11.11.2014 Views

Yap Summit Community Sector - Yap State Government

Yap Summit Community Sector - Yap State Government

Yap Summit Community Sector - Yap State Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Source: Millennium Development Goals & The Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia, Status Report 2010<br />

Links of Environment and Welfare with other sectors<br />

Existing<br />

MRMD and teachers (informal link); DAF-EPA- MRMD (invasive species); YINS-EPA-MRMD (quarantine); MCT<br />

[Working Group Note: MCT resources deployment to other departments should be subjected to further analysis]-<br />

<strong>Yap</strong>-Cap -Micronesia Challenge.<br />

Suggested `<br />

MRMD-DOE (newsletter); Environment –Tourism-Communities (e.g. eco-tourism); YINS-OPB-R&D-COM-DAF-<br />

MRMD-YFA-Our <strong>Yap</strong> Youth-Communities-Foreign Universities (capacity building).<br />

[Secretariat Note: the link between COM Land Grant and DAF community based agriculture practices should be<br />

explored.]<br />

The <strong>Sector</strong> through existing reviews and/or policies<br />

U.S. Department of Interior: Report to Congress on the First 5years Review of the Compact of free Association<br />

with the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia (2010)<br />

N/A<br />

FSM: Comments from the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia on the Five Year Review of the Amended Compact of<br />

Free Association (2011)<br />

pp. 59. “Recognizing this lack of prior funding, as well as the fact that many planned outcomes have yet to be<br />

achieved, the Office of Environment and Emergency management developed, in 2009, a 5-year Environment<br />

<strong>Sector</strong> Plan. This plan lays out distinct priorities and indicators for the environment sector as well as the programs<br />

that need to be funded in order to achieve these Goals.” [Working Group Note: explore its effective<br />

implementation.] .<br />

pp. 59. “Unfortunately, incomplete, inconsistent and non-standardized indicator reporting precludes any<br />

systematic presentation or analysis of the environment sector. Projects have not historically been planned for, or<br />

renewed, on a long-term basis and as such there are no consistent indicators of performance, or means by which<br />

to assess improvement or digression … <strong>Yap</strong> had no measures for which year on year comparison is available.”<br />

pp. 60. Despite the fact that under the Compact Environment shifted from being a crosscutting issue to become a<br />

self-standing sector, “Environment sector expenditures are clearly only a small fraction of Compact expenditures,<br />

averaging 3.5% of compact expenditures from FY04-FY08. Additionally, there has been a steady decline in spending<br />

on the environment sector from 4.2% of Compact expenditures in FY04 to 2.6% in FY08. The lack of measurable<br />

environmental indicators, much less progress in those indicators, can largely be attributed to relative dearth of<br />

environment sector funding which precludes sustained environmental projects.”<br />

pp. 61. Figure 9.3: <strong>Yap</strong> has the lowest salaries and wages percentages of the Environmental <strong>Sector</strong> Expenditures.<br />

pp. 62. “The environment sector grant is an important addition to the Amended Compact and the FSM believes<br />

that through proper vision and planning it can achieve the expectations set forth during negotiations.”<br />

52 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!