(best examples and good practices) on household organic waste ...

(best examples and good practices) on household organic waste ... (best examples and good practices) on household organic waste ...

11.11.2014 Views

105 already recycled a relatively large proportion of municipal waste ong>andong> long>andong>filled approximately 40 %.(EEA Report No 7/.,2009) German waste policy follows the EU’s waste hierarchy, with prevention as the first priority, followed by material recovery ong>andong> energy recovery, depending on which is better for the environment. Objectives for managing municipal waste also focus on avoiding contamination of waste ong>andong> ensuring treatment ong>andong> long>andong>filling of waste that is not recovered. (EEA Report No 7/.,2009) The two most important fractions of waste are (paper ong>andong> biowaste). Among the most efficient actions for the treatment of these types of waste, are: composting or anaerobic biological treatment; ong>andong> limiting the organic content of long>andong>filled waste. (EEA Report No 7/.,2009) Germany set a target in 1999 for stopping long>andong>filling ong>andong> treating residues by 2020. This is an ambitious ong>andong> very difficult to achieve objective ong>andong> includes, recovering waste incineration residues ong>andong> further developing treatment technologies such as sorting ong>andong> MBT. (EEA Report No 7/.,2009) Except for recycling targets for packaging waste, very few quantitative targets have been set at federal levels. Those that exist generally apply to paper ong>andong> cardboard. In addition to the targets of the 2004 Packaging Directive, the paper industry has committed itself to recycle around 80 % of waste paper in a voluntary agreement. (EEA Report No 7/.,2009) 7.2. The German policy Germany is a federal republic made up of sixteen federal states (Bundesländer). Responsibility for waste management ong>andong> environmental protection is shared between the national government, the federal states ong>andong> the local authorities. The national Ministry of Environment sets priorities, participates in the enactment of laws ong>andong> oversees strategic planning, information ong>andong> public relations ong>andong> defines requirements for waste facilities. Each federal state adopts its own waste management act containing supplementary regulations to the national law, e.g. concerning regional waste management concepts ong>andong> rules on requirements for disposal. There is no national waste management planning in Germany. Instead, each federal state develops a waste management plan for its area. (EEA Report No 7/.,2009) According to the producer responsibility principle, which is a core tenet of German waste legislation, the producer of a product generally still has responsibility for the product when it becomes waste. However, this principle

106 has been specified only for some product types such as packaging ong>andong> waste electric ong>andong> electronic equipment. For waste generated by households, the Recycling Management ong>andong> Waste Act assigns responsibility to the local public waste disposal authorities (in most federal states these are the districts ong>andong> towns). Their responsibility covers collecting ong>andong> transporting waste, measures to promote waste prevention ong>andong> recovery, ong>andong> planning, constructing ong>andong> operating waste disposal facilities. Municipalities have more practical tasks such as providing sites for waste collection. (EEA Report No 7/.,2009) One of the key means of diverting waste from long>andong>fills is limiting the organic content of long>andong>filled waste. A long>andong>fill ban was introduced to achieve this goal. It was introduced in two steps ong>andong> using three pieces of legislation because the initial statute contained severe loopholes. The first step was an administrative regulation (TASi) in 1993, which limited the organic content in waste going to long>andong>fills to less than 3 % total organic carbon (TOC). Achieving such a low organic content necessitated thermal treatment of the waste. The debate concluded that incineration should be the only pre-treatment method but it was agreed to extend the transition period from 8 to 12 years so the final deadline would be 1 June 2005. The aim was to allow enough time to establish treatment capacity especially in the federal states formerly situated in East Germany. Moreover, it was agreed to permit exemptions in exceptional cases to allow some flexibility. Finally, the Bundesrat (the body at which the federal states are represented) called on the Ministry of Environment to define the criteria for environmentally sound long>andong>filling of residues from mechanical-biological treatment. (EEA Report No 7/.,2009) In some cases states expong>andong>ed the use of incineration as a method of waste treatment in order to achieve the targets set by TASi, whereas others invested in MBT as the main pre-treatment method ong>andong> made use of extensive exemptions from the provisions. Separate collection of biowaste ong>andong> paper is also regulated mainly through legislative measures. In 1983 the Federal State of Hesse initiated separate collection of biowaste to divert waste from long>andong>fill. Between 1985 ong>andong> 1993 the number of inhabitants with a collection system for biowaste increased from 400 000 to 7.6 million. Intervention at national level came in 1993 with TASi, which requires the competent waste authorities to set up separate collection schemes for biowaste from households ong>andong> garden waste from public parks. (EEA Report No 7/.,2009)

