830.91<br />

13 Landslide 491896.03 589066.40 112+674.38 27<br />

14 Landslide 491574.31 589008.92 113+298.83 28<br />

Surface<br />

washing<br />

Surface<br />

washing<br />

469349.00 553823.00 160+112.23<br />

469449.00 553645.00 160+289.91<br />

15<br />

Surface<br />

washing<br />

(from - to)<br />

485912.00 581950.00 122+971.34 29 Landslide 469299.00 552537.00 161+400.60<br />

30 Jaruga 469523.00 551090.00 162+872.53<br />

485726.00 581822.00 123+197.38<br />

31 Jaruga 469561.00 549771.00 164+228.44<br />

3.5 Hydrogeological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route<br />

According to the lithologic structure, structural type <strong>of</strong> porosity, degree and nature <strong>of</strong> cracks,<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> water and other hydrogeological parametres that induce their porosity, rocks<br />

masses/sediments recognized along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line may be divided in the<br />

following groups:<br />

3.5.1 Well porous rock masses/sediments<br />

Within this group, there are:<br />

al- alluvial sediments <strong>of</strong> the River Treska (Q = 10-50 l/s, T = 300-5000 m 2 /day),<br />

where there is a confined type <strong>of</strong> aquifer <strong>of</strong> free level, the maintenance, drainage,<br />

directions and oscillations on the groundwater level (GWL) <strong>of</strong> which correspond to<br />

the river. In the upper part <strong>of</strong> the River Treska, the replenishment also results from<br />

several identified karstic aquifers. Smaller portion <strong>of</strong> replenished water comes from<br />

atmospheric precipitation.<br />

MD–(slab-like marbles), Т 2 1,2 , (slab-like limestones with horn slates), Т 2,3 (massivle<br />

riverbank limestones). The following hydrogeological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the medium<br />

are applicable for them: >10 karst appearances/km 2 , Q aquifer > 100 l/s. Within the,<br />

karst-fractured type <strong>of</strong> aquifer <strong>of</strong> free groundwater level is developed. The<br />

maintenance <strong>of</strong> these aquifers originates mainly from atmospheric falls, to a certain<br />

extent from the regional fault structures, which in blocks divided the present rock<br />

masses, and smaller portion from side replenishment from some adjacent aquifer.<br />

Drainage <strong>of</strong> these aquifers has mostly been registered through a number <strong>of</strong> karst<br />

121


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

springs, and a portion through overflow into certain adjacent aquifer. The oscillation<br />

<strong>of</strong> level <strong>of</strong> groundwater in this aquifer is specific, and consequently reflected in the<br />

karst springs capacity. Many <strong>of</strong> these springs, like "Sum", "Gorna Belica", "Kalista"<br />

are captured for water supply for the City <strong>of</strong> Struga and surrounding villages.<br />

3.5.2 Medium porous rock masses/sediments<br />

Within this group, there are:<br />

Аl-(alluvial) sediments <strong>of</strong> the River Sateska, where there is a confined type <strong>of</strong> aquifer<br />

<strong>of</strong> free level, the maintenance, drainage, directions and oscillations on the<br />

groundwater level (GWL) <strong>of</strong> which correspond to the river. The following<br />

hydrogeological characteristics are applicable for the aquifer: Т = 50-300 m 2 /day, Q =<br />

2-10 l/s. Most <strong>of</strong> the replenishment <strong>of</strong> this aquifer results from the existing karstic<br />

aquifers (such as Petricanski izvori, the springs near the village Godivje, karst aquifer<br />

in Izdeglavje, springs on north <strong>of</strong> the village Belcista and others), a portion from<br />

atmospheric precipitation, a portion from temporary side tributaries entering into the<br />

river Sateska and portion by way <strong>of</strong> overflow from side karst aquifers, like the karst<br />

limestone massif above the village Klimestani.<br />

М- (Paleosoic marbles), Т 2 1,2 , (slab-like limestones with horn slates) and Т 2<br />

1,2<br />

(dolomite marbles), where a karst-fractured type <strong>of</strong> aquifer has been<br />

developed. The following hydrogeological characteristics are applicable for<br />

them: 1-10 karst appearances/km 2 , Q aquifer = 10-100 l/s. The maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />

these aquifers originates mainly from atmospheric falls, to a great extent from<br />

the regional fault structures. Well developed regional tectonics, in the frames<br />

<strong>of</strong> Western-Macedonian tectonic zone, certainly plays certain role in the<br />

drainage <strong>of</strong> these aquifers. In addition to this, drainage <strong>of</strong> these aquifers has<br />

mostly been registered through a number <strong>of</strong> karst springs, and a portion<br />

through overflow into certain adjacent aquifer.<br />

3.5.3 Poorly porous rock masses/sediments<br />

Within this group, there are:<br />

Pr-(proluvial) sediments, which by their local distribution do not posses any major<br />

significance, and Pl 2,3 (Pl 3 ) – Pliocene sediments <strong>of</strong> Kicevo basin, valley <strong>of</strong> Debrca<br />

and Struga basin, with developed confined type <strong>of</strong> aquifer under pressure (with<br />

artesan or subartesan groundwater level). Hydrogeological characteristics are as<br />

follows: Т = 15-50 m 2 /day, Q = 0,5-2 l/s, Q aquifer = 0,05-0,5 l/s.<br />

Т 2,3 -conglomerates and sandstones, where fractured type <strong>of</strong> aquifer with free water<br />

level exists. Hydrogeological characteristics are as follows: Q well = 0,5-2,0 l/s; Q aquifer =<br />

0,05-0,5 l/s. Replenishment <strong>of</strong> this aquifer is accomplished through atmospheric falls.<br />

No surface outflow has been recorded for this aquifer, which means that its drainage<br />

takes place into al-aquifer <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska or overflows into Pliocene sediments<br />

(described above).<br />

3.5.4 Predominantly non-porous rock masses/sediments<br />

This group <strong>of</strong> rock masses/sediments has the following characteristics:<br />

Low level <strong>of</strong> porosity and water production (T < 15m 2 /day).<br />

The presence <strong>of</strong> springs with low level <strong>of</strong> production (Qi < 0.5 l/s) in non coherent rock<br />

masses. Most <strong>of</strong> them are <strong>of</strong> temporary nature <strong>of</strong> flow (dry out).<br />

122


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

The presence <strong>of</strong> shallow dug wells for the cattle and irrigation, which are generally<br />

exploited by occasional manual drawing water from the well.<br />

Developed cracks and intergranular porosity, shallow under the surface and local<br />

limited spreading.<br />

Within this group, there are:<br />

ј, b-lake and organogenic marsh sediments;<br />

-metamorphised rhyolites;<br />

MmD-carbonate shales;<br />

QD-quartzirtes;<br />

FD-phyliotoides;<br />

Sq; Sqse- metasadnstones and alevrolites and quartz-sericite shales within the<br />

Paleozoic complex.<br />

Registered hydrogeological appearances and objects along the route<br />

Along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line, the following hydrogeological appearances and objects<br />

have been registered:<br />

Table 6 Hydrogeological appearances<br />

No.<br />

HG phenomenon or<br />

objekt<br />

Y X Capacity, comment<br />

1 Excavated well - group 496147.00 5968690.00<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Chlorine. station and<br />

pipeline Studencica<br />

Source.primitive<br />

captured<br />

495291.75 595455.56<br />

495645.63 595137.11 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

4 Source, uncaptured 494979.00 594659.00 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

5 Source, uncaptured 492739.45 593031.27 1,0-10 l/s (up the road Kicevo - Ohrid)<br />

6 Excavited well, group 493750.00 593205.00<br />

7 Source, captured 493888.00 593383.50 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

8<br />

9<br />

Carsten source,<br />

uncaptured<br />

Carsten source,<br />

uncaptured<br />

493220.50 592520.75 10 – 100 l/s<br />

493338.75 592327.90 1,0-10 l/s<br />

10 Excavited well, group 493135.00 592710.00<br />

11 Source, captured 493394.00 592233.00 1,0-10 l/s<br />

12 Source, captured 492523.50 589217.00 1,0-10 l/s<br />

13 Well, excavited 492625.00 588845.00<br />

14 Source, captured 492796.50 590507.50 1-10 l/s (water supply <strong>of</strong> the village Vidrani)<br />

123


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

No.<br />

15<br />

16<br />

HG phenomenon or<br />

objekt<br />

Source primitive<br />

captured<br />

Source primitive<br />

captured<br />

Y X Capacity, comment<br />

492501.50 590928.00 1,0-10 l/s<br />

493600.00 589453.50 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

17 Well, excavited 492625.00 588845.00<br />

18 Karsten source, captured 491690.00 588630.00 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

19 Source, uncaptured 490023.70 588909.32 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

20 Source, uncaptured 489595.47 587225.34 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

21 Source, uncaptured 489279.50 586348.50 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

22 Source, captured 489360.50 585464.00<br />

23 Source, captured 487620.50 585877.00<br />

24 Source, captured (group) 487414.00 585014.00<br />

0,1 – 1,0 l/s (water supply <strong>of</strong> the village<br />

Turje)<br />

0,1 – 1,0 l/s (water supply <strong>of</strong> the village<br />

Slivovo)<br />

0,1 – 1,0 l/s (water supply <strong>of</strong> the village<br />

Slivovo)<br />

25 Source, captured 487480.50 583989.00 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

26 Source, captured 485924.50 582934.50 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

27<br />

Source, primitive<br />

captured<br />

486160.58 582204.50 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

28 Source, captured 485799.00 582086.50 1,0 - 10 l/s<br />

29 Source, captured 485275.50 581666.50 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

30 Artesian bore hole 485095.00 581330.00 Q с.и . = 0,2-0,4 l/s<br />

31 Well, pierce 485350.00 581200.00<br />

32 Excavited well(group) 486105.00 580705.00<br />

33 Source, captured 486394.70 580551.46 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

34 Source, uncaptured 484892.50 578009.00 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

35<br />

Wrecked uncaptured<br />

source (group)<br />

485578.00 578097.50 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

36 Well, drilled 484913.60 577431.65<br />

37 Well, excivited(dug) 484850.00 577484.00<br />

38<br />

Carsten source,<br />

captured<br />

486140.00 576980.00 10 – 100 l/s (in the village Izdeglavje)<br />

39 Well, excavated (group) 485920.00 576935.00<br />

40 Source, uncaptured 483480.34 576049.08 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

41<br />

Carsten source,<br />

uncaptured (group) and<br />

485085.00 574904.00 Wrecked source “Blue Virovo”<br />

124


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

No.<br />

HG phenomenon or<br />

objekt<br />

wet field<br />

Y X Capacity, comment<br />

Q = 10 – 100 l/s<br />

42 Source, captured 483126.65 571158.57 Fountain - 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

43 Source, uncaptured 482302.56 570727.09 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

44 Source, uncaptured 481824.13 570509.29 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

45 Source, uncaptured 481684.65 569707.48 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

46 Source, uncaptured 482379.48 568732.40 Over active landslide - 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

47 Source, uncaptured 482072.53 567535.07 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

48 Well, excavated 478727.01 564020.69 In the village Volino<br />

49 Artesian bore hole 475643.94 562696.20<br />

In the monastery circle near the village<br />

Moroishta<br />

Qси. = 0,3 – 0,6 l/s<br />

50 Artesian hole (group) 475469.51 562249.29 In the village Moroishta<br />

51<br />

Carsten source<br />

(group)<br />

469595.98 559978.86 “Noice”, Q = 100 – 1000l/s<br />

52 Regional plumbing 470908.50 559972.60 From G.Belica to Struga<br />

53<br />

Carsten source,<br />

captured<br />

470060.28 556220.52<br />

Part for water supply <strong>of</strong> the village Kalista<br />

Q = 1,0-10 l/s<br />

54<br />

55<br />

Carsten source,<br />

uncaptured<br />

Carsten source,<br />

uncaptured<br />

469172.43 555304.96 Source “Good water” Q = 10 – 100 l/s<br />

469193.09 554974.16 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

56 Source, captured 469771.35 551820.87 1,0-10 l/s<br />

57 Source, uncaptured 469360.89 550921.52 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

58 Source, uncaptured 469676.25 550817.12 0,1 – 1,0 l/s<br />

59<br />

Reservoir and supply<br />

pipeline<br />

469534.82 549957.86<br />

For water supply <strong>of</strong> the village Radozda<br />

and watchtowers<br />

It should be mentioned that there are three speleological objects in the wider area <strong>of</strong> the<br />

village Drugovo - caves, identified as proposals for protection under the category monument<br />

<strong>of</strong> nature, namely: Utova Dupka, Kalina Dupka and Ginceica. However, these caves are at<br />

great distance from the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line.<br />

3.6 Tectonics and seismic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route<br />

The area <strong>of</strong> the railway line route belongs to the Western Macedonian zone, which is<br />

characterized with fine plicative structures and radial tectonics.<br />

125


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Structures in Western Macedonian geotectonic zone extend along NW-SE to NNW-SSE<br />

directions. Tectonic development is connected with two major orogeneses: Herzine and<br />

Alpine orogenesis.<br />

By Herzine orogenesis, Paleosoic sediments were regionally metamorphosed and wrinkled<br />

in mild synclinal and anticlinal structures.<br />

Alpine orogenesis enabled strong dynamo-metamorphism, intensive wrinkling <strong>of</strong> the terrain<br />

and in most cases reprocessing <strong>of</strong> herzine structures. In later phases <strong>of</strong> Alpine orogenesis<br />

(by the end <strong>of</strong> Lower or beginning <strong>of</strong> Middle Pliocene), the terrain was affected by very<br />

intensive radial tectonics, forming several tectonic grabens.<br />

Paleosoic metamorphic rocks are intensively wrinkled into mild synclinal and anticlinal<br />

structures. Synclinal ones are bigger, well expressed, with brachiform character at spots,<br />

while anticlinal are less expressed, narrow and open structures.<br />

The most significant structures within the boundaries <strong>of</strong> Western Macedonian zone include:<br />

Brzdanska anticlinal, Presecka synclinal, Vrbjanska anticlinal , Pesocanska synclinal,<br />

Stogovo synclinal, Karaorman synclinal, Sateska anticlinal, Botun brachisynclinal,<br />

Frangovska anticlinal, Crndrim anticlinal, Kicevo graben and the graben Debrca.<br />

In the period <strong>of</strong> Middle Plocene, certain segments <strong>of</strong> the terrain were subject <strong>of</strong> intensive<br />

radial tectonics (neotectonics), the result being the establishment <strong>of</strong> several tectonic<br />

grabens. The most remarkable is the Ohrid graben, oriented in N-S direction, between<br />

mountain ranges Galicica-Karaorman and Jablanica-Mokra, and delineated with the<br />

southern slopes <strong>of</strong> Karaorman Mt. on north.<br />

During the formation <strong>of</strong> Pliocene grabens, the terrain became rather labile with intensive<br />

manifestation <strong>of</strong> radial tectonics. It was active through entire Middle and Upper Pliocene, and<br />

it was also active in Quarter with a tendency <strong>of</strong> slowing down. Most <strong>of</strong> the faults have deepsea<br />

nature and such faults occur mainly in SW area <strong>of</strong> Galicica and landscapes <strong>of</strong> Jablanica,<br />

where diapirically extended bodies <strong>of</strong> ultrabasites occur on the same ruptures.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the vertical ruptures are active today as well, which confirms the data that the wider<br />

area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and Prespa Lakes belongs to the most active seismic areas in Macedonia.<br />

The region covering the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia and areas at 100 kilometers<br />

beyond its borders, in tectonic terms, belongs to the Mediterranean orogene area <strong>of</strong> Alpine-<br />

Himalaya belt. Predetermined by such tectonic affiliation, seismic activity <strong>of</strong> this region is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the strongest on the inland part <strong>of</strong> the Balkan Peninsula.<br />

Occurrence <strong>of</strong> disastrous earthquakes reaching epicentral intensity up to X MCS-64 and<br />

magnitude to 7,8 (the highest magnitude observed ever on the Balkan Peninsula), is<br />

frequent in this region.<br />

Earthquakes in the region are mainly shallow (h<br />

hypocentres <strong>of</strong> up to 40 km, and most <strong>of</strong>ten to 20 km.<br />

60 km), with most <strong>of</strong> them having<br />

Through the time, earthquake epicenters have concentrated into specific epicentral areas<br />

connected in seismogene zones. These zones, with their epicentral areas and all historical<br />

and contemporary earthquakes that have taken place therein, determine the seismicity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

analyzed region <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />

126


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 26 Tectonic regionalization <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />

Three seismogene zones define the seismicity <strong>of</strong> the wider region:<br />

The first among them stretches along Vardar River valley, covering epicentral areas<br />

from the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Serbia, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia and <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Greece,<br />

respectively, and it is connected with the tectonic unit <strong>of</strong> the Vardar zone (part <strong>of</strong><br />

Dinarides-Helinides) – therefore, it has been named Vardar seismogene zone in<br />

seismological and seismotectonic literature.<br />

The second seismogene zone is linked with Ograzden-Halkidiki zone (major part <strong>of</strong><br />

Serbian-Macedonian massif and some part <strong>of</strong> Kraistidna zone on Carpato-<br />

Balkanides). This seismogene zone includes epicentral areas from the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Serbia, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bulgaria and <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Greece,<br />

respectively. The valley <strong>of</strong> Struma River stretches along major part <strong>of</strong> its eastern<br />

edge and therefore it has been named Struma seismogene zone.<br />

The third seismogene zone includes epicentral areas from the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Serbia,<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> and <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Greece, respectively.<br />

The valley <strong>of</strong> Bel Drim River stretches into its furthest northeastern part, and the<br />

valley <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim River and the valley <strong>of</strong> the mouth <strong>of</strong> these two rivers – river<br />

Drim stretch along its upper western part. Therefore, this seismogene zone has<br />

been named Drim seismogene zone.<br />

Based on the above, it may be concluded that the seismicity <strong>of</strong> the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Macedonia and border areas is predetermined by the three main longitudinal seismogene<br />

zones (Struma, Vardar and Drim).<br />

127


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 27 Map <strong>of</strong> isolines <strong>of</strong> seismic intensity <strong>of</strong> earthquakes in Macedonia (by MCS)<br />

With reference to the degree <strong>of</strong> seismic intensity by MCS scale, the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

passes through three areas:<br />

Area with maximum seismic intensity <strong>of</strong> 7 0 – which includes the stretch from the<br />

railway station Kicevo to the stretch below village Slivovo;<br />

Area with maximum seismic intensity <strong>of</strong> 8 0 – from the stretch below Slivovo, to the<br />

stretch vilage Meseiste - village Volino;<br />

Area with maximum seismic intensity <strong>of</strong> 9 0 – which comprises Ohrid Lake together<br />

with the shore belt, and thus the stretch village Meseista - village Volino, to the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the route.<br />

128


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 28 Seismic map<br />

3.7 Soil characteristics<br />

The route <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin with its length <strong>of</strong> 62.3 km passes through several<br />

basins and mountainous areas, which are rather different in terms <strong>of</strong> pedogenetic factors<br />

(geology, relief, climate, vegetation and man impact). This diversity <strong>of</strong> pedogenetic<br />

conditions has predetermined the presence <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> soil types, which alternate at<br />

small distances, making the soil cover rather diverse.<br />

The rote <strong>of</strong> the line, except several sections which pass through mountainous area, runs<br />

through colluviums and alluviums <strong>of</strong> Kicevo, Izdeglavje, Belciste and Struga basins.<br />

129


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

These deposits host colluvial soils, colluvial soils with signs <strong>of</strong> lessening, cements, alluvial<br />

with well expressed signs <strong>of</strong> hydromorphism, and marsh-gley soils, while the siliceous<br />

substrates, depending on vegetation and altitude, as well as the stage <strong>of</strong> pedogenesis, have<br />

the following types: brown forest soils, litosols and regosols. On limestone rocks, the<br />

following types have been recognized: brown forest soils on limestone and dolomite<br />

(calcokacambisols) and limestone dolomite chernosems (calcomelanosols).<br />

3.7.1 Colluvial soils<br />

In the investigated area, the route runs through several sections over this soil type, namely:<br />

Kicevo basin, the area <strong>of</strong> village Drugovo (103-107 km) - the route passes over<br />

colluiviums created <strong>of</strong> silicate material (phylitoides and shales), characterized by low<br />

level <strong>of</strong> sorting due to steep terrain and short transport, as well as high content <strong>of</strong><br />

skeleton. On the surface, processes <strong>of</strong> surface and weak burrow erosion are notable.<br />

Appearances <strong>of</strong> lessening due to more intensive clay washing out are present on flat<br />

micro-sites.<br />

Figure 29 Colluvial soils<br />

At the entrance into Struga basin, near the villages Klimestani and Mesesita, the route<br />

runs over alluvial soils formed <strong>of</strong> sediments <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, as well as on the<br />

contact with colluvial sediments formed <strong>of</strong> shale like siliceous material. These colluviums<br />

are rather irregular, from morphological point <strong>of</strong> view. In some, stratification is not clearly<br />

expressed, but there such with clear distinction <strong>of</strong> strata and diverse granular<br />

composition. They have skeleton on surface, though fine granulated earth prevails. As<br />

the terrain approaches the village Trebenista and the route goes down towards the<br />

central part <strong>of</strong> the fields, colluvium gradually turn into soils <strong>of</strong> more and more fine<br />

mechanical composition and into alluvial soils.<br />

130


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Colluvial soils in the area <strong>of</strong> the village Radoliste go down steeply towards the village<br />

Struga fields. These colluvial soils were formed by material obtained by soil erosion<br />

formed onto limestone and dolomite, and therefore they occur in red colour, heavier<br />

mechanical composition and better sorted.<br />

3.7.2 Alluvial soils<br />

Alluvial soils through which the route passes are formed <strong>of</strong> the alluvial sediments <strong>of</strong> the river<br />

Sateska and its tributaries in the area <strong>of</strong> Izdeglavje and Belciste fields, as well as lake and<br />

marsh sediments in Struga basin.<br />

In Izdeglavje field, the route passes along the western side <strong>of</strong> the field along the flow<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sateska river, over alluvial soils which have dry pr<strong>of</strong>ile due to specific unsorted<br />

and coarse skeleton material, despite the high level <strong>of</strong> subsoil waters. These are low<br />

acid carbonate free soils, with low content <strong>of</strong> organic matter and nutrients.<br />

The route section in Belciste field passes through skeletal alluvial soils. These soils<br />

have poor water carrying physical properties, they are carbonate free and<br />

structureless. In a small segment, south <strong>of</strong> Novo Selo, the route passes through pure<br />

skeleton.<br />

Alluvial soils <strong>of</strong> Struga field cover the areas <strong>of</strong> the villages Volino, Moroviste, Livada<br />

and Mislesevo (144-149 km). They were formed mainly on material transported by<br />

the river Sateska. These are young, under-developed soils with well expressed<br />

stratification <strong>of</strong> the soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile. Close to the river, they have coarser mechanical<br />

composition, while in the zone <strong>of</strong> the route they are characterized by finer mechanical<br />

composition. These are carbonate free soils with low acid activity, while mechanical<br />

composition varies depending on the distance from the former riverbed <strong>of</strong> Sateska.<br />

Their content <strong>of</strong> organic matter and nutrients is low, but still they are assessed as<br />

soils with good potential fertility, good water porosity and good water and air regime.<br />

In the route segment from 146-147 km, in the area known under the name Propast,<br />

alluviums with morphological indications <strong>of</strong> gradual transformation into marsh ones are<br />

found, owing to the high level <strong>of</strong> groundwaters in the depression, in a form <strong>of</strong> plod spots<br />

and planes. With regard to these soils, particular attention should be paid to the high<br />

groundwater level, detected at small depth due to extremely humid conditions, which<br />

makes this terrain an unstable ground for construction interventions.<br />

3.7.3 Marsh soils<br />

Marsh soils (149-156 km) are found in the zone <strong>of</strong> the former Struga marsh (on left and right<br />

along the course <strong>of</strong> the river Crn Drim), which was characterized by presence <strong>of</strong> areas<br />

beneath low peat bogs. Areas under marsh soils are actually depression <strong>of</strong> the Struga fields,<br />

which is positioned below the level <strong>of</strong> the Lake, and therefore groundwater is in permanent<br />

contact with the lake ones and they are thus subject <strong>of</strong> strong oscillations. Parts <strong>of</strong> these<br />

areas are now covered by coarse deposit transported there by the left tributaries <strong>of</strong> Drim,<br />

primarily Belicka Reka. Besides, major portion <strong>of</strong> the excessive water is evacuated through<br />

canal system to the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and in the canal Sum. Still, during the field investigations<br />

we found gley horizon at the depth <strong>of</strong> 40-50 cm, which indicates high water level <strong>of</strong> ground<br />

waters, while on the right <strong>of</strong> the river Drim, in the area Sarkanica, presence <strong>of</strong> large areas<br />

under surface water have been detected.<br />

131


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 30 Marsh soils<br />

Marsh soils have been also identified in the area <strong>of</strong> the village Kalista, immediately below the<br />

highway to <strong>Albania</strong>, below the village Radolista (162 km). These are soils with high content<br />

<strong>of</strong> organic matter, heavier mechanical composition relative to alluvial soils and well sorted.<br />

Due to the high groundwater level both with humid alluviums and marsh gleyey soils, they<br />

are used for production <strong>of</strong> annual crops. Plantation <strong>of</strong> perianual plants has not been noted in<br />

these areas.<br />

The segment <strong>of</strong> the route in the mountainous region, spreading in the areas <strong>of</strong> the villages,<br />

Popolzani, Vidrani, Brzdani and Judovo, soils formed on limestone and dolomite alternate at<br />

small distances, as well as soils on silicate ground (regosols and shallow brown forest soils<br />

under oak vegetation), mostly as a result <strong>of</strong> frequent changes in geological substrate <strong>of</strong><br />

limestone in siliceous rocks.<br />

132


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

After the exit from the tunnel near Slivovo, up to the entry in Izdeglavje field, the line runs<br />

over shallow soils formed on limestone. These are soils <strong>of</strong> shallow pr<strong>of</strong>ile formed onto solid<br />

rock. Any degradation <strong>of</strong> the soil cover with these soils results in intensive erosion and loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> entire soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />

On the way from the village Botun to the village Klimestani, the route goes through regosols<br />

formed on shales. These are shallow soils with low content <strong>of</strong> humus and rather unstable<br />

with regard to erosion due to low content <strong>of</strong> organic matter, poor stability <strong>of</strong> structural<br />

aggregates and great slope <strong>of</strong> the terrain. In a part <strong>of</strong> the gorge, intensive wood cutting on<br />

inclined terrain has been observed, as well as construction interventions, resulting in<br />

intensive erosion processes.<br />

With its last section, from the stretch 163-170 km, in the areas <strong>of</strong> the villages M.Vlaj and<br />

Radozda, the route <strong>of</strong> the line passes through soils formed onto siliceous ground (phylitic<br />

shales), prevailed by regosols and cements on minor locations. Calcareous dolomite<br />

chernosems and brown soils limestone and dolomite have been identified on marbleized<br />

limestones. With a short section, the route passes through limestone crumbles (talus).<br />

3.8 Hydrography and quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters in the area<br />

The wider area <strong>of</strong> the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Albania</strong>) is part <strong>of</strong> the territory <strong>of</strong> two major regional watershed areas:<br />

Watershed area <strong>of</strong> the river Treska, the following watercourses gravitate in its<br />

upper course: (1) river Studencica, formed on north <strong>of</strong> the village Dobrenoec, i.e. it is<br />

uncaptured remain <strong>of</strong> the springs <strong>of</strong> Studencica (the waters <strong>of</strong> which have been<br />

captured by regional water supply system supplying water to several municipalities);<br />

(2) Brzdanska Reka and (3) Ehlovecka Reka;<br />

Watershed area <strong>of</strong> the river Crn Drim, into which, from its outflow from Ohrid Lake<br />

to the artificial water accumulation Globocica, the following watercourses gravitate:<br />

(1) Sateska Reka, which is the biggest tributary to the river Crn Drim. The following<br />

rivers enter into it: Bigorstica, Golema Reka, Gorna Reka, Vilipica, Mala Reka,<br />

Pesocanska Reka, channel Matica (composed <strong>of</strong> the rivers Slatinska Reka,<br />

Ozdolenska Reka and Shosanska Reka), Kocunska Reka, Zletovska Reka, Golema<br />

Reka and Graista; then (2) river Belicka Reka, which is uncaptured remain <strong>of</strong> several<br />

karstic aquifers above the village Gorna Belica, (the waters <strong>of</strong> which have been<br />

captured for water supply to the City <strong>of</strong> Struga and surrounding villages); (3) river<br />

Sum, formed by the karstic aquifer <strong>of</strong> the same name, (4) river Vevcanska Reka,<br />

formed by the karstic aquifer above the village Vevcani, and (5) river Susica, formed<br />

west <strong>of</strong> the village Visni.<br />

133


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 31 Watershed areas<br />

Fluctuations in the levels <strong>of</strong> these watercourses are within the hydrological cycle; however,<br />

in periods <strong>of</strong> high water level, some <strong>of</strong> these watercourses are characterized by appearance<br />

<strong>of</strong> overflows from their riverbeds and temporary lake formation, over smaller or larger areas<br />

along watercourses.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> the river Treska, overflows have been recorded in the area near the entry into<br />

the river Brzdanska Reka.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, overflows have been recorded in the part below the village<br />

Arbinovo (before entry in the gorge), then along the extension from the village Izdeglavje to<br />

the point before the village Pesocani, at the entry point with the river Matica and before the<br />

village Botun (Dolna Debrca). Part <strong>of</strong> the course <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska (before the village<br />

Volino) was artificially redirected into channelized course towards Ohrid Lake, which<br />

contributes in the protection against flooding in the lower course, towards the Lake, as well<br />

as the entry into the river Crn Drim.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> the river Crn Drim, overflows from its riverbed and temporary lake formation<br />

have been recorded along the stretch from the city <strong>of</strong> Struga to the point before the village<br />

Velesta.<br />

Data on the quantitative characteristics <strong>of</strong> the watercourses Treska, Sateska and Crn Drim<br />

was taken by the Hydrometeorological Administration, for a period <strong>of</strong> 3 hydrological years<br />

(2000-2002 година), and average values are as follows:<br />

River Treska (measuring point village Izvor, watershed area <strong>of</strong> 60 km 2 )<br />

Qmax. = 2,37 m 3 /s, Qsr. = 1,85 m 3 /s, Qmin. = 1,36 m 3 /s<br />

River Sateska (measuring point village Botun, watershed area <strong>of</strong> 357 km 2 )<br />

Qmax. = 7,02 m 3 /s, Qsr. = 3,78 m 3 /s, Qmin. = 2,41 m 3 /s<br />

134


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

River Crn Drim (measuring point village Lozani)<br />

Qmax. = 22,38 m 3 /s, Qsr. = 16,31 m 3 /s, Qmin. = 12,09 m 3 /s<br />

Under the Decree on waters clasification, according to the purpose and degree <strong>of</strong> purity,<br />

surface waters (watercourses, lakes and accumulations) and groundwaters are distributed<br />

into classes, namely:<br />

Table 7 Classification <strong>of</strong> waters<br />

Class<br />

I<br />

II<br />

III<br />

IV<br />

V<br />

Use / Purpose <strong>of</strong> the water<br />

Class <strong>of</strong> very clean, oligotrophic water which in natural condition and eventual disinfection<br />

may be used for drinking and for production and processing the food products, as well as for<br />

spawning <strong>of</strong> noble types <strong>of</strong> fish – salmonides. The buffering capacity <strong>of</strong> the water is very<br />

good. It is constantly saturated with oxygen, contains low level <strong>of</strong> nutrients and bacteria, and<br />

very low level <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic pollution with organic substances (but not inorganic matters).<br />

Class <strong>of</strong> water with low level <strong>of</strong> pollution, mesotrophic water, which in natural condition may<br />

be used for bathing and recreation, for water sports, for spawning other types <strong>of</strong> fish<br />

(cyprindae) , or which by regular methods <strong>of</strong> processing and conditioning (coagulation,<br />

filtration, disinfection and alike) may be used for drinking and production <strong>of</strong> food products.<br />

The buffering capacity and saturation <strong>of</strong> water with oxygen during the whole year are good.<br />

The present burdening may lead to insignificant increase <strong>of</strong> primary productivity.<br />

Class <strong>of</strong> moderately eutrophic water, which in natural condition may be used for irrigation,<br />

and after regular methods <strong>of</strong> processing (conditioning) it can also be used in the industry<br />

where there is no need <strong>of</strong> water with drinking quality, The buffering capacity in weak, but it<br />

preserves the acidity <strong>of</strong> the water to levels that are still adequate for most <strong>of</strong> the fish.<br />

Occasionally, there is deficiency <strong>of</strong> oxygen. The level <strong>of</strong> primary production is significant,<br />

and some changes in the structure <strong>of</strong> the community can be noticed, including the types <strong>of</strong><br />

fish. The burdening with harmful substances is evident, as well as the microbiological<br />

pollution. Concentration <strong>of</strong> harmful substances varies from natural level to level <strong>of</strong> chronic<br />

poisoning in relation to aquatic life.<br />

Class <strong>of</strong> strongly eutrophic, polluted water, which in natural conditions may be used for other<br />

purposes, but only after certain type <strong>of</strong> processing. The buffering capacity exceeds the<br />

limits, which leads to larger acidity levels that have impact on the development <strong>of</strong> younger<br />

generation. In the epilimnion, there is oversaturation with oxygen, while in the hypolimnion<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> oxygen is too low. Flourishing <strong>of</strong> algae is notable.<br />

Increased decomposition <strong>of</strong> organic matters, simultaneously with water stratification, may<br />

lead to anaerobic conditions and death <strong>of</strong> fish. Massive sites <strong>of</strong> tolerant species, fish<br />

populations and benthos organisms may be affected. Microbiological contamination does not<br />

allow this water to be used for recreation, while harmful substances discharged or released<br />

from the sediment (sediment - deposits) may affect the quality <strong>of</strong> aquatic life. Concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> harmful substances may vary from chronic to acute levels <strong>of</strong> toxicity for the aquatic life.<br />

Class <strong>of</strong> very polluted, hypertrophic water, which in natural conditions may not be used for<br />

any purpose. The water has no buffering capacity and its acidity is harmful for many fish<br />

species. Big problems occur in oxygen regime, with over saturation and scarcity <strong>of</strong> oxygen in<br />

epilimnion, leading to anaerobic conditions in the hypolimnion. Disintegrators prevail over<br />

producers. Fish or benthos species do not exist constantly. Concentration <strong>of</strong> harmful<br />

substances exceeds acute levels <strong>of</strong> toxicity for aquatic life.<br />

Under the Decree on waters categorization (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no. 18/99 and 71/99),<br />

natural and artificial watercourses, sections <strong>of</strong> watercourses, lakes, accumulations and<br />

135


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

groundwaters, the waters <strong>of</strong> which are distributed in classes by their purpose and degree <strong>of</strong><br />

purity, are divided into five categories.<br />

The I category includes watercourses the waters <strong>of</strong> which meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> the I<br />

class, the II category – requirements <strong>of</strong> the II class, the III category – requirements <strong>of</strong> the III<br />

class, the IV category – requirements <strong>of</strong> the IV class, and the V category includes<br />

watercourses the waters <strong>of</strong> which have to meet the requirements <strong>of</strong> the V class.<br />

The main types <strong>of</strong> watercourses pollution <strong>of</strong> the area along the railway line route originate<br />

from municipal waste water discharged from the populated places and agricultural and<br />

livestock breeding activities.<br />

The quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters in the immediate surrounding <strong>of</strong> the railway line route is not<br />

significantly deteriorated by emissions <strong>of</strong> industrial activities.<br />

The text below presents categorization <strong>of</strong> watercourses and lakes in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia (based on the Law on Waters, Article 85, paragraph 4 and Article 4, paragraph 3,<br />

published in the Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 38/90, 63/94 and 63/98).<br />

Treska river watershed<br />

Brzdanska Reka (from the village Brzdani to the entry in the river Treska)–2.<br />

category;<br />

River Studencica (from the village D.Dobrenoec to the entry in the river Treska)–2.<br />

category;<br />

River Treska (from the village Izvor to the entry in the river Vardar)–2. category;<br />

Crn Drim river watershed<br />

River Sateska (from the village Botun, to the entry in Ohrid Lake)–2. category;<br />

River Sum (from the village Sum to the entry in the river Crn Drim)–2. category;<br />

Река Crn Drim (from Struga to the border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)–2. category;<br />

Under the relevant legislation in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, the monitoring <strong>of</strong> surface waters<br />

is performed continuously by the Hydrometeorological Administration from Skopje. The type<br />

<strong>of</strong> measurements, methodology and parameters monitored, as well as changes and<br />

condition <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> waters are carried out in accordance with a special Programme.<br />

The Programme implementation is aimed at surface waters quantity and quality monitoring<br />

on the whole territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. As a result <strong>of</strong> all these activities, annual<br />

reports on the quality <strong>of</strong> waters are produced.<br />

In the area <strong>of</strong> intended construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Kjafasan, the watershed areas<br />

in the region <strong>of</strong> Kicevo and the second area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid-Struga region, are covered. Kicevo<br />

region covers the upper course <strong>of</strong> the watershed area <strong>of</strong> the river Treska.<br />

In the period up to 1996, Hydrometeorological Administration carried out examinations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> waters at 3 measuring points in the region <strong>of</strong> Kicevo, namely:<br />

SP 63501–village Izvor, river Treska,<br />

SP 63502–Bigor Dolenci, river Treska,<br />

SP 63525– Kicevo, Kicevska Reka (river)<br />

136


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 32 Measuring points monitoring the waters in the watershed <strong>of</strong> Treska river<br />

Based on the results from the said monitoring, it has been found out that the regime and the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> waters in the rivers Kicevska Reka and Treska are affected by discharged<br />

municipal wastewaters from the City <strong>of</strong> Kicevo and thermal power plant "Oslomej".<br />

Other permanent surface watercourses include the rivers Golema Reka and Studencica.<br />

River Treska originates from a karst aquifer near the village Izvor, on the southern slope <strong>of</strong><br />

the mountain Bistra. Up to Kicevo Basin, it is known under the name Golema Reka. Its<br />

watershed has numerous springs and rivers, which replenish it permanently and therefore it<br />

is a river with the greatest annual fluctuations in the flow in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. The<br />

spring is located at 750 m a.s.l., and its yield ranges between 1500 and 2000 l/s. р.<br />

Studencica is left tributary to the river Treska. River Studencica is mountaimuous river with<br />

great gradient <strong>of</strong> water mirror. The watershed area <strong>of</strong> the river Studencica is long-shaped,<br />

lying on southeastern slopes <strong>of</strong> Bistra Mt., and occupying 53 km 2 . The flow direction is<br />

northwest-southeast. It spreads over from the highest spot level <strong>of</strong> 2099 m a.s.l., to spot<br />

level 565 m a.s.l. The main spring is at spot level 1780 m a.s.l. Its length is 14.1 km. Most <strong>of</strong><br />

the watershed area is covered with oak and beech forest and pastures. Hydrographic<br />

network is composed <strong>of</strong> several aquifers, minor streams and gullies. The waters <strong>of</strong> the river<br />

137


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Studencica are used for water supply <strong>of</strong> the populated places Kicevo, Makedonski Brod,<br />

Prilep and Krusevo and other smaller settlements. This water has been categorized as II<br />

class.<br />

The water supply system “Studencica” supplies water to the cities Kicevo, Makedonski Brod,<br />

Prilep and Krusevo and a number <strong>of</strong> rural settlements situated along supply pipelines in<br />

Kicevo and Prilep regions, respectively.<br />

The system was constructed for a capacity <strong>of</strong> 1500 l/s, and it uses the water from the springs<br />

<strong>of</strong> Studencica the yield <strong>of</strong> which is within the range from 450 to 4300 l/s. Supply pipelines,<br />

from the springs to the populated places, are made <strong>of</strong> steel, with a total length <strong>of</strong> 100 km.<br />

In days <strong>of</strong> maximum water consumption, and minimum yield <strong>of</strong> the spring, the system is not<br />

able to satisfy the demand for water in connected places. The quality <strong>of</strong> the water in the river<br />

Treska, at the very spring, has not changed substantially for years now. It corresponds by all<br />

criteria to water quality <strong>of</strong> first category.<br />

At the measuring point below Kicevo-village Bigor-Dolenci, the quality <strong>of</strong> water <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

deviates from the prescribed one with regard to organic and microbiological pollution, which<br />

is a consequence <strong>of</strong> the wastewaters from the City <strong>of</strong> Kicevo.<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> the precipitation infiltrated beneath the soil surface, establishes the groundwater<br />

resources.<br />

Their movement in soil and through rock masses is small, with minor or major delays. At<br />

suitable points, they come out on the surface and enrich surface waters.<br />

The springs at Dolno Popolzani is situated in the village Dolno Popolzani-Kicevo area, at<br />

around 200 m south <strong>of</strong> the river Treska. The yield <strong>of</strong> this spring varies in the course <strong>of</strong> the<br />

year, ranging between 200 and 1000 l/s. The aquifer is situated in Devonian limestones,<br />

positioned at 640 m above sea level.<br />

Aquifer, surface and groundwaters, or combination <strong>of</strong> those, are used for water supply <strong>of</strong><br />

populated places.<br />

In Ohrid-Struga region (Crn Drim river watershed area), Hydrometeorological Administration<br />

has two measuring points in the zone <strong>of</strong> intended construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-<br />

Kjafasan: SP60018–Kalista, Ohrid Lake and SP60019–Struga, river Crn Drim.<br />

Also, the water <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake is controlled at four additional measuring points: SP60012– St.<br />

Naum, SP60015–Hotel Metropol, SP60016–City <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and SP60017–City Beach.<br />

According to the above measurements, it has been established that the quality <strong>of</strong> the water<br />

in the river Crn Drim, at its exit from Ohrid Lake, is relatively clean and can potentially be<br />

affected by municipal and industrial wastewaters from the cities Ohrid and Struga, especially<br />

those not collected into the wastewater collection system and treatment plant.<br />

138


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 33 Measuring points monitoring the waters in the watershed <strong>of</strong> the river Crn Drim<br />

3.9 Quality <strong>of</strong> air in the area<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, as signatory <strong>of</strong> the Stabilization and Association Agreement, makes<br />

efforts, inter alia, towards approximation and transposition <strong>of</strong> the European legislation in the<br />

area <strong>of</strong> air. The Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment and Physical Planning (MEPP) prepared the<br />

framework Law on Ambient Air Quality in line with the Framework Water Directive 96/62/EC,<br />

as well as Decree on the limit values <strong>of</strong> the levels and types <strong>of</strong> polluting substances in the<br />

139


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

ambient air and alert thresholds, deadlines for limit values achievement, margins <strong>of</strong><br />

tolerance for the limit values, target values and long-term targets.<br />

Regular air quality monitoring is one <strong>of</strong> the most important tools in providing relevant data on<br />

the state <strong>of</strong> the air in a given area. Responsible authority for the air quality monitoring is the<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment and Physical Planning, through the system <strong>of</strong> monitoring stations<br />

established throughout the country.<br />

Figure 34 Monitoring stations<br />

Hydrometeorological Administration has set its stations on the whole territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Macedonia to monitor meteorological parameters and air quality. So far, the two<br />

mentioned institutions have not carried out measurements <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> the air along the<br />

railway line route.<br />

Table 8 Measuring parameters <strong>of</strong> institutions<br />

3.9.1 Quality <strong>of</strong> ambient air in Kicevo<br />

The quality <strong>of</strong> ambient air in Kicevo is monitored by automatic monitoring station, functioning<br />

in the frames <strong>of</strong> the State automatic ambient air quality monitoring system, managed by the<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment and Physical Planning. The station was set in December 2002 and<br />

140


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

since then, hourly data on all measuring parameters are received continuously in the central<br />

stations based in the Macedonian Environmental Information Centre.<br />

The monitoring stations measure the concentrations <strong>of</strong> the following polluting substances:<br />

sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, suspended particulate matters bigger than 10 micro meters,<br />

ozone and carbon monoxide. The station is also equipped with instruments which measure<br />

the following meteorological parameters: temperature, wind direction and velocity, humidity,<br />

pressure and global radiation.<br />

The ambient air quality monitoring station located in Kicevo shows the pollution in the city<br />

caused by human activities, heating <strong>of</strong> households during winter period, traffic and work <strong>of</strong><br />

industrial facilities. Namely, the Thermal Power Plant “Oslomej” is situated in the vicinity <strong>of</strong><br />

Kicevo.<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> data presented below is based on the Decree on the limit values <strong>of</strong> the levels<br />

and types <strong>of</strong> polluting substances in the ambient air and alert thresholds, deadlines for limit<br />

values achievement, margins <strong>of</strong> tolerance for the limit values, target values and long-term<br />

targets (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no. 50/05).<br />

3.9.1.1 Sulfur dioxide<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> data on sulfur dioxide obtained by the monitoring station Kicevo for the period<br />

2007-2009 is presented in the table below:<br />

Table 9 Limit values for SO 2<br />

SO 2 [µg/m 3 ] 2007 2008 2009<br />

Protection <strong>of</strong> human health<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming on one hour GV for protection <strong>of</strong> human helath +<br />

MT set for the relevant year<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming on one year GV for protection <strong>of</strong> human health to<br />

be reached in 2012 year<br />

0 0 0<br />

0 0 3<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> exceeding the daily GV protection <strong>of</strong> human health 0 1 1<br />

Protection <strong>of</strong> ecosystems<br />

Averrage annual concentration [ µg/m3 ] 17,53 22,97 22,71<br />

Averrage concentration in winter [ µg/m3 ] 21,02 26,10 31,22<br />

The hourly limit value for human health protection plus the margin <strong>of</strong> tolerance for 2007 was<br />

500 μg/m 3 , for 2008 - 470 μg/m 3 and for 2009 it was 440 μg/m 3 , and the allowed number <strong>of</strong><br />

exceedences during a year is 24 times. The table shoes that during the analyzed period<br />

there is no exceedence <strong>of</strong> the hourly limit value for human health protection plus the margin<br />

<strong>of</strong> tolerance specified for the respective year. The hourly limit value for human health<br />

protection that should be achieved in 2012 is 350 μg/m 3 and it was exceeded only three<br />

times during 2009, and the allowed number <strong>of</strong> exceedences during a year is 24 times, which<br />

means that and the allowed number <strong>of</strong> exceedences during a year was not exceeded.<br />

Daily limit value for human health protection is 125 μg/m 3 , and the allowed number <strong>of</strong> its<br />

exceedednces is three times during a year. Considering that daily limit value for human<br />

141


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

health protection was exceeded only once in each 2008 and 2009, exceedence <strong>of</strong> the daily<br />

limit value for human health protection for the period 2007-2009 was not recorded.<br />

The next Figure shows the average annual concentration and the average concentration in<br />

winter period <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide for the period 2007-2009, in Kicevo. It is notable that there<br />

was minor exceedence <strong>of</strong> the average annual concentration relative to limit value for<br />

ecosystems protection in 2008 and 2009. It is also notable that the average concentrations<br />

<strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide measured in winter period are higher than the average annual<br />

concentrations every year and they slightly exceed the limit value for ecosystems protection.<br />

Figure 35 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> SO 2 in Kicevo<br />

3.9.1.2 Nitrogen dioxide<br />

According to the analysis made for hourly values <strong>of</strong> nitrogen dioxide concentrations obtained<br />

by the monitoring station Kicevo for the period 2007–2009, we may note that there is no<br />

exceeding <strong>of</strong> hourly value in terms <strong>of</strong> human health protection.<br />

Namely, the hourly value for human health protection plus margin <strong>of</strong> tolerance for 2007 was<br />

300 g/m 3 , for 2008 - 280 g/m 3 and for 2009 it was 260 g/m 3 , and the allowed number <strong>of</strong><br />

exceedences during a year is 18 times.<br />

The hourly value for human health protection to be achieved in 2012 is 200 g/m 3 .<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> data is presented in the table below.<br />

Table 10 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> nitrogen dioxide for the period 2007-2009<br />

Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2) 2007 2008 2009<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming one hour GV to protect human health + MT for<br />

a relevant year<br />

0 0 0<br />

142


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming one year GV for protection <strong>of</strong> human health<br />

which should be reached in 2012 year<br />

0 0 0<br />

Просечна годишна концентрација [ g/m 3 ] 12 28 30<br />

The average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> nitrogen dioxide is presented on the next Figure.<br />

Figure 36 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> nitrogen dioxide for the period 2007-2009<br />

The diagram shows that the average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> nitrogen dioxide relative to the<br />

limit value for human health protection plus margin <strong>of</strong> tolerance specified for the respective<br />

year (60 g/m 3 for 2007, 56 g/m 3 for 2008 and 52 g/m 3 for 2009), the limit value for human<br />

health protection to be achieved in 2012 (40 g/m 3 ) and limit value for vegetation protection<br />

(30 g/m 3 ) was not exceeded in none <strong>of</strong> the years <strong>of</strong> the analyzed period.<br />

3.9.1.3 Suspended particulate matters sized up to 10 micrometers<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> data on the suspended particulate matters sized up to 10 micrometers is<br />

presented in Table 11.<br />

Table 11 Analysis <strong>of</strong> suspended particulate matters sized up to 10 micrometers for the period 2007-<br />

2009<br />

Suspended particulate matters sized up to 10 micrometars (PM 10) 2007 2008 2009<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming the daily GV to protect human health + MT set<br />

for the relevant year<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming the daily GV for protection <strong>of</strong> human health<br />

which should be reached in 2012<br />

129 167 175<br />

215 254 218<br />

Averrage annual concentration 85 80.72 76.89<br />

Daily limit value for human health protection plus margin <strong>of</strong> tolerance for 2007 was 75 g/m 3 ,<br />

for 2008 - 67 g/m 3 and for 2009 it was 59 g/m 3 , while the allowed number <strong>of</strong> exceedences<br />

during a year is 35 times. Daily limit value for human health protection to be achieved in<br />

2010 is 50 g/m 3 .<br />

Table 11 shows that the number <strong>of</strong> exceedednces <strong>of</strong> daily limit value for human health<br />

protection plus margin <strong>of</strong> tolerance specified for the respective year, as well as the number<br />

143


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

exceedences <strong>of</strong> the daily limit value for human health protection to be achieved in 2010,<br />

exceeds the number <strong>of</strong> allowed exceedences.<br />

The next Figure shows the average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> suspended particulate matters<br />

sized up to 10 micrometers.<br />

The Figure shows that the average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> suspended particulate matters<br />

sized up to 10 micrometers relative to the limit value for human health protection plus margin<br />

<strong>of</strong> tolerance specified for the respective year (60 g/m 3 for 2007, 54 g/m 3 for 2008 and 47<br />

g/m 3 for 2009) and the limit value for human health protection to be achieved in 2012 (40<br />

g/m 3 ), was exceeded every year <strong>of</strong> the analyzed period.<br />

It should be pointed out that there is a slight trend <strong>of</strong> decline in the average annual<br />

concentration, but it is above the allowed limit values.<br />

Nevertheless, based on the analyses made, we can make a general conclusion that high<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> this polluting substances are recorded on the whole territory <strong>of</strong> the country,<br />

especially during winter period <strong>of</strong> the year.<br />

Figure 37 Average annual concentration <strong>of</strong> suspended particulate matters sized up to 10 micrometers<br />

for the period 2007-2009<br />

3.9.1.4 Carbon monoxide<br />

Based on the analysis <strong>of</strong> hourly data on carbon monoxide, the following Table <strong>of</strong> carbon<br />

monoxide has been composed.<br />

Table 12 Analysis <strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide for the period 2007-2009<br />

144


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Carbon monoxide (CO) 2007 2008 2009<br />

Maximum daily eight – hour average concentration <strong>of</strong> CO<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming the GV to protect human health + MT<br />

for the corresponding year<br />

6.08 8.13 8.64<br />

0 0 0<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> overcoming the daily GV for protection <strong>of</strong> human<br />

health which should be reached in 2012<br />

0 0 0<br />

Based on the analysis made we can conclude that there was no exceeding <strong>of</strong> the limit value<br />

for human health protection plus margin <strong>of</strong> tolerance during the analyzed period <strong>of</strong> three<br />

years, specified for each year starting with 2007 (16 mg/m 3 for 2007, 15 mg/m 3 for 2008 and<br />

14 mg/m 3 for 2009), nor exceeding <strong>of</strong> the limit value for human health protection to be<br />

reached in 2012.<br />

The maximum daily 8-hours mean value <strong>of</strong> the concentration <strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide is<br />

presented on Figure 38.<br />

Figure 38 Maximum daily 8-hours mean value <strong>of</strong> the concentration <strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide for the period<br />

2007-2009<br />

The diagram shows that the exceeding <strong>of</strong> the concentration <strong>of</strong> carbon monoxide above the<br />

respective limit values were not recorded during the analyzed period.<br />

3.9.1.5 Ozone<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> data on the concentrations <strong>of</strong> ozone is presented in the following Table.<br />

Table 13 Analysis <strong>of</strong> data on ozone for the period 2007-2009<br />

145


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Озон (О 3) 2007 2008 2009<br />

Long term goals<br />

Maximum daily eight – hour average concentration 184 155 138<br />

АОТ40 calculated from one – hour values from May to July 21480 23637.4 17865<br />

Target values<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> exceeting on target value for protection <strong>of</strong><br />

human health<br />

37 57 20<br />

The target value for human health protection for ozone is 120 g/m 3 and it must not be<br />

exceeded by more than 35 times during a year. Yet, Table 13 clearly shows that in 2007 and<br />

2008, the allowed number <strong>of</strong> exceedences <strong>of</strong> the target value for human health protection<br />

was exceeded was exceeded, while in 2009, the number <strong>of</strong> exceedences <strong>of</strong> the target value<br />

for human health protection was lower than the allowed number <strong>of</strong> exceedences.<br />

The long-term value for human health protection for ozone for the period 2007 to 2009 is<br />

presented on the next Figure.<br />

Figure 39 Long-term target for human health protection for ozone for the period 2007-2009<br />

During the analyzed period, the maximum daily 8-hours average value <strong>of</strong> the concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> zone exceeded the long-term value for human health protection for all three, though the<br />

overview on Figure 40 shows clearly that the maximum daily 8-hours average value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> zone has a falling trend.<br />

146


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

The long-term target for vegetation protection for ozone for the period 2007-2009 is<br />

presented on Figure 40.<br />

Figure 40 Long-term target for vegetation protection for ozone for the period 2007-2009<br />

The long-term target for vegetation protection was exceeded at the measuring point Kicevo<br />

during 2007, 2008 and 2009.<br />

АОТ40 expressed in ( g/m 3 x hours) means the sum <strong>of</strong> the difference between hourly<br />

concentrations above 80 g/m 3 (= 40 th pieces <strong>of</strong> billion) and 80 g/m 3 during the analyzed<br />

period May-July.<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> the analysis, one-hour values are taken into account, measured every<br />

day between 8.00 in the morning and 20.00 in the evening by Central European Time, when<br />

solar radiation is the greatest. In general, exceedences <strong>of</strong> long-term targets for ozone have<br />

been recorded at all measuring points in our country and they are related to the geographical<br />

position <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia in the southern part <strong>of</strong> Europe, characterized by a<br />

high number <strong>of</strong> sunny days during summer period.<br />

3.9.2 Quality <strong>of</strong> ambient air in Ohrid<br />

The ambient air quality monitoring in Ohrid is performed only at one measuring point in the<br />

city and it measures sulfur dioxide and smoke. This measuring point is part <strong>of</strong> the network<br />

for air quality monitoring in Ohrid <strong>of</strong> the Hydrometeorological Administration. Data obtained<br />

by this measuring pont for the mentioned polluting substances are average daily, because<br />

manual methods <strong>of</strong> their analysis are applied.<br />

Data on the analysis made for sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006 are shown in Table 14:<br />

Table 14 Analysis <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006<br />

Ohrid<br />

Averrage annual<br />

concentration<br />

Мах Min MPC<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> days with average<br />

concentration above the MPC<br />

147


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Sulfur dioxide [ g/m 3 ] 22,53 52,02 0 150 0<br />

Smoke [ g/m 3 ] 7,92 44,41 0 50 0<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> these polluting substances is within the maximum permissible concentrations<br />

(MPC) specified in Article 4 <strong>of</strong> the Law on Air Pollution applicable in that period.<br />

The average monthly concentrations <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006 are shown in<br />

Table 15 and Figure 41.<br />

Table 15 Average monthly concentrations <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006<br />

Polluting<br />

substance<br />

Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July August Sep Oct Nov Dec<br />

Sulfur dioxide 19,36 26,71 29,60 27,59 22,41 16,92 21,80 18,62 19,90<br />

Smoke 11,84 9,06 9,06 9,01 4,59 6,58 6,98 5,60 9,30<br />

Figure 41 Average monthly concentrations <strong>of</strong> sulfur dioxide and smoke for 2006<br />

Data presented shows clearly that the concentrations <strong>of</strong> these polluting substances are<br />

higher during winter period <strong>of</strong> the year, than during the summer period when concentrations<br />

are relatively low.<br />

Generally, the overall analysis conducted so far lead to the conclusion that Ohrid is relatively<br />

clean urban environment where no increasing <strong>of</strong> the concentrations <strong>of</strong> the two polluting<br />

substances have been recorded above MPC.<br />

The limit values <strong>of</strong> the levels and types <strong>of</strong> polluting substances in the ambient air are<br />

presented in the following tables.<br />

148


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Table 16 Limit values for protection <strong>of</strong> ecosystems and vegetation<br />

Polluting substance Protection Average period Limit value<br />

Sulfur dioxide - SO 2 Ecosystems Year winter period 20 µg/m³<br />

Nitric oxide (NO + NO 2) Vegetation Year 30 µg/m³<br />

Source: Annual report <strong>of</strong> processed data on the quality <strong>of</strong> the environment -2008; MEPP<br />

