Yap Summit Community Sector - Yap State Government
Yap Summit Community Sector - Yap State Government
Yap Summit Community Sector - Yap State Government
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />
Source: Millennium Development Goals & The Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia, Status Report 2010<br />
Links of Environment and Welfare with other sectors<br />
Existing<br />
MRMD and teachers (informal link); DAF-EPA- MRMD (invasive species); YINS-EPA-MRMD (quarantine); MCT<br />
[Working Group Note: MCT resources deployment to other departments should be subjected to further analysis]-<br />
<strong>Yap</strong>-Cap -Micronesia Challenge.<br />
Suggested `<br />
MRMD-DOE (newsletter); Environment –Tourism-Communities (e.g. eco-tourism); YINS-OPB-R&D-COM-DAF-<br />
MRMD-YFA-Our <strong>Yap</strong> Youth-Communities-Foreign Universities (capacity building).<br />
[Secretariat Note: the link between COM Land Grant and DAF community based agriculture practices should be<br />
explored.]<br />
The <strong>Sector</strong> through existing reviews and/or policies<br />
U.S. Department of Interior: Report to Congress on the First 5years Review of the Compact of free Association<br />
with the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia (2010)<br />
N/A<br />
FSM: Comments from the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia on the Five Year Review of the Amended Compact of<br />
Free Association (2011)<br />
pp. 59. “Recognizing this lack of prior funding, as well as the fact that many planned outcomes have yet to be<br />
achieved, the Office of Environment and Emergency management developed, in 2009, a 5-year Environment<br />
<strong>Sector</strong> Plan. This plan lays out distinct priorities and indicators for the environment sector as well as the programs<br />
that need to be funded in order to achieve these Goals.” [Working Group Note: explore its effective<br />
implementation.] .<br />
pp. 59. “Unfortunately, incomplete, inconsistent and non-standardized indicator reporting precludes any<br />
systematic presentation or analysis of the environment sector. Projects have not historically been planned for, or<br />
renewed, on a long-term basis and as such there are no consistent indicators of performance, or means by which<br />
to assess improvement or digression … <strong>Yap</strong> had no measures for which year on year comparison is available.”<br />
pp. 60. Despite the fact that under the Compact Environment shifted from being a crosscutting issue to become a<br />
self-standing sector, “Environment sector expenditures are clearly only a small fraction of Compact expenditures,<br />
averaging 3.5% of compact expenditures from FY04-FY08. Additionally, there has been a steady decline in spending<br />
on the environment sector from 4.2% of Compact expenditures in FY04 to 2.6% in FY08. The lack of measurable<br />
environmental indicators, much less progress in those indicators, can largely be attributed to relative dearth of<br />
environment sector funding which precludes sustained environmental projects.”<br />
pp. 61. Figure 9.3: <strong>Yap</strong> has the lowest salaries and wages percentages of the Environmental <strong>Sector</strong> Expenditures.<br />
pp. 62. “The environment sector grant is an important addition to the Amended Compact and the FSM believes<br />
that through proper vision and planning it can achieve the expectations set forth during negotiations.”<br />
52 | P a g e