(best examples and good practices) on household organic waste ...

Figure 13.: AD life cycle .......................................................................................................................... 31
Figure 14.: Combustion processes for mass burn incineration ................................................................. 38
Figure 15. :Three types of incinerators: (a) fixed grate (left), (b) rotary kiln (middle), (c) fluidized
bed(right)............................................................................................................................................... 40
Figure 16.: Grate system structure.......................................................................................................... 41
Figure 17.: Rotary kiln waste incinerator ................................................................................................ 42
Figure 18.: HICB type fluidized bed type gasification furnace sketch drawing ......................................... 43
Figure 19.: TPS circulating fluidized bed gasification plant <strong>and</strong> gas cleaning plant ................................. 50
Figure 20.: A typical plasma gasification plant ....................................................................................... 52
Figure 21.: Conceptual design cross section ............................................................................................ 56
Figure 22.: Andritz drum drying system .................................................................................................. 73
Figure.23.: Magnetic Separation ............................................................................................................ 76
Figure 24.: Optical sorting ...................................................................................................................... 77
Figure 25.: Diagram of MRF process ....................................................................................................... 78
Figure 26.: Generation of municipal waste in the EU-27, 1995 <strong>and</strong> 2007................................................. 85
Figure 27.: Percentage of municipal waste that is l<strong>and</strong>filled in the EU-27, 1995 <strong>and</strong> 2007 ...................... 86
Figure 28.: Percentage of municipal waste that is incinerated in the EU-27, 1995 <strong>and</strong> 2007 ................... 86
Figure 29.: Management of biodegradable municipal waste 1995–2005 ................................................ 89
Figure 30.: Separate collection of biodegradable waste in Italy ............................................................. 92
Figure 31.: Schematic operation of Montanaso plant in Italy. ................................................................. 95
Figure 32.: Separate collection of biodegradable waste fractions in Germany ...................................... 107
Figure 33.:Drying process description diagram ..................................................................................... 110
Figure 34.: The schematic flow of the Kaiserslautern plant in Germany. ............................................... 118
Figure 35.: Average composition of SRF of Dresden plant in Germany .................................................. 123
Figure 36.: Process diagram of the Dresden plant in Germany. ............................................................. 125
Figure 37.: The DDD drying system ...................................................................................................... 126
Figure 38.: Process diagram of the Rennerod plant in Germany. ........................................................... 131
Figure 39.: Schematic operation of the Ludwigslust plant in Germany. ................................................. 133
Figure 40.: Biological treatment through decades in Sweden ............................................................... 141
Figure 41.: Stockholm concept .............................................................................................................. 145
Figure 42.: Linköping concept ............................................................................................................... 149
Figure 43.: The life-cycle of the Växtkraft project in Västerås ............................................................... 152