Table 17 Limit values for human health protection<br />

Pollutants<br />

Sulfur dioxide - SO 2<br />

Nitric oxide<br />

PM 10<br />

Carbone monoxide<br />

Average period<br />

Maximum daily 8-hour<br />

average<br />

Limit value to be<br />

reached in 2012<br />

year<br />

Allowed number<br />

<strong>of</strong> bridging over<br />

the year<br />

Limit value for<br />

20008 year<br />

1 hour 350 µg/m³ 24 470 µg/m³<br />

24 hour 125 µg/m³ 3 125 µg/m³<br />

1 hour 200 µg/m³ 18 280 µg/m³<br />

1 year 40 µg/m³ 0 56 µg/m³<br />

24 hour 50 µg/m³ 35 67 µg/m³<br />

1 year 40 µg/m³ 0 54 µg/m³<br />

10 mg/m³<br />

0<br />

15 µg/m³<br />

Lead 1 year 0,5 µg/m³ 0 0,9 µg/m³<br />

C 6H 6 1 year 5 µg/m³ 0 9 µg/m³<br />

Source: Annual report <strong>of</strong> processed data on the quality <strong>of</strong> the environment -2008; MEPP<br />

For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this Study, air quality measurements were conducted along the railway<br />

line route for particulate matter. The exact points <strong>of</strong> conducted measurements with<br />

coordinates are presented on the next Figure. The results obtained are presented in<br />

Appendix 3.<br />

149


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 42 Measurements <strong>of</strong> dust in the air<br />

3.10 Environmental noise in the area<br />

Emission <strong>of</strong> noise in the environment has been primarily identified in relation to the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> technology, industry and transport.<br />

According to the Law on the Protection against Environmental Law (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no.79/07), environmental noise is the noise caused by undesired or<br />

harmful external sound generated by human activities imposed from the nearby surrounding<br />

and causes nuisance and annoyance, including the noise released from means <strong>of</strong><br />

transportation, i.e. road, railway and air transport and sites <strong>of</strong> industrial activity.<br />

Nuisance related to noise means annoyance caused by emission <strong>of</strong> sound which is frequent<br />

and/or lasting, generated in a given time and place, which impedes or has impact on the<br />

people’s common activity or work, concentration, rest and sleeping.<br />

150


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Nuisance related to noise is defined through the extent <strong>of</strong> annoyance <strong>of</strong> the population by<br />

the noise determined by way <strong>of</strong> field surveys or inspections.The limit values <strong>of</strong> the basic<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> environmental noise are specified in the Rulebook on the limit values <strong>of</strong> noise<br />

level (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 147/08).<br />

According to the extent <strong>of</strong> protection against noise, the limit values <strong>of</strong> the basic indicators <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental noise caused by different sources should not exceede:<br />

Table 18 Noise levels<br />

Field differentiated by the degree <strong>of</strong><br />

protection against noise<br />

Noise level expressed in dB<br />

Lд Lв Lн<br />

Range <strong>of</strong> first degree 50 50 40<br />

Range <strong>of</strong> second degree 55 55 45<br />

Range <strong>of</strong> third degree 60 60 55<br />

Range <strong>of</strong> fourth degree 70 70 60<br />

o Ld – day (period from 07,00 to 19,00 hours)<br />

o Le – evening (period from 19,00 to 23,00 hours)<br />

o Ln – night (period from 23,00 to 07,00 hours)<br />

According to the extent <strong>of</strong> protection against noise, the areas are determined by the<br />

Rulebook on the location <strong>of</strong> measuring stations and measuring points (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 120/08).<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Area <strong>of</strong> I extent <strong>of</strong> protection against noise is area intended for tourism and recreation,<br />

area in the close vicinity <strong>of</strong> health care institution for hospital treatment and area <strong>of</strong><br />

national parks and nature reserves.<br />

Area <strong>of</strong> II extent <strong>of</strong> protection against noise is area intended primarily for stay, i.e.<br />

residential area, area in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> buildings intended for training and education<br />

activity, facilities for social welfare intended for accomodation <strong>of</strong> children and elderly<br />

persons and facilities for primary health care, area <strong>of</strong> play grounds and public parks,<br />

public green areas and recreation areas and sites within local parks.<br />

Area <strong>of</strong> III extent <strong>of</strong> protection against noise is area where undertaking in the<br />

environment is allowed, where causing <strong>of</strong> noise will be less disturbing, i.e. commercial<br />

- business - residential area, which is at the same time intended for stay, or where<br />

there are facilities with protected premises, artisan and similar activities <strong>of</strong> production<br />

(mixed area), area intended for agricultural activity and public centres, where<br />

administrative, commercial, service and catering activities are performed.<br />

Area <strong>of</strong> IV extent <strong>of</strong> protection against noise is area where undertaking in the<br />

environment is allowed, which may cause disturbance with noise, area without<br />

dwellings, intended for industrial or artisan or similar activities <strong>of</strong> production, transport<br />

151


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

activities, storage activities and service activities and public activities generating<br />

significant noise.<br />

Under the Decision on determination <strong>of</strong> the cases in which and conditions under which the<br />

peace <strong>of</strong> citizens is considered disturbed by harmful noise (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Macedonia no. 01/09), the activities by which, in case they produce noise in excess <strong>of</strong> the<br />

limit values <strong>of</strong> noise levels, the peace <strong>of</strong> the citizens is disrupted, are identified.<br />

In absence <strong>of</strong> well developed state monitoring network, there is no measurement data<br />

available for environmental noise levels in the wider area <strong>of</strong> the subject location.<br />

Consequently, there are no planning documents for noise management, i.e. strategic map<br />

and action plan.<br />

Measurements <strong>of</strong> noise levels have been conducted along the railway line route. The values<br />

<strong>of</strong> the conducted measurements are presented in Appendix 4.<br />

Figure 43 Noise measuring points<br />

152


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

3.11 Biological diversity<br />

3.11.1 Biogeographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area<br />

Biogeographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area are presented through the division <strong>of</strong> biomes by<br />

Matvejev (Matvejev 1995: in Lopatin & Matvejev 1995; Matvejev & Puncer 1989) and in<br />

accordance with climate-vegetation-soil zones (regions) by Filipovski at al. (1996).<br />

1. Biomes <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean evergreen<br />

forests and maquis (the clip <strong>of</strong> the map<br />

does not contain such biomes)<br />

2. Biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean,<br />

predominantly deciduous forests and<br />

shruberries<br />

3. Biome <strong>of</strong> South-European, primarily<br />

deciduous forests (ecotonic-vykarian<br />

landscapes are marked 23, 32 and 321-<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> numbers is related to the<br />

prevailing ecological characteristics;<br />

landscapes with steppe elements are<br />

marked with 263 and 236)<br />

4. Biomes <strong>of</strong> European, primarily needleshape<br />

leaved forests <strong>of</strong> boreal type (these<br />

landscapes with elements <strong>of</strong> deciduous<br />

forests are marked with 43; deciduous<br />

forests with elements <strong>of</strong> needle-shape<br />

leaved forests are marked with 34)<br />

5. Biomes <strong>of</strong> Alpine rock grounds, pastures<br />

and snow fields <strong>of</strong> Alpine-Nordic type<br />

6. Biomes <strong>of</strong> steppe and forest-steppes (the<br />

map clip does not contain such biomes)<br />

7. Biomes <strong>of</strong> rocky grounds, pastures and<br />

rocky ground forests on<br />

(oro)Mediterranean<br />

mountains<br />

(oromediterranean elements in sub<br />

Mediterranean forests are 27, in<br />

deciduous 37, in boreal 47 or combined<br />

347, 437, 743 or 473).<br />

Figure 44 Biomes in southwestern part <strong>of</strong> Macedonia (by Matvejev & Puncer 1989)<br />

3.11.2 Biomes<br />

According to the division <strong>of</strong> biomes <strong>of</strong> Matvejev & Puncer (1989), the corridor <strong>of</strong> the<br />

planned railway line Kicevo-Radozda belongs to the biome <strong>of</strong> South-European,<br />

primarily deciduous forests and biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean, predominantly<br />

deciduous forests and shrubberies (Figure 44).<br />

153


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean, predominantly deciduous forests and<br />

shruberries spreads over most <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor. The most outstanding<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> climate is well expressed arid period in the course <strong>of</strong> the summer,<br />

while maximum precipitations take place during spring and autumn. More thermopile<br />

segments <strong>of</strong> the lowest parts <strong>of</strong> Kicevo valley, the valley <strong>of</strong> Sateska river in Ohrid<br />

gorge and shore area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake between Struga and Radozda are situated here.<br />

This biome includes also most <strong>of</strong> the areas adjacent to the route <strong>of</strong> the planned<br />

railway line. From among plant communities specific for this biome, we find<br />

Quercetum frainetto-cerris, as well as elements <strong>of</strong> Querco-Carpinetum orientalis (on<br />

lower parts) along the line. All biocenoses are characterized with the animal life<br />

forms Xeroaestisilvicola and Xeroaestidrymicola (Matvejev 1995). Plants, besides<br />

trees, are dominated by terophytes and criptophytes. Plant species most specific for<br />

the biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean, predominantly deciduous forests and shruberries,<br />

in the observed corridor, include: Quercus pubescens, Quercus frainetto, Quercus<br />

trojana, Quercus cerris, Carpinus orientalis, Ostrya carpinifolia, Corylus colurna,<br />

Crataegus orientalis, Acer tataricum, Acer hyrcanum, Acer monspessulanum,<br />

Syringa vulgaris and Tilia argentea.<br />

The most specific vertebrate species include:<br />

Amphibians and reptiles: Testudo hermanni, Lacerta trilineata and Ablepharus<br />

kitaibelii.<br />

Birds: Parus lugubris, Dendrocopus syriacus, Ficedula semitorquata, Streptopelia<br />

decaocto and Accipiter brevipes.<br />

Mammals: Dryomys nitedula, Apodemus flavicollis, Glis glis and Erinaceus<br />

roumanicus.<br />

The most important habitats found within the analyzed corridor are the following:<br />

Natural habitats: Italian and Turkey oak forests, forests <strong>of</strong> Hop hornbeam (Ostryo-<br />

Carpinion orientalis), forests dominated by Macedonian oak (Quercus trojana), as<br />

well as alder belts along rivers and riverby belts <strong>of</strong> willows and poplars (listed in<br />

Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat Directive).<br />

Seminatural and antropogeneous habitats: degraded forests <strong>of</strong> Hop<br />

hornbeam, Acacia plantations, orchards under apricots, peaches, almonds,<br />

walnuts and quinces, vineyards, fields with/without boundaries, alleys,<br />

gardens, villages, towns.<br />

Biome <strong>of</strong> South European predominantly deciduous forests occupies the highest parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> the observed corridor. From among plant communities specific for this biome, Sessile oak<br />

forest (Orno-Quercetum petraeae) can be found within the boundaries <strong>of</strong> the corridor.<br />

Animal life forms specific for the observed area include Theroaestisilvicola and<br />

Herboaestisilvicola (Matvejev, 1995), minor share <strong>of</strong> evergreen phaerophytes is<br />

characteristic here. The most important plant species in this biome include: Quercus<br />

petraea, Fagus sylvatica, Carpinus betulus, Corylus avellana, Berberis vulgaris,<br />

Sorbus aucuparia, Evonymus europaea, Acer campestre, Acer pseudoplatanus,<br />

Sorbus torminalis, Tilia platyphyllos, Ligustrum vulgare, Viburnum opulus, Prunus<br />

avium and Convallaria majalis. Specific vertebrate species are the following:<br />

154


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Amphibians and reptiles: Triturus cristatus, Salamandra salamandra, Rana<br />

dalmatina, Hyla arborea, Anguis fragilis, Lacerta agilis, Natrix natrix.<br />

Birds: Phylloscopus sibilatrix, Turdus philomelos, Parus caeruleus, Phoenicurus<br />

phoenicurus, Erithacus rubecula, Dendrocopus leucotos, Coccothraustes<br />

coccothraustes, Strix aluco.<br />

Mammals: Capreolus capreolus, Clethrionomys glareolus, Glis glis, Muscardinus<br />

avellanarius.<br />

The most important habitats found within the analyzed corridor are the following:<br />

Natural habitats: Sessile oak forests, woodlots, rivers and clearings within oak<br />

forests.<br />

Seminatural and antropogeneous habitats: degraded forests, meadows,<br />

orchards under apples, plums, pears, cherries, meadows under alfa-alfa, fields<br />

under wheat crops, gardens, alleys and several villages.<br />

3.11.3 Climate-vegetation-soil zones<br />

According to the division made by Filipovski et al. (1996), there are eight climate-vegetationsoil<br />

zones in Macedonia. Most <strong>of</strong> the corridor <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line Kicevo-Radozda<br />

belongs to the warm continental area. Much smaller part belongs to the cold continental<br />

area. Elements <strong>of</strong> continental sub-Mediterranean area occur near Kicevo and Struga.<br />

155


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 45 Climate-vegetation-soil zones in Southwestern part <strong>of</strong> Macedonia (by Filipovski at al. 1996)<br />

The warm continental area occupies the lower parts <strong>of</strong> all valleys in western Macedonia,<br />

between 600 and 900 m a.s.l. The total area it covers in Macedonia is 7400 km 2 or 27.4%.<br />

Prevailing and climate zonal plant community in this area is the Italian and Turkey oak forest<br />

community (Quercetum frainetto-cerris macedonicum Oberd. emend. H-t). Italian and Turkey<br />

oak forests in most <strong>of</strong> the western Macedonia are the first and lowest forest community. In<br />

practice, the whole route <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line passes through this area.<br />

156


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 46 Italian and Turkey oak forest near village Arbinovo<br />

At the very beginning <strong>of</strong> the analyzed corridor, we find elements <strong>of</strong> continental – sub-<br />

Mediterranean area, which is more specific for central and eastern parts <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia. In the western part <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, continental – sub-Mediterranean area spreads<br />

over the gorges <strong>of</strong> the rivers Crn Drim, Radika, as well as Skopje and Veles valleys. This<br />

area covers total area <strong>of</strong> 8970 km 2 or 34.9% <strong>of</strong> the national territory <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. It usually<br />

occupies parts up to 600 m a.s.l. Climate zonal community is the forest <strong>of</strong> the eastern<br />

hornbeam and Downy oak (Querco-Carpinetum orientalis macedonicum Rud. apud H-t).<br />

Such elements can be found along the shore area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake, between villages Kalista<br />

and Radozda as well.<br />

These two zones overlap with the biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean, predominantly deciduous<br />

forests and shrubberies, according to Matvejev.<br />

Cold continental area occupies higher parts <strong>of</strong> the mountains, above the warm continental<br />

area, between 900 and 1100 m a.s.l. The total area covered by this area in Macedonia is<br />

3420 km 2 or 13.3%. Climate zonal community is the forest <strong>of</strong> Sessile oak (Orno-Quercetum<br />

petraeae Em). This zone overlaps with the biome <strong>of</strong> South European, predominantly<br />

deciduous forests, according to Matvejev.<br />

157


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

3.11.4 DESCRIPTION OF ECOSYSTEMS AND HABITATS<br />

3.11.4.1 Zonal natural forests<br />

3.11.4.1.1 Downy oak-Hop hornbeam forests (Querco-Carpinetum orientalis) 10<br />

Downy oak-Hop hornbeam forests are not typical forest ecosystem in the frames <strong>of</strong> the<br />

analyzed corridor <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line Kicevo-Radozda.<br />

This ecosystem belongs to the zonal biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean, predominantly deciduous<br />

forests and shrubberies.<br />

Specific plant community is Querco-Carpinetum orientalis macedonicum Rud. 39 apud<br />

Ht. 1946. This thermophilic community grows mostly on skeletal soils (silicate or carbonate).<br />

The main edificators in these forests are the eastern hornbeam (Carpinus orientalis) and<br />

Downy oak (Quercus pubescens). Apart from these species, the community usually includes<br />

other woody species, such as: Juniperus oxycedrus, Rubus sanguineus, Pyrus<br />

amygdaliformis, Cornus mas, Colutea arborescens, Coronilla emeroides, Prunus spinosa,<br />

Acer monspessulanum, A. tataricum, Crataegus monogyna, Ulmus campestris, Rhamnus<br />

rhodopaea, Asparagus acutifolius, Ruscus aculeatus, Hedera helix. In the storey <strong>of</strong> grass<br />

plants, the following species grow: Cyclamen neapolitanum, Lathyrus venetus, Anemone<br />

apenina, Lithospermum purpureoviolaceum, Lamium purpureum, Cardamine graeca, Carex<br />

halleriana and other species. During field investigations, in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> Kicevo, individual<br />

trunks <strong>of</strong> black pine (Pinus nigra) were found as well.<br />

Mammals are represented by high number <strong>of</strong> species, namely: Vulpes vulpes, Felis<br />

sylvestris, Canis lupus, Canis aureus, Meles meles, Martes foina, Mustela nivalis, Lepus<br />

europaeus, Apodemus flavicollis, Apodemus sylvicollis, Glis glis. From among birds, many<br />

species were found during field investigations, the most numerous <strong>of</strong> which include:<br />

Streptopelia turtur, Oriolus oriolus, Erithacus rubecula, Fringilla coelebs, Troglodytes<br />

troglodytes, Carduelis chloris, Aegithalos caudatus, Turdus merula, Turdus viscivorus, etc.<br />

Birds species specific for Downy oak-Hop hornbeam forests in this area include: Parus<br />

lugubris Sylvia cantillans and Dendrocopus syriacus. Herpet<strong>of</strong>auna is also rich: Rana<br />

dalmatina, Bufo bufo, Bufo viridis, Coluber jugularis, Anguis fragilis, Podarcis muralis,<br />

Podarcis erhardii rivetti, Lacerta viridis, Lacerta trilineata, Ablepharus kitaibeli, Testudo<br />

graeca, Testudo hermanni. From among insects, the most specific species are the following:<br />

Carabus convexus, Calosoma sycophanta, Calosoma inquisitor, Myas chalybaeus, Cymindis<br />

lineata, Cymindis axillaris, Brachinus explodens, Brachinus crepitans, Calathus fuscipes,<br />

Calathus melanocephalus. Butterflies are most frequently represented by Nymphalis<br />

polychloros, Lybithea celtis, Vanessa atalanta, Colias crocea, Polyommatus icarus,<br />

Gonepteryx rhamni, etc.<br />

10<br />

EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I) does not cover these forests as priority habitats for<br />

conservation<br />

158


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 47 Remains <strong>of</strong> Downy oak and Hop hornbeam forests near Kicevo<br />

This community is widely spread in Adriatic and Aegean sub-Mediterranean region. In<br />

Macedonia, is spreads mainly in central and eastern parts. In the valley <strong>of</strong> Vardar River, it is<br />

climate zonal community which climbs up to 600 m a.s.l., and on southern slopes reaches up<br />

to 1000 m a.s.l.<br />

Within the observed corridor, we find strongly degraded Downy oak and Hop hornbeam<br />

forests on minor areas, which <strong>of</strong>ten look like hilly pastures with remains/elements <strong>of</strong> Downy<br />

oak and Hop hornbeam forests. These include more thermophilic parts <strong>of</strong> the lowest parts <strong>of</strong><br />

Kicevo valley (fragments), the valley <strong>of</strong> Sateska Reka in Debrca (along the stretch from the<br />

village Botun to the village Pesocani) and shore area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake, between Struga and<br />

Radozda (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />

3.11.4.2 Italian and Turkey oak forests (Quercetum frainetto-cerris macedonicum) 11<br />

Italian and Turkey oak forests, together with Downy oak and Hop hornbeam forests belong<br />

to zonal biome <strong>of</strong> sub-Mediterranean predominantly deciduous forests and shrubberies.<br />

These forests grow most <strong>of</strong>ten on deep soils <strong>of</strong> silicate, and sometimes carbonate substrate.<br />

Quercetum frainetto-cerris macedonicum Oberd. emend. H-t. is specific phytocenosis.<br />

The most important plant species include: Quercus frainetto, Q. cerris, Q. pubescens, Acer<br />

campestre, Acer tataricum, Carpinus orientalis, Crataegus monogyna, Fraxinus ornus,<br />

Prunus spinosa, Pyrus piraster, Sorbus torminalis, Cornus mas, Corylus avellana,<br />

Sambucus nigra, Rubus discolor, Clematis vitalba, Prunus vulgaris, Ostrya carpinifolia,<br />

Juniperus oxycedrus, Evonymus verrucosa, Geranium sanguineum, Euphorbia cyparissias,<br />

11 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 9280 Quercus frainetto woods (Italian oak forests)<br />

159


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Asparugus acutifolius, Hieracium pilosella, Digitalis lanata, Lathyrus venetus, Festuca<br />

heterophylla, Melica uniflora, Symphytum tuberosum, Anemone apenina, Primula acaulis,<br />

Aremonia agrimonoides, Viola alba, Cyclamen neapolitanum, Veronica chamaedrys, etc.<br />

Forests are in most <strong>of</strong> their area dominated by Italian oak, while Turkey oak is less<br />

abundant. The latter prevails on the hill Cartojca, in the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, between<br />

the villages Arbinovo and Izdeglavje.<br />

The fauna in Italian and Turkey oak forests is very similar with the one in Downy oak and<br />

Hop hornbeam forests. The most important difference is connected with the extent <strong>of</strong><br />

degradation <strong>of</strong> forest habitats - Downy oak and Hop hornbeam forests are much more<br />

degraded and occupy much smaller areas. Ornith<strong>of</strong>auna is represented by high number <strong>of</strong><br />

species, the following being more specific: Dendrocopos major, Dendrocopos medius, Picus<br />

viridis, Columba palumbus, etc. Forests within and by the corridor <strong>of</strong>fer nesting opportunities<br />

for some <strong>of</strong> the most important species, which were not recorded during field observations,<br />

but still included in the analysis in order to apply the precaution principle. Among them, the<br />

following are the most important: Aquila pomarina and Ficedula semitorquata. The most<br />

important representatives <strong>of</strong> mammals are the following species: Vulpes vulpes, Canis<br />

lupus, Ursus arctos, Meles meles, Martes foina, Mustela nivalis, Mustela putorius, Lepus<br />

europaeus, Apodemus flavicollis, Apodemus sylvicollis, Glis glis. Herpet<strong>of</strong>auna is<br />

represented by relatively high number <strong>of</strong> species: Rana dalmatina, Bufo bufo, Bufo viridis,<br />

Coluber jugularis, Anguis fragilis, Podarcis muralis, Podarcis erhardii rivetti, Lacerta viridis,<br />

Ablepharus kitaibeli, Testudo graeca, Testudo hermanni. From among insects, the following<br />

species are the most important: Myas chalybaeus, Carabus intricatus, Carabus violaceus,<br />

Carabus convexus, Molops rufipes, Harpalus serripes, Harpalus dimidiatus, Amara eurynota,<br />

Amara aenea, Calathus fuscipes, Calathus melanocephalus.<br />

This forest community spreads only on the Balkan Peninsula, and in Macedonia it is climate<br />

zonal community in the warm continental area. It is found in all valleys in our country, usually<br />

above 600 m a.s.l. Considering that it is mentioned in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Habitat and wild<br />

species Directive, this forest habitat enjoys the status <strong>of</strong> conservation in Europe, although it<br />

is widely distributed in Macedonia.<br />

In the frames <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor, it is a dominant forest community covering the<br />

largest areas <strong>of</strong> all forest habitats (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />

3.11.4.3 Chestnut forests (Castaneo-Quercetum macedonicum) 12<br />

Chestnut forests belong to the biome <strong>of</strong> South European predominantly deciduous forests. In<br />

Macedonia, they are found in Italian and Turkey oak, and even in Downy oak and Hop<br />

hornbeam belts. All chestnut forests in Macedonia belong to association Castaneo-<br />

Quercetum macedonicum (Nik. 1951) Wen. 1965 (syn: Castanetum sativae-macedonicum<br />

Nik. 1951) <strong>of</strong> the alliance Castaneo-Quercion Soõ (1962) 1964. Most <strong>of</strong>ten they grow on<br />

heavy clayey soils, and they are very diverse by their floristic composition. Chestnut forests<br />

in Macedonia are not extremely acidophilic, and they are relatively thermophilic.<br />

Besides chestnut (Castanea sativa), fragmented chestnut forests also include significant<br />

number <strong>of</strong> woody plants from the adjacent Italian and Turkey oak woods (Quercus frainetto,<br />

Q. pubescens, Q. cerris). Most <strong>of</strong> the chestnut forests within the observed corridor are<br />

modified under the influence <strong>of</strong> man. Chestnut forests have been limited to minor woods or<br />

12 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 9260 Castanea sativa woods (chestnut forests)<br />

160


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

boundaries <strong>of</strong> numerous small meadows. Therefore, we can also find other fruit trees there,<br />

such as Prunus cerasus, P. cerasifera, P. spinosa, Juglans regia, Pyrus pyraster.<br />

In the storey <strong>of</strong> shrubs, the following species were found: Coronilla emerus ssp. emeroides,<br />

Lonicera caprifolium, Cytisus nigricans, Hedera helix. The storey <strong>of</strong> grass plants<br />

accommodates the following species: Tammus communis, Helleborus odorus, Ranunculus<br />

ficaria, Viola odorata, Cyclamen hederifolium.<br />

Chestnut forests in Macedonia are under threat <strong>of</strong> degradation and extinction due to the<br />

widely spread viral diseases and cutting <strong>of</strong> high quality wood. They are important at<br />

European level, too.<br />

The fauna <strong>of</strong> vertebrates is very similar to the one <strong>of</strong> Downy oak and Hop hornbeam and<br />

Italian and Turkey oak woods, but the number <strong>of</strong> dead trunks along the stretch from the<br />

village Radozda to the border makes us expect that there is high number <strong>of</strong> specific bird<br />

species (Picus canus, Strix aluco,Certhia bachydactyla, etc.)<br />

The only chestnut forests within the investigated corridor, in a form <strong>of</strong> fragments, are found<br />

between the village Radozda and Macedonian-<strong>Albania</strong>n border at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 750 to 850<br />

m (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />

3.11.4.4 Sessile oak forests (Orno-Quercetum petraeae) 13<br />

Sessile oak forests belong to the cold continental area where climate zonal community<br />

exists. They are included in the zoo-biome <strong>of</strong> South European predominantly deciduous<br />

forests.<br />

The main plant community is Orno-Quercetum petraeae Em 1968. It grows on shady and<br />

rather humid slopes. In deep river valleys, it may go down to 600 m a.s.l., and in sunny<br />

slopes it climbs up to 1300 m a.s.l. There are optimum conditions for the growth <strong>of</strong> this<br />

community in the altitudinal belt between 900 and 1100 m a.s.l. Soils are skeletal, acid, they<br />

grow on siliceous substrate, and the most frequent soil type are the brown forest soils<br />

(cambisols).<br />

Floristic composition <strong>of</strong> these forests is poorer compared to Italian and Turkey oak and<br />

Downy oak and Hop hornbeam woods. Sessile oak (Quercus petraea) is edificator. Although<br />

not mentioned in the pr<strong>of</strong>essional literature, frequently found species <strong>of</strong> this community in<br />

the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest is the oak Quercus dalechampii which is also known among people<br />

under the name “gorun”. Other tree species also grow in the storey <strong>of</strong> trees, such as:<br />

Fraxinus ornus, Sorbus torminalis, Acer hyrcanum, Acer tataricum and Tilia tomentosa.<br />

Grass storey is represented by Luzula forsteri, Trifolium balcanicum, Lathyrus venetus,<br />

Festuca heterophylla, Cynanchum speciosum, etc.<br />

This forest community spreads in western parts <strong>of</strong> the Balkan Peninsula. In Macedonia, it is<br />

spread throughout the national territory.<br />

Within the investigated corridor, Sessile oak forests occupy the highest slopes, while in river<br />

valleys they go lower as well. Sessile oak forests have been recorded in dales south <strong>of</strong> the<br />

village Pesocani and on a part <strong>of</strong> the hill Cartoica between villages Arbinovo and Izdeglavje.<br />

They are most widely spread between the villages Judovo and Slivovo, but the line passes<br />

13 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I) does not cover these forests as habitats with conservation<br />

priority<br />

161


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

through this part through a long tunnel, and therefore Sessile oak forests are not mapped<br />

(please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />

3.11.5 Azonal forests<br />

Azonal forests in the investigated corridor grow along the courses <strong>of</strong> rivers, streams and<br />

canals.<br />

3.11.5.1 Alder belts and woodlots (Carici elongatae-Alnetum glutinosae) 14<br />

Alder belts grow along rivers and streams. The alder (Alnus glutinosa) is edificatory in these<br />

belts. Besides alder, other woody and shrub species are also found here, such as: Carpinus<br />

betulus, Salix amplexicaulis, Rubus discolor, Juglans regia, Clematis vitalba, Humulus<br />

lupulus, Sambucus nigra, etc. In the storey <strong>of</strong> grass plants, we find Caltha palustris,<br />

Ranunculus ficaria, Lamium purpureum, L. Maculatum and other species.<br />

Alder belts and woodlots <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor belong to the alliance <strong>of</strong> Alnion<br />

glutinosae (Malcuit 1929) Meijer Drees 1936. There are several representative communities<br />

<strong>of</strong> this alliance in Macedonia, in its western parts, including: Geo coccinei-Alnetum Em 1964,<br />

Fraxino-Alnetum glutinosae Lj. Micevski & J. Matveeva 1978 and Carici elongatae-Alnetum<br />

glutinosae. The former community is found on higher altitudes. The latter community has<br />

been described from the gorge <strong>of</strong> the river Treska between Makedonski Brod and Matka.<br />

Alder communities in the region <strong>of</strong> Debrca belong to the third community, i.e. Carici<br />

elongatae-Alnetum glutinosae.<br />

Ornith<strong>of</strong>auna is represented by several species, the most specific among them being:<br />

Motacilla cinerea, Cinclus cinclus, Dendrocopos major, Parus palustris, Picus viridis, etc.<br />

High number <strong>of</strong> species are absent because <strong>of</strong> the degraded status <strong>of</strong> these belts.<br />

Herpet<strong>of</strong>auna is very rich (almost all amphibian species are found along small rivers or<br />

flooded areas covering these forests, as well as high number <strong>of</strong> reptiles, including grass<br />

snake Natrix natrix and Aesculapian Snake (Elaphe longissima). Fauna <strong>of</strong> mammals is not<br />

well studied, but the following species have been confirmed along rivers: otter Lutra lutra,<br />

water shrew Neomys sp, wildcats Felis silvestris, etc.<br />

Alder woodlots in Macedonia are very rare. They have been destroyed on most <strong>of</strong> their<br />

former habitats, together with marshes drainage after the Second World War. The only well<br />

preserved stand is found in Belciste marsh, near by the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest, but it is also <strong>of</strong><br />

significance that some <strong>of</strong> the rather well preserved stands are found within the subject<br />

corridor itself.<br />

These forests have had similar destiny in the whole <strong>of</strong> Europe and therefore they have not<br />

only been listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the Habitats and wild species Directive, but they have high<br />

conservation priority (*). This means that every EU Member State has to designate protected<br />

area within the spread <strong>of</strong> these habitats (Natura 2000 area) for the purpose <strong>of</strong> their efficient<br />

conservation.<br />

In the frames <strong>of</strong> investigated corridor, alder belts have been observed over most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, along the rivers Brzdanska, Judovska and Vilipica (village<br />

Slivovo), as well s along other watercourses and canals in ravine areas (villages Botun,<br />

14 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 91E0 * Alluvial forests with Alnus glutinosa and Fraxinus excelsior<br />

(Alno-Padion, Alnion incanae, Salicion albae) (alluvial alder and willow forests and minor forests)<br />

162


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Volino). Alder woodlots or their remains have been observed in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the villages<br />

Arbinovo and Botun (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />

3.11.5.2 Willow belts (Salicetum albае-fragilis) 15<br />

Willow belts are far less abundant in the frames <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor than alder belts.<br />

They spread along rivers, i.e. on places flooded during spring, while during summer water<br />

drains deeper in soil layers, but it is still in root zone. The soil is sandy and sludgy, porous<br />

and rich in mineral matters.<br />

Community <strong>of</strong> willow belts belongs to the alliance Salicion albae Soô (1930) 1940 and<br />

association Salicetum albo-fragilis Issler 26 em. Soô 57.<br />

The storey <strong>of</strong> trees is dominated by white willow (Salix alba), and the following species have<br />

been observed along it: Salix fragilis, Populus alba, Salix amplexicaulis, Alnus glutinosa. In<br />

the storey <strong>of</strong> grass plants the following species occur: Arum italicum, Lamium purpureum, L.<br />

maculatum, Lycopus europaeus, Solanum dulcamara, Eupatorium cannabinum.<br />

Fauna is very similar with the one in alder belts; from among birds, the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

penduline tit Remiz pendulinus is specific.<br />

Specific representatives <strong>of</strong> invertebrates include the following species: Arion subfuscus,<br />

Helix lucorum, Balea serbica (snails) and Pterostichus niger, Anchomenus dorsalis, Platynus<br />

assimilis, Nebria brevicollis, Bembidion decorum (ground beetles - Carabidae).<br />

Willow belts are threatened in Europe due to canalization <strong>of</strong> rivers (Annex I <strong>of</strong> Habitat<br />

Directive). The situation in our country is similar.<br />

Short willow belts have been recorded within the investigated corridor along the river<br />

Sateska, and the best developed ones grow northwest <strong>of</strong> the village Izdeglavje, at the site<br />

Staro Selo. Riparian belts near the motel Pocinka (village Arbinovo) are characterized by<br />

abundant presence <strong>of</strong> white poplar (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />

3.11.5.3 Remains <strong>of</strong> marsh oak forests (Quercus robur) 16<br />

Forests <strong>of</strong> the alliance Quercion robori-petraeae Br.-Bl. 1932 (or Alno-Quercion roboris Ht<br />

1937) grow on deep clayey soils flooded during spring due to the rise in the level <strong>of</strong><br />

groundwater, and less <strong>of</strong>ten due to overflow <strong>of</strong> river waters.<br />

These woodlots are very rare and cover very small areas in Macedonia.<br />

Along the course <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, by the village Moroista, we noted remains <strong>of</strong> the<br />

community Quercetum pedunculiflorae macedonicum Em. Several preserved trunks (15)<br />

<strong>of</strong> Quercus robur have gigantic dimensions (the fattest tree has a rim <strong>of</strong> 6.7 m) and grow in<br />

the yard <strong>of</strong> the church St.Bogorodica and cover an area <strong>of</strong> 0.8 ha.<br />

This is the only stand <strong>of</strong> its kind in Macedonia, and therefore it has been proposed for<br />

protection as “monument <strong>of</strong> nature” under the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />

15 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 91E0 * Alluvial forests with Alnus glutinosa and Fraxinus<br />

excelsior (Alno-Padion, Alnion incanae, Salicion albae) (alluvial alder and willow forests and minor<br />

forests)<br />

16 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 9190 Old acidophilous oak woods with Quercus robur on sandy<br />

plains<br />

163


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

(2000-2020). This site is beyond the investigated corridor. In Macedonia, this community is<br />

potentially distributed in Pelagonia, Polog, Kicevo Valley and Vardar Valley, too.<br />

Remains <strong>of</strong> these woodlots within the investigated corridor can probably be found along the<br />

canals in Strusko Pole (fields), but due to their extremely fragmented status and full<br />

degradation, they do not compose individual habitat and thus they are not presented on the<br />

Map <strong>of</strong> habitats in Appendix 6 and 7).<br />

Figure 48 Truffle oak (Quercus robur) in the village Moroista<br />

164


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

3.11.6 Open areas - pastures<br />

Hilly pastures are poorly represented in the investigated corridor. These are secondary<br />

habitats existing on areas on which forest ecosystems grow primarily, at altitude <strong>of</strong> up to<br />

1200 m. Therefore, within the habitat <strong>of</strong> hilly pastures, we may find various succession<br />

stages, from open pastures to strongly degraded woods (Downy oak and Hop hornbeam and<br />

Italian and Turkey oak woods). These habitats are characterized with great daily and<br />

seasonal amplitudes <strong>of</strong> air and soil temperatures and lower humidity (especially stressed<br />

during summer period). These ecological conditions are the reason for the specific spectrum<br />

<strong>of</strong> life forms, i.e. bigger abundance <strong>of</strong> thermophitic plants.<br />

In the frames <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> interest, most <strong>of</strong> the grass areas are in fact abandoned fields<br />

and meadows, which still lack typical characteristics <strong>of</strong> hilly pastures. Therefore, as well as<br />

for the fact that the period <strong>of</strong> elaboration <strong>of</strong> this Study did not allow field investigations (early<br />

spring), it was not possible to determine more precisely the affiliation <strong>of</strong> these grass areas.<br />

(please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />

Fauna <strong>of</strong> these habitats abounds <strong>of</strong> specific species, so that the most specific reptiles<br />

include Coluber caspius, Ablefarus kitaibelli, Vipera ammodytes, Podarcis taurica, P. erhardii<br />

rivetti, birds are represented by Anthus campestris, Lanius collurio, Lanuus minor, Lanius<br />

senator,Carduelis cannabina, etc.<br />

Hilly pastures, especially on calcareous ground, are habitats <strong>of</strong> priority for conservation<br />

under the European legislation.<br />

3.11.7 Rocky areas<br />

The investigated corridor comprises small areas <strong>of</strong> rocks and rocky grounds, which by their<br />

geological composition and vegetation may be calcareous or siliceous.<br />

Rocky habitats are characterized with very low biological production and extreme climate<br />

and soil conditions. Temperature oscillations are great during day and year. These habitats<br />

are characterized with low humidity because <strong>of</strong> the low water retention capacity <strong>of</strong><br />

indigenous substrate and poorly developed soils. Such ecological conditions induce the<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> specialized plant species (chasmophytes) and animals. Vegetation cover is<br />

poorly developed, and so the physiognomy <strong>of</strong> the habitat is determined by the composition<br />

and the structure <strong>of</strong> rocks. Yet, the presence <strong>of</strong> rare and endemic plant species is an<br />

important feature <strong>of</strong> these habitats.<br />

3.11.7.1 Calcareous rocks and rocky grounds 17<br />

Specific flora and vegetation grow on calcareous rocks and rocky grounds. Literature<br />

contains limited data on the composition <strong>of</strong> the flora and plant communities growing within<br />

the investigated corridor.<br />

Chasmophytes grow in the cracks <strong>of</strong> the rocks. During the field investigations, the following<br />

plant species were recorded: Sedum acre, С. album, Centaurea spp., Ceterach <strong>of</strong>ficinarum,<br />

Asplenium trichomanes, etc. This data is not sufficient to determine the synthaxonomic<br />

affiliation <strong>of</strong> these habitats.<br />

The best habitats on calcareous rocks have been recorded along the shore <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake,<br />

between the settlements Elen Kamen and Radozda (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats,<br />

Appendix 6 and 7). Given the small areas covered by these habitats in the investigated<br />

17 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 8210 Calcareous rocky slopes with chasmophytic vegetation<br />

165


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

corridor, they are not sites <strong>of</strong> conservation interest, although listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> EU Directive<br />

on habitats and wild species under the code 8210.<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> small areas they occupy, these habitats do not host any significant fauna<br />

species, i.e. only opportune and widely distributed representatives are present (Buteo rufinus<br />

was recorded away from the corridor).<br />

However, presence <strong>of</strong> some bat species is possible along small cracks and canals <strong>of</strong> the<br />

massif, and these are priority group for conservation.<br />

Figure 49 Calcareous rocks near the village Radozda<br />

3.11.7.2 Siliceous rocks 18<br />

Siliceous rocks are not specific habitat in the investigated corridor, because they occupy<br />

small areas and are scattered mostly over forest habitats. Therefore, flora composition <strong>of</strong><br />

siliceous rocks is similar with the composition <strong>of</strong> the surrounding habitats, but with<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> certain species, namely: Polypodium vulgare, Asplenium trichomanes,<br />

Asplenium septentrionale,<br />

Despite their low number <strong>of</strong> representation, they <strong>of</strong>fer potentially conditions for nesting <strong>of</strong><br />

certain bird species (there are records <strong>of</strong> nesting <strong>of</strong> ravens Corvus corax on most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sites, which is a precondition for the settlement <strong>of</strong> several species <strong>of</strong> kestrel (Falco<br />

tinnunculus, F. beregrinus, F. biarmcus), and Bubo bubo.<br />

18 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 8220 Siliceous rocky slopes with chasmophytic vegetation<br />

166


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Small areas with habitats on siliceous rocks were recorded on the left side <strong>of</strong> the river<br />

Sateska, near the village Pesocani and in the gorge <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska between the<br />

villages Arbinovo and Izdeglavje (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7). Given<br />

the small areas covered by these habitats in the investigated corridor, they are not sites <strong>of</strong><br />

conservation interest, although listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> EU Directive on habitats and wild species<br />

under the code 8220.<br />

3.11.8 Wetlands<br />

The territory <strong>of</strong> intended railway line route passes through moderate continental climate<br />

zone, situated between the mountains Ilinska, Karaorman and Jablanica. The designed<br />

railway line route is characterized with hilly relief in the region <strong>of</strong> Kicevo to the village<br />

Meseiste and plane marshy in the region <strong>of</strong> the village Meseiste to the village Kalista, at an<br />

altitude <strong>of</strong> 700-900 m. Mountains are characterized with exceptionally steep slopes<br />

separated in between with small and medium rivers.<br />

There are seven rivers within the corridor <strong>of</strong> the route, the following <strong>of</strong> which are bigger:<br />

Treska, Sateska and Crn Drim, while rivers Vilipica, Judovska, Brzdanska and Bukov Dol are<br />

more prominent in the group <strong>of</strong> smaller ones. Besides, the corridor hosts significant number<br />

<strong>of</strong> springs, nameless streams, drainage canals (artificial water bodies), the canal <strong>of</strong> the river<br />

Sateska (modified water body), as well as non-permanent water bodies, such as flooded<br />

areas (during spring upon rivers overflow), swamps, marshes (remains <strong>of</strong> Struga marsh) and<br />

pit bogs. Non-permanent water bodies occur mainly during spring upon snow smelting and<br />

remain by the end <strong>of</strong> the spring or early summer (depending on the volumes <strong>of</strong> rain). Small<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> Struga marsh sustain throughout the year, but due to constant drainage, these<br />

areas are very small and fragmented.<br />

It is interesting to point out that the aquatic ecosystems in the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

belong to two watersheds, namely Adriatic (Crn Drim river watershed) and Aegean (Treska<br />

river watershed).<br />

3.11.8.1 Ohrid Lake<br />

Proximity <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake, which apart from the watershed <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska (which enters<br />

into Ohrid lake through a canal) enters within the corridor in the final part <strong>of</strong> the route (near<br />

the village Radozda) is <strong>of</strong> particular importance for the designed route. Ohrid Lake is the<br />

oldest, continuously existing lake in Europe and one <strong>of</strong> the most important aquatic<br />

ecosystems in terms <strong>of</strong> diversity (endemism, relictness, species diversity) on global level<br />

(Cvijic, 1905, 1911). Most scientists agree with the time frame <strong>of</strong> 2-5 million years age <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Lake (Stankovic 1960). Some authors maintain that the southern basin <strong>of</strong> the Lake occurred<br />

during Miocene (Ivanovski and Strackov, 1974; Spirkovski et al. 2001). According to the data<br />

<strong>of</strong> Albrecht & Willke (2008), Ohrid Lake has the highest index <strong>of</strong> endemic diversity on global<br />

level (even higher than the Baikal Lake, Tanganyika, Malawi, Titicaca, Biwa, Aoki), by which<br />

it is recognized as the most important lake not only in Europe, but also in the world. Ohrid<br />

lake is part <strong>of</strong> the group <strong>of</strong> lakes marked as Desaret lakes, composed <strong>of</strong> Ohrid, Prespa<br />

(Large and Minor) and Maliq (<strong>Albania</strong>).<br />

Ohrid Lake is located in the tectonic depression between the mountains Jablanica and<br />

Galicica. It is the deepest lake on the Balkans with the maximum depth <strong>of</strong> 288 m and<br />

average depth <strong>of</strong> 155 m. The water surface <strong>of</strong> the Lake amounts 358 km 2 and the estimates<br />

are that it contains 55.4 km³ <strong>of</strong> water. The Lake’s maximum length is 30.4 km and maximum<br />

width is 14.8 km. The length <strong>of</strong> the shoreline is 87.53 km.<br />

The bottom <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake in the shore region is mainly rocky with presence <strong>of</strong> relatively<br />

coarse stones, while in the bays, usually up to 1 m depth, there are sand deposits. Mixture <strong>of</strong><br />

organic sediment and sand is found much less frequently, which is more frequent in the<br />

167


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

region <strong>of</strong> the villages Kalista and Radozda. At a depth <strong>of</strong> 5 m, there is mainly sandy bottom<br />

where dense populations <strong>of</strong> diverse species <strong>of</strong> Chara grow. The belt <strong>of</strong> Chara spreads<br />

mainly to a depth <strong>of</strong> 10-15 m. Fine sediment (clayey) occurs at bigger depths with poor<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> organic matters. Diversity <strong>of</strong> substrates enables the growth <strong>of</strong> high number <strong>of</strong><br />

microbial algae species (Diatomea) which at certain sites reaches as many as more than<br />

200 confirmed Diatomeas.<br />

Figure 50 Sandbars on the river Sateska near the village Volino<br />

With regard to macrophytes, Ohrid Lake is rich in species. The most abundant and frequent<br />

species in the Lake include different species <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton (P. perfoliatus, P. crispus, P.<br />

pectinatus, P. acutifolius) and Ceratophyllum demersum, while at a depth <strong>of</strong> 5-15 m, a belt <strong>of</strong><br />

Chara occurs composed <strong>of</strong> several species (C. ceratophylla, C. ohridana, C. globularis). The<br />

biggest belt <strong>of</strong> claspingleaf pondweed Potamogeton perfoliatus with a total area <strong>of</strong> 684.029<br />

ha (Talevska 2009) is found in the region <strong>of</strong> the village Radozda. Reed stands (Phragmites<br />

australis) occur in the shore region spreading to a depth <strong>of</strong> 2 m on rocky ground, but there is<br />

also Cladophora on wooden poles grown over with epiphytes.<br />

168


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 51 Reed belt on Ohrid Lake shore, between the settlement Elen Kamen and the village<br />

Radozda<br />

3.11.8.2 Rivers and streams<br />

River Treska in Kicevo valley, also known under the name Golema Reka (Big River), is third<br />

in length tributary <strong>of</strong> the river Vardar. It originates from karstic aquifer, occurring on the<br />

southern branch <strong>of</strong> the mountain Bistra, below the peak Kiska in the village Izvor in Kopacka<br />

at 740 m above sea level, and it enters the river Vardar in Skopje Valley near the village<br />

Saraj, at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 260 m. The total length <strong>of</strong> the course is 138 km, with a gradient <strong>of</strong> 480<br />

m and watershed area <strong>of</strong> 2.068 km 2 or 8.04% <strong>of</strong> the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />

(Gasevski 1978).<br />

In its evolution, Treska built Kicevo (14.0 km), Brod (17.5 km) and Golema (66.2 km) valleys,<br />

and it cuts Kicevo valley, alluvial river expansion <strong>of</strong> Brod, Porece area and small portion <strong>of</strong><br />

Skopje Valley. Research carried out so far confirmed that Treska had pirate valley,<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> two rivers: one entering Skopje Lake – Lower Treska and the other one<br />

entering Porece Lake – Upper Treska. The one entering Porece Lake flew out through<br />

Barbaras and Usi in Pelagonia. Upon the Skopje Lake run<strong>of</strong>f, the lower erosive base<br />

lowered down in Skopje Valley, the vertical erosion increased, causing backward<br />

replacement <strong>of</strong> the aquifer <strong>of</strong> Lower Treska and its infiltration in the basin <strong>of</strong> Porece. Thus, it<br />

drained the water from Porece basin and carried out piracy in the upper course or Upper<br />

Treska building a unique valley.<br />

In the corridor <strong>of</strong> the route, Treska River is characterized with rapid water flow and rocky<br />

bottom. At certain points, there are riparian weak sand deposits, while organic sediments are<br />

almost completely absent. Riparian region is inhabited by woody species (alder, willow,<br />

poplar) resulting in significant shade. Open areas occur less frequently resulting mainly from<br />

tree cutting on the river banks. Rocky ground and tree bark immersed into the water are<br />

grown over with aquatic mosses (Fontinalis antipyretica). No other macrophitic species have<br />

been recorded during the investigation period.<br />

River Sateska is the largest river in the watershed area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake. Its watershed area<br />

covers around 411. 5 km 2 . Around 39.36 % <strong>of</strong> the total surface watershed area belongs to<br />

Ohrid Lake. Aquifer region <strong>of</strong> the river is located in the mountainous region, while its middle<br />

169


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

and lower course are in the plane region. Sateska river is characterized with great erosive<br />

potential and carries significant amounts <strong>of</strong> undissolved mineral matters. In its middle and<br />

lower course, the river runs through agricultural areas, being additionally loaded with organic<br />

(dissolved and undissolved) matters. Several villages are located along the river with<br />

unsettled communal problems. Wastewaters contribute further to the river pollution. It is<br />

maintained that in the past (up to 18 th century), the river entered Ohrid lake directly, and<br />

later, due to human activities, it changed its natural bed near the village Volino and entered<br />

the river Crn Drim. In 1961, the riverbed <strong>of</strong> Sateska was diverted towards Ohrid Lake<br />

(Sibinovic 1987). The flow <strong>of</strong> the water in the river is largely variable and dependent on<br />

climate conditions (quantity <strong>of</strong> water sediments). It is characterized with two peaks: in spring<br />

(March-April) as a result <strong>of</strong> snow melting and in November and December (more intensive<br />

rain and snow falls). The annual flow <strong>of</strong> the river is around 129 million m 3 .<br />

The corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line incorporates the middle and the lower course <strong>of</strong> the river<br />

Sateska. In the region <strong>of</strong> the village Pesocan down to the village Meseiste, the river is<br />

characterized with rapid flow. The bottom <strong>of</strong> the river is mainly rocky, but with notable sand<br />

deposits at places with weaker flow. Organic sediment is found rarely. In spring, the water is<br />

highly turbid due to significant presence <strong>of</strong> inorganic matter.<br />

Figure 52 Sandy bank on the river Sateska near the village Pesocan<br />

Macrophyte vegetation in this region is represented mainly by small populations <strong>of</strong> aquatic<br />

mosses (Fontinalis antipyretica and Rhynchostegium riparioides) fixed onto the rocky<br />

ground. From among macrophyte algae, we find mostly Hydrurus foetidus, while in summer<br />

months, Cladophora sp. is dominant. During spring period, coarser stones, as well as<br />

branches immersed in water are grown over with epilytic communities in outstanding brown<br />

colour, dominated mainly by siliceous algae (Diatomea).<br />

In its lower course (after the village Meseiste down to the entry into Crn Drim, i.e. Ohrid<br />

Lake), the river Sateska is characterized with a slower flow and small meanders. It is<br />

170


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

important to note that during field investigations, due to the high water level <strong>of</strong> the river<br />

Sateska and high water level <strong>of</strong> the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid in particular, part <strong>of</strong> the water from the<br />

Sateska river was redirected to its natural riverbed (i.e. to the entry into Crn Drim river), while<br />

the rest was flowing through the canal towards Ohrid Lake. Because <strong>of</strong> its high water level,<br />

the river flooded the surrounding areas under alder, poplar and willow, thus forming marshy<br />

biotopes (with prevailing woody vegetation). The bottom <strong>of</strong> these marshy biotopes is sludgy<br />

with rich organic detritus. The bottom <strong>of</strong> the river itself (in its natural riverbed) is rocky, with<br />

notable sand deposits at certain places. Apart from that, exceptionally great impact <strong>of</strong> solid<br />

municipal waste disposed <strong>of</strong> in the vicinity and in the very riverbed is notable. In such<br />

conditions, the water is highly turbid with visible matters <strong>of</strong> organic and inorganic origin.<br />

Typical aquatic vegetation has not been detected. The canal <strong>of</strong> Sateska river (modified water<br />

body) is built <strong>of</strong> big size stone blocks and the flow is regulated. Under such conditions, the<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> aquatic vegetation is impossible. Due to the strong variation in the water flow in the<br />

canal, growth <strong>of</strong> stable epilytic vegetation is not possible. The most frequent substrate in<br />

such conditions includes fallen branches or grass plants (terrestrial) immersed in the water<br />

for longer than two weeks.<br />

River Crn Drim flows out <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 695 m and its length is around 56<br />

km. The middle course <strong>of</strong> the river at the outflow from the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid is 22.24 m 3 /sec. The<br />

river retains its natural characteristics only at less than half <strong>of</strong> its course, i.e. from the exit<br />

from Struga to the village Tasmarunista. There are two large accumulations (Globocica and<br />

Spilje) for electricity production. In the region <strong>of</strong> the city <strong>of</strong> Struga, the river is canalized and<br />

with rapid flow, and after the exit from the city, the riverbed is natural. The bottom <strong>of</strong> the river<br />

is rocky in its central part, while the bank segments are covered with sand deposits. Apart<br />

from this, the region close to the banks is characterized by the presence <strong>of</strong> great quantities<br />

<strong>of</strong> solid municipal waste, as well as numerous immersed branches.<br />

Macrophyte vegetation during spring is less common, while bigger presence <strong>of</strong> macrophytes<br />

occurs during summer and early autumn, when vegetation is represented by Potamogeton<br />

perfoliatus, P. crispus, P. pectinatus, P. acutifolius, Myriophyllum spicatum and Zannichellia<br />

palustris (Talevska 2010). There are much smaller populations <strong>of</strong> reed - Phragmites australis<br />

and broadleaf and narrowleaf cattail - Typha latifolia and Typha angustifolia (Talevski et al.<br />

2010). During the year, significant populations <strong>of</strong> Cladophora occur as well, with more<br />

intense domination in the course <strong>of</strong> summer.<br />

Smaller rivers in the corridor are Vilipica, Judovska, Brzdanska and Bukov Dol. During<br />

spring, due to snow melting, these rivers are characterized with rapid flow and full-watered.<br />

During summer, the quantity <strong>of</strong> water is drastically reduced also due to the possibility for<br />

their use for irrigation. The bank <strong>of</strong> the rivers is usually planted with woody species, which<br />

causes intense shading. Under such circumstances, one could expect lower species<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> algae. Dominant macrophyte in this rivers is the aquatic moss (Fontinalis<br />

antipyretica). The bank <strong>of</strong> the river Bukov Dol, as a result <strong>of</strong> human impact (wood cutting) is<br />

open and unshaded. Signs <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic impacts are also related to the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

solid municipal waste and demolishing waste on the very bank, as well as in the river itself.<br />

Owing to the rapid flow, the bottom <strong>of</strong> the river is rocky, without visible deposits <strong>of</strong> sand and<br />

sediment. Stones are grown over with rich epilytic sediments. Significant populations <strong>of</strong> bluegreen<br />

algae (primarily Phormidium spp) have been found in the epilithon.<br />

3.11.8.3 Springs and wells<br />

In the artificially formed small puddle from the spring above the village Radozda, the<br />

following species <strong>of</strong> vascular plants grow: Callitriche stagnalis, Veronica beccabunga,<br />

Ranunculus repens, Mentha sp. and Equisetum telmateja.<br />

171


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Beyond the investigated corridor, there are many karstic springs: springs in the foothill <strong>of</strong> the<br />

hill Gaber (Sini Viroj near the village Belcista and springs near the village Novo Selo), as well<br />

as the springs in the village Izdeglavje.<br />

3.11.8.4 Swamps and marshes 19<br />

Along running waters, the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line includes swamps, marshes and artificial<br />

water bodies (irrigation and drainage canals). Swamps are found mainly along the course <strong>of</strong><br />

the river Sateska (before the village Moroiste) and they are mostly non-permanent. They are<br />

distrophic-eutrophic with rich deposits <strong>of</strong> organic sediment, low content <strong>of</strong> dissolved oxygen<br />

and high content <strong>of</strong> nutrients. The main substrates for algae growth are the numerous<br />

branches fallen into the water. In spring, these substrates are grown over with big<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> siliceous algae. In addition to these, though with low abundance and <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

free, green algae (Spyrogira spp) occur as well. Also, small areas under mountainous pit<br />

bogs have been found near the river Vilipica, which are probably humid only during summer.<br />

They are rich in organic sediment which is excellent substrate for the growth <strong>of</strong> rich<br />

Diatomea flora. The prevailing component, mosses, is represented by several species.<br />

Remains <strong>of</strong> Struga marsh are also found near the railway line. This marsh, as a result from<br />

the constant drainage, has been strongly degraded and transformed into cultivable land.<br />

Small stands <strong>of</strong> reed are present close to Ohrid Lake, while the rest is represented with the<br />

communities <strong>of</strong> Caricetum elatae and Cyperetum longi. In segments with weaker flow, there<br />

is a growth <strong>of</strong> green algae (mostly Spyrogira spp.). Prevailing substrates for the growth <strong>of</strong><br />

Diatomea are organic sediments and macrophytes. The following marshy communities are<br />

found in the fields <strong>of</strong> Struga: Scirpo-Phragmitetum, Cyperetum longi, Caricetum elatae W.<br />

Koch 1926 lysimachietosum Mic., Sparganio-Glycerietum fluitantis Br.-Bl. All marshy<br />

habitats <strong>of</strong> the railway line corridor belong to a type listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> EU Directive on<br />

Habitats and wild species under the code 7230. This habitat type includes communities <strong>of</strong><br />

the alliances Phragmition and Magnocaricion elatae.<br />

19 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): 7230 Alcalin fens<br />

172


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 53 Humid meadows and marshy habitats in the remains <strong>of</strong> Struga marsh near the village<br />

Radolista<br />

The fauna in this area is not very specialized in relation to individual plant communities.<br />

Historically, the area used to be very important nesting, resting and overwinter stay <strong>of</strong> high<br />

number <strong>of</strong> bird species, out <strong>of</strong> which only few individuals can be found today, mostly<br />

occasionally (disoriented or at migration) or in low number for overwinter stay. This includes<br />

several species <strong>of</strong> heron and ibis (Ardea cinerea, A. purpurea, Egretta gazetta, Casmerodius<br />

albus, Nycticorax nycticorax, Platalea leucorodia, Plegadis falcinelus), but Ardeolla ralloides<br />

and Ixobrichus mnutus, as well as Circus aeruginosus from among birds <strong>of</strong> pray make nests<br />

in the area. Flooding and humid conditions enable the presence <strong>of</strong> several species <strong>of</strong> snipes<br />

