30-Year Old Two-Life Pavement Case Study

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Smoothness 220 200 180 160 140 IRI (in/mile) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2 3A 3B/ALT. 3B1S 3B2S 3C 4A 4B 4C 5A 5B 5BT Test Sections
FAULTING IN OUTSIDE WHEEL PATH (in). 0.60 0.55 0.50 Faulting > 0.5 in typically requires reconstruction/slab replacement Faulting (in n) - 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.<strong>30</strong> 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 Faulting > 0.15 in typically requires diamond grinding /other rehabilitation 2 3A 3B 3BIS 3B2S 3C 4A 4B 4C 5A 5B 5BT Test Section Avg. Max.
Page 1 and 2: Florida Econocrete Road: Performanc
Page 3 and 4: What prompted this project ? • Sh
Page 5 and 6: Project Description • Contractor
Page 7 and 8: US 41/SR 45 Project Alignment
Page 9: • Section 2 (Control): 9 in PCC 6
Page 13: • Sections 4A, 4B, 4C: 3 in PCC 9
Page 17 and 18: Condition Survey Results
Page 19 and 20: Cores from Well Performing Cement T
Page 21: Cores from Longitudinal Cracked Sec
Page 26 and 27: Observations (Continued): • Compo
Page 28: Thank You !

30-Year Old Two-Life Pavement Case Study

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?