105<br />

already recycled a relatively large proporti<strong>on</strong> of municipal <strong>waste</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>filled<br />

approximately 40 %.(EEA Report No 7/.,2009)<br />

German <strong>waste</strong> policy follows the EU’s <strong>waste</strong> hierarchy, with preventi<strong>on</strong> as the<br />

first priority, followed by material recovery <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> energy recovery, depending <strong>on</strong><br />

which is better for the envir<strong>on</strong>ment. Objectives for managing municipal <strong>waste</strong><br />

also focus <strong>on</strong> avoiding c<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong> of <strong>waste</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> ensuring treatment <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>filling of <strong>waste</strong> that is not recovered. (EEA Report No 7/.,2009)<br />

The two most important fracti<strong>on</strong>s of <strong>waste</strong> are (paper <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> bio<strong>waste</strong>). Am<strong>on</strong>g<br />

the most efficient acti<strong>on</strong>s for the treatment of these types of <strong>waste</strong>, are:<br />

composting or anaerobic biological treatment; <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> limiting the <strong>organic</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tent<br />

of l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>filled <strong>waste</strong>. (EEA Report No 7/.,2009)<br />

Germany set a target in 1999 for stopping l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>filling <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> treating residues by<br />

2020. This is an ambitious <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> very difficult to achieve objective <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> includes,<br />

recovering <strong>waste</strong> incinerati<strong>on</strong> residues <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> further developing treatment<br />

technologies such as sorting <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> MBT. (EEA Report No 7/.,2009)<br />

Except for recycling targets for packaging <strong>waste</strong>, very few quantitative targets<br />

have been set at federal levels. Those that exist generally apply to paper <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

cardboard. In additi<strong>on</strong> to the targets of the 2004 Packaging Directive, the paper<br />

industry has committed itself to recycle around 80 % of <strong>waste</strong> paper in a<br />

voluntary agreement. (EEA Report No 7/.,2009)<br />

7.2. The German policy<br />

Germany is a federal republic made up of sixteen federal states (Bundesländer).<br />

Resp<strong>on</strong>sibility for <strong>waste</strong> management <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> envir<strong>on</strong>mental protecti<strong>on</strong> is shared<br />

between the nati<strong>on</strong>al government, the federal states <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the local authorities.<br />

The nati<strong>on</strong>al Ministry of Envir<strong>on</strong>ment sets priorities, participates in the<br />

enactment of laws <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> oversees strategic planning, informati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> public<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> defines requirements for <strong>waste</strong> facilities. Each federal state adopts<br />

its own <strong>waste</strong> management act c<strong>on</strong>taining supplementary regulati<strong>on</strong>s to the<br />

nati<strong>on</strong>al law, e.g. c<strong>on</strong>cerning regi<strong>on</strong>al <strong>waste</strong> management c<strong>on</strong>cepts <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> rules <strong>on</strong><br />

requirements for disposal. There is no nati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>waste</strong> management planning in<br />

Germany. Instead, each federal state develops a <strong>waste</strong> management plan for its<br />

area. (EEA Report No 7/.,2009)<br />

According to the producer resp<strong>on</strong>sibility principle, which is a core tenet of<br />

German <strong>waste</strong> legislati<strong>on</strong>, the producer of a product generally still has<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>sibility for the product when it becomes <strong>waste</strong>. However, this principle

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!