(Gallinago gallinago, Tringa ochropus, Tringa glareola, Tringa totanus, Philomachus pugnax<br />

etc.), storks Ciconia ciconia and Black-headed wagtail Motacilla flava feldegg. The most<br />

specific species from among mammals is the otter Lutra lutra. Almost all amphibian species<br />

found in Macedonia can be found here.<br />

3.11.8.5 Reeds (Scirpeto-Phragmitetum W. Koch)<br />

Physiognomy <strong>of</strong> the habitat is determined by the reed (Phragmites australis). Reed stands in<br />

the corridor are not thick, which is common for this habitat. Besides reed, the following<br />

species are also found in the community: Typha spp., Scirpus lacustris, Mentha "aquatica",<br />

Iris pseudacorus, Alisma plantago-aquatica etc. The habitat develops on permanently or<br />

occasionally humid soils, and at Elen Kamen-Radozda in the very water <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake.<br />

Small areas under reed were identified in the investigated corridor. The most important ones<br />

are found between villages Volino and Moroista and along the shore <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake between<br />

the settlement Elen Kamen and the village Radozda.<br />

Reeds along Ohrid Lake shore build very narrow belt where vegetation has poor coverage.<br />

In this regard, this habitat has limited significance for biological diversity and probably is not<br />

an area where many birds nest.<br />

173


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Reeds in Struga Fields between villages Volino and Moroista occupy large areas and have<br />

certain importance for many animal species (see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />

3.11.8.6 Caricetum elatae W. Koch lysimachietosum Mic.<br />

Community belongs to the alliance Magnocaricion elatae (W. Koch) Br.-Bl, which used to<br />

spread along valleys in the past, but due to specific climate conditions, it sustained only in<br />

Ohrid Valley.<br />

The community grows in depressions which are constantly flooded or have high ground<br />

waters. At certain places, water is retained throughout the year. In parts which are somewhat<br />

higher, water can withdraw during summer, but the soil retains its humidity. Soils are rich in<br />

organic matter with weakly acid pH (~6).<br />

Specific species <strong>of</strong> this community is Carex elata. It grows in a form <strong>of</strong> columns with a height<br />

<strong>of</strong> 30-60 cm. From among other species, we can find Scutellaria galericulata, Senecio<br />

paludosus, Galium palustre, Lysimachia vulgaris f. glanduloso-villosa, Lythrum salicaria,<br />

Rumex hydrolapatthum, Iris pseudacorus, Polygonum amphibium, Roripa amphibia, Scirpus<br />

lacuster, Sium latifolium, Alisma plantago-aquatica, Typha latifolia, Stachys palustris etc.<br />

Association Caricetum elatae has Euro-Siberian distribution. In Macedonia, it is known only<br />

in Ohrid Valley, where it is represented as specific sub-association lysimachietosum.<br />

In the frames <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor, it is found in the remains <strong>of</strong> the former Struga<br />

marsh, between Struga and villages Kalista and Radolista, and used to grow north <strong>of</strong> Struga<br />

as well, along the river Crn Drim (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7, under<br />

wetlands-marshes).<br />

3.11.8.7 Cyperetum longi Mic.<br />

This community also belongs to the alliance Magnocaricion elatae (W. Koch) Br.-Bl. It<br />

probably developed upon the withdrawal <strong>of</strong> the community Caricetum elatae in the<br />

Postglacial period. Typical sub association grows in Struga Marsh, compared to Skopje<br />

Valley where subass. caricetosum acutiformis Mic. is found.<br />

Physiognomy <strong>of</strong> the community is given by Cyperus longus., and the height <strong>of</strong> stands ranges<br />

between 150 and 200 cm.<br />

The association Cyperetum longi grows on areas which during spring and winter months are<br />

under water, while in summer months, after mowing, the soil dries out and cracks. pH <strong>of</strong> the<br />

soil is poorly alkaline to very poorly alkaline.<br />

This community has low economic significance, as does the community Caricetum elatae. It<br />

is mowed twice in a year, but the hay is <strong>of</strong> low quality and used for stables laying. Better hay<br />

is produced by crops with Trifolium fragiferum and Agrostis alba.<br />

Specific species <strong>of</strong> this association are: Cyperus longus, Pulicaria dysentherica and<br />

Veronica scutellata. Specific species <strong>of</strong> the alliance are: Galium palustre, Lysimachia<br />

nummularia, Carex acutiformis, Leucojum aestivum, Carex riparia and Lycopus europaeus.<br />

In Macedonia, it is also found in remains <strong>of</strong> Skopje area marshes (Aracinovo-Hipodrom-<br />

Petrovec-Katlanovo), as well as in Ohrid and Struga marshes.<br />

In the frames <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor, it is found in the remains <strong>of</strong> the former Struga<br />

Marsh, between Struga and villages Kalista and Radolista and north <strong>of</strong> Struga, along the left<br />

bank <strong>of</strong> the river Crn Drim (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7, under<br />

wetlands-marshes).<br />

174


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

3.11.8.8 Sparganio-Glycerietum fluitantis Br.-Bl. 1925<br />

This community belongs to the alliance Glycerieto-Sparganion Br.-Bl. et Siss. It grows along<br />

canals with slowly running water, and forms marsh meadow stands spreading over large<br />

areas. The soil is constantly humid due to the high groundwater level.<br />

From flora point <strong>of</strong> view, this community is scarce in species. The most abundant is Glyceria<br />

fluitantis which is also characterized by high coverage. Sparganium neglectum and S.<br />

Polyedrum grow massively. From among species characteristic for the alliance, we also find<br />

Myosotis caespitosa and Veronica anagalis-aquatica.<br />

In Struga Marsh, this association is represented by sub-association Sparganio-Glycerietum<br />

fluitantis heleocharetosum Mic. This sub-association is distributed in the areas <strong>of</strong> Bitola and<br />

Struga. Differential species <strong>of</strong> this sub-association are Heleocharis palustris, Galium<br />

palustre, Oenanthe fistulosa, Ranunculus ophioglossifolius and Veronica scutellata. In the<br />

vicinity <strong>of</strong> the village Kalista, a patch <strong>of</strong> Potamogeton pusillus grows, usually found in small<br />

depressions covered by surface water with a depth <strong>of</strong> 40 cm. These spots are dominated by<br />

Potamogeton pusillus, and some other species <strong>of</strong> aquatic plants are found as well, such as:<br />

Nymphaea alba and Utricularia neglecta. The association Sparganio-Glycerietum fluitantis is<br />

probably widely distributed in Macedonia. It has been known in the areas <strong>of</strong> Skopje, Bitola<br />

and Struga. In the frames <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor, it is found in the remains <strong>of</strong> the former<br />

Struga Marsh, between Struga and villages Kalista and Radolista (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong><br />

habitats, Appendix 6 and 7, under wetlands-marshes). The areal <strong>of</strong> this community has been<br />

significantly shortened because <strong>of</strong> the amelioration <strong>of</strong> the Struga Marsh, but there are still<br />

some vital segments.<br />

3.11.9 Anthropogenic habitats<br />

3.11.9.1 Woodlots and plantations- Black pine plantations<br />

Forest plantations within the investigated corridor are represented by plantations <strong>of</strong> black<br />

pine (Pinus nigra). The black pine plantations were erected in the past as bare land<br />

afforestation measure and erosion prevention measure.<br />

Apart from black pine, this plantations may also include white pine trunks (Pinus sylvestris).<br />

In the storey <strong>of</strong> shrubs and grass plants, species from the surrounding habitats can be found<br />

as well, such as: Quercus pubescens, Quercus cerris, Quercus frainetto, Rubus sanguineus,<br />

Carpinus orientalis, Ranunculus ficaria, Trifolium pratense, Crocus weldenii, Helleborus<br />

odorus. From among birds, the most significant species is the snake eagle Circaetus<br />

gallicus, which nests over these plantations. There are especially large plantations in the<br />

vicinity <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Kicevo at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor, as well as between<br />

villages Arbinovo and Izdeglavje. In the rest <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor, especially between<br />

villages Slivovo and Klimestani, black pine plantations are represented by dispersed smaller<br />

stands (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats, Appendix 6 and 7).<br />

3.11.9.2 Meadows 20<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the meadows in the investigated corridor are constantly less or more intensively<br />

managed (humid and moderately humid), while minor portion is under extensive<br />

20 EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС (Annex I): does not include meadows from Macedonia as habitats with<br />

priority for conservation<br />

175


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

management or abandoned years ago. Meadows in the plane part are characterized with<br />

rather anthropogenized features, while those spreading over edge parts <strong>of</strong> forests or in the<br />

valleys are extensive. Depending on the intensity <strong>of</strong> mowing, meadows may have specific<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> plant and animal species (humid meadows in particular) or flora and fauna<br />

compositions may be dominated by species from the surrounding grass and wood habitats if<br />

less mowed or abandoned.<br />

Figure 54 Meadows and fields in the zone <strong>of</strong> Italian and Turkey oak forests before the border-crossing<br />

Kjafasan.<br />

Figure 55 Meadows and remains <strong>of</strong> chestnut forests in the zone <strong>of</strong> Italian and Turkey oak forests near<br />

the village Radozda<br />

176


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

In the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest, the meadowws belong to the so called ravine meadows (Micevski,<br />

1964), while in syntax terms they belong to the alliance Trifolion resupinati Mic. <strong>of</strong> the order<br />

Trifolio-Hordeetalia H-ić., or class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea Br.-Bl. et Tx. These are habitats<br />

<strong>of</strong> Heleno-Mesian type <strong>of</strong> riparian and humid meadows. They are characterized by<br />

domination <strong>of</strong> different species <strong>of</strong> clovers (Trifolium spp.) in their floral composition,<br />

compared to continental European meadows where different species <strong>of</strong> grass (Poaceae)<br />

prevail.<br />

Humid and moderately humid meadows in our environment are under threat related to their<br />

substitution with meadows with alfa-alfa which are more productive, but uni-type and with<br />

very low value in terms <strong>of</strong> biodiversity. Yet, they have not been listed as habitats with priority<br />

for conservation in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС for the sole fact that they have not<br />

been proposed for conservation so far by no party (the Annex is composed by EU Member<br />

States) However, similar habitats which phytocenologically belong to the alliance Molinion<br />

W. Koch and Molinio-Holoschoenion Br.-Bl. (semi-natural humid meadows with tall herbal<br />

plants – code 6410 and 6420 <strong>of</strong> Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС, as well as the<br />

alliance Arrhenatherion Koch (circum-Mediterranean mesophilic meadows – code 6510) are<br />

considered threatened in Europe. Accordingly, meadows <strong>of</strong> the alliance Trifolion resupinati in<br />

Macedonia are certainly priority habitat type for conservation.<br />

The period in which field investigation <strong>of</strong> the habitats was carried out along the corridor <strong>of</strong><br />

the proposed railway line did not allow precise determination <strong>of</strong> phytocenological affiliation <strong>of</strong><br />

meadows. However, based on certain earlier analysis and analogy with Prespa area, we<br />

may conclude that the meadows in the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest belong to the following<br />

communities: Cynosureto-Caricetum hirtae Mic., mostly to sub-association ranunculetosum<br />

aceris Mic., Trifolietum nigrescentis-subterranei Mic. and most probably association<br />

Trifolietum resupinati-balansae Mic.<br />

Species characteristic for these communities, as well as the alliance uniting them, include<br />

several species <strong>of</strong> clovers (Trifolium resupinatum, T. balansae, T. nigrescens, T. filiforme, T.<br />

patens, T. repens, T. pretense, and frequently found T. fragiferum), then grasses (Cynosurus<br />

cristatus, Anthoxanthum odoratum, Agrostis alba, Alopecurus utriculatus, A. pratgensis,<br />

Bromus racemosus), sedges (Carex hirta, C. vulpina, C. distans, C. divisa), as well as<br />

Lychnis flos-cuculi, Oenanthe stenoloba, Oe. silaifolina, Oe. fistulosa, Ranunculus acris, R.<br />

velutinus, Cirsium canum, Inula britanica and many other meadow species.<br />

They are <strong>of</strong> particular significance for some bird species, primarily storks, and it seems that<br />

the valley <strong>of</strong> Sateska river with humid and flooded meadows is at least occasionally for<br />

migration is used by cranes (Grus grus). The presence <strong>of</strong> crake (Crex crex) has not been<br />

confirmed, but it is very probable. Apart from their conservation significance, these meadows<br />

also have high economic value, because they produce high quality hay. Meadow habitats <strong>of</strong><br />

ravine meadow type are widely distributed in the valleys <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, but major part <strong>of</strong> their<br />

areas is threatened to extinct due to abandoned mowing.<br />

In the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest, they are especially abundant in Struga Valley and Debrca (more<br />

humid variants), and throughout the corridor on minor areas (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong><br />

habitats, Appendix 6 and 7). At some places where meadows are mixed with small field plots<br />

and gardens, they are not presented on the map.<br />

3.11.9.3 Agricultural habitats<br />

Areas under intensive agricultural activities within the investigated corridor may be fields,<br />

gardens, vineyards and orchards.<br />

177


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

3.11.9.4 Fields<br />

The most frequently grown crops on the fields <strong>of</strong> the investigated corridor are wheat and<br />

corn. Fields occupy larger areas in Struga Fields, while mixed with meadows, gardens and<br />

orchards they can be found along expansions <strong>of</strong> the river valleys (Sateska, Treska,<br />

Brzdanska, Judovska, Vilipica rivers) or through Downy oak-Hop hornbeam forests (villages<br />

Slivovo, Radozda).<br />

Figure 56 Fields and meadows in the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Treska near the village Drugovo<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the fields are separated by boundaries <strong>of</strong> trees or shrubs. Tree boundaries may be<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> fruit trees (Prunus spinosa, P. cerasifera, P. cerasus, Juglans regia, Populus<br />

nigra cv. pyramidalis), and much more <strong>of</strong>ten remains <strong>of</strong> natural vegetation. In Struga Fields,<br />

boundaries are dominated by willows, alders and poplars. Different oak species (Quercus<br />

pubescens, Q. frainetto, Cornus mas) are also found in hilly areas.<br />

Field plots occupy mainly very small areas which together with boundaries contribute to<br />

mosaic-like outlook <strong>of</strong> the agricultural land. Major areas are occupied only by plots near the<br />

city <strong>of</strong> Struga, on the area <strong>of</strong> the former Struga marsh (please, see the Map <strong>of</strong> habitats,<br />

Appendix 6 and 7).<br />

Compared to the economic importance <strong>of</strong> the fields, their importance for biodiversity is very<br />

low. However, climate conditions during the last winter and spring characterized with<br />

increased precipitation, showed that the fields in the surrounding <strong>of</strong> Struga up to the village<br />

Moroista convert easily into swamps and marshes, i.e. habitats typical for that area 50 years<br />

ago. Many rare birds (ibis, spoonbill heron) have been recorded in these sites, as they use<br />

flooded areas for feeding.<br />

The following butterfly species were also recorded in the fields: Gonepteryx rhamni,<br />

Nymphalis polycholoros, Nymphalis antiopa, Vanessa atalanta, Colias crocea. The<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> the communities <strong>of</strong> ground-beetles is dominated by: Harpalus distinguendus,<br />

178


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

H. affinis, H. rufipes, Amara aenea, Chlaenius vestitus, Brachinus explodens, Pterostichus<br />

niger, P. nigrita, Carabus coriaceus, Bembidion lampros, Cicindela campestris.<br />

Birds: Ciconia ciconia, Corvus cornix, Upupa epops, Garrulus glandarius, Fringilla coelebs,<br />

Carduelis carduelis, Turdus merula, Turdus viscivorus, Pica pica.<br />

3.11.9.5 Gardens<br />

Favourable conditions for formation <strong>of</strong> gardens exist along the valleys <strong>of</strong> the rivers in the<br />

investigated corridor. These are individual parcels with small or very small areas. The most<br />

frequent crops grown there include beans, tomatoes, peppers, cabbage and pumpkin.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the small area <strong>of</strong> the gardens, we can not talk <strong>of</strong> any specific floral and faunistic<br />

elements.<br />

3.11.9.6 Vineyards<br />

Vineyards in the observed corridor occupy small areas, although Ohrid-Struga region is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the major grapes and wine producing regions in Macedonia. Private vineyards cover small<br />

areas and are most <strong>of</strong>ten surrounded with fields. Due to small and scattered areas under<br />

vineyards, specific plant and animal species do not exist there.<br />

Vineyards in the corridor are located in plane parts <strong>of</strong> Struga Fields, especially between the<br />

villages Meseista, Klimestani and Trebenista. On the map <strong>of</strong> habitats, they are presented<br />

collectively with other agricultural habitats.<br />

3.11.9.7 Orchards<br />

Orchards in the investigated area are most <strong>of</strong>ten composed <strong>of</strong> apples, and less <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>of</strong><br />

cherry, sour cherry, walnut, pear and peach. Flora and fauna are highly dependent on the<br />

surrounding agricultural land, because <strong>of</strong> the small areas <strong>of</strong> orchards.<br />

Orchards are found along the entire investigated corridor, but they are more frequent in<br />

Struga Fields. On the map <strong>of</strong> habitats, they are presented collectively with other agricultural<br />

habitats.<br />

3.11.9.8 Urban and urbanized areas as habitats<br />

The only urban habitats within the investigated corridor belong to the City <strong>of</strong> Kicevo.<br />

Besides, there are several industrial facilities (factory <strong>of</strong> Oteks in the village Meseiste and<br />

some other) located within the corridor.<br />

Urban areas have low importance for biological diversity. Species living in urban habitats are<br />

usually cosmopolitan.<br />

From among birds, the presence <strong>of</strong> stork (Ciconia ciconia) little owl (Athene noctua) and<br />

scops owl (Otus scops) is the most significant.<br />

3.11.9.9 Populated places and settlements<br />

The investigated corridor also includes several populated places (villages and settlements).<br />

Populated places are habitats where specific communities <strong>of</strong> plants and animals develop<br />

and are usually adapted to “joint” life with people. From among plants, these are most <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

nitrophilic and ruderal plants <strong>of</strong> low conservation significance as they are cosmopolitan<br />

species.<br />

Bird fauna in rural areas is somewhat specific, although some <strong>of</strong> the species live in natural<br />

habitats as well, such as: Hirundo rustica, Delichon urbica, Passer domesticus, Phoenicurus<br />

ochruros, Pica pica, Crovus monedula, Corvus cornix, Passer domesticus.<br />

179


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

3.11.10 Significant habitats and species<br />

3.11.10.1 Significant habitats<br />

There is low number <strong>of</strong> habitats in the investigated corridor. Some <strong>of</strong> these habitats are<br />

listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС, which means that an EU Member State or<br />

accession country (like Macedonia) are obliged to conserve them. Some <strong>of</strong> these habitats<br />

are frequent and widely distributed in Macedonia. Besides, some <strong>of</strong> these habitats have<br />

priority for conservation in the EU (marked with “*”), i.e. they require designation <strong>of</strong> special<br />

areas for conservation (Natura 2000).<br />

1. Italian and Turkey oak forests. Although listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Directive<br />

92/43/ЕЕС, these forests are widely distributed in Macedonia, especially in its western part.<br />

They even build continuous climate zonal belt between 700 and 900 m a.s.l. Forests in the<br />

investigated corridor are well developed, but under strong pressure <strong>of</strong> forestry activities.<br />

These forests were affected by forest fire near the village Slivovo.<br />

2. Chestnut forests. Chestnut forests in Macedonia are mainly distributed in its western<br />

parts, from Shar Planina to Jablanica Mts., but they also grow in southeastern Macedonia<br />

(Belasica). They are included in Annex I <strong>of</strong> EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС. Within the investigated<br />

corridor, they occur between the villages Radozda and Macedonian-<strong>Albania</strong>n border.<br />

3. Alder belts and woodlots. These forests are considered as priority habitats for<br />

conservation (*) under the EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС. Alder woodlots are <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

importance, as they are almost completely extinct in other parts <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. Alder belts<br />

grow along almost all rivers and streams in the investigated corridor. Woodlots have been<br />

also recorded near the villages Arbinovo and Botun. Alder stands, alike other riparian<br />

habitats, have very important ecological function in the prevention and mitigation <strong>of</strong> floods,<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> pollution, they are natural corridors for the movement <strong>of</strong> animals and have<br />

certain specific roles in the exchange <strong>of</strong> mineral matters.<br />

4. Willow belts. Willow belts within the investigated corridor are much less abundant than<br />

alder belts, and therefore their importance is lower. They are listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU<br />

Directive 92/43/ЕЕС. Part <strong>of</strong> them that could constitute forest stands are not found within the<br />

investigated corridor; otherwise, they have priority for conservation under the EU Directive<br />

92/43/ЕЕС (*).<br />

180


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 57 Willow belts by the river Crn Drim<br />

5. Remains <strong>of</strong> minor forests <strong>of</strong> marshy oak. As already indicated in the text, the only<br />

recorded remain <strong>of</strong> minor marshy oak forest is located in the village Moroista, outside <strong>of</strong> the<br />

investigated corridor. Yet, there is a possibility for other individual trunks or smaller groups to<br />

be found along canals and marsh-like sections between the village Vilino and the village<br />

Moroista. Communities <strong>of</strong> marshy oak in Macedonia are exceptionally rare and very<br />

important for the diversity <strong>of</strong> habitats and species.<br />

6. Calcareous rocks. Calcareous rocks in lower parts <strong>of</strong> Macedonia are substrate onto<br />

which rare and endemic chasmophytic species develop, covered by EU Directive<br />

92/43/ЕЕС. Calcareous rocks in the investigated corridor are found between the settlement<br />

Elen Kamen and the village Radozda. Apart from their biological importance as habitats for a<br />

typical vegetation, plants and birds, calcareous rocks in the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest are<br />

exceptionally important in terms <strong>of</strong> protection <strong>of</strong> cultural and historical monuments as well.<br />

7. Siliceous rocks. Siliceous rocks are listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> the EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС.<br />

However, siliceous rocks have low importance within the investigated corridor because <strong>of</strong><br />

the small areas they cover.<br />

8. Reeds. Reeds are habitat which enables high biological diversity. Due to hydro<br />

ameliorations in the past, large portion <strong>of</strong> the area under belts was destroyed. Such is the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> Struga Marsh which has been almost completely destroyed. Very small fragments<br />

are found between the villages Kalista, Radolista and the City <strong>of</strong> Struga. Reed remains are<br />

found between the villages Volino and Moroista, as well as along the shore <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake,<br />

near the village Radozda.<br />

181


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

3.11.11 Important species<br />

3.11.11.1 Diversity <strong>of</strong> algae and macrophytes<br />

3.11.11.1.1 Current knowledge<br />

Biological diversity <strong>of</strong> algae in the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line has been rather poorly<br />

investigated with an exception <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake. So far, there is data only on the composition<br />

and partially on algae distribution for Crn Drim. Trajanovska (2009), during several years <strong>of</strong><br />

chara study, established the presence <strong>of</strong> three species <strong>of</strong> chara, namely: Chara tomentosa<br />

(=Chara ceratophylla), Chara globularis (=Chara fragilis), Chara ohridana and a species <strong>of</strong><br />

starry stonewort [Nitellopsis obtusa (Desv.) J. Groves].<br />

Apart from macroscopic algae, significant number <strong>of</strong> macrophytes has been found in the<br />

river Crn Drim, including Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud., Typha latifolia L., Typha<br />

angustifolia L., Shoenoplectus lacustris (L.) Palla), Mentha aquatica L., Lemna minor L.,<br />

Lemna trisulca L., Potamogeton perfoliatus L., Potamogeton pectinatus L., Potamogeton<br />

crispus L., Potamogeton acutifolius Link., Potamogeton natans L., Zannichellia palustris L.,<br />

Myriophillum spicatum L., Myriophyllum verticillatum L., Ceratophyllum demersum L.,<br />

Vallisneria spiralis L., Elodea canadensis Rich.& Michx. и Utricularia neglecta Lehm.<br />

(Talevski 2010).<br />

Figure 58 Spring above the village Radozda with Lemna.<br />

As far as Drim Basin is concerned, literature contains data on the qualitative composition <strong>of</strong><br />

mayflies (Ephemeroptera) and stoneflies (Plecoptera), as one <strong>of</strong> the main members <strong>of</strong><br />

benthos communities (Ikonomov, 1960). There is no data on other groups. In his study <strong>of</strong><br />

mayflies in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, Ikonomov (1960) carried out detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> this<br />

group in Vardar, Drim and Strumica Basins. In Drim Basin, he established the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

relatively high number (37) <strong>of</strong> Ephemeroptera, or around 50% <strong>of</strong> the overall number <strong>of</strong><br />

mayflies known for the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />

182


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

With regard to the entry area <strong>of</strong> Sateska river into Ohrid Lake, there is data only on the<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> phytoplankton which incorporates centric diatomea Cyclotella ocellata and<br />

Stephanodiscus hantzschii, while Asterionella formosa and Ulnaria ulna are found from<br />

penate forms, while phytobenthos has remained completely unexplored. Due to the<br />

channeling <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, diversity and abundance <strong>of</strong> macrophytes have reduced<br />

drastically. Small populations <strong>of</strong> Typha latifolia, . Lemna minor, Potamogeton perfoliatus L.,<br />

Potamogeton pectinatus, Myriophyllum verticillatum L., Ceratophyllum demersum L have<br />

been found near the river entry into the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid.<br />

So far, there has been no data at all on the composition and presence <strong>of</strong> algae in the upper<br />

course <strong>of</strong> the river Treska. The status <strong>of</strong> other aquatic ecosystems covered by the railway<br />

line corridor, such as Struga Marsh, rivers Bukov Dol, Vilipica, Brzdanska, Judovska, as well<br />

as numerous aquifers, marshy biotopes, peat bogs, canals, etc., is the same. During these<br />

investigations, the results on species composition and distribution <strong>of</strong> algae in the mentioned<br />

water bodies have been presented for the first time. Data on macrophytes in the river Treska<br />

within the railway line corridor is not available as well. During investigations, two species <strong>of</strong><br />

mosses have been established (Fontinalis antipyretica and Rhynchostegium riparioides)<br />

found supported on rocky ground.<br />

Diatomea in Ohrid Lake are relatively well explored, although majority <strong>of</strong> data refers to<br />

Ohrid City and area around St.Naum springs. Initial knowledge <strong>of</strong> this region has been<br />

presented by Pavlov (2010), who established more than 200 species <strong>of</strong> algae in the vicinity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the village Radozda. High number <strong>of</strong> established species is endemic for Ohrid Lake, such<br />

as Amphora ohridana, Cyclotella fottii, Cymbopleura juriljii, Diploneis ostracodarum,<br />

Epithemia ohridana, G. sancti-naumii, G. mihoi, Navicula subhastatula etc.<br />

3.11.11.1.2 Results obtained in the frames <strong>of</strong> the Study<br />

Ohrid Lake is characterized with rich diatomic flora found in benthos communities. Four<br />

communities are found in the shore region <strong>of</strong> the village Radozda, namely: epilithonic,<br />

episamonic, epiphytic (<strong>of</strong> Cladophora) and periphytonic (Phragmites australis). Each <strong>of</strong><br />

these communities is represented by different species composition. The epilithon is<br />

dominated mainly by species <strong>of</strong> the orders Gomphonema (G. tergestinum, G. fonticolum, G.<br />

micropus) and Navicula (N. antonii, N. subalpina, N. ognjanovae). Episamonic communities<br />

are dominated by the species Cyclotella ocellata, Amphora indistincta, A. pediculus,<br />

Encyonopsis microcephala, Pseudostaurosira brevistriata and Staurosirella pinnata. As<br />

epiphytes <strong>of</strong> Cladophora species <strong>of</strong> the order Diatoma (D. densicostata, D. ehrenbergii),<br />

Encyonema (E. pseudocaspitosum, E. ochridanum) occur, as well as several<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> the species complex <strong>of</strong> Gomphonema olivaceum. The greatest diversity <strong>of</strong><br />

diatomea is found in periphytonic communities, where we find a series <strong>of</strong> endemic species<br />

such as Cymbella ohridana, Gomphonema macedonicum, G. irroratum, Aneumastus<br />

ohridanum, Aneumastus albanicus, Placoneis macedonicum etc.<br />

River Crn Drim has very similar composition as Ohrid Lake, although several cosmopolitan<br />

species that are rarely found in the Lake have significantly higher representation here<br />

(including Hannaea arcus, Planothidium lanceolatu, P. rostratum etc.). Yet, several<br />

interesting species have been identified in the river, like Cylotella fottii, Diatoma ochridana,<br />

D. densicostata, Placoneis balcanicus, P. subgastriformis, Navicula mollicula, Geissleria<br />

ohridana etc., which used to be regarded endemic for the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid. According to<br />

species composition, primarily for the presence <strong>of</strong> endemic species, it is regarded highly<br />

sensitive to impacts from the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line.<br />

183


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

3.11.11.2 Plants<br />

The area through which the corridor <strong>of</strong> the proposed railway line extends has been poorly<br />

explored in terms <strong>of</strong> flora, except the section in the area <strong>of</strong> Struga marsh. There are<br />

exceptionally few data and these relate to incidental findings. Yet, there is sufficient amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> literature and our own data to assess floral diversity <strong>of</strong> wetlands (all above listed, together<br />

with alder forests). The text below describes rare and significant plants found along the<br />

corridor <strong>of</strong> interest, while overall heritage is presented on the table on wetlands in the area <strong>of</strong><br />

Belcisko Blato (marsh).<br />

Table 19 Important species <strong>of</strong> vascular flora in the subject corridor<br />

Type Locality in the corridor <strong>of</strong> inerest Meaning<br />

Lathyrus palustris L. Struga Swamp The only site in the RM<br />

Sium latifolium L. Struga Swamp The only site in the RM<br />

Salvinia natans L.<br />

Acorus calamus L.<br />

Nuphar luteum (L.) Sith. et Sm.<br />

Kalista – Struga – Struga Swamp<br />

Struga Swamp<br />

Lake Kalista (from Struga Swamp is<br />

missing)<br />

Berne convention, Appendix I;<br />

CFP*A(ii)<br />

The species is not found many<br />

decades and is considered to<br />

disappear from the flora <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />

Plant that is disappeared from the<br />

flora <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />

Ranunculus fluitans Lam. Crn Drin near Struga The only site in the RM<br />

Ranunculus circinatus Sibth. Struga Swamp In RM found only in Prespa<br />

Dryopteris carthusiana (Vill.) H. P.<br />

Fuchs<br />

Belcisko In evlova forest swamp<br />

A third site in the RM, but not in the<br />

corridor<br />

Utricularia<br />

* IPA-Important Plant (internationally designated areas according to series <strong>of</strong> criteria (Aspecies<br />

and C-habitats)<br />

3.11.11.3 Insects<br />

There are several species within the investigated areas listed in international conventions for<br />

biological diversity conservation (Table ).<br />

Table 20 Overview <strong>of</strong> important species <strong>of</strong> insects and some arthropods<br />

IUCN Corine HD Habitats Location<br />

Potamon fluviatile NT Lake Village Rodozda<br />

Austropotamobius torrentium<br />

VU<br />

Streams<br />

rivers<br />

and<br />

Kalista-Radozda, all rivers<br />

and streams<br />

Aeschna isosceles LC Swamp Struga swamp<br />

Calopteryx splendens LC Swamp Struga swamp<br />

Orthetrum brunneum LC Swamp Struga swamp<br />

Orthetrumcoerulescens LC Swamp Struga swamp<br />

184


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Sympecma fusca LC Swamp Struga Swamp<br />

Sympetrum sanguineum LC Swamp Struga Swamp<br />

Carabus intricatus LR/nt + Oak forest all forests<br />

Carabus convexus dilatatus + Oak forest all forests<br />

Calosoma sycophanta + Oak forest all forests<br />

Cerambyx cerdo IV Oak forest all forests<br />

Osmoderma eremita IV Old forest -<br />

Pieris balcana LC Oak forest Valley <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim<br />

Coenonympha rhodopensis<br />

Euphydryas aurinia<br />

Parnassius apollo VU IV<br />

Maculinea arion<br />

Lycaena dispar LR/nt IV<br />

Zerynthia polyxena<br />

LC<br />

IV<br />

IV<br />

Meadows, fallow<br />

land<br />

Meadows, fallow<br />

land<br />

Meadow,<br />

land<br />

Meadow,<br />

land<br />

Meadow,<br />

land<br />

Meadov,<br />

land<br />

fallow<br />

fallow<br />

fallow<br />

fallow<br />

target corridor<br />

valley <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim<br />

valley <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim<br />

valley <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim<br />

valley <strong>of</strong> the Crn Drim<br />

target corridor<br />

Considering the distribution <strong>of</strong> certain butterfly species <strong>of</strong> priority for protection at European<br />

level, eight Important Butterfly Areas have been designated on the territory <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />

The area "Struga" covers the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Crn Drim from its outflow from Ohrid Lake,<br />

up to the dam Globocica.<br />

On the other side, Ohrid Lake, part <strong>of</strong> the shore area <strong>of</strong> which is integrated in the corridor <strong>of</strong><br />

the future line, as well as flooded areas in its vicinity, have been recognized as important<br />

ornithological site in Europe.<br />

Apart from the species concerned, several endemic species are also found within the<br />

investigated corridor, such as: Tapinopterus rambousekianus (distributed only on Jablanica),<br />

Molops rufipes steindachneri (western macedonian species), Aptinus merditanus (southern<br />

Balkan species). The investigated corridor covers small and atypical part <strong>of</strong> the areal (they<br />

prefer higher areas) <strong>of</strong> these species distribution.<br />

Table 21 Species diversity (vascular plants) in humid habitats near Belcisko Blato (near the corridor)<br />

Type/taxon<br />

Habitats<br />

Achillea millefolium L. Millefolium<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Achillea pannonica Scheele<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Agrimonia eupatoria L. ssp. Eupatoria<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Agrostis stolonifera L.<br />

Swampy meadow<br />

Ajuga reptans L.<br />

Swampy meadow<br />

Alisma plantago-aquatica L.<br />

Wet meadow<br />

185


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Type/taxon<br />

Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertner<br />

Alopecurus arundinaceus Poiret in Lam.<br />

Alopecurus geniculatus L.<br />

Anthoxanthum odoratum L.<br />

Aremonia agrimonoides (L.) DC<br />

Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) Beauv. ex J. & C. Presl<br />

Arum maculatum L.<br />

Atyrium filix-femina (L.) Roth var. multidentatum Doell<br />

Berula erecta (Huds. ) Cuville<br />

Bidens tripartita L.<br />

Bromus hordeaceus L. ssp. Hordeaceus<br />

Bromus racemosus L.<br />

Bromus sterilis L.<br />

Callitriche stagnalis Scop.<br />

Caltha palustris L. ssp. cornuta (Schott, Nyman & Kotschy) Beck<br />

Calystegia sepium (L.) R. Br. ssp. Sepium<br />

Carex acutiformis Ehren.<br />

Carex appropinquata Schumacher<br />

Carex distachya Desf.<br />

Carex distans L.<br />

Carex hirta L.<br />

Carex otrubae Podp.<br />

Carex pseudocyperus L.<br />

Carex remota L.<br />

Carex riparia Curt.<br />

Carpinus betulus L.<br />

Catabrosa aquatica (L.) Beauv.<br />

Cerastium caespitosum Gilib.<br />

Circea lutetiana L.<br />

Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. var. incanum Beck<br />

Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. var. horridum W. Gr.<br />

Cirsium palustre (L.) Scop.<br />

Cirsum vulgare (Savi) Ten.<br />

Convolvulus arvensis L.<br />

Cornus sanguinea L.<br />

Corylus avellana L.<br />

Habitats<br />

Forest Evlova<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Forest Evlova<br />

Bog<br />

Forest Evlova<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Forest Evlova<br />

Forest Evlova<br />

Bog, swamp, boggy meadow<br />

Swampy meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

water<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow; Блато<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Swampy meadow, Evlova forest<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Evlova forest; блатна ливада<br />

Evlova forest<br />

water<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Evlova forest<br />

186


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Type/taxon<br />

Crataegus monogyna Jacq. ssp. Monogyna<br />

Cynosurus cristatus L.<br />

Dactylorhiza incarnata (L.) Soó ssp. Incarnata<br />

Dactylorhiza saccifera (Brongn.) Soó<br />

Daucus carota L.<br />

Dipsacus laciniatus L.<br />

Dryopteris carthusiana (Vill.) H. P. Fuchs<br />

Eleocharis palustris (L.) Roemer et Schultes ssp. palustris<br />

Epilobium hirsutum L. var. Hirsutum<br />

Epilobium parviflorum Schreb.<br />

Epipactis palustris (L.) Crantz<br />

Equisetum fluviatile L.<br />

Equisetum palustre L.<br />

Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers. ssp. Annuus<br />

Eupatorium cannabinum L. ssp. Cannabinum<br />

Evonymus europaeus L. var. bulgarica (Vel.) Stoj. et Stef.<br />

Evonymus verrucosus Scop. var. laevifolius Beck<br />

Festuca rubra L. ssp. Rubra<br />

Fragaria vesca L.<br />

Frangula alnus Millers ssp. Alnus<br />

Galega <strong>of</strong>ficinalis L.<br />

Galeopsis speciosa Miller<br />

Galium aparine L.<br />

Galium elongatum C. Presl<br />

Galium palustre L.<br />

Galium rivale (Sibth. et Sm.) Griseb.<br />

Galium verum L. ssp. Verum<br />

Geranium robertianum L.<br />

Geum molle Vis. et Pančić<br />

Geum urbanum L.<br />

Glyceria plicata (Fries) Fries<br />

Hedera helix L.<br />

Holcus lanatus L.<br />

Habitats<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Swampy meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Swampy meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Swampy meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Swampy meadow, Wet meadow<br />

Swampy meadow, Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow, блато<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

187


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Type/taxon<br />

Humulus lupulus L.<br />

Hypericum tetrapterum Fries<br />

Iris pseudoacorus L.<br />

Juncus articulatus L.<br />

Juncus effusus L. var. compactus Lej. et Court.<br />

Juncus glaucus Ehrh.<br />

Juncus inflexus L.<br />

Juncus tenuis Willd.<br />

Juncus tenuis Willd.<br />

Juniperus communis L. ssp. Communis<br />

Lathyrus pratensis L.<br />

Lemna minor L.<br />

Lemna trisulca L.<br />

Ligustrum vulgare L.<br />

Linaria vulgaris Mill.<br />

Lolium perenne L.<br />

Lonicera sp. ?<br />

Lotus corniculatus L. var. Corniculatus<br />

Lychnis flos-cuculi L.<br />

Lycopus europaeus L.<br />

Lycopus exaltatus L.<br />

Lysimachia numularia L.<br />

Lysimachia vulgaris L.<br />

Lythrum salicaria L.<br />

Mentha aquatica L.<br />

Mentha longifolia (L.) Hudson<br />

Mycelis muralis (L.) Dumort.<br />

Myosotis arvensis (L.) Hill.<br />

Myosotis laxa Lehm. ssp. caespitosa (C. F. Schultz) Hyl.<br />

Myosotis scorpioides L.<br />

Myriophyllum verticillatum L.<br />

Oenanthe fistulosa L.<br />

Ononis arvensis L. var. spinescens (Ledeb) Garcke<br />

Orchis laxiflora Lam. ssp. Laxiflora<br />

Peucedanum aegopodioides (Boiss.) Vand.<br />

Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel<br />

Plantago lanceolata L. var. Lanceolata<br />

Poa trivialis L. ssp. Trivialis<br />

Habitats<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow,<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Swampy – in water<br />

Swampy – in water<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Bog<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Swampy meadow<br />

Evlova forest, wet meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Bog<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Swampy<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Bog, wet meadow<br />

Bog, evlova forest<br />

Open water –in/on vater<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Bog, wet meadow<br />

Bog<br />

Wet meadow, bog, evlova forest<br />

Open water – in/on water<br />

Wet meadow, bog<br />

Bog<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

188


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Type/taxon<br />

Potamogeton pusillus L. var. panormitanus A. Bennett.<br />

Potentilla reptans L.<br />

Prunella vulgaris L.<br />

Pulicaria dysenterica (L.) Bernh.<br />

Quercus sp.<br />

Ranunculus acris L.<br />

Ranunculus ophioglossifolius Vill.<br />

Ranunculus repens L.<br />

Ranunculus sceleratus L.<br />

Ranunculus serbicus Vis.<br />

Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix ssp. Trichophyllus<br />

Rhinanthus minor L. var. Minor<br />

Roripa kerneri Menyh. et Borb. in Matemat.<br />

Roripa prolifera (Heufel) Neilr. var. Prolifera<br />

Roripa sylvestris (L.) Besser ssp. Sylvestris<br />

Rosa corymbifera Borkh.<br />

Rubus caesius L.<br />

Rubus discolor Weihe & Nees<br />

Rubus sanguineus Friv. var. Sanguineus<br />

Rumex conglomeratus Murray<br />

Rumex crispus L.<br />

Rumex hydrolapathum Hudson<br />

Rumex pulcher L.<br />

Rumex pulcher L.<br />

Rumex sanguineus ? L.<br />

Salix alba L. ssp. Alba<br />

Salix cinerea L.<br />

Salix triandra L. var.triandra<br />

Sambucus nigra L.<br />

Scutellaria galericulata L.<br />

Solanum dulcamara L.<br />

Sparganium erectum L. ssp. neglectum (Beeby) Schintz et Thell.<br />

Stellaria aquatica L.<br />

Torilis arvense (Huds.) Links sp. Arvense<br />

Tragopogon balcanicum Velen.<br />

Trifolium campestre Schreb. var. campestre<br />

Trifolium fragiferum L. bonannii (Presl.) Soják<br />

Habitats<br />

Swampy meadow, wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Evlova forest, Bog, wet meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Open in evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Bog<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Swampy meadow, Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Bog,wet meadow,<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Bog Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Swampy<br />

Evlova forest ,Bog<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Bog, Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Swampy meadow, Bog, swampy<br />

Wet meadow, Bog<br />

Wet meadow, Bog<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow, Bog, swampy<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Bog<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Wet meadow Bog<br />

Wet meadow, Bog<br />

Wet meadow<br />

189


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Type/taxon<br />

Trifolium hybridum ? L. Hybridum<br />

Trifolium pratense L. var. Sativum<br />

Trifolium repens L. Repens<br />

Trifolium resupinatum L.<br />

Typha latifolia L.<br />

Urtica dioica L.<br />

Valeriana <strong>of</strong>ficinalis L. ssp. Officinalis<br />

Verbena <strong>of</strong>ficinalis L.<br />

Veronica anagalis-aquatica L. var. anagalis-aquatica<br />

Veronica arvensis L.<br />

Veronica becabunga L.<br />

Veronica scardica Griseb.<br />

Veronica scutellata L.<br />

Viburnum opulus L.<br />

Vicia cracca L.<br />

Vicia villosa Roth. ssp. varia (Host) Corb.<br />

Habitats<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Bog, Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Near stream<br />

Bog<br />

Bog<br />

By the stream<br />

Wet meadow, bog<br />

Evlova forest<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Bog<br />

Wet meadow<br />

Near stream<br />

Bog<br />

Bog<br />

By the stream<br />

3.11.11.4 Vertebrates<br />

Taking into account the number <strong>of</strong> habitats through which the line route passes, significant<br />

number <strong>of</strong> vertebrate species has been recorded or expected. Also, owing to the bigger<br />

conservation interest on European level for these groups (especially birds), major portion <strong>of</strong><br />

the overall number is considered important (listed in the annexes <strong>of</strong> Habitat Directive or, in<br />

the case <strong>of</strong> birds, Annex 1 <strong>of</strong> the Bird Directive). It should be pointed out that high number<br />

species, mentioned here as important in relation to their coverage by the annexes, are<br />

frequent and widely distributed in Macedonia.<br />

Table 22 Important amphibian species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

No. (Superior) type IUCN Habitats directive Bern<br />

convention<br />

1 Triturus carnifex - II; IV II<br />

2 Bombina variegata - II; IV II<br />

3 Bufo viridis - IV II<br />

4 Hyla arborea - IV II<br />

5 (Pelobates syriacus balcanicus) - IV II<br />

6 Rana dalmatina - IV II<br />

7 Rana graeca - IV III<br />

Table 23 Important reptile species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

No. (Superior) type IUCN Habitats directive Bern<br />

convention<br />

190


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

No. (Superior) type IUCN Habitats directive Bern<br />

convention<br />

1 Emys orbicularis LR/nt II; IV II<br />

2 Testudo graeca VU II; IV II<br />

3 Testudo hermanni LR/nt II; IV II<br />

4 Cyrtodactylus kotschyi - IV II<br />

5 Lacerta trilineata - IV II<br />

6 Lacerta viridis - IV II<br />

7 Podarcis erhardii - IV II<br />

8 Podarcis muralis - IV II<br />

9 Podarcis taurica - IV II<br />

10 Ablepharus kitaibelii - IV II<br />

11 Coluber caspius - IV III<br />

12 Coluber najadum - IV II<br />

13 Coronella austriaca - IV II<br />

14 Elaphe situla - II; IV II<br />

15 Elaphe longissima - IV II<br />

16 (Elaphe quatuorlineata) - II; IV II<br />

17 Natrix tessellata - IV II<br />

18 (Telescopus fallax) - IV II<br />

19 Vipera ammodytes - IV II<br />

Table 24 Important bird species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

No. (superior) type Macedonian name IUCN Birds<br />

Directive<br />

Bern<br />

Convention<br />

1 Gavia stellata Small sea diver I II II<br />

2 Gavia arctica white I II II<br />

3 Podiceps auritus Ear diver I II II<br />

4 Phalacrocorax pygmeus Small cormorant I II II<br />

5 Botaurus stellaris Big aqueous bull I II II<br />

6 Ixobrichus minutus Small aqueous bull I II II<br />

7 Nycticorax nycticorax Night heron I II<br />

8 Ardeolla ralloides Yellow heron I II<br />

9 Egretta garzetta Small white heron I II II<br />

10 Casmerodius albus Big white heron I II<br />

11 Ardea purpurea Red heron I II II<br />

12 Ciconia ciconia stork I II II<br />

13 Plegadis falcinellus IBIS I II II<br />

14 Platalea leucorodia heron I II II<br />

15 Aythya nyroca Black NT I III I: II<br />

Bonn<br />

Convention<br />

191


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

No. (superior) type Macedonian name IUCN Birds<br />

Directive<br />

Bern<br />

Convention<br />

16 Pernis apivorus I II II<br />

17 Circaetus gallicus I II II<br />

18 Circus aeruginosus Boggy harrier I II II<br />

19 Circus cyaneus Poland harrier I II II<br />

20 Circus macrourus Hunting harrier NT I II II<br />

21 (Circus pygargus) Meadow harrier I II II<br />

22 Accipiter brevipes I II II<br />

23 Buteo rufinus I II II<br />

24 (Aquila pomarina) Little eagle I II II<br />

25 (Aquila chrysaetos) Golden eagle I II II<br />

26 Falco vespertinus blue NT I II II<br />

27 Falco columbarius Small falcon I II II<br />

28 Falco eleonorae Mediterranean falcon I II II<br />

29 (Falco peregrinus) Gray falcon I II II<br />

30 Bonasa bonasia I; II/2 III<br />

31 Alectoris graeca partidge I; II/1 III<br />

32 Porzana porzana Swamp tainted chicken I II II<br />

33 (Crex crex) NT I II II<br />

34 Grus grus Gray I II II<br />

35 Himantopus himantopus I II II<br />

36 (Recurvirostra avosetta) I II II<br />

37 Philomachus pugnax I; II/2 III II<br />

38 Tringa glareola Forest tringov I II II<br />

39 Larus melanocephalus Mediterranean gull I II II<br />

40 Larus minutus Small gull I II<br />

41 Sterna nilotica tern I II II<br />

42 (Sterna caspia) Caspian tern I II II<br />

43 Sterna hirundo river I II II<br />

44 Sterna albifrons Small I II II<br />

45 Chlidonias hybrida Tern, white beard I II<br />

46 Chlidonias niger Black tern I II II<br />

47 Bubo bubo owl I II<br />

48 Caprimulgus europaeus I II<br />

49 Alcedo atthis I II<br />

50 (Coracias garrulus) NT I II II<br />

51 Picus canus Gray woodpecker I II<br />

52 Dryocopus martius Black woodpecker I II<br />

Bonn<br />

Convention<br />

192


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

No. (superior) type Macedonian name IUCN Birds<br />

Directive<br />

53 Dendrocopos syriacus Syrrian woodpecker I II<br />

54 Dendrocopos medius medium woodpecker I II<br />

55 Melanocorypha calandra Great lark I II<br />

56 Calandrella<br />

brachydactyla<br />

Small lark I II<br />

57 Lullula arborea Forest lark I III<br />

58 Anthus campestris Poland I II<br />

59 (Acrocephalus<br />

melanopogon)<br />

Bern<br />

Convention<br />

I II II<br />

60 Sylvia nisoria tainted I II II<br />

61 (Ficedula semitorquata) Colorful NT I II II<br />

62 Ficedula albicollis I II II<br />

63 Lanius collurio I II<br />

64 Lanius minor small I II<br />

65 Emberiza hortulana garden I III<br />

Bonn<br />

Convention<br />

Figure 59 Ibises (Plegadis falcinellus)<br />

Table 25 Important mammalian species along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

No. (superrior) type IUCN habitats directive Bern<br />

convention<br />

1 (Rhinolophus blasii) - II; IV II II<br />

Bonn<br />

convention<br />

193


Ohrid lake<br />

Rivers and streams<br />

Marshes, swamps<br />

and wet meadows<br />

farmland<br />

Evlovi and vrbovi<br />

belts<br />

Blackboron forests<br />

Oak forests<br />

Chestnuts forests<br />

Settlements<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

2 Rhinolophus ferrumequinum - II; IV II II<br />

3 Rhinolophus hipposiderus - III; IV II II<br />

4 (Rhinolophus mehelyi) VU III; IV II II<br />

5 (Eptesicus serotinus) - IV II II<br />

6 (Pipistrellus kuhlii) - IV II II<br />

7 (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) - IV III II<br />

8 (Hypsugo savii) - IV II II<br />

9 (Myotis oxygnathus) - III; IV II II<br />

10 (Myotis capaccinii) VU II; IV II II<br />

11 (Myotis mustacinus) - IV II II<br />

12 (Myotis myotis) - II; IV II II<br />

13 (Myotis daubentonii) - IV II II<br />

14 Miniopterus schreibersi NT II; IV II II<br />

15 Felis silvestris - IV II -<br />

16 Lutra lutra NT II; IV II -<br />

17 Ursus arctos - II; IV II -<br />

18 Dryomys nitedula - IV III -<br />

19 Muscardinus avellanarius - IV III -<br />

3.11.12 Valorization <strong>of</strong> vertebrate fauna<br />

Valorization <strong>of</strong> vertebrate fauna has been made in accordance with several international<br />

criteria presented in the Chapter "Determination <strong>of</strong> sensitivity".<br />

It is evident that the most important habitats are the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and riparian marshes,<br />

swamps and meadows, followed by oak forests, belts <strong>of</strong> willow and alder and cultivable<br />

areas.<br />

Table 26 Valorization <strong>of</strong> amphibians<br />

(Amphibia)<br />

Habitats directive<br />

Not included 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3<br />

II; IV 2 2 2 1 1 1 1<br />

IV 4 4 5 3 4 1 2 2 3<br />

V 1 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />

Emerald network<br />

невклучени 8 8 9 5 7 1 6 6 7<br />

194


Ohrid lake<br />

Rivers and streams<br />

Marshes, swamps<br />

and wet meadows<br />

farmland<br />

Evlovi and vrbovi<br />

belts<br />

Blackboron forests<br />

Oak forests<br />

Chestnuts forests<br />

Settlements<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

included 2 2 2 1 1 1 1<br />

Bern convention<br />

II 5 5 6 3 4 1 2 2 3<br />

III 5 5 5 2 4 5 5 5<br />

Total 10 10 11 5 8 1 7 7 8<br />

Table 27 Valorization <strong>of</strong> reptiles<br />

(Reptilia)<br />

IUCN<br />

LC 2 2 4 15 11 3 15 15 11<br />

NT 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2<br />

VU 1 1 1 1 1 1<br />

Habitats directive<br />

Not included 1 1 2 4 3 2 2 3<br />

II; IV 1 1 3 3 3 2 4 4 4<br />

IV 1 1 1 10 7 3 11 11 7<br />

Emerald network<br />

Not included 2 2 3 14 10 3 13 13 10<br />

included 1 1 3 3 3 2 4 4 4<br />

Bern convention<br />

II 2 2 4 12 9 5 14 14 10<br />

III 1 1 2 5 4 3 3 4<br />

Total 3 3 6 17 13 5 17 17 14<br />

Table 28 Valorization <strong>of</strong> bird fauna.<br />

195


Ohrid lake<br />

Rivers and streams<br />

Marshes, swamps and wet meadows<br />

farmland<br />

Evlovi and vrbovi belts<br />

Blackboron forests<br />

Oak forests<br />

Chestnuts forests<br />

Rocks<br />

Settlements<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

CRITERIA<br />

IUCN<br />

SPEC<br />

ETS<br />

Bird Directive<br />

CATEGORY<br />

VU 1<br />

NT 1 4 2 1 2<br />

LC 46 55 42 60 80<br />

1 3 2<br />

2 2 9 8 8 1 13 5 2 3<br />

3 17 2 16 16 11 4 14 9 9 12<br />

-E 5 2 8 5 21 16 28 24 1 10<br />

-EW 2 0 2 2 2<br />

non-SPEC 19 7 23 13 21 14 25 20 6 13<br />

NE 1<br />

(EN) 1<br />

R 3 2<br />

(R) 1<br />

H 2 7 2 2 1 3 2 2<br />

(H) 5 1 4 8 5 2 11 6 5 3<br />

VU 2 2 2 1<br />

(VU) 3 1 1 1<br />

D 2 2 4 7 1 7 4 1 3<br />

(D) 6 1 8 7 3 5 2 4 7<br />

S 15 6 19 10 31 24 39 30 4 16<br />

(S) 12 3 12 10 11 6 16 16 3 7<br />

NE 1<br />

I 18 27 13 9 3 17 8 3 2<br />

I; II/1 1<br />

I; II/2 1 1 1<br />

II/1 2 1 1<br />

II/1; III/1 1 1 1 1<br />

II/1; III/2 7 2 1 0<br />

196


Ohrid lake<br />

Rivers and streams<br />

Ohrid lake<br />

Marshes, swamps<br />

and wet meadows<br />

Rivers and streams<br />

Marshes, swamps and wet meadows<br />

farmland<br />

farmland<br />

Evlovi and vrbovi<br />

belts<br />

Evlovi and vrbovi belts<br />

Blackboron forests<br />

Blackboron forests<br />

Oak forests<br />

Oak forests<br />

Chestnuts forests<br />

Chestnuts forests<br />

Rocks<br />

Settlements<br />

Settlements<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

CRITERIA CATEGORY<br />

II/2 11 8 9 9 4 8 8 6<br />

II/2; III/2 1 1<br />

Not included 9 20 18 43 28 55 43 13 29<br />

included 19 29 13 9 3 18 8 3 2<br />

Emerald netwoek Not included 29 30 31 52 32 64 52 15 36<br />

II 22 11 45 27 44 28 65 45 15 25<br />

III 25 14 14 11 6 14 12 3 8<br />

Bern convention Not included 1 3 6 1 3 3 5<br />

I; II 3<br />

II 31 6 48 17 21 16 36 23 7 10<br />

Bonn convention Not included 14 5 11 27 40 19 46 37 11 28<br />

Total 48 11 59 44 61 35 82 60 18 38<br />

Valorization has not taken the bats into consideration, due to the short period <strong>of</strong><br />

investigation. We expect 14 species, all listed in the annexes <strong>of</strong> the Habitat Directive, three<br />

<strong>of</strong> which are globally threatened.<br />

Table 29 Valorization <strong>of</strong> mammals<br />

(Mammalia)<br />

IUCN<br />

LC 4 4 12 16<br />

DD 2<br />

197


Ohrid lake<br />

Rivers and streams<br />

Marshes, swamps<br />

and wet meadows<br />

farmland<br />

Evlovi and vrbovi<br />

belts<br />

Blackboron forests<br />

Oak forests<br />

Chestnuts forests<br />

Settlements<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

(Mammalia)<br />

NT 1 1 1<br />

Habitats directive<br />

Not included 4 4 12 17 19 10 18 18 9<br />

II; IV 1 1 1 1<br />

III; IV<br />

IV 1 2 1 3 3<br />

Emerald network<br />

Not included 4 4 12 18 21 10 20 20 9<br />

included 1 1 1 1 2 1<br />

Bern convention<br />

Not included 3 3 6 12 7 2 7 7 6<br />

II 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2<br />

III 1 1 6 5 13 7 12 12 3<br />

Total 5 5 13 18 21 11 22 21 9<br />

3.12 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> landscapes<br />

In the context <strong>of</strong> the ecology, landscape is the basic functional unit incorporating man and<br />

their activities within the space, including the ecosystems. In fact, interaction <strong>of</strong> man with<br />

biological diversity and inanimate natural properties <strong>of</strong> a given area constitute landscape.<br />

Everyday activities <strong>of</strong> people are carried out in several ecosystems (natural and<br />

anthropogenic), i.e. at a level <strong>of</strong> a landscape. Therefore, the landscape reflects the socioeconomic<br />

situation <strong>of</strong> an area from ecological point <strong>of</strong> view (although it is originally<br />

geographical term).<br />

Landscape is topographically defined territory composed <strong>of</strong> specific mosaic <strong>of</strong> inter-related<br />

ecosystem types that could be or have been subject <strong>of</strong> specific human. Landscape is<br />

defined primarily as a piece <strong>of</strong> land that can be covered by a single view. But, ecology<br />

excludes the view, i.e. landscape exists independently from the perception (as different from<br />

paysage). It is heterogeneous and dynamic level <strong>of</strong> ecological systems organization.<br />

