11.11.2014 Views

HQ$History - United States Special Operations Command

HQ$History - United States Special Operations Command

HQ$History - United States Special Operations Command

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Founding and Evolution of USSOCOM<br />

Founding USSOCOM<br />

“I think we have an abort situation,” Defense<br />

Secretary Harold Brown informed President<br />

Jimmy Carter on 24 April 1980. Carter simply<br />

responded, “Let’s go with his [the ground commander’s]<br />

recommendation.” The mission to rescue<br />

53 American hostages had failed. At a desolate<br />

site in Iran known as “Desert One,” tragedy<br />

occurred minutes later when two aircraft collided<br />

on the ground and eight men died. The failed<br />

mission struck a blow to American prestige and<br />

further eroded the public’s confidence in the U.S.<br />

government.<br />

The event culminated a period of <strong>Special</strong><br />

<strong>Operations</strong> Forces (SOF) decline in the 1970s.<br />

SOF capabilities had deteriorated throughout<br />

the post-Vietnam era, a time marked by considerable<br />

distrust between SOF and the conventional<br />

military and by significant funding cuts<br />

for special operations. The Desert One disaster,<br />

however, led the Defense Department to appoint<br />

an investigative panel, chaired by former Chief<br />

of Naval <strong>Operations</strong>, Admiral James L.<br />

Holloway. The Holloway Commission’s findings<br />

caused the Defense Department to create a<br />

counterterrorist joint task force (CTJTF) and a<br />

<strong>Special</strong> <strong>Operations</strong> Advisory Panel.<br />

Desert One did serve to strengthen the<br />

resolve of some within the Department of<br />

Defense (DOD) to reform SOF. Army Chief of<br />

Staff General Edward C. “Shy” Meyer called for<br />

further restructuring of special operations capabilities.<br />

Although unsuccessful at the joint level,<br />

Meyer, nevertheless, went on to consolidate<br />

Army SOF units under the newly-created 1st<br />

<strong>Special</strong> <strong>Operations</strong> <strong>Command</strong> in 1982, a significant<br />

step to improve Army SOF.<br />

By 1983, there was a small but growing<br />

sense in Congress of the need for military<br />

reforms. In June, the Senate Armed Services<br />

Committee (SASC), under the chairmanship of<br />

Senator Barry Goldwater (R-AZ), began a twoyear-long<br />

study of the Defense Department,<br />

which included an examination of SOF. Two<br />

events in October 1983 further demonstrated<br />

the need for change: the terrorist bombing<br />

attack in Lebanon and the invasion of Grenada.<br />

The loss of 237 Marines to terrorism, combined<br />

Wreckage at Desert One, Iran (April 1980) where eight<br />

Americans died.<br />

with the command and control (C2) problems<br />

that occurred during the Grenada invasion, refocused<br />

congressional attention on the growing<br />

threat of low-intensity conflict and on the issue<br />

of joint interoperability.<br />

With concern mounting on Capitol Hill, the<br />

DOD created the Joint <strong>Special</strong> <strong>Operations</strong><br />

Agency (JSOA) on 1 January 1984; this agency,<br />

however, had neither operational nor command<br />

authority over any SOF. This JSOA was unable<br />

to improve SOF readiness, capabilities, or policies—hardly<br />

what Congress had in mind as a<br />

systemic fix for SOF’s problems. Within the<br />

Defense Department, there were a few staunch<br />

SOF supporters. Noel Koch, Principal Deputy<br />

Assistant Secretary of Defense for International<br />

Security Affairs; and his deputy, Lynn Rylander,<br />

both advocated SOF reforms.<br />

At the same time, a few visionaries on<br />

Capitol Hill were determined to overhaul SOF.<br />

They included Senators Sam Nunn (D-GA) and<br />

William Cohen (R-ME), both members of the<br />

SASC, and Congressman Dan Daniel (D-VA),<br />

the chairman of the Readiness Subcommittee of<br />

the House Armed Services Committee. Daniel<br />

was convinced that the U.S. military was not<br />

interested in special operations, that the country’s<br />

capability in this area was second rate, and<br />

that SOF operational command and control was<br />

an endemic problem. Nunn and Cohen also felt<br />

strongly that the DOD was not preparing adequately<br />

for future threats. Nunn expressed a<br />

growing frustration with the services’ practice of<br />

reallocating monies appropriated for SOF modernization<br />

to non-SOF programs. Senator<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!