11.11.2014 Views

Yap Summit Community Sector - Yap State Government

Yap Summit Community Sector - Yap State Government

Yap Summit Community Sector - Yap State Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Figure 18 The Role of Consumers Choices in the Economy<br />

As Cameron (1991) highlighted in a FAO study on Food Security in the FSM, “an imported food item is<br />

qualitatively essential if it contains a nutritional component that cannot be obtained within the local<br />

environment at any price … [or] prices are too high … to afford”.<br />

Food security is another lens through which the contradiction of “self-reliance” in <strong>Yap</strong> can be examined. In the<br />

Report to the US Congress on the “First 5 years Review of the Compact of Free Association with the Federated<br />

<strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia (2010)” the US Department of Interior defines as “economically self-sufficient” an economy<br />

that “produces goods and services in sufficient quantities to meet the demands of the population.” What is not<br />

clear in this definition is whether the “goods” mentioned are “essential goods” as highlighted by Cameroon (1991)<br />

or goods pushed into the local economy by a “Cargo Cult”. In fact, there is no poverty in <strong>Yap</strong>, if poverty is defined<br />

as insufficient access to food. In <strong>Yap</strong> the “severity of poverty” target that measures the first Millennium<br />

Development Goal (MDG) defining Poverty, Hardship and Hunger is only 1.7 (Millennium Development Goals &<br />

The Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia, Status Report 2010). What is curious is that despite the fact that subsistence<br />

agriculture is practiced by every family on the island the food poverty line for <strong>Yap</strong> is set at 6,394 USD per day<br />

(Millennium Development Goals & The Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia, Status Report 2010). It is therefore<br />

reasonable to suggest that the food poverty line as set actually includes imported food that was defined through<br />

the “Cargo Cult” as “essential”, despite the complete availability of nutritional goods on the island. In this respect it<br />

is worth highlighting how the high “vulnerability” of Small Island <strong>State</strong>s is due to, within other factors, a high<br />

“dependence on strategic imports” (Briguglio, 1995). What should be taken under consideration is the extended<br />

definition of “strategic imports” that aid dynamics constructed over time. Food and beverages represent the best<br />

sample in this respect, and they are within the highest components of household expenditures according to the<br />

Consumer Price Index (CPI). In fact in 2010, of the total basket of items attributed to <strong>Yap</strong>ese households that was<br />

weighted as being 18.5% of the total FSM purchases (100%), food was set as being 4.8%, beverages 1.9%, and<br />

apart from fuel which was weighted 0.8%, all the other commodities were below 0.3% (FSM SBOC, 2011). Soft<br />

drinks, alcohol and tuna cans are within the main items imported and sold by local retail businesses (DOI and<br />

Pacific Island Training Initiative, 2010). All of these items have local substitutes, namely coconut water, tuba and<br />

fresh tuna. Not only do all these items have a local substitute, but each family has access to these products<br />

through land, which makes them affordable to anyone in economic terms, while equivalent imported items<br />

undermine the extent of the impact on the local economy of retail businesses: if the items sold would be local<br />

products, the impact of the retail business on the <strong>Yap</strong>ese economy would be greater.<br />

44 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!