Landscape development is under the influence <strong>of</strong> natural or anthropogenic factors or<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> both. A landscape type (which is actually the basic systematic category with<br />

landscapes) may possess entirely natural characteristics or to be entirely modified by man<br />

and not to cover a single natural ecosystem (as is the case with major urban areas). Thus,<br />

the landscape exactly is the level <strong>of</strong> ecological organization which involves people and their<br />

activities in ecological systems. Through landscape, we explore the functioning <strong>of</strong> mannature<br />

relations and define the causes for the current outlook and distribution <strong>of</strong> ecosystems<br />

in the space.<br />

198


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> easier comprehension <strong>of</strong> the text, the main characteristics <strong>of</strong> landscapes<br />

and the basic terminology are clarified below.<br />

The landscape has a structure, i.e. it is composed <strong>of</strong> several categories <strong>of</strong> landscape<br />

elements:<br />

- Matrix is dominant, comprehensive element<br />

- Patches are minor elements dispersed in the matrix (they may be small forests<br />

inside agricultural land or open terrains within a forest)<br />

• Mosaic is a group <strong>of</strong> patches<br />

- <strong>Corridor</strong>s are linear elements<br />

o<br />

o<br />

• Network is a group <strong>of</strong> corridors<br />

Edge - may be distinguished in the frames <strong>of</strong> patches and corridors, and has<br />

explicit mutual relations with the matrix,<br />

Interior– may be distinguished in the frames <strong>of</strong> patches and corridors, and<br />

has poor or no interaction at all with the matrix.<br />

Spatial organization <strong>of</strong> the mosaic and networks constitutes the imprint <strong>of</strong> the<br />

landscape. It is important in the exploration <strong>of</strong> similarities or differences <strong>of</strong> two<br />

landscapes from structural point <strong>of</strong> view. The structure is the basis for the functional<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> individual landscapes.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the more important aspects <strong>of</strong> landscapes include: size <strong>of</strong> patches, which means<br />

the amount <strong>of</strong> available habitat; fragmentation; heterogenity; spatial ration between patches -<br />

connection and connectivity.<br />

Connectiveness–two patches <strong>of</strong> the same type are close to each other and<br />

connected with the space,<br />

Connectivity– individuals or their reproductive parts <strong>of</strong> species are able to move from<br />

one to another patch even when those are not linked.<br />

Quantitative presentation <strong>of</strong> heterogenity and fragmentation depend on the scale.<br />

Preservation <strong>of</strong> natural values <strong>of</strong> an area is possible only by integration <strong>of</strong> human needs<br />

within conservation activities. Basically, landscape approach should secure maximum<br />

preservation <strong>of</strong> nature under conditions <strong>of</strong> full implementation <strong>of</strong> man's intentions and<br />

projects. In the specific case, the landscape should sustain the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />

line with all accompanying elements and structures, with minimum impacts on the<br />

environment (including natural ecosystems and man's goods and creations). In all cases,<br />

incorporation <strong>of</strong> such a big size infrastructure project, like the railway line with a length <strong>of</strong><br />

62.6 km in the landscape will cause significant changes in landscape characteristics and<br />

serious impacts on all elements <strong>of</strong> the landscape (both cultural and natural). Therefore, there<br />

is a necessity for determination and description <strong>of</strong> cultural and natural characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

landscape types along the route.<br />

In the frames <strong>of</strong> the area intended for construction <strong>of</strong> the future railway line Kicevo-Radozda,<br />

human activities have been and are performed with different intensity in different<br />

ecosystems, mainly depending on the altitude. Thus, several distinctive landscapes have<br />

been formed along the corridor.<br />

The main activity and land use along the corridor is the forestry (Kicevo-Botun) and<br />

agriculture, mainly farming (in Struga Fields). These intensive activities have been<br />

performed for centuries leaving behind a strong imprint on the entire territory, on landscapes<br />

199


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

and nature in general. Besides, the presence <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake and historically and geologically<br />

determined lake terraces in the southern part <strong>of</strong> the corridor, together with the prevailing<br />

vegetation types are the main factors determining the appearance and diversity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

present landscapes along railway corridor. Moderate continental climate and strong climate<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake summarize the external influence.<br />

Considering the above mentioned anthropogenic, biogeographical, physical and<br />

geographical characteristics as criteria, three to four landscape types can be distinguished<br />

along the railway line route with gradation from purely cultural through predominantly cultural<br />

up to more or less natural characteristics. Specific natural vegetation which attributes the<br />

external appearance <strong>of</strong> natural or slightly modified landscapes is described in the chapters<br />

on biogeographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area along the route, and on habitats <strong>of</strong> plant<br />

communities. Clearer distribution <strong>of</strong> biomes or zones overlaps with the distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

landscapes to a great extent. Geographical characteristics or spatial entireties are presented<br />

in more detail in the respective chapters.<br />

Two clearly differentiated spatial entireties can be distinguished along the railway line,<br />

namely: hilly-subalpine and gorge-like northern part (km 0+000 km 36+000) with two typical<br />

landscape types and plane lake southern part (km 36+000 to km 54+800) with one<br />

landscape type. In the furthest southern part (km 54+800 to km 61+500), the corridor passes<br />

through an area <strong>of</strong> similar characteristics as the one in the northern part.<br />

3.12.1 Hilly rural landscape in oak forest belt<br />

This landscape type covers most <strong>of</strong> the area extending along the assessed corridor for the<br />

railway line Kicevo-Radozda construction. More precisely, it spreads from km 1+800 to km<br />

36+000 and from km 54+800 to the end <strong>of</strong> the corridor. The hilly rural landscape can be<br />

treated predominantly as cultural landscape.<br />

Relief is hilly-mountainous with steeper or gentler slopes. The slopes are cut through with<br />

river valleys. The gentler one is predominantly siliceous, but there is also calcareous ground<br />

in the furthest southern part. Certain parts are characterized with alluvial deposits. Erosion is<br />

severe problem at certain spots. This landscape is widely spread landscape in hilly part <strong>of</strong><br />

the whole Macedonia.<br />

In the core area, under the influence <strong>of</strong> the railway line, the matrix is represented with<br />

agricultural areas (mainly meadows and small gardens and fields) with lots <strong>of</strong> trees. Trees<br />

are fruits or oak trunks or woodlots (chestnut trunks are specific for the furthest southern part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the railway line corridor). <strong>Corridor</strong>s are wide and real small forests at places, which means<br />

they can serve as habitats and migration paths <strong>of</strong> migration for carnivore animals. It may be<br />

confirmed that this landscape has sufficient importance in terms <strong>of</strong> supporting biodiversity in<br />

general. Patches <strong>of</strong> forest vegetation are connective, and in some cases connected. It is <strong>of</strong><br />

particular importance that connectivity reaches far in the area and rather distant forest<br />

ecosystems <strong>of</strong> adjacent landscapes are connected through these landscape corridors. An<br />

important feature <strong>of</strong> this landscape (not the same in all areas <strong>of</strong> this landscape type) are the<br />

linear corridors in river valleys represented by alder or willow belts or small patches <strong>of</strong> alder<br />

woodlots. They ensure survival and easy movement for many important animal species<br />

(otter, for example), and thus represent particularly important structural element for the<br />

functionality <strong>of</strong> this landscape in terms <strong>of</strong> biodiversity conservation.<br />

In peripheral parts <strong>of</strong> the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest, the landscape gets more and more an<br />

appearance <strong>of</strong> semi-natural landscape <strong>of</strong> broadleaved forests.<br />

200


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Populated places are villages <strong>of</strong> compacted type which are not continuously distributed and<br />

most <strong>of</strong>ten not connected with asphalted roads in between (they are connected with the<br />

main road Kicevo-Ohrid). Some are almost completely depopulated, and so traditional<br />

agricultural practices have been abandoned (Vidrani, Judovo, Slivovo), and some others to a<br />

certain extent.<br />

In recent times, processes <strong>of</strong> overgrowing prevail on abandoned fields and meadows with<br />

adjacent shrub or forest vegetation.<br />

It is specific that some other human structures are scattered throughout the landscape<br />

(petrol stations, small factories or plants, queries, etc.) that have been out <strong>of</strong> operation for a<br />

long. This only disrupts the appearance <strong>of</strong> the landscape (paysage), but not its<br />

functionality 21 .<br />

Cultural and historical monuments are scarcely represented and limited to certain rural<br />

settlements. They are mostly represented with churches and cemeteries (usually within the<br />

church land) 22 .<br />

3.12.2 Landscape <strong>of</strong> subalpine broadleaved forests<br />

Oak forests composed mainly <strong>of</strong> Sessile oak spread at an altitude higher than 900 m along<br />

the stretch from the village Judovo to the village Slivovo. They constitute subalpine<br />

landscape <strong>of</strong> broadleaved forests in which patches are wood clearings <strong>of</strong> different<br />

dimensions. This landscape is <strong>of</strong> exceptional importance for the carnivores because they<br />

provide favourable habitat for the individuals migrating between core areas in the frames <strong>of</strong><br />

the National Parks “Galicica”, “Pelister” and “Mavrovo”. Belt <strong>of</strong> mesophilic oaks and beech<br />

forests spreads along whole Shar Planina Mt.<br />

At the stretch near the village Popolzani, this landscape continues through hilly rural<br />

landscape to the same landscape type on the mountain <strong>of</strong> Bistra.<br />

Construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Radozda will not have any direct<br />

impact on the structure and functioning <strong>of</strong> this landscape and therefore it will not be<br />

described in detail.<br />

3.12.3 Urban landscape Kicevo<br />

There are two urban entireties in the frames <strong>of</strong> the wider area affected by the construction<br />

and especially operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Radozda: Kicevo and Struga. Only Kicevo<br />

is situated in the narrow corridor determined for assessment <strong>of</strong> the line impacts. The<br />

landscape spreads over the very beginning <strong>of</strong> the railway line corridor (km 0+000 to km<br />

1+800). This is a genuine urban landscape, the peripheral part <strong>of</strong> which is represented with<br />

degraded land and structures <strong>of</strong> secondary and tertiary infrastructure.<br />

Urban landscape has very low importance in terms <strong>of</strong> biodiversity, but interventions in it<br />

(such as railway line construction) have impact on people themselves (reduced quality <strong>of</strong><br />

living, pollution, noise).<br />

3.12.4 Lake plane landscape<br />

This landscape in Macedonia is found only in Ohrid-Struga Valley and Prespa. In the corridor<br />

<strong>of</strong> the line, it spreads from km 36+000 (village Klimestani) to km 54+800 (village Radolista)<br />

and covers Struga Fields, which is in the most part modified former Struga Marsh. The<br />

landscape is purely cultural, agricultural.<br />

21 See the chapter on socio-economic context<br />

22 See the chapter on cultural heritage<br />

201


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

The relief is plane without outstanding elevations throughout the area. The relief is formed<br />

onto lake terrace, and thus the geological ground is composed <strong>of</strong> lake sediments. Ohrid<br />

Lake it self is specific feature <strong>of</strong> the landscape. The whole area is characterized with high<br />

level <strong>of</strong> ground waters apart from the dense canal network installed in the past to drain<br />

Struga Marsh.<br />

The landscape is dominated by agricultural land, which means that the matrix is represented<br />

with fields and other anthropogenically modified habitats (rural settlements and gardens,<br />

meadows, etc.). The biggest portion <strong>of</strong> the area is occupied by the matrix. Patchy structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> the landscape is made <strong>of</strong> rare and dispersed habitats with reeds, as well as residues <strong>of</strong><br />

marshy habitats. There are no plane humid forests and woods at all, but there are individual<br />

remains <strong>of</strong> forest vegetation (marshy oak, alder or willows) 23 .<br />

<strong>Corridor</strong>s are represented with canals and marshy vegetation associated with them. The<br />

most important corridor in the frames <strong>of</strong> this specific landscape is the old riverbed <strong>of</strong> Sateska<br />

and alder belts and remains <strong>of</strong> woodlots along the riverbed. Most <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> Sateska is<br />

not within the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest for the Environmental Impact Assessment Study related to<br />

the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Radozda. It may be assessed that<br />

the functionality <strong>of</strong> the landscape, in relation to medium and small size mammals and other<br />

vertebrate and invertebrate fauna, is at satisfactory level (corridors are functional). All<br />

corridors are presented on the map <strong>of</strong> habitats (Annex 6 and 7). Visual layout <strong>of</strong> the<br />

landscape is given in Appendix 5.<br />

Anthropogenic establishments, except fields, are represented in this landscape with rural<br />

settlements and industrial facilities. The most important villages that would be affected<br />

directly with the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line are the villages Klimestani,<br />

Meseista, Volino, Moroista, Zagracani and Radolista. From among industrial facilities, the<br />

most important are the plant <strong>of</strong> the “Oteks” factory near the village Meseiste and the factory<br />

“Poliplast” for products <strong>of</strong> plastic mass, the Joint Stock Company “Grafikom” for printing<br />

activity, Public Enterprise “Jablanica” for parquet and lumber production, Public Enterprise<br />

for water management “Crn Drim” dealing with water management in Struga area (see the<br />

chapter on socio-economic context). There are no outstanding cultural or historical<br />

structures and monuments within the corridor <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />

3.13 Population, populated places and economic and social parameters<br />

The documentation that defines the future railway route, as a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> 8, Kicevo- Lin<br />

section, shows that 26 settlements, belonging administratively to four municipalities, are<br />

directly affected. Analyses have been made in the aforementioned settlements, concerning<br />

social-geographical and economic-geographical features along the route <strong>of</strong> the Kicevo-<br />

Radozda railway line.<br />

Table 30 Overview <strong>of</strong> municipalities and settlements within or affected by the corridor along the route<br />

<strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin<br />

Municipality<br />

KICEVO<br />

DRUGOVO<br />

Kicevo<br />

Settlements<br />

Brzdani, Vidrani, G.Popolzani, D.Popolzani, Drugovo, Judovo,<br />

23 With regard to the importance <strong>of</strong> natural marshy vegetation remains, see chapter 3.11.8.4<br />

202


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

DEBARCA<br />

STRUGA<br />

Arabinovo, botun, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Pesocani, Slivovo, Turje,<br />

klimestani, Meseista, Volino, Trebenista,<br />

Mislesovo, Moroista, Struga, Zagracani – Sum, Radolista, Kalista,<br />

Frangovo, Radozda<br />

The socio-geographical characteristics are shown through analyses <strong>of</strong> total population, its<br />

gender, national, age and some economic structures.<br />

The economic-geographical aspects have been considered through detailed review <strong>of</strong><br />

agricultural land by land registration lots classified in populated places, municipalities and<br />

along with a display <strong>of</strong> land affiliation by property (private, public sector and in total).<br />

Numerous aspects <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> the primary sector, as well as the other activity<br />

sectors, are presented and can be noted through this data.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> railway line environmental impact and functionality <strong>of</strong> the space on both sides <strong>of</strong><br />

the railway line, various infrastructural aspects <strong>of</strong> the linear and institutional infrastructure<br />

have been analyzed.<br />

3.13.1 Social- geographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> settlements along the Kicevo- Lin railway<br />

line route<br />

3.13.1.1 Total population, population by gender and ethnic structure<br />

Description <strong>of</strong> the basic functions <strong>of</strong> a given space assumes necessary study <strong>of</strong> the<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> population and settlements. The basic elements <strong>of</strong> the population<br />

demographic structure, in function <strong>of</strong> comprehending the socio-geographical aspects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

area along the Kicevo- Lin railway line route, include:<br />

-number <strong>of</strong> population,<br />

-population gender structure,<br />

-ethnic structure,<br />

-population age structure,<br />

-population characteristics according to economic activity, and<br />

-households and apartments.<br />

The study was performed in settlements, classified by municipalities and collectively,<br />

all along the railway route. Thus, a more complete and more accurate insight in<br />

characteristics in every particular territory was enabled, and accordingly undertaking <strong>of</strong><br />

adequate measures for status improvement.<br />

3.13.1.2 Population in numbers<br />

Natural characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area, on one hand, and socio-economic aspects, on the other,<br />

are the basic determinants that have had and still have impact on population coverage in a<br />

given area. In the case <strong>of</strong> the corridor along the railway line Kicevo-Lin, most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

settlements are scattered in the valleys <strong>of</strong> rivers Treska, Sateska, Crn Drim and by the Ohrid<br />

Lake. The population numbers, gender and ethnic structure are shown in Table 31.<br />

According to overview <strong>of</strong> the table, it is established that 26 settlements are located along the<br />

Kicevo-Lin railway line route. The only urban places among them are Kicevo and Struga,<br />

while the rest are rural. According to data from the 2002 census, these populated places<br />

have 60992 inhabitants, 43626 <strong>of</strong> which live in the cities, and the rest (17366) in villages. In<br />

addition, one settlement has 0-10 inhabitants, seven settlements have 10-100 inhabitants,<br />

203


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

four have 100-300 inhabitants, one has 300-500 inhabitants and 13 are with more than 500<br />

inhabitants.<br />

In relation to this data is also the population density which in the areas <strong>of</strong> Debrca villages is<br />

under 10 inh./km 2 which is relatively low. On the contrary, in the Struga Field, along the<br />

railway corridor, the population density reaches approximately 350 inh./km 2 , so it is noted<br />

that the space is rather densely populated. In terms <strong>of</strong> demographic development, the<br />

relatively large number <strong>of</strong> settlements, with less than 100 inhabitants is alarming, due to<br />

expectations that these settlements may soon be completely depopulated. Such populated<br />

places are Vidrani and Judovo near Kicevo, and the group <strong>of</strong> villages in the municipality <strong>of</strong><br />

Debrca, including Arbinovo, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Pesocani, Slivovo and Turje, which are<br />

demographically and economically rather degraded.<br />

Regarding railway line functional aspects, it is realistic to expect a certain positive impact on<br />

settlement revitalization, meaning their constant maintenance, provided that part <strong>of</strong> their<br />

population is directly involved in the railway. The railway route section from the Botun village<br />

to the Radozda village passes through the Struga Field, where populated places are<br />

demographically and economically vital, therefore the railway line positive impacts should be<br />

many-sided. The case here concerns demographic, economic socio-cultural development<br />

aspects.<br />

3.13.1.3 Gender structure <strong>of</strong> the population<br />

The population gender structure is one <strong>of</strong> the demographical indicators that determine the<br />

population vitality in a certain area, as well as the way <strong>of</strong> organizing life and work.<br />

According to data presented in the enclosed tables, it can be concluded that male population<br />

prevails in the populated areas. The reason for this state mainly relates to the frequent<br />

emigration <strong>of</strong> female population, which, in terms <strong>of</strong> migration, is more dynamic, due to<br />

emigrational features <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>of</strong> these areas, education, marriage (for the younger<br />

population) etc.<br />

204


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Table 31 Overview <strong>of</strong> total population, population by gender and ethnic structure, by municipalities and populated places along the railway line route Kicevo-<br />

Lin<br />

KICEVO MUNICIPALITY<br />

Settlements<br />

Total<br />

population<br />

Man Woman NATIONALITY<br />

Macedonians <strong>Albania</strong>n Turks Roma Vlachs Serbs Bosniaks Other<br />

KICEVO 27067 13568 13499 15031 7641 2406 1329 75 82 7 496<br />

TOTAL 27067 13568 13499 15031 7641 2406 1329 75 82 7 496<br />

DRUGOVO MUNICIPALITY<br />

Settlements<br />

Total<br />

population<br />

Man Woman NATIONALITY<br />

Macedonians <strong>Albania</strong>n Turks Roma Vlachs Serbs Bosniaks Other<br />

BRZDANI 162 83 79 162 - - - - - - -<br />

VIDRANI 8 4 4 8 - - - - - - -<br />

G. POPOLZANI 109 55 54 109 - - - - - - -<br />

DRUGOVO 1492 786 706 1250 108 128 1 - 2 - 3<br />

JUDOVO 27 16 11 27 - - - - - - -<br />

TOTAL 1798 944 854 1556 108 128 1 - 2 - 3<br />

205


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

DEBRCA MUNICIPALITY<br />

Settlements<br />

Total<br />

population<br />

Man Woman NATIONALITY<br />

Macedonians <strong>Albania</strong>n Turks Roma Vlachs Serbs Bosniaks Other<br />

ARBINOVO 26 8 18 26 - - - - - - -<br />

BOTUN 227 128 99 220 - - - - - - 7<br />

IZDEGLAVJE 136 64 72 136 - - - - - - -<br />

NOVO SELO 68 31 37 64 - - - - - - 4<br />

PESOCANI 95 45 50 95 - - - - - - -<br />

SLIVOVO 16 7 9 16 - - - - - - -<br />

TURJE 17 10 7 17 - - - - - - -<br />

KLIMESTANI 57 33 24 - - - - - - - -<br />

MESEISTA 779 374 405 776 - - - - - - 3<br />

VOLINO 462 236 226 226 - - - - - - -<br />

TREBENISTA 513 251 262 500 - - - - - - 13<br />

TOTAL 2396 1187 1209 2076 - - - - - - 27<br />

SREUGA MUNICIPALITY<br />

Settlements<br />

Total<br />

population<br />

Man Woman NATIONALITY<br />

Macedonians <strong>Albania</strong>n Turks Roma Vlachs Serbs Bosniaks Other<br />

206


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

MOROISTA 909 450 459 903 6<br />

MISLESOVO 3507 1754 1753 2791 527 28 13 66 15 - 67<br />

STRUGA 16559 8221 8338 8901 5293 907 97 550 72 16 723<br />

ZAGRACANI 1075 540 535 1 1071 - - - - - 3<br />

SUM 837 431 406 2 823 - - - - - 12<br />

RADOLISTA 3119 1561 1558 1 3085 - - - - - 33<br />

KALISTA 1178 589 589 95 1079 - - - - - 4<br />

FRANGOVO 1739 893 846 - 1734 - - - - - 5<br />

RADOZDA 808 402 406 806 2<br />

TOTAL 29731 14841 14890 13500 13622 935 110 616 87 16 855<br />

Table 32 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> total population, population by gender and ethnic structure, by municipalities and populated places along the railway line route<br />

Kicevo-Lin<br />

Municipality<br />

Total<br />

population<br />

Man Woman NATIONALITY<br />

Macedonians <strong>Albania</strong>n Turks Roma Vlachs Serbs Bosniaks Other<br />

KICEVO 27067 13568 13499 15031 7641 2406 1329 75 82 7 496<br />

DRUGOVO 1798 944 854 1556 108 128 1 - 2 - 3<br />

DEBARCA 2396 1187 1209 2076 - - - - - - 27<br />

STRUGA 29731 14841 14890 13500 13622 935 110 616 87 16 855<br />

TOTAL 60992 30540 30452 32163 21371 3469 1440 691 171 23 1381<br />

207


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

3.13.1.4 Ethnic structure<br />

Ethnic structure <strong>of</strong> the population along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Kjafasan is<br />

heterogeneous. Around 53% <strong>of</strong> the population are Macedonians, 35% <strong>Albania</strong>ns and the<br />

remaining 12% are Turks, Macedonian <strong>of</strong> Muslim religion, Vlachs, Roma, etc. Settlements<br />

along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line from Kicevo to Struga are populated by Macedonians,<br />

while the section from Struga to the village Radozda is dominated by <strong>Albania</strong>n, Roman,<br />

Turkish, Vlach and other population.<br />

3.13.1.5 Age structure <strong>of</strong> the population<br />

The age structure <strong>of</strong> the population is the main determinant on which the vitality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population depends. In this specific case, it is notable that most <strong>of</strong> the populated places are<br />

characterized with significantly higher share <strong>of</strong> mature and particularly old population. In<br />

rural settlements, especially those with less than 100 inhabitants, there is almost no young<br />

population belonging to the age group <strong>of</strong> 0-19 years. Details <strong>of</strong> age structure by populated<br />

places, municipalities and collectively for the corridor, along the railway line route Kicevo-<br />

Kjafasan, are presented in the tables below.<br />

Table 33 Overview <strong>of</strong> population by age groups, by municipalities and populated places along the<br />

railway line route Kicevo-Lin<br />

KICEVO MUNICIPALITY<br />

Settlements<br />

AGE GROUPS<br />

0-19 г. 20-64 65-> вкупно<br />

KICEVO 8167 16560 2340 27067<br />

TOTAL 8167 16560 2340 27067<br />

DRUGOVO MUNICIPALITY<br />

Settlements<br />

AGE GROUPS<br />

0-19 г. 20-64 65-> вкупно<br />

BRZDANI 27 92 43 162<br />

VIDRANI 0 2 6 8<br />

POPOLZANI 29 59 21 109<br />

DRUGOVO 453 875 164 1492<br />

JUDOVO 0 12 15 27<br />

TOTAL 509 1040 249 1798<br />

DEBRCA MUNICIPALITY<br />

Settlements<br />

AGE GROUPS<br />

0-19 г. 20-64 65-> Вкупно<br />

ARBINOVO 2 5 19 26<br />

BOTUN 53 128 46 227<br />

IZDEGLAVJE 22 58 56 136<br />

NOVO SELO 13 25 30 68<br />

208


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

PESOCANI 18 56 21 95<br />

SLIVOVO 0 3 13 16<br />

TURJE 0 8 9 17<br />

KLIMESTANI 6 31 20 57<br />

MESEISTA 165 400 214 779<br />

VOLINO 117 262 83 462<br />

TREBENISTA 106 298 109 513<br />

TOTAL 502 1274 610 2396<br />

STRUGA MUNICIPALITY<br />

Settlements<br />

AGE GROUPS<br />

0-19 г. 20-64 65-> Вкупно<br />

MOROISTA 273 529 107 909<br />

MISLESEVO 1003 2162 342 3507<br />

STRUGA 5042 9941 1576 16559<br />

ZAGRACANI 444 570 61 1075<br />

SUM 378 411 48 837<br />

RADOLISTA 1361 1566 192 3119<br />

KALISTA 494 608 76 1178<br />

FRANGOVO 749 883 107 1739<br />

RADOZDA 208 493 107 808<br />

TOTAL 9952 17163 2616 29731<br />

Table 34 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> population by age groups, by municipalities and populated places<br />

along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin<br />

Settlements AGE GROUPS СТРУКТУРА ВО %<br />

0-19 г. 20-64 65-> вкупно 0-19 г. 20-64 65-> вкупно<br />

kicevo 8167 16560 2340 27067 30,1 61,2 8,7 100<br />

drugovo 509 1040 249 1798 28,4 57,8 13,8 100<br />

debrca 502 1274 610 2396 18,8 49,2 32,0 100<br />

struga 9952 17163 2616 29731 33,5 57,7 8,8 100<br />

total 19130 36037 5815 60992 31,4 59,1 9,5 100<br />

Data in the tables shows that the mature age group <strong>of</strong> 20-64 years prevails with around<br />

60%. Young age group <strong>of</strong> 0-19 years, at an average, is represented by around 30 %, and<br />

population older than 65 years is represented at an average by around 10%. If observed by<br />

populated places in a municipality, it is notable that the share <strong>of</strong> old population in Drugovo,<br />

Debrca and Ohrid is high. This means that the population in the settlements along the<br />

railway corridor is approaching deep maturity with a tendency towards full depopulation <strong>of</strong><br />

the area. On the other side, the percentage <strong>of</strong> representation <strong>of</strong> young population in Struga<br />

209


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Fields is rather high, while the proportion <strong>of</strong> old population corresponds with the one <strong>of</strong><br />

stable demographic structures <strong>of</strong> population.<br />

In the context <strong>of</strong> the above, there is a serious issue <strong>of</strong> revitalization <strong>of</strong> the settlements in the<br />

Municipality <strong>of</strong> Debrca, while stable demographic structure <strong>of</strong> the population can be<br />

expected in the settlements <strong>of</strong> Struga Fields and other populated places.<br />

3.13.1.6 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the population by economic activity<br />

Population by economic activity (persons at an age above 15 years) is a very important<br />

component <strong>of</strong> demographic study, as these components enable an insight in socio-economic<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> a given population. The text below presents data on economically active<br />

(including data on persons performing activity and persons not performing an activity) and<br />

economically inactive population. Economically active population consists <strong>of</strong> persons at an<br />

age <strong>of</strong> 15 and older. They have been grouped as persons performing an activity (i.e.<br />

employed or self-employed) and persons not performing an activity (including persons that<br />

have terminated their employment for various reasons) and so they look for a job.<br />

Economically inactive population includes persons who are work able, but for various<br />

reasons do not look for a job, such as: housewives, persons at military service, in prison,<br />

students, persons not able to work, retired persons, etc.<br />

Table 35 Overview <strong>of</strong> the population by economic activity, by municipalities and populated places<br />

along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin<br />

KICEVO MUNICIPALITY<br />

ECONOMICALLY ACTIVE<br />

ECONOMICALLY<br />

SETTLEMENTS<br />

TOTAL<br />

ALL<br />

IMPLOY UNIMPLOY<br />

INACTIVE<br />

KICEVO 20887 9904 5929 3975 10983<br />

TOTAL 20887 9904 5929 3975 10983<br />

DRUGOVO MUNICIPALITY<br />

ECONOMICALLY ACTIVE<br />

ECONOMICALLY<br />

SETTLEMENTS<br />

TOTAL<br />

ALL<br />

IMPLOY UNIMPLOY<br />

INACTIVE<br />

BRZDANI 146 23 23 - 123<br />

VIDRANI 8 1 1 - 7<br />

POPOLZANI 88 56 27 29 32<br />

DRUGOVO 1159 688 355 333 471<br />

JUDOVO 27 5 2 3 22<br />

TOTAL 1428 773 408 365 655<br />

DEBRCA MUNICIPALITY<br />

ECONOMICALLY ACTIVE<br />

ECONOMICALLY<br />

SETTLEMENTS<br />

TOTAL<br />

ALL IMPLOY UNIMPLOY<br />

INACTIVE<br />

210


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

ARBINOVO 24 1 - ARBINOVO 24<br />

BOTUN 188 66 40 BOTUN 188<br />

IZDEGLAVJE 120 38 12 IZDEGLAVJE 120<br />

NOVO SELO 60 19 7 NOVO SELO 60<br />

PESOCANI 82 32 15 PESOCANI 82<br />

SLIVOVO 16 1 1 SLIVOVO 16<br />

TURJE 14 - - TURJE 14<br />

KLIMESTANI 53 17 14 KLIMESTANI 53<br />

MESEISTA 666 280 172 MESEISTA 666<br />

VOLINO 362 162 89 VOLINO 362<br />

TREBENISTA 431 167 137 TREBENISTA 431<br />

TOTAL 2016 783 487 TOTAL 2016<br />

STRUGA MUNICIPALITY<br />

ECONOMICALLY ACTIVE<br />

SETTLEMENTS<br />

TOTAL<br />

ALL<br />

IMPLOY UNIMPLOY<br />

ECONOMICALLY<br />

INACTIVE<br />

MOROISTA 706 391 224 MOROISTA 706<br />

MISLESEVO 2770 1343 819 MISLESEVO 2770<br />

STRUGA 12919 6150 4114 STRUGA 12919<br />

ZAGRACANI 753 131 90 ZAGRACANI 753<br />

SUM 550 161 139 SUM 550<br />

RADOLISTA 1961 389 269 RADOLISTA 1961<br />

KALISTA 803 185 93 KALISTA 803<br />

FRANGOVO 1154 375 102 FRANGOVO 1154<br />

RADOZDA 658 389 244 RADOZDA 658<br />

TOTAL 22274 9514 6094 TOTAL 22274<br />

Table 36 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> the population by economic activity, by municipality along the railway<br />

line route Kicevo-Lin<br />

ECONOMICALLY ACTIVE<br />

SETTLEMENTS<br />

TOTAL<br />

ALL<br />

IMPLOY UNIMPLOY<br />

ECONOMICALLY<br />

INACTIVE<br />

KICEVO 20887 9904 5929 KICEVO 20887<br />

DRUGOVO 1428 773 408 DRUGOVO 1428<br />

DEBARCA 2016 783 487 DEBARCA 2016<br />

211


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

STRUGA 22274 9514 6094 STRUGA 22274<br />

TOTAL 46605 20974 12918 TOTAL 46605<br />

Data presented in tables indicates that economically inactive population accounts for 55%,<br />

i.e. more than economically active persons whose share is 45%. If we take the unemployed<br />

persons out <strong>of</strong> the economically active population, we may conclude that as low as 28% are<br />

persons performing pr<strong>of</strong>ession and they support the entire remaining population. It turns out<br />

that economically inactive population has greater influence on the overall state, where on<br />

one side there are persons with personal incomes that are most represented in the cities<br />

Kicevo and Struga and rural settlements in the Municipality Debrca and some villages in<br />

Ohrid area, and on the other side, as inactive population, there is younger population in the<br />

populated places <strong>of</strong> Struga Fields.<br />

The impact <strong>of</strong> the railway line, in terms <strong>of</strong> economic activity <strong>of</strong> the population, should be<br />

significant, especially in populated places in Struga Fields where relatively high portion <strong>of</strong><br />

young people that do not perform an activity (in the context <strong>of</strong> various needs in the railway<br />

transport, customs and economic systems), they will engage in and around activities<br />

connected with the railway transport.<br />

3.13.1.7 Households, members per households and dwellings<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the most important indicators <strong>of</strong> the population vitality, work ability and<br />

(comparatively) utilization <strong>of</strong> natural resources within given space, is the number <strong>of</strong><br />

households and especially the number <strong>of</strong> members per household as the main element in<br />

assessing the possibility for economic management <strong>of</strong> agricultural assets. Therefore, the text<br />

below presents the status concerning the number <strong>of</strong> households per populated place in<br />

Osogovo Mountains area compared to the number <strong>of</strong> population members per household<br />

and housing units.<br />

Table 37 Overview <strong>of</strong> population, households, number <strong>of</strong> members per households and dwellings, by<br />

municipality and populated place along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin<br />

KICEVO MUNICIPALITY<br />

Settlement Total population Households No.<strong>of</strong> mem. Per households housing<br />

KICEVO 27067 7510 3,6 9246<br />

TOTAL 27067 7510 3,6 9246<br />

DRUGOVO MUNICIPALITY<br />

Settlement Total population Households No.<strong>of</strong> mem. Per households housing<br />

BRZDANI 162 53 3,0 99<br />

VIDRANI 8 5 1,6 26<br />

G.POPOLZANI 109 36 3,0 55<br />

DRUGOVO 1492 441 3,4 586<br />

JUDOVO 5 3 1,7 10<br />

TOTAL 1776 538 3,3 776<br />

DEBRCA MUNICIPALITY<br />

212


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Settlement Total population Households No.<strong>of</strong> mem. Per households housing<br />

ARBINOVO 26 17 1,5 80<br />

BOTUN 227 76 3,0 142<br />

IZDEGLAVJE 136 58 2,3 122<br />

NOVO SELO 68 37 1,8 39<br />

PESOCANI 95 43 2,2 88<br />

SLIVOVO 16 10 1,6 75<br />

TURJE 17 9 1,9 64<br />

KLIMESTANI 57 23 2,5 40<br />

MESEISTA 779 246 3,2 564<br />

VOLINO 462 137 3,4 244<br />

TREBENISTA 513 169 3,0 345<br />

TOTAL 2396 825 5,4 1803<br />

STRUGA MUNICIPALITY<br />

Settlement Total population Households No.<strong>of</strong> mem. Per households housing<br />

MOROISTA 909 212 4,3 262<br />

MISLESEVO 3507 840 4,2 1127<br />

STRUGA 16559 4261 3,9 5604<br />

ZAGRACANI 1075 230 4,7 251<br />

SUM 837 192 4,4 211<br />

RADOLISTA 3119 667 4,7 703<br />

KALISTA 1178 283 4,2 341<br />

FRANGOVO 1739 385 4,5 413<br />

RADOZDA 808 217 3,7 347<br />

TOTAL 29731 7287 4,1 9259<br />

Table 38 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> the population by age groups, by municipality along the railway line<br />

route Kicevo-Lin<br />

Settlement Total population Households No.<strong>of</strong> mem. Per households housing<br />

KICEVO 27067 7510 3,6 9246<br />

DRUGOVO 1776 538 3,3 776<br />

DEBARCA 2396 825 5,4 1803<br />

OHRID 1811 575 3,1 1193<br />

STRUGA 29731 7287 4,1 9259<br />

213


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

TOTAL 60970 16160 3,8 21084<br />

Based on the data presented, we may conclude that the number <strong>of</strong> members per is relatively<br />

low, basically less than 4 members per household, including urban environments. This<br />

problem is significant in rural settlements where the number <strong>of</strong> members per household is<br />

around 2, and in high number <strong>of</strong> cases it is less than 2. This especially articulated in the<br />

populated places Popolzani, Vidrani, Brzdani and Judovo in Kicevo area and the group <strong>of</strong><br />

villages in the area <strong>of</strong> Debrca, such as Arbinovo, Botun, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Pesocani,<br />

Slivovo and Turje. This means that high proportion <strong>of</strong> the households have weak economic<br />

ability to work. The problem <strong>of</strong> single member households exists, too.<br />

It can be noted that, at the level <strong>of</strong> all data, the number <strong>of</strong> dwellings is higher than the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> households by around 25%. This situation is much more explicit in rural<br />

settlements, which have drastically disrupted demographic structure. There, due to<br />

depopulation and migration processes, part <strong>of</strong> the dwellings have been abandoned. In<br />

demographically more vital populated places, like the cities Kicevo and Struga and major<br />

populated places Drugovo, Mislesevo, Radolista, etc., the number <strong>of</strong> dwellings relative to<br />

households is higher, but not so drastically as in the case <strong>of</strong> demographically weaker<br />

settlements. This is due to the fact that some households own more than one dwelling.<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line is expected to have positive impact on revitalization and<br />

economic sustainability <strong>of</strong> the area.<br />

3.14 Use and categorization <strong>of</strong> the land around the railway line route<br />

The analyzed area within the corridor Struga-Kjafasan amounts 6027 ha (Table 39). This<br />

area should be supplemented by the part <strong>of</strong> forest habitats, above the tunnel Judovo-Slivovo<br />

(353 ha), by which the overall area <strong>of</strong> the corridor reaches 6380 ha.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> this area is made <strong>of</strong> forests (41.7%) and agricultural land (39.8%). There, Italian and<br />

Turkey oak forests are predominant covering an area <strong>of</strong> 2507 ha. To the forest land, we can<br />

also add riparian alder forests covering 131 ha or 2% <strong>of</strong> the total area <strong>of</strong> the investigated<br />

corridor, which although occupying small areas are very important in terms <strong>of</strong> biological<br />

diversity conservation.<br />

Agricultural land is dominant mainly in Struga Fields. Major part <strong>of</strong> it is represented by huge<br />

complexes <strong>of</strong> fields covering the former Struga Marsh. Therefore, remains <strong>of</strong> marsh habitats<br />

are frequently found within agricultural areas.<br />

Land use in the analyzed space along the railway line Kicevo -Lin is presented in Table 39.<br />

Table 39 Land use in the analyzed corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Kjafasan<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> land<br />

Area<br />

[ha] %<br />

FOREST LAND 2658.15 41.66<br />

Natural forests 2507.54 39.30<br />

Blagun – gaberovi forests 50.56 0.79<br />

Ploskachevo – cerovi forests 2391.13 37.48<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> land<br />

Area<br />

[ha] %<br />

Well – developed forest 2239.09 35.09<br />

214


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Purpose <strong>of</strong> land<br />

Area<br />

Degraded stage 34.11 0.53<br />

Final degraded stage 117.93 1.85<br />

Chestnut forests 34.64 0.54<br />

Gorunovi forests 31.21 0.49<br />

Forest plantation 150.61 2.36<br />

Blackboron plantations 150.61 2.36<br />

Near river FORESTS 130.76 2.05<br />

Evlovi belts and forests 130.76 2.05<br />

LAND PASTURES(OPEN HABITATS) 33.8 0.53<br />

Брдски пасишта 33.8 0.53<br />

Wetlands 74.19 1.16<br />

Wetland habitats 15.68 0.25<br />

Wet meadows 56.81 0.89<br />

Alluwial sands 1.7 0.03<br />

WET SURFACES 110.49 1.73<br />

Lake 110.49 1.73<br />

AGRICULTURAL LAND 2539.22 39.80<br />

meadows 607.82 9.53<br />

Fields, vineyards and orchards 1799.23 28.20<br />

Abandoned fields 132.17 2.07<br />

RURAL AREAS AND INDUSTRY 480.63 7.53<br />

Settlements 470.61 7.38<br />

Urban habitats 184.18 2.89<br />

Rural habitats 286.43 4.49<br />

Industry 10.02 0.16<br />

quarry 1.78 0.03<br />

separation 1.07 0.02<br />

Industrial facilities 7.17 0.11<br />

TOTAL LAND ANALYZED 6027.24 94.47<br />

HABITATS OVER TUNNEL JUDOVO -SLIVOVO* 353.08 5.53<br />

TOTAL 6380.32 100.00<br />

Well – developed forest 2239.09 35.09<br />

Degraded stage 34.11 0.53<br />

Final degraded stage 117.93 1.85<br />

Chestnut forests 34.64 0.54<br />

*Habitats and land use above the tunnel Judovo-Slivovo have not been analyzed. Most <strong>of</strong><br />

this area is forest land.<br />

215


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 60 Land categorization<br />

3.14.1 Economic and geographical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area along the railway line<br />

route Kicevo-Lin<br />

Economic development <strong>of</strong> a given area is in close correlation with its natural and geographic<br />

characteristics, such as relief structure <strong>of</strong> the area, location <strong>of</strong> populated places, natural<br />

resources, distribution <strong>of</strong> the population, level <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> institutional and linear<br />

infrastructure and other factors.<br />

Taking into account the above factors, direct perception <strong>of</strong> the area along the railway line<br />

route Kicevo-Lin and other economic and geographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> this mountain massif<br />

have been considered primarily through review <strong>of</strong> agricultural areas by cadastre (registered<br />

land) plots. More precisely, alfa-numerical presentation <strong>of</strong> cultivable land areas (fields,<br />

gardens, orchards, vineyards, meadows), pastures, forests, infertile lands, etc., has been<br />

made. In this context, it was possible to acquire better picture <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong> the basic natural<br />

resources and their impact on economic development <strong>of</strong> the region. In close correlation with<br />

these capacities, we have also considered other economic and non-economic activities and<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> relevance for the sustainable development and use <strong>of</strong> the space along the railway<br />

line Kicevo-Lin. Overview <strong>of</strong> infrastructure availability in populated places and the region was<br />

made, as well as overview <strong>of</strong> possibilities for more intensive communication between the<br />

settlements in the region.<br />

3.14.1.1 Overview <strong>of</strong> agricultural areas by registered land plots along the railway line<br />

route Kicevo-Lin<br />

The overview <strong>of</strong> agricultural areas by registered land plots along along the railway line<br />

Kicevo-Lin is presented by municipality and populated place. Factographic data is also<br />

216


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

classified by sectors <strong>of</strong> ownership, in order to enable clearer perception <strong>of</strong> the size <strong>of</strong><br />

agricultural areas by registered land plots clustered as cultivable and uncultivable land. More<br />

precisely, cultivable land is classified as fields, rice fields, gardens, orchards, vineyards and<br />

meadows. Uncultivable land is classified as areas under pasture, forest, reeds and marshes<br />

and infertile land. This provides more comprehensive and specific view over natural<br />

capacities <strong>of</strong> the space along the railway line Kicevo-Lin. Detailed data is presented in the<br />

tables below.<br />

.<br />

217


ORDINAL NO.<br />

PROPERITY (HA)<br />

FIELDS<br />

RICE FIELDS<br />

GARDENS<br />

ORCHARDS<br />

INTE.<br />

ORCHARDS.<br />

VINEYARDS<br />

INTENSIVE<br />

VINEYARDS<br />

MEADOWS<br />

TOTAL<br />

TRE.SURF.<br />

PASTURES<br />

FORESTS<br />

SWAMPY<br />

BARREN LAND<br />

TOTAL AREA<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Table 40 Overview <strong>of</strong> agricultural land by registered land plots, by municipalities and populated places along the railway line route Kicevo-Lin<br />

DRUGOVO MUNICIPALITY<br />

NAME OF CADASTRAL<br />

CULTURE<br />

CULTURE<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />

private 54.8 - 1.8 17.2 - 1.3 - 1.8 76.9 135.2 106.9 - 8.8 327.8<br />

1 BRZDANI<br />

social 0.2 - - 0.1 - 0.4 - - 0.7 70.8 284.0 - 25.3 380.8<br />

total 55.0 - 1.8 17.3 - 1.7 - 1.8 77.6 206.0 390.9 - 34.1 708.6<br />

private 40.0 - 0.9 4.3 - 0.1 - 2.9 48.2 19.9 23.4 - 1.0 92.5<br />

2 VIDRANI<br />

social - - - - - - - - - 11.7 130.5 - 14.1 156.3<br />

total 40.0 - 0.9 4.3 - 0.1 - 2.9 48.2 31.6 153.9 - 15.1 248.8<br />

G AND D POPOLZANI private 16.9 - 0.9 5.0 - - - 22.5 45.3 26.2 25.8 - 2.0 102.0<br />

3<br />

social - - - 0.1 - - - - 0.1 6.1 107.2 - 11.4 124.8<br />

total 16.9 - 0.9 5.1 - - - 22.5 45.4 32.3 133.0 - 13.4 226.8<br />

DRUGOVO private 104.9 - - 9.3 - 2.0 - 0.3 116.5 40.0 8.2 - 14.4 179.1<br />

4<br />

social 0.5 - - 0.1 - - - - 0.6 137.0 328.4 - 31.7 497.7<br />

total 105.4 - - 9.4 - 2.0 - 0.3 117.1 177.0 336.6 - 46.1 676.8<br />

private 47.9 - - 8.1 - 0.1 - 6.4 62.5 162.7 64.3 - 2.5 292.0<br />

5 ЈUDOVO<br />

social 1.2 - - 0.2 - - - 0.3 1.7 62.9 464.2 - 22.3 551.1<br />

total 49.1 - - 8.3 - 0.1 - 6.7 64.2 225.6 528.5 - 24.8 843.1<br />

private 490.8 - - 99.0 - 16.4 - 37.4 643.6 54.0 29.4 - 136.4 863.4<br />

6 KICEVO<br />

social 37.6 - - 37.6 - 44.6 - 5.0 124.8 368.7 449.2 - 281.0 1223.7<br />

218


ORDINAL<br />

NO.<br />

PROPERITY<br />

(HA)<br />

FIELDS<br />

RICE<br />

FIELDS<br />

GARDENS<br />

ORCHARD<br />

S<br />

INTE.<br />

ORCHARD<br />

ORCHARD<br />

S<br />

INTE.<br />

ORCHARD<br />

S.<br />

TOTAL<br />

TRE.SURF.<br />

RICE<br />

FIELDS<br />

GARDENS<br />

ORCHARD<br />

S<br />

BARREN<br />

LAND<br />

INTE.<br />

TOTAL ORCHARD AREA<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

7<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

total 528.4 - - 136.6 - 61.0 - 42.4 768.4 422.7 478.6 - 417.4 2087.1<br />

TOTAL private 755.3 - 3.6 142.9 - 19.9 - 71.3 993.0 438.0 258.0 - 165.1 1856.8<br />

social 39.5 - - 38.1 - 45.0 - 5.3 127.9 657.2 1763.5 - 385.8 2934.4<br />

total 794.8 - 3.6 181.0 - 64.9 - 76.6 1120.9 1095.2 2021.5 - 550.9 4791.2<br />

DEBRCA MUNICIPALITY<br />

NAME OF CADASTRAL<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

CULTURE<br />

FIELDS<br />

FIELDS CULTURE<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1<br />

1 TURJE<br />

2 SLIVOVO<br />

3 АRBINOVO<br />

private 281.3 - 0.7 2.6 -<br />

private 281.3 - 0.7 2.6 -<br />

1 TURJE<br />

social 247.5 - - 0.4 - social 247.5 - - 0.4 -<br />

total 528.8 - 0.7 3.0 - total 528.8 - 0.7 3.0 -<br />

private 247.7 - 0.9 2.8 -<br />

private 247.7 - 0.9 2.8 -<br />

2 SLIVOVO<br />

social 63.7 - - 0.1 - social 63.7 - - 0.1 -<br />

total 311.4 - 0.9 2.9 - total 311.4 - 0.9 2.9 -<br />

private 209.9 - - 2.8 -<br />

private 209.9 - - 2.8 -<br />

3 АRBINOVO<br />

social 47.2 - - - - social 47.2 - - - -<br />

total 257.1 - - 2.8 - total 257.1 - - 2.8 -<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

219


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

private 258.8 - 1.0 1.5 -<br />

private 258.8 - 1.0 1.5 -<br />

4 IZDEGLAVJE<br />

4 IZDEGLAVJE<br />

4<br />

social 20.3 - 0.3 0.3 - social 20.3 - 0.3 0.3 -<br />

total 279.1 - 1.3 1.8 - total 279.1 - 1.3 1.8 -<br />

private 165.5 - 0.2 - -<br />

private 165.5 - 0.2 - -<br />

5 PESOCANI<br />

5 PESOCANI<br />

5<br />

social 34.6 - - - - social 34.6 - - - -<br />

total 200.1 - 0.2 - - total 200.1 - 0.2 - -<br />

private 136.5 - 0.1 1.3 -<br />

private 136.5 - 0.1 1.3 -<br />

6 NOVO SELO<br />

6 NOVO SELO<br />

6<br />

social 14.8 - - 0.1 - social 14.8 - - 0.1 -<br />

total 151.3 - 0.1 1.4 - total 151.3 - 0.1 1.4 -<br />

private 293.0 - 0.4 3.2 -<br />

private 293.0 - 0.4 3.2 -<br />

7 BOTUN<br />

7 BOTUN<br />

7<br />

social 76.6 - - - - social 76.6 - - - -<br />

total 369.6 - 0.4 3.2 - total 369.6 - 0.4 3.2 -<br />

private 113.3 - 0.2 16.0 -<br />

private 113.3 - 0.2 16.0 -<br />

8<br />

KLIMESTANI<br />

KLIMESTANI<br />

8<br />

8<br />

social 14.2 - - - - social 14.2 - - - -<br />

total 127.5 - 0.2 16.0 - total 127.5 - 0.2 16.0 -<br />

private 440.2 - 8.0 61.5 -<br />

private 440.2 - 8.0 61.5 -<br />

9<br />

MESEISTA<br />

9<br />

9<br />

MESEISTA<br />

social 157.2 - 0.9 15.7 - social 157.2 - 0.9 15.7 -<br />

total 597.4 - 8.9 77.2 - total 597.4 - 8.9 77.2 -<br />

10 VOLINO<br />

private 357.9 - 5.3 49.9 - 10 VOLINO private 357.9 - 5.3 49.9 - 10<br />

social 6.4 - - 5.5 - social 6.4 - - 5.5 -<br />

220


ORDINAL NO.<br />

PROPERITY (HA)<br />

FIELDS<br />

RICE FIELDS<br />

GARDENS<br />

ORCHARDS<br />

INTE.<br />

ORCHARD<br />

ORCHARDS<br />

INTE.<br />

ORCHARDS.<br />

TOTAL<br />

TRE.SURF.<br />

FIELDS<br />

RICE FIELDS<br />

GARDENS<br />

ORCHARDS<br />

BARREN LAND<br />

INTE. ORCHARD<br />

TOTAL AREA<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

11<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

total 364.3 - 5.3 55.4 - total 364.3 - 5.3 55.4 -<br />

private 371.0 - 7.9 52.8 -<br />

private 371.0 - 7.9 52.8 -<br />

11<br />

TREBENISTA<br />

TREBENISTA<br />

social 20.1 - 0.2 3.1 - social 20.1 - 0.2 3.1 -<br />

total 391.1 - 8.1 55.9 - total 391.1 - 8.1 55.9 -<br />

private 2875.1 - 42.8 194.4 - TOTAL private 2875.1 - 42.8 194.4 -<br />

TOTAL<br />

social 702.6 - 2.2 25.2 - social 702.6 - 2.2 25.2 -<br />

total 3577.7 - 45 219.6 - total 3577.7 - 45 219.6 -<br />

11<br />

STRUGA MUNICIPALITY<br />

NAME OF CADASTRAL<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

CULTURE<br />

FIELDS<br />

CULTURE<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1<br />

1 MOROISTA<br />

2 KOROSISTA<br />

private 436.1 - 8.0 20.5 -<br />

private 436.1 - 8.0 20.5 -<br />

1 MOROISTA<br />

social 22.2 - 0.2 21.3 - social 22.2 - 0.2 21.3 -<br />

total 458.3 - 8.2 41.8 - total 458.3 - 8.2 41.8 -<br />

private 230.9 - 13.3 13.2 -<br />

private 230.9 - 13.3 13.2 -<br />

2 KOROSISTA<br />

social 0.4 - - - - social 0.4 - - - -<br />

1<br />

2<br />

221


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

total 231.3 - 13.3 13.2 - total 231.3 - 13.3 13.2 -<br />

private 788.0 - 1.6 118.0 -<br />

private 788.0 - 1.6 118.0 -<br />

3 МISLESEVO<br />

3 МISLESEVO<br />

social 160.6 - - 95.6 - social 160.6 - - 95.6 -<br />

total 948.6 - 1.6 213.6 - total 948.6 - 1.6 213.6 -<br />

private 205.8 - 3.6 49.6 -<br />

private 205.8 - 3.6 49.6 -<br />

4 STRUGA<br />

4 STRUGA<br />

social 289.6 - 1.7 68.5 - social 289.6 - 1.7 68.5 -<br />

total 495.4 - 5.3 118,1 - total 495.4 - 5.3 118,1 -<br />

private 237.3 - - 14.9 -<br />

private 237.3 - - 14.9 -<br />

5 ZAGRAC.SUM<br />

5 ZAGRAC.SUM<br />

social 14.7 - - - - social 14.7 - - - -<br />

total 252.0 - - 14.9 - total 252.0 - - 14.9 -<br />

private 213.2 - - 19.3 -<br />

private 213.2 - - 19.3 -<br />

6 RADOLISTA<br />

6 RADOLISTA<br />

social 0.1 - - - - social 0.1 - - - -<br />

private 213.2 - - 19.3 - private 213.2 - - 19.3 -<br />

social 110.4 - 0.6 4.8 -<br />

social 110.4 - 0.6 4.8 -<br />

7 KALISTA<br />

7 KALISTA<br />

total 1.1 - - - - total 1.1 - - - -<br />

private 111.5 - 0.6 4.8 - private 111.5 - 0.6 4.8 -<br />

social 86.3 - - 13.6 -<br />

social 86.3 - - 13.6 -<br />

8 FRANGOVO<br />

8 FRANGOVO<br />

total 0.2 - - - - total 0.2 - - - -<br />

private 86.5 - - 13.6 - private 86.5 - - 13.6 -<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

222


ORDINAL NO.<br />

PROPERITY (HA)<br />

FIELDS<br />

RICE FIELDS<br />

GARDENS<br />

ORCHARDS<br />

INTE.<br />

ORCHARD<br />

ORCHARDS<br />

INTE.<br />

ORCHARD<br />

MEADOW<br />

TOTAL<br />

TRE.SURF.<br />

FORESTS<br />

SWAMPY<br />

SWAMPY<br />

BARREN LAND<br />

TOTAL AREA<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

STRUGA MUNICIPALITY (cont.)<br />

NAME OF CADASTRAL<br />

CULTURE<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

CULTURE<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />

private 4.6 - - 1.0 - 2.4 - 23.5 31.5 75.1 179.1 - 2.5 288.2<br />

9 MALI VLAJ<br />

social - - - - - - - - - 74.0 607.4 - 13.4 694.8<br />

total 4.6 - - 1.0 - 2.4 - 23.5 31.5 149.1 786.5 - 15.9 983.0<br />

private 29.9 - - 3.8 - 8.3 - 15.4 57.4 118.4 187.7 - 11.3 374.8<br />

10 RADOZDA<br />

social 1.3 - - - - 0.6 - 0.4 2.3 67.5 317.7 - 32.0 419.5<br />

total 31.2 - - 3.8 - 8.9 - 15.8 59.7 185.9 505.4 - 43.3 794.3<br />

TOTAL private 2342.5 - 27.1 258.7 - 71.2 - 313.6 3013.1 447.0 1011.0 0.5 192.4 4664.0<br />

11<br />

social 490.2 - 1.9 185.4 - 2.5 - 6.7 686.7 639.7 2218.6 0.1 448.4 3993.5<br />

total 2832.7 - 29.0 444.1 - 73.7 - 320.3 3699.8 1086.7 3229.6 0.6 640.8 8657.5<br />

223


ORDINAL<br />

NO.<br />

PROPERITY<br />

(HA)<br />

FIELDS<br />

RICE<br />

FIELDS<br />

GARDENS<br />

ORCHARD<br />

S<br />

INTE.<br />

ORCHARD<br />

ORCHARD<br />

S<br />

INTE.<br />

ORCHARD<br />

MEADOW<br />

TOTAL<br />

TRE.SURF.<br />

FORESTS<br />

SWAMPY<br />

SWAMPY<br />

BARREN<br />

LAND<br />

TOTAL AREA<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Table 41 Collective overview <strong>of</strong> agricultural areas by registered land plots, by municipalities and populated places along the railway line Kicevo-Lin<br />

KICEVO-LIN RAILWAY LINE<br />

NAME OF CADASTRAL<br />

CULTURE<br />

CULTURE<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />

DRUGOVO private 755.3 - 3.6 142.9 - 19.9 - 71.3 993.0 438.0 258.0 - 165.1 1856.8<br />

1<br />

social 39.5 - - 38.1 - 45.0 - 5.3 127.9 657.2 1763.5 - 385.8 2934.4<br />

total 794.8 - 3.6 181.0 - 64.9 - 76.6 1120.9 1095.2 2021.5 - 550.9 4791.2<br />

DEBARCA private 2875.1 - 42.8 194.4 - 146.9 0.3 313.1 3554.5 112.3 417.5 - 100.8 4185.1<br />

2<br />

social 702.6 - 2.2 25.2 - 45.4 - 30.7 805.3 488.2 6669.2 - 974.1 8936.8<br />

total 3577.7 - 45 219.6 - 192.3 0.3 343.8 4359.8 600.5 7086.7 - 1073.9 13121.9<br />

private 197.9 - 1.1 24.3 - 45.4 - 3.5 272.2 87.0 1937.9 - 464.0 2761.1<br />

social 1480.3 - 22.5 204.5 - 189.5 - 68.8 1965.6 126.8 1957.7 - 495.9 4546.0<br />

STRUGA total 2342.5 - 27.1 258.7 - 71.2 - 313.6 3013.1 447.0 1011.0 0.5 192.4 4664.0<br />

3<br />

private 490.2 - 1.9 185.4 - 2.5 - 6.7 686.7 639.7 2218.6 0.1 448.4 3993.5<br />

social 2832.7 - 29.0 444.1 - 73.7 - 320.3 3699.8 1086.7 3229.6 0.6 640.8 8657.5<br />

total 5972.9 55.4 596.0 - 238.0 0.3 698.0 7560.6 997.3 1686.5 0.5 458.3 10705.9<br />

TOTAL<br />

private 1232.3 3.3 248.7 - 92.9 - 42.7 1619.9 1785.1 10651.3 0.1 1808.3 15864.7<br />

total 7205.2 58.7 844.7 - 330.9 0.3 740.7 9180.5 2782.4 12337.8 0.6 2265.6 26570.6<br />

224


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Tables above present data on the size <strong>of</strong> areas by registered land plots, by municipalities<br />

and populated places along along the railway line Kicevo-Lin. Total <strong>of</strong> 26 areas <strong>of</strong> populated<br />

places covering 26570,6 hectares (265 km 2 ) have been included. This means that the<br />

average size <strong>of</strong> rural area amounts around 10 km 2 . Nevertheless, although the immediate<br />

corridor occupies only around 60 km 2 (corridor on right and left <strong>of</strong> the railway line route with<br />

a total width <strong>of</strong> 1 km), analyses have been made to cover whole areas <strong>of</strong> the populated<br />

places.<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> the total area <strong>of</strong> the territory <strong>of</strong> 26570,6 hectares, 15864,7 hectares or 59.7% are<br />

socially owned, and the rest <strong>of</strong> 10705,9 hectares or 40.3% are in the private sector.<br />

Owing to the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the territory (predominantly mountainous area), cultivable<br />

land area covers around 1/3 <strong>of</strong> the territory <strong>of</strong> the settlements in the corridor or 9180,5<br />

hectares. Fields <strong>of</strong> 7205.2 hectares prevail, then orchards with 844.7 ha, meadows with<br />

740.7 ha etc. Most <strong>of</strong> the cultivable areas are in private ownership. Changes in lifestyle and<br />

economy management <strong>of</strong> the population in the course <strong>of</strong> the last decades has resulted in<br />

part <strong>of</strong> these territories not being cultivated, and so we can conclude that they supplement<br />

uncultivable areas, especially those under pastures and forests.<br />

Uncultivated area (pastures, forests, reed marshes and swamps, barren land) occupies<br />

around 2/3 <strong>of</strong> the territory along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin. The largest areas<br />

are under forest -12337.8 ha, followed by 2782.4 ha under pastures, 2265.6 ha barren land,<br />

etc. Major part <strong>of</strong> uncultivated land area is socially owned, or precisely around 1/4 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mentioned area is privately, and 3/4 socially owned. This applies in particular on populated<br />

places in Kicevo area and the area <strong>of</strong> Debrca, where areas <strong>of</strong> the populated places are<br />

dominated by hilly and mountainous characteristics <strong>of</strong> the land. Private sector has bigger<br />

share in rural areas <strong>of</strong> Struga Fields, so that 1/2 <strong>of</strong> the settlements' areas are in private, and<br />

the rest in social ownership.<br />

In the context <strong>of</strong> the above described situation, practical extension <strong>of</strong> the railway line through<br />

Struga Fields, with a length <strong>of</strong> around 20 km, will affect around 1000 hectares privately<br />

owned land within the corridor itself, part <strong>of</strong> which will have to be subject to expropriation <strong>of</strong><br />

land, which assumes expenditures to regulate the matter. This process will inevitably be<br />

carried out along the whole route <strong>of</strong> the railway line; however, given the configuration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relief and the size <strong>of</strong> registered land plots under forest, pastures, barren land etc., in the area<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kicevo, Debrca and around the section leading to the border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>,<br />

the issue will not be very difficult. The statement can be supported by the fact that the route<br />

<strong>of</strong> the railway line in these areas passes through tunnels and bridges, which makes the need<br />

for land expropriation significantly smaller.<br />

3.15 Existing or planned infrastructure around the route<br />

Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the infrastructure in a certain area are very important components <strong>of</strong> daily<br />

functioning and work needs <strong>of</strong> the population. In the sphere <strong>of</strong> infrastructure equipment,<br />

economic, institutional and linear infrastructures are almost equally important.<br />

3.15.1 Economic infrastructure<br />

Considering geographical characteristics, the economic infrastructure <strong>of</strong> the immediate<br />

corridor <strong>of</strong> the route <strong>of</strong> the Kicevo- Lin railway line is not very developed. The bigger part <strong>of</strong><br />

the corridor passes through economically underdeveloped rural areas, including the section<br />

from Drugovo to the village <strong>of</strong> Meseista and the section from Radolista to Radozda. Primary<br />

activities from the agriculture domain (farming and fruit-growing on insignificant surfaces as<br />

gardens) and forestry (as a natural recourse which, in conditions <strong>of</strong> abandoned and<br />

demographically weakened populated areas, is uncontrollably exploited by forest enterprises<br />

225


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

and illegal woodcutters) predominate in this area. Livestock breeding, in conditions <strong>of</strong><br />

depopulated settlements, only developed to the level <strong>of</strong> satisfying insignificant personal<br />

needs. In the secondary sector domain, regarding the aforementioned sector <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />

route, industrial facilities are non-existent.<br />

The economic infrastructure from the secondary activities domain is present in the urban<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> Kicevo and Struga, and in some <strong>of</strong> the larger rural areas in the Struga Field. In<br />

Kicevo for example, some <strong>of</strong> the most distinguished industrial facilities include: Construction<br />

Company “Bistra Drvo”, Public Enterprise “Elektrostopanstvo”, Joint Stock Company “Zito<br />

Karaorman” for production <strong>of</strong> flour, bread and bakery, Joint Stock Company EMO,<br />

operational unit for steel latticed pillars, that is to say production <strong>of</strong> metal constructions, Joint<br />

Stock Company “Tane Celeski” for production <strong>of</strong> tools, Joint Stock Company “Tajmiste” for<br />

production <strong>of</strong> string products, Textile Works “Kikoteks”, forest management Public Enterprise<br />

“Lopusnik” etc. More distinctive facilities in Struga include: Joint Stock Company "Struzanka"<br />

for production <strong>of</strong> textile products and curtains, Joint Stock Company “Grafikom” for printing<br />

activities, Public Enterprise “Jablanica” for production <strong>of</strong> parquet and timber, Public Water<br />

Management Enterprise “Crn Drim” for water management, Joint Stock Company “Ilinden”<br />

for skyscraper construction, Joint Stock Company “Jugotrans” for passenger transport and<br />

other facilities. A textile branch factory <strong>of</strong> “Oteks” is found in the village <strong>of</strong> Meseista.<br />

The railway line impact on the development <strong>of</strong> every domain economic infrastructure should<br />

undoubtedly be positive and a development factor. At the same time, expanding economic<br />

capacities, as well as establishing new facilities <strong>of</strong> other domains with enhanced production,<br />

transport and trade capacities, should be expected.<br />

3.15.2 Institutional infrastructure<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> institutional infrastructure in populated areas near the railway corridor, excluding<br />

several <strong>of</strong> the settlements around Kicevo (Vidrani, Judovo) and around Debrca (Turje,<br />

Slivovo, Arbinovo etc.), almost all bigger settlements have schools, out-patient clinics,<br />

commercial facilities, posts, gas stations and some restaurants and tourist facilities. Other<br />

institutional infrastructure facilities from the sphere <strong>of</strong> banking, tourism (hotels, motels,<br />

resting areas etc.), social-cultural and other facilities are found in the areas <strong>of</strong> the cities <strong>of</strong><br />

Kicevo and Struga, as well as some villages near the Ohrid Lake.<br />

The railway line, with its accompanying elements (railway stops and stations), should impact<br />

revitalizing and expanding <strong>of</strong> institutional infrastructure capacities in settlements near the<br />

railway.<br />

3.15.3 Linear infrastructure<br />

The linear infrastructure along the route <strong>of</strong> the Kicevo- Lin railway line, is mainly composed<br />

<strong>of</strong> highways, regional and local roads, and at certain locations a water-supply and electricity<br />

infrastructure.<br />

The planned railway line route intersects several highways and regional roads. More<br />

specifically, the route intersects the Kicevo- Ohrid highway, near the village <strong>of</strong> Popolzani,<br />

and once again at the section near the Botun gorge. Furthermore, the railway line intersects<br />

the Struga- Debar regional road, near the city <strong>of</strong> Struga, and once again the Struga-<br />

Kjafasan highway, near the village <strong>of</strong> Frangovo. Multiple intersections with local roads occur<br />

along the way, in the Debrca area and the Struga Field, such as intersections with the local<br />

roads leading to villages Arbinovo, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Belcista, Volino, Moroista,<br />

Zagracani-Sum, Kalista and other less significant roads. This situation will have certain<br />

impacts regarding the existing communication <strong>of</strong> settlements with highways and through<br />

226


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

them with urban centers near the railway line. In this context, adequate technical measures<br />

for establishing an open natural communication <strong>of</strong> space on both sides <strong>of</strong> the railway line are<br />

inevitable.<br />

The railway line compulsorily intersects many water management objects, such as the river<br />

Sateska canal gravitating towards the Ohrid Lake, the Crn Drim river, the underground<br />

aqueduct from the village <strong>of</strong> Radolista towards Struga, as well as several canals <strong>of</strong> the<br />

amelioration network in the Struga Field. These objects correlations will most certainly<br />

disrupt the existing ecological balance. Thus, the need for adequate technical solutions is<br />

inevitable, minimizing the railway line negative environmental impacts.<br />

At certain points, the railway line comes across elements <strong>of</strong> the electro-distribution network,<br />

present in the railway corridor. This occurs at several places in the Debrca area and the<br />

Struga Field.<br />

3.16 Forests<br />

3.16.1 Forest and forestry management in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia<br />

3.16.1.1 Forest management<br />

Under the Law on Forests (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no. 64/09, all forests in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia, depending on geographical, natural and economic characteristics, are divided<br />

and organized into parts/units called forest management units (FMUs). There are 197 FMUs<br />

on the territory <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia (current status). Each FMU, depending on the<br />

relief, topography, hydrography, composition, structure, age, and other natural<br />

characteristics and criteria, is divided/organized in smaller parts, called sections or<br />

subsections. Subsection is the smallest geographical, natural and economic spatial<br />

organizational unit in the frames <strong>of</strong> a FMU. All measures and activities within a FMU (forest<br />

growing, protection and use) are planned and carried out at the level <strong>of</strong> subsection.<br />

Management plans are prepared for each FMU. The validity <strong>of</strong> plans is 10 years. The plans<br />

are approved and adopted by the MAFWE, upon prior conducted review and issued consent<br />

by relevant institutions and entities. No activities in the forest, except physical protection, can<br />

be carried out beyond the plan. With regard to forests <strong>of</strong> economic purpose, commercial<br />

management plans are adopted, while for the forests within protected areas, management<br />

plans include elements <strong>of</strong> the content <strong>of</strong> the forest commercial management plans, as an<br />

integral part (Article 29 <strong>of</strong> the Law on Forests).<br />

A FMU, based on its geographical and natural characteristics, covers part <strong>of</strong> a mountain<br />

massif or one smaller hilly lower mountain massif, one or more landscapes, one or more<br />

biomes, several climate-vegetation-soil zones/belts, several habitats and several growth<br />

sites and habitats.<br />

According to the purpose, forests are divided into forests for economic/commercial purpose<br />

and forests for special purpose. Forests for commercial purpose should primarily have<br />

commercial, while forests for special purpose have conservation, natural, scientific, cultural,<br />

historical, defense, etc. importance. Significant part <strong>of</strong> the forests for commercial purpose,<br />

owing to their natural and economic characteristics, should be designated for forests for<br />

special purpose, as they do not have economic value and perform exclusively generally<br />

useful functions. Forests with special purpose, regardless <strong>of</strong> the use, and for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

their sustainable development, require provision <strong>of</strong> sustainable sources <strong>of</strong> funding.<br />

According to the ownership, forests in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia are in state and private<br />

ownership. Forests <strong>of</strong> religious communities are treated as private ownership.<br />

State forests for commercial purpose are managed by the PE “Macedonian Forests”, and<br />

private ones by their owners, most <strong>of</strong> whom are organized into Association <strong>of</strong> private forests<br />

owners.<br />

227


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Forests with special purpose (national parks, forest reserves, multi-purpose areas, training<br />

and scientific forests, forest parks, etc.) are managed by public institutions national parks,<br />

public institutions for multi-purpose area management, PE “Macedonian Forests”, public<br />

enterprises at local level (Skopje, Vinica, Strumica, etc.), Agriculture and Forestry School<br />

“Gjorce Petrov” from Kavadarci, etc. The management entity, depending on the category <strong>of</strong><br />

protection and purpose, is determined by the Assembly and the Government <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />

Under the Law on Forests, forests for commercial purpose owned by the state are<br />

managed by the Public Enterprise “Macedonian Forests” with its headquarters in Skopje.<br />

The public enterprise comprises 30 branches. Public enterprise, both at headquarters and<br />

branch levels, is organized into sectors (preparation <strong>of</strong> plans and programmes; growing,<br />

protection and ecology <strong>of</strong> forests; use <strong>of</strong> forests and other wood products; plan and analysis;<br />

investment and development; hunting and hunting tourism; commerce; finance and legal<br />

administrative affairs.<br />

Under the applicable legislation and <strong>of</strong>ficial national forest classification (forests for special<br />

purpose), the forests for economic/commercial purpose prevail in the structure by purpose,<br />

with 92%. Many forests with exclusively conservational or other ecological functions,<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficially have a treatment <strong>of</strong> economic forests, while in fact exist as forests with special<br />

purpose (many artificially erected and natural forests in the zones <strong>of</strong> watershed areas <strong>of</strong><br />

water accumulation, protection <strong>of</strong> settlements, transport routes and many other). Many <strong>of</strong><br />

those forests have been and still are great burden to the forestry <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia. Such forests require permanent investments. Unfortunately, up to date, although<br />

many <strong>of</strong> them have been erected under decisions <strong>of</strong> national bodies and authorities and<br />

prepared and reviewed project documentation, they have not gained the treatment and the<br />

attribute <strong>of</strong> protection forests or forests with other ecological function.<br />

Under the current legislation, decisions <strong>of</strong> the Assembly <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia,<br />

decisions <strong>of</strong> the Government, and even decisions <strong>of</strong> municipal assemblies (adopted before<br />

1991), forests for special purpose are managed by public institutions, public enterprises<br />

on state and local levels and public educational institutions. Individual decisions <strong>of</strong> municipal<br />

assemblies adopted before 1991, concerning forests for species purpose, have neither been<br />

disputed, nor reviewed and still exist as such.<br />

Forests in the three national parks are managed by three public institutions (national park<br />

administrations), and the five protection forests and forests for special purpose are managed<br />

public enterprises, i.e. institutions at central and local level.<br />

Forests in multi-purpose area – forest reserve “Jasen” are managed by the Public Enterprise<br />

for management and protection <strong>of</strong> the multi-purpose area “Jasen”, with its headquarters in<br />

Skopje.<br />

The Park Forest Vodno is managed by the PE “Parks and Greenery”-Skopje. Forest for<br />

training and scientific purposes “Mihajlovo” – Kavadarci is managed by the state secondary<br />

school “Gjorce Petrov” from Kavadarci, etc.<br />

Other forests managed by state or local public enterprises cover small areas and have no<br />

significant role in the creation <strong>of</strong> forestry policy and general importance <strong>of</strong> forests for the<br />

sustainable development and promotion <strong>of</strong> forests and environment in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia (Forest Park Gazi Baba, Forest Park Vinica, etc.).<br />

3.16.1.2 Game management<br />

Under the Law on Hunting (Article 36-43), the game in the hunting sites in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia, with the approval <strong>of</strong> the Government, is awarded for use (concession) to legal<br />

228


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

persons and hunters’ societies registered for performance <strong>of</strong> hunting activities, by way <strong>of</strong><br />

concession for a period <strong>of</strong> 10 to 20 years.<br />

In the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, based on natural conditions and concepts and strategies for<br />

development <strong>of</strong> agriculture and forestry as dominant space users, regionalization <strong>of</strong> habitats<br />

and spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> hunting and breeding centres have been made. There are 11<br />

hunting management areas in the country, in which all hunting sites for small and big size<br />

game are grouped.<br />

3.16.2 Goals <strong>of</strong> forestry development<br />

The goals <strong>of</strong> sustainable development and improvement <strong>of</strong> forests and forestry in the<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia should be in line with the strategic projects for forest sustainable<br />

management and use, including primarily: Strategy for Sustainable Development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Forestry in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, and Action Plan for its implementation, adopted by<br />

the Government in 2006, as well as the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia and Plans<br />

for sustainable use and management <strong>of</strong> forests.<br />

Under the said strategic and other projects, by 2020, priority is given to the following goals:<br />

Integrated planning and management <strong>of</strong> space in mountain regions;<br />

Sustainable use, extension and improvement <strong>of</strong> forest resources;<br />

Higher proportion <strong>of</strong> leaved and native tree species;<br />

More dense and better quality network <strong>of</strong> forest infrastructure;<br />

Improvement <strong>of</strong> assortment structure;<br />

Rational and cost-efficient use <strong>of</strong> timber and timber waste;<br />

Expansion and standardization <strong>of</strong> production assortment;<br />

Improvement <strong>of</strong> conditions and possibilities for use <strong>of</strong> the potential <strong>of</strong> other wood<br />

products;<br />

Enrichment and expansion <strong>of</strong> biodiversity, especially fauna;<br />

Achievement <strong>of</strong> sustainable and development balance in natural resources use<br />

(forests, water, soil, biodiversity, etc.;<br />

Valorization <strong>of</strong> generally useful ecological functions <strong>of</strong> forests;<br />

Improvement and promotion <strong>of</strong> forest protection system, etc.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the measures and activities for sustainable development, improvement and use <strong>of</strong><br />

forests are contained in the action plans <strong>of</strong> the mentioned strategic documents, mainly<br />

Strategy for Sustainable Development <strong>of</strong> the Forestry in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia by 2006,<br />

Action Plan for the Strategy implementation, as well as projects for forestry transformation in<br />

the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />

The most important provisions, decisions, measures and activities aimed at establishing<br />

conditions and possibilities for implementation <strong>of</strong> the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Macedonia, meaning also achievement <strong>of</strong> the goals <strong>of</strong> the Strategy for Sustainable<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> the Forestry in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, include the following:<br />

‣ political will to implement spatial plans and strategies;<br />

‣ pr<strong>of</strong>essional, scientific, political and public campaign towards amendment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

legislation in the area <strong>of</strong> forestry for the purpose <strong>of</strong> acquiring and implementing the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> integrated management and use <strong>of</strong> the space in mountainous regions;<br />

229


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

‣ implementation <strong>of</strong> the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia and the Strategy for<br />

Sustainable Development <strong>of</strong> the Forestry in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, in the<br />

domains <strong>of</strong> forestation and amelioration <strong>of</strong> forests.<br />

‣ establishment <strong>of</strong> information system for marketing, monitoring <strong>of</strong> the status in forests,<br />

planning, production, market, conservation, etc;<br />

‣ amelioration <strong>of</strong> degraded forests and shrublands through direct and indirect<br />

conversion;<br />

‣ fostering native, leaved, commercial species and disease and pests resistant<br />

species;<br />

‣ timely implementation <strong>of</strong> planning activities in forests growing and conservation<br />

(clearing, lightning, selective cutting, phased and final cuttings, fire prevention lines,<br />

etc.);<br />

‣ increased investment in projection and implementation <strong>of</strong> sustainable modern forest<br />

road infrastructure;<br />

‣ investment in modern techniques and technology (modernization <strong>of</strong> the processes <strong>of</strong><br />

opening, growing, use and conservation <strong>of</strong> forests – modern and multi-functional<br />

machinery);<br />

‣ establishment and development <strong>of</strong> information system and modern infrastructure for<br />

marketing, planning, designing, collection, processing, packaging and search for and<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> markets for other wood products;<br />

‣ establishment <strong>of</strong> institutional and economic climate for rapid development <strong>of</strong> hunting<br />

and investment in protected areas – reserves and other habitats <strong>of</strong> importance for<br />

fauna;<br />

‣ establishment <strong>of</strong> legal and institutional framework for integrated management <strong>of</strong><br />

mountainous ecosystems and frameworks for sustainable regime <strong>of</strong> use, balance<br />

and development <strong>of</strong> natural resources (forest-water-mineral resources-game, etc.);<br />

‣ campaign for valorization <strong>of</strong> generally useful and social functions <strong>of</strong> forests;<br />

‣ inventory and Cadastre <strong>of</strong> forests;<br />

‣ certification <strong>of</strong> tall trunk forests;<br />

‣ establishment and development <strong>of</strong> monitoring centre and network and protection <strong>of</strong><br />

forests against diseases, pests, forest fires and disasters;<br />

‣ continuous education <strong>of</strong> the staff in forestry, state administration, education and other<br />

institutions at all levels (from workers to the manager in chief), etc.<br />

In the past period, until the end <strong>of</strong> 1990s, there was a trend <strong>of</strong> permanent improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

forest resources in scope and quality and environment as a whole. Basically, this was due to<br />

political and public will and state support for forestation <strong>of</strong> bare lands, erosive and ungrown<br />

forest lands and outside forests. In parallel with the forestation, investments were made in<br />

amelioration <strong>of</strong> degraded forests and shrublands. All these projects were implemented with<br />

the support from the state budget and state institutions, primarily the Assembly <strong>of</strong> SRM,<br />

MAFWE, Fund for forestation (which existed until 1990) and <strong>of</strong> course strong efforts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Forest Management Enterprises and local institutions.<br />

In the coming period, apart from enhancement <strong>of</strong> the productive capacity <strong>of</strong> forests, priority<br />

task will be to improve the efficiency <strong>of</strong> forestation as first precondition for enlargement <strong>of</strong><br />

overall areas under forest. This assumes pr<strong>of</strong>essional attitude and approach to this primary<br />

measure and activity in forestry.<br />

230


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Other significant measure and activity concerns amelioration <strong>of</strong> degraded forests and<br />

shrublands.<br />

Existing openness <strong>of</strong> forests is not sufficient and not in function <strong>of</strong> forestry development,<br />

primarily in terms <strong>of</strong> growing, protection and use <strong>of</strong> forests, development <strong>of</strong> hunting and<br />

hunting tourism, protection and use <strong>of</strong> other forest products, as well as development <strong>of</strong> rural,<br />

mountain and monastery tourism. Important measures, activities and investments should be<br />

made in forest road infrastructure as one <strong>of</strong> the dominant capital investments in the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> hilly and mountainous regions in the country and development <strong>of</strong> rural<br />

municipalities (National Strategy for Development <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Rural Areas 2007-<br />

2013).<br />

Considering the current status and increasingly occurring climate change, great attention<br />

should be paid to the protection <strong>of</strong> forests against plant diseases and pests, with particular<br />

accent on forest fires. In this context, it is necessary to observe and apply the laws in the<br />

country and functioning <strong>of</strong> legal state consistently.<br />

Based on the above and current circumstances in the country, primarily in forestry, the real<br />

projection <strong>of</strong> the forestry development in the next 10 to 12 years should focus on sustainable<br />

development, and promotion should be subject <strong>of</strong> the next spatial plan.<br />

This conclusion is founded on the set goals and measures in applicable (current) plans for<br />

forests management, implemented goals and activities in the past 10 year period <strong>of</strong><br />

regulation (analysis <strong>of</strong> forest management and use in the past) and certainly current financial<br />

situation in forestry, as well as the need for transformation <strong>of</strong> the forestry system.<br />

The goals and the measures for implementation <strong>of</strong> the forthcoming activities in forestry are<br />

envisaged in the Action Plan for the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Strategy for Sustainable<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> the Forestry in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. Their execution is directly<br />

conditioned by political will and commitment and activities for their accomplishment. The<br />

main roles in this process belong to: the Government, governmental institutions, primarily<br />

MAFWE and entities with the basic activity in the management <strong>of</strong> forests for special and<br />

commercial purposes, as well as non-governmental organizations and associations,<br />

primarily the Association <strong>of</strong> private forests owners.<br />

3.16.3 Status <strong>of</strong> crops in the contact zone<br />

Within the corridor - the railway line route Kicevo-Radozda, in the contact zone <strong>of</strong> 500 m on<br />

left/right, there are 6 (six) forest management units (FMUs), and three more are located in<br />

the immediate surrounding. Forests within those FMU are mostly used for commercial<br />

purposes and mainly in state ownership. All state owned forests are managed and operated<br />

by the Public Enterprise "Macedonian Forests", through the following forest management<br />

branches (FMB):<br />

- FMB “Lopusnik” – Kicevo (3),<br />

FMU Mazatar; FMU Drenovo, FMU Belicka Reka-Preseka<br />

- FMB “Galicica“– Ohrid (2)<br />

FMU Slavej 1, FMU Volnista<br />

- FMB “Karaorman“–Struga (1)<br />

FMU Jablanica-Radozda.<br />

The forests in private ownership, the share <strong>of</strong> which is low, but very significant in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

expropriation, are manged by their owners. Part <strong>of</strong> these forests also include artificially<br />

erected plantations, primarily <strong>of</strong> black pine. For the purpose <strong>of</strong> fast and effective<br />

231


area<br />

Total increment<br />

wood<br />

Pllaned afforestation<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> expropriation procedure, it is necessary to undertake measures and<br />

activities for quick and efficient updating <strong>of</strong> ownership (<strong>of</strong>fice based and field activities).<br />

The corridor/route <strong>of</strong> the railway line should pass through 133 subsections distributed in the<br />

mentioned FMUs. For each <strong>of</strong> these FMUs, there is 10-year management plan, with different<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> their validity<br />

Measurement, calculation and planning <strong>of</strong> different forest activities, like forestation, seedling,<br />

various growing measures, main cuttings, are carried out at the level <strong>of</strong> subsection.<br />

Data in the tables below is taken from the plans, proportionally estimated for the contact<br />

area in relation to proportional coverage <strong>of</strong> these subsections in the contact zone. The<br />

following species are presented on the maps in Appendix 8:<br />

beech - green (dark and light, depending whether it is low-trunk or tall-trunk)<br />

oak - brown (different colour intensity for different species)<br />

pine - red (different colour intensity for black pine, white pine and other pine species)<br />

other leaved trees – yellow with a mark in the box (cg – black hop hornbeam, bg –<br />

white hop hornbeam, br – acacia, bz - birch, js - aspen)<br />

fir – blue<br />

douglasia – violet.<br />

Table 42 –Woodstock by Forest Management Units<br />

Forestry commercial unit<br />

ha m 3 m 3 ha m 3<br />

Drenovo 321 1070 21536 0 0<br />

Belicka reka - Preseka 193 295 22479 0 0<br />

Mazatar 478 596 25017 0 9285<br />

Slavej 1 180 312 12434 0 0<br />

Volnista 373 595 14503 0 2370<br />

Jablanica - Kafasan 298 269 10484 0 0<br />

TOTAL 1821 3284 113017 5 13036<br />

WITHOUT TUNNEL 1403 2762 92753 5 12551<br />

OVER TUNNEL 418 522 20264 0 485<br />

The contact zone <strong>of</strong> the railway line incorporates 1821 ha <strong>of</strong> forest in total (covered by<br />

regulation plans), out <strong>of</strong> which 1403 ha are in the free zone, and around 418 ha above<br />

tunnels. The zone above tunnels is not included in further calculations.<br />

232


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Within the said area, the total annual increment is 27 620 m 3 wood mass. Overall wood<br />

mass in these forests is 92 753 m 3 . It has been planned 24 to cut out 12 551 m 3 out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total annual increment for a period <strong>of</strong> 10 years (amounting 27 620 m 3 ), which means that the<br />

reserve available for cutting is 45.4% <strong>of</strong> the increment. In addition to this, it has been<br />

planned to forest only 5 ha (forestations carried out through the action The day <strong>of</strong> the tree<br />

are not included in these calculations).<br />

The age <strong>of</strong> plantations ranges between 5 and 100 years, and the average age is 44 years.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> existing risk <strong>of</strong> forest fires (categorization 1-4 class), in categorized subsections,<br />

the average risk is <strong>of</strong> 3 rd category.<br />

Figure 61 Overview <strong>of</strong> forest management units in the contact zone along the route<br />

24 In plans with 10 years validity<br />

233


Type <strong>of</strong> crops by type<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> crop<br />

area<br />

area<br />

Total increment<br />

Total increment<br />

wood<br />

wood<br />

Pllaned afforestation<br />

Pllaned afforestation<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Table 43 Composition <strong>of</strong> crops by growing type<br />

ha m 3 m 3 ha m 3<br />

CLEAN TOTAL 898 1555 61147 5 9954<br />

TOTAL 505 1207 31606 0 2597<br />

stemmed 1237 2354 77700 0 11243<br />

high 166 408 15053 5 1308<br />

3.16.4 Manner <strong>of</strong> management<br />

According to composition <strong>of</strong> crops, pure crops prevail represented mostly by Italian and<br />

Sessile, with segments <strong>of</strong> black pine and chestnut.<br />

Low-trunk crops are absolutely dominant in the area. This category incorporates all crops <strong>of</strong><br />

leaved species: different oaks, beech, black and white ho hornbeam, etc.<br />

Tall-trunk crops are actually the crops planted artificially, mostly with black pine. This group<br />

also includes crops <strong>of</strong> chestnut.<br />

Table 44 Composition <strong>of</strong> crops by species<br />

ha m 3 m 3 ha m 3<br />

CLEAN SUBCONTRACT<br />

BLACK PINE 58 159 5593 0 83<br />

GORUN 573 970 35848 0 4246<br />

Ploskach 254 411 18418 5 5625<br />

CHESTNUT 13 16 1287 0 0<br />

SUBCONTRANC<br />

White gaber 85 67 2873 0 0<br />

Cer 8 9 581 0 0<br />

Black gaber 30 30 1803 0 0<br />

Blagun 6 4 105 0<br />

Black pine –other type 74 662 5173 0 329<br />

234


Type <strong>of</strong> crops by type<br />

area<br />

Total increment<br />

wood<br />

Pllaned afforestation<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Cer<br />

33 62 3268 0 0<br />

Cer<br />

108 198 10424 0 0<br />

White gaber 117 113 4975 0 2268<br />

chestnut 45 62 2405 0 0<br />

The average amounts <strong>of</strong> wood mass in these subsections fall within the averages for the<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. The plans for forest management I the mentioned FMUs envisage<br />

different measures for use. Under the plans, the 10 year increment available for cutting is<br />

12551 m 3 . The greatest increment available for cutting has been planned in the FMU<br />

Mazatar 1. In low-trunk degraded crops <strong>of</strong> oak and beech, resurrection cutting is primary.<br />

The cutting interval with these crops is 40 years. There are sufficient crops mature for cutting<br />

in the subject area. As opposed to them, in tall-trunk crops <strong>of</strong> black pine established by<br />

artificial way, i.e. planted at great density <strong>of</strong> 2000 seedlings/ha, only selective cutting has<br />

been envisaged to optimize the number <strong>of</strong> trunks and the quality <strong>of</strong> wood pulp, and better<br />

survival <strong>of</strong> trunks is provided in case <strong>of</strong> strong winds, snow, etc. (In black pine crops not<br />

treated in this way, the trunks are thin and tall and thus their mechanical properties are lower<br />

and damages from wind and slow are visible). If the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line is not<br />

harmonized with the dynamics <strong>of</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> planned forest activities, disturbance <strong>of</strong> the so<br />

called production process could occur.<br />

235


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

3.17 Erosive processes in the contact zone<br />

Figure 62 Risk <strong>of</strong> erosion along the route<br />

The Figure shows that, in general terms, there is lower risk <strong>of</strong> erosive processes in the<br />

contact zone (category 4 and 5). In plane parts, the terrain is <strong>of</strong> category 5, and parts under<br />

forest belong to categories 3, 4 and 5. It should be pointed out that it is the dense forest<br />

cover exactly which provides protection to the terrain from erosion; however, due to the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> erosive factors, potential change in land cover and removal <strong>of</strong> forest vegetation<br />

would take the land into higher risk categories 1 or 2.<br />

236


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 63 Erosiveness at sections<br />

The highest degree <strong>of</strong> erosive processes (categories 1 and 2) exists in the area around<br />

Belicka Reka in Treska (south <strong>of</strong> Popolzani). A risk <strong>of</strong> second category erosion also exists<br />

near the village Botun. The risk <strong>of</strong> erosion in other parts <strong>of</strong> the contact zone is mainly low.<br />

3.17.1 Status <strong>of</strong> crops in the construction zone <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

Description <strong>of</strong> the route through the railway line axis:<br />

Note: The term bare land used in the text refers to land not grown over with forest and also<br />

unregulated.<br />

Route through FMU DRENOVO<br />

237


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

From the station Kicevo, it passes through bare land, and then enters section 5 g (pine<br />

artificially planted crops) in a length <strong>of</strong> 800 m.<br />

Then, it passes through bare land with rare woody vegetation not included in the plan. Then,<br />

it passes through section 1 b (oak) in a length <strong>of</strong> 100 m. From there, it proceeds through<br />

agricultural land.<br />

Route through FMU Belicka Reka - Preseka<br />

It enters in this FMU near the village Dolno Popolzani, at station km 108 in subsection 72 b.<br />

Then, it runs for 350 m through a forest <strong>of</strong> Italian and Turkey oak. In this section, there are<br />

viaducts above the section. Then, it runs for 200 m through 71 d (Italian and Turkey oak) and<br />

220 m through 71 g (Italian and Turkey oak). In this section, there is also viaduct above the<br />

section, as well as short tunnel above 70 v. Then, it runs for 100 m through 69 d (Italian and<br />

Turkey oak), and then through bare land and enters section 68 where tunnel 5 is located.<br />

After the exit from the tunnel, it runs for 100 m through 68 b (Turkey oak and Sessile oak),<br />

and then again through bare land and enters into tunnel 6 from where it exits in section 67<br />

where it runs for 70 m through 67 d (Turkey and Downy oak). After that, the route runs for<br />

550 m through 67 g (Downy oak and white hop hornbeam) and part through bare land (with<br />

rare oak-hop hornbeam vegetation, but not covered by the plan). It enters 66 v (Downy oak<br />

and white hop hornbeam) and runs for 70 m through a forest and then 70 m through bare<br />

land and then again through forest for 70 m and from there it enters tunnel 7. After the exit<br />

from the tunnel, it runs for 70 m through section 66 g (Downy oak and Turkey oak). Through<br />

section 65 g, it alternately passes through forest and bare land, <strong>of</strong> which the forest <strong>of</strong> Turkey<br />

and Sessile oak amounts 300 m. Just before the village Judovo, the route changes the<br />

direction towards southeast and enters in 58 on a bare land and there, at km115 it enters in<br />

the long tunnel no. 8.<br />

FMU Volnista<br />

From the tunnel, the route exits below the village Slivovo. Here, the route enters section 13.<br />

By slight replacement for 100 m lower, it is possible to avoid a route through a Sessile oak<br />

forest. In this section, the route runs for 400 m. Then, the route enters section 15, first in<br />

tunnel 9, and then passes through a Sessile oak forest in 15 а and 16, in a total length <strong>of</strong><br />

300 m, passing on its way through bare lands as well and reaching the village Arbinovo. In<br />

this part, the route runs through agricultural land.<br />

FMU Slavej<br />

In this unit, the route enters south-southwest <strong>of</strong> the village Arbinovo in section 141 b and<br />

runs through 141 b and g through Italian oak forest in a length <strong>of</strong> 700 m. The route also<br />

passes by a black pine crop in a length <strong>of</strong> 300 m. It enters tunnel 10 and from there exits and<br />

runs through agricultural land areas up to the village Pesocan.<br />

From there, the route runs outside the boundary <strong>of</strong> the forest. Then, it passes between FMU<br />

Slavej and FMU Mazatar which are physically separated by the shore area <strong>of</strong> the river<br />

Sateska.<br />

FMU Mazatar<br />

Near the village Botun, the route enters section 78 and 81, passing through tunnel 11. After<br />

the exit from the tunnel, it passes again through plane agricultural land. Up to Klimestani, the<br />

route runs along the boundary <strong>of</strong> the forest, i.e. sections 83 а (Italian oak), 84 v (black pine)<br />

and 85 v (black pine with acacia) in a total length <strong>of</strong> 1km.<br />

Then, the route runs through agricultural land from the village Meseiste, up to after Struga<br />

near the village Kalista.<br />

238


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

FMU Jablanica - Kjafasan<br />

In this unit, the route runs between sections 6 and 23, but it does not enter any <strong>of</strong> them.<br />

Near section 7а, it enters a tunnel and then exits for short above the village Radozda and<br />

reaches section 1а, an area grown over with Italian oak and hop hornbeam in a length <strong>of</strong><br />

350 m.<br />

To calculate the potential loss during construction activities, we have calculated the surface<br />

area and the wood mass within the construction zone <strong>of</strong> the route.<br />

The route passes through 19 sections in 5 FMUs. The construction zone along the axis <strong>of</strong><br />

the railway line was calculated for a width <strong>of</strong> 50 m.<br />

Under such conditions, the route passes through 4.85 km in forest in total (without the part <strong>of</strong><br />

tunnels). The construction zone covers an area <strong>of</strong> 24,25 ha under forest. The overall wood<br />

mass in this zone amounts 1854.25 m 3 . Apart from wood mass, there is also potential loss <strong>of</strong><br />

annual increment <strong>of</strong> wood mass <strong>of</strong> 42.44 m 3 in total.<br />

Table 45 Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the forest in the railway line route (along axis)<br />

The construction zone <strong>of</strong> the railway line also includes temporary storehouses for materials<br />

and access roads. Project documentation does not contain data on the position and length <strong>of</strong><br />

the access roads. This is <strong>of</strong> particular importance because construction <strong>of</strong> access roads<br />

assumes destruction <strong>of</strong> additional forest. During the route construction, the opening <strong>of</strong><br />

239


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

access road through oak forest results in a loss <strong>of</strong> at least 50-60 m 3 /km additional forest, at<br />

an average.<br />

The available documentation also lacks data on the number, size and distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

temporary storehouses. This impact can not be assessed accurately. Yet, a loss <strong>of</strong> around<br />

70-100 m 3 /ha wood mass should be included in the calculations as well.<br />

3.18 Natural heritage<br />

With reference to the railway line route from Kicevo to the populated place Radozda, in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> natural heritage, the following should be underlined:<br />

‣ According to the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, sectoral Study on natural<br />

heritage conservation, the number <strong>of</strong> identified objects <strong>of</strong> nature within the subject area<br />

is 10 as presented in the next Table.<br />

Table 46 Objects <strong>of</strong> nature<br />

1. Cave ”Utova Dupka” Drugovo<br />

Drugovo<br />

2. Cave Kalina dupka<br />

3. Cave Ginceica<br />

4. Suvi Dol<br />

Drugovo<br />

Drugovo<br />

5. Belcisko blato Belcista<br />

6. Pesocanska river Belcista<br />

7. Cave Jaorec Belcista<br />

8. Ohrid lake Ohrid, Struga<br />

9. Dabovi Stebla Struga<br />

10. Platan s. Kali[ta Struga<br />

Particular attention should be devoted to Belcisko Blato (swamp), located close to the<br />

route. This is due to the fact that this monument <strong>of</strong> nature is characterized with unique<br />

natural values, especially indigenous flora and fauna. The site Belcisko Blato has been<br />

included in the national Emerald network <strong>of</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> special conservation interest and<br />

has been proposed for designation as strict natural reserve under the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. It is necessary to identify potential negative impacts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway construction on this site, primarily on biodiversity. Close care has to be taken <strong>of</strong><br />

the maintenance <strong>of</strong> the site integrity and conservation <strong>of</strong> natural habitats, before all.<br />

‣ In addition to the above, it should be taken into account that a part <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

gets close to the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid and therefore the impact <strong>of</strong> the railway construction on<br />

the habitats and biodiversity, as well as hydrological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area, should<br />

be assessed. Under the national legislation, Ohrid Lake has been designated for<br />

protected area <strong>of</strong> III category - Monument <strong>of</strong> nature and is part <strong>of</strong> the world natural and<br />

cultural heritage (UNESCO).<br />

‣ Near the route, there is a site with oak trunks, within the populated place Moroista, which<br />

has been planned for designation as monument <strong>of</strong> nature.<br />

240


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

‣ Near the route, in the yard <strong>of</strong> the St. Bogorodica Monastery, in the populated place<br />

Kalista on Ohrid Lake shore, there is a Plane tree (Platanus orientalis) trunk, designated<br />

for protected area in the category <strong>of</strong> monument <strong>of</strong> nature.<br />

‣ Part <strong>of</strong> the railway line route, in Struga region, passes through the area which is part <strong>of</strong><br />

the world cultural and natural heritage <strong>of</strong> Ohrid region (UNESCO). With reference to this<br />

region, care should be taken <strong>of</strong> the following sites possessing natural values:<br />

- Sublakustricki springs near the church <strong>of</strong> St.Bogorodica <strong>of</strong> Kalista<br />

- The site <strong>of</strong> Kalista which is the only natural habitat for yellow water-lily (Nuphar lutea) at<br />

Ohrid Lake.<br />

- The site Podmolje is away from the route, but it is the most wide spread reed belt<br />

(Phragmites australis) at Ohrid Lake and natural habitat for threatened bird species and<br />

sprawning ground for the carp. For these reasons, attention has to be paid to this object<br />

<strong>of</strong> nature as well.<br />

3.19 Cultural heritage<br />

Several cultural and archeological sites have been recorded on the wider area <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway line route. They are presented in a table below (Archeological map <strong>of</strong> RM,<br />

1994), and graphically in Appendix 6.<br />

241


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Table 47 Archeological sites<br />

Archaeological<br />

Settlement Specifically position Meaning and time Description Concern<br />

site<br />

1 Kamen Most - Opale Radolista 1,5 km NE from the town Settlement for neolith Several graves Probably<br />

2 Kitino Kale and Kitka Kicevo In the town Bronze age Settlements None<br />

3 St. Ilija Meseista 1 km NE form the town Settlement form bronze age Pieces from ceramics None<br />

4 Dere – kaj Cesma Trebenista NW from the town Settlement form bronze age Pieces from ceramics Probably<br />

5 Dupen Kamen Struga West side Necropolis from Hellenistic time Several Hellenistic graves i None<br />

6 Popolzani Popolcani In the town Settlement from Rome age basis Probably<br />

7 Dzepino Frangovo In the town Settlement from Rome time 100-100 m basis Probably<br />

8 Kaldrma Radozda 300 m west from the town Road from Rome time Via Egnatia Probably<br />

9 Feriste – Petrin Dol Frangovo Around 1 km NW Settlement from Rome time Graves Probably<br />

10 Kadri church Frangovo SW side Middle age church basis Probably<br />

11 Laista Novo Selo 2 km SW Graveyard from Rome time Arhitektonic object Probably<br />

242


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Archaeological<br />

Settlement Specifically position Meaning and time Description Concern<br />

site<br />

12 Monastery <strong>of</strong> St.Bogorodica Kalista In the chick Middle age church Pieces in the curch None<br />

13 Selce Brzdani 2 km North Settlement form late antic age basis<br />

Probably<br />

14 Seliste Brzdani 1,5 km west Settlement form late antic age Pieces from ceramics<br />

Probably<br />

15 Bogorodicna Krasta Brzdani On the hill Middle age church basis<br />

Probably<br />

16 Kula Pesocani 500 m east Middle age church basis<br />

Probably<br />

17 Zadel Botun 500 m NW Settlement form late antic age Pieces from ceramics<br />

Probably<br />

18 Gorno Pole Meseista west Settlement form late antic age basis Probably<br />

243


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Archaeological<br />

Settlement Specifically position Meaning and time Description Concern<br />

site<br />

19 Cemetery Ciflik Koroista 500-800 m, near the quarry Settlement form late antic age graveyards<br />

Probably<br />

20<br />

Kale<br />

Koroista 1,5 km NE Middle age church Pieces from ceramics<br />

Probably<br />

21 Rasnica Koroista South direction Settlement form late antic age Pieces from ceramics Probably<br />

22 Radolista Radolista East side Settlement form late antic age Pieces from ceramics Probably<br />

23 Arapian Cementary Sum South-east Settlement form late antic age graves None<br />

24 Gradi[te Vidrani East side Settlement form late antic age graves Probably<br />

244


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Archaeological<br />

Settlement Specifically position Meaning and time Description Concern<br />

site<br />

25 Livadiste Judovo Settlement form late antic age<br />

Probably<br />

26 Dobra Voda Arbinovo 1 km SW Middle age church basis<br />

Probably<br />

27 Krivi Zagoni - Lozista Meseista 400 m west Settlement form late antic age graves<br />

Probably<br />

28 Lozja - Buzelica Kalista west Middle age church graves None<br />

29 Latinska Crkva Koroista 1 km south<br />

Middle age church<br />

graves Probably<br />

30 Gypsy cementery Radolista east<br />

Middle age church<br />

31 Behind Lozja Meseista 1,2 km SW Settlement form late middle age Pieces from ceramics None<br />

32 Dzuma - Dzumija Sultan Bajazit dzamija Kicevo In the town None<br />

245


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Archaeological<br />

Settlement Specifically position Meaning and time Description Concern<br />

site<br />

33 Environment <strong>of</strong> Kicevo Kicevo In the surrounding <strong>of</strong> the town Middle age moneys money None<br />

34 Rim church Drugovo Near the curch Middle age church graves Probably<br />

35 Vodici Brzdani 300 m west Middle age church graves<br />

Probably<br />

36 Seliste Svinjiste 3 km west Middle age church graves Probably<br />

246


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

4 Assessment <strong>of</strong> environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> the project implementation<br />

4.1 Safety aspects<br />

The most important safety aspects related to linear projects, i.e. railway line, concern<br />

derailing, collisions, fires and explosions (including sabotages or terrorism), trains falls,<br />

clashes with passenger traffic or people in moments <strong>of</strong> line crossing, etc.<br />

Considering the fact that the subject railway line is electrified, safety aspects from incidental<br />

explosions <strong>of</strong> fuels in locomotives or stations for fuel filling are excluded. During the railway<br />

line designing and construction, provisions <strong>of</strong> the Law on Safety in the railway System<br />

(Official gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no.47/10) will be observed.<br />

From among potential accidents related to a linear project, the first ranked are <strong>of</strong> course the<br />

collisions. Proper placement <strong>of</strong> road and traffic signalization and adherence to it will result in<br />

avoidance <strong>of</strong> high number <strong>of</strong> these accidents.<br />

Fires may break out from rails sparkling or lack <strong>of</strong> care by passengers, as well as in cases <strong>of</strong><br />

transport <strong>of</strong> inflammable material by way <strong>of</strong> its sparkling. In order to avoid unwanted fires,<br />

the railway operator will regularly maintain the surface around the rains and train regularly its<br />

staff in proper operation <strong>of</strong> the railway transport.<br />

4.2 Impacts on biological diversity<br />

4.2.1 Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats and ecosystems<br />

Based on the description <strong>of</strong> the current status <strong>of</strong> environmental media in Chapter 3 and<br />

especially chapter on the status <strong>of</strong> biological diversity (Chapter Error! Reference source<br />

not found.), as well as by application <strong>of</strong> nationally and internationally recognized criteria,<br />

sensitivity <strong>of</strong> ecosystems and habitats was assessed (including also human settlements as<br />

habitats). The most sensitive places and their natural and human induced values were<br />

underlined. Making distinction <strong>of</strong> these key or valuable ecosystems, habitats or places is<br />

necessary in order to achieve thorough assessment <strong>of</strong> possible impacts <strong>of</strong> the construction<br />

and operation <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line Kicevo-Radozda and propose effective measures<br />

for their protection or future management.<br />

4.2.1.1 Methodology<br />

Sensitivity was assessed using a matrix designed specifically for this purpose. The matrix<br />

was used to asses the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> natural ecosystems and habitats exclusively.<br />

4.2.1.2 Matrix creation<br />

Ecosystems/sites (presented in orders) were assessed by criteria (shown in columns <strong>of</strong> the<br />

table <strong>of</strong> the matrix).<br />

4.2.1.3 List <strong>of</strong> assessed ecosystems/sites<br />

The following ecosystems (described in Chapter 3.11.4) were assessed: Downy oak-Hop<br />

hornbeam forests, Italian and Turkey oak forests, chestnut forests, Sessile oak forests, alder<br />

forests, willow belts, marshy oak stands, hilly pastures, calcareous rocks, siliceous rocks,<br />

Ohrid Lake, rivers, streams, springs, swamps, humid meadows, black pine plantations,<br />

meadows, fields, vineyards, orchards, gardens, urban habitats and rural habitats.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the ecosystems (like marshy) included several plant associations which were not<br />

assessed individually.<br />

247


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

4.2.1.4 Description <strong>of</strong> criteria<br />

Total <strong>of</strong> 14 criteria were used to asses the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the above listed ecosystems and<br />

habitats:<br />

1. EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС;<br />

2. Rare communities in Macedonia;<br />

3. Well preserved natural communities;<br />

4. Presence <strong>of</strong> species from IUCN Global Red List;<br />

5. Presence <strong>of</strong> species important for Europe (European Habitat Directive);<br />

6. Presence <strong>of</strong> endangered birds;<br />

7. Presence <strong>of</strong> endemic species;<br />

8. Presence <strong>of</strong> rare species;<br />

9. Landscape values;<br />

10. Economic values;<br />

11. Abundance in species;<br />

12. Geomorphological and geological value;<br />

13. Protection from erosion;<br />

14. Value <strong>of</strong> the protection from pollution.<br />

Criteria were selected to reflect national and international (European and global) importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> ecosystems/habitats and their species composition that can be found in the project and<br />

wider analyzed area. The more valuable the habitat (more applicable criteria), the more<br />

sensitive it is.<br />

Criterion 1 – Habitat Directive (Council Directive 92/43/ЕЕС concerning the protection <strong>of</strong><br />

natural habitats and wild flora and fauna). The List <strong>of</strong> important habitats is given in Annex I-<br />

Types <strong>of</strong> natural habitats <strong>of</strong> interest for the Community the conservation <strong>of</strong> which requires<br />

designation <strong>of</strong> special areas for conservation.<br />

Criterion 2 - Rare communities in Macedonia. Rareness <strong>of</strong> the communities was assessed<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> the expert experience and current knowledge on communities distribution.<br />

Criterion 3 - Well preserved natural communities. Extent <strong>of</strong> naturalness i.e. scope <strong>of</strong> human<br />

intervention and manner <strong>of</strong> land use was assessed on the basis <strong>of</strong> the expert judgment.<br />

Criterion 4 - Presence <strong>of</strong> species from IUCN Global Red List. Number <strong>of</strong> species<br />

enrolled in the IUCN Global Red List in the habitat determines its value. Categories <strong>of</strong> the<br />

IUCN Red List are described below:<br />

EXTINCT (EX). The taxon is extinct when there is no reasonable doubt that the<br />

last individual has been extinct. A taxon is presumed Extinct when exhaustive<br />

surveys in known and/or expected habitat, at appropriate times (diurnal,<br />

seasonal, annual), throughout its historic range have failed to record an<br />

individual. Surveys should be over a time frame appropriate to the taxon’s life<br />

cycle and life form.<br />

EXTINCT IN THE WILD (EW). A taxon is Extinct in the Wild when it is known only to<br />

survive in cultivation, in captivity or as a naturalized population (or populations) well<br />

outside the past range. A taxon is presumed Extinct in the Wild when exhaustive<br />

248


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

surveys in known and/or expected habitat, at appropriate times (diurnal, seasonal,<br />

annual), throughout its historic range have failed to record an individual. Surveys should<br />

be over a time frame appropriate to the taxon’s life cycle and life form.<br />

CRITICALLY ENDANGERED (CR). A taxon is Critically Endangered when the best<br />

available evidence indicates that it meets any <strong>of</strong> the criteria A to E for Critically<br />

Endangered, and it is therefore considered to be facing an extremely high risk <strong>of</strong><br />

extinction in the wild.<br />

ENDANGERED (EN). A taxon is Endangered when the best available evidence<br />

indicates that it meets any <strong>of</strong> the criteria A to E for Endangered (see Section V), and it is<br />

therefore considered to be facing a very high risk <strong>of</strong> extinction in the wild.<br />

VULNERABLE (VU). A taxon is Vulnerable when the best available evidence indicates<br />

that it meets any <strong>of</strong> the criteria A to E for Vulnerable (criteria from A to E are not<br />

described in this Study), and it is therefore considered to be facing a high risk <strong>of</strong><br />

extinction in the wild.<br />

NEARLY THREATENED (NT). A taxon is Near Threatened when it has been evaluated<br />

against the criteria but does not qualify for Critically Endangered, Endangered or<br />

Vulnerable now, but is close to qualifying for or is likely to qualify for a threatened<br />

category in the near future.<br />

LEAST CONCERN (LC). A taxon is Least Concern when it has been evaluated against<br />

the criteria and does not qualify for Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable or<br />

Near Threatened. Widespread and abundant taxa are included in this category.<br />

DATA DEFICIENT (DD). A taxon is Data Deficient when there is inadequate information<br />

to make a direct, or indirect, assessment <strong>of</strong> its risk <strong>of</strong> extinction based on its distribution<br />

and/or population status. A taxon in this category may be well studied, and its biology<br />

well known, but appropriate data on abundance and/or distribution are lacking. Data<br />

Deficient is therefore not a category <strong>of</strong> threat. Listing <strong>of</strong> taxa in this category indicates<br />

that more information is required and acknowledges the possibility that future research<br />

will show that threatened classification is appropriate. It is important to make positive<br />

use <strong>of</strong> whatever data are available. In many cases great care should be exercised in<br />

choosing between DD and a threatened status. If the range <strong>of</strong> a taxon is suspected to<br />

be relatively circumscribed, and a considerable period <strong>of</strong> time has elapsed since the last<br />

record <strong>of</strong> the taxon, threatened status may well be justified.<br />

NOT EVALUATED (NE). A taxon is Not Evaluated when it is has not yet been<br />

evaluated against the criteria.<br />

Criterion 5 - Presence <strong>of</strong> species important for Europe. This criterion takes into account<br />

European Habitat Directive and IUCN Red List. Important species in the Habitat Directive<br />

are listed in:<br />

Annex II – Animal and plant species <strong>of</strong> interest for the community the conservation <strong>of</strong><br />

which requires designation <strong>of</strong> special areas for conservation<br />

Annex IV - Animal and plant species <strong>of</strong> interest for the community in need for strict<br />

protection<br />

Criterion 6 - Presence <strong>of</strong> endangered birds. This criterion is based on several<br />

conventions. Birds are assessed separately because <strong>of</strong> their good elaboration in<br />

international conventions. The following conventions have been taken into account:<br />

249


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

А. Bird Directive – Council Directive 79/409/ЕЕC on the conservation <strong>of</strong> wild birds<br />

Annex I – Species with special measures for conservation with regard to their habitat in<br />

order to secure their survival and reproduction in their area <strong>of</strong> spread. In this context, the<br />

following should be taken into account:<br />

• Species endangered with extinction<br />

• Species vulnerable by specific changes in their habitats<br />

• Species considered rare because <strong>of</strong> their small population or limited local<br />

distribution<br />

• Other species requiring particular attention because <strong>of</strong> the specific nature <strong>of</strong><br />

their habitat<br />

Annex II – Due to their population level, geographical distribution and reproduction degree in<br />

the community, species listed in Annex II may be subject <strong>of</strong> hunting under the international<br />

legislation. Member States should ensure that the hunting <strong>of</strong> these species does not<br />

jeopardize the conservation efforts in their area <strong>of</strong> distribution.<br />

Annex II/1 – Species related to Annex II/1 may be hunted in seas and on land where<br />

this Directive is applicable.<br />

Annex II/2 - Species related to Annex II/2 may be hunted only in Member States as<br />

specified in their legislations.<br />

Annex III – Member States should prohibit, with regard to all birds occurring in wild on the<br />

European territory <strong>of</strong> the Member States, sale, transport and breeding for sale, <strong>of</strong>fers for sale<br />

<strong>of</strong> alive or dead birds and any recognizable part or derivative <strong>of</strong> such bird.<br />

B. Bonn Convention<br />

Appendix I – Species threatened with extinction<br />

Appendix II – Migratory species protected by agreements.<br />

Migratory species that have unfavourable status <strong>of</strong> conservation or would have significant<br />

benefit from the international cooperation organized by concluded agreements, are listed in<br />

Appendix II <strong>of</strong> the Convention. Therefore, the Convention encourages the parties to carry out<br />

global or regional agreements and management <strong>of</strong> individual species or, very <strong>of</strong>ten, group <strong>of</strong><br />

listed individuals.<br />

C. SPEC – Species <strong>of</strong> interest for European conservation (only for birds)<br />

SPEC 1<br />

SPEC 2<br />

SPEC 3<br />

Non-SPEC E<br />

European species <strong>of</strong> interest for global conservation<br />

Unfavourable status <strong>of</strong> conservation in Europe, concentrated in Europe<br />

Unfavourable status <strong>of</strong> conservation in Europe, not concentrated in Europe<br />

Favourable status <strong>of</strong> conservation in Europe, concentrated in Europe<br />

Non-SPEC Favourable status <strong>of</strong> conservation in Europe, not concentrated in Europe<br />

D. European threatened status (ETS)<br />

• CR – Critically endangered – if the European population falls under any <strong>of</strong> the criteria<br />

<strong>of</strong> IUCN Red List <strong>of</strong> critically endangered<br />

250


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

• EN - Endangered - if the European population falls under any <strong>of</strong> the criteria <strong>of</strong> IUCN<br />

Red List <strong>of</strong> endangered<br />

• VU - Vulnerable - if the European population falls under any <strong>of</strong> the criteria <strong>of</strong> IUCN<br />

Red List <strong>of</strong> vulnerable<br />

• D - Declining - if the European population does not fall under any <strong>of</strong> the criteria <strong>of</strong><br />

IUCN Red List, but has declined by more than 10% for 10 years or three generations,<br />

• R - Rare - if the European population does not fall under any <strong>of</strong> the criteria <strong>of</strong> IUCN<br />

Red List, and is not declining, but counts less than 10000 reproductive pairs (or<br />

20000 individuals or 40000 overwintering individuals) and is not bordering major non-<br />

European population<br />

• H – Harassed – if the European population does not fall under any <strong>of</strong> the criteria <strong>of</strong><br />

IUCN Red List and is not rare or declining, but it has not recovered yet from<br />

moderate or major declining suffered thereby in the period from 1970 to 1990<br />

• L – Localized - if the European population does not fall under any <strong>of</strong> the criteria <strong>of</strong><br />

IUCN Red List and is not rare, exhausted and declining, but is significantly<br />

concentrated with more than 90 % <strong>of</strong> the European population in 10 or less sites.<br />

• S - Safe - if the European population does not fall under any <strong>of</strong> the above listed<br />

criteria<br />

• DD – Data Deficient – if there is no adequate information to make direct or indirect<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> its risk for extinction based on its distribution and/or population status<br />

• NE – Not Evaluated – if its European population has not been evaluated by the<br />

criteria<br />

Criterion 7 - Presence <strong>of</strong> endemic species. This criterion assesses the number <strong>of</strong> present<br />

endemic species in the habitat. The result shown in Table 48 is the average <strong>of</strong> the results on<br />

endemic species <strong>of</strong> flora and fauna.<br />

Criterion 8 - Presence <strong>of</strong> rare species. This criterion assesses the number <strong>of</strong> present rare<br />

species in the habitat. The result shown in Table 48 is the average <strong>of</strong> the results on rare<br />

species <strong>of</strong> flora, fauna and fungi.<br />

Criterion 9 - Landscape values. Landscape value has been assessed on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

several characteristics: structural and functional importance <strong>of</strong> certain landscape, aesthetic<br />

value, rarity in Macedonia, etc.<br />

Criterion 10 - Economic values. The importance <strong>of</strong> the economy determines this criterion.<br />

The most important economic values in the project area are connected with forestry, water<br />

potential and livestock breeding.<br />

Criterion 11 – Diversity <strong>of</strong> species. The overall value <strong>of</strong> biodiversity, i.e. diversity <strong>of</strong> species<br />

has been assessed on the basis <strong>of</strong> expert judgment.<br />

Criterion 12 - Geomorphological and geological value. The basis <strong>of</strong> this criterion was the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> significant geomorphological and geological structure. It should be pointed out<br />

that the result <strong>of</strong> the matrix relates only to some sites within the range <strong>of</strong> the assessed<br />

habitat.<br />

Criterion 13 - Protection from erosion. One <strong>of</strong> the important features for preservation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

natural conditions is the potential for protection <strong>of</strong> the habitat against erosion.<br />

Criterion 14 - Value <strong>of</strong> the protection from pollution. Absorption capacity for pollutants is<br />

very important feature <strong>of</strong> ecosystems. It is based on expert judgment.<br />

251


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

4.2.1.5 Scoring and ranking<br />

Scoring <strong>of</strong> all habitats for each <strong>of</strong> the 14 listed criteria ranged from 0 to 3. The meaning <strong>of</strong><br />

these scores is as follows:<br />

0 – no occurrence/insignificant<br />

1 – low occurrence/significance<br />

2 – medium occurrence/significance<br />

3 – strong occurrence/significance<br />

The sum <strong>of</strong> scores for the habitat determines its sensitivity. The highest possible sum is 42.<br />

Ranking <strong>of</strong> sensitivity was made on the basis <strong>of</strong> the following table:<br />

0 - 10 – low sensitivity (ls)<br />

11-20 – medium sensitivity (ms)<br />

21-30 – high sensitivity (hs)<br />

31-42 – very high sensitivity (vhs)<br />

The meaning <strong>of</strong> each extent <strong>of</strong> sensitivity is described below:<br />

ls – no specific obstacle for construction activities; yet, aesthetic value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

landscape should be protected and unnecessary destructions and excessive disturbances<br />

should be avoided; impact on this habitat will be <strong>of</strong> minor significance.<br />

ms – construction activities are allowed, but the work should be carried out with<br />

precaution, destruction <strong>of</strong> these habitats or their parts should be avoided; if destruction is<br />

unavoidable, recultivation measures should be undertaken; impact on this habitat will be <strong>of</strong><br />

medium significance.<br />

hs – such places, biotopes and sites have enormous significance with regard to<br />

natural or economic values; any type <strong>of</strong> construction activity should be avoided; if there is no<br />

other solution, then maximum measures should be undertaken to protect the site; when<br />

natural sites are affected, special construction regime is applied (e.g. seasonal restrictions,<br />

strict territorial recommendations, etc.); any damage caused on these ecosystem types<br />

should be recovered and compensated in accordance with the Law on Nature Protection.<br />

Permanent monitoring should be organized by the Investor during construction activities.<br />

vhs – all construction activities are prohibited; any construction activity near such<br />

places or sites should be restricted and preventive measures should be undertaken as in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> highly sensitive habitats/sites. Very strong negative impacts will cause irreversible<br />

changes in these habitats/sites, i.e. they will be lost permanently. Investor should organize<br />

permanent monitoring during construction works as in highly sensitive habitats/sites.<br />

4.2.2 Assessment <strong>of</strong> the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats<br />

Based on the described methodology, assessment <strong>of</strong> the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats found in the<br />

investigated corridor was made. The analysis <strong>of</strong> the results showed that urban habitats had<br />

lowest value (5 points in total), and Ohrid Lake (38 points and alder belts (31 points) had the<br />

highest value.<br />

None <strong>of</strong> the habitats was assessed as very highly sensitive. Total <strong>of</strong> six habitats was<br />

assessed as highly sensitive (hs): chestnut forests, Sessile oak forests, alder belts and<br />

forests, stands <strong>of</strong> marshy oak, rivers and marshes. The group <strong>of</strong> medium sensitive (ms)<br />

includes 12 habitats: Downy oak and hop hornbeam forests, Italian and Turkey oak forests,<br />

252


EU Directive 92/43/ЕЕС;<br />

Rare communities in<br />

Macedonia;<br />

Well preserved natural<br />

communities;<br />

Presence <strong>of</strong> species from<br />

IUCN Global Red List;<br />

Presence <strong>of</strong> species<br />

important for Europe<br />

(European Habitat Directive);<br />

Presence <strong>of</strong> endangered<br />

birds;<br />

Presence <strong>of</strong> endemic<br />

species;<br />

Presence <strong>of</strong> rare species;<br />

Landscape values;<br />

Economic values;<br />

Abundance in species;<br />

Geomorphological and<br />

geological value;<br />

Protection from erosion;<br />

Value <strong>of</strong> the protection from<br />

pollution.<br />

total<br />

sensitivity<br />

Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

willow belt, hilly pastures, calcareous rocks, siliceous rocks, streams, springs, meadows,<br />

fields, vineyards and rural habitats. Other four habitats were assessed as lowly sensitive (ls):<br />

black pine crops, orchards, gardens and urban habitats.<br />

Table 48 Matrix determining the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats<br />

Habitats<br />

Downy oak-Hop<br />

hornbeam forests<br />

Italian and<br />

Turkey oak<br />

forests<br />

2 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 12 ms<br />

1 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 3 2 20 ms<br />

chestnut forests 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 2 2 24 hs<br />

Sessile oak<br />

forests<br />

1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 1 3 2 23 hs<br />

alder forests 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 3 22 hs<br />

willow belts 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 2 1 2 3 31 vhs<br />

marshy oak<br />

stands<br />

3 1 3 0 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 3 1 19 ms<br />

hilly pastures 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 13 ms<br />

calcareous rocks 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 2 0 1 17 ms<br />

siliceous rocks 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 10 ms<br />

Ohrid Lake 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 38 vhs<br />

rivers 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 0 0 23 hs<br />

streams 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 19 ms<br />

springs 2 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 12 ms<br />

swamps 3 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 27 hs<br />

humid meadows 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 9 ls<br />

black pine<br />

plantations<br />

1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 20 ms<br />

meadows 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 23 hs<br />

fields 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 11 ms<br />

vineyards 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 3 1 0 1 0 10 ms<br />

orchards 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 8 ls<br />

gardens 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 1 0 9 ls<br />

urban habitats 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 5 ls<br />

rural habitats 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 11 ms<br />

253


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

4.2.2.1 Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> individual habitats<br />

The text below elaborates the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> individual habitats. Also, all possible conflicts and<br />

problems that could occur during the railway construction and operation have been<br />

indicated.<br />

1. Downy oak and hop hornbeam forests (ms-12)<br />

These forests have low economic significance because <strong>of</strong> their scarce presence in the<br />

investigated corridor. Most <strong>of</strong> them are degraded and no major conflicts are expected during<br />

the railway construction and operation.<br />

2. Italian and Turkey oak forests (ms-20)<br />

These forests have great economic significance because they are the main forest resource<br />

exploited by forest enterprises. However, these forests in Macedonia are climate zonally<br />

distributed, and cover the largest area within the investigated corridor among all forest<br />

habitats.<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> the designed route passes through Italian and Turkey oak forests which leads to an<br />

expected direct destruction <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> these forests for the purposes <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

construction and access roads opening. In addition to this, the construction <strong>of</strong> the line will<br />

result in fragmentation and disruption <strong>of</strong> other landscape characteristics.<br />

3. Chestnut forests (hs-24)<br />

Chestnut forests in Macedonia have disjunctive spread with most <strong>of</strong> the aerial in western<br />

Macedonia Chestnut forests which have been significantly modified under the influence <strong>of</strong><br />

people are found near the village Radozda.<br />

The route <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line passes through this habitat, and we can expect direct<br />

destruction <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> this habitat and probable destruction <strong>of</strong> some individual chestnut<br />

trunks.<br />

4. Sessile oak forests (hs-23)<br />

Sessile forests compose climate zonal belt in Macedonia and have wide distribution. Within<br />

the investigated corridor, they develop on Preseka, above the long tunnel between the<br />

villages Judovo and Slivovo. Therefore, no conflicts are expected during the railway<br />

construction and operation.<br />

5. Alder belts (hs-22)<br />

Alder belts are priority species for conservation under the EU Habitat Directive. These<br />

communities are important for their specific ecological functions (control <strong>of</strong> pollution,<br />

protection from floods and erosion, symbiotic nitrification, enrichment <strong>of</strong> soil with nitrates).<br />

They are azonal type <strong>of</strong> vegetation connected with the flow <strong>of</strong> rivers and streams, and they<br />

are found in a form <strong>of</strong> woodlots within certain marshes. In the investigated corridor, most <strong>of</strong><br />

alder communities occur in a form <strong>of</strong> riparian belts.<br />

During the railway construction, direct destruction <strong>of</strong> alder communities or modification <strong>of</strong><br />

hydrological regime in their biotopes is possible.<br />

6. Alder forests (vhs-31)<br />

Alder forests are more important than alder belts. They occur near the villages Botun and<br />

Arbinovo. Alder forests in Macedonia are widely spread, and the best preserved stands at<br />

the level <strong>of</strong> Macedonia are found within the wider area <strong>of</strong> the railway line corridor. Alder<br />

forests have important role in supporting high biological diversity and play important role in<br />

preventing floods and pollution.<br />

254


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Alder forests are the only habitat assessed as very highly sensitive. Any destruction <strong>of</strong> alder<br />

forests is not permissible. A more serious conflict situation could occur near the village<br />

Arbinovo, where the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line runs close to alder forest and marshy habitats.<br />

Figure 64 Alder belt along river Sateska near the village Arbinovo<br />

Figure 65 Alder belt along the river Treska<br />

255


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

7. Willow belts (ms-19)<br />

Willow belts have similar ecological functions like alder communities. Within the investigated<br />

corridor, they occupy very small areas, and accordingly have much lower importance and<br />

lower sensitivity.<br />

During the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line, no major problems are expected in<br />

relation to willow belts.<br />

8. Marshy oak stands (hs-21)<br />

Marshy oak in Macedonia is a rare species, and its stands are even rarer. Several trunks in<br />

the church yard in the village Moroista are considered to be the best preserved stand in<br />

Macedonia. Apart from the national importance, communities <strong>of</strong> marshy oak are enrolled in<br />

the list <strong>of</strong> habitats for conservation under the EU Habitat Directive. This stand is outside the<br />

investigated corridor and no impacts are expected from the railway construction and<br />

operation. However, we can not exclude the possibility for direct damages on some<br />

individual marshy oak trunks in Struga Fields.<br />

9. Hilly pastures (ms-13)<br />

Hilly pastures in Macedonia are widely spread, especially in central and eastern parts where<br />

they occupy large areas. Within the investigated corridor, actually no typical communities <strong>of</strong><br />

hilly pastures grow, but they occur in some transitional succession phases <strong>of</strong> abandoned<br />

agricultural lands or strongly degraded forest ecosystems. In addition to this, these areas are<br />

rather small and have no significant importance for biological diversity.<br />

During the construction <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line, direct destruction <strong>of</strong> parts <strong>of</strong> hilly<br />

pastures is possible, but this conflict does not have high priority.<br />

10. Calcareous rocks (ms-17)<br />

Calcareous rocks near the village Radozda have significance for biological diversity<br />

(chasmophytic flora and vegetation, presence <strong>of</strong> rare and endemic species). This area has<br />

great importance because <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> cave churches.<br />

Given the fact that the route <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line is away from the mentioned<br />

calcareous rocks, major impacts on natural ecosystems are not expected. However, during<br />

mining and opening <strong>of</strong> the route, measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> vibrations have to be undertaken,<br />

in order to protect cave churches.<br />

11. Siliceous rocks (ms-10)<br />

Siliceous rocks in the investigated corridor occupy insignificant areas, and thus no specific<br />

vegetation and flora grows on them, but they are formed under the influence <strong>of</strong> adjacent<br />

habitats.<br />

During the railway construction and operation, no impacts are expected on siliceous rocks.<br />

256


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 66 Siliceous rocks near the village Pesocan<br />

12. Ohrid Lake (vhs-38)<br />

Ohrid Lake is characterized with the highest sensitivity in relation to all habitats in the<br />

corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line, due to numerous characteristics it has, such as presence <strong>of</strong> rare<br />

and well preserved communities, presence <strong>of</strong> endangered bird species, and enormous<br />

number <strong>of</strong> endemic species. Many authors have pointed out the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid not only as<br />

the most important ecosystem in Europe, but also on global level due to its high index <strong>of</strong><br />

endemic biodiversity.<br />

During the railway construction, series <strong>of</strong> negative impacts on the Lake is possible in the<br />

region <strong>of</strong> the village Radozda, such as erosion and inlet <strong>of</strong> excavated material, drainage <strong>of</strong><br />

matters from construction locations along the line, wastewater from the camps <strong>of</strong> workers,<br />

etc. During the railway construction, inlet <strong>of</strong> matters in the Lake is possible, as well as<br />

destruction <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> the communities, increased turbidity, pollution with fuels and oils and<br />

eutrophication.<br />

13. Rivers (hs-23)<br />

Rivers are highly sensitive for a series <strong>of</strong> characteristics, such as presence <strong>of</strong> rare and<br />

protected communities and species, endemic species, as well as landscape values. Several<br />

rivers are located in the railway corridor, among which Crn Drim and Sateska are<br />

distinguished as more important and sensitive to impacts.<br />

During the railway construction, series <strong>of</strong> negative impacts on rivers are possible, such as<br />

inlet <strong>of</strong> matters from construction sites, wastewater from camping sites for the workers, inlet<br />

<strong>of</strong> solid municipal waste, etc. Great negative impact can originate from leakage <strong>of</strong> fuels, oils<br />

and lubricants, which due to their high toxicity may cause damages on communities. In<br />

addition to this, construction <strong>of</strong> bridges may cause change in the flow <strong>of</strong> rivers and inlet <strong>of</strong><br />

solid waste material (rocks and stones) and finer material (sand, soil) which could cause<br />

pollution <strong>of</strong> the water and increased turbidity.<br />

257


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

14. Streams (ms-19)<br />

Similar as rivers, streams are sensitive because <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> rare communities, which<br />

are to a great extent well preserved, as well as species enrolled on the IUCN Red List.<br />

Possible impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway construction are identical as those <strong>of</strong> rivers, but with stronger<br />

intensity due to the size <strong>of</strong> the water body. More severe conflict situation could arise in the<br />

region <strong>of</strong> Bukov Dol, where inlet <strong>of</strong> solid waste material is possible during the construction <strong>of</strong><br />

the bridge and the tunnel.<br />

15. Springs (ms-12)<br />

In the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line, there are several springs in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the village<br />

Radozda. Potential impacts include changes in the spring replenishment as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

buffering in the region <strong>of</strong> the watershed area, as well as full or partial covering <strong>of</strong> the spring.<br />

Yet, no serious disruptions <strong>of</strong> these habitats are expected.<br />

16. Marshes<br />

Marshes are habitats that are strongly affected on global and European level which is the<br />

ground for their inclusion in different international conventions. Areas under marshes in<br />

Macedonia have been significantly reduced during the last 60-70 years. The former Struga<br />

Marsh is almost entirely dried out and destructed. Remains <strong>of</strong> Struga Marsh may be seen<br />

between the City <strong>of</strong> Struga and villages Kalista and Radolista. The route <strong>of</strong> the railway does<br />

not affect this area and marshy communities in it directly, but certain impact can be expected<br />

during the operation (annoyance, use <strong>of</strong> local roads through the marsh remains, etc.).<br />

Reed community was recorded in Struga marsh, too, between the villages Volino and<br />

Moroista. The construction <strong>of</strong> the railway may cause direct destruction <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> this habitat.<br />

Also, during the operation, we may expect severe impacts due to annoyance.<br />

17. Black pine plantations (ls-9)<br />

Black pine plantations within the investigated corridor have very low importance for biological<br />

diversity, but they have certain importance in erosion prevention and control. These are<br />

artificially planted plantations which cover small areas, and they are dispersed through<br />

Italian and Turkey oak forests.<br />

During the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line, direct destruction <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the black pine<br />

plantations is possible, but this conflict has much lower significance than the destruction <strong>of</strong><br />

natural forests.<br />

18. Meadows (ms-20)<br />

Meadows are semi-natural ecosystems on which specific vegetation grows. Generally,<br />

meadows in Macedonia are habitats with reducing areas due to abandoned traditional<br />

agriculture and livestock breeding and different amelioration undertakings. They support high<br />

biological diversity and are significant for their ecological functions (economic value,<br />

protection from erosion).<br />

Meadows in the investigated corridor are situated in river valleys and gorges, immediately<br />

next to watercourses. Certain impact on meadows can be expected during the railway<br />

construction mostly due to the use <strong>of</strong> access roads.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> the meadows near the village Radozda, we may expect direct destruction<br />

because the planned route <strong>of</strong> the railway line passes through meadows located between the<br />

remains <strong>of</strong> chestnut forest.<br />

19. Humid meadows (hs-23)<br />

Humid meadows are represented by the communities Caricetum elatae and Cyperetum<br />

longi. These are rare communities in Macedonia which have never had high economic<br />

258


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

importance for the local population. They support specific biodiversity characterized by the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> rare species <strong>of</strong> plants and important bird species. They are best developed in<br />

the remains <strong>of</strong> Struga Marsh (near village Radozda), along the valley <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska<br />

(especially near the village Arbinovo) and in Struga Fields (between the villages Moroista<br />

and Volino). The construction <strong>of</strong> the railway may be a serious problem due to direct<br />

destruction <strong>of</strong> these habitats or interruption <strong>of</strong> their connection with the surrounding habitats.<br />

20. Fields (ms-11)<br />

Fields are anthropogenic habitats with primary economic significance. They have very low<br />

importance for biological diversity. During the construction, destruction <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> these<br />

habitats is inevitable (directly through the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line and construction <strong>of</strong><br />

new access roads). Also, we may expect impacts during the railway operation (annoyance,<br />

pollution, vibrations). Yet, those have been assessed as low/insignificant because <strong>of</strong> the low<br />

sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the habitat.<br />

21. Vineyards (ms-10)<br />

Vineyards are anthropogenic habitats with usually higher economic significance than fields.<br />

However, within the investigated corridor, the importance <strong>of</strong> vineyards in terms <strong>of</strong> support for<br />

biological diversity is low.<br />

During the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line, we may expect direct impacts on vineyards.<br />

During the line operation, the most serious problem will be soil, water and air pollution.<br />

Figure 67 Vineyard near the village Meseista<br />

22. Orchards (ls-8)<br />

Orchards have high economic value, but relatively low significance for biological diversity.<br />

During the railway construction, the most serious problem will be soil, water and air pollution.<br />

259


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 68 Apple orchard in the village Volino<br />

23. Gardens (ls-9)<br />

Gardens in the investigated corridor occupy small areas, and therefore have low economic<br />

significance and very low importance in terms <strong>of</strong> biological diversity. We may expect<br />

destruction <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the gardens as a result <strong>of</strong> the railway construction. During the line<br />

operation, the most serious problem will be soil, water and air pollution.<br />

24. Urban habitats (ls-5)<br />

From among analyzed habitats, urban habitats have the lowest importance in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

biological diversity. The planned route in the City <strong>of</strong> Kicevo takes care for infrastructural and<br />

residential structures. Construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line in urban habitats will not<br />

have any serious impact on living organisms and their communities. In other parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

investigated corridor, no conflicts with infrastructural projects are expected.<br />

25. Rural habitats (ms-11)<br />

Rural habitats have much higher importance than urban habitats. Yet, their importance in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> supporting the biological diversity is relatively low. Rural habitats are characterized<br />

with the presence <strong>of</strong> cosmopolitan species and ruderal communities. Potential conflicts<br />

related to the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line may be assessed as low.<br />

4.2.3 Impacts on habitats<br />

4.2.3.1 Destruction <strong>of</strong> forest habitats<br />

Anthropogenic plantations: major part <strong>of</strong> pine plantations in the area <strong>of</strong> Kicevo (km 104+800<br />

to km 105+400) will be destructed. Pine forests in that part, as anthropogenic creations,<br />

have no big importance for biological diversity <strong>of</strong> the region, but they have high economic<br />

significance and role in the prevention <strong>of</strong> erosion.<br />

260


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Destruction <strong>of</strong> Italian and Turkey oak forests. During the railway construction, the<br />

following forest stands will be affected by direct destruction:<br />

- Italian and Turkey oak forest – from the village Popolzani to the village<br />

Judovo;<br />

- from the village Slivovo (km 121+200) to the village Arbinovo (opposite<br />

motel Pocinka – km 124+000);<br />

- from the village Arbinovo (km 125+200) to the church St.Bogorodica – near<br />

the village Izdeglavje (km 126+600);<br />

- from the village Botun (km 135+200) to the village Klimestani (km 138+800);<br />

- village <strong>of</strong> Frangovo – small part <strong>of</strong> around 100 meters will be affected<br />

(around km 159+800 to km 159+900);<br />

- from the village Radozda to the border (quantification <strong>of</strong> this impact is<br />

encumbered for two reasons: oak forest is cut through with active or<br />

abandoned meadows and presence <strong>of</strong> chestnut trunks in this part, which is<br />

special and significance impact.<br />

Hop hornbeam oak forest. Destruction or degradation <strong>of</strong> this forest type is not<br />

envisaged given the fact that the railway line passes through tunnel in the area <strong>of</strong><br />

growth <strong>of</strong> this habitat,<br />

Chestnut forests. The most important impact on chestnut forests is expected at<br />

around one kilometer south <strong>of</strong> the village Radozda (km 163+000 to km164+000). High<br />

number <strong>of</strong> old and younger chestnut trunks are expected to be destructed during the<br />

railway construction. Considering that these stands are strongly modified chestnut<br />

forests, the quantity <strong>of</strong> the impact is not significant. Nevertheless, destruction <strong>of</strong><br />

chestnut trunks has negative economic effect as well.<br />

4.2.3.2 Humid forests and riparian belts<br />

Humid forests, especially with alder, are <strong>of</strong> highest conservation interest in the corridor. Their<br />

importance is described in the relevant chapter determining the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats<br />

3.11.10.<br />

Riparian belts by the river Treska – Destruction <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> the alder belt (highly<br />

sensitive habitat) on the river Treska near the village Popolzani is almost unavoidable.<br />

Riparian belts by the river Brzdanska- Major degradation <strong>of</strong> alder belt along the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> Brzdanska Reka along the stretch from the village Popolzani to the village<br />

Brzdani is not expected. However, certain degradations are possible, mainly by<br />

accidence, at certain pieces <strong>of</strong> these belts where they approach close to the existing<br />

asphalted road to Demir Hisar.<br />

Riparian belts by the river Judovska- Degradation <strong>of</strong> the belt <strong>of</strong> alder vegetation<br />

along Judovska Reka from the village Brzdani to the village Judovo is almost<br />

unavoidable. The valley has steep slopes, and the route runs above the river along its<br />

right side. Construction works will cause destruction <strong>of</strong> great part <strong>of</strong> the oak forest, but<br />

also part <strong>of</strong> alder stands. Another problem has to do with the very narrow road to the<br />

village Judovo and it is not suitable for heavy vehicles. Additional works will certainly<br />

cause destruction <strong>of</strong> alder trunks together with small gardens or meadows.<br />

Riparian belts by the river Vilipica- Destruction <strong>of</strong> woodlots and forest belts near<br />

the village Slivovo (km 121+000). There is indirect threat to alder woodlots and belts<br />

at km 121+000 to km 122+000. The threat can result in destruction or degradation <strong>of</strong><br />

261


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

these woodlots and alder belts if construction works require movement <strong>of</strong><br />

mechanization and/or freight vehicles in them to access the route which otherwise<br />

does not affect them directly (it is located somewhat higher than the oak forest). By<br />

quantity, this impact is not the same as the corresponding negative impact near the<br />

village Arbinovo, because these stands are much more degraded.<br />

Alder forests near the village Arbinovo – In the region below the village Arbinovo,<br />

before the entry <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska into the gorge near the hill Cartojca, there are<br />

alder woodlots or thin trees and alleys in a rather good condition. After the alder forest<br />

close to Belciste Marsh, these are probably the best alder stands in Macedonia. This<br />

is also the ground for their high sensitivity to degradation (see matrix in Table 48<br />

Matrix determining the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> habitats). Based on their sensitivity, negative<br />

impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway construction may be high.<br />

Figure 69 Proposal for route redirection near the village Arbinovo to avoid destruction <strong>of</strong> alder forest,<br />

marshy habitats and humid meadows<br />

Alder belts in the foothill <strong>of</strong> Kula near the village Pesocani – At the twist at the<br />

river Sateska around the hill Kula (around hundred meters north <strong>of</strong> the village<br />

Pesocani), there are alder belts which are directly affected by the railway line<br />

construction (~km 130+000).<br />

Alder woodlots and alleys near the village Botun – In the area <strong>of</strong> the village Botun,<br />

direct impacts (destructions) are expected on alder belts and woodlots in the following<br />

sites:<br />

- north <strong>of</strong> the village Botun (~km 134+500),<br />

- east <strong>of</strong> the village Botun (~km 135+000) and<br />

- belts along the gorge (~km 136+000 to km 139+000).<br />

262


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 70 Alder woodlot near the village Botun<br />

Alder forests with poplars near the village Meseista (village Klimestani)-The<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> the railway will cause destruction <strong>of</strong> alder belts between the villages<br />

Klimestani and Meseista. These alder belts, as opposed to previous ones, are<br />

characterized with higher presence <strong>of</strong> other woody species (willow, poplar).<br />

4.2.3.3 Marshes and swamps<br />

Description <strong>of</strong> habitats and species in the relevant chapters leads to the conclusion that<br />

marshy habitats are very important for biodiversity in Macedonia. That importance has<br />

crucial influence on the positioning <strong>of</strong> these habitats as highly sensitive, which is visible<br />

in Table 48. Based on this, negative impacts <strong>of</strong> the planned railway line construction on<br />

marshes and swamps have high intensity. The strong negative impact is further stressed<br />

with the fact that under the current conditions these habitats are <strong>of</strong> drastically reduced<br />

areas due to hydro-ameliorations back in 1950s. Construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line will be<br />

additional (cumulative) effect on further degradation and functional characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

these habitats. The most severe impacts are expected in the following areas:<br />

village Arbinovo-Marshes near the village Arbinovo have been preserved on larger<br />

areas within alder woodlots or their remains, as well as between mowed humid<br />

meadows. According to the Feasibility Study, the route <strong>of</strong> the future railway line<br />

passes in the middle <strong>of</strong> these habitats and cuts twice the river Sateska. The<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line is expected to have huge negative impacts<br />

(destruction, fragmentation) on this habitats in that area.<br />

Struga Marsh (including also marshes near the village Radolista)-The route <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway line passes through the former Struga Marsh. Hydro amelioration interventions<br />

in the past have destroyed the natural vegetation in this area almost entirely. The<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line will reduce the possibility for revitalization <strong>of</strong> Struga<br />

263


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Marsh. Opening <strong>of</strong> access roads is additional threat for the remains <strong>of</strong> the Marsh<br />

(marshes, humid meadows, boundaries with willows).<br />

Reeds near villages Volino and Moroista - this habitat is not threatened with direct<br />

destruction during the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line itself, because it does not run<br />

through it. Negative impacts could be expected during the opening <strong>of</strong> possible access<br />

roads.<br />

4.2.3.4 Humid meadows<br />

Humid meadows in the corridor are special conservation interest. Their importance is<br />

described in the relevant chapter 3.11.9.2. The construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line poses<br />

danger <strong>of</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> high number <strong>of</strong> fields and meadows on the boundaries <strong>of</strong><br />

which there are canals <strong>of</strong> marshy vegetation.<br />

Below is the list <strong>of</strong> sites where destruction <strong>of</strong> humid meadows is expected:<br />

village Slivovo - river Vilipica - destruction <strong>of</strong> humid meadows is expected near the<br />

village Slivovo (km 121+000), together with degraded alder woodlots. There is indirect<br />

threat for humid meadows at km 121+000 to km 122+000. The threat may result in<br />

destruction or degradation <strong>of</strong> these humid meadows, if construction works require<br />

movement <strong>of</strong> construction mechanization and/or freight vehicles in them in order to<br />

access the route which otherwise does not affect them (it is located somewhat above<br />

in oak forest).<br />

Humid meadows near the village Arbinovo - as already indicated, the construction <strong>of</strong><br />

the planned railway line will cause destruction <strong>of</strong> alder forests, marshy habitats and<br />

humid meadows. All these habitats are highly or very highly sensitive.<br />

Humid meadows and fields near the villages Volino and Moroiste - destruction <strong>of</strong><br />

some <strong>of</strong> the humid meadows is expected in Struga Fields, especially between villages<br />

Volino and Moroiste.<br />

Humid meadows near the village Radolista - impacts on humid meadows near the<br />

village Radolista are identical with identified impacts on marshy habitats in Struga<br />

Marsh.<br />

4.2.4 Impacts on flora and fauna<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line will bring better accessibility <strong>of</strong> certain sites. This will<br />

increase the pressure on biological diversity, due to intensified hunting (and poaching),<br />

fishing and collection <strong>of</strong> medicinal and aromatic plants.<br />

4.2.4.1 Flora<br />

Direct impact <strong>of</strong> the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Radozda on plants<br />

is presented through the assessment <strong>of</strong> their habitats. Specific impact <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

construction is not expected on individual plant species. Impacts on individual chestnut<br />

trunks have already been elaborated in the section on impacts on chestnut forests.<br />

4.2.4.2 Fauna<br />

Direct impacts <strong>of</strong> the construction and operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line on invertebrates are not<br />

expected. Relevant impacts on invertebrate populations are covered in the description <strong>of</strong><br />

impacts on habitats.<br />

The most important impacts on vertebrates during the railway operation include:<br />

disturbance and direct mortality due to deadly collisions <strong>of</strong> animals with trains;<br />

264


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

habitats fragmentation (has significant impact on fauna), but this aspect has been<br />

elaborated in the segments on impacts on landscapes.<br />

Electric installations also have negative impact on birds through causing <strong>of</strong> direct mortality<br />

(electrocution). Birds, which stand on poles or transmission cables may die if they cause<br />

"short circuit". It is well known in the world that high number <strong>of</strong> big size bird species die on<br />

poorly designed electric railway installations as they use poles for observation, rest and<br />

nesting. Electrocution does not endanger only birds, but it is also a threat to the safety <strong>of</strong><br />

railway transport.<br />

Some animals (bear, wolf) avoid parts in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> railway lines because <strong>of</strong> human<br />

activities and increased noise.<br />

It is expected that columns that will bear the electricity conductors for trains supply will be<br />

used by birds as standing grounds, and even potential nesting points. Mortality <strong>of</strong> birds in<br />

such cases is well documented and surprisingly high, especially during migration period.<br />

Birds are affected by electrocution due to closure <strong>of</strong> the circuit with their wings or body<br />

(contact through earthing and phase or two phases). Thus, larger birds are more suspicious<br />

to electrocution. Bird species particularly affected by electrocution (but also collision) during<br />

the railway line operation include storks, herons and birds <strong>of</strong> pray.<br />

4.3 Impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters<br />

Pollution <strong>of</strong> waters during the railway line construction may be physical, chemical and<br />

biological. Physical pollution is manifested through presence <strong>of</strong> solid matters <strong>of</strong> earth<br />

residues, sand, solid matters from tires friction, remains <strong>of</strong> accidents, etc. Chemical pollution<br />

<strong>of</strong> surface waters can be caused by discharge <strong>of</strong> liquid matters like oils and greases. Solid<br />

particles, through road surface wash-out, settle in gutters and drainage canals and they can<br />

cause their clogging, while fats and oils may float on surface and reach the recipient. There,<br />

they create a "film" that prevents oxygen supply to the watercourse, thus preventing the<br />

normal development <strong>of</strong> the biological component into the recipient.<br />

Chemical pollution also results from dissolution <strong>of</strong> pollutants present in the air. These<br />

pollutants originate from exhaust gases <strong>of</strong> vehicles, imissions from polluting components <strong>of</strong><br />

the nearby industrial and manufacturing facilities, dissolution <strong>of</strong> individual components <strong>of</strong> the<br />

surrounding land, application <strong>of</strong> agrochemical products and pesticide, animal and plant<br />

waste, etc.<br />

Chemical pollution may be manifested as strongly acid, weakly acid neutral environment and<br />

all variations ranging from strongly base to strongly acid environment. It should be taken into<br />

account that not all <strong>of</strong> these pollutions originate from the transport corridor/railway line.<br />

Majority <strong>of</strong> them may be present also in the absence <strong>of</strong> constructed <strong>Corridor</strong> 8 or acid rains<br />

can cause the chemical pollution <strong>of</strong> surface waters.<br />

Biological pollutions result from disintegration <strong>of</strong> organic matters used as food <strong>of</strong> various<br />

micro organisms. They may be due to food thrown by unconscious participants in traffic,<br />

leaves scattered around by wind, feathers and other matters present in the immediate<br />

surrounding.<br />

The above defined pollutions may be constant, seasonal or incidental. Intensity and form <strong>of</strong><br />

pollution <strong>of</strong> surface and ground waters may be considered in phases here as well:<br />

construction phase and use/operation phase <strong>of</strong> the railway line.<br />

During the construction phase, compaction <strong>of</strong> the subground and other measures aimed at<br />

securing stability, may lead to change in the ground permeability, by which direct impact is<br />

caused with regard to the regime <strong>of</strong> surface and ground waters.<br />

265


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

When the route passes through an embankment, this may create a severe physical barrier to<br />

the flow <strong>of</strong> surface and ground waters running through that area to reach the recipient. In this<br />

context, unnecessary retention <strong>of</strong> the terrain and excessive humidification and even flooding<br />

can occur.<br />

When the road is in incision, the flow <strong>of</strong> ground waters is cut. In such cases, when the<br />

quantity <strong>of</strong> ground water is higher in the ground, at groundwater level increase, disrupted<br />

regime <strong>of</strong> ground waters affects the surrounding lands.<br />

Wastewaters during railway operation<br />

During the railway line operational phase, pollution <strong>of</strong> surface waters occurs most frequently<br />

during precipitation. In such periods, the dust settled on the track and accompanying<br />

facilities is washed-out by the falls and dissolves suspended particulate matters. Ran falls or<br />

waters originating from snow melting are burdened with matters which settle on the line and<br />

the area controlled by it.<br />

Putting the railway into operation and its operation can lead to discharges <strong>of</strong> sanitary waste<br />

waters generated mostly by passenger terminals and service stations. These waste waters<br />

should be treated in accordance with the regulations regarding municipal waste waters.<br />

Also, waste water emission could result from the maintenance and repair <strong>of</strong> locomotives and<br />

wagons. Discharge under high pressure may cause discharges <strong>of</strong> waste water containing<br />

particulate matters <strong>of</strong> transport material, dyes, greases and oils, etc. During these<br />

interventions, base solutions for removal <strong>of</strong> dyes, greases and other impurities from axles<br />

and other metallic parts Also, acids and bases may be used to remove corroded materials<br />

(present along entire line). Passenger trains generate sanitary water as well, which is usually<br />

discharged directly on the surface <strong>of</strong> the track/railway.<br />

4.3.1 Impact <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> construction in mountaneous and hilly relief will cause destruction <strong>of</strong> soil and rocks<br />

into smaller fractions, which will accumulate on the slopes, i.e. near riverbeds. During snow<br />

melting and more intensive rainfalls, these fractions will be transported to the riverbeds.<br />

Rocks and soil removed or disintegrated during the railway construction and transported to<br />

riverbeds will cause increased turbidity, i.e. increased quantity <strong>of</strong> solid suspended matters.<br />

On the other side, this will also increase the content <strong>of</strong> heavy metals, and consequently the<br />

toxical effects on living organisms.<br />

Nevertheless, the greatest danger in relation to the railway line construction comes from<br />

incidental leakage <strong>of</strong> fuels, oils and lubricants from vehicles and machinery used in the<br />

railway construction. It is well known that hydrocarbons contained in fuels and oils are<br />

extremely toxic for living organisms. It is especially dangerous if incidents occur on the shore<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake or within the watershed area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake (e.g. river Sateska), which would<br />

endanger endemic living organisms in the Lake, but also irreversible damages would occur<br />

on habitats and biocenoses.<br />

Establishment <strong>of</strong> linear construction belt (which should be in the width range <strong>of</strong> 10-50 m) and<br />

construction zones during the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line, accompanying tunnels and<br />

bridges and access roads to individual parts <strong>of</strong> the route can affect the quality <strong>of</strong> surface<br />

waters in the following way:<br />

Disruption and removal <strong>of</strong> soil cover (humus) and part <strong>of</strong> rock masses/sediments<br />

may cause erosion <strong>of</strong> the sediments and potential pollution <strong>of</strong> the surrounding<br />

surface waters through increase in the level <strong>of</strong> solid suspended particulate matters in<br />

them;<br />

266


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Delayed removal and dislocation <strong>of</strong> excavated masses during tunnels opening can<br />

cause formation <strong>of</strong> artificial partition and accumulation <strong>of</strong> water downstream in<br />

surface watercourses existing along dales, below the locations envisaged for tunnels<br />

opening;<br />

Polluted waters run-<strong>of</strong>f from sites <strong>of</strong> construction activity;<br />

Leakage <strong>of</strong> fuels and oils from vehicles and construction machinery;<br />

By way <strong>of</strong> removal/throwing <strong>of</strong> waste in surface waters;<br />

Heavy metals contained in emissions from vehicles.<br />

Irreversible direct impacts on the regime and the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters are not expected<br />

from the execution <strong>of</strong> construction works.<br />

Potential different sites along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line that should be paid attention<br />

include:<br />

At station 108km;<br />

At station 114km + 850m (before the entry into tunnel no. 6);<br />

At station 120km + 430m (before the exit from tunnel no. 6);<br />

At station 122km + 070m (before the entry into tunnel no. 7);<br />

At station 126km + 020m (before the entry into tunnel no. 8);<br />

At station 126km + 147m (before the exit from tunnel no. 8);<br />

At station 135km + 025m (before the entry into tunnel no. 9);<br />

At station 136km + 015m (before the exit from tunnel no. 9);<br />

At station 137km + 855m (before the entry into tunnel no. 10);<br />

At station 138km + 335m (before the exit from tunnel no.10);<br />

At station 159km + 550m (before the entry into tunnel no. 11);<br />

At station 162km + 752m (before the exit from tunnel no. 11).<br />

Another potential impact related to the railway construction originates from workers' camping<br />

sites, as well as the point for cleaning and maintenance <strong>of</strong> the vehicles and mechanization.<br />

Camping sites <strong>of</strong> workers engaged in the railway construction may be sources <strong>of</strong> pollution<br />

with faecal (municipal) waste waters, but also solid municipal waste (especially from<br />

packaging <strong>of</strong> food and materials used in construction). Good organization and selection <strong>of</strong><br />

suitable place in the camps are necessary (if such are planned). Discharge <strong>of</strong> faecal<br />

wastewaters in rivers or Ohrid Lake could be potential disaster (especially for the Lake <strong>of</strong><br />

Ohrid) and significant deterioration <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> water.<br />

4.3.2 Impact <strong>of</strong> the railway line operation on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters<br />

During the railway line operation, the main danger for surface and ground waters comes<br />

from incidents <strong>of</strong> chemical substances run-<strong>of</strong>fs (inorganic fertilizers, solvents, fuels). In case<br />

<strong>of</strong> incident <strong>of</strong> this kind, aquatic ecosystems will be polluted. Ohrid Lake is especially<br />

sensitive ecosystem. Therefore, the relevant services <strong>of</strong> PE <strong>Railway</strong>s will be obliged to<br />

prepare an action plan for coping with incidents <strong>of</strong> this kind. At the same time, this services<br />

have to be trained and staffed adequately.<br />

It has been assumed that railway stations will be connected to utility systems and therefore<br />

no serious impact is expected from municipal waste waters on natural ecosystems.<br />

267


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

During the operation, the railway line as a construction project may not have any impact on<br />

quantitative and qualitative characteristics <strong>of</strong> surface waters.<br />

Expected potential impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> waters during this phase are related to railway<br />

compositions running over the line. The most critical points on the line where impacts on<br />

surface waters can be expected are the locations where the railway line crosses the existing<br />

watercourses, i.e. the bridges. Potential sources <strong>of</strong> water pollution during this phase include:<br />

Leakage <strong>of</strong> fuel or oils from driving machines (locomotives) for railway compositions<br />

(trains) energizing;<br />

Removal/throwing <strong>of</strong> waste (especially from passenger trains) into surface waters.<br />

4.3.3 Impacts on rivers and other wetlands<br />

4.3.3.1 Impacts during construction<br />

Potential impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway construction phase on wetlands and algae diversity include:<br />

- run-<strong>of</strong>fs from railway line construction sites,<br />

- run-<strong>of</strong>f/drainage at the sites for stations construction,<br />

- excavated or removed material,<br />

- drainage <strong>of</strong> river sediments,<br />

- sanitary waste waters (from workshops), and<br />

- other activities connected with the construction.<br />

Water drained from the construction sites may contain increased quantity <strong>of</strong> sediment, solid<br />

particulate matters and various contaminating substances. Potential sources <strong>of</strong> water<br />

pollution during the railway line construction are the following: а) wash out and erosion from<br />

the surface on the location <strong>of</strong> works execution; b) concrete or other material used for support<br />

walls construction; c) water used to wash vehicles used during construction; d) water used to<br />

reduce dust during construction; e) fuel, oils and lubrication preparations for vehicles and<br />

equipment used during the railway construction.<br />

Wastewater discharges during construction may cause physical, chemical and biological<br />

impacts. Physical impacts may result from increased sediments through erosion, blockage <strong>of</strong><br />

canals and rivers and causing <strong>of</strong> floods under conditions <strong>of</strong> intensive precipitations.<br />

Increased content <strong>of</strong> solid suspended particulate matters in water may cause reduction in<br />

the concentration <strong>of</strong> dissolved oxygen in the water due to а) reduction in light penetrating<br />

into water column, reducing the intensity <strong>of</strong> photosynthesis and phytoplankton and<br />

phytobenthos (micro and macrophytes), which in turn reduces the production <strong>of</strong> oxygen in<br />

the water column; b) high content <strong>of</strong> suspended matters and turbidity results in increased<br />

energy retention (retention <strong>of</strong> energy in the water column), which results in increased<br />

temperature and consequently reduction in dissolved oxygen. Horoscopy could also occur in<br />

extreme conditions.<br />

In addition to the above, there are also chemical and biological impacts which depend<br />

primarily on the chemical characteristics and quantity <strong>of</strong> nutrients in the water released by<br />

run-<strong>of</strong>f. Significant chemical effects may occur at discharges <strong>of</strong> concrete and cement which<br />

also induce increase in pH value <strong>of</strong> the water. At the same time, increased pH value causes<br />

toxic effects and reduction in the populations <strong>of</strong> organisms and biodiversity in general.<br />

Material excavated or removed during the railway construction may have significant impact<br />

on wetlands and quality <strong>of</strong> water. Therefore, great care should be taken during disposal <strong>of</strong><br />

268


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

the excavated material, especially while constructing the tunnels. Excavated material<br />

consists mostly <strong>of</strong> rocks, earth and stones which are able in case <strong>of</strong> erosion to cause<br />

physical disruptions, such as interruption <strong>of</strong> water flow, change in the flow configuration, as<br />

well as increase in turbidity and quantity <strong>of</strong> nutrients and solid suspended particulate matter.<br />

During the construction <strong>of</strong> bridges over rivers, pollution may occur with heavy metals, which<br />

are bounded mostly to the sediment in the river. Also, river sediments have high ability for<br />

bounding <strong>of</strong> organic compounds (such as hydrocarbons released from fuels, oils and<br />

lubricants). Dissolution <strong>of</strong> heavy metals and organic compounds from sediments is slow, but<br />

persistent process and can cause significant impact on the quality <strong>of</strong> water. Both heavy<br />

metals and hydrocarbons are strongly toxic for all organisms and this could cause<br />

(depending on the concentration) reduction <strong>of</strong> populations and biodiversity loss. Particular<br />

attention should be paid during the construction <strong>of</strong> bridges in plane part <strong>of</strong> the railway line,<br />

designed near by Sateska River. Inlet <strong>of</strong> sediment into the river Sateska will endanger<br />

directly the ecosystem <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake. Pollution <strong>of</strong> the sediment with organic compounds and<br />

heavy metals in particular would cause enormous damages on the life in Ohrid Lake.<br />

Municipal wastewater occurs from sanitary facilities for the work force on the site <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway construction. Wastewater is characterized with high level <strong>of</strong> biological oxygen<br />

demand (BOD), ammonium, phosphorus and coliform bacteria. This effluent would cause<br />

pollution <strong>of</strong> the aquatic ecosystem. In case 500 workers take part in the work on the railway,<br />

around 250 m 3 wastewater would be released on daily basis. Extremely high impact on<br />

wetlands and quality <strong>of</strong> water would occur if these wastewater is discharged directly into the<br />

water without pretreatment. However, it is assumed that appropriate sanitary infrastructure<br />

will be placed for the workers and no discharge <strong>of</strong> municipal waste waters into aquatic<br />

ecosystems will be allowed. It is supposed that mobile chemical toilets, septic tanks and<br />

appropriate location for (municipal) wastes will be provided.<br />

In addition to the above, problems may occur during the railway construction with regard to<br />

solid waste disposal which may result in pollution or damages to wetlands. Food remains or<br />

waste <strong>of</strong> food packaging are <strong>of</strong> particular importance, as well as the waste from the<br />

packaging <strong>of</strong> materials used in the railway construction. If these matters reach wetlands,<br />

they may cause pollution through inlet <strong>of</strong> organic matters and nutrients (and reduction in<br />

oxygen quantity), increase in turbidity, salinity and conductivity. On the other side, release <strong>of</strong><br />

liquids stored in the area <strong>of</strong> the railway line development, such as oils, diesel fuel, solvents,<br />

lubricants, may have extremely high impact on wetlands. Therefore, in order to reduce the<br />

risk <strong>of</strong> such releases (incidents), it is necessary to provide suitable barriers (boundaries)<br />

which would prevent the propagation <strong>of</strong> liquids and their penetration into soil or water, as<br />

well as appropriate disposal, keeping and handling <strong>of</strong> fuels, oils and lubricants.<br />

4.3.3.2 Impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway line operation on wetlands<br />

Possible impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway during its operation include:<br />

- water for air conditioning,<br />

- leakage <strong>of</strong> water from wagons,<br />

- discharge <strong>of</strong> water from stations,<br />

- drainage.<br />

It is assumed that stations and platforms, during summer period, will have natural ventilation<br />

or mechanical ventilation if they are covered or closed. Air conditioning <strong>of</strong> the premises is<br />

envisaged by air cooling. In this way, there will be no discharge <strong>of</strong> wastewater from air<br />

conditioning. Electricity based heating is recommended during winter, as it does not include<br />

269


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

heating <strong>of</strong> water, which in the period outside heating season would be discharged into<br />

aquatic ecosystems. In this way, no impact would be expected on wetlands.<br />

Leakage <strong>of</strong> certain quantity <strong>of</strong> fuel and oils from locomotives is also expected. At some<br />

points, bigger quantity <strong>of</strong> fuel or oils release can be expected (e.g. in stations), and they<br />

would be washed out by water sediments and transported to the soil or surface waters. Such<br />

situation would cause disruptions <strong>of</strong> wetlands.<br />

Functioning <strong>of</strong> depots and stations will generate municipal wastewater from toilets/utilities.<br />

This waste is mainly characterized with increased concentrations <strong>of</strong> BOD, suspended<br />

particulate matter, ammonium, phosphates. Yet, it is considered that significant impacts on<br />

wetlands would occur if waste waters are discharged without pretreatment. It is assumed<br />

that the stations will be connected to municipal system or will be adequately installed and<br />

maintained regularly.<br />

Wastewater will be generated from the stations for wagons and locomotives<br />

cleaning/maintenance. Thorough cleaning <strong>of</strong> the floor <strong>of</strong> the trains would be carried out<br />

every second week. Water with detergents would be additionally released through daily<br />

cleaning <strong>of</strong> wagons. These waste waters may cause physical, chemical and biological<br />

degradations in wetlands, if they are not collected and treated.<br />

Functioning <strong>of</strong> the railway will also generate residues <strong>of</strong> oils, fuels and lubricants. These<br />

matters may be washed out from the surface <strong>of</strong> the line and thus drained to aquatic<br />

ecosystems. This situation can be especially explicit on bridges, where these matters would<br />

be inlet with the water sediments directly into the recipient.<br />

4.4 Impacts on landscape<br />

4.4.1 Disorder in functional characteristics <strong>of</strong> the landscape <strong>of</strong> subalpine<br />

broadleaved forests.<br />

Operation <strong>of</strong> linear infrastructural projects has negative impact on the connectiveness and<br />

connectivity <strong>of</strong> ecosystems. Certain impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway line operation can be expected on<br />

the functional landscape characteristics <strong>of</strong> oak forests. Planned bridges and tunnels along<br />

the entire railway line route are factor reducing the negative impacts.<br />

Major impacts may be expected in the area between the villages Slivovo and Meseista. In<br />

this part, the line passes through oak forests, marshy habitats and agricultural land and<br />

separates these habitats from the riverbed <strong>of</strong> Sateska.<br />

In order to avoid negative impacts on the functional characteristics (connectiveness) <strong>of</strong> oak<br />

forests, no mitigation measures are proposed. Construction <strong>of</strong> the planned tunnels and<br />

bridges provides sufficient guarantee for the maintenance <strong>of</strong> the functionality <strong>of</strong> this<br />

landscape.<br />

4.4.2 Impacts on hilly rural landscape<br />

The railway line will cut high number <strong>of</strong> fields and meadows on the boundaries <strong>of</strong> which edge<br />

vegetation (boundaries) <strong>of</strong> fruit trees and oaks grows. This vegetation attributes the imprint<br />

<strong>of</strong> this landscape type, but it is also a significant corridor for the movement <strong>of</strong> high number <strong>of</strong><br />

animal species. Destruction <strong>of</strong> these structures is expected to result from the route itself<br />

(direct occupation <strong>of</strong> area), construction works (direct or indirect destruction <strong>of</strong> trees), as well<br />

as from access roads. This habitat destruction is expected to reduce the functionality <strong>of</strong> this<br />

landscape relative to natural processes.<br />

270


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

4.4.3 Impacts on plane lake landscape<br />

The railway line will cut large area on which remains <strong>of</strong> marshy habitats are found (they<br />

support reproduction <strong>of</strong> amphibians or nutrition <strong>of</strong> certain animals) on both sides.<br />

Amphibians move from marshy habitats towards grass ones 9including fields) for food and<br />

the opposite direction to lay eggs. Although the railway line differs from a highway and<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> trains will not be too high, more problematic passage <strong>of</strong> amphibians and other<br />

animals over the railway (around 50 cm) is expected, as well as increased mortality during<br />

such passages.<br />

4.5 Impacts on geological structures<br />

4.5.1 Construction phase<br />

Expected impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway in this project phase on geological structures would be in a<br />

form <strong>of</strong> degradation and erosion <strong>of</strong> rock masses/sediments, due to:<br />

Opening <strong>of</strong> access roads and operational plateau for foundation (anchoring) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

track railway construction, execution <strong>of</strong> the accompanying elements <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />

(halt points, railway stations, overpasses, underpasses, culverts);<br />

Excavation <strong>of</strong> tunnels;<br />

Excavation <strong>of</strong> foundations for the planned accompanying electric installation;<br />

Possible leakage <strong>of</strong> fuels and oils from construction machinery and vehicles for<br />

transport <strong>of</strong> construction materials and equipment, and<br />

Handling and management <strong>of</strong> chemicals and oils for the purposes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

accompanying electric installation.<br />

Degradation and erosion <strong>of</strong> rock masses/sediments include all contemporary engineering<br />

and geological processes and appearances described above. Critical points for these<br />

potential impacts are the stretches where the line passes over dales with already identified<br />

trenches and landslides, and <strong>of</strong> course the most critical points are the stretches where the<br />

line is going to be positioned under ground (tunnels). There, depending on the existing<br />

geological composition and existing tectonics <strong>of</strong> rock masses, we may expect degradations<br />

through rock slides and wreck <strong>of</strong> underground spaces. Such occurrences may be expected<br />

in relation to tunnels nos. 9 and 10 (on the stretch from the village Botun to the village<br />

Klimestani) and near the tunnel no.11 (near the village Radozda) due to the relatively<br />

weaker engineering geological properties <strong>of</strong> the present rock mass (Sqse–phylitic shales).<br />

For the purposes <strong>of</strong> the railway construction, no opening <strong>of</strong> new installations is envisaged for<br />

the phase <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> mineral and geological resources in the area <strong>of</strong> the route corridor.<br />

Accordingly, no negative impacts are expected on mineral resources in the subject area.<br />

With reference to hydrogeological occurrences and facilities, impacts expected during this<br />

phase which require attention include:<br />

Potential degradation and destruction <strong>of</strong> existing underground linear facilities<br />

(pipelines) intersect by the railway line. One <strong>of</strong> the most critical is the railway line<br />

intersection with the regional water supply pipeline supplying water to the City <strong>of</strong><br />

Struga and surrounding villages, close to the village Sum (station 135 km-136 km).<br />

Also, potential impacts may be expected on the local water supply system supplying<br />

water to the village Radozda and guardhouse on Macedonian-<strong>Albania</strong>n border<br />

(station 163 km+970-164 km+100).<br />

271


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Potential direct and direct impacts (through water occurrences and facilities) on<br />

aquifer rock masses (hydrogeological collectors), through vertical infiltration<br />

(leakage) <strong>of</strong> fuel, oil or cement solution from vehicles and construction machines.<br />

Potential location at risk is in the tunnel no. 6 (station 115km + 500-119 km + 00),<br />

where the line is expected through a part <strong>of</strong> represented hydrogeological collectors:<br />

MD–slab-like marbles and Т2,3 massive and bank-like limestone from the springs <strong>of</strong><br />

which the village is supplied with water. Also, location at potential risk is found on the<br />

stretch above the village Popolzani to the area below the village Vidrani (station<br />

107km + 950-110 km + 350), where the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line passes through part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the represented hydrogeological collectors: MD–slab-like marbles drained through<br />

the identified karst springs in the village.<br />

4.5.2 Operational phase<br />

With reference <strong>of</strong> operational phase (use and servicing phase), impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway on<br />

geological structures, engineering geological appearances and processes are not expected.<br />

The possible impacts on hydrogeological occurrences and facilities remain potentially<br />

dangerous, through above described direct and indirect pollution <strong>of</strong> aquifer rock masses<br />

(hydrogeological collectors) on the same stations.<br />

4.6 Impacts <strong>of</strong> vibrations and seismics<br />

In the course <strong>of</strong> construction and later operation <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Struga-Lin (border<br />

with <strong>Albania</strong>), series <strong>of</strong> impacts will be caused on the environment through which the route <strong>of</strong><br />

the railway passes. Most frequent possible impacts include:<br />

- Impacts occurring as a result <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line itself,<br />

- Impacts occurring as a result <strong>of</strong> the operation <strong>of</strong> transport means in the phase<br />

<strong>of</strong> the railway use.<br />

Besides other, specific impacts occurring as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the railway construction are<br />

as follows:<br />

- Seismic effects resulting from mining for the purpose <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the structures<br />

on the railway line itself – incisions, tunnels and bridges.<br />

Specific impacts occurring as a result <strong>of</strong> the operation <strong>of</strong> transport means in the phase <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway use include, inter alia:<br />

- Vibrations on the ground resulting from the movement <strong>of</strong> trains over the railway line.<br />

The text below will describe techniques for establishment <strong>of</strong> the safety zones for seismic<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> mining, techniques for assessment <strong>of</strong> the intensity <strong>of</strong> vibrations occurring as a<br />

consequence <strong>of</strong> trains movement over the line.<br />

These types <strong>of</strong> impacts are presented in more detail in the separate Elaborate prepared for<br />

the purposes <strong>of</strong> this Study, presented in detail in Appendix 9.<br />

Impacts <strong>of</strong> vibrations generated during the railway construction and during its operation are<br />

especially significant near the populated places (Kicevo, Brzdani, Vidrani, G. Popolzani, D.<br />

Popolzani, Drugovo, Judovo, Arbinovo, Botun, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Pesocani, Slivovo,<br />

Turje, Klimestani, Meseista, Volino, Trebenista, Mislesevo, Moroista, Struga, Zagracani-<br />

Sum, Radolista, Kalista, Frangovo, Radozda), because <strong>of</strong> the risky group <strong>of</strong> receptors -<br />

people. Some animal life forms are equally sensitive to impacts <strong>of</strong> vibrations, and it may<br />

happen that they leave their habitats.<br />

272


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

4.6.1 Response <strong>of</strong> people<br />

The response <strong>of</strong> people to vibrations on the ground is influenced by many factors. Some <strong>of</strong><br />

those factors are physical, like amplitude, duration and frequency content <strong>of</strong> vibrations, while<br />

other factors like the type <strong>of</strong> population, age, gender and expectations are physiological (ISO<br />

2631-2, 2003). This means that people's reaction to vibrations is subjective and differs for<br />

different people.<br />

4.6.2 Impact <strong>of</strong> vibrations on sensitive equipment<br />

Vibrations <strong>of</strong> the ground caused by the traffic may obstruct the operation <strong>of</strong> sensitive<br />

equipment such as electronic microscopes inside buildings. Therefore, sometimes it is<br />

necessary to mitigate vibrations if the railway line passes near building. The type <strong>of</strong> suitable<br />

measure against this should be determined depending on the specific conditions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway and buildings.<br />

4.6.3 Impact <strong>of</strong> vibrations on buildings<br />

The overview <strong>of</strong> reports on damages <strong>of</strong> buildings related with vibrations (Nelson &<br />

Saurenman, 1983) shows that there is only 5% probability that buildings will suffer structural<br />

damages due to the spped <strong>of</strong> particles smaller than 50 mm/s and there has been no case <strong>of</strong><br />

damages on buildings reported for speeds <strong>of</strong> particles smaller than 25 mm/s. According to<br />

the report, there is no risk <strong>of</strong> architectural damages on normal buildings due to vibrations<br />

weaker than 15 mm/s.<br />

Generally speaking, we may say that the problem <strong>of</strong> excessive vibrations on the ground<br />

caused by railway traffic has three links, i.e. source, path and receptor. In other words,<br />

vibrations on the ground caused by railway traffic are influenced by factors like roughness <strong>of</strong><br />

wheels and rails, specific support <strong>of</strong> track, dynamic characteristics <strong>of</strong> vehicles running over<br />

rails, strength <strong>of</strong> rail bearers, design <strong>of</strong> the railway structure, characteristics <strong>of</strong> the soil and<br />

design <strong>of</strong> the structure <strong>of</strong> facilities and speed <strong>of</strong> the train.<br />

It is commonly assumed that there will be no damages on buildings due to vibrations caused<br />

by ground vibrations. The most important impact that may result from the vibrations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway line Kicevo-Struga-Lin (border with <strong>Albania</strong>) is related to people living in buildings<br />

along the planned route <strong>of</strong> the railway line. Furtheron, if there is equipment sensitive to<br />

vibrations inside buildings, its proper functioning may be disordered by vibrations if no<br />

measures are undertaken. If there are buildings <strong>of</strong> special nature very close to the railway<br />

line route, like theatres or old historical buildings, they should be observed with great<br />

attention with regard to ground vibrations.<br />

4.7 Impacts on soils<br />

Soil is a natural resource which is very complex and exceptionally sensitive to different<br />

external impacts. Soil reacts quickly to existing negative impacts which may result in its<br />

accelerated degradation, but on the other side it recovers very difficult and slowly from<br />

changes suffered as a result <strong>of</strong> these impacts. These changes may induce loss <strong>of</strong> the basic<br />

functions <strong>of</strong> the soil which define its fertility.<br />

Based on the above, it is necessary to identify all possible negative impacts in each<br />

individual case that may be classified in several types <strong>of</strong> soil degradation, namely:<br />

Soil erosion,<br />

Reduced content <strong>of</strong> organic matter,<br />

Soil compaction,<br />

273


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Soil salination,<br />

Soil contamination,<br />

Loss <strong>of</strong> soil biodiversity,<br />

Soil conversion (soil sealing),<br />

Landslides, and<br />

Floods.<br />

The term soil degradation in the context <strong>of</strong> environmental impacts <strong>of</strong> certain construction<br />

undertakings concerns several different processes, the most important being: loss <strong>of</strong> fertile<br />

soil layer, change in water permeability, soil degradation at locations used for material<br />

borrowing for construction, degradation resulting from surplus material disposal, soil<br />

conversion on places where construction activities take place (soil sealing) and other<br />

impacts which depending on conditions may have major or minor impacts.<br />

Construction works related to vegetation clearing and soil layer are actually the biggest<br />

changes in the topography <strong>of</strong> the terrain. As far as the impact on soils is concerned, in case<br />

<strong>of</strong> construction works <strong>of</strong> this type, we distinguish two critical phases: construction phase and<br />

operational phase.<br />

Chapter 3.7 describes in brief the most important soil types identified and their location in<br />

different sections <strong>of</strong> the railway line. This chapter deals with sensitivity <strong>of</strong> individual soil types<br />

in relation to construction activities and possible forms <strong>of</strong> soil degradation.<br />

4.7.1 <strong>Railway</strong> line construction phase<br />

Soil contamination<br />

Soil contamination is a type <strong>of</strong> degradation related to and deriving from more general<br />

activities connected to the very process <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the railway and facilities designed<br />

for its functioning. Therefore, it is difficult to link contamination with intensive activities on<br />

individual sections <strong>of</strong> the route, as is the case <strong>of</strong> other types <strong>of</strong> degradation. That is why we<br />

will make more general overview <strong>of</strong> certain sources <strong>of</strong> contamination that may occur in the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> construction and apply on the entire section.<br />

Soil contamination in this phase can result from:<br />

inappropriate handling <strong>of</strong> fuels and their derivatives used for construction machines,<br />

washing <strong>of</strong> machines outside <strong>of</strong> specified and adequate locations,<br />

inadequate handling <strong>of</strong> construction materials and aggressive chemical matters used<br />

during construction,<br />

inappropriate construction and location <strong>of</strong> camping sites where machines and materials<br />

are kept, as well as<br />

other activities that are not performed in accordance with the guidelines for technical<br />

measures for prevention (mitigation) in the course <strong>of</strong> the construction.<br />

Soils contamination during construction is one aspect <strong>of</strong> impact on soil which can be<br />

minimized if the relevant technical measures prescribed for construction are observed.<br />

We should point out that soils nearby watercourses and wells are especially vulnerable to<br />

soil contamination if ground waters are positioned close to the soil surface.<br />

In the area <strong>of</strong> investigation, such specific cases have been identified with: alluvial soils in<br />

Izdeglavje and Belcista valleys, due to the fact that the route passes by the flow <strong>of</strong> Sateska<br />

274


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

River which then enters the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid, and thus any pollution <strong>of</strong> these soils<br />

characterized with exceptionally high porosity and permeability will have direct impact on<br />

these waters. Also, alluvial and marsh gleyey soils in the area <strong>of</strong> Struga Fields are<br />

vulnerable for three reasons, namely: (а) these are soils with shallow ground waters, (b) they<br />

are intensively used in agricultural production and therefore contamination <strong>of</strong> these soils will<br />

have an impact on further fertility <strong>of</strong> the soils in support <strong>of</strong> agricultural production, and (c)<br />

potential contamination <strong>of</strong> ground waters used for irrigation, and for drinking water supply in<br />

some cases.<br />

As far as other types <strong>of</strong> degradation are concerned, they are mainly connected with the need<br />

to organize transport <strong>of</strong> big quantity <strong>of</strong> construction material and related activities <strong>of</strong> opening<br />

<strong>of</strong> access roads to certain parts <strong>of</strong> the route, clearing <strong>of</strong> soil cover in the part where the<br />

railway will pass, the need to establish borrowing pits for disposal <strong>of</strong> the surplus earth.<br />

Soil erosion and destruction <strong>of</strong> soil cover<br />

Section 1 covers the stretch from Kicevo to Struga (villages Drugovo, Brzdani, Judovo,<br />

Slivovo, along the course <strong>of</strong> Sateska river and Struga Fields).<br />

The general characteristic <strong>of</strong> the terrain is high stratification with high hills and deep dales,<br />

with permanent or temporary water flows. There are small earth slides (calcareous detritus),<br />

as well as colluvial cones produced by delluvial-prolluvial deposits. All this contributes to the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> numerous incisions and cross-cuts on the route, as well as viaducts and tunnels<br />

the construction <strong>of</strong> which will have great impact on soils in this part <strong>of</strong> the route.<br />

In the initial part <strong>of</strong> the route (station Kicevo-Brzdani-exit from the tunnel near the village<br />

Slivovo), the route runs first through plane terrain over alluvial cultivated soils. Then, in the<br />

area <strong>of</strong> the village Drugovo, the route rises above the village and passes over colluvial<br />

sediments covered with poor vegetation and rare artificially planted forests. Soils are inclined<br />

and even under natural conditions there are visible presence <strong>of</strong> surface and trench erosion.<br />

In order to achieve the required grading, the project envisages high number <strong>of</strong> cuttings in<br />

the terrain, which assumes disorder in natural vegetation and surface soil layer and<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> intensified erosion, as these are unstable colluvial sediments on inclined<br />

terrain. Then, the route makes cuttings into solid compact limestone, and after the crossover<br />

<strong>of</strong> the river Treska, on the stretch near villages Popolzani, Vidrani and Brzdani, it<br />

continues over inclined terrain cut through by dales over a complex <strong>of</strong> regosols and brown<br />

forest soils which are on inclined terrain under oak vegetation. On this stretch, and in order<br />

to cross over the high number <strong>of</strong> dales and gullies, the project has envisaged around 20<br />

bridges (105+700 l-80 m, 106+024 l-80 m, 106+637 l-200 m, 107+075 l-200 m, 107+418 l-<br />

118 m, 107+817 l-400 m, 108+300 l-40 m, 108+487 l-165 m, 109+540 l-162 m, 108+839 l-25<br />

m, 110+185 l-160 m, 110+520 l-70 m, 110+915 l-110 m, 11+340 l-90 m, 111+830 l-180 m,<br />

112+230 l-120 m, 112+433 l-60 m, 112+890 l-120 m, 114+700 l-60 m) and 8 tunnels the<br />

longest <strong>of</strong> which is the one on the stretch between the village Judovo and the village Slivovo,<br />

with around 6 km in length.<br />

High number <strong>of</strong> construction interventions on a relatively small stretch assumes employment<br />

<strong>of</strong> huge earth works and transport <strong>of</strong> big quantities <strong>of</strong> construction material and earth<br />

excavation. Chemical contamination <strong>of</strong> soil can occur in the surrounding area <strong>of</strong> such<br />

construction interventions related to the use <strong>of</strong> construction materials containing certain<br />

aggressive chemical components which in turn can induce disruption <strong>of</strong> the quality (type) <strong>of</strong><br />

the soil, contamination with heavy metals or physical mixture <strong>of</strong> internal construction material<br />

with the fertile pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the soil. Besides, in the case <strong>of</strong> construction projects <strong>of</strong> this kind,<br />

part <strong>of</strong> fertile surface areas around the project is covered over with inert (barren) soil layer<br />

obtained through excavations, process <strong>of</strong> uploading and unloading, etc. Also, access roads<br />

should be opened to each <strong>of</strong> the planned facilities, which increases further the impact on<br />

soils in this part <strong>of</strong> the railway line.<br />

275


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Due to the high number <strong>of</strong> tunnels in this part <strong>of</strong> the route, great quantity <strong>of</strong> excavated<br />

material is expected from most <strong>of</strong> the envisaged tunnels. Part <strong>of</strong> this material will be used as<br />

subground for the railway line , while the rest will be stored in several disposal sites or used<br />

as material for recultivation <strong>of</strong> some open pit along the route.<br />

On the stretch from the intersection Preseka to the station Izdeglavje, the route passes<br />

through rather complicated terrain with high number <strong>of</strong> natural cuttings and dales, mostly on<br />

calcareous material. Soils on limestone in this part are exceptionally vulnerable to erosion<br />

due to shallow solum, usually inclined terrain and weak vegetation. In circumstances like<br />

this, fertile layer may be quickly taken away and the resulting damage is irreversible, and<br />

therefore extraordinary prevention measures should be undertaken.<br />

High number <strong>of</strong> lateral cross-cuts with limestone is also envisaged (total <strong>of</strong> 8 bridges have<br />

been planned with a total length <strong>of</strong> 1025.00 m and two tunnels with a total length <strong>of</strong> 530 m).<br />

The material to be obtained by excavations <strong>of</strong> tunnels and lateral excavations could be used<br />

for construction <strong>of</strong> the embankment <strong>of</strong> the railway line in the area <strong>of</strong> Izdeglavje and Belcista<br />

fields. Terrain is rather difficult to access, and considering the high number <strong>of</strong> structures, this<br />

will require opening <strong>of</strong> new access roads in addition to existing ones. This part <strong>of</strong> the section<br />

will be subject to the same possible impacts <strong>of</strong> soil contamination and degradation.<br />

On the part <strong>of</strong> the route from the station Izdeglavje-intersection Meseiste, for the first several<br />

kilometers (130-135 km) the route runs over alluvial sediments and follows the logics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

terrain, without major construction interventions that would have impacts on soils, except the<br />

cutting at the hill Veternik, which is <strong>of</strong> calcareous origin. We should point out that, in the part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the section close to the village Botun, the route passes through the lowest part <strong>of</strong> Belcista<br />

Field over alluviums with possible high subsoil waters which gravitate to the river Sateska.<br />

There is a need to undertake special measures to prevent contamination <strong>of</strong> these soils<br />

because they are light and infiltration <strong>of</strong> toxic matters in ground and overground<br />

watercourses would be easy.<br />

Above the village Botun, the route enters a tunnel (no. 11 ), and then crosses the river by<br />

bridge in order to avoid torrents on the hills Korito and Koprnica. Then, the route makes<br />

several more crossings over the river and the highway, and by way <strong>of</strong> several cuttings and<br />

two tunnels (12 and 13) exits from Struga Field where it runs over alluvial and colluvial soils<br />

on the right side <strong>of</strong> the highway up to the intersection Meseista. This is rather difficult part<br />

passing through an area <strong>of</strong> regosols and shallow brown forest soils on inclined terrain, which<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> degraded vegetation will be subjected to accelerated erosion. Such case has been<br />

identified on the stretch 137-139 km where due to intensive wood cutting and opening <strong>of</strong> a<br />

forest road, there is occurrence <strong>of</strong> intensive erosion processes and potential earthslide.<br />

From the intersection Meseista to the Station Struga, the section runs first through slightly<br />

inclined colluvial soils, on which weak traces <strong>of</strong> erosion are visible. The bigger inclination<br />

and weak filtration <strong>of</strong> heavy (by mechanical composition) colluviums induce the occurrence<br />

<strong>of</strong> major quantities <strong>of</strong> water which runs <strong>of</strong>f on the surface. In the central part <strong>of</strong> Struga Field,<br />

the railway runs over alluvial and gley soils which have not been subjected to erosion<br />

processes, owing to the flat terrain and good water permeability. Shallow ground water has<br />

been identified, which given the long rainy period preceding the investigations, as well as the<br />

high water level <strong>of</strong> the Lake, is not strange at all. Particular attention should be devoted to<br />

these soils during the construction phase <strong>of</strong> the railway, in order to avoid excessive<br />

trampling and compaction <strong>of</strong> the top soil, as well as degradation <strong>of</strong> the drainage canal<br />

network which is anyway in poor condition. If the above considerations are not taken into<br />

account, there may be occurrence <strong>of</strong> excessive humidity <strong>of</strong> these soils and surface waters<br />

and thus disorder in water-air regime <strong>of</strong> soils and consequently their reduced value as<br />

agricultural areas.<br />

Section 2 covers the part from the Station Struga-Zagracani, Radolista-Radozda.<br />

276


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

With regard to this section <strong>of</strong> the route, concerning the impact <strong>of</strong> construction on destruction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the top soil and intensification <strong>of</strong> erosion processes, the part <strong>of</strong> the route from 163-165 km<br />

is especially interesting; there, it runs along the highway in the areas <strong>of</strong> the villages<br />

Frangovo and M.Vlaj, on inclined terrain <strong>of</strong> cultivated areas and soils, formed on colluvial<br />

sediments, produced by material sliding from higher terrains beneath soils formed on<br />

limestone. This is a zone <strong>of</strong> activity <strong>of</strong> several torrents the erosive processes on which may<br />

intensify and induce earthslides if the top soil is destroyed. Then, the route proceeds through<br />

a longer and a shorter tunnel and several bridges in the zone <strong>of</strong> soils on limestone and<br />

dolomite, as well as complex <strong>of</strong> cement forest soils and regosols.<br />

Disintegration <strong>of</strong> soil structure (soil compaction)<br />

This is another way <strong>of</strong> soil degradation which occurs during linear projects development, as<br />

a result <strong>of</strong> the activity <strong>of</strong> construction mechanization. The area <strong>of</strong> Struga Field will be<br />

subjected to this type <strong>of</strong> soil degradation in particular, because the soils are formed on a<br />

sediment with a deep soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile, low content <strong>of</strong> organic matter and weak stability <strong>of</strong><br />

structural aggregates. Also, colluvial soils in the area <strong>of</strong> the villages Drugovo, Meseista and<br />

Zagracani will be subject to compaction. Soil compaction induces disruption <strong>of</strong> the soil<br />

structure and porosity <strong>of</strong> the soil and water-air regime, which in turn leads to reduction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

infiltration and filtration ability. As a result <strong>of</strong> this, surface waters occur, which in combination<br />

with the high groundwater level, as is the case in the river <strong>of</strong> Crn Drim river flow (in the zone<br />

<strong>of</strong> gley soils) and above the village Kalista, may cause excessive humidity <strong>of</strong> surrounding<br />

areas and intensification <strong>of</strong> gley processes. Therefore, existing access roads should be used<br />

to the maximum during the route construction, and care should be taken during the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> the embankment on the route in order to avoid disruption <strong>of</strong> natural flows <strong>of</strong><br />

ground waters as this may cause formation <strong>of</strong> water ponds along the route.<br />

Soil conversion (soil sealing)<br />

Conversion <strong>of</strong> soil, together with erosion, is the heaviest form <strong>of</strong> soil degradation, because<br />

the soil as natural resource is lost irreversibly, both in economic (for agricultural production)<br />

and ecological terms (as natural habitat fore different plant and animal species).<br />

Several zones which are particularly vulnerable to this type <strong>of</strong> degradation in the investigated<br />

area include: alluvial and gley soils in the areas <strong>of</strong> Izdeglavje, Belcista and Struga Field, due<br />

to their economic importance as agricultural land for the local economy and soils formed on<br />

limestone and dolomite which are relict soil types the formation <strong>of</strong> which takes tens <strong>of</strong><br />

thousands <strong>of</strong> years.<br />

4.7.2 Operational phase<br />

During the railway operation, the soil will be mostly under threat <strong>of</strong> erosion and<br />

contamination. Contamination would be product <strong>of</strong> the following processes:<br />

- Contamination from fuels and derivatives released from the locomotive along the<br />

route and at stations.<br />

- Contamination <strong>of</strong> soils with substances from gas emissions. The most significant<br />

pollution with gas substances and aerosols occurs at a distance <strong>of</strong> 10 meters from<br />

the railway, because <strong>of</strong> the rapid sedimentation <strong>of</strong> substances that are heavier than<br />

air.<br />

- Waste waters from toilets and maintenance <strong>of</strong> station halts.<br />

- Solid waste (organic and inorganic). Its production originates from passenger<br />

transport and around station facilities.<br />

277


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

- Pouring <strong>of</strong> materials that are transported (liquid fuels, ores, etc.). This is one more<br />

dangerous source <strong>of</strong> soil pollution in the nearest part to the railway line during its<br />

operation.<br />

- Treatment <strong>of</strong> the vegetation around the railway line with herbicides.<br />

Erosive processes that may occur during the railway construction are located in the<br />

surrounding <strong>of</strong> facilities (bridges, tunnels, underpasses, drainage canals, etc.), as well as at<br />

embankments and support walls <strong>of</strong> cuttings.<br />

4.8 Impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> air and climate<br />

Electric railway line is a transport mode that is the least harmful for the environment. The<br />

main air emissions and impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> ambient air are related mostly to the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> the railway, generated by construction machines, while in the course <strong>of</strong> its<br />

operation those generated indirectly prevail, namely: increased emission intensity during<br />

manipulation <strong>of</strong> the freight at certain stations with transfer vehicles, increased presence <strong>of</strong><br />

road vehicles at such stations, use <strong>of</strong> diesel locomotive, etc.<br />

4.8.1 Construction phase<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> the construction phases assumes some intensity <strong>of</strong> gases and dust emission from<br />

the activities, machines and materials used. The main sources <strong>of</strong> emission are:<br />

Leveling <strong>of</strong> the terrain, excavation and rails placement<br />

Placement <strong>of</strong> signals and telephone lines<br />

Placement <strong>of</strong> electric installation.<br />

As no specification <strong>of</strong> the equipment to be used and dynamics <strong>of</strong> use are available,<br />

calculation will be based on the common CORINAIR values and certain values recognized in<br />

practice. The length <strong>of</strong> the line, according to the proposed design, is 62.5 km. It includes<br />

tunnels in a length <strong>of</strong> 12 400 m, viaducts in a total length <strong>of</strong> 3 130 m, as well as auxiliary<br />

facilities. The table below presents average emissions from construction machines for 1 km<br />

constructed line.<br />

Table 49 Average emissions from construction machines<br />

Construction phase CO NOx VOC PМ10* N 2O CH 4 NH 3 CO 2 SO 2<br />

Leveling, digging and placement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the rail<br />

Емисија (kg/km)<br />

4 2 16 1 0 0 0 177 0<br />

Signalisation 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 13 0<br />

Electrical equipment 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 50 0<br />

Total 5 2 19 1 0 0 0 240 0<br />

*emission <strong>of</strong> the treated material is not calculated<br />

According to Australian guideline on the assessment <strong>of</strong> emissions during excavations, dust<br />

emission is calculated by the following equation:<br />

EF<br />

U<br />

2.2<br />

PM<br />

0.75<br />

0.001184<br />

1 ER<br />

10 1. 4<br />

PM 10<br />

M<br />

2<br />

1.3<br />

278


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

where:<br />

EF PM10 – factor <strong>of</strong> emission <strong>of</strong> particles with diameter smaller than 10 m (kg/t processed<br />

material)<br />

U – wind speed (m/s)<br />

M – humidity <strong>of</strong> material (%)<br />

ER PM10 – efficiency <strong>of</strong> emission reduction<br />

At wind speed <strong>of</strong> 2.2 m/s and humidity <strong>of</strong> the earth mass <strong>of</strong> 5%, without reduction system,<br />

the PM10 emission will be 0.25 g/t. Taking into account that 51 480 m 3 or around 128.700 t<br />

<strong>of</strong> earth are treated for each kilometer railway, then the emission <strong>of</strong> flying dust from<br />

construction sites will be 31.4 kg.<br />

Emission factor for uploading and unloading <strong>of</strong> dampers is 0.0043 kg/t, or 553.4 kg/km. It<br />

turns that the total emission <strong>of</strong> PM 10 , at a construction site <strong>of</strong> 1 km, is 584.8 kg.<br />

The most unfavourable alternative for the environment is to carry out the construction works<br />

in a manner that each next kilometer is constructed upon the completion <strong>of</strong> the previous one.<br />

In such case, construction <strong>of</strong> one kilometer railway would be completed in around 22 days,<br />

and the intensity <strong>of</strong> dust emission would amount 0.307 g/s. According to the guideline for<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> BAT <strong>of</strong> the English Environmental Agency, the contribution <strong>of</strong> activities is<br />

determined by the following expression:<br />

PC<br />

RR<br />

DF<br />

where:<br />

PC-contribution <strong>of</strong> the process in the pollutant concentration increase, μg/m 3<br />

RR-quantity <strong>of</strong> emission, g/s<br />

DF-dispersion factor<br />

g<br />

3<br />

m<br />

g<br />

s<br />

Dispersion factor depends on the level <strong>of</strong> release, and its numerical value <strong>of</strong> long-term<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> the emission on the ground is 148.<br />

Taking all values into account, the following concentrations <strong>of</strong> harmful substances into the air<br />

around construction sites are obtained as a result <strong>of</strong> the activities <strong>of</strong> railway construction.<br />

Table 50 Concentration <strong>of</strong> harmful substances in the air around construction sites<br />

Construction phase CO NOx VOC PМ10* N 2O CH 4 NH 3 CO 2 SO 2<br />

Leveling, digging and<br />

placement <strong>of</strong> the rail<br />

Концентрација како придонес на активностите (μg/m 3 )<br />

0,31 0.16 1.24 45.53 0 0 0 13.75 0<br />

Signalisation 0 0 0.08 0 0 0 0 1.01 0<br />

Electrical equipment 0.08 0 0.16 0 0 0 0 3.88 0<br />

Total 0.39 0.16 1.48 1.01 0 0 0 18.64 0<br />

279


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

*Emissions from earth excavation and manipulation are included<br />

According to the results obtained, the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line has minimum and<br />

short-term impact on the quality <strong>of</strong> air.<br />

4.8.2 Operational phase<br />

Electric traction trains have been envisaged to run over the railway line, which will eliminate<br />

all emissions into the air. Certain impact on the quality <strong>of</strong> air can occur at stations and<br />

intersections due to maneuvering activities <strong>of</strong> diesel locomotives, unloading, storage and<br />

operations <strong>of</strong> road vehicles. These impacts are minimum, but there is no sufficient data<br />

available to carry out a quantitative assessment. Due to the nature <strong>of</strong> the railway operation –<br />

linear facility for railway transport to be used for transport <strong>of</strong> passengers and material goods,<br />

impacts on climate change are not expected either during the railway construction nor during<br />

its operational phase.<br />

4.9 Impacts <strong>of</strong> noise<br />

4.9.1 Construction phase<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line is related to a series <strong>of</strong> activities which cause noise.<br />

Table 51 presents machines that are most frequently used in railways construction and<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> noise at reference distance <strong>of</strong> 15 m from the source. The values in the table are<br />

based on data from the available literature.<br />

Table 51 Noise levels from construction equipment<br />

Noise during construction Level <strong>of</strong> noise (dBА) 15<br />

m from the source<br />

Source <strong>of</strong> noise during<br />

construction<br />

Level <strong>of</strong> noise (dBА)<br />

15 m from the source<br />

Comresor 81 drill 101<br />

Digger 80 drill 96<br />

Ballast Equalizer 82 Pneumatic toll 85<br />

Ballast Tamper 83 pump 76<br />

Compactor 82 chainsaw 90<br />

Concreate mixing 85 Rock drill 98<br />

Pump for concreate 82 roller 74<br />

Vibrator for concreate 76 saw 76<br />

Crane 88 Shaking mashine 83<br />

Mobile crane 83 Scrap mashine 89<br />

bulldozer 85 shovel 82<br />

generator 81 pushing 77<br />

Mashine for flattening 85 woodcutter 84<br />

Pneumatic gun 85 Track loader 85<br />

Dneumatic drill 88 track 88<br />

Considering that different equipment is used in different construction phases, USEPA<br />

recommends the following values by phases:<br />

Table 52 Noise levels from railway line construction sites (15 m from source)<br />

280


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Construction phase Noise with all equipment Noise with minimum equipment<br />

Cleaning <strong>of</strong> the fiels 84 84<br />

excavation 89 79<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> the base 78 78<br />

Construction 87 75<br />

Finishing 89 75<br />

Noise spread is a logarithm function expressed as<br />

D<br />

D<br />

( G<br />

1<br />

D<br />

Leq<br />

Leq<br />

ref ) 20 log<br />

10<br />

10 log<br />

10<br />

Dref<br />

Where:<br />

L eq (ref) – equivalent level <strong>of</strong> noise at reference distance from the source<br />

D ref – reference distance <strong>of</strong> noise from the source<br />

D – distance from the source<br />

G - Factor <strong>of</strong> the terrain<br />

Taking into account the heighest values and neglecting the terrain factor, the most<br />

unfavourable scenario <strong>of</strong> noise spread around construction sites is established, based on<br />

which the diagrame on Figure 71 was made.<br />

ref<br />

Figure 71 Reduction <strong>of</strong> noise with reference to the source (construction phase)<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the works will be carried out outside <strong>of</strong> the populated places, without sensitive<br />

receptors. Additionally, the noise during the construction is an annoyance <strong>of</strong> temporary<br />

(short-term) nature, so the impacts are not significant, except in the immediate vicinity <strong>of</strong><br />

construction sites. Impacts at a distance <strong>of</strong> 400 m are within the limits below 60 dBA during<br />

active period. The intensity <strong>of</strong> work during night will be at minimum and this will reduce the<br />

impacts on animals.<br />

281


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

4.9.2 Operational phase<br />

The US Federal Transit Administration (USA-FTA) has prepared guidelines on the<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> the impacts on noise and vibrations from the transport. The assessment<br />

phases consist <strong>of</strong>:<br />

1. Specification <strong>of</strong> reference level at source – the procedure starts with estimate <strong>of</strong><br />

noise level at sources;<br />

2. Conversion <strong>of</strong> the reference noise level at the source <strong>of</strong> exposure into Leq(h) or<br />

Leq(dvn);<br />

3. Assessment <strong>of</strong> noise spread.<br />

Noise in the railway transport originates from:<br />

Locomotive<br />

o Drive motors<br />

o Auxiliary installations<br />

o Contact between wheels and rails<br />

o Breaks<br />

o Sirens<br />

Wagons<br />

o Contact between wheels and rails<br />

o Breaks<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> compositions and speed <strong>of</strong> trains are significant factor for noise. In fact, the<br />

speed <strong>of</strong> the train determines the predominant source <strong>of</strong> noise. In case <strong>of</strong> diesel<br />

locomotives, the noise from engines is predominant at lower speeds, while the source <strong>of</strong><br />

noise at higher speeds is the contact between wheels and rails.<br />

Under the optimistic scenario, the maximum number <strong>of</strong> compositions to run over the line<br />

daily in 2040 will amount 39, out <strong>of</strong> which 14 passenger and 25 freight. This number has<br />

been accepted for further calculations along the whole line.<br />

The levels <strong>of</strong> exposure to noise from different sources in the railway transport according to<br />

FTA [1] are given in Table 53.<br />

Table 53 Levels <strong>of</strong> exposure at noise from different sources <strong>of</strong> the railway transport<br />

Source/type<br />

Intensity(dB)<br />

Local trains Locomotive Diesel - electric 92<br />

Electric 90<br />

Diesel multy units Diesel 85<br />

Buzzers 400 m with crossing 110<br />

Choaches Scrap, welded reils 82<br />

Reilway transit welded reils 82<br />

Tranzit buzzer 200 m with crossing 93<br />

Transformation <strong>of</strong> exposure at noise from the locomotive (SEL ref ), in a form <strong>of</strong> Leq(h), is<br />

carried out according to the following expression:<br />

where:<br />

L<br />

S<br />

( h)<br />

SELref<br />

10 log( Nlok<br />

) 10 log 10 log( V )<br />

S<br />

ref<br />

35.6<br />

eq<br />

2<br />

282


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

L eq (ref) –equivalent level <strong>of</strong> noise at reference distance from the source<br />

S ref<br />

S<br />

N -<br />

–reference speed<br />

–current speed<br />

number <strong>of</strong> locomotives in compositions<br />

V - frequency (number <strong>of</strong> compositions per hour 10·log(3600)-35.6) translation <strong>of</strong><br />

seconds into hours<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> hourly equivalent level <strong>of</strong> noise for a day, night and evening is performed<br />

so that the appropriate frequency is inserted in the expression. To calculate the referent<br />

hourly level <strong>of</strong> noise from wagons, we apply the following expression:<br />

L<br />

S<br />

( h)<br />

SELref<br />

10 log( Nvagoni)<br />

20 log 10 log( V )<br />

S<br />

eqV<br />

3<br />

ref<br />

in which variables have the same meaning as above. The average daily equivalent noise at<br />

reference distance is calculated as:<br />

10<br />

10<br />

L 10 log 12 10 4 10 8 10 13.8<br />

4<br />

dvn<br />

L ( d )<br />

L ( v)<br />

L ( n)<br />

eq<br />

eq<br />

eq<br />

10<br />

35.6<br />

In the above expression, 13.8 is 10·log(24/10). Taking into account the number <strong>of</strong><br />

compositions and taking the maximum speed as constant, we get the values <strong>of</strong> the reference<br />

equivalent noise at daily level, as presented in Table 54.<br />

283


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Table 54 Calculation <strong>of</strong> reference equivalent noise (15 m from the source)<br />

Passanger<br />

Locomotive SEL ref LeqL(h)d 53,6<br />

SEL(loko)ref 90 LeqL(h)v 52,4<br />

No <strong>of</strong> coaches locomotiveN(lok) 1 LeqL(h)n 52,4<br />

K 10<br />

Speed 100<br />

Frequention 14<br />

ден 0,6667<br />

вечер 0,5<br />

ноќ 0,5<br />

Coaches<br />

No <strong>of</strong> coaches 7 LeqL(h)d 55,0<br />

SEL(vagon)ref 82 LeqL(h)v 53,8<br />

LeqL(h)n 53,8<br />

Freight<br />

Locomotive<br />

SEL(loko)ref 90 LeqL(d) 56,3<br />

N(loko) 1 Leq(v) 55,4<br />

K 10 Leq(n) 54,1<br />

Speed 100<br />

Frequention 25<br />

1,25<br />

1<br />

0,75<br />

Coaches<br />

N(vagon) 15 LeqV(d) 61,1<br />

SEL(vagon)ref 82 Leq(v) 60,1<br />

Leq(n) 58,8<br />

Total for periods Leq(d) 63,5<br />

Leq(v) 62,5<br />

Leq(n) 61,6<br />

Leq(dvn) 63,0<br />

284


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

If the obtained level <strong>of</strong> 63 dBA is substituted in the equation (1) we will get the curve <strong>of</strong> noise<br />

spread from the railway transport on the line in its least favourable variant. That curve is<br />

shown on Figure 72.<br />

According to these results, at a distance <strong>of</strong> 120 m from the railway line, the level <strong>of</strong> noise<br />

declines to 45 dBA which corresponds with the natural phone. This means that at a distance<br />

<strong>of</strong> 120 m from the source, the noise will be lower than natural phone by around 3 dBA.<br />

Already at 250 m, the noise from this railway line will not have any notable impact.<br />

Therefore, the field spreading to 120 m left and right from the line is marked on the layout<br />

map.<br />

Figure 72 Noise decline with reference to source (operational phase)<br />

Graphical presentation <strong>of</strong> noise impact on the affected area can be found in Appendix 10.<br />

4.10 Solid waste management<br />

During the railway line construction, the work will involve new material, i.e. a new line will be<br />

located and set up and thus there will be no waste generated from reconstruction (mostly<br />

construction waste and demolition waste). During the operation and functioning <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway line, different types <strong>of</strong> waste will be generated. These include municipal waste,<br />

packaging waste, waste from construction activities, etc. Minor quantity <strong>of</strong> hazardous waste<br />

will occur among other wastes.<br />

4.10.1 Waste during construction<br />

The waste to be generated during the railway construction will originate from construction<br />

activities and construction industry. Construction operations generate non-hazardous waste.<br />

Construction equipment that will be used for construction may be used for several times, and<br />

thus reduce waste from construction activities. Fractions <strong>of</strong> waste that will be generated as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> construction activities are related to the types <strong>of</strong> materials and equipment that will<br />

be used during construction (earth and concrete works, assemblage, electric and<br />

mechanical, finishing works, etc.).<br />

Maintenance <strong>of</strong> the mechanization to be used during the railway construction will not be<br />

performed along the route <strong>of</strong> the line, i.e. on the location itself, but it will be taken to<br />

285


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

adequate service centres in the nearby populated places, where authorized service<br />

operators exist. For these reasons, no waste specific for this type <strong>of</strong> activity will be<br />

generated (accumulators, lubrication, greases and oils, used tires, etc.).<br />

Solid waste generated by the work contractors/workers during the railway construction, will<br />

be approximately identical in composition with the waste generated in households.<br />

Inert waste originated from excavation or from tunnels opening is natural material (earth or<br />

stone) which may be reused in the railway construction, for embankments or as buffer in the<br />

line setting. Based on the calculations made on cross-section pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the railway, the<br />

expected material to be dealt with by the contractor <strong>of</strong> works is shown in the following table.<br />

Table 55 Amounts <strong>of</strong> inert waste<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> activity Quantity m 3<br />

Excavation <strong>of</strong> humus 533.840<br />

Excavation 2.797.240<br />

Embankment 2.498.356<br />

Buffer 167.304<br />

Crush stone 170.830<br />

gravel 21.577<br />

The next table shows expected waste types during the phase <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />

line, presented in accordance with the List <strong>of</strong> wastes (Official gazette <strong>of</strong> RM no. 100/05).<br />

Table 56 List <strong>of</strong> wastes<br />

12 WASTES FROM SHAPING AND PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL SURFACE<br />

TREATMENT OF METALS AND PLASTICS<br />

12 01 13 welding wastes<br />

15 – WASTE PACKAGING; ABSORBENTS, WIPING CLOTHS, FILTER<br />

MATERIALS AND PROTECTIVE CLOTHING NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED<br />

15 01 packaging (including separately collected municipal packaging waste)<br />

17 – CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTES (INCLUDING EXCAVATED<br />

SOIL FROM CONTAMINATED SITES)<br />

17 01 01 concrete<br />

17 03 bituminous mixtures, coal tar and tarred products *)<br />

17 04 metals (including their alloys)<br />

17 05 04 soil and stones<br />

17 06 04 insulation materials<br />

17 09 04 mixed construction and demolition wastes<br />

20 – MUNICIPAL WASTES (HOUSEHOLD WASTE AND SIMILAR COMMERCIAL,<br />

INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL WASTES) INCLUDING SEPARATELY<br />

COLLECTED FRACTIONS<br />

20 01 separately collected fractions *)<br />

20 02 01 biodegradable waste<br />

20 03 01 mixed municipal waste<br />

20 03 04 septic tank sludge<br />

20 03 07 bulky waste<br />

286


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

*) Depending on composition, it may be categorized as hazardous waste<br />

4.10.2 Operational phase<br />

The waste to be generated during the operational phase <strong>of</strong> the railway line will originate from<br />

its maintenance or by the users <strong>of</strong> the railway transport and it has municipal nature at<br />

stations or intersections.<br />

The types <strong>of</strong> waste generated include consumables, spare parts and equipment. Dynamics<br />

<strong>of</strong> generation <strong>of</strong> these wastes is related to the maintenance and to the frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

passengers.<br />

4.11 Socio-economic aspects, ownership aspects and impacts on revenues<br />

The planned route <strong>of</strong> the railway line, due to its length, will pass through state and privately<br />

owned land (mostly agricultural land and cultivable areas). As a structure, it will not occupy a<br />

lot <strong>of</strong> space in width, which implies negligible impact on places related to agricultural<br />

activities or related to economic revenues.<br />

Permanent loss <strong>of</strong> land, forest and other properties, as well as potential damage during the<br />

railway construction or operation, will be subject <strong>of</strong> compensation in accordance with the<br />

Macedonian legislation.<br />

Public Enterprise “Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s”-Skopje will carry out appropriate process <strong>of</strong> land<br />

expropriation with each natural or legal person, owner <strong>of</strong> land which is required for the<br />

project implementation.<br />

4.12 Visual effects/impacts on landscape<br />

4.12.1 Construction phase<br />

Landscape in the frames <strong>of</strong> construction zones established along the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

will be notably modified during the construction. The number <strong>of</strong> construction zones, their size<br />

and locations must be specified in the technical documentation for building. These zones,<br />

together with the sites for storage <strong>of</strong> construction materials and assemblage segments for<br />

the railway line, will be visible and cause changes in the aesthetics <strong>of</strong> the landscape. Yet,<br />

these changes will be <strong>of</strong> short-term nature, their duration being equal to the duration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway construction itself. Therefore, as well as for the fact that the route will pass through<br />

forest landscape in most <strong>of</strong> the corridor, the said changes will be negligible.<br />

Upon the completion <strong>of</strong> the construction works, and in accordance with the obligations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Law on Building, micro relief and vegetation in these zones will be subject to restoration.<br />

4.12.2 Operational phase<br />

At certain sites, the new railway line will induce limited visual changes in the existing<br />

landscape and paysage. As a result <strong>of</strong> the narrow corridor occupied by the line, the length<br />

and the number <strong>of</strong> tunnels, proximity <strong>of</strong> the regional road Kicevo-Ohrid-border with <strong>Albania</strong>,<br />

as well as distance <strong>of</strong> populated places, it is expected that the visual effect <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

will be insignificant.<br />

No landscapes with significant landscape values, tourist and recreational zones, historical<br />

and architectural monuments have been identified in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the route, the aesthetic<br />

values <strong>of</strong> which would be in conflict with it. There are no recorded, designated or proposed<br />

areas for protection <strong>of</strong> the landscape diversity in the close surrounding <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

Kicevo-Lin in the Spatial Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia 2002-2020.<br />

Apart from the careful planning <strong>of</strong> the railway route, it will need to be cleared from<br />

vegetation, trees and part <strong>of</strong> the forest management units, but due to the small width <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway, interventions will be minor. In addition to this, execution <strong>of</strong> excavations and erection<br />

287


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

<strong>of</strong> embankments, setting <strong>of</strong> bridges that cross the rivers Treska and Sateska, as well as<br />

development <strong>of</strong> viaducts (crossing dales and trenches) will contribute ti the modification <strong>of</strong><br />

visual characteristics <strong>of</strong> the area concerned. Notable visual changes will occur at points <strong>of</strong><br />

intersection with local roads.<br />

4.13 Impacts on forests<br />

Construction activities along the route will induce major changes in many domains.<br />

4.13.1 Construction phase<br />

1. The so called soil sealing, i.e. conversion from productive into unproductive land will<br />

take place, and in this case permanent conversion <strong>of</strong> forest into building land by<br />

which economic and generally useful functions and values <strong>of</strong> forest will be<br />

permanently lost;<br />

2. Construction <strong>of</strong> access roads, other infrastructure and facilities will have additional<br />

impacts through disruption <strong>of</strong> natural ecosystems and increased amount <strong>of</strong> expected<br />

negative effects and damages;<br />

3. Links between different ecosystems will be broken and therefore permanent<br />

negative impacts are expected in the food chain, movement and reproduction <strong>of</strong><br />

animals, etc. There is also direct impact on the established balance, cycles,<br />

processes and dynamics <strong>of</strong> sustainable development <strong>of</strong> biological development;<br />

4. Forest fragmentation will occur in certain sections which will have negative<br />

reflections on economic activity;<br />

5. Change in the manner <strong>of</strong> operation in certain parts along the railway line, i.e. at<br />

places <strong>of</strong> planned resurrection wood cuts and various other activities aimed at<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> productivity will result in change <strong>of</strong> forestry measures due to the line<br />

construction, which will burden the forest managing enterprise financially. The<br />

overall changes envisaged will take place in around 1820 ha.<br />

4.13.2 Operational phase<br />

In the course <strong>of</strong> the operational phase <strong>of</strong> the line, the most significant impact will be<br />

increased risk <strong>of</strong> fire.<br />

- risk <strong>of</strong> forest fire occurrence from the sparkles during breaking and other operations <strong>of</strong><br />

rail vehicles.<br />

4.14 Impacts on erosion and deposits during construction and operational phases<br />

The following impacts can be expected during construction and operational phases <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway line:<br />

1. Disruption <strong>of</strong> the established regime <strong>of</strong> water running, with possible severe negative<br />

within the corridor <strong>of</strong> the railway line;<br />

2. Increased hazards <strong>of</strong> erosion processes, including even stability <strong>of</strong> slopes due to<br />

earth works. Considering the great volume <strong>of</strong> construction works, especially<br />

voluminous earth works, excavations and embankments along the line route will<br />

288


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

cause intensification <strong>of</strong> erosive processes, which will have negative effects on the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> waters;<br />

3. Turbidity <strong>of</strong> watercourses will occur frequently which will have negative effects on the<br />

life in the watercourses and Ohrid Lake; Processes <strong>of</strong> transportation and<br />

retransportation <strong>of</strong> deposits along hydrographic network <strong>of</strong> Sateska river are<br />

expected to intensify. Such processes will have negative effects on the ecosystem <strong>of</strong><br />

Ohrid Lake;<br />

4. Due to huge earth works, upon compensation activities, a surplus <strong>of</strong> around 300 000<br />

m 3 is expected for disposal. This will result in soil degradation (type: change in<br />

outlook), but there is a danger <strong>of</strong> erosive processes in disposed material.<br />

4.15 Impacts on natural heritage<br />

The planned route <strong>of</strong> the railway line will not pass close to any recorded protected natural<br />

heritage.<br />

During the elaboration <strong>of</strong> the planning documentation and detailed designing <strong>of</strong> the railway<br />

line, the Investor will observe the requirements for conservation <strong>of</strong> the recorded natural<br />

heritage stipulated in Macedonian legislation and multilateral agreements in the area <strong>of</strong><br />

nature conservation.<br />

This approach implies avoidance <strong>of</strong> potential construction activities, opening/use <strong>of</strong> access<br />

roads, as well as location <strong>of</strong> the railway route in areas around the recorded protected areas.<br />

This will ensure elimination <strong>of</strong> potential direct impacts thereon.<br />

4.16 Impacts on cultural heritage<br />

During elaboration <strong>of</strong> the planning documentation and detailed designing <strong>of</strong> the railway line,<br />

the Investor will observe the requirements for conservation <strong>of</strong> recorded cultural heritage<br />

incorporated in Macedonian legislation and multilateral agreements in the area <strong>of</strong> culture.<br />

There are no archeological sites and areas with cultural heritage along the planned route <strong>of</strong><br />

the railway line that would pose limiting factor in the process <strong>of</strong> railway line planning and<br />

designing. During the railway construction, the Institute for Monuments Conservation from<br />

Ohrid will perform monitoring. In case existence <strong>of</strong> artifacts is established or indications <strong>of</strong><br />

potential archeological good on the location during earth and construction works, the<br />

activities will be terminated and the Administration for Cultural Heritage under the Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

|Culture will be notified duly.<br />

Impacts on cultural archeological heritage are not expected during the operational phase <strong>of</strong><br />

the railway line.<br />

4.17 Impacts <strong>of</strong> radiation<br />

Impacts <strong>of</strong> radiation are not expected during construction works and railway line operation.<br />

4.18 Impacts <strong>of</strong> odour<br />

Impacts <strong>of</strong> odour are not expected during construction works and railway line operation.<br />

4.19 Cumulative impacts<br />

Changes in environment induced by the activities in combination with other activities from<br />

the past, present or future activities which are similar with the activities planned within the<br />

observed area, are called cumulative impacts. Based on this, in relation to the planned<br />

289


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

railway line, cumulative effects may occur as a result <strong>of</strong> other existing or future projects <strong>of</strong><br />

the same kind along its corridor (highway, regional road).<br />

In the area near the rote, construction, i.e. extension <strong>of</strong> the existing main road Kicevo Ohrid<br />

to achieve the level <strong>of</strong> highway has been planned. Expected cumulative effects include noise<br />

and air emissions. They are expected to take place in a short time interval, and therefore we<br />

may assess them as negligible.<br />

4.20 Matrix <strong>of</strong> environmental impacts<br />

Identification the impacts <strong>of</strong> project activities on different elements <strong>of</strong> the environment has<br />

been made in order to establish link between the activities in all phases <strong>of</strong> the project life<br />

cycle and the state <strong>of</strong> the environment in the afected area, socio-economic and health<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> the population living and working in the project area.<br />

While assessing the impacts, criteria for environmental impact assessment have been set<br />

and matrix prepared to assess all impacts on different elements <strong>of</strong> the environment.<br />

Criteria for environmental impacts assessment are presented in the following table.<br />

Table 57 Criteria for environmental impact assessment<br />

Criteria<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> the impact due to the selected criteria<br />

Caracter <strong>of</strong> the impact Positive (+) Negative (-) None-neutral 0<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> the impact Direct Indirect Cumulative<br />

Density <strong>of</strong> the impact Big Midle Small<br />

Area <strong>of</strong> the impact Area Volumen Dispersion<br />

Time <strong>of</strong> existence Immediately After some period (h/d/y)<br />

Time duration Short Midle Long<br />

Reversibility repeat Non-repeat<br />

Probability <strong>of</strong> the impact Certainly Probably Impossible<br />

Importancy Local Nacional Cross-border/global<br />

Appendix 11 contains the matrix <strong>of</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-lin construction.<br />

290


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

5 Measures for environmental impacts prevention or reduction<br />

5.1 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on geomorphology<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> geomorphology (relief), significant sites or endemic forms the integrity <strong>of</strong> which<br />

would be disrupted (modified) during the corridor development have not been recorded<br />

along the railway corridor (Kicevo-Lin), starting from Kicevo Valley, through the furthest<br />

northern parts <strong>of</strong> Ilinska Planina Mt., Debrca and Ohrid-Struga Valley. Therefore, no specific<br />

mitigation measures have been envisaged with regard to them.<br />

In addition to the above, along the entire corridor, no sites have been identified which could<br />

induce occurrence <strong>of</strong> snoslides or major earthslides due to the morphoplastics, that would<br />

pose obstacles to the normal performance <strong>of</strong> the transportation upon putting the railway line<br />

into operation. Therefore, specific measures for their mitigation have not been envisaged.<br />

With regard to potential occurrence <strong>of</strong> caverns (cave expansions) along the designed tunnel<br />

between the villages Judovo and Slivovo, the contractor will notify the competent authority<br />

(Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment and Physical Planning) in time. Furthermore, during the opening <strong>of</strong><br />

the tunnel above the village Radozda, care should be taken to prevent any damage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cave church.<br />

5.2 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on biological diversity<br />

5.2.1 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on habitats and ecosystems<br />

5.2.1.1 Forest habitats<br />

Italian and Turkey oak forests<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line will result in direct destruction <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> the forest habitats,<br />

especially Italian and Turkey oak woods.<br />

Mitigation measure: Avoidance <strong>of</strong> excessive and unnecessary destruction <strong>of</strong> these woods<br />

and use <strong>of</strong> existing forest roads as access roads during railway line construction.<br />

Construction works in forest habitats should be limited to a minimum narrow belt around the<br />

route.<br />

Chestnut forests<br />

Mitigation measure: To avoid unnecessary destructing <strong>of</strong> chestnut trunks. Destruction <strong>of</strong><br />

chestnut trunks should be minimized, i.e. only on spots <strong>of</strong> direct passage <strong>of</strong> the line.<br />

5.2.1.2 Humid forests and riparian belts<br />

Riparian belts along Treska river<br />

Mitigation measure: the feet <strong>of</strong> the bridge columns near the village Popolzani (km<br />

107+811) should be positioned above the right bank <strong>of</strong> the river Treska, and on the left bank<br />

they should be away from the river to avoid destruction <strong>of</strong> alder riparian belts.<br />

Riparian belts along the rivers Brzdanska, Judovska and Vilipica<br />

According to the current route plan, there is no direct threat <strong>of</strong> destruction <strong>of</strong> alder belts<br />

along the rivers Brzdanska, Judovska and Vilipica. Potential danger derives from the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> access roads or rockslides during construction activities above the riverbeds.<br />

Mitigation measure: To avoid any destruction <strong>of</strong> alder belts along the rivers Brzdanska,<br />

Judovska and Vilipica. In case such degradations occur, recultivation <strong>of</strong> the natural<br />

vegetation will be accomplished as a matter <strong>of</strong> necessity.<br />

291


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Alder forests near the village Arbinovo<br />

Alder forest in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the village Arbinovo have been assessed as very highly<br />

sensitive. Under the current plan, the route <strong>of</strong> the railway line passes through alder woods.<br />

Figure 73 Marshy habitats near the village Arbinovo (alder woods, humid meadows and marsh<br />

communities)<br />

Mitigation measure: The proposed route is confirmed by one modification concerning the<br />

bridge solution between spot heights 124+334,42 and 124+489,37. This solution will improve<br />

the access <strong>of</strong> people to meadows and secure uninterrupted crossing <strong>of</strong> animal species, as<br />

well as uninterrupted air circulation.<br />

Alder belts in the foothill <strong>of</strong> the hill Kula near the village Pesocani<br />

The route <strong>of</strong> the line passes through alder belts along the river Sateska, in the foothill <strong>of</strong> Kula<br />

near the village Pesocani, posing direct threat <strong>of</strong> riparian vegetation destruction.<br />

Mitigation measure: The route should be diverted above these habitats, along the right side<br />

<strong>of</strong> the river Sateska and avoid its double cutting with the future railway line.<br />

5.2.1.3 Marshes<br />

Marshy habitats near the village Arbinovo (see the mitigation measure <strong>of</strong> alder forests<br />

near the village Arbinovo)<br />

Struga marsh (including the marsh in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the village Radolista)<br />

Mitigation measures:<br />

To avoid destruction <strong>of</strong> tree boundaries which are remains <strong>of</strong> the marshy vegetation<br />

(willows and poplars).<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> underground culverts for amphibians, reptiles and mammals.<br />

Reeds near the villages Volino and Moroista<br />

292


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Mitigation measure: Access roads, camping sites, temporary waste duming depots should<br />

not be developed in the reeds between villages Volino and Moroista.<br />

5.2.1.4 Humid meadows<br />

General mitigation measure: Unnecessary destruction <strong>of</strong> marsh vegetation has to be<br />

avoided. Where this is unavoidable, it should be limited to the minimum! This measure<br />

applies to all humid meadows (humid meadows along river Sateska, humid meadows<br />

between Volino and Moroiste)<br />

Humid meadows near the village Arbinovo. (see the mitigation measure for alder forests<br />

near the village Arbinovo).<br />

Humid meadows near the village Radolista (see mitigation measure in Struga marsh).<br />

Monitoring over the implementation <strong>of</strong> mitigation measures for the impacts on forest<br />

ecosystems, marsh habitats, meadows and some <strong>of</strong> the landscapes should be carried out<br />

during the railway line construction. Given the fact that the subject habitats and sites are<br />

spread along the entire route length, it would be preferable to hire an expert (biologist)<br />

during construction works along the entire route. The engagement <strong>of</strong> this expert in days is<br />

shown in the table with the measures for impacts reduction, including the monitoring<br />

measures.<br />

5.2.2 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on species<br />

In order to reduce direct death rate <strong>of</strong> animals from collision with the trains during the<br />

operational phase, the following will be necessary:<br />

removal <strong>of</strong> dead animals from the line vicinity,<br />

removal <strong>of</strong> food and other wastes near the line.<br />

Removal <strong>of</strong> potential sources <strong>of</strong> food will reduce the presence <strong>of</strong> animals near the railway<br />

line and thus the direct death rate will be reduced as well.<br />

Also, it is recommended snow cleaning and establishing clearings at every 50-100 meters. In<br />

this way, animals that would move on the line could escape on the clearings in time and thus<br />

the collisions-deaths <strong>of</strong> animals will be reduced, and the safety <strong>of</strong> the transport will be<br />

increased.<br />

The columns bearing the electricity conductors required for electricity supply to trains are<br />

expected to be used by birds as standing points, and even as potential nesting spots. In<br />

such cases, bird death cases are well documented and surprisingly high, especially during<br />

migration. Therefore, many European countries undertake activities for readaptation <strong>of</strong><br />

electric columns and attention is paid to the design <strong>of</strong> newly erected columns. The electric<br />

columns have so far not been subject <strong>of</strong> the required attention, but lately, especially in<br />

Germany, care is taken <strong>of</strong> the new design as well.<br />

Beards are subject to electrocution due to the circuit closed with their wings or body<br />

(earthing contact and phase or two phases). For this reason, larger birds are more exposed<br />

to electrocution. Bird species that will be particularly threatened by electrocution (but also<br />

collision) during the railway line operation include storks, herons and birds <strong>of</strong> pray.<br />

There are solutions for drastic reduction in death cases with birds, and all <strong>of</strong> them are based<br />

on preventing the birds to close the circuit (moving the wires away from each other and from<br />

the main column at a distance bigger than the range <strong>of</strong> the bird's wings):<br />

293


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

1. Supporters (insulators) should be hanged downwards (not upwards) on the<br />

horisontal partition <strong>of</strong> the columns.<br />

2. The lowest distance between two adjacent wires should be bigger than 140 cm.<br />

3. Distance between the peak <strong>of</strong> the column and the first wire beneath it, alike the<br />

distance between insulator and uninsulated part <strong>of</strong> the wire should exceede 60 cm. If wires<br />

are placed laterally <strong>of</strong> the column, they should be moved away <strong>of</strong> it on an insulated<br />

supporter which is at least 140 cm long.<br />

4. At each column, at least 60 cm <strong>of</strong> the wire should be insulated with plastic coating,<br />

on both sides <strong>of</strong> the supporter.<br />

During the railway line construction, sensitive aquatic ecosystems should be subjected to<br />

periodical inspections by relevant specialists, in order to secure proper application <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prevention measures. Sensitive sites include Ohrid Lake near the village Radozda, Crn Drim<br />

upon its exit from Struga, the river Sateska near the villages Pesocani and Volino, and river<br />

Treska in the region <strong>of</strong> the village Popolzani. It is also recommended to perform periodical<br />

sampling <strong>of</strong> water for chemical analysis, paying particular attention on the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

hydrocarbon compounds, nutrients (phosphates, nitrates, ammonium) and bacteria (total<br />

and coliform). In parallel, laboratory analysis should be made <strong>of</strong> the composition and<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> benthos diatomea as one <strong>of</strong> the relevant indicators <strong>of</strong> water pollution. It is<br />

recommended such analysis to be carried out every two months.<br />

5.3 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on the functionality <strong>of</strong> landscapes<br />

Hilly rural landscape<br />

General measure: To prevent unnecessary destruction <strong>of</strong> boundary vegetation. To avoid<br />

(and fully prevent where possible) destruction <strong>of</strong> boundary vegetation immediately around<br />

the route.<br />

Impacts on plane lake landscape<br />

Mitigation measures: to build culverts with much bigger frequency (at every 150 m) in the<br />

plane lake landscape, from the village Klimestani to the village Radolista.<br />

5.4 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on geology<br />

Design and construction phase<br />

The following measures should be applied in order to establish conditions for avoidance <strong>of</strong><br />

possible impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway line on geological structures, engineering geological<br />

appearances and processes and hydrogeological appearances and facilities during detailed<br />

planning and designing:<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> appropriate alternative solution while dimensioning the railway line route<br />

and required access roads along the stretches (stations) where underground linear<br />

facilities (canals and pipelines) exist;<br />

294


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> appropriate alternative solution and adequate construction materials<br />

while dimensioning the route <strong>of</strong> the long-distance transmission line and necessary<br />

access roads along the stretches (stations) where possibility for potential direct<br />

pollution <strong>of</strong> aquifers has been identified (hydrogeological collectors), and in this way<br />

also indirect pollution <strong>of</strong> recorded water occurrences and facilities. One <strong>of</strong> the<br />

solutions is to apply, i.e. install insulation construction materials (clay buffer,<br />

geotextile, etc.) on critical stretches (stations);<br />

Also, attention should be paid <strong>of</strong> segments <strong>of</strong> the existing regional pipeline<br />

"Stidencica", along the extension from chlorination station towards the city <strong>of</strong> Kicevo<br />

(station 102 km-103 km) and extension where the line crosses river Treska by a<br />

bridge (station 107 km + 600-108 km + 000);<br />

Geodetic survey and rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> potentially sensitive engineering geological<br />

appearances and processes with regard to rockslides, surface wash-out, draw <strong>of</strong>f,<br />

and earth slides. These are recorded appearances and processes having potential to<br />

cause geological hazards in relation to line safety and stability.<br />

To eliminate and reduce potential impacts <strong>of</strong> the railway line on geology, hydrogeological<br />

occurrences and facilities and engineering geological appearances and processes,<br />

management measures should be undertaken during construction phase, including:<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> adequate and technically proper functioning construction machinery and<br />

vehicles;<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> suitable locations for temporary and permanent disposal <strong>of</strong> excavated<br />

rock masses/sediments;<br />

Adoption <strong>of</strong> good construction and construction zones management practices:<br />

As required, installation and maintenance <strong>of</strong> control measures for erosion and<br />

sedimentation along drainage lines, to prevent transport <strong>of</strong> sediments from the<br />

construction zones along the railway line route;<br />

Progressive rehabilitation and stabilization <strong>of</strong> disrupted rock masses/sediments in<br />

order to reduce erosion;<br />

Rehabilitation (grass or vegetation planting) <strong>of</strong> permanent sites for excavated rock<br />

masses disposal. Formerly removed humus material could serve this purpose;<br />

Removal <strong>of</strong> deposited earth material, as soon as it becomes possible;<br />

Provision <strong>of</strong> equipment/vessels for leakage removal.<br />

Operational phase<br />

The main precondition for elimination <strong>of</strong> potential impacts in this project phase is selection <strong>of</strong><br />

adequate and technically proper functioning power mechanization, as well as adequate and<br />

technically proper functioning power and construction mechanization and vehicles (in the<br />

phase <strong>of</strong> the line maintenance and service).<br />

During maintenance and service activities, the personnel will be obliged to observe the<br />

requirements for prevention regarding potential events <strong>of</strong> fuel or oil leakage from the<br />

vehicles.<br />

5.5 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on seismics and vibrations<br />

5.5.1 Methods for reduction <strong>of</strong> seismical effects <strong>of</strong> mining<br />

The operations <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> the structures along the route (incisions, tunnels, bridges)<br />

will be conducted by applying techniques <strong>of</strong> drilling and mining, which will cause seismical<br />

295


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

effects in the environemnt. Adopted danger distances should comply with the technical rules<br />

<strong>of</strong> the legislation and they have to be observed.<br />

Mining should be performed by applying millisecond arresters, upon prior calculation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

maximum permissible quantity <strong>of</strong> explosive to be detonated simultaneously (equal arrest<br />

interval).<br />

It is recommended to use the NONEL system for initiation <strong>of</strong> explosive charge in order<br />

to annul negative effects <strong>of</strong> mining.<br />

Sources <strong>of</strong> vibrations - it is specific that strong vibrations are generated during mining<br />

activities, and their effects should be minimized, which can be achieved by calculation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

radius <strong>of</strong> danger zones, for the following risks occurrence:<br />

• Dispersion <strong>of</strong> the material,<br />

• Seismic activity,<br />

• Air waves dangerous for people,<br />

• Air waves dangerous for structures.<br />

If, upon the adoption <strong>of</strong> danger zones, and for the purpose <strong>of</strong> maximum reduction <strong>of</strong> these<br />

risks, safe manner <strong>of</strong> mining is in principle expected by application <strong>of</strong> the modern NONELsystem<br />

<strong>of</strong> connectors between mining holes, the maximum permissible quantity <strong>of</strong> explosive<br />

in one mining drilling should be determined.<br />

The application <strong>of</strong> this mining parameters and proper disposal <strong>of</strong> excavated blocks will<br />

drastically reduce negative impacts on the environment.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> the modern way <strong>of</strong> initiation <strong>of</strong> NONEL has numerous advantages compared to<br />

classical way <strong>of</strong> mining charges initiation. The most outstanding properties <strong>of</strong> the NONELsystem<br />

giving advantage to it before the classical way <strong>of</strong> initiation include the following:<br />

- Reduction <strong>of</strong> stresses from detonation,<br />

- Safe in operations in the mine field,<br />

- High possibility for explosive charge targeting,<br />

- NONEL-system is resistant to moisture, electricity, flame and friction,<br />

- Possibility for conducting the mining works under water as well,<br />

- Simple handing and preparation for complex mass mining,<br />

- Possibility for combination with all classical means <strong>of</strong> initiation,<br />

- Activation <strong>of</strong> high number <strong>of</strong> mining holes with different intervals <strong>of</strong> initiation,<br />

- Relatively effective means <strong>of</strong> initiation both for surface and underground mining,<br />

- Better granulation <strong>of</strong> mined material,<br />

- Reduced dispersion <strong>of</strong> rock pieces.<br />

296


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 74 Presentation <strong>of</strong> rock mass behaviour in mining with NONEL-system and detonation fuse<br />

Figure 75 Presentation <strong>of</strong> rock mass behaviour in initiation at several drillings with NONEL- system<br />

and detonation fuse<br />

297


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 76 Photograph made during mining with NONEL-system<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Albania</strong>), the estimates based on the intensity <strong>of</strong> the activities lead to the conclusion that<br />

seismic impacts resulting from mining will not present major problem and will be restricted to<br />

the working environment in the zone <strong>of</strong> construction activities. It is recommended to use<br />

NONEL system <strong>of</strong> explosive charging in order to eliminate negative impacts <strong>of</strong> mining.<br />

5.5.2 Methods for mitigation <strong>of</strong> vibrations from railway transport<br />

In order to reduce vibrations <strong>of</strong> the ground caused by trains at certain distance from the<br />

track, several aspects should be taken into consideration, such as generation <strong>of</strong> vibrations at<br />

the source, their propagation in the surrounding and interaction with the structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

recipient. In other words, methods available for mitigation <strong>of</strong> excessive vibrations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ground may be divided into three general groups, namely:<br />

The first group includes those resulting in generation <strong>of</strong> less intense vibrations at<br />

source.<br />

The second group <strong>of</strong> measures is focused on the propagation <strong>of</strong> vibrations from<br />

source towards recipient, and<br />

The third group <strong>of</strong> measures includes the methods that reduce the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

vibrations on recipient. Based on this, the best method or methods should be<br />

adopted, taking into account technical and economic aspects <strong>of</strong> the problem.<br />

5.5.2.1 Mitigation methods at source<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the methods that may be used for avoidance <strong>of</strong> excessive vibrations in the railway<br />

structure are listed below (Wilson et al. 1983, Nelson and Sauernman, 1983, and<br />

Bahrekazemi et al., 2003):<br />

- Welded rails,<br />

- Modification <strong>of</strong> design <strong>of</strong> the wagons, especially primary system for suspension,<br />

- Elastic wheels,<br />

- Wheels alignment,<br />

- Rails sharpening,<br />

- Elastic adhesives for direct fixing <strong>of</strong> rails,<br />

- Stabilization <strong>of</strong> the soil under the embankment,<br />

298


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

- Floating slabs,<br />

- Reducing the train speed.<br />

Usually, a combination <strong>of</strong> two or more <strong>of</strong> these methods is used. For example, wheels<br />

alignment, rails sharpening, welded rails and elastic fixing are used all together. Each<br />

method is the most efficient within certain frequency range. Methods <strong>of</strong> wheels alignment<br />

and rails sharpening are efficient at a frequency <strong>of</strong> more than 100 Hz, while floating slabs<br />

are efficient at frequencies exceeding 15-20 Hz. This method is most frequently used in<br />

subground railways characterized with their high frequency property compared to traffic on<br />

surface railways on s<strong>of</strong>t soil.<br />

On the other side, in the range <strong>of</strong> very low frequency (below 20 Hz), the method <strong>of</strong> soil<br />

stabilization can mitigate vibrations.<br />

5.5.2.2 Methods <strong>of</strong> path mitigation<br />

Sometimes, we use barrier on the path <strong>of</strong> is the waves propagating from source to recipient,<br />

in order to mitigate ground vibrations. The method also known as protection has been<br />

studied experimentally (Woods, 1968, and Masarch 2004) and numerically (Haupt, 1978,<br />

Besoks, 1986, and Ahmad and Al-Hussaini, 1991), both for open and in-filled trenches used<br />

as barrier. Compared to open trenches, it has been established that both width and depth<br />

are relevant for in-filled trenches. Furthermore, the optimum depth <strong>of</strong> in-filled trenches is<br />

around 1,2 times bigger than the wave length <strong>of</strong> Raili's waves in soil material (Ahmad and<br />

Al-Hussaini).<br />

The method is used with certain efficiency in the reduction <strong>of</strong> ground vibrations caused by<br />

railway transport, by use <strong>of</strong> stabilized soil with calcareous cement as with the in-filled<br />

trenches (Wit and Bahrekazemi, 2003). An important deficiency <strong>of</strong> methods in soils with s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

clay results from relatively low frequency <strong>of</strong> vibrations in this soil type which is suitable for<br />

very long wave lengths. Thus, to be efficient, the trench has to be very deep.<br />

5.5.2.3 Methods for mitigation with buildings<br />

If only one or several buildings are affected by excessive ground vibrations from the railway<br />

line, alternative methods, such as insulation, can prove suitable.<br />

Insulation <strong>of</strong> the foundations <strong>of</strong> the buildings from the ground, by applying the system <strong>of</strong><br />

elastic support as shown in Figure 77, is a method used sometimes to mitigate ground<br />

vibrations. With this method, the building is observed as a rigid body placed on a certain<br />

number <strong>of</strong> springs (and shock absorbers). Natural frequency <strong>of</strong> the system has to be<br />

designed to be far below the lowest frequency <strong>of</strong> vibrations that should be subject <strong>of</strong><br />

mitigation, as can be seen by one degree <strong>of</strong> the free system on the right part <strong>of</strong> Figure 77.<br />

The bottom left part <strong>of</strong> Figure 77 shows reduction <strong>of</strong> vibrations at different frequencies.<br />

Natural frequency <strong>of</strong> the system in vertical direction is 4 Hz. As we can see from the natural<br />

frequency spectrum defined by manufacturer, vibrations at frequencies higher than around<br />

10 Hz are reduced efficiently.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> industrial building where excessive ground vibrations may impede the operation <strong>of</strong><br />

certain equipment, it could be appropriate to insulate only parts <strong>of</strong> the building or even only<br />

the foundations <strong>of</strong> the sensitive equipment <strong>of</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the building in a similar way as the<br />

one described above for the entire building.<br />

299


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Figure 77 Building insulation to reduce ground vibrations from the nearby railway line by use <strong>of</strong><br />

system <strong>of</strong> springs (Gerb Vibrations Control Systems)<br />

There are methods for mitigation <strong>of</strong> ground vibrations potentially caused by the railway<br />

transport along the railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>). The<br />

method or the combination <strong>of</strong> methods that will be used depends on factors like frequency<br />

content <strong>of</strong> vibrations generated on the ground, the distance <strong>of</strong> structures from the line, type<br />

and stratification <strong>of</strong> soil in the area where the line is built, the number <strong>of</strong> structures that need<br />

to be protected from excessive ground vibrations and types <strong>of</strong> structures. Further on, ground<br />

vibrations combined with environmental noise from the railway can be perceived as more<br />

annoying by people. Therefore, combination <strong>of</strong> methods for noise with those for vibrations<br />

mitigation is recommended in order to achieve the best results.<br />

The speed <strong>of</strong> trains and the force <strong>of</strong> wheels are two very important factors influencing the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> ground vibrations. Geotechnical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the terrain also have important<br />

effect on vibrations. With regard to the type <strong>of</strong> the trains running over the line, we may<br />

conclude that there is no significant difference between vibrations generated in rails <strong>of</strong> freight<br />

and non-freight trains when vibrations are normalized for the force <strong>of</strong> the wheels and the<br />

speed <strong>of</strong> the train. Vibrations generated by freight trains are reduced with the increase <strong>of</strong> the<br />

300


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

distance from the axis <strong>of</strong> track symmetry at lower rate compared to non-freight trains. Also,<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> vibrations may be influenced by the speed <strong>of</strong> the train.<br />

5.6 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on soils<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the main tasks in the planning <strong>of</strong> civil works is to plan well the balance <strong>of</strong> materials by<br />

individual sections, i.e. the surplus <strong>of</strong> earth obtained by cuttings and tunnels opening and the<br />

demand for material for embankments erection. In this way, the demand for additional<br />

material would be balanced with the surplus material requiring disposal. Also, the need for<br />

borrowing pits and disposal sites would be lowered, which is a benefit for the environment<br />

while reduced manipulation <strong>of</strong> materials would reduce the cost <strong>of</strong> the facility construction.<br />

General measures that need to be undertaken in order to reduce the impact <strong>of</strong> railway line<br />

construction on soils include:<br />

Strict protection <strong>of</strong> all zones, beyond the core construction zone, so to avoid excavation<br />

<strong>of</strong> additional areas for temporary and permanent use (storage <strong>of</strong> construction materials,<br />

parking <strong>of</strong> mechanization or workshops for vehicles repair). Regular control <strong>of</strong><br />

machinery fleet in order to minimize the threat <strong>of</strong> leakage <strong>of</strong> hazardous chemical<br />

substances into soil;<br />

Proper management <strong>of</strong> the top soil because that material can be used further for<br />

inclinations recultivation and stabilization;<br />

Keeping and manipulation <strong>of</strong> fuels has to be a strictly controlled process which assumes<br />

undertaking <strong>of</strong> measures <strong>of</strong> prevention <strong>of</strong> soil contamination. Filling in the machines and<br />

aggregates with fuel must not be closer than 50 m to watercourses, canals or drinking<br />

water wells;<br />

Opening <strong>of</strong> access roads to certain construction sites beyond those specified in<br />

technical documentation should be prohibited;<br />

Machines should be parked at duely planned and arranged areas (camps) which should<br />

comply with the required preconditions for soils protection against contamination with<br />

fuels and derivatives;<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> contamination <strong>of</strong> the soil with incidential spillage <strong>of</strong> fuel or a derivative, the<br />

contaminated layer <strong>of</strong> soil should be removed and disposed <strong>of</strong> at suitable location;<br />

During dying or other type <strong>of</strong> chemical protection on a part <strong>of</strong> constructions, appropriate<br />

protection measures have to be undertaken, such as covering <strong>of</strong> surrounding soil;<br />

Adequate management <strong>of</strong> generated municipal waste;<br />

Cleaning <strong>of</strong> the equipment and vehicles should take place only at specifically<br />

determined places designed in a manner to avoid contamination <strong>of</strong> soil and ground<br />

waters. In this way, washing <strong>of</strong> trunks/concrete mixers will be with prevented<br />

uncontrolled throwing away <strong>of</strong> concrete remains. Concrete amounts that will be<br />

accumulated in this way can be further disposed <strong>of</strong> as inert solid waste or reused as<br />

filling material in some construction processes;<br />

Upon the completion <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction, all borrowing pits and disposal sites<br />

will be recultivated so to improve visual effect and renew natural vegetation;<br />

Wastewater from toilets and maintenance <strong>of</strong> station facilities - appropriate systems <strong>of</strong><br />

sanitary wastewater treatment, as well as system <strong>of</strong> collection and treatment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

waste water generated during stations maintenance should be established;<br />

301


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Solid waste (organic and inorganic). Its generation occurs in the course <strong>of</strong> passenger<br />

transport and around station facilities. Solid waste will be managed by an appropriate<br />

service that will collect and transport it to adequate locations, because it can be<br />

incorporated in the soil and result in soil prolonged pollution;<br />

Treatment <strong>of</strong> vegetation around the line with herbicides. Amounts and timing <strong>of</strong><br />

treatment should be well planned and soil and ground waters pollution should be<br />

prevented;<br />

Erosion processes that may occur in the course <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction are in<br />

the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the structures (bridges, tunnels, underpasses, drainage canals, etc.), as<br />

well as with embankments and supporting walls <strong>of</strong> cuttings. Regular monitoring and<br />

undertaking <strong>of</strong> prompt intervention measures are required for timely prevention <strong>of</strong> major<br />

degradation <strong>of</strong> soil along the line.<br />

Mitigation measures for certain soil types that are the most vulnerable in relation to<br />

degradation:<br />

1. Colluvial soils (villages Drugovo, Meseista, Frangovo, Radolista)<br />

Areas are onto rather inclined terrains and mostly cultivated. Soil is clayey and heavy which<br />

determines possible occurrence <strong>of</strong> intensive erosion. The route usually makes cuttings<br />

diagonally to the inclination <strong>of</strong> the terrains under colluvial soils. High number <strong>of</strong> civil works<br />

contributing to contamination have been planned.<br />

Mitigation measures:<br />

- Construction <strong>of</strong> support walls, drains and drainage system,<br />

- To stabilize embankments upon cuttings, free area for the inclination stabilization<br />

should be developed,<br />

- Destruction <strong>of</strong> natural vegetation should be avoided,<br />

- Stabilization <strong>of</strong> the embankments <strong>of</strong> the route with fertile soil layer and grass<br />

planting. In addition to this, inclinations may be strengthened with jute-grid and<br />

embankments on cuttings with mat-grid made <strong>of</strong> polyester fabric,<br />

- Treatment <strong>of</strong> torrents, especially in the part <strong>of</strong> the route where bridge columns lie;<br />

- Arrangment <strong>of</strong> entrance and exit portals <strong>of</strong> tunnels with grass planting,<br />

- Civil works should be limited to minimum near the route in order to reduce the<br />

destruction <strong>of</strong> the vegetation to the maximum.<br />

2. Alluvial soils and marshy gley soils (Struga Valley)<br />

Ravine soils with high groundwater, under intensive agricultural production. There is real<br />

danger <strong>of</strong> soils compaction, disintegration <strong>of</strong> natural structure and disordering water<br />

physical properties.<br />

Mitigation measures:<br />

- Minimum treading over minimum possible area during the line construction;<br />

- Particular attention should be paid to canal network and construction <strong>of</strong> overpasses<br />

for free evacuation <strong>of</strong> excessive water;<br />

- Wastewater treatment system to prevent soils contamination around stations.<br />

3. Soils on calcareous and dolomite ground<br />

302


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

These are relict soils <strong>of</strong> special ecological importance. They usually occur on great<br />

inclinations and therefore shallow solum and poor structure make them subject <strong>of</strong> rapid<br />

degradation.<br />

Mitigation measures: to undertake all measures envisaged for colluvial soils.<br />

5.7 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> air<br />

5.7.1 Construction phase<br />

Civil works are limited in time to a single place, but emissions, especially dust, are<br />

significant:<br />

Fencing <strong>of</strong> parts <strong>of</strong> the construction sites where increased dust emission is expected<br />

due to the effects <strong>of</strong> the wind;<br />

Splashing <strong>of</strong> access roads with water;<br />

During earth material excavation and transport, paths should not have a slope above<br />

8% in order to reduce consumption <strong>of</strong> fuel and accordingly exhaustive gases<br />

emission;<br />

5.7.2 Operational phase<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> diesel locomotives for transport or maneuvering should be limited to minimum,<br />

especially on bigger stations;<br />

Transport <strong>of</strong> road fraight vehicles should be regulated at the stations (Struga, Kicevo)<br />

in order to minimize operation <strong>of</strong> engines while standing.<br />

5.8 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters<br />

Measures for waters protection during design phase involve applying <strong>of</strong> technical solutions<br />

through designing <strong>of</strong> facilities that will prevent or reduce the impact <strong>of</strong> soil pollution. While<br />

designing, particular attention should be paid to drainage. At several points, <strong>Corridor</strong> 8<br />

intersects several watercourses. For the purpose <strong>of</strong> proper operation <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

(uninterrupted and safe performance <strong>of</strong> the transport) on one side, and protection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project itself against erosive action <strong>of</strong> storm waters and environment protection on the other,<br />

high quality and comprehensive drainage <strong>of</strong> the superstructure <strong>of</strong> the construction should be<br />

provided.<br />

Drainage is the main protection measure for storm waters collection and removal. While<br />

providing it, care should be taken to carry out the drainage in a manner that will prevent<br />

pollution <strong>of</strong> surface and ground waters.<br />

5.8.1 Construction phase<br />

Introduction <strong>of</strong> water protection measures during construction should commence as early as<br />

with the terrain clearance. Cut or unrooted trees should not be thrown into watercourses in<br />

order to avoid prevention <strong>of</strong> water running through them on one side, and degradation <strong>of</strong><br />

organic mass on the other.<br />

General measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> potential impacts <strong>of</strong> emissions into surface waters during<br />

construction phase include procedures <strong>of</strong> good construction practice which should be taken<br />

care <strong>of</strong> by the competent civil engineering supervisor:<br />

Near surface waters, construction zones will be established on adequate distance, or<br />

in absence <strong>of</strong> space for construction zones establishment, surface waters will be<br />

chanallized adequately;<br />

303


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Introduction <strong>of</strong> control measures for erosion and sedimentation, through<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> temporary drainages for removal <strong>of</strong> potentially dangerous surface<br />

waters that will be formed from the construction project;<br />

Collection and treatment <strong>of</strong> the wastewaters from the construction site prior to their<br />

discharge into surface watercourses;<br />

Disposal <strong>of</strong> excavated material outside drainage lines and surface waters;<br />

Removal <strong>of</strong> excavated and deposited earth material, as soon as possible;<br />

Provision and use <strong>of</strong> equipment/vessels for evacuation <strong>of</strong> potential leakages;<br />

Solid waste disposal into containers;<br />

Placement <strong>of</strong> mobile toilets at distances <strong>of</strong> more than 100 meters from drainage<br />

lines;<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> services <strong>of</strong> authorized company for handling and removal <strong>of</strong> wastewater from<br />

mobile toilets.<br />

5.8.2 Operational phase<br />

Taking into account the sources <strong>of</strong> potential pollution, the measures for reducing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

potential impacts <strong>of</strong> the emissions on surfacewaters during the operational phase include<br />

primarily activities for control and maintenance <strong>of</strong> the railway line.<br />

During the maintenance and control activities, the personnel will be obliged to observe the<br />

requirements related to public order concerning waste throwing near surface waters and<br />

possible events <strong>of</strong> fuel or oil leakage from vehicles.<br />

In the course <strong>of</strong> the operational phase, it will be necessary to prepare schedule <strong>of</strong><br />

maintenance <strong>of</strong> the systems for collection and removal <strong>of</strong> waters and other liquids from the<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> the tracks. Occurrence <strong>of</strong> mud in culverts may induce septic conditions,<br />

development <strong>of</strong> undesirable micro organisms, contamination <strong>of</strong> water and spread <strong>of</strong> odour.<br />

5.8.3 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on wetlands<br />

5.8.3.1 During the railway line construction<br />

In the course <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction, the following additional measures should be<br />

undertaken in order to reduce impacts on wetlands and algae, that have not been described<br />

among measures for waters and soils protection:<br />

- Vehicles washing zones have to be fenced and restricted. The treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

wastewaters generated in this way will require construction <strong>of</strong> simple plants (twolevel<br />

ponds-sedimentation tanks) in order to prevent discharging <strong>of</strong> untreated<br />

wastewater into streams, rivers or Ohrid Lake. Particular care should be taken at oils<br />

replacement, where spill out <strong>of</strong> oils on soil or into water has to be strictly prohibited<br />

and sanctioned. The sites for vehicles maintenance must not be located close to<br />

Ohrid Lake;<br />

- Vehicles washing in rivers, streams or Ohrid Lake has to be prohibited;<br />

- While dying metal construction, especially metal bridges, the part subjected to dying<br />

has to be covered in order to prevent spilling out <strong>of</strong> dye into surface waters;<br />

- Camping sites for the workers must not be located on the shore <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake and<br />

the banks <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska;<br />

304


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

- Construction <strong>of</strong> ocassional barriers near the streams will be required in order to<br />

prevent inlet <strong>of</strong> material (rocks, stones, earth) during the railway construction, which<br />

would cause disruption <strong>of</strong> the water course <strong>of</strong> the streams/rivers;<br />

- The planned railway line route has to be outside protected zones;<br />

- The planned route has to be executed in a manner to prevent intrusion <strong>of</strong> polluting<br />

substances and solid waste into water bodies;<br />

- Protection measures against water pollution have to be undertaken in particular close<br />

to the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid, as well as within the watershed area <strong>of</strong> the river Sateska, so to<br />

prevent any pollution <strong>of</strong> the Lake.<br />

- Also, attention has to be paid to drainage and irrigation canals, as their covering with<br />

materials from the railway line construction may induce significant dsamages;<br />

- In order to eliminate the possibility for waters pollution with food remains (organized<br />

provisions for workers), daily delivery <strong>of</strong> food for the workers is proposed to the place<br />

<strong>of</strong> construction and transport <strong>of</strong> the vessels to the place with settled municipal<br />

infrastructure.<br />

Ohrid Lake is the most important aquatic ecosystem in Europe and therefore it should be<br />

subject <strong>of</strong> particular attention during the railway line construction. The Lake has to be<br />

designated as highly sensitive ecosystem both during construction and operational phase <strong>of</strong><br />

the railway line. Particular attention has to be paid to the protection against incidental<br />

leakage <strong>of</strong> fuels and oils. During the construction, all measures for Ohrid Lake protection<br />

have to be undertaken against such incidents. In case <strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> incidental leakage <strong>of</strong><br />

fuels and oils on the surface <strong>of</strong> the soil, the affected layer <strong>of</strong> earth has to be removed and<br />

transported and disposed <strong>of</strong> at appropriate landfills, outside the watershed area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid<br />

Lake. For this purpose, the relevant services <strong>of</strong> the project constructors have to prepare<br />

detailed plan <strong>of</strong> action in case <strong>of</strong> incidental leakage <strong>of</strong> fuels and oils. To that end, training <strong>of</strong><br />

workers for different emergency situations is required. This service has to maintain<br />

permanent cooperation with the Centre for Crisis Management and <strong>of</strong>fices <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

Environment and Physical Planning. Also, this service should be properly equipped in order<br />

to be able to react promptly to these kind <strong>of</strong> incidents.<br />

5.8.3.2 During the railway line operation<br />

The following measures should be undertaken to reduce negative impact <strong>of</strong> the railway line<br />

operation on wetlands:<br />

- Adequate maintenance <strong>of</strong> surface drainage systems, especially at places where<br />

bigger quantity <strong>of</strong> leaked fuels, oils and lubricants (stations, depots) can be expected,<br />

because theur efficiency is highly dependent on proper cleaning and maintenance;<br />

- Construction <strong>of</strong> drainage system in depots where trains would be maintained<br />

(washing, cleaning, parts replacement, etc.). Wastewater generated by training<br />

cleaning (wagons and locomotives) must not be discharged directly into municipal<br />

sewerage system. For this purpose, treatment system should be constructed to<br />

remove suspended particulate matters and oils. Separated waste oils should be<br />

managed in accordance with the applicable legislation and best available techniques;<br />

- Construction <strong>of</strong> municipal wwastewater treatment plant at all major stations (4). At<br />

other, smaller stations, mobile toilets will be installed to be managed by authorized<br />

natural person or legal person. This will prevent impact on wetlands;<br />

- Use <strong>of</strong> biodegradable and phoshat-free detergents for trains cleaning and<br />

maintenance;<br />

305


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

- In case customs terminal is built in Struga, i.e. close to the Lake <strong>of</strong> Ohrid, it will need<br />

to be equipped with collection system to collect sediment (dust) and residues <strong>of</strong> oils<br />

and fuels. This collection system has to be maintained and cleaned adequately.<br />

Collected water (especially after rainfalls) must in no case be discharged directly into<br />

natural recipient. It has to be prior treated, but the treated water must not be<br />

discharged in the watershed area <strong>of</strong> Ohrid Lake.<br />

5.9 Measures for noise impacts reduction<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> the railway line, as any other construction activity, assumes generation <strong>of</strong><br />

noise due to the use <strong>of</strong> heavy machines, excavation and transportation <strong>of</strong> huge quantities <strong>of</strong><br />

earth material, mining events, compaction, etc.<br />

Measured applicable for noise impact include:<br />

Erection <strong>of</strong> sound barriers;<br />

Reduction <strong>of</strong> the intensity <strong>of</strong> work during evening and night hours;<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> equipment which generates less noise.<br />

Despite the fact that the impacts <strong>of</strong> noise to be generated by the trains on this railway line<br />

will be restricted to around 200 meters, and noise level will be equalized with the natural<br />

phone already at 120 m, it may be significant at certain locations (in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> some<br />

stations) because <strong>of</strong> the proximity <strong>of</strong> residential buildings.<br />

The measures for environmental noise reduction include:<br />

Erection <strong>of</strong> sound barriers wherever needed;<br />

Restriction <strong>of</strong> speed through sensitive locations;<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> system <strong>of</strong> breaking and warning that generate lower noise level.<br />

Passengers in trains are also exposed at the impact <strong>of</strong> the noise. To reduce these impacts,<br />

wagons should be well insulated and sound insulated windows should be used.<br />

5.10 Measures for sustainable waste management<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> appropriate waste management, reduction <strong>of</strong> generated waste amounts<br />

and safe disposal <strong>of</strong> different waste fractions, waste separation will be necessary. The<br />

vessels for waste fractions collection should be adequately marked depending on the type <strong>of</strong><br />

the waste.<br />

Waste should be collected at designated places, removed by relevant operators, i.e.<br />

companies licenced for performance <strong>of</strong> public services in accordance with the Law on Waste<br />

Management. The manner <strong>of</strong> collection, disposal and frequency <strong>of</strong> waste removal should be<br />

defined in the basic plan for waste management.<br />

5.10.1 Construction phase<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> expected waste types, the manner <strong>of</strong> its management is presented in the<br />

following table.<br />

Waste<br />

fraction/type<br />

Packaging waste<br />

Handling<br />

Selection/recycling/reuse Other fractions Transport/recovery/<br />

removal<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> waste types<br />

for which there is market<br />

interest<br />

Comment<br />

Mixed waste Licensed entity Fractions <strong>of</strong><br />

hazardous waste<br />

will be separated<br />

306


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Municipal waste<br />

Demolition<br />

waste/other waste<br />

from construction<br />

activities<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> waste types<br />

for which there is market<br />

interest<br />

Reuse <strong>of</strong> demolition<br />

waste/ Selection <strong>of</strong><br />

waste types for which<br />

there is market interest<br />

Excavation waste Part <strong>of</strong> the waste<br />

(humus) to be used for<br />

recultivation, and<br />

deposits to be used for<br />

filling-in surface pits, and<br />

if this is not possible,<br />

landfilling<br />

Mixed waste Licensed entity Fractions <strong>of</strong><br />

hazardous waste<br />

will be separated<br />

Mixed waste Licensed entity<br />

/demolition waste<br />

landfill<br />

Fractions <strong>of</strong><br />

hazardous waste<br />

will be separated<br />

Inert waste As agreed Due to huge<br />

quantities <strong>of</strong> inert<br />

waste, Programme<br />

for waste<br />

management<br />

should be<br />

prepared in<br />

accordance with<br />

the Law on<br />

Environment<br />

- While setting temporary construction points, mobile toilets should be set and they will<br />

be maintained and emptied at certain intervals;<br />

- For the purpose <strong>of</strong> adequate waste management, waste bins will be placed in<br />

different coloures for collection <strong>of</strong> different waste fractions;<br />

- During construction works, wastewater from concrete production will be generated (if<br />

mobile concrete base is available). Such waste water contains high quantity <strong>of</strong><br />

suspended particulate matter (mainly silicate and sand) and has the common pH<br />

above 12. This water has to be colected, treated, i.e. neutralized, prior to discharge;<br />

- Waste generated during route clearing or biodegradable waste during the route<br />

development should be adequately collected and transferred to an operator for<br />

recovery;<br />

- Metal waste (remains or wires) expected during the railway line construction should<br />

be separated from other wastes, as materials that can be reused or recycled.<br />

- Hazardous waste may be generated during vehicles operation. During the railway<br />

line construction, all heavy vehicles that will be used (they use mostly oil or petrol as<br />

fuel) will need to be equipped with special vessels for leaking fuel collection.<br />

Particular attention should be paid to prevent leakage <strong>of</strong> oils from vehicles, but in<br />

case <strong>of</strong> such event absorbers should be used to reduce impacts on environmental<br />

media, contaminated soil should be removed from the watershed area <strong>of</strong> surface<br />

waters along the railway line.<br />

5.10.2 Operational phase<br />

Non-hazardous waste<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> temporary disposal <strong>of</strong> municipal waste, adequate site should be selected<br />

that will not be close to any water body or populated place. Particular attention should be<br />

paid to the disposal <strong>of</strong> materials that are not inert. The whole generated waste should be<br />

collected, disposed <strong>of</strong> or removed in a controlled manner, by authorized waste operator.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the waste types may be managed by private operators in possession <strong>of</strong> licence for<br />

collection, transport and disposal <strong>of</strong> waste, in accordance with the Law on Waste<br />

Management and relevant secondary legislation.<br />

Hazardous waste<br />

307


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

The waste called hazardous is the waste which can be explosive, oxidizing, inflammable,<br />

irritating or toxic, cancerogene, corrosive, infectious if incinerated or in contact with air, water<br />

and acid and generate toxic matters. This type <strong>of</strong> waste should be temporarily stored at<br />

appropriate places and to be labeled.<br />

Hasardous waste generated by the route maintenance during its operation should be<br />

adequately collected and labelled, and then removed and managed by a licenced entity.<br />

5.11 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on cultural heritage<br />

In the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the sites that have already been described within the description <strong>of</strong> cultural<br />

heritage, care should be taken while performing construction activities to avoid damages on<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the values. Presence <strong>of</strong> expert in the area <strong>of</strong> cultural heritage is recommendable, for<br />

example Institute for Cultural Heritage in Ohrid, to carry out the monitoring during the railway<br />

line construction.<br />

In case during the performance <strong>of</strong> earths and construction works artifacts are found or<br />

indications occur that certain archeological good is found at some sites along the railway line<br />

route, construction works will be terminated and Administration for Cultural Heritage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Culture will be notified in a timely manner. Also, the specified sites will be secured<br />

and temporarily fensed to avoid potential negative impacts in terms <strong>of</strong> their safety and<br />

status.<br />

5.12 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on forests and forestry<br />

5.12.1 Construction phase<br />

Prior to the commencement <strong>of</strong> any activity on the railway line route, according to the<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> the Law on Forests, Elaborate on the establishment <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> damage<br />

resulting from the permanent conversion <strong>of</strong> forest into construction land should be prepared.<br />

The Elaborate will define the area for clearing and permanent conversion, the quantity <strong>of</strong><br />

wood mass <strong>of</strong> tree-stump, the price <strong>of</strong> the wood mass, increment lost, lost revenues from<br />

other wood products, lost generally useful functions <strong>of</strong> the forest, etc. 25 .<br />

In order to reduce negative effects <strong>of</strong> the construction <strong>of</strong> access roads and other<br />

infrastructure that will cause cutting <strong>of</strong> significant wood stock (also with impacts on<br />

ecosystyems), the existing forest road infrastructure should be used (upon compensation),<br />

while the scope <strong>of</strong> the new infrastructure will be dimensioned carefully and to the necessary<br />

minimum.<br />

Planning, construction, maintenance and use <strong>of</strong> forest infrastructure is regulated by the<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> Articles 73 and 74 <strong>of</strong> the Law on Forests, namely:<br />

Due to the termination <strong>of</strong> the links between different ecosystems, and in order to<br />

provide corridors, paths for game movement from one side <strong>of</strong> the railway line to the<br />

other, culvert should be planned and constructed in an amount and at distances most<br />

suitable for that purpose;<br />

The occurred fragmentation causes change in forest division which should be<br />

reviewed in the elaboratrion <strong>of</strong> the new plan for the respecitve FMU.<br />

5.12.2 Operational phase<br />

In this phase, the danger <strong>of</strong> forest fire outbreaks should be eliminated if the rules on the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> measures are applied consistently with the Law on Fire Prevention and the<br />

25 Regulated by Articles 13, 14, 15, 18 and 60 <strong>of</strong> the Law on Forests.<br />

308


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Law on Forests. All measures and procedures should be applied for fire prevention<br />

(prevention pre-suppressive and suppressive).<br />

Obligations <strong>of</strong> the line managing entity:<br />

- Permanent removal <strong>of</strong> the vegetation on the line subgrade;<br />

- Cleaning <strong>of</strong> drains and gutters to facilitate water flow capacity, but also to<br />

eliminate the possibility for growing <strong>of</strong> vegetation within them and risk <strong>of</strong> fire;<br />

- Greening with fire resistent species (not to plant needle-shape leaved<br />

species).<br />

Obligations <strong>of</strong> the entity managing the forest along the line:<br />

- All obligations deriving from the Law on Forests and the Law on Fire<br />

Prevention.<br />

5.12.3 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> negative effects <strong>of</strong> the railway line construction on<br />

erosion and deposits<br />

The Main Design for the railway line construction should contain "Phased project"<br />

that will include the following elements:<br />

Documentation for expropriation;<br />

Elaborate on permanent conversion <strong>of</strong> forest into construction land;<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> wood cutting along the route and forest order establishment;<br />

Tree-stumps digging out,<br />

Removal <strong>of</strong> active/fertile soil layer and its storage on suitable locations;<br />

Earth works, etc.<br />

During the line construction, mechanization and technology causing minimum<br />

stresses and harmful impacts on the regime <strong>of</strong> spring waters within the range <strong>of</strong> the<br />

railway line route/corridor and downstream <strong>of</strong> it, below the line, should be used.<br />

Inclinations should be executed in accordance with the standards, and inclinations<br />

at risk <strong>of</strong> erosive processes only, should also be greened out by fire resistant<br />

species. For slopes where risk <strong>of</strong> chasmal processes exists, appropriate main<br />

designs should be elaborated;<br />

In order to reduce the negative effect <strong>of</strong> erosive processes along the line, good<br />

planning and compensation <strong>of</strong> earh masses (excavations and embankments)<br />

should be accomplished, and excessive earth mass should not be thrown<br />

whereever in a form <strong>of</strong> huge heaps <strong>of</strong> disposed material (as is <strong>of</strong>ten done), but it<br />

should be stored inside suitable depressions for that purpose which will be later on<br />

recultivated;<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> earth masses from excavation may be used for development <strong>of</strong> embankments<br />

by watercourses with low banks, where overflows occur, based on prior elaborated<br />

project documentation;<br />

Fertile-humus accumulation horison <strong>of</strong> soils, as well as parts <strong>of</strong> horisons В and В/С<br />

along the route should be separated from the geological horison (indigenous<br />

horison) as a matter <strong>of</strong> necessity and stored along access roads to be used later on<br />

in the process <strong>of</strong> biological recultivation <strong>of</strong> landfills formed <strong>of</strong> excavations;<br />

During the line construction, efforts should be made to minimize the negative<br />

impacts <strong>of</strong> coarse stone blocks rolling and other harmful impacts, massive<br />

rockslides and alike, over watercourses slopes and riverbeds and remedy the<br />

consequences.<br />

309


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

5.12.4 Measures for reduction <strong>of</strong> impacts on socio-economic aspect<br />

In Botun, peripheral parts <strong>of</strong> Struga and the village Radolista, there is a potential for imapcts<br />

on residential buildings and therefore measures are required to comensate the owners.<br />

In the context <strong>of</strong> property, part <strong>of</strong> the railway line passes over state owned land (mainly the<br />

routs from the village Drugovo to the village Novo Selo, then from Botun to Meseiste and<br />

from Frangovo to Radozda); however, in the areas <strong>of</strong> the settlements Drugovo, Novo Selo,<br />

Botun, Moroista, Korosista, Mislesevo, Struga, Zagracani-Sum, Radolista, Frangovo and<br />

Radozda, the railway line will occupy land in private ownership, so that the land<br />

expropriation is inevitable. Measures for land owners compensation are inevitable, too.<br />

At several points, the railway line intersects main, regional and local roads (with the main<br />

road Kicevo-Kjafasan it intersects near the village Popolzani, close to Botun Gorge and near<br />

the village Frangovo with the regional road Struga Debar, very close to the City <strong>of</strong> Struga,<br />

and local roads in the area <strong>of</strong> Debrca and Struga Fields (such as intersections with the local<br />

road to the villages Arbinovo, Izdeglavje, Novo Selo, Belcista, Volino, Moroista, Zagracani-<br />

Sum, Kalista and many other minor roads). This situation will affect the current<br />

communication <strong>of</strong> the settlements with the main roads and urban settlements. Unavoidable<br />

technical measures will be required to establish uninterrupted natural communication <strong>of</strong> the<br />

area on both sides <strong>of</strong> the line.<br />

The railway line intersects with a number <strong>of</strong> water management facilities (the river Treska,<br />

river Sateska, canal on the river Sateska which gravitates to Ohrid Lake, Crn Drim river,<br />

underground water supply system from the village Radolista to Struga, water supply system<br />

near the village Radozda and several canals <strong>of</strong> the amelioration network <strong>of</strong> Struga Fields).<br />

These intersections will affect water management and established ecological balance.<br />

Therefore, it is recommended that the Main Design devotes particular attention to the<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> the already set infrastructure network and avoid conflicts with it. Over certain<br />

extensions, the railway line also intersects with elements <strong>of</strong> the electricity distribution<br />

network established within the railway corridor. This occurs at several sites in the area <strong>of</strong><br />

Debrca and Struga Fields. Technical solutions for impacts elimination are necessary.<br />

5.13 Overview <strong>of</strong> measures for environmental impact reduction and environmental<br />

monitoring<br />

The matrix <strong>of</strong> measures for environmental impacts reduction and environmental monitoring<br />

is presented in Appendix 12.<br />

310


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

6 Recommendations and conclusions<br />

6.1 Project justification<br />

Project justification is presented in paragraph 1.3 <strong>of</strong> this Study. On this ocassion, we should<br />

re-stress the importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Corridor</strong> 8 (railway transport) aimed at connecting the country<br />

with two ports (Duras and Burgas), exchange <strong>of</strong> goods and easier transfer <strong>of</strong> people. Also,<br />

this mode <strong>of</strong> transport is preffered compared to other transport modes, because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

insignificant impacts on the environment during its operational phase.<br />

6.2 Recommendations<br />

Recommendations driving from assessed impacts include;<br />

Findings <strong>of</strong> the experts with regard to expected impacts during the railway line<br />

construction and use and accordingly proposed measures will be observed;<br />

Measures proposed should be translated into phased solutions <strong>of</strong> the Main Design;<br />

Monitoring group should be established by the Investor, to monitor the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the proposed measures into the Main Design, as well as their<br />

implementation in practice, during the construction and exploitation <strong>of</strong> this linear<br />

project.<br />

PE "Macedonian <strong>Railway</strong>s" should employ at least one person responsible for<br />

environmental management in relation to the activities <strong>of</strong> railway transport<br />

completion in the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />

6.3 Conclusion<br />

From environmental point <strong>of</strong> view, the linear project - construction <strong>of</strong> railway line Kicevo-Lin<br />

(border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) does not pose any particular threat to environment and<br />

nature and the route is acceptable in its entirety. If the proposed measures for possible<br />

environmental impacts reduction and mitigation are adopted, it will be sustainable in longrun,<br />

both from financial and environmental and quality <strong>of</strong> living points <strong>of</strong> view.<br />

The process <strong>of</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Impact Assessment Study for the project -<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> railway line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>) was carried out<br />

in accordance with the legally prescribed methodology.<br />

The preparation <strong>of</strong> the Study involved team <strong>of</strong> experts in all areas required for a complex<br />

linear project <strong>of</strong> this type.<br />

All aspects <strong>of</strong> environment and nature, cultural heritage, as well as aspects <strong>of</strong> socioeconomic<br />

development and people's welfare, have been considered.<br />

The above has been done to secure sustainability <strong>of</strong> the project on long-term basis.<br />

During the Study development, good communication has been accomplished among expert<br />

team members, as well as with the Investor and developer <strong>of</strong> the Conceptual Design. This<br />

resulted in timely information obtaining and access to the terrain and required plans.<br />

311


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

7 References<br />

- Просторен план на РМ 2004-2020 (МЖСПП)<br />

Biodiversity, landscape<br />

Albrecht, C. & Wilke, T. (2008): Lake Ohrid: biodiversity and evolution. Hydrobiologia, 615:<br />

103-114.<br />

Cvijic, J. (1906-1911). Osnove za geografiju i geologiju Makedonije i stare Srbije. Srpska<br />

kraljevska akademija.<br />

Ernst Basler and Partners (1995). The World Bank Feasibility Study on the Lake Ohrid<br />

Conservation Project. Zollikon. 158 pp.<br />

Гашевски, М. (1978). Основни хидрографски особености на речната мрежа во СР<br />

Македонија. Географско Друштво на СР Македонија, 15-16: 29-42. Скопје.<br />

Икономов, П. (1960): Распространување на Ephemeroptera во Македонија. Acta. Mus.<br />

Mac. Sci. Nat., Т. 7, 3:41-74, Скопје.<br />

Икономов, П. (1980): Сезонска и лонгитудинална дистрибуција на Plecoptera (Insecta)<br />

во однос на температурниот фактор во изворниот регион на реката Треска<br />

(Велика Река). Год. Збор. на Биол. факултет на Унив. "Кирил и Методиј" во Скопје,<br />

33:5-13.<br />

Ivanovski T. & Strackov, M. (1974). Tectonics and history <strong>of</strong> the tectonic evolution <strong>of</strong> Ohrid<br />

Valley nad its outskrits. In: Symposium on hte Problems <strong>of</strong> the Regulation <strong>of</strong> Lake<br />

Ohrid. Maced. Acad. Sci. Skopje, 17-29.<br />

Митиќ В. (1998): Фитопланктонот и хлорофилот а во литоралниот регион на<br />

Охридското Езеро каде што се влева реката Сатеска. Петто советување:<br />

Водостопанство во Република Македонија. Реферати и соопштенија: 161-165.<br />

Митиќ В., Јорданоски М., Патчева С. и Велјаноска Е. (2000): Одредување на<br />

квалитетот на истечната вода од Охридското Езеро кај Струга. Седмо<br />

советување: Водостопанството во Република Македонија, Струга. Реферати и<br />

соопштенија: 247-252.<br />

Pavlov (2010). The ecology <strong>of</strong> the benthic diatom community in Lake Ohrid and the<br />

possibility for assessing the ecological status <strong>of</strong> the lake. Msci Thesis UNESCO-IHE<br />

Institute For Water Education. Delft. 172 pp.<br />

Pfister, P. & Pipp, E., (2009). Leitfaden zur erhebung der biologischen qualitatselemente:<br />

Bundesministerium Für Land- Und Forstwirtschaft, Wasserwirtschaft, U.U., Vii, S. &<br />

Wien, A.<br />

Rott, E. ed. 1999. Indikationslisten fur aufwuchsalgen in osterreichischen fliessgewassern.<br />

Teil 2: Trophieindikation sowiegeochemische praferenz; taxonomische und<br />

toxikologische anmerkungen., Wien: WWK, Bundesministerium fur Land-und<br />

Forstwirtschaft.<br />

Schaumburg, J., Schranz, C., Stelzer, D. & H<strong>of</strong>mann, G., (2007). Action instructions for the<br />

ecological evaluation <strong>of</strong> lakes for implementation <strong>of</strong> the EU water framework directive:<br />

Makrophytes and phytobenthos.<br />

Сибиновиќ, М. (1987). Езера. Охридско и Преспанско. Завод за водостопанство на<br />

СРМ- Скопје. 156 стр.<br />

312


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Spirkovski, S., Avramovski, O., Kodzoman, A. (2001). Watersheed management in the Lake<br />

Ohrid region <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> and Macedonia, lakes & reservoirs. Research and management<br />

6: 237-242.<br />

Stankovic, S. (1960). The Balkan Lake Ohrid and its Living World. Monographiae Biologicae<br />

Vo. IX, Uitgeverij Dr. W. Junk, Den Haag.<br />

Taleska, M. (2010). Influence <strong>of</strong> Human Activities on Submerged Vascular Macrophytes<br />

Alongside Crn Drim River. BALWOIS 2010 - Ohrid, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. 25-29 May<br />

2010.<br />

Talevska (2009): Surface area <strong>of</strong> the belt <strong>of</strong> red head grass (Potamogeton perfoliatus L.) in<br />

Lake Ohrid. BALWOIS 2009. - Ohrid, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia.<br />

Talevski, T., Talevska, M., Milosevic, D. & Talevska A. (2010). Anthropogenic Influence on<br />

Ichthy<strong>of</strong>auna and Macrophyte Diversity in the Crn Drim Ecosystem. BALWOIS 2010 -<br />

Ohrid, <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia. 25-29 May 2010.<br />

WFD-UKTAG, (2008). Phytobenthos - diatom assessment <strong>of</strong> lake ecological quality<br />

(DARLEQ) (WFD-UKTAG), W.F.D.-U.K.A.G., Sniffer, Place, G., Edinburgh, 3aa, E.,<br />

Scotland & www.Wfduk.Org.<br />

K. H. Tan (2000) Environmental Soil Science: Second edition, Revised and Expanded.<br />

Books in soils, plants and the environment, vol 74. Marcel Dekker, Inc.<br />

H.D. Scott (2000) Soil Physics. Agricultural and Environmental Applications. Iowa State<br />

University press/Ames<br />

http://book.coe.int/EN/ficheouvrage.php?PAGEID=36&lang=EN&produit_aliasid=1827<br />

http://www.aplic.org/<br />

Soils<br />

Ѓ. Филиповски, Р. Ризовски, П. Ристевски (1996)Ч Карактеристики на климатсковегетациските<br />

почвени зони (региони)во Република Македонија. МАНУ<br />

Ѓ. Филиповски (1995) Почвите на Република Македонија. Том 1. МАНУ<br />

Ѓ. Филиповски (2003) Деградација на почвите како компонента на животната средина<br />

во Република Македонија. МАНУ<br />

D. Popovski (1953) Zemjljista Belcickog Polja. Zemljiste i biljka, God II, No.2. Beograd<br />

Д. Поповски (1955): Почвите во Издеглавско поле и нивните својства. Социјалистичко<br />

земјоделство, Год VII, Бр. 6. Скопје.<br />

Д. Петковски (1994)Ч Генеза, својства и распространетост на почвите во кичевско<br />

поле. Годишен зборник на Земјоделскиот институт, Книга XIII-XIV. 1994. Скопје<br />

Д. Поповски (1953)Ч Почвите во струшко поле. Зборник на земјоделскиот испитателен<br />

институт. Книга II, Скопје<br />

S. Parr (1999): Study on the Assessment <strong>of</strong> Indirect and Cumulative Impacts as well as<br />

Impact Interactions. European Commission Directorate-General XI, Environment,<br />

Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection.<br />

Посебни планови за стопанисување со шумите, подготвени од ЈП “Maкедонски<br />

шуми” – сектор за планирање 1978<br />

Посебен план за стопанисување со шумите “Беличка Река- Пресека” 2008-2017<br />

Посебен план за стопанисување со шумите “Дреново” 2007-2016<br />

313


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

Посебен план за стопанисување со шумите “Волништа” 2004-2013<br />

Посебен план за стопанисување со шумите “Мaзатар” 2003-2012<br />

Посебен план за стопанисување со шумите “Славеј” 2003-2012<br />

Посебен план за стопанисување со шумите “Јабланица - Ќафасан” 2009-2018<br />

Закон за шуми (Сл.весник на РМ , 64/09)<br />

Подзаконски акти во врска со шумарството<br />

Карта на ерозија на РМ - ЗВРМ , 1993<br />

Air:<br />

Noise<br />

[1] Air Pollution Associated with the Construction <strong>of</strong> Swedish <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />

Norrbotniabanan Case Study, Ross Phillips, Banverket Norra Banregionen, Luleå,<br />

December 2006<br />

[2] Horizontal Guidance Note-H1 (Annex F), Environment Agency , Bristol, April<br />

2010 http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/pdf/GEHO0410BSIL-e-e.pdf<br />

[3] Emission Estimation Technique Manual for Mining and Processing <strong>of</strong><br />

Nonmetallic Minerals , Environment Australia, 2000<br />

http://www.npi.gov.au/publications/emission-estimation-technique/pubs/<br />

nonmetallic.pdf<br />

Годишен извештај за квалитет на воздухот 2006, 2007, 2008 година (МЖСПП)<br />

Месечни извештаи за квалитет на воздухот за мерно место Кичево (МЖСПП)<br />

[1] Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, FTA-VA-90-1003-06, May, 2006<br />

[2] Railroad Noise Emission Standards, US EPA<br />

[3] http://www.nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=20016M33.txt<br />

Water<br />

1. Z. Karamanolevski, J. Milevski, S. Alchinova Monevska, REVIEW OF AVAILABLE OF<br />

PHYSICO-CHEMICAL, GEOMORPHOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL QUALITY ELEMENTS<br />

ON SURFACE WATER AND THE MONITORING ACTIONS UNDERTAKE IN<br />

HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL ADMINISTRATION, BIECO, 2005.<br />

2. Annual Reports on Surface Water Quality in <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, 1977-1997,<br />

Hydrometeorological Institute <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, Skopje, 1998.<br />

3. Study on Integrated Water Resources Development and Management Master Plan in the<br />

<strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> Macedonia, Financed by JICA -Japan International Cooperation Agency, 1997-<br />

1998.<br />

4. Water Pollution Monitoring System for Streams and Rivers in Macedonia – I and II Fase,<br />

EAWAG, Swiss, 1997-2004 and 2006.<br />

6. http://www.meteo.gov.mк<br />

Socio-economic aspects<br />

ВГИ. (1970-1972): Топографски карти со размер 1:25000 (Гаус-Кригерова проекција) за<br />

територијата на Република Македонија (216 секции), Белград.<br />

314


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

ВГИ. (1976): Топографски карти со размер 1:200000 (Гаус-Кригерова проекција) за<br />

територијата на Република Македонија, листови 4221-Скопје, 4222-Куманово, 4223-<br />

Ќустендил, 4121-Битола, 4122-Прилеп, 4123-Солун. Белград.<br />

ДЗС (2004) Попис на населението, домаќинствата и становите во Република<br />

Македонија, 2002, Вкупно население, домаќинства и станови, вкупно население<br />

според изјаснувањето за националнат припадност, мајчиниот јазик и вероисповедта<br />

(податоци по населени места) книга 10, Скопје.<br />

ДЗС (2004) Попис на населението, домаќинствата и становите во Република<br />

Македонија, 2002, Вкупно население по пол И возраст (податоци по населени места)<br />

книга11, Скопје.<br />

ДЗС (2004) Попис на населението, домаќинствата и становите во Република<br />

Македонија, 2002, Вкупно население во земјата, вкупно население според активноста<br />

и полот (податоци по населени места) книга12, Скопје.<br />

Маркоски Б. (1992): Картографско картометриски проучувања на хипсометриската<br />

структура на просторот и разместеноста на населението во Република Македонија.<br />

Докторска дисертација,, Институтот за географија, Природно математичкиот<br />

факултет,, стр. 1-625, Скопје. (ракопис).<br />

Маркоски Б. (1995): Хипсометрија на просторот и населеноста во Република<br />

Македонија - картографски метод. Македонска ризница. стр. 1-316, Скопје.<br />

Маркоски Б. (2004): Картографско дефинирање и диференцирање на планинските<br />

просторни целини во Република Македонија, Билтен за физичка географија, ПМФ-<br />

Институт за географија, стр. 25-34, Скопје.<br />

Републичка геодетска управа. (1982): СР Македонија низ катастарска евиденција.<br />

Скопје.<br />

Waste<br />

- IFC Environment, Health and Safety Guedilines for <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />

- Листа на видови на отпад („Сл. весник на РМ“ бр. 100/05)<br />

- http://www.campuserc.org/virtualtour/waste/best/Pages/default.aspx<br />

315


Environmental Impact Assessment Study <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

for Construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Line Kicevo-Lin (border with the <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>)<br />

APPENDICES<br />

316

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!